By Sadie Bass

Mar 9, 2010 4:53pm

Tiny Camera Could Be Future of Police Work

ABC's Pierre Thomas and Jack Cloherty report: A new camera and sound system that can be worn like a headset may change police work as we know it.  The new Taser head set cam is being tested now in four American cities, and the cops seem to think is it a game changer. Cincinnati police chief Thomas Streicher said, "It is the next giant step for law enforcement in America." The camera puts you in the shoes of the police officer. You can see, hear and experience a confrontation as an officer does. The video looks like a something from a movie or a high-end video game. But this is no video game – it’s real. Tonight on World News, you will experience what it is like to chase a dangerous suspect down a dark alley, as seen through the eyes of a young Cincinnati police officer.  The suspect turns on the officer, and manages to wrestle her taser away from her, but police backup arrives, and the man is eventually subdued.  It is video of potentially deadly incidents like that make the video so valuable. Chief Streicher says the cameras not only provide virtually ‘bullet proof’ evidence in criminal cases witnessed by an officer, but they provide police accountability as well.  “The camera doesn’t lie,” Streicher said. And he pointed out that the camera can also provide evidence that can exonerate a police officer when his or her conduct is challenged.  “This is transparency,” he said. The camera is being tested in Cincinnati, Fort Smith, AK., San Jose, CA., and Aberdeen, SD.

User Comments

a camera, the future of police work? How could that be possible in the Orwellian Control Grid that is being implemented? What a shocker! /s Of course it will conveniently not work at times!

Posted by: W. Wallace | March 9, 2010, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I for one support it. Even if it feels a little “big brother” it will end all the suspicious “the police report says” problems.
The truth will set you free.
We already have a police state….I think this will make our police state more honest.
And all video should fall under public domain.

Posted by: Sarah | March 9, 2010, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Sarah has something there.
If officers knew what they did would be shown in court and could show up on the evening news as well, they would be much more professional and also be very careful to comply with the law. It is the next logical step from the dashcam.
It protects the officer AND it protects the citizen.

Posted by: Tom | March 9, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

good thing. But we should not forget the social part. when everything is monitored from now on. where it begins. where to hear it

Posted by: sara | March 9, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

I really can’t see why anyone would object to this. The police would have their point-of-view documented, including what they heard and said. Knowing that everything is recorded is more likely to have the police do everything by the book. Which is fairer for both police and suspects. In addition, the suspects behavior is documented from the officer’s point of view, thus allowing anyone later to have a better appreciation of the situation as the officer experienced it and had to react to. Looks like a win-win to me.

Posted by: Tyrone | March 9, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Fort Smith, AK? I thought Fort Smith was in Arkansas.

Posted by: David | March 9, 2010, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Good idea but the public would benefit more by installing these on our politician in Washington

Posted by: Floyd | March 9, 2010, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

I work in the courtroom and this would alleviate so many problems and keep both police and citizens on their toes..which is a good thing.

Posted by: Jean-Paul | March 9, 2010, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

I think this is a great idea. It will help save many officer’s butts in a questionable situation. It will help the victims in some situations also. Remember several assaults done by Police Officers. It will keep honest people honest, help keep borderline honest people honest and help weed out dishonest people.

Posted by: Eileen | March 9, 2010, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I don’t trust any police man I think this is the best.
No one can lie about what happen I live in N.C. I hope that this will come to the whole state of North Carolina soon

Posted by: Desi Bonds | March 9, 2010, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Technology needs to be employed to keep law enforcement honest. They might not like it but it will make a lot of us out here feel safer knowing this technology is there. Teachers did not like it when computers came along and student performance could be tacked and bad teachers not doing a good job could be identified. This is no different, if the cop is right we are all for him. This will make it easier to identify the bad apples that every police department has.

Posted by: W | March 9, 2010, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I feel that police can not trusted. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Police are held to a higher standard, for which they are not meeting. This camara levels the playing field instead of trusting a cell phone camara or the word of a bystandar.

