By Jennifer Parker

Aug 16, 2007 12:38pm

Edwards Asks Obama to Team Up Against Lobbyist Donations

ABC News’ Rick Klein Reports: Former Senator John Edwards is ratcheting up the pressure on his Democratic rivals on the issue of accepting campaign contributions from lobbyists, as he seeks to highlight a distinction between himself and several other candidates in advance of ABC’s Democratic debate Sunday in Iowa.

Edwards, D-N.C., on Thursday sent a letter to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., to join him in calling on the Democratic Party to stop accepting lobbyists’ contributions. Both Edwards and Obama have refused to accept money from federally registered lobbyists during their campaigns for the presidency — a position that puts them at odds with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.

"Lobbyists are at the core of the way the system is rigged against regular folks," Jonathan Prince, Edwards’ deputy campaign manager, said in a conference call with reporters. "Let’s take that money out of the process."

Edwards wants Obama to join him in calling for the Democratic National Committee as well as the party’s House and Senate fundraising arms to reject lobbyists donations going forward.

The Democratic Party committees accepted at least $1.9 million from the lobbying industry in the 2006 election cycle, and at least $2.3 million in the 2004 cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. 

Many in the party would resist giving up that cash since it would almost certainly amount to unilateral disarmament; the Republican Party is highly unlikely to rule out such a lucrative source of cash. The party committees did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

The move reflects an effort by the Edwards campaign to grow the candidate’s on the issue of lobbyists’ contributions. Obama and Edwards both drew headlines at a recent forum for liberal bloggers, with their public break with Clinton over whether it’s appropriate for presidential candidates to take money from people who make their living seeking to influence government policy.

In the conference call, Prince also drew a distinction between Edwards and Obama while noting that Edwards has never accepted money from lobbyists or Political Action Committees, while Obama did accept their dollars during his 2004 run for Senate.

Prince also contrasted Edwards’ views on lobbyists’ role in the political process with those of Obama, who told The Washington Post on Wednesday, "The insurance and drug companies can have a seat at the table in our health-care debate; they just can’t buy all the chairs."

Prince said Edwards has a different view of lobbyists.

"The lobbyists for the big corporate interests are not going to have a seat at the table in the Edwards administration," he said. "We know what the lobbyists want. What’s necessary now is to beat it back and get what the people want."

The Obama campaign released a statement that declined to comment on the specific request regarding the party committees, but pointed out that Obama has proposed a package of lobbying and ethics reforms that aim to reduce the influence of money on politics.

"It’s not enough just to refuse their money, we have to curb their influence," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton. "We invite John Edwards and every other candidate to support the sweeping reforms Obama has proposed to take our government back from the special interests and put it in the hands of the American people."

User Comments

As a person who has had two decades in the insurance industry & medical fields;I believe that our legislature has given way to much power to insurers medical supply companies. They tell our legislation how to write the laws to give them more power, as well as profit! I would like to remind the public that Insurance and pharmacy products are consumable products that are necessary, and in the case of insurance, often legislated into local state laws( such as for auto insurance as manadatory.) How can you legislate for higher rates, less reasonable settlement, caps on limits to settle liability issues, by the same industry you require the public to BUY under law?Stop the madness and end these unethical lobbying favors to anyone in ANY PUBLIC OFFICE. Limit campagin donations to just funds and not much.. and denounce other forms of payoffs..SAY BY BYE JUNKETS!Golf outings, trips and bonus jobs after your term has ended!

Posted by: Pam Toll | August 16, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Good for you Edwards and Obama! Let’s show the nation which party is the party of ethics!

Posted by: Cat | August 16, 2007, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

No vote for Clinton and Lobbyists….

Posted by: Alain | August 16, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Yes we must stop the bush clinton regime that uses division to rule the masses

Posted by: DanielleClarke | August 16, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Applause for both Edwards and Obama. You can harp all you want about what they have or have not taken in the past. But they are the only ones turning down anything. Hillary and all the rest are taking anything they can get their hands on from anyone.

Posted by: Aaron | August 16, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Applause for both Edwards and Obama. You can harp all you want about what they have or have not taken in the past. But they are the only ones turning down anything. Hillary and all the rest are taking anything they can get their hands on from anyone.

Posted by: Aaron | August 16, 2007, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

The movement is growing, we will take our government away from the extremists in both parties. We need inteligent non divisive leadership to move this country forward. I don’t want revenge for GW I want to heal our country and change the way we govern. We will not yield!
Obama 08!

Posted by: JimmieFromDayton | August 16, 2007, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

I feel that Mrs. Clinton will be nothing more thab Bush lite.

Posted by: Mildred Kish | August 19, 2007, 10:36 am 10:36 am

If you people really want to find out the facts about lobbying and Barack Obama’s involvement. Go to his senate website and click on ISSUES then scroll to the bottom and you’ll find a link to ethics & lobbying reform. Another good site is the Library of Congress. From there you can track house and senate bills, voting records and word for word discussion of committee admendments and house and senate floor discussion. I wish everyone that post would check these out and they just might see how hard some of our legislators do work. Be sure however to check out Obama’s CLEAN UP ACT (curtailing lobbyist effectiveness through advance notification updates and posting act). It’s his bill to curtail the lobbying mess. Or just Google it. This is off the subject but I just wanted to mention it anyway. While I was in the Library of Congress, I happened to click on a bill about SCHIP, the health insurance for children that Bush has threatened to veto. Senator Baccus was speaking on the Senate floor in favor of the bill and a comment he made really struck me. If you recall Bush has favored repeal of the estate tax. Senator Baccus pointed out the fact if the estate tax laws were to be changed as Bush would like, ONE family in the U.S., the WALTON family, would realize 32 billion dollars in tax breaks over 5 years. The SCHIP bill being debated was asking for 35 billion to offer insurance coverage to 10 million more uninsured KIDS over the same time frame. That’s the Republican way !!!

Posted by: gc | August 20, 2007, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

I would vote for either of them based on this alone. I’d like to see candidates from both parties make this pledge. If they truly want to “serve” the public, they should get by on their salaries, cars, planes, housing allowances, health insurance and other perks that we individual taxpayers pay for. I’m thankful these two gentlemen are raising the bar.

Posted by: LagunaTriMom | August 21, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.