By David Schoetz

Dec 28, 2009 11:39pm

Closing Arguments: Time to Profile Passengers?

The Christmas Day terror scare has raised new questions about airport security — and information sharing among federal officials. Technology does exist to help spot bomb making materials, called whole body imaging, but the expensive machines are not mandatory because of privacy concerns. But is technology enough? Some say that a form of passenger profiling may be necessary. So tonight, we ask: Should part of enhanced airport security include profiling passengers of certain countries, races and religions? Or does any type of profiling run against our Constitutional beliefs and national ideals? Tell us what you think. You can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.

User Comments

Should air/bus/train passengers be profiled? Absolutely!
If it saves one life? Absolutely!
Otherwise the terrorists win.

Posted by: De Duck | December 29, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

i have always been completely against any kind of profiling. what scares me is that today for a brief moment i thought it might be ok…that seems to me like the terrorists might be winning. their actions are causing me to rethink my fundamental beliefs.

Posted by: melody | December 29, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Yes, it is past time we recognize the value of profiling.

Posted by: Nate | December 29, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Not profiling will be judged as derelictionin the wake of the next terror attack.

Posted by: mam | December 29, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

this is long overdue. let’s start tomorrow.

Posted by: Ed Wilson | December 29, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Absolutely NOT!! How are you going to feel when it’s you that has been profiled? Or your mother? Or your sister? Or your child? And you, or them, are bent over a table in a back room being cavity searched because you look like/have the same name as a supposed terrorist?

Posted by: m. | December 29, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

absolutely

Posted by: lewis c whittle | December 29, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Yes, all of the terrorist have been Muslim since 9/11. So why not target them.

Posted by: Big Man | December 29, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Absolutely. We should have been profiling all along instead of putting as much wasted effort as we do into ‘screening’ equally simply to be politically correct.

Posted by: Justin | December 29, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I believe that people who fit the profile of a terrorist should be watched more closely during airport screening, and they should all be required to walk through the new full body scanning machines. This would be common sense, not racism, and we should not be concerned about “political correctness”. We should be concerned only with safety!

Posted by: Melissa | December 29, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Absolutely! In this day-in-age, sadly, we have to…

Posted by: Jen | December 29, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I have no problem with profiling. It may not be fair to some ethnic or religious groups, but frankly I don’t care. This country’s safety, and that of it’s citizens, myself included is MUCH MORE important

Posted by: Bruce Jacob | December 29, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Yes, we should profile passengers. No, I don’t think it’s against the constitution. The constitution pertains to U.S. citizens. Look at how Israel keeps it’s citizens safe. They are surrounded by terrorist countries.

Posted by: Mary | December 29, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Yes. While TSA & Law Enforcement are public agencies, an airport is private property and responsible for keeping it’s customers safe. And with so much riding on how they secure their facilities, every possible means should be used, including profiling.
Fact is profiling is effective. It’s not pretty and it casts shadows. But it works.

Posted by: John M | December 29, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

we should profile air pasengers you dont see little old ladies with bombs

Posted by: fred franz | December 29, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Fear makes ppl do stupid things.

Posted by: m. | December 29, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Profiling is a very important tool in our quest to stay safe from jihadists. I am 100% in favor of profiling.

Posted by: Patricia | December 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Flying is a privilege and not a right so therefore passengers should be profiled as they do in Israel. There is no violation of personal rights of any kind. If you agree to fly then you must comply with the rules. Political Correctness has gotten us into this position where terrorists are flying and legitimate passengers are grossly inconvenienced. BD

Posted by: Bill Duckwitz | December 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

It is WAY PAST time to profile airline
passengers. Should have started with Twin Towers destruction.

Posted by: wallace | December 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

I have always though profiling was the way to go. Time to quit stopping grandma’s, babies, moms, kids of US citizens and they know who needs to be patted down & checked at the airline security lines!

Posted by: joanieG | December 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Should air/train passengers be profiled? Definitely!!!
If this is what it takes to insure safe travel, by all means do it. The majority of all terrorist attacks recently have been committed by one religious group.

Posted by: James | December 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Yes, we need to quit worring about being politically correct and start putting out safety first.

Posted by: Todd | December 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Absolutely. Start ASAP.

Posted by: Hank Albers | December 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Racial profiling is wrong and should never be implimented under any circumstance. We need to work on our security measures and treat every individual fairly.

Posted by: Yitzakh | December 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Too much is not done in the name of freedom. We should be free to be protected, which means profiling, if it helps protect us. Abosolutely.

Posted by: erchen | December 29, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Absolutely-it’s time to stop being concerned about what is politically correct and attack the problem “head on”.

Posted by: jo | December 29, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Absolutely. Look at statistics.

Posted by: lucy | December 29, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Absolutely Yes! And long over due.

Posted by: Greg | December 29, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Absolutely! Us Americans have allowed others to control our country long enough. If we moved to China? Do you think they would print their ballots in English for us and go out of their way to appease our religious views? It’s time to take our country back! Stand up Americans….We the People!

Posted by: sdb | December 29, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Absolutely, let’s employ profiling which will improve airline safety by concentrating resources.

Posted by: stox | December 29, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I don’t think that idea is completely thought out. I am Indian and I am worried that people who can’t tell the difference between me and someone that is from Afghanistan. So does that mean I deserve to be picked out from others, that seems insane to me. Maybe a better idea is checking into the background of people buying airline tickets to see where and why they are flying to a certain area and check up on that. Profiling would never be an option if it were any other race or culture and therefore isn’t fair for Americans who came here from other countries.

Posted by: nia | December 29, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Absolutely. It is past time.

Posted by: e | December 29, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

It is a new world and people out there want to kill Americans … any Americans. If we know the general groups and/or tendencies of those who wish to do us harm, of course we should profile them. It is criminal not to do so.

Posted by: Jim | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution declares “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and siezures.” This right “shall not be violated … but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be siezed.” In no way does profiling fit within those restrictions.

Posted by: Doug | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Absolutely we should be profiling!
Quit wanding little old ladies and white-headed old men who can barely hold their arms up, and focus on those persons most likely to be terrorists or to conduct terrorist activities.

Posted by: Gloria | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Absolutely.
It’s about time.
Pulling aside one’s grandmother for a full search in the name of NOT profiling is more absurd than pulling aside someone behaving in an unusual manner – warranting a search based on behavior profiling.

Posted by: K. Hart | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

oh course we should profile, we have been doing it in medicine since the begining of time. How else would a doctor make an acuate diagnois, first they must profile the patient… Do you smoke? is there a history of heart problems? what race? female? male? Did you have any prior surgeries?
Should I say more, We are looking for something, we need to profile!

Posted by: sandy | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Of course we should! We reached a point a long time ago when preserving lives became more important than ideals.

Posted by: Frank | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Our citizens are to used to having it easy when it comes to travelling. It’s about time that we all bite the bullet and admit that we can no longer close our eyes to terrorist the government can only do so much to protect us. All I hear is the inconvenience of going thru security at the airport. Well when you’re complaining think of the alternatives, YOU COULD BE DEAD.

Posted by: Dolores | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

To NOT profile would be foolish! Profile by race! Profile by country! Profile by religion! So what if it offends! Look at how successful Israel has been. It works when it is done properly.

Posted by: Carolyn | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

if you have a significantly higher proportion of the population causing a problem, it’s only logical to counter the problem with the most expeditious and efficient use of limited resources…time to not worry about hurting peoples’ feelings.

Posted by: charlie | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I travel frequently, and I vote yes to profiling, yes to extra security questions, yes to pat downs, yes to added screening devices, and yes to 1st checked bag costing $0.00 (thus reducing amount of cabin baggage)

Posted by: JEA | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Absolutely, this is another safeguard against terrorists. We should have started profiling immediately following 9/11. Unfortunately, the Constitution that was written to protect the very people of the United States is now working against us. The terrorists should not be given any Constitutional Rights. Its time to close the borders.

Posted by: Diane | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Yes…we have to start profiling the passengers. I know this will be offensive to some, but they are coming from one religion. I hope we don’t continue to be politically correct on this because if we do, we will have more innocent people lose their lives!

Posted by: Eric | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Not yet time to profile..let’s wait till these Jihadists blow a plane with ten aircraft at the airport docking stations with a few fuel trucks around..
This administration by having NNeopolatano telling us there is no terrorism anymore is too much. Incompetence will kill us all!

Posted by: Peter Stelljes - Wakefield | December 29, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Does 911 ring a bell? What will it take before we’re all having to board the plane naked! I have been saying ever since the shoe bomber, I’m sure glad he didn’t try to hide it in his pants… well need I say more?

Posted by: McKinley | December 29, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, guess what … it just might be a duck. Yes, use profiling for the protection of everyone. Individual rights help no one when they’re dead due to terrorism. Employ El Al’s passenger screening process now!

Posted by: Steve | December 29, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Yes we should profile

Posted by: DUKE | December 29, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Good police work has always involved profiling. To do less is irresponsible. I have always done so, and could care less if anyone likes it or not. In almost every case I was correct in my feelings. I have not flown since 2000 and will never again unless our airlines adopt procedures like the Israels have for their flights.

Posted by: Art Roberts | December 29, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Profiling is necessary in this instance. We have to so we can protect ourselves. Don’t you think it is time we start thinking of ourselves where this is concerned? this is no time to be “politically correct”! We are in a war situation.

Posted by: Jane Mahoney | December 29, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

we have compromised our common sense away. We have so feared to be called prejudice….YES! We must start profiling, also hearing Fathers when they urge us to take precautions with their sons. If they look like they could be Thugs, you Must watch them. Wake up America before 9/11 happens in a much bigger scale.
The terrorist expect our complacency,they count on it.

Posted by: Worried | December 29, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Profile-YES!!!
Until sufficient dogs are trained to serve as bomb material sniffing and people who carry that material are identified. Then the dogs could be retired when technology creates a means to either eliminate the threats or eliminate the people who attempt to carry those out. Perhaps profiling isn’t as “bad” as once reported…especially if boarding an aircraft bound for the USA homeland.

Posted by: JCalvin | December 29, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Yes, we should start profiling! Consistently, there is one group of people who are consistently trying to wreak havoc on our shores. This Detroit incident was an absolute near miss and that man should never have been let on that plane without being subjected to a thorough search. Are we violating peoples rights? No, we’re saving people’s lives.

Posted by: Tony | December 29, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Profiling has become a necessity. While being politically correct, we are endangering the lives of Americans.

Posted by: steve | December 29, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

YES…. WE SHOULD PROFILE!!
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck… It’s Probably A Duck !!!
Im sick to death of the lack of common sense today in all realms!

Posted by: Sharon Connors | December 29, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

The time has come to protect ourselves. Absolutely profile!

Posted by: larry johnson | December 29, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Its time. The other countries that do it have very little problem. Its for the good of the majority of Americans

Posted by: jerry | December 29, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

this a sad day when we don’t have better technology then to screen anyone that looks middle eastern even if they are from the US

Posted by: joe | December 29, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Yes, we should profile airline passengers,where did all this political correctness come from anyway? The ACLU?

Posted by: Peter Ambler | December 29, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Of course we should be profiling- as Bill Duckwitz pointed out, if you don’t want to be subject to profiling, you certainly do not have to travel by air. Nobody’s rights are being violated, because nobody has to submit to the search. Don’t fly if the extra search bothers you so much.

Posted by: CH | December 29, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Profiling has been used effectly by Israel, Great Britain, France and other countries for years without jeopardizing basic human rights.
We need to use this crucial tool to insure our safety, while reducing the cost of security.
The other choice is to assume that everyone is a terroist and act accordingly. I take profiling over this Orwellian nightmare.

Posted by: Sam | December 29, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Absolutely yes on profiling. We know who to look at. They target us so let’s target them! High ideals are fine but they won’t save lives in the world today.

Posted by: Linda | December 29, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I arrived almost 41 years into the US.
Grew up with racial issues at school, home, work, and day to day. Yes, it has gotten better. We have an Afridan American President. We have wealthy Black Americans, so I say we are moving forward. Our safety should not be compromised as Americans. We are not living in a perfect world, and with these radicals, our world is less safer.
You wish to fly or do other things in my country, well then just stick it out.
I have since I am 9 years old, will be turning 50 in 14 days and don’t like to know that I have put up with so much to die for radical stupid thinking. A lot of other countries in the world have less rights, and are hurting people. With us placing these regulations, might not make people happy but we will be safer. Stop the crying and get over it.
Thank you

Posted by: GP | December 29, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I think we’re beyond profiling or bomb-sniffing dogs. It may sound drastic, but why don’t we have a place in every airport where males and females have to part and we are all required to change into “authorized” travel garb. We would be required to check in our civilian clothes and have them returned at our destination point. It may sound drastic or gross to some, but if it will help eliminate another September 11 it’s worth it.

Posted by: Jason | December 29, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Why wouldn’t any entity look to utilize proven analytical and statistical review of historical recorded data to make knowledgeable, intellectual future predictions/decisions based on facts? Possibly because it would reduce cost, streamline major processes, decrease time/lines and improve customer service/loyalty while marketing to the specific target?!? And now its clear….

Posted by: Stano | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

There are people of certain ethnic backgrounds who want to kill as many of us as they can–we have to profle,our lives and those of our children and grand children are at stake!!
These are not people we can negotiate or reason with–for some reason they hate us and want us off this planet!!

Posted by: Lynne | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

yes,its about time . sorry if it offends some people. public safety is #1.

Posted by: nick | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yes, we should have been profiling all along. Why waist our finite resources searching a black woman from Memphis, or a gray haired grandfather from Chicago. Put your resources on Muslim men and women between the ages of 18 and 35.

Posted by: Richard Wilkison | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

I would rather profile than die!

Posted by: Jtmacb | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yes Should have started profiling 5 years ago.

Posted by: David | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yes , Profile, life is to important to worry about someones feeling.

Posted by: Richie | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

“m” asks how I am going to feel when it is I in the back room bent over being cavity searched?
Safe. That’s how I would feel.
Search everyone if you have to. We want no more plane loads of innocents crashing to the ground because we were being politically correct.

Posted by: Jim | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Yea It is about time the goverment get off their a– and do something. Profiliing is a start. take pics of everyone boarding and keep it for 30 days then destry them.

Posted by: Jackson | December 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

If profiling had been in effect in 2001, 9/11 would probably not have happened. As a flight attendant, I have told the captain during our briefings that I profile. This, of course, was frowned upon, because it’s not “politically correct.” Look where “politically correct” has gotten us in the past.

Posted by: Linda | December 29, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

YES!! Profiling is necessary. Look at what the Israeli’s do and take a lesson from them. We are wasting our efforts on random searching. After 911 I was selected to be hand searched, luggage screened, etc. I certainly do not fit the ‘profile’ of a terrorist being a gray haired female over 60. When was the last time any one fitting that description carried out a terrorist act. Wake up America, unfortunately we can no longer remain ‘politically correct’ Start profiling now.

Posted by: Sandy | December 29, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I’m with Joanie G

Posted by: Patricia | December 29, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Yes, it is time to profile look-a-like bombers and not old women in wheelchairs like me.

Posted by: Janet S | December 29, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Makes more sense than random searches that don’t even provide information except who has forgotten to throw away their Dasani before getting in line…the current system of protection is a laugh….when white Christian grandmothers start bombing airplanes and beheading people they disagree with, then profile them, search them, discriminate against them….I’ll gladly submit to the it….Profiling does not hurt anyone with nothing to hide…..

Posted by: Ann Heape | December 29, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

I think that it is definately time to begin profiling. I have thought this way for a while now. I believe I heard on tonights report about the Constitution protecting people against profiling. Well how about this? The Constitution only pertains to CITIZENS of the United States. If we have suspicions about foriegners, we should not think twice about profiling them if we believe that they are a potential threat. And if Iran can detain our citizens for however long they choose, well then we can detain foriengers and deny them flight if we believe that there is suspicion or “probable cause”. Now if we choose to profile our own citizens, they can dismiss such accusations by using the fourth amendment. So, if Security really has a problem, then they can recieve a warrant. If our Government feels that such a process would take too long, considering that people are constantly bustling through airports, then give airport security privledges to pick up warrants from a security office located within the airport. There are ways to prevent these things. We just have to realize that we can deny any foriegner entry into our country. It’s not racism, it’s not facism. It’s profiling, for the good of the majority of the citizens of the United States of America.

Posted by: Tyler | December 29, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

ABSOLUTELY! Quit with all the “political correctness” already, thats why this pious radical was able to attempt his plot already, no airport employee wants to lose his or her job for being “insensitive”?

Posted by: david mcbrady | December 29, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Let the profiling begin! What are we waiting for, another tragedy?

Posted by: Carol L | December 29, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Wow, at first I thought profiling would be a good idea while thinking about the facts, it is faster and more cost effective. Only take people who look like they would want to blow something up. (not just saying Muslims here, but clearly they would be on the list of things to watch out for.
Then I read the clearly racist and bigoted comments on this page and say that yes, it may be simpler to stop muslims instead of white people, but it goes against everything that America stands for (not really but everything that I want America to stand for) and is a hurtful, racist tool.
“Time to quit stopping grandma’s, babies, moms, kids of US citizens” just because they are muslim.

Posted by: Jared | December 29, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Will we all have to take off our underware, while standing in line, to clear security? Give me a break! Profiling is WAY overdue.

Posted by: John | December 29, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

It is time to profile passengers. Our safety is more important than someone’s religion or ethnicity being insulted.

Posted by: J. Power | December 29, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Yes,it’s only common since that we should profile. Why is the U.S. the only country that is willing to sacrifice its very existence to keep from offending a group of people. Could it be that politicians are more concerned in getting re-elected than protecting our country?

Posted by: James | December 29, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Why are we even questioning the idea of profiling??? Should’ve been doing it all along.

Posted by: Deb | December 29, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Profiling should, by all means, be implemented. The sole purpose of the American government is to protect its citizenry, not to worry about stepping on someone’s toes and to be politically correct.

Posted by: Keith | December 29, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Absolutely, what is wrong with our leaders? Everyone is so concerned with being politically correct that common sense has been thrown out with the bath water! Wake up “leaders”!! How many have to die before you realize what most of us already know? That there is a specific group of people who want to kill US!!

Posted by: Liz P | December 29, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

To profile means to save lives. It is not quite that simple and insulting in educated communites. However, that process is dictated and determined by the sign of the times and that sign reads, “Protect us no matter whose feelings you hurt.”

Posted by: c newton | December 29, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

I was profiled 6 years ago when I had to go to Kansas City for 2 consecutive weekends. I was searched 9 times on those 4 flights. 3 of those searches occured on a single flight. After the 3rd search I asked if I fit the profile and was told yes. It actually made me feel more secure, but yet annoyed. I have not been on a plane since.

Posted by: Horst Buxa | December 29, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Without question. You don’t like it, WALK. Flying is a privilege, you don’t like the rules, don’t fly. Perhaps what would work would be strip search, paper flying suits, you get your clothes back when you land. You don’t like it, write your congressman, but you won’t be getting on the plane.

Posted by: charles | December 29, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Profiling is the most abused word when it comes to identifying suspects. The word was used for political mileage and the hopes of making lots of money from deep government pockets. (Tort reform) The proper term is Behavioral Characteristics. This tactic has to be used for preliminary identification of suspects. Experts have identified the various steps, behaviors, and patterns of those who have committed similar bad acts. When someone has satisfied a reasonable percentage of similar behaviors, they should be examined further to disrupt potential acts. If race happens go be one of the patterns, then it should be only considered with other known behaviors and patterns of similar criminal acts. It is never considered on it’s own merits.

Posted by: Bruce B | December 29, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

There is no question that we should be profiling. We need to stop TSA’s inept random scanning and switch to searching people who cry out to be searched.
El Al airlines knows how to be effective. The beaurocrats at TSA should take some lessons from them.
Our new TSA protection is to prevent visits to the restroom in the last hour of a flight. GIVE ME A BREAK!
We need some common sense injected to the situation.

Posted by: Phil | December 29, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

It is past time to profile. If it is OK to assume that a person who is coming out of a bar that is staggering and getting into a car is a possible drunk driver. Then it should be OK to assume that a Muslim man with Jihadist leanings might possibly be a terrorist. When was the last time you saw a grey haired grandmother try to hijack a plane or to blow up the same? If it is alright to keep an eye out on a man who has leanings toward molesting children why is it not alright to keep an eye out on people who have radical Muslim leanings. It is a matter of public safety.

Posted by: Talk2the hand | December 29, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I believe we NEED to profile! We should have profiled after 911, but I realize that being Politically Correct is important to alot of entities (Goverment and Otherwise…). This country really needs to do everything it can to protect ourselves from deadly acts of terrorism.

Posted by: Cathy | December 29, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Absolutly! It’s about time that politically correct is not always the correct nor best way to handle all situations. Profiled peoples “rights” may be comprmised, but so are the dead pasageners on a bombed airplane. Sorry, the latter trumps the former every time!

Posted by: Gerald | December 29, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

To “STOX”…let me correct you..if you came here from another country…you are not an AMERICAN….

Posted by: OneAmerican | December 29, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Yes, It is time to start using profiling as a necessary tool to keep people safe. I think it is pretty obvious who needs to be looked at when trying to board a commercial airliner.

Posted by: John | December 29, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Linda….We do not have an African American President! We have an American for our president, otherwise, he would have never been able to run for office.

Posted by: sdb | December 29, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

BTW, I am not a hysterical person who is afraid of a shadow, but I think these radicals have other plans for harming Americans as well. It wouldn’t surprise me if there are many jihadists living up and down American streets who are just waiting for a sign from their leaders to start blowing up cities left and right at the same time thus creating chaos. Then who will wish we had started paying more attention to who we allow to come here, and get lost in the system?

Posted by: Liz P | December 29, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Why are we so brain dead?Have we become so jingoized,we no longer know the meaning of our words?”Profiling”is no more and no less than common sense,or if you will,the scientific method.Hydrogen+oxygen=water.2+2=4.Radicalized youth,from anywhere,=trouble.Mormon grandmother,or Tibetan monk=nice travel companions.How many Babtists have blown themselves up this year?How many Moslems?What’s the ratio?Where should we concentrate finite resources?Why should we abdicate our rights of free passage?Should we show up at the gate naked with no baggage?Use our factual data.Use our brains.Publish results for peer review.Save lives.And believe me ,you don’t want to see me naked.

Posted by: alex | December 29, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

This is a matter of life or death. Life is sacrosant especially when one is an airline passenger and there is no escape, choice or freedom from a deadly situation. The choice people will need to make is between the threat of sudden death versus a diminution of privacy and a willingness to accept profiling in order to be secure and safe.

Posted by: Ron | December 29, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

It is time to stop worrying about offending people and use profiling. It is a miracle that the plane over Michigan did not explode killing the 200 plus on board. And it will happen again if measures are not taken by our lax government officials.

Posted by: Amy Lawrence | December 29, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

We should have started profiling years ago. We will never be safe until we wise up and stop being so foolish and naive in this country. Profiling might not make us completely safe but it will make us safer.

Posted by: Doug | December 29, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Even profiling was not necessary in this most recent case–if what I have read is correct. Common sense would have been enough. Hmm, let’s see. One way ticket. Paid with cash. No luggage. Intercontinental flight into US. On a watch list. Passport check shows recently traveled–where? Oh, yeah, Yemen.
We do not need the additional travel restrictions. We need to use our collective heads and not concern ourselves with some people’s opinions. By all means profile, but let’s use our common sense, too!

Posted by: Leanna | December 29, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Yes, I see that we have no option but to start profiling. The terrorist are determined and we need to do everything we can to prevent an attack. Safety should be the objective,…..we need to profile.

Posted by: Carol | December 29, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Yes, it’s common sense. It should be the front line of defense. But this man wasn’t in our country, so I’m not sure howthis would’ve stopped him. Also, not everyone who wants to hurt us is going to fit the profile and that might make us complacent.

Posted by: Arlene | December 29, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Its not we who are blowing up our planes and cites… its “them”…. do we know who they are? what they look like? or what religion they practice??? maybe where they are from?… but wait!! thats wrong!!… lets look at those who ARE NOT blowing up our planes or cites… what do they look like… what cities or countries are they from…or maybe what religion they practice…. they are the ones we really need to be concerned about… those suspects need to be searched… xrayed and body scanned… those who are the lowest of the low in the terror scale.. Yes thats exactly what we are doing…. HELLO America! Terrorist Profile me if it will protect me (and my fellow Americans) against the real terrorist sitting next to me. I promise to thank you afterwards! Pro-Profiling!

Posted by: Ken Spring | December 29, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Absolutely, definitely, it is not only our right but our duty to assure as completely as possible that our visitors are not intending to attack us! –and close the borders, ship illegal immigrants out. We’re under attack, for crying out loud!!

Posted by: John | December 29, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

As a commercial US based airline pilot, it is time to profile! If it was blonde hair, blue eyed males with Christian beliefs, who were trying to terrorize the USA, then I would expect myself and others that match that description to be singled out. If that is “profiling” then it needs to be done. Myself and many others would not be upset with the Governments decision to “profile,” or “search,” blond hair, blue eyed males more often because we would all understand that it would lead to everyone’s safety. If this is considered “profiling“ and not “excessive searching” then it needs to be used. The Government and the USA are not the people to be upset with, if you are blonde hair and blue eyed, it’s the people that continuously prove themselves to be terrorist. It shouldn’t no matter what they look like or what their background or beliefs are, if a specific description is creating these attacks on US soil then they need to be scrutinized or “profiled“ or searched.

Posted by: Ditty | December 29, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

As El Al, has stated many times, its overwhelming success in thwarting bombings is due to very specific kinds of vigilance: 1) reviewing manifests BEFORE passengers arrive at the airport, and 2) the use of highly trained undercover agents who can recognize specific behaviors of passengers as they arrive in the airport for flights. No matter what country, sex or age we try to profile, terrorists will always try to find a way around them…but if we find a more intelligent ways of really looking at passengers (not their underwear) we may have a chance. Having every passenger in the world take off their shoes is ridiculous. All we needed to do, as recommended 9 years ago, was see who was paying cash, had no luggage for an overseas flight, and bought a one way ticket! Come on Homeland Security! Wake up! Or will we have to endure another attack to get really angry?

Posted by: diva | December 29, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Abso FREAKIN Lootly !!!! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. I often wonder what our forefathers who fought so hard to establish and build this country would think of us. I am SURE they would be dissapointed that we have replaced our backbones with bleeding hearts and that we give two you-know-whats about what anyone else thinks. We have let TOO many extreme liberals put the concern of the many over the concern of our country. It’s time to kick some butt, take some names and to hell with political correctness. Political correctness never bought anyones freedom or rights !!!

Posted by: Brian Antonoff | December 29, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am

this should have been done right after 9/11 we are all trying to be politically correct but this will get us killed for being nice its time we did the common sense thing and will work better safe than sorry

Posted by: frankH | December 29, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

There is nothing “unconstitutional” with profiling. In fact it would be unconstitutional for the federal branch of government to not protect its citizens.

Posted by: greg | December 29, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I don’t think Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab should have been watched or even stopped because he is Nigerian. But because he was on a watch list, bought his tickets cash, had no luggage etc. Profiling waste too much time following the innocent. Not the American way I think.

Posted by: HermanJ | December 29, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Linda….so sorry I addressed you. I meant to address GP that posted right after you.

Posted by: sdb | December 29, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

One has to be more precise as to what exactly is meant by “racial profiling.” If two white males, approximately 6 ft tall rob a bank, it is NOT racial profiling to stop cars inhabited by men fitting that description in he area. Same deal with terrorist suspects.

Posted by: cap10john | December 29, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Absolutely yes!! It is long overdue. They already do in reverse. I am blond, female, 57 years old, weigh about 100 pounds and I am almost always pulled over for extra screening to prove they aren’t profiling. Now just how many 100 lb. blond females have you heard of that have blown up anybody or anything?? They are wasting valuable time with me. Profile & search those who fit the previous homicide bombers. Starting NOW!!

Posted by: the blond lady | December 29, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

It makes no sense to waste time strip searching or doing secondary screening on airline crews, little American kids, and little old ladies. As a former airline captain, I was outraged at the lack of profiling. We know who the main groups are who are the problem and refuse to use that info. It is not unfair to profile since being looked at because of your religion or national origin is simple police work. We don’t go to England to look for the Mafia origins.
I have been stopped and frisked by police because I was a big white guy who met a profile of a white guy crook. Should I have cried about racial profiling? Absurd!

Posted by: Randy | December 29, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Amen Brian!!
Abso FREAKIN Lootly !!!! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. I often wonder what our forefathers who fought so hard to establish and build this country would think of us. I am SURE they would be dissapointed that we have replaced our backbones with bleeding hearts and that we give two you-know-whats about what anyone else thinks. We have let TOO many extreme liberals put the concern of the many over the concern of our country. It’s time to kick some butt, take some names and to hell with political correctness. Political correctness never bought anyones freedom or rights !!!

Posted by: sdb | December 29, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Yes, we definately should be profiling. Any needed safety steps should be taken.

Posted by: Kristi Iru | December 29, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

We need to profile individuals and quit harassing innocent people. Failure to scrutinize people based on their background is foolhardy and unrealistic. But, this country will not put up with giving up all of their freedoms for the sake of being secure. Screening for terrorists is often like looking for a needle in a haystack. To truly be secure, we have to fully examine every person and every item that is shipped. We can’t even stop drugs. How are we going to stop a bomb?

Posted by: Bob | December 29, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Absolutely. Protecting lives should be far more important than political correctness.

Posted by: Kurt F | December 29, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am

It’s time! It’s way PAST time! The profile has written itself. I don’t think the founding fathers envisioned a religion that would be fundamentally bent on destroying the country, and I don’t think they intended that the Constitution would protect their actions and treasonous speech.
Our “political correctness” is keeping us from resolving this issue, and if we don’t get the issue resolved, we are in bigger trouble.
Excuse me, there’s a knock at the door… oh, it’s Homeland Security… guess they’re taking me somewhere…

Posted by: Dan | December 29, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Profiling should have been used months ago. It works where it`s used

Posted by: Charlie | December 29, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Yes, passenger profiling should definitely be used. This doesn’t run against our Constitution or national ideals. The only thing it runs against is the ridiculous “political correctness” that has been forced down our throats over the past few years. America needs to once again focus on what is good for the country as a whole and stop worrying about those few who seek media attention by crying foul. We’ve become such a nation of crybabies that some are more concerned about someone searching their bags, pockets, or shoes than whether or not the plane they’re about to get on might blow up in mid-flight. A little more attention should be given to safety and self-preservation.

Posted by: Patriot | December 29, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

What group has committed all the terrorism acts against the USA, young
Arab, Moslem, under 25 males?? Political
correctness of not profiling is total BS
and long overdue for change. If we ever intend to win this war on terror, we’ve got to concentrate on the group that is
causing all of this terrorism, PERIOD!
Sure, some innocents may get harassed, but if it saves one American life, tough!

Posted by: gerald | December 29, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Profiling will keep us safer than we are now. I live in the Detroit area, and I want to be safe if I fly. I am probably not going to fly without profiling. I don’t wish to have a plane blow up–I probably would be able to see it. Anyone want to see it explode overhead? And…have the news show it over and over and over….and over…

Posted by: CB | December 29, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am

The fact is that there are people who seek the glory they see in killing Americans. We are simply foolish not to use every means to stop them.

Posted by: James | December 29, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Yes,we should profile

Posted by: Ella | December 29, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Definitely! I am absolutely sick of all of the “political correctness” in our society, which is profoundly stupid when it comes to protecting our citizens against further terrorist attacks! I am sure the terrorists enjoy our stupidity & certainly realize that they can take advantage of the situation. Please, American, protect our countryman against those who hate us & want to destroy us!!

Posted by: M Jane Clements-Bailey | December 29, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

As long as our borders are opened to anyone being able to come and go for whatever reason they have, I say yes to profiling.
Its the only way to help keep us safe from more terrorists or wanna be terrorists.
The only problem is that most of them are here already because our government has not protected us better.

Posted by: NewIndependent | December 29, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

You call it profiling; most people call it common sense! All terrorist acts against the USA, with the exception of the Oklahoma bombing, have been carried out by Muslim terrorists. Let’s drop the
political correctness torch before it
annihilates us all.

Posted by: Tonia Greger | December 29, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Yes do PROFILE to the thought of safety.. We have been profiling all along but to the idea that we are not really profiling anybody. Example: If someone seems “different” we seem to do all in our power to show that we are not treating them different apologizing if they feel inferior or slighted by anything whether we caused the situation.
It is unfortunately a sign of the times… political correctness has gone too far in many cases, it is now affecting our safety.
Now we are and will probably continue to pay the consequence of “less” liberties for the trade off of a possible thought being safe. Sad…but we all know that “feeling” safe and secure is thing of the past.

Posted by: GIGI | December 29, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am

We must profile members of each agencies and political leaders whose irresponsibility fascilitate the incidence before we even think of profiling American citizens.
We have spent $40 billion for airport security system since 2001.

Posted by: azby | December 29, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Yes – no questions no doubts – we need to profile. The terrorists have all been within the same profile – males of middle eastern descent ages 18-34. The fact that we have not done this yet is simply absurd. There are numerous actions that are allowed due to the Patriot Act and the fact we hold prisoners at Guantanamo Bay already show that the Constitution and personal freedom is moot in these matters so adding profiling is a drop in the bucket. The airports in Jerusalem have been doing this successfully for years.

Posted by: azchip | December 29, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Of course, common sense demands it.

Posted by: Sandra fitzsimmons | December 29, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Absolutely. We should start profiling and screening the people that are threateneing Americans and those that are most likely to target Americans.

Posted by: Mike | December 29, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Protecting the lives of our citizen must be given top priority.

Posted by: Harry | December 29, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Absolutely profile. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and sounds like a duck, odds are its a DUCK.
I would rather be politically incorrect and alive than politically correct and dead.

Posted by: Stevieg | December 29, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

If I were Muslim, or Middle Eastern, I would gladly submit to extra searches. I would want those that are causing this disention to be caught as it is causing inocent people to be distrusted. Also anyone not wanting to be completely searched or sniffed by a dog should be a person of interest. I personally would rather strip naked then have my plane blown up!

Posted by: Arlette Schweitzer | December 29, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

It’s about time we took our country back! We’ve allowed everyone in the entire world to run the U.S. for too many years now. Profile? HELL YES11

Posted by: Barb | December 29, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Yes! Start with me and my family, we have nothing to hide. But, can all of you say that? Would you all be willing to submit? No? Why? Tell the truth.

Posted by: RichR | December 29, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

In Israel profiling as proved to be the sure way to prevent bombs from being brought on an airplane. It’s time for our country to realize that our constitution never had envisioned such an enemy as the terrorists have become.

Posted by: Brian | December 29, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Yes, profiling has the potential to be more effective than many of the electronics that are being put in place.

Posted by: Mike G | December 29, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Absolutely! This is crazy that we haven’t. I don’t care who we offend, it’s a matter of safety. If white males age 30-35 are involved in terrorist activity, I would be happy to be profiled!

Posted by: Dave in Minneapolis | December 29, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Definitely,if you have nothing to hide then you won’t mind taking some extra time for safety. This should have been going one for a long time. We should stop being so politically correct. This is like a war!!

Posted by: gayle | December 29, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Full body scan should be used on anyone on a watch list!

Posted by: Anthony | December 29, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am

absolutely. it is way past due. who cares if feelings are hurt if it saves lives. why have we waited so long?

Posted by: jaxkie | December 29, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Yes we must learn from the Israeli airline that has been so successful in avoiding attacks.
We need to remember that this most recent attack, and the ‘shoe bomber’ attack were simple failures of the explosives. Each could have been another Pan Am / Lockerbie 747.
We aren’t keeping the correct people off the planes.

Posted by: D Schultz | December 29, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Yes, we should start right away. Certain people are doing these acts of terror. They should be profiled along with other means of protecting the people. As someone said you don’t see little old ladies carrying bombs. I see it as a right that every person should be protected when boarding an airplane and if it take profiling to help make this happen so be it.

Posted by: gpchicago28 | December 29, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Positively profile. Way past time. As an American citizen I am sick to death of political correctness. We are at war with jihadists and we must meet them head on. We cannot give them opportunities. Our government entities need to wake up.

Posted by: Joan Chaffin | December 29, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Asolutely! I think if they are of a ethinic background and are law abiding then they shouldnt mind. In the end the strickter laws would be prtoecting them too. My question is this.. How many of the people that would be profiled are acually American citizens? I’d like to think that my hanes are not immune to law and searches if i was deamed a threat to the other 100-200 passengers that would like to get home to there families!

Posted by: mike | December 29, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Profiling is not such a bad idea. We need to judge based on appearance if it will bring safety to one another. What does it matter if it’s your mother or sister who is being profiled? At least the attempt is made to protect. What if that ONE person is let by because they don’t SEEM like a potential terrorist and they are the reason your loved one is no longer? It’s time to adapt to the modern dangers of foreign society NOW.

Posted by: Ariel | December 29, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Yes,yes,a thousand times yes! Profiling is a logical form of protection and violates no ones “rights” as there are no rights to fly on an airliner. If one chooses to fly, one already submits to ridiculously ineffective screening. It’s time for real screening.

Posted by: Ray | December 29, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

I believe it is an invaluable system for the israelis. As far as American airports go, maybe not. Airport security managers have already traveled there and studied the way they work and found some compatibility problems namely the fact that we have much more air traffic here, most of which is inter-US travel (as opposed to a lot of International travel in Israel). But i think you would have to be a bong sucking soldiers spitting hippie living in Berkely not to notice the subtle pattern in WHO the problem is revolving around. We have a system. We know who these people are. round em up. send em to gitmo. keep em there. forever. dont let em fly, float, or walk into the country.

Posted by: fred | December 29, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

If we succumb to the ways and means of the “dark side,” the enemy, we forfeit a part of our humanity. We surrender the entitlement to the very freedoms we purport to protect. It is an old argument within the legal community. How many innocent persons’ rights can be justifiably violated to catch one criminal? One? One hundred? One thousand? one million? It is the first step to a pogrom.

Posted by: Russell | December 29, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

absolutely profile. we are in a war.

Posted by: john | December 29, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

It is WAY PAST time to profile airline
passengers. Should have started right after 9-11

Posted by: Don Rasberry | December 29, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

How long are we going to try to be politically correct,, Its way past due !! Obama is ordering new security measures,, PROFILING would be it,,If you want to come to our country then you might have to go through a little inconvinance for a short time..its time we protect ourselves..How long are we going to worry about what others might think, rather than worry about what they might do,,I am so sick of all this protection for our enemies!!

Posted by: janJ | December 29, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Absolutely use profiling, it works! Why would we worry about privacy when innocent lives in the USA are jeapordized by idiots that can be talked into dieing for a cause that would harm people that don’t even know. If going to see their maker is so darn good, why don’t the leaders of these idiots step up and go first. Use profiling now or anything else they need to do to rid the world of terrorist once and for all. There is a reason that there is no crime in the country that was going to cane the boy from America for spray painting a car. Its because they punish severely people that commit crimes. Its time to stop giving the jailed inmated big screen tv’s and put an pick back in their hands and break rocks or work the road ditches, whatever and stop being good to those that are caught in the act with witness’s. Their rights should be taken away for taking someone else’s away. They would soon learn or…..

Posted by: Tom v | December 29, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Absolutely, profiling should be incorporated…we are talking about saving peoples’ lives, not hurting peoples’ feelings!!!

Posted by: Suzabelle | December 29, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am

And if your going to do profiling, because it is affective, just be quiet about it and get the darn job done, will you?

Posted by: Tom v | December 29, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

YES!!! honestly, do you think a family with three kids is planning to commit a terrorist attack? profile all the way!!!! if it saves thousands of lives then who the heck cares?

Posted by: wiggle | December 29, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am

If passengers are advised when purchasing a ticket that certain people may be profiled for enhanced security, what’s the problem? Flying is a privilege.

Posted by: Jeff | December 29, 2009, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Profiling in airports will be the beginning of legalized profiling everywhere. It is short-sighted to say otherwise. Sadly, though, logic points to profiling as a simple and effective weapon against terrorism in America.

Posted by: Seth | December 29, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am

profiling is not the ansewer,America should not policing the world and stop bombing inocent people and we all be safe.

Posted by: walter | December 29, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

My 70+ mother-in-law is searched every time she flies, because TSA has to process a certain percentage. We are ALREADY PROFILING just doing it in the lamest way possible.
Until we pay reasonable salaries all we will ever have is rent-a-cops with very little skills. The Israelies have developed their methods for 40 years.
I am for profiling but also learning how to do it right.

Posted by: Michael | December 29, 2009, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Profiling is needed!!! it just takes a little common sense to see someone and have a bad or suspicious feeling about him or her…the feelings of ONE PERSON aren’t worth a dime compared to the lives of thoudands of innocent Americans… we need to start using our brains people, for cryin’ out loud!

Posted by: smith | December 29, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am

It is efficient. I have been profiled many times for the sake of political correctness, but nothing in my profile suggests violence. I am targeted simply because I represent the opposite of the likely offenders. I am old, travel with children with a ton of luggage and with two way tickets. I missed my plane twice because the line was so long for the extra “exams” including children and babies. That is nuts!

Posted by: Jacob | December 29, 2009, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Yes, I agree with Profiling, I would rather give up a little privacy that lose my family, loved ones or others!

Posted by: Amom | December 29, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

we should have started profiling people years ago…its important for the safety of ALL Americans, no matter what the color of your skin is, your ethnicity, or you religion. what else can we do to stop these horrible and totally devastating acts of violence?

Posted by: joe | December 29, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Today’s terrorists don’t all have a common ethnicity or national origin (consider the Taliban soldier John Walker Lindh, an American of European ancestry). But they all share the same religio-political ideology: Islamism.
Islamists embrace a barbaric 7th-century form of Islam and a commitment to the subjugation of the entire world to those beliefs. Not all Muslims are Islamists. But without question, all Islamists are Muslims. And virtually every terrorist is a radicalized young male Muslim.
It’s insane and suicidal to ignore this fact and treat Lutheran grandmothers, Catholic schoolboys, atheist professors, and Buddhist businessmen as being just as big a risk.
The trick, of course, is to distinguish moderate, tolerant, peaceful Muslims from the radicalized Islamists, and it’s not easy.
But moderate, tolerant, peaceful Muslims more than anyone have a stake in helping the authorities do so, and should welcome increased scrutiny and questioning. Their cooperation will help authorities develop psychological profiles that aid in distinguishing the crazies from those who are no threat.
To continue treating everyone as possessing the same threat potential is just willful blindness. When indulged in by public officials, it’s malfeasance and dereliction of duty.

Posted by: Richard G. Combs | December 29, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

What people call “profiling” is in actuality actions based on informed decision making and statistical analysis…Which obviously just makes sense. To not do this is not only pedantic, it is also irresponsible and means that ‘political correctness’ is MORE important than smart decision making. What a waste of brain cells!!
To NOT profile is an embarrassment and offensive to our intelligence, our decision making, and our ability to do what is right.
If one is scared to make proper decisions, that entity is weak and deserves to lose. Ask Patton, George Washington, Lincoln, MLK, and any leader you respect in any race, culture, government or religion. Fear and weakness will be our downfall, not smart decision aka ‘profiling’.
What a joke we are even discussing this in our society. I thought we were a nation of leaders, intelligent minds, compassionate souls, freedom-seekers and individual perspective. Obviously if the fear of profiling wins, all adjectives above do not apply!!
If we do not use our brain power to protect and serve, we are an aggregation of idiots. Cattle deserving of slaughter.
Get smart! Be proactive! Protect our sons and daughters!! Protect our historical heritage and our future destiny!!! To NOT due that, due to fear of not being politically correct…is grounds for emigration. Do what you know is best!!!

Posted by: CCS | December 29, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
we need this NOW!!! i’m scared to fly now… :( please, we have to do something about this… all Americans must band together to defeat this

Posted by: pam | December 29, 2009, 1:49 am 1:49 am

we should do profiling because:
1) Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most of terrorists are Muslims.
2) Flying is not right.
3) The airports and airlines job is to keep everyone safe.
Furthermore, if USA stop importing Oil, by drilling everywhere and clean energy, would stop funding to the terrorists.
It would stop the Iranian nuclear program (I am Iranian), Hamas, and other terrorist group in the middle east.
President Obama promised clean energy policy and millions clean energy jobs, which we are stilling waiting.
I would like to debate my views on your show. I have been watching your show since hostages crisis in 1979.

Posted by: Daniel Soleymani | December 29, 2009, 1:49 am 1:49 am

This country has become so politically correct that it will be our down fall. Yes, profile. If this last terrorist had been profiled, he would have been caught before boarding the plane, Wake up America!

Posted by: Annie Jenks | December 29, 2009, 1:51 am 1:51 am

I agree with Greg earlier, its time to take our country back and do whatever it takes to keep terrorist OUT.I am tired of liberals saying “but they (terrorists)have rights too”. They do only if we allow them to have and I say NO. They don’t deserve any rights in this country.

Posted by: Tom v | December 29, 2009, 1:54 am 1:54 am

This is very sticky. The argument that flying is a privilege rather than a right and so no violation of rights is involved may not fly (pun intended). Driving is also a privilege but the state may not exclude people from driving based on ethnicity, religion, or race. Heck, in my state, even illegal aliens are given drivers’ licenses (don’t get started on that one). As Americans we always walk a fine line between maintaining personal liberties and maintaining collective security. While I agree that increased measures are needed to ensure safety in the air (or the subway or in a stadium or . . .), I’m not at all sure I trust the government with deciding who can’t board a plane because of a surname or physical appearance or dress. Since some really zealous, right-wing, light-skinned Christians in this country are pretty rabid about their disdain for the nation as a whole, would I, as an evangelical Christian (which I am), want to be subjected to profiling because a TSA guard wants to know my religious orientation? What we have learned recently about the disconnect between national intelligence agencies that helped the terrorists to pull off the September 11, 2001 attacks troubles me more than wondering whether a man in a long shirt and sandals is going to blow up my plane. The scenario with the latest would-be-bomber is another example of our own security folks asleep at the wheel. I want my government’s intelligence agencies and their security procedures to work efficiently before we decide to pull out of line every man with a long shirt and sandals or every woman with a veil.

Posted by: Jeff Boyer | December 29, 2009, 1:56 am 1:56 am

we need to profile. this potential catastrophe should be a HUGE wakeup call. come on people, we need to make these sentiments known… flying on an airplane is one’s own decision.. profiling people is not taking away or violating people’s rights, if you think about, its protecting the rights of Americans

Posted by: Richy | December 29, 2009, 1:57 am 1:57 am

No, even though it would be a much more effective use or our security resources, we shouldn’t profile. I’d much rather my family, friends and fellow citizens die from a terriorist attack than be politically incorrect.

Posted by: BobD | December 29, 2009, 1:58 am 1:58 am

WE the People, in order form a perfect Union, establish justice, INSURE DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY, PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE, PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE, and SECURE the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish……
YES, PROFILE the heck out of everyone!
INSURE domestic tranquility! PROVIDE for our common defense! PROMOTE our general welfare. Whatever it takes!

Posted by: terry schroth | December 29, 2009, 1:58 am 1:58 am

i’m extremely scared right now, is anyone else just a little bit terrified? PROFILE for the love of pete!

Posted by: Samie | December 29, 2009, 1:59 am 1:59 am

for the record, i want my family, friends and loved ones to be safe and protected forever and always.. so profile!!!!!!! it brought tears to my eyes when i heard this story… it make me so SO SO SO ANGRY! why should we Americans take this? how dare this stuff should happen? ya know what, it shouldn’t!!!!

Posted by: LEE | December 29, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am

The drafters of our constitution would probably think the question itself is idiotic. People of Arab descent are commiting terrorism against the US and we don’t focus on Arabs when investigating? Thomas Jefferson knew to focus on people with red coats when looking for the enemy.

Posted by: Steven Fritz | December 29, 2009, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Yes,flying is a privilege and not a right. Those who fit the profile of a terrorist should be screened through a body scanner and watched more closely. If they are not a terrorist then they have nothing to worry about. It’s better to think about the safety of the passengers than to worry about political correctness.

Posted by: PRB | December 29, 2009, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Hello America!!!! We should have been profiling long before the 911 atrocity! We are dealing with a radical form of Islamic extremists that are on a mission to kill every Islamic non-believer of the on the planet which often includes killing themselves in their barbaric, poignantly evil act of cowardliness!!!! If this seems like a politically incorrect statement to make then just ask the thousands upon thousands of childless parents, widows, widowers, and orphaned children of the 911 attack how they feel about it!!! If we inconvenience millions with “Profiling” to save but “one life” then it’s TOTALLY WORTH IT!!!!! I flew 6 weekends in a row 2 weeks after 911 and I was profiled and singled out on every flight because the leather instrument bag I was carrying resembled a rifle bag, but I welcomed the obvious common sense observation that was being made… so I say to all you “whining politically correct idiots” that we do not live in Disneyland. This a cruel world filled with evil and injustice!!! So.. unfortunately PROFILING isn’t a choice it’s a necessity to further protect innocent people from the hand of these sadistic Islamic cowards and other radical factions!!!!! It’s time we as US citizens take the bull by the horns and stand up to any governmental bureaucracy or any “out of touch” human rights organization that jeopardizes the travel safety of American citizens …. PROFILING …. OB-SO-FREAKIN’- LUTELY!!!!!!!! And They can start with me!!!!! I welcome it if it means I arrive safely to my destination!!!!!

Posted by: Tom the Flyer | December 29, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am

i agree with you! you only have American rights if you are an American! so when these liberals go ahead and say “oh, but everyone must be treated equally,” “oh everyone should be given the benefit of the doubt…,” it makes me want to break something… people we need to protect ourselves and the country. our country will fail if we don’t do otherwise!

Posted by: Olga | December 29, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Absolutely yes! Whatever happened to common sense? I guess it died in the wake of all the political correctness permeating our society today.

Posted by: GS | December 29, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am

yes! no one, i repeat NO ONE, should ever, ever have to fear for his or her life or safety, or the safety of anyone they love, when they fly (or take any type of transportation for that matter)on an airplane! being an American should instill within us a feeling of security and it is weakened everytime something terrible like this occurs!

Posted by: Iggy | December 29, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am

Yes; however this never would have happened if his visit had been revioked earlier. Federal agencies need to quit being so egotisical and work together!

Posted by: Mark | December 29, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Please let’s protect the American people…can we really check everybody underwear..NO but we have been checking shoes..Can’t we put a small nice pet pig on every flight…we must start thinking like them..a person who will blow themselves up for 72 virgins wouldn’t if a pig was on the flight and parade it up and down the aisle for everybody to see. Allah isn’t going to let you in heaven if you die with a pig??? PROFILE every moslem name person or looks like one to make sure..if they have nothing to hide it won’t be any different than all of having to take off our shoes and underwear next..if it saves one life, it is worth it. They are not going to stop until they rub it in our face again and again and make us very fearful..we must start thinking like them to conquer them.

Posted by: Joyce McGee | December 29, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

I would rather be profiled than dead

Posted by: buzz | December 29, 2009, 2:18 am 2:18 am

when i heard this news, i got so worried i almost peed my pants. the president has to do something about this! he was elected, now he must aid the American people in the fight against terrorism. we are in a war. the lives that have been lost should not be lost in vain. they are fighting for our freedom and we can only help the cause by being vigilent in our own country and our surroundings. Profile everywhere!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: EET | December 29, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am

Profiling is simply using statistical data to inform our decisions.
Every insurance company does it (with cars: your age, sex, zip code, grades, etc.), law enforcement agencies use it to locate possible suspects, Facebook does it to present ads you are more likely to click on, etc. Nothing about this strikes me as Constitutionally or ethically wrong, even if it can be annoying.

Posted by: Kurt | December 29, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Profiling is wrong based on age race gender religion sexual preference.
Why cant they just profile people with firecrackers on them and no passports?
Does anyone even seem slightly skeptical that this person got on an international flight w/o a passport and was video tapped the entire flight?
This was a classic black op designed to bring in a total and complete police state. Next they will recommend everyone wear taser bracelets.

Posted by: Davinita | December 29, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am

The Israelis have been using a very sophisticated airline profiling system for decades and they quietly point out that, to date, no terrorist has been able to take an aircraft. Obviously, not all Muslims are terrorists, but, thus far, virtually all terrorists are Muslims. With our limited military, intelligence and law enforcement resources, we MUST use those resources effectively and, therefore, profiling MUST be one of the tools available to separate the “wolves” from the sheep.

Posted by: Delta6 | December 29, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am

i agree with tom v, joyce mcgee and buzz (and everyone else who said yes to profiling). whatever the case may be, we have to stop this..what has America done to stop this kind of stuff from happening? obviously, we have failed in what we have tried to do (if that be anything at all) to end these attacks because they are still happening.

Posted by: Yams | December 29, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am

If profiling means we assume every Middle Easterner is a terrorist, then no, we shouldn’t profile because that would be racist. But, if it means we’re using facts in existence to improve our odds of catching actual terrorists, then yes, we should profile because that would be logical. What facts do we know about recent terrorists?

Posted by: ArtyS | December 29, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am

You know, this news just about completely ruined my vacation lans for next year… yeah it sound pathetic but thats how annoyed and angry and upset i really am. and the sad part is that i was really looking forward to going to my first international vacation…

Posted by: Mike J. | December 29, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am

YES. Safety of hundreds of people is more important than someone feeling picked on. Other countries do it. It’s called using intelligence and available tools. Profiling is a political correct term that makes us weaker.

Posted by: Scott | December 29, 2009, 2:38 am 2:38 am

um, we know that all recent terrorists have been Muslim… what else is there to try to find out? come on,

Posted by: Scott | December 29, 2009, 2:40 am 2:40 am

the need for profiling seems obvious. It is a very good tool, why not use it.

Posted by: Louis | December 29, 2009, 2:44 am 2:44 am

profile!!!!!!!!! i just ruined my diet because i got so worked up about this issue.

Posted by: Jane | December 29, 2009, 2:45 am 2:45 am

The FBI profiles serial killers. How is that different than profiling terrorists?

Posted by: EdThomas | December 29, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am

we need to profile people. its important for the safety of every American. please, president Obama, take action… our safety is in your hands

Posted by: Taylor | December 29, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am

yes. seriously, i dont care if your feelings are hurt. we should profile you if you seem suspicious and are sort of creepy. get over it. i’m angry about this. we are NOT doing enough to protect ourselves and catch people who want to harm us. i wouldn’t care if i was profiled. if its happening to everyone, then everyone is being treated fairly the same way

Posted by: Penny | December 29, 2009, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Profile people. i don’t think i will want to fly on a plane again until something gets sorted out

Posted by: Noah | December 29, 2009, 2:57 am 2:57 am

Penny, If it happened to everyone, it wouldn’t be profiling. A profile only applies to a small percentage of the population (though there’s more than one profile). And yes, we should be doing it so our secuity dollars are used more effectively.

Posted by: Hank R | December 29, 2009, 3:00 am 3:00 am

profile. i wish we lived in a world where we didn’t have to worry about these kind of concerns but because some people, who are easily persuaded because of weak character, get talked into doing stupid things like killing thousands of innocent souls, we need to take action against them

Posted by: Jordan | December 29, 2009, 3:01 am 3:01 am

well, since we haven’t been doing too much else to prevent terrorists on planes, PROFILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yah yah

Posted by: Helga | December 29, 2009, 3:06 am 3:06 am

I believe that Islamic and muslim people should understand the seriousness of the issue. Obviously not all muslims are terrorists, so those that are not terrorists should give up 5 minutes of their time to be searched. If the muslim people of the united states and other countries are truly altruistic and care about the safety of the world, they will make this small sacrifice. However this is not to say we should lighten security on races and religions that are not in question.

Posted by: Daivik | December 29, 2009, 3:09 am 3:09 am

Anyone who doesn’t think we should profile would probably think executing a terrorist is also wrong. We should profile even if it means our mothers, brothers, fathers, sisters or children.
If we do not profile we will come to regret it – i believe sooner than later.

Posted by: Rick | December 29, 2009, 3:09 am 3:09 am

We need to be on the lookout for people who look fishy… most likely, when people at airports, or wherever, profile people, they have some sort of deep feeling that that person could harm others. we need to stop expecting that American families with three kids, grandmas, and groups of all-American school kids are out to get us. people please.

Posted by: Nellie | December 29, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Absolutely, this is long overdue. If Americans were blowing up people all over the world and I went travelling I would realize that a few of my fellow idiot Americans have made my life a little more inconvenient.

Posted by: USA kid | December 29, 2009, 3:12 am 3:12 am

YES! Why is this even up for debate!? Wake up America.

Posted by: Sean | December 29, 2009, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Absolutely we should be profiling. Look at Isreal, they are doing it and have been for some time. What will it take for us to get smart??? More innocent US citizens dying???

Posted by: Susie G | December 29, 2009, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Darn right we should profile people on airlines. One doesn’t have to possess fear in order to possess common sense.
Those that think fear is a motivational factor for profiling, have no sense!

Posted by: mike | December 29, 2009, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Jordan, The 9-11 terrorists weren’t persuaded to do a stupid thing because they had weak characters. They were fanatics, groomed (brainwashed) from birth to believe a particular point of view. Don’t be fooled by how stupid their actions were into thinking they’re weak.

Posted by: W Walls | December 29, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

Unfortunately, I feel that it is now time for the U.S. government/Homeland security, TSA to do a bit of homework on those of us who fly.
To those out there that have tried to wreak havoc on us, remember this…divided we may fall but united we still stand tall!!!
Semper fi!

Posted by: Susan | December 29, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

Why not….What should anyone have to hide boarding an air craft??This country is said to b pure freedom,well the world has changed and if we dont change r its my right attitude,these un holy actions will continue.

Posted by: Escobar | December 29, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

we will regret the decision not to profile soon. it needs to be done, darn it. a few people profiled because they look a certain way could save hundreds, if not thousands of people who deserve to live.

Posted by: Danny | December 29, 2009, 3:16 am 3:16 am

I don’t mean to sound rude, but this is a dumb question. Don’t we profile on a daily basis? An employer interviewing a potential employee? A city their choice of Mayor? A State their Governor and Senators? Our Nation and our President? They tell us who they are and their qualifications, then we decide if they are trustworthy. Isn’t that profiling? Isn’t that why Israel’s EL-AL Airlines doesn’t have the same problem we don’t? If they suspect you, you don’t fly – period. Or do we prefer to be blown up by nut jobs who want to kill us simply because we’re Americans? Again, stupid question. Of course we should – beats dying and killing those the wreckage lands on.

Posted by: Daniel | December 29, 2009, 3:16 am 3:16 am

Not only is profiling necessary but it would also save time, money and effort now spent on our current useless searches.
Risking our security for P.C. has gone far enough.
If profiling picks certain groups perhaps they will change their spots!?

Posted by: Arvid von Nordenflycht | December 29, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Absolutely, we should profile starting yesterday. Don’t worry about the 80 year old grandma from Iowa, but that guy with a beard and turban from Iraq…yup! And it should be via a strip and body cavity search.

Posted by: drfood | December 29, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Isn’t profiling criminals common, i.e. serial killers? These terrorists are worse than serial killers. It’s common sense and not unconstitutional.

Posted by: Kathy | December 29, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

YES, WE SHOULD BE PROFILING AGGRESSIVELY, ESP MIDDLE EASTERN TURBAN WEARING PEOPLE, WHO CAN EASILY HIDE EXPLOSIVES IN THEIR TURBANS….THAT IS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN NEXT. IT IS AMAZING THAT IF YOU ARE MIDDLE EASTERN AND WEARING A TURBAN THEY WILL NOT MAKE YOU TAKE IT OFF WHEN GOING THROUGH THE SCREENING, BUT IF YOU ARE WHITE AND WEARING A HAT YOU ARE FORCED TO REMOVE IT. START PROFILING THE TERRORISTS INSTEAD OF THE INNOCENT PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO GET BLOWN UP.

Posted by: Karen | December 29, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Absolutely not. A profiling system, presumably without provisions, would be wide open to abuse and exploitation, plausibly evolving into a system where anyone or everyone could be profiled regardless of race or religion. For example, imagine a scenario in the distant future where our government arbitrarily decides that white Christian females are considered a security threat, and thus could be profiled under the existing law. To avoid a nightmare like this, let’s put our present fears aside to preserve our cross-cultural constitutional freedom from discrimination for our children.

Posted by: bj | December 29, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

For God’s sake, YES, PROFILE!

Posted by: Jan | December 29, 2009, 3:18 am 3:18 am

We should be profiling in airport security and in every environment where it is useful. It is completely obvious that it helps accomplish the main goal, despite all the whining objections. To compensate for the unfairness visited upon those who are wrongly pestered, let’s give them assistance in rooting out the elements of their community that are causing the problem. For example, the most effective deterrent to radical islam can and should be an empowered non-radical islam. Profiling is no more and no less a part of the solution.

Posted by: pmd | December 29, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Yes, profiling should be done and law enforcement or the military should be doing the screening rather than the TSA. I stopped flying US airlines to overseas destinations post 9/11 and will be flying on EL AL on my next trip because they profile!

Posted by: simone | December 29, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Americans have lived with their rose-colored glasses on for far too long. We need to realize that it’s time to stop being politically correct, and to stop worrying about hurting someone’s – or a collective ethnicity’s – feelings. Israel has profiled passengers and have not had an air incident in over 30 years. We need to take a page out of their playbook and keep the skies safe.

Posted by: Mike A. | December 29, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Absolutely, it’s a no brainer. What do you think they do in Israel, they don’t seem to have any problems. Better to profile than do a strip search of 85 year old granny! Now all we have to do is warm up the room temperature I.Q. crowd that is running the TSA show!!

Posted by: Rosmarie | December 29, 2009, 3:19 am 3:19 am

these attacks on us need to be stopped by us. if we stay aware of people we fly with or are in contact with on a daily basis, we could help each other and the country. we do profile on a daily business but we’ve had so many airline problems regarding this issue that i think we should have learned a lesson by now.

Posted by: Kenny | December 29, 2009, 3:20 am 3:20 am

There is no question in my mind that profiling is reasonable when a particular group threatens our safety, What is also of great concern is the knee jerk over reaction of our government agency by imposing unreasonable rules when they don’t even pay attention to information they had that would have prevented an incident if they had acted properly and in a timely manner.

Posted by: RayF | December 29, 2009, 3:21 am 3:21 am

I think we really have to think this out in more detail .Is safety more important or making someone feel uncomfortable that is coming into our country . I hate that we have to think this way as I came into this country myself . Safety first I would say ..

Posted by: m aldana | December 29, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am

Liberals are afraid of their own shadows, but are offended by profiling. Time for some common sense logic, instead of insipid, emotional, knee jerking.

Posted by: mike | December 29, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am

i flew the day after christmas and it was as if nothing changed! that is scary. the TSA people don’t do a thing and quite frankly, i don’t think they care. i’m sorry, but profiling should be used. we know who it is who is targeting us, well then, let’s use our brains and take care of the situation, shall we?

Posted by: Yan | December 29, 2009, 3:25 am 3:25 am

It is time to consider profiling coupled with common sense. Someone at TSA should be fired for the failure of communication between agencies.

Posted by: KW | December 29, 2009, 3:26 am 3:26 am

Absolutely, it’s a no brainer. What do you think they do in Israel, they don’t seem to have any problems. Better to profile than do a strip search of 85 year old granny! Now all we have to do is warm up the room temperature I.Q. crowd that is running the TSA show!!

Posted by: Rosmarie | December 29, 2009, 3:28 am 3:28 am

m. has his head in the wrong place. Not all muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists are muslim. I guess you would not mind if your family is on a plane that blows apart. Don’t leave a stone unturned to identify the bad guy.

Posted by: Rod | December 29, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am

Obviously. El Al has done it for decades … complete success. The TSA has been body pat downing grandmas one step above a wheel chair but let clear suspects walk aboard without a passport. The lines are a joke, the TSA is a joke. Let’s outsource the TSA jobs to Blackwater or Israel.

Posted by: Obviously | December 29, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am

Not every muslim is a terrorist, but every terrorist is a muslim. That is a fact. Profiling arabs and muslims is long overdue. This will better protect everyone, including the muslim population. They should recognize this and be thankful. Those of us who disagree should be searched twice.

Posted by: John | December 29, 2009, 3:30 am 3:30 am

this is a difficult question but profiling should be used. but that alone cannot save us from these murderous villians. we need added security, i.e. at least 5 or 6 armed undercover officials on each plane who are there in the case of suspicious activity, and we need to instate this promptly. how much londger can we wait? for another attack? that’s just a swell idea… please, the hesitation alone makes me sick

Posted by: UY | December 29, 2009, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Definitely! It would feel so much safer flying if this policy were in place. Stop wasting our time in long lines at the airport in the name of fairness or ‘equal treatment’, and do thorough searches of those who should be profiled instead.

Posted by: Don | December 29, 2009, 3:35 am 3:35 am

down with the TSA!!! honestly, they should all be fired and replaced with some better sort of institution. pardon me, but i’ve been in the security lines at the airports (and most of you have been too, duh) and they barely do anything. they search bags belonging to a mon=m with four small children but let a group of weird foreigners go through without so much as a backwards glance. i think they are all just a pot of stupids.

Posted by: Scoob | December 29, 2009, 3:35 am 3:35 am

If almost all terror attacks on planes are committed by tall purple people with green hair, and none by short pokadot people with grey hair, wouldn’t it make sense to pay more attention to tall purple people with green hair.

Posted by: Rich | December 29, 2009, 3:35 am 3:35 am

We are allowing ourselves, as Americans, to look weak, and the terrorists are laughing at us, and attacks are going to escalate if we don’t start using COMMON SENSE, and SAY who our enemies ARE: the radical Muslims! And of course, we should profile! We are making ourselves look really STUPID!

Posted by: Lea | December 29, 2009, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Yes, it is time to profile. Profiling is a legitimate way to keep us safe. Profiling is used in other parts of the world when there are wars and unrest to keep passengers on airlines, trains, and buses safe. Maybe then TSA will be able to stop wasting time with US school groups and look for terrorists instead.

Posted by: Margaret Logan | December 29, 2009, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Sadly I think it is a necessary evil. What are we going to tell the families who lost loved ones in a successful bombing, it is better to not profile? I think not. Can you imagine the disaster to the US transportation industry and the enormous ripple effect to the economy as a whole? Sorry, we have to profile people.

Posted by: Peter Anninos | December 29, 2009, 3:37 am 3:37 am

ABSOLUTELY! Realistically, profiling already exists in many areas of our lives.
It should CERTAINLY be used to save lives and preserve our hard won freedoms and way of life.

Posted by: NancyS | December 29, 2009, 3:38 am 3:38 am

Absolutely profile muslims. The Islamic people say they are not all terroist, but they should understand from there people comes the terrorist. Do they want to be on an airplane that is blown up? I say do whatever is neccesary to keep our country safe.

Posted by: ann | December 29, 2009, 3:39 am 3:39 am

Terriorists are inconvienciencing Americans, and making our lives a lot more complicated when we travel because we DON’T profile!

Posted by: Lea | December 29, 2009, 3:42 am 3:42 am

i’m sick and tired of living in fear every time i get on an airplane, and ya know what? i’m tired of some darn muslim terrorits making my life harder every day. the lives of Americans are hard enough right now as it is, the economy is down the tubes, people are jobless, and poverty is on the rise. this addded on to our already large world of hurts makes me mad and it should make every other American just as POed.

Posted by: Greta | December 29, 2009, 3:47 am 3:47 am

READ THIS!!!!!!! I am a white BLOND American female, and I get pulled over during airport screenings. Meanwhile 5 MIDDLE EASTERN MEN pass straight through the screening and they (the middle eastern men) are laughing out loud that I am being pulled over for additional screening. When I complained I was told by the screener that “they are NOT allowed to pull over the MIDDLE EASTERN MEN because they will be accused of profiling……..so instead they waste their time with me”. THe airport screeners agreed that the MIDDLE EASTERN MEN were LAUGHING in our face because SECURITY IS SO STUPID. WE SHOULD START PROFILING BEFORE ANOTHER PLANE GETS BLOWN UP. STOP WASTING TIME PULLING OVER WHITE BLOND WOMEN when the TERRORISTS ARE MIDDLE EASTERN. START PROFILING, AND STOP BEING SO IGNORANT, THEY ARE LAUGHING IN OUR FACES AND THE AIRPORT SCREENERS ARE FRUSTRATED THAT THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO THEIR JOBS. I have also spoken to many stewardess’ that are very frightened that the security measures are lax and that there is no PROFILING, and that they have to go out of their way to treat the MIDDLE EASTERN MEN BETTER THAN THE NON-TERRORISTS. SO now we have to cater to the terrorists.

Posted by: Karen | December 29, 2009, 3:49 am 3:49 am

i know this sounds extremely radical and very very bad (and please i hope no one takes this too badly, but its my opinion), but sometimes i wish that America just stopped letting foerigners into the country. and when Americans get stopped and searched but a group of idiotic laughing middle eastern jerks walk right on through, thats just sad and pathetic. way to go America, way to go..

Posted by: TT | December 29, 2009, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Yes! Is it really that horrible to risk offending a member of a particular race, religion, or age group by “profiling” them as they are about to board an airplane? Or should we not dare to risk offending anyone, and just pick up the body parts as they fall from the sky over Detroit?

Posted by: Carolyn | December 29, 2009, 3:55 am 3:55 am

what has the world come to? so a little old granny gets stopped by the brainless TSA people but suspicious non-English speaking turban people can just mosey on through the gates as if they own the whole place? what is wrong with that picture???? can anyone tell me???

Posted by: Tutu eats alot | December 29, 2009, 3:58 am 3:58 am

people: forget about privacy. i don’t care if you use some sort of scanner or if you go through my luggage in front of anyone. i have nothing to hide, but those people who get slightly offended that they are being picked on because of “profiling”, well, heck with them. people who have something to hide will object to being searched and will act offended if they are “profiled”. fine then, they should leave the country….

Posted by: Winona | December 29, 2009, 4:09 am 4:09 am

i’ve never liked flying before anyway, but in light of recent events…. i’m now really worried… oh no…. oh no…. please,,,, what should I do?

Posted by: Fran | December 29, 2009, 4:15 am 4:15 am

absolutely profile middle eastern peoples. if they don’t wanna be profiled, then maybe they shouldn’t blow up planes in America (or anywhere reallY)….. dumbos…

Posted by: Rachel | December 29, 2009, 4:18 am 4:18 am

forgive me everyone but people should just stay in their own countries…. it would make things a lot easier…. the USA has a lot of issues (it most definitely is not perfect, that’s for sure) but we can get through this together. if all of us team up we can fight this. theres more of us then there are of them. and don’t forget that its not just Americans who are getting attacked…. united we stand, divided we fall!!!!

Posted by: Quincy | December 29, 2009, 4:23 am 4:23 am

I just wish there was some way for us to negotiate all this peacefully. i’m not exactly happy with how Obama is handleing the country right now but I want him to be successful and get the country out of this mess… i feel that he could negotiate with those crazy people if only they wanted to listen. instead all they do is send us videos and scare us…. really, i wish we could just solve this dilemma and everyone could just get along. unfortunately, this isn’t the case…

Posted by: Wanda | December 29, 2009, 4:27 am 4:27 am

you know the most stupid thing i have ever seen in an airport is when my 7 year old little brother, 7!!!! YEARS OLD!!! got wanded at the airport. okay people, get a flippin’ life. that’s the most dumb thing that’s ever happended. you honestly think a white middle class kid riding in first class (we got upgraded, we were lucky in that at least) is going to blow up the plane? i wanted to take that wand from the TSA person and whack them across the head with it. maybe they should wand that group of weirdos standing in a corner near the bathroom… what has the world come too?????

Posted by: Jessie | December 29, 2009, 4:34 am 4:34 am

Well everyone, i’ve read most of these comments and it seems to me that the main answer is that we almost all believe in the use of “profiling” to create a better and safer transportational system for us Americans. The only question is: how do we implement this plan? We all have to do something…. we can’t let this keep going on.. i’m terrified and i know that a lot of Americans are right now too. we have to keep ourselves and loved ones safe. If another attempt happens, I sware I’ll be so angry….. Please everyone. YOU have the power. Find a way to get “profiling” allowed because with out it, i feel doomed… :(

Posted by: Mamie | December 29, 2009, 4:41 am 4:41 am

Hello, what profiling?
It is time for all authorities to start using COMMON SENSE, something they are lacking big time!

Posted by: dovalon | December 29, 2009, 4:57 am 4:57 am

I’m extemely pertified right now. I was shaking when I watched the news this past evening and for the first time heard about this terrorist attempt. I wanted to throw up I felt so sick. Why does it have to be this way? I wish it didn’t have to be but I say that profiling is the way to go. I’m a nervous-wreck as it is and now hearing this story has just given me more to fear. I DON”T WANT TO LIVE MY LIFE IN FEAR!!! I just don’t, and I don’t deserve to either, and neither does any other true BLOOD American! we need to act fast…. i’m scared. what should we do now?????

Posted by: scared | December 29, 2009, 5:02 am 5:02 am

First of all, I would like to say that indirectly racial profiling already exhists; this, would just make things legal. I think people need to search for more realistic solutions that don’t underscore people’s race, relgion or ethnicity. What happend in Detroit was unfortunate, but keep in mind that the government was warned by the man’s father; also, this does not mean that all Nigerians’ or Muslims from any culture are capable of terrorism. Our governments security failed the system, even with the latest technologies. But, to subject everyone who looks like or practices a specific religion or comes from a certain country to additional scruitny is uncalled for. What’s next? Should the government bar them from travelling or entering the states at all? Why isn’t the media saying much about the men that were aprehended and released the next day (from the same airport)? Two men where travelling and because they “looked middle-eastern” and were watching a movie, they became terror suspects…..
If we’re going to subject people to additional scruitny, then it should apply to everyone regardless of race, relgion, ethnicity, etc.
There are groups of terrorists that are non-Muslim & non-Middle-Eastern and we need to keep this in mind.
Lastly, I wasn’t overall enthused by Obama’s speach regarding the incident because I felt that he made comments that contribute to stereotyping people from countries such as Afghanistan, Yemen,Somalia, etc.
I believe his speach should have talked about terrorism in general and not from what country the individual may be from. We must acknowledge that the father (also a Muslim) of the Nigerian man did his duty and forewarned our government; however, what our government did was to let something happen in order to blame a religious group and legally impose additional humiliating acts to them…..

Posted by: Nancy | December 29, 2009, 6:34 am 6:34 am

If it looks a dog, barks like a dog, and acts like a dog it probally is a dog. Of course profiling is necessary and rightly so.

Posted by: Sonny | December 29, 2009, 6:46 am 6:46 am

I propose the Unabomber and the Washington Sniper as templates for profile no. 1 and no. 2. And profile no. 3 should be ‘anyone vaguely associated with Islam’… Obama will like the cavity searches i’m sure.

Posted by: unbelievable@guerrillamailblock.com | December 29, 2009, 7:31 am 7:31 am

m, who is opposed to profiling, doesn’t understand it. It’s not just about how you look. Many factors are considered, and with Mutallab there were many clues. Stopping everyone with equal probability is inexcusable and negligent. We missed Mutallab while some screeners were busy checking mom’s baby formula.
The new TSA rules are not only ridiculous, they will slow down the system even more and make flying more painful than it already is. THAT is how the terrorists win. The terrorists do not win by making us choose sensible methods that have been shown to work over foolish and misguided notions of political correctness and “racism.” But we must have the courage and the good sense to choose those methods. Our Constitution does not require us to be stupid. Apparently not enough of us realize that.

Posted by: Carlos | December 29, 2009, 7:34 am 7:34 am

Profiling could work. however, it is limited by the individuals employing it properly. It still requires a human interpretation which is far from accurate. Full body scanners could also be part of the answer. Again, the data is still left for human interpretation and is still far from perfect. There is an alternative. There is a failure of TSA screeners to detect fake bombs brought through security by undercover TSA agents. In the most recent tests, conducted in 2006, security screeners at LAX failed to identify 75% of fake bombs, while Chicago O’Hare screeners missed 60% of the bomb components. Billions of dollars spent, for less than 50% reliability!
No screening process, operated by humans, operate at 100% efficiency. Professional profilers have limitation, biases and prejudices. Even with their highly specialized training, the trained profiler would find it very difficult to determine if a person’s intent involves acts of terrorism or smuggling. I know that the several agencies, domestic and foreign, are considering a touch screening instrument, call the PTSSA, that has the ability to determining a person’s intent, in this case smuggling and terrorism, in 2 minutes. I believe that an identification system like this would also act as a powerful deterrent

Posted by: C Sprague | December 29, 2009, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Yes, profiling should be used as soon as possible. If profiling will help keep the air safe then we need to use it. Yes, the United States is home of the free and security needs to do whatever to keep it that way.

Posted by: joe | December 29, 2009, 7:47 am 7:47 am

Profiling is unlawful by the standard of the Rule of Law – the intent of the Constitution of the United States. Nonetheless, common sense – which is not lauded any longer should be exercised at all times by personnel employed at locations with large populations of consumers such as airports. Law enforcement sometimes overstep the boundaries of their position, likewise, sometimes the law may seem weak. The solution is to use wisdom and discernment in each incident, but caution to place blame on groups unless – per the law of the land – it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Posted by: Writ Edict | December 29, 2009, 7:56 am 7:56 am

“Profiling” is such a bad word these days. We’ve made it synonymous with racism. Profiling, by definition, involves so much more than taking one physical attribute out of context and applying it universally to a particular group of people. It actually involves looking at a number of attributes in the context of where they are observed and reaching a conclusion that a person is worthy of your heightened awareness. In other words, profiling is using common sense to make real observations based on training, experience, statistics, intelligence, etc. and applying to reach a conclusion that should raise your awareness level. Law and procedures protect our rights as citizens or visitors to this great country. We should not muzzle our trained protectors by telling them not to use common sense (aka “profile”).

Posted by: JG | December 29, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Nah, lets keep pulling those little 80 year old ladies to the side and pat them down becasue we know they are the true threat

Posted by: s | December 29, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Think about this: If the terrorist would have succeeded with his plan that day, “profiling” would be a moot point today.

Posted by: stone | December 29, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Maybe you can clutch the constituion when the plane explodes. Actually, the terrorist have won we when they get constitutional rights.

Posted by: jamescbuilder | December 29, 2009, 8:25 am 8:25 am

Of course we should profile! And we should deploy and use the full body scanners. And, most importantly, we should ALLOW law enforcement to do it’s job. If we don’t, many of us will be dead – but politically correct. /s

Posted by: Don Fey | December 29, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Absolutley! we should have been profiling years ago just like the Isrealis do. El al has never lost a plane to terrorists because it profiles. Flying is not a right. If you want to get on a plane with 300 other people you should be willing to undergo some discomfort.

Posted by: Lee Peretz | December 29, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

I’m tired of jeopardizing our safety in order to be politically correct. While the TSA is busy checking the 70 year old lady with a video game, a man with explosives gets a pass because we don’t want to be accused of profiling. Although the rules apply to everyone, let’s use a little common sense and take a second look at the people that are more likely to be a problem. When Police are looking for a suspect, they have a right to talk to people fitting the description, why is this different?

Posted by: Bonnie M | December 29, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Profiling has been poorly covered in the news. The way it generally works is that law enforcement looks at the specific evidence at the scene of a crime and comes to some reasonable conclusions about the type of person who committed the crime.
This may include race, but not always. Age, gender, height, weight, what kind of person they are psychologically etc. It’s not racist or unconstitutional. It’s just one of many tools used by law enforcement. It may be of little use in predicting future crimes unless you have a very specific idea of the type of crime you are talking about. Terrorist attack is obviously two vague. Suicide bombing using a specific type of bomb, at a specific airport might give you some ideas, however.

Posted by: Terry Prothero | December 29, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Yes, profiling is needed for the safety of all passengers.

Posted by: Rob | December 29, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

It’s way past time. Better to be profiled in the terminal than politically correct as your broken plane falls to the ground.
Lets get some experts in from Israel.

Posted by: jc | December 29, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Absolutely YES!!!! Avoiding the use of profiling is a luxury we can no longer afford. The enemy is using every advantage they can and we should also.

Posted by: Darryl | December 29, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Absolutely profile. You look to where crime is likely to be.

Posted by: Tom Violette | December 29, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

I’d much rather a few bleeding hearts were offended, and stop one bomb. All the people whining should be the ones in charge if when one bomb DOES go off that could have been avoided due to profiling, to go and tell all the family members of the plane that “It’s ok your family is dead, because at least I wasn’t profiled!”
If you have nothing to hide, it shouldn’t be a big deal. They can profile ME for all I care. Save your whining, and let’s save lives.

Posted by: Adam | December 29, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Yes. If you have nothing to hide you will not be affected. It is long over due, it should have started in 2001. Shame on our government for allowing this not to be done.

Posted by: AF | December 29, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

We need a seperate airline JUST for Muslims.

Posted by: dick burke | December 29, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Profiling simply means making educated guesses about where to spend additional effort in security. The alternative is uneducated behavior which has little chance of catching terrorists because the cost of treating Grandma and the bad guy the same is astronomical.
We already use profiling. Try going through security at an airport with a backback. I promise you will have someone swab your pack for tagets and drugs. Backpackers apparently ARE STATISTICALLY more likely to be bombers or involved with drugs.
Profiling works. The Israelis have been using it for years. You can’t argue with their success rate.
Can some security officer abuse a person and blame that on profiling? Why yes, of course. Can they do that today, and blame it on some other “characteristic” or “indicator”? Yes again. If some security person being paid a meager salary wants to ruin your day, they can.
Bottom line, take one characteristic (a backpack) and add it to another characteristic (gender) and another (age group) and another (you name it) and that’s a “profile”. Do you really want TSA ignoring important characteristics of the public because that’s profiling? Not really. You do want profiling, because it’s efficient, logical, and a better way to catch the bad guys.

Posted by: PETE | December 29, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Absolutely yes, we should be profiling.
It is stark raving insanity that we have not been profiling in the past: and once again, we can thank failed government for that one.
We are at war with these terrorists. You do whatever you have to do to win a war and save the lives our countrymen. Americans are dying needlessly, because there has been no profiling.

Posted by: Proud Native American and Angry Independent Voter | December 29, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Maybe we should have two separate flights to the same destinations. One where people are profiled and searched and one where anyone can get on the plane. Lets see which flight you choose to fly on. I think I’ll choose the body search, profiled flight. As the Israelis (and others with a brain) say “not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists ARE Muslims”! Wake up before more of us die.

Posted by: DTE | December 29, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

The fastest way to increase terror attacts in this country is to start profiling innocent people because they look like this or worship that. If we are willing to stoop to that level we might as well wave the white flag of defeat because the terrorist will have accomplished their goal of destroying the American ideals of FREEDOM, JUSTICE and EQUALITY for ALL people. Without these things, there is no AMERICA. Of course we need to take steps to protect ourselves but whatever those steps may be, grandma has to be subject to them also.

Posted by: Eric | December 29, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

ABSOLUTELY…the heck with political correctness! Our concern with what everyone else thinks is going to be the downfall of America.

Posted by: Jill | December 29, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Absolutely not! The idea of profiling passengers is absolutely ridiculous, racist and ignorant.
For those who think the majority of terrorist attacks in America have been committed by Muslim’s such as ‘Big Man’ (who obviously has issues with his ‘size’!!!), clearly don’t know any different because the only time they hear of a terrorist attack is via brain-washing media programs who feed them select stories of Muslim only attacks. You never hear about the other attacks by white folk and it’s just another way to produce further segregation, racism and fear into people and for the government, authorities and media to stay in control. Turn off the T.V, read a book, a newspaper from another country outside the U.S. an open your eyes to the beauty and harmony that other cultures can bring to your life. Sorry to burst your bubble!!!

Posted by: Sarah | December 29, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Profiling is done every day in every city in America, and it’s common sense. If a short, fat caucasian man is involved in home invasion robberies, the news is going to show a sketch and describe his features so that people can be on the lookout and beware! This is a no-brainer. What gets me is when I see a sweet old couple who can barely walk being frisked and “wanded” in the security line. They are not likely to be carrying a bomb… let’s focus on the typical person that these groups go after for brainwashing and indoctrinating. Advertisers are great at profiling and it’s not considered negative at all… I guess “common sense” just isn’t so common anymore!

Posted by: Julia | December 29, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

The attacks against the USS Cole, the embassies, the trade centers, etc., have been by Muslin extremists between 18 and 35. Yes, it is time to profile these people and quit searching Grandma.

Posted by: William H | December 29, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

YES!! If you want to fly, you should be willing to abide by the rules. Keeping passengers safe is imperative.
Old grandmothers are not the bomb carriers. The people that fit the profile of a terrorist, or are on a “terrorist list” are the ones that should be watched.
if they are offended, TOO BAD. Peoples safety comes 1st.

Posted by: Bill | December 29, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Are you kidding? Of course we should. We are at war! Jihadists have stated so! Open your eyes! The so called attempted bombing failed, but it was planned to succeed. This was too close for comfort folks. ACLU stands for American Civil Liberties Union. Those people on the plane were Americans. Help to protect Americans not Jihadists.

Posted by: Bill Bailey | December 29, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

To Whom It May Concern:
The focus of flight security should be the safety and security of every passenger, especially citizens of the USA as well as some clear thinking and creativity in order to maintain both. At this point, being politically correct and being careful about racial profiling, is not the issue!
This is a teachable moment! Is it possible to run instructional public announcements via television networks, etc., that provide US citizens with the basic information necessary, in order to spot some other traveler who might pose a threat. Arming US citizens with information would serve to increase their sense of security, and, at the same time, alleviate some of the paranoia and fear that may have resulted from recent terrorist events. Knowledge is power! Travelers would no longer feel so vulnerable and at the mercy of some terrorist extremist.
These terrorists are counting on our sense of political correctness and fairness. We do not have to prove that to anyone! We have the military capability, the know-how, and the power to have already destroyed al Queda and their strongholds. Instead, we are working to keep peace !
The United States and our allies have the best technology in the world.
Yes we can brainstorm about what possibilities there are:
• Network airline technology in order to track the travel history of “suspicious” passengers
• Train every employee at every airport to recognize passenger behavior that might seem “irregular”
• A public campaign to educate the US public to recognize certain unusual or irregular behavioral characteristics among fellow passengers
• Use all available technology to access terrorist and extremist computer networks, both in the USA proper as well as internationally! Whatever happened to propaganda?
• Monitor every passenger, and search every male (since it seems as though every terrorist incident has involved only males) on every flight, both national and international, especially flights with any passenger who has demonstrated suspicious behavior or behavior irregularities
According to one of our founding fathers, Benjamin Franklin,
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”
Sincerely,
Emma Fogle-Borel

Posted by: Emma Fogle Borel | December 29, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Of course we should “profile” passengers.
All Muslims need to be subjected to intense examination pre-flight – after all most all terrorists who want to destroy our nation have the common connection of that religion.
Sorry that some innocents will be inconvenienced but America must protect Americans!

Posted by: Dick Lindsay | December 29, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Absolutely! What are we waiting for? Another tragedy. I don’t understand why it is taking us so long to get serious about this. There was a time when I would have objected to profiling, but we are in 2009 and terrorist don’t give a flip if we hurt someone’s feelings by profiling. If we profile and get serious with this business then the terrorists won’t be so inclined to try and beat our poor security system. Please start profiling immediately.

Posted by: Step | December 29, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

How do you profile properly?

Posted by: Lets get it on | December 29, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Yes it’s time to profile.

Posted by: betty | December 29, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Do you think any of the passengers on the doomed flights of 11Sept01 would have traded more time in a tougher screening line for safety of their lives? Do you think those killed on US soil that day would be promoting racial profiling this side of heaven if they could be with their families? We owe it to them to drastically change our policies, no matter how difficult that becomes for all of us.

Posted by: webb | December 29, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

for the person that thinks profiling means to bend someone over in a back room and cavity search them…well that is just ridiculous…we have to do something though. If pulling certain groups aside and doing a little extra search…around the pant legs etc (the last psycho had stuff strapped to his leg for crying out loud) then let’s do it. I for one would not be offended to be searched more if it meant more security. I was pulled aside twice for my flight to Florida…once because they saw a bottle of perfume in my purse and once in the line going to the plane…me and a sailor from the back of the line were pulled aside..almost like they had forgotten to check before and it was an afterthought…oh by the way, I am a white, blond female…

Posted by: Kelly | December 29, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

We know that All Muslims are not terrorist However ALL TERRORIST HAVE BEEN MUSLIMS – So yes its time to profile

Posted by: Gary Fallon | December 29, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Profiling could work. however, it is limited by the individuals employing it properly. It still requires a human interpretation which is far from accurate. Full body scanners could also be part of the answer. Again, the data is still left for human interpretation and is still far from perfect. There is an alternative. There is a failure of TSA screeners to detect fake bombs brought through security by undercover TSA agents. know that the several agencies, domestic and foreign, are considering a touch screening instrument, call the PTSSA, that has the ability to determining a person’s intent, in this case smuggling and terrorism, in 2 minutes. I believe that an identification system like this would also act as a powerful deterrent

Posted by: C Sprague | December 29, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Yes. We waste time and money by checking everyone including very senior people and small children. We could quietly profile with those that are more likely be a threat. I have flowen for over fifty five years and have over thirty thousand hours in the air. I am a retired 747 Captain so have seen much in my career. I have put forth the following recommendation that we inform the passengers in the flight briefing that they be told that they can use thier seat cushion to protect themselves from a person with a sharp object or from burning debrie. It is made of dense foam and has handles on it. We could go one step further and put kevlar on it to make it bullet resistant. I have recommended this but have been turned down, Some feel that it might cause concern with the passengers. My thought is that it will give a better feeling when you feel you have and item to help protect and keep yourself safe.

Posted by: Bob Evans | December 29, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Profiling is way overdue.Had it been in force this man may have been stopped at security before boarding.Look at what we did to the Japanese during World War 2.I’m totally against that but we must stop being so wishy washy about muslims feelings if they are the main profile in this situation.How many more must die before common sense prevails?

Posted by: Karl | December 29, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

What happened on the Delta flight should never have happened and would never happen on a flight to or from Israel. Look to Israelis for security / safety in flying. It is time to be proactive regarding the safety of Americans. YES…to profiling!

Posted by: Sarah Lipp | December 29, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

As a retired Customs Officer I can tell you that the law and your training “require” you to profile types of individuals presenting themselves for entry into the U.S. It’s called “Border Search Authority”. Traditionally it has been used for detecting contraband… Have we moved so far to the left that we now do not consider a terrorist bomb to be “contraband”…???

Posted by: CarCzar | December 29, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

I totally agree with the Israeli Security Forces, that all Muslims are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim. We have become over obsessed with political correctness. This was a perfect example of over confidence. Yes, to profiling. 2001 some ethnic groups complained, but Muslims were killed in the Twin Towers. Profiling and full body screenings at airports. Let the pork that’s going to legislators states (especially to airports serving only 20-30 people with one or two flight a day) go to pay for the screening machines for all our airports. After all, it’s our tax dollars.

Posted by: Susan Calder | December 29, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

The time to profile passengers came with the first Islamic Terrorist attack. When hunting rabbits one expects his Beagle to ignore cats and track only rabbits.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | December 30, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

any terrorist attack is obviously wrong. but the reason for this attempt was the bombing in yemen. the reason for other attacks have been US involvement and occupation in the middle east.
the US should just avoid all the crazies and get the hell out of the middle east. the lies about them hating the US for your freedom is rubbish.

Posted by: unbelievable | December 30, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Should we profile? Duh…ya think?

Posted by: Zeke | December 30, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

I agree with all of the profiling supporters. It is only common sense that we should have learned from the last 30 or so terrorists, that all fit a PROFILE. I sent an email to the president out of frustration but would like to know how(perhaps a vote) we can really get logical thinking and peoples will across, because calling congressman or senators will just fall on deaf ears. Does anyone realize that 99.? % on a daily basis probably never needed screening ? Iam glad to see this being discussed in various media !

Posted by: Bob | December 30, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Yes! We should have been profiling long ago and following the path of the Israeli’s. The terrorists are males, and we all know what they look like. Every one of them should be checked. Leave all the anglo women and old men alone! We are the ones who are inconvenienced. If you don’t like it, don’t fly.

Posted by: Heidi | December 30, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

We should absolutely profile airline passengers. You don’t see baptist grandmas or catholic moms carrying out suicide bombings! It is muslim male extremists! Its time to be less politically correct and face the truth of the matter! Innocent peoples lives are worth profiling.

Posted by: mrsmacarena | December 31, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Absolutely. If middle-aged-white-women were blowing things up, I wouldn’t mind a bit if I was profiled and checked. Lives are at stake here, don’t be stupid.

Posted by: Chris | January 3, 2010, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Maybe conservative Christians should be profiled as potential Abortion Clinic Bombers, too? After all, we know some conservative Christians support killing abortion-service providers and gays.
If profiling is effective, maybe it should be done to all groups, not just to some.
Maybe Southerners should be profiled as racists……….Lord knows, there’s a peck of ‘em down there.

Posted by: Doppelganger | January 4, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

We MUST begin to profile passengers based on race, religion, sex, and age. It WORKS! The “hand wringers” from the ACLU and other liberal entities will go crazy, but it is the most effective weapon we have against terror, and it is time to protect our country.

Posted by: road.rep | January 5, 2010, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.