Posted by: Cindy | March 9, 2010, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

fantastic! finally the police will be held accountable for their actions just as much as the suspects they apprehend. The only ones who wont appreciate this is the police, live streaming should be implemented to avoid “missing” video as well.

Posted by: Paddy | March 9, 2010, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I believe that the cops who feel this is invasive, they are the ones who abuse the power of the badge.

Posted by: jake | March 9, 2010, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

This is a great idea. With such devices the days of second guessing a officers word will be no more. As long as the footage is raw and not edited then there can be no arrgument about what it showes. This is good for all.

Posted by: Steve | March 9, 2010, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Hmmm! I am fore it! We have some Officers out there who go over board with their powers. This technology will certainly help clean up the Police Dept and the streets.

Posted by: JStern | March 9, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I think the cameras are a great idea. The Police in any town or city should be a trusted entity, however these ladies and gentlemen are under as much or more stress as the rest of the American public. It is probably not humanly possible to trust any large group of people with the responsibility they carry. I think these cameras level the playing field and forces police officers to respect the authority they have sworn to uphold.

Posted by: Harold Pringle | March 9, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Big brother is watching them but also could help them and support their work.
Its darn if you do and darn if you don’t like many businesses now a days.

Posted by: Joan Jones | March 9, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I think it is a very good tool for police officers, the times they get into a situation the camera will show everybody just what happened.

Posted by: Richard | March 9, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

CPD, if you weren’t embarassed by this officers performance with the Taser, you should be. Who the hell is doing your training?!
She aimed the Taser at a thick jacket with no chance of getting any effect with the probes.
She closed the reactionary gap and actually got into a struggle with her OWN TASER!
Then she goes for her primary weapon and spends half the time in a cross-fire situation with the other officers at the scene.
PLEASE, stay off the news until you stop embarassing the rest of us who actually take pride in our performance.

Posted by: Mike | March 9, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Bring on the cameras! As the mother of a police officer I know what hell my son goes through in making life and death decisions on a daily basis trying to protect the public and himself.Maybe if parents would start teaching their children to respect the law we would not have need for cameras.Cameras will make everyone think twice about their behavior, if thay have a conscience at all.

Posted by: Denise | March 9, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

PLEASE – what are we doing here^%$##$@! Remember the old song from the 60s or 70s: “The Revolution will NOT be televised” ???? We’re entering into a situation where we’ll only be REACTING to past events, like when shopping mall videos that show a victim being attacked by someone AFTER the fact….. a little too late to be proactive, don’t you think???? NEXT TIME YOU GO TO AN ATHLETIC EVENT, leave the instant replay alone. We’re being DRIVEN by techno GAGETRY and losing our human talent to percieve and respond in REAL TIME !!! God help us all!

Posted by: marg benson | March 9, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

It may seem like big brother but the Trucker’s have put up with it for years with tracking devices in their vehicles. Maybe we should re look at all the “big brother” tactics and all of us being more responsible to “police” ourselves as adults. Police should be trusted as adults, can they?? Most of them, just like the drivers, it isn’t the majority we worry about.

Posted by: Interested | March 9, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I think camera’s are a good idea. I know a lot of cops and let me tell you there are only a few who are really “protect and serve” and honest.
I was set up as a young adult by a PA state police officer. I did nothing wrong… so I took it to court, thinking an inocent man can’t be convicted…Boy was I wrong. It was only a traffic offence and The cop lied to the Judge…and the Judge didn’t want to hear what I had to say. Guilty as charged and I didn’t do a thing. YES cameras are a good idea.
KP

Posted by: K. Preston | March 9, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

The camera is a great idea, both for and against the police and law enforcement.
There is altogether too much deceit and corruption in the court procedures, with prosecutors withholding unfavorable evidence and the police officers covering their own backside, collectively, because in their heart they know and think the person is guilty of perhaps other crimes.

Posted by: Paulie | March 9, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

so, is it ANY surprise that we’re becoming more like the USSR? it’s the convergence theory actualized!

Posted by: marg benson | March 9, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

i agree because this takes away corrupted ploice officers

Posted by: bob | March 9, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Mike, I thought the same things. If they would have had to use deadly force against this guy, it would have been just as much this female officers fault as anyone else’s.
It’s obvious to anyone watching that she wasn’t in control of either her equipment or the situation and all she managed to do was endanger everyone else on the scene.
I’m hoping they fired whoever did her use or force and taser certification; and send her back to the academy!

Posted by: Steve | March 9, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I think this technology could be of benefit in fighting crime. However, the video I observed in Cinncinati, if this had been Louisville,Ky. the suspect would have been dead.

Posted by: Marvin | March 9, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

This has been in operation for years in Europe, The United Kingdon has had their police wearing video cameras and microphones with no wossie issues like the comments of some maybe fat and out of shape officers worried of their privacy. I think all United States Police officers should be wearing A/V equipment. And if netwoked like those in the U.K. they would be live so someone in the department seeing and hearing plus calling for help too!

Posted by: Carroll Gant, JR. | March 9, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Absolutely! Perhaps this can be used by the victims of police brutality! I always supported the decisions of the police department until recently. I know have first hand knowledge of being of this. It would have proven my claim of innocence and have the officers take responsibilty.

Posted by: Ginny | March 9, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

I’m an ex Police Officer by choice and I’ve always said officers need a body cam. I’ve even talked with some officers about it and their excuse was, “We have too much equipment to wear now.” I’m glad to see the technology, it will keep the truth out front. Now, strong laws need to follow that will punish the officer for not utilizing the camera when he or she is on duty.

Posted by: G Reon | March 9, 2010, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

I think it’s a good idea. There are a lot of bad cops out there who think that they are above the law. Maybe if they knew that they were being watched they would be more cautious of what they do. Make them accountable for their actions.

Posted by: Kerry | March 9, 2010, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Great Idea! I know first hand how important this is. I have always supported the police and decisions until recently when I was attacked by an officer. Wrong place and the wrong time? Know a great attorney??

Posted by: G M | March 9, 2010, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I feel you Mike. That would embarass good cops.

Posted by: Harold | March 9, 2010, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Big Brother is here, and he is not going away. Like everything that takes place in our world, this will accelerate into our lives, and will eventually be accepted. I guess as we produce more people we must pay for them through more control on all of us. I am glad I am 67, and will not have to live with this for 67 more years. longer.

Posted by: Ken | March 9, 2010, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

As a minority raised in an inner city, I know first hand about police brutality, lying on the stand, the blue code of silence. I think that this has been a long time coming. Can’t wait till a faultless lie detector is invented.

Posted by: Ely Rodriguez | March 9, 2010, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

This would certainly keep more criminals off the street. There would be taped documentation of what happened during an arrest. I watched an arrest go down on live TV just last week via helicopter. If the police would had these cameras, we would have had a clearer picture of what really happened and maybe this time the guy would be kept behind bars for good!

Posted by: Amusicmom1 | March 9, 2010, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

I work for a phone company in the customer service department. I have everything I say to the customer and type on my computer recorded. I say whats the difference. Have you ever gone into a bank? Camera’s everywhere. Do you the tellers or customers have a problem with that? Nope! Same diff.

Posted by: Ely Rodriguez | March 9, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Police need to be held accountable for there actions, 2007 I was frame by a Orlando, FL Orange County Sheriff Officer in which this officer told me that I did not have any rights and proceeded to planted drugs on my car window to search my car. In 2009 two Orange County Officer gang me me in my own home and said that I assaulted them. Prior to these encounters with Orlando, FL Officers I had no prior arrest. By all means they should be recording what happens in order to justify there actions.

Posted by: Willie Foster | March 9, 2010, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

THIS IS A GREAT THING, AS ONCE I DROVE OF FROM A LOCATION IN RALEIGH,NC AND AFTER I STOPPED AND JUMPED OUT OF THE CAR THE 1ST OFFICER BEGAN TO BEAT ME IN THE HEAD WITH HIS FLASHLIGHT ,SO I PUSHED HIM DOWN AND RAN AND JUMPED IN A SMALL STREAM AT WHICH TIME, #1 AND NOW #2 UNLOADED THEIR 9MM HANDGUNS ON ME I HEARD THE BULLETS BUBBLING PAST MY HEAD .OVER AN ENGAGEMENT RING & 2FLAT TIRES JUST THAT FLAT TIRE MAKING GUY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: BRETT | March 9, 2010, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Finally! This will protect the police from the scumbags who cry ‘police brutality’ to get the heat off their guilty behinds.

Posted by: Pam | March 9, 2010, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

I agree Mike. I am only the wife of a police officer and I knew her perfomance was dangerous.
I understand the purpose of these cameras but also see all of the things that my husband has to put on his body when he gets dressed to protect himself and the public to go to work and can’t imagine one more thing added to that.
While I understand that in every job there are bad apples and those are mainly the only ones you see on TV.
It seems that the comments I have read are all about “Let’s catch the cops doing bad” and have no concern about the criminal they are dealing with who did the wrong to begin the situation in the first place.
It has come to a point where an officer doing his job is dang if he/she does and dang if they don’t.
They are not Jedi Warriors and can sense a disturbance in the force every time something is done wrong and do their best with the training they receive.
I see the purpose of the cameras but I guess being married to an quality, honest officer and only knowing good guys wearing badges, I think this is questioning the integrity of every officer over a bad few.

Posted by: wife | March 9, 2010, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Yes, I agree this should apply to all government officals to some degree.

Posted by: Willie Foster | March 9, 2010, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

How can this technology be seen as anything but good for both law enforcement and the public alike? Not only would it document what actually transpired but it can be used as a training tool for both the officers involved as well as others.

Posted by: Marty Jaso | March 9, 2010, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

I would think they would want this. If someone where to kill them I would want my death recorded. Maybe they would be able to find the person that killed them. Just a thought

Posted by: AJ | March 9, 2010, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

My first reaction when I saw this story was “Would I like ‘Big Brother’ watching over my shoulder (or, in this case, next to my ear) everything I do at work? HECK NO!!!”…Then I remembered that at my job, my computer is subject to monitoring, my emails can be subject to review, and my calls could be recorded. WELCOME TO CORPORATE AMERICA POLICE FORCE! :-)

Posted by: Rhonda | March 9, 2010, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

The British government who have never seen a CCTV camera they didn’t like have already been implementing this program amongst some members of the constabulary.
We sold our rights to privacy years ago and we are now merely slaves to the latest technology.

Posted by: steve | March 9, 2010, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Hey G.M., when you find a great attorney let me know. I have experience with bad cops as well.

Posted by: G Reon | March 9, 2010, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

it’s about time!!!those police that are a credit to the uniform won’t have anything to worry about. this protects them but for the loose cannons that think that they can do their dirtiness and get away with it are out of here!! and jail time is in their furture. good, for the people good for hornest cops bad for the ones who are crimanals with a badge that hide behind the blue wall. now that wall has a window.

Posted by: AnthonyReynard | March 9, 2010, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

With the endless examples of corrupt cops a cross the nation, to hear a cop argue that cameras are bad because it feels like “Big Brother is watching him” is a laughable statement.
The tiny camera is an answer to the age-old question, “And who’s watching the watchers?” The question would never be raised if there wasn’t a history of abuse.
Will the tiny camera ever be misused? What hasn’t been?

Posted by: Samuel Beckett | March 9, 2010, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

I can’t beleive anyone would not think this was great, unless you have something to hide.

Posted by: Yvonne | March 9, 2010, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Finally a way to keep those fascists honest, to often cops get away with things such as brutality and unlawful arrests.

Posted by: Jonathan | March 9, 2010, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

I know how this works. If the cop needs to use the evidence, they present it in court. If the cop pulls someone over and stuns them, or beats someone, or does anything they don’t want people to find out about, the camera “mysteriously” malfunctions or is destroyed in the commotion.

Posted by: Kevin | March 9, 2010, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

“The police are going overboard with their power…I feel the police can’t be trusted…blah, blah, blah” Walk a mile in my shoes!!! Don’t criticize the work I do to protect you, put my life on the line EVERYDAY for you, and attend more officer funerals than I ever care to mention. All while you sit in your office safe and snug, away from danger. I’ve been a police officer for 20+ years and I have a video camera in my patrol car and a mic on my belt. I wish I had that same equipment 20 years ago…I’ll wear as many cameras as you want me too. One month after my camera was installed, had a female come to the police station and complained to the Chief. She stated that I used profanity and was belligerent and rude while giving her a speeding ticket. When the Chief told her my patrol car was equipped with video/audio equipment she immediately exited the station, running for her car. The Chief decided to view the video tape and guess what he found…SHE was the one using profanity, called me every name in the book, even stated on the tape that she was going to make up some crap about me in a complaint so she could get out of the speeding ticket!!! So I’ll wear any camera you want me to wear!!! People are so quick to say the police are corrupt…can you imagine what I would have had to endure with that complaint if I DID NOT have a video camera in my car? Do my job for a day, deal with all the thieves, drug users, and thugs and tell me that you want to keep doing the job for the money I take home. I have to work a part-time job just to pay all my bills…Here’s an idea, the next time you NEED help, you’re in a motor vehicle crash, you’re home is broken into, somebody keeps speeding through your neighborhood while your kids wait for the bus, you’re just a victim of some random crime…call a CRACK DEALER instead of a COP and see what kind of service you get…bet he won’t have a video camera on his car!!!

Posted by: Clayton | March 9, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Yeah man, it’s great ! I think they should plant these tiny things in every convicts brain so they can shove a cable hook-up to there butt and download everything the idiot has did in the past year ! I feel it’s very humane for all idiots that are not humane !

Posted by: Jeff | March 9, 2010, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

I wonder why the policeman interviewed would be concerned about wearing a camera. I believe his salary comes from tax dollars, and I for one, would rather see him on the job, than in a donut shop.

Posted by: Tom | March 9, 2010, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

I think it is wrong!! Police are in a position that you liberal people will never know. Put a camera on your head and follow you around at work. I bet you get fired the same day. Police are are last line of defence, who do you liberal people call when your house is broken into. Grow-up life not fair, let the cops do their job!

Posted by: mark | March 9, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

This seems like a win-win for everyone involved. When you look into this product a little more, you see that this camera and the taser usage information can be downloaded, stored and viewed over Taser’s website.
Then it can be pulled up in the police station, courtroom, classroom, ect. Video doesn’t lie. This will help to make lawsuits, court battles, ect. more cut & dry. Good work Taser!

Posted by: Mike S | March 9, 2010, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

If most businsses’ call center calls can be recorded to adjust training to improve customer service, why can’t this be mandatory for police departments in improving the “To Protect and To Serve? Let’s find out if police truly are any city’s finest.

Posted by: Really? | March 9, 2010, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Clayton….First, I want to THANK YOU & ALL THE OTHERS for your service! Also, you make a great point and I’m sure that in their time of need every one of these “police bashers” would not hesitate for a second to call for help no matter what they believe!
Do not let the few, in the minority, who choose to comment here make this new tool be about catching “bad cops”. This is just one more tool given to law enforcement to help protect and serve, provide evidence and help with training using real-life situations!

Posted by: Mike S | March 9, 2010, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

I personaly think it’s a good Idea. Here in Portland Oregon we have had several shootings by the police with in a six month window and there have been alot of distrust between the people and the police and it would help bring responsabilaty to the situation for both sides of the story.

Posted by: Bruce | March 9, 2010, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

too bad the officer wearing it
will be looking the other way, while
his partners beat the crap out of
the innocent guy.

Posted by: spacerook1 | March 9, 2010, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

The police look at this as “big brother” watching over their shoulders, but this is a silent witness to their innocence in police brutality cases. The criminals won’t hesitate to lie on the cops, file false charges, putting the officer on desk duty or suspension pending an investigation. Although there are cameras in the police cruisers they don’t always get the whole picture. When the offender moves out of camera range their actions can’t be seen, and that could make all the difference in the world. I look at them as one more weapon in the fight against crime.

Posted by: Carolyn G. | March 9, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

cops with cameras,first the video shows how out matched the female cop was,seeing the video was like the knife in a gun fight story.as for the cop saying big brother watching them. a video camera on cops will tell who was telling the truth,unless the camera gets “damaged”

Posted by: ron | March 9, 2010, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

That’s great news. Not only do the police officers have to act more professional but they have to follow the law, to the letter. And this is also good news for citizens. It is great for the courts to get first hand knowledge about what exactly went on, in the field. Bravo! I hope the use of cameras spreads across the country.

Posted by: Jerry | March 9, 2010, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

I wonder how much more they are going to expect cops to wear? Many already carry tape recorders. Has the question of what happens during a scuffle? With the wires wrapped around an officer’s neck & head, is that safe? And, just how good is the quality of the video pictures… is it good enough to see everything the officer sees? I’d FAR rather see officers equipped with portable fingerprint (LIVESCAN) scanners. For the cost involved, to catch a murderer from California in New York would be more bang for taxpayer buck.

Posted by: Fred | March 9, 2010, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

There are potential problems. In the San Jose test, officers can *choose* when the system is enabled. Would you expect a bad cop to willingly elect to record certain activities? Also, there are no clear rules for how this video/audio can be used later, including when shot inside businesses, homes, bedrooms, etc. Can it be archived forever? Enhanced to try find other violations? And so on. And frankly, TASER’s reputation is far short of wonderful, and the use of their equipment has already caused unnecessary and inappropriate deaths.

Posted by: Reader | March 10, 2010, 2:50 am 2:50 am

We are well on the way to the Bibical 666.

Posted by: S.A | March 10, 2010, 4:14 am 4:14 am

I think that these cameras are a great idea. They should be controlled from a main terminal, not by the officer wearing them. Live stream and back-up recording would be great as well. Sadly the days of the police being the “good guy” are long gone. These days you have to worry about the police just as much as the criminals, hopefully something like this will keep the playing field even and honest.

Posted by: Rese | March 10, 2010, 4:30 am 4:30 am

A few years back there was a dramatic film with Robin Williams called “The Final Cut”. In the film everyone has an organic computerized chip implanted when they are born. The chip records all life experiences throughout a persons life. Imagine if that actually existed, it would cause people to be completely honest. There would be no crime, no cheating spouses, no corrupt politicians.
If this camera device being used by police officers keeps them honest and shows a criminal’s behavior at the same time, everyone could see the truth.
Perhaps this is the forerunner of such a device that appears in the film. I think it could revolutionize the criminal justice system and society as a whole.

Posted by: DAVE | March 10, 2010, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Doesn’t change the fact that officers are human……they lose their cool, and they abuse people physically, when they lose their cool.
All this will do, is let them know, that when they lose it…..they will also lose their job. Question is….will they do the job as well, in the first place???

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 10, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Why does it seem gov’t always gets ripped off. $1500 for the camera and I don’t know if they are charged the $90 monthly fee per officer that Taser charges some police department in California. They could get a Vhold ContourHD 1080p for around $325 and mod it.

Posted by: chris | March 11, 2010, 1:56 am 1:56 am

As a law enforcement professional, I have concerns regarding a police officer utilizing a video recording device to record non-custodial citizen contacts. In memorializing an individual’s words and actions, in a manner subject to retrieval, playback and enhancement, is the officer unreasonably intruding upon the subjects right to privacy? In an instance where the officer is invited into a home, would activating the video camera constitute a search? To whom would the tape belong, the individual officer or the Police Department for which they serve?
DAVID RAHINSKY

Posted by: Dave Rahinsky | March 11, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

I have thought it a good idea for many years. It does two things. It protects police officers from false accusations and keeps the police officers from being dumb and stupid.
Retired Police Captain, S.F.P.D.

Posted by: Rich | March 11, 2010, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.