Anti-war GOPers face tough times
News comes this week that Rep. Walter Jones, R-NC, is facing a primary challenge from Onslow County commissioner Joseph R. McLaughlin, a retired Army officer who tells Congressional Quarterly that “a number of us have become very concerned about his drift to the left, espousing ideas that we don’t think reflect the views of the conservative base back in the district. Virtually every major vote on the war on terror, he has lined up with the liberals.”
This is fairly standard now for Republicans who have opposed the war in Iraq.
In Nebraska, Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., will likely have to fend off Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning.
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, is being challenged by former aide Eric Dondero, who recently blogged that after former Mayor Rudy Giuliani took on Paul at last week’s former debate, “My former boss looked like a complete nutcase. He looked frail. His hands shaked. He showed his age. He was completely unprepared for Giuliani’s romping response. Is this the man that should be representing South Texas Congressional District 14 in the US Congress?”
Last weekend at the Maryland GOP convention, Rep. Wayne Gilchrest, R-Maryland, can’t have been happy to see activists wearing “Run, Andy, Run” stickers. Those were a reference to state senator Andrew P. Harris, a Baltimore County Republican, who will likely soon announce that Gilchrest, too, will face a Republican opponent.
But it’s not merely those Republicans who have voted to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq who face challenges.
In February, after seven Republican Senators and 17 Republican House members voted for a non-binding resolution expressing opposition to the so-called “surge,” Weekly Standard editor William Kristol said “there will be primary challenges in the Republican Party against some of those congressmen and, I hope, against some of those senators, and they deserve to be primaried, because they are acting, I think, in a shameful way.”
Conservative activist/blogger Hugh Hewitt launched a group to do just that, the “Victory Caucus,” to “primary” the so-called “Surrender Caucus” — the 17 House GOPers who voted against the surge.
Rep. Ric Keller, R-Florida, has drawn a primary challenge from Todd Long, who raised more money than Keller last quarter.
In South Carolina, Rep. Bob Inglis, R-SC, may also face a challenge. The GOP chairman in Spartanburg County told a local newspaper that “I’m not going to discourage challenges. Bob has stepped on a land mine that he didn’t really need to.”
– jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
The Repubs are now playing their time-honored game (at least since the Goldwater years) of “Who Is the Most Conservative?” This periodic pogrom of ideology usually occurs among the Repubs after they’ve suffered a drastic defeat and bewilderedly wonder what to do next. Rather than taking any sensible steps of moving more toward the ideological center to attract more voters, they instead choose to lurch farther and farther to the right, engaging in such dimwitted and dismal discussions like disproving the theory of evolution, resulting in an alienation of more and more potential voters. A noted political commentator stated that moderate Republicans–the few that remain in DC–are an endangered species. This current activity proves him absolutely correct.
Posted by: chuck | May 24, 2007, 8:40 am 8:40 am
First they lost in 06 due to them acting like Libs, period, Proven by the fact that the Dems put up so-called moderates in the states. The Republican purged the Party and unfortunate some true conservatives got affected.
Unlike libs, Conservatives look for something in their candidates and punish them that do not act conservative.
FYI – Funny thing the States where Pres. Bush went and campaigned, those Republicans kept their seats.
Also history shows house cleaning every few years. The Libs might win in 08, but that will be their last for many many years
Posted by: spock | May 24, 2007, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Your point proves that the “Republican Morality” has no conscience because of their continued support of fabricated Iraq War which we all know was based on lies.
Adam
Posted by: Adam Young | May 24, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Alex – What proven lies? show the proof please!, I can give proof that they were not lies all 17 reasons. I know you libs pick on one reason out of them all, which actually was not a lie either. Stop reading the Lib Media do research on you own if you have an open mind.
I will say something when I do not agree with the President, but you libs follow the Soros propaganda machine blindly.
Posted by: spock | May 25, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Mr Spock, u again? Ur FYI statement is not true. He campaigned or at least raised money for Jim Talent. I am not sure he went to Santourums aid because he was so unpopular. How about the replican from Montana is it mr Burns? He lost too and I’m sure there are a few more. Mr Geoge Allen lost.
Posted by: Zhonni | May 28, 2007, 10:10 am 10:10 am
The President went to States but did not go with the candidate in all cases. He actually on showed upo with 2 to 4 and they won. He did not go to Pennsylvania. And as I said the election was not about the War, it was about Repubs acting like Libs.
Posted by: spock | May 29, 2007, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm