By David Schoetz

Mar 22, 2010 5:02pm

Faith and Science Collide: A Future for God?

Does God have a future? That’s the primary question teed up in tomorrow night’s “Face-off” debate, framed around the delicate but undeniable tension between God and science. Dan Harris, who has brought “Nightline” several “Faith Matters” reports, moderated the event before a packed, partisan crowd at Cal Tech on March 14, pictured above. It is scheduled to air tomorrow night — that’s Tuesday, March 23, 11:35 p.m. ET. Earlier today, Harris told me the substance of the debate transcends the standard atheist-versus-believer conflict, probing the question, “Are we at a point in history where science proves or disproves the existence of God?” Squaring off are familiar foes — on one side, spiritualist Deepak Chopra; on the other, skeptic Michael Shermer — each flanked with backup support onstage and in the audience. And while these two have locked intellectual horns several times before, they had never actually met in person. Why not invite about a thousand people for the occasion? “To have a live audience is a huge difference,” Harris said, describing one particularly lively exchange between a physicist in the audience and Chopra. It is the sixth “Face-off” debate, following closely on the heels of last month’s “Is It Okay to Be Fat?” debate.  The topic, however, is more in line with another moderated by Harris and participated in by Chopra, which posed the question “Does Satan Exist?”  There is already been some buzz about the #futureofgod debate, including this write-up from a Whittier Daily News reporter who covered it. As always, we hope to hear from you. ——————– UPDATE: You can read the ABCNews.com report HERE. Click HERE for a slideshow of images from the event. And embedded below is a spirited preview clip in which Chopra defends his scientific credentials. It should be a good one.

User Comments

I am a Christian and I am a Christian Minister. I feel my beliefs are more in league with Depak than the people who are telling the world what Christians believe.
Christianity has an enormous, underlying spirituality that is in direct conflict with he dogma and doctrine that the Church often professes – reading the words of Jesus, the Teacher, reveal the dichotomy very well. I believe most Christians are deeply confused because the doctrine deeply conflicts with the teachings of the Teacher.
All that Jesus is said to have done, the miracles and signs, were mere selling points that, I believe, were intended to get us to listen to his message of compassionate rebellion. The miracles are like the diplomas on a Doctor’s wall – a display of qualifications intended to gain our trust and allegiance.

Posted by: Tom Anderson | March 22, 2010, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Tom, why did they focus on the eye-glassed guy with the VanDyke beard? Was Satan lurking in the crowd to see what the hub-hub was about? But seriously:
-Depak was expressing basic stuff. Most of which was/is considered heresy, wrong-thinking, etc by most Christian churches, Catholic Church, and most Orthodox Churches (at least officially but likely Depak’s stuff is probably in line with many current practices/teachings/sermons). Usually the issues were taken seriously and refuted by bigtime Creeds, Papal Bulls, censures, ex-communications, etc. (read up on Manichaeism, Gnostics, the Reformation, etc etc and so on….) Much of these thoughts existed a long time ago but have reappeared in Christian churches in recent times, essentially, is using VERY old issues but under a “new age” mantra, and to some degree Asian religious ideas, to appeal to Western audiences under a “Christian” framework. There also is, of course, the direct influence of Hindi and Buddahist, primarily, on Western religions due to the “fad” in the past decades and some of those old ideas also creeped in. Deepak just packages these basic ideas and has a nice receptive audience but they have nothing to do really with Christianity (at least as the Bible or Jesus would have it) except as this new/old idea of “spirtualism”, ecuemenialism, or whatever.
This is in no way to criticize, or support, one demonination or indeed religion at all, except to say one needs to be careful with definitions and know history. I suggest reading up or even taking a basic comparative religious class to get some basic history and you’ll see that most of this “new age” stuff has been dealth with before. Many times. Amazingly, or not, the ancient debates, councils, works, etc dealt with even more perplexing issues and often in much better format, and indeed debate, than ABC “roundtables”.

Posted by: Ed | March 22, 2010, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

This is silly. Its like having a debate on whether Santa Claus or The Cookie Monster Exists.The next show should be entitled,” Does the tooth Fairy have a future”?.

Posted by: Mark | March 22, 2010, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Factually I agree with the scientist, I think he’s 100% right, but religion has a role. It brings people together and can be very comforting. Hopefully in the future it will go back to being about love and compassion for others instead of political issues and power as it is today.

Posted by: BoPeep | March 22, 2010, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Debate, any debate starts-or ends- with definition of terms. So Mark is somewhat right. You can’t have a “debate” with any hope of resolution or winner, really, if the questions are wrong, the intent is different, or the standard of logic, examples, or proof differ. Like, imagine, if Obama debated Madison, Jefferson, or indeed any signers or founders of the country! Then imagine the same debate with Barry versus Nasser, Abū Dharr al-Ghifārī,Trotsky, Haji Misbach, etc. Imagine the different outcome! The beliefs, point-of-view, and core beliefs are so different that first debate is ridiculous or unproductive but the second debate would likely have Barry involved with an outcome.
Likewise you cannot “debate” religion- whether it is religion, core-beliefs, superstition, Gaia theory, or certan political mantras– if the beliefs are so core and the questions are so charged, “set up”, or whatever. The proofs, standards of logic, and premises etc mean, by definition you cannot, really, “debate” these things excepting when people agree to a certain standards of proof, belief, or premises; which by-the-way we are told are “culturally based” anyway!

Posted by: Ed | March 22, 2010, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

As god is an imaginary construct, neither a past, present, or future is a property of god.

Posted by: cag | March 22, 2010, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

I do not believe that you can have a debate about organized religion or God. I do not recognize a Masters Degree in Religion as a legitimate form of Academia.You might as well tell me you have a Masters degree in Black Magic or voo doo. We as human beings are perfectly capable of loving our neighboors, empathy, and a sense of community without any form of superstition whatsoever.Why do people feel that believing in God equates to being a good and spiritual human being? I can be a good man, with strong morals, and a pilar of my community without worshiping some deity, god, or gods, with an all emcompassing grand master plan.

Posted by: Mark | March 23, 2010, 12:34 am 12:34 am

I would love to believe that when I die, that some disembodied form of my self floats out of my body into some nirvana. But there is no proof of this from either Religion or Science.

Posted by: Mark | March 23, 2010, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I would love to believe that when I die, that some disembodied form of my self floats out of my body into some nirvana. But there is no proof of this from either Religion or Science.

Posted by: Mark | March 23, 2010, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I’ve seen comments on a lot of sites lately; this site is attractivve because it seems to attract people with working brains, who seem generally to recognize that we may not be able to “think” our way through this issue.
I agree that you cannot (should not) have a debate” about “God”; but we can, and probably should, share “conceptual” ideas.
Seems to me that, unless there is a “God”, who chooses to clearly reveal himself/herself/their selves (sic), we may go on guessing, more or less “forever”.
I agree with, and try to live like, the person who believes that it does not require a “God”, to behave civilly and responsibly to our fellow creatures.
I do not feel obligated to espouse any particular point of view.
I “guess”, but will not argue about, the possibility that we are merely a lesser “culture”, established on this planet by some other, substantially superior, culture.
I also have a portion of my brain which is comfortable with the idea that our “God” is entirely within our own minds.
I am into “recycling”, including accepting that it may happen to some, or all, “souls” (as an engineer, I have a bit of a problem with the expanding “numbers”, of world population, but I suspect that is not significant), to be “reincarnated”.

Posted by: L. W . "Bill" Frank, P. E. | March 23, 2010, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Religion is simply about control. It is like any business. It is all about control. Think about it-everything that they do is to control you! When you wake up to this fact you will understand the worlds religions are nothing more than mans feeble attempt at controlling other men in the name of the unknown or perhaps the most vexing question of all? Why do we exist? Are we here merely to eat sleep and shiiit? Do we have a purpose? What is the purpose? Along comes religion with it desire to act as a broker between you and God. They claim that all other religions are false and only theirs is the right way. It is all an illusion. God does not need man to praise him. That is pure nonsense.

Posted by: Roy West | March 23, 2010, 2:13 am 2:13 am

do democrats have a future….they think they are gods…

Posted by: amplitude jones | March 23, 2010, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Bill Frank. As you suspect the “expanding numbers” is not really an issue. It’s a very large universe to draw souls from. I started “remembering” other “lives” in other bodies after a spontaneous out of body experience over thirty years ago.
Before the OOBE I was an agnostic who was proud of being a “realist”. I believed in what I saw, touched, etc. My OOBE was more “real” than anything I had ever experienced. After that I had other “experiences” such as remembering past lives. I am not religious but no longer allow the shortcomings and inconsistincies of religion to block my from my own spirituality. Best regards to you and thanks for the respectful and thoughtful comments. Dan

Posted by: Dan | March 23, 2010, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Creation
Religion seems to be worried that science is moving in on their territory by answering the question of creation. Actually science does not answer the question of creation at all. The two biggest theories we relate to creation are the big bang theory and evolution. They are not theories of creation but theories of change.
The first law of thermodynamics states that matter and energy are interchangeable and each can be changed in form. That is to say that matter can change into energy and energy can change into matter and that matter can change into other types of matter and energy can change into other types of energy. But science says the there is no known force in the Universe that can create or destroy anything, either matter or energy. Only change them.
Evolution describes matter and energy changing over time. We all agree that matter and energy change over time.
The big bang theory is not about creation. It states that all matter and energy at one time were present in a tiny ball and exploded to create the known universe we see today. It was not a process of creating something out of nothing , just an expansion of what was already here and the changes that took place as it expanded.
The theory also states that the big bang itself would have destroyed all evidence of whatever existed before the big bang. Therefore although science has lots of theories about how things change over time it offers no theory of creation at all.

Posted by: Dan | March 23, 2010, 3:26 am 3:26 am

Thinking yourselves wise, you’ve become fools. God doesn’t need you to believe. Cag wrote that he can be good without God. Of course, he can’t. Perhaps he can love the neighbors that he likes. But he can’t love his enemies. The standard of God’s perfect love is way beyond Cag’s small thinking. Man can only serve self or God. Selfishness = evil, regardless of the immediate outcome. Al Capone set up soup kitchens. Did that make him good?

Posted by: Tom Massey | March 23, 2010, 4:12 am 4:12 am

I believe in myself and my family. My family is my spititual comfort. I don’t need some made up god to find happiness and peace on earth. I see the future of god desolving into a renewed belief in onesself and family. In the past God was an excuse. In the future excuses will be more personal and not based on some make believe spirit of some kind. Maybe the worl will finally find peace without religion to fight over.

Posted by: Eric | March 23, 2010, 7:02 am 7:02 am

God is a belief in a person spirit or whatever you woulds like to call him. God is not a religion he is all religion
Is life a accident some may think so I choose to think not. Is there evil that question is sadly easy to answer I am sorry to say just look around listen to the new look in you own neighbor hoods. Is there a battle between Good and Evil that is one that goes on everyday. The battle between science and God will always be there. But no man religion guides me only my heart and the belief in God guides me and there is noone that can or will change my belief. Everyone need to do that themselfs and they will find there own way hopefully to GOD.

Posted by: tom | March 23, 2010, 7:17 am 7:17 am

Does “God” exist? Have a future?
If, we open mindfully, and intelligently, redirect this famous “Title” to identifying ‘Life’, we can concretely state: That ‘Our Creator’ and “Origin” both exists and has a future. The future of ‘man’ is another story; as. Life needs not ‘man’ to continue on in its evolution.
By doing so, we also regenerate Life into our very own Natures of Being; as, so early civilized man demonstrated to factually, and realistically, be of Physical and Spiritual (other nature)attributes in many ways.
From the Christian (Catholic in particular) point of view: The upcoming Pope-ly Saint declared that heaven, hell, paradise, and purgatory, do not exist. That pretty much wipes-out the fairytale versions and H-Book Fiction Novels. It also knocks -out their “God’s Future”; unless ‘man’ foolishly determines to destroy Life via “Blind Faith” cover-ups of factual historical mind-games, which were instituted for reasons of wealth and power at extremely human levels.

Posted by: FGreggMeagher | March 23, 2010, 8:26 am 8:26 am

It is funny- the liberal traitor pigs are the ones attacking folks who have faith. Article One of the US COnstitution says freedom of religion. Americans respect other folks’ faith- or choices to not have faith. We may not care to be around you, but we do not force and coerce you to have faith. Scum traitor pig liberal democrats always want to force other folks to do things as THEY think they should be done. They are anti-freedom traitor pigs. SO again I ask: do democrats have a future, thinking themselves to be gods?

Posted by: amplitude jones | March 23, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Why is it that people who call themselves christian, have to call those who are not “pigs’ , traitors, etc. I guess they simply call themselves “christian” but don’t really follow Christs words…I believe there is a name for that, but I don’t call people names…

Posted by: Eric | March 23, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am

A future? First you have to make me believe IT had a past. If god is imaginary, I guess that you could say the stories of god have had a past, a present and a future. Unlike the other gods of mythology they have had a past also. Thor would be a god that lost his future, as with Zeus and Promotheus. But why should this god live on while so many are long gone? Because, once people let go of antiquated and unproven thought, the “god” is no longer needed.

Posted by: freethought | March 23, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

God is too great and omnipotent to be explained by man and science. Science is man’s attempt to explain what is around us. If scientists can’t explain something they can’t prove with the limited technology available to them, like God and his scheme of creation…then they lazily dismiss it as not being real without putting their own logical and intellectual shortcomings into account. How mortal.
Nature and our universe work too well to be a mere coincidence caused by a violent explosion with an unknown cause. Imagine tossing a hand grenade into a garage and expecting a fully restored, operational 67′ Ford Mustang to result from the blast! That’s the ‘Big Bang’ in a nutshell, a scientific fairytale to fill an imaginary void that religion already explains, and in better detail. Faith is a meaningful virtue too easily discounted by non-believers who don’t understand it.

Posted by: Bill W. | March 23, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

I believe in myself. I don’t care what god can do. I can pass my exams if I study hard. Can god help me on that if I don’t study? You can do whatever you want if you just believe in yourself.

Posted by: Alex | March 23, 2010, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Are you kidding? Does God have a future? Ummm…I guess that depends on your opinion of God. But, opinion does not dictate truth. If that were the case, then no matter what your opinion on anything, YOU would be right. Ummm, again…since an opinion does not determine truth, our opinion of God and His existence has no bearing on the truth or whether or not He has a future.
So, if there is a God, the question is ridiculous. And if your opinion is that there is NOT a God, the question is still ridiculous. I love this…that which has been made questioning the future of the maker. Based on this ludicrous question, I think WE are the ones who should be questioning OUR future.

Posted by: Cyndi Wall | March 24, 2010, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Trying to prove there is a God is like trying to define love with words. Anyone who has ever experienced the emotion of love, romantic or platonic, knows that words and scientific knowledge are inadequate to define it. Those who truly believe the existence of God also know that words cannot prove His existence. It is the Relationship which confirms the validity of God to the believer, something as difficult for a non-believer to understand as for someone who has never known love to understand the depth of inner assurance that one has with love, even though love defys definition.

Posted by: carole | March 24, 2010, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Hi FGreggMeagher, The First Ammendment says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” From the constitution online. But what did a liberal pig like me expect from a Republican. Those proud to be dumb. Faith is belief without proof. A debate is impossable as there is no proof to present just faith. I have faith, do you? Or do you want proof? Faith at the point of a gun is not faith but fear.

Posted by: Luther52Browning | March 24, 2010, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Does God have a future? Oh please, how arrogant! “A fool says in his heart, ‘there is no God.’” It doesn’t get any more foolish than that!

Posted by: Jeff | March 24, 2010, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Science cannot disprove the existence of God but it might discover – much to its chagrin – that there is a God. Despite its occasional claims to the contrary, the scientific community still has a lot to learn about our environment.

Posted by: D J Wray | March 24, 2010, 4:07 am 4:07 am

My suggetion, Iligalize all religions and ligalize all drogs THERE WILL BE NO MORE Wars and Problems on Earth

Posted by: peter bubla | March 24, 2010, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Y’all have an opinion. But I dare you to honestly ask God what he thinks. Quietly without format be true to yourself. Ask what he wants you to know. Ask if He is. Ask Him to lead you. Show you what makes Jesus freaks like myself tick. Because if you humble yourself & ask Him to reveal himself, you just better watch out. A bomb won’t go off. A light won’t flash. But if you really take some time to let God take control, you will find He does exist, He loves you, He needs not our little debates. He has a plan for you, not to harm you but to finish the creation of you He intended before your parents ever met. God created everything & part of our experience of that we call science. It is just His order to this creation. Most will never take a honest moment to acknowledge God & therefore write me off as something less than human, but get over yourself. He will fix all your little worries, your needs to be accepted, your desire for fulfillment. He won’t make you into something you abhor, but rather something you always wanted. Something special that when you look in the mirror you can stop criticizing yourself. This will take time but God will only honor your humble request to know him. Please take that moment He loves you & I without knowing you love you also, & I am even now saying a prayer that you come to know Him & His way of life. Jesus is the way, the truth, & oh yeah that’s right He is God. May you be blessed in every way & may you stop for a moment & ask Him for some proof, guidance, love. Don’t get hung up on my words here you honestly know what I am talking about. I am just another fail-able human but you know deep down inside God Loves You in Jesus. I hope God blesses your sox off. Peace y’all!

Posted by: ken | March 25, 2010, 2:48 am 2:48 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.