It is the depopulation and anti-family programs put into place against minority races in the early 1900s that has resulted in the ghettoization and descent of the black culture by the likes of Margaret Sanger. What we see happening to marriage in white middle class and poor demographics in the last 40 years has been the result of these programs being applied to society at large after the family-destroying power had been observed and verified.

These programs are the welfare, divorce, and domestic violence programs that allow women to do things that they were once dependent on a man for. Why would a woman re-marry if welfare or state aid paid enough to not require the income of a new husband? Why would a woman stick around with a guy who she finds boring and unsexy 5-10 years in, if she can keep the house, kids, and a significant portion of his paycheck and get to go ****ing around like 50 Shades of Gray? How does a woman ensure she gets custody? She merely has to say he’s an abuser, and DV laws live VAWA kick in without question!

All of this is designed to scientifically destroy the one big competitor to the State collective, and that is the Family collective. The Family bonds outweigh State bonds, and thus the competition to State bonds must be eliminated if the State is to be the supreme power. This is the crux of communism, and our laws and social situation reflect that the USSR may have been a test-bed for what JPM and GS have in store for the US.

Unless baby daddy died, no welfare benefits. Period. No going after baby daddy for his pay, if you can’t afford to raise the kid, then he gets custody. If he can’t raise the kid, then the kid goes to a family member or adoption.

There are no punishments on women anymore for poor behavior, because in the name of “the children” we’ve ensured at least one parent will be the winner while the other one the loser. I think if you kick the man out and you no longer give him love, housework, companionship, and TLC, then he doesn’t owe you love, money, companionship, or TLC either! The important one here is MONEY.

I also think single motherhood would be IMPOSSIBLE if the welfare and child support machinery were dismantled. Women would make good choices, or take the cost of making bad ones. Women had it better pre-1800 when a divorce meant that husband got everything, wife walked with nothing, BUT SHE OWED NOTHING! Today, a divorce means wife gets everything, husband walks with little-to-nothing, BUT HE STILL OWES HER! Today I would say MEN ARE MORE OPPRESSED in relationships than women ever were on a grand scale. No worries, the religious traditionalists and islamists will replace you feminist atheist hate-mongers with their 3.5 kids per couple to your 1.2 kids per couple!

Since no form of contraception is 100% effective, and since abortion is self-evidently murder, the only answer is: no sex til marriage. Which is what the Bible told us all along.

Some of these kids do beat the odds, and good for them. Buit overall, these children create a massive social-welfare and crime burden that our society simply can no longer tolerate or afford. There is a REASON why the old timers insisted on, no sex til marriage.

Married teen moms are a whole ‘nuther story. As far as I know their kids turn out fine.

Not all teens are horrible parents. Not all are sponges on society. But you cannot deny the fact that it is a real problem.

THINK BEFORE YOU ACT. Be responsible. Use birth control, including but not necessarily limited to CONDOMS. STD’s are also RAMPANT in teens.

Them’s the facts.