Romney Strapped Dog to Car Roof
ABC News’ Jake Tapper Reports: Republican presidential candidate former Gov. Mitt Romney, R-Mass., has angered animal rights activists for strapping his dog to the roof of his car on a family trip from Boston to Ontario, Canada.
According to the Boston Globe, in one of the family’s 12-hour drives to their family’s cottage in Canada over 25 years ago, Romney strapped a dog carrier to the roof of the car for the whole trip — with the family Irish setter, Seamus, inside.
Seamus protested in a scatological way, going to the bathroom on the roof of the car.
Animal rights activists reached by TIME Magazine said the tale seems a little cruel.
"It is commonsense that any dog who’s under extreme stress might show that stress by losing control of his bowels: that alone should have been sufficient indication that the dog was, basically, being tortured," Time quoted Ingrid Newkirk, president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals as saying.
Newkirk said it was "a lesson in cruelty that was … wrong for [his children] to witness."
Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
I guess he could do it because dogs don’t vote!!
Posted by: Marc | June 28, 2007, 9:08 am 9:08 am
That act of stupidity alone would be enoung to dissuade me from voting for him, if I were so inclined.
Posted by: Dsanch | June 28, 2007, 9:10 am 9:10 am
he has fired himself to ever be elected to anything, even dog catcher! AWFUL
Posted by: charlene Bostrom | June 28, 2007, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Not the sort of prudent action I expect of a man aspiring to be a national leader!
Posted by: zipstick | June 28, 2007, 9:16 am 9:16 am
He should be put in a cage and strapped to the roof of a car and driven 500 miles and see how he likes it. Lost my vote.
Posted by: Carla | June 28, 2007, 9:16 am 9:16 am
This man is a complete moron and should be charged for cruelty to an animal. When I was young, there was a woman in our neighbourhood who routinely put her weimerauner (sp?) in the trunk of her car whenever she needed to take the dog to the vet. The parents in our neighbourhood staged an intervention, went to her door and demanded that she relinquish the dog to one of the group who had a special interest in that breed and who then kept the dog and gave it a loving home. People need to take action and not just allow this kind of stupidity to go unchallenged. If this is an example of his decision-making skills, who would want him in public office? Idiot.
Posted by: Rebecca | June 28, 2007, 9:17 am 9:17 am
pure stupidity…..and neglect….
what message does it send to his children! What was wrong with his wife for not speaking out!!!
His creditablity is out the window!!!!
Posted by: Judy | June 28, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am
No way would I want this man to be president of our fine country. He’s an idiot.
Posted by: Mary Anne Caragol | June 28, 2007, 9:23 am 9:23 am
It is safer for a dog to be in a dog carrier and securely strapped to the vehicle than what many people do when they let their pets hang out windows or ride in the back of their trucks. The carrier would act more like a seat belt than sitting free inside a car. Give the man a break
Posted by: renae | June 28, 2007, 9:25 am 9:25 am
If he would do that to his dog, imagine what he would do to people in middle and lower class America. Oh wait, they’d probably be relegated to the trunk.
Posted by: sandpiper | June 28, 2007, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Um, it’s not safer, the strap could have been undone. Having the dogs head a half a foot out the window is not that dangerous. Not to mention it probably scared the dog.
Posted by: hatey | June 28, 2007, 9:36 am 9:36 am
I’m sure Romney could afford a vehicle large enough to allow the dog crate to ride safely inside the vehicle. How stupid.
Posted by: valentine0591 | June 28, 2007, 9:39 am 9:39 am
I am speechless. He’s not getting my vote.
Posted by: E Williams | June 28, 2007, 9:45 am 9:45 am
So what’s wrong with that? He probably got the idea from one of those Chevy Chase Vacation movies. They thought enough of their beloved pet to take him along. His critics will make it sound like Seamus was tied to the rear bumper. At least he had the full protection of the carrier. Give this poor family some credit. The weather could pose a problem between September 1 and August 25, in which case Seamus would need earmuffs and mitts.
I like this gut, Romney.
Posted by: Alex Mullins | June 28, 2007, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Maybe he should get Michael Vick as a running mate ?
Posted by: Jethro Brown | June 28, 2007, 9:50 am 9:50 am
“that alone should have been sufficient indication that the dog was, basically, being tortured,”
Tortured? i see now why the liberals are crying about us torturing prisoners, they have no idea what so ever what the word means. Tortured? come on….
Posted by: Ray | June 28, 2007, 9:54 am 9:54 am
What the heck is wrong with you people?! Everday I see semi-trucks full of cattle and pigs going down the highway in containers very similar to over sized pet carriers. These trucks are goings many hundreds of miles in all weather conditions, including the dead of winter! Why don’t you boycott the beef and pork industry?!
The animals, according to Ingrid Newkirk, must be stressed and tortured because urinate and defecate all over their containers!! How utterly stupid some of you people are!
Posted by: Errol | June 28, 2007, 9:56 am 9:56 am
SHAME on Jake Tapper for not making it clear that the dog incident happened 24 years ago in 1983. But also shame on anybody that would treat an animal that way.
Posted by: John | June 28, 2007, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Hey Ray, I don’t think you are getting the picture. The dog was tortured, whether you feel that the correct term you used was correct or not. We have a term in American society to explain this completely. It is “Scared ****less”. Get the idea? Stop trying to make this a “liberal” vs. “conservative” issue. The animal puts its full trust in the owner. It is the owners responsibility to be a good steward to that animal. Period.
Posted by: Jason | June 28, 2007, 10:00 am 10:00 am
He just lost any chance of my vote as well. Animal cruelty should absolutely not be tolerated by any society, it is pure evil.
Posted by: jenn | June 28, 2007, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Did this actually happen 23 years ago? If so, let it go…I would like to hear Rominy’s side before passing judgement.
Posted by: Pattyb | June 28, 2007, 10:07 am 10:07 am
What a cruel idiot!!! Would he travel with one of his children that way? That dog was frightened and undoubtedly uncomfortable. If he can’t take care of his dog, how can he take care of our country??
Posted by: Jacquie | June 28, 2007, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Errol: You have a point. Those animals are also no doubt under undue distress. I recommend that you DO boycott the beef and pork industry.
John: I agree on both accounts. I was wondering when this event happened, since the date was not mentioned.
renae: You have a point (at least about the way *some* people let their dogs hang out of cars, or have their dogs roaming about freely in the back of a pickup). However, that doesn’t make the dog carrier idea any better.
Posted by: Ben | June 28, 2007, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Hey Jason, I couldn’t agree more. Here’s another way of looking at it. Would you strap a child in a car seat to the roof of the car? Of course not, so why would it be okay to strap a dog up there? Lastly, for the people that think this is okay I really hope you don’t have pets!
Posted by: Rob | June 28, 2007, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Where is the photo evidence? Sounds like a “Mainstream Media who cried wolf” scenario. I dont believe it for a second.
Oh, and torture? I see dogs all the time in the beds of pickups and they seem to enjoy the wind blowing past their faces. I just read an article that you nut jobs want to protect of all things dirt and rocks for good so that someone strolling on a beach cant pick up a pebble for a momento. WE GOT DAMN ASTEROIDS SLAMMING IN TO OTHER BODIES IN SPACE FOR GOD’S SAKE! TSUNAMIS THAT CAN ALTER A BEACH FOREVER, QUAKES THAT RAISE CORAL BEDS 10 FEET ABOVE THE OCEAN!
ANIMALS EAT OTHER ANIMALS AND SOME PLAY WITH THEIR FOOD, TORTURING IT BEFORE THE KILL IT! EVER HAD A CAT THAT ATE MICE? AND YOU WANT TO MAKE THEM HUMAN? EVER SEE KILLER WHALES GOING AFTER A SEAL?
Posted by: Mr. Twister | June 28, 2007, 10:18 am 10:18 am
What’s really disturbing here is the fact that somebody is actually trying to push an antagonistic agenda against Romney based on the Globe article. By the way, hands up from all of you Romney haters who actually read the Globe article…….yeah, I didn’t think so. This whole story renders merit only to the unyielding fact that the type of “animal rights activist” (or any “activist” for that matter)disturbed by this “news”, functions in this world under a substantial cloud of disillusionment. I bet all of your animals are under “stress” just because they have to live with you…..just thought I’d mention that.
Posted by: Amani | June 28, 2007, 10:18 am 10:18 am
He is Clearly not fit to take care of the Country and should withdraw from the race.
Posted by: mike | June 28, 2007, 10:19 am 10:19 am
To me he was kind and showing love taking the dog on vacation with the family ,there nothing wrong in what he did .aim sure the dog was safe and comfortable riding up there, with all that fresh air ..This man did no harm to the dog.. The place I live the people eat there dog and your making a big deal because he put the on top his car .Now if he put human up there, that a different story .but a dog —- its ok
Posted by: jerry tatum | June 28, 2007, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Is this the type of man that some people want to see as President of the United States?? What he did to his dog is cruelty plain and simple. Just one more reason that I would not cast my vote for this man.
Posted by: BGF | June 28, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Please, this is NO BIG DEAL. Common practice for the poultry industry to pen tens of chicken with no room to move in cages stacked ontop of stacked chickes 8′ high, 8′ wide 40′ long without even a tarp to shade them. The chicken all survive till their slaughtered. The dog dumped because he had to – let it go people. It’s NOT A HUMAN it’s “just a dog” and animal.
Posted by: Keith | June 28, 2007, 10:25 am 10:25 am
For heaven’s sake, this was 24 years ago, and I’m sure the complete story WAS NOT TOLD….this is stupid. If a story is going to be printed, make it something worth reading!!!!!
Posted by: amk | June 28, 2007, 10:28 am 10:28 am
I want to see the proof, sounds like crap to me. Also this supposedly happened several decades ago so why do they now bring it to light? It sounds like Animal activists just want to find some cooked up idea to try to keep a republican out of office. I do not believe it for a second.
Posted by: SDE | June 28, 2007, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Just when I thought I had found someone I could vote for, I hear this. If true, he’s lost my vote. Not because I’m such a big animal rights person, but it’s just plain stupid.
Posted by: Barbara T | June 28, 2007, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Just in case you haven’t heard …. approximately 30 years ago, Romney is known to have actually ran with scissors! What kind of man do we have here? Could he have possibly made unthinking and insensitive mistakes? Surely not! He should have a spotless record like ….. ohhh … maybe Ted Kennedy or Bill CLinton. I don’t like Romney but really….. let’s get a life!
Posted by: Justin Cayce | June 28, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Mitt’s act was not just cruel, it was dumb and unnecessary. The story reflects a lack of common sense, since the problem had other solutions. The number of empty seats inside the car was at least 1, and possibly as many as 3.
The Globe presents it as a story about crisis management, but the crisis was easily avoidable. We don’t need another president who blunders into crisis on account of poor planning. He’s supposed to be smart, but maybe his intelligence is of a shockingly narrow variety.
Lots of facts and proof here: http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2007/6/27/15342/6665/474#c474
Posted by: jukeboxgrad | June 28, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Perhaps he needed the room for the beer cooler inside to keep cool.
Posted by: Bryan | June 28, 2007, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Now I will not even consider Romney a candidate worthy of further attention.
Posted by: dks0442 | June 28, 2007, 10:57 am 10:57 am
While this was cruel and revealing as far as Mr. Romney’s consideration of animals (so much for “family member”), isn’t this mostly just another example of actions and stances over the years that just don’t seem to add-up to a real personality?
Posted by: CJ Young | June 28, 2007, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Mormon? No, he is actually a Moron!
Posted by: CM | June 28, 2007, 11:02 am 11:02 am
It was a single incident 25 years ago not a pattern of behavior. Yes it was a cruel act but which one of us can truly swear that we have never been cruel to an animal or another human being in our entire lives.
Posted by: Christine Mpaka | June 28, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am
It’s a dog….get over it.
Posted by: foozle | June 28, 2007, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I am no animal rights activist, but I don’t think that you need to be one to at least believe that all animals should be treated as best as they can be. We seem to forget that we’re also a part of the animal kingdom. Romney has already proven that he doesn’t demonstrate consistent judgement – so this isn’t a matter of Liveral vs. Conservative or anything of that sort. Rather, it is just another example of poor judgement on his behalf. The fact that is was quite some time ago might mitigate it a bit, but as most of us of a certain age already know – people really don’t change all that much after a certain point in their lives, so it’s not unreasonable to call this action into question. I must say that when I weigh the arguments based upon the posters who seem inclined to be Liberal vs. Conservative – the Liberal arguments are far more rational and compassionate and I’m not a Liberal. Conservatives seem to have a way of justifying any action as long as it meets their own ends. I do agree with the one poster who stated we can’t afford another President along the lines of the one we have now.
Posted by: Chris Sullivan | June 28, 2007, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Complete idiot! Will not get my vote for anything, not even dog catcher!
Posted by: KK | June 28, 2007, 11:06 am 11:06 am
I’m a die hard democrat and am not going to vote for hime anyway, however, wasn’t this 25 years ago. Can we somehow get a grip on reality here folks?
Posted by: GMan | June 28, 2007, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Why is this even news? What a complete waste of time to even care. If people cared about their fellow human beings as much as they cared about their dogs this would be a much better place. Time to rechannel your energy, people.
Posted by: tt | June 28, 2007, 11:09 am 11:09 am
who cares! Having a dog pee on a roof is not a vote changing issue, afterall, he didn’t shoot a man in the face(Cheney)!
Posted by: victor | June 28, 2007, 11:10 am 11:10 am
A ride on top in the wind, ah come on, that’s truly doggie style…
Posted by: T.Jones | June 28, 2007, 11:13 am 11:13 am
If Mitt promises he will strap Harry Reid to the roof of his car and drive Harry up to Canada and then abandon him, then he can have my vote. Go, Mitt!!
Posted by: Seamus the Dog | June 28, 2007, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Dogs ride in the back of trucks all the time…whats the difference? My uncle had one that would only ride on the hood.
Posted by: bd | June 28, 2007, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Awesome! I’ll have to try that sometime.
Posted by: chris | June 28, 2007, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Romney treated his family pet like a complete dog! How dare he? :)
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | June 28, 2007, 11:24 am 11:24 am
I think all of you people out there who think it was okay for him to put his dog on the roof of the car should be put in a carrier and strapped to the roof of the car and see how cruel you think it is then.
Posted by: Kathy | June 28, 2007, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Hey, maybe he was driving a Yugo and the choice was the dog or the kid. If he didn’t take the dog, the dog would have starved to death at home. Then nobody would have known.
Posted by: DJ | June 28, 2007, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Hey, how about we strap Mitt to the to top of his wife’s car and see how long it will take him to get to the White House! Idiot!
Posted by: Juliette Doris | June 28, 2007, 11:30 am 11:30 am
The dog… “protested in a scatological way”… what a load of crud. As if the dog was making a political statement by defacating over a period of 12 hours. And again… how is it safer for a pet to be loose in the back of a truck? Strapping pet carriers to the top of cars used to be common. Why is stuff like this being brought up for a presidential following social norms from over 2 decades ago? Jake Tapper… you are indeed an idiot.
Posted by: caballero | June 28, 2007, 11:30 am 11:30 am
The problem with people sometimes is they don’t try to put themselves in the ‘shoes’ or in this case paws of the pets and ask themselves …”How would I feel locked in a cage on top of a roof of a car going up to 70-80 mph down the highway not having any choice in the matter?? Just a little common sense required which is sad to say ,alot of folks are lacking…….even political candidates!
Posted by: Debi | June 28, 2007, 11:40 am 11:40 am
If this did happen 23 years ago, Jake Tapper shouldn’t be a reporter. That’s a big omission. I agree that it was a stupid thing to do on Romney’s part, but I sincerely believe he wouldn’t do that now.
Posted by: Anne | June 28, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am
I would have strapped his wife to the roof of the car like a deer. That would have allowed the dog to ride inside. Strapping women to vehicles used to be very common.
Posted by: cranialdisturbance | June 28, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am
This from Boson.com website on Romney:
“Before beginning the drive, Mitt Romney put Seamus, the family’s hulking Irish setter, in a dog carrier and attached it to the station wagon’s roof rack. He’d built a windshield for the carrier, to make the ride more comfortable for the dog.”
Why no mention of the windshield in this article?
Posted by: Kevin | June 28, 2007, 11:46 am 11:46 am
35 years ago, people didn’t typically put their kids in car seats or seatbelts. I would bet this was true of Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela etc. Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt probably didn’t treat their animals according to PETA standards.
Times change. Let’s worry about the problems we have NOW. The world has some really serious problems! Genocide is happening in Sudan, there’s a war going on in Iraq, Iran and North Korea are becoming nuclear threats, the economy is going into the toilet, and you want to focus on something that happened 23 years ago! Give me a break!
Posted by: JM | June 28, 2007, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Way to go Peta & ABC, another new LOW
in reporting facts from the bottom of the barrel.
Posted by: ivh | June 28, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am
How about just leaving the dog with a kennel instead of putting it through riding on the roof of the car?
Posted by: dee | June 28, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Tagg Romney, the oldest of Mitt’s five sons, told the story to the Globe. The story was supposed to show how cool Romney was in a crisis (when dog poop ran down the back window Mitt calmly hosed the car down at a gas station). They were driving 12 hours to Ontario from Boston to vacation at Mitt’s family cabin – Mitt told the family (and the dog) “no stops except for gas.”
Posted by: Dan | June 28, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am
If anyone is outraged by this and is not a vegetarian, then they are hypocrits.
Posted by: ratna | June 28, 2007, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Yeah, and I really like the headline: “Romney Strapped Dog to Car Roof.” ABC news dropped the ball on weapons of mass destruction, the suppoed Iraq/Sept. 11th connection, but they’re on it when is comes to (mis)reporting something that happened 23 years ago.
Posted by: JM | June 28, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Yeah, stuff that happened 20 years ago is irrelevant – unless it is about John Kerry.
Posted by: Dan | June 28, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am
I cannot believe you people. We have two dogs who travel together in their kennel either in the back of our truck or the back of an SUV, and they love it. they are in the comfort of their kennel and they are excited about going on a trip. And I can tell you, they are happier in the truck because they love the wind and they can see and smell everything going by. And just because the dog went to the bathroom does not mean it was tortured or scared. Dogs are dogs, and some of them go when they have to go. I have heard many people talk about their dogs going to the bathroom in their cars. Now, tell me which is better. The dog going to the bathroom inside the car or in their kennel. Some dogs just cannot be trained. Get over it people. Most dogs are not prissy and don’t have to have luxury accomodations on a road trip. Most are just happy dogs that are happy to be along for the ride. Irish Setters are strong dogs who love to be outdoors. They are not fearful dogs who need to be coddled. Now, let’s be a little more intelligent about what the important issues really are.
Posted by: Michelle | June 28, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Save the puppies and vote for RON PAUL!!!
Posted by: Boeman | June 28, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Stupid? Yes. But will it make him a bad president? It’s hardly relevant, especially since he’s probably long realized how stupid it was. If someone changes their vote for Romney based on this, it shows more than anything else that their decision was never based on anything that mattered in the first place. It’s for reasons of presidential qualification that I don’t know whether I’ll vote for him.
Posted by: Moryam | June 28, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Romney was treating his dog with a heckuva lot more care than the people I see routinely driving around with little MiMi sitting in their lap, ready to be crushed between the owner and the steering wheel at any sudden stop or thrown against the dashboard if the dog happens to be in the back seat. A crate is where a dog should be when you’re taking it with you on a trip. It wouldn’t matter one bit to the dog that the crate happened to be on the roof of the vehicle. As far as the dog’s concerned, it’s in a safe, enclosed environment and the article stated it was also shielded from the wind. I suspect most people posting here should be looking in the mirror first before pointing fingers at Romney.
And to say in the headline that “Romney Strapped Dog to Car Roof” is dishonest and deliberately misleading. Shame on ABC.
Posted by: SPL | June 28, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Dan, what does John Kerry have to do with this? That they’re both from Massachusetts????????
Posted by: JM | June 28, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Romney wants to double Gitmo, now he “renditions” his family pet on the roof of his car? Yeah, I’d trust a “man” like that. Guess his cruelty streak goes back a loooooong way. Anyone interview his kids and wife about beatings? Or, I don’t torture dogs anymore……Romney. A kinder, gentler America. Bully for you, Romney!
Posted by: Jane Garnett | June 28, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Interesting how these “vote” pages, about candidates manage to show up without the voting mechanism.
Happens a little too often to be perceived as “freedom of the press”.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | June 28, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Okay, now you’re just making wild accusations.
I’m a Democrat, but I can’t tolerate smear tactics, no matter who they’re directed against. If you don’t like Romney’s position on GITMO, fine. But don’t bring his family into this. That’s Coulter-esque.
Posted by: JM | June 28, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Wow, I guess Mr. Romney’s record is SO bad that you have to go back 25 years to find some sort of “dirt” on him.
Posted by: pete | June 28, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Get a life people!!! It was a dog…25 years ago no less.
Maybe he should kill someone in a drunken driving (alledgedly) accident like the senior senator from MA.
He could get a free pass on that.
Posted by: Kurt | June 28, 2007, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Jane:
Pretty amazing how someone forms such broad and sweeping conclusions based on such tiny, tenuous tidbits of information. If you bothered to read the article, it details over and over how kind Romney is to his wife, his children, his fellow students, his work colleagues…And yet — out of the entire week-long series, this is the one thing that gets called out, and in a completely dishonest way. How pathetic.
Per my post above, Romney’s treatment of his dog is a lot more responsible than the people who drive around with little MiMi sitting in their lap completely unsecured.
Posted by: SPL | June 28, 2007, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Did any of you actually read the Boston Globe article Jake Tapper, wanna-be journalist, alluded too? According to it, Romney made a windshield for the dog carrier so the dog would be more comfortable. I don’t care if you don’t vote for Romney becuase of this. However, if you take this Tapper guy seriously, maybe you shouldn’t be voting in the first place.
Posted by: microbrane | June 28, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
This is typical of the republican party and their abuse of animals. I know for a fact that Bush and Cheney have participated in CANNED HUNTS. Where was the outrage before their “election”?
Posted by: J.A.Steward | June 28, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
What a great society we live in! Everyone and everything has legal rights and someone to speak out for them if they cannot do it on their own. We are so great that we expect our leaders to be perfect in every which way even though, we the common people, can make all the stupid mistakes we want. This story is just proposterous and released just to make the headline. My challenge to all you people out there ready to beat someone up regarding their stupid msitakes …”he who is without sin, let him cast the first stone”.
Posted by: Julio Barraza | June 28, 2007, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Maybe strapping a dog carrier to the roof is not the first choice in pet transportation- but in my opinion if the only dirt anyone can bring up on Romney is from 23 years ago concerning a family vacation and a family pet incident- I think that speaks very well for his character.
Posted by: John Childs | June 28, 2007, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
I was wondering for whom to vote. The idiot commentators on this board, along with Ingrid Newkirk, have made me realize theat Mitt’s the man. He now has my full support.
Posted by: Rob McNeill | June 28, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Mitt is a real nut…this is just so cruel that I think “Cruelty to Aminal Actists Groups” should seek him out and fine him heavily for strapping his dog on the roof. A good vet will tell you not to let a dog lean out a window of a moving car for too long; not good for their eyes with the wind slapping the pets face. Maybe someone should tie/strap Mitt to the roof and let him make the trip from Boston to Canada.
I would love to see it..good job abc news for sharing this story.
Posted by: katy2 | June 28, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
well he either did not have enough sense to know how to treat his dog or he did not care. We already have a prez that treats the common citizen likes Romney treats his dog. Whether it is because he does not have enough sense or because he does not care really doesn’t change the fact that except for the well connected most of us have been going down the same road with this guy but in very different comfort zones.
I don’t need another disconnected or disconcerned president driving the country.
Pack your bags but leave us behind “Mutt” Romney!
Posted by: Mike | June 28, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Disclaimer: I am a Democrat.
I was commenting to my wife this morning how similar the media’s treatment of Romney has been to the treatment of Al Gore back in 2000.
The focus on statements such as the supposed “I invented the internet” (which Gore actually never said), or, for Romeny, “I’ve been a hunter all my life.” And now this misleading dog story.
The sad thing is that it was possible before the 2000 election, for those who dug into the facts, to see that George Bush was clearly much LESS honest than Al Gore, and (compare defrauding investors Enron style for Bush to making some small exagerrations for Gore). But the media never focused on Bush’s much more dishonest history.
And it is clear that Romney from the body of evidence that Romney is a considerate person, a family man, and that he has integrity. On the other hand, we have the “hero” of 9/11, Rudolph Giuliani, who has sordid business deals all over the place and who was much more inhumane to his own family than Romney ever was to his dog.
Mitt Romney is the media’s Al Gore. It’s laughable when the media attacks candidates like Gore or Romney for “ethical problems” when it’s own conduct is so far from what professional ethical conduct.
Posted by: JM | June 28, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Let’s see – Mormons believe in having as many kids as possible so that the unbaptized-in-the-faith spirits have a vessel in which to reside. Maybe if this moron Mormon had fewer kids there would be a place in the vehicle for the dog. Oh yes – I am from a Mormon family.
Posted by: frankfletcher | June 28, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
just shows what an idiot he is, and why would anyone vote for him as Pres.
Posted by: joe | June 28, 2007, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Yeah this is reason enough to not vote for him. This is way stupider than lying to the country about WMDs and spying on everyone. Morons.
Posted by: Nina Nealon | June 28, 2007, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Yeah, that’ll show him!
Posted by: JM | June 28, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
While a stupid move, it was 25 years ago. You people are crazy, get over it. It wasn’t last week!
Posted by: Glenn | June 28, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Seriously, people. Seriously. This is starting to sound like a mob mentality–like the people who want to go burn down a McDonald’s because they serve meat.
Posted by: JM | June 28, 2007, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
The dog probably loved every minute of it. What’s the difference between that and a dog or hourse being pulled in a dog trailer? Are those animals also being “tortured?” Good grief!!
Posted by: Hal | June 28, 2007, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
It was 25 years ago!! Besides, my dog always likes to hang his head out the door in the wind.
Posted by: Hunter | June 28, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
I cannot believe I am taking the time to write this, but there were so many hypocritical statements that you just cannot keep quiet! Those who are most disturbed by Mr.Romney’s quarter-century-ago “mistake”, are obviously the same mis-guided souls who are driving around with their little “companions” on their laps while driving. I live in an area with a high number of accidents and road rage, and I can tell you that nearly all of the dogs I see traveling with their owners are riding without a seatbelt, freely moving about the vehicle. Would the same people allow that for their 5 year old children or relatives? I would bet they would see a difference in that…there would seem to be…almost a major difference between humans and animals in their eyes since they are not protecting their “companions” in the same way. HYPOCRITES! The bottom line is this…Romney broke no laws of the land and only a very tiny percentage (not enough to sway ANY election) of people will base their vote on a president’s pet policies.
Posted by: clark andress | June 28, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
There isn’t a person on this earth who does not have skeletons in their closet. We never really know these political candidates. Hell, the media cannot even be trusted, and that’s where the vast majority of us get the information to form opinions about them. I say, who cares. Most dogs stayed outside in those days, winter and summer. It was a different era. A lot of things were done differently back then.
We can never know what kind of person we are voting for.
Posted by: Karan Vaughan | June 28, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
I never liked him as Governor, and I can’t ever imagine him as President… What a moron!
Guys like him should be selling used cars or life insurance….
Keep him away from all animals and kids…
Romney is scary news!
Posted by: BrandonBoston | June 28, 2007, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
IF this is true, and it’s a might big “IF” given the age of said report, it’s deplorable. That said however, people make mistakes. 25 years ago animal activism was not what it is today. I dare say that 25 years ago few would have been outraged. For me, I won’t vote for him because I don’t agree with his politics. This alleged incident has no bearing. It’s ridiculous it’s even getting this kind of press.
Posted by: Russell Deason | June 28, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
You people need to find something else to be concerned with. If this isnt an example of the media trying to rail road a republican canidate, I dont know what is. You NEVER see this kind of attention paid to a democrats past. I mean, democrats have a drunk driving senator who killed a woman, and an ex KKK member on their staff. IMHO that is much worse than strapping a dog carrier to the roof of the car.
Posted by: Supacool | June 28, 2007, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Get on with life people. Being so critical of canidates is the reason we have such poor choices. If this is the worst thing he has done, then maybe he deserves to be president. As for anything PETA, they are a terrorist organization disguised as a animal group.
Posted by: Joe | June 28, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
It’s not like it was a person on the roof – it was only a dog…
Posted by: Mike | June 28, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
You ara all missing the point. This was the Boston Globe, obviously it never happened!!
Posted by: C.Reed | June 28, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Yawn. This was 25 years ago. This dog is not even alive today. It’s not like he strapped his child to the roof. The animal rights people would probably not even care about that. Boy, people are really digging.
Posted by: V.McLean | June 28, 2007, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
The dog was in a carrier. What is the cruelty? Exposing the dog to open air? Dogs love the air whipping by the car, that why they always stick their heads out the window.
Some people need a life.
Posted by: Slickwilly | June 28, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Give the guy a break. 23 years ago. Haven’t you done anything in the last 23 or so years that could be considered questionable? You people act as if he robbed a liquor store or something.
Posted by: tom | June 28, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
lets look back 25 years ago when many of you were picking your nose and eating dirt and dog crap, does that have any reflection on who you are today. every one of us made bad decisions in our lives, and to say that this man has not learned anything in 25 years is absolutely absurd, as is the reaction to this. 25 years ago, my god, your all acting like it was yesterday, give the man a break and go back to your mud pies!
Posted by: gary | June 28, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Doesn’t anyone recognize BS anymore. What is the source of this story. Through the ever expanding internet rumor machine we have the ability to impugn anyone’s character.
Posted by: JDA | June 28, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Let “he who is without sin cast the first stone”. Come on people maybe it was stupid, but what have you done in the past that you would want to redo??
Posted by: DJ | June 28, 2007, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Hey the car didn’t have air conditioning. It kept the dog cool and by the way Romney put a windshield in front of the cage to deflect the wind
Posted by: DJ | June 28, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Tagg Romney, Mitt’s oldest son, told the story to the Globe. It apparently made an impression on him as a young teen for him to bring it up 23 years later.
Posted by: Dan | June 28, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
This is the kind of story reporters do when they’re lazy. And Tapper didn’t even come up with the idea himself. Some blogger over at TIME magazine, sitting comfortably in her swivel chair reading the Globe series online, happened to see the mention and thought to herself, “Hey, let’s start a little controversy. I wonder what the PETA people think of this.” Clearly a demonstration of bravery and determination on the part of our intrepid reporter.
Then our guy Tapper gets the story and dumbs it down even more — with a misleading (even dishonest) headline written buy some guy who knew better but wanted to attract a lot of attention.
While we may have gotten a breather from the latest update on Paris Hilton’s emotional state, the media do a disservice to our democracy with this kind of reporting.
Posted by: SPL | June 28, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Is this a Mormon thing?
Posted by: Jack | June 28, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Was this an isolated incident or was this the usual way of transporting Seamus back and forth to Canada? Why do we care what a presidential candidate did 25 years ago? Because we, as voters, are looking for patterns of good and bad decision making. And, just because there are other acts of animal cruelty throughout the world doesn’t make this incident any less abhorrent.
Posted by: NCHiker | June 28, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Calm down animal rights lovers. It’s a dog for heaven’s sake. Is it any different than allowing a dog stick his head out a window of a moving car? No. When did we cross the rubicon in this country that pets should be treated like humans? They are ANIMALS. I swear this country is whacked.
Posted by: Jerry | June 28, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
“lets look back 25 years ago when many of you were picking your nose and eating dirt and dog crap, does that have any reflection on who you are today. every one of us made bad decisions…”
Okay – But he was in his MID-30s!!!!!
It dosen’t matter because he probably changed his mind on animal cruelty just like he did on abortion, gay rights, gun control………..
Posted by: frankfletcher | June 28, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
I dont get it whats the problem here?
Posted by: jim | June 28, 2007, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Anyone who would change or make their voting decision based on a 24 year old “pseudo-story” should have their vote taken away from them and given to a voter that will make an intelligent decision.
Posted by: Baddawg | June 28, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Jeffrey Dahmer also liked to torture animals before he turned that hobby to humans. Kinda like bush. So, um, if you are thinking of voting republican. Think again.
Posted by: stevex47 | June 28, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Whats really amazing about this story? This story, odviously because it involves a republican, received more comments and attention than the immigration bill that the senate thumbed their nose at. I understand that for most democrats, it’s easier to insult than help.
Posted by: JONCON | June 28, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
If this is the issue that sways you one way or the other, you shouldn’t vote.
Posted by: JP | June 28, 2007, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Seriously? This is how we’re judging candidates these days? Granted that was a seriously stupid thing to do, but really? This is akin to tabloid fodder. Next will be the story of Edwards bunny clubbing as a teen and then how McCain was addicted to cow tipping with a baseball bat until the age of 25. Whoever becomes president WILL have a serious flaw or has made a significantly stupid mistake in his or her past. I guess we all just have to decide the gravity of that past situation and the present person’s values and actions. Seriously, freaking out over a stupid decision about a dog vs. someone who did cocaine regularly or someone who was involved in illegal property deals is odd. This is simply political posturing amongst a group of people trying to hold others’ skeletons up in front of their own. If you’re basing your vote on this, you should probably just opt for the write in candidate “Micky Mouse”.
Posted by: Sam | June 28, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Well crafted, Fletcher! How long did it take you to come up with that intelligent comment?
Posted by: Cindy Lou Who | June 28, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
When traveling with dogs, their comfort level simply needs to be evaluated for the entire journey – no excuses. I would never do it – I don’t even know who would? I know of people who are so (mis)guided by religions that teach animals have no soul – consequently find no cruelty in their actions. “It’s just a dog.” Sorry, but over and over again I have found that religion and ignorance are quite often parters.
Posted by: Libratine | June 28, 2007, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
This is an outrage. How could anyone do this and think that it was acceptable?
You would have to be insane — or a very unfeeling persone.
John
Posted by: John Natali | June 28, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
So, that’s it? This is news? Please, quit wasting everyone’s time trying to dig up 25 year old dirt on this guy. This has nothing to do with his qualifications to be president.
Posted by: MB | June 28, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Good Lord –it was 25 YEARS AGO PEOPLE!! Is this how far you have to dig to get good dirt these days? Man…Hillary will be in BIG trouble.
Posted by: Ann B | June 28, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Bush, when governor, shot one of the Texas birds which was on the Endangered List. Reaction: He thought it was funny.
Posted by: Betsy | June 28, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
all you animals lovers out there that are condemning romney probably have done a lot worse than this morally and otherwise. the media really had to dig and go way back to find something on him.
Posted by: pgriggs | June 28, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
I’m a dem but I agree this is ancient history. But honestly, how many republicans brushing this off as happening 25 years ago we’re screaming along with the Swift Boat ads attacking Kerry?
Posted by: TPF | June 28, 2007, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Come on people…we’ve all done stupid, hurtful things, either ignorantly or intelligently, to animals at one time or another in our lives. Don’t cut the man short b/c he’s certainly not the only person who’s ever done this before. No one is righteous, no one.
Posted by: Leslie | June 28, 2007, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
If this was Clinton that did it or any other Liberal, it wouldn’t have been a story…..give it up..
25 years ago….TOO FUNNY. If our Liberal media served a positive purpose like FOX NEWS does like reporting eminent domain abuse they would gain a little respect from viewers
Posted by: Freddie | June 28, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
At least if people are talking about this we aren’t talking about how Romney avoided the Vietnam draft and how none of his five sons serve in the military (but he’s for staying in Iraq).
Posted by: Dan | June 28, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Nothing upsets me more than animal abusers. I am not a militant, though I think they should be treated the same as murders and child abusers.
Though I am not surprised, it takes a criminal to be part of our criminal government, and obviously Mitt is a criminal. Most mormans are, however, either they are criminals or brainwashed slaves. I know, cause I lived with them for years.
Wake up sheeple!
Posted by: Octavia | June 28, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
I’m sure his thoughts were something like this……yeah I’ll put the dog in the car….no, on the roof….no in the car is better….but the roof will make more room. Just another example of his flip flopping around on what he does vs. what he says.
Posted by: TimTom | June 28, 2007, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
All you folks who think that this story in irrelevant because it happened 25 years ago and because it was “just a dog” are missing the point. If the man has total disregard for the life of an animal how much regard is he going to have about the lives of human beings. Regardless of who long ago it was cruelty is cruelty and I would not want a man in the White House who would engage in such cruelty.
Posted by: BGF | June 28, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
25 years ago? Yes he was wrong to do so.
But its over done and over 2 1/2 decades ago.
Posted by: brett | June 28, 2007, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Although it was over two decades ago and cruel to the dog consider him fortunate that he didn’t have to listen to all this Moron’s (sorry, Mormon’s)inevitable political pap. What’s a scatological?. Should I use Deet on it?
Posted by: Ozarkhobo | June 28, 2007, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
did Ghouliani’s wife staple it to the car?
Posted by: Mary Lou Hamm | June 28, 2007, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
I suspect those animal-rights people who are the most upset are probably “Pro-Choice” activists as well.
Posted by: Mike | June 28, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
for the love of god how many years ago was it… 25?? Does our media have nothing better to report on? how about those 5 seniors that died in a horrible car crash this week?? Maybe he tortured an ant with a magnifiing glass when he was 5 lets write about that too.
Posted by: Kelly | June 28, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
I usually strap 6 or 7 mangy mutts to my vehicle every road trip I take!
Posted by: FurTrader | June 28, 2007, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
How the heck is this even considered news? Folks, I’m a dog-lover and I am no Romney fan, but this happened TWENTY-FIVE YEARS AGO. People change! This has no bearing on Romney the candidate today!
Jeez, is this what this upcoming election is going to be like?
Posted by: Joe Simmons | June 28, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
It was long ago and it was thoughless, cruel and stupid. If this kind of treatment of animals is OK with you, then you’re a jerk too. HOWEVER, this has nothing to do with rendering public policy decisions that affect millions of human lives. There are so many other GOOD reasons NOT to vote for this guy.
Posted by: Tony | June 28, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
The dog, what about all the flies and mosquitoes that ended up on the grill and windshield.
Posted by: DJ | June 28, 2007, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
I used to burn ants with a magnifying glass 25 years ago, so my chances for running for president are over.
Posted by: Paul | June 28, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Hmmm… he sounds VERY Republican to me….
not much sense, and very aggressive and down right STUPID solutions.
Posted by: Dismal Leadership DOOMS US | June 28, 2007, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
I think that what the story says is inappropriate. Let’s think about this. Where is our source from? probably those people who don’t want him to succeed. Is it credible? Where has the writers got the information? If it is true than why wasn’t he taken to court by the animal rights group. Maybe if we can see the evidence it would give a logically clear view of his character. Who knows what really happened?
Posted by: Kin | June 28, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Romney, lets crucify Clark Griswald for dragging a dog that was tied to his bumper
Posted by: DJ | June 28, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I don’t see the problem. Dog’s like it outside. People roll down their windows and let the dogs breath the outside air. Its in a dog crate for crying out loud…the dog is fine. Give me a break. You people act like he strapped a baby to the top of the car…
I would have no problem strapping a dog to the top of my car.
Posted by: scott | June 28, 2007, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Is it not good to strap animals to the top of a moving car?? My neighbor,s been doing it to their kids for years, and they Love it!!!!
Posted by: Kris B. | June 28, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Ha. Not surprised. Romney is a snake oil salesman, and if this country is buying what he’s selling.. we are in more trouble than I thought.
Posted by: Katie | June 28, 2007, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Common ABC….get back to the important stuff. You dropped Paris for THIS ??? ;-)
Personally I would have ridden on the roof & let the dog drive; that would have been the ‘humaine’ thing to do.
Posted by: Mac | June 28, 2007, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Hey everyone, get over it and get a life.
Posted by: Alan | June 28, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Republicans like torture, so this story probably will endear Romney to the “base.”
Posted by: dartagnan | June 28, 2007, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
For those not residing in the peoples’ Republic of Massachusetts, please try to understand – the Boston Globe is a propaganda newsletter of the American Socialist Party,(They call themselves Democrats) You cannot believe anything they write about republicans.
Posted by: C.Reed | June 28, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Is Mitt going to strap the American people to the roof of his philosophical car and drive us to Armageddon?
Posted by: sandra l | June 28, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
And by the way…how many defenders are Mormons with their own agendas?
Posted by: sandra l | June 28, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Sandra, if he does it would be a fun and prosperous ride
Posted by: DJ | June 28, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Many of you act like he strapped the dog to the bumper for crying out loud. I’m taking my cat on a 1100 mile trip starting tonight and he’ll have to ride in the cab of my tiny truck. This poor cat will be forced to endure 17 hours of loud music and conservative talk radio! I know, that’s criminal!
Posted by: Tony | June 28, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
I wasn’t voting for him anyway because he a Mormon. Now I see that his stupidity goes beyond believing fairy tales.
Posted by: Tom G | June 28, 2007, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
A big mistake that I am sure he regrets today. I hope I , and all of you are not held accountable for every mistake in judgment we made 25 years ago.
Thank goodness we all grow up and become wiser
Posted by: mfree | June 28, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Why would Tagg Romney, who was 12 at the time it happened, choose to tell this story about his father?
Posted by: Dan | June 28, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Dangerous, not really. Insensitive, again, not really. Safer than letting them ride in the seat without restraints, yes. Stressful for the dog, maybe for a minute or two, but no different than putting them in the carrier and putting the carrier in the back of the car, or the bed of a truck. Having a dog jump the seats and cause the driver to lose control is far more dangerous to the occupants of the car, and the dog, than putting the dog in a secure car top carrier. What if the straps came loose, broke or something? I once had a guy turn in front of me at 40 miles an hour because his dog jumped into his lap. Totaled my car and left me with a knee that has never been the same. What if there was a car wreck, or a plane fell on the car, or a train hit it, or the sky fell and the ground evaporated into a burning pit of fire? Get a grip. When people start worrying over a dog more than they worry over humans, I have to question their objectivity. Feed the hungry, clothe the naked, house the homeless and cure the diseased first, then I’ll listen to your whining and crying about a dog. Grow up and learn to focus on what is important. When you fall for mud slinging and campaign smear tactics like this, you only show just how gullible you really are.
Posted by: RL | June 28, 2007, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
He flipped a coin and Tagg won. He is the lucky one
Posted by: DJ | June 28, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I was going to vote for Hillary, but now I am going to vote for Mitt. He took his dog on vacation instead of dumping him at a kennel, he obviously loves animals.
Ever see a dog that liked Hillary? They don’t they run from her. I wonder why.
Posted by: Lifer democrat | June 28, 2007, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
There is nothing I like more then riding upon my owners car roof. Usually he sticks me in the front seat of his car where I have to poke my head out the window. I enjoy riding on that roof, as do all my friends, cats included. Rover
Posted by: Rover | June 28, 2007, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Some people treat the family pet as if they are a member of the family.
I hope that registered voters who either have a loved one enlisted or are active military pay attention here:
No matter how you spin it, this shows a reckless disregard for life…..and he IS pro-life now, right?
Posted by: loretta | June 28, 2007, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Not as bad as Bill Frist adopting and killing cats.
Posted by: Watson | June 28, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
An Irish Setter has long hair and enjoyes the wind and outdoors. Mitt could find a no better place for the dog’s happiness amd comfort to travel than a high spot in the open air. Mitt was doing just right as far as I can see. Most of the dum idiots are the writers above.
Chet
Posted by: Chester | June 28, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
You people are idiots. I don’t care who the candidate is. I’m far more concerned about the dumb things they’re doing NOW than something dumb they did 25 YEARS AGO!
Posted by: Jim | June 28, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Please, this was 25 years ago. What did YOU do 25 years ago that we can put in the headlines for all to read. You who point the finger are guilty of the same. Shame on you! Give me a break.
Posted by: John | June 28, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
what a jerk…no vote from me, nor anyone that i know after i forward this page to their email addresses.
Posted by: bev | June 28, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
something done 25 years ago should be forgotten? what’s the matter with you? figure out how old he was at the time & then think about it.
Posted by: bev | June 28, 2007, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Transporting an animal like this is illegal in the state of MA so apparently someone at some point determined that it was cruel and passed a law. You can’t let a dog ride in the back of your truck either.
FYI: vets recommend you don’t let your dog put their head out the vehicle window either – they can get all kinds of foreign matter in their eyes.
Posted by: Sarah | June 28, 2007, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Man that would have been hilarious to see that sight coming down the road
Posted by: krotch | June 28, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
I can see that the Democratic party is desperate to destroy this man, so they paid their operatives to find something that they could destroy him on.
Posted by: frank | June 28, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
This is just part and parcel of the self-inflicted “legendary” status Romney confers on himself. Anyone who would treat a dog like that can’t be expected to treat humans any better.
But, if you’d like another example, when he was running for governor of Massachusetts (a job he lied to get and a job he couldn’t wait to get away from each week so he could go nuzzle “honies” (southern voters) in the Red States), he and his wife Ann gave a press conference. She was asked about her health (she has MS). She began to talk about she felt that her health would be better served if they stayed in Utah. At that moment Mitt leaned over and told her to shut up, in front of reporters. He was threatening and unfriendly as he did it. That action told me right then and there that Mitt Romney did not give a damn about his wife’s health if it interfered with his political ambitions. He did NOT get my vote and he does not deserve anyone else’s. If you’ve been fooled by his good looks and rhetoric, then you seriously need to rethink what it is that you find important in a president. Frankly, a man who abuses his wife verbally, deserts his job, then lies about how he accomplished so much while he was actually out courting other voters (while ignoring the folks at home) is nothing more than a straying spouse (or one who needs “Big Love”).
Be forewarned: this man is not who he wants you to think he is. Just ask Ann and Seamus.
Posted by: dejah | June 28, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
My name is Prince and I am President of AWEROVR (Animals Who Enjoy Riding On Vehicle Roofs). Please stop this nonsense right now. Most of my dog and cat friends have fought for years to get up on that roof and now you are trying to stop those years of struggle. Getting up there, with our tongues hanging out…..well, it’s something you have to try. I, and my French Poodle Friend, Moni-ami, are both DD’s (Democratic Dogs) but if we could vote, it would be for this Rommney guy.
Posted by: Prince | June 28, 2007, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Romney’s own son Tagg told the Boston Globe this in an interview.
Posted by: Sarah | June 28, 2007, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
see i dont see the big deal, if you put enough duct tape down, there is no way a dog or any animal can fall off the roof while your driving, ive tried it millions of times
Posted by: krotch | June 28, 2007, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
It’s both funny and sad to read the comments and find the ones who stick up for even the most asinine behavior like this. While I’m no fan of Mitt I had no idea he was this much or a cruel moron.
As for those willing to accept almost anything that happened 25 years ago. Where was Mitt by 1982? Let’s read his bio:
Mitt Romney received his B.A., with Highest Honors, from Brigham Young University in 1971. In 1975, he was awarded an MBA from Harvard Business School, where he was named a Baker Scholar, and a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School.
From 1978 to 1984, Mr. Romney was a Vice President at Bain & Company, Inc., a leading management consulting firm.
Wow, no slacker. Harvard MBA and law school grad and VP of a management firm. So it’s not like he’s some immature party-animal trying to get off the bottle back then, sorry if that remark resembles our current President.
Nope, Mitt is a pretty cruel dude.
Posted by: Bill | June 28, 2007, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Needless to say this is all hear say. Has any one given any consideration or time for Mr. Romney to answer these charges. I am afraid that I will not vote for Mr. Romney based on his out look on certain issues which are facing this country right now. Not on something which susposibly happened 25 years ago. I would suggest people to get Mr. Romney’s side of the story so you can get all the facts.
Posted by: Anthony Hess | June 28, 2007, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Come on…Are we really looking to judge Mitt Romney off of something that happened 25 years ago? Look at the issues not some retarded liberal propaganda.
Posted by: Tom | June 28, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
1) Romney was too cheap to put the family pet in a local dog kennel for care, which rationale people who love their pets do when they travel.
2) And he certainly didn’t consider the “family pet” family, by sticking it on the roof.
3) Mormons like Romney believe that a God had physical sex in the flesh with Mary to conceive Jesus, and Jesus now lives in Arizona with 24 wives, and that the Jews established large cities in America before Columbus, of which there is now no archeological evidence to support, and Romney believes one day he too will be his own God like God and Romney will rule a universe or a planet like Earth as a God himself…and have sex with his female subjects like his God did with Mary . . .well then I think he is crazy, besides arrogant.
Posted by: Snoopy hang on! | June 28, 2007, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
I interpret this as somebody with ingenuity and problem solving skills. No space in the car…put the dog on the roof…problem solved! I’d rather vote for a risk taking problem solver than a do-no-wrong dweeb.
Posted by: Kozman | June 28, 2007, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
His magic underwear made him do it, that and a boatload of ignorance.
Posted by: Sister Evangeline | June 28, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
HOW FUNNY IN USA IST LEGAL TO TORTURE PEOPLE. BUT BIG OUTRAGE WHEN U TORTURE DOGS. PHONEY PEOPLE.
Posted by: ragouman | June 28, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
I like the Romney apologists here. It’s great to defend a nitwit who has reversed his positions on essentially EVERY issue just to be considered suitable by the political establishment for a presidential bid. Strapping dogs to the roof of cars is not something that sane people do; then again, sane people probably aren’t Mormon, either.
Posted by: J. | June 28, 2007, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
“Tagg Romney commandeered the way-back of the wagon” meaning there was plenty of room inside the car for the dog. I’ve been traveling with pets for almost 20 years and I never, never, never would have done this. Not yesterday, not 20 years ago. Those who can excuse this in wany way, shape or form are immoral.
Posted by: Free Bird | June 28, 2007, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
I guess the dog was either a rehablitated felon hoping for clemency or an advocate against global warming! This Romney guy is a pompous politial jackass! How in the world did he manage to be governor of Massachusetts?
Posted by: Leonardo | June 28, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
He’s mean.
Posted by: Debra | June 28, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
I wish people cared as much about inhuman treatment of other people as they do about animals.
Posted by: KHS | June 28, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Whenever my family went on vacation, Dad would put the suitcases on the rear floor board and cover them with a pallet making them level with the rear seat in our 1953 Buick. We kids would lay down and sleep during the drive. Wasn’t that horrible? No seat belts, no car seats, a situation that would be deplorable and illegal today but no one was the wiser in the 1950′s. In this situation regarding Romney and his dog, the real question would be, “What would he do today?”. What if we judged Ted Kennedy’s actions at Chappaquiddick by today’s standards? Wait, I’m sorry – that was a bad example.
Posted by: Granpa | June 28, 2007, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
40 years ago my mom and dad made me stand between them in the front seat of our car with no safety straps at all, and back then car dashes were made of steel. Things like that were common back then, a dog in a kennel carrier on the roof 25 years ago was no big deal, Heck a dog in a carrier on the roof yesterday would be no big deal. **News Flash** Dogs like all that air.
Posted by: tony | June 28, 2007, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
So here’s a question for you. Who would you prefer to see strapped to the roof of a car for a 12 hour ride, an irish setter or Ann Coulter?
Posted by: jane jetson | June 28, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
What is with the ridiculous elongation of time? The man was an adult 23 years ago so his actions then are an undeniable indicator of his character.
Dogs are domesticated mammals that would be incredibly frightened in a cage on the roof of a vehicle traveling 50-70 mph for hours at a time. If Romney’s attitude remains the same towards the treatment of a family pet, it is no wonder the man maniacally proclaimed that he wants to “DOUBLE” Guantanamo. He’s most likely unable to feel empathy and wholly ignorant of expert opinion regarding geo-political blowback.
Posted by: Isome | June 28, 2007, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Absolutely disgusting. Look at the GOP ’08 candidates. This idiot, Giuliani who hires a crackhead and then a racist to run his SC campaign and McCain who is the last one on Earth who thinks that Iraq is a good thing. What kind of insanity are we dealing with here? Oh yeah, the GOP. Sad. USA deserves far far better.
Posted by: ethan | June 28, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Hey Isome: have you ever seen fear in the eyes of a dog in the back of a pickup truck doing 70mph? No you haven’t
Posted by: tony | June 28, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Mary Ann and Tony,
I hope neither of you has a dog and if you do, i hope someone takes it from you. would you strap your freaking child to the top of your car. Well, you both probably would. Most intelligent people would not because there is a chance they could go flying off or worse if there is an accident and the car rolls on top of the dog. Same goes for dogs in the back of trucks. that is just negligent as well!
Posted by: Carah | June 28, 2007, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Hey Tony, are you unable to tell the difference between the BED OF A TRUCK and the ROOF OF A CAR?! huh’?
I didn’t think so.
The larger part of this issue, however, is that the man demonstrated a lack of common sense by that neandrathal act made in the early NINETEEN EIGHTIES (if the 23 year date is correct). It was NOT common to see dogs locked in their kennels and strapped to the roof of a vehicle. I wish people would NOT make things up.
We’re not talking about the 30′s, 40′s, 50′s or 60′s even. We’re talking about the RECENT past.
Posted by: Isome | June 28, 2007, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
I think that’s the year Blade Runner came out.
Posted by: gregsolo | June 28, 2007, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Do we know if this really happened? OMG who the hell cares, I’m sure all of you people being critical have not done anything 25 years ago that might have offended people. If this was Hillary you would be saying “great job, letting the dog feel free and getting it fresh air instead of it being cooped up in the car for 12 hours, she has my vote…”. The only reason you people are upset is because of who did it not what they did.
Posted by: Jeff | June 28, 2007, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
I’m a Democrat and I’m not voting for Romney anyway. Still, this whole dog thing doesn’t seem like that big a deal.
Posted by: Jack Bridges | June 28, 2007, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Speaking of animal cruelty, in all the discussion about health care, I’d like to hear candidates’ positions on the use of animals in research and what they’ve done to support/create incentives for alternative models. Animals make good stories, but let’s see coverage of a more comprehensive animal topic such as federal research funding of animal tests.
Posted by: Jill O. | June 28, 2007, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Most people will not change their vote because of the story. I certainly will not because frankly I find Mormons to be absolute strange. Polygamy? Special underwear (perhaps blessed by Mr. Smith himself)? Some secret tabernacle/church/whatever that they can only go to after being invited and then never talk about being in it?
It’s commonly understood that people without compassion towards animals lack compassion towards humans.
Mitt sees nothing wrong with strapping a dog kennel to the roof of a car in the 1980′s and traveling for hours at a minimum of 50 mph, hence Mitt’s desire to DOUBLE Guantanamo.
Posted by: Isome | June 28, 2007, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
25 years ago – not yesterday people. Do you know what Bush and Clinton were doing 25 years before they got elected?
Posted by: finny | June 28, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
To All who wrote in to tell everyone who was appalled at this story that “its just a dog” – “get a grip” and other comments – have ya all heard of “I speak for those who can’t.”
Posted by: Traeh79 | June 28, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
OMG!! You people are idiots..For one thing has this story been confirmed?? It says “according to the Boston Globe”, like they don’t have an agenda! Have a nice day!
Posted by: Whatever | June 28, 2007, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Isome,
Do you see the irony? You are concerned about how Romney treated his dog 25 years ago. But you also have no problem in bashing Mormons and spreading information that is taken out of context or just plain wrong.
Posted by: JM | June 28, 2007, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Bad decision. Even 23 years ago there were kennels to keep dogs in while you went on vacation.
Posted by: Marty | June 28, 2007, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Isome: Do you think the dog cares if it’s on the roof of a car or the bed of a truck? Ears a flappin’ tongue hangin’ out, drool a drippin’, a dog doesn’t care!
Posted by: tony | June 28, 2007, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Carah: Tony owns a cat, and I’m taking my it on a 1100 mile trip starting tonight and he’ll have to ride in the cab of my tiny truck. This poor cat will be forced to endure 17 hours of loud music and conservative talk radio! I know, that’s criminal isn’t it?!
Posted by: tony | June 28, 2007, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
And to all of you who have posted here and who think any of this is funny, then you are just as sick and worthless as Mitt Romney. No wonder the world is in the toilet!!!
Posted by: lousgirl | June 28, 2007, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
This type of attack was already predicted. Next will be: FRED THOMPSON HITS DEFENSELESS DEER WITH CAR TO AVOID KILLING 3 YEAR OLD.
Posted by: Bill | June 28, 2007, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Like none of you shocked and dismayed people ever did anything stupid and senseless. It happened 25 years ago. Gimme a break. Liberal whiners.
Posted by: JOHN | June 28, 2007, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
The point was made earlier about how horrible this was. Did the dog complain/file a law suit? NO, the dog was absolutely thrilled to be with the family, how he got there was not a concern to him. Remember there was a windshield for the dog
Posted by: DJ | June 28, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Anyone else find it funny that the dog’s name is SEAMUS (Shame-us?)
Posted by: bill | June 28, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
How many of us exercised less than sound or compassionate judgment when we were younger? This is a non-story.
Posted by: Joe Cottam | June 28, 2007, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
It appears it would have been much better for him if he had driven his dog off a bridge and left it for dead. Less political fall-out, and all that.
I love animals and don’t think this was cruelty.
Posted by: Dot | June 28, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
The dog peed probably because it was up there 12 hours. We take horses in trailers to shows all the time. What’s the difference??? Why are liberals soooo freakin stupid???
Posted by: Russ | June 28, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Bill Clinton also had a dog named Seamus and it was killed by a car.
Posted by: Dot | June 28, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
I guess you were young and immature, but knowing this, I still could never vote for you. Do you realize your mistake now? How would you like to be put in a cage on top of a car for 12 hours on the highway???????? Just think of the sheer insensitivity- the fright, the noise, the smell; I can’t believe your wife went along with it. I demand a public apology. Dawn Aura
Posted by: dawnaquamarine | June 28, 2007, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Don’t vote for him… For anything (even clam warden). This is old news, the dog is surely dead by now, but this story does reinforce the idea that this guy just is a rotten human being. Please folks, lets talk about todays issues and where this empty suit stands. The last pretty boy with ‘populist appeal’ has put this country into a stinking mess that will take a generation to resolve. Let’s leave this one at the Ritz, with his own kind, where he can do no damage.
Posted by: knuckles | June 28, 2007, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
This is just MOTS where the GOPs are concerned. Shrub used to delight in placing lit firecrackers in the mouths of live frogs and watching the poor creatures explode. And the ever gentle Dr. Bill Frist has admitted to “adopting” cats from animal shelters and using them to experiment on.
And we all know about the torture at Abu Ghaib & Gitmo!
Apparently, there’s something in the GOP water.
Posted by: Elaine | June 28, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
If the dog didn’t like it on the roof, why didn’t he just say so? Wait, dogs can’t talk! Wait, dogs aren’t even human! What the heck is going on here? From what people are writing, it looks like there are many nitwits that think they’re on the same level as humans. Get real, people. Dogs are dogs, not people!
Posted by: k9p | June 28, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Yes it was mean and dumb, but it was also 25 years ago. Isn’t here more recent poop on his roof?
Posted by: pat | June 28, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
For those of you who say “it is just a dog” that is correct only to a point…bottom line is Seamus was a family pet…our pets are part of our family and we have a responsibility to treat them as such…you do not strap a family member to the roof of your car…so for those of you who feel this is okay I hope you do not have pets.
Posted by: Donna | June 28, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Do people actually believe everything reported by Boston Globe and ABC news? I am sure that most of the “he lost my vote” posts on here are not even real.
I am amazed that out of all noteworthy news that could discredit Romney, the Dem hit men at BG and ABC concocted a 25-year non-story. Give us a real hit job will ya!!!!
I am expecting to hear next that Romney is not fit to be the president because about 60 years ago he was wetting his bed.
Posted by: krimchik | June 28, 2007, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
You people that equate dogs with humans when it comes to strapping them in their cage to a roof are probably also the ones that have no problem with their dog pooping on my lawn. If dogs should be treated like people, perhaps they should be incarcerated for pooping outside. And how would you like it if I had my two-year-old son come over and poop on your lawn?
Posted by: k9p | June 28, 2007, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Does he still have the dog?
Posted by: Brian O'Brien | June 28, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Don’t worry. You’ll see Hillary Clinton naked on a pack of Twinkies before you see this guy in the White House. Relax, many problems lay ahead. Mitt at most will be appointed ambassador to Utah. It is there he can do the most good.
Posted by: DD | June 28, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Oh give me a break people. Yeah, he was really being cruel.
Would I do it, no. But jeez. It IS more dangerous for a dog to be hanging out the window…every year dogs get sucked out of cars or fall out during a hard brake, or whisked from the back up pickup trucks. A dog that jumps onto the driver can also create an accident.
We put our dog in a special doggie carrier when we traveled on the airplane. I am sure the dog did not like that, and she usually peed in there. But she was no worse for wear.
Grow up people.
Posted by: Thomas ANderson | June 28, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Strapping Hillary to a car roof……hmmmmmm……..and the problem is…….?
Posted by: Steve | June 28, 2007, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
What a complete, utter and clueless fool. And some of you clowns are defending what he did. Shows you low right wingers will stoop, don’t it? Get used to the fact that America is done with the GOP for the next century.
Posted by: yankee | June 28, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Can you imagine the “outrage” and hysterics that Fox, CNN and the hundreds of rightwing talk radio shows would be feigning if this were about a Democrat? Republicans have shown that a lie that can get tens of thousands of people killed is preferable to a lie about a sexual encounter as long as it is done by a Republican. Hell, if Clinton were a Republican, what he did would probably even be shrugged off by the base. What a sad pathetic bunch of hypocrites!
Posted by: John | June 28, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
The faux-outrage from the leftwingers is predictable, I suppose. Well, let’s find out if it was legal to carry a dog in a pet carrier on the roof of his car in 1982. I have a hazy memory that the feds began requiring pet restraints in pickup beds back in the mid-80s, but since I didn’t have a pickup truck I didn’t pay much attention to it. Heck, somebody fnd out if it’s legal to carry your dog in a roof-carrier today.
In 1992 Bill Clinton got hammered because he smoked dope in college and lied about it when asked. Ever since lefties have left no rock unturned looking for dirt to throw at Republican politicians in retaliation. They’re not mature enough to admit that it was a fair hit: Clinton DID do illegal drugs and he got caught lying about it. Nothing they dredge up will ever change that. Now they’re shocked – “SHOCKED, I SAY” at something Romney did 25 years ago that may have been legal and common practice then (and might even be legal and common practice today!).
Posted by: Orion | June 28, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
If Romney had strapped his illegal Mexican maid to the roof for the drive to Canada, now THAT would be a story. The dog 25 years ago is a TOTAL NON STORY. The real story is that there are college graduates who hold down full-time jobs that are so unable to rationally analyse a set of facts that they would be outraged by this non-story. How embarrassing. No wonder Islam will kick the crap out of this country for many years to come!
Posted by: Justin | June 28, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
I am shocked! REALLY SHOCKED…at the overreaction to this non-story. The sanity of this country seems to be at an all-time low.
And for the record: for protecting his kids from a 12-hour car trip with a smelly dog I am changing my vote from Hillary to Romney.
Posted by: Jim | June 28, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Justin: I think you mean “analyze” and nothing to be embarrassed about when having an opinion. The issue is strapping the dog to a car not slamming those who post their opinions.
Posted by: College Graduate | June 28, 2007, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
I am no Romney fan, but the story seems thin at best. I guess its just another slow news day at ABC?
It is so sad that this kind of garbage passes for news today. Please tell me that you checked the sources out for this story beyond copying it from the Boston Globe…
Posted by: jim jones | June 28, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Umm straying a bit off topic Orion, and using this to divide people into 2 camps, i.e. liberal democrats and conservative republicans is pointless. Every response you can imagine is represented here regarding this story. Labeling people is not relevant.
Regarding your comments about Bill Clinton, I doubt any “left winger” cares if he smoked pot or got high, or would be mad at anyone for revealing it. If you think Democrats are taking revenge for that, you are naive. No one in this country needs to “look under a rock for dirt to throw” at Republicans. Read any newspaper, there is plenty of dirt.
Posted by: SeattleMavyn | June 28, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
I’m not sure I get this either. There’s no bigger animal advocate than I am but if this was done responsibly, I don’t see the issue.
Posted by: Karenna | June 28, 2007, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
SeattleMavyn: Umm, you may not have noticed that Yankee did the dividing you’re accusing Orion before Orion did. Kind of selective of you, don’t you think?
Posted by: Graduate School Educated | June 28, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Well, he didn’t show any more stupidity or insensitivity than the current WH occupant… he could be a strong GOP candidate!
Posted by: L | June 28, 2007, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Sad to see how Americans make a big deal about a big ruckus made 25 years ago, whether it’s smoking a joint during college that cost Douglas Ginsberg the Supreme Court or Mitt putting a dog on the roof, it always becomes juicy when someone’s up for election. Amazing though if someone cheats on his wife while in office, it’s no big deal.
Posted by: Jonathan | June 28, 2007, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
He is a total alien – creepy from head to toe – this story doesn’t shock me in the slightest.
Posted by: RO | June 28, 2007, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
give me a break, if this is all the “dirt” that can be dug up on the guy then he’s got my vote.
btw. my lahso opso loves riding on my motorcycle with me. she’s tethered to my chest, and just loves the ride.
so for that i can’t run for public office.
Posted by: miles douglass | June 28, 2007, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
The use of the word “strapped” by the Boston Globe conjures up images of poor Fluffy being hog tied and suffering. Just as they intended. Mitt is Gov of Mass, and all the politics that entails, and the BG is running this now. Would this be news if it read,”Romney transported dog on car roof.”
Posted by: Matthew | June 28, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
This confirms my opinion that he’s an idiot.
Posted by: Amanda | June 28, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
For all the knuckleheads out there that are defending his actions, I would like to see how yoiu would feel about being stuck in a cage, strapped to the roof of a moving vehicle, driven down the highway at high speeds for hundreds of miles and hours on end. I am a Republican and from Massachusetts – HE JUST LOST MY VOTE!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Shelby | June 28, 2007, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Anyone that can be that cruel to a animal cannot be trusted. I know that was a long time ago but he should have known better especailly with his children in the car. That is not saying too much on how he raised his children.
Posted by: hatchville1964 | June 28, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
what is it with Republicans and animal torture? Former Senator Bill Frist “adopting” cats in need of good homes just to dissect them, Rudy Giuliani’s wife’s work in puppy vivisection for the pharmaceutical industy, and now this? Now that torture is legal for humans, just think what fun they’ll have if they win in ’08.
Posted by: not amused | June 28, 2007, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
ok, I pose this question to all you people who are up in arms about this, if you grew up in the 1970′s and early 80′s, should we go around and start prosecuting and arresting and fining all of your parents who let you ride int he back of a pickup truck? roll around in the back of a station wagon with the seats folded down? sit in the front seat with no seat belt on? ride a bicycle without a helmet? spanked a child as punishment? or any other number of things that are considered completely taboo nowadays.
Like other’s have said, the dog was in a carrier, strapped to the roof, with a special windshield built for it to protect it from most of the wind. It was summer time, not like it was winter and the dog froze or anything like that.
get over it, ridiculous this is even being reported, and even worse that it has a headline like it does.
Posted by: normalhuman | June 28, 2007, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Normalhuman, there is a huge difference between voluntarily riding in the back of a pick-up and being locked in a cage on top of a moving vehicle. I mean REALLY! You cannot be that stupid and heartless.
Posted by: Tiff | June 28, 2007, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Ridiculous reporting. Is this the grounds for maybe not voting for a well-qualified and experienced person for president? Do we need to feel ridiculous? Let’s see, he’s been governor of Mass. and ran the Olympics in his faith’s Mormon-founded state, but, this is what we aren’t supposed to base a vote for him on? Well, the reporters are the nuts!! I remember watching dogs just love their heads full force in the wind in the back of pickups when they could clearly sit down on their own and avoid the abuse. He probably thought the dog would love it up there. And, he’s talked about this incident or reporters wouldn’t know about it. He realized afterwards the dog didn’t like it and said he wouldn’t do that again. Say that!!!
By the way, MITT ROMNEY for PRESIDENT!!! He’s good and clean in his dealings business wise and you don’t hear Bostonians complaining up a storm about him!!!!
Posted by: MaryAnne Chasel | June 28, 2007, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Wow, if he treats his dog this way it makes me wonder how he’d treat the rest of Americans when he had them under his control. Scary. The sociopaths really are trying to take over the country.
Posted by: Wendy | June 28, 2007, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
When I read this article I thought the guy was a jerk. Then sitting around drinking a beer, I thought if somebody strapped Geroge Bush to the top of the car it wouldn’t bother me a bit. Haaa. I will have to meditate on this conundrum a bit.
Posted by: ZERO | June 28, 2007, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Next story: Mitt wore diapers, wet his bed and sometimes used a pacifier!!! (59 years ago).
Why do people focus on stories like this? We need a strong and honest leader for our country. In that regard, this is a nonstory.
Posted by: Dot | June 28, 2007, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
DJF. Read a newspaper or watch the news every now and then. Romney was voted out of office and MA is Kennedy country – Democratic!
Posted by: Tiff | June 28, 2007, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
boy …we do it all the time as humans..its called a convertible or ragtop…..how about a motorcycle….my dog would have loved it. BTW another article pointed out he tried to install a wind screen.
Posted by: dee | June 28, 2007, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Hey Dot. I really hope your not actually from Mass. He WAS NOT voted out of office! He did not run for re-election. If your going to post, get your facts straight. Oh wait, you probably are from MASS, democrat?!?!?!?!?
Posted by: Andy | June 28, 2007, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
I don’t have a real problem with it. I’m sure alot of these outraged people have done worse things.
Posted by: Jim | June 28, 2007, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Sorry Dot, I thought you made the Mass comment. It was TIFF. My last comment was directed at you TIFF!!!!!
Posted by: Andy | June 28, 2007, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Will someone please think of the children?
You people are arguing like leopards and seals! LIKE LEOPARDS AND SEALS. I just wish i had a dog.
Posted by: DingleDangle | June 28, 2007, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Where is the outrage about our soldiers being beheaded. Where is the outcry from the left. Please give me a break. 50 million + babies have been murdered in abortion mills…how about their torture.
Posted by: Rodney | June 28, 2007, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
who cares? it was a dog people not a human. get over yourselves people and over this story. 25 years ago people let their kids ride in the front seat of the car with no seat belt and there was no such things as air bags. this is a story that only moronic people will care about. would anyone do this now? probably not… but 25 years ago people did not treat their pet animals as they do now.
gotta go, puffy, my poodle, is having a snout job and doctors office just called and the snout job was a success!!! best in show here we come!!
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy | June 28, 2007, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
The line is very clear here. Either you recognize animal cruelty when you see it, or you’re a republican facing a psychotic break from the stress of not having a single viable presidential candidate to run in 08.
Posted by: Disgusted | June 29, 2007, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Breaking News kennedy drove drunk of a bridge and a human female was killed!
jail time zero.
elected 50 times
rich…you bet
Posted by: dw | June 29, 2007, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Just goes to show you what kind of a person this idiot is. I wouldn’t want someone like him running a local school board, never mind the whole country. His disgusting behavior extends to people as well as animals.
Posted by: rightone | June 29, 2007, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Who would vote for this jerk!?! You can learn alot about people from the way they treat their Mom, kids and animals. This guy’s a loser. Poor Seamus. We have a rooftop carrier for our car and sometimes the straps get loose and we have to tighten them. I feel uncomfortable with my luggage up there, I couldn’t imagine having an animal up there!
Posted by: VeggieMom | June 29, 2007, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Jake has forgotten how Mrs Clinton’s husband negligently let his dog ‘Buddy’ run wild to end up getting struck and killed by a car. I don’t recall PETA’s outrage at his failure to properly care for his dog.
Posted by: Wm Babbington | June 29, 2007, 1:16 am 1:16 am
How is this any different than riding in a convertable or the back of a pickup truck? I’ve seen plenty of animals riding like that. Actually a convertible or pickup may be even worse because the animal is unrestrained and can jump out. I remember loving to ride like that as a child and also being unrestrained because there was no law back then for it. My parents must have been monsters who hated me! Not!!! With the way the highways and society is today though, I wouldn’t let my kids do that because of the high speeds, heavy traffic and sick people who might harrass or be cruel to the exposed rider.
That said, do we know that Romney actually did that? I would never put MY pet on top of a vehicle because all the wind can’t be good for the eyes or ears and the straps could break. That’s just common sense for most people.
Posted by: Kathy H | June 29, 2007, 1:18 am 1:18 am
And of course Newkirk would just prefer the carrier was inside the car so it would be easier to gas the dog and throw its body into a dumpster at a shopping centre. After all, to PETA, the only ‘free’ animal is a dead one..
Posted by: PETAdoesntknowwhatethicalmeans | June 29, 2007, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Ok, so what is the difference between being locked in a container on the roof versus locked in a container in the back of the SUV or station wagon?
Either way he is confined to a small space and stuck in it.
What is the different between being in container on the roof or being able to walk around the back of a pickup truck? Or what if the container was in the back of a pickup truck?
People, no harm came to the dog, can we please remember that? Also, this was 25 years ago, times were a hell of a lot different, as I said in my last comment, there are a ton of things that are completely different today in society compared to 25 years ago. To condone a man for actions that are considered taboo in modern times, but not taboo and actually very common 25 years ago it foolish and a complete NON NEWS STORY.
and on a side note, I am from MA, and Mitt Romney can go for plenty of other reasons, this is hardly anything to be concerned about with him and it is disgusting the way this is being reported by ABC with a completely misleading sensationalized title to the story.
How bout we stick to the facts when deciding about a candidate, to say he would treat other humans or the poor badly because of how he treated a dog 25 years ago is asinine.
People go through life experiences and they learn from them, if no one screwed up once in awhile then this place would be pretty damn boring.
No one is perfect, and as it has been said already, I doubt there is a single one of you who hasn’t done something in your past that we could all choose to condemn you for your actions.
Posted by: NormalHuman | June 29, 2007, 2:18 am 2:18 am
I love convertibles! I drive with the top down all of the time. I do have a windshield. I have the top down in the heat of the day and the cool of the night.
I’ve even been caught in the rain on a drive with my mother with the top down. My children, grandchildren and dog love to ride in the back seat. I’ve had many road trips with the top down all day and especially at night!
I have to say my dog has never messed in the back seat of our convertible with the top down, however I did have a dog mess all over my grandfather’s shoe in the back seat of our car with the top up.
Gosh, I never thought a convertible was cruel. I’ll have to let the motorcycle drivers and convertible owners know this is a cruel way to travel.
I’m going to have to think about how I’ll let my dog know the bad news.
Posted by: Convertible lover | June 29, 2007, 2:26 am 2:26 am
People are worrying about some pooch when our president is sending young men out to be killed in the middle east?!
Posted by: Murray | June 29, 2007, 2:47 am 2:47 am
Anybody who knows anything about dogs knows they will NOT foul their own living area, their own “den” which is what a dog carrier is to the dog.
This story is utter BS.
Posted by: Don | June 29, 2007, 3:26 am 3:26 am
I love dogs and now there’s absolutely no chance of me voting for him
Posted by: John | June 29, 2007, 3:39 am 3:39 am
Im not sure what is more disturbing. The fact that Mitts dog soiled itself after 12 hours on the roof of a car, or that some people in America ever considered him a serious candidate.
Posted by: Hell no to Mitt | June 29, 2007, 4:23 am 4:23 am
There are two comments that need to be refuted that posters keep on repeating:
1. This is a bogus story.
No, this is a story that ROMNEY gave
the Boston Globe, an example of his
“problem solving” in dealing with the
dog poop.
2. This happened 20 some-odd years ago.
Yes, but Romney is using the story
as, again, an example of his genius.
Whether or not one is a dog lover, there is one thing that is known: dogs will generally not relieve themselves where they “nest”, unless they are left there for far too long, or unless they are extremely nervous. Neither case speaks well for Romney.
This story reminds me of Bill Frist bragging of how he used to buy cats and do medical training. If you don’t care about their actions, you might question their judgment in bragging about said actions.
Posted by: maxcat06 | June 29, 2007, 4:36 am 4:36 am
Many of the writters above are petty haters, or easily deceived.First of all it said the incident was 25 years ago. Second some of the complainers above must have reacted only to the headline dog tied to the roof. That is not what the article said. If the story is true the dog cage was tied on the top the station wagon the dog was safer that all the loose dogs in the back of pickup trucks in those days. It took strong laws in my state to require the dogs to be tied in with a short enough rope so they could not fall over the side and choke, and years to enforce it. Romney is a great man, and much better than every one of the Democratic Party Hopefuls. Also be careful of anything you read in the Boston Globe. It is very biased against Republicans.
Posted by: Don | June 29, 2007, 4:37 am 4:37 am
now if we could just take that idea and apply it to the sleazy muslims down in GITMO
Posted by: Petey | June 29, 2007, 5:04 am 5:04 am
Love the Liberals . .. . “Kill the babies, but don’t hurt a dog” btw – I thought we were not supposed to care about someone’s past? I guess that only applies to the Liberals. I thought “character didn’t matter”? Again I guess that only applies to the LIberals
Posted by: Errol Thomas | June 29, 2007, 5:52 am 5:52 am
Most of you people are basing whether or not he should be President on something that happened 25 years ago. If he had molested a child, raped a women or murdered someone I’d say you have a point. What he did was no different that hauling a horse in a horse trailer. Get over it and get a life.
Posted by: Crash | June 29, 2007, 6:19 am 6:19 am
This is all they ( the dems ) can come up with?
How about Teddys trip through the intercoastal waterways?
AT least the dog lived.
They’re love for that man allows their comfort zone to accept murder of a human being but a dog on a roof is high crimes.
The obvious obsurdity of the left will always make the silent majority chuckle.
Morons who keep these things in the public eye only defeat any real chances for change.
MikePrince
Posted by: Mike Prince | June 29, 2007, 6:45 am 6:45 am
Again, this is NOT a tabloid story…it was actually a story Mitt Romney told a reporter, apparently proud of his leadership abilities. The Boston Globe ran a multi-day series on Romney, and it was a very informative, extremely detailed piece.
Perhaps reading the story first might prove instructive.
It’s generally easier to comment on something when actually familiar with the source material…
Posted by: maxcat06 | June 29, 2007, 6:46 am 6:46 am
What – really – WHO did Ted Kennedy leave IN a car UNDER water 40 years ago? Really!
Posted by: kim | June 29, 2007, 7:38 am 7:38 am
The stupid piece of crap couldn’t even stop for a few minutes to walk the dog?
And he is running for president?
What a dickhead, he’s on vacation and he forces his dog to defecate in its crate. That is cruel behaviour toward a family pet.
This guy doesn’t deserve any public office.
Posted by: Pete | June 29, 2007, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Aproximetly 25 years ago while working as a securuity gaurd on a movie set, I met a young actress who I described as untalented and spoiled. Her name was Jullia Roberts. Guess I can’t be president either.
Posted by: DRUST | June 29, 2007, 8:46 am 8:46 am
I suspect that most of the “outraged” people posting here wouldn’t vote for Mitt anyway, so their opinions really don’t matter. If they really are basing their decision for president on this “issue”, then I would rather they forgo voting altogether. What will be the deciding factor – the side of the head the candidate parts their hair on?
I have learned many interesting things reading this sorry list of comments. For example, I have discovered that because of my religious views, I believe in fairy tales, am insane, absolutely strange, most likely a criminal and definately a brainwashed slave. My wife will be no doubt interested to know that I probably beat her every night.
I have also learned that somehow, Mitt attaching his dog to the top of his car, in a car carrier, with a windscreen attached to it is somehow equal to John Kerry’s actions and statements back in the Vietnam era. I have learned that if someone does something that you would not do, that doesn’t mean they made a different decision, it means they are an idiot.
I have learned that “dogs are humans too”, at least as far as some folks here are concerned. How far are you willing to take this analogy? Most dogs are on a leash when taken for a walk, live outside in a dog house or other such shelter, and are fed dog food regularly. Is this how you would treat your child? Then again, most of you would probably rather “vote for a yellow dog than vote Republican” anyway. Your choice, it’s a free country.
As for me, I haven’t decided yet who I support – the election is a year and a half away for crying out loud! But I know one thing; the decision will be made on much more weighty matters than putting a dog carrier on top of a car!
Posted by: John | June 29, 2007, 8:55 am 8:55 am
It was over 25 years ago, traffic and other things are lots more busier these days. I think it was a bit odd, but at least he took his pet with him. Dogs are seen standing around in the back of pick-up truck, right? At least the dog was in a carrier. I like dogs also, but comparing a dog to a human……come on.
Posted by: elizabeth | June 29, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Dumb move on his part, but do we really dismiss him as a viable candidate for something he did 25 years ago? I know people who MALICIOUSLY hurt animals and turned out to be upstanding citizens.
Posted by: Darrell | June 29, 2007, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Much more interesting is a story that ran in the Portland Press Herald “PAC donations from Utah raise doubts in Maine”, May6, 2007. http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/070506newdonor.html
“But the money didn’t come from a donor in Portland, Lewiston or Bangor. State records show that it came from a small city near Zion National Park in southwestern Utah, from a contributor listed as RECAF Inc.
What is RECAF Inc.? And why did it donate $250,000 to a political action committee established in Maine by the national Republican Governors Association?
There is no sign of any such company at the firm’s listed address. But the paper trail links RECAF to a controversial network of treatment centers for troubled teenagers affiliated with Robert B. Lichfield, a fundraiser for Republican Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign.
Lichfield, 53, describes himself on campaign disclosure forms as a self-employed consultant. But he’s more than that.
He’s also a trustee in the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, a Utah-based organization affiliated with residential youth treatment centers around the country and abroad. The association has been the defendant in multiple lawsuits alleging abuse of children, a charge the association has denied.”
“However, there are links between Lichfield and Romney, who last fall was chairman of the Republican Governors Association, the group whose Maine-based PAC received the $250,000 contribution from RECAF.
Romney’s job with the governors association included raising money on behalf of GOP gubernatorial candidates across the country.
Lichfield is now serving as co-chairman of the Utah finance committee for Romney’s presidential campaign, which has an early fundraising lead over the other GOP contenders.
In February, Lichfield helped organize a $1,000-per-plate breakfast for the former Massachusetts governor.”
You may want to hop over to ISAC = International Survivor Action Committee http://www.isaccorp.org/ and read about Mr. Lichfield here http://www.isaccorp.org/wwasps.asp
Then it is significant how Mitt Romney treated his dog, I think.
Posted by: Esli | June 29, 2007, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Also, this sounds like another political ploy to bash a pres. candidate; obviously, it’s working. Is there pics of this occurring? And don’t get mad at me, it’s just silly to make this public: did the dog die??? At least he could breathe.
Posted by: elizabeth | June 29, 2007, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Wow, you are a sad, sad bunch of people. Are you so self absorbed with yourselfs and your pets you let eat off of your plate you want to burn this man on a cross? Oh no! what if the straps come undone! Oh no! what if we spent our time doing something constructive, rather than buying our pets food that has better quality standards than the food over 1/3rd of the worlds pop. has to eat. Like half of the house wifes who posted here will vote anyways, give me a break.
Posted by: josh | June 29, 2007, 9:45 am 9:45 am
25 years ago? Is that the best dirt the lefties can dig up on Mitt?
Posted by: Roger | June 29, 2007, 9:48 am 9:48 am
He has simple, common-sense solutions. I can’t wait to see what excellent ideas he has for our illegal immigration problem. He’s got my vote!
Posted by: Steve | June 29, 2007, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Somebody ought to take Romney and strap him to the top of a car.
Posted by: Chris | June 29, 2007, 10:04 am 10:04 am
most of you people are a bunch of morons and shouldnt be allowed to vote just based on stupidity. This SUPPOSEDLY happenend 25 years ago,and without getting all the facts you start shouting ” im not going to vote for him now” Tell the truth liars, that you alway vote democrat anyway
Posted by: steve | June 29, 2007, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Come on, folks. This is taking “gotcha” journalism to an all new low. The most important words in this non-story were “25 years ago.”
Posted by: Krashkopf | June 29, 2007, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Romney hasn’t lost my vote because I would never vote for a Republican. But never the less anyone who would do such a thing is heartless if not downright cruel. Romney’s pretty boy looks and smooth talking BS won’t make up for that incident. Even the mindless morons who vote for a candidate because of their “likeability” can figure out that Romney is done.
Posted by: willrayu | June 29, 2007, 10:24 am 10:24 am
barking moonbats activate!! Didn’t the article say this happened 25 years ago. If you have to dig that far to find something to whine about, get a life already.
Posted by: Aaron | June 29, 2007, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Well, dogs love to travel with the window rolled down their head hanging out, anyway. I guess attacking his relegion is not enough or it is not working.I want to hear his side of the sotry before I condenm him on sg. happened 23 years ago.
The liberals must find him dangerous and there is not much they can go after.
He is the right man for the job!!!!! He still has my vote.
Posted by: judit | June 29, 2007, 10:31 am 10:31 am
How this guy has even come this far boggles the human mind !! He is an opportunist, he say’s and does things according to what the majority wants. It scares me to know how empty headed people are to allow him this far !!
Posted by: Ray | June 29, 2007, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Doesn’t sound any dumber than our previous two commanders in chief.
Posted by: blauschwein | June 29, 2007, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Reading the comments of those who defend Romney because it happened 25 years ago or other rationalizations to excuse him instead of questioning what kind of demented person would do such a thing clearly show them as members of the 28% who still support Bush/Cheney.
Posted by: willrayu | June 29, 2007, 10:41 am 10:41 am
This happened over 20 years ago! Give me a break! I’m not a Romney supporter in any way shape or form (I’d vote for Duncan Hunter in a heart beat!), however, I also know that we all have made stupid decisions in our lives at one time or another that could be ridiculed by some radical left wing group. Probably many of you who are bashing him for this stupid act have done things just as bad if not worse. In fact, I bet some of you voted for Bill Clinton–twice! That should require jail time! :)
Posted by: Chris | June 29, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Why didn’t the dog talk to the local police after he returned from the trip? The dog could have alerted his relatives or at least talked to an attorney! Good thing the dog is dead and the statute of limitations has run out.
Posted by: John | June 29, 2007, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I have always thought highly of and respected Mitt Romney but this incident, if true, is completely unacceptable. I am a strong conservative but I have no tolerance for anyone who could be so thoughtless and cruel to an animal.
Posted by: Sue | June 29, 2007, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Had to be stress that caused the dog to defecate. Couldn’t be that the dog just had to go.
Seems to be a biased conclusion.
Once I had to put a cat in a carrier. Put the carrier inside my car to go to the vet. The cat urinated. Must have “tortured” it.
Now I know.
Not sure how what he did is any different than putting a dog in the back of a truck or in a convertible with the top down.
Posted by: George | June 29, 2007, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Who cares! it’s just a mutt.
Posted by: brewtus | June 29, 2007, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Ummm. Who cares?
It was over 25 years ago, right?
I guess nobody has ever made a mistake before – especially one relating to their pets.
I guess I shouldn’t ever run for President – I used to jump on my dog’s back when I was 6. I thought it would be fun, not cruel.
Give me a break, morons. Those of you who can’t read or wouldn’t vote for him anyway – feel free to shut the hell up.
If he made the drive in a convertible, would it still be torture?
Is there anything in this article that implies or outright states that he didn’t let the dog out and/or take it for a walk or two during a stop?
And I own a dog. Sometimes, they go to the bathroom because they are scared. Sometimes, they use the bathroom because they can’t hold it anymore.
To imply that this is ‘torture’ is silly.
Go read the article – he had built a windscreen to shelter the dog from the wind. Likely, the dog just had to poop.
So Romney pulled over, washed the dog, car, and carrier, and went about his way.
Neo-hippie crap is what this is, not anything else.
Screw PETA – they kill more dogs than they save or help. They operate an incinerator that they use to burn dogs remains, after they poison them of course!
Grow up, losers.
If THIS is enough to sway your vote, you are an idiot who doesn’t deserve the right.
Posted by: Jeff | June 29, 2007, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Stupid? Yes. But the dog lived and it was 25 friggin years ago you morons. Plenty of people ride around with dogs in the back of their trucks. How is this worse. Yes, it ‘feels’ wrong, but the dog is in a secure spot. In the backof a truck, the dog could jump out. I have two dogs and wont be strapping a pet carrier to my roof. I also own a truck and they dont ride in the back. But thats MY choice. One dog is too old. And the other one is too dense and WOULD jump out. Otherwise I bet he’d get a real kick from riding in the back. (He’s a Lab)
Get a life my liberal friends. If you think Romney is stupid… just think… YOU are FAR dumber! And you dont even realize it!!!
Posted by: Ringo | June 29, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Sounds like fun. I wouldn’t mind being in a cage on the top of the car for a long ride. Quite enjoyable actually.
Posted by: Jason | June 29, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am
“Did this actually happen 25 years ago? If so, let it go”
OK, then stop bringing up Jesus.
But he died for your sins!
Yeah, it was a long time ago. Let it go.
Posted by: themq | June 29, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Well, just like GWB torturing animals when he was a kid, now Republicans are supporting another vicious animal hater for the Whitehouse.
Bush can torture humans now in Iraq and GITMO, cause that’s how those sociopaths progress, wonder how long its gonna take Mitt if he gets into office?
Isn’t one torturer president enough for this century?
Posted by: Pete | June 29, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
It really amazes me to read the ignorant comments out there. It seems that some people believe that dogs are unthinking blobs of flesh put here for our amusement and have no emotions or ability to comprehend their situation. For a family pet to suddenly be put on the roof of a car in a crate would be very traumatic indeed. The unrelenting noise of the wind whistling through the holes of the crate would be maddening. I believe that hearing lost would be a concern here. I happen to do research in the hearing field. I also own and show dogs, so I know a lot about them. Defecating is often a fear response as is vomiting. Besides. With the dog on the roof, how would he know if it needed a potty break? Stupid indeed.
Hey. As far as Mormons go. I wonder if those Christians out there understand that Mormons believe that only Mormons go to heaven. And that heaven to them is a planet called Kalob where God lives with his wife and family.
Posted by: Brad | June 29, 2007, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Which of you, 25 years ago, was not allowed to roam free in your parents car? If you were a parent, which of you allowed your children to roam free in the back of the car? We were allowed to sleep on the back window ledge of the car and climbed freely over the seats in the station wagon when we went on family trips. And who never rode in the back of a pick-up truck?
Restraints, car seats and seat belts weren’t given a second thought way back when.
So would that make your parents child abusers? Should the parents that allowed this behavior be imprisoned or financially punished for this child abuse?
So everyone who is a parent and allowed this kind of behavior from their children needs to voluntarily turn themselves in to local law enforcement so they can be charged with child abuse and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Posted by: Piper | June 29, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
I wouldn’t mind strapping a few liberals to roof for a tortuous ride for 500 miles or so, hell lets make it a thousand. I want to laugh so hard about people crying about something that happened 25 years ago to an animal. And apparently something that hasn’t happened since. Not that I care anything about Romney, but I guess you could say I care about liberal/treehugger/animalrights/babykilling liberals even less. People that can’t seem to get their values in order.
Posted by: Wireline | June 29, 2007, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Glorified lumber huggers commenting on this irritate me more than anything. I’ve traveled with my dog in a dog carrier and strapped to the roof of a vehicle is far safer than the idiot who is driving around with poochie in their lap or running around loose in the car.
His Mormon background and political beliefs might well limit his legitimate chance at the white house. Strapping a dog to the roof is like the last reason to not elect him.
Posted by: Sean | June 29, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Ringo you are asking far too much of a liberal when you say “think”. They feel they don’t think.
Posted by: Wireline | June 29, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
It appears that people don’t comprehend when they read, the article states this incident was 25 yrs ago.
Besides I wouldn’t trust ABC News with accurate reporting about Republicans.
I say show us a picture, only then I might consider it possible this actually happened.
Posted by: Frank | June 29, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Man will be judged on how he treats animals and the planet. A good man does NOT harm either. A good man does NOT think, “it’s a dog, get over it” or “it’s an animal”. That is the kind of people we DOM’T need living on this planet any longer.
Posted by: ANIMAL LOVER | June 29, 2007, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
I thought it was a rather stupid act. Why put’em on the roof when you can put’em in the trunk, or better yet, tie the dog to the bumper so it can get some exercise on the long boring trip.
Posted by: Hilllary | June 29, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
People need to know that how a person treats animals IS a very good indicator of the man himself. Bush participated in canned hunts. That is where he actually buys an old zoo animal such as a leopard and “releases” it into his fenced property and shoots it. Then he mounts it on the wall of his Texas ranch home. This is appalling, our president is appalling and that should have been enough of a reason to NOT vote for him or support him. As for the people who would like to see liberals treated the same way Mitts dog was, you are horrible excuses for human beings.
Posted by: Worried | June 29, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
If instead he drove a young woman off a bridge and let her drown he would be a respected leader. Mitt blew it big time!
Posted by: Mary Jo | June 29, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
What Kennedy did was a horribe, regretable accident. What Romney did was intentional. There is a difference!
Posted by: Worried | June 29, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
As for the people who would like to see liberals treated the same way Mitts dog was, you are horrible excuses for human beings.
Likewise those that don’t mind the murder of unborn children. The most innocent of all life. Thank you for helping me make my case once again. Your right Mary Jo, Mitt did blow it big time, if he was a drunk and driving young women off bridges he might could have even have been a famous Senator.
Posted by: Wireline | June 29, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
How this guy has even come this far boggles the human mind !! He is an opportunist, he say’s and does things according to what the majority wants. It scares me to know how empty headed people are to allow him this far !!
Posted by: Ray | Jun 29, 2007 10:35:02 AM
Oh my goodness you mean he could possibly out Clinton Clinton by doing what he thinks the majority wants?
How radical!
Posted by: wireline | June 29, 2007, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
How many idiots put their dog in the back of a pick-up truck or let it stick it’s head out of an open car window risking eye damage from flying road grit and debris and that’s just fine.
Posted by: Gary Ward | June 29, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Any one that would NOT vote for someone because of this – doesn’t need to be voting in the first place… what a bunch of morons!
Posted by: commonman | June 29, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
In response to Carla’s post: “The parents in our neighborhood staged an intervention, went to her door and demanded that she relinquish the dog to one of the group who had a special interest in that breed…”
Carla, inciting mob action to commit 1) Trespass and 2) Strong Arm Robbery (the taking of personal property under threat or duress) are not likely to help your misguided cause, but are likely to get you prosecuted (or worse, if the property owner also happens to own a gun…).
Use your head Carla. Have a “Save-The-Dog” bakesale and then take the proceeds and offer to purchase the property (dog/animal/chattel) from the lawful owner.
Go Mitt!
ps) my dog loves riding in the back of my pick-up truck…no seat-belt and ALL!
Posted by: Mike A. | June 29, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
If we were all held to things we did 25 years ago …. well, lets just say we would not get very far. If you base your opinion to vote for someone on something like this, then you should not be allowed to vote at all – unless of course you live in Palm Beach!!
Posted by: Jeff | June 29, 2007, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
The fact that is was over two decades ago, speaks volumes as well. Is there anyone here that has done something 20 plus years ago that they wouldn’t do now… but because he is a canidate.. “I’m not voting for him” or “sorry, you lost my vote”… if that’s the case, I’m sure Mitt doesn’t need your vote. Like I said before, if this is the only reason you’re not voting for Mitt, then you probably don’t need to be voting for anything.
Posted by: common | June 29, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
**The problem with people sometimes is they don’t try to put themselves in the ‘shoes’ or in this case paws of the pets and ask themselves …”How would I feel locked in a cage on top of a roof of a car going up to 70-80 mph down the highway not having any choice in the matter?? Just a little common sense required **
I don’t put myself in the paws of a pet and ask myself “how would I feel about walking around on all fours and drinking out of the toilet while tethered to a leash” either. Just a little common sense is required to realize that dogs are not people.
Posted by: Stephen | June 29, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
What’s the difference between carrying your dog caged on top of the car and carrying it caged in the back of a pick-up? Or how about letting it ride in your convertible with most of it’s body in the wind stream. My dog rides inside my truck with his head stuck out the window rain or shine. He loves it. Lighten up folks. If the gov made a mistake it was to not walk the dog often enough.
Posted by: mike tuc | June 29, 2007, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Bill Clinton let his poor dog run into the street and get killed. Not one liberal — or the politically-oriented ‘animal rights’ arm of the democrat party — said one word about poor Buddy! Ah, but I expect nothing less than full-blown hypocrisy from libs and their media handpuppets.
Posted by: spellchk78 | June 29, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Perhaps there should be a pet lover running for president. The country seems to take better care of its pets than children. Why isn’t there a candidate recognizing this shift in priorities?
Posted by: Marc | June 29, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Perhaps there should be a pet lover running for president. The country seems to take better care of its pets than children. Why isn’t there a candidate recognizing this shift in priorities?
Posted by: Marc | June 29, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Are you people complete morons? He strapped a dog carrier to a roof. How exactly did the dog suffer? Because it was drafty? Would it be any less cramped in the cabin? If you put a dog in the back of a truck and drive, does he hide from the wind? No, he hangs over the side. The only thing you might say is that he was scared because he couldn’t see what was going on. Honestly, get over it.
Posted by: Ben | June 29, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
How many accidents are caused every year by people that strap something stupid to the roof of their car?
Posted by: Case Closed | June 29, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Wow! Whoopee! That’s all you can find.
A dog in a shelter with a plastic screen he put together to protect his family pet during the summer. I hear the dog lived to `15 years (ie 105 years, must have suffered terribly).
At least he stayed true to his family and dogs, by taking them somewhere.
Oh, that’s right, libs don’t have families only spend fortunes on their pets.
Wow, all you can find after 30 years is this. Funny, when I worked on Ronald Reagan’s campaign in high school/college as he started to climb in the polls, it was the libs trying to throw Knifes like McCain’s doing all the time. Rise above Mitt, we believe in you. Ronald Reagan had to do it when he started making a move in the polls, now you will become the target.
Your the only credible Republican that’s stood by both his family and pets.
vr
DR
Posted by: dr | June 29, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
You republican apologists are SICK SICK SICK!
Posted by: Fair game | June 29, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
He killed the family dog!!!!!!! Oh my G&D I will never vote for him…
He put the dog on the top of the car, the dog died, (at least the story doesn’t say that the dog is alive) so he must have killed the dog.
(After all it is 25 years later, and dogs don’t live that long)
Come on all, what a bunch of morons losing sleep over something like this
Posted by: sean | June 29, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
How many people out there 25 years ago loaded kids, animals into the bed of the family pickup and went on a trip. Back then you would of thought nothing of it, but now that the government has deemed it unsafe do we worry about it.
How many hunters, dog show’rs transport their animals in carriers in the bed of their pick ups.
All you people are making your judgements based on the way things are today. If you went back 25 years and you saw the carrier on the top of the car you would not of even given it a second thought. But now that the government says that such things are unsafe and the animal activists have a louder voice things are viewed different.
Posted by: Kevin | June 29, 2007, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
I would never strap my dog to the roof of my interstate bound vehicle. How about you?
Posted by: Sense please | June 29, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
that’s pretty funny. i don’t think it as big a deal as people make it out to be. when i was young, we went on family picnics and took the dog in the trunk of the car. before you libs get all crazy, the dog jumped in the trunk voluntarily and shaggy always enjoyed picnics at the lake.
Posted by: josh | June 29, 2007, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
23 years ago I think people were driving w/o the use of child seats – does this make them child abusers?
Posted by: pat | June 29, 2007, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
At least it wasn’t Aunt edna.
Posted by: Chevy | June 29, 2007, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
And hearing this story would make you think he could exerise sound judgement because . . . ?
Posted by: Kris | June 29, 2007, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Clearly the dog should have been in an infant car seat to ensure its safety. Is this the best dirt we can get on this guy? Good Dog people!
Posted by: J | June 29, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
“How many accidents are caused every year by people that strap something stupid to the roof of their car? ”
I don’t know Ben…suppose you tell me.
Posted by: John | June 29, 2007, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
The man has no affinity for the animal tied to the roof of the vehicle. Perhaps the dog had an odor about him, considered offensive that the man didn’t want to endure. What ever happened to that dog? Did he travel back the same way? Does he take his current animals and ship them on the roof of his current vehicle? Has he ever regretted putting his dog through that ordeal? Has he done other questionable actions toward pets/animals since 1983? I can tell you that he never would have gotten my vote anyway, but I would reccomend supervision for him when he decides to pack ‘living’ beings. His wife might have been so greatful that she wasn’t the one with the roof-carrier view she just shut up and put the ‘dog’s welfare’ out of her mind. You never really know, right?
Posted by: 1776resister | June 29, 2007, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Read the CNN article, it paints a different picture. Good old Seamus jumped on the roof and voluntarily went in the carrier. Mitt also modified it with a protective wind breaker (all for the purpose of torturing poor Seamus).
Posted by: J | June 29, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
FINALLY! Mitt’s hidden agenda is exposed. Double GITMO for more dog torturing capacity.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2007, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
This just in…Mitt occasionally took his family to McDonald’s. Clearly his support of America’s obesity factory means he is complicit, and liable for shortening the lifespan of the next generation of voters. I anticipate his the campaign slogan for his 2nd term will read “Free Big Mac’s for Everyone!” as he will need the vote of those coming of age obese Americans.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
J writes: “This just in…Mitt occasionally took his family to McDonald’s. Clearly his support of America’s obesity factory means he is complicit, and liable for shortening the lifespan of the next generation of voters. ”
I don’t know – didn’t Bill Clinton eat at McDonald’s too? I guess Mitt must actually be a closet liberal!
Posted by: John | June 29, 2007, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Posted by Animal Lover:
“Man will be judged on how he treats animals and the planet. A good man does NOT harm either. A good man does NOT think, “it’s a dog, get over it” or “it’s an animal”. That is the kind of people we DOM’T need living on this planet any longer.”
Would that be in the scriptures according to Mother Gaia? I don’t remember it being in the Bible… And exactly what are you suggesting be done with “that kind of people” anyway?
Posted by: John | June 29, 2007, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Why does everyone always want to throw a fit and get mad at something that happened over 25 years ago? I’ll bet the same people that are “outraged” are the same people that loved him and thought he was a good candidate up until they found this out. You are outraged at the fact that this man put his dog in a carrier and strapped it to the car to take the dog on a trip. At least he didn’t leave the dog home without food and water. Get over it. It happened 25 years ago. You have a government that is sending our guys off to get killed in a war that we went into on false pretenses. Have we found any weapons of mass destruction yet? Our healthcare system sucks, old people can’t afford their medicines. Can you think of anything else that is so wrong with this country besides someone strapping a dog carrier to the top of their car? Put that energy, effort and outrage to some good use and fight for something worthwhile.
Posted by: Wendy | June 29, 2007, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
No animal can go for 12 hours without relieving itself.
Posted by: Mona Montgomery | June 29, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Come on, people. it was 25 freakin’ years ago! I bet you never did anything untoward in the last 25 years. There must be a statute of limitations on the junk we decide to freak out about.
Enjoy-Polarbear
Posted by: Polarbear | June 29, 2007, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Hey, I don’t appreciate having my comments censored – so quit it!!! I’ll re-assert my initial observation: Mormon beliefs are CRAZY (research it online if you don’t believe me), so Romney has about as much of a chance of being elected US President as a Muslim like Obama – NO CHANCE! I don’t care if he eats his stupid dog, because I hate dogs! The only thing that pisses me off more than an annoying dog is an annoying dog owner! What I can’t figure out is why other Mormons would want Romney to run for president in the first place, when they must know that the media will expose their weird customs and beliefs to the world. What are they thinking???
Posted by: S_Temper | June 29, 2007, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Why did he even bother with the dog crate? The dog would have been fine if he just tied it up there.
Posted by: Adam | June 29, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
S_Temper:
Romney didn’t decide to run because Mormons wanted him to; he is running because he chose to. Despite the fact that you find Mormon beliefs CRAZY, Mormons are not this monolithic block that moves in lock step after first checking with Salt Lake on everything. All one would have to do is compare Harry Reid and Orrin Hatch (or Mitt Romney) to figure that one out.
And yes, there are plenty of Mormons who are concerned with the media exposure that will occur because of Romney’s bid. Primarily they are concerned about people getting it wrong – and reacting the way you have. You never know, there may be people out there that might think some of the things you believe are a bit wierd. In the end it doesn’t matter much. Mitt can still run for president if he chooses – he doesn’t have to get a “mother may I” from the church at large (or church leadership) to do so.
Posted by: John | June 29, 2007, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
John | Jun 29, 2007 5:56:39 PM
Despite the fact that you find Mormon beliefs CRAZY, Mormons are not this
Like believing native americans are lost descendants of Israel despite DNA evidence? Would that be some of the crazy stuff you’re talking about?
Posted by: Fair and balanced | June 29, 2007, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Those of you calling him a moron and other assorted names: if you haven’t done anything stupid — anything at all — in the last 25 years, then you’re off the hook. Otherwise, you’re arrogant hypocrites.
People make mistakes. It’s what they do in the aftermath that defines them as human beings. Find me a story about Romney beating his dog with a club last week, and then I’ll be upset.
People’s arrogance astounds me sometimes.
Posted by: mickeysix | June 29, 2007, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
All I can say is that I’m embarrassed that this issue would even be considered news. I want to know who the scientist was that commented on the state of the dog while he was on top of the car. Who Cares!? In fact my dog is still strapped to the top of my car right now and I don’t intend to get it off any time soon. To all you animal rights activists, find something else to do with you lives.
Posted by: Jim | June 29, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
1. Why is this even being talked about, this was 25 years ago.
2. Now I wouldn’t strap my pet to the roof, but Torture?? Come on! And in reply to the lady who was upset over the woman who took her dog to the vet in the trunk. Why does this bother you? Does it make any difference if the dog rides in the passenger compartment of the car, or the trunk. It is probably safer to drive with out a dog running around inside the car.
3. Why do we waste our time worrying about what religion Romney is? I think we would do better to worry about the direction our government is going and take our country back!!
IT IS OUR COUNTRY YOU KNOW!!
Posted by: rebecca | June 29, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
- ‘No animal can go for 12 hours without relieving itself.’
Neither can a person, I’m quite sure Romney took the dog out when they stopped to rest.
I swear people in this country get more upset over supposed cruelty to animals than they do over human rights abuses.
Posted by: rebecca | June 29, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Squeenter’s guess is you won’t see stories from 10 years ago, let alone 25 about Hillary and probably other dems as well. The MSM goes along with the dems and blows all of their negative stories off. The bias of the press in this election cycle is clearer than ever and earlier than ever too. How much dirt digging are they doing on the Rs to come up with stuff like this??? Can’t wait for the October surprises they try to cram down the voters’ throats.
Posted by: squeenter squillo | June 29, 2007, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Oh and BTW, where were Bill and Hillary when their dog got loose and was killed by a car? Does a responsible pet owner let the dog get loose? Not according to the TV judges Squeenter has seen.
Posted by: squeenter squillo | June 29, 2007, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
I would never strap my dog to the roof of my interstate bound vehicle. How about you?
Posted by: Sense please | June 29, 2007, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
I would love to be strapped to the top of an interstate bound vehicle in a shielded cage. Honestly, it would be the ride of my life and very enjoyable once I got used to it.
Posted by: Marc | June 29, 2007, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
First, I’d like to start off by pointing out that in the early 80′s most people didn’t wear seatbelts or use baby carseats. But we’re talking about a dog here…my dog loves to stick her head out the window for an entire journey! I really doubt that Seamus was miserable–it probably felt just like a ride in a convertible. Mitt is a dog lover and the fact that he brought the family dog on the trip showed that he loved it. When their dog couldn’t go on a trip with them Mitt and Ann used to drive their dog an hour away to relatives in the country just so that their dog didn’t have to be locked up in a kennel. They certainly had the money to board the dog and yet they took the time to do a 2 hour round trip at the beginning and end of their trip to make sure their dog was in a loving environment. I think that because Mitt is squeeky clean (He really IS…I know him) his opponents are showing their desperation with this supposed dog abuse.
Posted by: Dog Lover Sixty Seven | June 29, 2007, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
I took a 14 hr trip on my motorcycle by myself.I was didn’t feel alone or tortured.What about horses locked in trailers on long hauls? Are they tortured too?Perhaps they should ride in the car with the family also. Tell that to a horse owner?Try and take their horse away?Maybe these animals need counseling for the trauma they experienced.Perhaps they can sue their owners.PETA= People Eating Tasty Animals
Posted by: carnivore | June 29, 2007, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Over 25 years ago? And it is just now making news? Geez—-gotta dig up the dirt for the uninformed—-no matter how old.
Posted by: smithcat | June 29, 2007, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
To all of those people who ask if we would put a child up there on the roof. I wouldn’t,but I also would not make my child eat out of a bowl on the floor or have him nuetered.I wouldn’t walk my kid on a leashDOGS ARE NOT THE SAME AS CHILDREN!If you think they are I hope you don’t have any kids.
Posted by: carnivore | June 29, 2007, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
How do we know if the animal enjoyed it or was scared?Kids go on roller-coasters and scream,are they torturing themselves?Do they need a shrink for being masochistic?I think a 12 hr.ride then a long vacation running around in the Canadian fresh air is better for the dog than locking him up in a kennel with a bunch of strangers taking care of him.Would you put your kids in jail while you went on vacation.Even if the dog was stressed,everyone gets stressed.It’s part of life.My goldfish is a family pet,does it get scared when I shut off the light or turn on the vacuum?Perhaps I need “The Fish Whisperer” or some idiot pet psychic to analyse it current mental well being.This is the most ridiculous non-sense I have yet to read about a Presidential canidate.We have no way of knowing if the dog enjoyed his vacation or not.
Posted by: carnivore | June 29, 2007, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
You mean to tell me that Mr. Romney is so clean, that the only “dirt” they could find on him is this 25 year old story?! How desperate and pathetic the people who posted this story look. But, perhaps they are smart, just look at all the emotion and energy people are exerting on this. Keeping our attention off the really important things. What a short attention span group we are.
Posted by: Lisa | June 30, 2007, 12:07 am 12:07 am
For all you out there who think it is ok to treat an animal like this, get a life. Of course it is inappropriate and cruel. How can you people say it is just a dog/just an animal?They have the right to be treated fairly just as we do. I hold animals in higher regard than humans anyway, they for the most part are innocent, humans are wrecking this planet and treat others like s***. We are inferior to animals I believe. I am an animal lover and whilst he didn’t intentionally do it to be cruel, it was still an act of stupidity. If indeed the story is true, who knows, he would never get my vote!
Posted by: Liz | June 30, 2007, 3:01 am 3:01 am
Wow, stumbled upon this blog by accident. Don’t care about Romney one way or the other, but what a bunch of dumbxxxx post here!!!
Posted by: erick | June 30, 2007, 5:37 am 5:37 am
If you think dogs should be treated like humans then perhaps they should be arrested for the 4.5 million bites that occur annually in the U.S.Perhaps they should be tried in a court of law for being the second largest cause of child injury in the U.S. 80% of all reported dog bites are by dogs familiar to the victim.The vast majority of dog attacks are done by dogs that are licensed and treated well by their owners.
You need professional help if you think dogs are superior to a human.You sound like someone hurt you emotionally and you have withdrawn from the human world.Therapy and the proper medication may help you resolve these issues.
A 12 hr ride on the roof in a shelter is not cruelty.You do not know if the dog found it invigorating or terrifying.A dog does not think like a human.It is not your child.It has a completely different set of senses in which it perceives the world and those senses are totally beyond your or my comprehension.If you were to die alone in a house your dog will eat you when it begins to starve.If abandoned by it’s owner and exposed to other dogs it will behave as it naturally should and run with the pack.The natural world is violent and unforgiving.The natural world is far more cruel and stressfull for any animal than a 12 hr.ride where at the end of it,it was fed,sheltered,petted and reunited with the family.The dog is an animal.Mental stress of a dog is got to be the most ridiculous thing I’ve read in years.
You obviously glorify your dog because of your personal failures in your relationships with humans and keep pets to satisfy a deep loneliness caused by your inability to fit in with creatures that can speak words other than “ruff”.You think it is cruel because you personify the animal with human attributes and believe the animal to be the friend you never had through human relations.
I endured far more stress pledging a college fraternity than a 12 hr ride in a box.Try basic training for the Army if you think what Romney did was cruel.My drill sargeants came up with far more inhumane things to do to us than a ride in a box.If I had a choice to ride in a box on top of a car for 12 hrs.once a year in the summer,followed by a vacation, or go to work for 8hrs week/48weeks a year,I would chose the ride.
A dog is driven by the instinct to eat.Your dog likes you because you feed it.Plain and simple.Your dog didn’t pick you for your conversational skills or your personallity.You chose it because it filled a certain need within you.
Romney’s dog had a far more longer and stress free life than it would have had in the natural world where it would have to fight everday just to defend it’s meal.
Just because an animal is a family pet doesn’t increase it’s sensitivity to a new experience.It sees the family heirarchy as a pack order,and he feels he is at the bottom.He sees the head of the household as the Alpha dog,not as his buddy and friend.Any expert on dog obedience will tell you this.I don’t think the dog felt insulted or any resentment for having taking a long ride.
Most animals are scared of being placed in new settings or enviroments. Zoologists transport wild animals in similarly small cages all the time to relocate them to different preserves.Some of these trips take several hours and some are done hanging underneath a helicopter after being shot with a dart.That sounds much more stressfull than what Mitt’s dog went through.Would you say the zoologists are cruel because the animal was scared?Your dog is not some special creature from your fantasy world,it is a dog, just like every other dog,driven by instinct.Reacting as if in a pack.
If taking that ride was the worst experience in my life,I would consider myself lucky.
Posted by: snoopy | June 30, 2007, 6:34 am 6:34 am
Anyone who thinks that this amounts to animal cruelty is absolutely nuts.The dog suffered no phsyical harm.It still was familar with it’s carrier and was reassured by the voices from the family in the automobile that all was well.The dog also had some reasurrance everytime they stopped that the family was still there and they exibited no fear of the situation.It may have caused some stress due to the noise of the road and the speed at which it was traveling but it would have settled down shortly and relaxed.Remember,dogs can also run fast and they are comfortable traveling fast.If the carrier was only used to transport the dog to negative experiences(such as the vet)then the anxiety of the dog would be greatly increased.By rewarding the dog with attention and food,plus a relaxed family setting after the trip you would soon erase any residual anxiety that the animal retained from the travel.
For all of the supposed dog lovers who think this was cruelty to animals,I suggest you learn a lot more about how animals really think instead of treating them like a human.They are not human and have different needs than what most owners think is proper care.Most dogs I train are easier to work with than the ignorant owners who think of a dog as an equal member of the family with a similar mentality as humans.This was by no means cruel,maybe a little stressful,but not cruel.The dog was never exposed to adverse weather conditions and would have not suffered any less physically had he been in a car with the windows down.As long as it was fed at it’s regular time and had access to water it would be fine.Treating a dog the same as one would treat a child is the biggest mistake a loving owner could make.
Posted by: dog trainer | June 30, 2007, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Ohhh please… I bet you self righteous liberal pricks all had a good laugh when Clark Griswald did it!
.
Posted by: fhlh89 | June 30, 2007, 10:36 am 10:36 am
It’s mind boggling to me that people can go absolutely nutso over something that happened 25 years ago to a dog in an enclosed carrier when they think nothing of sucking the brains out of a viable fetus/human being during a late term abortion.
Posted by: Phil | June 30, 2007, 11:08 am 11:08 am
This happened 25 years ago people. Geeze if you gotta go back 25 years to get some dirt on a candidate, I think he needs to be elected.
Posted by: Mike | June 30, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Ok I will take a risk.
I ride a Harley Davidson Motorcycle.
I have a dog. His name is Tag. I brought him home from the SPCA where he was on death row.
Tag loves to ride on the Harley with me .
He gets stressed when I try to put a helmet on his head or a seat belt.
Tag also gets depressed when I tell him he can’t go this time.
My wife says that Tag waits at the window just staring. She know I am close to home when Tag starts wagging his tail, long before she hears my loud pipes.
I have biker friends that have lost their life because a driver in a car killed them.
Most Drivers will say “I never saw or heard a motorcycle.”
My head boils in the heat because I am forced by law to wear a helmet.
I have a Police Officer friend that just got back from Iraq. He spent a year in the foul weather risking his life , and is now back working the streets risking his life. All so I can worship Jesus here in the safety of my home with my wife, children and my riding buddy, Tag
Have A blessed Day !
Posted by: Pastor Yacky | June 30, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Well, just when I thought Romney couldn’t get any dumber, he trumps that. Yes, he took the dog with them, but come on, a dog is trained to NOT urinate or defecate in their space, which is why crate-training is so effective. The mere fact that this dog did this shows that he was under a great amount of stress. While I’m not sure it would have amounted to cruelty back then, I really doubt anyone would get away with that now. Dogs can also get motion sickness, maybe Seamus had problems with that. Setters are also bigger and active dogs who need a lot of exercise and to be cooped up in a crate, no matter where it is, for 12 hours, even to allow for five minute nature breaks, is just being a bad dog owner.
And to the people who equate it to pigs and cow transport… You’re just as stupid as Romney. Dogs are (usually) family pets with emotional value who don’t end up on your grill or in your casserole at dinner. And do you really think the dog could in any way be reassured by voices from a car that was going probably at least 55 mph? Come on, I doubt he could even hear anything but the wind rushing past its crate. You should be strapped to the top of a car and see how much you can hear. Dogs have excellent hearing, but I seriously doubt it’s that good. Oh, and the comments about Chevy Chase? Anyone dumb enough to emulate that scene(or any part of a movie like that) has no business being President.
And yes, this happened a while ago, but please, did he have even less common sense back then?
Posted by: labgirl | June 30, 2007, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Labgirl, you should be more informed. Crate training shold be used carefully or it could be misunderstood by the
trainee to imply a need for action on their part, a training technique not recommended for Democrats.
Posted by: cuznmikie | July 1, 2007, 12:56 am 12:56 am
What the hell do you use a dog carrier for anyway if it’s not used to transport a dog? You animal rights knuckle heads have NFI about what you’re taking about.
Yeah right, like you were going to vote for a Republican and now you’re not based on this dog carrying incident that took place 25 years ago. Uh-huh and I’m Santa Claus.
Posted by: Fred Farkel | July 1, 2007, 2:17 am 2:17 am
An average dog can run 20 mph with greyhounds hitting 42 mph.Yes a dog could hear voices 2 ft away at 55 mph.It can hear a person simulate a dog howl up to 3 miles away.Can you hear someone in the backseat at 55mph with the windows down?Do you think a cheetah goes deaf while running at 70mph?
As for the motion sickness,I have yet to see a dog that does not enjoy a ride in a car,in a motorcycle sidecar,in the back of a pick-up truck ect…
Dogs are routinely transported by airplane in the same type of carriers for 12 hrs. or longer and will deficate and urinate in their carriers.Anyone who has interned at a vets office knows it is not uncommon to clean a dogs small kennel area after a dog has an overnight stay.This myth that a dog will only soil it’s carrier or “den area” under extreme stress is completely wrong.A dog usually does not see a carrier as it’s den area.A den area gives the ability for a dog to leave and do it’s business outside.A carrier’s intent is to keep the dog confined for it’s safety or the saftey of others.Also,if a trained dog has it’s walk cycle disrupted,it is not uncommon for a dog to relieve itself in a different location.
A pig has an equal intelligence level to that of a dog.Just because a dog has emotional value to a person makes doing what Romney did worse? How?So if a wild wolf was transported in a similar way it would be OK with you?I’m just trying to understand your point.Having an emotional attachment to an animal does not increase it’s sensitivty to outside stimulus.I’m sorry,but no matter how much someone loves it’s pet, they can’t alter it’s DNA The dog will never think like a human.It is an animal of instinct and to give an animal human attributes is delusional behaviour.It’s OK to love your dog like a member of the family but don’t treat them like one.It could lead to obedience issues and will confuse the dog about what it can and can’t do.It’s by far the main reason why I have a job.
As for myself being put in a box on top of a car for 12 hrs,It wouldn’t really bother me.Especially if there was a vacation on the other end of the ride.It is better than spending a week in a kennel surrounded by strangers. It might be a little boring but I’ve yet to see 12hrs. of being bored and separated from my family being equated to cruelty.There were many times on extended trips with my 3 kids that I wish I could have ridden on the roof or the car for the entire ride.
The dog very well could have enjoyed the ride and soiled it’s cage because the kids slipped him too much junk food or a chocolate bar at a gas stop.There is no way to know how the dog felt about the ride.Assuming that the dog suffered some sort of trauma is an emotionally based opinion.It is in no way an established fact.
Dogs are not dainty little creatures,they are psychologically and physically tough animals.When a dog is taken away from it’s mother as a pup, they both seem to adjust rather quickly and do not exhibit an emotion pattern similar to what could be expected of a human parent who had a similar experience.You would think that stealing a mother’s pup would be far crueler in human terms than a 12hr ride in the country.Yet people do it everyday to satisfy their own emotional desire to have a bond with another species.The point is, that a dog’s emotions and thoughts are much different from a humans and it is ignorant to think of a dog’s emotions, in human terms.
Posted by: dog trainer | July 1, 2007, 2:27 am 2:27 am
Pastor Yacky: Those loud pipes suck. They do not “save lives”.
Picture this: most of the motoring public are hermetically sealed in nearly sound proof vehicles and here you come along with your loud pipes passing one of these cars. You know when they hear the pipes? When you are abreast of them and it scares the living dog squeeze out of them. This could cause them to swerve into you as they exclaim “WTF was that!?!?”
Scenario Number 2:
You are approaching another sound proofed car on a two lane highway from the opposite direction. Which way do your pipes face? Forward or backwards? Most pipes are facing backwards. The sound waves are traveling in the opposite direction that you are going. Again, when does the driver in the sound proof car hear you? After you pass him.
Loud pipes don’t save lives, loud pipes suck. And they scare dogs in pet carriers strapped to car roofs. I want you to think about that the next time you ride.
Posted by: Fred Farkel | July 1, 2007, 2:37 am 2:37 am
If dogs and people should be treated the same,why can’t I go buy a pet person? He can call me master.Don’t tell my boss this.I don’t want him to start paying my with biscuits.
Posted by: teddy | July 1, 2007, 3:35 am 3:35 am
It’s not like he strapped it to the hood like a dead deer. Remember when kids and dogs rode in the beds of trucks. no car seats, not even seat belts free to get up and walk tround even. when I was a kid, i would even ride on the bed of my uncles flat bed,no sides. Dogs would rather be in the fresh air rather than inside,thats why they stick their heads out windows.
Posted by: patsy pirillo | July 1, 2007, 5:46 am 5:46 am
The people complaining about this are idiots. Dogs are not harmed by being exposed to wind. For that matter, neither are human beings. I sit on top of a motorcycle going in excess of 60 miles an hour all the time and no, I don’t have a wind deflector. You tree hugging animal rights activists should get a life. Speaking of life, I bet a sixteen year old going down to the local abortion mill is perfectly acceptable to you because dogs are obviously more important to you than human babies or beings for that matter.
Posted by: Tom | July 1, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Did it occur to anyone that maybe the dog was transported this way because of its irregular bowel habits?
The dog was an Irish Red Setter. The detritus eaters of the dog world.
Knowing the journey was to be a long one, and knowing the dog’s nature, Romney obviously didn’t want to have to stop every 20 minutes so the dog could relieve himself, lengthening the journey even more.
What’s more, if this was such a heinous act of cruelty how come no one stopped him and asked what was going on? On a journey of that length someone must have seen what was in the dog carrier. (Canada customs perhaps?)
I think he chose the safest and most sensible option. Driving with five boys AND a Red Setter, a large, ungainly and boisterous dog in the car would have been both stressful and dangerous.
Romney gets my vote!!
Posted by: Doglover | July 1, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
How different is this than flying with the dog where they are in the unpressurized luggage cabin with no heat or air conditioning?
Posted by: Dale | July 1, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Gee-Romeny had a dog on the roof and you guys are going nuts- but you are they same nuts that keep Kennedy in power and in office, did you forget he left a girl in the back seats.
Posted by: ER | July 1, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I’m glad that the liberal media is making such a big deal of this. People will realize that there really isn’t much dirt to find on Romney. Rudy and Hilary…well that’s another story
Posted by: Steve | July 1, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
I am hoping that he would not do this act today, and I do agree that it was a misguided act lacking common sense. However, he was trying to bring the family pet on vacation with his family and that counts for something.
This is not a liberal versus conservative issue. It is a common sense issue. He lacked it, but I am going to guess he would not consider doing that today. And for the people commenting on the animals being hauled around inhumanely…you are correct; that’s not acceptable either.
One more thing I am an independent voting on the person and not the party.
Posted by: Deej | July 1, 2007, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
A number of years ago I occasionally traveled between Ann Arbor and Grand Rapids (MI) by motorcycle. Strapped to the back in a smaller cage was the family cat. When it was time to go, I set the cage on the floor and called her… in she went on her own. She was as excited to go as we were. And, she got plenty of attention on the highway from passing cars (look at the kitty mommy!)None the worse for wear! So if a CAT can handle travel, you can bet the dog was fine.
How about if we look for better information about the candidates, like maybe some FACTS instead of silly emotionally driven drivel like this. Our country needs solid leaders of character. YOU have to be a solid and confident citizen to chose well, not subject to distractions and silly inuendo like this. Your way of life and maybe even your physical life depends on this!!
Posted by: DFL | July 2, 2007, 8:17 am 8:17 am
I find it interesting that the same people who yell about a man putting a dog on the roof defended another man for burning a draft card. Priorities I suppose. After all, aren’t pets more important than freedom? Poor judgment to be sure but probably no more stressful than riding a motorcycle other than the confined space. One vet said that drying out the eyes is a possibility. Oh wait, dogs can blink which waters the eyes. Mountain out of a molehill.
Posted by: Royce | July 2, 2007, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Reading this amazes me at the level of intelligence of the people today. Won’t vote for someone because they are a morman, because they let their dog go on vacation on top of a car, because they are a republican, because they are a democrat, because because. Whatever has happened to common sense. I am a republican and have never voted republican because I was a republican. You vote for what is best for our country, our children, our future. It is “not just a dog” but before you criticize learn something about the animals you are supposedly concerned for. I come from a long line of animal lovers – ranching, rodeoing, house pets, deer hunter, elk hunter. What the hell – has everyone gone nuts? Maybe some of you need to eat more meat & spend time in nature with the animals.
Posted by: par | July 2, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Reading this amazes me at the level of intelligence of the people today. Won’t vote for someone because they are a morman, because they let their dog go on vacation on top of a car, because they are a republican, because they are a democrat, because because. Whatever has happened to common sense. I am a republican and have never voted republican because I was a republican. You vote for what is best for our country, our children, our future. It is “not just a dog” but before you criticize learn something about the animals you are supposedly concerned for. I come from a long line of animal lovers – ranching, rodeoing, house pets, deer hunter, elk hunter. What the hell – has everyone gone nuts? Maybe some of you need to eat more meat & spend time in nature with the animals.
Posted by: par | July 2, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Mitt Romney strapping his dog to the roof for even a ride around the block let alone 12 hours is nothing but CRUEL!!!!!
You lost my vote you s.o.b.!
Posted by: Ellyn LaVine | July 2, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
So he had a carrier on top of the car. As long as the carrier was facing rearward and the temp wasn’t in the freezing range… So What?
I have seen a huge number of dogs riding loose in the back of some yahoos pickup truck that were probably in a lot more danger than that pooch was. Heck the pooch probably defacated\urinated on the roof because of a long trip rather than in any sort of protest to the accomodations.
Posted by: Skeeter | July 2, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Will Mitt strap the American people to the roof of his car and drive us to Armagedon? Yeha! Where’s Peter Sellers when you need him?
Posted by: sandra l | July 3, 2007, 2:24 am 2:24 am
anyone that is that insensitive to a member of his own family, which pets definitely are, is a disgrace to the human race, and certainly not fit to be commander-in-chief. I had been seriously considering Mr. Romney, so am very thankful that the truth regarding his personal behaviors has come out.
Posted by: kathleen | July 4, 2007, 6:47 am 6:47 am
Why don’t we strap Mitt Romney to the top of a car and drive him to equal miles. I just removed him from my ballot for President. How dare you Mitt???
Posted by: Sara Westbrook | July 12, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
I wouldn’t put a dog on the top of my car, but having ridden in the back of a pickup truck, I have to say that I believe that the dog might have liked riding there.
I’d like to know what was going to kill the dog riding on top of the car any more than riding in the back of the car and getting rear-ended or having an accident while he’s unstrapped in the car? And how ingenious that he put a windshield on it?
How’s that any different than riding a motorcycle? He obviously was smart enough to attach the carrier so it didn’t fall off. And how does anyone know they didn’t let the dog out for potty breaks? It’s not like you can control when a dog has to go . . .
Don’t forget, also, that was a different time . . . before children’s car seats, seat belt laws, etc., etc.
Posted by: Andra | July 14, 2007, 12:56 am 12:56 am
To Carnivore: Are you seriously implying that the people who posted here are conspiring in an attempt to keep the focus on the dog story instead of some deeper darker issues?
Posted by: Dog Lover Sixty Seven | August 11, 2007, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
I think it’s quite funny that both the author and at least one person commenting think that 1983 was the dark ages before there were boarding kennels and no child restraint laws. It wasn’t THAT long ago, people. We brought our first baby home from the hospital in a carseat that was essentially the same as those sold today and that was in 1981. I know they were around for at least a few years before that, too.
Boarding kennels have been around forever.
It wasn’t a different time. Mitt Romney did what was convenient for himself without much thought to what was best for his pet.
Posted by: Kathy | August 16, 2007, 9:23 am 9:23 am
This election season I’m going for the gnarly look.
So Mit ain’t getting my vote even if he ate the dog for lunch. Which I do not suspect for even one minute.
Posted by: M. Simon | September 13, 2007, 1:40 am 1:40 am
people think it is ok to abuse pets because they cant turn their abusers in and they think they wont get caught
Posted by: dog lover #1 | October 26, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
It was 25 years ago. It’s possible he would think differently about it now. People mature.
Posted by: Sara | December 27, 2007, 12:21 am 12:21 am
what a ..it just goes to show that the level of ineptness in elected public officials…very shallow & …AND FYI OR DID YOU NOT KNOW THAT PETS IN THE COMMONWEALTH ARE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE…A GREAT MANY OF THEM(ESP REPUBLICAN) ARE REGISTERED VOTERS…
Posted by: scomule2 | December 28, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
WHATEVER…jERKS…NO BIG DEAL…
Posted by: JBF | January 3, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Regarding those here who ask us to give the Romney family a break because it’s perfectly safe to strap a dog to the roof of a car–I assume they would also condone strapping a baby to the roof of a car, using the same argument. And if a car was crowded, then I imagine they themselves would not mind being roped to the roof in a box and riding that way from Boston to Canada, provided they had a warm coat. Sadly, they are missing the point. Our job (as adult humans) is not simply to keep beings in our care alive, but to avoid terrifying them as well. There are many degrees of abuse. It is sad, to me, that I have to explain (to a few who don’t seem to “get it”) that we are outraged not because we thought the dog’s life was in danger but because of the demonstrated obliviousness to the dog’s well-being. Everyone knows that other animals experience fear and misery same as we do. For this reason, most of us do not strap our family members (or our constituents) to roofs and we would not dream of strapping our pets to a roof for ten minutes let alone 12 hours (driving full speed on super highways). What a mortifying experience for any living creature. Being “immature” is not an excuse either. Imagine if Romney said, “I used to be a child molester, but I was young and immature then.” There is a world of difference between immaturity—even ignorance and stupidity—and cruelty. I can forgive anyone of just about anything—but getting rid of innate cruelty requires serious work and serious repentance. Romney has lost my respect completely. Then again, next to Huckabee’s son, Romney looks saintly. Not to downplay this fatal flaw in Romney’s character–but Eagle Scout David Huckabee actually lynches stray dogs. This election is giving us glimpses not only of the mean-hearted and creepy but also, apparently, of the downright evil.
Let’s hope we have now reached the bottom of the animal cruelty pit, at least. Perhaps we can agree (since we’re in the 21st century now) that being an animal abuser, or siring one, should disqualify a person from leading our country.
Posted by: IndependentVoter | January 5, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Regardless of whatever stance you decide to take on this issue, could those of you who say thing such as: “What’s wrong with you people? Why not boycott the beef industry?” please take the time to actually research the moral stances of animal rights activists and realize that the majority of us DO boycott the meat industry as well as the fur industry, the animal breeding industry, the animal research practices, etc. And despite what you might have heard about “ALF” and “animal rights terrorists,” most of us are actually nonviolent; it’s this new little thing called the “Kindness Revolution.” We don’t wear ski masks; we don’t burn down animal research laboratories. So please, pull your head out of your bum and realize that your opinion of us is completely incorrect and rediculous.
Posted by: K | January 16, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
This is ridiculous. One can hardly classify transporting a dog in a carrier on a roof as “torture.” Besides, if the dog had been inside the car or even in a pickup bed and traveling down the road at the same speed, he would have been subjected to the same sort of “torture,” yet you don’t see their owners being chastised for that. And “Seamus protested in a scatological way, going to the bathroom on the roof of the car”? What is this, analysis on bladder control? Maybe the dog just had to go to the bathroom. Give Romney a break. He’s the best candidate this country has right now. Go Romney. Tie that dog to the roof where it belongs.
Posted by: Krista | February 1, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
@ Ray,
Yes, those pigs and cattle are scared out of their minds, and those rides are surely torturous, which is why you should boycott the mean industry anyway.
I loved Romney, he was the only Republican Candidate that I liked… now I’m actually kind of glad he dropped out, as this incident really makes me question his character.
Posted by: Liz | February 11, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
im not voting for romney, cuz im not old enough
Posted by: haley | March 5, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Not a bad idea; on a hot day dogs love the wind in their face,and often stick their head out the window while traveling… Around here many times I’ve seen the dog loose in the back of a pick up truck. i can’t get over the holier than though stupidity of the comments. Grown people that would base their vote for a president on this event. Pathetic
Posted by: earl | March 14, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am
It was 25 years ago! Animal rights wasn’t such a big deal back then. I don’t think so many people decided to have dogs instead of children at that time, so people didn’t treat dogs as children back then. And yes, putting a lose dog in your car is much more dangerous for the dog and all of its occupants if an accident occurs than securing it on top. Anything that is not securely fastened becomes a projectile. And dogs urinate when they get excited about visitors, if the dog urinated on top of the car, its not a surprise because it was up there for 12 hours. It would have been weird if it didn’t urinate. I’ve ridden on the top/back of vehicles for HOURS and I thought it was a great experience. The dog probably had a blast.
Posted by: Kish | April 12, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
This is old news which I just found out about today! Fascinating.
But how can anyone conclude that, during a 12-hour trip, when the dog is in a secured dog carrier, that it “protested in a scatological way” by having a bowel movement on top of the car? I would probably have urinated and pooped too!
I agree with Kish…all of Kish’s statements.
Sheesh.
Posted by: Edward | December 1, 2011, 5:40 am 5:40 am
i value animals more than most people,because animals dont know any better,and know whats going on like people do.
You cant say to a dog,hey your going to be in this cage at 60 to 70 mph for about 12 hours,ok and nothing is going to happen to you-
versus a human who knows robbery and rape is sick and does it anyway-
what a sick man-seriously,life is life,who doesnt care for a life itself???
Posted by: jon | December 31, 2011, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Cant believe this jerk. This will make my voting easier. Why didnt someone witnessing this turn him in!
Posted by: Tyler McGee | January 8, 2012, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm