
(Laura Burke)
An Alaska man and his family are counting their blessings after walking away with minor injuries from a hands-on scuffle with a bear.
“When the bear was headed towards us, we were like, ‘OK, it’s do or die now,’” Toby Burke, a wildlife biologist for Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, told ABC News.
On Sunday afternoon, Burke, 48, along with his wife, Laura, and three children decided to go bird watching along the Alaskan Kasilof River Beach. The sun was out and the skies were clear, but the chilly 30-degree Alaskan air had the family bundled up in layers.
While the two environmentalists were observing through telescopes, they noticed something a bit larger than the typical bird.
“We saw the bear in the distance and we said, ‘Hey let’s not go down there. Let’s stay up here,’” Burke told ABC News.
Burke wasn’t too worried. After all, he does live in bear country.
The bear disappeared into the undulating dunes and Burke said he assumed it might have fed on a washed-up marine mammal. Burke and his family turned around and continued their hike through the dunes.
Moments later, they found they were very wrong about the bear’s intentions.
“The bear is coming, it’s coming towards us!” yelled 11-year-old Grace Burke to her father.
“We were raising our arms and made loud noises,” Laura Burke said. “That’s supposed to scare the bear away. Instead of running away, it came right towards us.”
That’s when the bear bounded towards them and Toby Burke yelled to his wife, “Get behind me!”
Laura Burke, with her 7-month old baby on her back, grabbed her two other children to get behind her husband.
“When the bear came at my husband, my 8-year-old, Damien, wanted to run,” Laura Burke said. “I remember his dad said, ‘Don’t run. Stick together!’”
Toby Burke grabbed the first thing in sight: his scope attached to a 6-foot-long tripod.
“I put the scope sideways into the bear’s mouth, keeping it away, and it swatted at the scope and severed it,” he said.
The severed metal tripod left a sharp shaft, which Burke used to hit the bear in the face to scare it away. Yet it still didn’t seem to budge and smacked the tripod out of Burke’s hands.
“It was just me between my family and the bear,” he said. “At that point, I made physical contact. All I could do was put my left arm up. Then its mouth clamped down on my forearm. So I remember hitting it in the face with my right arm.”
After several minutes of scuffling, the bear gave up and ran away, and Burke managed to walk away with minor bruises and scratches.
“I definitely felt a crushing sensation when it clamped down on my arm,” he said. “Fortunately, because I had heavy layers of clothing on, I’m basically just really bruised up.”
Once the bear had left, Laura Burke called Alaska State Troopers and Alaska Wildlife Troopers to notify them of the bear and warn others on the beach.
“Upon arrival, an investigation revealed a female brown bear was acting erratically by attacking a vehicle, a telephone pole and then, eventually, attack a male walking on the beach,” said a news release by the Department of Public Safety.
Two troopers were walking along the tree line when the bear came running out of the woods towards them and it was shot. The deceased bear was released to a local charity.
“I mean, he’s very lucky,” Megan Peters, a public information officer with the Department of Public Safety, told ABC News. “I’m sure it was terrifying compared to other bear maulings. He’s really lucky.”
While Burke and his family are still shocked from the encounter, they believe their calm, collected reaction was what saved them.
“We weren’t terrified only because we always knew it’s a reality when you live up here,” Burke said. “We knew this day may come one day. Mentally, we were prepared for that.”
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Another story of someone out in bear country without something to defend themselves with. Sorry, but a telescope isn’t such a defense.
And with a 7 month old baby… Luck is what this story is about.
Posted by: Hugh | May 1, 2013, 8:05 am 8:05 am
he’s lucky the bear was sick.
Posted by: d | May 1, 2013, 8:18 am 8:18 am
If the bear was acting erratically, the implication is that it was diseased. Was its body REALLY released to a charity, presumably for meat?
Posted by: JrzWrld | May 1, 2013, 8:28 am 8:28 am
What kind of moron goes hiking in ALASKA without a gun? And with his FAMILY!!! Unbelievable…
Posted by: John Caile | May 1, 2013, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Just goes to show: Don’t mess with a birdwatcher!
Posted by: Serge | May 1, 2013, 9:02 am 9:02 am
thank god nothing happened and there safe, but dont press your luck, you were very lucky the bear decided to leave, two words BEAR MACE!
Posted by: bill | May 1, 2013, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Hiking and bird watching in known bear country with your wife and 7-month old baby with NO GUN. That is equal too going to the zoo, opening up a bear cage and yelling dinner time while just standing there. Their actions were beyond stupid. Not a peice off grey matter in his head or his wifes head.
