College Cheerleading Coach Agrees: It’s ‘Not a Sport’ … Yet
ABC News on Campus reporters Marlei Martinez, Miriam Smith, and Danielle Waugh blog:
Cheerleaders across the nation haven’t felt especially peppy since federal judge Stefan Underhill ruled last week that cheerleading is “still too underdeveloped and disorganized” to be considered a varsity sport. It all started when the Quinnipiac University’s women’s volleyball team sued the school for pulling its funding and re-routing it to the cheerleading squad. They claimed the transaction had violated Title IX, the legislation that requires men and women’s athletic programs to receive equal funding. But one cheer coach is standing up for the court’s decision. Dena Segbers, who has led the Syracuse University Spirit Program for nearly eight years, and has been coaching cheerleading for 25 years, said technicalities disqualify cheerleading as a competitive collegiate sport.
“Under the definition of Title IX and NCAA, [cheerleading] truly is not a sport on the collegiate level,” Segbers told ABCNews.com. “All true sports need to have a set of contests. And on the collegiate level, we do not have a true set of annual contests.”
Although the United Cheerleading Association (UCA) hosts the annual 'College Cheerleading National Championships,’ the UCA Championship gives universities the authority to choose whether or not they will compete — unlike the NCAA basketball playoffs. Segbers said her squad has competed in the Championships for the past eight years in a row, however, competition is not their focus.
“Our primary purpose is to support the athletic teams that we are assigned to through the athletic department,” she said. “And I would like it to continue to be that.”
Most of the college cheerleaders we spoke with adamantly disagreed with the court’s ruling. Samantha Lavien, 21, a senior broadcast journalism major at Syracuse University, has been cheering for SU since her freshman year.
“I disagree with the decision a lot,” Lavien said. “I think cheerleading is a sport and by calling it not a sport it really undermines athletes on the field.”
Lavien has played a number of other sports in the past, including softball and basketball. She says cheerleading requires just as much effort.
“I try just as hard in cheerleading as I did in anything else,” Lavien said. “We have a lot of practices, we go to competition, we prepare for competition, we prepare for games, so I think that we deserve the same respect as any other athlete.”
Many college cheerleaders, Segbers’ squad included, perform stunts and gymnastics in addition to sideline cheering. Liza Boyer, 24, who cheered at Louisiana State University for four years and now teaches cheerleading at St. Ann’s Elementary School in Germantown, Tenn. said, “It requires an extreme amount of athleticism to do the gymnastics we perform, and every athlete that attempts to do it would definitely agree. The amount of time we put in to practicing and working out is equivalent to any other sport.” Eighteen-year-old Caroline Babb, who cheered competitively throughout high school, agrees with Boyer. She will be joining the University of Texas at Austin cheering squad this year.
“I think the judge is making too much of a generalization for sure by saying that cheer isn’t a sport because there are lots of different kinds of cheerleading,” Babb said.
But cartwheels, basket-tosses and double back-hand-springs are what Segbers says will one day be cheerleading’s saving grace.
“I do think that when cheerleading does become a sport, I know it will, there will be competitive cheer teams that will probably be named something else,” she said. “Probably ‘competitive stunts and gymnastics,’ which [are] the true athletic elements to cheerleading.”
Judge Underhill hasn’t completely ruled out this possibility. In his decision he wrote, “Competitive cheer may, some time in the future, qualify as a sport under Title IX.” Modern-day cheerleaders may take on many roles, Segbers said, such as motivating their fellow athletes, engaging the crowd and creating the atmosphere for the home court advantage. In her view, these encouraging services alone aren’t enough to deem cheerleading a sport.
“Cheerleading is just that, leading cheers,” she said. “If the girls are doing dances on the sidelines or they’re holding a sign trying to get a crowd response that technically wouldn’t be considered athleticism.”
Email
Clouded Leopards Amaze 'GMA' Anchor
Blue Ivy Pictures Hit the Web 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
How is cheerleading not a sport when College Football does not follow a true playoff system and yet is a sport in the NCAA’s eyes???
Posted by: sesz | July 27, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
cheerleading is qa sport in my case cheerleading helps you work out and you come together as a team
Posted by: carina | July 27, 2010, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
I believe what the Judge meant to say is that he has never played an oraganized sport and probably never had the ambition to. How can a person say that it has no playoff or qualifying process, I don’t remember watching the ice stone playoffs or archery on ESPN a well noted SPORTS channel, just because the college level does not qualify for specific funding and has to resort to donations and fund raisers shows that they are more enthusiastic about their SPORT than the volleyball team or football,baseball, golf and any other so called sport team. I believe their is more genuine enthisiasm in cheerleading than any other so called sport.
Posted by: Mark | July 27, 2010, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Cheer is NOT A SPORT. That is in NO WAY a dis to cheerleaders. Dancers are athletes, circus performers are athletes, Madonna and Brittney are Athletes….
They just happen to do an Entertainment Activity that is Athletic and that more than ok…. It is AMAZING.
As to the judges ruling. Unorganized it is a bad term. Cheer is to Fractionated to be a sport. Also it does not follow strong “competitive” principles in their competitions and it won’t for many many years. It won’t because IT WILL HURT BUSINESS compared to how it is run now.
There is a whole business dynamic behind how cheer is done. Follow the money. 75% if not more of all cheer is owned by one company (yep, UCA and NCA are both owned by same company and others too.) The whole thing is a well greased money making engine and the ONLY money that goes back into the athletes is done so to further promote the cheer business empire.
Nothing wrong with that when you look at Cheer for what it is. An ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS that is athletic.
Love ya Cheerleaders. Be happy for what you got. Guarantee… if you push your way into athletic category you are going to be VERY disappointed on the changes that will be required of you. No more spirit trophies, no more spirit sticks, no more phoo phoo fluff that makes cheer special to you.
Posted by: Buz | July 27, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
I think what the article is trying to say is that there is no mandated competition. the NCAA basically defines a sport by competition. if a school isn’t competing in cheer leading it can’t call it a sport. But that doesn’t mean cheer leading doesn’t require athletic skill, strength, stamina etc. I would imagine most cheer leaders are in better physical shape than the golf or bowling teams at some of these schools. It all comes down to how you define sport. IMO, standing on the sideline while two other teams are competing does not a sport make.
Posted by: Scott | July 27, 2010, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Cheerleading is definitely a sport. In my opinion, it is THE sport. In order to be a top elite cheerleader, you need to have the skills of many top athletes combined: the strength of football players, the stamina of runners, the fearlessness of gymnasts, the flexibility of dancers… the list goes on and on. People outside the sport don’t understand that cheerleading requires the same passion, dedication, and, essentially, talent that any other sport takes.
As Scott so eloquently put it, “standing on the sideline while two other teams are competing does not a sport make.” This is true. And this is not the essence of cheerleading. In addition to leading the crowd, cheerleaders throw people 20 feet in the air. They do tumbling that equates to that of a high-level gymnast. And yes, cheerleaders do put on a performance and they do entertain. But so do football players. Does this mean that football is not a sport? Not by any means.
I’m sure that this judge (or for that matter, anyone who says that cheerleading is not a sport) has never been a cheerleader himself, or even gone to a cheerleading competition. That is where you can see the hard work that goes into cheerleading. In my opinion, cheerleading could be viewed as another version of football. You need to have 25+ people know exactly what they’re doing, be aware of what others are doing, work together, and memorize certain “plays” if you will– routines. There are different routines for games then there are for competitions, and so on and so forth. There is so much more detail that I could go into.
The judge’s reasoning for his decision was that cheerleading is too underdeveloped and unsanctioned to be considered a sport. This is not the fault of the millions of people across the globe who practice the sport, but rather the fault of society for not delving deeper into the true meaning of cheerleading. It is up to society to take a closer look at the SPORT that millions have fallen in love with- cheerleading. Once they do, they will realize and begin to agree with what we cheerleaders have been saying all along.
Posted by: hrae24 | July 28, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Dancing and Cheerleading is completely a sport! It keeps you exercising while still having fun. And if you really know the sport you would know you have to mentally be prepared and physically and some sports don’t even have to do that. Look at Dancing with the Stars right now, most people that do it (even the football players will admit) it is hard work, and can get very complicated. I know that it may look easy, but it is just because whoever it is has not gone and done it yet! Cause if they did they would definitely think it was a sport!
Posted by: Miranda | September 24, 2010, 2:06 am 2:06 am
I guess if you want to cheer you have to play softball. Most ridiculous thing I’v seen. Good banter between teams is fun but now girls softball has made stupid cheers a part of their game. Cheerleading is it’s own sport.
So much for fighting for eqaully for women.
Posted by: rose | September 26, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
cheer is a sport…throwing people is much harder then throwing a football or any other ball..we condition, work ourselves. No one respects it because they’ve never done it themselves
Posted by: Heidi | October 1, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
This Judge Underhill should try cheereleading and than try to say that it is not a sport!we have to work as much as hard as any other athlete out there!
Posted by: Jessica | November 2, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
It is funny people say that it is not a sport because it is not organized like one so why dont they just organize it like one and give it independence from other sports and then send it back to court
Posted by: susan | February 7, 2011, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Cheerleading is DEFINITLY A SPORT! I know i sound like everyone else that agrees but its hard, Its fun, Its Athletic if you cheer the RIGHT way you would be able to understand that cheer is a sport!! And I think that that judge whoever should try cheerleading. Like Heidi said Its easier to through a football or baseball or a Basketball or anything in that catagory, Than it is to through a person, I personally LOVE to cheer!
Posted by: Brianna Celeste | February 16, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
This is ridiculous cheerleading is a sport and i don’t think that coach is doing a very good job saying that cheerleading isn’t a sport because it is!
Posted by: Annabel | October 7, 2011, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm