By David Schoetz

Apr 22, 2010 11:53pm

Is Obama’s Wall Street Tough Talk Lip Service?

President Barack Obama came to New York City today to take on Wall Street, urging the passage of legislation he says would curb the risky practices that pushed the U.S. economy into its worst recession in decades.  The president said that while he believes in the power of the free market, "a free market was never meant to be a free license to take whatever you can get, however you can get it." So tonight, we ask: Is President Obama doing enough to reform the financial industry? Or do you expect more business as usual, even if Main Street ultimately pays the price. Tell us what you think. Embedded below is Jake Tapper's "World News" report on Obama's tough talk.

User Comments

Do I think that Obama is just giving lip service regarding Wall Street? Of course Not! He is just stating what has needed to be said for a long time. Those greedy guys on Wall Street have taken this country for a destructive ride far too long and it’s about time someone reins them in. Too many people are still suffering because of what they have done and still want to contiue to do if they can get away with it. The President is perfectly justified in saying and doing what needs to be said and done. To heck with all the nay sayers who never said or did anything to avert the Wall Street melt-down when they were the majority. Shame on them.

Posted by: Teresa O'Brien | April 23, 2010, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I’m surprised ABC News seems so sanguine re. the control pending legislation will give the government over the financial industry. Clearly the potential for government abuse will continue to exist long after the current administration is history, and a reactionary regime replaces the current radical crew. The straw man the President erected as he excoriated those who would be unfettered to “take whatever you can get, however you can get it,” ignores nearly a century of regulations enacted to prevent such abuse, and his citing the danger of another financial collapse ignores the fact that it was the Community Reinvestment Act and subsequent regulatory legislation and community activism (which the President also fomented as legal counsel for ACORN in Chicago) which forced financial and mortgage institutions to make high risk unsecured loans in an effort to give home ownership to poor people, who had no business buying houses, which nearly brought down the financial industry in 2008–a collapse the Democrat Party and their sympathizers in the media hyped up and blamed on the Bush administration (which tried to curtail the sub prime madness, only to be rebuffed by a Democrat Congress and media which cried “racism,”) in your successful effort to bring to power a radical America-hating Marxist chief executive. Enjoy the ride, for while the government is gaining control of every other industry and endeavor, the mainstream media will eventually also come under its control (e.g. proposed govt. bailout of newspapers); and like I said in the beginning, one way or another, the right will one day gain control of the government, and the apparatus to control [national police force, anyone?] everything else, including the media [can't have sedition, can we?], will already be in place.

Posted by: Ken Blake | April 23, 2010, 12:42 am 12:42 am

God bless him he’s trying, but does any rich man know how to handle Wall Street? No; The rich dont take down the rich and thats just the way it is. The way to do it is before Obama became President, President Brush shouldn’t have given any money to the banks or wall street to reward them for doing this to our country. Instead, the people who were resonsible should have all been imprisoned for treason. Next, the credit reporting angentcy’s should have been made illegal because they also let this all happen. Look at what has happened. Houses all over the country are sitting vaccant and the only people who can get into them are the folks again that have only perfect credit! These are the same folks that got into the now foreclosed homes to begin with! On paper they look great but in reality it’s all nothing but a lie. Then here we go again! What needs to happen is since the banks were all given basially a second chance people whom have low credit scores but let say a steady income should be able to get themselves into a house! Give these people second chance at owning their own homes. For instance, I saw a beauitful home that had been foreclosed on and just sitting there with a sign in front that read “NO DOWN PAYMENT OR CLOSING COST! AND YOU COULD ALSO NAME YOUR OWN COMFORTABLE MONTHLY PAYMENTS TO FIT YOU AND YOUR FAMILIES NEEDS!” I called about it and they stated that our credit was too low of a score to purchase it. You see only a rich famiily could live there not us. Yet we are paying over $1000.00 a month in rent we have done so faithfully in every place we have rented. On time too. Yet we still can’t get into a house of our own. No matter what, it seems our credit is always 10 points to low for our own home. You see thats not right! The only way to slove this problem is to make rules saying Americans like us have the right to own a home just as much as any guy out there who has somehow attained a good credit report on paper but has a job that could mean another forecloser any minute. Yes my Husband is disabled and he gets a SSI check every month but at least it is constant. But my Husband also helped in Cambodia to end the Viet Nam War. Our men and women got to home because of what he did for them, why cant we have the right to own our own home? Something is wrong with the way our credit burea’s report credit and that is where the President needs to fix the problem so all of this doesn’t happen again.

Posted by: PAT MAYFIELD | April 23, 2010, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Hurray! I have been asking Pres. Obama to get involved with financial regulations. As a Realtor, I was shocked when the no-money down loans became “legal”, adjustable loans that could not be covered as rates climbed. It was insanity from the start. It appeared anyone who was breathing could get a loan.
Now, of course, lenders and appraisals have swung too far to the other extreme. We need some common sense.
What has happened to the “shadow inventory”? Are the banks holding it so they can get into the real estate business?
I’m definitely in favor of regulations that make sense. If real estate gets moving, the economy will improve. Home sales result in decorating, remodeling, etc.
As for Wall St. – my trust is gone.

Posted by: Lore | April 23, 2010, 3:23 am 3:23 am

From the “fixes” by Jimmy Carter to the “fixes” by Bill Clinton to ACORN and all its “organizers” to our present situation where every enormity and every action that has caused dire consequences since 2006 being traced to a rubber stamp vote of approval by the Democrat Congress it is apparent that our economy’s train has not changed course, but, more than ever, remains on a track straight to hell.
Wall Street owns Obama; the only change we will see is a change for the worse.

Posted by: Michael Pottorff | April 23, 2010, 3:24 am 3:24 am

I believe that our President is going to do everything in his power to reform the financial sector for the good and betterment of the American people. It will need to be a coordinated and consorted effort with those who must think about the good of the whole instead for the power of the few. We (the US) are only as strong as our weakest link. If there is any significant group of citizens that has the lower hand, we all suffer, since they will pull us down. This includes the financial sector as we have already seen these past few years. Their horrible activities and behaviors have brought a whole country down. It would be the same with the poor or sick. Their problems become a nations problems, if we don’t all stand together and be United (as in the “United States”, right?) Isn’t that what we stand for? United we stand, divided we fall.
I hope this financial reform comes to pass, in as much of the spirit of the law can be enacted. That will give me a bit more peace of mind and trust in Justice in our Nation. I am tired of hearing the cold reality of the regular guy being taken advantage of and being treated unfairly by Public or Private industry who create rules, policies, behaviors and bureaucracy only to benefit themselves and their selfish endeavors, always to the detriment of the public/consumer. The motivation, of course, is profit. Greed is one of the seven deadly sins. I am hopeful that our children will benefit from the reform.

Posted by: Maria Tapia | April 23, 2010, 4:10 am 4:10 am

No. He is not doing enough to reform the financial sector. He is mainly putting on a big show. I despise the financial sector, almost as much as failed government. The government and its king pin, Obama, need to get rules in place pronto to regulate the financial sector. Why haven’t they done this? Why haven’t they restored the Glass-Steagal act, which Clinton so foolishly eliminated? Why haven’t they restored the uptick rule, which Bush so foolishly eliminated? Why haven’t they given us a single-payer, universal, nationalized pension system, so that we do not have to be dependent on the financial sector to eat when we can no longer work?
Obama and his gang need to wake up to the fact than two entire generations of Americans (over a hundred million of us) had our 401k and 403b savings destroyed by the government-caused 2nd Great Depression in which we now find ourselves. 401k’s and 403b’s were a bad idea to begin with. I predicted that they would not work from the beginning. They are an even bigger failure than even I thought. Two entire generations of Americans will now have to work into their 70’s and 80’s, because they have no way to fund a retirement.
Obama and his gang need to extend to all Americans the access to the federal employee pension system immediately. We need to be given access to a system that will still give us a retirement income irrespective of what the stupid financial sector does, just like the government employees now get. We and our employers will pay into the federal pension system on behalf of ourselves, just as we are already paying into it on behalf of the government employees. We just need to be given access to participate in it, like they already are. Then we would have fairness and equality, which are words that people like Obama and his gang do not understand.

Posted by: Proud Native American and Angry Independent Voter | April 23, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

This reform bill is a joke.Obama is no different then Bush.Geithner is a pawn for wall street, and Larry Summers?He was instrumental in the dismantling of wall street regulation in the first place.The solution is simple.Too big to fail–Too big to exist.BREAK UP THE BIG BANKS.It is the only solution.
If your chickens are being eaten by foxes,why would you hire those very foxes to guard the hen house? The fix is in.The rich will get richer the poor will be poorer and the middle will be destroyed.

Posted by: mark beddingfield | April 24, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Apparently Obama missed my lead letter to the Boston Globe in Jan 2001 regarding Clinton’s Legacy:
“Clinton’s legacy? It will be as the Neville Chamberlain of the Democratic
party, and for the same reason; that he caved to fascism —- not the old
personalized, nationalist fascism, but a newer ‘friendly fascism’ of global
corporate empire.
Clinton tried to triangulate corporate fascism with a slightly friendlier
version, that could feel our pain while applying it also. He learned too
late that you can’t co-opt fascists by applying half their programs for
them. They will only grouse and continue to do the second half with rougher
hands on the controls.” [As they proceeded to do with their W puppet for 8 years]
Obama apparently does not understand that a (small d) democratic president can not negotiate with corporatist Empire whether it is the overtly fascist old type, or the modern two-party and covertly guileful ‘Vichy’ “inverted totalitarian” empire of which Sheldon Wolin so accurately writes in “Democracy Incorporated”.
Obama’s speech to Wall Street, unlike Ike’s courageous exposure of the MIC Empire and JFK’s more courageous and career-ending American University outing of the corporate/financial/militarist Empire behind the curtain, proves that rather than a hero, Obama is nothing but our fifth successive pre-selected “emperor-president” [Andrew Bacevich's term].
Alan
, Maine

Posted by: Alan MacDonald | April 25, 2010, 11:18 am 11:18 am

In the question posed by Nightline at the start of this blog, the financial service sector is referred to as the “financial industry”. This is wrong. The financial sector is not an industry. It does not make anything. It was supposed to be a service sector that provided us a safe place to invest our money. What a joke that has turned out to be. Instead, it has fleeced us for our life savings.
Has this country gone so far over the cliff in not being able to manufacture anything anymore that it now calls something as fluffy and failed as the financial sector an “industry”? God help us.

Posted by: Proud Native American and Angry Independent Voter | April 26, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.