Posted by: jstate83 | May 1, 2013, 9:18 am 9:18 am
That bear needs to be tested for transmittable disease. Hiking–or birdwatching–where large beasties rule without a means of defense is not smart. Attacks may not be frequent, but it is spectacular when it happens and too often fatal. An adult taken out by their own stupidity is natural selection, but the little ones need to be protected.
Posted by: crabbyoldb | May 1, 2013, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Perhaps environmentalists just don’t taste too good.
Posted by: Casual Observer | May 1, 2013, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Why wasn’t the bear tested for rabies? Or is rabies not a threat in Alaska?
Posted by: Lurker111 | May 1, 2013, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Most bird watchers don’t carry a rifle with them while bird watching. People should realize bears roam over most of this nation, I’m in the lower 48 and I can easily run into a bear in any number of local, state or federal parks/forests. This bear didn’t care if you were armed or not, it was not acting normally and attacked pretty much everything it saw. Mace would have just made the bear madder and unless you’re armed with a high powered rifle or shotgun the attack would have occurred, with likely the same result. Sure you can use a 9mm handgun, but know this – it’ll take a perfect shot to kill him quickly with one or two shots. Meanwhile he will be gnawing on you!
Posted by: newsitrust | May 1, 2013, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Alaska Wildlife Troopers are use to shooting stuff and there were two of them together meaning that the bear faced two guns at the same time. Troopers win; since if one trooper can wound the bear; the other trooper has a kill shot chance. Even with bolt action rifles they could fire off several rounds before the bear had a chance to reach the two. They probably drop the rifles and go with their pistol is it got within 10 feet of them since pistol have 7-17 rounds in the them each. Even with 9mm; if you hit it with say 10 rounds; go chance of a wound bear would be done for.
Posted by: Annoymous | May 1, 2013, 11:30 am 11:30 am
I don’t think that this was a full grown bear
Posted by: Andrew | May 1, 2013, 11:46 am 11:46 am
I would have taken my Rossi model 92 in .454 casull… 8 shots, short throw lever action, 16 inch barrel and all stainless steel. Like it or not as the oldest male in your household the safety of your family is YOUR responsibility. If that bear was a couple of hundred pounds heavier or had cubs with her you would be looking at 2 or 3 fatalities…
Posted by: John from the Free Republic of Texas | May 1, 2013, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
See. I missed that before where they both are “environmentalists” (code for liberal)
That explains the mindset of living in bear country and not carrying a weapon.
Lucky for them, things turned out ok. Probably better than it would have they carried a firearm. Liberals often shake while holding a firearm and I haven’t met one yet that doesn’t close their eyes when they shoot.
Posted by: dd23 | May 1, 2013, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Did they check that bear for rabies? If not, anyone who came into contact with it before or after death is at risk.
Posted by: Vincent Dobbs | May 1, 2013, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
The bear should be checked for RABIES!!!
Posted by: bob | May 1, 2013, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
It’s one thing to jeopardize your own safety, it’s both assinine and cruel to place your little children in such high risk situations. That entire family could have been lain to waste by that bear.
Posted by: wgerp226 | May 1, 2013, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I hope the female bear wasn’t protecting a cub/s. :(
Posted by: Donna | May 1, 2013, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
…that’s good a bear that may be sick/diseased is fed to
poor people…lol…unbelievable. Ya just can’t get any more stupid.
Posted by: booboo | May 1, 2013, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Alaska…Bears…Family Hike…No Gun…DUH!
Posted by: Don | May 1, 2013, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
most of the commenters on here are just running their mouths– If you’ve ever had the good fortune to meet Toby, you’d know he’s a tough and extremely experienced outdoorsman, the real-deal Alaskan… and he doesn’t deserve the absurd stuff you commenters are dishing out. Sad people, slandering someone’s character just by what you read in a short news story. And the armchair cowboys commenting on here about their big guns are a joke. There are lots of ways to live in bear country, and not everyone chooses to be armed at all times. A little respect for your fellow man and a lot less finger-pointing and smart-a$$ comments after the fact would be appreciated. Thanks.
That bear was a fool to mess with Toby :) Glad it all turned out OK.
Posted by: yhw | May 1, 2013, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
A Bear attacking poles, vehicles and people is not normal, this is what a rabid fox or coyote have been seen doing, Troopers who gave this animals remains to Charity need to retrieve it and have the brain tested for rabies before someone eats this meat., at the least they should have had it tested before doing this since they already had reports that a bear was acting erratically in the area. Where has common sense gone?.
Posted by: Peter | May 1, 2013, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm