Deadly Grizzly Bear Captured in Montana
Wildlife officials in Montana have captured the female grizzly bear who officials believe rampaged through a campground near Yellowstone National Park before dawn on Wednesday morning. Two of the bear’s cubs were also captured.
The mama grizzly, who weighs between 300 and 400 pounds, killed one person and injured two others at the Soda Butte campground around 4 a.m.before campers sought shelter in their vehicles. All the bears, including the cubs, will be euthanized. They are considered a threat after witnessing their mother being aggressive.
Tune in tonight for the full story, including an interview with a survivor of the attack. We’ll also speak with Randy Miller, an animal trainer with Predators in Action who’s cousin was killed in a bear attack two years ago.
Check out that story from “GMA” below.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
It is a sad day when the high and mighty human race is allowed to trespass into the backyards of the wild and then kill a mama bear (and her cubs) simply because she may have been protecting them. When you take it upon yourself to go into an area that is known to have bears, then you should do so knowing the risks involved.
Posted by: J.R. | July 29, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Oh J.R., for goodness sake, the bear and people were in a campground. While this is a really good illustration of why people need to keep their food and scented items locked up you can’t really be advocating the elimination of camping areas? Or allowing human killing animals to walk free?
Posted by: R.L. | July 29, 2010, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
I live just 32 miles from Yellowstone National Park, in the small community of Emigrant, MT. Being a native Montanan, I would have to side with the bears, we (humans) are the trespassers and deserve what we get when we freely choose to step into the hunting grounds of a natural born predator defending her family and her food, just the same as any mother would, humans included
Posted by: Michael B. Adam | July 29, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
I’m with J.R. its sad to take retribution on an animal doing what nature intended. We can only trespass on their range with with the understanding they have a right to protect their family as we do ours.
Posted by: bob | July 29, 2010, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
The campground was Soda Butte campground.
Really sad story.
Posted by: Matt | July 29, 2010, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
I agree with JR. This is a wildlife area and the bear’s home. We intrude on her grounds, she does what comes natural to a wild animal…protect her young and now we are going to kill her and her cubs. I don’t get it. The people who were camping there should have known better.
Posted by: 3katz | July 29, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Consensus is it is the bears home, and humans were trespassing. That is the risk of camping in bear country. Don’t allow tents in the area works much better that killing and animal that is protecting its home, babies and looking for food.
Posted by: profounddestiny | July 30, 2010, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Consensus is it is the bears home, and humans were trespassing. That is the risk of camping in bear country. Don’t allow tents in the area works much better that killing and animal that is protecting its home, babies and looking for food.
Posted by: profounddestiny | July 30, 2010, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Protecting her cubs? The victims were minding their own business and sleeping in their tents. It’s the bears who were roaming around looking for trouble.
Posted by: nono | July 30, 2010, 1:45 am 1:45 am
To even suggest the mother bear was a human-seeking predator is absolutley absurd. She has probably lived in that territory all her life, and when she picked up the scents, wanted to make sure her babies were safe. That’s more than most humans do. Humans prefer to put their babies in dumpsters, and worse.
Posted by: gcavalet | July 30, 2010, 7:47 am 7:47 am
anyone who is a threat to my kids will be dealt with, be they in a car (because to a bear, being in a tent or a car is not a sign that we “don’t want trouble”)Get real people and get in the real world !
Posted by: Craigy Boy | July 30, 2010, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I am sickened over your decision to euthanize a mother bear and her cubs in the recent unforturante accident to the camper. We humans are trespassing in their territory and should be respectful of their natural instincts to protect their young and hunt for food. Why can’t they simply relocate the family. We don’t euthanize human predators.
Posted by: carol Lundgren | July 30, 2010, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
That campground was not the mother bear’s territory. If it was, there’d be a whole lot of attacks at that campground, and they would have closed it long ago. This momma bear wasn’t looking for food, either, because she didn’t drag the humans away for her and her cubs to eat.
Posted by: Whatinthe | July 30, 2010, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
When will people learn that wild animals are WILD. You enter their domain at your own risk. Stay in a hotel!! How much is this going to cost the park service, and how do they know for sure they have the right bear??
Posted by: Bea | July 30, 2010, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Let us not forget that there are signs posted with the writing BEARS COUNTRY.That alone should get the message across that it is highly possible that you may encounter a bear while sleeping in a nylon tent that offers no protection whatsoever from a bear,a MOTHER bear that will see you as a threat to her cubs and will attack if you are minding your own business or not.
Posted by: msbuzz | July 31, 2010, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
If only the humans who are in charge could,or would,deal with human attackers and killersas aggressively as they do for wildlife who cannot speak or defend themselves.The human is also a mammal but we treat rapist and child molestors better than we do the innocent mammals living in their own habitat and were doing fine until MAN came along.
Posted by: msbuzz | July 31, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
In reply to nono’s comment about the bears were the ones who were out roaming around looking for trouble,I think that mama and the 3 bears were out roaming around looking for a place to use up a double roll of CHARMIN………Sounds as real as your idea.
Posted by: msbuzz | July 31, 2010, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
What an insane world we live in when so many loony arm-chair “naturalists” kick back and blithely say, “Sure, let the bears eat people whose only crime was wanting to enjoy nature.”
So, how about Elora Petrasek–the 6-year-old little girl who was killed by a bear in Tennessee a few years ago? Nothing wrong with that in your eyes?
Or 93-year-old Adelia Maestras Trujillo, who was savagely mauled to death in her own home when a bear broke in?
Or 5-month-old, Ester Schwimmer, who was snatched from a stroller on the front porch of her Fallsburg, New York residence and killed in front of her horrified parents?
I suppose they were “Just in the wrong place at the wrong time?” I’m sure a few you will say, “Oh, well, that’s different.” No it isn’t. It doesn’t matter where someone is murdered. What matters is that steps are taken to make damn certain the murderer doesn’t strike again.
You can’t simply trap a killer bear and move it. Bears are territorial. “Problem” bears have been trapped multiple times near the same spot they have been trapped before after being transported far out into the wilderness; they simply return “home.” Trapping and relocating is not a solution for killer bears. Put them in a zoo? Quite a threat to the workers who have to take care of them and clean up their areas and maintain the bear’s health, wouldn’t you say? Would you want your daughter taking care of a bear who had killed someone else’s son or daughter?
So, it’s alright, in your eyes for a mother bear to kill a human whom she, (mistakenly), believes a threat to her family, yet it isn’t alright for humans to do the same? You people are certifiable.
You justify your warped delusions with irrevelant, soulless, statistics such as, “there are x number of humans, and y number of bears,” as if that somehow makes things hunky-dory.
Well, if those statistics bother you so much, I suggest that you do something about it and stop breeding. Those of us who remain sane and harbor a love for our own species and children, instead of a demented, bitter hatred, would prefer it if you didn’t.
Posted by: EMT near Yellowstone | August 8, 2010, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Way to go EMT. I just wanted to add that these armchair environmentalist liberals also forget because of the strict ban on hunting bears the population of bears have grown so rapidly that these fatal encounters have become inevitable.
Posted by: Expandable | August 22, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
I agree with EMT, but also side with the bears. I have worked with killer animals, a tiger and was present when a bear killed a fellow trainer. Something I have seen with the animals in zoo’s and facilities that have killed someone is that it is almost entierly human error. But there is a SAFE way to deal with problem animals in a controlled environement, aka a zoo or sanctuary.
While animals that hunt humans on purpose should be put down, there are reasons they hunt people, and we should understand those reasons. The animals are old/delerious/protective, etc. But the cubs in this case should try to be relocated to a facility. Even though they do learn from their mother, they are probably still young enough to learn many other behaviors.
I do not want the hunting laws re-established. Bears were not hunted, or at least not as dramatically before the gun and pelt hunting came to the area, and once they reach the limit that the environment can sustain them, they will stay at that number, never truly increasing. A problem may be that the campers do leave food out and that attracts and feeds the bears, incresing thier numbers and familiartity with people.
Those people who do go camping in bear territory know the risks, or at least should, and do so to be out in nature and enjoy it. Knowing the risks, they should always be on thier guard and protect thier gear and themselves by not inviting wildlife to come to them.
In conclusion, we just need to find a balance. Animals should not be put down just because they are problematic, but only if they truly are killers, and I wish more people who were just as bad or worse than these animals would be put down. But balance is needed, and it usually finds itself in nature. It is we who have upset the balance far too often and we need to be aware of that and make sure we do not leave another negative impression on the wildlife we live alongside.
Posted by: Crysta; | August 29, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
To kill the protective mother was wrong. Especially when we hear on the news of so many human mothers who abandon or even murder their own children. To kill ( murder ) the bear cubs was an abomination. When people enter the domains of wild beasts, be it sharks, crocodiles, or bears, they should be aware of the risks involved. We should not punish a grizzly for being a grizzly.
Posted by: Toby | September 4, 2010, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
That is just freaking stupid, we’re invading their teritory and they’re getting punished for it. Besides we let bad humans live who kill other people.
Posted by: Wolf Star | October 30, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm