Hello Jake Tapper..thanks for the YOUTUBE-link..I visited that website and after a two hour wait watched the Video twice..I think the truth of the matter(Civil Rights)/shown by MLK is his Place in History..has some non-debatable points..that is..MLK is fairly correct in some of his “descriptions”..But as a Leader(moral or what-ever)..his use of the English language is very doubtful in many places more places than MLK mind can really draw from..
I would excuse the really “long-drawn” articles of his mind/for the real truth that he has chosen to fight..its him that speaks might be the vector for truth/that seems the central truth to end the Racial Segregation of the evils MLK could root out..
I did see some portions of Real Time consequences that offer bad attitude/development-seems lost in the I Have a Dream Speech..
I personally find some tactics being hidden in the speech..where-by politcs overlaps for its own purposes(power/manipulation)..
I do not think Civil Rights would have done the job w/o MLK..but in working you sometimes come to terms on your friends real intentions-and just turn from righteousness for a moment..
I do not see MLK as some sort of a Moral Leader(but then I’m white and raised Catholic)usually I’m fighting off the Mormons and the Latter Day Saints just for fun..it doesn’t take a long time too have a view of Christian over-bearing lifestyles come to play either..
Bottom-Line on the speech/dimensions vs. actual events/and language vs. communication/
I would grade the speech poorly contructed on those increments with-in it/
I pass the speech because MLK did get his place in history..which marks the speech a true purpose in thoughts.
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will 
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Hello Jake Tapper..thanks for the YOUTUBE-link..I visited that website and after a two hour wait watched the Video twice..I think the truth of the matter(Civil Rights)/shown by MLK is his Place in History..has some non-debatable points..that is..MLK is fairly correct in some of his “descriptions”..But as a Leader(moral or what-ever)..his use of the English language is very doubtful in many places more places than MLK mind can really draw from..
I would excuse the really “long-drawn” articles of his mind/for the real truth that he has chosen to fight..its him that speaks might be the vector for truth/that seems the central truth to end the Racial Segregation of the evils MLK could root out..
I did see some portions of Real Time consequences that offer bad attitude/development-seems lost in the I Have a Dream Speech..
I personally find some tactics being hidden in the speech..where-by politcs overlaps for its own purposes(power/manipulation)..
I do not think Civil Rights would have done the job w/o MLK..but in working you sometimes come to terms on your friends real intentions-and just turn from righteousness for a moment..
I do not see MLK as some sort of a Moral Leader(but then I’m white and raised Catholic)usually I’m fighting off the Mormons and the Latter Day Saints just for fun..it doesn’t take a long time too have a view of Christian over-bearing lifestyles come to play either..
Bottom-Line on the speech/dimensions vs. actual events/and language vs. communication/
I would grade the speech poorly contructed on those increments with-in it/
I pass the speech because MLK did get his place in history..which marks the speech a true purpose in thoughts.
Posted by: MarkSM | January 15, 2007, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
I Have a Dream: 15,846 Days Ago
Wednesday, August 28, 1963
Posted by: Blog Your Days | January 15, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm