By Jennifer Parker

Apr 9, 2007 3:52pm

Obama to Nix Fox Debate

ABC News’ Jake Tapper Reports: Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, will be the second Democratic presidential candidate to boycott a proposed debate to be broadcast by Fox News Channel.

"CNN seems to be a more appropriate host," an Obama campaign aide tells ABC News.

Obama and Fox News Channel have had frosty relations ever since January, when the channel hyped and repeated untrue allegations that Obama had attended an extremist Islamist madrassa as a child living in Indonesia. (More on that here).

Former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, was the first to formally boycott the Fox News debate, which is sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus, of which Obama is a member.

The debate is to be held on September 23 in Detroit.

Edwards deputy campaign manager Jonathan Prince said last week that "there’s just no reason for Democrats to give Fox a platform to advance the right-wing agenda while pretending they’re objective." 

Edwards had previously pulled out of a Fox debate planned by the Nevada Democratic Party, which ultimately — under pressure from liberal groups such as MoveOn.org, and liberal "netroots" internet activists — dropped Fox News Channel as a sponsor.

During that controversy, Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes criticized Edwards, though not by name.

"Any candidate for high office from either party who believes he can blacklist any news organization is making a terrible mistake about journalists," Ailes said at a Radio and Television News Directors Foundation dinner in Washington last month.

"Pressure groups are forcing candidates to conclude that the best strategy for journalists is divide and conquer, to only appear on those networks and venues that give them favorable coverage," Ailes said, adding that any candidate "who cannot answer direct, simple, even tough questions from any journalist runs a real risk of losing the voters."

But in that same address, Ailes joked about the similarity of Obama’s name with that of terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, saying, "It’s true that Barack Obama is on the move. I don’t know if it’s true President Bush called [Pakistan President Pervez] Musharraf and said, ‘Why can’t we catch this guy?’ "

Obama has agreed to do the six debates sponsored by the Democratic National Committee as well as one in January sponsored by the CBC to be broadcast on CNN.

User Comments

Finally, Democrats are voting with their feet. There is no reason to legitimize Fox “News”. No Democrat should appear on that network, any more than one would expect a Republican to appear on “Democracy Now”.

Posted by: arvo | April 9, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

“Pressure groups are forcing candidates to conclude that the best strategy for journalists is divide and conquer, to only appear on those networks and venues that give them favorable coverage,” Ailes said, adding that any candidate “who cannot answer direct, simple, even tough questions from any journalist runs a real risk of losing the voters.”
Anyone who has listened carefully to FOX news understands the “so-called” reporters have an agenda to ask questions of the “Have you stopped beating your wife” ilk. The “Gotcha” mentality is clear.
For real news without the BS, try PBS.

Posted by: Don A | April 9, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Smart move for both Edwards and Obama. Any candidate who appears at a Fox News debate will have one strike against them from this voter. I don’t know why any Democrat would want to assist in the perpetration of the total fraud that is Fox News.

Posted by: sullyman | April 9, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

“Any candidate for high office from either party who believes he can blacklist any news organization is making a terrible mistake about journalists,” Ailes said at a Radio and Television News Directors Foundation dinner in Washington last month.”
What does that have to do with Fox which is neither a news organization or has any journalists on staff?

Posted by: Kotka | April 9, 2007, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Obama and Edwards, way to go guys! Ailes, you can use the time Faux News would have allotted to the Nevada debates for a debate between O’Rielly and Imus. That would be yet another Faux News television event that none of us would watch!

Posted by: nutty4tahoe | April 9, 2007, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Way to go Barack! There is no need to justify this Fox organization as a news network or as anything that should be taken seriously. I only hope to see more of this in the future from any politician more concerned with the good government CAN do and the level of discourse we CAN have, than with getting their face and message out there regardless of the venue. Cheers!

Posted by: Shawn | April 9, 2007, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Now if only the other candidates would boycott FOX also, we would all be better off and learn about the issues rather than the FOX agenda.

Posted by: Hans Nahme | April 9, 2007, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Bill O’really’s job must be hanging by a thread.
What is the Congressional Black Caucus? Is there a Congressional White Caucus?

Posted by: georgembush | April 9, 2007, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

I long for the days of a liberal media bias….

Posted by: donviti | April 9, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Good! It’s about time that people stop treating Fox like a real news outlet.

Posted by: Dave | April 9, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

What is wrong with the above story? Oh, yeah, the parts where Fox’s Ailes keeps referring to his network’s on-air personalities as “journalists.”
That is the whole reason for this boycott. And I heartily approve.

Posted by: Karen M | April 9, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Happy to find your sight.
My preference for President and
Vice Pres would be Edwards & Obama!
Smart men for a nice change.

Posted by: patti kanner | April 9, 2007, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

When will Hil boycott Fox? Or will she pull another one of her attempts to pander to Republicans just like her Iraq vote?
My predictions is that she will appear on Fox because she will do anything to get elected.

Posted by: C Mo | April 9, 2007, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Hillary????

Posted by: wagonjak | April 9, 2007, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

This is ridiculous. You act as if Fox News is the only news channel with an agenda. Right, and CNN doesn’t have a leftist agenda. All media stations are biased, but most of them are towards the left which is why everyone here is attacking Fox rather than CNN or ABC. It’s hard to believe that Americans can be as stupid as you are acting. Who cares what a news channels’ bias is, if you can’t answer their questions, don’t run for the presidency. Your going to get alot of tough, biased questions from the press when (and if) you get into the office, so deal with it now and show the American people your not afraid to take on people or entities of opposite beliefs. My goodness, be a man.

Posted by: Jennifer | April 9, 2007, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

It seems to me that Barack Obama’s feud with Faux is only begining to heat up. Imagine Obama as president. Would he shut Faux out of the White House??? Should he and can he???

Posted by: Kevin M | April 9, 2007, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Who cares if it is a news organization or not (I believe it is as much as any of the other cable news stuff but it doesn’t matter)? It is a venue that speaks to millions of Americans who may never hear the Democratic (and Senator Obama’s) views otherwise. I thought Obama and the Democrats want to speak to all of us and be uniters? Guess not. I guess anyone who watches Fox News is worthless scum who is not worth considering? Oh well Democrats show their true stripes. They really don’t care about us red staters. We are just a bunch of stupid hillbillies who can’t possibly filter information or integrate news from a variety of different sources with a variety of different biases. I guess people like me, who watch Fox News, read the Economist, the National Review AND the Guardian, the Independent, various liberal blogs, etc. aren’t worth speaking to. You folks will never be uniters because you have contempt for the beliefs of a large number of Americans and aren’t afraid to show it. Even though you don’t really even know what my beliefs are. And I am sure you have never watched Fox for more than 2 minutes so how you can have a personal opinion is beyond me. You just parrot what you hear without any personal experience or knowledge.

Posted by: Jim | April 9, 2007, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

I totally agree wih Barack Obama and John Edwards and believe they are setting a course that all Democratic candidates should follow. Anyone who believes FOX News is a legitimate news organization is as uninformed or misinformed as anyone can be.
We have had enough of an “ersatz” news organization that supports the likes of the current president and his regime who fail to hear or accept the will of the majority of Americans.

Posted by: David Biddle | April 9, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

“Pressure groups are forcing candidates to conclude that the best strategy for journalists is divide and conquer, to only appear on those networks and venues that give them favorable coverage,” Ailes said”
I would just like to understand how a person from that network can make a statement like that. Have we not all seen Cheney and Bush and others from this administration run to FOX and ONLY FOX when they wanted the “word” to go out? It’s standard procedure for God’s sake!
So for FOX to now cry foul when the shoe is on the other foot is truly an ironic twist.

Posted by: Kelly | April 9, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

DONT FORGET FOX NEWS IS THE #1 NEWS STATION KNOWN FACT.I’M A INDEPENDENT I WATCH CNN CBS ABC BUT I PERFER FOX. I FIND THEY HAVE A BETTER WAY OF TELLING IT LIKE IT IS.

Posted by: nat | April 9, 2007, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

I respect Obama and Edwards more for showing they will take stand and call a Faux a Faux.I tune um out and tune in PBS.

Posted by: Doug P | April 9, 2007, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Fox “News” is a joke. There is no news on FOX, just conservative garbage and lies all the time.

Posted by: Cliff M. | April 9, 2007, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Way to go guys! Now encourage the rest in refusing to legitimize Fox. In no way shape or form does it broadcast “news” nor does it employ “journalists”.
Keep it up and you win points with me!

Posted by: julie A | April 9, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Any similarity between Faux News and a legitimate, objective news organization is purely coincidental. Well done, Senator Obama.

Posted by: Joe H | April 9, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

All this goes to show is Obama like the Edwards are scared they can’t answer the tough questions. Everyone questions Fox’s right wing agenda, but what about the Far left CNN or the others (NBC,ABC,CBS) those channels are so far left I can’t see how they keep on the road.

Posted by: GOP Commando | April 9, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

That’s the way to go, Mr. Obama!
Let them hold the Republican Debates. Here is the major question on Iraq:
Q: How is our success in Iraq impacting your campaigns?
McCain: I support the troops and Gen. Petraus. And that’s straight talk.
Romney: No, I support the troops and Gen. Petraus, and I’ve offered my trusty rifle to the cause
Giulliani: Yeah, I support the troops and was the Mayor on 9/11. Who’s Petraus? Is he one of Bernie K’s guys?
Tancredo: I support the troops, but I wonder who this Petraus character is, is he a foreigner? Sounds like.
Fred Thompson: I support the troops. That General Petraus reminds me of a story…..

Posted by: Ellen | April 9, 2007, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Foxnews is the best there is, and it’s shame they won’t come onto a “REAL” network!

Posted by: Justme8811 | April 9, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

“But in that same address, Ailes joked about the similarity of Obama’s name with that of terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, saying, “It’s true that Barack Obama is on the move. I don’t know if it’s true President Bush called [Pakistan President Pervez] Musharraf and said, ‘Why can’t we catch this guy?’ ”
This statement by the head of FIX “news” says it all. They are slime merchants plain and simple. The closest they get to news is when the do the weather. Thank you Obama for sticking to your values. And shame on the Congressional Black Caucus for agreeing to do this debate with the merchants of slime and propaganda.

Posted by: thromulese | April 9, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Awesome! Every non-conservatvie person should boycott FOX “news”. Let it turn into a channel for nut jobs only……like the relgious network. This will give Rush, O’Rielly and Hannity something to rant about for a day. Then they can go back to talikng about how terrible it would be if Bill Clinton got back into the White House and had an affair again!!

Posted by: Sington | April 9, 2007, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

“What is the Congressional Black Caucus? Is there a Congressional White Caucus?”
yes, that would be the other 493 congresspersons as compared to the 42 in the CBC.

Posted by: jahyarain | April 9, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

I have to admit that I am disappointed by this decision. I have voted Republican all my life and feel as though this upcoming election would likely find me voting Democrat for the first time ever. Despite Fox’s right-leaning stance, this will be a missed opportunity to reach out to those who are teetered to the right and welcome them to the left. Unfortunately, it will have to be another Democratic candidate to do that now. I really like what I see and hear from Obama, but am disappointed tremendously in his judgement on this one. Even though I’m fed up with Republicans in General, you wouldn’t find them boycotting a debate hosted by CBS. Best of luck to the campaign!

Posted by: Tim | April 9, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

It’s always funny when someone from Fox calls themselves a news agency but that ok I can call myself a pirate that doesn’t make it true

Posted by: Me | April 9, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

What a bunch of cry babies! We are to expect these men to stand up to real threats??
Please.

Posted by: Ann B | April 9, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I’m disappointed that Obama will not attend fox cosponsored debate. Obama has gotten pretty good press on Fox ( I watch all outlets). As a relatively unknown BUT very promising candidate who seems to have good instincts I would hate to have him fall into a right/left rut!

Posted by: jj | April 9, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

That’s unfortunate. The fact that it is sponsored by Fox News would be an even greater incentive to attend, in my opinion. Just as Bill Clinton successfully slammed Fox News and the consrvative propaganda campaign in his interview, Obama and Edwards could’ve potentially changed a lot of the negative opinion surrounding them by participating.
I would like to see the candidates speak of their platforms against one another soon. Some things I would like to be debated would be education, the Iraq war plan and mostly what the candidates would do to support the UN Millennium Development Goals to end poverty. According to the Borgen Project, just $19 billion a year would ease starvation and malnutrition, yet we hardly contribute to end starvation, choosing instead to fund a $340 billion (and rising) war campaign. In addition, $12 billion a year would provide education for every child on earth. Educational access is so important, here in the US too. I guess I’ll have to wait for the next debate!

Posted by: ellec | April 9, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

So if Fox News is right leaning…what do you call CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, and NPR? “Fair and Balanced”…I think not

Posted by: Sean M | April 9, 2007, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Debate? What debate? The Democrats are so in-bred in their politics that all they can resort to is liberal one-upmanship.
The Democrats have no chance of winning the election unless they get moderate voters – and this just ensures that they won’t.

Posted by: John Kantor | April 9, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

This is music to my ears! I pray that all dem candidates avoid Faux News like the plague that it is!!! They are a worthless bunch of wanna be journalists! DEMS/LIBS, stop legitimizing these freaks on the NO NEWS channel!

Posted by: gretch | April 9, 2007, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Bravo to every candidate who opts out of lending Fox any credibility. Other than PBS, I can’t say I’m impressed by any of our mainstream new outlets, but Fox isn’t even in the ballgame. It may stroke the egos and fears of the most jingoistic and hateful (or fearful) among us, but it ain’t news. Just the RNC propaganda arm, with Ailes leading the march.

Posted by: Doug R | April 9, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Any politician that is trying to become the president and is afraid to debate on Fox News will never be strong enough to confront our country’s enemies

Posted by: Jeff B | April 9, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

“Edwards had previously pulled out of a Fox debate planned by the Nevada Democratic Party, which ultimately — under pressure from liberal groups such as MoveOn.org, and liberal “netroots” internet activists — dropped Fox News Channel as a sponsor.”
Oh, please! This is a Republican talking point. The Democrats pulled out because the attack dogs at Fox kept smearing them! To give credence to the “Moveon controls the Dems” bromide is to be no better than Fox.

Posted by: Lurkitty | April 9, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

“Faux” News still won’t learn but I agree with the approach

Posted by: Floyd | April 9, 2007, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Edwards rejection of the Faux News sponsored debate was instantaneous. Glad to see BO finally got around to doing the right thing, too. Those with principles instinctively know what’s right to do and do it. Those less gifted take more time. Meanwhile, where’s Calculating Clinton on this?

Posted by: BARRY C | April 9, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Let me get this straight. It’s ok for CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC & CNN to all have liberal biases but it’s not ok for Fox to have a conservative bias. I don’t understand why the media is allowed to have any bias but they do so DEMS, show some courage and show up.
Despite DEM fear tactics, I am a moderate that finds FOX news interesting and a bit refreshing from all the doom and gloom of the other “enlightened” networks.

Posted by: Bill Hansen, | April 9, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

I am so glad that after John Edwards now also Barack Obama decided not to participate in the primary debate on Fox. Fox “News” is a propaganda channel for the GOP and should not be regarded as a regular bypartisan news outlet.

Posted by: uschi | April 9, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

What a joke! Obama and Edwards have all the cash and coverage they presently want. Both these guys will be talking to FOX ‘journalists’ as soon as it suits their political need (and it certainly will once the general election draws near…). It’s all about timing the exposure and the spin.

Posted by: Perry | April 9, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

It’s about time this country finally started to stand up, to the twisted and half baked stories, Fox News has been airing for the last 10 yrs. Edwards and Obama are willing to lose a few votes, than compromise what they believe in. WTG guys!!!

Posted by: E. S. | April 9, 2007, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

The Democratic candidates aren’t snubbing Fox they’re snubbing everyone who watches Fox (apparently that’s quite a few people).
If you don’t like Fox news then don’t watch it. I don’t necessarily agree with the manner in which they report everything but it’s no different than any other news outlet, including this one.
Grow up!

Posted by: Rodney | April 9, 2007, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Hooray, hooray. It is about time the Dems took a stance aginst the sham news shows.
Fair and balanced my tookus,Fox does not deserve to remain on the air.

Posted by: gerry o | April 9, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

It’s about time our country started to stand up to the twisted and half baked stories that Fox News has been airing these last 10 yrs. Obama and Edwards are willing to lose a few votes in order to stand up for what they believe in. Where is Hillary’s stand?

Posted by: E. S. | April 9, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Now if we can get ALL the democratic candidates to refuse Fox, this will send a powerful message to the American people that democrats are not going to be pushed around by conservative journalists asking irrelevant questions on all the critical issues that abound in the world today. Hooray for their courage!

Posted by: emmagrump | April 9, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Fox news is a complete JOKE. No sane person watches those neocon hack artists.

Posted by: bill dixon | April 9, 2007, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Oh please, It’s a democratic debate. All they are doing is playing to the fringe element of their party…just look at he posts.
Was he afraid Harold Ford Jr. was going to ask a tough question?
It’s sponsored by the CBC.
All you people hate the fact that at least one station isn’t liberal.

Posted by: Don | April 9, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

I’ve read both the story and the comments. You guys have missed the boat. A debate doesn’t promote the people asking the questions, it’s about the answers given. If you ever wanted a chance to influence some conservatives, broadcast your platform on Fox. What’s gained by having a debate in front of your friends where questions are asked by your friends? Nothing.

Posted by: Scott | April 9, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Thats the democrat way to run and not fight. If the democratic nominees can’t stand up to a news organization that may not agree with their agenda, then how do we expect a democratic president to stand up to terrorists. Oh thats right there are no terrorists just plain old mom and dads who blow up their own kids. Democrats are just appearing cowardly as usual.

Posted by: Sarah C | April 9, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Fox has coasted on stirring up conservative rage for too long. This network has helped the neo-cons tear the nation apart. It’s time to get back to real, unbiased news.
In the same way that porn stars find it impossible to make the jump to a mainstream film career after they’ve gone all the way on the XXX screen, I’ll bet a lot of Fox “journalists” will find the ceiling of their post-Fox careers very low. It will serve them right.
Ditto for any candidate who bets their image on exposure via Fox. Republican, Democrat or Independent — Lie down with Fox, wake up with fleas.

Posted by: Hank Fox | April 9, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Oh my, They arn’t bending over backwards to be liberal! Get over it, Ya, CBS,CNN are Fair to Republicans, and msnbc too! What a joke! Those are FAR LEFT WING CHANELS!

Posted by: Democrats are so wimpy! | April 9, 2007, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Thank God for these two. Will Clinton have the guts to follow suit? It would be a real star to her character and would actually make me consider voting for her again.

Posted by: Tony P | April 9, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

I’m sure the voters will get much more out of a spoonfed debate from the DNC. LOL Of course, that’s why they’re democrats in the first place. RUUUUNNNNN. It’s getting too hot and uncomfortable!!

Posted by: Just Me | April 9, 2007, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Hey georgembush, yes, there is a white caucus. It’s called… CONGRESS

Posted by: frank h | April 9, 2007, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

If these politicians are afraid to talk with Britt Hume but praise Pelosi for talking with the Syrian Terrorist President, they don’t have the intelligence or strength to be a president.

Posted by: Jeff B. | April 9, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Bravo, Obama and Edwards! The curtain of ‘fair and balanced’ is continually being pulled back inch by inch to reveal the media manipulation perpetrated by Fox.

Posted by: John McD | April 9, 2007, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

So if Fox is so right wing, what is ABC, NBC, and CBS? Why would any republican go on any of these networks, they are obviously pushing a left wing agenda some would say. In the end it works both ways, every network has some sort of agenda and position.

Posted by: Bill | April 9, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Typical liberal politicians hiding behind a false veil of the media. Everyone knows the mainstream media has a huge liberal bias, then , when the shoe is on the other foot, they all go home crying.
No need to insult Edwards or Obama, as their weak-minded actions speak for themselves.

Posted by: John | April 9, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

obama & edwards are simply cowards that won’t appear in what they consider a hostile environment. says a great deal on how they would handle criticism if elected.

Posted by: flyboy2112 | April 9, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Fox News it NOT a legitimate news source but rather a distortion of the news. Even their slogan is a distortion of the truth, “Fair and Balanced”. If people are going to make their decision on our next President based on Fox News our democracy is over. All politicians should boycott Fox News.

Posted by: Russ Lukes | April 9, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

It’s really to bad that most of you people stick to one channel and expect to get the total story. If you watch more than one news channel you would probably be aware of what is going on around you rather than the liberal blathering that is going to cost you money in tax increases!

Posted by: Myron W | April 9, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

This is a win-win: First, candidates who take action to back up their words; second, pulling back the curtain to expose the sham of a “news” network that Fox pretends to be.

Posted by: John | April 9, 2007, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Obama Joins Edwards in Boycotting Fox Debate, But Can This Be Taken Further?

Posted by: Liberal Values | April 9, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Wise strategy. We must ensure a Democrat wins the presidency next time around. We cannot afford to have any of the Democratic candidates made to look foolish in the event they decide not to answer a specific question or choose to sidestep an issue. It is best they be with CNN. That network has been friendlier to us in the past. Go Barack!

Posted by: Ted | April 9, 2007, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

I just feel better that fact based journalism is rewarded and we quite this charade of Fox News being normal journalism — it is propoganda pure and simple. Worse yet it is aimed at hurting the viewers that watch it. Let them watch McCain etc on Fox. Thanks Obama and Edwards

Posted by: Gra | April 9, 2007, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

All of the above posts are from people/groups that obviously encourage partisan participation by the so-called “fair” news organizations of today. Maybe the Repub candidates should boycott CNN, ABC, CBS and all other “news” oultets that have a political agenda contrary to their political beliefs. I do not condone these types of actions and in fact believe that this is yet another confirmation that our news today is run by left/right-wing partisan groups. There is no such thing as “fair and unbiased” news today (left or right wing)!

Posted by: Becky G | April 9, 2007, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Way to go John Edwards! Set the pace and the STANDARD!!!

Posted by: Laura K. | April 9, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

I don’t consider Foxnews to be bias towards any party but if canidates from the democratic party felt that way, it seems that they would want to express their views on such a channel. Unless they have nothing to bring to such a debate that would make all listen and not just some, the biased view.

Posted by: Robert S | April 9, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

This is NOT a smart move to make. For someone who is undecided as to which candidate to support at this time, the decision by Mr. Obama and Mr. Edwards only makes me say they are NOT the candidates to vote for.
What are you afraid of, Mr. Obama? That a conservative will ask you a question you don’t have an answer for?
I am sorry to confess this only supports the theory, “Where the going gets tough, the Democrats won’t go!”

Posted by: John | April 9, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Member of the Congressional Black Caucus. I’m getting tired of committees or organizations that are based of skin color. I don’t know how this is not considered racist in itself.

Posted by: Josh | April 9, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Democrat’s fixation with FOX News proves the point that the rest of the mainstream media has a left leaning bias. I rarely hear complaints from Dems about ABC, CBS, NBC or CNN. FOX News continues to expand their viewership because they cover the whole story rather than just cherry picking the points that favors liberal views. Dems love free speech as long as those speaking believe as they do.

Posted by: O Smith | April 9, 2007, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Democrats will watch ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN with all the liberal slant that goes with those networks. Rebublicans will watch Fox and the conservative slant that goes with it’s network. So whats the problem? I’m Sure Fox will take those ratings and run.

Posted by: Louie | April 9, 2007, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

In my opinion Barack’s protest of Fox News was a bad move. Democrats are so often referred to as wimps. I think it is a stereotype and not always true, but this further legitimizes that argument. To me there is nothing like going to the opponent’s house and taking an away game. It worked for Bill Clinton.

Posted by: max Resnik | April 9, 2007, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Good ! About time a stand was taken.

Posted by: RayAnn | April 9, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

It’s seems to me that Obama and Edwards are afraid to answer tough questions that the voters want to hear on their postions. I think these two are looking for a free pass and not the new president that I am looking for….

Posted by: Steve | April 9, 2007, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

I dont think its good idea to boycott Fox. Stand up and be the canidate that can face any advisary. Show us what your made of. Because there are going to be alot harder challenges than a “bias news chanel.”

Posted by: rita | April 9, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

There are many old timers in the former Soviet Union who would identify Fox as a “state run” propangada machine. If you listen to Fox you are misinformed. Frankly, I would question one’s intelligence if they rely on the Fox network for information. Notice I can’t bring myself to type “Fox N–ws.” Because it’s not.

Posted by: JWard | April 9, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

This is a case of the “race to the left” that is inevitble in the democratic primary season. MoveOn.org has paid for the party… its theirs… and the candidates are following the Soros marching orders.

Posted by: Scott | April 9, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Fox News may not be as “Fair” and “Balanced” as they advertise to be – BUT NEITHER IS CNN.
For real reporting my recommendation is – Jim, Gwen, and Margaret over at PBS!

Posted by: Steve Shiplett | April 9, 2007, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

“Bill O’really’s job must be hanging by a thread.
What is the Congressional Black Caucus? Is there a Congressional White Caucus?”
Yeah, practically the rest of the congress.

Posted by: RJ | April 9, 2007, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Thankfully the tide may be turning against Faux News!! From 1974-1998 I reported for abc,nbc,cbs,cnn,pbs,and telemundo among others. NONE of us had an agenda. The fact that Roger Ailing was once a Bush partisan or Clinton or anybody, automatically precludes him from being in the news business. We all fell short of the mark of “objectivity” but we sought, we fought, we struggled to allow our viewers to decide the facts…if, Faux news wants to pretend to be a news organization…much as Colbert does, that is fine. More power to them. But if they want to be a RIGHTWING ADVOCACY CHANNEL..then no one owes them the consideration of a courtesy visit.
The Edward R. Murrow Express

Posted by: Edward R. Murrow Express | April 9, 2007, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Its ok to speak with Syria and Iran but not debate on Fox?? Are we fearless or fearful? The democrats are consistently inconsistent.

Posted by: captdoc316 | April 9, 2007, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

I am not sure if I am following. What is the difference between CNN and FOX? Both have their 30 minutes of news every day and then hours of opinion. A debate does not have much to do with the news organization’ opinion, or does it?

Posted by: Ron | April 9, 2007, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Being devils advocate here, but, if you’re 100% true to your position, why should you boycott any outlet? What would the opinion if a Republican nominee boycotted CNN which is very liberal? I say buck up and be a man, or woman, which ever the case may be and participate. Who knows, they could win over a Republican vote and the vice versa could happen. Isn’t that what debate is about?

Posted by: Kim B | April 9, 2007, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

liberals…liberals…liberals…hide in your little boycott world and don’t expose yourself to anything other than democratic biased journalism.

Posted by: mark | April 9, 2007, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

I’ve stopped watching FOX news a long time ago. I don’t like narrow minded news…. Or the reporters who spread it.

Posted by: Carroll G. | April 9, 2007, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Keep in mind the emergence of a right-wing TV show was a long overdue response to the ridiculous broadcasts that of liberal media, most notably CNN. Perfect example, the ridiculous “surveys” posted by Dobbs and Cafferty are phrased so far in favor to the left, its laughable that John Q Public actually takes the time to post a response.
For any topic, domestic or foreign, each American must view multiple media outlets, digest the right/left wing jibberish, then form his/her own opinion. Albeit not efficient, but is an unfortunate necessary. A great example is our very own ABC vs Fox regarding the handling of Rosie O’Donnell’s testimonial “We deserved, 911″.
I now doubt that this message will even get posted. More unresponsible and cowardly decision-making by the media.

Posted by: Shawn H | April 10, 2007, 12:12 am 12:12 am

I watch both FOX and CNN and The truth is that FOX does not lean anymore to the right than CNN leans to the left. The hate mongers that showed their true colors in this comment session are blind to reality. Why is Obama really afraid of FOX? It is not because of the stupid reasons listed by the recent comments. He just doesn’t want to have to work hard. Come on people stop this stupid business of making FOX your favorite whipping boy. By the way, there are some very good reporters on FOX and there are some true idiots on CNN so the mix about right. Why is everyone part of the “right-wing conspiracy” ? Is there never a left-wing conspiracy? ABC, NBC, CBS are absolute models of middle of the road – NOT ! Wake up.

Posted by: Ed. P. | April 10, 2007, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Fox does a disservice to legitimate journalism everywhere. It is a powerful statement when politicians who are usually willing to sell their souls for media coverage becomes the peoples champion against the journalistic abomination that is Fox News. This feeling is more widespread than anybody can imagine.

Posted by: Tyler C | April 10, 2007, 12:13 am 12:13 am

So Democrats want their own freedom of speech while trying to shut down the free speech of Fox News and all those who like watching it. That says a lot of unflattering things about all who think this is okay. The most damning is that it’s unAmerican.

Posted by: sandy | April 10, 2007, 12:22 am 12:22 am

This would be like any of the Republican candidates boycotting ABC, NBC, MSNBC, and CNN. They all have as much of a liberal slant as FOX does a conservative one. Studies have shown that there is in fact a liberal bias in the mainstream media. Google “liberal bias media”

Posted by: Sam J | April 10, 2007, 12:46 am 12:46 am

“But in that same address, Ailes joked about the similarity of Obama’s name with that of terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, saying, “It’s true that Barack Obama is on the move. I don’t know if it’s true President Bush called [Pakistan President Pervez] Musharraf and said, ‘Why can’t we catch this guy?’ ” ”
These are the types of tough questions that Fox asks, as part of its “fair and balanced” coverage.

Posted by: Bill Hardy | April 10, 2007, 1:21 am 1:21 am

What a bunch of hypocrites only when they are in there liberal favor they will show up! They are afraid of the real questions!! and they have no answers for the real questions as always!! That shows how they will deal with the war etc run and hide!!

Posted by: Mieke S | April 10, 2007, 1:27 am 1:27 am

It’s about time progressives got together and showed Faux News who’s boss. We need to take it a step further and get this “news” channel taken off the air.
Why should we pay to watch garbage? Moreover, my neighbors aren’t smart enough to know the trash Faux is shoveling them – we need firmly ensure lies and anti-progressive hate speech have no platform, anywhere.

Posted by: Joey Diggs | April 10, 2007, 1:33 am 1:33 am

But Obama did not boycott a news network because it is common knowledge that FAUX *news* is the propaganda arm of the GOP and is not news and would fail any professional accreditation criteria of its journalists or *new* programs.

Posted by: Jim | April 10, 2007, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Interesting that Obama feels compelled to bitch-slap the Congressional Black Caucus in this way.
Sad that so many paragons of integrity choose to be defined more by their choice of enemies than by their friends.
(p.s. to JE – if a debate sponsored by the Teamsters was to be held on Fox would you have such immediate access to self-righteous indignation?)

Posted by: PJD | April 10, 2007, 1:45 am 1:45 am

I am very proud of Edwards and Obama, just saw him on the Tonight Show. I’m glad that the Democrats are now starting to fight back and stand for what WE believe in.

Posted by: Jeremy Hunter | April 10, 2007, 2:31 am 2:31 am

i’m glad obama also pulled out of the fox “news” debate. fox channel is not a news channel, its a talk show. its not news. there is no reason any democrat should go on fox channel for any reason. by appearing on fox, they only legetimize fox. so good work edwards and obama. fox would only try to find ways to make the democrates look foolish. they would use clever tricks with lighting and comments here and there and all kinds of industry tricks to make the democrats look foolish and silly.

Posted by: a person | April 10, 2007, 3:18 am 3:18 am

Only trailing John Edwards’ lead on this issue by a week shows great progress for Barak Obama.
After hearing Edwards deliver a comprehensive description of his universal health care plan at a conference in Las Vegas two weeks ago, Obama proceeded to tell the same crowd that he would be announcing the details of his plan in two months after consulting with his health care experts.
While he may have great potential, Barak Obama continues to demonstrate that he’s not yet ready for prime time.
“Way to go Barak!” indeed….

Posted by: SPS | April 10, 2007, 4:06 am 4:06 am

Wake up to all those out there that can’t think for themselves! I think its pathetic and cowardly for the Dems to boycott Fox News. I watch ALL the networks/cables shows and then make up my mind – Fox is no more 1 sided than anybody else! If you think Fox is skewed, try to listen to Dobbs on CNN. He should be banned from reporting anything except traffic reports.

Posted by: Al B | April 10, 2007, 5:13 am 5:13 am

This is foolishness. The candidates would all be Democrats, so what agenda would Fox be promoting? Trying to see which Democrat can best defend his or her position? I can understand why the Dems might feel apprehension if this was a Dem v. Rep debate, and they were afraid the Fox mediator might favor the Rep. But this is sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus, which is no friend to Republicans, and it’s all Democratic candidates? What’s the big deal?

Posted by: Susan | April 10, 2007, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Hmmm…I find it interesting you all approve of the Left-Wing bias that spews from CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, et al but not the Right-Wing bias from 1 itty-bitty channel.
All ‘journalists’ have an opinion and an agenda, folks…get a grip if you think they don’t. Why? Because all humans are like that too!
I’m also quite pleased they’re boycotting Fox…shows me who’s too cowardly to handle actually being questioned!

Posted by: Paige | April 10, 2007, 10:04 am 10:04 am

georgembush wrote:
“Is there a Congressional White Caucus?”
I answer:
Yes, George. It’s called the republican party.

Posted by: Gonzo | April 10, 2007, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Interesting: The democrats are afraid of debating themselves on the Fox News Channel. What are they afraid of? A hard question? Or do they prefer a softy that is set up by the liberal media? If they can’t handle hard questions how are they going to do on the international scene. Are these the type of wimps we want to lead the country? I think not!!

Posted by: PaulR | April 10, 2007, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Right thing to do!!!
As a REGISTERED REPUBLICAN I sincerely feel that FAUX NEWS is a garbage can.
It’s a gung of corrupted, selfish crooks having nothing to do with “journalism”.
Let them believe they are “news”.
Do not step into the gutter and keep your cloth clean.
My full respect for this brave and honest move.
Cheers.

Posted by: Greg | April 10, 2007, 11:07 am 11:07 am

The FOX Network is as bias to the right as CNN/ABC/CBS/NBC networks are bias to the left.

Posted by: Edward M | April 10, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am

These are people you would trust to stand up to terrorists? They can’t even debate on a television station that may give them a tough question!
Please.

Posted by: Ann M | April 10, 2007, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Okay I was a Democrat 20 years ago and left the party after the bias and petty fighting going on. I have been Independent since and vote about 50/50 on candidates and issues, but this is really starting to get me ticked because I was hoping to maybe come back to the party.
The actions of every candidate who has pulled out of this debate tells me this is NOT the Party for the people, but the party for it’s closed inner circle. Based on the fact of these people pulling out of a debate hosted on a specific news station that does not match their ideas 100% tells me they don’t care about me as an Independant voter. I watch ALL news sources because as someone stated, they ALL have an agenda and bias based on the reporters slant. This is true of Every Media organization out there and if you don’t know this or believe it you need to wake up to reality.
Bottom line of what these actions are saying? These candidates are telling me I am not smart enough to watch a debate and determine for myself what is going on. Sorry, but every single candidate who pulls out of a debate on Fox has completely lost my vote now because they are telling me I am too stupid to make an intelligent decision on my own.
This also goes the same for those ignorant people who refuse to watch Fox news because they say it is bias. What you are saying is you are too stupid to make and intelligent decision on your own.

Posted by: Jeff | April 10, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I agree that Fox News is ridiculous. I know you guys are mostly liberals, but here is a worthy Republican you might like to see running against whatever Democrat you vote for: Ron Paul
Then the lesser of two evils is not so bad for you, eh? Do what you can to get this man the Republican nomination, I say.

Posted by: Jack B. | April 10, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

….any candidate “who cannot answer direct, simple, even tough questions from any journalist runs a real risk of losing the voters.”
I agree with Jeff, any candidate that can not answer the questions THEY PREAPPROVED AND AGREED TO just because it will be aired on Fox News is not worthy of my vote. I will have to give Rudy and McCain a closer look.
I WILL NEVER watch Al-CNN after watching the lies they aired while I was in Iraq. The prison network is so far out that most of their viewers are watching to see themselves on TV.

Posted by: Run Hill Run | April 10, 2007, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Love FOX news, Do not watch cnnnnnnnn. Do not listen to oBama,nor clinton. Edwards for the POOR man a farce> Built a multimillon house a forced up county proper tax on the poor.

Posted by: jobo | April 11, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

To the people who are disapointed in Obama for shutting out the red-staters:
He’s not shutting us out. He’s smacking down FOX for lying about him repeatedly. They knew he didn’t attend a madrassa and they ran with that. That’s crazy. I live in a red state [AK]. I can watch the debates on some other channel. We ALL need to smack FOX down.

Posted by: Phoebe | April 13, 2007, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

I understand Senator Obama’s concerns but there won’t be any debates on TV if the all of the canidates take the same position. I dislike all of the news outlets, especially Fox. Fox seems to be part of the the President’s staff.
I’m a conservative Republican but feel that ethics,fairness,people’s rights,concensus,leadership,security and fiscal responsibility are not important to the current administration.

Posted by: Jery | April 16, 2007, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Seriously, there was a study done by UCLA and Fox News was a lot closer to the center than ABC, CBS, or NBC.
Really, if the Dems can’t answer the tough questions, then they have absolutely no reason to be running for office.
To be honest, I doubt some of the people here whom say they are conservative really are conservative.
I honestly like Fox News, cause I find it a lot easier to filter out what is just what the “Journalist’s” opinions are from what actually happened. It’s actually quiet easy, cause they clearly state when they are giving their opinions. So to some it up Fox News is conservative, but unlike the “Mainstream Media” they’re honest about it and clearly indicate when they are giving their opinions.
Btw, Alan Colmes whom works at Fox News is a Liberal not a Conservative.
O’Reilly is a commentator not a news anchor.
Get your facts straight people.

Posted by: Christopher | April 17, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

This dustup is exactly why having media outlets owned by a few, powerful people with agendas is dangerous to the democratic process. I wouldn’t want Obama to appear to legimitize Fox News by attending the debate but then again if he appears on French or German or Iranian newcasts as President, he’ll face the same bias and preconceptions, why not practice his responses now?

Posted by: Hara Maderich | April 17, 2007, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

One of the problems that I have with the democratic party leadership is that they are hard to find!
While I am clearly inspired by Barack, as I have joined this grassroots campaign to do my part. However, not going on Fox was a missed opportunity to turn the tables (as Bill Clinton did)! What? Are we incapable of spinning and spewing the rhetoric? Are we not just in our causes “by the people and for the people?
If we cannot kick FOX Television’s distorted butt, how the heck can we defeat, Papa Doc Bush, Karl Rove and Dick Cheney? COME ON!

Posted by: Maiysha | April 19, 2007, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Who seriously considers Fox News to be a legitimate news source? Its really more of an entertainment channel with legitimacy equal to the Jerry Springer show. In fact Fox News appears to be an oxymoron. If its deceit and incorrect facts you seek, like that of the present White House administration, then sure, watch that so called news channel. Why would a serious candidate for my government even consider being on a misleading and truth bending entertainment show? Good on them for stepping up and recognizing it for what it is.

Posted by: Jesse | July 25, 2007, 6:11 am 6:11 am

Black Leaders: Stop ‘hatin’ on Barack !
I regularly listen to talk radio ranging from Air America, which is more progressive or Democratic…to Rush Limbaugh, Dennis Prager and Michael Medved which are Republican….and black radio particularly Warren Ballentine and Rev. Al Sharpton on the Radio 1 Network which is doing a great job of reaching the black community and creating an opportunity for voices nationwide to be heard. I find it interesting to hear the different views from the hosts….as well as callers nationwide…on the subject of Barack Obama for President. Many of the hosts, even callers, on both Air America and the Republican shows voice massive approval and support of Barack Obama. It’s actually quite refreshing to see and hear that so many white Americans are ready for a black president, basically because they feel he is the best choice regarding the issues of America and the world. Now, that’s progress.
Then I listen to the Rev. Al Sharpton. First of all, let me state that I greatly admire Rev. Sharpton. The work that he does through his National Action Network is developing into become a mighty force in the black community nationwide and I feel that all blacks should be supportive of NAN. But when I listen to Rev. Sharpton talk about Barack Obama’s presidential campaign I am totally amazed, shocked and beyond extremely disappointed. I’m almost embarrassed. Here we have Rev. Sharpton, who many blacks, including myself, look at as the number one leader for justice and empowerment in the black community…..and here we have a black man…Barack Obama…who is a very serious, capable, qualified candidate for President of the United States, supported by millions nationwide, with a realistic chance to enter the White House. But instead of rallying, supporting and stating this black historic opportunity as it is….Rev. Sharpton would rather not express his support of Obama at all !!! What’s wrong with this picture ? I can not believe that the leader(s) of the black community like Rev. Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson are NOT supportive of what could be the first black president of the United States, ever? That is crazy !!!! We, as blacks, know that in order for the black communities to rise up out of the muck and mire that permiates, we must all work together….as a family. We know that we always preach that we should be supportive of black achievement, black businesses, our black youth and each other. If that is the case, that we are to be supportive of each other, which I do believe that to be true, than never has that need been more evident than now. ALL black people should be in absolute support of Barack Obama for President, not just because he’s black, but because of his stance, capabilities and qualifications. This should be a period of rallying in the streets, shouting with pride that we have a true opportunity to change history and put a black man in the White House. And this rally cry should be lead by our leaders. Yes, Rev. Al, Rev. Jackson, the NAACP…ALL black leaders should be sounding the trumpet to inspire all black people to vote for this historic change.
Why aren’t they. Rev. Al states that he hasn’t heard enough from Obama regarding the issues to make a decision. I find that a bit disingenuous seeing as to how I know where Obama stands on the various issues….and so do the millions of white Obama supporters. Rev. Al also says that Obama may not have enough experience. I find that to be a sadly interesting comment, particularly considering both Rev. Al and Rev. Jackson ran for President with absolutely NO political experience, but never stated that they were too new for the post. (NOTE: Rev. Al knows that Barack Obama has been a U.S. Senator for over 2 years…..and that Abraham Lincoln was a Senator for 2 years….and turned out to be considered one of the greatest Presidents of all time). Rev. Al also states that he is not hearing enough talk from Obama regarding specifically what he will do for the black community. Now common sense should tell all black folks that Obama has to play the political game. Keep in mind, he is running for president of the United States…that means everyone, black, white, hispanic, muslim, jews,and all others. Obama can not be appearing as if he will only be concerned with the black community needs or he has absolutely no chance of winning. Maybe that’s where Rev. Al went wrong with his campaign. Does Rev. Al think that Obama should be shouting ‘ungawa…Black Power’ during each debate ? There is no way that he could do that and expect to win. But once he is President, common sense tells us that he would be more receptive to the needs in the black community than any other candidate. That’s just common sense based on what we DO know about Obama. Then some folks want to say he’s not ‘black enough’. That is the most pathetic thing I’ve ever heard. First of all, his name is Barack Obama……not like Jesse or Al. Secondly, Obama is half Kenyon…..that’s pretty black !!!
Sometimes I just wonder to myself, why aren’t Rev. Al and Rev. Jackson leading the rally to support this historic cause. Could they be jealous that Obama has already achieved more acceptance than they did during their campaign efforts. I would hate to think that to be the fact. Or, are they hopeful that Hilary will win because they feel that she will assist them in their personal efforts if elected President. I hope that too is not the case…..that would be selling out…..and I would never believe either to be sell-outs. But for our leaders to not support Obama is like saying that they feel a white person would do better or more for the black communities, which history has proven is just not the case. Then what can it be ? That is the question. I believe that Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would be very proud and thankful to see that, in spite of all of the weights that have burdened and held the black community down, one black man has risen to such a level that he is a viable choice to be President of the United States in 2008. I believe that Rev. King would truly lead a powerful movement to change the tide of history. I see marches, flags, signs, songs, t-shirts, buttons and millions of blacks proudly expressing jubilee for this opportunity to make a real change in our country. WE SHALL OVERCOME….has been our motto for the black struggle for many generations and we are still struggling, in oh so many ways. And we will never overcome, until our leaders wake up, stop ‘hatin’ and vigorously lead the cause that will truly make a positive difference in our country, in our black community, and in the entire world. Rev. Al….Rev. Jackson….
It’s Time To LEAD !!!

Posted by: Greg Jones | August 14, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Fools who watch and believe FOX think Jerry Springer and Big Time Wrestling is REAL. Barack Obama doesn’t need to go on FOX to get roasted by FOX. They are going to trash talk Obama for the next decade even if he becomes America’s greatest President. It’s not in their interest to be fair with anyone outside of the club. Good for you Obama! Please don’t ever cave in. FOX is blatant PROPAGANDA.

Posted by: Habodabi | March 16, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

CNN obviously pushe obama down our throats.. If Obama can’t handle Fox news then he is too weak to be president.

Posted by: TS | March 17, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Rev. Wright and Fox News must have something in common. I cannot stand to hear that raving over and over again. One thing is certain it is bound to have a reverse effect. I didnot start out an Obama supporter, but I am now!
The people on Fox and Rev. Wright both have the same purpose. To indoctrinate
the weak minds of Americans.

Posted by: outfoxed | March 22, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

PLEASE, PLEASE,PLEASE GET ON WITH IT. eNOUGH OF THE NONSENSE…

Posted by: Lou | April 16, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Thank You ABC for asking good questions of the canidates. Yes, these questions matter! Many Americans are not so shallow-minded. We can think for ourselves.

Posted by: Mark Trahan | April 18, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

all u people who are saying Obama is scared of fox are missing the point. He is making a statement that all of you should realize. Fox news is not free press, its controlled propaganda and it needs to be shut down or restructured. Theyre pulling the wool over your eyes and only report what they feel furthers the republicans. Why would barrack enter a biased debate it ruins the whole point of having a debate.

Posted by: foxsux | September 10, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.