Feb 15, 2012 1:00pm

Should the World Health Organization Regulate Alcohol Use?

A University of Oxford researcher is calling on the World Health Organization to put in place policies that would regulate alcohol use.

Devi Sridhar, a lecturer in global health politics, wrote that WHO should treat dangerous drinking as a global public health crisis, just as the agency treats disease outbreaks and tobacco use.  WHO, she said, requires countries to report outbreaks of certain diseases and also institutes policies requiring member nations to take measures designed to curb tobacco’s supply and demand.

“About 2.5 million deaths a year, almost 4 percent of all deaths worldwide, are attributed to alcohol — more than the number of deaths caused by HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis or malaria,” Sridhar wrote in her commentary, published in the journal Nature.

In 2010, WHO published a document, the WHO Global Strategy to Reduce Harmful Use of Alcohol, that included strategies such as prohibiting “unlimited drinks” promotions and instituting a minimum age to purchase alcohol.  These recommendations, Sridhar argued, should become legal requirements.

Excessive drinking is also a major public health issue in the U.S.  According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, excessive drinking cost the U.S. $223.5 billion in 2006.  Losses in workplace productivity, illnesses caused by too much drinking and motor vehicle accidents made up most of the burden.

Dr. Ihsan Salloum, a professor of psychiatry at  the University of  Miami’s Miller School of Medicine, said while binge drinking and alcoholism are problems in the U.S., preventive strategies in this country, such as raising the legal drinking age and taxing alcoholic beverages, have helped reduce the alcohol-related health burden significantly.

“If we can get countries around the world to agree on these type of strategies, we can have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality,” he said.

Even if there is international consensus on ways to reduce problem drinking, Sridhar said there will likely be problems with enforcement, just as there are with tobacco in certain countries.

Nonetheless, she said WHO must move forward with efforts to make safer consumption of alcohol a public health priority.

“The WHO is the only body with the legitimacy and authority to proactively promote health through the use of international law,” she wrote.

 

 

SHOWS:

User Comments

Al Capone.

Posted by: Herne | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 2:05 pm

Education and regulation….I guess Oxford is letting any idiot threw the doors these days.

1.Any more damn prohibitions against the rights to my pursuit of happiness will result in the American Revolution part 2.

2. Do any prohibitionists know how to read? (Apparently history isn’t recognized at Oxford.)

3. How did this bone head not get laughed at?

4. If this is a foreign student. Her/His peers should really remind them, that here in the U.S. we the people have a Constitution. That many people fought and died for …. MY FREEDOM was earned….. NO ONE tells ME what is best for ME…. If I’m TOLD what is best for me…… my response will be a boot up your ass!

Posted by: Herne | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 2:25 pm

The Government already taxes the heck out of alcohol as it does tobacco. What are we getting in return for these taxes? Nothing but more tax. Half of Congress appears to have substance abuse trouble and they are already in control. Government can’t properly regulate and enforce anything.

Posted by: Give Me a Break | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 6:01 pm

Herne, in response to your rant. Do you drive the speed limit? If so, every bit of your arguement falls flat.

And by the way, this article clearly states the researcher is simply recomending other countries apply the same regulations ALREADY on the books in the U.S. No drinking and driving, no serving someone who is already smashed, no selling to minors. No where does it mention prohibition or taking your budweiser away.

Posted by: scent of reason | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 6:11 pm

Posted by: scent of reason—Why deny Darwin Award Winners their prize??? Sure Drunk Driving laws make sense but they don’t do anything about it, they don’t stop it, reduce it, or anything, you cannot really enforce a law that millions of people choose everyday to break, even with the penalties we have, because catching only .001% of drunk drivers is not much of a deterrent, and even when caught a little money goes a long way.

Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 6:26 pm

We already tried that. It didn’t work then. It won’t work now.

Posted by: Bob Cochran | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 6:32 pm

The WHO is about as useful as the United Nations. Is this George Orwell’s 1984? If people want to drink themselves into oblivion, that’s their prerogative. If they get behind the wheel and put other people’s lives in danger, then that’s another story. I’m sick of the governments and other world organizations thinking they know what’s best for everyone. They don’t. They are only human, no better than all of us.

Posted by: LShed | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 6:32 pm

Don’t you think we have more than enough regulations and governments trying to control us already. This is ridiculous!!! What ever happened to FREEDOM?????

Posted by: irishrose | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 6:44 pm

“Education and regulation….I guess Oxford is letting any idiot threw the doors these days.”
the correct “threw” would be “through”. Apparently you did not go to Oxford.

Posted by: Tim C | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 6:47 pm

You bet! As the Supreme Court justification for Obama Care the fact that an individual may be a liability to the government allows for the government to require enrollment. The same logic allows the government to require compliance with alcohol rules they establish. Then food rules, then when you can or can’t have kids. We’re now born to feed the machine.

Posted by: Kalabi | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 6:49 pm

Every country in the world should regulate alcohol consumption to prevent alcoholism and alcohol consumptio0n related human injury.

Posted by: Girish | February 15, 2012 February 15, 2012, 8:04 pm

If WHO really wants to do some good, it should work on educating people about population control, not alcohol consumption. Third world countries just keep pumping out babies they can’t feed. The combination of unchecked breeding and medical advances is destroying the planet. It’s enough to drive one to drink.

Posted by: LagunaTriMom | February 16, 2012 February 16, 2012, 1:08 am

Oh, rolling ofthe eyes emoticon, babies are wonderful, special gifts from God, and His planet will provide once all of us believe in Him and trust in Him.
Personal freedom is a wonderful thing and must be protected at all costs. Penalties for infriginging upon others freedom must also be protected. It’s all about BALANCE…I can have a glass or three of wine, but then I shouldn’t get behind the wheel of a car (killing machine when drinking_) because I endanger others, which infringes on others rights to safely drive on the roads. My rights shouldn’t infringe upon the rights of another….IMHO, at least this as we as an American nation founded upon Christian beliefs should hold fast!

Posted by: Juliettemomof3 | February 16, 2012 February 16, 2012, 11:35 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.