By Tom Johnson

Sep 25, 2009 11:13am

Majority of Americans Support a “Public Option” in Health Reform?

A brand new New York Times/CBS News poll finds that President Obama is facing, in the words of the Times, "declining support for his handling of the war in Afghanistan and an electorate confused and anxious about a health care overhaul…"

But there is also this interesting nugget.  For all the battles over the so called public health care option, today's poll finds nearly 2/3 of Americans are in favor of the idea.

User Comments

Uh, don’t think so. As was so eloquently dialogued in Goodfellas, “Clean your loop” and try again.
Tina

Posted by: Tina | September 25, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Did anyone actually think a New York Times / CBS poll would show anything except exactly what the Democratic leadership wanted?
If they conducted a poll at all they only questioned Democrats who voted for Obama. Possibly just those working in the White House.

Posted by: oonogil | September 25, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

This is true. Only through a public option will health insurance companies start doing right by consumers. Currently they are able to avoid and mess over the average Joe. The desire for profit overrides good sense in caring for our citizens. We MUST have a major overhaul to ensure consistent and reasonable access to healthcare for ALL Americans. Right now what we have is SO POORLY designed, it is incredible.

Posted by: Jonathan | September 25, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

So,in which section of OUR CONSTITUTION does redistribution of my wealth to the masses reside?? It does not – time for America to starve the beast ( At least those of us who actually contribute something) and go on strike – The President just loves him some unions and I’m sure he would support this tactic 100%

Posted by: cp | September 25, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Hey, I’m in favor of a Government Option if the folks who sign up for it can only go to Government run Hospitals and Clinics.
Sort of like an expansion of the VA but for people who can’t afford private insurance.
Just make sure that with this Government Option that it’s illegal for private hospitals to administer care to people with YesWeCan Care Insurance.
Problem Solved.

Posted by: Noz | September 25, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

I hope none of you ‘rugged individualists’ allow yourselves to be treated by Doctors who went to a publicly-supported medical school. And for goodness sake, don’t any of you use the public roads to get to the doctor’s office. Only good for nothing freeloaders would do that.

Posted by: The Goatherder | September 25, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

That’s known as BLATANT media manipulation.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 25, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Two out of three people support a government-run healthcare option? Yeah, right. To paraphrase Barney Frank, on what planet have they been questioning people about this?

Posted by: bkm | September 25, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

The Goatherder is a typical example of someone you cant have a rational conversation with because they use examples that make no sense. I work I pay for those public roads you speak of. This is America. You have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. No where in there does it say you have a right to a free anything. Its not my resposiblity, or anyone elses, to provide health insurance to people who cant afford it. Health insurance isnt a right to anyone. Its an option. The constitution says all men are created equal. It doesnt say we die that way.

Posted by: DJ | September 25, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Rassmuessen report today – Fifty-six percent (56%) of voters nationwide now oppose the health care reform proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That’s the highest level of opposition yet measured and includes 44% who are Strongly Opposed. Will ABC report this poll? I don’t think so.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | September 25, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

DJ, exactly you pay for it through your taxes, the same as would be for health care. You cant have it both ways, socialism is socialism, where the govt. takes money from taxes and builds an infrastructure and services for the population. So lets be real capitalist and get rid of Social Security, Medicare, Public Schools, no money for supporting roads and bridges, let the communities who have them take care of it, or private companies have them and charge tolls. No police or Firemen (that is also funded by govt. by taxes), let people hire private security firms and firemen. Lets not mess around and stick to your guns, lets have real capitalism, or support socialism

Posted by: medellin | September 25, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

The big difference in all those things you named except for medicare everyone uses. i dont have a problem with a system that everyone can take part in. The problem i have is taking my money and paying for a system in which I myself will never take part in. I didnt say social programs are a bad thing as long as they arent being used for one group of people. Again trying to talk to someone who uses irrational examples to compare Healthe Care

Posted by: DJ | September 25, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

bkm | Sep 25, 2009 12:52:21 PM: We have been residing on Earth in the U.S. of America. You need to come back from you base on Pluto which is not even a planet. The “PUBLIC OPTION” IS supported and desired by the majority of Americans. As much as those like you try to distort this, reality will not be driven away from those of us who get it and do care about our needs and God forbid the needs of others too.

Posted by: dlboggan | September 25, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Well, I’ve never used a fireman or a police officer in my life. Well…uh. Never mind! Anyway, maybe I might have to some day, so I’ll give you that one. However, I do not have any children and never will, so why do I have to pay school taxes? And every person uses the health care system, or will use it some time in his or her lifetime. Have you NEVER been to a doctor?

Posted by: JLG | September 25, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

The only acceptable “public option” is national health care for everyone.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 25, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

DJ, I think I understand. Anything that government does that you use directly is OK, anything that someone else uses is socialism. At least you have some intellectual consistency. But don’t call your system ‘capitalism,’ call it what it is “DJ’ism.”

Posted by: The Goatherder | September 25, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Posted by: JLG | Sep 25, 2009 1:58:09 PM
You Shouldn’t have to pay school taxes if you dont have children I totally agree with you. Yes I have been to a doctor but like most working people I pay for my own Insurance and I dont want it for free. Your right every person does use the Health Care system and everyone should have to pay for it.

Posted by: DJ | September 25, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

The Senate has recently voted to kill an effort to allow the importation of cheaper prescription drugs from abroad.
Why? Because a lot of these senators are recipients of contributions from the drug company execs. (both democrats and republicans alike).
There’s a fair amount of doctors who are being paid to promote new drugs.
There might be five or more different drugs to do the same thing. The “New and Improved” medicine will make a whole lot more than the old “tried and true” med.
Flat Social Security Tax — Why don’t Congress pass this law?
Because the senators receive big contributions from big corporations.
It’s real precious to see both democrats and republicans pound the podium and raise their voice because they want what’s best for the public.
Do they really?
Their words are not congruent with their actions.
We (all of us – democrats and republicans alike) are being played the fool.
You want to do something? Then demand cheaper drugs (whether it’s from abroad or not); demand that the senators no longer are recipients of big bucks from drug companies and corporate America.
Change the way politicians can do business with the very ones who are keeping us broke.

Posted by: sick and tired of being sick and tired | September 25, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

So you must support the public option also? Remember, the ‘public option’ is that people are allowed to BUY insurance provided by a public entity. No one is advocating that the government subsidize the public plan. The part of the Reform Act that subsidizes insurance for the poor is a different part of the plan; it is the part that mandates that everyone has to buy health insurance. Since I pay for healthcare for the uninsured right now, through the free care they get in the emergency room, I am getting a better deal that way.

Posted by: The Goatherder | September 25, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Posted by: The Goatherder | Sep 25, 2009 2:07:30 PM
When did I call it socialism? I Didn’t.
I didnt say only things I could use either. I said things everyone could use. The health care system they are propsing isnt socialism.
Socialism – a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
If you are for socialism though could you put my name on your bank account and perhaps the deed to your home if you own one.

Posted by: DJ | September 25, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

DJ, Do you pay full price for your health insurance, or do you receive group insurance through your employer? Many “working people” do not get health insurance through their employers and they are the ones least likely to be able to afford the huge premiums charged for private insurance. If they can even get insurance, period. And if you think you’re not paying for all of those people’s medical care already, think again. They go to hospital ERs and, when they can’t pay the bills, those costs are passed on to everyone else in the end.

Posted by: JLG | September 25, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

If my President will pay for part of or the majority of my health premium and I don’t have to spend $338.00 a mo plus when I do go to the hospital to have a test run I have a $1,500.00 a year deductible I’m all for it…..Thanks Obama for at least trying to do something for the common people. It may not be the best but neither is this.
I’m just thankful I’m not on any meds…Couldn’t afford it.

Posted by: Barbara Beck | September 25, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Sorry, you are right, you did not call it socialism. But you did say that you could not have a rational conversation with someone like me. My examples are very rational. It is just that they do not seem rational if you look at it only from a ‘what’s in it for me’ point of view. The Constitution begins with “We the people,” not “Me the individual.” Like it or not, we are bound together in a civil society.

Posted by: The Goatherder | September 25, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

The New York Times, once a bastion of journalistic excellence, has sadly morphed into a spokesman for the Democratic Party.
Will they ever regain credibility?
I doubt it.

Posted by: John Palshaw | September 25, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Get to get it right Charlie, YES a majority of the people support health care reform, but not the president’s plan. Reform needs to be at the provider and Insurance carrier level. Not start another government run insurance. That gonna cost more, heck they can’t even figure out the cost. They Can’t even run medicare and they want a government insurance. No this not a republican or democrat issue either.

Posted by: dj | September 25, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

7 out of 10 Americans are not whack-job lemmings who watch Fox.
We realize we’re the only country in the world that doesn’t provide care for all its citizens. Only in America is there a health care “industry”. Absolutely shameful.
Cover everybody. Every BODY.
Let’s join the planet this year, folks.
CIGNA/Palin in 2012.
Chr*st.

Posted by: Wake_Up | September 25, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

To all those opposed to Health care Reform. I was one who thought I would never be on the dole, until the corporation I worked for divided the money between the CEO and upper management and left their subordinates with no job, no pension, no health benefits. You may all think you will never need help but no one has the ability to foresee what the future holds for you. A stroke, heart attack, cancer, any dibilatating illness where you can no longer work and provide for yourself or family. You are all just one illness away from losing your home and poverty. And, please remember we seniors PAID for our Social Security and have been and are paying for MEDICARE. Who knows, you just may need Medicare/Medicaid yourself someday, so quit bellyaching about people being moochers, the majority are not, they were just that one illness, job loss away from having to accept help.

Posted by: Ann Geary | September 25, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Does anybody know what the public option premium will actually cost per individual and/or family?
I saw a few quotes, but they all had a wide gap. If you quote a price, please write where you got that quote.
Can we also focus on other health reforms?:
Cheaper drugs abroad; some doctors on the payroll of drug companies; some senators taking huge contributions from drug companies and others; why Congress won’t pass a flat rate for Social Security so that corporate America will finally pay their fair share.
We can focus on more than one thing at a time, can’t we?
Don’t forget about all of the other health reforms that will help tremendously.
ABC? Why don’t you focus on all of the above as well?
Why doesn’t the Senate speak up about these reforms? Why don’t the doctors speak up about their little pocket money?
This has nothing to do with democrats vs. republicans. We are indeed in the same boat. Lets look at Congress to see what laws they pass and which ones they turn down.
Some politicians’ words are not congruent with their actions. This goes for both sides of the aisle.

Posted by: who's on our side? | September 25, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Yes YES. There are many of us out there who think a public option of some kind is fair and necessary. “The Goat Herder” makes a terrific point. People who want nothing from the government should avoid public schools and universities, and stay off the roads. The government is an integral part of our life. Health care should be no different. If you don’t want a public option, don’t use it!

Posted by: CarolB | September 25, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Finally confirmation of what I thought would be true all along! Americans who actually understand the rising health care costs DO want a public option! It’s the only real way to contain and slow these giant insurance, medical and pharmacuetical companies!

Posted by: Jean Hoelscher | September 25, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

The NY Times and CBS are so deeply in the Obama/Democrat tank, their “polls” have absolutely no credibility or significance.

Posted by: R.M. Edaps | September 25, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Is there anyone with half a brain that believes anything that the NY Times reports? They have become a pure propaganda rag with declining advertising revenues.

Posted by: Dr. J. | September 25, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

The New York Times has no credibility so people don’t believe their Pro Obama polls.
How about the poll that has been the same for years: The American people believe that the major news media are in the tank for Obama and his goons. You can throw ABC(All Barack Channel) in there too.

Posted by: Jim | September 25, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

This is a grenade being thrown at the public with a timeless fuse. While the current adminstration may not utilize it for a total Government Run Health Plan, eventually some of the elected crazies will force it on everyone. It may not be Socialisum as it stands but its opening the doorway for Socialisum to come in.

Posted by: Barney | September 25, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

The poll did not give people the option of no reform or non government reform. It assumed that everyone wanted government reform and then 2/3 said they wanted a bipartisan approach. It was a push poll essentially.

Posted by: bct | September 25, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

No one will ever get free healthcare. No one. Nothing free. And it’s always fun spending others peoples money, when it’s not yours. Americans will not have this happen. Even if it passes, no american will continue it. ABC, CBS, NBC, GE, Etc all have strong instructions to say. 80% of americans want to be themselves. It won’t last. Follow the flow of the funds. Look real hard. Free money will be stopped, and free healthcare will never happen. Now helping true americans is great. That’s what we want. All to be fair and equal. That’s not what’s happening, and yes, follow the funds.

Posted by: Iowa | September 25, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Why do you think congress just voted to NOT put this blunder of a bill on the internet? And they don’t want you to know how much you will pay for it. I wonder why.

Posted by: m vale | September 25, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Why does a healthcare bill state that a new Health Choice comissioner will have all your perrsonal tax information? This isn’t about care it’s about power.

Posted by: m vale | September 25, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

I think your data, ABC NEWS, is completely wrong and you are printing bad data in order to try and help the Socialists vote in Government run medicine. This is why you have no credibility on these issues. You are biased!!

Posted by: brian | September 25, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Add over 50 new government agencies and we will save you money. No, I don’t think so…………..

Posted by: mvale | September 25, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

The source for this is the NY Times? You are kidding of course, that scandal sheet has zero credibility on any issue other than the sports page.

Posted by: brian | September 25, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Wow! Republicans are SO IN DENIAL! Even when a sizable number of their own favor this option (how else could you get 2 out of 3?) they STILL will not admit that maybe this is what Americans really want!
Republicans are staunchly opposed to what they call “redistribution of wealth” EXCEPT when they believe that redistribution may one day flow to THEM. They had no problem with all those no-bid contracts for Halliburton: after all, maybe the company THEY own (or more likely just work for) would get such favored treatment too (as if they had their own man in the administration!) No, they only object when something happens that might benefit “one of ‘those’ people”!
But most Republicans would never DREAM that one day they too might become sick or injured – and lose their health insurance – and go bankrupt just trying to survive. They know that, because it has never happened to any of their rich Republican friends! Of course not: because whenever that does happen to a Republican, that Republican fairly soon becomes a FORMER Republican and often a newly-loyal Democrat! Or else they simply die – penniless – like my dyed-in-the-wool GOP brother did when his private health insurance would not pay the costs of his chemo.
The truth is, all Republicans are really Darwin Award candidates!

Posted by: Jordan | September 25, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

The NY Times poll had Obama beating McCain by 17 points in 2008.
The NY Times poll has Obama’s approval rating 8 % points higher than any other poll.
The NY Times never asked about the pubic option.
Given the lack of credibiity at the NY Times, the exposure of scandals and its censorship and propaganda, does anyone take them seriously?

Posted by: Karen | September 25, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

JLG, you pay taxes that fund schools because, even though you don’t have children, you benefit from the existence of those schools. It’s called a positive externality. You benefit from the economy that is based on well educated students. You benefit because education keeps some kids from succumbing to a life of crime. Where positive externalities exist, the service is underfunded because of the free rider effect. It is the same reason the government supplies roads, police departments, fire departments, electricity to rural areas, etc. By the way, there is a positive externality to you for other people getting health care.

Posted by: Chris | September 25, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

So, where are Republican ideas for healthcare reform? All they are doing is arguing the same dead argument over and over again to delay the vote. We need healthcare/health insurance reform NOW, and the best way to get insurance costs in line is to have a public option. Even the Mayo Clinic and most doctors agree that a public option is needed. Let’s get this done now!

Posted by: dlh | September 25, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

To the quote: “So,in which section of OUR CONSTITUTION does redistribution of my wealth to the masses reside?? ”
The preamble – the most important part!
“Provide for the Common Welfare” – in other words to give aid to all.
Also please remember – if you spread hatred, you are not doing God’s work. God never hates!

Posted by: Chazzman | September 25, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

And if you don’t support the option, pay your fine, or go to jail for up to one year!!!…Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) received a handwritten note Thursday from Joint Committee on Taxation Chief of Staff Tom Barthold confirming the penalty for failing to pay the up to $1,900 fee for not buying health insurance.
Violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty, Barthold wrote on JCT letterhead. He signed it “Sincerely, Thomas A. Barthold.” you say Police State!!!!!And for all the morons who say “well, they make you get car insurance (and there are some very high level morons who have said this!!) that required insurance is if you impact someone ELSE’s CAR…so yes, if my having an operation is going to make someone else have to go to the hospital, then this all makes sense!!!

Posted by: dainmezron | September 25, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

For those of you who either already have health insurance or have enough money to pay out of your pocket for medical care , then I guess that you all wouldn’t understand what it’s like to have to tell your spouse or children that you can’t afford to take them to the doctor or emergency room.
I do understand what it’s like. If I (or my family) were to need medical treatment , we would be FORCED to go to the emergency room.
I have a pretty good job and make decent money. I also have all the same bills that most everybody does and it’s getting harder and harder to pay them.
If the government can provide some sort of health insurance for people like me and my family , I’m all for it.
I never thought that only those with wealth should be able to get medical coverage.
If any of you out there who have health insurance and don’t want a “public option” , will you please enlighten those of us without health coverage as to what you would for US. I am assuming that you all think we actually DESERVE to have health coverage.

Posted by: dltgold | September 25, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

The key to lowering health care costs — which is the number one problem facing our economy — is getting competition through getting rid of the abuses, monopolies and conflicts of interests in the health care “market” and actually making it a market in reality rather than in name only. Seriously regulating the insurance industry, taking away their anti-trust exemption, in return allowing insurers to sell policies in all 50 states instead of just their own, requiring that doctors operate independently of hospitals just as optometrists operate independently of eyeglass shops — these are all ways of achieving this goal. Unfortunately, neither party will do any of these.
But at least the Democrats will do the public option, which is another way of achieving this goal.
If you don’t have competition, if you don’t regulate or eliminate conflicts of interest, and if you don’t have a public option, you’d better get ready for more health care hyperinflation, more cuts in Medicare, and more outsourcing of jobs overseas as employers flee this country in search of cheaper employee health care.

Posted by: DBX | September 25, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

DJ you sound like someone using irrational arguments which is typical of someone you cant have a rational conversation with because they use examples that make no sense! I love these people who gripe about having to pay taxes so freeloaders can have health insurance, but they are the ones that are first in line to use the programs or anything else that everybody’s tax dollars are being used for! It’s called the public option because it’s just that, and OPTION! And yes, healthcare is a right. Who put you in charge of deciding what the constitution says? The constitution says we are created equal, in life and in death.

Posted by: PG | September 25, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

How about we get rid of all you representatives who are better than us. when you give us a health care program that is good enough for yourselves (being OUR representatives) then it will be good enough for us. how can you represent us when you place yourselves above us???

Posted by: jake | September 25, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

The majority of Americans do not want the government running health care. 85% are happy with their insurance. The NYT fabricated this data.

Posted by: brian | September 25, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I’m not a big fan of any of the health care bills because I do not see them reining in costs by gradually removing for-profit health insurance as every other high-income nation has. But I don’t see ANY benefit unless a public option or non-profit coops are included. Getting these included would be a tremendous win over the special interests who control so many Congressman. Even Dem. Mike Ross, whose lifetime campaigns have cost $7,000,000, has been funded over $900,000 by insurance interests and about $3,500,000 by insurance, health, and big pharma. Any wonder he says, as his masters’ demand, that he won’t support a public option?
Even super-capitalistic “Japan Incorporated” realizes it’s absolutely ridiculous to regard for-profit health insurance as “free-market capitalism”. How can you keep health costs down when your corporate plan requires greater amounts of sickness and higher costs in order to prosper?

Posted by: The_Mick | September 25, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

don’t believe a word of it!

Posted by: CASINS | September 25, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Count me in. I’ve been supporting a public option since I was a senior in college 28 years ago. And believe me, I’ve spent those 28 years examining and considering all of the angles and also enjoying, for some years, the benefits of a western European single-payer system in a country that cannot, otherwise, be described as anything but enthusiastically capitalist, with a population that intensely appreciates individual freedoms.
People who fear a public option do so because they’re terrified that it will be extremely popular. The irony of this is delicious: “Let’s deprive the American people of this possibility because we’re afraid that no matter what they claim now, they will really want it if they’re offered it, if they see that they can get health insurance cheaply and without worrying about pre-existing conditions or job loss, and what will happen to all those execs at the private insurance companies?”
Capitalist European countries have to worry about taxpayer expenditures on their health-care programs, that’s true, but in a reversal of our situation, their citizens would mount a revolution if they were deprived of those benefits. And it’s worth pointing out that France, considered by the WHO to have the best health care in the world, spends 11% of its GDP on health care, with ALL French citizens being covered, while we spend 16.5% of our GDP on health care, despite the fact that around 20% of our adults under the age of 65 are uninsured. If you are unfamiliar with statistics of this kind, you’ve never lived in any countries abroad or enjoyed their benefits. I have.
I’m not unrealistic enough to think we can institute a single-payer system here, but a public option is the next best thing. I repeat. Count me in.

Posted by: Eleonora27 | September 25, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Do you think physicians, RN’s, LPN’s, CNA’s, lab techs, x-ray techs, office workers, accountants, dietary personnel, housekeeping personnel, hospital execs, maintenance personnel, top surgeons, the anesthesia people, the physical therapy people, etc.,
will cut their pay and benefits so that the public can be charged less thereby reducing their insurance premiums?
Don’t forget about the utilities. Will the utility companies now charge less thereby reducing your premium cost?
Don’t forget about the benefit packages for all hospital employees: paid time off, sick time, health insurance, life insurance and any other benefits.
Don’t forget about building cost of a new hospital or to add or renovate the existing hospital. Will that also be decreased somehow so our insurance premiums can be reduced?
Don’t forget the maintenance/upkeep of the hospitals.
Don’t forget Security for the hospitals.
Will the Security people take a cut in pay, too?
There are countless number of people who work in a hospital setting that have not been mentioned.
You get the picture.

Posted by: Don't forget about other health reforms | September 26, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am

CONSTITUTIONALITY ISSUE?
Apparently National Endowment for the Arts director of communications Yosi Sergeant has resigned after the squabble over arts organizations funded by NEA promoting Obama’s health-care agenda.
The news media (if it isn’t in the Obama camp) should submit Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests for the applications to the NEA of those art organizations that have been supporting the Obama healthcare agenda.
But, don’t hold your breath these are democrats we’re talking about. Plus government run healthcare itself isn’t constitutional!

Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 26, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Right now I’m one the fence with the healthcare mess. I have a question for those that want it. How much are you willing to pay each month, say for a single person? $300-$400 with no deductables or no preexisting conditions?

Posted by: Diane | September 26, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Government run public option?? Just look at the bill coming up in Congress for a $4,000,000,000 bail-out of the post office!! What a perfect example. The Gov. should run nothing.

Posted by: FoundingFathers | September 26, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Boy NY Times and CBS as well as ABC are not only responsible for electing ( or hiring) our new President but may also be responsible for throwing thousands if not millions of people on unemployment who work in some form for health insurance companies. Yeah and you are going to tell me the government can do a better job at this than health insurance companies that have been doing it for decades? They can’t even get the bill right.

Posted by: Colette | September 27, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Look the Government spends money recklessly. We all know that and agree on it. There is a lot of waste and a lot of Fraud. It is really easy to defraud the government because it is too big. look at Bernie Madhoff and the SEC and Barney Frank and Fannie Mae, Rengle, Dodd, Pelosi. so don’t tell me there will not be rampant fraud when the politicians start taking over the health insurance companies. And think of all those pitifull Retirees who invested their 401 ks in Atena, Humana,Cigna, Well Point. Au Revoir! We will have the media to thank!
oh by the way….Did you read all the earmarks in the last bill. I rest my case. They are just using you guys!

Posted by: Colette | September 27, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am

As one other pro-Obama news outlet published yesterday, “…an increasingly aggressive campaign to line up votes for a health care bill, which faces a crucial vote in the Senate Finance Committee this week. After months of cutting deals and stroking drug makers, hospitals and doctors, the president’s aides are laying the groundwork for a final round of Congressional arm-twisting, with Mr. Obama increasingly in a hands-on role.” Obviously, the administration could care less what the American public wants for Health Care Reform. The White House insists on calling it “Health Care Insurance Reform”, because they plan on spending $Trillions of our money financing it.

Posted by: K. Daraa | September 27, 2009, 6:45 am 6:45 am

You have to look how our politicians in Congress do business. Our Senators are going to change health care?
How? They are the ones in the pocket of the health care system.
Democrats, Republicans, and Independents alike take huge contributions from the health care industry.
They still allow doctors to take money to represent drug companies.
They still refuse to pass the flat tax Social Security Act. Why? Ask the senators why.

Posted by: ask yoursenator why | September 27, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

National health care for all……or nothing.
The middle class can no longer support the poor.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 27, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

I pay enough taxes, that’s what taxes are for so we don’t have to pay for something that we already have paid for by paying taxes, healthcare, roads,briges, are kids education that what we pay taxes for to supply the need of Americans. And healthcare is needed just a much as drinking water is need, is that simple enough for you haters.

Posted by: danny | September 27, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Why do people think that capitalism means to make it rich off of everything and everyone.

Posted by: danny | September 27, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Support for public option has the support of 75% of doctors – those who should have a clue about how the healthcare system works.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112818960
Why is it those most opposed to the public option HAVE access to good medical care?

Posted by: Danno | September 28, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Are there any manufacturers out there? To be successful in manufacturing, you have to cut out waste, cut out activities that do not add value to the customer. This is Lean Manufacturing, that is why Toyota is so successful.
So what value do insurance carriers add for the consumer? Absolutely no value. They take money in (premiums) and pay money out, and keep a share. This ‘service’ costs roughly 20 in direct costs and at least 10% in indirect costs.
Because insurance companies have spent millions supporting politicians, we will never be able to pry ourselves from the 30% cost penalty of the added layer that does not provide direct benefit to the consumer.
To design the most efficient healthcare system from scratch would not include a layer of added cost for ‘insurance’.

Posted by: Danno | September 28, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Posted by: Chris | Sep 25, 2009 6:07:22 PM
“JLG, you pay taxes that fund schools because, even though you don’t have children, you benefit from the existence of those schools.”
Believe me, Chris, I grasp that concept. My argument was solely to counter DJ’s complaint that he will have to pay for a public health option that he doesn’t use.
I’m perfecly fine with paying to have public schools that every child can attend. I’m also perfectly fine with paying for a public health option that will provide health care to the millions of people who don’t get health care because cannot afford insurance. If that makes me a “socialist”, so be it.

Posted by: jlgeroni | September 29, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.