Step Closer to Required Condoms in Porn?
A quick update to a story Lisa Ling and producer Arash Ghadishah brought to us in November about the delicate issue of mandating condoms in the pornography industry. The worker safety board in California voted unanimously yesterday to further study a condom requirement proposal written by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. Under the current law, porn stars must test negative for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases within 30 days of filming. Most pornography insiders, many of whom we talked to, say the testing policy is safety precaution enough — adding that more viewers would turn away if condoms were a requirement at a time when the industry is already losing business to free Web content. We also talk to former porn star Darren James, whose positive HIV test in 2004 shut down the industry for a month. He now advocates for a condom requirement. Here's the segment, "Risky Business."
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Obviously the testing is not working out if AIDS found its way into the industry. I guess they’re just going to have to decide what’s more important to them… Sales or Lives?
Posted by: Buy Condoms | March 19, 2010, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
With all of the past and current hype about “HIV” & “AIDS” it’s extremely surprising that there is even a “bareback” or even a porn industry at all.
“The Padian Study” will forever remain a landmark in history and the House of Numbers will eventually explode. The Condom Industry’s fast $ell “safe sex” paradigm will be exposed too.
Posted by: Tomás Brewster | March 20, 2010, 8:31 am 8:31 am
“test negative for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases within 30 days of filming”
What about the 3 month window period? And what if the person contracted it AFTER he got tested? I don’t see how “bareback porn” has ever been legal.
Posted by: Jane Jones | March 20, 2010, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Unless the Government takes action and makes it a mandated law nothing will change.
Posted by: T Jones | March 20, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm