Romney Grabs a Sign
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has been really going after the Democrats as of late, slamming Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., for saying that kindergartners should receive "age appropriate" sex education (LINK) (even though Romney supported "age appropriate" sex education in the Bay State when he was governor — read more about that HERE), implying Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., holds Marxist positions (LINK) ….
And now our friends at TMZ.com have a photograph (LINK) of the governor posing for a picture with a supporter’s sign that reads: "No to Obama, Osama, and Chelsea’s Moma (sic)."
Says Obama spokesman Bill Burton in response: "This kind of smallness is what makes Americans so tired of politics and points precisely to what they want to change in Washington."
What do you think? Has he gone too far?
– jt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Yes, these types of statements or quotes should be avoided (we are not kindergarteners)in trying to drum up “being cute” and let’s get to the real serious issues in our country that need to be addressed and be more like adults who are concerned about our government.
Posted by: Vera Clauder | July 22, 2007, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Although Romney doesn’t impress me in the least, I think perhaps he was just being a good sport, holding up the girl’s sign – hey, it DOES rhyme. However, this just adds more evidence to my opinion of him – he’s not very bright.
Posted by: Rhonda | July 22, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Comparing a bright, loving, patriotic man of Christian faith like Barack Obama to the world’s most vile terrorist is just monumentally disgraceful on Romney’s part.
He owes Obama and America a truly contrite apology. And he owes himself some reflection on why he is buying in to such base hate speech. I understand that the GOP base is just mimicking the hate speech they hear from people like Coulter and Limbaugh and O’Reilly. But a presidential candidate should aspire to higher than imitating shock jock pseudo-journalists and their juvenile audiences.
Posted by: Elodie | July 22, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Nothing wrong with it:
1) Mr. Romney didn’t create the sign.
2) The sign isn’t comparing anyone to anyone else.
I’ve seen worse signs from the likes of peta and other organizations and no one said anything about them.
Posted by: pete | July 22, 2007, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
This is exactly why most Americans are tired of everything political. I definitely think it is time for America to elect a president that is a solid, christian man that will run this country as it was intended to be run hundreds of years ago. It is time we start taking care of things how our forefathers envisioned and stop making this an arena for political slamming.
Posted by: Kim | July 22, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Why is this even a story and why is Obama upset over such a sign? Both he and osama bin laden’s cowardly henchmen demand that coalition forces are disbanded, US Armed Forces declare their FAILURE AND DEFEAT and return home? ….oh, and they both use the same definition of “supporting the troops”! Gag. Come on Obama, be proud of your FAILURE AND DEFEAT position and the ENEMY you embrace!
Posted by: cheesetopping69 | July 22, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
The “ears” Mit, the “ears”.
Posted by: Chas | July 22, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
If Barack Obama was caught proudly and arrogantly, holding a supporters sign that said;
“No to Mitt Romney , Warren Jeff’s ( The MORMON Polygamist , Child Rapist , Cult Leader ) and Trophy Wives Husbands,”
every single poster who is defending Mitt Romney would have a living conniption fit.
They would cry xenophobia and sexism in a heart beat. What Mitt Romney did is absolutely no different than the analogy I just gave and we all know it!
Posted by: DR | July 22, 2007, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Pay attention to detail people. Romney didn’t SAY anything, nor did he create the sign. He stood next a SUPPORTER who held a sign (that wasn’t even spelled correctly). Obama never said he was upset at Romney, he merely pointed out that that kind of petty insult rather than genuine political discourse is why so many Americans are completely turned off to politics.
Posted by: Jason | July 22, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
How did the forefathers intend for this country to be run hundreds of years ago? Unequal opportunities for minorities, segregation…? It is definitely time for a change. This country is ready and in need of a man of strong man of faith who is capable of doing a good job. Let’s stop the religous bigotry. Candidates know that they will be scrutinized for almost anything and it was wrong for the govenor to pose for a picture with such a vile phrase.
Posted by: Karla | July 22, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
I saw this story on a far-left website last night. THE SIGN IS NOT COMPARING OBAMA TO BIN LADEN! It is making fun of Senator Ted Kennedy’s slip of the tongue a while back, in a speech where he said “…just ask Osama, uh, Osama bin, uh, Obama”. This slip was a godsend to political satirists and humorists on the right, and Rush Limbaugh even has a parody song in which a Kennedy impersonator sings “Osama-Obama” set to the tune of La Bamba. There is absolutely NO STORY here. Dems are hoping for another “macaca” moment. If this is the best they can do, Mr. Romney doesn’t have much to worry about.
Posted by: Marcus | July 22, 2007, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
“I definitely think it is time for America to elect a president that is a solid, christian man…” …Ummm really? America hasn’t elected a non-Christian President, EVER!! Maybe what we need is not a “solid christian man” but someone who ISN’T a “solid christian man”. Maybe a nice peaceful, rational, Buddhist who doesn’t consider talking to someone a sign of weakness? Maybe an atheist or agnostic who won’t spend all their time pandering to the religious right? Just a thought, but it seems that we’ve had 231 years of white, christian men running things and everybody seems to have a complaint about where this country is headed. Maybe we should change things up a bit.
Posted by: Jason | July 22, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
This is one of the oldest political tactics in the book- sort of associate yourself with something way out there, or incendiary, without actually being the instigator or overtly supporting it. Just let it sort of brush by you, so those who support you and ‘get the message’ will be happy; those who think it is outrageous can be placated with a smug “well, it wasn’t really me, it was the person with the sign/ the underling/ the overzealous campaign staffer.” Fox News and others have repeatedly “accidentally” linked Obama’s name to Osama’s- this is nothing but more dirty politics. And then they try to flip it, it’s the fault of those who ‘can’t take a joke.’ Grow up and wake up, people…
Posted by: CopperMtCrow | July 22, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
I disagree with Mr. Burton (Obama spokesman)statement. This kind of thing is not “… what makes Americans so tired of politics….” it makes poliics American and fun. It pulls them into politics and the discussion. The clever rhyming and creativity of the citizens of this country gives them a chance to get involved and understand the issues (oh, forgot Democrats don’t want people to understand so they will not vote smart).
Besides, what canidate refuses to pose with a supporter? He didn’t make the sign (despite the efforts of the headline to make it sound that way). In fact, the sign doesn’t even endorse Romeny, this sign could appear at any of the Republican (or even some Democrat) canidates’ rallies and be still true to the holder’s view.
Posted by: Ernie | July 22, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
I’m sure Mr. Romney would be outraged if somebody used the sign:
“No Mormons, No Morons for President”
Posted by: what goes arouns... | July 22, 2007, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Hillary cannot deny she’s a Marxist until she unflinchingly unveils her socialist manifesto thesis from Wellesley College to the internet in full format, and then point by point denies every socialist dictate she advocates in writing.
Obama has nothing to do with Osama other than a name rhyme and that both their fathers were Muslim. It may, esp. in these times of terrible terror threats from fundamentalist Muslims, cast a shadow of doubt on how Obama could NOT be more greatly-sympathetic to our would-be assassins, and that is only fair to state aloud.
Osama can just plain burn in hell.
Posted by: colinhfp | July 22, 2007, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
A PERSON whose thoughts are not obfuscated by medieval superstitions. Funny that Romney would say “a MAN”.
Posted by: America needs | July 22, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Romney needs to concentrate on the real issues. Not silly rhymes. This sort of thing makes him seem small and not very presidential at all. We are at war! Trying to tie a fellow american to the enemy through a child’s rhyme is not becoming of someone who is trying to earn the position of solving the Iraq problem and leading us in the greater war on terror.
Posted by: Scott | July 22, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
His laugh won’t last long. The primary election will wipe it off!
http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2007/07/mitt-romney-may-laugh-now-but-his-laugh.html#links
Posted by: KYJurisDoctor | July 22, 2007, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Headline should have read: Obama plays “gotcha” politics. Poor wittle Obama got his wittle feewings hurt?
Posted by: Scott Royer | July 22, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Romney is doing it to win over Bush conservatives and hide the fact that he is the biggest FLIP FLOPPER of all time and make the right wing of his party forget he is a Morman. Romney will say and do anything to win an election. He is the prototypical politician that movies and television have shown for years.
Posted by: Bo | July 22, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Maybe he might win over some Republican extremists with his attacks of Obama in the last few days. But he just cheapens himself to me. I”m tired of attacks which spin the words and usually have no basis. I”m tired of any attack that seems like a “Swiftboatfortruth” type of attack. Wish you luck Mitt, but you lost this Goldwater Conservative. You need to get back on topic to win me back.
Posted by: roy | July 22, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Please stop this foolishness. He can do better than that…
Posted by: jhune | July 22, 2007, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Why would I vote for a person who believes that I was cursed Black? I’d rather vote for David Duke.
Posted by: Sham | July 22, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Isn’t it amazing that the dems are upset about “Osama Obama”? LOL – The origin of the name is from none other than Ted Kennedy – who IS A Democrat. I find that hilarious. And BTW Yes, Mitt Romney is by far the better choice for President over Barak Hussein Obama.
Posted by: Bill | July 22, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Thanks ABC! Now perhaps we can move on to more IMPORTANT issues….
Posted by: Troy Street | July 22, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Willard chose to pose for the photos with the woman and her sign. Wingnuts are trying to claim he probably didn’t even know what the sign said before he signed it, let alone posed for the pics, one of which he’s even shown holding the sign up for others to see. That’s a fine defense. I suppose if he becomes president he’ll sign bills without reading them either.
I’ll tell ya what, the Republican deadenders can have all the people who think Barack Obama is Muslim and went to a madrassa (arabic for school) in Indonesia and we’ll take all the people who know how to spell momma.
Posted by: markg8 | July 22, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Where’s the controversy? He posed with someone holding a sign. Big deal.
Posted by: Jared | July 22, 2007, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Come on now, the presidential race has nothing to do with someones religion, it is his patiotism and love for this great country. BUT, if you want to bad mouth the “Mormon” church, sorry, you can’t. There is nothing to bad mouth. Mormons are good and desent, hard working, family first, God loving honest people. Oh ya, you can’t overlook the fact that the Mormon church converts over 300,000 people to the church every year. The Mormon church is the fastest growing church/religion in the western hemisphere. They must be doing something right. 13 million strong as of today. The Mormons are more respected today then ever before. The service and giving they provide for people all over the world is astronomical. They are wonderful people. So don’t even try to bad mouth a Christian religion that does so much around the world for Mormons and Non-Mormons alike. Good try, now “move on” to something else..
Posted by: ERIC | July 22, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
What is age appropriate sex education for a kindergartener? Is it putting an egg of an avacado over a glass of water and watch the evolution of the plant?
Posted by: Ted C. Wood | July 22, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Romney is no different than what the Republicans called John Kerry in the 2004 election…a flip-flopper. He’s now changing his views on issues. Stuff he was in favor for in Massachusetts, he’s now against as he runs for President. And as for posing with that sign…that’s low and uncalled for. If a democrat had done that to a republican candidate, all of you republicans would be screaming bloody murder for an apology. So I think Romney should apologize for it and say that he was wrong…..because that sign is wrong. It is not fair to compare Barak Obama to Osama bin Laden. It is low, childish, and unnecessary. It truly shows the maturity of the candidate in question. I’m not judging him based on his religion because that doesn’t affect my vote….but his content of character. And with that, I can tell that he doesn’t have a decent character. So if you’re going to sit there and scream back that we’re against his religion or that he was just standing next to a sign….think about what you’d be doing if it was a democrat comparing one of your candidates to a republican. You’d be hopping ticked. So you can’t set a double standard back the other way.
Posted by: James | July 22, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
I really liked this guy for a while, even sent his campaign $50. He has done a good job of changing my mind. I thought he was a little above the fray but he is as much in the gutter as the rest of them.
Posted by: jay | July 22, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Romney should be ashamed, but he wont think about it. I surived having Romney as gov. of MA. He does not have what it takes to be President. Also….he is calling 2 other candidates terrorist? How wrong is that!!!!
Time for Romney to go back to Utah.
Posted by: Doyle Schroeder | July 22, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
It truly is unbelievable what a dirtbag Mitt Romney is. So now he hates Obama, animals, gays, education, the rule of law, … Does this guy ever get anything right? We can thank Republican voters for George Bush, and I’m sure they’re just drooling at the chance to vote for Mitt Romney.
Posted by: rightone | July 22, 2007, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
I think Romney is being very small minded and pathetic. Barack Obama is not a muslim, has no connection at all to terrorism so to point out a similarity between his name and that of a terrorist is pathetic. Mitt is close to Matt but that doesn’t mean that Romney plays QB for the Arizona Cardinals. Nor does Rudolph Giuliani’s first name does not mean he is a Nazi.
As for the comments on sex ed, well that just shows how small minded much of the conversation about sex ed is. Sex ed doesn’t have to be about the actual act of intercourse and how to do it, it can also be about relationships and how to form the kind of happy stable relationship in which sex can flourish. Wouldn’t expect a conservative to understand that though.
Posted by: Markymark | July 22, 2007, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
The candidates and the press will only stick to the issues if the American people demand it.
AS for the Clinton’s, they have moved on in their marriage, personal and political lives and I suggest we do the same. For a former president and acting US Senator of this nation, we should have the good manners and decorum to listen to what they have to say on the issues and problems of today.
This is a very important campaign and election, we will either debate the issues and search for solutions based on knowledge, intelligence and experience. Or we can listen to the same old name calling, dog wagging, racist, sexist, and religious slurs.
Flag waving cannot disperse this kind of stench and national pride should not allow it. Why do we continue to listen and uphold people whose only claim to fame is the degrading of others?
This government was formed on a separation of church and state, we are not a theocracy so one’s religion is not an issue – it is a personal comment and a slur.
In the end you get what you settle for. We as a nation have settled for far to little for far too long.
Our congress is quagmired in this muck -we have to move forward.
Posted by: White Mountain | July 22, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Congress and the Senate should continue to force the War issue down the “War Presidents” throat. George Bush thinks God is on his side, he is dislusional and needs a rap on the presidential knuckles. 15 Republicans are up for reelection this fall, those votes would override a veto. VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE!
Posted by: sandra l | July 22, 2007, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Shocking! We’re losing a war, our schools suck, and our health care is the laughing stock of the industrialized world. So what do the neo-cons want to debate?…sex ed!!! HAHAHAHA. Oh, and why is Osama still on the loose anyway? We’ve spent a trillion dollars and can’t find the man responsible for 9/11? Why the republicans still hold a single office in Washington is beyond me. History will judge this to be a time of madness and shame for America.
Posted by: sc | July 22, 2007, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Well, it’s certainly tacky…
Posted by: Jan | July 22, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
As for the super-Mormon condoning the comparison of Obama to Osama, how is this any different from what the leftist media is doing every day? For example, see Friday’s (June 20) editorial by Eugene Robinson in the Washington Post comparing our President to Osama. Or the newly elected “muslim” representative from Minnesota who recently compared our President to Hitler?
The precedent set by the left over the last six years for attacking the President for anything and everything (and the tacit support of the media), including calling him a liar, a war criminal, blood thirsty killer, etc. is going to come home to roost for the left. The bottom-line is that Republicans play the blood-sport game better than the Democrats and the pendulum will swing back much harder. The tragedy is while we still fight each other over nothing, our enemies are growing in strength, every day. The reason their strength is growing is not for lack of effort or strategy in killing them, it is because our sense of purpose here at home is not unified and focused. We need someone to unite our people and move beyond the same old politics. That person is not running for President and they do not exist in our political establishment.
Wake up America, the next attack is coming. Are you ready?
Posted by: Robert Marley, Jamaica, NY | July 22, 2007, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Robert,
I love that you admit that another attack is coming. Thanks to the current republican president, we’re no safer than we were on Sept. 10, 2001. The republicans have no plan or clue on how to clean up the mess they’ve created. We’ve wasted 7 years and a trillion dollars under republican leadership. Congratulations on being one of the sheep that follow them to nowhere.
Posted by: sc | July 22, 2007, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
KENNEDY: There you go.
Why don’t we just ask Osama bin — Osama Obama — Obama what — since he won by such a big amount. Seriously, Senator Obama is really unique and special.
Posted by: Dee | July 22, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Age-appropriate sex education for a kindergartener is teaching them to know the difference between good touching and bad touching and how to respond to a stranger when they are made to feel uneasy.
To foolishly say that there is “no age-appropriate sex education” for younger children is irresponsible and sounds more like pandering than thoughtful reflection.
Posted by: elemteacher | July 22, 2007, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Gotta hand it to Romney hes a salesman. Constantly tossing out the red meat to the base.
At least Reagan, who Mitt trys to imitate, was good natured in his criticisms of the Democrats. Romney is gaining the reputation as a cheap shot artist.
As time passes, and voters start to examine him in detail, it will become clear that he has a history of saying whatever it takes to win.
Posted by: Richard | July 22, 2007, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Is this what we are arguing about? Its amazing what some people can conclude over a single pic. Rather is it another arrow in the quiver of people who shoot at candidates they have already decided are on the wrong side of their political border? We have much bigger problems as mentioned in previous comments. It sounds like we all want the same thing to be safe and to be free and healthy. The real question to me is to what extent to people want to take responsibility for and what we want a stranger who works for the city or gov’t they want to give that responsibilty to. As far as sex education, I dont care how good your intention and motives are ITS NONE OF YOUR BUSINES TO BE TEACHING MY KID ABOUT TOUCHING AND BODY PARTS!!! How about just teaching reading, writing, and arithmatic. Science, geology, I mean we cant even do that well. Why are strangers I dont know personnally so concerned about my child’s sexual knowledge when we are the embarrassment in the industrial world in genuine education. I’m more concerned about my childs education in the sciences, why are people so concerned about if my child knows how to put a condum on a cucumber rather than knowing quadratic equations.
Posted by: david | July 22, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Well the media has made SOMETHING out of NOTHING once again.
Posted by: Micah | July 22, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
I find it interesting how Obama always tries to dodge actually talking about specific issues by playing the “politics as usual” card. The media is afraid to ask him tough questions and too liberal to talk about his liberal record. Remember at the 2nd Dem. debate when each candidate was asked whether English should be the official language of the country (all but Gravel said yes) and Obama tried deflecting the question by saying it was trying to divide us. Does that mean every issue Obama has an opinion on that is out of the mainstream (almost every single issue) is an attempt to divide us? The inability of the media to independently investigate Obama’s record is blatantly unethical.
Posted by: Greg B | July 22, 2007, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
I would just love to see Obama debate Romney on the issues. Barack would kick Romney to the curb, maybe the street.
Posted by: John Austin | July 22, 2007, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Is anyone surprised that a GOP candidate would need to do this to fire up their ignorant base? This is how GOP candidates are nominated, its been like that since the 1990′s……I would like to see Barak challange Mitt to a live debate……America will see who has substance and who is merely a used car salesman….Molacai
Posted by: molacai | July 22, 2007, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Molacai,
I believe that any of the top three Democratic presidential candidates would clean the floor with the top three Republican presidential candidates in a debate.
Posted by: John Austin | July 22, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
To the Romneyites, is there really much difference between a Mormon and a Scientologist?
Posted by: Mark | July 22, 2007, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Pete,
Last time I checked, PETA wasn’t running for office.
Posted by: Brad | July 22, 2007, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
cheesetopping69,
Finally! I think I’ve found someone who can answer my question about the “war”. Please tell us all exactly what the Moron means when he says “we must win” the war on terror. Define “win” for us. How do we win? How do we know when we’ve won? If it takes the next 20 years and costs Americans their freedom, will that be when we’ve won? Please help us understand this.
Posted by: Brad | July 22, 2007, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
is’n it amazing that every republicans are afraid to face Obama on General Election. so to prevent that happens GOP’s are trying to link Obama to Osama. are we serious or just joking arround, how ever the GOP’s difine Obama, I will vote for him. I am axious to see debate between Dem’s and GOP’s which will be the ultimate
I am For Obama, Don’t Tell GOP’s!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Akhiro | July 22, 2007, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Their isn’t a candidate out there who could debate Ron Paul!!!…
Posted by: Stephen | July 22, 2007, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
I am a white, married for 24 years, college educated conservative middle aged woman who is an independant but have always voted republican. We have a 19 year daughter serving in Iraq in the Army and a 23 year son in the Air Force serving in Korea. Barack Obama has peeked my interest and I have read up on him and his beliefs and ideas. I’m tired of people saying that Barack Obama’s father was a Muslim, he was and is not…his African grandfather (whom he never met or knew was a muslim). Barack really didn’t even know his own father, he had no formal religious upbringing, he is just as white as he is black, raised by white grandparents in Kansas and Hawaii. I believe he has a servant’s heart to bring people together on common ground and make things better for the underpriviledged and those that have been done wrong black or white, he is not perfect and maybe his political inexperience can be a good thing, so far he is not deeply rooted in Washington’s politics and special interest groups. Hillary is in so deep and has been for so long and will stop at nothing to gain the power of the presidency. I do not believe ANY rebubican will win the white house after the Bush fiasco(someone has got to be behind the scenes pulling his strings)he is not acting like himself. I agree is not the smartest president we have ever had but he seems to be a loose cannon right now. Unless something drastic happens I will vote for Barack Obama next election if he’s the candidate, I hope he stays the course and focuses on the issues and doesn’t get caught up in the political mud slinging that most Americans are sick and tired of hearing. And hopefully people will research the candidates for themselves and not rely on rumors and hearsy.
Posted by: Marsha | July 23, 2007, 1:58 am 1:58 am
I will vote for Ron Paul in the primaries. If he or Fred Thompson win the Republican nomination I will vote for either of them. If McCain or Giuliani run against Hillary or Obama….I will vote for secession. God help America, which will become ‘The Unarmed United States of Mexico’.
Posted by: Royce | July 23, 2007, 6:36 am 6:36 am
Speaks volumes about the minds of some South Carolinians and Romney. The same set of lunatics who hailed Giuliani’s grandstanding with Ron Paul at a Republican debate. If people have sunk to this level, their opinions are of no merit. Romney pandering to these lowlifes says a lot about his shamelessness. It is clear that some Republicans see race baiting and slander as acceptable in the election cycle. The party of morals is anything but.
Posted by: Murton | July 23, 2007, 6:51 am 6:51 am
I agree with CopperMtCrow’s comments: Gov. Romney is posing with the sign in the picture to create some publicity for his campaign, such as it is. By appearing in the picture with the sign, he can easily disassociate himself from what it expresses if he wants to do so. If not, he’s made an implicit comment without making an explicit comment. Sneaky and snarky!
Posted by: chuck | July 23, 2007, 8:48 am 8:48 am
In answer to “To the Romneyites, is there really much difference between a Mormon and a Scientologist?”: Why on earth would you ask a Mormon about what Scientologists believe? Go to the library, talk to Scientologists, write John Travolta or Tom Cruise. I’m a Mormon and have no clue what Scientologists believe so why on eart would you want me to compare the two church’s beliefs?
Posted by: genlin | July 23, 2007, 9:13 am 9:13 am
First the attacks on Obama are from the Hilary camp not the GOP. See in the GOP’s eye Hillary is going to be the candidate from the socialists not Obama.
But a few words on Obama credentials — Sorry can think of any, he has no credentials. Oh I would not be surprised he is the one attacking himself. And Please he went to a Mslim school, got his name from Muslim law, in the eye of Muslim law he is Muslim.
As far as Romney, this is a none news item, it is hypocrisy, because if he was a Lib it would never be reported.
Posted by: spock | July 23, 2007, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Maybe my eyes are failing but I see no comma between “Obama” and “Osama.” I’m willing to bet the sign’s creator specifically meant “Obama Osama.” That Romney would endorse such a statement speaks either to ridiculous naivete or joining in a despicable, fallacious political smear.
Posted by: GordonsGirl | July 23, 2007, 11:05 am 11:05 am
if Mitt willingly endorses this kind of political message, he is only fit to be a broadcaster on the notorious fox news, not our future president. We as a nation must demand a new sense of maturity and solidarity in our future president.
Posted by: j | July 23, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Fresh Ideas don`t come from stale Politicians. 2008 the year to change the hate for the current Government, or disolve it!
Posted by: JB | July 23, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Even if this was just a clueless moment on a tiring campaign trail, shouldn’t we elect a President that has the fewest clueless moments under stress? We need to elect an exceptional person as President, not a handsome or rich one too focussed on being telegenic to pay attention to what he is doing.
Posted by: Jock | July 23, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
amen, Jock…it’s like not knowing the mike is open or that there are cameras rolling everywhere, esp if you are a leading presidential candidate
Posted by: phillygirl64 | July 23, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
*yawn* much ado about nothing
Posted by: cordelia525 | July 23, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Are people offended because it puts Obama and Clinton in the same phrase as Osama Bin Laden? Does it indicate some kind of allegience between the three? The answer to the latter is no. The answer to the former is yes because people bring their own bias to the forefront. I guess if the sign said “No to Obama and Chelsea’s Moma”, the Clinton and Obama camps would be raving about the clever rhyme, right? This is what you come up with when you can’t track down drug use or affairs in someone’s past. If you really want to talk about the issues, then do not make this an issue.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | July 23, 2007, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
People are right- there’s no comma. It says “Obama Osama”, talking about one person. Since this article pretends there is a comma (like most biaed mainstream media spin-it-for-the-GOP articles), GOP partisans like Sean O’Brien pretend this is just about slamming Romney for the sake of it.
It’s really about the real McCarthyism of the “if you support Dems you support terrorism” line of the Republicans the past several years, and how Romney is definitely endorsing that divisive and dishonest attitude by standing by that sign. This IS an ISSUE. It’s the Republicans that resort to name-calling and McCarthyism because they have already been proven wrong about all the issues.
Posted by: Tom | July 23, 2007, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
It’s true Kennedy made the Osama – Obama verbal slip (He had problems pronouncing Judge Alito’s name too – kept calling him Alioto)
Anyway… all you people that work full-time in the indignant industry need to find another line of work. Geeez…you’re such a drag.
Posted by: Hedley Lamar | July 23, 2007, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Tom – Where have you been , GOP leaned media, thats a joke. 90% of the mainstream media is liberal lesson one.
Lesson 2 – What have the lib dems done to make us safer from terrorists, see unless you willing to defend the U.S. you do support the terrorists.
3 – your upset at Romney comparing Obama to Osama, where was you outrage when the Libs compare Bush to Hitler. Oh and Romney did not make the sign.
oh and it was The mighty Kennedy that started the Obama Osama rhythm.
Posted by: spock | July 23, 2007, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
spock – get real. lesson 2 – the war in Iraq has made the terrorist threat ten times worse, thanks to bush and co. lesson 3- where have you heard that analogy made (bush to hitler) besides on some fringe left extremist blog that no one visits? whereas the obama osama misnomer is all the talk on fox news. oh, and tarantino style, back to lesson one : the media has one bias and one bias alone, and that is the bias of advertising grubbing, corporate $$$-kissing.
Posted by: j | July 23, 2007, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
What’s Bush got to do with this Romney sign thing? Why bring him into this “discussion”?
Again with the indignant thing….
Why not just present your view on a topic instead of being mad all the time. I’m sure if I met you I wouldn’t like you as a person, but I wouldn’t tell you that non-stop.
Posted by: Hedley Lamar | July 23, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
if you don’t like the romney response wait a bit and he will change it. junior high jabs and postings really tell where he is coming from. grow up and get a real job
Posted by: judy | July 23, 2007, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
That was a great sign! Where do I get the t-shirt?
I’d have more respect for Obama if it weren’t for the fact that he thinks it’s okay to take away my parental rights. Sex education in Kindergarten? No wonder the world is going to Hell.
Posted by: dpgirl | July 23, 2007, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
I don’t know why any of you people are buying Romney’s spiel. The man says what the focus group wants to hear, and does what’s best for Mitt Romney. He takes credit for things he should not, and passes the buck under pressure. He was a terrible Governor in Massachusetts, he would be an equally terrible President. As for the sign, his response says it all. Mitt Romney doesn’t care about anyone. He just wants your vote, and he’ll tell you whatever you want to hear to get it.
Posted by: Timothy O'Neil | July 23, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Romney is a flake and doesn’t have a chance, he’s a joke!!
Posted by: Free America | July 24, 2007, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Obama was the first one to start popping off with his mouth about other candidates, I respect the person to focus on the issues and detach themselves from the other childish flakes.
Posted by: Me | July 24, 2007, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Timothy O’Neil – spewing propaganda huh? First all the candidtes use focus groups, ok Obama uses the most.
Next Romney save Mass. from going bankrupted, he saved the Olympics, he actually is the most qualified of all the candidates officially in the field right now. Why do you think the libs are attacking him the most?
He was able to work across party lines, come on he was a Republican Governor in one of the most liberal states who re-elects a murderer and a traitor for Senators all the time.
Posted by: spock | July 24, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am
To all the so called parents that are ticked that Obama would SUPPORT sex ed to students as young as kindergarten doesn’t have a clue what he was actually referring to.
Planned Parethood ASKED him his opinion of the subject and he stated it. He also says whatever schoolboard/states deteremine what is AGE APPRORIATE.
Here are so stats to wake you:
++30-40% of victims are abused by a family member.
++Another 50% are abused by someone outside of the family whom they know and trust.
++The median age for reported abuse is 9 years old.
++More than 20% of children are sexually abused before the age of 8.
and one that should make you aware of the importance of sex ed:
+++Young victims may not recognize their victimization as sexual abuse+++
Posted by: cordero | July 24, 2007, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
oh-and Mitt Romney will say and do anything for a vote.
First he was for abortion now he is pro-life, first he was for rights for gays now he is against it. He supported sex ed now he is against it.
flip flopper…flip flopper…flip flopper
Posted by: cordero | July 24, 2007, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm