Closing Arguments: Obama Slashing Exec Pay
The top 25 best-paid executives at the seven corporations that received the biggest taxpayer bailouts will face a significant pay cut this year. The companies include: Bank of America Corp., American International Group, Inc., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial. President Obama's "pay czar" Ken Feinberg will announce up to 90 percent salary cuts; with total compensation — including those big bonuses — cut in half. Any executives perks worth more than $25,000 will require government approval. The companies, as you might imagine, are not happy about it — fearing that they may lose their best talent. But tonight, we ask: Do you think the government should cut executive pay at companies like this? Is it too much? Or perhaps too little? Tell us what you think. You can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
These companies should not complain, as they are lucky we tax payers bailed them out. Furthermore, if they worry about losing their “best talent,” I am highly skeptical that the nations best talent got them to the point of needing government bailout!
Posted by: Valerie | October 22, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Hell yes they should have their pay cut! If you’re taking government money to keep the company you run afloat, you haven’t earned your full salary (and certainly don’t deserve any bonuses or perks)
Posted by: GL | October 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Pay to retain talent? What Talent? All their companies failed, and are now taking handouts. This “talent” should be looking for a different occupation!
Posted by: Joe Gillie | October 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
I totally agree with OUR president. Take it ALL back. These folks have ripped us all off for so long they have more then enough of our money left after we cut their income to get us out of the hole they put us in. After we recover then we can discuss raising their benefits to a MORE reasonable range.
Posted by: Fred | October 22, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
I totally agree with the Obama administration reducing executive salaries, especially since they have used and abused the public’s trust for too long. It’s about time we had true leadership to combat the rampant unethical greed and avaricious which dominates Wall Street.
Posted by: Teri | October 22, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
The audacity of this administration is unprecedented. When Big Brother starts dictating Salaries to execs, how long before they come after your salary and equalize everyone’s pay? A slippery slope and Americans are fools if they remain apathetic about this.
Posted by: L Everett | October 22, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
That is an intelligent comment. The banking Industry is worried they will lose their Best Talent if their incomes are lowered. Considering their “Best Talent” was in charge when the whole banking industry tanked this year and had to be bailed out by the rest of the country. I don’t think I’m too worried.
Posted by: Joan | October 22, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Should their pay be cut? Yes ,if they helped cause the problem.
Will they lose talented people? I think they’ve proven they ain’t that talented. If they have a better offer let them go.
Banking and money-lending is a business that’s about 3000 years old? There is no secret technology to it that makes anyone working in it indispensible.
Posted by: robcat2075 | October 22, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
It’s high time we put the brakes on these greedy guys. We wouldn’t be in this mess if not for the likes of them
Posted by: L. Curry | October 22, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
I DO NOT think the government should cut executive pay in private business. The government needs to cut their own executive pay and stay out of the private sector!
Posted by: Terri Jones | October 22, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
In 100 percent agreement with the post by Valerie.
Posted by: HP | October 22, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Regardless of what the paid talking heads of the talk radio world will have you believe, it is the rampant greed of the bloodsucking executive branch of corporate America that is the root of all evil. When the top 1% own over half of the wealth in this country something is wrong. How much do they need and why?
Posted by: ArtFarmer | October 22, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
i say the gov’t should shake these execs down. They got tax payers bailout & still have the nerve to charge us average folks high fees (overdrafts) etc. we are still paying high rates , NO PAY RAISES FOR THE YEAR ( LOCAL 3 iBEW) TERRIBLE MEDICAL THAT DON’T COVER VISITS TO ALLLERGISTS (FOR FOOD ALLERGIES) & THE ENT doctor visits . This is my life & their Execs get to have bonuses on our taxes. This ia an abomination.
Posted by: nikki | October 22, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Their greed put the nation where it is today – why should they be treated any differently than the people they have ruined. We need to put God back in our country and not greedy people who think they are gods.
Posted by: Patti | October 22, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
I TOTALLY Agree that they should cut their pay by 90% and there should not be any bonus paid. We the public bailed them out and basically they want to lavishly live their lives while others are strugling. If we had not bailed them out, they would be out of a job, definitely would not be making by at least having a job. First you lose our money and you want us to reward you for it. It’s kind of like a thief stealing from a store and the police arrives and says “hey you want more, let me help you take some more!!”
Posted by: Vinnie | October 22, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
What a joke. These execs have NO talent. They squandered away their own money and now they are doing the same with the money that we bailed them out with. We should have fired them all before we bailed them out!
Posted by: Johnny Mize | October 22, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Cut more high level executives pay. Make deeper cuts. These companies required bailouts, because they took crazy risks with our money and now created this economic mess. The top executives get crazy benefits and increases and the average person gets laid off.
Posted by: JEM | October 22, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
I tend to agree that the top execs, get paid too much, probably way too much. But I have a problem with the Govt. telling people what they can earn.Why can’t/don’t the stockholders call for the heads of these individuals.Leave the Govt. out of it except to prosecute for any wrong doing.
Posted by: Freeride | October 22, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
The government had no business getting involved in business and should never have given away OUR (its not theirs) money to business. That being said they have no business setting any compensation packages for private business. Are they going to do the same for professional atheletes, entertainers (music,TV & movies)? I don’t think anyone would disagree those people are overpaid. What about in their own house (government)? How many of us are being paid what the pay czar (sounds Russian) makes. As a matter of fact, it not only sounds Russian, it sounds COMMUNIST!
Posted by: Bob | October 22, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Not only should the top executives have to have their pay cut, all profits should be taken to repay the amount of bailout money that they received. These people are making a huge profit off the backs of poor and middle class working people.
Posted by: wayne | October 22, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
I absolutely so not no but HELL NO. Ever since this twit of a President arrived in office we now want to debate over what any one earns . Stay the hell out of Private enterprise. (PRIVATE)
If wrong doing and laws are broken then yes if so twit in Washington thinks they makes too much Hell NO.
If you want to start controlling salaries from the White house the change the name of the country to Little Russia or United Soviet States of America.
Shut up and leave private enterprise alone.
Posted by: Edd | October 22, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Yes, based on the outcomes, their pay should be cut. I suggest that the money be given to public school teachers, school social workers, and community organizers to
improve education and provide support and direction for students.
Posted by: pauline | October 22, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
About time! I am in total agreement with President Obama. Make the pay cuts, the sooner the better. I believe people are tired of the greed. No great loss of “talent” either!
Posted by: Debbie | October 22, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
>by L Curry
>I DO NOT think the government should >cut executive pay in private business. >The government needs to cut their own >executive pay and stay out of the >private sector!
You are right they should cut their own pay and at the same time no executive for a publicly traded company should make more than the President Of The United States
Posted by: ArtFarmer | October 22, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Hooray for the salary cuts!!! They should count themselves as lucky they’re not being hanged by angry mobs of taxpayers who are bailing their sorry, greedy asses out! First they bring us all to the brink of another great depression, then they piggishly grab and hold ‘bonuses’! For their nasty performances!??
Posted by: KrisM | October 22, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
President Obama is holding these companies accountable for their actions; and when you borrow money, you don’t get to go shopping before the bills are paid! Talent is when your better than average folks and if companies are afraid of losing their ‘talent’, then hire some of the real talent that are current unemployed, I bet we can do better!
Posted by: Bianca | October 22, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
I agree with Obama, it is about time these execs get a dose of our paychecks. They are not that talented, just greedy. Good riddens! Lower their pay, to an average pay. Most real talented people live on a lot less. While we are at it we should lower rents, and housing costs to go with our little paychecks that most employers pay.
Posted by: kimmypratt | October 22, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
I love the statements stating that without the ridiculous salaries they can’t recruit the best management to run these companies. Wasn’t it these same managerial geniuses that led these companies into financial ruin? What a joke… a bunch of overpaid, over-rated clowns that have the audacity to rake in millions of dollars in salaries and perks while their companies get bailed out by the over-burdened $25k per year taxpayers. Just another fine example of America’s biggest problem… the rich and greedy unrepentently exploiting the rest of society.
Posted by: Michael S. Coffey | October 22, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
cut cut cut! Best talent? They should have been fired!
Posted by: Mary | October 22, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
If my company did as poorly as the companies that the taxpayers bailed out, I would not be paid at all; never mind receiving millions of dollars in bonus money. I believe President Obama is finally doing the correct and ethical approach by addressing these excutive obscene bonuses and reducing them. If large bonuses creates exceptional excutives, then why did these companies fail in the first place? I say “YES” to cutting salaries, however, I’ll believe it when I see it actually happen. So far, I’ve yet to see President Obama accomplish anything.
Posted by: Fran | October 22, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
I personally get rather upset with those executives that want to preserve the status quo at the expense of the American tax payer. The argument that they will “lose top talent” rings so hollow in these times it’s ridiculous. They are more interested in maintaining their own over inflated salaries and bonuses than actually acomplishing something with their companies, that I think we should immediately fire any executive that uses that argument about executive compensation.
Consider:
1. If they had such top talent to begin with, then why did their company have to have a hand out to the government to use the tax money from hard working americans to rescue their company.
2. The job market is really tough right now, even for top executives. Consider the record number of companies in those industries that got bailed out, that went under (i.e. Lehman Brothers). All of those people (top executives included) are now out there looking for jobs. I would say that the very people they say would leave if not “properly compenstated” are quaking in their boots, just hoping that the company they work for turns around enough to make their jobs secure again. They wouldn’t even dare think of leaving, because they know they would be competing with dozens of others at other companies, some of whom are even more talented then they are.
As part owners (i.e. Taxpayers), we should demand that any executive caught making the claim that they would “lose top talent” if they are not “properly compenstated”, should be immediately shown the door (as Mr. Trump says, “You’re fired!”), as it is plain they don’t see the real picture.
Allen Ackerman – Owner
Systems Consulting of WNY – SCWNY.NET
Posted by: Al A. | October 22, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
YES!YES!YES!These beuracracies need to be held acountable for their mis-management. And while the Governmnet is cutting their obscene wages, they should have say in the new fees these banks are implementing to feed their bottom lines. In this ecoonmy, it is unconscienable to raise overdraft protection fees, and charge “single swipe fees” every time you use your overdraft protection line. We are already paying 12% interest on this line as it is.
Posted by: Jayne | October 22, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Since the govt owns large parts of these corporations, outlandish salaries should be outlawed. I’m surprised, in fact, that the incompetent execs weren’t ousted as a condition of the bailout – they certainly were greedy and didn’t help the people of the US, so why should they be given special priveleges and high salaries?
Posted by: silh | October 22, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Yes, there is too big a difference in pay between the top and the workers; remember Ben & Jerry’s who promoted a salary structure wherein the highest-paid company employee could earn no more than five times the lowest-paid. As to losing their people, who would be stupid enough to hire people who ran the company into the ground!? Besides look at the rest of the world they are making money with-out the “great” capitalist system and the do not trickle down plan!
Before Reagan, corporate CEOs earned less than 50 times the salary of an average worker. By the end of the Reagan-Bush-I administrations in 1993, the average CEO salary was more than 100 times that of a typical worker. (At the end of the Bush-II administration, that CEO-salary figure was more than 250 times that of an average worker.) Republicans own records show that 87% of these wealthy who were given a tax break took their businesses to China or India; that94% never paid taxes and most importantly to the Sean Hannity and Beck crowd only 3% donated anything other than what is term “token” under $10,000.
Posted by: Gary | October 22, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am
This spells a death knell for American business. Is that what people want? Wake up people before it is too late and see the rocky road this administration is leading us down. It is not to late yet, but it soon will be if Americans do not stand up for the principles that once made this country great. It is Capitalism that worked for this Country. We can see how well Socialism (Communism) has worked where it has been tried. USSR, Cuba, China, Viet Nam, Cambodia, Laos, ect. Yeah those are all models to aspire to. What the hell are people thinking?
Posted by: Bob | October 22, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am
It is about timethese big exec’s come down to earth. I raised three children on less than what they get for bonuses!
If these were their best, how did they go down the tubes and have to be bailed out?
I think high exec’s everywhere are too hung up on money and forget the rest of us are struggling people.
Posted by: Bea | October 22, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Comment to Freeride:
You mentioned… ” they have no business setting any compensation packages for private business”
Here’s the only problem, those companies are NOT private, they are publicly traded and now we the American Taxpayer own a good portion of them, so they are way far afield from “private” hence the need for controlling their out of control compensation packages.
Posted by: Al A. | October 22, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am
How does the government intend to keep these businesses competitive when the top business minds in these particular companies will move elsewhere to get properly compensated for their efforts. Altruism is fine in fantasy land, however we are dealing with the harsh reality of a competitive business environment that is going to see the energy and intellect of these companies stripped dry.
Posted by: Chris | October 22, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am
REALLY! What has taken our government so long to hold them some how responsible!
It seems alot of people are getting away with alot illegal things today.
These people should not only have pay cuts, they should be in jail. They have put this country in a terrible mess. People have lost their jobs and homes because of their greed. Shame on them!
Posted by: janice | October 22, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am
I DO NOT BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD HAVE BECOME INVOLVED AT ALL IN THE BEGINNING. THERE IS NOT NOW NOR WAS THERE EVER A JUSTIFICATION FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO STEP INTO PRIVATE INTERPRIZE AND NOT ONLY DIRECT IT ; BUT, TAKE OWNERSHIP AND REDISTRIBUTE THE BONOFIDE STOCKHOLDERS STAKE TO THE GOVERNMENT AND THE UNION.WHERE DID THE AUTHORITY COME FROM? THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF OUR GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THIS POWER. WE CAN NOT ALLOW THIS TYPE OF CONTROL TO CONTINUE. OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR RIGHTS ARE BEING DESIMATED BY A FEW POWER HUNGRY POLITICIANS. WE MUST STOP THIS MOVEMENT
Posted by: John | October 22, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
I also agree 100 percent with Valerie.
These executives are bank robbers.
Posted by: Elliott | October 22, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
To Bob
The Capitalism that built this country does not exist anymore. Reigning in greed and financial injustice is not socialism but controled Capitalism. Why do you continue to listen to highly paid mouth pieces like Beck, Hannity, Rush. They have never worked a day in their lives other than being paid to scare the crap out of you. Have you not noticed that their ramblings only benifit the top 10% of wage earners and incense fear in anybody willing to listen to them
Posted by: ArtFarmer | October 22, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Of course Obama should cut the pay of the top execs of the companies that accepted bailout money. The phrase “too big to fail” means the entire theory of a self regulating free market is false. Has anyone noticed that banks in socialized countries are not doing so badly? Unregulated capitalism means you end up with only a few winners and MANY MANY LOSERS. The US no longer busts up monolopolies because the anti trust laws and enforcement have been effectively demolished.
These days, we expect politicians to act like puppets of big business, but once in awhile, a politician with a bite does the right thing.
Go, Obama GO. We can hardly wait to see which of the bad guys you take down next. We love ya in Wisconsin.
Posted by: Patricia | October 22, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am
These executives should be replaced.
Some of them should even serve time in
jail. We should have laws and regulations
to prevent this from happening again.
Posted by: Bobby | October 22, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am
NO!they should not be entitled to extra bonus’And
maybe if they lived in our world for awhile they may
tend to see just how greedy they really are.In Minn.
those same people think that we should pay for a
stadium so the rich can be served good food,drinks,
while we cannot even afford to go to the games in the
nose bleed section.Our governor doesn’t think that
people who make over $250 thousand a year should
pay their fare share,he wants us to keep them in the
position they have come accustom to!!WRONG!!!!
Posted by: Rachelle | October 22, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Let them know what it means to live paycheck to paycheck… It really sucks and it puts life into perspective… I think many would agree that they didnt deserve their 2008 bonuses either (all the while so many were loosing their jobs…)
Sock it to them- they already did us.
Posted by: MParks | October 22, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Oh- right.. So “their best talent” are the ones that got us into this mess- so are they really our best talent..?
Posted by: MParks | October 22, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Yes, the top 25 best-paid executives at the corporations that received taxpayer bailouts should receive a significant pay cut. Their short-sighted and poorly conceived decisions nearly destroyed this country. They should not be rewarded for their actions.
Posted by: Judy Cook | October 22, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am
I don’t think that they should get the big money when we the tax payer who are paying there bills get nothing in raises on social security. They have used our money to bail out there poor judgement so why should they get a reward.
Posted by: Gary M | October 22, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am
yes cut their damn pay! No more(crying) threats from the FED/Investment Bankers. Twice now they have threatened the american public with “this will end the economy/financial world as we know it” if we don’t mindlessly follow their wishes. First in 1999ish when a Clinton appointed group headed by a woman to investigate the OTC derivatives danger. Secondly, in 2008 when the meltdown began, we were told exactly what to do because we were in GRAVE DANGER. No more threats from the bullies(cry-babies) in the FED/Investment banking good-ole-boys-club. The governments role is to protect the public from this shell-game. no more weak and willy-nilly governement who appears enamored with ignorant execs. This should have ended last november and we’re still talking about it. Governments, please learn to follow basic money management and simplify rather than complicate, this only creates chaos.
Posted by: kerry | October 22, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am
Froth, Froth in the market? What is Froth? Oh, Froth is the young parents who pace the floor, in the middle of the night,wandering how they are going to keep a roof over their childrens heads because the morgtage payment just trippled. A ballon morgtage. Well no matter will group them into a morgtate security package with others of the like and sell their accounts to another country and let it be their problem. Bonus, they want a bonus for running our countries financial system into the ground? Bonus, Bonus for running the companies into the ground? I don’t think so. I think termination, fines and a little jail time should be the bonus. We must restore integrity into our business and financial system. We don’t even have the money to finance the wars that protect our country from terrorists. No Bonus for this.
Posted by: Dallasman | October 22, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Why only 90%? Why not 100%
Posted by: Roger | October 22, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Executive pay to ANY company that received govenment bailouts should be reviewed and eliminated. The “talent” that everyone is afraid of losing is NOT very talented (in light of their performance requiring a bailout in the first place). Upper level management at many of these failed companies act in collusion, becoming Yes-men to each other. These executives have lost their critical thinking skills; they are more concerned with lining their own pockets, and pointing blame everywhere but at themselves, rather than efficiently and effectively managing these failing businesses.
Posted by: Judy | October 22, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Regarding whether the cut in pay “too much or perhaps too little”
The extraordinary bail out needed as a result of the extra ordinary greedy, reckless behavior of members of the financial industry makes this difficult to answer.
Experts warned those in the private financial industry and in the government regulatory agencies that banks were engaging in reckless unregulated exchanges of staggering amounts of money. It was already going on back in the 90s, and those honest whistle blowers either lost their jobs, or were ridiculed and marginalized.
Let’s ask the victims of this financial disaster (those who lost jobs, homes, businesses, life savings) to set an appropriate amount of compensation for these so-called financial experts.
For the jokers who are worried about maintaining some kind of sacred difference between government and private industry. That distinction was wiped out when the banks could no longer pay their bills and came begging for money. Companies in the private industry pay their bills. Not so for these banks. The people in these banks should be grateful for the helping hand from the government and should be very busy working out ways to prevent this disaster from ever happening again.
The only concern I have is that the most guilty financial manipulators have probably already left their posts (like rats from a sinking ship). Those who remain, may be very honest and want to do the “right thing”. I am sorry for them. However, until the bail out money is paid back with interest, that company will need to put themselves on a reasonable budget until they repay their debts to the public. Once their debt is repaid, I don’t care how much they hand out to execs.
We all have to stop whining about reality. So execs can’t make as much money any more? Boo hoo. Loggers who clear cut a forest, end up without jobs. When you over-fish a stream, it means there will be no more fishing jobs. When a bank runs out of money it stops being a bank.
No terrorist has done greater damage to our country. Instead of giving these wealthy executives media time to complain about their loss of bonuses, they should be preparing for jail-time for destroying the faith ordinary U.S. citizens had in their bankers. They may not have broken the letter of the law, but they broke the spirit.
Shame on them and on those who defend them.
Posted by: Patricia | October 22, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am
I totally agree with President Obama. It’s about time someone stood up for the main street. I hope that strict laws are put in place and the salaries of ALL executives in the financial industry are not only reduced but also capped for future regardless if the firm was bailed out or not. And GET the tax payers money back from these crook institutions.
Posted by: Nomi | October 22, 2009, 1:46 am 1:46 am
I think all CEO’s should be limited to no more than ten times what the lowest paid employ gets paid.
All those humogerus packages obscene.
Posted by: Parvin D. Chastainp | October 22, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am
The last thing anyone in our country should do is give these white collar criminals is sympathy They have stollen our homes and our integrity. they should be in jail! They abused our trust and are willing to exploit us all!
Posted by: Anna Vivette | October 22, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am
they don’t deserve compensation for causing workers to lose their jobs homes and breaking up the families of those who did have talent and the only compensation received was a pink slip, not to mention that the same workers are expected to pay taxes for their so called talent. instead of compensation they need to get real jobs and start paying back what they owe the taxpayers. Lets start with selling off their homes and cars to pay us back. leave them ONLY with the hemmoroid cream in their medicine cabinet that they need from sitting on their gold toilets reading executives for dummies. they should be ashamed of themselves. please let us know where they take their talent next so we know where to avoid taking our business.
Posted by: Patricia E. | October 22, 2009, 2:50 am 2:50 am
The government bailed out the unions not the auto industry.The govt. doesn’t have any right getting involved in corporations.The stock holders of these companies are the only ones to set executive pay or pay cut.Wake up people , The govt. is wrong.
The govt. is wrong.
The govt. is wrong.
Watch your back America.
Posted by: Ron K. | October 22, 2009, 2:58 am 2:58 am
Cap their salaries ALL the CEO’s and top exec’s that take bonus bailout $$$
and MAKE THEM DO VOLUNTEER WORK for six months helping the homeless and working in food banks!
Posted by: Don | October 22, 2009, 3:14 am 3:14 am
LOOSE THEIR BEST TALENT? Their best talent is what got us into this mess, along with a Republican run house that paved the corporate yellow brick road for them dance down. Let them find out what it’s like to struggle to pay their bills and feed their families. Why worry about loosing them? They should have “FIRED” them all a long time ago!
Posted by: Vernette Griffee | October 22, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am
Yes they should take pay cuts. So should the hot shots that are in the insurance business, the house and the senate, I bet that would reduce our debt. They get that pay for life. I can’t pay for myself so why should I have to pay for them?? Cut all the wages for people screwing the small working people!!!!
Posted by: Mikie | October 22, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Referring to my earlier comment: Whoops. I didn’t mean to insult leeches. They are actually useful.
Posted by: Bernie | October 22, 2009, 3:20 am 3:20 am
It’s to much power for the fascist Obama administration to be able to extort contributions (which Obama is out campaigning for the dems this week) from people who he can cut their salaries, bonus’s, perks, and other compensation (we will never exactly where these execs are their real pay from), kill their businesses altogether if they make his enemies list by not donating to his causes.
Posted by: talkhooloo | October 22, 2009, 4:12 am 4:12 am
It’s an extortion racket- Obama can either leave the ceo’s with money if they donate to him or he can take all their money and business away if they don’t donate to him.
Posted by: talkhooloo | October 22, 2009, 4:14 am 4:14 am
Hey ABC, why don’t you do a story on how much these bankers and their firms are “donating” to Obama while Obama holds their wages over their heads?
Posted by: talkhooloo | October 22, 2009, 4:15 am 4:15 am
These bloodsucking leeches have operated in the penumbra of Alan Greenspan’s Libertarian insanity. They deserve to have their salaries and bonuses seriously cut. Talent? What talent? Talent for creating a disaster that we, the taxpayers, had to save them from. Let them go find new jobs. So what?
Posted by: Bernie | October 22, 2009, 4:30 am 4:30 am
I am glad that this is being done. Long before the recession hit, I saw the pay that CEO’s were getting and I told otherrs that this would be the downfall of our country.
Greed and lack of self-discipine has brought this about. The mind set of these people has to be changed.
All CEO’s are getting too much money, the stockholders of their companies should be able to have some control over the pay of executives.
Our President has more responibility than these executives, their pay shouldn’t be more than the president receives.
Posted by: Barbara | October 22, 2009, 6:19 am 6:19 am
I think the Senate should use the health care reform bill that came from the Health, Education, Labor and Pension committee and the finsl bill from Congress should carry the name of Ted Kennedy, he worked hard for a long time for this.
Posted by: Barbara | October 22, 2009, 6:22 am 6:22 am
It’s also ironic to see the number of people on here posting that these executives should have their pay cut. Who lives in the glass house that’s going to cut their pay?? A congress that that just approved and passed a budget that runs a deficit of $1.4 TRILLION dollars for a nation that is $11 TRILLION dollars in debt…and they’re telling businesses how to run things? Let’s stop bailing out congress every two years re-electing these fools and start getting our own house (the nation’s government) in better financial shape.
Posted by: Alex | October 22, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Remember what Thomas Jefferson said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want (i.e. free health care, social security, free education, low cost housing loans guaranteed, welfare, etc.) is also a government big enough to take everything you have (starting with the contractually legal salaries of private industry).
It sickens me that I’m in Afghanistan defending so many Americans’ rights to apparently cheer on and willfully encourage the government to take away money from their fellow Americans…these CEOs started or run businesses that employ millions of americans (putting food on the tables and roofs over heads) while producing goods or services for millions more Americans and yet, so many of you are speaking of them like common criminals. My nation is changing while I’m gone fighting for it…and I’m starting to wonder if the real enemy of the constitution I’m sworn to defend isn’t the people slowly expanding our government and taking over private businesses.
Pray for our Soldiers and our allies, we lost a few more good men today.
Posted by: Alex | October 22, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
These top execs. are thinking of themselves first and the U.S.A. second!
I beleive these execs should not take these large sums of money of their own action.
The govt. shouldn’t have to force the issue here, the stockholders should handle this in their boardrooms.
If these top execs. don’t like it, and want to cut and run — let them go, then blackball them as unpatriotic traders!!
Posted by: D.R.A. | October 22, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Let me see if I understand the excuse for excessive executive salaries … if they don’t provide humongous paychecks to executives, companies fear losing their best talent. Well, someone should inform these clowns that unemployment is near 10% in this country and surely there’s a dozen or so qualified candidates willing to accept a reasonable salary to replace those executives that quit to find greener pastures.
Posted by: Rosemary B. | October 22, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
I believe that ALL wages, prices, and salaries should be cut-not just Executive Salaries. Americans need to learn that there is just a finite amount of fuel to go around, whether it is green or black.
Posted by: Jon K. Evans | October 22, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Of course, the executives should have their pay cut substantially, and the pay should be regulated and set by the government. This is a no brainer. These corporations are now owned in large part by the taxpayers. That is us—We The People! That means those executives work for us now. We should have a say in what they are paid and whether or not they even have a job anymore. Most of them should be fired, and the jobs should be given to more capable and motivated people who will not make the huge mistakes that the existing executives did. And there are plenty of these more capable people around who will be happy with much lower compensation than the outrageous compensation that the existing executives have been giving themselves. When We The People became the owners of these companies, the government (acting as our agent) should have quickly changed out the existing executives and replaced them with competent people.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Angry Independent Voter | October 22, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
What right does the government have to dictate salaries?
Posted by: Steve | October 22, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Steve,
Salaries of executives in a corporation are set by the Board of Directors acting on behalf of the shareholders. For these bailed out financial disaster firms, We The People are the shareholders and the government has every right to represent us in setting the salaries of the executives.
If these greedy, contemptible executives had an ounce of honesty in their bodies, they would have turned down the outrageous compensation they were getting in the interest of saving the companies. But instead, they took the money and let the companies fail and caused the need for We The People to bail them out with our tax dollars (our money).
These contemptible executives know only greed and self interest. They have made themselves rich by destroying the life savings on millions of hard working Americans in their IRAs and 410ks.
The contemptible executives should be happy they are not in prison. I would become happy if I saw them go to prison.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Angry Independent Voter | October 22, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Oh HELL yeah!!! I’m a senior living on a whopping $845 a month, thanks to major cuts by the state of California. And in Huntington Beach to boot! The cost of living is exorbitantly high here. I often go to bed hungry as I’m not ‘entitled’ to food stamps (California being the ONLY state in which this occurs). If I can find ways to survive, there’s not one inkling of doubt in my mind that those exec’s can live on a minute portion of the extremely high incomes they already take home!!!
Posted by: Terry | October 22, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
The pay for Exec’s should be capped @ $500,000.
Posted by: Bill | October 22, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Terry:
Your comments are right on. In fact, you have given me a great idea for how to fairly handle the crooked executive problem. All the executives that caused the financial disaster companies should have all of their material wealth liquidated and used to partially make the taxpayers whole, including reimbursing them for losses in IRA’s and 401k’s.
Then, after these contemptible crooks are broke, put them each on a $845 per month stipend for life.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Angry Independent Voter | October 22, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Maybe if these companies’ executives had considered taking pay cuts as a solution to their problems they would not have needed government bailouts. The comment about losing “top talent” is hilarious. Who would hire someone who participated in leading their previous company into bankruptcy? Without government bailouts their current income would be zero.
Posted by: Eugene | October 22, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
I agree with most of what has been said , to be honest there is no One worth what they pay these people , sorry your not that great to me . Everyone needs to take a cut even Washingston , let’s back the wages up I don’t care who it is . It would not hurt for Washington to take 18% to 25% cut on , when we get back on top then we can talk raise . Most in Washington is already rich so hey help your country out & take a cut , do the right thing without being ask . You have made a lot off us , more ways then one .
Posted by: Jlivingston | October 23, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
I just really wonder what they do with all this money they make , you can only drive one car & your wife one car , make your kids work & buy their own car , like most american’s do . Your wife don’t have to have the Best or You . One house is enough not 2 or 7 come on down to our way of living , it’s really not all that hard or bad you might learn something + see how to enjoy life without someone waiting on you do it yourself or let family pitch in & help have fun doing it .
Posted by: Jlivingston | October 23, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Of course, they should have their pay CUT! In fact they should all be out of a job. This country is in financial ruin because of these. We should take their pay and bonuses and payback the american people. We are the ones out of jobs, healthbenefits etc!
Posted by: gpchicago28 | October 24, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
The President is absolutely right. The talent they may lose got us into the mess we have in our financial services industry. The bonuses and high salaries are designed as an incentive when performance is positive, not when a company needs to be bailed out by taxpayers. In true capitalism a company succeeds or fails based upon the market. These companies should have failed and gone bankrupt, then the bonuses would not be an issue, nor would large, obscene salaries be an issue. Bankruptcy would mean no salaries or bonuses.
Posted by: Howard | October 24, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am
These top executives should have their pay cut. Their ridiculous pay has helped put us in a near recession. They should pay their fair share of taxes and pay back the bailout money. The rest of us should not have to bear the burden alone.
Posted by: boop2000 | October 24, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am
I agree that the pay cut is necessary but it should be done by the Wall Street execs themselves – not the government. Government getting into free enterprise is not a good thing. Of course the execs would NOT cut their pay on their own because they don’t want to lose their lavish life style so someone has to make them do it. The money they slash from their salaries should be used to help the American taxpayers but that will never happen – you can be sure that the government will grab the money not taken as salary and bonuses on Wall Street and spend it on more “perks” for themselves.
Posted by: Elle | October 24, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
This is all about control and Obamas got have it! This is also about class war- fare and I mean war-fare. If Obama creates the divisiveness he intends he wins.
Devide and conquer!
Posted by: Colette | October 26, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Don’t simplify the arguement. My bank was forced to loan money due to “government regulation” And then sold to Fanny Mae and or Freddie Mac. Our congress was in on this scheme and Barney Frank was one of the originators. Look at old transcripts. Now the hypocrits are blaming wall street. This is why congress has a low approval rating with business people. Get the corrupt politicians out of office.
Posted by: Colette | October 26, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm