World Cup Wager Tests U.K./U.S. ‘Special Friendship’
ABC's Catherine Cloutier reports from London: Saturday marks the first time the United Kingdom and the United States have faced off in the World Cup in 60 years, and the countries’ ambassadors are not letting the game go off without a friendly wager. Politico released an email exchange between British and American Embassy employees Monday, calling the bet a “test to the special relationship.” At stake is a dinner at the restaurant of the winner’s choice. As British Embassy spokesperson Martin Longden stipulated, “loser pays.” Phillip Breen, a spokesperson for the American Embassy to the U.K., initiated the exchange. “The World Cup is exciting time for both the U.S. and the U.K.,” Breen told ABC News. “This is the first match, and we knew there will be lot of attention paid to it.” Breen’s first email included a bit of taunting. “We will understand if you decline, given the outcome of the last such encounter,” he wrote, referencing the 1950 game in which the U.S. beat the U.K. with a score of 1-0. Deemed one of the greatest upsets in World Cup history, the game has been called “the Miracle in the Grass.” The British Embassy accepted the bet, describing the U.S. as generous because “the British Ambassador does not anticipate paying out.” In reference to the comment about their previous encounter in the tournament, Longden wrote, “The history of English football is long and extensive, in contradistinction to U.S. soccer.”
Breen countered back. “It is true that our soccer (a fine English word we have kindly preserved for you) history is not as long and illustrious as yours. However, as your generals noted during WWII, we have a unique capability for quickly identifying and advancing talent,” he wrote. The winner of the bet will be determined on a South African soccer field on Saturday. “We’re not going to make predictions, but we’re rooting for the U.S.,” Breen told ABC News, adding, “On any given day, the U.S. is capable of beating any team in the World Cup.” But in the email exchange, the British Embassy had the final word: “The Ambassador takes his steak like American soccer victories – somewhat rare.”
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Its going to be awesome. Go USA.
Posted by: Huh | June 9, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
“referencing the 1950 game in which the U.S. beat the U.K. with a score of 1-0″
The US beat England, get your countries right..
Posted by: Foxhill | June 9, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Hilarious to see our ambassadors getting fired up over soccer game and trading jibes like two normal guys before a match. That said, the British ambassador better be ready to serve up some humble pie.
Posted by: Josh | June 9, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
In any case our chant is awesome! USA! USA! USA!
Posted by: Nate | June 9, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Wow, even the US embassy doesn’t understand the difference between the UK and England?
Posted by: Bill | June 9, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Okay, that last jab about rare steak was a good one.
What I worry about is how juicy a target that game will be to any would-be nutjob with a dirty bomb. I hope we’re not leaving security to the S.Africans.
Posted by: Todd | June 9, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I’m an English US resident living in California with my american husband. Should be an interesting game! Will be wearing an England shirt but have to say I will be happy with the result either way!
Posted by: Marie | June 9, 2010, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Wow. We beat the UK? I didn’t even know they had a team.
Posted by: Max | June 9, 2010, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
OK, so I guess I’m a little late to the whole we’ve-never-played-the-U.K. barrage, but yeah — we’ve never played “the U.K.” in the World Cup.
Posted by: Tom | June 9, 2010, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
I know an American over here whom I see quite often. He’s done nothing but grin from ear to ear for days, in anticipation of this match. I hope England play the States off the park, partly to gain the points, but mainly because he’ll be bloody unbearable for weeks if we lose.
Posted by: ThunorUK | June 9, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
I love it. I love it. I love it. This is going to be awesome!!!
Posted by: john | June 9, 2010, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
America may not as far behind England in soccer as England would be behind America in baseball but the United States would have to count heavily on the fortunes and luck on the day of the match to win rather than on consistent superiority.
The day American players have the ability to play in first-class (football) matches in England is yet to arrive. David Beckham, on the other hand, arrived to great fanfare a few years ago to play for an American team.
In any case, the Embassies keep the special relationship going partly through their own brand of national humor.
Posted by: Candadai Tirumalai | June 10, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am
I just saw GMA report 26 BILLION would watch the World Cup. Really? Are they counting whales and giraffes? The earth population is only 6.7 Billion.
Posted by: John | June 11, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Nice job covering these details in the UK/USA got my interests perking.
Sincerely
Fred D
USA
Posted by: Fred D | June 11, 2010, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
I am a Portuguese living in America and I played for Sporting of Portugal in my early age and love soccer but I hate to hear TV REPORTER LALAS when they do not know what they are talking about…SAYING THAT THE USA GOAL WAS A FLUKE…Well let me explain something you MR LALAS Soccer Abc TV reporter if you have played soccer and you been a Goalie and try to grab a powerful ground ball like that was… you will not be able to grab the ball every time because is the hardest ball for a goalie is a ground ball and to take the merit from the USA player is wrong…is not the first time I see similar goal as matter fact see quite few like it over the last 40 years…Tony
Posted by: Tony | June 12, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I was wondering about the “26 billion” on GMA, too. I think they’re adding up all the viewers of each game. So if 1 billion watch 26 games, that’s 26 billion. I just checked the population calculator, and it says 7 billion.
Posted by: Carrisa | June 12, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm