Senators Behaving Badly
ABC's Stu Schutzman reports from New York: Where have you gone Mike Mansfield and Everett Dirksen? These days, our nation turns its lonely eyes to Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell, Tom Coburn, Chuck Schumer and all the rest. Gone is the collegiality which earmarked the US Senate in Mansfield and Dirksen’s day as perhaps the most exclusive club in the world. Today the Senate floor is more like a verbal battlefield where enmity and hostility rule the day. The overdrawn debate and subsequent health care reform votes have brought out the worst in our so-called political leaders of both political stripes. “Cooped-up senators turn cranky” reads a headline in today’s Politico.com. Cranky is an understatement to describe Senators trying to advance or block the current health care reform bill making its way thru that august body. “A marathon session of early-morning, late-night and weekend votes,” notes Politico, “has everyone on edge in the cooped-up Capitol, with testy exchanges and harsh recriminations replacing the clubby decorum that usually prevails in the Senate.” Loose translation — they’re at each other’s throats. Case in point: On Sunday afternoon, in the run up to the decisive vote (which actually happened at 1am this morning), Republican Senator Tom Coburn appeared on the floor — “What the American people ought to pray,” he beseeched, “is that somebody can’t make the vote tonight. That’s what they ought to pray.”
This was not taken by most anyone in the chamber as a veiled anonymous threat. “It was difficult to escape the conclusion,” wrote the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank, “that Coburn was referring to the 92 year old wheelchair-bound Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV ) who has been in and out of hospitals and lay at home ailing.” Byrd did in fact show up after midnight during a snow storm following a blizzard of recriminations and threats. “It’s been brutal,” said Senator Kent Conrad. “We got to stop,” added Senator McCain, “we got to stop this kind of behavior. I’ve never seen anything like it.” Neither, apparently have the American people who hold Congress in their lowest esteem ever. And if Senator Coburn is the barometer, it will only get worse. “I think it will” he said. “Heaven holds a place for those who pray.”….Or does it?
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
It seems as if our representatives have placed themselves above those they represent. I am sure that there were good parts to healthcare reform that republicans could have gotten behind and I am sure that meetings held behind closed doors without them could have been opened to allow them in. But none of this seem to happen.
As taxpayers we have seen one bill after another rushed into law, bills written and authored by who knows who, that will impact our lives for years to come. Robbing Peter to pay Paul is ok for Paul but we have leadership that is bound and determined to take everything Peter and his offsprings have to get Paul to vote for them. Incredible.
Posted by: david | December 21, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Blame the Republicans for the loss of Bipartisanship on Capitol Hill.
They are still not over the fact that they lost the election.
They are praying so much for Obama to fail that they will sell their own souls to the devil.
Pitiful.
Posted by: Steve_NJ | December 21, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Republicasn can not have their cake and eat it.
They complain they were not included in any negotiations, yet anytime they tried to bring them in they would do everything in their power to scuttle the bill.
After Harry Reid had had it with the group of 6 (remember it had 3 Repubs), we all knew that all the Repubs wanted was NO BILL, NO REFORM, NADA, NOTHING.
They are not only the party of NO, but they are a bunch of hypocrites if they keep complaining that they were left out.
Posted by: Steve_NJ | December 21, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Just remember – the second oldest profression is more and more like the oldest.My 82 year old mother is not a white racist bigot, according to Sen. Whitehouse, since she was not suportive of the health care bill – she did not want to see the cuts to Medicare.
Posted by: jamescbuilder | December 21, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Seems like lumps of coal should be handed out.
Posted by: Huh | December 21, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
It started with Ginrich and his Contract on America, Tom DeLay and others of that era. Unfortunately the democrats folded back then just like they are today.
Posted by: jan | December 21, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Ever since Republicans put out their Contract on America, things have gotten really ugly.
Of course, ever since religious folks decided to enter the political arena and ram their religion down other throats, things have also gotten uglier.
Maybe if the U.S. were less religious, the interaction of its citizens would be less ugly.
Posted by: Doppelganger | December 21, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Those who have no rational basis for their policies invoke God. But human beings are notoriously imperfect at determining God’s will– to the point where we have repeatedly killed each other over what we think God wants. A better tactic might be to try to make a rational argument.
As for wishing a fellow senator wouldn’t be able to make it to the chamber, I have a simpler wish. I wish that, in a democracy, the majority ruled.
Posted by: David in CT | December 22, 2009, 6:54 am 6:54 am
The Senators are “at one another’s throats.” But not yet literally so. No brutal beating or roughing up, as (very occasionally) in the 19th century.
Posted by: Candadai Tirumalai | December 22, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Sen. Coburn was out of line. He should be reprimanded.
As I see it, religion doesn’t have anything to do with what’s happening in America. The Lord does not promote greed or any of the other deadly sins.
So if someone is going around doing these things in the name of The Lord, I would not listen to them.
Run the other way.
Posted by: ddg | December 22, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
It’s a matter of the extremes being the loudest and most arrogant, but it’s not that new. Historically, the really “good old days” were just as bad, if not worst. Read about all the crap Lincoln took during his days of great leadership. What turns my stomach is the hypocrisy. Many times John McCain, the self-righteous critic of someone like Al Franken and others, has been an unadulterated and vulgar bully toward people he was grilling. I recall a woman on whom he used one expletive after another in a tape on television.
The truth is that during the Mansfield-Dirksen years there were many more moderates and fewer people who thought they could never be wrong. By the way, if anyone needed shutting up during this absurd wrangling about health care, it was certainly Joe Lieberman, who utterly failed to represent what the great majority of his constituents wanted from health care reform, a PUBLIC OPTION to make the greedy, monopolistic health insurance companies actually compete for once.
Posted by: Igorvitch | December 22, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
What is happening here is that the good of the people is no longer important to any of the politicians. It is about how much they can line their pockets through bribery and scams. Come on, do you really think that either party is better then the other? They are all completely disconnected from reality. Maybe if they did say a pray to God for discernment, what’s right for all would be accomplished. We need reform in every area of the government, not just healthcare. Can’t someone in Govt. finally say, let’s make some decisions for the people not just for our own party. Honestly, the partys mean nothing anymore to most Americans. They have turned into a joke.
Posted by: Marsha Weisbeck | December 22, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Yes, members from both parties are very vulnerable to the promised bribes of lobbyists. That’s as much the fault of our election and campaign systems presently than it is the fault of individuals. Presently, the situation is that you cater to the lobbyists and fat cats or you haven’t the funds to run an effective campaign. Consequently, should we throw our hands into the air and accept that we can’t do anything about it or should we move together to demand complete campaign reform to disarm the lobbyists?
Nothing, for example, is being said about the Supreme Court’s looking at rescinding the only piece of campaign reform legislation passed in recent history: the McCain-Feingold Bill. The conservatives on the court are claiming that this bill limits the “freedom of speech” of the fat cats such as Lockheed-Martin to outright buy elections. WE have to stand up and say: “NO, we need more limitations on special interests influencing politicians and election so that the voice of the people has at least a chance of being heard. We need a peaceful revolution against extreme bribery and undermining of our democratic processes, or they will become more and more the play things for the wealthy and powerful.
Posted by: Igorvitch | December 22, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Yes, members from both parties are very vulnerable to the promised bribes of lobbyists. That’s as much the fault of our election and campaign systems presently than it is the fault of individuals. Presently, the situation is that you cater to the lobbyists and fat cats or you haven’t the funds to run an effective campaign. Consequently, should we throw our hands into the air and accept that we can’t do anything about it or should we move together to demand complete campaign reform to disarm the lobbyists?
Nothing, for example, is being said about the Supreme Court’s looking at rescinding the only piece of campaign reform legislation passed in recent history: the McCain-Feingold Bill. The conservatives on the court are claiming that this bill limits the “freedom of speech” of the fat cats such as Lockheed-Martin to outright buy elections. WE have to stand up and say: “NO, we need more limitations on special interests influencing politicians and election so that the voice of the people has at least a chance of being heard. We need a peaceful revolution against extreme bribery and undermining of our democratic processes, or they will become more and more the play things for the wealthy and powerful.
Posted by: Igorvitch | December 22, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
It seems to me both parties are at fault. All we seem to hear are half truths and see deceptive manuevers in Congress. How many have read the Health Bill and all the special ammendments?
Gone are the days when we could believe our leaders have the best interest of the country at heart instead of the special interests which rule this land.
All are at fault including the President, his Cabinet and his advisors.
Posted by: victoria Francis | December 22, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
The Senate has gone from a comity club to a comedy club.
Posted by: Joe White | December 22, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Harry Reid claims on the senate floor that every 10 minutes 2 people die because they do not have health insurance.
No doubt another liberal lie. But if it is not a lie, then liberals must be O.K. letting over 400,000 people without insurance die while waiting for the legislation to take affect in 4 years.
Posted by: Cogito | December 22, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Not a lie at all about people’s dying from lack of health insurance. Where have you been? America ranks lower than 30th of advanced countries in the category of deaths due to needless delays and these are almost all caused either because people can’t afford health insurance or the insurance companies take their sweet time to okay necessary procedures and tests. Why do you think the AMA and most doctors support this health care bill? Do some reading and quit listening and watching propaganda television commercials by the insurance companies. Here are some outright lies: (1) massive cuts in Medicare (2) death panels (We already have them from the greedy insurance companies (3) cost will break us (The fact is the bill will cut the deficit by 150 billion in a matter of 5 years.) (4) rationed health care (People already have to wait more here than in countries with government health care,) Why do you think the insurance companies are spending a million bucks a day to fight this bill? One word that should not be controlling health care at all is the answer: GREED.
Posted by: Igorvitch | December 22, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Labels that people spit out like “liberal” are also signs of the lack of civility and decency in current politics. By the way, the word is “effect,” not “affect.”
Obama did not start this recession. It started in 2007 and even as fierce a laissez faire man as Bush’s Sec. of the Treasury, Hank Paulson, went begging to Congress for the bailouts because he knew their failed economic “trickle down” and the totally unethical Wall Street bankers (Thompson is a former CEO for Goldman-Sachs.) had brought us to the teetering edge of another Great Depression.
There have been Presidents ever since Teddy Roosevelt calling for reform in health care. At least Obama and his people are getting something done about it. The last administration did not even care about the millions of Americans denied access to health care.
It’s these kind of uniformed and fallacious opinions spread by the likes of Beck and Limbaugh that have made people too lazy to check them for facts and truths that have completely muddied the atmosphere so that problems cannot be objectively examined and solved.
Posted by: Igorvitch | December 23, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Igorvitch: BRAVO!!!!!
Posted by: stone | December 23, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Every ten minutes two people die because of lack of health insurance.
I am certain that this is true.
How many die every ten minutes with health insurance?
Just curious. This question is not meant to imply anything at all.
Here in New Orleans the uninsured or under-insured can get health CARE if you know where to look. It takes tenacity, but you will find health CARE when needed.
I foresee lawyers involved on both sides regarding this bill. I don’t know how it’s going to end up, but it will be interesting.
How come this bill (once passed) won’t start for another four years? Is that correct? Why? What about those two people every ten minutes?
Posted by: ddg | December 24, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
When will campaign contribution reform happen?
Posted by: ddg | December 24, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Igorvitch wrote:
“Not a lie at all about people’s dying from lack of health insurance. ”
Yes, it is a lie.
The so-called study (that puports to show that 44,000 Americans die each year due to no health insurance) did not even bother to verify whether the subjects in the study that died had health insurance at the time of death or not.
The study was conducted by the head of an advocacy group that lobbies for a single payer system.
It is not an objective, nor a scientific study at all.
Its more junk science from the political left.
Posted by: Joe White | December 25, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am
According to the US census, there are about 2.5 million people who die every year in the United States.
According to some report, there are two people every ten minutes who die because of no insurance.
When the two statistics are compared, the uninsured deaths are relatively low.
Did the report say if these people received any health CARE and still died?
I’m just curious. I know there’s health CARE available if needed; it demands some work, but it can be done.
An advocate can help you find these resources (such as some churches and community centers.)
Peace to you on this Christmas Day and for the following year.
Posted by: ddg | December 25, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
How can you not expect that kind of behavior. You’re dealing with people who have that job because they are not smart enough to do anything else for a living.
Posted by: morgan thomas | December 26, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Right wing radicalism has been egged on by Beck, Limbaugh and Hannity. GOP senators may not exactly like or agree with those individuals but it was a conscious decision by the RNC to completely defy Obama and no GOPer has even offered to compromise even after the public option and Medicare age reduction were withdrawn. I agree – the deficit and debt are outrageous and need to be addressed. Can’t we all put aside our differences for the good of the country?
Posted by: Bob | December 28, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Bob: good comment and request. Although I don’t agree with the republicans and their “no” attitude, you have to give them credit for being in defiant, rigid lock-step. Standing together no matter even if it’s for the good of the country (think the recent stalling on troop funding and unemployment compensation). Telling the whole country to pick a finger for no other reason than just because. Republicans will never put aside differences as long as they are out of power. Given their attitude, they will not have power for a long, long time!
Posted by: stone | December 28, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
this is nothing new. In years past beside being visibly, or audibly, drunk Senator, on occaison, actually fought each other or hit each other with heavy canes! Big deal. They are supposed to represent their States and when a Federal government out of control and a person with meglamanical tendencies want to hurt their state the Senators SHOULD be outraged. Everyone knows that, like the stimulus, the “healthcare” boondoogle wills shovel funds to certain states, activist groups, and party.
Posted by: Ed | December 28, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm