By Bradley Blackburn

Dec 29, 2009 4:37pm

Whole Body Scan vs. Your Privacy: How Far Is Too Far?

ABC's Aaron Katersky Reports:   On June 4, 2009 the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill, H.R. 2200, that would limit the use of whole-body imaging (WBI) systems in airports.  The amendment prohibits the use of full-body scanners as a primary screening method.  They can be used as secondary screening and in such a case “would require the TSA to give passengers the option of a pat-down search in lieu of going through a WBI machine.”   The sponsor, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) said at the time “to suggest that every single American–that my wife, my 8-year-old daughter–needs to be subjected to this, I think, is just absolutely wrong.”   Reached today by phone, Chaffetz told ABC News he still supports only limited use of WBI technology.   “We have to find the right balance between personal privacy and the need to secure an aircraft,” Chaffetz said.  “The technology exists to be more effective and yet less invasive.”   The Senate has not taken up the matter and Chaffetz conceded there’s little chance it would pass now.   The Justice department is currently being sued by the Electronic Privacy Information Center over WBI, but as of October 1, 2009, the TSA ordered an additional 150 WBI machines for use in airports.    Privacy is not the only reason the TSA has not deployed them en masse.  WBI technology costs ten times as much as what’s in place at airports now, and there are questions about whether it’s worth it.   Experts say the technology would almost certainly find a gun or knife but not necessarily something carried the way the Nigerian carried his explosives.    “The full-body scan is not the answer,” said Charles Slepian of the Foreseeable Risk Analysis Center in New York.  “Even with a full-body scan if you went through there with nothing on but you had something in the crevices of your body you won’t see it in the full-body scan.”

User Comments

I agree that the whole body scan is going a bit too far. Would I trade a bit of my privacy for an increase (arguable) in safety? NEVER! Give a little here…..give a little there…..next thing you know we have lost our personal liberties. Be careful everyone….if we give up this “little bit of privacy” it may not be too long before we have none left to give.

Posted by: Eric | December 29, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

I worked in TSA for over 5 years.Why dont you get silly and say you cant look in my bags .Is that going too far? We have the ability to stop all this nonsense and state if you dont want people to see if your image then dont fly! Its not a God given right to fly you know!Its stupid to expect TSA to do their job but dont do this or that when your life is at stake,right? TSA cant feel their way around when patting down. Doesnt that make it easy to know where to hide your bomb? Come on this is too stupid to really talk about!

Posted by: larry | December 29, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

The machines are set so as you cannot identify the person who is being screened so it really should be one of a number of systems that should be used including profileing, as stated if you dont want to submit then dont fly.

Posted by: earl | December 29, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Whole body scans equal porn. I do not want some creep looking at my body, which is a good one, and maybe snapping a picture and emailing it to his friends. There is such a thing as invasion of privacy. I am not terrorist and not even close so why should I be treated with less respect than the Gitmo detainees. I am sure that forcing them to submit to having naked pictures made of them would be cruel and unusual punishment.

Posted by: shell game shocked | December 29, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

What’s the hourly wage of a TSA employee? I sure TMZ would pay big money for celebrity body scans.

Posted by: Helen | December 29, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

TSA cant feel their way around when patting down. Doesnt that make it easy to know where to hide your bomb? Come on this is too stupid to really talk about
Posted by: larry ************************************
Gee larry, looks like your looking forward in viewing these images huh? It’ll be cheaper than buying
the magazines now.

Posted by: spacerook1 | December 29, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

as stated if you dont want to submit then dont fly.
Posted by: earl *********************************
Lets see, less passengers, less inspections…
less inspections, less inspectors….gee earl,
pick up your pink slip tomorrow.

Posted by: spacerook1 | December 29, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

If body scans are needed to insure safety in the air then lets go with them! What’s the big deal!

Posted by: Nancy Lundgren | December 29, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

What about when you go to a theater or a mall or even a cruise ship or a school? Anything can happen anywhere. If people are concerned about plane safety what about safety everywhere? Just something to think about…

Posted by: janet mitchell | December 29, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

I find it very interesting that we can expose ourselves to others in the form of wearing near to nothing at the expense of being insulted or verbally violated and in some cases provoking physical violation in the form of rape and yet we holler its an invasion of privacy when it comes to our safety. Exposure is exposure, come on people give us all a break.

Posted by: BB | December 29, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

What about when you go to a theater or a mall or even a cruise ship or a school? Anything can happen anywhere. If people are concerned about plane safety what about safety everywhere? Just something to think about…
———-
You are absolutely correct, Janet. An attack can happen anywhere people gather.
I believe one primary reason air traffic is such a major concern is that air planes when hijacked can be used as a weapon itself. An airplane’s freedom of movement means it can strike almost anywhere else such as theaters, schools, hospitals, and so forth.
The federal government, despite what some people may think, does not have unlimited funds. It is often necessary to make difficult choices in what can and can’t be done during any budget year.

Posted by: malcat | December 29, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Here’s the deal: People don’t want to be scanned due to invasion of privacy and would prefer it be used in select situational instances. Yet using it selectively would require…wait for it…”profiling” to some extent which other people don’t want. So which is it folks? Is it everyone gets the whole body scan or only people who are profiled and it becomes a second line of defense? It cannot be done both ways and either way, it’s a significant shift in our way of life in America. Pick one path and stick to it with no regrets or remorse. Additionally, if the chosen path offends some people, flying is a privilege, not a right and if whole body scans offends you or if being profiled offends you, there are alternatives to your transportation methods.

Posted by: sigh | December 30, 2009, 2:36 am 2:36 am

The more we do this, the more they are just going to find ways – like coming up with something that is easily planted on an innocent bystander, for instance.
And they WIN – because we have given up our rights and rearranged our lives around our fear for them. That’s feeding the trolls IMO!

Posted by: dont whimper so loud | December 30, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am

How come no one talks about the radiation dose one gets from these scanners? Higher risks of cancer?
It seems that companies making these scanners (General Electric) are using the Christmas Day incidents to push forward with an idea that has been stale for the past few years.

Posted by: Oldie | December 30, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am

As a frequency business traveler, I say go for the full-body scans. I don’t consider it an invasion of privacy at all. It’s a grayed out radio-wave image of your body, not a full color spread in magazine. People are way to reverent of there body images, we all have the same parts after all.

Posted by: J. Michaels | December 30, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

I am not as concerned about privacy as I am about the safety of these machines. Is it really necessary that my 6 and 9 year old be exposed to this? Use this device as a secondary screening only. Use our intelligence first to screen suspicious travelers, and then this device. Intelligence should have caught this young Nigerian man who purchased his ticket in cash, had no luggage and was on a watch list. The answer is not to throw the kitchen sink at every American citizen b/c the system failed, it is to better use our intelligence first! If this becomes a standard primary screening tool, will we then hear about increase cancer rates 5 or 10 years from now? There is literature out there that these body scanners are not completely safe. Common sense! How could they be? Radiation is radiation, and even a little amount on a regular basis over a substantial period of time cannot be a good thing. Common sense! Many Americans travel routinely during the course of a year. I would much rather a pat down, then to risk unnecessary radiation exposure.

Posted by: S. Mills | December 30, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Why is it so hard to understand that some people don’t feel comfortable with strangers looking at their genitals?

Posted by: Janet | December 30, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Eric, sounds to me like you like the patting down and full body search a little too much. Maybe you want this to happen so you can get off? Bet you’ll be in heaven if they ever decide to do a body cavity search on every passenger..you’ll be ‘up there’ all day long wont you??

Posted by: Marianna | December 30, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

The answer is to employ every technique that Israel’s El Al uses. Plain and simple. They do not mess around and they are successful. We are too politically correct (rather, politically afraid) in our country.

Posted by: GD | December 30, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Our government is slowly whittling our personal rights, freedoms and privacy, in the name of “national security” and I all hear is a loud yawn. The Nazis did the same in Germany over half century before. Much the same in Stalinist USSR, China, Cambodia, and … shall I go on? My God, don’t you ever learn? People, where will it end??? I say no way should we permit full body scan invasion of the last vestige of our dignity! I have a baby daughter, and a beautiful wife, and damn if I am going to permit some underpaid pervert gawk at their genitalia in virtual porno without my loud protests! I served in the Vietnam War, in Central America opposed to the Sandinistas, in Latin America against the drug cartels, and I sure as hell never dreamed that North Americans would discard their liberties so easily and so recklessly! Damn it, USA; grow some cojones, at the very least try to emulate the Iranian freedom fighters who are being persecuted at this very moment, for chrissakes!!!!!! Isn’t anything worth standing up to except to high gas prices??????

Posted by: roberto alexander | December 30, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Female staff for ladies and children, Male staff for men. In the circumstances, and in respect of the proposals being considered, this may be the most sensitivity that could be shown. Wish I could think of something better, given there’s not much scope if full body scans are introduced.

Posted by: Nelsonsglasseye | December 30, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Eric and Larry; you are both a couple of boneheads to simplify this issue with a “don’t fly.” Have your grandmother go through the scanner and her genitalia exposed to some bonehead like you guys, won’t you? See if she agrees giving up her privacy to security. How in the hell is anyone to visit a family member in Asia/Europe/ Hawaii? Walk on water? Charter an inflatable raft from Cuba? Like a couple of Hitler Youth, you answer: if you don’t like Adolf’s plans for the Jews, leave Germany so the rest to us to do as we please, in the name of “security.” Hah! Don’t even think about it! This old war vet is not about to turn the USA to you imbeciles because YOU feel it’s OK to be seen nude in an airport! “Don’t fly”! Stupidest words I’ve ever heard come from an American. You’re letting your petty useless job get to your heads fantasizing that you are CIA agents protecting the free world. READ MY LIPS: WE DON’T WANT YOUR STINKING FULL BODY SCANNERS BECAUSE WE VALUE OUR PRIVACY! Get it? Read my first comment and you will.

Posted by: roberto alexander | December 30, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Our government is slowly whittling our personal rights, freedoms and privacy, in the name of “national security” and I all hear is a loud yawn. The Nazis did the same in Germany over half century before. Much the same in Stalinist USSR, China, Cambodia, and … shall I go on? My God, don’t you ever learn? People, where will it end??? I say no way should we permit full body scan invasion of the last vestige of our dignity! I have a baby daughter, and a beautiful wife, and damn if I am going to permit some underpaid pervert gawk at their genitalia in virtual porno without my loud protests! I served in the Vietnam War, in Central America opposed to the Sandinistas, in Latin America against the drug cartels, and I sure as hell never dreamed that North Americans would discard their liberties so easily and so recklessly! Damn it, USA; grow some cojones, at the very least try to emulate the Iranian freedom fighters who are being persecuted at this very moment, for chrissakes!!!!!! Isn’t anything worth standing up to except to high gas prices??????

Posted by: roberto alexander | December 30, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Regarding the invasion of privacy with “full body scans,” I submit that is nonsense.
One cannot open a web page addressing this subject without seeing images of the scans. One cannot identify the subject in any way. If this is the case, exactly how does this invade privacy.
If I can stand in front of a device that will positively determine if I am a threat to a flight or not, I will gladly do so. Of course, a big factor in this is whether it is an across-the-board requirement. To do less would be inappropriate.
Folks – there is enough risk in flying without having to worry about some whacked-out extremist bringing things on board that can bring down the craft. Let’s drop the weak argument of “invading my privacy.” I am quite certain it is more an argument of “leave me alone-don’t bother me!”
We are in a world where thousands of morbidly-ignorant people – in a very strange world – wish to harm innocent people. Is it not worth a bit of inconvience to optimize flying safety?

Posted by: saftgek | December 30, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

The issue here is the banal attempts by many to redesign the definition of democracy. You all have options you opt or opt out of flying. No one individual makes you get on a plane. If you civil liberties are infringed then do not fly. But do not denigrate the United States for attempting to preserve human rights. Either do not fly or live in a country where you always live in risk. Others believe their lives are more important then your civil liberties.

Posted by: Drew Jeffrey Stevens | December 30, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

The TSA is lying when they say your face is blurred, and it is possible they could store a database of your naked picutres, when they want. The images above are the fake images the TSA created to make us believe that the photos are not detailed, when in reality the images are as detailed as if you were staring right at a naked person. They might even store them in the future in a type of database with your name attached to them. You cannot even board an aircraft now without TSA punks photographing your 6 year old daughter nude.

Posted by: Cannon | December 30, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

WHEN WILL IT STOP WHEN PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE NOT SAFE, AND WE
SHOULD DO BODY SCANS.

Posted by: FARRA | December 30, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

What’s the big deal? I don’t have any hangups about my body, even my privates! I don’t think after looking at hundreds of bodies, a TSA employee is going to say “wow, look at those hooters!” or “wow, that guy is hung!” You are making a big deal out of nothing. I would rather go through a scanner than to have to tackle a would be terrorist on a plane at Christmas!! Now I don’t know if these things are basically xrays which could, over time, accumulate harmful radiation to frequent fliers. I would think a “pat-down” would be worse because if the security person was afraid to feel a woman or man up, then that is where a terrorist would surely hide what they needed to hide. Are we so hung up on our bodies as being private and scaret that we could lose hundreds of people because of it? I say “let ‘em look!”

Posted by: Patrick | December 30, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

I Don’t understand!!! I am a developer for a US retail company and if we can build a system to track every single item in our inventory and share that data with 2000+ stores, the US government has to be able to create a centralized “No Fly” list. My team and I could build one in less than a week if that is what it’s gonna take. Really People?

Posted by: Anthony Stowe | December 30, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I don’t look forward to having full body scans to fly either but it it means increased safety, I say go for it. Some of these guys ranting and raving about invasion of privacy would be the first to try to sue if anything happened and want to know why the airlines or the government didn’t do more to protect them.

Posted by: John | December 30, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Hey Larry, don’t go telling me that your colleagues won’t abuse the system with every pretty girl that goes through. You guys are a bunch of idiots proved by this “no getting up the last hour of the flight” thing. How is that going to prevent terrorism?????? Your outfit’s showmanship does nothing to keep us safe and is all a bunch of BS that makes you feel like you’re doing something. I hope everyone heeds your “don’t fly” suggestion and every airline goes bankrupt and out of business. Then those employed by your idiot department can go looking for new jobs if they can find one with standards low enough to accept them.

Posted by: BG | December 30, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I work in oncology and the amount of radiation that that machine will emit is far less then people are exposed to in everyday situations. Microwaves?? People get chest xrays and other xrays and don’t complain about that then why complain about something that most people only do on certain occasions. Lets get realo here. It’s for everyones safety. If we had people in this administration who had a clue about security maybe things like this wouldn’t happen, but we have those who have no credentials to to be Homeland Security. Because you were a governor of a border which I live in and who supported the current Prez. doesn’t make you an expert. She was one of the worst governors Arizona ever had. The U.S. always reacts when something like this happens instead of preventing it from happening first. Take some advice from Israel, they don’t have terrorist attacks because they don’t care if they profile. They don’t care if it’s not politically correct to profile. The U.S. is aloways trying to make other countries who hate us like us. I say screw them all. Let’s profile more, let’s use whole body scans and let’s let our Intelligence work for us without the help of homeland security who is a waste. The U.S. knew about this character and they did nothing about it. Doesn’t that make you feel safe. It sure doesn’t make me feel safe. I haven’t felt safe since this administration has taken over. I have never feared flying but I do now and I will be flying very soon and am very fearful. I trust no one. America let’s open our eyes and stop thinking about who is going to see our body images instead let’s think about our safety.

Posted by: Leona | December 30, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Here’s another example of airline security stupidity: a week and a half ago my wife and I were 5 minutes late for the cut off of checking our bags thanks to the transport service. The airline told us that we could not get on our flight and have the bags come later because traveling separately from your bags is a “security risk”. So, we were put on standby and luckily got a flight 8 hours later. Our bags were sitting in LAX waiting for us for about 6 hours before we arrived ourselves. So much for that excuse to inconvenience the public. Furthermore, don’t they know by now that terrorists will happily fly with their bomb-laden luggage? So, what difference does it make? Just an excuse to make it look like they’re keeping us safe with their stupid, good for nothing rules.

Posted by: BG | December 30, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Nothing is going to be safe until they realize that profiling is a necessary evil. It does no good to strip search or body scan grandma while Abdul Al Mohammed walks through unscathed because no one wants to offend Muslims.

Posted by: charlee | December 30, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Our Founding Fathers said it best: “They who would trade liberty for security soon have none and deserve neither.”

Posted by: BG | December 30, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Israel has a solution that has been in effect for several decades: 1)study the threat. 2) know the threat and what it looks like;and 3)examine anything or anyone that looks like the threat.
Simply… profile the hell out of the threat and if it quacks like a terrorist,it’s a threat and then don’t let it fly until you’ve “probed” every possible place an explosive can reside. Then and only then let them on the plane. Hint: most 80 year old grammas are not terrorists… let them and those who don’t fir the profile proceed through “standard” examination. Strip search or whatever the “profiled”. Seems simple and it apparently works for Israel.

Posted by: Doubting Tom'as | December 30, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

I agree with those who question how much radiation these scans subject people to. What’s the underlying technology? What dosage will a frequent-flyer experience? I think I’ll just travel by car if at all possible.

Posted by: Pragmatist | December 30, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

I was chosen for a full body scan on my last international flight. I am tall, slender, long blonde hair, and relatively referred to as ‘built’. To say I look like any type of terrorist would be a far stretch of the imagination. Do you think I was profiled orjust selected for the resulting picture for someone like Eric??

Posted by: Diana | December 30, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

The answer is simple just board planes naked that way we have nothing to hide.The airlines will need to clean the seats every flight or give out clean towels.
The right to fly naked is at least equal to the right to bear arms and free speach.

Posted by: Larry | December 30, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Airline travel isn’t a right. So if the cost of travel includes a five second peek under my clothes I will pay it. But it won’t be long before the terrorists swallow the bombs or insert them in a place where the scanner can’t see. I’m sorry to say it but profiling and backgound checks as a part of buying a ticket are not far off. When the government has to balance our desire for privicy with the need for safety, safety wins.
I can’t stand the security lines because of all the whining about the inconveniences. The solution to the complainers is trains, buses, and cars. Stand up for your rights and stay home!
Latin America and Central America are the same place.

Posted by: Ranger Captain | December 30, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Sending Guantanamo Terrorists back to the people and places that spawned them in the first place for rehabilitation sums up what is wrong with the Government. Why not give someone who is NOT a citizen and is hell bent on killing Americans every right to a fair CIVIL trial that only CITIZENS of our country have. WOW, we need more change and NOW!

Posted by: AC1961 | December 30, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Okay, do you really think privacy is going to matter to you when your plane is going down or flying into a building? And why do people think that the TSA Officers who would be in a room with a computer are all skeevy perverts getting off on a nondescript black and white image of a person? Give the Officers some credit. The WBI would probably actually decrease the time it takes to get through security screening, so we don’t have to wait for the guy in front of us to take things out of his pockets 3 times before he can finally make it through the metal detector without setting it off. I say, “privacy schmivacy”…I would rather do this and get to my destination safely then think smugly in my seat,”hah! TSA’s not going to see me naked!” as the plane falls out of the sky. Let’s get real…there is a real threat, and we need to take a real stance against it.

Posted by: Gimmeabreak | December 30, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

I have ben a flight attendant for 33 yrs and because I had a knee replacement 3 yrs ago, I have to go thru a full wanding even thoug I’m in uniform EVERY time I go thru security. I think the body scanners are great, it takes me 2 minutes and the screener never sees me as they are in another room or behind a screen. I think they should absolutely be used in secondary screening.
For all of you who are so worried about your civil liberties, I think my liberties would be violated far more if I was blown up by some terrorist acting supposedly in the name of “Allah”.

Posted by: Char | December 31, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Maybe there should be some thought given to making everyone who travels by air do so in the nude. That would eliminate any funny business about bombs in the cabins during flights. However, the real downside would be when passengers in the inner seats would want to enter or exit their row during the flight. It would be so unpleasant for the person in the isle seat.
Even so, anything for the public safety.

Posted by: George Riedl | December 31, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I don’t see the scanner as an invasion of my personal liberties. God, your doctor, your Mom and for some a few hookers end up seeing your stuff during your life. This is a dull outline image in black and white that someone in a back room looks at, not porn or arousing images. Do you really think after the first thousand or 100 thousand passengers they are going to get excited about your particular junk? If you are that gifted in that department then you are probably already flaunting it! Even for those who are shy or religious, this is a clinical inspection of your god given, standard issue body parts to make sure you’re not smuggling. Less invasive than a pat down or standing in line dumping your bags out for everyone to look at during manual inspections.
I’m all for keeping big brother at bay but this is for safety and will help catch criminals/terrorists. The drug money finances the terrorists, we need to catch them all!
Stay safe everyone.

Posted by: Mike | December 31, 2009, 2:00 am 2:00 am

I think those who think that the body scan equals to porn must be a delusional. How you consider the smuggled bomb inside the body undetected until it blows up and kill innocents?

Posted by: Jual Tanah | December 31, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

“Charlee” writes it brilliantly: Our Founding Fathers said it best: “They who would trade liberty for security soon have none and deserve neither.” It IS about liberty, privacy, and the Bill of Rights! Each time a terrorist tries to blow up a plane, more of our rights are eroded, and 80% of the contributors here gleefully scamper like sheep to the slaughterhouse BEGGING their rights be taken away “for security’s sake”! saftgek, you are sheep; you use arguments to cheapen our rights, (and flying is a right, if you believe in equality, unlike in the past when only the rich could afford it; the poor could only afford the bus. Is it that many here want the poor off the airplanes to give them more leg room?). These rights have been paid dearly in blood and guts by our veterans — mostly middle class, mostly poor, since the American revolution. If you can’t defend the constitution, go to North Korea where you can get off by willingly having your body cavities prodded with hammers and sickles by TSA look-alikes.

Posted by: roberto alexander | December 31, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Janet Napolitano is doing such a poor job of head of Homeland Security.
One agency doesn’t talk to the other agencies?
They don’t share information like who to look out for?
This guy’s father alerted authorites to look out for his son. He fit the profile of a depressed misfit that al qaeda recruits.
This wasn’t important enough?
It was reported that Homeland Security’s job is to REACT to a crisis and that they did a “fine job”. What are they talking about? It was some random guy who tackled the bomber. Also, the bomb only caught fire.
These passengers got lucky that day.
I know how some people operate. Each department is protective of their territory. Nobody shares information, and nothing gets done.
We have the technology.
I expect a whole lot more from Homeland Security.

Posted by: ddg | December 31, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

You all do know that if the right places had been taken care of after 9/11 then terrorism would have been diminished to the point that we wouldn’t be commenting about the current situation and how to deal with it.

Posted by: stone | December 31, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

I’ve been through them- before as a test (I think at Heathrow or CDG). They, basically, said “if you go through this line it is quicker” but its a full body scan. This was a few years ago and I think they were testing them out. I have no problem with it as long as the data is not archived (beyond a reasonable time), kept, or shared with others.(How about a law with both severe civil&criminal penalties for the above such, Congress?) And it raises questions about children. Technically, it would be childporn according to some statutes I would think.
Another solution is to codify this choice: longer lines for normal and shorter lines for body x-ray?
Of course much of the problem could be solved with common sense (profiling, cost/benefit analysis and the public accepting some “danger” when flying, stricter visa/background-check for certain countries/profiles, and more aggressive investigation of unsavory folks) but, of course, we can’t offend anyone.

Posted by: Ed | December 31, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Where’s the “right places” that we should have taken care of? They keep moving and are being imported in from all other – including here in America.
The time is now and we have to deal with what we have on hand now.
So, it would be helpful if Homeland Security and all of the other agencies could get their act together.
We deserve better.

Posted by: ddg | January 1, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Anyone notice that when you get an x-ray at the Dentist they have to leave the room and cover you with that heavy blanket but frequent flyers will be going this radiation field possibly a few times a week without any protection?
Well… cancer is a profitable disease afterall.

Posted by: Lance | January 2, 2010, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Dentists and assistants do many x-rays throughout the day, week, month, year.
A passenger would not get that kind of exposure.

Posted by: ddg | January 2, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I won’t be visiting America again or spending any more money there. The radiation given out by these things will kill more people than the terrorists could ever hope too, not to mention the damage to reproductive organs.
Good luck with the dollar.

Posted by: Chris | January 3, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Get over it people. We live in a day and age where we need to put personal opinions aside and do what is best for the majority which is to comply with regulations, even if it means a body scan. So, you have one go on your merry way. It’s not like these people personally know you anyway.

Posted by: Laurie | January 3, 2010, 10:45 am 10:45 am

BB, I have to agree with you. Go to any beach or swimming pool and you will see far more than will ever show on the body scan!
S>Mills, I have not seen where anyone proposes scanning your 6-9 year old children. You just want to gripe about something. I’ll bet you are one of those that show up at the beach with almost nothing covering you.

Posted by: Greyghost | January 3, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am

A thorough education is needed regarding this whole situation at the airport.
The more you know, the more you feel in control.
Don’t you want to fight back?
This is the way to go.
I know one thing, if a passenger begins to only pull on his undies, somebody’s going to jump him.
The headline could read:
“Knicker-bomber gets KO’d just in nick of time”

Posted by: ddg | January 3, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Routine scans like this go too far. Not flying isn’t an option for many, but to be subjected to what amounts to a public strip search in an airport is outrageous.
There has to be another way.
I only fly now when I absolutely must, otherwise I drive.
The public needs to boycott flying and shut this obscenity down.

Posted by: Wil Dalton | January 3, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

These scanners should only be used when a secondary screening is needed. They are too intrusive for general screenings.

Posted by: GaLiberal | January 3, 2010, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Posted by: Eric | Dec 29, 2009 5:21:25 PM
I worked in TSA for over 5 years.Why dont you get silly and say you cant look in my bags .Is that going too far? We have the ability to stop all this nonsense and state if you dont want people to see if your image then dont fly! Its not a God given right to fly you know!Its stupid to expect TSA to do their job but dont do this or that when your life is at stake,right? TSA cant feel their way around when patting down. Doesnt that make it easy to know where to hide your bomb? Come on this is too stupid to really talk about!
———————–
Eric, you completely missed the point. This is not about looking in your bags with an x-ray scanner. It’s about doing a virtual strip search of your person. While flying my not be a right (neither is driving), flying is a necessity due to the absence of other transportation. For many businesses flying is a necessity. Even for personal travel, flying has become the preferred method of travel with the amount of traffic on highways and the cost of gas. It’s not about TSA being able to do it’s job; it’s about my rights against unreasonable search.

Posted by: GaLiberal | January 3, 2010, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Posted by: Cannon | Dec 30, 2009 6:19:28 PM
WHEN WILL IT STOP WHEN PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE NOT SAFE, AND WE
SHOULD DO BODY SCANS.
————————————
I will not give up my constitutional rights against unreasonable search for some false sense of security.

Posted by: GaLiberal | January 3, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

It’s not like you are in your own car and someone decides to “scan” you.
When a person decides to hop a plane, they have to go by the airport’s rules and safety standards.
If this is too much for one’s sensibilities, then they must find an alternate way for transportation.
I’m concerned about the luggage and what gets on the plane.
It’s been shown that sometimes there’s a lack of continuity of security of the luggage. The problem happens after the luggage is checked and the point where it gets onto the plane.
I hope they fixed this breach.

Posted by: cc | January 4, 2010, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

If YOUR flight was saved with a scan of a passenger, you wouldn’t complain about your little privacy! Scan me baby!

Posted by: Gerald | January 4, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

SHELLGAMESHOCKED,YOU ARE SO DEADLY ACCURATE WITH YOUR COMMENT.AS REGULATION GROWS,FREEDOM DIES.

Posted by: BIG D | January 4, 2010, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

These machines are more powerful than microwaves. I guess you’ll believe anything
There is real terrorisim in the world but this is
Caused by blowback in the countries the u.s.
Subvertly takes over or tries to take over.
In other words carma, but I believe most if not
All acts have been done by the NWO.
Or the old anglo saxon world order.
Problem reaction solution or the Hegelian
Dialectic. You simply dont wait for your agenda
To fall on your lap you make it happen.
Military stragetist have used this for 1000′s
Of years. And now poloticians use it too.

Posted by: Mack | January 5, 2010, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

I think these are called terawaves, Thats like a billion waves in a given space. This is not in theory
but proven it unzips dna strands and further miscommunicates the info . Basically the people around this machine will recieve as a gift
Cancer. You know you can laugh but arrogence is not a virtue. And by the time you figure it out it might be to late. Really. You people need to wake up
You think you know whats going on. Get rid of your
Ego and learn the truth about the food additives
And about depleted uranium bullets and about what
Pilots and engineers say about 911.

Posted by: Mack | January 5, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Look you boys and girls are being dumbed down and pacified with flouride and mercury. There even putting lithium and prozac in the water.guess what
Anti-depressents have ,flouride. All this to keep
You from getting angry. Just like hitler did. The truth
Is very scary and yes it makes people uncomfortable. I agree on this. But once we become aware of this we can now spread the news and help. Your asking what can I do. Lots and lots of stuff. First get angry then start telling people what you know. Then give out flyers, or dvd’s . Remember the nwo or old school estabishement is counting on
Your ignorance and lack of care. And also being distracted to get there agenda through.there many book and movie makers who have made literally thousands of books and dvd’s on the subject this is
Not hysteria or paranoia, Actually the nwo uses
Phsycology tricks to demonize people who espouse these ideas. And it works. The nwo understands the human mind.

Posted by: Mack | January 5, 2010, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

It seems that some of the links to th existence of the nwo I posted got erased. You see people this blog is brought to you by a co-sponser of the old boys club ABC news. I’m sure they’ve sat in the back taking notes like time magazine has done at the builderburg meetings. Remember they’ve worked for thousands of years without our knowledge.
They buy up businesses like mcdonalds and walmart
To control the food and insert there sterility drugs and poisons.
They had many a revolutions because they always mistreated the gen.pop. The kings would sometimes
Be killed. There are also mass cullings or thining the herd. Two countries would get together and decide to start a war all to cull their population. Sounds crazy but the real reasons for war are because some rouge nation like Iraq does’nt go along with the plan. It seems that know Iran is in the crosshairs
And guess what there not in the U.N. .So believe me or not but I’m with George Carlin he did’nt believe anything the Govt.said. He knew who the real omers were his father let him on the secret.

Posted by: Mack | January 5, 2010, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

There called terahertz waves and they do unzip DNA. They will eventually cause cancer just like they recently revealed CT scans are like taking 85 x-rays. Cancer has gone up like in the 40′s from 1in 33 to 1 in 3 people. Childrens cancer has skyrocketed to 2000 percent or 20 times. Thinj this through cancer research is not workin at all. Guess who founded the cancer rearch institute John D. Rockefellar, one of the most if not the most motivated eugenist. Guess who else was a eugenisist Hitler. Mao, Stalin. Are you starting to get the picture on why everything is broken. Update , there not trying to fix it.

Posted by: Mack | January 5, 2010, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Did I scare you people because thats whats needed.
Look they control the media so nothing tgere doing gets to you. They control the armed forces a brainwash the young recruits to do thier killing. They
Sell you there modified fast foods to sterilize and destroy your immune system , let me not forget the chemtrails in our skies everywhere to spread barium and aluminum and who knows what else. This system in which all the banks are involved is real. Pres. Woodrow Willson appoligized to the american
Public for allowing the fedral reserve to take over our banking systems. It is believed they killed him. The feds Considered him easy prey because he was a profressor and was not privy to the politcal history of the machine. The feds had tried with real politicians and failed. This system of banks are luciferian, the word should be self explamatory.
Maybe you don’t believe in satan but they do.
And if you’ve ever wondered why they kill anybody whose against them in a whim its cause there satanist. Hello! Are you starting to get why there’s wars and constant covert war.the cia has invaded
At least one nation every year almost since its inception. JFK almost abolished the Fed. Res.and had a bill already written to disband the CIA. I’ m not making this up. He knew of the machine, in one of his qoutes he informs the public of thos and asks the public to help him spread the news. I think he was made an example to scare anyome else who had an bright ideas. Look the can stop our leaders but they cant kill an idea cause ideas are bulletproof. Look at Cuba look at Iran look at vietnam look at Cambodia . In every instance a little poor nation with only heart and union defeated the U. S . There afraid of the public don’t you get it , its that easy.
The machine.

Posted by: Mack | January 6, 2010, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Full body scanners won’t detect explosives stuffed up a terrorist’s ass, or swallowed. How safe do you feel now?
Human intelligence, behavioral training for screeners, metal detectors, and canines… Especially use of canine, man’s best friend! Start training the dogs and stop this non-sense see thru clothes techno bullcrap before these jerk terrorists succeed again!

Posted by: WhatAboutDogs | January 6, 2010, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

I will never fly again…Period. I will not encourage my loved ones to visit me if they have to go through this B.S. There will be many like me who will just choose not to fly anymore…and the dominoes will fall one upon another. I guess flying will be only for the ELITE in the end; as it should be. Gone forever is the free world that my ancestors fought and died for. Thank you very much; you who have sold your souls…and might I ask you? For What?

Posted by: Belinda | January 7, 2010, 6:06 am 6:06 am

Some of you whinning and crying need to keep your tails out of the airports and dont fly period. If you so worried about some one seeing your private parts DONT FLY. I am quite sure the folks who died on those planes flown into the twin towers would gladly had been subjected to a strip search had they had an inkly they would die by some fools with Box cutters as weapons. Get over yourselves. As for the idiot he says he dosnt want some one looking at his gentiles.(Get over yourself and keep your ### on the ground. Take a train, or bus or drive. If you are so worry about your privacy DONT FLY! Its a choice to fly. You dont have to. If they strip your ass butt naked if it means save lives so be it. Probably something no one else wants to see anyway. quit damn bellie aching and keep out of the airports then you can remain private as your little heart desires. I dont give a rats butt what they do to make me safe I DONT want to die in no plane crash that could have been avoided because I refuse to give up my privacy. you folks are a tool. I vote strip and body cavity search. or keep the hell out of the airports.

Posted by: Blkshepherd | January 7, 2010, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Enough is enough. Little by little we’re loosing our privacy rights and nobody seems to care. Our US public just goes with the flow and nobody asks any questions. I would never submit to a body scan. And soon enough, even with these machines in place, a terrorist will smuggle something in through a body cavity. Then those would have to be searched, too. People, it is time to stand up and say no. I’d much rather keep my privacy rights and stand a slight chance of being blown up on a plane than give those rights up and stand a slight chance on being blown up on a plane. Enough is enough. Might as well eliminate the right to privacy all together.

Posted by: kevin | January 16, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am

It is your choice to fly and its not like they can clearly broadcast you private parts you stupid ass U.S. citizens if you have a problem with the U.S. or something the government is doing leave.

Posted by: cody | January 21, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I wonder what people will think when they find out the images full body scans produce are really no different than a negative photo. Simply convert this image from a negative into a positive and you have a naked photo in full color. Can you imagine all of the possible things people will be able to do with these photos after they leak to the internet (or tsa employees themselves)?

Posted by: Justin n | February 6, 2010, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

I like to travel, but when I read about the use of full body scanners, I think I’ll stay home. As a past victim of rape, this technology is harmful to me psychologically. To be invaded is to be invaded…period. I’ve also read that these scanners will show the use of feminine hygiene products by women who are having their period and that a TSA agent will discuss it with the passenger if that is seen. Yes, all women want to discuss their periods and their choice of sanitary products with strangers…NOT! This is totally wrong!!

Posted by: Lisa | April 4, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Full Body Scanning, Bio Scanning, EZ PASS, etc….all these types of scanning are leading somewhere, and its not a good place. Despite the fact that people keep screaming SAFETY….we have a a fraction of the worlds governments who have other intentions.
Also REMEMBER… that technology advances quick, so these images will soon be more detailed as the years go by. Think about that.

Posted by: Kyle | October 23, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Is someone getting payola?

Posted by: g. royse | December 6, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.