VETO
Amidst the breaking global news of Armageddon in its many forms (North Korean, Iranian, Israel/Lebanon/Gaza), will President Bush exert his presidential prerogative of a VETO for the first time ever this week by squashing a bill allowing federal funding of embryonic stem cell research?
The White House says yes….
Depending on your point of view, such is either a profile in courage, bad politics, bad policy, or a sound, principled decision….. Unquestionably, however, it’s not what a majority of the American people — 61% of whom find such research "morally acceptable" according to a recent Gallup poll — would want. To say nothing of the GOP-controlled House, which passed such a bill in May 2005, or the Senate, which looks like it may do the same tomorrow.
So many developments since President Bush’s first prime-time address on the subject, back in the innocent days of August 2001… not just the terrorism one month and two days later, of course, but on this issue:
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s complete reversal on the issue, now supporting funding the research; news that the "60" pre-existing embryonic stem cell lines the President grandfathered into his executive order is actually more like 22; a push for adult stem cell and cord cell research as an alternative; the deaths of embryonic stem cell research advocates Christopher and Dana Reeve; the revelation that the stem cell work of South Korea’s Dr Hwang Woo-suk was faked.
What will it all mean come week’s end? Likely that the bill passes the Senate, but not with a veto-proof majority, and the President vetos it and — perhaps — the Democrats finally find themselves with an issue that helps them, at least in the margins, with swing voters.
But we shall see…
More later
JT
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
But the President likes to proclaim loudly and often that he doesn’t govern by polls, so, in theory, the Gallup results should be of no consequence to him. Of course, in reality, he is all-too-sensitive to poll results and he won’t be able to resist one more attempt at “solidifying his base,” at least if Karl Rove has anything to say about it. The only problem I foresee is that someone will have to explain to the President what a veto is and how to apply it, since he’s never cast one in his current job.
Posted by: chuck | July 17, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Swing voters most likely do not support further animal experimentation paid for by thier tax funds.
Posted by: buzz | July 18, 2006, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm