Feb 24, 2010 2:09pm

Larry Flynt to Students: “We Have to Tolerate Things We Don’t Necessarily Like”

ABC News on Campus reporter Lauren McGaha blogs:
   
Larry Flynt has been imprisoned nine times. He has been heavily involved in Supreme Court battles. He has survived an assassination attempt during an obscenity trial in 1978.  But sitting in his gold-plated wheelchair center stage at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, he said it was all necessary to defend his right to free speech.
Flynt was greeted with warm applause from a packed auditorium as the keynote speaker for UNC First Amendment Law Review’s 2010 Symposium last Thursday.
He is known by many as one of the most powerful men in porn. As the head of Larry Flynt Publications, he is no stranger to controversy. His company produces sexually explicit magazines and videos, including Hustler.
Not surprisingly, Flynt has spent most of his adult life wrapped up in legal battles, fighting to protect his first amendment rights to publish what some call obscene material in his magazine.
During his speech, Flynt discussed the sacrifices he’s made while protecting his First Amendment rights.
“Fighting those battles wasn’t easy,” Flynt said. “I’ve been shot and paralyzed as a result of it. But freedom of speech is not freedom for the thought you love, it’s freedom for the thought you hate the most. You have to get your head around that.”
And Flynt wasn’t shy about exercising his right to free speech, as he criticized the latest decision by the Supreme Court to allow corporations to pour an unlimited amount of funding into political campaigns.
“That’s a terrible, terrible decision,” Flynt said. “You know, Bush’s legacy will not be the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or even Katrina. It’s going to be those two toads he put on the Supreme Court.”
Flynt said he’s grown increasingly concerned that “many of the freedoms that we’ve gained by the liberal Warren Court have been placed in jeopardy with the new conservative Supreme Court, appointed primarily by Bush.”
And after years of legal battles, Flynt stands by his magazine and its content.
“It’s easy for me to understand why sex has become such a political buzz word,” he said. “The church has had its hand on our crotch for over 2,000 years. The government is headed exceedingly in that direction, feeling that if they can control your pleasure center, they can control you. But to live in a free society, we have to tolerate things we don’t necessarily like.”
And as far as expanding First Amendment rights, Flynt says the less governmental interference, the better.
“The greatest right that any nation can afford its people is the right to be left alone,” he said. “Every American feels that way. Unless they’re breaking the law, they want to be left alone.”
Several audience members asked questions about the First Amendment during a Q&A session after Flynt spoke.  But some remarks provoked the crowd.
Anthony Maglione, a 2009 UNC graduate, began his question by addressing the audience, asking, “How do we feel about having Larry Flynt here tonight?”
Audience members began to boo, while some shouted “We feel fine!” Moderators encouraged Maglione to proceed to a question, and when he continued to read what seemed to be prepared remarks from a notepad, security escorted him away from the microphone.
Maglione says he was never given a chance to ask his question fully.
“The UNC Law School moderators and the campus police silenced me when I attempted to ask a question about the content and harm of Flynt's ‘speech,’” Maglione said. “Our community should discuss whether we want to legitimize someone who profits from the degradation of women.”
Seemingly unfazed by the remarks, Flynt remained silent during Maglione’s criticism and removal.
Other members of the audience were more accepting of Flynt’s right to publish Hustler.
“Women are not necessarily shown in the best light in the magazine,” said Michael Murray, a 2009 UNC graduate. “But at the same time, if people don’t like what it says then don’t read it. That’s the message, plain and simple.”
After his speech, Flynt acknowledged that he is one of the most prominent men in the adult entertainment industry, but said he wants his legacy to be more than porn.
“I’d like to be remembered as someone who fought to extend the parameters of free speech,” Flynt said. “I think that’s a pretty noble goal.” 

User Comments

Larry Flynt is a hypocrite, as are his supporters at this event.
He gives a speech about his ‘valiant’ battle to protect free speech. He states:
“But freedom of speech is not freedom for the thought you love, it’s freedom for the thought you hate the most. You have to get your head around that.”
Now if he was so concerned about free speech, why didn’t he protect Anthony Maglione’s right to disagree with Flynt’s views?
If all those who welcomed Flynt and supported him cared about free speech, why did they start booing Maglione as soon as it was apparent that he disapproved of Flynt?
Why did Flynt sit there quietly as one person’s right of free speech was denied? If Flynt is so committed to free speech, I think he should have calmed the crowd and encouraged them to listen to an opposing view.
I guess Flynt and his supporters beleive free speech is valid only when the speaker doesn’t disagree.

Posted by: malcat | February 24, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

malcat, the puritans and those anti-free speech feminists just don’t get the point what Larry Flynt is saying. That if the government can decide what we can or cannot see or read, we will slide off the slippery slope into the dictatorships the likes of the Nazis and their modern counterparts like the Iranian regime. Larry has a notorious background as a pornographer but did he force the naked models(men and women) in his media to pose? I have yet to hear any one of them sue him for that after all these years. If he did not help build that notoriety, will he be invited to speak at UNC? I think not!

Posted by: Scorpionet69 | February 24, 2010, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Larry Flynt’s association with the adult entertainment industry is his greatest handicap. Frightened and fixated people just can’t get past that idea and grasp what he is really saying.
In addition, others are fixated on opposing the opposers so much, they forget they are acting in the opposite manner to what they claim they support.
Wisdom and maturity are not inherant qualities. They have to be learned through experience..often times embarrasingly.

Posted by: KsDevil | February 24, 2010, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Scorpionet69, I don’t like Larry Flynt and disapprove of his type of entertainment. I do not think he or his ilk should be allowed to do what they do for a living. But the courts say they do, so I respect their decision. I fully believe and support the statement “Unless all enjoy the right, then no one has rights.”
My comments were about Flynt’s action following his speech at this event. The article ends with: “I’d like to be remembered as someone who fought to extend the parameters of free speech,” Flynt said. “I think that’s a pretty noble goal.” ”
But he does nothing…NOTHING…to defend Anthony Maglione’s right to speak. He does nothing to calm the crowd who, after cheering Flynt’s battle defend free speech, boos Maglione. He does nothing to prevent Maglione from being physically and forcibly removed.
That’s why I called Flynt and his supporters hypocrites. I would feel the same way about anyone who declares themself a warrior for free speech and then sits by while another’s right to free speech is denied.

Posted by: malcat | February 24, 2010, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Larry Flynt isn’t very tolerant of moral people, or Christians.
Flynt has been blessed with free speech, on which he has made millions by degrading humanity. He has lowered sexuality to this gross, perverted, selfish thing.
That’s free speech. He has the right to do that.
I also have the right to say what a sleezy person Flynt is, and that he needs to practice what he preaches. He fights for free speech,a s long as he agrees with it, and he profits from it.
Nothing new here..this is the new patriotism. Me, me me, and me. If you dare disagree, well too bad. Maglione didn’t have free speech, did he? he said something Flynt didn’t like, so he was removed. So much for tolerance.

Posted by: Miselaineous | February 24, 2010, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Saying that it is perfectly OK to have this man publish his brand of smut and then to add that if you don’t like , don’t read it is foolish. I can only hope that the people who say this are from outside this country. This rag (magazine) (sic) fuels the anger that some men have towards women and then they carry out their perverted ideas. Like to see this trash, then please don’t eave it laying around for the kids to read. Oh by the way, don’t do as I do but rather do as I say does not work with kids in the day and age.I would close on the fact that he hates the right(R’s) because it was this group that made him face court action as well as jail.Now how are the D’s going to do during the reign of terror ? Well he was in a school right ! sorry state of affairs…………….

Posted by: Bill | February 24, 2010, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

I guess Flynt and his supporters beleive free speech is valid only when the speaker doesn’t disagree. by: malcat | Feb 24, 2010 3:50:44 PM ***********************
Gee, sounds soooo familiar when people disagreed with bush’s war, they were called anti-patriotic and ostricized.
don’t lecture about being hypocrites.

Posted by: spacerook1 | February 24, 2010, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Actually, Flynt and the whole audience were very patient with Maglioni. And FWIW, Flynt charged no speaker’s fee for the talk. He flew his own jet, on his own dime, to come face to face with the next generation. I think that shows devotion to his cause of free speech.
He has my respect. Maglioni should have shown some, too.

Posted by: Eli | February 24, 2010, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

THE SPEAKER IS NOT ABLE TO DO THE SLIGHTEST WHEN THESE TYPES OF EVENTS OCCUR.
IF HE HAD HAD THE QUESTION TROUGH, HE WOULD HAVE ANSWERED IT FULL SCALE. SELFEVIDENTLY.

Posted by: VEDEL | February 25, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

The ONE place where you DO NOT have freedom of speech is on college campuses, and Larry Flynt had NOTHING to do with that.
Do people even read the articles before they mindlessly post on here?

Posted by: jafo | March 4, 2010, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Is sad that the people we may find distasteful are sometimes are strongest defenders of freedom.

Posted by: Shhaz | June 6, 2011, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

It is sad that the people we may find distasteful are sometimes our strongest defenders of freedom.
Just goes to show that we ALL have to speak up and act when our freedoms are threatened and not leave the task just to the exceptions among us.

Posted by: Shhaz | June 6, 2011, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.