By Sadie Bass

Feb 9, 2010 10:37am

UN Asks for $538 Million to Aid Pakistan’s Humanitarian Crisis

ABC's Nick Schifrin reports from Pakistan: The war that Pakistan has waged inside its own borders since 9/11 has cost the country $35 billion and displaced millions, including 3 million people in just the last year — the largest dislocation anywhere since Rwanda. Today the United Nations said Pakistan’s humanitarian situation remains a crisis because of that war and appealed for $537 million to help feed, clothe and reconstruct the lives of the country’s neediest in the next six months. “Pakistan is a front line state on the War on Terror,” said Hina Rabbani, Pakistan’s minister of state for finance. “Peace and development are interdependent… To win this war, we have to win the hearts and the minds of the people. This is the only way to defeat extremism.” The UN’s role in that effort is mostly providing emergency aid to those made homeless by the military’s two major military campaigns against the Taliban since March. The US has a huge stake in that — both in the sense that it is the largest donor to the UN’s campaign and because instability in Pakistan threatens the Pakistani army’s gains against the Taliban. Today the U.S. ambassador for humanitarian relief, Robin Raphel, lauded the UN’s “extraordinary” efforts and promised the United States would “respond generously” to the UN’s appeal. She told me that money would be separate from any money coming to Pakistan from the White House or from the Kerry-Lugar bill. But the UN’s ability to develop Pakistan – especially its poorest and most violent province, the Northwest Frontier – has been weakened in the last year. It has temporarily pulled out most of its foreigners who work on development, instead leaving many of the emergency workers in place with severe security restrictions. Twelve UN workers were killed in Pakistan last year. The head of the UN’s humanitarian office in Pakistan also admitted that Haiti would make his work more difficult, telling me “it will take away financial resources” from Pakistan.

User Comments

Pakistan has done far too little, to help with the war on terror, with its border territory overrun with Taliban and terrorists of Al-Qaeda.
If they want aid, they must demonstrate they are willing to be more cooperative, in dealing with militancy.
I don’t see the UN offering aid to the US.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 9, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

I can’t remember one thing the UN has ever done directly for the United States. They’ve cost us a lot of money and a lot of blood but so far we haven’t got much for it except insults and more outstretched hands.
We already provide 70% of the aid to Somalia and Ethiopia, now we are asked to feed Pakistan too. We defend the entire planet and feed half of it with money we borrow from China.
I wonder if I can claim the world population as dependents on my income tax?

Posted by: oonogil | February 9, 2010, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

they’re kidding,right?

Posted by: GP | February 9, 2010, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

they’re kidding,right?
Posted by: GP | Feb 9, 2010 11:37:04 PM
______________________________________
my sentiments exactly!!!

Posted by: dk | February 10, 2010, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Every American should at least watch Charlie Wilson’s War documentary which can be got on PBS.Only then you can understand the reasons for today’s mess in NWFP and Afghanistan.40 plus years ago the biggest American listening station was in Peshawar Frances Gray Powers flew from Peshawar when he was shot down over USSR. We have to think beyond our nose otherwise this is only going get worse,hot spots around the world have to be taken care of. Economies of poor countries have to be helped, education like Greg Mortersen’s effort have to be encourged and guns alone will never solve this for sure. Read the book Three Cups of Tea.

Posted by: rashid zaidi | February 10, 2010, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

The UN works with developing countries – not super powers. US tax payers are not contributing a lot. As a percentage of the GNP of the US – the UN only gets 0.22% of the US GNP. Not even the 0.7% needed to achieve the MDGs. A pittance which does not warrant arguments such as the above.

Posted by: mins | February 10, 2010, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.