By Tom Johnson

Oct 12, 2009 2:46pm

Zero Tolerance = Zero Sense?

ABC's Stu Schutzman from New York:

Every so often, a story surfaces which presses our collective “outrage” button.  Such a story turned up on the front page of today’s New York Times entitled “It’s A Fork, It’s A Spoon, It’s A…..Weapon?”
In it, 6 year old Zachary Christie, a Delaware 1st grader, faces expulsion from school and 45 days in a juvenile detention center. His crime–bringing his new Cub Scout combo eating utensil to school, excited to try it out at lunch.  There’s every indication that Zach’s a good student and a good kid and no evidence he had any nefarious intent for the utensil’s use other than to eat lunch with it.  The school district doesn’t dispute that.  Still, the school says the utensil qualifies as a weapon leaving it no choice, under zero tolerance policy , other than to throw the book at young Zach “regardless of (his) intent”.
There have been other attention getting incidents across the country and in this same Delaware district.  One boy suspended after someone dropped a knife in his lap; a girl expelled after using a knife for a school art project.
“It just seems unfair,” Zach told the Times. “I think the rules are what is wrong, not me.”  Well said Zach; criminologists and educators have been debating just that for at least the decade since the horrific killings at Columbine High School in 1999. The greater good vs individual rights. Some argue Zero Tolerance works and is the only way to keep all students feet to the fire and maintain safe schools. Others say that discretion and common sense should be added to the equation sparing  kids who obviously have no criminal intent from overly harsh penalties.
National School Safety and Security Services, a well respected consulting firm, says most of the problem is media hype. “Contrary to suggestions by the media, politicians and ivory-tower theorists,” they write, ”……Many educators tend to bend over backwards to give students more breaks than they will ever receive out on the streets of our society and in the workplace.”  Some do, some don’t but California may have found some middle ground. The California education code includes a zero tolerance provision “to send a ‘get tough’ message to the community that violent behavior, incidents and crime would not be tolerated. “  But, and it’s a big but, California recognizes, for instance, the distinction between “brandishing a knife at another person” which requires mandatory expulsion and “possession of any knife….of no reasonable use to the pupil” as a “significant but discretionary infraction” with punishment left to the discretion of the principal or superintendent.  Common sense!
Back in Delaware, Zachary Christie’s school district stands by the discipline meted out to him. His mother tells the Times zero tolerance policy is “out of control”. At least one state legislator agrees, asking the school district to “get all the facts, find out about Zach and his family and then act with common sense for the well-being of this child”.  Common sense! Why not allow professional educators a little wiggle room.

User Comments

“Common Sense” says it all. A juvenile detention center???? My god! What would that do to a six year old who obviously is not a problem child? He does not have problems now, but that type of punishment could really create a problem child. I sincerely hope that someone along the line says STOP! This is totally ridiculous! The kid has learned his lesson, get on with it!

Posted by: Rob | October 12, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

When California’s policy looks like a paragon of good sense next to yours, you’re doing it wrong.
Zero tolerance is just an excuse for administrators to not bother to think.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 12, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

How is there going to a Civilian Military force when our kids are being told there toys are weapons. How about if at 6 years old we train them on how to safely use a weapon, instead of making criminals out of them. This is ridiculous and I hope we get a solution. All in the name of trying to make the population weak.

Posted by: Lou | October 12, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Please stop putting down our educators. These are the people we depend upon to turn out students who are functionally illeterate, can’t find the United States on a globe, who have trouble adding one and one together to get two. It is so obvious that these educators have all the answers that we should just shut up and sit down and let them do their job. After all the future of the nation rides upon their shoulders.

Posted by: j0112 | October 12, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

“These are the people we depend upon to turn out students who are functionally illeterate, can’t find the United States on a globe, who have trouble adding one and one together to get two.”
j0112 | Oct 12, 2009 3:59:10 PM
Dude, your neighborhood sucks. All the ten year olds I know are literate, know where the US is on a globe and are stressing over getting their times table mastery down (timed recitation).

Posted by: jhw539 | October 12, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

It’s school officials like this that are pushing me more and more to start homeschooling my children. Seriously people, get a clue. Obviously the cub scouts wouldn’t classify this as a weapon if they gave it to a 6 year old for crying out loud.

Posted by: mthrof4 | October 12, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Why don’t the school officials spend their time doing something about the older kids who cuss the teachers out daily? Are they only brave enough to punish the little kids?

Posted by: sue carter | October 12, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

When I was a kid I carried a Marine Corps knife to school that kept wearing a hole in my pocket. I never threatened anyone with it, but I did open some cola bottles and cans of Vienna sausage when the key strip broke off.
I still carry a knife that I can’t get into a court house with, though its only use is to open packages, pick my teeth, remove splinters and file my nails.
I used to carry a folding hunter in my brief case and found it useful on many occasions. And as a kid wore a hunting knife on my belt all summer.
Those days seem to be over, I guess boy scouts have to carry powder puffs these days.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | October 12, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Where’s the common sense?
A back pack could be a weapon. How about a plastic fork or spoon that the cafeteria provides? How about shoe strings? You can tie them together and strangle somebody. How about a belt? You can swing it around and hit somebody or strangle them. How about a notebook? The coil that binds some of the notebooks together can be undone and used as a weapon.
See what I mean about zero tolerance?
Where do you really stop?
Common sense is indeed needed.

Posted by: ddg | October 12, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Zero tolerance was created by the same people who run the Congress and the White House–Democrats!!!

Posted by: Chris | October 12, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

It seems to me, and I say this as a recently retired teacher, that a lawsuit claiming the school system is “throwing the book” at someone who is too young to understand the intricacy of the rules involved would scare the school system. Did the school system specifically say “Cub Scout Combos are a weapon and not allowed?”
The threat of the lawsuit alone might be enough to get these idiots to see common sense.
The courts tend to rule strongly on the parent-student side. When a teacher catches a student smoking the teacher will usually be asked, “Did you see him actually inhale or was he just holding a lit cigarette?” or when a student’s caught cheating: “Did you actually see him look at the cheat sheet or did you just find it under his test paper?”

Posted by: The_Mick | October 12, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Homeschool your kid. Get them away from these freaks! It’s like a priest at our church said, You can’t tell teachers anything, they think they know it all!

Posted by: Ann | October 12, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Just think about why zero-tolerance had to be put in place. In the 1970s (before zero-tolerance), I attended an inner-city school that was made far worse by the idiots who kept giving “second chances” the thugs who that made it impossible for *any* of us to learn. The outrages that come about as a result of zero-tolerance are nothing compared to the outrages that would ensue if we put decision-making authority back into the hands people who don’t understand that the fifth or sixth (reported) offense don’t warrant a “second chance”, even when the perpetrator is more “disadvantaged” than the victim.

Posted by: Next93 | October 12, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Why not do something about all the school kids getting murdered on their way to and from school? Did “zero tolerance” do anything to protect Albert Derrion? No. The problem with the school administrators and most politicians today is that none of them have any common sense anymore.

Posted by: Debbie | October 12, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

And zero tolerance policies haven’t done anything to prevent kids from shooting other kids at school, has it? the only thing that zero tolerance does is give parents the “illusion of safety” at their schools. The truth is if someone is hell bent on hurting somebody at a school, they will do it. They are not worried about violating a zero tolerance policy or the law.

Posted by: Debbie | October 12, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

That’s one child left behind…

Posted by: lee | October 12, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

The No Child Left Behind is a contradiction of the Zero Tolerance Act.

Posted by: lee | October 12, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

The only way to solve this epidemic is to have a metal detectors at every school entrance. We have them at airports, at court offices and federal buildings. Why not have them where they will deter potential issues and train these kids while they are young. What are the school districts waiting for? Having we had enought school violance to convince them? There’s been more school problems compared to airports and sports events or any other place that has these metal detectors. With a rise in gangs they need to stop this before it escales. We talk about hate groups being an issue, yet gangs are being looked at as hate groups. Why not? Too young? Isn’t that the worse stage to let it happen?
Kids either go to school to study, or parents need to kep them home until everyone can be safe. Don’t send me your problem child. If you can’t control him/her what makes you think I want to. There’s other students who care and need and deserve the attention. I’m all for the no child left behind act, but it’s not helping with those who are violent, regardless of the age. A three year old should already know the rules and if not, than be placed in a class/school that can cater to them at their own pace.

Posted by: lee | October 12, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

How is a fork a weapon? Heck – some kid stabbed another kid with a pen at my daughter’s school last year – should we outlaw pens at school?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | October 12, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

If race were the reason for “Zero Tolerance”, it would be simple enough to simply reduce the process to printed affidavits with names redacted, presented to an independent disciplinary panel. That’s something that would remove almost all bias. Instead they went for expediency and reduced things to simple equations, removing all thought processes. Zero Tolerance = Zero Thought. It is wrong at ALL levels of society and is strong evidence of the dumbing down of America. Don’t blame this on liberals or conservatives – it’s the intellectually lazy on both sides of the fence.

Posted by: JrzWrld | October 13, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

My main concern is for Zachary and the lasting effect that the actions of the school and the school board will have on this impressionable young 6 year old. No wonder our schools and children are having so many problems when our educators can’t exercise even a small measure of common sense in dealing with a case such as this. It’s ludicrous to consider juvenile detention for Zachary. Send the school board trustees instead for acting like idiots!!!

Posted by: stevem | October 13, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

A 6 year old? Seriously? How can this child be punished for an claimed intended act that he is not even capable of understanding yet? Does the school not have it’s own forks and other various cutlery? They should, I don’t know of any school that forces people to eat with their fingers. If that’s the case, the school should be chastised for voilating it’s own rules. This is compeletely ridiculous; if that school system has to fear a FORK maybe they need to rethink how much control over their students they actually have.

Posted by: Chasity | October 13, 2009, 4:12 am 4:12 am

What if another student got a hold of this fork, spoon, knife? I blame the parents for letting the poor child take it to school in the first place. Come on . . . has anyone heard of common sense? Again, with all that is happening in this world, the parents didn’t think . . what if another child got a hold of this?

Posted by: pma | October 13, 2009, 7:46 am 7:46 am

I have 2 small boys in school. They know they are not allowed to take ANY type of knife to school. Not even plastic. The punishment might be a little to harsh though. But no kid should ever bring any knife type tool around other kids without PROPER supervision. The parents should teach that with the cub scouts. It always starts with the partents.

Posted by: melissa owenby | October 13, 2009, 7:46 am 7:46 am

It is considered a weapon and the child should not have brought it to school. As far as his punishment goes, I believe it is a little extreme, but they have a zero tolerance rule and they are enforcing it! How would you feel if your child was one potentially hurt by this and educators didn’t do anything to prevent this. They are only trying to prevent harm in the school system-

Posted by: Kristin | October 13, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

The rules should apply equally,no matter what the age.The parents should have been aware that this would fall under zero tolerance and not let him take it to school.With all the violence in schools today,you can’t be too careful.A boy threatened my daughter in elem.school and brought a knife to school.I was informed that the blade of the knife had to be 4 inches for it to fall under zero tolerance.Like a 3 and 3/4 inch blade couldn’t hurt her?

Posted by: vchat | October 13, 2009, 7:53 am 7:53 am

KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE BALL. This was not a plastic fork! It was a KNIFE with a sharp BLADE. That is an inappropriate item for a 6 yr old to be carrying without an adult. The parents should have taught him, this is for cub scouts only. Do NOT take to school or out of the house for that matter, without an ADULT! It is a weapon and I believe in ZERO tolerance. As a parent of a child with anger disorder, my child has been evaluated and is being treated for that diagnosis. At 6, no one new he had it. He was never allowed to take plastic sword or pretend gun to school, much less a real knife blade! Heaven help us!

Posted by: hoosierlady | October 13, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am

The punishment for Zachary Christie and his pocket knife is extreme. But did anyone ask why Zero Tolerance has been put in place? My children attended public school (till high school) as my husband and I did, but that was before Zero Tolerance. Incidents were documented and documented with little punishment. Delaware is the #1 state for children attending private and parochial schools. Why do you think that is? For our family, it became apparent that the rules that were in place were not helping create the best learning environment. Both of my children are now attending universities due to the excellent education they received in a parochial high school.

Posted by: DelawareMom | October 13, 2009, 7:56 am 7:56 am

What is this country coming to when they try to put a GOOD six year old child in a detention center for bringing utensils to school?? Have we all lost our minds??? This is something that as a cub scout he was proud of, so of course he wants to show it to his friends. All he was trying to do was eat with it, he did not threaten anyone or just take the knife out.This child is a good student and not a trouble maker. To hear him talk on TV you can tell how smart he is and had no intention of causing trouble.For heavens sake!!! What is wrong here???Are school officials losing their minds??? God forbid they should make a smart decision, and talk to the child first and see why he brought an eating utensil to school. THAT’S ALL IT WAS TO HIM.

Posted by: Elizabeth Ryan | October 13, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Stu, It is obvious your opinion is skewed. I saw the report on tv this morning and not only was it a fork and spoon (not a spork), it contained a blade. I think you should report the ENTIRE story.

Posted by: hoosierlady | October 13, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am

A KNIFE IS A KNIFE. Even with the spoon and fork, it is still none the less a knife. While he did not pull the knife on another student, how can we pick and choose? Keep the knives at home parents!

Posted by: hoosierlady | October 13, 2009, 8:02 am 8:02 am

This is ALL a bunch of hooey !! When some kid (teenager) who has been doing pretty good at school, all of a sudden snaps, then you same do-gooders are going to shout to the rafters… “someone should have known”.. or “why weren’t there signs”… or “why did it happen”… always looking for someone ELSE to blame! Sometimes it happens! Otherwise cool, calm collected children, teens, adults all of a sudden SNAP!
At that point you ALL jump on the band-wagon, he/she should never have had the opportunity to have brought that lethal fork or spoon to school in the first place.
IT WORKS BOTH WAYS PEOPLE! YADDA YADDA YADDA, all of you just want to yap to hear yourselves yap.
If you don’t like the school policy, get your petition, go through channels, and change it, but when you change it, don’t complain when something dire happens because of it! What you’re complaining about is (punish some, and let some go)… selective enforcement? Dang! There is absolutely no pleasing ANY of you!!!!!!

Posted by: Adkins | October 13, 2009, 8:02 am 8:02 am

The Christie parents should be sent to reform school to learn how to exercise common sense. Regardless of whether the boy had any “bad intentions” by bringing the knife to school ( and yes, folks, it is a knife, even though there are eating utensils attached to it ) his parents were stupid to think that it was ok. Would you want the airlines to allow this “eating utensil” on the planes? I am sure Zach is a real nice, decent kid but some kids aren’t. School officials don’t have time to decide who can be trusted with a weapon and who can’t. Zach’s parents should be embarrassed.

Posted by: Jan Ross | October 13, 2009, 8:02 am 8:02 am

As a former Hearing Officer in Philadelphia, I was responsible for hearing appeals for cases involving weapons in school. Very often, I had to determine if the item could be considered a weapon, if the item was being concealed, the intent of the student, and the ability of the student to understand. In this case, the student clearly did not understand that this item could be considered a weapon and was not attempting to conceal the item The actions of the School Board are totally unwarranted. The resolution should have been a parent-student-principal conference and some simple counseling. The actions of the School Board do nothing but make them appear ridiculous.

Posted by: Allancg1 | October 13, 2009, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Parents should know their school’s policy and when gifting a child of 6 something as cool as that “tool”, they should have also explained the dangers of having the knife on it and that it is not to leave the house, except with mom and dad or his scout leader on camping trips. He’s a bright kid, I’m sure he would have understood and this whole controversy would have been avoided.

Posted by: Karen | October 13, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Of course it doesn’t make sense to a parent who is trying to avoid her child’s supension and probably hasn’t worked in the school system. I have seen students use combs, paper clips, pens, pencils, and actual weapons as a weapon or a tool for self defense. The staff at schools need something to help protect them from students. The age of this student may be a factor to some but I have seen 7 year olds do things that I would never expect them to do. A swiss knife (oops… new Cub Scout combo eating utensil) to school is a weapon no matter the age.
The consequence is a little extreme. A supension and a school counselor speaking to the child as well as the school the purpose of the safety policy would be a better one in my opinion.

Posted by: crystal | October 13, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

I am an Eagle Scout, and I am an Officer with the Department of Corrections. I can only say that this is yet another sign of no common since to back up the education that our teachers are supposed to be getting. For one, we are talking about a six year old boy. 2. This boy is part of a program that teaches good morals and gives guidance in the proper use of a tool like the one in question. 3.A six year old with the excitement of being part of an outdoor program like Scouting , that teaches way more then our school systems do today should be applauded. The parents of this child, I hope will continue to work with this young lad and keep him in scouting all the way trough to Eagle. I have had more doors open up to me because I am an Eagle Scout, not because of what I learned in school. The education I had only solidified the type of positions I have had over the years. What I am saying is that I have been told that I was put at the top of the list in several opportunities because of Scouting, not only my education! I say this only because there are so many out there that do not know what Scouting really offers. To condemn this child to the extreme that an adult is trying to enforce, makes me wonder what the mental age of this adult or adults really is! I can only say that it would be sad to give this child the feeling that he has committed a crime, when the crime here is stupidity on the educators part!!! The child has only committed an infraction, and only needs guidance. In this case though it seems that the adults need the guidance.

Posted by: Tracy McIntyre | October 13, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Zero tolerance is policy at my childrens’ school and my girls cant take an Aleve for headaches or whatever. I have to bring ANY medication to the school nurse.I dont like it but I understand it. From what I saw the parents didnt know he took it to school and the ALC is going overboard. He’s 5yrs old and they should have had policy in place to have a meeting with the parents and child to explain WHY and that it cant happen again. I agree with the policy in place to protect students and staff; however, the punishment is overkill considering the circumstances of this case. ZERO TOLERANCE is inconvenient but necessary.

Posted by: MamaRed | October 13, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

#1-OUTLAW factory schools; any new school, K-12, should again be a neighborhood school; urban sprawl suxx!
2K – 3K are waayy ttooo many children, too few teachers, not enough time to eat lunch; lunch is 11am to 1pm, do not start at 9am!
Stop rezoning; quit bussing; kids do not develop school pride when they do not “belong”.
Special Ed. should have own facilities with Special Ed. trained teachers.
Take some lessons from European school systems – evaluate children early to be able to train: smart factory employees, train them to understand current equipment/machines, able to be productive after grade 12; train others for college entry to become leaders of industry.
Most USA hi-schools let out graduates with no working skills and not really good for college.
Teach money management: saving, investing, buying wisely. Not knowing how money can help when used wisely is probably our one big downfall.
When minds are trained to be used correctly even average people will live better, happier lives. Our children’s virtual stumbling blindly through life is the result of our inferior educational environment.

Posted by: Modris | October 13, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

ddg: “Zero tolerance was created by the same people who run the Congress and the White House–Democrats!!!”
That is a rather grandiose statement and warrants something in the way of proof. I doubt that Democrats are unilaterally responsible for zero tolerance policies. While I definitely believe zero tolerance policies in general are far too constricting, I do not think that every school utilizes its zero tolerance policy in such a way as to thwart minors from cutting their grilled chicken with a plastic knife (although there is a case of this actually happening in a particular school of which I can no longer remember the name). I am a Democrat myself–or, at least, a liberal, for sure–and I disapprove of zero tolerance policies. I believe that deterrence is necessary but not to such a degree of severity or idiocy as many examples.
The ABA is quite an excellent source for any who wish to research this particular topic further.

Posted by: ignominal | January 27, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.