Thimerosal in Vaccine Out as Autism Cause
Millions of parents who for years had feared a vaccine was to blame for their child's autism learned today that is not the case. At least according to a special federal court, which — while expressing sympathy for families — found no direct link between autism and the vaccine additive Thimerosal. The ruling by the so-called vaccine court means that those families are ineligible to receive federal victim compensation. So tonight, we ask: Is this ruling enough to convince you there is no connection between vaccination and autism? Click HERE for a full report on the ruling from our Medical Unit. Embedded below is tonight's "World News" report on the topic.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Why would we believe a government committee with the outcome of this decision. After all, they are they ones to pay if it is proven to cause Autism. DUH
Posted by: Cindi | March 13, 2010, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Those in the know…know better. No one expects pharmaceutical companies to lose this one.
Posted by: Maria Elena | March 13, 2010, 12:13 am 12:13 am
There are, without a doubt, thousands of parents who noticed an immediate change in their children following immunization which progressed to a diagnosis of autism. It is foolish to think that any one toxin would be responsible for the epidemic of autism…consider however, the overall toxic exposure all children are faced with combined with toxins from vaccines and an underlying genetic predisposition for autism (for which we have no reliable tests for)…..Toxic Load + Vaccines + Genetics = Autism
Posted by: Ben | March 13, 2010, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Too much evidence to prove otherwise for me. Did “Big Pharma” pay the courts off too?
Posted by: Dee | March 13, 2010, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Very simple experiment…follow 1000 unvaccinated children and 1000 vaccinated …compare results. Why is no one doing this?
Posted by: Ben | March 13, 2010, 12:16 am 12:16 am
It doesn’t convince me. Do I trust them? no way.
Posted by: Cindy | March 13, 2010, 12:18 am 12:18 am
The special committee fails to take into account not only the circumstancial and anecdotal evidence but fails in the tradition of ‘observation science’. The very significant numbers of children who exhibit and ‘contract’ autism can’t be ignored and eventually the evidence will be uncovered to prove that combining vaccinations instead of spreading them out stresses the developing brain in small children. How many “safe” and “approved” drugs have eventually been found to cause significant damage; ie, Thalidamide, and may other example.
Posted by: Paul | March 13, 2010, 12:19 am 12:19 am
I have always thought that the brain changes with autism may not be caused by the chemicals in the vacine, but due to the emotional stress of a parent allowing the child to be HURT by the doctor.
So that brain changes occur after vacination, but it may be an emotional stress related damage.
So it seems like it was the fault of the vacine.
Posted by: Karen | March 13, 2010, 12:19 am 12:19 am
There is no dought in all parents minds vaccines are causing children t end up with autism. If you took a count, it would be overwhelming.
Posted by: Martha | March 13, 2010, 12:24 am 12:24 am
There are many parents who had amazing healthy beautiful children change over night after a shot.
MANY.
I’d like to hear the government tell me that’s false too.
Posted by: leslie | March 13, 2010, 12:29 am 12:29 am
No. I believe that vaccines are causing brain damage, possibly including autism and asperger’s syndrome.
“Vaccines like pertussis are actually used to induce encephalitis (experimental allergic encephalomyelitis) in laboratory animals.” Levine S. Lowinski R. (1973). Hyperacute allergic encephalomyelitis, Amer J pathol, 73: 247-250.
Plus, adults are also falling victim to Hepatitis B vaccines. Here’s what one woman, originally diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome found out happened to her:
“In my case, when I received the inoculations, my body formed no antibodies. Instead, the substance attacked my central nervous system. I was asked if I’d ever had electro-shock treatments. Apparently my brain scan showed this type of damage.”
Posted by: LT | March 13, 2010, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Ummmmmm…..HANNAH POLING case?!!!?
And it is just like the mom (Mrs.Estepp) in the “World News” report stated…”GOVERNMENT attorneys defended a GOVERNMENT program using GOVERNMENT funded science which was decided by GOVERNMENT judges…”
They will never fully admit to anything because can you imagine if the GOVERNMENT had to pay all these thousands of families for their childrens’ vaccine injuries and Autism?!?! It’s just so sad…..
Posted by: RM | March 13, 2010, 12:36 am 12:36 am
I am actually amazed that the Federal Government would even try to approach the subject of vaccines related to Autism in children. They have covered up for the Food and Drug Administration as well as the drug companies to the point now of me wondering who all is actually involved and on what levels. I personally know doctors that have gone to Washington to address this issue and have proven that the mercury levels between 1990 and 2000 in vaccinations were causing autism in children and serious illness in soldiers that were adminstered vaccinations. What a sad state we are in in this country when we spend tax payers money to investigate a situation that has made so many people so sick knowing full well the outcome will be in the governments favor. The government is so involved in shielding the drug companies from this disaster that they wrote protection for them in the Terrorists Act. What is terrorism again???? I’m just wondering??? What an atrocity! How can we ever trust the government on anything again? Only if you make it to the top of that political chain will we ever see what really goes on. Frankly, I am more certain now than ever before that the preservative in the vaccines have caused autism and many other illness and the that the government has a great deal to hide from us all.
Posted by: Amber | March 13, 2010, 12:38 am 12:38 am
I am actually amazed that the Federal Government would even try to approach the subject of vaccines related to Autism in children. They have covered up for the Food and Drug Administration as well as the drug companies to the point now of me wondering who all is actually involved and on what levels. I personally know doctors that have gone to Washington to address this issue and have proven that the mercury levels between 1990 and 2000 in vaccinations were causing autism in children and serious illness in soldiers that were adminstered vaccinations. What a sad state we are in in this country when we spend tax payers money to investigate a situation that has made so many people so sick knowing full well the outcome will be in the governments favor. The government is so involved in shielding the drug companies from this disaster that they wrote protection for them in the Terrorists Act. What is terrorism again???? I’m just wondering??? What an atrocity! How can we ever trust the government on anything again? Only if you make it to the top of that political chain will we ever see what really goes on. Frankly, I am more certain now than ever before that the preservative in the vaccines have caused autism and many other illness and the that the government has a great deal to hide from us all.
Posted by: Amber | March 13, 2010, 12:38 am 12:38 am
As an Aspergerian (its what some of us with Asperger’s Autism like to call outselves), I saw this outcome comming years ago. Frankly people these days are going crazy over autism and it’s rather sickening, rather than trying to help us, they’re trying to help themselves by trying to find a way to get rid of us.
There are many organizations and charities dedicated to “helping” autistics, that never actually bother to ask autistics how they can help us. Sure they may be parents, or doctors, or both, but when it comes right down to it, no one knows more about autism than us, because it is who we are.
Posted by: Ren | March 13, 2010, 12:43 am 12:43 am
There has been a study in India of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids. And the 10 year study proved that there is virtually NO difference in autism rates between the 2. My youngest son is autistic. I can tell you his autism is NOT the result of a vaccine. It is the result of a random genetic mutation. Parents want someone to blame when they find out a child is autistic. I understand that. I did too, at first. But looking at ALL the medical evidence proves that vaccines do not cause autism. I’m glad the Vaccine Court agreed with all the scientific evidence and found no link. Maybe now people will quit wasting time trying to blame someone for the autism and focus on their child.
Posted by: Cindbird | March 13, 2010, 12:43 am 12:43 am
And so it continues…
No matter who conducts research there’s is always going to be someone shouting foul play. Look at the facts:
1. Thimerosal was removed from vaccines in 2001, yet autism is still on the rise
2. Could it be as simple as the testing for diagnosing autism/asperger’s has advanced over the last decades. I know going to school as a child there were a lot of kids who, looking back, probably were suffering from autism, but because proper tests were not in place, these kids were just placed in “special ed” classes
3. Andrew Wakefield, the lead author of the 1998 article published in The Lancet that brought this “link” to the public, had received funding from British trial lawyers to seek evidence against vaccine manufacturer’s. The other 10 coauthors have since retracted their interpretation. Other speculation is that Mr. Wakefield knowingly withheld evidence that contradicted his claims of an autism-vaccination connection.
4. Whether or not you trust the US gov’t, there have been studies in Sweden, Denmark, UK, another funded by the EU, Japan, and others, who have found NO scientific and concrete link between vaccinations and autism.
5. Is no one concerned that the incidence of measles has risen?
Posted by: Kelli | March 13, 2010, 1:02 am 1:02 am
The US Govt along with many other govt’s of Western societies are involved in a MASSIVE cover-up of this Big-Pharma scandal. Their studies are specious at best, bogus at worst. Thimerosal is composed of over fifty percent organic mercury (most toxic form) and along with the foreign proteins and dead viruses in vaccines make for quite a nasty biochemical cocktail to administer to kids 36 times before puberty. See results of recent study on vaccines in primates in NeuroToxicology. Stark and devastating.
Posted by: Julian | March 13, 2010, 1:18 am 1:18 am
MY son,up until a little after 2yr old,was progressing like a regular tot. after the vaccinations he regressed. I believe the pharmaceutical took our children s future away from us and them. They will not admit to any harm from the vaccine because of multiple law suits At least compensate them for misfortune that was thrusted upon them,and the toll it takes on each and every family.Lastly all the family with children or family members who have autism should write the President Obama to do more for children and family’s that care for them.
Posted by: len | March 13, 2010, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Yes, if a person is sick, someone with a lot of money must be legally liable! That’s it!
Posted by: zorg | March 13, 2010, 1:24 am 1:24 am
First of all, I don’t trust the US government to conduct such a study. It is in their best interest to keep parents lining up for vaccines.
Secondly, even if the study was conducted ethically, it doesn’t convince me of the overall safety of vaccines. We weren’t meant to inject things into our bodies. There is a whole body of evidence against it that the government and medical community at large are ignoring.
When you compile all the statistics regarding vaccines, your child is actually more likely to suffer from an adverse vaccine reaction than to contract one of the illnesses, let alone suffer permanent injury or death from said disease. Using simple statistical math, the choice is clear.
When a doctor is considering treatment for any condition, the risks and benefits of the treatment are discussed and the treament is only administered if the benefits outweigh the risks. This, however, is ignored when it comes to vaccines.
Posted by: Clare | March 13, 2010, 1:27 am 1:27 am
Who’s study did they use to base this decision? A study by one of the drug companies that make the vaccines? This issue will never be put to rest until a fully independent study is done. I can tell you, my son spoke early on, then he stopped. When and IF it is ever proven that thimerisol does not contribute to autism will he ever get another vaccine. Mercury is the most toxic substance on the planet. Think about it folks! Who thinks it’s a good idea to inject this into our bodies?
Posted by: Arlene | March 13, 2010, 1:46 am 1:46 am
For the “Aspergerian” Ren;
Asperger’s is not Autism. Asperger’s and Autism have seperate DSM IV DX codes. Asperger’s and Rett’s do have the same DSM IV code (299.80) but no ” Aspergerians” I know of say they have Rett’s.
If someone were to ask my adult son who has Autism (299.00) what people should do for autistics, he would probably just repeat the question, which is his way of saying “I don’t know” or “I don’t understand the question”. If you asked my neighbor’s 17 year old granddaughter the same question, she wouldn’t say anything. But she has never said anything.
So, who should speak for them???
Posted by: Rick | March 13, 2010, 2:34 am 2:34 am
I don’t think Autism is linked to the vaccination , because in many instances fraternal twins are not both autistic and in most cases identical twins are both autistic. My son was showing signs of autism when he turned one. They were more noticeable when he turned two because at that age they are expected to do more, i.e. form 3-5 word sentences,etc. I don’t think it is the vaccine and I am worried for those children that are not being vaccinated for this reason. It was just a greedy man in Britain trying to make money using us parents who are desperate to get some answers.
Posted by: Cintia | March 13, 2010, 3:19 am 3:19 am
I never questioned the vaccination concern. Autism is hereditary. Plain and simple. Check your genealogy. Accept reality. Don’t find anything? It’s not autism.
Posted by: M | March 13, 2010, 3:20 am 3:20 am
Shame on Nightline for sidestepping the real issue, which is the connection between thimerosal and autism. I was a healthy adult until I developed mercury toxicity. Based on the neurological symptoms I have experienced first hand, such as inability to focus and concentrate, there is no doubt in what’s left of my mind that there is a connection. It is well documented that some individuals are genetically predisposed to be much more sensitive than others to the effects of mercury. According to the CDC, mercury is the third deadliest substance in the environment. Thimerosal is 49.6% mercury, and is still used in the flu vaccine. How can anyone in their right mind believe that it is safe to inject this into our bodies? Would the judgges who issued this ruling knowingly inject their children with a known poison? Do some real research and do a real story on the politics of mercury toxicity. Start by reading “Diagnosis: Mercury” by Jane M. Hightower, M.D., and ask why the FDA uses politically censored data obtained from Saddam Hussein on which to base its standards for “safe” exposure to mercury.
Posted by: WCC | March 13, 2010, 4:28 am 4:28 am
To “Rick”
The DSM-IV codes are merely a classification system, like the Dewey decimal system.
Let me provide an example,the numbers are from the top of my head since I’m not going to take the time to actually look up the actual numbers of a book. Lets say we have two Books on George Washington, one on his childhood family life, another on his death, they have two different numbers, but they are without a doubt still about George Washington.
The same applies here, and it should also be noted that Rett’s is also on the autistic spectrum.
But if you insist on having a “pureblooded” autistic, I know of several high functioning autistics who can also speak on behalf of autistics as well. Either way, autistics have a voice, and it needs to be heard.
Posted by: Ren | March 13, 2010, 4:38 am 4:38 am
where is our vaccinated vs. never-vaccinated study? to the poster who said mercury was removed from vaccines in 2001 GROW UP. this is a lie. mercury in pediatric vaccines was on shelves and did not expire until 2003 (my son received the DPT in 2005 with the full 25mcg of thimerosal) pediatric flu vaccines are NOT required to be mercury free if there is an ‘epidemic’ of flu. The CDC calls an epidemic of flu every year. with bi-yearly flu shots for young children, most are getting more mercury now than ever and most vaccines still contain ‘trace’ amounts. courts ruled Hannah poling DID get autism from her vaccines, a few months later, they ruled a little boy DID get pdd-nos from his MMR injection. vaccines cause health problems, parents know it, pharma knows it, doctors know it and so does the government.
Posted by: sarah | March 13, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am
What a crock ABC!
Do you seriously think this “case is closed?”
And why hide behind the the name “thimerosal” when you know most viewers have no idea you’re talking about a KNOWN NEUROTOXIN — mercury — that was injected into our children’s boides?
If it’s soooo safe, why not just state the REAL facts so your viewers can get the REAL story?
Kelli Ann
(not to be confused with the “other” Kelli who has commented on this story!)
Posted by: Kelli Ann Davis | March 13, 2010, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
You can’t mandate vaccines and then not compensate people who are injured by them. The mom said it right, government research, government lawyers, government program, government judges.No justice No peace.
Posted by: Holly Masclans | March 13, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Actually, the federal court’s Special Masters simply wrote, “Having failed to satisfy their burden of proof under the articulated legal standard, petitioners cannot prevail on their claim of vaccine-related causation.” The Special Masters, lawyers all without even a single science undergrad degree among them, made no claim about whether vaccines were or were not causally related to the children’s autistic regression. They simply said that the petitioners did not present enough evidence to support their claim.
Posted by: Coralie | March 13, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
The special masters’ misinformed conclusions mean nothing. All that matters is there are millions of sick children who are being done a grave injustice, adding insult to injury. In their zeal to defend the vaccine program that they themselves profit from, and to cover for past mistakes, HHS is preventing the type of meaningful research that will help these children and the children being born every day who will be affected by the woeful lack of oversight over the ever-increasing vaccine schedule. Because the pharma manufacturers have been insulated from liability by Henry Waxman’s 1986 law, our children are being subjected to the medical equivalent of Ford Pintos.
Posted by: Garbosmed | March 13, 2010, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Perhaps,it is not the thimerosal in the vaccine that causes autism. That is not to say the vaccine is not responsible. Changes in the immune system may be triggered by vaccination, predisposing some children, not all, to conditions like asperger’s and autism. Maybe, just too many vaccines, too soon and too close together is the cause.
Posted by: Rachael | March 13, 2010, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
To quote Winston Churchill…”Truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is”… great truth. Fact. Truth is any foreign heavy metal is going to harm the body. How? In any way that happens. I believe that it does much more than we have any idea it does to inject heavy toxins, metals and chemicals. I do NOT have any autistic children, but I signed off from the having shots after they experienced multi-episodes of febrile seizures from them in just one day. They did not get the 3rd MMR shot, I could not DO IT! No one, unless they can support and pay for my harmed child for life, can ever get me to give them. I would go to jail on this willingly.
Posted by: Smarr | March 13, 2010, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Vaccines save lives, that’s a given. Perhaps millions of lives in poor, malnourished third world countries through out time have been spared horrible diseases and have simply died of starvation or the atrocities of war.
Yes vaccines save lives, as do weapons of mass destruction or other so called deterrents. The cost of such programs and the human fallout as a result of implementing such programs is another thing.
Why would the government or any nation that has the authority to send cruise missiles into neighborhoods or inject known neuro-toxins into the bodies of children admit anything that would call into question the reasoning of such actions. After all the action is for the better good, it is to save lives.
The vaccine program is a national security issue as illustrated in the Patriot Act. There will never be anything that would call into question the program, collateral damage is just one of those sad consequences of war, war against disease.
The US Department of Health and Human Services issued a statement about the vaccine court’s decision, in it is the following quote, “The safety and efficacy of vaccines—and the public’s confidence in them—is one of our highest priorities. ” Public confidence is a top priority.
HHS Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, in her interview with Arthur Allen for The Reader’s Digest, on February 5th of this year said the following, “There are groups out there that insist that vaccines are responsible for a variety of problems despite all scientific evidence to the contrary. We have reached out to media outlets to try to get them to not give the views of these people equal weight in their reporting to what science has shown and continues to show about the safety of vaccines,”
The head of the government’s Health and Human Service agency says that the government has made an effort to censor the media coverage regarding vaccines.
There will never be any government funded scientific acknowledgment of a connection between vaccines and anything remotely linked to autism. There is too much at stake. They will admit that on occasion they maim, they cause brain injuries and that they kill, but they would never admit that vaccines cause lingering burdens on society in about 1% of the child population and their families.
Posted by: bensmyson | March 13, 2010, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Re Ben: “Very simple experiment…follow 1000 unvaccinated children and 1000 vaccinated …compare results. Why is no one doing this?”
It HAS been done, multiple times, in different countries. A study in Denmark looked at tens of thousands of children. Autism rates were actually slightly higher in unvaccinated kids – but the different was not statistically significant.
It’s done. It’s been proven. Comprehensively.
Posted by: Louise | March 13, 2010, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
I have no medical or scientific expertise and I cannot dispute this claim on medical or scientific grounds.
I am very familiar with the history of the credibility of claims made by both the United States government and the pharmacutical industry on many issues.
Why should I believe that either one is FINALLY telling the truth?
That’s what I thought.
Posted by: Tom | March 13, 2010, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
I don’t believe vaccines can cause any injuries at all because my doctor told me so and I am too damn ignorant to look into it for on my own and decide for myself.
I believe seat belts are a waste of time and money, cigarettes are healthy and lead in gasoline, paint and baby toys is just fine.
Thalidomide is a wonderful drug, especially for pregnant women. People who drive Toyota’s are leadfooted idiots who just want easy money by trying to extort money (the ones who lived of course) from the poor company who designed a perfect gas pedal.
We have so many people trying to blame those who make a profit bringing us all the wonderful lifesaving chemicals and drugsinto our homes and bodies, America will be in ruins if the crazy parents of sick children have their way!
Thank the God for wise government judges and God Bless America!
Posted by: Tim Kasemodel | March 13, 2010, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Yes. Absolutely.
Posted by: Proud Native American and Angry Independent Voter | March 13, 2010, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
“Very simple experiment…follow 1000 unvaccinated children and 1000 vaccinated …compare results. Why is no one doing this?”
Because
1) this isn’t large enough to tell you anything
2) it would be unethical to randomly chose children to be left unprotected by vaccines
3) if one chose children whose parent’s chose to not vaccinate, this could lead to biases which could make the results meaningless.
Posted by: Sullivan | March 13, 2010, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
“See results of recent study on vaccines in primates in NeuroToxicology. ”
You mean the study by Andrew Wakefield, recently found to be unethical and callous towards his study subjects by a recent hearing? The study that was recently pulled from the journal before it was published?
That’s the best you’ve got?
Posted by: Sullivan | March 13, 2010, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
” Is no one concerned that the incidence of measles has risen?”
Jenny McCarthy is (sort of) concerned. She says that maybe people will have to die of infectious disease before she is taken seriously.
Posted by: Sullivan | March 13, 2010, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
“Those in the know…know better. No one expects pharmaceutical companies to lose this one.”
That’s because those of us in the know realize that the pharmaceutical companies weren’t involved in this one.
This was a case against the U.S. government.
Posted by: Sullivan | March 13, 2010, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Just what does a court know about matters of medical science? The gavel is now a fairy-wand that issues legal proclamations.
Posted by: Bill Michael | March 14, 2010, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Re Clare at 1:27 AM “First of all, I don’t trust the US government to conduct such a study. It is in their best interest to keep parents lining up for vaccines.”
Um, how? It costs the government money to give people vaccines. If vaccination rates fall, then the government doesn’t have to spend as much money on immunisation programs.
Of course, it *is* in the government’s interest to have high vaccination rates, because low vaccination rates = sick babies, children and adults, and dead babies, children and adults. That’s not good for the government. But that’s not what you meant, right?
Posted by: Louise | March 14, 2010, 3:05 am 3:05 am
Louise, should a child come down with a touch of the measles or mumps, 99.9% of them will be fine. Mommy may miss a day or two at work to stay at home to care for the child but by and large no big deal.
If vaccines can prevent mom from missing a day or two of work then mommy makes more money, gets more widgets built, sells more thing-a-ma-bobs. More tax revenue generated. If the vaccines cause an injury then job opportunities open, licensing fees collected, doctors prescribe medicines, secretaries file paperwork, claims adjusters are needed, therapists, teachers, care takers all have jobs, pay taxes, make purchases of new cars, TV’s and go on vacations. It’s a no brainer, it’s a win win situation.
Our sick and injured children are an economic stimulator generating tens of billions in tax revenue, maybe more. For every dollar spent it goes into the hands of someone, that someone pays taxes on it and hands it to someone else, that person pays taxes on it and hands it to someone else for some reason or another and so on and so on until the original dollar is a penny and it put in a jar.
Posted by: bensmyson | March 14, 2010, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Oh, bad example bensmyson. Measles is far from a benign disease. A carer might miss a day or two of work to look after someone with a headcold. Symptoms of measles include a painful and dangerously high fever of 40C/104F+ and photophobia (essentially a migraine that lasts for up to 2 weeks). So the patients who end up ‘fine’ are very sick for a couple of weeks, often requiring hospitalisation (which, btw, costs more to the government than the forgone taxes from a carer staying home during the illness).
Relatively common complications include pneumonia, bad ear infections, corneal scarring, and encephalitis. These complications can lead to permanent hearing loss, blindness, and brain damage.
Oh, and death.
In otherwise healthy populations, 1 in 1000 people develop the serious complications I mentioned, and 1 in 3000 die. That might sound low to you, but you don’t know very many people. It’s actually a high rate. Imagine if everyone stopped vaccinating and 1 million people caught meales–that’s 300 deaths and 700 people who end up blind, deaf or brain damaged.
The 99.9% figure you quote only refers to children in otherwise healthy populations, btw. The complication rate is higher among adults and among people with other health conditions. In immunocompromised people the fatality rate is up to 1 in 3 people.
200,000 people died of measles in 2007 so let’s knock off calling it a mild disease, OK?
Posted by: Louise | March 14, 2010, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Also, ignorance of medicine aside, your economic argument doesn’t make sense, bensmyson. You are claiming that:
1. the government doesn’t want people to get sick, because it will lose tax revenue from people staying home to care for sick children.
2. the government does want people to get injured from vaccines because it will receive tax from the jobs created to look after said people.
What the…?
Have a look at that argument. It’s premised on the government being full of psychopaths (in fact, every government in the world, as well as countless scientists and health care workers not employed by governments who promote vaccinatation). But that aside, it ignores several important points:
* lots of jobs are created looking after people with infectious diseases and their long-term consequences. Why not let measles run rampant, so you can have more hospitalisations, employ more nurses, doctors, clerical and rehab staff; sell more hearing aids and aids for people with brain damage etc.
* the rate of adverse events from measles vaccination is many times lower than the rate of severe complications from measles–so you’d get a lot more sick people that the greedy evil government can benefit from if people got measles rather than vaccine-related adverse events.
* caring for a disabled child causes far more lost productivity than caring for someone with an acute illness–so if the government is concerned about lost tax revenue from people caring for someone with measles, how much more concerned would they be about lost taxes from someone caring for, as you call it, a ‘vaccine injured child’?
Posted by: Louise | March 14, 2010, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Maybe mommy used too much makeup and the toxins in it caused autism in their child. Why not since you are so quick to think that vaccines did it, why not mommy’s makeup?
And no, they will not compensate unproven claims. If they did that they’d have to compensate anyone who claimed anything. Like makeup toxins being the cause of autism.
The anti-vaxxers (no, you can’t choose which vaccine is good and which is bad) are making babies sick and causing deaths, but you don’t hear them talk about that do you? You don’t hear them talk about herd immunity that could prevent these illnesses and deaths because they choose to ignore their deadly handiwork as vaccination rates drop and disease rates rise. You don’t hear them talk about Andrew “he lies” Wakefield’s fall from grace, either. Why let reality get in the way of their irrational and unfathomable fears of vaccines, vaccines that have been _proven to save lives._ Anti-vaxxers truly disgust me.
Posted by: lester jackson | March 15, 2010, 12:56 am 12:56 am
I was babysitting my niece at the time she received her vaccine. After my sister took her for the shots, she ended up in the hospital for 4 days with fever and when she came home she was different from that day on . You can’t tell me it had nothing to do with the shots. That child was healthy before this and I witnessed an immediate change in her learning and conecting with things . It was like a switch was turned off in her brain. I have always believed it was connected to that .
Posted by: pam | March 15, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Vaccines are safe! Vaccines are safe!! Thimerosal (fifty percent organic mercury) is harmless as a lullaby! Thank you Nightline for spinning, er I mean breaking the story! And Big Thanks to Big Pharma for putting paid to all those crybabies (not the autistic ones who don’t cry). A big ‘shot in the arm’ to Fedzilla the govt monster who never admits wrongdoing!!!
Posted by: julian | March 16, 2010, 4:56 am 4:56 am
The government basically already acknowledges that vaccines cause autism in children, but they will never admit it on a population scale because the outcome for them would be disastrous.
While they loudly rule against class-action autism lawsuits, they quietly compensate individual cases of vaccine-induced autism like those of Hannah Poling and Bailey Banks, both diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders but where the exact wording was not “autism” but “brain-swelling,” “encephalitis,” “Acute Disseminated Encephalopathy Disorder,” and the all-too popular “autistic symptoms.”
Why? Because, in a way, vaccine court is responsible for the autism epidemic. Had it not been there to shield vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits, there would not be this explosion in the number of vaccines preserved in thimerosal given to children, and by default, in the number autism cases resulting from that. Nonetheless, they basically know those drugs cause autism and will quietly compensate individual autism cases that don’t sue under the specific label of “autism,” and therefore won’t bankrupt the program or open the floodgates to more litigation.
Posted by: Jake Crosby | March 18, 2010, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm