Jun 22, 2006 9:18am

Videogames, MySpace, Snakes and Kos

Sorry so inactive on the blog yesterday….

Was crashing on a few stories…one was for World News Tonight on MYSPACE.COM CONTROVERSY about whether such social networking sites are veritable candy stores for sexual predators…

the other was for NIGHTLINE about a videogame — one allegedly twisted by insurgents to make it anti-US — that the Pentagon told the House Intelligence Committee about during a rare open hearing. The dot-com story is HERE and the video is HERE.

Stephen Colbert notes that on FOX News the other day, Wall Street Journal editor Dan Henninger offered: "a footnote to our gay marriage discussion: A woman in India last week married a snake. I would like to ask the proponents of gay marriage–which violates, after all, traditions going back through all of human history–to now absolutely, positively guarantee that the next movement is not going to be allowing people to marry their pet horse, dog or cat." The video of Henninger and Colbert’s response can be viewed HERE.

…and the New Republic’s Jason Zengerle asks some tough questions about DAILY KOS…Specifically, wether "Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitsas (of the famous Daily Kos) engaged in a pay-for-play scheme in which politicians who hire Armstrong as a consultant get the support of Kos."

more later….
jt

User Comments

Great report on the MySpace problem with predators on yesterday evening’s WNT! Although I realize that parents can’t continuously monitor their children’s activities on a computer, they need to set some limits and provide some supervision for their children. It’s the parents unaware of what can happen to their children in cyberspace who need this information!
Stephen Colbert’s response to the gay marriage comments was witty, funny, and showed a high degree of intelligence that Mr. Henninger will never possess. The “argument” (and I’m being extremely charitable here) cited is, as I commented on one of your previous blogs, nothing more than a feeble, weak-kneed canard used in denying civil rights: “If we don’t stop it here and now, who knows where this execrable practice will lead?” Were this WSJ editor living in the early years of the previous century, I’m sure that he would have used the same ill-conceived rationalization to decry miscegenation, women’s suffrage, desegregation and integration, women’s rights, and who knows what else. By making such unenlightened comments, Mr. Henninger has undeniably shown that he is a man ahead of his time, if his time is the thirteenth century—B.C. How did this dimwit become an editor of what used to be considered an influential newspaper?

Posted by: chuck | June 22, 2006, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

I don’t see what the big deal is for any two consenting adults to marry. And if someone wants to marry their pet, and it is clear that the pet likes them and that they take good care of it, why not? who does it hurt? me? I don’t think so. my kids? get real! they would just laugh! the world needs more nonjudgmental people who are willing to just get along and let other people just get along too. In fact, wouldn’t bother me if someone wants to marry a tree and take care of it in sickness & in health! I can think of worse things to do with one’s life.

Posted by: Danny Occoquan | June 23, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.