By Sadie Bass

Dec 16, 2009 12:44pm

Jerusalem Tomb Discovery Casts Doubt on Turin Shroud

ABC's Simon McGregor-Wood reports from Jerusalem: Israelis Archaeologists announced Wednesday they have found the first burial shroud from the time of Jesus.
 
Researchers found that fragments of the fabric are of a much simpler weave than that in the famous Turin shroud, which some believe to be the shroud that wrapped the body of Jesus himself.
 
The new shroud is in two pieces, one for the head, one for the body. The Turin shroud is a single piece of fabric.
 
The latest discovery was made in a tomb complex outside the Old City of Jerusalem. The tomb is thought to have belonged to an important member of the Jewish priesthood. Carbon dating proves the remnants are from the years between 0 and 50 CE or AD.
 
DNA samples from the human remains indicate the priest had leprosy.
 
The newly discovered shroud is made from a two way weave, while the Turin shroud has a more intricate twill weave which textile experts say was introduced a 1,000 years after Jesus lived.
 
The latest discovery will cast further scientific doubt on the validity of the Turin Shroud.
 
Last month however a Vatican researcher said that by using computer analysis of photographs of the Turin shroud she had detected the words “Jesus Nazarene” in Greek, Aramaic and Latin.
 
The latest discovery in Jerusalem probably won’t put an end to the debate.

User Comments

They found another shroud in a tomb.
What does that have to do with the Turin Shroud?
The weave was simpler. I get it.
They now come to a conclusion that since this was a simpler weave, the Turin weave could not be from that time.
They are assuming this. They don’t know this as a fact.
One big question still remains even with all of our modern technology:
How did that picture of a crucified man transfer onto that shroud? It’s not paint; it’s not a drawing; it cannot be ducplicated exactly like that shroud of Turin.
My faith does not hinge on a shroud from Turin or from anywhere.
It’s just a really interesting story and something to think about.

Posted by: ddg | December 16, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

The Fraud of Turin……..a fake? Who would have ever thunk?

Posted by: Doppelganger | December 16, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

This isn’t a controversy…the Shroud of Turin has already been shown to be false.

Posted by: leogorky | December 16, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

At the time the shroud was first gaining fame, the pope had local officials investigate. They came back with the report that they talked with the person that produced it (no, it wasn’t Jesus) and that he was in fact a very clever fellow. It was bringing in the crowds and the money, so the pope declared that it should be considered an important piece, much like a DaVinci, even though it wasn’t real. Feel free to research the history.

Posted by: Mike | December 16, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

DDG, it doesn’t give you pause that the weave in the Shroud of Turin wasn’t done for another 1,000 years? That being the case, I would like to sell you George Washington’s motorcylce (it was a Harley). This is in line with carbon dating that has the shroud originating in the middle ages.
This has nothing to do with the existence of God, simply whether something is a fraud or not. And yes, a number of ways have been put forward on how to duplicate the image.

Posted by: L GP | December 16, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Since the scriptural record indicates that the body cloth and the head cloth were folded and separate upon discovery that Christ had ressurected, the Turin Shroud just doesn’t seem to be compatable with scripture. The Gospel of John 20:7.

Posted by: James | December 16, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

My Savior is risen! I don’t need to concern myself with these matters.

Posted by: s | December 16, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Not like Christians require a high level of reliable evidence in the first place. Otherwise they wouldn’t be Christians.

Posted by: Scorpio Redhead | December 16, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

99% of the religius relics of the roman catholic church are fakes,the act to deceive has been around since the beginning of time.

Posted by: jasper | December 16, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

The Gospel account describes two coverings. The “veronica” [ver icon - true image] veil is identical to the image on the shroud of Turin including the blood stains – that would indicate the veil was covering the head and then the shroud covered the veil as well as the body (which is consistent with the folded over aspect of the shroud). There are other examples of that type of cloth used in the shroud from the 1st century AD. This is just Israeli propaganda to make Christians angry and make it appear there is a wedge between the US and Israel, so Israel can say ‘we are standing alone against all our enemies’ and that is why we had to use Nuclear Weapons against Iran.

Posted by: John | December 16, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Okay, the shroud of Turin is not a FAKE. But it was not the shroud from Jesus. It was a shroud from someone (probably a Christian) who was tortured or crucified many centuries after the death of Jesus. I don’t know of any leaders within Christianity (Catholic or Protestant) who claim the shroud of Turin is from the burial of Jesus.

Posted by: Nichole | December 16, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Twill has been around since before the first century. Several hundreds of years in fact.

Posted by: m | December 16, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

So, who thinks God wrote “Jesus Nazarene” on Christ’s shroud in three languages?

Posted by: Sheila | December 16, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Whether shroud of Turin is real or fake, what does it matter? ….. is it somehow holy because it once encased Jesus’ body? Like religion as a whole, if you don’t believe no amount of proof will ever be enough ….. if you do believe no amount of proof is needed. I lean towards thinking the shroud of Turin is a fake. In fact, I thought that was pretty much the prevailing scientific holding but like most of you, I lack the expertise to make a valid assessment. So again, what does it matter? Believe what you want. Peace All

Posted by: Robert | December 16, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

> ………. Even if it is real, who is to say that “picture” is of Jesus? Who even claims to know what Jesus looked like (aside from the shroud)? Also, I seriously doubt your claim that with modern technology the “picture” could not be duplicated. What is your expertise to make that declaration …. I strongly suspect that you have no such expertise but are relying on someone else’s biased assessment. At the end of the day, what does it really matter? Peace All

Posted by: Robert | December 16, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

The Shroud was purchased by Joseph of Arimathea a rich man, Jesus was laid in his new tomb not thrown in a garbage pile like most victims of crucifixion. The Shroud has been examined by a VP8 analyzer that shows a perfect 3-D picture of the face of Jesus. There are many people who want to deny Christ then and now. The doubters want to not believe. This statement proves nothing. There was a small cloth around his head and the blood stains match perfectly with the shroud and it has been carbon dated to the correct time. Ray Rodgers found evidence that the Shroud that was carbon dated was a piece that was invisibly rewoven, I saw the electron microscope picture of the threads woven end to end. The blood type on both was AB+. There is so much evidence that has been proved like Jerusalem flowers and pollen. You people make me sick, Jesus will deny you because you have denied Him.

Posted by: Pat Smith | December 16, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The Bible also said His legs would not be broken which was usually done to hasten death so the crucified man couldn’t raise himself up to breath. Jesus on the Shroud does not have broken legs. There is also a rectangular plaque under the chin that says LAMB. A Roman flagrum was used to put over 100 scourge marks on the body which show a high bilirubin count from the terrible trauma inflicted. Using fluorescence they found serum at the edges of the blood stains and the blood has stayed red. Atheists always want to believe there is no God and Jews and Muslims don’t want to believe Jesus was the Messiah. Protestants don’t want to believe that the Catholic Church has the burial Shroud of Jesus in their possession either but since this truely is His Shroud then it makes people doubt their own beliefs. That’s why so many try to defame it. They have also found out that His body was upright, levitating when the image was transferred to the Shroud and they think it was produced by a huge amount of radiation something like the Big Bang. Why don’t all of you doubters try doing some real research into it.

Posted by: Pat Smith | December 16, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

> …. judge not, lest you be judged. Jesus was about love and acceptance …. you sir, are pathetic example of christian behavior.

Posted by: Robert | December 16, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Posted by: Pat Smith | Dec 16, 2009 6:31:57 PM …. after I read your post, I shook my head in amazement, then broke out in laughter. You sir are the one who desparately wants to believe … possibly to validate your own beliefs?

Posted by: Robert | December 16, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

eh, nice evidence; you don’t think someone who wanted to deceive had access to the same gospels, or followed the same logic to deceive? This is ridiculous; it has turned into commentary of christians versus the world. This is a piece of cloth. Remember, no idols, no worship of idols… eh, this includes cloth. geesh. Personally, I don’t think it is real in what it is meant to depict, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t an interesting history regarding it. But just because I don’t believe in this cloth it doesn’t give you the right to assume what else I do or do not believe. Folks need to get practical, though, even in their faith, and stop thinking every discussion is an affront. Faith should stand up to scrutiny, by the way, or else its just sheer adherence to doctrine. And doctrine is stale, often dormant, and doesn’t progress very often.

Posted by: kentmichaels99 | December 16, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

see

Posted by: james | December 16, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Well anyone who after finding ancient burial shroud from Jerusalem starts talking about Turin shroud is not researcher or scientist at all.

Posted by: Alex | December 16, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

I dont know exactly where the turin shroud came from, but I have always said that it was not the shroud that Jesus was wrapped in. The scripture clearly says that the shroud that Jesus was wrapped in was a two piece shroud (like the one in this story). It states that the body piece and the head piece were in two different places in the tomb. Its there, look it up if you doubt.

Posted by: Scott | December 16, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

I dont belive in magic, im not impressed with 2000 year old hyped legends. Frankly if im sure Jesus lived, im sure he was a good compassionate man, im sure he found ways to share 20 fish with 200 people and it was a mirracle everyone shared the meal. But he didnt do magic and turn dirt into fish, he just got people to get along, at a time when the sword was the negociator it was a miracle someone could use Gahandi or Martain Luther King like skills to resolve problems.
People God does not exist, Magic does not exist.

Posted by: Dan | December 16, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Posted by: kentmichaels99 | Dec 16, 2009 7:03:27 PM ….. amen.

Posted by: Robert | December 16, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

A couple of years ago, the discovery channel took two first century Jerusalem skulls, made a composite, and determined that Jesus looked like Sirhan Sirhan.
Does that mean two skulls found in a future Cleveland mean Abe Lincoln looked like Drew Carey? Of course not. This kind of “science” is a laughable attempt to push a political agenda…nothing more.
Was this leper buried in a hurry, during a TB epidemic? Was he buried after the Roman occupation ended in 70 AD? Was he as wealthy as Jesus’ Uncle, Joseph of Arimethea, who may have been one of the worlds wealthiest men?
Was either shroud a supernatural red herring, designed as a test of Christian faith? I believe we will get the answers in the End.

Posted by: Eric | December 17, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Between 0 and 50 CE, Wow! That is PRECISION carbon dating!
Wouldn’t it be ironic if this is the body of Annas or one of the members of the Sanhedren who condemned Jesus to death?
Or maybe it was Judas, or St. Stephen…isn’t random speculation fun?

Posted by: Eric | December 17, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

I AM in agreement with kent.
I once believed in the shroud but now i dont, nor does it matter. The triple inscription is, to me, evidence to th contrary of it being genuine.
My faith is between myself and the Divine and is not dependant on ANYthing material because they are separate domains anyway.

Posted by: trops | December 17, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am

This is not an idol neither are statues. It’s no different than a photograph of your loved one. I don’t ask you to worship, I personally wouldn’t want you even near it. You don’t deserve it. You are entitled to your opinions just like I’m entitled to mine. It is not a painting, there is no evidence of paint it is amazing in the fact that it is a image like a photograph made before photography was ever invented. Go ahead and continue in your denial of the Lord. They can’t fake the VP8 analyzer image either. It’s not reproducible with a photo. Have you studied all of the scientific data? I have. I happen to believe what the scientists have determined.

Posted by: Pat Smith | December 17, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am

For those of you that retain the ability for rational thought, the latest issue of the Skeptical Inquirer has an interesting and detailed article on a recent experiment that was able to duplicate the Shroud of Turin using only materials available in the middle ages.
If you insist on handicapping your children with creationist fairy tales, do not be surprised when they cannot compete with kids that spent their time learning about how the world actually works.

Posted by: Craig Landrum | December 17, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am

“Researchers found that fragments of the fabric are of a much simpler weave than that in the famous Turin shroud, which some believe to be the shroud that wrapped the body of Jesus himself.”
This is a little sensationalistic. The Catholic Church, around 1990, had a high-tech investigation done on the Shroud of Turin, and as a result the Vatican announced that it is NOT authentic.
Yet this article doesn’t mention that fact at all – that the official Catholic position is that it’s a fake. That would detract from the sensationalism of the story, wouldn’t it? Better to fool the reader by withholding information than to make an article less interesting: I think that’s the new motto of the American media.
Of course some people still think it’s real. Some people think Elvis is alive, too.

Posted by: The_Mick | December 17, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

>
You know it is pretty easy to verify disinformation these days:
>>Study of garments worn by 3,000-year-old mummies excavated in western China’s Tarim Basin (see ARCHAEOLOGY, March/April 1995) has yielded the world’s oldest cashmere threads. Other mummies wore wool twills woven in a plaid design dating to 720 B.C. that required looms most likely brought by settlers from the Eurasian steppes. <<

Posted by: dg | December 17, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

to L GP: Did you not read my entire post? I said that it did not matter. My faith does not hinge on a shroud.
I also went on to say that it was just an interesting story and something to think about.
Now, as far as GW’s motorcycle – I will have to pass on that.
Is this a motorcyle that only you can see? Well, bless your heart. You would have been better off believing in the shroud.

Posted by: ddg | December 17, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Historians and scientists around the world cannot agree on how this was made. Each group can “back up” their theory::::
“It’s a photograph” theory: Historian, Nicholas Allen, stated that the image was formed by a phtographic technique from the l3th century.
***There are others (scientists,etc.) who said that the technical skills required to produce the phtographic or near photographic realism in the image would be unrealistically advanced for that time.
“It’s a painting” theory:
In l979 scientists stated that the image is actually made up of billions of submicrometre pigment particles.”
***However, scientists went on to say “that no known technique for hand application of paint could apply a pigment with the necessary DEGREE of CONTROL on such a NANO-SCALE fibrillar surface plane.”
Phtograph? Painting?
Re: the carbon dating – scientists (yes, real scientists) came to the conclusion that the carbon dating was faulty due to a fire the shroud was in centuries before and also for other reasons that I don’t remember at this time. Just look it up if you are interested.
Again, it doesn’t really matter. A person’s faith should not hinge on a shroud or anything like that.
It’s just an interesting thing that, apparently, historians and scientists cannot agree upon over the years.

Posted by: ddg | December 17, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Unfortunately without fakery and sham there wouldn’t be any religion in the world. Fortunately God is bigger than religion.

Posted by: Bill O'Really | December 17, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

George Washington’s motor bicycle? Wow! I’ll buy that!! I bought into the turin shroud, the fragments of the true cross, various little bottles of sacred blood and some snake oil, the bible & bits of UFO. Must rush – my son is very sick and I must go and pray for him – it really is great having faith.

Posted by: NJH | December 17, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Don’t buy into everything that comes along. Otherwise, you will be left with nothing at the end of the day.
You want to find if there is God?
Simply ask God to come into your life.
p.s. Physicians are a good thing. God would want you to help your children and others. It’s people and their silly ways that mess everything up.

Posted by: ddg | December 17, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Catholic “scholars” are always coming up with new and more elaborate miracles. The Turn Shroud has been demonstrated to be false, it conflicts with the New Testament itself which says Jesus had a separate cloth placed over his face, and now there are supposedly mysterious Aramaic letters which nobody has spotted until now, despite all the analysis done on the shroud for decades. Whatever next?

Posted by: Aramaic Scholar | December 18, 2009, 7:08 am 7:08 am

You guys at ABC and the broadcast media have to keep up on science a little better! The Shroud of Turin was shown to be a fake years ago as reported in magazines such as Science News. To the best of my recollection it is in fact paint and though it may not have been a fake in the sense of being intended to deceive anyone, it isn’t what it has always been portrayed to be…Jesus’s burial shroud.

Posted by: Waynne | December 24, 2009, 8:02 am 8:02 am

“The new shroud is in two pieces, one for the head, one for the body. The Turin shroud is a single piece of fabric.”
Apparently these people don’t do their homework. The head cloth was found. It’s the sudarium of Oviedo. The stains on it match the shroud and has the same blood type. Also twill weave existed while Christ was alive.

Posted by: PrincesseJen | September 28, 2010, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

As a scientist, I have to complain about the misinformation being given here. The shroud did NOT carbon date to the time of Jesus, but to about 1000 years later. Another problem is that the remains of crucifixion victims who were nailed in the Holy Land have been found and they were nailed through the wrists and shins – it’s long been said the hands and feet wouldn’t hold the weight. But the shroud has the wounds at the incorrect place!

Posted by: The_Mick | December 3, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

It doesn’t matter if the shroud is real or not. Faith is a’sposed to be stronger than any piece fabric.

Posted by: Jocko | July 27, 2011, 7:47 am 7:47 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.