Who Did VA Tech Officials Warn First?

Certainly we can be glad that Bill Clinton made absolutely certain that the murderer would be the ONLY person there with a gun — he had a guaranteed flock of unarmed peasants with which to make bloody headlines.
The Clinton crowd sure did account for an awful lot of dead people during their reign. Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc.
And, at VT, residual victims of their reign!

So what if a campus-wide lockdown had gone into effect sooner? The shooter would have been locked into some other crowded building and he would have simply murdered those people instead. His victims were not specific. Granted, security procedure was lacking, but the main issue here is that the students, faculty and staff at Virginia Tech were not allowed to arm themselves before the fact and defend themselves in the midst of a slaughter. Since this totally avoidable massacre, more than a dozen major universities across America now allow students who meet their state’s guidelines for the carrying of concealed weapons to do so. I am surprised that Virginia Tech has yet to do so. Just remember that according to the Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, where there are armed law abiding citizens, there is less violent crime, yet where useless gun control still lingers and where there are so-called gun-free zones on college campuses, shopping malls, elder and child care centers, offices and places of employment, and more recently, military bases, there is a greater opportunity for mass shootings against large numbers of unarmed victims. Fort Hood is a recent example. Until the Clinton Administration, personal firearms were allowed on military bases; at least in the glove boxes of personal vehicles. Now they are forbidden. That is another so-called gun-free zone that needs to be cleaned up.