States Look to Establish Online Animal Abuser Registries

Diane Padys/Taxi/Getty Images
A movement that started in Suffolk County, N.Y., is quickly spreading across the country.
Its goal: to require animal abusers to sign up for online registries, much like those required for sex offenders.
The Suffolk County Society for the Prevention of the Cruelty of Animals was the first in the country to set up an online registry in 2010, where convicted animal abusers must register a photo and current address for ten years as well pay a $50 per year fee.
Now, as many as five states, including Arizona, Maryland, Florida, New York, and Colorado, have legislation pending.
Senator Ronald Young of Maryland is working on drafting his version of the bill after he said he received reports of a puppy being shot by a bow and arrow and a small dog being thrown out of a window from 23 stories within his district.
“I’m a pet owner, and I’ve also met and talked with a lot of people and groups that support it,” Young said. “People with pets should know who is living near them for the protection of their own animals. We want to prevent future victims.”
“Dexter’s Law,” Florida Senator Mike Fasano’s proposed legislation, sets the same parameters as Suffolk County and Maryland’s bills, and Fasano said he has received an overwhelming positive response from his constituents.
Representatives of the Animal Legal Defense Fund, a non-profit organization that works to promote animal protection, said their baseline legislation has two goals.
The first, to reduce the number of animal victims by raising awareness in communities, and, the second, to help communities save money by reducing rehabilitation costs.
“It’s a doable proposal and it will not only help animals and save money, but also prevent potential violence against human beings,” said Stephan Otto, attorney and director of legislative affairs for ALDF.
Otto said many animal abusers have a strong risk of becoming human abusers, and the registry allows more eyes in the community to watch them and prevent future violent crimes.
The Suffolk County registry requires abusers convicted of both misdemeanors and felonies to register with the site, but no names are registered on the site yet because it was just recently established.
Chief Roy Gross of the Suffolk County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals said they received dozens of calls from other municipalities and legislators who were interested in following in the county’s footsteps.
“This law is long past due and we worked very hard to support the proposal,” Gross said. “We are pleased this law was enacted, and were hopeful that other cities in the country will also do it. We would like to see some eventually be done federally as well.”
Fasano disagreed, saying he believes it is an issue that should be handled on a state-by-state level.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
this is a great idea… i hope pet stores and breeders will check these registries to make sure animals do not fall into the wrong hands.
Posted by: kp | January 21, 2012, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I think this is a great idea as well!! How would someone go about contacting someone in their State to get this looked at? I’m in Louisiana and we don’t have this yet.
Posted by: brigit | January 21, 2012, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Our pets DESERVE our protection. I hope every state adopts laws like this and that pet sellers consults the lists to save animals from abuse.
Posted by: travelertraveler | January 21, 2012, 11:58 am 11:58 am
It’s about damn time!
Posted by: RichJ49 | January 21, 2012, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Echoing RICHJ49′s post! Will contact local animal shelters to see if any organization is spearheading this in my state and will see if they need donations to get this started. Long overdue! Our furry friends need, and will get, our help!
Posted by: velvers | January 21, 2012, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I’m wondering about all the dog lovers that drive around in their cars with their dog in the lap of the driver. Is that any smarter than having a kid in your lap while behind the wheel? NO. I makes me mad as hell because besides putting the dog at risk, it puts other drivers at risk of being centerpunched by the idiot with the dog in his lap. Make that a law FIRST!
Posted by: Wayne Mayer | January 21, 2012, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Agree with all of the other posters. Go to the Animal Legal Defense Fund website in this article and you can sign a petition that will send it to your local state representatives and congress. There is also alot of other information on this website. I just signed the petition and it was sent to my representatives in North Carolina-I urge anyone reading this article to go to the website to help our furry defenseless animals.
Posted by: sammy | January 21, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
At the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s website ExposeAnimalAbusers.org, you can contact your state legislators directly with just a few clicks to urge them to support abuser registry legislation where you live.
Posted by: Lisa Franzetta | January 21, 2012, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I just signed the petition on the ALDF website, which is being sent to reps in Washington State. There were only about 89000 signatures though, for the whole country, so keep on signing!
Posted by: lifesajourney | January 21, 2012, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
The very people wanting this law should be the first to be charged for animal abuse. Putting a rope around a dog’s neck and “taking it for a walk” is abusive. When these animals are constrained, they have no freedom to roam as they would want to. Notice what a dog owner does when a dog sidetracks: he or she pulls the rope to force the animal to continue keeping pace with him or her. Oftentimes the rope tightens and chokes the dog. If we did this to another person, it would be seen as suicidal or lynching.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 21, 2012, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Great idea.
Posted by: Librarian53 | January 21, 2012, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Confining a bird in a cage is abusive—it is false imprisonment. Putting a leash around a dog’s neck is abusive—it is lynching . All creatures are naturally predisposed to live in their own habitats the way nature intended. Humans are the ones who feel they are “superior,” and that they have the right to impose their depraved values and ways of living on other creatures.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 21, 2012, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Those who are known animal abusers should be registered as such, because they should not even be allowed to own animals if they can’t give them the love, compassion and respect they deserve. I wish I hadn’t read in the article about the small dog thrown from a window at 23 stories. How horrible this nutjob is that did that. At least that dog is in a better place now where that can never happen to it again. So often when I hear of things like this happening to an animal I go and give my pets an extra hug to show them I do so love them.
Posted by: Debbie | January 21, 2012, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
this is decades over due. as for “noflyzone2″ – you’re crazy.
Posted by: bajacalla | January 21, 2012, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
I LOVE this idea…bring it on….it’s about time…..we need to protect our animals just as much we need to protect our children…..awesome.
Posted by: dreamonia | January 21, 2012, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
A good idea, but not enforceable. There are states now who can’t keep control of where sexual predators/child molestors are residing. They continually whine that they don’t have the resources to manage these databases, which the public overwhelmingly supports. Do you really think they’ll give even equal priority to animal abusers?
Posted by: Thomas | January 21, 2012, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Costly. Unenforceable. Overreaching. Ineffective.
You going to vote for the tax increase to pay for it?
You going to require registration with a 3-day waiting period for people who sell pit bull puppies out of the back of their pickups?
Who is required to verify the identity of a buyer? What about give-away pets?
Have sex offender lists reduced the number of sex crimes committed against children?
Y’all have good hearts; now get some good brains.
Posted by: Judy | January 22, 2012, 4:14 am 4:14 am
I see the view points of it being difficult to enforce. As it already is with sex offenders. But we must try. Without any effort you can not expect a better outcome or any change. It is a step and a start. Animals need a voice, I am sorry to sound cleshay but we have to speak for those who can not. The same as you would (or should) if you witnessed abuse on a child. I wish more people in this world could see the inhumanity that is being done to defenseless living beings. I hope one day people will be able to see more clearly.
Posted by: Nicole | January 26, 2012, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
I think it is an excellent idea and should be enforced immediately because there is so many abusers out there and they should never get away with it. Animals deserve the same respect for life as humans. Please continue to be their voice. God Bless ^A^
Posted by: Carolyn Correira | January 27, 2012, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
DO IT NOW. IN ALL 50 STATES.
Posted by: jmuhj | February 3, 2012, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm