Jan 4, 2013 4:17pm

FDA Moves on New Food Safety Rules

The FDA proposed new rules today that would require US food distributors to implement additional measures to combat food-borne illness. The guidelines are aimed at improving food handling in both the agriculture and manufacturing sectors after a series of recent disease outbreaks in peanuts, cantaloupe, cheese, and leafy green vegetables that killed scores of Americans.

Food safety organizations welcomed the new rules after a long delay.

“Under the old rules, we’ve been reacting to food contaminations after they happened,” Ami Gadhia of Consumers Union said in a statement. ”The goal here is to prevent deadly outbreaks before people get hurt.  We’re anxious to dive deep into these proposed rules so we can review and comment on the details.”

One rule would require growers, manufacturers and distributors to develop formal plans for preventing contamination, including techniques for cleaning equipment and keeping animals out of crops. Mandatory contingency plans for outbreaks would also be required of businesses, to be approved by the government. The rule would apply to both foreign and domestic suppliers, provided their goods are bound for US consumption.

Another rule proposes enforceable safety standardization in the production and harvesting of produce.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, 3,000 Americans died last year from food-borne illnesses, with an additional 130,000 hospitalized.

In an effort to stave off industry protests Food and Drug Administration officials stressed the rules would be implemented on a risk-based scale, with higher emphasis placed on foods intended to be eaten raw. For example, fresh tomatoes bound for supermarket produce aisles would be held to much stricter standards than beans intended to be cooked and canned.

The FDA estimates it will take roughly a year for the government to move toward implementing the rules, including a 120-day period for public comment. After adoption the largest agriculture businesses will have two years to comply, and small-scale producers will have extensions well beyond that time frame.

Most American food distributors are already in compliance with many of the regulations set out today, but many are voluntary and the government believes stricter enforcement could have prevented deaths from recent highly publicized outbreaks. For example, during the 2011 listeria outbreak in cantaloupes federal investigators found dirty processing equipment and standing pools of old water on the floor of the Colorado farm that produced them. The contaminated produce was linked to 33 deaths.

But these measures are part of the Food Safety Modernization Act, a sweeping series of regulatory changes to the industry that have been tied up in the Obama administration for well over a year. As the first major overhaul of the FDA in decades, President Obama signed the legislation into law with modest Republican support from Congress two years ago to the day, with a one-year deadline to see its first policies put into practice.

Speculation of political motivations at work cropped up during the delays, fueled after the rules were hung-up at the Office of Management and Budget in the review process. Some industry watchers suggest the administration may have sought to deny Republicans an additional talking point during an election year by tabling new proposals.

Pew Research reports there have been 15 major outbreaks regarding FDA-related products since the FSMA was signed into law, resulting in 40 deaths.

 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Oh, yes, develop a plan to stop food-borne illnesses. That will probably work. I’m pretty sure most businesses used to try to get people sick.

Posted by: Throckmorton09 | January 4, 2013 January 4, 2013, 5:05 pm

Let’s see – the corrupt FDA forces small milk producers who omit it, to advertise for Monsanto’s rGBH by making them say it’s just fine on their labels. No other food product is forced to do that. So I wonder how the FDA, Monsanto’s Stooge, will find a way to pervert this law in that company’s favor, so FDA leaders can get bribes and revolving-door jobs. Soon the FDA will ban any foods that are Not bioengineered by Monsanto. You might as well call it the FMA – the Food and Monsanto Administration.

Posted by: Jim Mooney | January 4, 2013 January 4, 2013, 6:43 pm

the rules for food safety is ok but people already do some of the stuff they are told them to do for rules but it might be a good idea anyway but i think they need to think about it before they get people mad for giving them too work but people might just hire other people to clean off the food and that might make more jobs so i guess it’s a good idea and there will be less people dying from food

Posted by: Emily Span | January 4, 2013 January 4, 2013, 6:45 pm

Who will pay for “government” inspectors? The trick is to find “smarter” ways to provide “safe” food without adding costs which never go away! Ultimately the consumers pay for added costs!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | January 4, 2013 January 4, 2013, 6:49 pm

I would rather pay more for food that won’t kill me. The problem is that the FDA is owned by corporate agriculture and chemical companies so I don’t really see them doing anything to improve our food supply that Monsanto and other giants poisoning it don’t approve of.

Posted by: Michelle | January 4, 2013 January 4, 2013, 9:19 pm

We absolutely need government oversight for food safety compliance. Who else would do it? Food producers are in business for profit and could be inclined to ignore rules that cost too much money to maintain. However, I don’t understand what’s “new” about the rules. My parents were dairy farmers with a small milk processing plant, and they were fully aware of bacteria & their growth rates, proper sanitation practices, perils of antibiotic use in the animals, etc… They had expertise in pretty much all of the so-called “new” issues and rules of today… And my parents didn’t graduate from high school. This bureaucratic ship needs to turn more quickly!

Posted by: Claire | January 4, 2013 January 4, 2013, 9:30 pm

The problem with “government” enforcement is that there is no incentive to find “smarter” ways to accomplish the goal! If there is an economic incentive there will be a better way found! (Necessity is the mother of invention)

Posted by: Common _ Sense | January 5, 2013 January 5, 2013, 11:27 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.