Closing Arguments: Keeping Friendly Skies
President Obama, who returned from his holiday vacation today, will be briefed tomorrow about enhanced security and intelligence sharing in the wake of the Christmas Day terror scare. Meanwhile, more than two dozen names were added to the no-fly watchlist today, and the TSA has directed airlines to administer full body patdowns to all U.S. bound travelers from fourteen countries considered to have some link to terrorism. But these enhanced screenings have not begun in all airports. And if and when they are, they may not be able to detect the type of explosive used in the Christmas Day bombing attempt. When it comes to using full body scanners, privacy concerns persist. So tonight, we ask: Will the enchanced measures work? And if not, what will? Tell us what you think. You can follow "Nightline" anytime on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Nightline.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Spending all this money on better security???? The ticket agent should have done his/her job. A big red flag should go off. This man paid cash for a one way ticket from Amsterdam to Detroit, helloo????
Posted by: Winona Hayes | January 5, 2010, 12:09 am 12:09 am
As a Flight Attendant for a major US Airline I do not mind the extra security. What I do mind is the in consistency in the TSA’s practices. I thought the whole purpose of the government operated TSA was to ensure consistency! I can tell you I fly throught many airports and it is NOT consistant
Posted by: usflightattendant | January 5, 2010, 12:13 am 12:13 am
I don’t think pat downs will work. Listening to a parent’s call to alert the US authorities of their perceived threat of the child to the US will work. More importantly, the full body scanners are effective and the data is not saved. They will work.
Posted by: J Raehl | January 5, 2010, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Full body scanners make sense! About the only way to detect all explosives. I think we would all feel more comfortable flying in the skies knowing that all of our fellow passengers had gone through a full body scanner and passed. “NO explosives aboard.”
Posted by: Joanne Ross | January 5, 2010, 3:17 am 3:17 am
None of this will work. It is a waste of money! Kurt Haskell who saw the underwear bomber prior to boarding the flight says Mr. bomber was never searched. Kurt Haskell heard from a man that was with the underwear bomber tell the TSA that the nigerian didn’t even have a passport. The nigerian man and the other man were then able to board the plane. They didn’t have to take off their shoes and walk through a metal detector.
Posted by: Steve Garrett | January 5, 2010, 3:29 am 3:29 am
Google Kurt Haskell
Posted by: Steve Garrett | January 5, 2010, 3:30 am 3:30 am
Yes, the enhanced measures will help. These should be implemented at all airports immediately. Also, full body scans and intense detailed profiling should be implemented everywhere immediately. These are all small steps in the right direction.
All of these things will help, but will not completely solve the terrorism threat to airliners. Additional measures should be identified and implemented on an ongoing basis. We are at war. The enemy will continue to seek new ways to attack us and we should continue to seek new ways to stop them. This is a process that never ends and shame on the government if it cannot stay ahead of the enemy and protect us. To make the government less likely to have internal communication problems like those that caused the Detroit incident, the Homeland Security Department should be folded into the Department of Defense. The Department of Defense is supposed to be defending us. Homeland Security is just a Bush boondoggle that has hurt, rather than helped.
Finally, I am appalled that I have heard nothing on the media about the possibility of the terrorists using the plastic explosives all over the place, rather than just on airlines. It seems that the government is so preoccupied with airlines that it is ignoring everything else. With our southern border wide open the way it is, I am very worried that the terrorists will bring in the explosives via Mexico and use them everywhere. If the government cannot keep drugs and aliens from coming across the border, how will they stop explosives from coming across?
Posted by: Proud Native American and Angry Independent Voter | January 5, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Scanners will help calm people down and sell scanners, that’s it. Checked baggage is not scanned thoroughly enough to prevent an act.
Posted by: SkepticHeck | January 5, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
For the people or person who saw that Mr. bomber did not have the proper ID or credentials to board the plane and said nothing, what part do you share in this failure? We all have a responsibility in this. If we see something that isn’t right, take the time and report it.
Posted by: Skip O'Rourke | February 5, 2010, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm