Jul 27, 2007 3:17pm

The Gay debate

In what may be just an opening salvo, the conservative group "Americans for Truth" is attacking the Democratic presidential debate to focus on gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender issues hosted by the Human Rights Campaign…(LINK).

The debate (LINK) to be held at 9 pm EST August 9 in Los Angeles, and broadcast on Viacom’s "gay" cable TV network, LOGO as well as live streaming video at LOGOonline.com.

Americans for Truth is a small, long-dormant organization based in Naperville, Illinois, that says it seeks to confront "the homosexual activist agenda."  But I suspect this is hardly the last criticism we will hear from the Right about this debate.

"Pardon our dismissive tone, but homosexual behavior is wrong — at least half the country still regards it as such," the group writes. "So why does the homosexual lobby get its own special presidential lovefest … er, debate? Because the Democratic Party has sold its soul on homosexuality. And we fear some in the Republican Party are rushing to catch up. The ‘gay presidential debate’ is so wrong on so many levels. The country is still divided on homosexuality — despite the media’s best efforts – yet all the questions presumably will come from ardently pro-’gay’ advocates — that is, proud, practicing homosexuals."

On the other hand, debates are hosted all the time by interest groups — the NAACP, the South Carolina Republican Party, Jewish and Catholic organizations, unions, Chambers of Commerce.

Does the fact that gay and lesbian issues remain quite controversial preclude a liberal gay and lesbian organization hosting a debate?  It will be interesting to see how other conservative organizations respond to this debate — will the RNC take a position? And how about the Republican presidential candidates?

Discuss.

– jt

User Comments

The AFT may be correct, as to the “love-fest” aspect (no pun intended, I’m sure) of the LOGO debate. But the debate is certainly pertinent and proper. A 1994 University of Chicago study found that about 3 percent of Americans are gay, lesbian, or bi-sexual–the figure approaches 10 percent only in some urban areas. By comparison, about 3 percent of Americans work in agriculture. The impact of both groups on our society is huge. Too bad, though–I’m willing to bet the Dems at LOGO won’t be asked about HIV-dangerous behavior, spouse-beating, or pedophelia in the gay community. And when the GOP’s debate before some national Ag association, they won’t be asked about cancer-causing chemicals, childhood obesity, or pork-barrel price supports. It’s easy to throw a love-fest. I’m waiting for the group–no matter what their philosophy–to challenge these candidates to a real debate.

Posted by: SteveW | July 27, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I do think the gay and lesbian community have an opprotunity to choose the politician that fulfills their needs and wants. They are Americans like the rest of us and they deserve to have their needs and expectations addressed.

Posted by: Charles | July 27, 2007, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Where is this agenda I keep hearing about? Is there a website I can go to so I can read it? I need to know what I’m supposed to be saying and doing. Thank you for posting this reminder. I need groups like Americans for Truth to remind me. I bet they found a copy, or maybe they just made one up. Oh wait, maybe they made up the concept? Sounds scary, doesn’t it? Let’s see: work, raise our families, try to enjoy the weekends. Yup, pretty scary.

Posted by: hmm. | July 27, 2007, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

This is news? Any time homosexuals are given attention you’ll have some religious groups who’ll come out against them. Some people feel homosexuality is a danger to society, they have the right to feel that way and they have the right to protest things like this. Those of us who feel that homosexuality is not wrong will do everything in our power to make sure more and more people come to that same conclusion.

Posted by: p | July 27, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

As a gay man myself, i applaude the Democrats for holding a debate. As for the “gay agenda”, i am tired of hearing that right wing spin “agenda”. Equal rights as other americans is hardly a gay agenda… its a basic right. KUDOS to the Democrats! and KUDOS to the vast number of Americans that are realizing the truth about gay people. More dialogue please! It only helps to increase the visability of our cause!
Clinton/Obama 2008 !!!!!

Posted by: Heath | July 27, 2007, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

All this paranoia about a “homosexual activist agenda” is really about the gayest stuff I’ve ever heard. You know, people conflicted by their strong inner homosexual desires who seek to ease their internal conflict by lashing out at gays and lesbians, thinking that by somehow distancing themselves from the gay community they will solve their problems. Live and let live. If you are opposed to homosexual behavior, don’t engage in any and leave it at that.

Posted by: Peter Dick Johnson | July 27, 2007, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Stop labeling groups like “Americans for Truth” as conservative. Call them what they are. They’re theocrats. They, not JWL, are the true American Taliban.

Posted by: BillG | July 27, 2007, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

You’re right about homosexuality being dangerous. I don’t want to see this country turn into a morality-lacking economy. Remember Sodom and Gamorah? Yep, lets not that be us.

Posted by: Carrie | July 27, 2007, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Well Carrie, what danger does homosexuality pose? Are you afraid that if you come in contact with a homosexual individual that you might become homosexual? America is the chief exporter of gluttony and greed. Why pick on one set of individuals when chances are you yourself are taking part in activities deemed immoral by the same book you use to justify your fear of homosexuals?

Posted by: p | July 27, 2007, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

To tell you the truth, I love gay people, but I don’t love their lifestyle. I have gay friends that I’m working on to change. They don’t mind me trying to help them either. I love them, therefore I care about them doing the wrong thing. If I see a drunk friend getting into a car to drive it, I will stop them. Unless you’re a Christian I can’t see how you would think homosexuality is wrong. But maybe some do anyway. I would like to find one who is not a Christian’s logic on why it is wrong. Anyone?

Posted by: MerieLynn | July 27, 2007, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

SteveW: Since when did “HIV-dangerous behavior,” pedophilia, and SPOUSE-BEATING (?!) only pertain to gays and lesbians? This is ludicrous.

Posted by: Chris | July 27, 2007, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

P, the reason I think it is wrong is because I believe the Bible to be true. It states in 1 Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders. I agree that the rest is just as dangerous as well. It is immoral for our country to be dealing with these kinds of acts including homosexuality. I am sorry if you don’t believe the same. But this is my opinion, and what I believe to be true. I don’t mean to tell anyone their going to Hell either. Its just that somebody asked.

Posted by: Carrie | July 27, 2007, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

By the way, Jesus Christ, according to the Gospels, never said a word about homosexuality. If it were as immoral as so called Christians claim it is I would have thought our savior would have devoted considerable time to making that clear. HE didn’t. And please, Sodom and Gamorah is a fictional story.

Posted by: Peter Dick Johnson | July 27, 2007, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

I’m here, I’m queer..get used to it.

Posted by: zack | July 27, 2007, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

And Carrie,
Corinthians was written by a completely fallible, imperfect human being, not Jesus Christ. Therefore they do not contain the direct words of God. There are no words from Jesus saying homosexuality is immoral.

Posted by: Peter Dick Johnson | July 27, 2007, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Peter Dick Johnson, I understand your point. But the Bible and the commandments in the old testiment still hold true in the new one. Maybe where Jesus was homosexuality wasn’t common. But here is a chapter in Matthew ch. 15 where Jesus Preaches: 16″Are you still so dull?” Jesus asked them. 17″Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man ‘unclean.’ 19For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. 20These are what make a man ‘unclean’; but eating with unwashed hands does not make him ‘unclean.’ ” He is still preaching against sexual immoral acts. Again, I don’t mean to insult anyone, this is just what I believe to be true. If you disagree, I understand.

Posted by: Carrie | July 27, 2007, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Carrie, you are free to believe what you like. But yes we disagree. The Bible also condoned slavery and stoning your wife, did it not?

Posted by: p | July 27, 2007, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

If you want to see a similar public arguement from our history all you have to do is go back and look at what the newspapers were publishing in the decades leading up to the civil war. A bigot is a bigot is a bigot and it doesn’t matter what religion you use to support it. Every church in the south swore that the bible supported the slavery too

Posted by: gordi | July 27, 2007, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Peter Dick Johnson, I believe the Word of God to be infallible and God-inspired. Therefore, it is perfect. I’m just explaining why most people in this country see homosexuality to be wrong. Because they have a strong faith in Christianity. I’m sorry you disagree, but that’s just how it is. People are different with different opinions.

Posted by: Carrie | July 27, 2007, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

p, It does do that in the old testiment, yes. Jesus came to the earth to relieve us of sin and condemnation. If you remember, there is a chapter about the stoning of an adulterer. Jesus forgave her, as he forgave a prostitute also. He came to set us (those who have faith) free from God’s judgement and wrath. The only forgiveness in the old testiment was through sacrifices. Jesus became the ultimate sacrifice so that we do not have to be stoned, but to ask God for forgiveness and through the blood of His son, we are healed. That is why, p. Sorry to put all this out to you be I just had to explain. :) Have a great day p!

Posted by: Carrie | July 27, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Carrie, to be honest I’ve never taken the Bible too seriously. I’ve read bits and pieces and have had many of my Christian friends go into detail about some of it’s teachings, but i prefer to make my moral decisions based upon my personal experiences and of those passed down through my family. Not saying my view is in any way superior to yours, just that this is where our differing views come from. Have a nice night.

Posted by: p | July 27, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Who cares if someone else is gay? If you think they’re going to hell, who cares if they are? Ok, you think it’s wrong – so what? Isn’t that what free will is all about – taking the chance on being wrong?

Posted by: Nina Nealon | July 27, 2007, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

There is a Gay Agenda in this country, because gays generally have the freedom to speak out. In countries where there is no protected speech and/or other freedoms, gays are not so public with their lives. I wonder how many gays are in the closet, in Iraq or Saudi Arabia? All that aside, it should never surprise even a single gay couple that they might be met with suspicion or worse. Just as most people are average, most people are not gay. This is not a judgment, but an observation (Of course, some of the most vehement activists will claim that we are all bisexual and living in denial). So, what we have is a simple case of our country having the means to the protect the minority. But do we have the will? I pose this rhetorical question: If a church accepted gays, would we be having this discussion? How much should a church doctrine be interfering with public/civic law? Boy, that’s a tough one, isn’t it? Because although we have the tradition and a Constitution that promotes a separation of church and state, most of our laws have a moral basis. So, again, it should not surprise a single gay couple that their lives are met with suspicion or worse.

Posted by: Rabbit | July 27, 2007, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

I’m not gay, but I believe in live-and-let-live. People who claim that being gay is wrong run the risk of being judged wrong themselves. America is way past ready to discuss these things in the open, and it’s likely the Dems will probably solidfy their base on this issue.

Posted by: rob | July 27, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Peter Dick Johnson, your attempt to duck away from what the New Testament says about homosexuality is self-delusional. Jesus said many things in his life that didn’t make it into the Gospels. What of his words that are in the Gospels are limited to a very narrow message — believe in him and a person will be saved.
But there’s a wider message that is in other books of the New Testament. Part of this wider message is that homosexuality is a great sin leading to eternal damnation. Paul speaks of it in Romans and in Corinthians.
Also, Jesus’ brother, Jude, refers to homosexuals as FILTHY and says they will “suffer the vengence of eternal fire”. Here is the passage from the book of Jude (King James). (You don’t think Jesus’ brother would know what Jesus said and thought on the subject?)
“001:004 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, ***turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness***, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
001:005 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward *destroyed them* that believed not.
001:006 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath *reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day*.
001:007 Even as *Sodom and Gomorrha*, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and ***going after STRANGE FLESH***, are set forth for an example, suffering the ***vengeance of eternal fire***.
001:008 Likewise also these ***FILTHY dreamers defile the flesh***, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.
001:009 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, ***The Lord rebuke thee***.
001:010 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but ***what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves***.”
001:011 ***Woe unto them!*** for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.”
Peter Dick Johnson, if you want to be so self-delusional, that is your choice. But you certainly are being self-delusional — as are all who encourage homosexuality.

Posted by: Jude Reader | July 27, 2007, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

carrie, carrie, carrie…that passage you’re so fond of also excludes “idolators, adulterers, effeminate, abusers of themselves, thieves, covetous, drunkards, revilers, and extortionists” from the “kingdom of heaven”. and then corinthians goes on to define adulterers as anyone who has sex outside of marriage, including those who divorce and remarry…looks to me like no one here is going to get into your heaven, including large numbers of the leaders of the religious right…
by the by carrie, do you cover your head when you pray? ’cause chapter 11 says that you need to.
the “gay agenda” is a freakin’ wedge issue that the far right is using to get americans to overlook the fact that our democracy is being bought by big business. what would jesus say about the 75-fold differential between the incomes of the wealthiest 20% and the poorest 20%? if you want to talk about sin, that’s one to take on–not what a handful of people do in their personal lives that hurts no one…

Posted by: n | July 27, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Funny how the religious groups keep coming out against the gay people… What did we just see? 600M dollar settlement by the church for molesting little boys? I’m not saying that gay people are molesters.. just that MALE PRIESTS had sexual desires towards MALE CHILDREN… Male to Male = Gay.. no? How about the multiple other examples of people higher-up in the church being convicted with male prostitutes? The list goes on and on. You have to know that those who are most against gays, are MOST LIKELY gay themselves! If you’re gay, then fine… who cares! It’s no one else’s business but yours! Bunch of hypocrites out there, lemme tell ya!

Posted by: Just a regular guy | July 27, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Recite the Pledge of Allegiance again, and repeat to yourselves this: Liberty and justice for all. Not limited to those that are closely tied to one religious group or the other; nor limited to those who hold convictions based not on what is right or wrong, but instead following what their political party stands for.
The issue of a citizen’s rights far outweigh partisanship on any scale.
Fifty years from now, when homosexuals and lesbians carry the same rights as those of any race, any gender, or any sexual orientation–where will you say you stood?

Posted by: Karma | July 27, 2007, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

The pledge of allegiance has absolutely no legal force of any kind, the Constitution is the supreme law and governs the federal government not the people who are sovereign. Now knowing that, no one has any right to interfere with the rights of any other person whether you agree with their choices or not, if you don’t like something walk away or turn the channel but leave everyone else alone to enjoy the same rights you do.

Posted by: Patriot 2008 | July 27, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

People on here think the bible should be done with, well if that was too happen then what would you have to go against? It appears some people on here there only thing in life to feel complete is to go against catholics, how do people like this because so worthless? I like how some of these people on here cherry pick passages in the bible, then spin them to fit there agenda. The laws of this country came from the same bible you guys hate so much, no wonder you hate this country!

Posted by: Bill | July 27, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

There should be no place in American politics or electoral debate for a discussion on the sexual preferences of any people. Mistaking this ridiculous, sophomoric item as a national issue and following it to it’s natural conclusion we should then open candidate debates over which position is or is not the acceptable one or two even among heterosexuals and ridicule those who practice sex in all but the accepted standard position(s). Everyone who does otherwise can then be called perverts and deviants. And the politicians can go on debating about it too, pretending it to be a national issue as they do every campaign cycle concerning people that are gay.

Posted by: Kid Charlemagne | July 27, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

carrie, did you just say its okay to hate gays because the “bible says so” and then give the example of slavery due to “bible says so” in your defense. cause if you did, that’s some screwed up stuff
—————–
people do stuff i don’t like all the time, i don’t like jehovah’s witness showing up at my front door but i don’t bomb their churches. i don’t like the hare krishnas harassing me with their pamphlets and you know…peacefully playing their tambourines and giving out free food, but i don’t think they shouldn’t have rights.
gay or not…still a person, and if you’re a christian…god made them the way they are…if you ever actually got to know a gay man or lesbian you would realize that no one would ever choose to live their life fearing that their family will disown them, or that the government will not allow them to marry the person they love, and because of what, something in a book that was written long ago about a magical being that there is no physical proof of other than your undying faith, due to a fear of HELL, and because you grew up being told god was real.

Posted by: kelsey | July 27, 2007, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Look; People who don’t believe the Bible are in trouble, yes, but people who don’t follow Jesus are headed for hell.
That’s what he said, that we, all of us, were damned, but that he, Jesus, came and died for us so that we could follow him. But people who continue in their sins are not merely going to hell, they are going to hell on a fast express train! Why? Because God let us kill this good man and we (some of us,) ignore him.
Over and over again the Bible tells us not to be involved in any with gays and what they do. People who ignore this are going to be like toast after many cycles through the toaster. But still alive and with feelings.
I have an in-law who is easily the most evil person I have ever met — he is a child abuser, a long time homosexual, and commits many bad acts with no care or concern. Yet, he is a minister in one of these congreagations that accept gays.
What do you think? Do you think God has someone changed?
Do you think God has a shortened arm, so that he cant reach out? Or that he is asleep.
The Bible says that neither is the case.
Also I see him work in the lives of his kids — and love them and change them.
Anyway, each of us has to decide whether we want to be Christians or not. More than anything else, each of us has to decide what to make of Jesus.
That question is without parallel.

Posted by: Jules Gilbert | July 27, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

“Americans For Truth”!? LOL. Wouldn’t a more accurate name be “Americans for Propaganda, Hate, and Bigotry”? And what is this “homosexual agenda” and “homosexual lobby” these bigots are always foaming at the mouth about? Are they talking about people who refuse to hate and speak out for tolerance? You know, just like Jesus did? They sure love to pick and choose their Bible statements. Doesn’t it also say in the Bible that woman who wear red are harlots and they’ll go to hell? Why don’t these bigots go after them? And I love the reporter saying gay and lesbian issues remain quite controversial. There are always going to be bigots, right wing extremists, Republicans, and religious zealots who preach hate against people who look, act, or think different from them. Does this mean there’s controversy? No, it just means these bigots should be ignored. And SteveW, why should the Democratic candidates be asked about “HIV-dangerous behavior, spouse-beating, or pedophelia (sic)in the gay community” when there are more heterosexuals then homosexuals: 1) with HIV/AIDS, 2) that engage in spouse beating (which I would imagine is an almost non existent problem since gays can only marry in one state), and 3) and that are convicted every year on charges relating to pedophilia. Also, your figures on homosexuality are incorrect and unsupported by any number of studies. Gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgendered people make up almost 10% of the entire population. How sad and pathetic that in the year 2007 there are still such hateful, bigoted, closed minded, homophobic, malicious people out there.

Posted by: informedone | July 27, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

jules—if your in-law is a child abuser, why haven’t you reported him to the authorities? why isn’t he in jail? or is it that you have your own idea of what constitutes shild abuse-one that doesn’t match up with the legal definition? (which is generally speaking, pretty broad, by the way.)
very few child molesters are actually homosexuals–like rapists of all types, they are all about a perverted abuse of power. you are using your experience with one person to paint an entire group with the same brush…is that how you would like to be judged?

Posted by: n | July 27, 2007, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

i am so tired of hearing from sects such as the “Americans for Truth” who are so quick to point out the sins of others. Was it once said that no one is without sin and that the plank was to be removed from the eye of the accuser before seeking to remove the splinter from the accused? Heteosexuals or people who prefer to have sexual intercourse with those of the opposite sex have done inspeakable acts of debauchery in ways not that different of homosexuals. In sin rated by gender?

Posted by: George Smith | July 27, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Jesus Christ teaches us to love one another unconditionally. It is easy to love someone who is a like you – a fellow American, a fellow Christian, etc. But what about people who are different? Doesn’t Jesus teach us to love them too? Isn’t this the exact point behind the parable of the Good Samaritan?
If you love me and hate the “sin” then your love becomes conditional and that contradicts the teachings of Jesus.
Don’t love me and deny me the legal rights that you have. I don’t need that type of love. Neither does Jesus becuase it’s a conditional love.
It’s not easy to love gay people, especially if it has to be unconditional. Your lives would be so much more “Christianable” if we weren’t around.
Hey, maybe gay people’s presence is God’s test for straight people. If Jesus teaches us to love one another unconditionally, then by the “majority” attempting to deny gay folks their rights, straight folks contradict the teachings of Jesus Christ.
I am willing to give you another chance but let’s try to do it right this time.
james

Posted by: james everett | July 27, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

First of all the Bible is the biggest scam in history. It is a way to make people behave the way a certain few would like them to. It is just a book written by MAN. It says not to worship in false profits..how the hell can we worship the bible – for all we know it could be false.
I think the important thing is to believe in yourself and live a good life and help as many people as you can – regardless if they are different from you.
Personally, I think people who believe so strongly in the Bible or ones who have less faith in themselves. Live your life for you! The way you would like to so long as you are not hurting anyone else.
Gay, Straight, Black, White, Asian, Indian -what ever. It doesn’t matter.

Posted by: Don | July 27, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Homosexual behavior is opposed to basic science and basic morality. Men are not supposed to have “sex” with men and women are not supposed to have “sex” with women. People running for president of the U.S. should understand this. Homosexual “sex” contradicts the basic complementarity between man and woman, which results in the creation of new human life — which is no small matter. The homosexual movement is based on extreme relativism and hedonism — “that which feels good should be accepted as right.” I support you Americans for Truth.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 27, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

oh george what truth you speak. everyone sins. and why must christians make it their business as to which sins people commit. i’m so tired of hearing hell this jesus that, keep it to yourself, it is not like we haven’t heard it before. if i wanted to save myself i would have already, you are only irritating people and turning them even further from the “straight and narrow” and if you want to be FULLY WITHOUT SIN you should probably be amish or a jehovah’s witness (they’re pretty damn serious) other wise i can gauruntee you’re a sinner.
and for how much you know about jesus, you should speak of tolerance and acceptance not of hatred and threats of hell.
and to a particular uncultured type of christains, i have faith that it is a crime against humanity if you believe so strongly in something but have not invested any time in learning about other ancient religions…perhaps the ones that preceded the bible, like the story of gilgamesh which is the ORIGINAL version of noah’s ark. or the similarities between siddhartha (buddha) and your almighty jesus.

Posted by: kelsey | July 27, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

I seem to always see where one “Christian” group is against homosexuality. I do not see any where in the bible where Christ says any thing about homosexuality. He talks about sex, but only the narrow minded would accept the thought that the sex he is referring to as bad is homosexual sex. It is deviant sex, whether that be homosexual or hetersexual, or beastiality sex, is up to question. BUT, what is not up to question is “are homosexual people born that way?” The answer is definitely YES. So, if you follow the line that God makes all people, and that we are made in his image, then God has a little gay in him. I think the percentage is 10 to 15%. Instead of always condeming, Jesus did not condem any one, but today’s “christian” feels it his or her duty to point out faults in others and to condem any behavior that does not meet their “standard”. Well, like some of the most vocal leaders of the christian movement have recent proven, even they are homosexual. They hide it because so many “hate” homosexuals. Why hate them??? Easy, they are not like you. Or, maybe they are too much LIKE you????

Posted by: Les | July 27, 2007, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Why do groups like “Americans for Truth” lie so much? There was a time when religion ruled the world…it was called the Dark Ages.

Posted by: Luis M. | July 27, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

jude, i know many versions of the bible also claim pigs to be filthy. do you eat pork?

Posted by: kelsey | July 27, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Being gay is not a lifestyle! Being gay is not a choice! I wish these so-called “Christian” groups would mind their own business and concentrate on all the real deviants found within their ranks!

Posted by: Luis M. | July 27, 2007, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Jesus of Nazareth condemned homosexual acts with the same words he condemned divorce: “In the beginning God made them male and female . . . and the man leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife and the two become one . . . therefore what God has joined let no man separate.” If Jesus forbade divorce for contradicting God’s design for the union of man and woman how much more did he forbid homosexual unions which lack “male and female”? It is called deductive reasoning.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 27, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

These are the same groups that told their followers that Bush was being called to lead this nation. You will never eliminate fools. I guess people chose to be gay to experience religious bigotry.

Posted by: Mikw Johnson | July 27, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

dear abc, i see some comments have been deleted. are you censoring us again?
<3 kelsey

Posted by: kelsey | July 27, 2007, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

In response to this question: “jude, i know many versions of the bible also claim pigs to be filthy. do you eat pork?”
No, I do not at pork.
To put your question in context, it refers to this that I said earlier:
“In the book of Jude, Jesus’s brother clearly says homosexuality is “filthy” and says those who follow it will “suffer the vengence of eternal fire”.”
I personally believe everything is true in the New Testament and try not to knowingly go against anything in it, though like all humans I of course fail miserably. But when I fail, I try to change i.e. “Go and sin no more”.
Some of the New Testament is figurative, for example Jesus often talks in figurative lanquage, especially in his parables. But there is nothing figurative about the New Testaments admonitions against homosexuality. The admonitions are literal and clear — and damning.

Posted by: Jude Reader | July 27, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

To Ill-informedone: I spent a good deal of time looking up studies, and found more references that supported one–the 1994 University of Chicago study of about 3,500 people nationwide, which included 90-minute interviews with each participant. 2.8 percent of males and 1.5 percent of females were gay, lesbian, or bi-sexual. The figure approached 10 percent only in a select number of urban areas, where, for example, 9 percent of males were gay. If the 3 percent figure nationwide turned out to have been different, I would have used a different comparison to another interest group than people who work in Agriculture, which turns out also to be about 3 percent. My point was that gay issues are perfectly legitimate as a debate topic, as would be, say, agricultural issues…but most debates avoid tough questions. I then looked up HIV studies, which say that, even after decades of education, HIV remains overwhelmingly confined to the gay community and intravenous drug users. If there were a debate on intravenous drug issues, it would be as appropriate a tough question to ask about HIV-risky behavior at that debate. ‘Spouse’ is a word now used to mean a life partner, married or otherwise, by many, including those in non-traditional, heterosexual families. Spouse abuse is an important issue in any community–no matter where that community ranks statistically–just ask a victim. I did misspell “pedophilia”. My dictionary is to old to have that word (progress is wonderful, isn’t it?), and my computer does not have a spell-checker, just like yours doesn’t have a fact-checker.

Posted by: SteveW | July 27, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

I am opposed to homosexual behavior based on science and religion. Basic anatomy and physiology teaches the objective purpose of our bodies. To treat our bodies — which are a fundamental part of who we are — contrary to their purpose is to live illogically and actually does harm to both parties involved.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 27, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

I think the whole point isn’t about whether or not being homosexual is right or wrong. It’s about civil liberities. No one is asking the Cathlolic or any Christian church to permit homosexuals to walk down the isle. No one is granting them a golden pass to heaven. And no one is arguing against your religion. In my opinion, it’s no one’s business what other people do in the bedroom, and all people should be granted civil liberties. Just because you think what someone does is wrong, doesn’t mean there needs to be a law preventing them the same civil rights other people have.
For instance, I don’t like or agree what the KKK does. Does that mean we should make a law banning the KKK from marrying, having or adopting children, or making medical decisions for their spouses? And if were going down that road, we’ll make the same laws for people that lie, because that’s in the bible WAY more than homosexuality is. The whole thing is taken way too seriously. Find something more destructive to argue about than who people are sleeping with.
Connecticut has Civil Unions and guess what? Life hasn’t changed for anyone except the gay people that want to get civil rights.
Back in the day, people used the bible to justify slavery. This is just another intolerance people try to back up with the bible. And honestly, I think you are the WORST Christians. Sin is not for you to judge. It’s for God to judge. So be Christ-like, and instead of wasting your time trying to prevent human rights… volunteer act your local homeless shelter and do something good for the world.

Posted by: Danielle | July 27, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

JB being so close-minded is an abomination.
your god inspired beliefs do not apply to everyone..i hope you’re not surprised.

Posted by: kelsey | July 27, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

This it’s why it’s unfortunate that we don’t live in an atheist society.

Posted by: Andy Martin | July 27, 2007, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

I speculate Jesus hung with a few homosexuals because he was known to befriend the outcasts. Hate the sin, love the sinner?

Posted by: Sandra | July 27, 2007, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Bill, begin with the centuries of our enslavement of the black man and examine the 100 year genocide of the red man. Then look at our war record in a short 250 years which is contrary to our pledge “in God we trust”, then tell me how you’ve come to the conclusion that this nation was built on any bible worth it’s salt or the word of any true and worthy God.

Posted by: Kid Charlemagne | July 27, 2007, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

This is not even an issue that politicians should be worrying about. Yes, perhaps being gay, lesbian, transexual or bisexual is wrong–in our eyes maybe, but we are not to JUDGE and we are not GOD. Moreover, you have other important things to worry about like, famine, hunger, wars, et cetera. We are the captain of our ships and someday, we’ll be all accountable to GOD when we die and how we lived our lives here on Earth. We are not from here and some of you may not understand where I’m coming from, but if you conform with the norms of this world, then your spirit will suffer. So don’t judge someone because of the way he is or what he/she does. Do your JOB as a LEADER, a POLITICIAN and CONCENTRATE with what’s really happening around us.

Posted by: Troy_25 | July 27, 2007, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

My relationship with God is my business; it is personal. When I face God, nobody will be there acting in either a prosecutorial or defense capacity. It will be God and me.
So don’t worry about my soul. I’ll worry about it. Concern yourself with your own soul.
In terms of my legal rights? Laws are made; laws are changed; laws are repealed.
Gay folks want the state of matrimony legalized so that we can share the same legal benefits afforded heterosexuals. The discussion should not go beyond that. THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF THE ISSUE.
As a Catholic, I know that my marriage will never be recognized by the Church. That’s my business; it is a private matter. Obviously, I have a problem with the Church but I have no problem with God.
God should not be in this issue.

Posted by: james everett | July 27, 2007, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

There is no equality between heterosexual unions and homosexual behavior. The union of a man and woman is the nucleus of society. In this union is the perfect complementarity of man and woman, new huma life, the source of the State, and the continuation of the human species. In homosexual behavior there is no complementarity between man and man or woman and woman. There is no new life. They don’t deserve the same recognition or benefits. They are not equal!

Posted by: Benjamin | July 27, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

The State or Government would not exist without the union of man and woman. The State owes its very existence to this union. The State would be ungrateful, illogical, and unjust to give the same recognition and the same benefits to homosexual unions — as if they give rise to the same benefits as the union of a man and woman.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 27, 2007, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

So, many people hate and are disgusted by gays and lesbians. Strange that you are more than willing to take our tax money to promote “your agenda”.

Posted by: bluezz | July 27, 2007, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Who the Hell cares what Jesus thinks? Or Bhudda, or Zeus? We don’t live in a theocracy. A church or a mosque can recognize or not recognize whatever they want to. But in a secular, pluralistic society, of course gay people should have the same rights to marry as straight people.

Posted by: dave | July 27, 2007, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

I don’t know why the media is highlighting a ‘small’ fringe group of supposed Republicans hating gay people. The democrats will not debate on the top news channel. The democrat activists are trying to force advertisers to quit advertising on that channel. They are specifically attacking one company for advertising on that channel. There are constant references to freedom of speech by the left. I feel as though it is totally the other way. It’s amazing but it is very scary. I think history will show that America made a major mistake by not allowing both sides of issues to be shown.

Posted by: sttanman | July 27, 2007, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

The democrats are exactly why Aristotle opposed democracy. They do not care about truth, justice, or logic but only about power and they will acquiesce to anyone who can put them into power; be it the abortion industry, the homosexual activists, the ACLU and their atheist and pornographic agenda, etc. This party has lost all touch with reality.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 27, 2007, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

There are so many hypocrites here – they claim they’re not bigots and that they’re not advocating hatred of those who are different, then they post comments like “So, many people hate and are disgusted by gays and lesbians.” Yes, you ARE advocating discrimination and hatred! Currently, anyone even suspected of being a homosexual can be kicked out of their rental housing, fired from their job, refused admission to a sick loved one’s bedside, denied inheritance rights for joint property and generally be treated as a second-class leper in most states in this so-called Land of Freedom and Equality. I’m not gay (in fact, I’m a perfectly straight mom of 3) but I find it sickening that anyone would justify such treatment of other human beings. I just can’t understand how anyone can believe that their religion condones such masochism.

Posted by: Julie | July 27, 2007, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Actually, I meant “condones such sadism” (although I suspect more than a few of these hate-mongers have masochism issues of their own.)

Posted by: Julie | July 28, 2007, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Julie: the land of the free and equal does not mean the land where you get to do anything and everything you want, hence the existence of laws. Men who have “sex” with men and women who have “sex” with women should not receive the same recognition and benefits as a man and a woman who create new human life and sustain this country. Without the union of a man and a woman this land of the free and equal would be just that — land without people. Homosexual acts are totally unnatrual and should not be done and there is no equality between heterosexual unions and homosexual behavior. Wake up people!

Posted by: Benjamin | July 28, 2007, 1:18 am 1:18 am

benjamin buddy, you be ticking me off.
“The State or Government would not exist without the union of man and woman. The State owes its very existence to this union. The State would be ungrateful, illogical, and unjust to give the same recognition and the same benefits to homosexual unions — as if they give rise to the same benefits as the union of a man and woman.” what the ****?
one could just as easily say that the state would not exist without the leadership of wealthy, white, male landowners, and it would be unjust to give the same benefits to the rest of the citizenry-as if they give rise to the same benefits…you may not have noticed, but we are a nation built on the radical notion that we are all equal–even those who would deny equal rights to all are permitted to speak their minds.

Posted by: n | July 28, 2007, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Benjamin – what a ridiculous comment! Homosexuals are a small percentage of the population, and since many of them won’t have children anyway (through adoption, surrogate, etc.) why not let them marry? It’s not like they’re going to marry someone of the opposite sex and have kids if they aren’t allowed to marry someone of the same sex. There are still plenty of heterosexuals out there to “sustain” the country.

Posted by: wyoguy1 | July 28, 2007, 1:22 am 1:22 am

The homosexual activists and those who support them are basing their position on equality and justice. My points are to make evident that there is no equality between heterosexual unions and homosexual behavior, thus there is no injustice in not giving them the same recognition and benefits. I’m analyzing the situation from very basic reality — the source of human life and the existence of every State or government that has ever existed.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 28, 2007, 1:28 am 1:28 am

If this Christian stuff is all that some would have us believe it’s cracked up to be, how come the majority of Christians believe in and want to go to heaven and yet no one is in any kind of a hurry to die?
Listen, if you’re going to be around anyway, could you please just let everyone else live life their own way and get your opinions and superstitions out of other people’s bedrooms?

Posted by: Kid Charlemagne | July 28, 2007, 1:34 am 1:34 am

No one will ever convince me that what my mother and father did when they conceived me — brought me into existence — is equal or the same as what two men or two women do. It would be like slapping my parents in the face and disparaging their love for each other and their gift to me — life and existence.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 28, 2007, 1:36 am 1:36 am

ok ben, buddy boy, let’s see if i got this right–homosexuals should not be allowed equal rights because they don’t procreate, thereby continuing our great nation? hmmm…well, i’m a lesbian and i have two children (we all make mistakes–the marriage, not the children, who are the light of my life). i have good friends who have been married for over 25 years and sadly have been unable to have children. who has greater rights in your formula? my straight, but childless friends? or myself, who despite my perfidity, has borne a new generation of forward-thinking americans?
i think i know your answer, and i’m sure that you can’t possibly see the flaw in your logic, but i thought that i’d put it out there anyway…
sleep well, you of the absolute certainty of the right (wing).

Posted by: n | July 28, 2007, 1:47 am 1:47 am

To all of you who seem to want to change the minds of the many bigots on here, let me give you a word of advice. Save your breath. As you can see from their postings, these people don’t respond to reason or facts or basic notions of humanity and equality. Bigots hate just because they do. I grew up in the South in the 1960s and initially I tried to argue with the racists and got the same result you are getting on here. They are ignorant, hateful people period. Don’t worry. The march of history, equality and compassion will brush them aside just as it has brushed aside the religious and racist and misogynist bigots throughout history. They’re losing and they are getting more desperate — just ignore them. Nothing makes them angrier.

Posted by: LAGuy | July 28, 2007, 1:50 am 1:50 am

LAguy–
you are, of course, absolutely right. (but don’t you think that sometimes it’s entertaining to try and torment them?)
ta

Posted by: n | July 28, 2007, 1:57 am 1:57 am

OK TA, I’ll admit it is fun baiting them. Kind of like teasing a yapping chihuaha who thinks he’s a lot bigger than he is.

Posted by: LAGuy | July 28, 2007, 2:00 am 2:00 am

I believe there is no equality between heterosexual unions and homosexual behavior for many reasons: in heterosexual unions there is a perfect physical, physiological, emotional, and personal fit. From this perfect union comes new life. Physical abnormalities such as sterility do not nullify the perfection of the personal union, although these couples often struggle greatly with this lack. These abnormalities cannot be compared to the total inablity of homosexual behavior to create life, because the latter are due to misusing the body, not an abnormal functioning of the body. The union of man and woman is the nucleus and foundation of society.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 28, 2007, 2:01 am 2:01 am

probably ’cause they only did it once–
didja notice that for all his sermonizing, he didn’t actually answer my question? (probably a politician–that would explain a lot!!)

Posted by: n | July 28, 2007, 2:10 am 2:10 am

My friend, you also need to be careful about stating that your marriage was a mistake because that automatically includes your children. Your children cannot be separated from your marriage. They would not be here without it.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 28, 2007, 2:16 am 2:16 am

OHHHHHHHTay. Somebody on here is just a few fries short of a happy meal.

Posted by: LAGuy | July 28, 2007, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Anyway – I hope all of you have a good night.
We are intelligent and free creatures capable of self-determination. All desires and instincts must come under the control of our intelligence and free-will. Determine yourselves; don’t be determined by the world.
Live according to the truth — you have a choice.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 28, 2007, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Sounds like:
(Posted by: n | Jul 28, 2007 1:22:12 AM)
Needs to get out of the closet…I mean damn! Hate spewed like that ultimately is directed towards “self”.
Dude, or dude-et…get your gay on and stop hatein’!!
Open the closet door and just step out!!
Kisses!!!!!
I’ll be O.K.

Posted by: Atlguy | July 28, 2007, 3:03 am 3:03 am

You have to ask yourself a bigger question when pondering the gay and lesbian issue: “Do you really believe there is some old guy called God floating somewhere above us who gets so upset and has his big godly feelings hurt by gay behavior that he throws temper tantrums like the very bigots on this thread?” After the great flood and Jesus dying, Jesus’s Dad apparently mellowed out and CON-servative bigots need to too. I wouldn’t be suprised if God loved the gays and lesbians more than they love the judgemental Christians who act oppositely of what Jesus taught. I truly feel bad for Jesus, he always either gets kicked out of these conversations with Christians or forgotten about. Poor guy.

Posted by: Truth | July 28, 2007, 4:29 am 4:29 am

This is such a diconomy…doesn’t it say somewhere that their is a division between church and state??? So why are we once again making this political..It always strikes me funny that the government says I am good enough to pay taxes and had no problem with me serving my country for eight years and was willing to let me die for its preservation of freedom. But as a gay American my value changed. I defended a constitution that doesn’t defend me. Although my church views my 6 year commitment to my partner with value because Mr President your church doesnt share the same values as mine you feel you have the right to deny me my constitutional rights with no consideration of my character. As a catholic are you going to condemn a Jewish person their rights because you differ in their perceptions…so why am I any different. We are EVERYWHERE!!!! We are often college educated with beautiful homes and most importantly with the power to vote…it’s only a matter of time and my guess is when we finally do get equal rights for our equal contributions to this country, the world will continue on!!!

Posted by: tracy swartz | July 28, 2007, 4:30 am 4:30 am

You religious fanatics are ridiculous! You will see when you get to the other side….that there’s nothing there. Live life today the best you can, it’s all you got! The Bible is a hoax.

Posted by: Don | July 28, 2007, 6:53 am 6:53 am

Is anybody getting just a little tired of this?
I am sure all gays and lesbians will be granted this “right”. All lawmakers are after all lawyers and they can’t wait to get their hands on all the fees for settling the divorces!
Now we all have to go through the abortion issue again, we have had available birth control and the morning after pill for years, but guess it’s too cumbersome to use. So now I have to spend my tax dollars to clean up your “mess”, because you are too lazy or irresponsible to take your free pills or was it because it’s aginst your religion to take them?
Let’s just let the country go to hell in a handbasket so we can deal with all this circular thinking again!
I happen to believe their are more important issues at stake than your sexlife!

Posted by: White Mountain | July 28, 2007, 6:59 am 6:59 am

This fires me up. Do gay people have the right to host a debate, organize, lobby for their rights.. of course they do. They have just as much right as the “christian coalition” on the other side lobbying the exact opposite. Further, as another poster said, progress will pass these gay haters by. Just like it did the sexists, racists, etc. It’s a historical certainty that we will evolve pass this too (pun intended for all you creationists out there). You know why? Because as much as you may hate the “gay lifestyle”, it doesn’t matter legally. No one can justify keeping rights from a person on the basis of sexual orientation. It doesn’t matter if it doesn’t meet your moral approval. People have a right to live as they wish in this country.. and that includes gays. If they wish to get married by the state, the state will eventually find legally they have no argument to deny them. Churches have, and will always have, the right to decide who they wish to marry.. as they are not tax paying entities.. but the government is supported by the taxes of ALL citizens, therefore, cannot discriminate. It’s really, that simple.

Posted by: Katie | July 28, 2007, 8:03 am 8:03 am

As if God doesn’t love gays! The Bible says, “For God so loved the WHOLE world…”
Who are these whackos with the audacity to claim representation for Christians? Maybe God wants to use the government and all these debate forums to call attention to an under-served and mal-understood population of His homosexual children, whom He loves and adores, as much as his straight, uptight, bigoted, and hard-hearted children…

Posted by: MyG | July 28, 2007, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Our country is “divided” on every topic under the sun. I have witnessed intense debates about whether or not kids should be allowed to bring peanut butter sandwiches to school. No one agrees on anything in this country, including whether or not there is a God, and if there is, what he/she cares about. That is how it should be. A diversity of ideas and tolerance of differences of opinion are what this country is all about.
Intolerance, particularly religious intolerance and the anti-gay rhetoric that always accompanies it are hallmarks of a totalitarian state. The further our country moves from our Constitution and our ideals, the louder and stronger that anti-gay rhetoric gets.
People who bolster their anti-gay stance with material from (whatever one of many very different versions of) the Bible, are a real threat to our democracy and to the ideals and principles expressed in our Constitution.
Yes, the Founding Fathers knew all about this threat. Our Constitution and the Bill of Rights were designed to protect all citizens from a monarchical government, but also from the threat of religious political extremists and their tendency to impose their religious/political manifestos on others.
So true patriots who support the Constitution and our democratic way of life will shun such rhetoric and instead seek the path of peaceful co-exist. One flag, one country, one nation of very diverse people with all kinds of religious and political beliefs.

Posted by: xnalivs | July 28, 2007, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Yawn. Why doesn’t this wingnut group that no one has ever heard of just hold its own debate. Not even worthy of a web story by ABC.

Posted by: Mike | July 28, 2007, 10:20 am 10:20 am

The Bible is the inspired word of God. 1 Corinthians, with it’s admonishments to homosexuals (among many other groups) was written by the Apostle Paul whose life was utterly changed by an appearance of the living Jesus Christ.
God hates homosexuality because it is against his nature, but what so many miss out on is that God hates all sin because it is against his nature. Christians are called to love all as God does but seek and encourage righteousness as God does.
Homosexuals, like the rest of us as sinners, can and will spend eternal life with God as long as they repent of their sins and ask for His mercy. That is necessary for all, but available for all. It’s really quite simple.
Also, it is not just Christianity that speaks out against homosexuality, Judiasm, Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism also view the practice as immoral.
Lastly, their is no doubt that people have done great evil in the name of religion from Christian bombers of abortion clinics to Islamic terrorists to Hindu rioters in India. What cannot be denied however is the vast good that religion also inspires people to do…abolition was led by Christians, the Confessing Church stood against Hitler and his genocide (admittedly, other Christians did not), and today billions and billions of dollars is collected from religious assemblies in the wake of monumental tragedies like 9/11 and Katrina as well as “everyday” tragedies like soup kitchens and drug counseling.
Too many people on here are demonstrating the very hate they see in the “Fundementalists” Christians. There is no doubt that some Christians have failed in their efforts to exhibit God’s love (we all do sometimes), but stooping to their level is not going to help anyone.

Posted by: Tim | July 28, 2007, 10:20 am 10:20 am

It’s fine if you believe that the Bible “is the inspired word of God.” But many people don’t, certainly nobody can prove that it is and it shouldn’t be shoved down people’s throats. When you can’t even prove the EXISTENCE of God, it’s incredibly arrogant to go even a step further and say that your particular interpretation of god is the correct one and must be reflected in law.

Posted by: Clint_Keith | July 28, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am

“Pardon our dismissive tone, but homosexual behavior is wrong — at least half the country still regards it as such,” the group writes.
Here’s the question that can’t ever be answered: what’s so terribly wrong with homosexuality? I know the Bible says it’s wrong, but WHY is it wrong?

Posted by: Patrick Craig | July 28, 2007, 11:12 am 11:12 am

What is so terribly wrong with homosexual behavior? (1) It goes against the meaning of our bodies. (2) It does injury to both parties involved — physical and emotional. (3) It is scandalous — sets a bad example for others. (4) 65% of all new HIV cases every year are due to homosexual male sex. (5) It destroys the personalities of the people who live this lifestyle (6) It destroys families.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 28, 2007, 11:23 am 11:23 am

The Bible does not say homosexuality is wrong, bible was inspired by God but written by men and they can interpret words the way they think is convenient for the church of for his own interests religiously speaking. Now, If people could open their minds a bit more they would stop being so mind blinded and would leave people enjoy their lives in peace cos does not matter what we are outside but what we become inside, good human beings able to help each other without thinking about religion, sex, race or asking how much money one has on his bank account and the most important of all, we always get what we give. Particularly speaking I think the nation has so many things real concerning to discuss in a debate.

Posted by: Martha DeMitrius | July 28, 2007, 11:37 am 11:37 am

I want them to ask all the candidates a direct question, with a yes or no answer only…. “If elected, will you submit to Congress, a request to pass a law legalizing gay “marriage”?
My main problem with Homosexuality is the fact that the gay movement and liberal left wing media want us to believe it’s normal, it not normal, it’s a mental disease. That said, I could care less what these people do in the privacy of their homes. I do care when the politicians start allowing them to adopt children into an already abnormal relationship, (before you say it, I know heterosexual relationships have problems to), it’s wrong, and I wont vote for a politician who thinks it may be right. I’m not a religious person, but I do believe “marriage is a very sacred institution” and that politicians and the gay movement should not mess with it. I have no problem if they want to create laws to allow same sex “unions” in order for them to get the same legal benefits that heterosexual couples have (except for adoption). I don’t believe a presidential candidate that openly supports the passage of gay “marriage” laws or adoption of children by gay couples, will ever get elected. It will be fun to see the Democratic candidates try to tip toe around these issues at this debate, are they going to be truthful, or just tell the gay audience what they want to hear, using statements that really don’t pin them down on the issues.

Posted by: FidoNY | July 28, 2007, 11:37 am 11:37 am

The writer of this article, Jack Tapper, is known for his anti-Democrat stories, right-wing bias and Republican leaning views. He recently ripped Harry Reid for no reason.

Posted by: Andrew | July 28, 2007, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Jesus of Nazareth condemned homosexual acts with the same words he condemned divorce: “In the beginning God made them male and female . . . and the man leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife and the two become one . . . therefore what God has joined let no man separate.” If Jesus forbade divorce for contradicting God’s design for the union of man and woman how much more did he forbid homosexual unions which lack “male and female”? It is called deductive reasoning.

Posted by: Benjamin | July 28, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Zues didn’t stike them down and he is older than God. And he weilds a mean lightning bolt. Maybe the Dems are trying to aid Chenny’s daughter. As gross as I think the homo acts are, I am not threatened by them, are you? Some one call Freud.

Posted by: logicaldiscourse | July 28, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Yes, there is definite proof that there is a God. Science, which is the study of facts known to be true, has been allowed to discover the complexity of DNA. It is a known fact, that no two persons on earth has the same exact genetic code found in blood, and has become just like a “fingerprint” for identification purposes. Science now states that the enormous complexity of DNA proves that a super intelligence did indeed create us and everything in the universe and He does indeed know each one of us, individually. Science, however is still working on the breakdown of code between “identical twins” but they will crack it some day. No. 2, God, in his perfect design created man and woman for procreation and the proof of this can clearly be seen in our specially designed anatomy. Yes, do check out “Genesis” in the Bible, which was written by Moses, directly from God’s spoken word and you will see that homosexual conduct is absolutely forbidden, as it conflicts with God’s perfect design. Want more proof? Sodom and Gomorrah, Pompay, Rome:all will go into destruction as they have forsaken their creator.

Posted by: Bonnie | July 28, 2007, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Ah, how I enjoy watching the ignorant frantically defend their ever diminishing moral hold on this world.
With each generation, liberal views gain foothold in out society as antiquated conservative ideals die out.
The majority of youth hold egalitarian viewpoints. Know that your hate mongering views will soon die out with you.
And that’s all the matters…

Posted by: Nate | July 28, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

“Science now states that the enormous complexity of DNA proves that a super intelligence did indeed create us and everything in the universe and He does indeed know each one of us, individually.”
No “science” does not say this. You’re hilarious. If scientists did indeed agree that DNA complexity = God we’d be hearing something about it every day in the news.
Thanks. You made my day. That was funny.

Posted by: Clint_Keith | July 28, 2007, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Religion was designed to be voided from the framework of the constitution for one reason: to protect religious minorities. If we allow public policy to be driven by a religious tone of any kind there will be smaller, minority religious sects discriminated against and thusly persecuted for their beliefs. Just as with the gay debate there are thousands of individual churches that accept homosexuality with their faith. In fact, the United Church of Christ openly accepts homosexuals on this basis: “He didn’t discriminate, so neither do we.” Just as we pursue an economic policy of a mostly free market for the better good we should also follow a free society. Believe what you want to. But please, don’t tread on me.

Posted by: Josh | July 28, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I care as much about what the bible has to say about homosexuality as what Harry Potter has to say about homosexuality. Social policy dictated by fictional religious doctrine is equivalent to a Taleban regime, to primitive shamanism. It’s stupid, has nothing to do with god, and is all about bigoted, spotlight-adoring and power mongering morons whom Jesus, a great prophet of spirituality and higher purpose (who, by the way, frequently and openly contradicted the old testament and never got a chance to edit the new one) would have patiently sought to steer in a more enlightened direction. Trust in your own powers of observation, your own reason. These are creation’s true gifts and it’s your god-granted responsibility to use them. Don’t blindly accept what fallible MEN, subject to their own uninspired prejudices and lusts, sought to exploit two thousand years ago. Trust in your own personal connection with god and fire the exploitive religious intermediary. And then consider human social policy on those and also practical terms – and be grateful that you live in a country where you can, and consider how badly it would suck if that hard-fought constitutional right were hijacked by fundamentalist mullahs, rabbis, or priests, or JK Rowling, each with a bestselling book in tow.

Posted by: Tom | July 28, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Democratic candidates focus on fighting the President instead of terrorists, they also focus on promoting homosexual agenda while gas prices are tripling, homosexuals can take care of themselves without my tax dollars funding them.

Posted by: telecom_1 | July 28, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Interestingly enough, although religion can play a positive role in people’s lives, it also lends itself to uninformed or unsubstantiated group think. So is the case with homosexuality. In the four Gospels traditionally accepted by the Christian religion, there is no record of Jesus discussing homosexuality or same sex relations. Misrepresentation of what Jesus said is critically dangerous as it is used to control populations and manipulate social policy to the exclusion of some. Kudos to the HRC for setting up this debate as it not only promotes freedom of speech, but recognizes that we the people have the right to seek information and make up our own minds. As a Christian man, I often times reflect on the words found in the Pauline literature of the Christian Scriptures that one doesn’t need a teacher, but rather the Spirit will guide one in all things. This is disconcerting for the leadership in Christianity (and rarely mentioned), because it requires them to relinquish control and walk humbly with one’s God. (Micah). The most common thread in all religions is a sense of a being with which one communes in right living with oneself and neigbor. Maybe we should begin there, “love God and love your neighbor as yourself.” I recall that those words are followed by, “do this and you shall live.”

Posted by: Merrell, MA, MDiv | July 28, 2007, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

So, from telecom’s post, we can draw the following conclusions:
1. The President is doing a great job fighting terrorists.
2. Homosexuals don’t care about tripling gas prices.
3. Homosexuals don’t pay taxes, so are entitled to no representation.
Telecom, we all tan in the radiance of your mighty intellect.

Posted by: Rainer | July 28, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

“Democratic candidates focus on fighting the President instead of terrorists, they also focus on promoting homosexual agenda while gas prices are tripling, homosexuals can take care of themselves without my tax dollars funding them.”
Republicans spend all their time trying to find some ridiculous spin to slam Democrats. Like your post. That’s why so many got voted out of office in ’06, and why so many more will be voted out in ’08.
Exactly how you relate the “homosexual agenda” to your taxes is beyond me.

Posted by: Clint_Keith | July 28, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

All of you ‘righteous’ Bible thumpers are a bunch of freaks. I am a gay man, who knows that Jesus Christ is my Savior and that he loves me, I don’t need ANY OF YOU to worry about MY salvation…. ‘he who casts the first stone..’ WHATEVER… 50% of the ‘heterosexual marriages’ end up in DIVORCE…. (guess they ain’t going to Heaven eh??)…
Let’s take a look at some Bible verses:
SHELLFISH “But all in the seas or in the rivers that do not have fins and scales, all that move in the water or any living thing which is in the water, they are an abomination to you.” (Leviticus 11:10)
“They (shellfish) shall be an abomination to you; you shall not eat their flesh, but you shall regard their carcasses as an abomination.” (Leviticus 11:11)
FARMERS: “…do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear material woven of two kinds of material.” (Leviticus 19:19)
Eating pig: “…and the swine, though it divides the hoof, having cloven hooves, yet does not chew the cud, is unclean to you.” (Leviticus 11:7)
Haircuts: “Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.” (Leviticus 19:27)
People as property: “Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property.” (Leviticus 25:44-45)
Heterosexual having sex while a woman is having her period: “If a man lies with a woman during her sickness and uncovers her nakedness, he has discovered her flow, and she has uncovered the flow of her blood. Both of them shall be cut off from her people.” (Leviticus 20:18)
Imagine what would happen today if we deported every man and woman who had ever had sex together during this time??
Kids disrespecting their parents: “For everyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother. His blood shall be upon him.” (Leviticus 20:9)
Hey Carrie and all you others: DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE OTHERS DO UNTO YOU: YOU DONT KNOW ME, you don’t know my life, my thoughts, my prayers, my emotions, my likes, my dislikes and my qualities. Just because I am gay, doesn’t mean I’m a rapist, murderer, child molester, freak, going to hell, uncharitable… I’m a person, who was BORN THIS WAY… EDUCATE YOURSELVES and do something better with your time… how about volunteering for something worthy (hey, I do that), how about having a private fundraiser for a great cause (hmmm.. my partner and I do that, for the animal shelter); how about EDUCATING YOURSELF??? I hope you don’t eat shrimp, pork, ever talk back to your parents, wear clothes made from several types of materials, never work on Sunday, etc…. stop ‘selectively’ quoting the Bible.

Posted by: adam | July 28, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

So if gays can marry..whats next? marriage to multiple partners? Marry animals? What are the boundaries anymore?

Posted by: marinesniper | July 28, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

“So if gays can marry..whats next? marriage to multiple partners? Marry animals? What are the boundaries anymore?”
This is Rick Santorum’s silly argument. The idea, of course, is that if we allow gay marriage, somehow all hell will break loose and we won’t consider ANYTHING sexually deviant. We’ll all be going around having orgies and having sex with animals and crossbreeding whole new species of animals.
It reflects a very messed up view of the human race and the country.
It’s kind of like saying, “if we raise the drinking age to 21, what’s next? 24? 35? 50? Will we even be able to drink in retirement?”
Yeah. Right. That’s what’s going to happen. That’s a very level-headed reaction to an idea.

Posted by: Clint_Keith | July 28, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Elements within the Democratic party are headed on a collision course. The Democrats want to court both the Muslims and the Homosexuals. If you look at Muslim controlled countries, the Homosexuals do not fair very well. This “debate” would not be happening in a Muslim country.

Posted by: jon baker | July 28, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Some believe that the attack on Gays by the Religious Right is the separation of Church and Sex. Hardly — the Church Leadership is into sex big time (which even includes the Catholics priesthood that get away with pedophilia).
Gays are attacked because they’re being honest about lust and have the freedom of expression that the Church denies herself because of its own fabricated Thou Shall Nots. Yeah — the attacks are based on the old sin of pure envy.
Need I say more?
Adam of CA.

Posted by: Adam Young | July 28, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Gee, last time I checked, the Constitution was the basis of law in this country, not the Bible. If it was the Bible, an American Taliban would already be running the country. Damn, they are. It’s called the Republican Party. And what is this “gay agenda” they’re always foaming at the mouth about? Do they mean teaching tolerance? Like Jesus did? If God hates anyone, it’s hateful, bigoted, intolerant, closed minded, self righteous, malicious thugs, not homosexuals.

Posted by: informedone | July 28, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Why can’t everyone just leave the gays alone they are a happy people. I do not care what their choice is when it comes
with whom they want to be.
I do not think that they care about what other people do, why can’t we just leave them alone.
Democrats clean up your own back yard then see what is left over after they are finished.
THOSE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES SHOULD NEVER NEVER THROW STONES!!!

Posted by: Carol R Hill | July 28, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

When will the 4% or less of people who like the same sex leave the rest of the 96% of the heterosexual population alone. Stop trying to force your unnatural, immoral, and illogical ideas and behavior on the rest of society. God back into the closet and stay there. Homosexual behavior is nothing to be proud about.

Posted by: Patrick | July 28, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Why dont they call it something else and give them the same rights. Marrage is part of the bible. Call it something else and see if that calms things down. I do not like the gay lifestyle and it goes against God and Nature. But people have rights and I must repect that. The gay community is trying to press themselves into my church and my life. That is the way alot of us feel. Try calling it something else and move on. We will both have the same rights without stepping on each others shoes.

Posted by: rich | July 28, 2007, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Lots of people say they support gay marriage until they see two men kissing and holding hands or one woman carrying another woman down the aisle — and they cover their childrens’ eyes. That’s when people say, “What was I thinking?”.

Posted by: Patrick | July 28, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

I personally take a great deal of offense at people suggesting that lesbians and gays are not fit to be parents. I was raised by two loving lesbians who paid their taxes and volunteered hours a week at a homeless shelter for over fifteen years. I was teased by a lot of kids, and as a result many of my friends growing up wound up being from other gay and lesbian families. Of the twenty-odd kids I actively know and stay in touch with from this group, not a single one of them was ever beaten or otherwise harmed – although one was molested by a Catholic priest! Gay and lesbian parents have to fight to be parents – and if they do that fight, I guarantee they really WANT to be parents and are ready for the responsibility. Conversely, my husband, raised by a traditional mother and father, was beaten regularly by his dad and his younger sister was sexually molested by same. That ideal, heterosexual dad has been in prison for the last 12 years. This is an extreme example, obviously, but I hope it drives home that there are far more important things to parenting and family life than idiotic discourse about who must or must not be privileged with the blessing and responsibility of raising a child. KIDS DON’T CARE ABOUT SEXUAL ORIENTATION, THEY JUST WANT A LOVING AND SUPPORTIVE HOME. By the way, my moms are great grandmoms, too.

Posted by: Keisha | July 28, 2007, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Hmmm, I believe that most of you really need to go and get some professional help. Politics are just that Politics. Religion is just that Religion. Peoples choices are just that, Their Choices. There is not a single perfect person on this earth, why do people insist on throwing stones when they live in glass houses?

Posted by: Cheryl | July 28, 2007, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Why don’t the gays and lesbians make a list of EXACTLY what they need to “feel”
equal?
If you get a civil union – you want a church wedding scantified by God and the church and the congregation.
How can the government grant that? Division of church and state prevents it.
I think what you want is absolution. If you “need” that then only God can grant it. If you don’t need it… then what is the problem?
If you are granted a civil union, you still – will never get approval for your lifestyle, that is just a fact and reality.
Abortion rights were granted by the government, it doesn’t make it right… it just makes it legal. Abortion is still recognized as a sin by the church.
The tax dollars of many citizens who in their heart and faith have to pay for and support what they believe to be a sin, to end a human life.
People in this country still struggle with inter racial and inter faith heterosexual marriages.
If you want equal rights by the state, that is one thing. Approval, by the the chruch and the population – isn’t going to happen. Tolerance yes, approval no.

Posted by: White Mountain | July 28, 2007, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

If God did not want any gay people on earth, there would be no gay people on earth. You can not tell other humans what god wants, and decide for the rest of us who gets to go where upon dying. You are only a human and no higher than ANY other human. I also have a dream that my children be judged solely on the content of their character, not the unfounded opinions of the self-righteous.

Posted by: margaret bleecker | July 28, 2007, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

I don’t see many people making comments which actually address the questions which Mr Tapper closed his entry with!
I think the hosting of this debate is a non-event. I see it as pandering to a demographic which the Democrats have not done much for despite all their talk.
If the RNC chooses to take a position, it will only be a repeat of what they have proclaimed before. In my dreams, they would say they are still examining the progress of the issue but instead I assume they will just parrot back what they usually say.
As far as the Republican candidates, my concern continues to be all of the attention the Religious Right continues to receive as the speaking voice for them in the press. I would hope by now the Republican party would see that being guided by only one aspect of a multicultural society is not a wise choice.
And after reading so many comments below, I have to point out to “Benjamin” one thing: he insists that what “sex” homosexuals have is unnatural and damaging but I know of no acts that we get up to that are not also being done between heterosexuals as well.
One final point: not all homosexuals are Democrats.

Posted by: Marty | July 29, 2007, 12:16 am 12:16 am

To Marty, Your right, I did not respond directly to the question.
It is a moot point.
This event will happen, will it be good for the Democratic party? NO.
Will it turn the debate from the serious problems facing this nation? YES. Will it influence voters? YES.
Do I approve of it? NO. WHY? Because it is an issue that divides our nation
when we need to stand united.
It will be aired on a channel that many Americans do not have access to, in the closet so to speak.
It would most helpful if the gay and lesbian community could step up on some of the other issues concerning this nation and not divide the vote.
What do you think about the war, immigration, national security, border patrols, national identity cards, health care, social security, education and foreign policy? It is common ground that brings people together.

Posted by: White Mountain | July 29, 2007, 7:14 am 7:14 am

Bigots need to get over themselves. People are gay and they should be treated equally, fairly, and with dignity. They are still discriminated against on so many fronts that yes they do need a debate about issues specific to their community.

Posted by: Paul | July 29, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

The only debate on this issue should be why the following countries have yet to fall apart after passing legislation repealing anti-discriminatory policies and either allowing civil union or same sex marriage.Some of which have been in effect since 1993. Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Greenland, Iceland, France, Germany, Portugal, Finland, Luxemborg, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Andorra, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Switzerland, Israel, Hungary, Croatia, Austria, Netherlands, Spain, South Africa, Belgium, Canada. In some areas, Mexico, Italy, Brazil, Australia, Argentina, and of course Massachusetts. Seems to me it’s like beating a dead horse on the stage of world opinion. I think it’s high time for our legislators to repeal laws and pass legislation allowing everyone the civil legal right’s to be equal, and then move on to more important matters, also keep the church out of it. Marriage is a civil matter in the first place. I can’t recall any church authorized to issue a marriage license.

Posted by: GC | July 29, 2007, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

If the “Americans for Truth” had taken their lofty moral stance against, say, mistreatment of animals, would they have received the publicity they now have? I think not. Raging against the so-called “gay agenda” (whatever that might be) is a sure-fire way of getting one’s organization noticed, as well as a sure-fire way of advertising one’s bigotry.

Posted by: chuck | July 30, 2007, 8:14 am 8:14 am

Gay or not. You are still a Man and a Woman. Get over your weakness.
I dont think it should be allowed! period, for lesbians to use the ability of a MANS spearm to have children, when they denounce the NORMAL way of reproduction. Men when you donate, always specify how the spearm is to be used only for the reproduction of a baby between a MAN and a Woman. Lesbians have one purpose in life, turn on the MEN. Gays (men) have one purpose in life, to get rid of women.

Posted by: JB | July 30, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

I’m straight and applaud the democratic party!! Since when did the bible run this country? I thought it was the CONSTITUTION, but that might just be me. The Republican Party is far behind on ALL social issues. For someone to argue politics with me and bring in the bible, is quite condescending. AND WHY THE HELL ARENT REPUBLICANS joining this debate? or commenting on it? I see where they are on these issues, a sad party indeed.
Along with being straight, I am also a LTCDR in the NAVY. “Dont ask, dont tell” is a abomination. I work with gays and I would much rather work beside some of them than these “straights”. I believe in the constitution and “equality for all”.

Posted by: Matthew Rice | July 30, 2007, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

I am straight. I am married. I do not care for the lifestyle the gay/lesbian/transexuals choose but it is their right to do so. If they want to get married or have life partners then that is fine by me. They should be afforded the same rights as couples as straight people are.
They have no rights as families, they can’t even have their life partners make decisions about their health or family because they aren’t deemed family. They are pushed aside and their wishes are not recognized. Children are given to grandparents never to see the other parents again because of the fear of the (lifestyle) and how it is going to affect the kids. Bull! Kids just want to be loved. It doesn’t matter who just as long as they are treated with kindness and love. Parents come in all shapes and all sizes.

Posted by: swaneck77 | August 7, 2007, 7:25 am 7:25 am

What would Jesus do? LOVE ALL OF GOD’S CHILDREN, regardless of sexual orientation. Stop using a religion whose most important religious symbol was the most tolerant and loving figure in human history to justify your fears, insecurities, and hatred.

Posted by: Anne L. | August 9, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Create equality by ABOLISHING Tax benefits for married couples.
I am a gay man. I have been in a relationship for 5 years. My partner makes more money than I and cannot claim me on his taxes.
Married couples can claim eachother on their taxes and receive GREAT tax breaks.
This is why we need rights.

Posted by: Joseph | August 10, 2007, 11:34 am 11:34 am

These arguments are all great…Why can’t the heterosexuals leave the homosexuals alone? Honestly, are we disturbing you? If you don’t like seeing two females or males walking down the street look down the other way. It seems that we are in the 1800′s again. Why are we getting discriminated again? This is a debate that won’t go away but if you think about it, the straight people that don’t accept it are making it harder on themselves. You don’t have to agree but just let us live our lives and move on. Focus on your own lives, not people that you don’t know. Maybe if you got to know some of us you would maybe tolerate and GOD FORBID maybe even befriend us.
No wait, don’t. And I read the marrying animals comment…Completely ridiculous. How do you sleep at night being so closed minded? I bet great but just think about the people that you are looking past just because you are scared of the unknown!

Posted by: J. Lyn | September 7, 2007, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Im Not Gay Anything But Gay People Do Cause Less Problem In Society. And By Problems I mean Criminal Activities.

Posted by: Argenis | October 22, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

I understand both sides of the party but I agree that i think being gay is not wrong. As all issues are neither black or white but “gray” it is my interpretation that there is nothing wrong with it. That is my interpettation that goes against God’s yes but I cannot see why i can’t hold my own voice and have different views than God if i chose to be a follower of Christ. My opinion is different than God’s.

Posted by: ML | August 3, 2011, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.