May 22, 2007 8:19pm

Bush to Explain a Bin Laden Terror Plot

ABC News’ Karen Travers Reports In his remarks at the Coast Guard Academy graduation on Wednesday, President Bush will discuss recent intelligence that asserts that Osama bin Laden commissioned a terror cell to be set up in Iraq to plan and launch attacks against the United States.

He will say that in 2005 Osama bin Laden tasked Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to go to Iraq to set up terror cells that would plan and plot attacks against the U.S. and other countries. Suspected terrorists captured or killed in the last 18 months have provided this intelligence but a White House official would not say if they were all captured or killed in Iraq.

A White House official told ABC News Tuesday evening that the President is often asked how the administration can say that Al Qaeda wants to use Iraq as a base to launch attacks. This official said the administration points to Al Qaeda’s public statements but this intelligence will explain further why the President says that was Al Qaeda’s intention in Iraq. The President often says if the U.S. does not defeat the terrorists in Iraq, they will come to the United States – he will make this point tomorrow and show how this intelligence supports that statement.

WHY DECLASSIFY THIS INTELLIGENCE NOW? A White House official said that some investigations where they have gleaned this intel have "run their course" and they have every reason to believe that Al Qaeda remains committed to using Iraq as a base for planning attacks.

WHY THIS SPEECH WEDNESDAY? The President is using the commencement address for this announcement because the Coast Guard is involved in protecting the homeland, is present in the Persian Gulf and in the waters around Guantanamo Bay and the President will use this opportunity there to talk more about homeland security.

The President will also discuss the importance of the Coast Guard in protecting America and talk about the homeland security measures the U.S. has taken to prevent another attack here.

User Comments

Hmmm. Isn’t this the same guy who said that Saddam had WMD’s? Isn’t this the same guy who stepped out onto the aircraft carrier and said mission accomplished? Isn’t this the same guy who’s lackies twisted intel to support the his reasons for going to war? Hey everyone, WAKE UP! We have an idiot in the White House and a bunch of sheep following him. Reminescent of a guy in Germany from WWII? Folks it’s time to call your congressman and tell them you are mad as hell and are not going to take it anymore.

Posted by: Jerry Grogan | May 22, 2007, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to figure out that there is a connection between Osama Bin Ladin, Terrorism, Zarqawi and Iraq. I am so glad our country acted on the reality of exponentially increasing terrorist groups in the world. Can you imagine if we just took out a couple of Taliban and thought we were safe?

Posted by: Virginia Hale | May 22, 2007, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Hi Virginia Hale,
So you are one of the Bush Dead Enders. But, come on, do you have to stick your head so deep in the sand? Or you just watch Fox for your news?
Its so easy to just bomb away all the countries we don’t like isn’t it?

Posted by: yugan | May 22, 2007, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Amazing how these “secrets” become declassified at the most opportune moment for Bush. Does anyone REALLY believe anything he says? P.s. I’m a long-time registered Republican.

Posted by: Lee | May 22, 2007, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Look, the left hand is doing something….no, look quick.
So easily fooled.

Posted by: chris | May 23, 2007, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Most Americans just push the internal Mute Button whenever our fearless leader speaks.
A friend of mine says the same thing everytime Bush makes a new statement or claim. She says, “Blah, blah, blah.”
Bush is just Cheney’s puppet, and we all know how (dis)honest that guy is. Enough said!

Posted by: John | May 23, 2007, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Be afraid, be very afraid! Only the Republicans can save you. Democrats are evil; e-v-i-l! BOOOOOO!!!
Will somebody please make the scary Republicans go away? PLEASE?!!!

Posted by: Boogeyman | May 23, 2007, 12:04 am 12:04 am

LOL, this is hillarious! Will the Bush regime EVER give up on their horrendous lies? It’s so obvious. LOL

Posted by: Valerie | May 23, 2007, 2:10 am 2:10 am

I only wish that the Coast Guard academy will walk out during the speech to show Bush how sick we are of his lies. Those lies are getting our young men and women KILLED. I wish he’d go away, just please go away Bush.

Posted by: Valerie | May 23, 2007, 2:13 am 2:13 am

Sigh… Why should Bush change anything he does or says? After all, late at night when he is all alone, he has personal talks with Jesus…
Yikes! Who elected this guy? Oh.. that’s right – the Supreme Court.

Posted by: John | May 23, 2007, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Our presence in Iraq is only helping to preserve the instability that allows Al-Qaeda to function in Iraq. We are just delaying the inevitable as long as we remain there. Once we leave, there will be serious sectarian conflicts, with the Shiites most likely taking control. Shiites in control means no Sunni Al-Qaeda. The best way to defeat Al-Qaeda in Iraq is to leave. I think Bush and Cheney know this, but would rather have the next president take the blame for “defeat”. Also, Al-Qaeda already has a nice base in parts of Pakistan that we can do nothing about, unless we wish to destabilize a country with nuclear arms.

Posted by: Ken | May 23, 2007, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Even if this new pack of lies were true, it doesn’t vindicate Bush/Cheney for their war crimes in creating the Iraq war based on lies and fabricated intelligence. Saddam would NEVER have tolerated Al Qaeda in Iraq and there would be nowhere near the death, destruction, and torture that is currently going on there due to our incredible blunder. George Bush is like the bully on the playground who needs a permanent time out!

Posted by: earthnotflat | May 23, 2007, 4:35 am 4:35 am

HELLO GEORGE, IS ANYBODY HOME ??? Of cousre there may be a connection now, MORON. We were concerned with BEFORE the bogus invasion !

Posted by: Jethro Brown | May 23, 2007, 6:19 am 6:19 am

If they knew what Bin Laden was saying to whom in 2005, how come they didn’t have the brains to know how to catch him?
We’ve learned not to trust any intelligence that comes out of the White house, and to long for the day that some intelligence goes in there.

Posted by: Oneinthebush | May 23, 2007, 6:23 am 6:23 am

Oh, I guess NOW I’m supposed to believe the Intel about Iraq! But I’m not supposed to beleive it when they can’t find WMD? And wasn’t this the same guy who throws a temper tantrum when everybody else but HIM leaks classified information – especially for political purposes. And wait a minute, isn’t this the same guy that said the war in Iraq WASN’T creating a new terrorist training program? And didn’t President Cheney say they were in their last throes? Bush is a Dead End.

Posted by: TomBob | May 23, 2007, 6:44 am 6:44 am

For the love of God, somebody make this idiot administration STOP already.
Seriously, just… just stop.

Posted by: BBp | May 23, 2007, 6:48 am 6:48 am

Bush has spent trillions of your dollars and tens of thousands of American dead and maimed to create a terrorist playground in Iraq. Why did it take Bin Laden so long to come to Bush’s horribly distorted game?

Posted by: geneonlbk | May 23, 2007, 6:57 am 6:57 am

Home land security my A&&! I think he said enough and done enough hes not trying to do anything but talk bull Hes just trying to start something so someone eles can finishhes mess for the next election.

Posted by: yaisab | May 23, 2007, 7:05 am 7:05 am

Will the major news organizations wake up and please report that there wasn’t any AlQueda in Iraq before Bush invaded? The US in Irag and Bush foreign policy have fueled the growth of terrorism not abated it.

Posted by: dan dwyer | May 23, 2007, 7:06 am 7:06 am

ilerlily…sorry that your son in in Iraq. But God is fighting with the terrorists, last time I checked. It is not the Kennedy’s, Kerry’s, etc.. that have marched us into this unending, illusive war on ‘terror’, but an administration, choking on it’s own power, that is now endangering our soldiers. God, save us from your followers!

Posted by: rglines | May 23, 2007, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Wake up people…the fact is more people die from murder in the 50 states each day than die in Iraq “at war”. We need to concentrate on our interior much more, but the news media wants to harp on problems oversees versus the ones right here in front of each and every US citizen living domestically. We need to make it safe for the citizens at home. It is so easy to jump on Bush and his administration, but how about do something about it instead of bitch and complain. Volunteer at your local homeless shelter, red cross, fire department, SOMEWHERE, instead of riding around in your too big SUV and carrying the kids to soccer and stopping by Target and McDonalds. Wake up. We are the sheep. And loud sheep still get sheared.

Posted by: Mike | May 23, 2007, 9:07 am 9:07 am

You know this should have been brought out a long time ago but now all of sudden it is now. Well so far everything has been such lies why would I believe anything he says and I mean anything. When I look at Bush he looks as though everything he has done is finally getting to him he looks so old and drawn.I think if he owns up to what he has done he will feel better for himself and his family just admit what he has done is wrong get our men out of the lie he put us in and he will go to the other side in peace. He is in the blame game and when you are in that game the person blaming will always lose.

Posted by: Carol R Hill | May 23, 2007, 9:08 am 9:08 am

ilerlily i hear you loud and clear, but being in Iraq and doing their dirty work for them is not the correct play here. The current Iraqi leaders are just sitting back and letting our boys (and girls) die over there while they are not stepping up to the plate like a “real” country who wants their freedom. IN the Revolutionary War who lost more lives? Was it the Americans who wanted to be free of oppression from Britain or the French who saved our butts? Not that we can compare here. We are not helping Iraq because it will eliminate a terrorist threat, or because its the right thing to do. We are doing it because Daddy said so and thats the way it has to be!

Posted by: lhhgbh | May 23, 2007, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Are you sure you know which side of this issue I am on? Didn’t think so. Paranoia will destory ya.

Posted by: Mitch | May 23, 2007, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Same old same old never changes his tactics I guess he figures we will never figure him out.

Posted by: ant | May 23, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am

This wouldn’t have happend if we didn’t invade Irag in the FIRST place! I can’t wait to Bush and the rest of the lying liars are gone!

Posted by: Melissa | May 23, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am

It amazes me after 911 why anyone would want to shy away from terrorism. We need to go wherever terrorism is and defeat them! There is no question whether or not we can defeat them, we can, its a fact. America’s job becomes more difficult when we have to watch out for innocent lives.
It is very easy for most people to criticize the president but he is doing his duty by protecting this country. If we want to go into protective mode and wait for the terrorist to come in and kill thousands then thats fine we can, but then you guys would be criticizing that hes not doing enough to protect us.
We will get our revenge once we get a democrat in office and see how bad things get screwed up.

Posted by: Travis | May 23, 2007, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Some of you have so much anger towards Bush, “the War”, Cheney etc.. It can not be healthy to live a life so full of hate, that the facts no longer matter. Just because you believe the war is wrong, that does not mean that everything that Bush or his people says is wrong. None of you have read this report yet; but this discussion is full of people already judging what it will say. Such an instinctual reaction is the mark of a childish mind. The world is not so black and white.

Posted by: Dave O'Dea | May 23, 2007, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Do you TRULY think that terrorism can be stopped?? It’s just like our ‘war on drugs’ that we haven’t even come CLOSE to winning! It’s evasive. It lives in the hearts of men and women. We have to continue to educate, and preach political answers, not the force of all out war. The poison of radical religious people need to be bred out of humanity.

Posted by: rglines | May 23, 2007, 9:29 am 9:29 am

So Al Qaeda has a presense in Iraq now, after we destroyed their government, army and infrastructure, and turned the place into a chaotic, anarchic free fire zone, blasted by civil war. Well all I can say is … duhhh.
If Bush had kept the focus on finding Bin Laden, who has always been the real danger, instead of exercising his personal vendetta against Saddam, thus squandering countless lives, hundreds of billions of dollars and the reputation of our nation, there would be no Al Qaeda in Irag today, and maybe, just maybe, Osama and his boy would have been taken out. Instead, Bush said “I don’t really care where Osama is.”
The gall of this president to think that we are just these mindless, dribbling idiots who can manipulated with his endless “the dog ate my homework” stories is beyond belief.

Posted by: Michael | May 23, 2007, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Unfortunately this administration has lost credibility with its claims of “reports”. No one believes Bush or his cronies anymore. He needs to resign. WAKE UP!

Posted by: LSR | May 23, 2007, 9:32 am 9:32 am

It amazes me all the propaganda that is coming from ALL the news people and how they are controlled. Not only are they controlled, all of us are by power of suggestion that Bush and others use. Even Bush is controlled and don’t realize it. It has to do with going towards the NWO (one-world government) which Canada, US and Mexico are already there. Not that there is nothing wrong if the leader of the NWO will be fair to all but, it is going to be very controlled and the freedom as we know it now will definitely be out the window. Eventually the US will be like the other countries and everyone will FLOCK to the new world leader thinking he will save us all and do good for us all when in reality it is like the Big Bad Wolf and Little Red Riding Hood.

Posted by: mandi | May 23, 2007, 9:36 am 9:36 am

I pity the fool that believes anything this administration says anymore.

Posted by: Mr. T | May 23, 2007, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Father like Son, Both put US in bottom of list for US dispution, trust, disloyal country esepcially in the Middle East.

Posted by: NA | May 23, 2007, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I’m so confused that who is right and who is rong. God bless America.

Posted by: Reddy Thummuru | May 23, 2007, 9:39 am 9:39 am

What a coincidence that this info comes on the eve of the Monica Goodling testimony. What a joke

Posted by: John D | May 23, 2007, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Don’t blame Bush. As long as we have blind patriotism Bush and Cheney will reap the benefits at huge cost to the nation. How did Saddam become from a friend (of President Reagan) to an Enemy. Go back to eighties, remember 8 year Iran – Iraq war? We gave Saddam the weapons to attack the evil Iran and UK (Margaret Thatcher) gave WMD’s to kill his own people (Kurds in 1988). How was OK then and not now when he has nothing. I have watched numerous times the President say Saddam has no connection to Al Qeada, no connection to 911 and not building nuclear weapons. We groomed him for benefit and we took him out when we are done using him. Please Mr. President don’t bring in the false intelligence. Saddam was a rogue, thug and a criminal all his life but we rewarded him with Apache helocpters (which he used gas his own people). Patriotism without researching what your government does secretly is fatal to the country.

Posted by: TheWindowToWorld | May 23, 2007, 9:50 am 9:50 am

TheWindowToWorld…well said.

Posted by: rgline | May 23, 2007, 9:54 am 9:54 am

It is so easy to be an armchair critic. We have always had them and always will. If the people who are so critical of the way things are would make an attempt to do something about it instead of just mouthing off, perhaps this situation would be taken care of. Note likely.

Posted by: debbie | May 23, 2007, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Apparently letting Bin Laden keep his nice safe haven in Northwest Pakistan is not a threat. Also, gee lets look at the dates: we invade in 2003, in 2005 Bin Laden suggests to Zarhkawi that he sets up training cells to launch attacks on U.S. from Iraq and in other countries. So the invasion that was suppose to make us safer has exposed us and our allies to more risk according to the Decider himself. Bush is immitating Custer on a far grander scale, leading the U.S. into the “A Little Bighorn” on the Euphrates.
No coincidence that this speech and release comes out the same day Monica Goodling is testifying. Right, and I also have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale if anyone is interested.

Posted by: Rickster Sherpa | May 23, 2007, 9:58 am 9:58 am

From an objective standpoint, it doesn’t really matter what Bush says anymore because the majority of the American people no longer trust him, regardless if he is telling the truth or telling lies. When you enter war, you tell the people that it will be a difficult and costly war. Never be optimistic about a military engagement because that will set you up for failure every time. I’m sure the Iranian government “appreciates” us very much for handing them the whole region on a silver platter.

Posted by: brent | May 23, 2007, 10:04 am 10:04 am

As a retired Navy guy and a Republican, it scares the hell out of me the damage Bush and company has caused our country and the world.

Posted by: Sam Wiede | May 23, 2007, 10:14 am 10:14 am

He has no credibility. He has taken no accountability for any decision made by himself, his office, or those he has appointed (he still has ultimate accountability for that, just like any CEO). While this information may, in fact, be credible, the boy has simply cried “wolf” too many times. From color-coded, poorly organized general fear hysteria to WMDs to Brownie to Gonzalez. From Iraq to New Orleans. Believe him at your own peril, at this point. He has not proven himself trustworthy by action or word.

Posted by: Rowan | May 23, 2007, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Well, this proves that by 2005 we had created in Iraq what we, in 2003, went in to destroy. Was this document dated 2001 or 2002, it would be more valid to Bush’s argument. Seeing that it is 2005.. it shows that we paved the road to forging Iraq/Al-Qaeda alliances.

Posted by: jupiter_too | May 23, 2007, 10:25 am 10:25 am

To ALL Republicans and Democrats.
GW has finally getting done what what he had promised to do in the 2000 elections. Be a uniter.
He is slowly getting us all united against that nut case in the White House.

Posted by: Roy | May 23, 2007, 10:28 am 10:28 am

ilerlily,
Do you honestly think Saddam could have shipped that many WMD’s to Syria without us catching on just a little bit that something was up? Weren’t we looking at photo’s of possible mobile labs (that were not labs) and yet they could haul all WMD’s out and we wouldn’t notice? In a short time frame?

Posted by: Susan | May 23, 2007, 10:30 am 10:30 am

So many lies from this Administration it’s hard to decipher what the truth is anymore. I can only believe that all this Administration feeds us are lies and half truths. What credibility does this Administration actually have anymore? Only 28% actually care what this President has to say. Pretty bad numbers for a career politician. Hope the 28% listen to him otherwise he should be giving his speech in a box…at least that way he can listen to himself. For the record I’m a moderate Independent voter and would be saying the same thing regardless of party affiliation.

Posted by: got2Bkidding | May 23, 2007, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Notice how Bush (and Cheney) allege there is an al Qaeda connection in Iraq NOW (or since 2005). But what about 2003? One of the reasons Dumb and Dumber got us into this mess four years ago was, along with their ridiculous assertions about WMDs (which were never found), Heckel and Jeckel claimed an al Qaeda presence in Iraq. Well, where were they then? We’re still waiting.

Posted by: Paul Fogleman | May 23, 2007, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Unbelievable that what was once the greatest country on earth is led by this moronic liar. How can his approval rating even reach 28% ? Bush should be charged with crimes against humanity in the Hague.

Posted by: Dan | May 23, 2007, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Yay! My approval ratings are at 28%, lets continue to lie to the american people just to see how low they can get!
Yeah im “sure” thats what Bush and his advisors are saying right now.

Posted by: Travis | May 23, 2007, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Well…when the next terror attack occurs (and it will occur)and it happens to be your friends or family that is affected – then remember your comments about “lies”.

Posted by: John | May 23, 2007, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Hey Travis, we seem to be a minority, as the current polls reflect. I don’t agree with a lot this administration has done, but we do need to fight terrorism in the lands that breed the terrorists and not let them make it to our homeland again.
We were lied to about the WMD. Get over it. We’re there now, we can’t just pull up and leave or things will only get worse there. ALSO, they will get much worse here.
And to the lady that thinks the Coast Guard should just get up and leave when he speaks….that is WAY WRONG. He is their Commander in Chief. They’d all be sent to the brig. You obviously have no understanding of military protocal.
I don’t care if you like Bush or if you don’t. He is our President. It is our American right to question him. But we should not shame him. That makes us look even worse. Unity people…it’s about the only thing we have any more.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 10:44 am 10:44 am

I agree ARSailorMom, I don’t want to be in Iraq just as much as the next, but we are there and we need to complete the mission!
I support the president and his fight to end terrorism.

Posted by: Travis | May 23, 2007, 10:48 am 10:48 am

It is very comforting to see you supporters out and yelling. The last couple of blogs I’ve read seemed to have no one that realized that people are getting too relaxed. It seems everyone has forgotten 9/11. It seems no one believes that Saddam would do anything to hurt the United States and the Al Qeada is currently plotting more destruction.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Anyone wanting to withdraw has forgotten 9/11 in my opinion.

Posted by: Travis | May 23, 2007, 10:55 am 10:55 am

So because we so called “liberals” think Bush is an idiot and speak out about this administration, we are all traitors and sympathize with dictators and terrorist – oh and we don’t care bout 9/11 either?

Posted by: MB | May 23, 2007, 11:06 am 11:06 am

I believe the Democrats were right with the administration on all the intel. Oh, by the way, I believe the Iraqi military was soundly defeated, also. I don’t believe everything he is doing is correct, but name a president who did everything that everyone agreed with. To be truthful, some of these are so full of paranoia, I’m afraid to think where they want the country to head.

Posted by: duh | May 23, 2007, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Unbelievable. Bush must be losing another lower set of his base and he has to pull this lie out so they have something else for false hope in the war criminal.
And he talks about 2005. Sorry, George, that was two years after you destroyed Iraq and all sorts of malcontents like Al Quada ended up in Iraq. You know George, I’d just keep you trap shut because even those in your lower base and starting to figure out that you and your cabal created a disaster.

Posted by: Vet_SK | May 23, 2007, 11:23 am 11:23 am

NO ONE disputes that al qaeda and every other insurgency is in Iraq NOW… let’s see some evidence that al qaeda was in iraq BEFORE we invaded.. The fact that Bush rolls this out as justification for Iraq seems a desperate attempt to show connections.
I supported our actions in Afghanistan.. but we lost our sight, and my support, when we went into Iraq.

Posted by: jupiter_too | May 23, 2007, 11:24 am 11:24 am

For anyone who has a son or daughter, uncle, aunt or whatever family member in Iraq. I don’t think anyone leaving comments on here are not supportive of your family members. I myself feel bad for our troops and their famalies but that does not mean I have to support this administration. Come on how many times do they have to lie to us before we wake up

Posted by: bcindiana | May 23, 2007, 11:29 am 11:29 am

What do we need to worry about terrorists for when it seems like we ourselves as a nation are ready to rip each others throats out? Are we heading in to another Civil War? The way we are acting as Americans why do we even deserve to live in this country? The only way it seems that we are going to win against the terrorists is to have our Civil War. Once that is over, whichever side is the victor either goes on to finish off the terrorists and re-establish this Great Nation OR give in to the terrorists and sing our kumbuyah’s to Allah.

Posted by: Fellow American | May 23, 2007, 11:32 am 11:32 am

I just returned from spending a year in Iraq and if you think the troops care how people think about this administration, is beyond rediculous. They just extended troop deployments to 15 months. 15 months in Iraq. I spent a year n- the longest, deadliest year of my life.
Please do NOT spread the notion that you have to support the president and his policies to support the trooprs.

Posted by: Vet_SK | May 23, 2007, 11:35 am 11:35 am

ARSailor Mom,
I notice that you didn’t respond to the fact that there were no ties between Saddam and al Queda. I find that to be so typical of righties that I argue with. They can never seem to acknowledge when they are wrong. They just skip over it and move on to some other talking point.
And there is no way that the war in Iraq is going to solve the problem of terrorism. Do you seriously believe that ALL of the terrorists are in Iraq? Do you seriously think that they’ve all been frightened into not attacking us because we invaded Iraq?

Posted by: Phylo Se Fiser | May 23, 2007, 11:35 am 11:35 am

yes, I’ve noticed my comments supporting our fight against terrorism keep disappearing…somebody at ABC must not like my opinions.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 11:36 am 11:36 am

remember the saying about lies? another will follow. and whatever lies told ? will be exposed as such in the light of day.

Posted by: strikefire | May 23, 2007, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Susan,
Ilerlily is correct. Saddam did ship WMD to Syria via passenger planes. Do a search in Google and type in “Georges Sadas.” You will find a video of Sadas admitting that WMD were in fact shipped to Syria. Or perhaps you don’t want to be confused with the facts?

Posted by: Kellee | May 23, 2007, 11:38 am 11:38 am

No, I’m not blind to the fact that there are terrorists in our own neighborhoods and in countries other than Iraq. Jeez…. Also, the reason I have not commented about any connection between Sadaam and the al Qeada is because I don’t know whether there is or isn’t and I haven’t formed a solid opinion on the matter. I try to keep my comments to what I either know or what is my opinion.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Vet-SK….thank you for your service.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Question for all my fellow americans. How many of you know the difference between the factions of Sunnis, and Shiites? and when you learn the differences? will you realize the faction america is backing is the wrong one.hum.. funny i saw a modern irag when saddam was in power, women dressed modern and progressing into the future. funny i see a trade off, america freeing the afghan female but now the iraqi female has been enslaved. i guess this is freedom and democracy. and america is footing the bill for all this.

Posted by: strikefire | May 23, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Sure, now Bush tells us of this suposed “link”. What took them until now from 2005 to inform the rest of the US Citizens? Typical government and they wonder who so few people go out and vote. Same ‘ol Same ‘ol.

Posted by: TimTom | May 23, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Folks, read the print. “in 2005 Osama bin Laden tasked Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to go to Iraq to set up terror cells that would plan and plot attacks against the U.S. and other countries”.
Had we not INVADED and OCCUPIED Iraq in 2003 (2 YEARS EARLIER), then maybe we would NOT have made the country weak enough, mad enough and vulnerable enough for it to be a base of operations.
All this intelligence says is that we created the Iraq of 2005 that was primed to be a base of operations for terrorism and now we have to fight to stop what we created.

Posted by: 2005folks | May 23, 2007, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Funny how I dont see any liberals mentioning Al-Qeada causing infighting in Lebanon right now? Also about how a 5 year old Iraqi boy who was tortured by terrorists and recently rescued?

Posted by: Mr. Twister | May 23, 2007, 11:54 am 11:54 am

This report is about the Al Qaeda’s intention or interest in Iraq at 2005.
I don’t see how this report justifies the war in Iraq.
Saddam Hussein is a nationalist and dictator whom all the Middle East specially the Iraqi people suffers from. But Saddam Hussein and his party were propagating completely different ideology that never intersects with Al Qaeda’s idiolgy, actually his ideology but him in conflict with Al Qaeda’s.
What I am trying to say that trying to establish link between Iraq(Saddam) and Al Qaeda’s just doesn’t make sense specially for people like me how grow in the middle, it is simply doesn’t add up. The united state invade Iraq to increase it is control in the area and mostly because of the oil.

Posted by: firas | May 23, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Lets explain in simple terms. If the Democrats are elected, there will be a repeat of 9/11. Homeland Security will be cut, illegals will cross the borders at will. Then you lefties will blame Bush for provoking Al-Qadea. Its better to fight on their soil then our own. So back our troops they are our saving grace.

Posted by: Derek | May 23, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am

What difference does it matter that the intel was from 2005 and we invaded in 2003? If Bin Laden had not set up shop in Iraq, he would have just done it somewhere else. Like Mr. Twister said, he has shop set up in Lebanon right now. I’d bet he has shop set up in a lot of places. The little dab of intel we’ve been made privy to came from 2005, it doesn’t say when it all started. People, wake up. The fight is against terrorism and it is everywhere….and our troops are not fighting it in Iraq only, they are other places as well, too.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Derek…that’s just it. Republicans are simple..minded, and must speak in simple terms.

Posted by: rglines | May 23, 2007, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Can we just IMPEACH him for being STUPID and a LIAR ? (He has turned Iraq into the terrorist-breeding-ground that Afghanistan used to be and NOW IS again.) I bet he can’t even spell I-r-a-q.

Posted by: The Hammer | May 23, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Just how long did it take those idiots to think this one up ???
It’s only been about 3 years since “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED”
Sounds like the story is a day late and a dollar short!

Posted by: Edwardc01 | May 23, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

When was Afghanistan NOT a breeding ground for terrorists? So, I guess Bush is to blame for the fact that people become terrorists? The way some of you are talking, do you think Bush wants there to be terrorists just so he can have war games? Do you honestly think ANY administration wants war just so they can get out their guns and raise the level of testoterone in the world? And, you call HIM stupid…

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Just how long did it take those idiots to think this one up ???
It’s only been about 3 years since “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED”
Sounds like the story is a day late and a dollar short!

Posted by: Edwardc01 | May 23, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Does he really believe all Americans are stupid? Why doesn’t Bush go after Bin Laden and stop trying to terroize Americans with this BS – now that his rating are the worst of any president EVER – Be scared, very scared…I am sure the news of his “secret” war with Iran will make us more friends in the region.

Posted by: peter | May 23, 2007, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Ah yes, when the ratings are down, play the “terror” card.
Sorry, Shrub. We’re not afraid anymore.
We’re just sick and tired of you.

Posted by: Paul | May 23, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Bush lied and cheated his way into the office and he lied about the war in Iraq. In his second election, he scared everyone into voting for him. Blame the idiots that thought they were doing our country justice by voting for him again. The last thing I would call him is an idiot, because some how he remained in office this long and the war is still going on. Maybe a liar and a cheat, but not an idiot.

Posted by: Jason | May 23, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Why do some of you think the American public at large should get intelligence information as soon as the military does? There are reasons they are just now releasing the information….it is not longer necessary to be kept a secret. It’s called strategy and planning. I just don’t understand why one reason so many of you are upset is because they are just now releasing this intelligence. What good would there be in releasing it too soon?

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Intellegence and The Bush Administration. A complete oxymoron.

Posted by: rglines | May 23, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

I’ll say it again, given I can’t find my first post here. I no longer believe a word Bush says. He keeps saying there are WMD’s in Iraq, and now he’s saying there is a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Excuse me, Bush, but Al Qaeda wasn’t in Iraq until after we threw out Saddam, who wouldn’t have allowed Al Qaeda in Iraq to begin with! Iraq is more unstable now than it was before. Nope, I no longer believe a word Bush says no more. He’s a lier.

Posted by: jupmod | May 23, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Chris has it right, and he has his facts right. That is a refreshing thing to see on this blog.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I see a lot of emotional responses to this article which is understandable, but unfortunate. The reality of the situation is that none of us have enough understanding of the situation in Iraq to have a clue about how to get out as soon as possible without creating a vacuum that causes more problems. Another part of that reality is that there is little trust in this administration to comprehend what has happened and make the right decisions to end this debacle. Let’s make sure we elect people based on their capabilities next time, instead of whether they are a ‘liberal’ or ‘conservative’ or that they are squeaky clean church-goers.

Posted by: KevinG | May 23, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

> Hmmm. Isn’t this the same guy who said that Saddam had WMD’s?
Yep, him along with Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Tony Blair, Colin Powell, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, John Edwards, The CIA, Russia, France, Egypt, Jordan, and Saddam Hussein… just to name a few.

Posted by: John Daly | May 23, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

KevinG, I would love to elect someone squeaky clean…my fear is that since we are plagued with professional politicians instead of real people to vote for, there is no such thing. Remember when someone had an issue, ran for office, resolved the issue and then went back to his home and career. We need that again.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | May 23, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

>I no longer believe a word Bush says. He keeps saying there are WMD’s in Iraq,
He does??? I haven’t heard him say that in years.

Posted by: John Daly | May 23, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Bush has caused more damage to our country than any terrorist group. He has alienated us from our allies, destroyed our reputation in the world, and continues to pour fuel on the extremists efforts.

Posted by: Don | May 23, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Does he really expect us to swallow his crap? You mean Osama commissioned a terror cell in Iraq, 2 years after we invaded and we are supposed to accept this as THE link between Iraq and Osama that we have been waiting for for 5 years. I don’t know if he is insulting my intelligence or if I am overestimating his.

Posted by: Waleeg | May 23, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Yes, it was bad intelligence that all our leaders followed, and approved the war in Iraq…BUT, Bush was all bent on a premptive strike instead of working with the U.N. to politically paralyze Saddam first, thrusting us into a war in which our ‘fearless leader’ was not smart enough to prepare for. His ‘cowboy’ cavalier attitude(and those that supported his ‘I have all power’ attitude) made this huge mess that our country will pay for long after his is gone.

Posted by: gdguy | May 23, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

How many UN resolutions and deadlines did Iraq ignore prior to Bush doing what had to be done (with congressional approval I might add). Working within the confines of the UN is a dead end. The UN is as anti-American as some of the countries we are currently dealing with. Russia and China will take the opposite side almost everytime in an effort to minimize our influence and to protect their own economic interests which definately do not coincide with ours. Wake Up Liberals before its too late.

Posted by: Bob | May 23, 2007, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Does Bush really expect us to believe anything that comes out of his mouth?

Posted by: Debbie | May 23, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

I posted defending Bush but when I came back to the site it was gone! Guess you just want one opinion. Figures!

Posted by: Mary | May 23, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Bush has been Bin Laden’s greatest and most prolific recruiter, and now he’s given them Iraq as a playground. The report, if it is true, is about 2005. That was after Bush’s foolish war turned Iraq into a terrorist haven, not before. This just points out how foolish it was, and how right those of us who were against it were. Too bad it doesn’t feel better to say “We told you so”.
And who knows what the truth is out of this band of theives anyway!

Posted by: tnkatz | May 23, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

This just goes to show how very important the selection of a vice president can be. Voters usually vote for who they want for president, giving only an afterthought to the vice president. Cheney is the ventriloquist here and Bush is his puppet. The media is saying Cheney was pushing for war with Iran. Is anyone surprised by this? Who can stop this madness?

Posted by: elbee | May 23, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Bob – Saddam ignored UN resolutions not American resolutions. As for Russia and China going opposite way couple things
1. Do you know disagreeing is democratic value we so much pooh, pooh?
2. Whenever there is a resolution against Isreal America always vetoes it. There were several of them and all the time we vetoed. Most of them are to just reprimand Isreal.
We think this is the greatest democracy in the world but can’t tolerate when someone opposes us. So much for setting up democracy in Iraq.

Posted by: TheWindowToWorld | May 23, 2007, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I heard this already. This info was leaked back around the time al-Zarqawi was killed. We Americans have short memories. Plus Hello anyone could have guessed what Bin would want to do inside Iraq. Use it for an OJT and a base.

Posted by: Joesnopy | May 23, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

This Resident is a lying sack of S__T -always has been, always will be. Just because he and his cronies managed to cheat their way into the White House does not mean he deserves respect – he is a LIAR, and liars do NOT deserve respect! This administration has never had, and never will have, any integrity whatsoever. It boggles my mind that 28% of th public STILL don’t want to see that. Is that becuase they would have to admit they’ve been bamboozled? Get over it! We need you to help replace these megalomaniacs with honest, loyal AMERICANS!

Posted by: PaineAttention | May 23, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Just a comment to those that believe we will be okay when Bush and Cheney are gone…get a grip! These guys are only the head of the snake that is threatening our country. Lots of so called moderates on both sides voted for the Patriot Act and for warrantless wiretaps and for the suspension of habeas corpus and for indefinite detainment sans attorney or charges in “camps” out of country…etc. If you read the language of what all this means, you’ll find a country quite unlike we were only ten years ago. When Reagan dismantled the FCC rules of “in the public interest”, the First Amendment teeth within the Fairness Doctrine, he was setting the stage for a shift in policy and limiting a public forum for discussion or debate. It has taken them twenty years of “little changes”, but look at what has happened. Since then, you as a citizen have essentially the right now to shut up or get locked up. We need to take back the basics of our Constitution and demand a rollback of this crap. If you don’t want to live in a perpetual military state vote, get active, and get pissed off.

Posted by: bob crawford | May 24, 2007, 8:17 am 8:17 am

ARSailormom,
My posts were removed as well. It is quit clear that ABC does not believe in Freedom of Speech unless the speech is what ABC wants us to believe.
To the rest of you leftists here!
Here is a fact. Iraq did have ties to terror groups and Al Qaeda. This has been proven on multiple occasions, but everyone on this board just wants to believe that President Bush has lied, which he has not. There is not one shred of proof that President Bush has lied about anything. President Bush stated that Iraq had WMD’s, well so did Clinton, Gore, Edwards, Kerry, Clinton (the other one), Lieberman, Feinstein, and many others. Also, the American, British, Italian, French, German, Russian, Polish, and the rest of the world stated that Saddam had WMD’s. Heck, even Saddam acted like he had WMD’s, so this left-wing lie stating that President Bush lied about WMD’s is just bogus. All that these left-wing lies do is hurt the USA.
Everyone on this board has forgotten about 9/11, the attack on the USS Cole, the 1993 WTC Attack, the attacks on our military bases and our embassies during the 90′s. These were AL Qaeda attacks. Al Qaeda was in Iraq before we went into Iraq and liberated the country from Saddam Hussein. Saddam did not earn the name the Butcher of Baghdad for nothing. He murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people.
I am a veteran of the US Air Force and I stand behind our President and our troops, but it is apparent that many of you on this post do not. I have friends that are in the Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan they state that everyday things are getting better there. You have to remember, we have won every battle and we are winning in Iraq and Afghanistan. The only way we can lose is if we pullout while we are in the middle of this war on terror, which is what liberal socialists fascists want us to do. Who’s side are American liberals on anyway, it does not appear to be the side of the USA. The leader of the House of Reps in the USA does side with the troops, the Iranian, Syrian, Hamas, and Hezbollah troops. She went to Syria and undermined the US policy and the under-minded the people of Syria that are trying to get rid of the Dictator there, way to go Nancy!
Liberals keep saying that we have to help the oppressed, well that is exactly what President Bush and our troops have been doing. There was a Genocide going on in Iraq by Saddam Hussein killing Kurds and Shiites, but Liberals say we cannot go into Iraq and stop that, but these same liberals want us to go to Darfur to do the same exact thing, what a bunch of hypocrites liberals are.
We have liberated over 50 million people from evil regimes over the last 5 years but the leftists in the USA do not care about that. All that these leftists have is hatred towards President Bush and the USA. It is obvious with all of these hate filled neo-liberal fascists posts.
This message board looks like something George Soros would fund like or the daily KOS, two very radical left wing web-sites that are filled with nothing but lies and hate for the USA.

Posted by: Brian | May 24, 2007, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Well I gotta say one thing for you Brian…you really ate your Wheaties this morning! I hope you won’t take it too personally when I say that Bush, Cheney, and their minions need mindless dupes like you to stay in power. What I find comforting is that you and your ilk are in the distinct minority now, less than thirty percent of Americans support these creeps any longer. I’m betting that less than 5 percent have the blindness that you have. Thank god for that. Let’s get on the impeachment bandwagon and rid ourselves of these vermin before they can cause any more damage to a potentially beautiful society.

Posted by: bob crawford | May 24, 2007, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

You guys are all a bunch of morons.
Do you believe everything the liberal media says? Who are the sheep now?

Posted by: Chris | July 8, 2007, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

The American people wanted revenge for the attack on Pearl Harbor so President Truman dropped 2 atomic bombs on Japan and the American people were very contented. The American people wanted revenge for the 9/11 attack on the twin towers in New York City. President Bush invaded Iraq without dropping atomic bombs on Iraq but the American people were not contented and now despise and humiliate President Bush. The American people must learn to realize that you just can’t drop atomic bombs on human beings for instant gratification. Revenge takes time to deliver using only military man power.

Posted by: HarryO | September 10, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Martin Luther King spoke only for the black African slaves. Hawaii’s politicians should act boldly and let the US government return the Hawaiian Islands to the people of Hawaii. The Christian sons revolution invading Hawaii was against US laws. They treated the Queen of Hawaii like a slave prisoner.

Posted by: Toby | January 19, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.