Aug 17, 2007 6:44pm

Edwards Calls Coulter ‘She-Devil’

ABC News’ Rick Klein Reports: Former Sen. John Edwards on Friday fired the latest round in his ongoing verbal feud with Ann Coulter, calling her a "she-devil" at a public event before quickly adding that he shouldn’t engage in name-calling.

Edwards, D-N.C., was railing against the right-wing media — including Fox News and Rush Limbaugh — when he reminded a crowd in Burlington, Iowa, that his wife stood up to Coulter in a public spat earlier this summer.

"We know these people. We know their game plan. They’re going to attack us personally," Edwards said. "They attacked Elizabeth personally, because she stood up to that she-devil Ann Coulter. … I should not have name-called. But the truth is — forget the names — people like Ann Coulter, they engage in hateful language."

In June, Coulter went on ABC’s "Good Morning America" and said she had learned her lesson after being blasted for suggesting in a joke before the Conservative Political Action Conference that Edwards was a "faggot." "If I’m gonna say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot," Coulter said.

That prompted Edwards’ wife, Elizabeth, to call in to MSNBC’s "Hardball" and challenge Coulter directly. "I want to use the opportunity … to ask her politely to stop the personal attacks," Mrs. Edwards said.

The call left Coulter uncharacteristically flustered — and was quickly turned into a fund-raising appeal by the Edwards campaign.

User Comments

You conveniently forgot to add that Coulter’s comment was mocking a comment by Bill Maher who said that he thought it would be good if Vice President Cheney was killed in a trip to Afghanistan. His comment was at the same time as Coulters’ “faggot” comment but received little to no coverage. The Edwards camp took her comment on “Good Morning America” out of context and placed it on their website.

Posted by: CompMike | August 17, 2007, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Edwards is so desperate he is trying to attch his name to Ann Coulter. She will be here long after he is just a footnote on some hair gel commercial.

Posted by: Scott | August 17, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

John who?

Posted by: lou | August 17, 2007, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

yeah, she was so flustered she was the ONLY person in recent memory to call out Edwards’ ambulance chasing days. Elizabeth’s flustered response to that was to just keep asking Ann to stop name calling. flustered indeed….

Posted by: Matt | August 17, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

John Edwards must be low on cash again!

Posted by: Thomas | August 17, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

I personally think this country will be fortunate
if we are smart enough to elect John Edwards as
President of the U.S.
George

Posted by: George W. Schaberg | August 17, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Rick Klein should not be allowed out of the house. Either he’s ignorant or deceitful or both. To leave out the context of Coulter’s assassination remark just perpetrates that particular fiction – which I honestly believe is his intent.

Posted by: JL | August 17, 2007, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Interesting how this article is just ANOTHER INSTANCE OF MSM liberal bias? Good call CompMike about how this article CONVENIENTLY leaves out the context of Coulter’s remarks. MSM hates her because she dares call them out on just this sort of misdirection and lies. MSNBC setup the Mrs. Edwards “confrontation” with Coulter with Chris Matthews complicity. I hope ABC as well as the other broadcast networks continue to loose market share as their credibility, competence and biases are exposed.

Posted by: Todd Adams | August 17, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Nice job, there, giving the Coulter quote out of context and not mentioning that she was CRITICIZING media blowhards like yourself who give liberals a pass on personal attacks — she was mocking Bill Maher who said he wished VP Cheney had died in a terrorist assassination plot. No outrage from the media there, and no phone call setups from Lynn Cheney either
I think your blog entry here qualifies as an in-kind contribution from ABC News to the Edwards campaign.
Think that through the next time you clowns have a meetings about your consistently declining viewership. If we want to hear what you guys have to say, we can just go the Edwards (or Clinton or Obama) campaign website like you guys do every morning before you decide what “news” stories to cover.

Posted by: DKM | August 17, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Gee, do people really think you guys don’t have a left slant after reading this article??? Heck Fox News is liberal too regardless of what they report. 90% of the staff is Democrat! They’re not going to report news that actually helps Conservatives or the general public for that matter.

Posted by: TBaug | August 17, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Wow, Bob, that’s strained spin. It is reprehensible to quote and demonstrate the absurdity of your opposition — “it would be as crazy of me to say X if you allow the other guy to say Y” ???
You’re in the camp that, indeed, doesn’t think that Maher should be criticized — which is exactly what Coulter was doing.
I would agree that it was “equally represensible”, as you put it, for the Edwards camp to quote Coulter out of context, and for the MSM to go along with it.

Posted by: apetrelli | August 17, 2007, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Thanks CompMike – I read the article and was immediately struck by the “lying by omission” – Coulter was simply paralleling Maher’s snide comments. Deception by omission even appears in this little article.
Edwards and his wife go after Coulter because she is a lightning rod to the extreme leftists. Edwards though has less chance of being president than hell freezing over.

Posted by: Mike Morris | August 17, 2007, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Not covered in the media: Edwards is an investor in a group that is now engaging in forclosures on Katrina victims who fell into the sub-prime lending trap. To my knowledge, unlike Edwards, Ann Coulter has never profited from the eviction and misery of didaster victims.

Posted by: Ron | August 17, 2007, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

John Edwards is the sleaziest politician that I’ve seen on the national stage in quite a long time–and that’s saying something. The doubletalk and hypocrisy that have been displayed during his so-called campaign so far set a new standard. The guy is, I have to say, fascinating to watch. It’s like watching Jimmy Swaggart, Alec Baldwin & Jimmy Carter all rolled into one. Scary stuff.
Things will improve quite a bit when he drops out–as he must. Then we can watch the two Demo candidate leaders self-destruct over the next year and that will be that.

Posted by: Chris | August 17, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

I would be shocked if anyone in the lame-stream media ever treated any conservative fairly. Why is it that readers such as CompMike have to bring out facts to put Ann’s remarks in proper context? It couldn’t be that all the writers and editors have the same left-wing bias, could it?
Ann is brilliant, ascerbic and sarcastic. She is so clever that most who hear her sound bites really have no idea what she is talking about. The lame-stream media may not like her, but that is no excuse to be unfair.

Posted by: LG | August 17, 2007, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Ron has it right. Edwards is damaged goods. Don’t forget his “carbon foot print” issues with his house.

Posted by: lou | August 17, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Pretty sad when the we have people in America that approve of or defend someone like Ann Coulter for her vile statements. That said, she seems to be able to find TV time on every major corporate network when she needs it.
Whether you are right or left is this really the type of person you want to respect and/or listen too?
Remember, she is laughing all the way to the bank when you read her hate filled books. By the way, what are her qualifications on anything except language and hate?
Don Imus where are you?

Posted by: Will | August 17, 2007, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Could ABC and Ricky Klein be more biased? Leaving out the full, inconvenient truth.
Wasn’t it Bill Maher who spoke of how were VP Cheney dead more people would live – with no liberal-press hysteria following.
“The call left Coulter uncharacteristically flustered –”
Not true. Ann Coulter’s response was, roughly: she wants to deny my free expression because she doesn’t like what I’m saying. No, I won’t stop.
If the liberal media could fight on fair and equal terms it wouldn’t be looked upon as the sniveling, lying, desperate and crumbling institution that it is. Go back and read about the Nifong case. My my what proud sanctimoniousness that spawned from ABC. Yet this ersatz, newspeak organization was as dead wrong as the throng of Duke racial-studies professors who signed a petition about the lacrosse students that affirmed their professorial racism. As H.L. Mencken said, it is only a democracy that can provide the amusing public circus of which other forms of government are incapable [usually due to severe oppression and mass murder - not so funny].

Posted by: Fred Waring | August 17, 2007, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

You conveniently forgot to add that Coulter’s comment was mocking a comment by Bill Maher who said that he thought it would be good if Vice President Cheney was killed in a trip to Afghanistan. His comment was at the same time as Coulters’ “faggot” comment but received little to no coverage. The Edwards camp took her comment on “Good Morning America” out of context and placed it on their website.
Posted by: CompMike | Aug 17, 2007 7:58:31 PM
One, that wasn’t what she was doing, and Two, Bill Maher never said that. Check the transcript of his show

Posted by: JD | August 17, 2007, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Edwards finally says something I agree with! Ann Coulter makes conservatives look bad. I would not be surprised to find out she was actually a liberal trying to smear conservatives by sounding hatefull, childish and homophobic.

Posted by: Plant Immigration Rights Supporter | August 17, 2007, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

John Edwards would kick most folks’ butts; he’s a tough trial lawyer from blue-collar roots. The glib assessment of his masculinity that Coulter offered is absurd.

Posted by: jake | August 17, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

CompMike:
“You conveniently forgot to add that Coulter’s comment was mocking a comment by Bill Maher who said that he thought it would be good if Vice President Cheney was killed in a trip to Afghanistan.”
They didn’t forget. ABC News deliberately leaves the context out in order to fool the individuals who get their news from the broadcast networks. Fortunately, the number of such individuals is dropping dramaticaly.

Posted by: Arminius | August 17, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Where was John Edwards when his wife called “Hardball” to criticize Ann Coulter? If John was offended by Ann’s remark, why could a presidential candidate and former Senator speak for himself?
Will Edwards ask his wife to call al Queda and complain they are meanies? Time to get a life of your own, John.

Posted by: Avanti | August 17, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Anyone who cannot see the theatrical method that Ann uses to expose people is not hate but more satire is a MORON,and almost as deluded as ABC news.

Posted by: Katie | August 17, 2007, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Coulter made light of the death of the Edwards’ son. She’s repeatedly dismissed the service of Max Cleland because he a triple amputee in Vietnam due to an accident rather than in combat. She makes a good living by crossing the lines of decency, to the detriment of our democratic discourse.
I’m a conservative, and Ann Coulter in no way speaks for me.

Posted by: dictatortot | August 17, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Any liberals out there have a clue why most US newspapers are on the verge of tanking? We are tired of subscribing to newspapers only to read editorials that rail against what their subscribers believe. That is informally known as “shooting yourself in the foot”. If you do the same thing everyday expecting a different result this time, you may qualify as insane.

Posted by: PaulT | August 17, 2007, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Will:
“Remember, she is laughing all the way to the bank when you read her hate filled books.”
Ann Coulter is extremely mild when compared to what you find on the Daily Kos, Democrats.com, and other far-left hate sites. She’s essentially the conservative version of Molly Ivins, only more attractive and intelligent.

Posted by: Arminius | August 17, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

John Edwards, no substance, all hair gel.

Posted by: david drake | August 17, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Whether you like Anne Coulter or not, this is shameful, to conveniently leave out was she actually said…

Posted by: Fresh | August 17, 2007, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Bill Maher never said he wished Cheney was dead. If you conservatives ever watched his show you would know that he said something to the effect of “If Dick Cheney was fighting in Afghanistan right now and something happened to him, I think they world would be a better place” in regards to his foreign policy. It was a jab at foreign policy, not a fatwah to kill Cheney.

Posted by: John | August 17, 2007, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

You poor misguided sheep. Ann Coulter and Bill Maher dated, and are good friends. Ann Coulter herself did not mention Bill Maher’s remarks on that interview, so why should that CONTEXT even be considered. God only knows what ANN COULTER was thinking when she said it. And some GOP here believe they are Miss Cleoe and can read her mind for “context.”
I will stick with what she actually said, rather than the imagined context. If she had been referencing something that her FLING Bill had said, I assume she would have mentioned it.

Posted by: Sandy1938 | August 17, 2007, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

I’m glad to see so many others who recognize the slimy hack-job that passes for journalism at ABC. To ignore the context of that quote is mind-boggling, and the notion that Coulter was flustered by a whining Edwards is just absurd. Pathetic biased reporting on a pathetic third tier candidate.

Posted by: mike | August 17, 2007, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

It’s amusing whenever the Edward’s Campaign is low on funds, they choose to attack Ann Coulter or Fox News. Obvious signs of a desperate campaign with no issues or values to stand on. Also interesting how Edward’s pulls out his Conservative hate card to change subjects from his latest campaign flub with his critical bash of the banking industry for the foreclosures on Hurricane Katrina victim’s homes when he has over $16 million invested with the same banks. He is truly a joke of a candidate and always good for a laugh.

Posted by: JN | August 17, 2007, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

I am an atheist (and a Goldwater conservative) so I don’t agree with Ann’s religious views. But anyone that PO’s arrogant lefties as much as she does has my endorsement. You lefties troll for offense and then cry crocodile tears whenever you find some.
John Edwards is simply a sleaze and a liar. Even if you’re liberal, I don’t see how you can support this jerk. A couple of the others are at least honest libs.

Posted by: BOB-ABQ | August 17, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

That prompted Edwards’ wife, Elizabeth, to call in to MSNBC’s “Hardball” and challenge Coulter directly. “I want to use the opportunity … to ask her politely to stop the personal attacks,” Mrs. Edwards said.
I wonder if she meant personal attacks like calling a woman, oh I don’t know. “She Devil” maybe.
The Edwards clan is almost as good at hypocricy and ABC’s micreant Rick Klein is at liberally editing other’s quotes.

Posted by: Robert | August 17, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Frankly, I’m disgusted with everyone’s behavior. All of the name-calling, innuendoes, bearing false witness, and digging up every piece of filth or controversy one can think of is the reason out government isn’t working the way it needs to. No one is perfect. All of us have faults and have made mistakes. The lack of civility disgusts me. We all need to shut up for a while and decide if we want to continue pandering to entertainers, politicians, news programs and others who, for their own personal gain, are turning our country into – I don’t even know the word for it.
We have real problems in our country and they aren’t new. We, our leaders, and those we look up to need to be coming up with some real solutions to things like, poverty, homelessness, health care for everyone, independence from fossil fuels. All facets of the political spectrum have been giving these issues for 40+ years and we are no closer to solving these problems then we were back then.
Let’s all cut the crap and start solving problems instead of whining.

Posted by: Alexandria | August 17, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Wow, this place is just chock full of right-wing trolls isn’t it?
I swear you folks would consider Pravda circa 1967 the ‘liberal media.’
But then, if all you ever listen to is Rush, and all you ever watch is Faux News, what is to be expected? Bet you still think that Sadam was behind 9-11.
Tell me one thing though, how do you keep your knuckles from getting scraped up as they drag across the ground? What a bunch of Neanderthals.
I think I’ll put on some Baby Einstein now, I need something intellectual after reading all your swill.

Posted by: VeganMilitia | August 17, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Poor Ann has had her comments taken out of context…she who does nothing BUT take other’s comments out of context, and wraps them in lies and inuendo. I feel sorry for her, but not because someone slammed her, rather because she finds it difficult to live in the world with normal people.
Did somone actually CITE the Lamebrain?

Posted by: David | August 17, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

the democrats created ANN COULTER. in the 1980′s and 90′s they ran around calling conservatives racist’s and alot of other stuff until finally someone got fed up and started to describe the liberals as they really are. to bad it had to be a woman first. makes all us guys look spineless.

Posted by: gary | August 17, 2007, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

RUFUS … are you serious? Idiots like you are what the left need…. LEMMINGS.

Posted by: STEVE | August 17, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Why can’t ABC simply state that Coulter was referring to Maher’s comment that he wished the Vice-President had been killed. And, you wonder why people see bias in the mainstream media.

Posted by: David Baker | August 17, 2007, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Kind of sad for Edwards to have to resort to name calling to make the news. Sort of shows how insignificant he is.

Posted by: wild bill | August 17, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Your paragraph about Ann Coulter’s remarks on “Good Morning America” is totally deceitful, leaving out the context. Ms. Coulter was pointing out sarcastically that the mainstream media and commentators were apoplectic over her referring to John Edwards as a “faggot”, but gave a pass to Bill Maher on his suggestion that, if the Vice President had been killed in a recent terrorist assassination attempt on him in Afganistan, more people (in Iraq, presumably) would be alive now and in the future. To the media, this was just fair comment. Ms. Coulter was commenting facetiously that the lesson here, apparently, is that the safe, acceptable way for one to attack John Edwards (or any political enemy) is to wish that he had been killed in a terrorist plot! ABC, be honest in your reporting.

Posted by: Warren | August 17, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

There’s something I really don’t get, but I know I should. The libs say Ann is vile and hateful, but the ones who are hateful are the ones writing about her not Ann. As to qualifications, as far as I know the only one needed to be a columnist and commentator is a superior command of the english language which Ann does to such a degree that she intimidates people. Now I get it!!!!!!! If the words are too big or you’re to ignorant, it’s hate speech.

Posted by: Kay | August 17, 2007, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

ANN the Howard Stern of politics only someone with a second grade education would support her comments. Give me a break.

Posted by: ed | August 17, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

With all the issues you Americans face, the best this wanna be presidential candidate can come up with is focus on Ann Coulter?
As John Stossel would say – Gimme a break

Posted by: Warren | August 17, 2007, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

For the record, Coulter specifically mentioned Maher’s comment when interviewed – and so did the interviewer, to clarify Maher’s comment, which (despite what some are trying to spin here) was roughly if Cheney was killed by terrorists, the world would be a better place because less people would die, which is both illogical and explicitly hateful.
Edwards calls Coulter a she-devil and Dean calls Republicans evil, and yet people still believe the right is the bastion of hate. Please.

Posted by: andrew | August 17, 2007, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

John — what a liar you are. That is not the quote from Bill Maher, and you totally made it up. It wasn’t about foreign policy. And, to defend Bill Maher, he wasn’t saying he wished Cheny were dead or that he should be dead. What he did was raise the question: don’t you think the world would be a better place, and fewer people would be dead, if Dick Cheney died?
And to whoever wrote this article: if you think Coulter was flustered, you didn’t watch the interview. Elizabeth Edwards was pathetically begging for Ann to stop picking on her husband, and Ann said nope, never. Nice spin job!

Posted by: Dave | August 17, 2007, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Many interesting comments. I call John Edwards “The Glassman”. Why? Because most inteligent folks can see right through him!
To you Edwards supporters, isn’t about time you turn away from limosine liberals like him that tell the rest of us how to live and what people to support while they wrap themselves in luxury and excess in their 10,000+ square feet mansions?? Have you not had your fill of the Kennedys, the Kerrys and the Edwards who promise everything and deliver nothing?? John Edwards made his fortunes winning questionable product liability lawsuits based upon junk data….and every single American (that’s us, boys & girls!) has lined the Edwards’ bank account as a result. One of the biggest problems this Country faces today is TOO MANY attorneys that have to make a living….some how. Want to scare hell out of yourself? Open your local Yellow Pages to “Attorneys”….the result will leave you gasping for air! And the last thing America needs is another attorney in the White House.

Posted by: Dave | August 17, 2007, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Ann who?

Posted by: k | August 17, 2007, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Anyone who aspires to be president must respect people’s right to speak in any form, be it from the left or the right. It is the president’s job to ensure and respect the 1st amendment and the right of all American’s to speak out. Anytime a candidate rails against the media it shows they are unfit for the job.

Posted by: Kurt | August 17, 2007, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

You conservative hacks are so pathetic. There is a war on, one in which American soldiers are dying, and all you can do is rush to the defense of a tired, idiotic wannabe provocateur as she attacks Democrats?
You still rant and rave rail against a liberal media. Didn’t you get the memo? Nobody believes that tripe anymore, except maybe Rush Limbaugh. Give it up already!
Do you really want to get into a debate about omission of facts and media bias? Really? With George Bush in office, and Karl Rove turning tail? And Alberto Gonzales, a certifiable moron, running the Justice department? You want to talk about facts? Now?
We can agree on one thing – the media sucks. And they really sucked when we needed them most, just prior to the biggest foreign policy catastrophe in U.S. history.
Keep on keepin’ on. Maybe someone still cares what you think. And please, keep believing intricately spun theories about liberal bias, and the ascendance of Fox News. It will keep you busy as the rest of the country comes finally begins to realize the truth.

Posted by: 42nate | August 17, 2007, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Oh, no! Johnny called Ann a “name caller”! That’s name calling! Name caller, name caller! That’s almost as pathetic as Edwards’ and most other Democrats’ vacuous conscience.

Posted by: Apache | August 17, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Sandy1938 — Bill Maher was ABSOLUTELY directly mentioned in the interview. Are you lying or just stupid?

Posted by: Dave | August 17, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Ann Coulter is bad for politics and bad for America. Her commentary is shallow and the only way she gains publicity is by making outrageous comments. I am glad that someone is finally calling her out for her hateful speech.

Posted by: CTW | August 17, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Ann Coulter is trawling the same “I’m outraged! I’m shocking! I’m in the hippies’/pukes’/traitors’ faces!” slime trail as Morton Downey Jr. or Wally George or Joe Pyne. And she will ultimately achieve the same rich and lasting legacy as those forgotten men.
It’s her fans you have to feel pity for… so desperate to have their baser impulses validated that they’ll take whatever they can get.

Posted by: Z.X. Cvbnm | August 17, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Poor John Edwards, No publicity, no one interested in his campaign…he needs Ann Coulter to get his name in the news, even if its negative.

Posted by: conservativevoter | August 17, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Not standing up to personal attacks is one of the main criticism leveled at Dems. Those who say “lighten up” on Ann Coulter must be card-carying fans. Or at least they think the she-devil’s hot.

Posted by: Jack Garish | August 17, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Yawn!

Posted by: Bill | August 17, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Rush Limbaugh posted a Marcus Aurelius quote: “The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” Democrats take note.

Posted by: TomG | August 17, 2007, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

I love the hypocrisy. Edwards sends his wife to call in and ambush Ann Coulter when she’s on MSNBC, and Elizabeth talks about civility and a higher level of discourse and begs Ann to stop name-calling. Then John Edwards comes out and calls her a she-devil. Way to raise the level of dialogue, Johnny boy!
If America falls for this phony, we get what we deserve.

Posted by: David | August 17, 2007, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Why must you freaking liars constantly take Coulter’s quote out of context by ignoring the fact that it was a parody of an actual death wish for Cheney uttered by Bill Maher?

Posted by: DaMav | August 17, 2007, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

“Sticks and Stones!” The Democrats can sure dish it out, but they can’t take it.

Posted by: Joe Momma | August 17, 2007, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Please stop the personal attacks you she-devil. Hahaha. I don’t know which is worse: the hypocrisy of Edwards or the liberal bias of this article. Thankfully the public is catching on to both….

Posted by: Steve | August 17, 2007, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

John Edwards is a plastic person, not to be taken seriously. He is a very distracting person. A nuisance. He must have Ann Coulter, because he has no plan except to promise to victims that he will take care of them with tax payers’ money. I get nauseated when I hear socialist ambulance chasers such as John Edwards speak, because approximately 50% of the American citizenry actually think they are victims, thanks to liberal pap.

Posted by: William | August 17, 2007, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Ann Coulter for President. She would be much better than Edwards.

Posted by: John D. Eastridge | August 17, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

John Edwards will not engage in a presidential debate on FOX because he believes them biased but he attends a KOS convention. If he does not want to engage in debate with biased organizations or people he should stay away from Ann Coulter she has a strong intellectual bias.

Posted by: James Palagyi | August 17, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

The show (Meet the Press) gave Mrs. Edwards all the time she wanted and was a definite setup. Coulter wasn’t speechless; she couldn’t get a word in between these two flaming libs.
So I would classify Lady Edwards as the she-devil – if anyone has to wear that tag!

Posted by: Al_Idaho | August 17, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

in 08′
Edwards/McGreevey
v.
Coulter/isaiah washington
v.
Bill Maher/Ron Paul
in a cage match, for the presidency.

Posted by: rich | August 17, 2007, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

ABC news, just more MSM liberal media bias. Think I’ll buy ANOTHER Coulter book to keep her in business while ABC and the rest of the liberal biased MSM continue to lose viewers.

Posted by: MikeH | August 17, 2007, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Let’s see…..and who was it that said the Republican’s use the “politics of personal destruction”? Sen. Edwards uses Ann Coulter and even his wife to promote his cause….whatever that might be. Who needs that for a leader?

Posted by: Chukkal | August 17, 2007, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

“We know these people. We know their game plan. They’re going to attack us personally,” Edwards said. “They attacked Elizabeth personally, because she stood up to that she-devil Ann Coulter. … I should not have name-called. But the truth is — forget the names — people like Ann Coulter, they engage in hateful language.”
He doesn’t need anyone to make him look bad. That paragraph is the proof. Good grief….

Posted by: R Gib | August 17, 2007, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

This whole thing is idiotic. It reminds me of the saying “Don’t fight with pigs because you both get dirty, and the pigs like it.” Don’t we have more important things to think about? Anyway, the longer this goes on the harder it is to tell which one is the pig.

Posted by: KEKarlsson | August 17, 2007, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Squeal, conservatives, squeal! Your once-effective bag of tricks has sprung a leak, and now you’re being called on it. Go tell each other that Ann Coulter’s devastating “parodies” are really “hitting a nerve” while the Congress turns bright blue.
2006 was the appetizer, 2008 will be the main course. AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Hangovers suck, don’t they?
P.S. AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

Posted by: Permanent Republican majority | August 17, 2007, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Ann Coulter is a She-Devil.

Posted by: Cherubim | August 17, 2007, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Hey ABC I thought was just a fake site that tried to make right wing America angry.Do you mean that there are really stupid uninformed and anti America goof balls like is portrayed on this site

Posted by: tony | August 17, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Compare Anne to the lib Anne Coulter, Cindy Sheehan.

Posted by: Walter E. Wallis | August 17, 2007, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Coulter needs to take a break from flying around on her broom- the Edwards are good people and have every right to call her out on her immature rants.

Posted by: looloo | August 17, 2007, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Using the Coulter quote of context is why nobody trusts the network news reporting.

Posted by: tony | August 17, 2007, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

The Edwards and people like them are what is wrong with this country

Posted by: tony | August 17, 2007, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

hey honey…c’mere…i think i found the 25% of the country that still thinks the republicans are doing a good job! and get this; some of them think ann coulter is HOT and they’re going to win in ’08!!! isn’t that cute?!!!

Posted by: reid | August 17, 2007, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

If this is ALL he has for Ann, what’s he going to say to Iran,Iraq,China, etc. OHHH the’ll be shaking in their boots !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Steve | August 17, 2007, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Maybe ABC News’ Rick Klein just needs to be more accurate and forthright. Most conservatives are smart enough to see through the engineering of rhetoric. Maybe the liberals aren’t. I suppose he is “preaching to the choir”, and isn’t smart enough to know it.

Posted by: glenn | August 17, 2007, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Edwards is such a gentleman….there are so many more more appropriate names she could be called!….most mature people understand name calling is not a good thing, something poor Ann will probably never learn…the best thing she could do for herself is sign up for long term therapy to find out where her anger and hatred stems from….

Posted by: mary | August 17, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Why oh why would a Presidental Candidate have to use a political satirist CONTINUALLY to raise donations?? John’s “two America’s” shouldn’t donate either. Let him continue to raise his money from trial lawyers.

Posted by: cr42ct | August 17, 2007, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Since when did the right-wing whackos/blowhards take over this site? Edwards just proved his point if the responses here are any indication. You ridiculous GOP/neo-con hate-mongers offer nothing but bile and vile. Can’t wait ’til November 2008…good riddance to bad trash.

Posted by: Gregg | August 17, 2007, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

so clever to post under different names so u can say the same thing a hundred different ways…very sean hannity.
get a life republicans. your days are numbered. enjoy the end of your murderous era.

Posted by: RepubsRSoSmart | August 17, 2007, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Ann Coulter is a breath of fresh air. Those who take such offence at her comments are convinced that on every issue, “The debate is over”. And cannot believe that anyone would dare disagree with them or refuse to take them seriously. I applaud her again and again and again.

Posted by: The Guru | August 17, 2007, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

I’ll use the words John Edwards used to describe when he found out Karl Rove was leaving. “Good bye and good riddance John.”
Your irrelevant

Posted by: raziorizzo | August 17, 2007, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

“The call left Coulter uncharacteristically flustered –”
Neither Edwards or the hosts of Hardball wanted a conversation. Democrats and Liberals in general don’t. The purpose of the call was to allow Edwards be nasty towards Coulter. Coulter was flustered because the host was not allowing her to respond!!! Being nasty to someone and not allowing a reasonable response is essentially what constitutes humor for a liberal.

Posted by: carlton | August 17, 2007, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Coulter’s “Satire”?
Satire is about mocking the powerful. To be right-wing is BY DEFINITION to be in favour of the powerful. That’s what the term actually means. There is no such thing as right-wing satire.
John Edwards is for the little guy. He started with nothing and became a major force for good in this country with his own talent and perseverance. “She-devil” ? He’s kicking ass!

Posted by: Federal | August 17, 2007, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Wow. I linked to this story through Drudge, and scrolled down to the comments. With the exception of a very few literate posts, the visceral anger and knee-jerk ad hominem attacks you people spew is truly dismaying. You should read “The Myth of the Rational Voter.” Ann Coulter, Bill Maher, the “MSM” and “Left Wing Media” and “Faux News” (God, what a tired pejorative…) are all in the entertainment business. They report, print, say what people will consume. It’s all product, just like any other. And quite clearly, almost all of you lap it up like hogs at the trough, and, God Forbid, anyone dare criticize your slop, you blindly lash out. It’s quite scary, and disheartening, because if the people who posted these comments are a representative slice of America, then God help us all, because that means we’re a nation of irrational, anti-intellectual simpletons.
Have you stopped to think how it could be possible that Ann Coulter and Bill Maher could, in fact, be friends, when their respective political personas are so diametrically opposed? Because they’re both in the same business – saying whatever crazy, scandalous, incendiary thing they can to keep you people coming back for more.
And you do, and that’s great, because everyone wins – they get paid, and you get relieved of the burden of reason and rational analysis.

Posted by: nyc | August 17, 2007, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

It’s surprising how many folks on this comment thread justify Coulter’s sleazy behavior by mentioning Maher’s sleazy behavior.
The fact is that this kind of name calling represents the lowest level of public discourse our country has ever seen.
Is this what our country is all about? Does Ann Coulter represent what the Republican party is all about? Would Lincoln have called his opponents
“faggots” or said they should be murdered?
I don’t think so. Real leaders have class and integrity even when push comes to shove. And I think the more Republican’s engage in name calling, the more damage they do to the party.
The same holds true of Democrats. Of course the Dems tend to call people names based on a holier than thou attitude. Some of my Democratic friends will call those who disagree with them on affirmative action or immigration racists or fascists. Lame.
And that kind of intellectual bigotry is almost as bad as putting down someone for their skin color or sexual preferences.
But anyone, Republican or Democrat, who calls their opponents names is just being intellectually dishonest.
All that does is show that you can’t put together a logical argument. It’s 3rd grade debating. That’s why Ann Couler and Rush Limbaugh are considered such lightweights by the general public — Because they think in terms of put downs and bumper sticker slogans and our country’s problems are far more complex than that.
That’s not to say that Edwards is a political Einstein. But on occasion, he comes up with interesting ideas for fixing our nation’s problems. A few of the Republican’s do as well — when they aren’t trying to be apologists for Bush and Iraq.
But those who try to defend Coulter are just plain lame. You guys need to learn how to think for yourselves.

Posted by: TimT | August 17, 2007, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

What a damn shame that ABC News still chooses to truncate Ann Coulter’s comment about John Edwards in order to completely change its meaning. Ann was referring to Bill Maher’s comment that lives would have been saved if Dick Cheney had been killed by a terrorist while in Iraq. Since no one in the major media objected to Maher’s comment Coulter wondered whether perhaps that would be OK for her to say about John Edwards. The entire sentence was played nationwide over and over again at the time so there is no excuse for such yellow journalism by ABC News.

Posted by: Mario | August 17, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

If Lincoln were alive today, he’d be a Democrat, not a Republican. That’s clear.

Posted by: Mark In Irvine | August 17, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Does Bill Maher even have a steady job? At least people outside the US have heard of Bush

Posted by: Average Black | August 17, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

(so many of) You people are crazy – why don’t y’all do something useful instead of all this stupid name-calling.

Posted by: Mark In Irvine | August 17, 2007, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Hey Gregg reread the blog. The vile and hate is coming from the left, as usual. But in your collective mind, it’s OK. After all you’re right, and all who disagree are obviously evil.

Posted by: The Guru | August 17, 2007, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

I think John Edwards has cried “Wolf!” a.k.a. Ann Coulter, once too often. I believe the result is the same as in the fairy tale. People, understandably, stop listening. The millionaire trial lawyer, having completed his Poverty Tour, is stumping for a headline. His dilemma is similar to one facing Britney Spears. With all the issues facing our nation and the world, we have Mr. Edwards demonstrating his Presidential timber by running up the ‘attack ann’ battle flag. He wants to Commander in Chief?

Posted by: jggrimm | August 17, 2007, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Little wonder this nation is in trouble.This whole mess of comments on both sides is ludicrous and imbecilic. Have we arrived at a point where civilty and self respect are dead virtues?t The venom is sickening.I was hoping to see some real reasons why bright,articulate people would resort to such immature and boorish comments.This is democratic dialogue!! GOD save us from ourselves!

Posted by: wjm | August 17, 2007, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

There you go again, taking Coulter out of context. You make it sound like she wants the guy dead. I’m no big fan of Ann Coulter, but for God’s sake you should at least put her GMA quote in context.

Posted by: Sleepy Owl | August 17, 2007, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Ann Coulter flustered?? By John Edwards’ wife. I dont think so. I heard the exchange, and I think she was annoyed by the fact she had to respond to a nitwit, but not flustered. Come on we are talking about Elizabeth Edwards – she cant hold a candle to Ann, the she-devil, Coulter. Go ANN.

Posted by: Tim | August 17, 2007, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I’m glad to see that so many people see through the article. This is nothing more than an attempt to help Edwards raise money and it tries to influence readers by omitting key parts of the story. The only support for the article that I have read are from people who spew more hate than opinion. Why is it so hard to discuss and disagree without such vulgar behavior?

Posted by: Michael9876 | August 17, 2007, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Bottom line is this. Edwards has been out of the headlines for weeks .. he is trumping up this ann coulter thing to try to make himself relevant. He still isn’t.

Posted by: Scott | August 17, 2007, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

For heaven’s sake! Have we run out of issues just to throw insults to people that have no validity like Ms. Coulter? How about all our lovely candidates (it seems like ‘contestants’ is a more apt word) providing sound answers for fiscal and security policy.

Posted by: Texan | August 17, 2007, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

It’s odd to me that the media gives anytime to Ann… it’s all about the ratings and hype…certainly not about wit and useful information. There will be a time when there is no Ann C. Please let it be sooner rather than later.

Posted by: David | August 17, 2007, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

“Edwards, D-N.C., was railing against the right-wing media — including Fox News and Rush Limbaugh…”
Notice how the liberal news media uses right-wing with Fox News? If Fox News tagged ABC News as left-wing (which is actually true) the talking heads would be frantic and the ABC News lawyers would be in court searching for a liberal judge to issue a cease and desist order.

Posted by: JD | August 17, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

How can any of you actually defend Coulter. What good has she done? Tell me, please. The bottom of the line is, it has been 6 years since 9/11 and the people that she has so valulently defended have failed to bring those responsible to justice. Who of you really cares what He, or She said? We’re in the middle of a terrible, expensive war that has only worstened the threat of Islamic esxtremists. So please, please take a step back and really examine what has happened to our country since 9/11. Are we really safer? Is Iraq actually in better shape now than it was before we invaded?

Posted by: tim | August 17, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

“I shouldn’t have name called”….this is what Democrats always and I mean always do. They have no new ideas, so they resort to name calling. Where are the Democrats’ new ideas? Tax reform (not just “taxing the rich”), social security reform, new education ideas, etc. There only ideas are from either the New Deal or from the 60s.

Posted by: David | August 17, 2007, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

John…it’s not name calling if you are telling the truth :)

Posted by: DedraToo | August 17, 2007, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

I guess this is where Rush Limbaugh’s followers come to meet.
WHAT LOSERS

Posted by: Brian | August 17, 2007, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I bet the “she devil” does not hold 16mil in investments in a subprime lender that is foreclosing on Katrina homes..
John says that he will try and move his
investments around a bit, and I for one bbelieve him LOL

Posted by: mudman | August 17, 2007, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

dont they read coulters books? they walked right into it:
“shes a she-devil” and she “engages in hateful language”
very typical lefties.
i also think its funny how there are sparse liberals have posted here.
looks like the only ppl that are reading this were directed by the drudge report.
YOU HAVE NO READERS/VIEWERS lame stream media.
haha, i borrowed that from a post above.

Posted by: j | August 17, 2007, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Welcome to the final throes of the Roman Empire redux.
Carry on. Carry on my children. Fiddle while your country crumbles.

Posted by: geo | August 17, 2007, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Christopher London: Hear, hear!

Posted by: nyc | August 17, 2007, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I can’t believe how many defend Coulter here.
In or out of context, her remarks are incendiary, callous, vitriolic, and have no place in civilized debate.

Posted by: timbaragain | August 17, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Right Jordan,
And don’t forget Hillary Clinton – another one term do nothing Senator.

Posted by: JD | August 17, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

It’s one thing for Edwards, who has an agenda, to equate Fox News with Rush Limbaugh, but to see ABC News, which pretends to be objective, do the same thing is breath-taking. Has ABC lost all standards?

Posted by: Jon | August 17, 2007, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

oh what a travesty. I’m going to have to start putting money in the parking meter, least I lock my front door and chain my pit bull. What has become of all of this displeasure?

Posted by: rich | August 17, 2007, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Once again, …blame Fox news. Who are the cheerleaders for gay rights, abortion, and gun control? Bingo! ABC, CBS, NBC, and and the First Church of CNN.

Posted by: skeexix | August 17, 2007, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Dont trust anyone that has a “Snake oil” salesman look.

Posted by: Snuffy | August 17, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

John Edwards is a strong secure man who is man enough to marry a woman who is his legitimate partner, best friend and lover. And he respects that she has a mind of her own. So many allegedly macho men marry “arm candy” or stepford wives who can be programmed to look good for the cameras.

Posted by: Christopher London | August 17, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

What people here call ambulance chasers are lawyers who help people win lawsuits against bad doctors,hospitals, etc.
God forbid any of you experience such malpractice in your lives. You’d run to the nearest so-called “ambulance chaser” to get what’s coming to you.
Hypocrites.

Posted by: timbaragain | August 17, 2007, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Imagine the implosion timeline if Edwards had pulled an Obama and criticized Clinton?
Just another * instead of a legacy

Posted by: dano | August 17, 2007, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

I don’t think Coulter acted flustered. If anything she was surprised a presidential candidates wife would stoop to calling in to a tv show. I think she expected more class from Mrs. Edwards!

Posted by: lc | August 17, 2007, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Now, why would you put Edwards’s comment in context but not Coulter’s?

Posted by: Reinhold | August 17, 2007, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

This is clearly why Mr. Edwards does not have a chance. First he cannot get along with his nieghbors, town and state. He could not get re-elected to Congress from his own area. His wife has to have MSNBC assist on a unapproviate stunt, that was unprofessional for MSNBC news staff to even consider. Why are we hearing about a third tier candidate, with no support? Is ABC afraid that the “Right” might win in 08? Find another topic, it is not helping the bottom line.

Posted by: Hole_rat | August 17, 2007, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

when was Ann Coulter flustered? I must have missed that part. I remember Elizabeth Edwards repeating herself.

Posted by: Jay | August 17, 2007, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

“You conveniently forgot to add that Coulter’s comment was mocking a comment by Bill Maher who said that he thought it would be good if Vice President Cheney was killed in a trip to Afghanistan.”
Uhhh, yeah they FORGOT to add that!
ABC News of course ALWAYS tries to be objective.
[~~~ eyes rolling ~~~]

Posted by: Willy from Westchester | August 17, 2007, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

My worst nightmare would be any candidate with the last name Bush.

Posted by: timbaragain | August 17, 2007, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Why is it that only the left can have satire? Maybe you do not understand what a conservative is. Democrats do not hold one single position on issues nor do Conservatives. I am not a ‘rich powerful person’ either. However, I am sick and tired of listening to a group of people that try to make people not ‘like-minded’ feel belittled or stupid or ashamed to disagree with you. The talk shows, the night time shows, magazines…it is non-stop. American’s should be able to have differing ideas and not be the same. All I am hearing from Democrats is that they are not allowed to differ themselves because they only want their candidates to trash the Republicans. I want to know what every candidate thinks about issues. Why are citizens trying to silence people on the right??? Hugo Chavez silences citizens thru intimidation. Why oh why are some Democrats trying to do the same???

Posted by: cr42ct | August 17, 2007, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

The Edwards Campaign is Toast. When you result to name calling and smearing vice getting your message out it means he out of ideas, again. But that what the left does, name calling never any facts or message except raise taxes.

Posted by: Willy Brown | August 17, 2007, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Insightful as she is, whatever possessed Ann Coulter to agree to that rope-a-dope appearance on liberal MSNBC — from which the Edwards campaign was able to generate such easy cash? Matthews obviously was working in league with them.
Why are otherwise-savvy conservatives such obliging patsies?

Posted by: rg | August 17, 2007, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

I read through all of these comments and just end up realizing more and more how uniformed the American people are. Democrats, Republicans, whatever! The country is in trouble folks! The trouble gets deeper and deeper as time wears on. When the people see that the “American dream” has been taken away from them by useless politicians, the 2nd revolution will be that much closer.

Posted by: MWH | August 17, 2007, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Ann Coulter is a cruel, foul-mouthed, know-it-all fool (My opinion). She can wear that crucifix every day but there is no place for her in the Christian faith.

Posted by: Sully | August 17, 2007, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Edwards is running in thrid, and can not seem to get any traction. He IS a footnote in history.

Posted by: Johnny Melrose | August 17, 2007, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

You so-called conservatives have a gift for taking someone’s personal tragedy and turning it against them, as though they should keep quiet about a wife’s cancer, a son’s death due to a wrong and misguided war, etc. As if those experiences aren’t important to the candidates world view and wouldn’t influence how they would govern. There’s nothing tough or manly about belittling someone over their hair, their talking about their dead son, or their complaining about someone’s hate speech. If you’re really so tough, get your fat butts over to Iraq. Your beloved commander needs you for the escalation of the surge. After all, his daughters are too busy.

Posted by: Joe Thompson | August 17, 2007, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Like coulter or hate her, I notice that almost all of the hateful name calling is coming from the left side. Please consider what you are saying, and what effect it has on the credibility of people who are trying to be civil in discourse.

Posted by: Bob the Dog | August 17, 2007, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

It’s a shame that some men feel so threatened by a strong woman. So should she go back to the kitchen and cook for you? Admit it….you hate women and that’s your problem not Ms. Coulter. Sound familiar anyone??

Posted by: Kal Albert | August 17, 2007, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

You can always tell when an article has been linked to from Drudge!! The same 10 guys post the same stuff 10 times to fill up the page. Oh well,
Stop repeating the talking points and look at the record, the whole record. Sad truth is John Edwards is probably the guy closest to Ronald Reagan from EITHER party.
This Republican is sick of the neocons twisting things around, I’ll vote for Edwards.

Posted by: Ron | August 17, 2007, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Eye Doctor to his patient: Your myophic, can’t focus and can’t read the writing on the wall. How long have you been a democract? (chuckle)

Posted by: skeexix | August 17, 2007, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

I could take or leave John Edwards. I really haven’t made up my mind on him. He seems really slick, like he was made in a factory, but if Republicans don’t like you, ya have to be doing something good. But thats beside the point, I think she is the devil. She rarely says anything good about anyone. If she is not the devil then i bet she has the Devil’s cell number, on spead dial # 2.

Posted by: waleeg | August 17, 2007, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

John Edwards is a moron and cannot hold an intellectual candle to Coulter
——————————————
Yeah, that must be why he became successful trial lawyer and a Senator. He couldn’t make it writing hate-filled books.

Posted by: Joe Thompson | August 17, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Edwards was right…Coulter could well be described with the words Barbara Bush used for Dem VP candidate Geraldine Ferraro: “Something that rhymes with witch.”

Posted by: greg | August 17, 2007, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Ron – you’re kidding, right? John Edwards is probably the guy closes to Ronald Reagan? In what sense that they’re both males? I didn’t see Ronald Reagan trotting his wife out to defend him. That’s just a start. Ronald Reagan was about minimizing government intrusion into our lives. I hardly think that is what John Edwards will do.

Posted by: Bill | August 17, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

It seems strange so many far right are chatting on a horrible MSM website! Coulter. I can not believe you guys love this woman so much you can not see her ugly goes too far. Take her comments on the widows of 9-11. She said they enjoyed the deaths of their husbands. Why gee golly, that is just some fun sarcasm again I suppose? Nope. It’s UGLY and it’s not Christian. All I see on here is whining over this unfair article when it pretty much reports it exactly like it went down.

Posted by: Sandra | August 17, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Furthermore, the fact that he has any legitimacy as one of the front runners for the nomination is embarrassing for the Democratic Party
——————————————
Remember those words when Fred Thompson rides in on his white horse to save the Republicans from Hillary. I read today that many Republicans want him to win the nomination because he is tall and would look impressive standing next to Hillary.

Posted by: Joe Thompson | August 17, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Scottked,
Yes, going after corporations like the one that made a pool drain that sucked a little girls intestines out sure puts him against the little guy, doesn’t it?

Posted by: Joe Thompson | August 17, 2007, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Ann Coulter is one of the most articulate writers on the political scene and her logic is sound. Her arguments against the left are very compelling and I don’t hear John Edwards or anyone else on the left disputing them; they just talk about how she attacks them. Why doesn’t John Edwards defend himself against the accusation of being an “ambulance chasing” lawyer? What about some of the cases he has tried? There are several that smell like ambulance chasing to me and quite sleazy at that.

Posted by: Dale Anderson | August 17, 2007, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Edwards D-N.C.? He’s not a member of Congress? Liberal bias in the press? That’s like saying the sky is blue.

Posted by: Robert | August 17, 2007, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Oddly enough, the number of comments from Conservatives here makes me wonder why we’re all wasting our time reading All Biased Commie News…

Posted by: Robert | August 17, 2007, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Ann was totally flustered when Elizabeth tried to be gracious to her. Love the ‘drive-by media’ reference, Dittohead.

Posted by: Harper326 | August 17, 2007, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

unbelievable liberal bias.
i’m a democrat but seriously.
just terrible

Posted by: nwaaals | August 17, 2007, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

George earlier stated that we should be so lucky to have Edwards as our president. If he was then maybe he could sue Osama Bin Laden for 9-11

Posted by: CC in NC | August 17, 2007, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

To all of you people who are so much holier than the rest of us, who complain about how this is supposed to be a civilized society and, gasp, look at this name calling —- this is a comments section on an article. This is not a political debate. This is not a town meeting. It’s a freakin’ internet story. If there’s ever a place to say “you’re an idiot and a hypocrite and here’s why,” this is the place to do it.

Posted by: David | August 17, 2007, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

George earlier stated that we should be so lucky to have Edwards as our president. If he was then maybe he could sue Osama Bin Laden for 9-11
——————————————
What’s your point? Bush hasn’t caught him and he said in so many words that he doesn’t really care. The Spice Girls couldn’t have done worse.

Posted by: Joe Thompson | August 17, 2007, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

What is telling here is in the insults that conservatives and liberals toss back in forth. One side is personally attacking the other, saying all sorts of vile and hateful things. The other side is insulting certain people and organizations, limiting their criticism instead generalizing. Even then, 9 out of 19 of the insults/comments in nature are more to say proof of their claims, and to express theri displeasure towards a policy. Only a few attack in general.
The first group is liberal/democrat supports, and the second is the conservative/republican supporters.
Kinda goes to show…. A tree is known by it’s fruit…

Posted by: Phil | August 17, 2007, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Sandra,
Have you ever actually read any of Coulter’s books, or do you just spew your judgement based on a few words that the MSM quote out-of-context from an entire chapter of Ann’s book?! yeah .. I though so!
Joe,
I don’t know where you “read today that many Republicans want him to win the nomination because he is tall and would look impressive” but that certainly doesn’t speak for ME nor a lot of Republicans! I think you might need to start seriously questioning where you are getting your news from! Is it ABC perchance?!
Fred Thompson has had quite a distinguished career both as a lawyer AND a Senator, aside from the acting thing! Perhaps you’ve heard of the “Watergate Hearings??!!” Be sure and Google the word “Watergate.” Crazy stuff!

Posted by: Keith | August 17, 2007, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Good point, Phil … I’m leaving this ‘discussion,’ because it’s nothing of the sort. Night all, PEACE OUT.

Posted by: Harper326 | August 17, 2007, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

I am saddened by the arrogance and hatred that is represented in all of these narrow-minded opinions. As I read these unbelievably hateful diatribes, keeping in mind that we are all Americans, I truely wonder what is becoming of this country. Seriously, you people should all take a step backward and realize that we are all Americans and the person on the other side of the aisle is not the enemy!

Posted by: Idahoveterinarian | August 17, 2007, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

The poster who thinks that Fox News in pervasively liberal is as out of touch as those who think that Ann Coulter is anything but a right wing opportunist, riding to riches on the looniest hate speech she can come up with.

Posted by: Paul | August 17, 2007, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Keith, I’ve read enough to know I do not want to support her by buying a book. I have seen her enough on Fox to loathe her. She takes it entirely too far. She has talent, but went ugly with it. I’m anti all the ugly.

Posted by: Sandra | August 17, 2007, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

I’m not surprised by an ABC News reporter skewing the facts to slant an article.
Yes, Ann Coulter is a shcok jock and yes, a comedian, so you need to report the context of what she said, and why.
So, it bears repeating that you conveniently forgot to add that Coulter’s comment was mocking a comment by Bill Maher who said that he thought it would be good if Vice President Cheney was killed in a trip to Afghanistan. His comment was at the same time as Coulters’ “faggot” comment but received little to no coverage.

Posted by: Stephen A. | August 17, 2007, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Let’s put it this way … if you insist on comparing Maher to Coulter as your justification that Coulter is no different let me say this.
Maher is incredibly current, witty, informative, hilarious, and real. Coulter is a nasty Harpy who makes stuff up and delivers it to right wing lemmings who want to roll themselves in like mindedness against liberals.
Coulter does this not to make a point from the facts or even to gain a greater understanding as Maher’s work tends to do… she does it to rally a whole group of Americans against another for the sole purpose of distracting us from actually asking real questions and questioning authority.
Maher questions authority. Coulter would rather point a finger at anyone who does this instead of actually addressing facts.
Big difference.

Posted by: Surgethis | August 17, 2007, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

People like Ann Coulter and her ilk are why the Republican party has lost its battle to lead another generation. Coulter’s unnecessary and despicable comments about Edward, the 9/11 wives, and the Republicans failure to publically denounce her are further proof that they do not have the moral character to lead.
Personal attacks and character assassination only shows that you do not have the intellectual heft to win an argument or that your position is weak. Republicans have become the party of effette playground bullies who pretend to be patriots but never actually serve their country.
Reagan and Goldwater would be ashamed of what their party has become.

Posted by: Former Conservative | August 17, 2007, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Keith. P.S. Wouldn’t Thompson be one of those horrible actors?

Posted by: Sandra | August 17, 2007, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Bill Maher is a functional idiot…..night all

Posted by: skeexix | August 17, 2007, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Is someone named Rick Klein the leftist useful idiot who penned this press release for the Edwards campaign and the leftist advocacy/lobbying group calling itself ABC “News”? To correct his garbage would take days, but if you want to know what Coulter actually said you will need to check the entire speech not the conveniently edited version selected by Rick Klein and his leftist advocacy group ABC so-called “News”.

Posted by: Tom | August 17, 2007, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Thank you Idahoveterinarian! It would be nice if some of our fellow Americans returned to civil discourse even if they don’t agree with one another instead of seeing who can put down who the fastest.

Posted by: Texan | August 17, 2007, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Keith,
I’ve got no problem with ‘Ol Fred personally, in fact, if we had to have another Republican prez, I’d rather it be him than any of the others. I however, won’t be voting Red this year because it’s going to take someone other than a Republican to get us out of the Iraq disaster and reverse the deepening trend of deficit spending. Universal Healthcare is also a priority for me. I have no illusions that this won’t happen soon, given all of the other problems resulting from 8 years of gross mismanagement that the Democratic president will face, but I know it will take a Democrat to get it moving. My vote is for Obama. Second choice would be Edwards.

Posted by: Joe Thompson | August 17, 2007, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

I’m enjoying all the anguished complaints from you right-wingers who are so up in arms about the kind of ad hominem attacks you have employed so infamously over recent decades.
Does the name Karl Rove sound familiar? Or Lee Atwater?
Swallow a little poison now and then, and like Mithridates, you too will outlive your enemies.

Posted by: Nic Brodeur | August 17, 2007, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Edwards won’t be the Democratic nominee for president. Why don’t you dummies rake him over the coals like you do the Republicans. That way, it might make you look a little less partisan, you won’t hurt Obama and you can expose him for the fraud he really is. Think about it!

Posted by: Rob | August 17, 2007, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

John quoted Bill Maher:
“If Dick Cheney was fighting in Afghanistan right now and something happened to him, I think they world would be a better place”
and then “John” added:
..” in regards to his foreign policy. It was a jab at foreign policy, not a fatwah to kill Cheney.”
You’re kidding, right?! You even quoted Maher, and you and the rest of the Lefties STILL deny that Maher wanted Dick Cheney to die?!
Oh .. I get it! This is the same kind of defense that Bubba used: “Well, it depends on what the word “IS” is!” You are either dumb, delusional, or gullible! The rest of us (us “Right Wing Nutjobs”/”Neocons”) know EXACTLY what he meant!

Posted by: Keith | August 17, 2007, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I see no problem with his becoming wealthy as a result of doing good work as a trial lawyer. I don’t expect anyone to give up their money if it was acquired legally and see nothing hypocritical about advocating for the poor, i.e. fairer taxes and universal healthcare even though you’re rich.

Posted by: Joe Thompson | August 17, 2007, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

One more reason why Edwards is my candidate…

Posted by: pamela | August 17, 2007, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Ann Coulter is disgusting. She is a prime example of what is wrong with the Republican Party. John Edwards would make a great president. All Coulter wants to do is stir up the typical right wind hate machine. It is so very sad the way the deeply flawed conservative ideology continues to exploit otherwise well intentioned Americans. Coulter supports and defends incompetence, fear mongering, and corruption. She and all who support her are doing more bad than good.

Posted by: Eric | August 17, 2007, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Coulter was NOT ‘flustered’ as the article states. Many would be, though. She railed back like she should… saying that Edwards is so upset by her comments that her husband uses her for political fundraising.

Posted by: Rich Miller | August 17, 2007, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Rich I saw it live and she was rather flustered.

Posted by: Sandra | August 17, 2007, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

*”If I’m gonna say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot,” Coulter said.*
Totally out of context and used in a deceitful way.
People are watching what you do, and turning off your network because they know they’re being lied to.

Posted by: GEAH | August 17, 2007, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

AMEN, JC!!!

Posted by: duke | August 17, 2007, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

I would love to see the Democrats nominate John Edwards to run for president in 2008. This would most certainly assure a Republican victory.

Posted by: Patrick | August 17, 2007, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

I’m an independent. I pick favorites according to rational thoughts and actions. I find Ann Coulter one of the most brilliant and insightful commentators today. I find John Edwards, on the other hand, to be one of the most disingenuous politicians today. But I’m not going to scream about it. Calm down. It’s an exchange of ideas. It’s opinion.

Posted by: rlr | August 17, 2007, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

John Edwards is such a lightweight – it SHOULD embarass the North Carolinians something awful that they elected him to Congress – even once. If he weren’t rich, we’d never hear from him again.

Posted by: Missourimule | August 17, 2007, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

This writer and his liberal nitwit apologists desperately try to cover up the fact that this ‘outrage’ is a completely contrived one.
I call them nitwits because in their attempt to smear Coulter, they are actually endorsing the point she was making on GMA: that there’s never any outrage whatsoever when a liberal says something outrageous — namely, Bill Maher hoping for the DEATH of the Vice President of the United States — but if a conservative says anything derogatory, all hell breaks lose.
So, now the nitwits try to manufacture a ‘controversy’ by DELETING the context of Coulter’s point (Maher). Which simply proves Coulter’s point: even a MANUFACTURED ‘statement’ by a conservative gets a hundred times more negative press than an actual outrage uttered by a liberal.
Thanks for illustrating her point so convincingly, nitwits.

Posted by: David NH | August 17, 2007, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

John Edwards: Another Liberal Hypocrite

Today, John Edwards said he shouldn’t name call . . . right after calling Ann Coulter a she-devil. What a hypocrite, the Breck Girl:Oh, and also, he’s made money off a company that has foreclosed on Katrina victims, a practice

Posted by: Radioactive Communist Zombies | August 17, 2007, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Keith – your post is full of complete nonsence. You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. Everything you posted is a right wing talking point lie. You are completely in the dark about reality. Good luck with that … you stupid fool.

Posted by: atomic | August 17, 2007, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

The Coulter quotes totally are out of context, and when I viewed the so-called confrontation Coulter certainly didn’t seem to me to have been flustered. I can see how Edwards in particular, and Democrats in general, would consider Coulter a she- devil. She regularly calls their hand and that puts the heat on them, hence, she-devil.
Haha. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. If you cannot take, don’t give. What goes around comes around.
Coulter is surgically incisive and shows no one mercy. I would hate to live around her, but I appreciate her ability and willingness to cut to the chase and fearlessly state the obvious that many others see but fear to say.
Hang in there, Ann, and keep doing what it is you do well, that is non-PC deflation of bloated liberal egos.

Posted by: JonE | August 17, 2007, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

I find Edwards to be on of the most transparent, disingenuous candidates to take the stage in a long time, and his national polling number show I’m not alone.
His debacle of holding investments with finance companies now foreclosing on residents hit by Katrina is just the latest example of his sloppy hypocrisy.

Posted by: 186 | August 17, 2007, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

I’m not a fan of Ms. Coulter’s drive-by tactics, I disagree with her stooping to the level to quote Mr. Mauher’s hate speech, and her tactics make it difficult to believe that she is truly a disciple of Jesus Christ, but leaving out the context of her quote is tantamout to journalism that is truly bush league. This is the kind of “press release” (political propoganda) that one would expect from the DNC not ABC News.

Posted by: BradH | August 17, 2007, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Ann Coulter is disgusting.
She was brainwashed by mean, ultra- conservative parents. Frankly, Americans have had enough of her type.
Hateful, stereotyping, foul mouthed, bigoted, and extreme in her ideology.
Go away Coulter. You have gotten rich by contaminating the political process.
You bring NOTHING of value to it.

Posted by: G. | August 18, 2007, 12:01 am 12:01 am

“Atomic:”
I’ve written about ten posts. Please explain which of my points you believe are “nonsense!” Otherwise, I’ll just assume that you read the first three words, saw that I’m a “Right-Wing Neocon” (read: I disagree with you and that makes me stoopit) and then added YOUR talking points!
Winning in the arena of ideas doesn’t usually end with: “you stupid fool!”

Posted by: Keith | August 18, 2007, 12:04 am 12:04 am

The righties on here are total freaks. I forgot how nasty things get when rightie trolls are involved. All they have are the talking points and anger. It’s no wonder they love Ann Coulter so much, they’re just like her. Sad insecure babies who desperately need to feel better than others because secretly they feel like pathetic weaklings. Hence the need to make up lies and spit at people like children without love or supervision.
Hang the facts with these right wing flying monkey jobs .. just vomit up lies and hatred and call it fact. Too bad we can’t put all the righties on an island somewhere. They all just need to act out and get out all those feelings they weren’t allowed to express as children. Pent up and scared of their won reality these sad folks would kill each other in no time. Righties are just angry children with unresolved development issues and a huge investment in never coming to grips with it.

Posted by: atomic | August 18, 2007, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Phil,
No – they are not interested in helping brainwashed Muslims, or women, or gays.
The GOP of today is full of extremists, ideologues, religious fanatics, and bigots. They are corrupt, incompetent and dishonest.
What happen to real conservatism? Oh – that’s right – Karl Rove was more interested in getting GWB 2 terms. What a price the GOP has paid for that.

Posted by: G. | August 18, 2007, 12:09 am 12:09 am

John
Anger is a sign of defeat!

Posted by: informedvoter | August 18, 2007, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Christopher:
I don’t totally disagree with you. But currently, the only way that a Candidate has a viable chance to win is with our two-Party system. Finding a way around that seems like a daunting task! However, I think the more likely thing to do is for voters to DEMAND that their Party — Democrat or Republican — start finding Candidates who reflect the views of the Party whole!

Posted by: Keith | August 18, 2007, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Keith – every point you made from health care to going off on Edward’s about being a trial lawyer are all un- researched and exactly what you have heard somewhere on right wing television word for word.. Seriously … why would I bother to go point for point with anyone like you. I know a thousand times more about every point you think you have knowledge of – it would be a waste of time to try – especially as you would be incapable of actually having a discussion. That’s why it’s fun to just call you what you are – a right wing talking point fool.

Posted by: atomic | August 18, 2007, 12:11 am 12:11 am

John Edwards is desperate. He might as well all it quits becuase a Hillary/Edwards ticket will never fly and would certainly doom the Democrats.

Posted by: Jack | August 18, 2007, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Rick Klein should be sacked for this ridiculous article. Maybe if he cuts up enough Ann Coulter comments he can report that she once stated: ‘Bill Clinton’ ‘is’ ‘not’ ‘a’ ‘sexual’ ‘predator’. ‘Bill’ ‘did’ ‘send’ ‘troops’ ‘to’ ‘stop’ ‘Rwandan’ ‘genocide’.
What a joke. This article panders to the ignorant just like the democratic canditates.

Posted by: sbeskur | August 18, 2007, 12:15 am 12:15 am

The American Public buys into this false Left/Right Paradigm. At the end of the day, does it make a difference? Perhaps in the present instance, if only because this is the most singularly corrupt regime in the history of the republic. The Democrats have shielded this adminstration from the depth of their corruption. Why you ask? Because the corporate interests that finance everything do not want the Executive Branch destabilized and the American public contemplating “The Big Lie”

Posted by: Christopher London | August 18, 2007, 12:15 am 12:15 am

here we go again

Posted by: anyone but hillary | August 18, 2007, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Larry,
I as far from a Marxist as they get. I am very pro Capitalism. I also support the Democratic party and am socially progressive. I live in a Democracy not a Theocracy
I am just anti-corruption, croynism, dishonesty, incompetence, extremism. The hallmarks of the GOP today.
No one in their right mind can support the GOP after the last 7 years. The GOP is in our bedrooms, spending our paychecks, and letting religious leaders speak for them. Scary stuff from the Government.

Posted by: G. | August 18, 2007, 12:18 am 12:18 am

What site is this? AB..Who? Let’s face it, the only reason any of us read this article is because there was a link off of drudgereport. No one cares about this writer’s political slant and his lack of depth to his quoted sources; he is part of a dying media dinosaur.

Posted by: aregularjoe | August 18, 2007, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Ann Coulter is a disgrace to the Republican party. Can you imagine the likes of Ronald Reagan stooping so low as to make the comments Coulter makes?
What kind of Christian calls for an assassination attempt, even in jest? For ANY Republican to justify her speech shows me how far the party has fallen in their attempt to hold on to power.
As for Bill Maher, he, too, was wrong to say what he said…as was Edwards to call Coulter a “she-devil.”
This kind of nonsense has to stop. This nation has serious problems to deal with. We don’t need people like Ann Coulter — who offer no constructive criticism — spewing filth on the airwaves.
If my Republican grandparents were alive today, they would be horrified to see what their party has disintegrated into. It’s really quite tragic, when you think about it.

Posted by: v w patterson | August 18, 2007, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Maher didn’t say that he wished Dick Cheney had died in Afghanistan. He defended the bloggers’ right to say that the bomb in Afghanistan had “been wasted.” Maher was defending freedom of speech.
Whenever some simpleton like you comes around and misrepresents a story, the rest of us know that you’re lying only because you can’t admit that the real story is the truth.

Posted by: carleiu | August 18, 2007, 12:22 am 12:22 am

its so funny to read the comments here, although i didn’t read them all, but to me it seems that most of the comments are complaining about this site being liberal, which makes me think that the majority of the posts are from conservatives…if the conservatives hate the site so much, why are they posting? as far as the story, coulter is a she devil…she is a vile person that engages in shock journalism and tv because she knows she has an audiance in the “conservative” crowd which has made her rich…people like her are destroying this nation by increasing the hatred between the dems and the reps…if people like coulter would quit the hate talk this country would be better…atleast mahr gives every side a chance to talk on his show and doesn’t call them a complete idiot while they are there….people need to quit hating someone just because of their label of conservative or liberal and do what is best for the country, which is to take advantage of democracy and have intelligent debates, not name calling and encouraging hate

Posted by: michael | August 18, 2007, 12:24 am 12:24 am

To the guy that claims to be pro capitalist but is lying and really is a marxist…we do not live in a democracy but a Republic…get your facts straight

Posted by: machuchar | August 18, 2007, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Ann Coulter is badly in need of a mouth-lift!

Posted by: Bernie Schaeffer | August 18, 2007, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Cut the bull…most are posting here because we vahe nothing better to do on this Friday eve…you have the most free time with your long diatribe.

Posted by: machuchar | August 18, 2007, 12:26 am 12:26 am

You people are idiots. I’m glad you can find such useless crap to argue about amongst yourselves. Maybe someday you morons can start addressing more serious issues, until then I recommend that most of you try to get a life.

Posted by: jdude43 | August 18, 2007, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Dan:
Thanks for adding to the discussion. It’s what I expect from a Leftie. I’ve been called worse, by far better people than you. Now go back and pick up your crayons!

Posted by: Keith | August 18, 2007, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Um, Bill Mahr is a COMMEDIAN.
There are two problems with Ann Coulter’s referencing of Mahr’s comment. Ann, as I recall, quoted Mahr nearly verbatim without any context. She presented the comment as if it were her own and most people didn’t realize it to be anything else since she makes similar comments regularly to keep attention on herself. I won’t bother listing all of them, there’s not enough space here.
The second problem, Ann Coulter is a Political pundit who has been hired on several occasions to speak at Bon-e-fide Republican events. Her hate rhetoric has the Party stamp of approval and support. She is the voice of the modern Republican party.
Bill Mahr, on the other hand, IS A FREAKING COMMEDIAN.
Poor right wingers. The persecution complex is so freaking old already. Maybe you can just grow up and act like big boys and big girls.

Posted by: sbandyk | August 18, 2007, 12:28 am 12:28 am

For all you that have fallen for Rove and Coulter — Rove is an aethist and Coulter dated Guicioni – the Penthouse founder’s Son.
They only care about money and power – for themsleves – NOT for you poor fools that supported the GOP.

Posted by: G. | August 18, 2007, 12:29 am 12:29 am

.
.
.
.
Ann WHO?
.
.
.
.

Posted by: wacker | August 18, 2007, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Jdude:
You’re absolutely right. Why I have wasted over an hour on an idiotic story about John Edwards who really has become an irrelevant player is kind of silly. Then again, poking the Lefties with a stick is fun too.

Posted by: Keith | August 18, 2007, 12:31 am 12:31 am

This discussion is pointless anyway because the GOP will be out of power for a generation and deservedly so.
When the GOP no longer is run by the religious right Theocrats – I will think about joining again.

Posted by: G. | August 18, 2007, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Ann Coulter for Prez

Posted by: alphonse | August 18, 2007, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Just like a typical leftist journalist to leave out context. You do know that Coulter was “uncharacteristically” flustered because she was totally unaware of Mrs. Edwards little session.
Keep it up, journalists, almost everyone has you figured out, except those that love to be spoon fed.

Posted by: LMAO | August 18, 2007, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Keith. you’ve been called worse? Hey you don’t have a clue what “worse” is. Your right. I’m a lefty with a hell of a slider and change up. Can’t beat that combination. And golly gee all those people who have called you worse— and are better than me ,well whoopy doo

Posted by: Dan | August 18, 2007, 12:37 am 12:37 am

You may not like the Dems 2nd tier prospect, John Edwards but at least he is not a nut case bible thumper like the GOP’s 2nd tier candidate Huckabee – what an embarrasment to the USA.
We can do much better.

Posted by: G. | August 18, 2007, 12:39 am 12:39 am

sbandyk:
Bill Maher is a “commedian” who has made a career as a political commentator. He even hosted a political show that routinely placed three Liberals around one solitary Conservative. To place Bill Maher in the same genre with, say, Jerry Seinfeld, is disingenuous. Even if you find Maher funny (which boggles the mind) he is first and foremost, a political commentator.

Posted by: Keith | August 18, 2007, 12:40 am 12:40 am

The GOP is filled with fat, old, out of shape white men who have one pervasive interest…$$$. They need to take some exercise and stop stuffing their greedy mouths with all those free Capitol Hill dinners the tax payers foot the bill for.
$$$ is the motivating factor in everything they do, in every law they pass, in every policy decision they make. Iraq was about oil. Always was, always will be. There is no democracy in Iraq. Never was, never will be.
The Republican party collectively hides behind the Bible, but they obviously haven’t read it lately. The biggest hypocrites in the world are these supposedly Christian right-wingers, who make a mockery of all that Christ taught and died for. Love thy neighbor? Not unless he’s white, rich and blond.
They don’t fool the nation and they’re not going to fool the electorate in the next Presidential election.

Posted by: v w patterson | August 18, 2007, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Cmon Keith your mind isn’t boggled its scrambled

Posted by: dan | August 18, 2007, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Dan:
Calm down. Besides, you are the one who started the name calling.

Posted by: Keith | August 18, 2007, 12:44 am 12:44 am

v w patterson,
Couldn’t agree with you more. America knows what you wrote to be true as well.
Rove is a lot of things – but he is not dumb – he got off his own sinking ship!

Posted by: G. | August 18, 2007, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Jackie:
You called ME a retreater. That’s why I didn’t understand your comments to me. I’ve always thought that the Democrats had trademarked the concept of retreat.

Posted by: Keith | August 18, 2007, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Now who is sending hate outl, the caring liberals who can feel the pain and oh yea dish it out just the same.
Lets all go out and buy some hedge funds and maybe we can have 200.oo haircuts.

Posted by: phil marquez | August 18, 2007, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Someone on here mentioned Hell frezzing over. HOW could that happen, Global Gore say’s the earth is getting warmer.. So if Hell freezes over then that would make Golbal Gore a lyer..ERR wait he is, sonever mind..

Posted by: R J | August 18, 2007, 12:49 am 12:49 am

I HATE in order to prove my undying love for Ann Coulter. I can’t help myself.

Posted by: Al Barger | August 18, 2007, 12:51 am 12:51 am

R J,
That’s right Global Warming is just a hoax – all the world’s top scientists are wrong. You and the science haters and religious fanatics in the GOP know better.
Did the tooth fairy tell you that there is no Global Warming?

Posted by: G. | August 18, 2007, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Can you feel the love? Any playwrights out there? Get this stuff down- you couldn’t make up anything this ridiculous!

Posted by: looloo | August 18, 2007, 12:54 am 12:54 am

I was unsure whether I should post a reply. After reading the sophomoric arguments by the lefties it seems a little too much like sparring with a one-armed weakling.
Oh well, I can’t help it, I will say a few things, without going too far beneath the surface. Here goes: the ranting denigrations against Coulter tend to be so cookie-cutter, insubstantial, and immature, that one could simply replace “Coulter” with “Edwards” in most of those posts, and voila! you have an appropriate reply — like two playground kids having a little go-round of “I know you are but what am I?” Pathetic. Grow the *** up, lefties, and learn to argue with a little force and panache, rather than the bellicose, mawkish retorts you are wont to post. It’s understood that you’re deathly afraid of Coulter and her ilk, and so intolerant that you would gladly cast away the Bill of Rights if it would stifle this type of outspoken conservatism — but you could sure take some debating lessons from her.
As for Edwards, does this cheap ambulance-chasing hack actually inspire anything more than a curdled stomach? He truly is a conniving charlatan of the most nauseating variety. It goes to show that you can, indeed, fool some of the people all of the time.

Posted by: Johnny | August 18, 2007, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Thanks G,
Yes, Rove deserted the ship…and I had to laugh…he’s going dove-hunting this weekend. What a perfect symbol for his hawkish ways. lol
Well, Condi and Dick are glued to Bush’s hip…they know what side their bread is buttered on.
To be honest, WHOEVER wins the next election — Democrat OR Republican — can’t possibly be as bad as Bush. I really think he is the worst leader we have ever had in this nation’s history.

Posted by: v w patterson | August 18, 2007, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Our conservative friends seem to forget how to type even when the talking points are put in oh-so-easy cut and paste blogs. Ann Coulter is a lightning rod period. Anything she says is destined for book sales and hopeful talk show gigs. Her little sister and fellow lawyer Laura Ingram is no different. The hair thing goes back to Rush Limbaugh. Rush is insanely jealous of anyone who weighs less or has more hair than himself. Being on the left only intensifies this. Nice try my little pinheaded neocons. Your attempts have been wasted.

Posted by: DW Griffith | August 18, 2007, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Re: v w patterson You have got to be kidding, I’ll assume you’re not old enough to have lived through the Carter years, He without a doubt was the worst…
Look it up!

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Calling Coulter a she devil is an insult to all of us she devil’s. Next to her we have an angelic halo over our heads. She is so much fouler.

Posted by: she devil | August 18, 2007, 12:59 am 12:59 am

The Republic party should be very thankful for Ann Coulter.
She is the goddess of the conservative world, and the bane of all the wackos that are trying to destroy the Western world.

Posted by: Carl | August 18, 2007, 1:00 am 1:00 am

I hope Edwards stays in the race as long as possible. He handed our President the largest presidential election margin in two generations with his rantings the last time. Keep up the vitriole Edwards. Ann Coulter isn’t running for any office, but it gives you the news spots you desparately need You may be the greatest hope for the GOP to date. My, my, it simply infuriates the left when Ms Coulter points out the insanity of the liberal fools who are driving the dems these days.

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Carey you are the one that makes sense, all this childish gibberish by the lefties is more than I can take
Take care of yourself Carey and God Bless you for your service.
The comments by the left make me hunger for some adult conversation.
I bet all of you little kids still live with mommie and daddy

Posted by: Jackie McEwen | August 18, 2007, 1:06 am 1:06 am

If Ann Coulter were just some person on the street she would still be one of the meanest,hurtful and most awful individuals I’ve ever come across in modern times. She is a hollow person; devoid of feeling for anyone. It doesn’t matter what her motives are or were or will be. I don’t hate her because I can’t see why someone would attack others where she can hurt them or their children or families the most. It’s a puzzle and not normal.

Posted by: Suzanne | August 18, 2007, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Why hasn’t Edwards’ financial ties into shady lending corporations been mentioned yet? I thought he was a champion for the downtrodden folk that just don’t know better. It’s front page story for a select few that still have open minds, but neery a mention in your local liberal mullet wrapper.

Posted by: CJ | August 18, 2007, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Hey, not a fan of Jimmy “Yikes! there’s a killer rabbit” Carter,” but I think Bush is worse…this Iraq situation is really a mess and I feel like Bush led us down the primrose path to a foreign policy debacle that will take years — maybe decades — to rectify.
Anyway, thanks for your response.

Posted by: v w patterson | August 18, 2007, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Dear ABC and Rick: Here’s what she actually said and why (it was easy to find online): “If I’m going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot,” Coulter said, picking up on remarks made by HBO’s Bill Maher, when Maher stated in March that “people wouldn’t be dying needlessly” if Vice President Dick Cheney had been killed in an insurgent attack in Afghanistan.

Posted by: BigBoy | August 18, 2007, 1:09 am 1:09 am

RE: Suzanne
She’s just telling it how she sees it Suzanne.
She’s taken the abuse from the left for too long and now is striking back. The left isn’t use to that…

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 1:11 am 1:11 am

OOPs Keith, I meant to say that Rick Klein is the retreater, sorry for the misstep. I was referreing to Rick Klein and Joe Thompson. All of the enemy loving liberals. If they loved our country as much as they loved the enemy, we would become an even greater country.

Posted by: Jackie McEwen | August 18, 2007, 1:17 am 1:17 am

The only time I ever saw Ann Coulter she had her facts completely wrong and when she was corrected denied the correction. After a bit of back and forth she said she would have to check what the interviewer had told her. She was rude, arrogant, ignorant and obnoxious. Maybe she earns her living being that way.
John Edwards on the other hand is honest and informed. If he chased ambulances it is because the state of health care in America leaves many people as victims when they most need help. Always keep in mind the elderly woman who was taken from her hospital bed and dumped on a sidewalk with homeless people. I’d like to see John Edwards president. Get a little law and order and decency back in America.

Posted by: maggie | August 18, 2007, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Politics is supposed to be contentious, and there were fiery disputes in earlier decades and centuries. Of course, liberal papers/news shows will spin things their way, and conservatives will spin things their way. What’s new is that the decade-long stranglehold the liberals have on the media has been challenged.
When I was younger I considered myself a liberal, because I “felt” it was the right way to be. When I became a conservative, I really started paying attention and thinking. The mainstream/liberal news media, when I listen to it by accident, depresses me because it sounds as though there is no hope. Then I realize what’s on, and I breathe a sigh of relief and discount the spin.
Ann Coulter is popular because she makes us laugh. Of course she is extreme, but she is a counterbalance to all the tommyrot that is slung our way by the liberals. For liberals to deplore her sharp tongue is disingenuous, but quite up to their usual standards… just like when the Democrats were in the minority in the Senate and House, as well as being out of power in the Executive Branch, and invented some sort of chivalry in which the Republicans are supposed to let them decide policy, out of consideration for the minority. When the Democrats won a slight majority in 2006, I didn’t hear anything more about how the minority deserved to call the shots. Too bad the Republicans lost their nerve and didn’t push through more conservative measures when they had the chance, and too bad Ginsburg or one of the others didn’t decide to take an early retirement so we could get another Bush-appointed Justice for the Supreme Court. Here’s to hoping the elephant trumpets in victory in 2008!

Posted by: Wendy | August 18, 2007, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Edwards like all polticians are sickos. The live on other peoples money and banter about with hate. John and elizabeth are hate merchants for their on gains on others sicko’s money.

Posted by: steve | August 18, 2007, 1:28 am 1:28 am

I love all this “liberal media” junk being spouted by righties here…this same liberal media that focused on nothing by Bill Clinton’s affair for 8 years and now gives conservatives a pass for everything. Citizens are bombarded with conservatives like Coulter every day on every news program, but if anyone media member says anything that isn’t a glowing endorsement of Coulter or any other conservative talking head, they are branded a liberally biased journalists. Just remember righties- it is because of you and your congressional leaders and President that Osama Bin Laden is still living life as a free man! Thanks for giving comfort to our terrorist enemies by backing right wing efforts to divert funds from capturing terrorists into a pointless war! The terrorists appreciate your efforts!

Posted by: Jason | August 18, 2007, 1:31 am 1:31 am

Edwards is an IDIOT. The best thing to do with someone like Ann Coulter is say nothing at all, anything else will only multiply her popularity.
Personally, I’d like to see both Edwards and Coulter disappear. I agree with Coulter’s views more than Edwards but I still can’t stand her.

Posted by: Bryan J | August 18, 2007, 1:31 am 1:31 am

disingenuous? thats a hoot

Posted by: Captainliberty | August 18, 2007, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Edwards does not care about anybody but himself. He moves in across from a person that he then complains about not keeping his house the way Edwards and his Wife would like.
Maybe the guy does not have the money John has because he did not spend his life suing people.

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Geeze, someone tell the wingers that the next full moon is not until the 28th.

Posted by: Were Wollfe | August 18, 2007, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Jason you said this and you are so wrong. Why when he was offered to Clinton did Clinton not take him?
YOU MAKE BUSH THE BAD GUY?
Just remember righties- it is because of you and your congressional leaders and President that Osama Bin Laden is still living life as a free man! Thanks

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Max Cleland was a bumbling idiot who dropped a grenade ON HIMSELF! He is NOT A WAR HERO! He is a clutz who unfortunately had to pay the price for his clumsiness. That said he is a vile idividual who was part of the CLinton dirty lies and tricks dept.

Posted by: k.Diggs | August 18, 2007, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Coulter is a disgusting sleeze slinger. As far as I’m concerned, those who defend her ways, and then talk about John Edward’s hair in the same rant, have the same intellect. Smart people are disgusting too. Who gives a damn about her being taken out of context in this one instance? Get a grip Coulter defenders. Christ!

Posted by: Musk | August 18, 2007, 1:55 am 1:55 am

I served on the USS Silversides SSN 679 Sonar Technician 2nd class. No I wasnt IN the desert. But then again Im not stupid either. Although I do realize my spelling is sad. Einstein too was also a terrible speller…and has us all beat in the IQ dept.

Posted by: Captainliberty | August 18, 2007, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Dear ABC
We (the media consuming public) are not as ignorant as we used to be and so, will not swallow your propoganda as easily as we did in the 60′s.
We know that Ann Coulter used the comment about Edwards being assassinated as a saracastic mockery of the left-wing Bill Maher who said Cheney should be assassinated in Afghanistan.. . which none of you liberals called him out on.
We also know Coulter wasn’t flustered, she was set up by MSNBC and Edwards’s wife… she was sarcastic and satirical with them and made both Chris Matthews and Edwards wife look ridiculous

Posted by: Tony | August 18, 2007, 1:59 am 1:59 am

This story isn’t even news. It shows how conservatives really control the news despite all the “liberal media” rants coming from the right. Oh wow, he said she-devil, oh my, oh golly. ABC revealed their affiliation with the RNC back when they avidly promoted that fictitious “based on a true story” documentary on 9/11 which was widely discredited and mocked for its phony contents. The media has frequently pledged allegiance to the right, another memorable moment was when the entire week leading up to the 2006 congressional elections the media forgot about everything except for a single misspoken sentence by John Kerry in an attempt to distract voters from the real pressing issues which would surely sink the right on election night. This is just another example- ignore the economic disaster the right wing has caused and focus on this “she-devil” comment. Great work ABC!

Posted by: Jason | August 18, 2007, 2:00 am 2:00 am

If you watch the Hardball segment closely, you’ll hear Coulter’s response to Elizabeth Edwards as the most honest thing she’s ever said. Paraphrasing, Coulter basically says that she won’t stop name calling because it’s how she gets paid!! If she stopped name calling, she’d get no TV appearances and wouldn’t sell any books.

Posted by: Eric | August 18, 2007, 2:07 am 2:07 am

John wrote “Why when he (bin laden) was offered to Clinton did Clinton not take him?”
LOL John, sounds like you swallowed the kool-aid given to you in last year’s phony “documentary” from ABC. Osama was never offered to Clinton. Clinton went after Osama and was very close to catching him. He considers not catching him his greatest failure (unlike Bush who can’t seem to recall making any mistakes at all during his presidency). But Clinton did propose the idea for a homeland security department to bring the intelligence communities closer together and sadly this idea was ignored by the Bush admin. until September 12, 2001. Oh, and let’s not forget about Clinton’s anti-terror legislation which was voted down by Republicans which would have increased the wiretapping of suspected terrorists and revamped other measures including airport security. Republicans could not dare let Clinton get a “victory” back then though, even if it meant making America less safer. “Party before country” has alway been the motto of Republicans and if you want to talk about unamerican acts, nothing is more unpatriotic than putting your political party ahead of your own country!

Posted by: Jason | August 18, 2007, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Let’s get something straight around here. The mainstream media are all owned by large corporations, which are inherently not liberal. True liberalism, among other things, opposes letting corporations control the government by controlling what we believe. The ‘liberal’ media put Bush in the White House by making Al Gore out to be a liar when he was telling the truth. The ‘liberal’ media let Bush get away with making jokes about ‘A dictatorship would be easier, as long as I’m the one giving orders.’ Bush said that three times before the 2000 election. Think what happens if you make a bomb joke at the airport. Would you hire some guy to be a camp conselor if he jests about pedophilia?
It is a well-understood fact of the human brain that if we hear a lie a thousand times we start to believe it. We have heard the ‘liberal media’ lie a thosand times. It isn’t true now and was barely true forty years ago.
If you ever want to learn what real liberals think, forget the big media. Read the Nation, read Mother Jones, read Utne Reader, read In These Times. Liberals saved the world from Hitler, when the conservatives would have preferred to sit that one out. Liberals set free the slaves. Jesus was a liberal. The good guys have always been the liberals. Conservatism, on the other hand, has always been about tricking the peasants into spilling each other’s blood for the benefit of a corrupt aristocracy.

Posted by: Tom | August 18, 2007, 2:13 am 2:13 am

Wow, most of you will take ann over john. Just about every day I get reminded of how America is going to go down the toilet. You can’t help yourself.

Posted by: John Driedger | August 18, 2007, 2:14 am 2:14 am

Ronnie wrote “I always say truth is like Kryptonite to a liberal.”
Well if this is the case they should hang around Republicans more. Generally where there is a gathering of Republicans, truth is nowhere to be found. You talked about expanding our intelligence gathering capabilities, that’s funny. That’s something Clinton had proposed back in his 1998 anti-terror legislation which was opposed by Republicans because they couldn’t dare give Clinton a legislative victory. Where were you back then Ronnie? Clinton could have used your help to convince Republicans of just how serious a threat terrorists were. In fact, as I mentioned above, the DHS was proposed by Clinton but it never gained traction and was ingnored by Bush until after September 11th. To bad citizens like you only became “patriots” once Republicans were in office.

Posted by: Jason | August 18, 2007, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Re: Tom
That was a good read, honest and very much today…
I enjoyed what you wrote… Keep it up!

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Ronnie wrote “Maybe asleep like Clinton was when the twin towers were bombed the first time or maybe when Bin Laden was offerd to him on a silver platter by the Saudis or maybe when our embassies were bombed in Tanzania or maybe when the Cole was bombed in 2000″
Hmmm…where is the ‘mastermind’ behind the 2003 WTC attacks? Roaming free? No, that would be where Bin Laden is. Looks like you drank the same ABC-promoted Kool-aid John did. Bin Laden was never offered up to Clinton like that. Do you think if you repeat it enough it is just going to become fact?

Posted by: Jason | August 18, 2007, 2:33 am 2:33 am

We and the World are at war with China.
They make everything and are and have learned the skils to make everything.
We no longer have the factories were skils are learned and the people that have the skills are dieing off.
No matter the party in the White House it is the same.
I see the rich as being in control with a long term goal as a one world Government. The thinking being one Government no wars.
Can they do it i doubt they can but they are trying.
When you see our Government happy with all our factories closing you have to ask why?

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Bin Laden was never offered up to Clinton like that. Do you think if you repeat it enough it is just going to become fact
Sorry it is fact he was offered to Clinton and what happened to the third terrorist at OKC. Clinton said we would get him and a day later not another word about him. ABC why are you not asking about him?
Read the book the third terrorist and you will see the Sadam connection.

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 2:43 am 2:43 am

Brother they are all sharks….. hard to know who to trust…if any…republican or democrate they both equal Special intrest groups. Just different ones.
And I apologize to everyone for my terrible writing skills. As my freind “B” pointed out so readily.
Back when I went to HS chics took typing, guys took auto shop.

Posted by: Captainliberty | August 18, 2007, 2:54 am 2:54 am

Re: Gary
Good piece Gary really, Bravo!!

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Shoot me now for saying this, but did Barack say something the other day that sounded pretty good? I think so. But the real question is, did he mean it, does he live it, or was it written for him to say?

Posted by: BK | August 18, 2007, 3:08 am 3:08 am

Ok, Ronnie, I’ll bite…
Is the answer that:
Back in 1996 we had this thing called the “Constitution” and the President then thought trying to incarcerate OBL here in the US before he had committed any crimes against us may have been illegal?
Knowing what we know now, would it have been a good thing had he locked him up, even if it was illegal? I say ‘yes’.
Do I think we should go out now and kill people who might commit a crime (or invade countries who might be a threat)? I say ‘no’.
Crystal balls don’t exist. And I’d rather we did our best to protect ourselves without compromising our (my) principles.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 3:08 am 3:08 am

That’s right, ABC News, I’m just a patsy of stupidity. Thanks for thinking I bought into your sandbagging of Coulter as you played blind to Bill Mahr’s heinousness like a rasslin’ referee bit.
Now, onto the Pulitzer Prize!

Posted by: The Cone Of Silence | August 18, 2007, 5:34 am 5:34 am

Good stuff coming from an ambulance chaser. Alot of time wasted on Ann Coulter – a sign of desperation?

Posted by: Randy | August 18, 2007, 5:38 am 5:38 am

Excuse me. But WHAT liberal media?? Everyone knows Rupert Murdock’s Right Wing proganda network FOX had gotton of out of control -even Republicans admit it. And ABC owned by Disney – is a HUGE contributor to the GOP and slants everything to the right. Face it there are NO liberal networks. NONE. You guys who cry ‘liberal media’ are trying to flip it around cause in your heart you know it’s the reverse. Fact — Republican conglomerates bought up all the networks after Reagan changed the FCC Laws in 1985. I wonder if this will get posted since some Repup from ABC obviously favors right wing responses on this blog. They’re you go again.

Posted by: RSL | August 18, 2007, 5:51 am 5:51 am

Bill Maher’s statements were part of a 4-way conversation. There are a number of posters here taking his comments out of context.

Posted by: VBKatLou | August 18, 2007, 6:12 am 6:12 am

This is a case of “perfect liberalism.” Edwards rails against personal attacks — then gives a personal attack; he says name-calling is bad — then calls Coulter a name; lastly he accuses the right of engaging in hateful language — after engaging in hateful language himself. You couldn’t make up a John Edwards if you tried. He has no parallel either as a hypocrite or an an idiot. But his hair looks great.

Posted by: Mahone | August 18, 2007, 6:16 am 6:16 am

ABC News’ Rick Klein Reports: Reports?
Didn’t the word ‘report’ used to imply a reporting of facts? No wonder so many of us completely dismiss the mainstream media. And no wonder people like Sen. (gag!)John Edwards want to change the laws to shut down people like Ann Coulter. Go Ann!

Posted by: lastmanonthewall | August 18, 2007, 6:17 am 6:17 am

I’m so glad that the liberal news media is discovered thanks to Fox News Channel, Limbaugh, O’Reilly and most importantly Ann “‘Queen Among Women” Coulter!
It si so obvious that the American people are disgusted by liberal media…it’s obvious if you look at Katie Couric’s ratings! LOL
Coulter only gets the last laugh! Go America! Go Conservative! God Bless Bush and Reagan!!!

Posted by: Joshua Thuma | August 18, 2007, 6:19 am 6:19 am

“I personally think this country will be fortunate
if we are smart enough to elect John Edwards as
President of the U.S.
George
Posted by: George ”
Sure…when was the last time you trusted and thought that a Trial lawyer has great ideas….? Please tell me you are kidding…please?

Posted by: john | August 18, 2007, 6:25 am 6:25 am

Wasn’t it good old “give’m Hell” Harry Truman who used to say, “I don’t tell anybody to go to hell, I just tell them the truth, and then they feel like they ARE in hell.” That is such a good line, even uttered by a democrat against republicans, that I can think of no better use of it than to tell liberals that they are being told the TRUTH by Anne Coulter, and that is why we hear the shrieking and moaning coming out of their mouths in the blogs, because they hear the TRUTH and it makes them feel like they’ve gone straight to hell, or whatever liberal Maher atheistic equivalent there is to hell.

Posted by: davidholyfield | August 18, 2007, 6:27 am 6:27 am

I forget the name of the man who was running against Hillary for senator awhile back in NY. He was doing well until he tried to “she-devil” her. His approval ratings plummeted and he lost, for picking on a girl.
One-term Edwards has to know he has no chance at the presidency, and his wife mouthing off at Hillary removes any chance at VP. It’s just such a stupid move for a presidential candidate to attack a woman who is not even running for office or his opponent. I know he’s a phony but I wouldn’t vote for Edwards because he seems downright dumb.

Posted by: Raina | August 18, 2007, 6:42 am 6:42 am

John Who???

Posted by: Joe | August 18, 2007, 6:46 am 6:46 am

Hmm… Looks like John needs another round of campaign donations.

Posted by: J. Warren | August 18, 2007, 6:46 am 6:46 am

Interesting all this. I linked to the ABC site via Drudge Report. And all these post tearing at the MSM is amazing! I practically dumped ABC, CBS NBC and can’t remember the last time I tuned to CNN. So to find so many conservative posting in the site is amazing. Doesn’t ABC pay any attention to what is being said in here? Don’t they have a clue that the jig is up with their liberal bias?
Ann Coulter has a rather cutting way of stating her views but her facts and viewpoint are right on. The left doesn’t hate her without good reason. She is no better friend to the conservative and no worst enemy to the tiresome left. Hoorah!

Posted by: arkmaker | August 18, 2007, 6:47 am 6:47 am

Liberals have no moral compass with which to measure a candidate’s honesty. Edwards is a lying fraud and so is Kerry yet liberals are missing that ‘bell’ in their head to warn them. That is because they are GODLESS. I dare liberals to actually read Ann’s book on that topic. They won’t though, their number one fear is being found out to be wrong.

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 6:47 am 6:47 am

You can always tell the ‘low information posters’ by the number of name calls they resort to. Just the last two posts on Edwards I see – dumb, stupid, phony, loser.
And you wonder why people call you the ‘low information voters’ (bless your little souls).

Posted by: Sue | August 18, 2007, 6:49 am 6:49 am

Don’t you just love it? Where else can you hear classical stuff cited, from Marcus Aurelius to Mithradates, interspliced with all the vituperation that made the newspapers back in the days of Jefferson and Andy Jackson drip with poisonous slander. Americans have always been rowdy! Let the mud fly, and the hurricane winds of strident factionalism blow out the candles of reason for just a little while,—-they always re-light. Shining that light of reason will make the nut-bugs slither off into the darkness, trailing their ooze of “gut feelings” about everything from “man made” environmental change (see volcanoes and sun cycles) to the goodness of big government, to the everpresent conspiracy riders (does any sane person really believe in their partisan world view enough to swallow a monstrous theory of American involvement in 911?)—— behind them into the perpetual gloom. Never having “blogged” before, I have had the very great privilege to say my piece, in a very small way. What a great feeling! Anne Coulter, you rock, babe!

Posted by: davidholyfield | August 18, 2007, 6:52 am 6:52 am

Ann’s writings can be cruel, but her analogies are right on. The Democrats hate people who expose their double standard and elitism. I love reading her take on politics, it is full of substantive points and addresses the issues and is also very funny. The left wishes they had someone like Ann. The comparison of Ann and Maher is apples and oranges. Maher could never carry Ann’s intellectual water.

Posted by: Tim | August 18, 2007, 6:53 am 6:53 am

What is so bad about “she-devils”?
I like Ann the she-devil, but I have to hide her books when my progressive (yeah, right) friends come over.
I like Coulter.

Posted by: OldLiberalPutz | August 18, 2007, 6:54 am 6:54 am

Sue
Those words you object to are called ‘adjectives’ not ‘names’
“You can always tell the ‘low information posters’ by the number of name calls they resort to. Just the last two posts on Edwards I see – dumb, stupid, phony, loser.
And you wonder why people call you the ‘low information voters’ (bless your little souls).
I wonder why you generalize and condescend to people who HAVE souls, whatever the size.

Posted by: Raina | August 18, 2007, 7:00 am 7:00 am

…another left-wing author conveniently leaving out important information to further his leftist-socialist agenda. Coulter tells the truth. cannot say the same about Klein, if indeed this blogged summary of his article is as biased as the original piece…..

Posted by: DJMurphy | August 18, 2007, 7:05 am 7:05 am

I love Ann Coulter.

Posted by: Stacey | August 18, 2007, 7:07 am 7:07 am

No liberal media? Please. Just because corporations own the media company does not make it conservative. Look, all the major news networks are based in huge urban areas, such as NYC. The people they employ generally have a certain world view, living in a large urban area. Plus, most liberal arts majors (me being one of the exceptions!), are left of center. Check any college journalism school to verify. These people see the world in a generally liberal, pro-government way in my view. This affects news coverage. Have you heard about the journalist poll in DC a few years ago where 90% of those polled voted for Clinton? It’s the news reporters and decision makers that influence the news mostly, not who owns the company.

Posted by: JMP | August 18, 2007, 7:15 am 7:15 am

I sincerely hope that we can elect this courageous, decent man to the White House.
John Edwards is right.
We must stand up to bullies and pimps who would sacrifice the freedoms paid for with the blood of our ancestors for political and financial gain.

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Edwards can say whatever he wants. This is all about the First Amendment. Let’s not follow the gov’t down the path of censorship. After all, censorship is becoming America’s favorite past-time. The US gov’t (and their corporate friends), already detain protesters, ban books l, shut down Imus and fire 21-year tenured, BYU physics professor Steven Jones because he proved explosives, thermite in particular, took down the WTC buildings. Free Speech forever.

Posted by: Norm | August 18, 2007, 7:24 am 7:24 am

Here’s another reminder that this article carefully twists the truth to keep Coulter’s comment about Edwards in the worst light. As noted at the start, she was actually commenting on the double-standard that the media (like ABC News) uses to let the Left get away with far worse things than anything Coulter says.

Posted by: Morgan | August 18, 2007, 7:32 am 7:32 am

Apparently, but thankfully incorrectly, abc thought they could smear Ann Coulter one more time by bringing up her comment which was a direct reference to what Bill Maher said about the President. Many people do pay attention to politics and clearly many more understand Ann Coulters turnabout of language and name calling by Democrats and Socialists than abc wishes understood it. Funny thing is, John Edwards doesn’t seem to get it. Maybe it’s in the genes of ambulance chasers and the MSM.

Posted by: Roger | August 18, 2007, 7:37 am 7:37 am

I think that we could go back to the days when politics stopped at the office and the country was united – before Nixon, if we are lucky enough to have John Edwards elected as President.

Posted by: Pete | August 18, 2007, 7:38 am 7:38 am

That freedom can be really rough riding sometime… Especially when it’s Aug. and there’s not a whole lot of things to report on. Ann’s eventual demise will be a reason to celebrate to be sure, but while she’s here, and (for reasons I don’t know) has a platform, she must be tolerated. As must Bill Maher, O’Reilly, etc…
If they (via silly hate speech laws or censorship) can stifle someone, (or anyone) you might be next. The best thing is to ignore these people. They’re just show-biz types who really don’t know anything more than you or I.

Posted by: Roi | August 18, 2007, 7:40 am 7:40 am

I searched ABC web news for the epithet “left-wing media” and came up short. Go figure. Must be oversight.

Posted by: RB | August 18, 2007, 7:44 am 7:44 am

Ann Coulter “flustered?” In your dreams. Is it possible that both Edwards and Obama are part of a Clintonoid plot to make Hillary look less sleazy and less stupid?

Posted by: Dr. Bob | August 18, 2007, 7:46 am 7:46 am

So, it was ok when she bashed those 9/11 widows? Second, she’s no Bill Mahr, she’s not a comedian…… She’s dry and not funny at all.

Posted by: Kid | August 18, 2007, 7:54 am 7:54 am

We voters in North Carolina would never have reelected Edwards to his Senate seat in 2004. Why in the world would anyone in any other state elect him to anything? Will one reporter ask Edwards this one question: “You are worth tens of millions of dollars. Why haven’t you started a company to employ the poor you claim to be so concerned about?”

Posted by: Clint | August 18, 2007, 7:55 am 7:55 am

It looks like ABC is trying hard to become the next CBS. LOL!!
The first post above says it all. The Liberal propaganda arm of the DNC (aka the MSM) conveniently ignores the profane and disgusting remarks remarks by Bill Maher but misrepresents and exaggerates remarks by any conservative. Bringing up old issues like Ann Coulter is like trying to breath fresh air into a dead dog. Edwards’ campaign is dead and stinking. Not even ABC can revive it now.

Posted by: Ricardo Maxwell | August 18, 2007, 7:56 am 7:56 am

ABC NEWS FLASH :
John Edwards comes out against “hateful language” by calling Ann Coulter “she-devil”

Posted by: Jace25 | August 18, 2007, 7:57 am 7:57 am

The article was the usual left-wing smear we expect from the left wing media in this country but the comments are very interesting. I’ve noticed that many of those which could be classified as ‘left-wing’ continue the practice of insults passing as facts. It seems impossible today to actually engage a liberal in intelligent, non-smear based debate. Where are the facts to back your statements up, guys? Here’s an example: the insults directed at Rush Limbaugh’s audience as ‘light-weights’ and ‘knuckle-draggers’. Actually surveys published in the very recent past have his audience placed either at the very top or next to the very top (I forget which) of the most educated of all media audiences. I’d like to see the same survey show where watchers of ABC News fall. And, by the way, we’re reading this article because it was linked on Drudge. Otherwise, intelligent conservatives and their fact-based and civil discourse would not be found here. (Ann can insult very civily just by telling the truth which as we all know sends leftists/liberals in a frothing seething mess of hatred. They can’t handle the truth.)

Posted by: Mary M | August 18, 2007, 7:59 am 7:59 am

the difference between Ann and John is that Ann is an American..John is an not

Posted by: bob | August 18, 2007, 8:02 am 8:02 am

waaa!! ann coulter is being mean to me. please send me $1000.

Posted by: stevieray | August 18, 2007, 8:07 am 8:07 am

To Davidholyfield: Thank you for your great post. How refreshing it is to see that there are still a few out there that have command of the English language! I guess all the educated liberal elite snobs are too busy winetasting or out driving their Priuses (sp?) to respond.

Posted by: Ricardo Maxwell | August 18, 2007, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Go Anne! Go!

Posted by: Nick | August 18, 2007, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Let’s see, I am going to call you a “she-devil” and then preach about how we shouldn’t call names. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Gawd you libs are a laugh!

Posted by: Guy Arthur Thomas | August 18, 2007, 8:11 am 8:11 am

The fact that people post comments here that suggest the Edwards’ are good solid people provides unquestionable evidence that the 30 year liberal effort to dumb down the public schools is an overwhelming success.
It would appear that liberals are good at something after all.

Posted by: Fudd | August 18, 2007, 8:14 am 8:14 am

What do you expect? Klein works for the
Almost
Broadcasting
Company

Posted by: Tricky Vic | August 18, 2007, 8:14 am 8:14 am

Ann Coulter has rather sharp comments, but essentially the core of what she says is true. And her comments reflect what many Americans think. I think she is awesome and of course the left wingers will resent her. The left wing resents anything that is not their position. The left wing sucks. period.

Posted by: Scott | August 18, 2007, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Most of Edwards’ fundraising has come from Coulter, so no wonder he’s name dropping her. His wife’s ambushing of her, and then being unable to debate in the slightest (all she did was repeat “Just Stop, Just Stop, Just Stop” over and over) was just tragically stupid.

Posted by: Foobear | August 18, 2007, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Liberals amuse me. Although it’s frightening to think that some of them actually believe the crap their blubbering.

Posted by: N. (Florida) | August 18, 2007, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Just like ABC……only telling the part of the story they want you to hear.
And these folks wonder why fewer and fewer people are tuning in.

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Once again ABC shows it’s bias. The second comment on this comment page said it first.
Ms. Coulter’s comment about Mr. Edward being killed by terrorists was refering to a comment Bill Maher made. He though it would have been better for Vice President Cheney to have been killed by terrorist. There was NO outcry (not a mention to my knowledge) from ABC or any other ‘mainstream’ media outlet.

Posted by: rusino | August 18, 2007, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Who wrote this article? Answer: John Edward’s press hack. The truth is that “John I Sue Baby Doctors Edwards” had Chris Mathews set Coulter up and she was not flustered, who can ever answer a question on that his show? Elizabeth Edwards is a shill for the campaign. She uses her cancer like a sword, who would challenge her, after all she has cancer, shouldn’t she be able to say anything about anyone?

Posted by: Terry | August 18, 2007, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Here is another opportunity for ABC to showcase
Ann Coulter.
After all, she/he makes for great viewing.
After Coulter’s slurs about the 9/11 widows, most Americans believed AC should never be on the tele again.
Dignity is never at the top of the page when ratings and dollars are involved.

Posted by: Midwest Maggie | August 18, 2007, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Ann Coulter is just a citizen, elected to no office by anyone, turn her off if you don’t like her, now what about the hate speech that comes from left wing ELECTED politians?

Posted by: hose | August 18, 2007, 8:21 am 8:21 am

John Edwards and his staff needs to be very careful… they are no match for Ann Coulter, she will have them for breakfast!

Posted by: rio | August 18, 2007, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Seriously, politics aside, both sides of the aisle have to agree that John Edwards is just too wussy to ever be viewed as “presidential” by anyone serious about leadership roles. He’s starting to make Barney Frank look masculine. Ann needs MORE airtime so she can thoroughly cover: Nanci Pelossi, hillary, Obama-, and Sir Teddy. There’s so much material there that’ll keep busy until the election.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Sounds like a few folks are threatened by John Edwards from the looks of these comments.

Posted by: JoAnnCr | August 18, 2007, 8:25 am 8:25 am

It’s all ok John. Go home to your 28,000 square foot mansion, get a $400 haircut, and tell the barber all about the two Americas while your investment company continues to foreclose on American’s homes. If you tip the barber big enough, he may even pretend to believe you are sincere.

Posted by: Dan | August 18, 2007, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Remember ten years ago before the internet was so popular, Rick Klein could have pulled this crap off and got away with it, this is a perfect example of how Bill Clinton got elected twice. It’s nice to know Hillary is not going to have the same luxary, the people are really wising up to the liberal press.

Posted by: Bill | August 18, 2007, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Threatened?! This guy is a buffoon who you can always count on for some absurd, whiny, cry-baby, non-presidential sounding amusement! Keep him coming! I’m only sorry he won’t be around much longer in this race. I can see him now as president: Honey, tell Mr. Bin Laden to stop pickin’ on us, the citizens are yelling at me. Oh and are my milk and cookies ready yet?
This guy’s a hoot.

Posted by: Joe | August 18, 2007, 8:30 am 8:30 am

Only an extremist would defend another extremist.

Posted by: Bob | August 18, 2007, 8:30 am 8:30 am

This headline brought a smile to my face. I sent John money after the incident on Hardball and I’ll be sending more because he called her a she-devil. Words cannot express the way I feel about her. At least not words that I would be comfortable writing in a public forum like this. Anyway, way to go John! I’ll be delighted and proud to call you my president some day.

Posted by: jv | August 18, 2007, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Is this a fifth grade name calling event? I thought Edwards was running for President of the United States? President Bush is called many negative things, and as a man says nothing.
Is Ann Coulter running for the Democratic nomination?
Edwards is a very weak candidate, he has many problems. The sub-prime lending issue is hurting people and he has 16 million invested in a company that is repossesing 34 homes in New Orleans. Any man who can’t focus on the important issues should not be considered as a serious person.
The question is is there an adult running for Presdient on the Democratic ticket? I don’t see one.

Posted by: Bob Ford | August 18, 2007, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Go Ann Go! I suggest that Fred Thompson go ahead and name her as his vice presidential running mate and “liven-up” the discourse. We need the extremes in political/ societal thinking to shake our sedated culture into the reality of this so-called “democratic” revolution…
So I say “Thompson/ Coulter ’08.”

Posted by: Abbott | August 18, 2007, 8:34 am 8:34 am

It is heartening to see so many Americans are not taken in by the media and the left wing hacks. Keep it up!

Posted by: William | August 18, 2007, 8:37 am 8:37 am

The republican machine takes advantage Of people with conservative values. They secured their party’s vote and even bought a few democratic votes with $300 in tax breaks so that them and their cronies can make billions. If you look at their investment portfolios you will see that they are in the disaster business. Bush – The Carlyle group(they make tanks), Cheny – Haliburton, Rumsfeild – Tamilflu and even Jeb Bush had investments in those faulty pumps they brought to New Orleans. These are just a few conflicts of interest that should have prevented us from putting these people in power.

Posted by: Lyle | August 18, 2007, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Oh, Yeah, Elizabeth just happened to be watching Chris Matthews that night (it doubled his viewers). Ann Coulter just happened to be on that night. Oh, and Mrs. Edwards just happened to have the telephone number to the studio on hand. And, oh Yeah, she was able to get right through and have her call on air. What a phony set-up. If anyone has doubts about collusion between the MSM and the Democrat Party, this should be just one wake-up call.

Posted by: PLUTO | August 18, 2007, 8:44 am 8:44 am

whatsssup?

Posted by: asdf | August 18, 2007, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Wow Lyle, that’s some fresh info bro. You must be another aspiring hack left journalist. Dude get real, you’re quoting Newsweek and Time and Chris Matthews and the NY Slimes and the Washington ComPost. Grow up and read something decent.

Posted by: Mikey | August 18, 2007, 8:50 am 8:50 am

more ridiculous, liberal spin speaking in half-truths about the comments made. you people will always be the losers in america.

Posted by: fezziwig | August 18, 2007, 8:51 am 8:51 am

If you still consider Edwards as a viable presidential candidate “You are stuck on stupid’!
Edwards is the reason for some of the health care fiascos facing the people in the USA. He is a lawyer,.. of the worst kind.

Posted by: Pedro Gomez | August 18, 2007, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Who is Edwards runn8ing against? Conservatives in the media or Senator Clinton and Barack Obama?
Such talk is silly. Coulter is a writer and columnist, when someone asks him about comments from Ann Coulter his response should be, “Ann who?”
Which is why Edwards can’t even hope for a VP spot in this election.

Posted by: David Flanagan | August 18, 2007, 8:51 am 8:51 am

The fact he has to send out his sick wife to fight for him proves Ann was right about him. They are so afraid of Fox News that they won’t even debate there. Why do you think that is? They are more afraid of the truth. Making the world think Fox News is the enemy while accepting campaign donations from China.

Posted by: hcocdr | August 18, 2007, 8:52 am 8:52 am

To CompMike: Alt. one could also say that Coulter is so desperate she is trying to throw manure on the Edwards family. They will be here long after she is just a bleep as a distant reminder of fundamental conservative fanaticism.

Posted by: Dan | August 18, 2007, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Comment all you want based on your own political views about Edwards. But his label for the Coulter-zebub was accurate.

Posted by: Anti-pundits | August 18, 2007, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Forget Edwards for a moment. What is incredible to me is to read the amount of sick hate that is apparent in the Coulter supporters. These are people who obviously have nothing more to do than sit in front of the tube watching O’liely, Gibson and the rest of the liars and hate-mongers. It is truely sad. These are people that pray to the swift boaters, believe all the Fox propoganda and honestly thing the country is fine with Bush/Chaney.

Posted by: Captain Charlie | August 18, 2007, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Top 40 on the Liberal Charts:
Tell Me Lies, Tell Me Sweet Pretty Lies

Posted by: nick | August 18, 2007, 8:53 am 8:53 am

ABC NEWS!!!!!!
ARE YOU KIDDING!!!!!!!?????????
How can you possibly call this un-biased reporting!!!!!!!!!!?????? Don’t you guys have editors?????????
If ANY of you people reading this story ever doubted that there is a liberal bias to the major medias,here’s the proof.
Now look up the real story or are you afraid that you’ll see that you’ve been WRONG all this time.

Posted by: Don | August 18, 2007, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Remember—The harder they pray, the more they lie, cheat and steal.

Posted by: Captain Charlie | August 18, 2007, 8:56 am 8:56 am

It doesn’t matter what Ann said. It matters that a presidential candidate is name-calling. Ann is still a private citizen whether you agree with her or not. That automatically disqualifies him in my book. What if Uncle Tom in Iran or Chavez calls him the devil in a speech and he is the president of the United States (I shudder to think). Is he going to get mad and throw a tantrum and start name-calling and maybe take it personally? Come on, you can’t have that type of immaturity in the white house.

Posted by: Chuck | August 18, 2007, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Interesting how quickly and thoroughly repub handlers get their little flock of spinners out to discredit Edwards, or any other dem candidate.

Posted by: tim | August 18, 2007, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Poor John Edwards calls a columnist a She Devil then complains about the level of discourse in Politics.
And No, I am not complaining about what John called Ann. Go ahead drop the level of discourse down to silly name calling about someone you are not even running against. I just thought that a trial lawyer/ former Senator could stand up for himself without resorting to school boy tactics or having his momma do his dirty work.

Posted by: jay | August 18, 2007, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Bless Ann Coulter! The Social missfitts that are the Democrat Party fighting over 51% of the 27% of American Democrats do not support me, do not represent me and will never. Interesting to hear Seggg-o-nope-allis talk about 81% support Hillary, that is 81% of 27%—not 81% of America. The Democrats remain the minority party.

Posted by: LarryD | August 18, 2007, 9:07 am 9:07 am

The general public is well aware what this slimeball (Edwards) is like. His gig is up and the polls show it. Amercans can smell a rat. The libs can no longer hide their true colors. They are border line communist that want all the power along with your hard earned money. Don’t let them do this and ruin our country.

Posted by: GC | August 18, 2007, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Noooooooooooo! This is a good thing, as Martha might say. Whenever Edwards needs haircut money, he invokes Ann’s name and Ann, poor dear that she is, can’t refrain from making a headline that gets John’s barber a nice 401k supplement. But, since Johnny’s not going anywhere anyhow but to the dust bin of history, as they say in politics, why not encourage the John-Ann debates so as to take Democrat money away from the real she-devil, Miss Hillary.

Posted by: Jack | August 18, 2007, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Great to hear that one of the candidates has the courage to go head-on against the OpEd conservatives who have created a “media jihad” against liberalism and political and economic fairness.

Posted by: GW Gardener | August 18, 2007, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Saying that Ann was flustered after Mrs. Edwards’ call is a complete mischaracterization. Statements is why people don’t trust the media.

Posted by: Jeff | August 18, 2007, 9:12 am 9:12 am

“Thompson-Coulter 2008″

Posted by: Abbott | August 18, 2007, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Anyone with an ounce of intellect can see through Coulter’s “mad dog” comments. Come on people, wake up!

Posted by: Sally Burke | August 18, 2007, 9:15 am 9:15 am

I say Ann would take Johnny in round 3. I always wondered what happened to the guy from 3′s Company – I didn’t know he was running for president.

Posted by: Barack | August 18, 2007, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Hey! It is o.k.. The news media of old is quickly on its way out. Newspapers and network news outlets are dying.
They are stabbing themselves in the back. Their readers/viewers are waking up to the fact that they twist facts, not display them as they are.
People, remember to breath in and out, in and out. There is no sense in getting all worked up about what will soon be nothing.
See ya’

Posted by: barry | August 18, 2007, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Ann Coulter makes money off of bashing liberals; And the Edwards campaign making money off Ann Coulter. Certainly a situation of the pot calling the kettle black.
Coulter’s just goofy stupid.

Posted by: marytee | August 18, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am

John Edwards is an extreme left wing pro slavery socialist. He is a little boy and can’t stand the heat. Do you really think this little twit could be president of The United States? if you are truly presidential material you and all around you would be above any one who is from the media. I think Coulter is great but, if I was running, I would ignore her completely or Bill maher or any other media person.
We have had 3 of the worst presidents in history all in a Row and now based on what is in the forefront of both parties we are confronted with having a 4th lousy presidientor worse.
Do you realy want civil war in this country, That is what we are heading for if we keep electing these pipsqueeks from the repulsive and democrap parties.
The country can not stand having another democrap or repulsive.
Please for the sake of America don’t vote for the criminal class from the repub or democrat parties.
None of them are worth your vote unless you don’t think your vote has any value and you are below these twits.
you are a member of “We the People” and that makes you 1000 times better than any politician unless you sell out.

Posted by: Peter C Stephens | August 18, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Taking Ann out of context, hmm. Lets see. Last week, on a Tuesday, Charlie Gibson said “We”, then later on in his broadcast he used the term “killed”. Then the next morning Diane Sawyer said — don’t dispute me, because I heard her say “Kennedy.” Oh my God!!!! ABC news killed Kennedy? Oh, my God!!
ABC news clearly said, “We killed Kennedy.” You savages!! Which Kennedy? Stay tuned, maybe Charlie will say JOhn, or Bobby or Joe and we’ll know.”

Posted by: Fred Little | August 18, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Yeah, Coulter was flustered. And Mrs. Edwards call was improptu. Another joke from our media. Who buys this garbage?? Oh, yeah, the idiots that can’t even spell. But let’s not call names.

Posted by: Dante | August 18, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am

I was recovering from surgery,
and I really just happened to
watch the Chris Mathews
show. Would someone
tell me how the cameras just
“happened” to be on Elizabeth
Edwards.
After being ambushed by the
Mathews gang I can assure
everyone that Ann Coulter was
far from flustered. I thought she
handled the situation very well.
Can you imagine having John Edwards as
Commander and Chief?

Posted by: Johnnie D | August 18, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am

C’mon now. All you Coulter supporters honestly believe that Clinton killed Foster and Schiavo was murdered by her husband and should have remained a vegtable forever. Admit it.

Posted by: Captain Charlie | August 18, 2007, 9:22 am 9:22 am

For John 9:06:05 — You referenced “hate-filled,” a phrase I used in my most recent post. You may want to read or listen to AC a bit more objectively. PS: Edwards is not my choice. Gov. Richardson has the experience and qualifications to make him the best choice — but he lacks charisma. Who did W send to North Korea recently to negotiate? Not a Republican — but rather Governor Richardson.

Posted by: Pablo | August 18, 2007, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Thanks ABC for leaving out the context of Ann Coulter’s remark. It adds to the weight of the bias at these “mainstream” networks – which are becoming increasingly irrelevant for people seeking balanced news. Mainstream = “lamestream” media indeed. The Edwards campaign is dishonest too, for using the quote out-of-context. If they’re comfortable doing that, imagine what else they’re doing with the truth. Buh bye John.

Posted by: john franks | August 18, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Anyone find it funny that it is only hate speach when it is a thought that they don’t agree with. Ann Coulter is one of the smartest women of our current time and should be an example four young girls around the country.

Posted by: Chris | August 18, 2007, 9:30 am 9:30 am

I am not an Edwards supporter, but Ann Coulter is a piece of TRASH and shame on the news media for even mentioning her name, she is a wacked publicity seeker to sell her book!!!

Posted by: Truth Be Known | August 18, 2007, 9:31 am 9:31 am

the republican’s couldn’t be so lucky as to have Edwards nominated. He may be the only chance for the republicans to win…

Posted by: spaz | August 18, 2007, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Hypocrite, One who pretends to be pious, virtious, etc. without really being so.
Extremely partisan and you seem to have to turn into this. All politicians seem to be this.
For everybody that joined the fight to scream about this horrible slanted article, let me remind you that you are supporting Fox doing it. They ARE the opposite. So, stands to reason – if you want truth and honesty in the press then don’t justify the people doing it on the other side. You can not have it both ways.
While the right screams that the left wants us to become communists and “it’s called capitalism”, they are busy in droves on here slamming Edwards for how he made his bucks. The right loves to discredit those horrible actors. Never mind that Reagan and Thompson are the same.
The press ate Clinton alive. Nobody on the right seems to recall this. “Clinton did nothing to get OBL.” Nobody on the right seems to remember accusing him of “wag the dog” when he was trying to do anything.
Gore is a hypocrite for having the big energy consuming home, and flying on private planes, while trying to promote the whole global warming thing. Cindy Sheehan? Well, she’s just gone nutty and needs to go away. Michael Moore? I’ll pay the conservatives to slam his campaign for socialized medicine. The Democrats are going too far left now as well. Extreme will continue to take us all down.
The right yells about the left always wanting to give a hand out, yet the Pill Bill gets shoved thru and not a peep. They lied about the cost and it is the biggest entitlement to go down in my life time.
I could slap Clinton for NAFTA, giving Pakistan the bomb, and allowing the press to get eaten up by big business.
I could slap Bush for so many things it does nothing but anger me.
I’m ready to slap them all over our open borders and the immigration issues.
80% of us believe in God. It stands to reason that it is a matter of how we precieve God, vs. the left being told they’re going to burn in hell because they are godless. Coulter claims to be Christian while speaking in a way I KNOW would not be acceptable if Jesus was around to chat. That is where she loses me. Frankly it seems to me a whole bunch of people are using Jesus to sell the goods anymore.
What is with all the shots at Elizabeth Edwards? Are we living in the 1800′s when a wife had to know her place or isn’t this 2007? I get the creepy feeling that as far as female rights go the left is wayyyy better. This will push the female voters that way. The right thinks a woman can never open her mouth? The fact of the matter is Elizabeth got Coulter at her own game a bit and I think it’s killing you guys. Trust me – this is good for Coulter and they’re all coming out ahead. Give me a woman with a brain over Laura “I do nothing but act like I live in the 50′s and support my husband” Bush any day. There stands a woman that had the platform to do some good and what has she really done?
Anyway, keep it up – ye that views the world in black and white. As far as I can tell our biggest issue currently is partisan infighting, while the boys on the hill play us all. They are ALL hypocrites. It’s called politics. We need to be sure we aren’t the same.

Posted by: Sandra | August 18, 2007, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Attacking Coulter is just a poor attempt for cover from the fall out from his employment and investments in a “predatory lender.”

Posted by: Big Deal | August 18, 2007, 9:34 am 9:34 am

It’s a bit sad that the only way John Edwards can get any attention, and money, is by going after Ann Coulter.

Posted by: James | August 18, 2007, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Preciously why I don’t get my news from ABC, NBC or CBS. What once were great news institutions that reported news as it actually was (well, most of the time) now are shameful, deceitful with their own ideology that report the news as THEY want to report it. How sad.

Posted by: Jif | August 18, 2007, 9:35 am 9:35 am

I’m so glad Mr. Edwards said what he said in his speech. He should not feel apolegitic at all. He has been the subject of vicious attacks for a long time now from her. Its quite alright for him to show some righteous backbone. More importantly, I hope he remembers to never stoop to her level. One thing that remains constant in life is that God or Karma (whatever you choose to believe) will make sure that you receive back 100 fold of what you dish out. Just as sure as there is day and night, individuals who think they are getting rewarded for glorifying the spread of evil talk and mean spiritness, will have their day.

Posted by: myak23 | August 18, 2007, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I wonder if this BLOG did address Bill Maher’s comments when Bill made them on HBO? I doubt it, but Ann C. is news and Bill Maher is not…I guess that is how it all shakes out at ABC these days…just wondering…
John

Posted by: John Mark Trent | August 18, 2007, 9:42 am 9:42 am

So it’s ok for the Edwards to call Ann Coulter names i.e. “she-devil” but it’s not ok for people to call John Edwards aka the Breck Girl names. What hypocrisy! Name calling and labeling is a language convention we use to discuss politics. Edwards is too thin skinned to be president.
I don’t even need to go into ABC’s misleading quote of Ann’s sarcasm in the context of her criticizing the media and John Edwards as previous posters have adequately exposed ABC news hypocrisy.

Posted by: Samuel J. Harris | August 18, 2007, 9:42 am 9:42 am

I can’t believe how negative people are toward John Edwards and his campaign. He may not be the perfect candidate, but to paint him as the anti-christ when Coulter is clearly the one who is off her meds is ridiculous.
All this whining and moaning about “liberal bias” and “context” is laughable as well. Take a pill people!

Posted by: Bryan | August 18, 2007, 9:43 am 9:43 am

The whole Edwards / Coulter fight is a joke. Edwards knows that most of the people in this country think of him as a two faced liar. He has zero chance of ever winning another public office let alone the Presidentcy so to try to get some type of media play he attacks Anne, the thing is its just not working. Its like Keith Olbermanns feud with Bill O’Reily he attacks Bill daily yet Bill could care less and Olbermanns ratings are still in the basement. The bottom line is the Left is made up of some of the most vile people in Amercia and the more they open there mouths the more the poepl see how scary they are.

Posted by: jeff | August 18, 2007, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Anyone who blinks that many times per minute can’t be trusted. It was really sad and desperate to use Elizabeth’s cancer

Posted by: greg | August 18, 2007, 9:53 am 9:53 am

ABC,NBC,CBS are fast becoming characterizations of themselves.
The moment Edwards the ‘poser’ recieves the inevitable phone call from Hillary telling him he will not be her running mate he’ll evaporate from the campaign

Posted by: john | August 18, 2007, 9:53 am 9:53 am

I do not agree with how Ann Coulter makes her points, but she does have valid points to make. Most people only know Ann Coulter from what somebody else says about her. Get her books from the library (so you do not have to buy them)and see from her own words (in cintext) what she believes. I was surprised when I did and learned a lot of information that propaganda news organizations and web sites were not telling us. I checked her resources and was amazed at how the facts are so easy to find, but people do not want to be bothered by the facts.

Posted by: Michael Williams | August 18, 2007, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Most Liberals are nothing but hypocrytes anyway. They attack attack attack, then when they get called out they play it off as they are the victims. Edwards is a two faced attack dog, The Clintons not only invented the attack they perfected it. I say Anne shoudl keep it up becuase when ever she goes after these low lifes onthe Left there true colors come out.

Posted by: jeff | August 18, 2007, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Most Conservatives are nothing but hypocrites anyway. They attack, attack, attack, then when they get called out they play it off as they are the victims. Coulter is a two faced attack dog, The Bush’s not only invented the attack they perfected it. I say Edwards should keep it up because when ever he goes after these low lifes on the Right their true colors come out.

Posted by: TomBob | August 18, 2007, 10:01 am 10:01 am

John Edwards is the pot calling the kettle black. All HE does is use personal attacks. He is irrelevant and he knows it. He will only be remembered for the youtube footage of him fussing with his hair , nothing of substance.

Posted by: Sheilah | August 18, 2007, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Those claiming Coulter’s “freedom of speech” is being impinged are either engaging in or, stupidly, falling for one of the fascist regime’s most successful propaganda moves.
Someone’s freedoms are only restricted when it’s done by someone who has power over the victim _ for example, government authorities or an employer. The media have no power over Coulter _ their criticism are the only reason she makes a living. She’s far more famous than Bill Maher, and that’s why she gets more publicity. If not for the “liberal media,” she’d be working at Wal-Mart, where she belongs.
The mainstream media are hardly “liberal.” Whenever they report anything negative about the fascist regime, it’s attacked as “liberal,” when the only bias it has a bias toward humanity. One doesn’t try to use “balance” when dealing with subjects like child molesters. It’s revolting to see Americans calling it a “bias” when media express outrage at the fascists’ behavior. You contribute nothing to society. You’ve done your best to destroy our country. Go back to Alabama and secede _ real Americans won’t miss you.

Posted by: Zell | August 18, 2007, 10:02 am 10:02 am

It frightens me at the quality of candidates that are seeking the white house. Edwards it at the bottom and will do what ever may get him media attention.

Posted by: paul cairns | August 18, 2007, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Love John Edwards or hate John Edwards, love Ann Coulter or hate Ann Coulter, I think we all can agree that John Edwards has much prettier hair.
Can’t we all just get along?

Posted by: $400 Hair Stylist | August 18, 2007, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Seeing so many posts on this subject, I am proud of my country and fellow Americans for being so robust in their discourse. I am a liberal who lives in a family with conservatives and libertarians, so I kinda understand where everyone’s coming from….. It just seems to me in this instance that a disproportionate number of posters are coming from the ultra-right, defending a horrible media person and claiming that the article in question comes from a “liberal media” source. It’s the same media that gives Coulter a platform in the first place. And how his it that so many right-wingers are tuned in to the so-called “liberal media” anyway? Something seems unfair and unbalanced….

Posted by: mike | August 18, 2007, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Edwards is just another Elite Liberal who NEVER worked for a living, a lawyer like Hillary who sues those who keep our society healthy and provide the products that improve our standard of living. He’s another who wants to live in a mansion and fly in jets while you stand in line for toilet paper and then tell you how greedy you are when you object to being taxed into submission. Same as Kerry who married the woman who married into the Heinz BILLIONS. MSNBC and it’s pathetic lineup of wannabe journalists are nothing but liberal propaganda machines trying to insure their own monopoly on the news by getting the commies elected so they can reinstate the “Fairness Doctrine” and silence the Americans who love individual freedom and free enterprise. Forget “All the news that’s fit to invent” Watch FOX NEWS, read the Washington Times and listen to Rush if you want to know what’s really going on. The Democrats are more afraid of tax cuts than terrorists because tax cuts limit their ability to continue the communist redistribution of wealth.

Posted by: Richard Z | August 18, 2007, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Please refresh my memory. Who is John Edwards again?

Posted by: BILLY BONES | August 18, 2007, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Alot of responses on the right bring up legitimate arguements about bias of this article and how it is taken out of context. Funny how all the left wing nuts in here can say is that Coulter is a “meanie”. The complaints about Coulter are drawn with a broad brush. I challenge any liberal to name ANYTHING that Coulter has said that was “vile” without taking it out of the satirical context it was originally meant to be stated in…..yeah I though so….you can’t.

Posted by: Hitch | August 18, 2007, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Many more sales of Coulter’s new book were just assured.

Posted by: mhr | August 18, 2007, 10:14 am 10:14 am

This article is so full of lefty bias, mischaracterizations, and downright lies that it is disgusting to anyone who knows the facts.

Posted by: jcb | August 18, 2007, 10:14 am 10:14 am

I watch all the major news shows at least once per week. I like Fox, not because I want “slanted” coverage, but because I get to see liberals AND conservatives TOGETHER debate issues. I want to hear both sides of the story, but 90% of the news shows do not allow a REAL conservative on the show for a differing viewpoint. When I watch Chris Matthews and Keith Oberman, they remind me of the old Radio Moscow propaganda broadcasts in English we used to listen to when I was on border duty in Korea. Their claims of what politicians personally think or believe are so outrageous and “matter of fact” especially when most of time they have never interviewed the person they are talking about. They are not journalists, they are gossip columnists.

Posted by: Michael Williams | August 18, 2007, 10:16 am 10:16 am

I think any one who attacks people for spelling is pathetic. Next i went to a true NYC Liberal school where feelings about people trump learning. Bottom line and my last post, Keep it up Libs you are making 08 so easy for the Right.

Posted by: jeff | August 18, 2007, 10:17 am 10:17 am

The MSM labels Coulter, Malkin and everyone at FNC as right wig but ignore the fact the guys like Mathews and Russert were major Democrat opperatives until then stepped in front of the camera to continue shilling for the DNC.
If the Dems aren’t paying half of Mathew’s paycheck, MSNBC should recut his contract. I think Howard Dean writes at least half his material.

Posted by: BLC | August 18, 2007, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Edwards is just another pretty boy looking to cash in on the American pay off system … ohh I mean bribery .. uhh I mean lobbyist

Posted by: Donald | August 18, 2007, 10:21 am 10:21 am

John– You w2ant to know what Edwards would do if he faced a terrorist attack? I’ll tell you this, he would NOT attack Iraq.

Posted by: Captain Charlie | August 18, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am

The comment: “Ann Coulter is extremely mild when compared to what you find on the Daily Kos, Democrats.com, and other far-left hate sites. She’s essentially the conservative version of Molly Ivins, only more attractive and intelligent.” needs to ahve one more thing… Coulter is not at room temperature like Ivins either.

Posted by: CWO4 | August 18, 2007, 10:25 am 10:25 am

As I said, Ann Coulter is an ankle-biting yap Republican,

Posted by: TomBob | August 18, 2007, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Nobody’s yet mentioned the role of MSNBC in the hit job on Ann. “Hardball” is not a call-in show. THEY DON’T TAKE CALLS. How does someone, even a prominent politician’s wife, get the phone number of a show that doesn’t take calls? She doesn’t. The MSNBC producers CALL HER when they know they’ve booked Ann as a guest. It was an ambush all the way. Ann was not told that EE was on the phone until just before they went on the air. MSNBC and Chris Matthews set her up to try to humiliate her, and no respectable journalist could omit that little detail of the story.

Posted by: mastermind | August 18, 2007, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Boy the right-wing are out in full force on this blog. Who would defend Ann Coulter? So biased by hatred and insecurity they forget which side their bread is buttered on. John Edwards is a good man and has my support for President.

Posted by: Stan D. | August 18, 2007, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Apparently John didn’t read the memo from Elizabeth about no more name calling…or is this yet ANOTHER Edwards double-standard?

Posted by: JD | August 18, 2007, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Jane…uh…I mean John Edwards and Ann Coulter clawing at each other? CATFIGHT! RRRROOOOWWWRRR!

Posted by: MeWiseMagic | August 18, 2007, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Why don’t I ever heard about the LEFT WING MEDIA? or the Exterme LEFT WING of Congress? Why isn’t Ted kennedy and Babbara Boxer introduced as: the two extreme LEFT WING? Why isn’t Bernie Sanders called a socialist? Could there real be a bias in the reporting?

Posted by: average Joe | August 18, 2007, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Has anybody stopped to realize how easily disarmed Edwards is by a female republican pundit (Ann Coulter) and that his wife had to come to his rescue? Yeah, this is the guy I want to defend and run my country against worldwide terrorism and stand up against Iran and Russia.

Posted by: Jim | August 18, 2007, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Those of you that continually insist the media is LIBERALLY biased because of incidents like this are wearing blinders. If the traditional media were truly biased to the left there would be THOUSANDS of articles and stories about the unmitigated disaster wrought upon this country by Bush and the neo-con elite. How many of you still think Saddam attacked us on 9/11? The RIGHT-WING media is resonsible for the 50% who think he did. Fearmongers and liars, all.

Posted by: DrDjPete | August 18, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am

There isn’t much one can add to these “educated” comments but I will try to sum it up…..Democrats (liberals) good Republicans (Conservatives) bad. It was ever thus and so shall it ever be.

Posted by: kondor26 | August 18, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am

I doubt if anyone is more influential at turning people liberal than Ann Coulter. Wave her high and proud, right-wingers!

Posted by: Steve | August 18, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Where’s the reference to Edwards employer evicting 55 New Orleans homeowners from their storm-damaged homes. So he’s for the pooh folks?
Bah humbug, just another hypocrite!

Posted by: Bot | August 18, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Suggesting that Rush Limbaugh would attack anyone personnaly, shows just how out of touch the Liberals really are. Anyone who listens to Rush on a regular basis knows that all he does is play back the liberals own words to illustrate how absurd they really are becoming. He demonstrates on a daily basis how the “drive by media” is self destructing.

Posted by: Bill | August 18, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am

I support every comment ever made by Ann. Libs are the scourage of this country. Edwards is a total wimp. Libs are ruining America. Down with neo-libs.

Posted by: Jon | August 18, 2007, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Ann coulter is a hateful person, that is protected by the GOP. She has and says nothing worth hearing.
She has willfully broken the voting law in Florida, yet remains unpunished.
We all have to answer for what we say and what we do on this earth.
I would not want to be Ann Coulter when the time comes.

Posted by: diane | August 18, 2007, 10:39 am 10:39 am

While I can’t defend Ann Coulter and I find her annoying and a bad image for conervatives, the left seems to ignore they engage in equally retarded rhetoric.

Posted by: Brad | August 18, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am

“The call left Coulter uncharacteristically flustered”
Hardly, she wasn’t flustered at all. She laughed at Mrs. Edwards hypocrasy the entire time.

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am

mark,
You state that you just want to learn more. Perhaps you should just keep tuned in to the John Birch Society or reread “None Dare Call It Conspiracy.” That appears to be the basis for your current belief system.

Posted by: Colorado Man | August 18, 2007, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Edwards has to remind us that his wife stood up to someone. Well, guess his
wife has the guts to stand up to someone
and he does not. Perhaps his wife needs
to be running for prez since he is just a head of hair!

Posted by: ne | August 18, 2007, 10:42 am 10:42 am

I am amazed how people argue in this blog. Their debating skills rate right up their with the kindergarten playground method of “my dad can lick your dad…no he can’t” method. How many of you who can not stand Ann Coulter have read any of her books? Just compare how often you see conservatives on liberal shows and liberals on conservative shows and the numbers will astound you. As for news articles, check Lexus Nexus and again the numbers show a definite bias.

Posted by: Michael Williams | August 18, 2007, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Coulter sure knows how to get the pinks into a lather. Edwards is a trial lawyer, where the main job skill is to check you ethics at the door.
He does have nice hair.

Posted by: usuf | August 18, 2007, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Edwards is a tool

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 10:51 am 10:51 am

After reading all these comments, why is it that when libs read any opinion different than theirs it’s considered “hatred”. No…. it’s considered free thought and speech.

Posted by: Skate | August 18, 2007, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Answer this: Why will many liberals not go on Fox when personally invited numerous times, but true conservatives will always go on the other networks? I can tell you why, because liberals are afraid to have a real debate. They would rather go on a program where the host agrees with everything they say. Sean Hannity AND Alan Colmes get on my nerves, but at least they draw out people and expose the holes in their arguments. Everytime I saw John Kerry on other networks, it was the same old propagand, but when he was interviewed on Fox, he impressed me because his answers were well delivered with good logical arguments an minimal spin. It was the best interview I ever saw hi give.

Posted by: Michael Williams | August 18, 2007, 10:52 am 10:52 am

It doesnt matter what Ann says she is not running for office nor is she in a office.John is just trying to get more money out of the far left.

Posted by: JASON | August 18, 2007, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Hey, lay off the Breck Girl. He is just jealous that he is not as pretty as Ann Coulter. He is the prettiest of the candidates, and definitely a clear cut winner in that categyory.

Posted by: Phil M | August 18, 2007, 10:55 am 10:55 am

ann is right.

Posted by: nvrno | August 18, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am

I wouldn’t want to be in the same room with Ms. Coulter without a rabies shot and hip boots to avoid the nonstop overflow from this commode.

Posted by: Taan | August 18, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Limbaugh had lost me as a listener years ago because of his ego. However, Since he is now under constant attack from the braindead liberals. I am in complete support of him. Ann Coulter is correct, in everything she has said. What liberals really cannot handle is Coulter and Limbaugh using thier own words, so effectively, against them. Stewart ( the comedic shill for liberal causes anywhere) wishes Cheney dead and it’s funny. Ann uses does the equivalent and it’s “just awful” Of course, all this is reported by the “unbiased media” who boo a state of the union address.

Posted by: Buc12 | August 18, 2007, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Only a liberal could contradict or be guilty of breaking his own rules in the same sentence. He calls her a she-devil, but wants her to stop the personal attacks. Edwards is a joke. He’s just vying for the vice slot which is going to go to Bill Richardson or Obama (in that order).

Posted by: boB | August 18, 2007, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Rick Klein:
That prompted Edwards’ wife, Elizabeth, to call in to MSNBC’s “Hardball” and challenge Coulter directly.
This is simply untrue. The Elizabeth Edwards ambush was planned in advance.
And Coulter did not look flustered to me. Klein must have high regard for Coulter’s ability to stay cool under pressure if he truly thinks she was flustered.
This is the best ABC News can do in recruiting reporters?

Posted by: James | August 18, 2007, 11:01 am 11:01 am

She was making the point that now in hollywood you have to go to REHAB if you call someone something untoward. RE: “Greys Anatomy” If you can’t keep up, don’t attempt it.

Posted by: KEITH | August 18, 2007, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Hey nvmo, spoken like a true lib. Nothing positive to say about Edwards so you have to smear Ann. That’s the liberal way. If you don’t have anything positive about your guy…. Attack, attack, attack.

Posted by: Skate | August 18, 2007, 11:02 am 11:02 am

I refuse, for conscience’ sake, to stoop to calling Mr. Edwards names No, I will not do that. And that goes for his media friends, too.

Posted by: Art Ferguson | August 18, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am

I am not here to defend Ann Coulter, all I am saying is that we need to dig for the facts FROM THE SOURCE because most newpeople are propagandists. Example, how many times do we hear people screaming McCarthism, when in fact the CIA released documents in 1996 proving that everyone he accused of being communist spies was true. His problem was that he knew that the CIA had tapped the Soviet communication cable under the Atlantic and were intercepting transmissions, but he could not reveal where he got his information for fear of compromising the source of the data. Even a Presidential staff member was a Soviet spy, but the President did not know it and the CIA was afraid of telling him because they thought he might give away how they knew. The media, except for a few conservative organizations, totally ignored what was probably the biggest news of espionage in 30 years. Given how the New York Times, and liberal congressmen, have outed government secrets, it is no wonder that this White House will not give up anytihng without a fight.

Posted by: Michael Williams | August 18, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Nothing is more pathetic than liberals trying desperately to prove that the media is not biased to the left – then viciously attacking only 1 media outlet, FOX. Why no attacks on MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, PBS, NY TIMES, LA TImes, etc.? When surveyed, more than 90% of the major media figures admitted to NEVER voting for a Republican. But they aren’t biased, no!

Posted by: Gary | August 18, 2007, 11:05 am 11:05 am

“Freedom of speech isn’t working out so well for liberals now that they aren’t the only ones with a microphone. It’s not so much fun when the rabbit’s got the gun.” — Ann Coulter

Posted by: Gary | August 18, 2007, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Hey folks, it seems Edwards got a little scratch on that last one from Ann and his wife is now applying some ointment to the scratch and combing his hair again in the corner. Edwards is now wondering if he can move this arguement into litigation and get Ann to settle out of court,..

Posted by: Jim again | August 18, 2007, 11:06 am 11:06 am

This must be a planted comment by a lefty, since every conservative, traditional, tax-paying, family-minded person I know identifies with her and for a so called conservative to write the above and dismiss her her main philosophy, albeit advanced sardonically, is deceitful.

Posted by: HammerHead | August 18, 2007, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Well the best thing to come out of this is hopefully Americans with intelligence above the low grade moron level will continue to turn off all the mainstream media.

Posted by: libertyrules | August 18, 2007, 11:10 am 11:10 am

When did all you conservatives become such crybabies? If you’re going to dish it out, you really should learn to take it as well. Boo-hoo.

Posted by: NeenerNeener | August 18, 2007, 11:13 am 11:13 am

..These media pukes like Klein are the guys who sat home alone on Saturday Night, in High School listening to Billy Joel records and cds…they have no life and seek only to create drama to get the masses a talkin!!

Posted by: Bobby Van Fleet | August 18, 2007, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Edwards the lowest form of life among politicians is one who uses his wifes life threatening illness to score points and more face time. How about telling us about those millions you have in wealth and yet talk about the evil wealthy, are you going to give up all of your wealth and live in a one bedroom apartment like you expect everyone else to do.

Posted by: Patriot 2007 | August 18, 2007, 11:15 am 11:15 am

The left-left-left far-left leaning media (which is referred to by the media as mainstream!) rewrites every news story so that it is negative for conservatives, such as Ann Coulter, and for the Bush administration. All they have to do is leave out a word here and add a word there. This article is just an illustration. The article, as written, is completely false. People like Edwards use the false report to inflame their left wing followers and for fund raising. A lot of what Coulter said must have struck a nerve (been true that is) or they wouldn’t have gotten into such a tissy. Edwards will raise a lot of money but he has about as much chance as I do of being the next P or VP.

Posted by: Robert Oliver | August 18, 2007, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Bubba, We don’t a new declaration of independence, we just need to enforce the Constitution, and if force is needed then so be it.

Posted by: Patriot 2007 | August 18, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Edwards simply is not presidential
timber. He is naive and unaware – in other words, he just doesn’t get it.

Posted by: Atttut | August 18, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Just read in the news Edwards sold his stock ($29 mil) in the sub prime mortgage co.s and had the gall to say he ‘couldn’t stand making money off companys that makes money off of people loosing their homes in foreclosure’.
Of course he failed to say he was doing it AFTER he profited highly!

Posted by: Walt Edmonds | August 18, 2007, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Main Stream Media? Just what is the MSM?
As for hypocrisy… this is not a “liberal” only position guys and gals.
“Conservative” most of you aren’t true
conservatives, else you would not be
the true believers in the Bush line.
You “Conservatives” will have a lot of fodder to work with, with the next President Clinton.
It will be fun seeing the anger again.

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 11:23 am 11:23 am

If you watch or read the old media you should expect this kind of reporting.It will be gone soon enough.Edwards must be desperate , he’s not hiding behind his wife to start a cat fight.

Posted by: kevin | August 18, 2007, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Let me get this straight (bad choice of words when dealing with the likes of John Edwards). Mr. “Hair Gel” calls Ann Coulter a “She Devil” and then goes on to complain about Coulter’s use of “hateful language.” What’s wrong with this guy?

Posted by: Karl Lynne | August 18, 2007, 11:26 am 11:26 am

North Carolinians cannot stand John Edwards and all that he represents: super-rich personal injury ambulance-chaser lawyer with a 28,000 square ft. house (the largest in the whole county). He is a sick hypocrit of the worst kind, and his wife is his mommy.

Posted by: shadowwoman | August 18, 2007, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I am a Democrat and there are two people I am absolutely, positively terrified of …. Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity. I haven’t read Ann’s books but I have seen and heard her on live tv. She is a mean-spirited witch. Ditto Sean Hannity….substituting dangerous idiot on a personal crusade. In my opinion he is more dangerous than Rush L. Heaven save us.

Posted by: MWB | August 18, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Evidently, the left wing posters feel as though ABC is left wing. I agree with you completely.

Posted by: cr42ct | August 18, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am

In the war of words between Edwards and Coulter, Edwards has been out of ammunition since the first battle. Go comb your hair John and smile pretty for the cameras.

Posted by: Phil | August 18, 2007, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Wait a minute, SHE-DEVIL? What man says that? I think Coulter had The Breck Girl pegged from the get.
And Tom, people like you are why planes and buildings go down. Wake up.

Posted by: Dante | August 18, 2007, 11:38 am 11:38 am

It is “hateful” for Limbaugh to point out that the company John Edwards and his wife have $14 million invested in is forclosing on Katrina victims. Edwards and his wife are a couple of big time phonies…did anyone mention that they are LAWYERS? That ought to be enough…

Posted by: Robert Stille | August 18, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Dear Friends & Neighbors,
Once you are branded the “Breck Girl” by the NY Times, it’s all over but
the crying & the gnashing of teeth. Sen.
Edwards doesn’t have a Prayer in getting
nominated. GLW Erie,PA>

Posted by: George L. Wands | August 18, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Oh boy this is getting fun SHE DEVIL…Anne is going to have fun with this one. She’s so witty and bright and hysterically funny…I can’t wait to see what she cooks up about this name. Edwards is the biggest phoney I have eery seen on the political circuit! I can’t wait for her “she devil” comments. Stay tuned

Posted by: BHaddock | August 18, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

ann coulter makes my stomach hurt I don’t see anything good coming out of the way she acts but i guess american politics is a dirty game….but really she does make my stomach hurt

Posted by: jim jones | August 18, 2007, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Its so funny that Edwards resorts to name calling on a regular basis then rallys against it. He is now so desperate that he needs to attatch himself to Ann Coulter for the publicity he hopes to generate. John Edwards has no experience to be president he is a lousy Sen. He was however pretty good at sqeezing big money out of Juries during his trail lawyer days using Junk science. What is the big fear of Fox News. Is john Edwards afraid of real questions concerning real issues.

Posted by: scott | August 18, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

It’s truly alarming that an unabashed ambulance chaser like Edwards even has a small group of undead zombies who try and come to his rescue.

Posted by: Jim P. | August 18, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am

The REAL Problem that John Edwards and Every Other LIBERAl has with people like Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh and FOX and any of the “so-called” Conservative media, is that they EXPOSE these people for what they Really Are, not for what they Try to portray.
See, the Liberals are ALL about ILLUSION, they are the ILLUSIONIST Artists of today, and Deal the Public a “Slight-of-Hand” that if the Public were to SEE what theya re really attempting to do, the Public would back away from them so quickly the LIBERALS would get Whiplash.

Posted by: Ed P | August 18, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Honestly this story is pathetic. What is he going to do if Iran threatens us with another attack, sick his Mommy on them. Anybody who supports this guy needs to check his manhood. He makes Hillary look masculine.

Posted by: Todd | August 18, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Well, you have to admit that Bill Mahr did have a great idea about Cheney and his trip to Afghanistan.

Posted by: Michael Alexander | August 18, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Notice that Coulter has dissappeared

Posted by: no1maestro | August 18, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

I expect nothing less from an ABC News blogger. Typical left wing bias, which has misinformed and misguided people into thinking John Edwards is a standup guy.
Seriously, anyone who can take this guy serious is out of their minds. Next thing you know he’ll have an I hate Ann Coulter fundraiser. He’s that pathetic.

Posted by: Steve | August 18, 2007, 11:54 am 11:54 am

“We know these people. We know their game plan. They’re going to attack us personally,” Edwards said.
Lessee.. calling Republicans “evil” and calling Bush “Hitler” (among many other names) aren’t personal attacks? Just gotta shake my head when I see that being said.

Posted by: Damage | August 18, 2007, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Railing against the right-wing media–including Fox News and Rush Limbaugh?
No one will deny Rush as a conservative icon, but to continue to paint Fox News as “right-wing” media without admitting to every other major news network as the “left-wing” media is disingenous.
Readers are not that gullible!

Posted by: Dave | August 18, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am

To all you guys defending Ann. I would not worry about Edwards ever getting on the ballot. He does not stand a chance.

Posted by: B Ambrose | August 18, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Extremists on both sides are worthless and dangerous and need to be removed… Bill and Coulter should NEVER be supported.

Posted by: Darren | August 18, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Folks, I have been a conservative for 50 years but this Coulter chick is bad news for everyone. I see no point in being mean spirited and rude.

Posted by: Wyatt | August 18, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am

For the most part, the news media mercilessly beats us over the head with their leftist propaganda in the hope that there are enough naive, apathetic voters out here to believe without verifying the information and then carry those agendas to the voting booth.
It’s all they’ve got, and if enough of us ignore it without calling them on it, it just might work for them in 2008.

Posted by: Jeff K | August 18, 2007, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

“Ann Coulter is extremely mild when compared to what you find on the Daily Kos, Democrats.com, and other far-left hate sites. She’s essentially the conservative version of Molly Ivins, only more attractive and intelligent.”

Posted by: QUESTION HILLARY™ | August 18, 2007, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

People like Coulter engage in hate language?? Are we forgetting what party Edwards is affiliated with? The democrats who use “nazi” and “Hitler” to describe republicans, wish for Cheney to be killed? Having just called Coulter “she devil” and yet Coulter is the one who uses hate language? Edwards, just go back to your 25,000 square foot home to better plan your poverty tour for president. You make the rest of the hypocritical pack look pure.

Posted by: PRStein | August 18, 2007, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Maturity stopped at the 6th grade for this pack of wolves.

Posted by: prstein | August 18, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Nevermind what you may think of Edwards… I can come up with a few other terms that describe Ann Coulter… all of which would be blocked here.

Posted by: Troy Street | August 18, 2007, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

How does anything Ann Coulter says really matter? John Edwards, on the other hand, is your basic poofy-haired empty suit who litigated his way into the good life and thinks that somehow qualifies him to be president. That some of you take him seriously says a lot more about you than it does about him. No matter, he’ll be gone from the national scene soon enough.

Posted by: Kyda Sylvester | August 18, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

“Bill Maher never said he wished Cheney was dead.”
Any REASONABLE person knew EXACTLY what Bill Moomahr was intending.
George Washington knew what to do with such treasonous, traitorous scum.
Let the swift public trials and ready executions (sell tickets, balance the budget, buy more MOABs) of all lib loon filth commence!

Posted by: QUESTION HILLARY™ | August 18, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

The hypocrisy of the far right knows no bounds. Ad hominem attacks are fine, as long as you’re not on the receiving end. Government give-aways are no good, unless they’re going to those who supported you in the last campaign. Military service? — for your son or daughter, not for Mitt’s or mine. Affirmative action? — against it, but it’s okay to put an unqualified black man on the high court. Gay marriage? Nay, but closeted gay sex remains a popular Republican past time.

Posted by: Colonel Pash | August 18, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Coutler is a whack job, definitely. But comments coming from a snake in the grass BS trial lawyer is laughable. John Edwards is as useless as the rest of them. Stupid liberal.

Posted by: James | August 18, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Nice job Buy Danish, she has also written, as you know, five NYT bestsellers that the libs love to hate but for some odd reason never read. They never did get a good grasp on that judging of books by covers thing. It’s good to let these people know what an academic they’re dealing with. I can’t tell you haw many times I’ve heard people who barely got out of high school call President Bush (Yale undergrad, Harvard MBA) stupid. Books by covers…
Also, why do almost all the lefty comments contain misspellings and grammatical errors. I know we type fast and typos happen but most of these ain’t typos. Hmmmmmmmm.

Posted by: Dante | August 18, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Nice hair.

Posted by: cheesetopping69 | August 18, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

MWB, you are terrified of someone whose books you’ve not read? You say “mean spirited,” but you say nothing of the ideas she writes of. You say Sean Hannity is a “substituting (sic) dangerous idiot on a personal crusade,” but say nothing of why.
Like so many other people here, the majority of whom are left of center, name calling substitutes for logic, and red herrings are thrown out as substance.
Ann Coulter and Bill Maher are provocative entertainers and commentators who are a product of the ignorance of the electorate, who mistake the circus sideshows and melodramas for real life issues. If people would stop looking for short sound bites and take the time to understand how local, state, and federal governments work, and what representative government really does, the general conversation would be raised a bit higher than “mean-spirited witch,” “dangerous idiot,” and “blood sucking leech.”
Most days it seems we’ve turned America into Oz, where the image of the wizard is far more to be valued than the worth of the (wo)man behind the curtain.

Posted by: dj | August 18, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Wow, I guess I didn’t realize how many Ann Coulter wannabes were out there. I’ve always believed that Ann was mentally ill, not in a character assassination way, but actually in need of professional help. It is disconcerting to see that she has a large following……………

Posted by: Ron | August 18, 2007, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Hey…you want to really have a laugh. John Edwards website has some info on the evils of predatory lenders…which as the WSJ noted yesterday, John was a consultant for Fortress Investments which is involved in predatory lending. He is such a fool that his campaign is not smart enough to take this rant against predatory lenders off his website yet. The guy is nothing but a slick lawyer who made millions off of doctors and he somehow thinks this will work with the general public. It will not. John and Elizabeth, the king and queen of their own fantasy lands.

Posted by: larry | August 18, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Bill Maher is a comedian, not a political pundit who clearly and unabashedly supports the right wing. Those are the fact. Maher said it on his HBO cable COMEDY and CURRENT EVENTS show, not on a news program. These are the facts.

Posted by: MB | August 18, 2007, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Socialist Edwards taking that quote out of text has fooled nobody. Everybody knows the comment was in response to Bill Maher wishing VP Cheney dead. Why doesn’t Edwards or the media go after the hateful leftwing comments who most often propogate these situations in the first place?

Posted by: Mark | August 18, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

well, that sounds like something that would come from a lying, hypocritical, liberal. it is ok for the libs to get free airtime on abc, nbc, cbs, oprah, letterman, etc. but they are afraid it seems that they feel threatened by a few media outlets like fox news for instance. maybe the liberals dont understand just how many people in the normally silent majority loath the very ground they walk on. and as far as ann coulter is concerned , if they think she is appalled by the moral decay the libs have spawned in this country mostly from the clinton presidency, they sure as hell wouldnt like to hear my opinion of them! they can try to keep up their double standard of speaking lies about bush, (just because slick willy was a habbitual one) but hey we know who the liars are, and the socialist minded people are. and that is the liberals ! they are so far out there in laa laa land that they actually think we had 9-11 coming to us, aLL i got to say is hey liberals keep up the rotton rhetoric against the conservatives and you will get ten fold the rhetoric back from this person! so get ready ! im not going to be silent now to you lying people ! and hey just bacause slick willy was a liar , quit trying to paint bush as one! you people seem so childish it seems like a bunch of little kids arguing at you debates. hillary is as much of a liar as bill , and obama is a good orator and that is all, he knows nothing about governing, he talks big talk but cant walk the walk. all the liberals are is a group of appeasers to our enemies, well hey i got something to tell them! we will fight back. what ever happened to good sense in this country? it seems common sense now should be called uncommon sense after seeing the liberals speak! all you liberals have done by bashing the president, and slandering him every inch of the way during his presidency is create a mountain of seething anger toward you! and you jerks talk hate speech!!! last time i heard there was freedom of speech! and you know what liberals ? i am going to speak how i feel toward you !!! and if you dont like it.. sue me!

Posted by: Thomas | August 18, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Coulter’s method to her poking, prodding, insulting, and shaming, is to get people to look at themselves. It’s remarkable how often the left-wing lacks self-reflection or is otherwise unwilling to deconstruct or stand behind what they say or do. Underneath her approach, even if it’s rudely calling someone “fat”, is merely an attempt to engender the smallest amount of self-awareness in those on the far left who never even consider that their agenda of social engineering intended to help might have the opposite effect. That is, they just might be wrong.

Posted by: PS | August 18, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Who cares what Ann Coulter has to say anyway. She is a hero to the right wing nuts out there in la la land, so be it. Hate away Ann! Your crazy fans love you for it.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

John is nothing but an idiot. He has nothing to bring to the table except name calling. He is such a loser.

Posted by: Ben | August 18, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

>Edwards needs to find his “own identity” and stop relying and using other peoples ideas and battles as if they were his. His wife tells him what to say and who to react to and then claims that the ideas are his.
lets pray that he doesnt get into the white-house in any shape or form

Posted by: dbsr | August 18, 2007, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

John Edwards is a multimillionaire, earning his money as a slimy trial attorney and clearly he is power hungry. My guess is he is on the Democratic side of the coin because the demographic makeup of the Democratic voter is much more ignorant then Republican voters (fact). He views the dummy down Democratic electorate as a jury and therefore speaks in dramatic, emotional and twisted Clintonistic double speak. I believe however he now has genuienley earned himself a spot light in the Democratic party. True hypocrite.

Posted by: KMAN | August 18, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

BTW, I would not consider ‘Good Morning America’ any kind of serious news show. In fact in many ways it is more of a comedy than the Bill Maher show. Anybody who thinks Bill Maher is funny has to have their head examined considering all the hatred he spews on HBO which has become just another leftwing outlet with the likes of Mahers, the Larry David circles, and all the leftwing agendas that are constantly pushed in HBO programming.

Posted by: Mark | August 18, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

John Edwards is a multimillionaire, earning his money as a slimy trial attorney and clearly he is power hungry. My guess is he is on the Democratic side of the coin because the demographic makeup of the Democratic voter is much more ignorant then Republican voters (fact). He views the dummy down Democratic electorate as a jury and therefore speaks in dramatic,

Posted by: KMAN | August 18, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

John Edwards is going the way of the Commodore 64 computer: way outdated, forgotten, and not applicable to today’s world. He is SO yesterday it’s ridiculous. He’s got nothing. His job at Fortress, where he made almost $500K for part-time work to “learn about finance” appears to be a thinly veiled way for the company to contribute large sums of money in the form of salary to him. His job there, per the WSJ, was to help them with economic info from overseas. Am I missing something, or how does needing to learn about finance equate with giving economic information from overseas, which is certainly far more difficult to do from a finance perspective than give info about the U.S. economy. The word that comes to mind is “shame,” and if you leave off the “e” for Edwards, you get the same thing. A “sham.”

Posted by: Dennis | August 18, 2007, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

The media continues to be an arm of the DNC, no wonder they have no credibility left nor any audience. What’s wrong with presenting the truth and letting the audience evaluate.

Posted by: William Hofmeister | August 18, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

I can think of a lot more names than she-devil for Fox Noise poster girl Ann Coulter. She deserves every one of them. Go Johnny Go.

Posted by: cliff jones | August 18, 2007, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Ann’s comment about Edwards being a “faggot” was a dig at political correctness and the Isaiah Washington incident, who since he said that, had to go into so-called “sensitivity” training. That was her point in saying that. The other points she makes, e.g., the NJ women, is that they were using what happened to their husbands as a political platform and if they were in politics, they should be able to be challenged as the Dem’s do the Repub’s. Anne’s whole game is to tongue in cheek use the same tactics the Dem’s use, and look at the outrage it engenders. If only we on the conservative side could spout the same outrage. Then again, we don’t control any of the mainstream media. Fox is too kind to lambaste them, which I do give them credit for. They are definitely taking the high road.

Posted by: Dennis | August 18, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Ooohh!!!
Mr. $2000 haircut, Mr. foreclose on Katrina victims while he’s lecturing us about two America’s, poor and rich, is telling us who is naughty and nice???
Democrats!

Posted by: Bob Larimer | August 18, 2007, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Geez—I can’t believe all these Neo-cons TRYING to defend the likes of ANN COULTER!!! Good for them….adds more POWER to the advancement of all those who know her and point her, and those like her, out to be the vile, despicable, name-calling, divisive, useless, good-for-nothing scum that they CLEARLY are and that all TRUE Patriotic HONEST Americans KNOW THEM TO BE!! LOL@ those who think that defending that sort of neocon slummery will get them anywhere but OUT of the category of what REAL Americans want or will put up with–LOL!

Posted by: Darrie | August 18, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

I am so tired of these libs getting upset because conservatives have one tv station and the radio as their media… Meanwhile, they have all the other stations!!!!! This is just killing me!
Hey Dems/Libs…..when will you finally realize that most people in this country think with their brain, not their emotions???????? None of you can actually hold an intelligent conversation regarding our world affairs.

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Ann coulter and her ilk, are sick, twisted, hateful, and ignorant people. PERIOD!

Posted by: garbo | August 18, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Edwards is making a hugh tactical mistake by taking Coulter on. Ann is a wonk and anyone who’s not plugged into the political chitchat 24/7, probably doesn’t give a hoot what she says. No matter what you think about the woman, she is smart. She can take apart the Edward machine (as it self-destructs) using Edward’s own words to do so.
It’s obvious, Edward’s is doing a ‘McCain’ and he & his staff know it.

Posted by: Kelja | August 18, 2007, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Ann Coulter is much worse than a “she devil”. She is one of the most hateful, ill informed, and evil people I have ever seen. The media is very irresponsible for giving such an individual a public forum to put forth her hate and misinformation. I have notified all of the major networks that I will immediately change the channel if I see her face on their broadcast and I hope others will do likewise and stop this evil person from having a public forum.

Posted by: Loyd | August 18, 2007, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Sad that Edwards has to resort to attacking Ann Coulter to grab a headline. That shows how much traction his actual ideas are getting. He should stick to 400$ haircuts and let the adults worry about Ann.

Posted by: scott | August 18, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

New Dem slogan:
Waaaaaaaaah (2 year old crying), you guys are being mean to me by calling me out on my hypocrisy.
Just fill in the appropriate candidate…for that matter, any of their candidates…and it fits just fine. Mix in a little right-wing conspiracy and you’ve got the cocktail that lost them the last 2 elections. Keep using it Hillary!

Posted by: Dennis | August 18, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Hillary Clinton / John Edwards
The First All Female Ticket

Posted by: N. | August 18, 2007, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

John Edwards is TOOOOO much of a hypocrite for most americans…. So in other words, WAKE UP YOU DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Wow, there’s a lot of hate coming from all directions against the media, the Dems, the GOP, Edwards, Coulter, Matthews, and more. Personally I think this is the result of the law of reciprocity – you get what you give.
Keep giving the likes of Coulter air time and buying her attack-dog rhetoric and you keep getting attacks. The same from others on both sides of the spectrum.
Keep pawning over politians that are more spit than substance and you get more of the same. Who cares about a persons color or religion, let’s talk about key issues that impact our lives -domestically and internationally.
As far as the media, there are only a few out there worth listening to, watching and reading – and I don’t include those coming from the extreme right or left. They may be entertaining but just perpetuate their own bias, therefore cutting off any intelligent discussion, and bringing on more dissention. This includes the likes of Matthews and Hannity, for example. This is what Fox has initiated and is now being copied by MSNBC – in an attempt to find their constituancy and market share from the left.
Overall, we now live in an environment that creates a lot of noise – separation, bias, hate and ugly disrespect for others. And, it is getting worse. This is another part of global warming – on a personal level.
Where oh where is that “Christian” feeling so many talk about? As a Jew I would like to see more of it.

Posted by: stan silberstein | August 18, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

did elizabeth approve of this message by johnny?

Posted by: bigdawg169 | August 18, 2007, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Good stuff Areyou kidding. Good stuff bro.

Posted by: N. | August 18, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Current state Democrat party is a bunch of freaks and they should be ashamed of themselves….
JFK, FDR, and many others were democrat…..and many of them would agree with our curent state of affairs… People need to take a step back and look into history to see what the democrat party was before…

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Interesting that he calls Ann Coulter a “she devil” and in the next breath says that the right wing media engages in “hate language.”

Posted by: ken | August 18, 2007, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

What a perfect ticket (Fire and Ice):
hillary and the Flamer

Posted by: LTrain | August 18, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

America needs Edwards like Eskimos need ice water.

Posted by: QUESTION HILLARY™ | August 18, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Maher didn’t say he wanted Cheney dead
Two things about the far right, firstly so much of what they say is out of context or just plain wrong. Secondly, they have been throwing dirt around like this for 20 years or more in the media, and don’t seem to be able to take it when Liberals fight back.

Posted by: markymark | August 18, 2007, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Whew. Finally read down to the bottom of the thread. The left, the right, the red, the blue, the hate the love, in sum John Edwards “two Americas” perpetuated by none other than the topic of this thread….John Edwards.
All these comments resulting from questionable words spoken by an American Presidential wanna-be.
You know, the position that should unite and not divide.
And the one point that should be clear to all that dare wade through these numerous comments – John Edwards obviously does not fall into the former category.
However, It would be unfair to lump all the blame on Edwards. If not for the Kaplans of the world, stoking the fire and stirring the pot while leaving out key ingredients, America would not be boiling over with non-issues like he-said, she-said.
But then, Kaplan or Coulter for that matter aren’t running for President, are they?

Posted by: PhilNBlanx | August 18, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Bob, come on, man–that’s a bit over the top, ok? Well, lefties, how does it feel to finally get your comeuppance? You’ve ruled the media roost for 50 years, and now it’s all crashing down around you. You’re squealing like little piggies stuck under the fence, and I’m quite glad about that. You “people” (I use the term very loosely) can’t squeal loud enough for me. It’s music to my ears. Interesting, isn’t it, how NO ONE debating Ann has EVER won the argument at hand. I’ve certainly never seen it. Get used to it, because you will soon be buried under the Avalanche of Conservatism which is on it’s way. The gates of Liberal Hell cannot prevail against it.

Posted by: John R. Kenny | August 18, 2007, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

“This is what the party of Lincoln and Goldwater has become?”
Clixon, Tedwords, Bidentime, and Obonger.
That IS what the party of Harry Truman, Pat Moynihan, Sam Nunn, and Scoop Jackson IS.

Posted by: QUESTION HILLARY™ | August 18, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

“Will Edwards ask his wife to call al Queda and complain they are meanies?”
Only if Osama accepts collect calls.

Posted by: QUESTION HILLARY™ | August 18, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Right on “areyoukidding” you got it goin on today bro

Posted by: N. | August 18, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

To anyone reading these comments that are independent voters or maybe slightly right or left of center. I hope you notice the hateful language of the right wingers on this message board. I personally don’t think this kind of hatred should be the philosophy governing our great country. These people stopped maturing around 6th grade.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

John Edwards is the personification of the “feminization” of this culture. He’s also a number one “sleazeball”. Railing about the atrocities of New Orleans but making sure eviction procedures are carried out if the “cash don’t hit the flash”!!!

Posted by: Arthur Cortis | August 18, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

“Nevermind what you may think of Edwards… I can come up with a few other terms that describe Ann Coulter… all of which would be blocked here.”
A prime example of liberal thinking. Nevermind what YOU may think, it’s only what I think that’s important and if you don’t agree, you’re an evil and small minded conservative.
I’ll proudly think for myself, thank you very much.

Posted by: KimW | August 18, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Why is anyone even talking about Ann Coulter anymore? She obviously needs negative media to keep her in the headlines. When she is on do what I do-change the channel. I dont have time or energy to expend on such a close-minded bigot.

Posted by: j castillo | August 18, 2007, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

He said, we know these people will attack us personally and then personally attacks Ann by calling her a she-devil. This guy is a worse candidate than Kerry and Bush combined. Next to the articulate Obama he makes Bush sound intelligent. He may have conned juries, but he ain’t gonna con enough voters. What a joke this twit is.

Posted by: Jason Malcolm, III | August 18, 2007, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

You liberals ALWAYS take an end-around and whip out the “hate” word whenever anyone other than a stinking liberal disagrees with your wretched, ideologies. “Hate-speech” for God’s sake! George Orwell warned us of this day, when you could be prosecuted for your THOUGHTS! Unfortunately, it will take yet another MORE devastating attack than 9-11 to finally shut you idiots up.
“A conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged”.

Posted by: John R. Kenny | August 18, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Well, I was going to blast you for intentionally taking Ann Coulter’s sarcastic remark out of context, but I see dozens of other informed citizens beat me to it. At least your readers are no longer blind to your blatant pro-Democrat bias. Ann Coulter simply points out the double standard imposed by news organizations like yours. And then you go and prove her point.

Posted by: Kelly Pontiere | August 18, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

“Someone’s freedoms are only restricted when it’s done by someone who has power over the victim…”
So you’re against campaign finance reform, mandatory radio media fairness, and all the lefty whiner censorship it entails?
Excellent.

Posted by: QUESTION HILLARY™ | August 18, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

It doesn’t matter who wins the Rep. nomination. The best part of elections in the 21st century is watching how creative the Democrats will get in snatching yet another defeat from the jaws of victory. Go Howard Dean!!!

Posted by: N. (Florida) | August 18, 2007, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

RE: Kelly Pontiere
You got it, nice one…Bravo, you write well…

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

This is a fascinating window into a possible USA civil war II. I wonder how much more insight into “the late unpleasantness” we would have if 19th century media could capture back-and-forth like this?
Of course, history doesn’t repeat itself, so this evident fracturing of the national polity may not result in an actual degeneration into open conflict. But, it sure looks that way if people continue to talk past each other this way, and inflame their passions at the expense of their minds, and follow commentators and aspirants to office who ‘trip their triggers’ in this respect.

Posted by: Frank in the Blue Ridge Mtns | August 18, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Re: areyoukidding?
Funny, really, I’m still laughing!

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Ann Coulter is disgusting. We should be discussing medical care for Americans and securing our homeland instead of the divisive bickering that ” people ” like Ann Coulter inspire.

Posted by: Timothy | August 18, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Sure Coulter is a jerk, but Edwards is a phony. Whoever runs his campaign is incredibly stupid. In additon to the incident with his rabidly anti-Catholic bloggers is the genius of having Danny Glover introduce him at campaign stops.
For anyone who doesn’t know anything about Glover’s politics, he is an American hating buddy of dictators Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez. Maybe Edwards should have Fidel (although he’s probably dead) and Chavez introduce him on the campaign trail. Edwards is a ambulance chasing bozo.

Posted by: Dave | August 18, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Yo! Watchu talkin’ about? Nuh uh Barry!

Posted by: joey | August 18, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Interesting Edwards calling Coulter a she-devil. Since the democrats don’t believe in God, can the devil exist? Can not have one without the other, but then that has never stopped the dems before, or in the future.

Posted by: Richard | August 18, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

RE: Paul
You’re the only one trying to be funny and falling way short! Did you actually read what you wrote?
I will say that you are funny but not in a Ha Ha way…
Mommy’s calling!

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Hey, “n.florida” and “areyoukiddingme” have some pretty freakin funny posts. You should see them. Scroll up.

Posted by: Billy (NY) | August 18, 2007, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Another classic story for those leftists that refuse to accept the leftward bias of the media. Top story on Yahoo Finance, from the AP, about a NC waitress praising the Dems for raising the min wage and how much that will help people like her. Except that wait staff are not paid min wage, they are exempt, so it will not affect her at all. The whole story is a set piece from the DNC, masquerading as news.

Posted by: gary | August 18, 2007, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

I have read all the comments so far, and it is pitiful how low down people have become. Money is the driving source in this country as it is the cause of so many mean spitited and disp-laced people. If we could all take a deep breath and learn all about Deepak Chopra, we will be a better nation and a happuer one too!!!!!!!

Posted by: Cindy | August 18, 2007, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Hillary will drop out after the primaries, and Rudy will win the election. The Dems LIKE to THINK that Hillary can be President, but in their heart of hearts, they know it will never happen. For the good of the Party, she’ll bow out. Even though I’m not FOR Rudy, he’s going to win. He’s centrist enough for left, right and center to join in with him.

Posted by: John R. Kenny | August 18, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Funny how this administration and their minions represent the politics of hate.

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Can we can agree on one thing?
- the media sucks -
And they sucked when we needed them most, just prior to the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history.
More bread and circuses, everyone?

Posted by: OldJoe | August 18, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Hey Bill, looks like I hit a nerve on that one, you seemed angry in your last post. Just giving you grief bud. I know you righties are pretty thin skinned, I shouldn’t be so harsh. I gotta go now. Tell your mom I said hi and YOU have a nice day, OK?

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Who is ‘bickering’? Edwards supporters simply gotta believe. They gotta believe that someone who invested $16 million into Fortress Investments and was paid over $400K by them for part time work truly ‘didn’t know’ about their sub-prime business. And then .. they gotta believe that someone that stupid should be president. If you can’t believe those then the only alternative is that he’s a total lying fraud.

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Oh Allan! There you conservatives go again dredging up FACTS! You know thats a foreign language to liberals!

Posted by: N. (Florida) | August 18, 2007, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

ABC, can you please fix your stupid “Post” button at the bottom of the blog? It’s on a bloody hair-trigger?

Posted by: John R. Kenny | August 18, 2007, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Scrolling through the comments, I’m
struck by how hateful people are.

Posted by: Dennis J. Edwards | August 18, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

“duhhhh, Im stupid…”
that’s satire, folks. this thread is filled with hate and bile. you should all be ashamed.

Posted by: you are silly | August 18, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

We must be getting close to the end of the third quarter and John$400 is trying to raise some more money from his favorite hate groups

Posted by: Allen Ridge | August 18, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

A six year old came up with the perfect response concerning Edwards calling Ann a ‘She Devil’ – “It takes one to know one.”! BWHAHAHAHA!

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Most of you people are so blinded by your own political attitudes that you miss the large picture; politicians tell people what they want to hear to get elected, and authors create PR to sell their books.
Wow what a surprise there’s been some political name calling, and wow yet a bigger surprise – an author throws out inflammatory remarks to keep themselves in the public eye.
The bottom line is that politicians lie and authors hype their own sense of grandeur. So stop looking at the paint strokes and start seeing the painting.

Posted by: Johnny | August 18, 2007, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Is Elizibeth singing? She must be…his campaign is over.

Posted by: Tex | August 18, 2007, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

My, my..a couple of thoughts; first John Edward’s isn’t going to be President which depending on your point of view could be either a good thing or a bad thing. Second Ann Coulter isn’t going to stop saying things like that, and she’s never going to be anything but a “talking head” columnist. With that being said, does it really make any difference at all what either of them says? The newly extended Presidential Campaign and the 24/7 news cycle means that anything and everything that might get attention will get reported somewhere and then picked up elsewhere and re-reported over and over, until as in a case like this it becomes an issue; when in reality the utterances of either of these two people is basically insignificant.

Posted by: Jon | August 18, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Why does ABC news distort Coulter’s quote by taking it out of context? Because ABC news is staffed by liberal partisans, of course!

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Clinton/Edwards….a formidable foreign policy ticket….weekend shopping in Paris. She for pant suits, him for haut coutire dresses

Posted by: MMMM | August 18, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Clinton/Edwards….a formidable foreign policy ticket….weekend shopping in Paris. She for pant suits, him for haut coutire dresses

Posted by: MMMM | August 18, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Forgot to add: Ann Coulter is a National Treasure!!!

Posted by: Arthur Cortis | August 18, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Maybe Ted Haggard can come by and they can all have a prayer circle, discuss moral values a get a nice massage together.

Posted by: Duke of Prunes | August 18, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

ABC: we’re still the one!! Oh wait that was in 1976 when we actually had reporters and not spin doctors working here.

Posted by: JJ | August 18, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

RE: Jon
Agreed, add the internet into the bunch. We were all subject to the mainstream media back in the day because it was the only thing out there. What they said was the NEWS, the truth as they saw it. Enter the internet and of course talk radio..
Now we hear and read very different views on just about everything. The world as we knew it is much smaller. Now the fight today is who’s right! Three things that motivate adults today, Money, Sex, Power…

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Sandy,
Ann Coulter assumes you follow the news well enough toknow what Maher said and his context. If you read a lot of her stuff, you know that one of her main themes is media bias in nit-picking conservatives but giving liberals a pass on silly things they say. It’s a major modus for her to mock the media by using the same quote line that some liberal got a pass on recently. Perhaps in your case she assumed too much….

Posted by: Al Clarke | August 18, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

I didn’t know Ann personally knew Hilary!

Posted by: JJ | August 18, 2007, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Thanks areyoukidding, but your still the king. N.Florida your the prince.

Posted by: MMMM | August 18, 2007, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Ann Coulter will reap what she sows.

Posted by: George | August 18, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Sounds like Edwards is getting hysterical about comments from the right.

Posted by: Bob | August 18, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

As for Ann Coulter……
I am basically conservative…and NO I really dont approve of how she talks about people….
However, maybe she is just saying what most conservatives refuse to say and find objectionable.. So I do think she serves a purpose… Not sure if its good or if its bad.. Personally, I prefer not speaking of others in that fashion, especially for all to hear…
Either way, she is our only dirty speaking force while the democrats put out so much filth regarding republicans on a daily basis… So, whether I like her or not, I appreciate her being there.
Tim

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

surely people can see through the fakey
shy boy style of rich John Edwards who pays HOW MUCH?? for haircuts. Who else
who spend time running for president when
his wife is trying to put her cancer into remission. He is an rich opportunistic spoiled rich boy who will find the youngest wife he can find is his wife dies.

Posted by: Caroline | August 18, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

As hate-monger Ann can’t be beat !

Posted by: DonA | August 18, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Coulter flustered? Yeah right. She handled it in her usual, confident manner. Your seem to forget to mention that the “Hardball” segment was totally staged to have Edwards call in the show (admitted by MSNBC). Oh, yeah, you also forgot to mention that Ann’s comments were based on what Maher said about VP Cheney…oh, but you’re the “unbiased” media…silly me.

Posted by: SAEngr | August 18, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

David Holyfield: Do you really believe that Harry Truman’s truth to power philosophy applies to Ann Coulter? Really? Think about that. Truman rose to fame in the Senate by heading the committee that looked into business fraud and waste during WWII. As a veteran himself, he wanted the GIs to have what the government ordered. To pick just one sample, Coulter opines that the 9/11 widows like being widows and that they flaunt it. That is untrue. She has never felt that kind of pain and, I hope, never will. To make that kind of statement is as unChristian as she can get. Truman and Coulter (and the rest of us) have our faults, but Coulter has gone over the edge so far, so often, as to lose all credibility. Go Ann??? Yeah, but where?

Posted by: AtticusinPa | August 18, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

John Edwards uses his wife’s cancer for politocal gain – what a sleave.

Posted by: Dallas | August 18, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

John Edward does not have the character or leadership ability to be President of the US. He should resume his “legal suits” against Medical malpractices.
Money does not make a president or a man.
To reducle female opposition is a serious characte flaw. How many other hateful idea does he possess?

Posted by: Jim Vondras | August 18, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

As usual, libs resort to lying. T Bonfig, the min wage DOES NOT apply to wait staff. The wage for wait staff is 2.13, and has not been increased. Typical lying lib.

Posted by: gary | August 18, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Ever notice how liberals warmly
embrace diversity, except when it
comes to opinions!

Posted by: Jon | August 18, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Okay folks…..BELIEVE IT OR NOT…
John Edwards has less of a chance becoming president as my dog growing wings and flying me to work everyday….
Intelligent people dont like hypocrites….and thats what he is…
He believes in global warming as a result of people… So he has a 20,000 sq ft home, etc… He only believes in the “other America” as having to cut back…. Not his Ameica…..but our america…
So Poopy on him!!!!!

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

RE: Jon
True, as long as you believe the very same way on the very same issues.
Be contra and watch out..

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Sheesh, all the wackjob sites must be linked to this story.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Come on you guys. How about getting off the politics for just a minute. Ann Coulter does not promote Positive solutions to anything. It’s not about Ann herself. She’s obviously a very intelligent woman. It’s that she brings hate and anger and personal attacks to every issue she discusses. Why would we defend that spirit or lack thereof, particularly in light of the current political milieu? Ann certainly has the right to speak out and some of us may agree with her positions. But as a public figure, doesn’t she have the responsibility to add to Positive Solutions to our country’s woes? A great boss I had once said, “Don’t come to me with a complaint or a problem without bringing a solution along with it.”

Posted by: Kate | August 18, 2007, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

AtticusinPa,
You refer to Coulter’s comments about 9/11 widows: She refers not to all, but to a group of four in New Jersey who chose to use their status as 9/11 widows as a pulpit to oppose the war in Iraq. Nobody questions their grief, but if they launch their opinions into the political mix based on it, they should not be immune to criticism and response, even if some of it is sarcastic.

Posted by: Al Clarke | August 18, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

No wonder Bush was elected, twice no less!

Posted by: stan silberstein | August 18, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Here’s a good topic… How about the 10 billion we spend a month in Iraq, while we cant afford to treat wounded vets at home, or repair bridges, or rebuild New Orleans, oe secure our ports and borders, or feed the hungry, or fund no-child-left-behind, etc etc etc

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

You people are so unfair. John Edwards is a good loking man and he has great hair.

Posted by: Observer | August 18, 2007, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Ann Coulter should be prosecuted for voter fraud. She used her real estate agent’s address as her residence on Palm Beach and therefor was allowed to vote in the wrong precinct in the 2006 election national, state and local elections.
Funny how Coulter and Fox News rail about voter fraud, but when this conservative wacko actually commits it, no coverage at all.

Posted by: Independent Thinker | August 18, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Paul!!!!!!!!!!! Now that’s perspective!!! Thanks for your list of the real issues!!! We needed that!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Kate | August 18, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Response to Johnny Gresham. Your said: “Edwards is right to elevate the debate to a more civil tone. Stick to issues NOT name calling.”
Edwards Calls Coulter ‘She-Devil’ and that is a more civil tone? What a giggle.

Posted by: B Ambrose | August 18, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

ALL: Here’s an HONEST question. Can anybody on this blog for one minute imagine any of the current democratic candidates being able to defend our country against the likes of Iran, Russia, and or the current threat that is now being brought against the world? HONESSTLY?

Posted by: Jim again | August 18, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Hey Jim Again…..
the only candidate I have seen so far with enough balls to handle our current state would be Rudy……
He has many failures as a candidate….but he has BALLS!!!!
I want someone willing to take on whoever, or whatever…. Not someone who will take the question to the UN…. Those people all suck!!!!

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Jim Again -
Yeah, I can see almost ANYONE doing a better job with foreign affairs than GW. Pee Wee Herman would have made a better President. GW doesnt understand diplomacy, nuance, compromise. He’s all pig-headed egotistical my-way-or-the-highway. He’d of had us at war with the USSR in 5 minutes. After half the world and a couple billion p[eople were dead, he’d gloriously proclaim “Mission Accomplished”. Gawd, 5 minutes? He wouldn;t have lasted 5 seocnds during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Flustered???!!! You better listen again, Rick. Ann was anything but flustered!!

Posted by: Sunny | August 18, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Edwards is the democratic candidate who really, really scares them. they will say or do anything to stop him.

Posted by: Sean B | August 18, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

This typical leftist bias takes remarks made by a conservative out of context, while apologizing in a fawning manner for the multitude of lies and propaganda by far left ideologues

Posted by: Frank Fiordalisi | August 18, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Hey Paul…..
GW may suck in many ways…but he is the only president to have seen so much crap…aside from FDR….
Question to you……would you rather have Jimmy Carter in there? If it wasnt for him, we wouldnt have such a problem with Iran…. Remember, those people only believe in strength….and he played the girlie card…

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

I find it interesting that the righties viewpoints are all talking points from those who tell them how to think–verbatim.

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Re: Sean B
It’s not fear, it’s pure comedy….

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

ronnielong -
Well, unlike the GOP, the Dems have varying ideas. Their having a one-vote Senate majority means that everyone has to be of the same opinion to get anthing passed, and when they have, GW vetoes it. If GW can pressure into just 2 not siding with the Dems then he wins. We just have to wait untill ’08 when they get a more substantial majority. Then they can begin to undo some of the tremendous damage done by Bush/Cheney/Rove.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Hey Paul…..
GW may suck in many ways…but he is the only president to have seen so much crap…aside from FDR….
Question to you……would you rather have Jimmy Carter in there? If it wasnt for him, we wouldnt have such a problem with Iran…. Remember, those people only believe in strength….and he played the girlie card…

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Hey Timtam,
You already said that–how often do you find yourself repeating what you just said? Maybe if you say it often enough you will begin to believe it. :)

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

timtan -
Yeah, Carter would have done much better than GW.
But if you want to try aguing points 20 years old, I’m not interested, they aren’t pertinent today. (Ok, just this once… Carter encouraged the Jihadis because two helicopters colliding ruining his rescue effort? You’d of rather we went in with gun blazing and had most our people killed? How about Reagan’s response to 230+ marines being blown up in Beirut.We picked up and high-tailed it out of there. Was that ‘girlie’?)

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

RE: areyoukidding?
Good one! I’m still laughing..yalls hair…haha

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

The Conservatives think they’re so tough – the party of John Wayne. Please! Then why do they let their team mascot be thi emasculating…thing?

Posted by: CLE in NYC | August 18, 2007, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Anne Coulter is the greats living American woman bar none!!! She is the model of what all conservitives should be. Anne Coulter for President.

Posted by: Marv W | August 18, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Let me explain something to the Hannitized bloggers on here: The media has a liberal bias because people in the media too the time to EDUCATE themselves. They are not running around reporting that the earth is only 5000 years old to appease a bunch of right wing nit wits.
Ann Coulter is simply a bottom feeding carnival barker making a buck screaming and throwing red meat to the slow thinkers.

Posted by: Cybesq | August 18, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Again, you totally misquoted Ann Coulter’s comments. She never said what you imply. You have taken it out of context. You quote should be “…if I’m gonna say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot…,”. You cherry pick on portion of her response. You capitalized the word “If” to say she was starting a sentence, she was not. Please quote correctly, remember the principles of journalism.

Posted by: Frank | August 18, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Edwards for prez?
Isn’t this much ado about nothing?
Really – how many on the left will even vote for this man?

Posted by: Kelja | August 18, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Re: Ann C
You are very good at writing. Great piece..

Posted by: B | August 18, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

RONNIE….
You failed to tell Paul that Taxes will be raised…SIGNIFICANTLY….AND….we will fall into recession….
Dont you love an economy like the dems want to give us????

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

ronnie -
yes, I do think things will change, we have never had a pres as nuts as GW and there is a lot that will be undone.
As far as national healthcare (or socializes medicine as you call it, I guess the reference to “socialist” is supposed to frighten). What did the latest gov’t report say? we’re 49th in the world for lifespan? Somewhere around the same infant mortality?

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Edwards is a colossal charlatan from several angles. His resume is thin and his use of his wife’s illness and dead child’s tragic end loathesome. So he has lived in Iowa for almost a year & hopes to win there, while his native state of South Carolina will certainly reject him, just as Tennessee rejected Al Gore in the 2000 election. Palmetto Staters know the Edwards con-man template all too well.

Posted by: daveinboca | August 18, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

So the guy who “learned about poverty” from the hedge fund which invested his millions and which also foreclosed on flooded out citizens of New Orleans is now trying to get a boost by attacking Coulter.
Am I the only person who thinks that this is pathetic?

Posted by: pete | August 18, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Thankfully John Edwards is not going to start calling people names. He will take the high road, unlike the she-devil. Now thats just a fact, that’s not name calling.

Posted by: James | August 18, 2007, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

The United States.
So divided.
Have you thought about a civil war for a change?

Posted by: Charles Frith | August 18, 2007, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Foolish me…I had no idea that Ann was seeking the Democratic nomination as President. Who knew?

Posted by: John | August 18, 2007, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

IF WE ELECT A DEMOCRAT…….ALL OF US WILL BE SCREWED IN OUR WALLETS!!!!! They only think of taxes, you know…..

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

You misquoted Ann Coulter. Not that I’m surprised.
The left throws objects at Ann Coulter trying to harm her. All because of her freedom of speech, the same freedom of speech the left uses when they talk about how they love Hugo Chavez.
If you’re a liberal – hypocrisy is thy name.

Posted by: Janice Barton | August 18, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

OMG……Areyoukidding…..YOU ARE KILLING ME!!!!!
LOVE IT! Keep it up….. You really know how to say it just right!

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

A Conservative calling a Liberal a hypocrite……you guys are the king of hypocrites…..

Posted by: TomBob | August 18, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Edwards? Good president? he was against hedge funds until he found out they paid hime over a million a year to consult. He was against forclosing on unpaid mortgages in new orleans until he found out 25 million of his money was invested in these loans. He was against a middle class tax cut, and pplans to revoke the one bush gave us, all the while he is having a 40 million dollar house built. If you think this guy would make a good president you are fooled. Then lets not forget about amanda marcotte, edwards tries to act like a christian in front of a christian crowd, but around the progressives he is a god hating athiest

Posted by: seamus mctool | August 18, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Hey folks…..
If you like Chavez……RAISE YOUR HANDS!!!!
Its funny how many of you think he is great… Even though many of his people think he is nuts..

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

An additional thought: While Ann Coulter is a “National Treasure”, she hasn’t reached the “omnipotence”of “Rush” the “Prophet”!!! In time Ann……………..

Posted by: Arthur Cortis | August 18, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

timtan -
I agree with you, we need to get GW and his ilk out of office soon before all our rights are taken away.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

It’s interesting to me that you give such credence to a high priced shyster that has made his money posing as a medium for deceased infants while attacking the methods of the doctors who attended them. And now, after one mediocre term as a Senator from South Carolina he is feeding his undernourished ego by running for the Democrat nomination for President of the United States. It’s sort of like you are giving credence to the “Elmer Gantry” of the legal profession. You should be ashamed.

Posted by: Asa Dunnington | August 18, 2007, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

I remember my dad, who brought a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart back from fighting in Pattons 3rd army, saying “we don’t start wars, we just end them”. Made me proud as a kid.
I can’t tell that to my children anymore.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

PAUL…..
I said nothing of the like…. I just dont want a democrat in the office…..
I like my life to be fortuitous…..not full of taxes everywhere I go…

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

I’m not a supporter of Edwards, but I do know how I feel about anyone defending Ann Coulter.
To anyone defending Ann Coulter… please do not publicly align yourself with the republican party. We have a reputation of being hate-mongers and our acceptance of Ann’s behavior only adds to that.

Posted by: Jason | August 18, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

I saw the interview and Ann Coulter was not flustered,

Posted by: George P. Burdell | August 18, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Bill Maher is a comedian, not a “news source.” Give it a rest you mouth breathers.

Posted by: Mike | August 18, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

I hardly know where to begin, but let’s start with the trope about “liberal” media. The so-called “mainstream media” might very well be called liberal, but only if the word “liberal” is defined in a particular way.

Posted by: laocoonJr. | August 18, 2007, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Ann Coulter, Flustered. Not in our lifetime.

Posted by: Sam Russo | August 18, 2007, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

“The call left Coulter uncharacteristically flustered.”
Yeah, right. Well, it’s obvious on which side of the political spectrum that this journalist sits.
The best comment from the set-up of Ann Couter with Edwards’ wife was Coulter’s question, “Why isn’t John Edwards making this call?”

Posted by: Woody | August 18, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Honestly, Edwards supporters, the reason Ann Coulter attacks him is because he is so attackable. I like rich people,I don’t hate them, but look how he did it.

Posted by: Jimmy J | August 18, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Well said, laocoonJr
Factual and logical.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

HEY CRASSIOUS…..
My great uncle served in Pattons 3rd army and I am a very big fan of George Patton…..
Gen Patton was right about going into Russia when he wanted to…and he would have taken out half the worlds dictator had he had the chance…
Patton was a true American…..

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Lacoon, I really can spell: obvious.

Posted by: Dave | August 18, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Coulter supported please wear t-shirts showing your support, so I know to keep my children away from you.
Anyone defending her behavior in this post, is supporting hated. Name calling hate speach is not something most mature adults support.

Posted by: Jan | August 18, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Dear Ann C, do you really think that there aren’t just as many if not more similar cases of fraud in the republican party? Do you really think that your opinions or mine are based on anything other than what accidentally leaks out to the public? Do you really think that we know half of what’s really going on? We are made fools of by politicians everyday and it is equally as foolish to demand that only your views are right. You’re only as right as who agrees with you and that too is based only on what leaks out to us.

Posted by: k8k9 | August 18, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Hey Ronnie….. AGREED!!!!!!

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

HEY T BONFIG……
What the heck do you do to pay that kind of tax???
Holy mackeral!!!!!!
I am just an accountant……

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Areyoukidding…
That’s supporting your troops.

Posted by: Jason | August 18, 2007, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Edwards is an ambulance chaser and idiot.
The left may eventually take over, then USA will be the second Soviet Union.

Posted by: fred | August 18, 2007, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Ex-Repub…
jus’ curious – where’d you end up? As a Dem or Libertarian?

Posted by: Kelja | August 18, 2007, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

lol, cant handle facts and logic huh?

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Edwards has heavy financial ties to Fortress Investment Group which is currently foreclosing on about 40 homes in New Orleans! I can’t wait to hear the spin on this one!!!

Posted by: Bluestate Con | August 18, 2007, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

It’s nice to see Republicans and Independents are smart enough to realize when things are not only taken out of context, but misquoted. Coulter’s sentence did not start with “If,” but with a whole qualifying clause before it. But in order to make the Democrat point that Coulter’s a harpy and attacked John Edwards, the author if this story conveniently changes the sentence. We’re catching on to you! There’s more information out there than ever before and we can get both sides of the story. That’s why all your news rankings are plummeting.

Posted by: Too Smart to be a Democrat | August 18, 2007, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

geez, a lot of typing there ronnie, of course, no content of value.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Help! There’s only one of me in here and I’m getting lonely!

Posted by: Brain Cell | August 18, 2007, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

John Edwards visited MY hometown, and said WHAT about OUR ANN? Listen to me, Mr or Mrs or Ms Edwards, or whatever you have fashioned yourself into for the moment. Burlington Hawkeyes have more respect for the carnival barkers at Steamboat Days than phony trial lawyers like you. In fact, we love our carnival workers! In fact, I hereby humbly apologize to our beloved carnival workers for putting their good works in the same sentence as whatever it was you do for a living.

Posted by: TomLama | August 18, 2007, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Yes, I said jail. When I came out of school it was illegal to join the military for me. No don’t ask don’t tell.
So much for America and our wonderful freedoms and equal rights. I remember the shock I got when I found out was not equal and could not join the military.

Posted by: Jason | August 18, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Well, I’m bored with the ignorant limbaugh parrots. Hope you’re enjoying dealing with the 70% of America that considers GW a huge failure. It is soothing to know that 50 years from now your great grand-children will come home from school one day and say to their mother “wow, mom, I just learned what a terrible President George Bush was”

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Mr. Edwards is a lawyer who became rich suing evil insurance companies before rural or small town Southern juries. One of John’s rules to success was that, no one who went to college or had worked for themselves, could sit on his juries.
John won because he is or was a poor Southern boy himself, and these juries could also relate to the word devil and “She-devil.”

Posted by: Tommy Shannon | August 18, 2007, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

johnny’s accountants created an “S” corporation with lil’ johnny-boy as the only employee.
that way johnny avoided paying the $600,000.00 that he legitimately owed the federal gov’t funded health care program
he wants you to pay but he won’t pay.
he is 1/a liar and 2/a professional tax cheat.

Posted by: bigdawg169 | August 18, 2007, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

The whining on this board reminds me of my five year old, crying after he’s made a terrible mess. Well guys, you had six years. You could have governed – could have proved your bankrupt philosophy. Instead, you blew it. The republican party and conservatism is destroyed for a generation. Get used to whining in the minority. See you in the White House – with a Democratic filibuster-proof Senate.

Posted by: TAO | August 18, 2007, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

My only problem with the talented (and hot)Ann Coulter is that she isn’t a libera

Posted by: allan | August 18, 2007, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

There are two Americas — One where successful ambulance chasing lawyers like John Edwards can afford $1200 haircuts, and the rest of us. Anyone that can’t see that Edwards is 100% genuine phony is a brainwashed loon.

Posted by: Ben | August 18, 2007, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

What an unbiased reporter. Rick Klein must be on the Edwards payroll. I watched the Matthews show. Ann Coulter was obviously set up. She was flustered?? This jerk couldn’t report a 5 alarm fire.
They must think the entire country is stupid. As I see from the other comments it AIN’T working. I don’t think we have to worry about an ambulance chasing shylock being elected.

Posted by: Jerry Stephens | August 18, 2007, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Typical condescending elitist Lib!

Posted by: Bluestate Con | August 18, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

You have no solutions to any of our country’s problems because you HATE AMERICA!! I wish all of you “LIBS” would leave america and push your sick views on somebody else!!

Posted by: jhon T bobbitefoller | August 18, 2007, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Again, we wouldn’t need someone like Ann Coulter (agree with her style or not), if the MSM did their job.
They (as the article that started this thread proves) pick a side/angle and then blatantly promote it.
political gain.

Posted by: Robert | August 18, 2007, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Democrat woman are so ugly because they are so hateful!!!!!
And….they have just a terrible outlook on life….
Every noticed the woman driving an old Ford Escort stationwagon with a democrat sticker on her car???? They are about the most ugliest things Ive ever seen….

Posted by: TIMTAN | August 18, 2007, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I support Ann. I tell my kids all the time to go out and be mean and call people names. I am training them to be good little Republicans.
Thanks for your help Rush and Ann.

Posted by: sam | August 18, 2007, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Still sounds like Edwards knows what he is doing, once you clear out all the emotional stuff on this thread- lots of opinion but little substance.

Posted by: looloo | August 18, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

ABC’s appeal to the mob: ABC News took Coulter’s comments out of context to further vilify her. Her comments were out of line, but ABC’s distortion makes them sound worse.

Posted by: LB Samms | August 18, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

and that good ol’ joke about going into the restaurant where the prices were too high and they had to leave.
he bought that line from jimmy carter or jay leno.
this boy is not good on his feet.
elizabeth! help me!

Posted by: bigdawg169 | August 18, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Hey T Bonfig,
However, I still see them here……all over the place.. They have their crappy old fords covered with stupid democrat stickers…
Most people here drive a nice car and dont put those dumb democrat stickers on their cars… They look angry…..have terrible hair…..ugly glasses….and just look stupid….

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

The reason Maher’s comments got little to no media attention was because he never said ‘… it would be good if Vice President Cheney was killed in a trip to Afghanistan’. His comments came in the context of a discussion on his show about a comment that was posted by one of the readers of the Huffington Post. A comment that wished Cheney died in the attack. A comment that Arianna immediately took down because she didn’t want to be associated with the comment. What Maher said was ‘I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power people wouldn’t be dying needlessly tomorrow’. It was an observation not a hateful death wish as the idiot wingers said it was to which the idiot wingers followers blindly repeated over and over again because they can’t think or find out the facts on their own. He further said ‘If he did die (in the attacks) more people would live’. Bill only quoted the comment on the HuffPo and also condemned it. So stop with your typical lies, wingers.
John Edwards can’t call Coulter a she-devil and then denounce her as having hate speech. Even though he is correct. He was being mild. She’s far worse than a she-devil. She’s lucky people only throw pies at her. I never condone violence towards anyone. Ever! Even if they are on par with reverend phelps. Which ann is on par or worse than phelps.

Posted by: andy phx | August 18, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

hey tuck,
give the guy a break! At least he’s using his ambulance chasing money to give mortgages to the poor folk (so he can forclose on them later).

Posted by: Bluestate Con | August 18, 2007, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Funny.
The libs willing to vote for the Edwards seem to be a very small group indeed….
I think his supporters are unabashed ambulance chasing lawyers.
Agree/Disagree?

Posted by: Kelja | August 18, 2007, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Dems crack me up. Free speech is offensive speech unless it’s Ann that says it then it’s shocking, hate speech blah blah blah.

Posted by: cdl | August 18, 2007, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

You’re tearing them up all by yourself , well done! (you’re probably like making lunch at the same time too). Not that baseless GOP talking-points are much of a challenge.

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

What a load of hooey… John Edwards is filler when there is nothing else to discuss. Absolutley no chance at the Whitehouse. Coverage of him and the time it took to write this (and you to read it) would have been better spent sleeping…

Posted by: james | August 18, 2007, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Ronnie,
Hey….I live in Florida and so far conservative people have been able to stave off the crazy democrats that want taxes everywhere you go….
I am so thankful we have another republican governor and totally miss Jeb Bush…. He was a great governor and Charlie is doing pretty good as well….
Anyway…I am hopefull we can keep them all out… If you go to the Miami area…..THEYRE NUTTY DEMS…
They even wanted to change the station they do the hurricane warnings on…just because they have the Rush Limbaugh show on it…
Now tell me how stupid that is!!!!!!!!!!!! These people are nuts!!!!!

Posted by: timtan | August 18, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Arizona does rock. I remember, when I was a kid, the wives of servicemen heading up the hill to the house with the big radio antenna on it in Paradise Valley. It was Barry Goldwater’s house and he’s let them talk to their husbands in Viet Nam. A true conservative Barry was, unlike the wimp fakers running the show today. I could respect him for that, even if I disagreed. I do like Chuck Hagel a lot, a man who has put principles and country above (his hijacked) party.

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Mix the comments on this thread with yard clippings and some water and you have enough manure to fertilize a good size garden for the entire season.

Posted by: looloo | August 18, 2007, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

The Bush administration lies everyday, ten times a day and the MSM never calls them on it, but since the MSM failed to call Maher on an inappropriate comment, the media is liberal biased. You guys crack me up.

Posted by: Michael7843853 G-O/F in 08 | August 18, 2007, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

No green iz AZ? That is laughable, the whole northern half of the state is Pine Forest. Go visit Payson, or Prescott, Mogollon Rim country, the White Mountains, San Franciso Peaks… I’ll admit the 122 degrees in 1991 was a little rough.

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

It is sad that the only way Edwards can get in the news is to trash Ann Coulter. At least Obama can come up with something original, like wanting to bomb our allies. But, do you guys at ABC want to know what is really very sad and very funny? The only reason anyone even comes to your web site is because Matt Drudge links to your amusing propaganda.

Posted by: Joseph | August 18, 2007, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

WHO IS THIS JOHN EDWARDS GUY??

Posted by: mario | August 18, 2007, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

The same mentality is what is turning elections more into popularity contests than a deliberation of issues, ideas, and approaches.
Campaigns now feel more compelled to bring you on their bandwagon than to lay out their plans for building a stronger America. Beware of those candidates who frequently change definitions, use the press, and hide their beliefs in order to sway public opinion instead of taking positions on issues for they stand for nothing without a public opinion poll and seek power at any cost.

Posted by: Wildman94 | August 18, 2007, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Edwards says ‘strong’ words about Ann Coulter…and both is supporters skip in circles and yell “Yay!”

Posted by: Phocus | August 18, 2007, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Ah, just a casual visitor… out gathering the facts to form your measured opinions.
But then two sentences later you tell the real story, the drudgereport guided you here, and like a good sheep you’re mouthing the worthless talking points.
The real disgrace is; this isnt even a topic worthy of debate.

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

There’s a huge difference between Maher and Coulter.
Maher trashes everyone, he’s ripped into the Clintons more than once. He states he is a comedian and IS sometimes funny.
Coulter claims to be a politcal commentator and makes her living off pitting one side of America against the other. She sticks to the GOP talking points without exception and makes mean, unfounded vitriolic statements just to gain attention. She’s like a leech living off the foment she can create amongst fellow Americans.

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

All liberals like Edwards do is talk about is what is wrong – without any solutions. Their plan entails taking more money out of the hard working general public coffers via taxes to be used by their constituency the Marxists of the world. Government does not increase productivity, efficiency, or prosperity for the general public, they just take and take from those that work.
The United States is the land of opportunity not entitlement, if you want it work for it.
All Anne Coulter does is bring their real ideals to the attention of the general public and they hate the exposure to the truth. And in Edwards case she is not afraid to expose him for what he is an ambulance chaser that struck it rich on a few cases where he was able to convince juries to pervert justice.

Posted by: Richard | August 18, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

With this sentence…
“I am a mid-40′s Conservative computer engineer. So I have more education and knowledge than most of the liberal population that likes to pass itself off as “intelligent” while calling conservatives “stupid.” ”
…You’ve proven yourself unworthy of real debate.

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

So now we know that you are a rich leftist as well. The lack of a sense of humor should have led us to that conclusion though..
P. S. Goldwater was NOT a Conservative.

Posted by: allan | August 18, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

How is Edwards attacking Coulter any LESS hateful than what he is railing against? Indeed, the liberal attacks on Bush have been nothing short of hate. Why no complaints about that Mr. Edwards? Oh, this is all about a political agenda and election sloganeering not to mention flat out propaganda spoon fed to the far left hate machine, I forgot that.

Posted by: Jim | August 18, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

yeah conservatives do great things for civil liberties like the patriot act and and wire tapping.

Posted by: ben | August 18, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

One of these people above me asked what qualifications Ann Coulter has aside from “being hate-filled,” or some nonsense like that. Hmm. Well, for starters, she attended and graduated a top law school. For another, she’s been writing weekly columns for years. And if you look at her books, and the amount of citations and source materials that she quotes, I don’t think you’ll argue that she is not an accomplished writer who THOROUGHLY researches when she goes to write her books.
She’s as bright as they come, and she’s studied the issues, and she’s not afraid to source her work. That seems like more in the way of qualifications than most journalists can claim.

Posted by: jdepps | August 18, 2007, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

I am thoroughly amused by all of the posts defending Ms. Coulter as “being taken out of context,” as if there is a proper context in which to joke about assasination of a politicain.

Posted by: Joel | August 18, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

This is why I will not buy a newspaper or watch the news on tv. leftist bleeding hearts. Get my news from WND.

Posted by: ted smith | August 18, 2007, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

It is really too bad that stupidity doesn’t hurt or John Edwards would be in mortal pain right now.

Posted by: James Perkins | August 18, 2007, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

I think that might have been the first honest thing Edwards has said. LOL.

Posted by: TJ | August 18, 2007, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

All this discussion brings us back to the undeniable same fact:
Ann Coulter is a She-devil.

Posted by: Cherubim | August 18, 2007, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Go Ann Coulter!!!!

Posted by: Ebates65 | August 18, 2007, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Edward’s got really beaten ,his fund symbol: FIG - “Fortress Investment Group Ll”-lost more than 53% of it’s value in the last 3 months .So feel sorry for him ,His $16. Mil is worth less than $8. Mil Today
I think so/ I hope so. Now he is with both Americas. the 100% and the 50%

Posted by: ariel | August 18, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Pathetic.MSM,DNC…what`s the differance? Thank God for Rush,Anne,Savage and all the truth tellers.

Posted by: bob | August 18, 2007, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

It’s interesting how some of you so-called conservatives complain about having Ann Coulter quoted out of context, and in the next sentence quote Bill Maher out of context. It’s typical of the “fair & balanced” crowd to take once side and not really look at the truth of what’s going on. Of course, these geniuses will come back and call me a liberal, but that just goes to show how little these people really want to know when it comes to facts.

Posted by: Richard | August 18, 2007, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Ann does what she does to provoke responses. You fall for it. It is funny.
And America does not have a health care crisis.
We have a health quality (not the care you can receive, but how you take care of yourself) and health cost crisis.

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Goverment provided healthcare doesn’t involve profit-taking, being single-provider it’s also less complicated. More efficient.
But the greedy me-me mentality is pretty popular today, so maybe we’ll just get to cover kids or something.

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

You think Government is efficient?
I’ll be right back. I’m going to go pray for your soul and my sanity.

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Edwards is a phony!

Posted by: George | August 18, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

I think it was Ann that said 9/11 widows were having a great time.

Posted by: jerry | August 18, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

The compariosons to Bill Maher are lame.
Bill Maher is a comedian. He makes funny comments about todays world, he specializes in politics. Listening to him we know, that a punchline is coming…we are not expecting him to tell truths (although some say he does)we expect us to entertain.
Ann Coulter is a political pundant, reporting on politics and has access to politicians and talks with them. Her words carry a weight that any comics does not.
Now if she came out as a comedian and charged a two drink minimum, then we would all know not to listen to her as anyone important.

Posted by: mark in nyc | August 18, 2007, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Edwards is all about class envy, dividing the country, overtaxation, political correctness and hatred for Bush and all conservatives and anyone who opposes his “ideas.” He’s desperate for money and Ann brings out the money from the left-wing wackos.

Posted by: Liz | August 18, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Some of the wingnuts ask for ideas, or issues-related posts… and when supplied switch back to their juvenile GOP spin.
Apparently arguing about an insult is more important than discussing the state and fate of our country.

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Ann Coulter for President!! She says it like it is!!!

Posted by: Chukkal | August 18, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Wow. The hatred for John Edwards shows just how scared the neocons are that he might get elected. All they can do is talk about hair. They’re running scared.

Posted by: Dan | August 18, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Don’t delude yourself. John Edwards won’t become President.

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

John Edwards is finished.
He wages war against poverty from the comforts of his palacious estate. He wants to fix health-care, the same system that made him millions on junk science and playing on people’s emotions. He thinks Ann Coulter is mean and name calls and then calls her a “She Devil”. John Edwards promotes free speech but has his wife try to stifle Ann’s comments. He wants to have a debate, just not on Fox News (the most watched cable news network). John Edwards is a walking contradiction. To think that he is one of the brightest that the Left can offer says something.
BTW – Anne Coulter isn’t running for office, she doesn’t claim to represent anybody. She is a commentator, one who specializes in political wit. Why doesn’t the Left take offense for what Sheehan, Baldwin, Belafonte, Penn, Striesand, etc say? Nope, the best the libs can do is attack Ann Coulter. How utterly pathetic.

Posted by: BJ | August 18, 2007, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

-If I remember correctly-, Maher considers himself a Libertarian… not a liberal or progressive. Which is why he trashes both sides.
Ann is on one side, and trashes the other. Wow?

Posted by: ISyairio | August 18, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Edwards……..what a jerk.
Liberals and leftists routinely use hateful labels for anyone who disagrees with them. But OOOooooo, let it come their way and its sooooo terible.

Posted by: Brett | August 18, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

The problem I have with the “right wing establishment” is that they bluff their way to the top. Take Iran for example. They just try to bluff them into submission. Guys, your bluffing doesn’t work. You begin to take on the appearance of cowards, you know.

Posted by: big bluff | August 18, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

If anyone, anyone at all can listen to Ann Coulter and hear anything but hate and mean spiritedness, I am amazaed. No one should say they wish the VP should be killed, but exactly HOW does that justify called John Edwards a faggot? What kind of person calls someone that anyway? It tells you all you need to know about this person. I will not watch her on TV, will not buy or read her books – anybody else care to help her NOT make $$$? I say God save us from people like her.

Posted by: kcareymac | August 18, 2007, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

I’ve found this story now linked to on not only Drudgereport, but 2 neocon blogs. The lunies are coming here in force. Well, as much force as they can muster, considering that 70% of America thinks that the Bush/Cheney/Rove slash-and-burn way of governing is a disaster.
Of course, 99% of that 70% have no interest in spending any of their Saturday arguing with angry brainwashed kids, but I am betting a lot of them will vote next year.
:)

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

kcareymac -
Agreed! There really is no excuse for her.
Her defenders ought to be embarassed. I know a lot of Republicans do disavow her caustic diatribe. She just wants to make money, which she’s found she can do by being outrageous and fomenting hatred.
She’s taken to wearing a crucifix on camera now, which I’m surprised it doesnt burn her. We see very Christian-like behavior from her

Posted by: Buckeye | August 18, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Goldwater was a conservative… -for that time-. The definition of a political stance changes over time.
As for ideas:
1) A massive shift in government policy towards financial incentives for space, energy, education, defense, etc. Similar to the X Prize.
2) Health Care should be shifted towards Information on Cost Effectiveness, Choices / Competition, and Prevention and away from Government Bundling. HSAs, information technology, a national health care market, and so forth would be a big part of this.
3) The Safety Net should be transformed into a Wealth Creation System… not a Government Enrichment Scheme. Health Savings Accounts, Personal Social Security Accounts, etc. This would reduce debt, the cost of taxes, improve retirement, increase growth, etc.
4) Education should move to school choice and charter schools, financial incentives for success, an intense focus on math / science / engineering / etc. It wouldn’t focus on improvements to a set standard like No Child, but instead would only provide information on the past performance of the school and the current performance of that school… as well as comparing that performance to the performance of other local schools, the state average, neighboring state averages, and the national average…
5) Um… a secure border and spread-out immigration (meaning we aren’t radically changing the make-up of the country in one generation!).
6) Limit the size of the governments budget relative to the size of the economy, % wise… dramatically changed tax system (FairTax or Flat Tax). Make it a constitutional responsibility to have a balanced budget (most of the time, anyways: wars, a crisis, etc, would be special circumstances… for a limited time).
7) Florida has something that lets their People speak directly to the government via the Internet, and lets them voice support for ideas constantly… we need this nationally. I can’t remember the website address…
OK, I’m tired of doing this post.

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Desperate, skysoldier? lol
It’s your ship that is sinking…
How’d that last election go for ya?
Wait til ’08, and maybe with decent majorities we can undo some of the massive damage GW has done to the US.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Hillary’s cleavage and Edward’s hair and Obama is black! That is the platform the Republicans are running on because all of their candidates stink! Get ready to lose the white house in ’08 cons.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Was this Edwards’ “Muskie Moment?”

Posted by: Dale Gribble | August 18, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

I’m amazed that people actually like Ann Coulter. Statements like she will be here long after Edwards is a footnote in history are laughable and horrific. She is a party-parroting extremist, who is incapable of dialoging in any logical or meaningful way. Her debating techniques are always predicated upon the lowest common denominator by employing juvenile tactics such as name-calling. Our country would be infinitely better off if people would stop blindly following political parties and start thinking for themselves.

Posted by: badben | August 18, 2007, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Are you people for real? I hope not. You are making all Republicans look so bad! And for all of our God’s sake… learn to spell.

Posted by: kcareymac | August 18, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

RQ, Conservatives aren’t for that. The appointed leaders of the movement decided to jump ship and shot the movement in the foot with the budget, etc.
Conservative grassroots aren’t for that (and are furious about it)… liberal grassroots are.

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

I think 43 has got a lock on “Worst President in History” and will likely hold that monicker in perpetuity.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

I’m glad they are using this as a fundraiser because it looks like John needs another haircut.

Posted by: Tony | August 18, 2007, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

When you look at the nasty things that politically partisan Americans are saying about each other right here on this site, it isn’t difficult to understand what is really wrong with the country. The problem is that the liberals and the conservatives are twins; Dumb and Dumber. The entire political playing field is a slim pit and both parties (Dem and Rep) need to be abolished. They are both a joke. And people like Coulter don’t add anything of value to our national discussions.

Posted by: Julian | August 18, 2007, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

My prediction is:
GW will be remembered 50 years from now not for 9/11, nor OBL, or even Iraq. Students will discuss his terms in office as the biggest Constitutional crisis in US histiry. Where a power-hungry president used a natioanl catastrophy to abridge the Constitution, to dominate the other branches of government, to politicize all aspects of our government, infringe upon our civil rights, break international law, to enact levels of government secrecy, and levels of government propaganda never before seen, etc etc etc

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

The only thing I dislike more than blogs are comments to blogs showing how ignorant the masses are.

Posted by: Gilemena Taylor | August 18, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

JOHN EDWARDS FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: levi | August 18, 2007, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

The GW and 50 years post reminds me of FDR.
How dare he dominate the political sphere, declare war, push for the development of a nuclear bomb, firebomb cities, take drastic measures during a tough time, use propaganda against the enemy, etc!

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Heck, I gave ronnie my ‘fixes’ an hour ago. He didn’t have much to say.
How many ways to clean up George’s messes do you require?
You should have written mine down…

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

I like the way Edwards uses his wife to call out Coulter! Maybe he’ll get his granny to call out Ahmadinejad if he’s elected president.

Posted by: David Stuart | August 18, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

To comment on this particular story outside of the context of Ms. Coulter’s unprovoked attack of Sen. Edwards as a “faggot” and a man who has used the death of his son as a politcal haymaker is error. I could not have stopped at “she-devil” and I would not have so quickly recoiled from “name calling” as did the candidate.

Posted by: LaocoonJr | August 18, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Ronnie,
Why don’t you persuade me that I am wrong? I am open minded and always interested in learning more. I just want to understand the world and help create conditions that can lead to positive change. I am not sure that I see a lot of effort in that direction coming from either the left or the right. They both fight for power and then have no idea how to use it for the common good.

Posted by: Julian | August 18, 2007, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

ronnielong -
So, a bunch of quotes, over a number of years showing many opinions that Saddam had WMD’s.
1. At the time GW chose to start this war, UN inspectors were back in, they were reporting nothing dire, their numbers were about to be tripled, and we were conducting around-the-clock overflights of his country.
2. (I love this one) I’m not seeing certain words in ANY of those quotes… Can you find me the word “invade” or “occupy” in one of them? No one was nutso enough to think conquering then moving into Iraq was a good idea except GW and his cronies.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

skysoldier,
another 60,000 votes go democratic and they have 60 seats in the Senate. Your argument cuts both ways.

Posted by: Julian | August 18, 2007, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Blah blah, spacecadet. Let’s just behave and wait til ’08, k? Take a pill.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I personally love that Saddam was knocked on his arse and removed from this planet.
The problem? The problem isn’t that we attacked Iraq. The problem is that we didn’t seriously plan for what would happen afterwards.

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Yeah good point above. How come Muslim leaders in America (or anywhere else) never come out and decry the violence? How come we’ve never heard them say Islam is a peaceful religion? Could it be that they are more honest about what they really are?????????

Posted by: Hebert Wang | August 18, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

The ABC report is another classic example of media bias and misinformation. Coulter took a lot of heat from her “faggot” reference. On GMA she noted that Bill Maher’s comment that he hoped Cheney would be assassinated by terrorist, escaped any media critisim…when she made the comment about Edwards and wishing he’d be shot by terrorists…she referred to the Mair comment… Had she originally said that instead of the gay reference it apparently would have been less abhorrent to the chattering class. It was a typical Coulter observation biting, satirical and truthful. This article and almost all references to Coulter’s speech in the media omit this context. The reason?…the liberal media want to promote the notion that all Conservative critics are reprehensible.

Posted by: Larry Bruch | August 18, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

I still wonder what happened to the Democratic Party. Lincoln would not be a Democrat today. Maybe he would have in the 1950s or 1960s when Democrats were the party of working men and women, organized labor, conservative family values, strong defense policies, etc. Now the Democratic Party is the Gay and Abortion Rights Party and anything else pales in comparison. It is a shame. I grew up a Democrat and can’t stand what comes out of the candidates mouths now. Who is still the most popular Democrat? A perjurer who commited offensive sex acts. Culture of Corruption? If you have the right views in the Democratic Party, you are forgiven any illegal act (Studds, Jefferson, Clinton, Berger, Reid, the list goes on and on). Are there Republican crooks? Sure there are. ALL the crooks should be thrown out, not just one party. I don’t care what the news hacks say. I don’t pay their salary. I want the elected politicians to stop calling names, fix things, and finally earn their paycheck like the rest of us are required to do.

Posted by: Halsted | August 18, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

ISyairo -
No the problem IS that we attacked Iraq. Previously we hadn’t attacked countries without provocation, or justification (don’t bring up week-enders like Grenada or Panama… apples vs oranges).
I wouldn’t have objected to a 20-cent bullet into Saddam (our former Buddy, and killer of more wacko Jihadis than we’ve begun to eliminate), or even a $200K cruise missile on his head. It was lunacy to think we could go occupy an Arab country without paying HUGE costs. We’ve given our treasure to knock an emasculated pipsqueak off his sandhill, for no valid reason.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

as usual, the Republicans make sense, make pithy comments and tease the Dems to no end. Nah, Nah
LMAO

Posted by: james | August 18, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

How many terrorist attacks have there been on US soil since 9/11? Something the man’s doing has to be working folks.
But let’s not confuse liberal minds with FACTS after all you guys are used to the drivel in the NY Slimes and Washington ComPost.

Posted by: Philly Boy | August 18, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

The only thing I dislike more than blogs are comments to blogs showing how ignorant the masses are.

Posted by: Gilemena Taylor | August 18, 2007, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

The only way We the People will be able to keep the government from destroying the country with debt is by pushing for a restriction on the federal budget as a share of the economy, a constitutional requirement for a balanced budget (most of the time), a tax system that empowers the people and not the government, etc.
Tax cuts, keeping taxes down, pork, etc… that really needs to be the old low-tax agenda. We the People need to become ambitious on this agenda.

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

yeah .. I am pretty sure that Lincoln was a Republican. Invest in fact checkers ;)

Posted by: Scott | August 18, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Larry: “one tiny one”? Wow. -An attack is an attack-. Considering we -were attacked all over the world-.

Posted by: ISYairio | August 18, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

John Edwards is a joke. The liberal media took Coulter’s comments completely out of context by deliberately leaving out the fact that she was asked about Bill Maher’s wishing Cheney dead (which was also conveniently not covered by the mainstream media). This is a joke and a desperate attempt by the dead Edwards campaign to try to raise money. It’s pathetic.

Posted by: Greg | August 18, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

I seem to remmeber the Jihadis blowing up 230+ Marines in Beirut on Ronnie’s watch (Reagan, that is). The ‘Great Communicator” had us pick up and run like hell. That’s the first major attack against us I can think of. well, Sirhan Sirhan was a palestinian come to think of it.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Ronnie,
You’d have to work pretty hard to convince me that the Republicans want the government out of our lives. Apparently you haven’t been paying much attention to the republicans lately. The Dems are just weak and ineffective politically. So they don’t scare me so bad. But the Republicans, they are all in your private life and stripping the constitution down to nothing.
As for a strong military, we spend more on the military than every other country on Earth COMBINED. Yet it doesn’t help against the Islamists. The Islamists can fight us for pennies for every million we spend. The real solution in Iraq, in my opinion, is to let the Shiite militias and Sunni militias finish off al qaeda in Iraq – it would take about 30 days if we got out of their way. After that, let the Iraqis practice self determinations. And let every other country practice self determination. We should get our troops out of every single foreign country. How has it helped us to have troops deployed outside of the US. It has caused nothing but trouble since WWII. We could use the money we save on the deployments to start a Manhattan alternative energy project and be completely finished interacting with the middle east. Let them solve their own problems. Meanwhile, we can work on our own. Al Qaeda is NOT a grave danger to us. And they would be less of a danger if we were not all over the middle east. They don’t mess with Sweden or Switzerland, do they? Because the Swedes and Swiss mind their own business and don’t get all tangled up in the affairs of other countries.

Posted by: Julian | August 18, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

To see right-wingers whine about context – this is Ann Coulter, after all – smacks of supreme hypocrisy.
Not that they can realize it…

Posted by: slpage | August 18, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m enjoying all this. There is a lot of cutting wit and sarcasm, but I’m hearing each person’s point as well. This beats TV.

Posted by: Hanky | August 18, 2007, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Quit whining people, most of my posts are gone too… they expire or get deleted, who cares.
Your ‘liberal media’ crap is so stale it’s almost invisible to me. You need to call it “corporate media” that’s what it is.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Skysoldier,
I am no fan of democrats either. Both parties are full of it! But when it comes to divisiveness and making enemies of you countrymen, the right-wing media is hard to beat. They are a hateful bunch and don’t really help make anything good happen. As for the election, I was just saying that depending on how you play the numbers game, an additional 60,000 votes in the right places and you have a veto-proof senate. Rove was fond of playing the numbers game to make it look like the Republicans didn’t lose badly in 2004. But it was smoke and mirrors and those who know how to evaluate Rove’s claims know that he is often full of poop.

Posted by: Julian | August 18, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Well Liberal Media, it is the govt’s job to protect you from yourself –isn’t that the way you liberals pass all these laws for “own good”?????

Posted by: jj | August 18, 2007, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Edwards was railing against the right-wing media — including Fox News and Rush Limbaugh…
That’s akin to stating “all the atom bombs the US dropped on Japan, including Hiroshima and Nagasaki.”
Skunk liberal media.

Posted by: GMN | August 18, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Liberal Media
Your broad-stroking of conservatives is the most narrow-minded expression I’ve seen here yet. Hypocrite.

Posted by: cbn | August 18, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Wow. I haven’t found such a group of reactionary neo-cons in one place in a long time. Guess what? Your boys blew it and now America is looking for competence and leadership, not the frat boy antics we’ve suffered.
By the way, John Edwards characterization is right on. And that’s my view, and many others, from the rural West of Wyoming. We’re stupid, but not that stupid out here.

Posted by: pcbobby | August 18, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Hey Edwards, my house is in foreclosure I hear you are in the market

Posted by: wayne | August 18, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

John’s reason for this outburst? I guess his campaign funds are running low
from buying carbon credits for those tangerine trucks bound for NC.

Posted by: FDNY | August 18, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

“The call left Coulter uncharacteristically flustered”
Uh, no, it didn’t, that’s a complete lie. Chris Matthews basically let Edwards go on and on, and then gave Coulter a couple of seconds to respond, and she said, ‘So, you want me to shut up and stop speaking, to silence my constitutional rights to free speech? No.’

Posted by: Truth | August 18, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Hey Liberal Media,
If conservatives are the equivelant of Islamofacists, then are liberals equal to A. Karl Marx B. V.I. Lenin C. Josef Stalin or D. All of the above?

Posted by: Me2 | August 18, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Like so much that appears on ABC this article is simply a lie. A desperate attempt at far left liberal spin. Ann Coulter was “uncharteristically flustered” by Elizabeth Edwards? Unfortunately for you this was on TV and clearly you are telling a brazen lie. I saw the show. It was an attempt as a hit job on Coulter and it failed. You’re engaging in fantasy projection. Do us a favor, tell the truth, just for a change of pace.

Posted by: Erick Blair | August 18, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Hagel? I have a lot of respect for that man. More than anyone related to GW.
He’s not a Republican why?
Because he thinks the war’s is a disaster? Because he’ll put country above (what’s left of his) party?
It’s an odd and corrupted definition you have of what a Republican is.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

As we are arguing about John Edwards and his traveling freak show, Ground Zero has just claimed the lives of two more NYC firefighters. I guess we need to remember what is really important.
And this is not a matter of right versus left; it’s right versus wrong.

Posted by: Me2 | August 18, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

OK, for all you die hard denier liberals, who refuse to accept that the MSM is liberal, how would you characterize the following media figures: Couric (cried when Bush was elected), Rather (on a vendetta from Nixon to Bush), Jennings, Brokaw, the list goes on. Name ONE that is identifiable as a Republican. Even on FOX, the majority of the reporters are democrats. So, the MSM is almost exclusively Democrats, but NOT biased, right? Sure!

Posted by: gary | August 18, 2007, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

I’m surprised John Edwards has grown up as much as he has. I didn’t think he could wipe his nose without John Kerry holding his hand.

Posted by: PaulG | August 18, 2007, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

JJ,
All of the media are responsible for protecting the people from the government. The media, as the fourth estate, has a constitutional responsibility to investigate all government activities and keep the electorate informed about all government activities.

Posted by: Julian | August 18, 2007, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

I have lost all respect for these “news organizations” and it will never return. They took a proud tradition of freedom and turned it into a lie machine. I would be *ashamed* to see my children with any kind of news job on their resume.

Posted by: Jami | August 18, 2007, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

GMN -
You’re a hoot… GW and his pack have conducted the most thorough, consistant and multi-proged attack on our Constitution in US hostory. THAT is what will be most remembered and discussed about his presidency.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

What a disgustingly dishonest bit of “reporting” by ABC News. No wonder people don’t trust the MSM anymore…

Posted by: RJ | August 18, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

retrometa -
“time of war”?
Jingoistic BS…
Cogress hasn’t declared war.
What nation we fighting?
When’s your ‘war’ end?
Is it the ‘war on crime’ or ‘war on drugs’? It lasts forever?
Pseudo-patriotic slogans like that are crap. Joseph Goebbels would have been proud of the idea (ROves?) to call it the “Patriot ACT” who can vote against that, eh? Even though it robs of us of freedoms.
The strutting chimp in office presently is the last thing I’d ever respect with the title of “War President”

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

“THOMPSON – COULTER 2008″

Posted by: Abbott | August 18, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

“Posted by: Paul | Aug 18, 2007 8:06:38 PM
You’re a hoot… GW and his pack have conducted the most thorough, consistant and multi-proged attack on our Constitution in US hostory. THAT is what will be most remembered and discussed about his presidency.”
Yes, I’m sure that’s the way you twisted lefties would like to remember it. But then, whenever challenged for evidence of these “attacks” on the Constitution, you can’t come up with a single, legitimate example.
But I’ll be waiting for you to provide one.

Posted by: GMN | August 18, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Damn proud of GWB. Damn right!

Posted by: FDNY | August 18, 2007, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

GMN -
Here ya go…
1. American citizens thrown into dark holes for years with no charges, no lawyers.
2. Unprecedented domination of the other two branches of govt by the executive branch.
3. Politicizing all areas and organizations within the gov’t.
4, Using signing statements to disregard laws passed by congress.
5. Breaking laws then pressuring congress to amend the laws to make their activities legal after the fact.
6. Enacting a level of secrecy never before seen.
7. Engaging in mass spying and data collection of US citizens.
The first one alone should have had us all in an uproar.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

NOT PRESIDENTIAL behavior!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Edwards needs to act more Presidential!

Posted by: jenny | August 18, 2007, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Doesn’t John Edwards know that with this comment we are going to have to now hear more stupid crap from that idiot Coulter. They both just need to shut up. The only difference between the two is at least John Edwards is ok looking (even though I don’t like him particularly). Ann Coulter is so ugly that she is a two bagger. You have to put a bag over her head and your head in case her bag falls off.

Posted by: JM | August 18, 2007, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Democrats = the most significant national security threat to the USA!

Posted by: RP | August 18, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

spacecadet -
Try to grasp this one: Iraq is not the ‘war on terror’.
You say “I don’t believe that all democrats are bad and conservatives good.”
Here’s another tough concept: A lot of Dems are conservatives.
And, the Dems you named aren’t responsible for 3500 American deaths and 10′s of thousands of Iraqis, GW gets that distinction. They also aren’t traitors for wanting to get out of GW’s 100-men/10-billion-dollar a month catastrophe.
Tokyo Rose? Geez, that’s a comparison devoid of logic.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

“Posted by: Larry Bruch | Aug 18, 2007 8:36:47 PM
Calling something the Patriot Act and the Clear Skies Initiative is straight out of Orwell. These folks have mastered the fine art of double-speak to the extent I’m assuming they rooted for Big Brother when they read 1984.”
Actually, a better example of the use of Orwellian language would be to call wasteful gov’t spending an “investment,” race-based hiring “affirmative action” and 60s retread marxists “progressive.”

Posted by: GMN | August 18, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Edwards is a less than laughable joke! The frightening thing is he and his wife are delusional enough to believe they can speak for the poor in America.

Posted by: Joe | August 18, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

“…the Dems you named aren’t responsible for 3500 American deaths and 10′s of thousands of Iraqis…”
Democrats prefer to kill unborn babies who have no choice in the matter and call it “pro-choice.”

Posted by: Melvin | August 18, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Scottked -
“Elitism is a frame of mind. As an elitist, there are those unwashed masses who are too stupid to help themselves (aka JE and the libs). ”
Geez, dude… visions of grandeur huh?
They have drugs for that.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

All you people are fools and sheep. All political parties are full of crap, and the fact that you all spew such hate toward each other based on nothing more than which party you prefer just amuses all the powermongers in Washington on both sides of the aisle. Wake up – you mean nothing more than either a dollar or a vote to these people. Sheep, all of you.

Posted by: Al Santangelo | August 18, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Ann Coulter is mentally ill. She is in constant need to “shock” the public with her ridiculous rantings. John Edwards came up with the perfect description of Coulter, “she-devil.”
Everything Edwards says is true, just, and correct. He has my vote. And he will win.

Posted by: impeachbush999 | August 18, 2007, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Somebody needs to tell John Edwards he is running for President and Ann Coulter, Rush, Hannity are not who he is running against. This guy is more concerned with Fox News than Al Qaeda.
If he thinks attacking the Media and Political Pundits is going to help him get elected, he is disqualified from public office.
I doubt this guy could ever win an election, except in some loony left wing district.
The Left in this country has called our President every name known to man. Numerous Senators and Representatives have called our Brave soldiers, Murderers, Terrorists and more.
Yet these people are concerned about a political pundit’s satire.
John Edward’s has lost the bubble. Does Hair Spray effect your thought process?

Posted by: Dennis L Klein | August 18, 2007, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Donald Segal -
You’re in an uproar that Hillary might trim Big Oil’s enormous ungodly profits? Profits subsidized by us? HGell, they pay half the taxes they did in the 60′s. You part of the Bush family or something?

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

PUHLEEZE.. will at least one liberal posting here explain to me how Edwards was paid $400K for 15 months to help study the relationship between capital and poverty concerning his company and NOT know that they were profiting off the backs of the poor including even Katrina victims? He also had $16 MILLION invested in them – but didn’t know about their predatory sub prime investments? If you do not think that it means he is a total lying fraud then you are admitting that he’s a total FOOL! I don’t see any wiggle room in between those two choices- you can pick one or the other. Which is it?

Posted by: Mike M. | August 18, 2007, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

This from a guy who made more money than most of us can imagine working for Fortress….a company dealing in sub-prime mortgages sticking it to the people in
New Orleans who couldn’t make their payments. But then again…one must be able to afford those expensive haircuts to run for president today. If he couldn’t make the bucks working for a sub-prime mortgage company, he would have to return to suing doctors again.

Posted by: mitch | August 18, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

I noticed some people complaining and intimating that the edit did not affect the meaning and even that the omitted portion was not said. From ABC:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2007/06/unfairness-to-c.html
“Coulter on Monday’s Good Morning America, asked about the time she used an anti-gay slur to impugn former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, said: “I did not call John Edwards the F-word. I said I couldn’t talk about him because you could go into rehab for using that word. But about the same time, you know, Bill Maher was not joking and saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack. So, I’ve learned my lesson. If I’m going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I’ll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot.”.”
Grammie

Posted by: Grammie | August 18, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

From what I have heard from both sides, I think that both had ought to learn a lesson. They should be fined by the FCC. Is verbal assault against the law? If so, they should get in trouble with that. This is outrageous that Coulter and the Edwards would be so childish to throw temper tantrums. The acts of both sides involved only make both unappealing.

Posted by: Alex H | August 18, 2007, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Why don’t you put her words in the proper context. Oh! that’s right, you are part of the dying dinosaur media.

Posted by: Bob Manverse | August 18, 2007, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Grammie -
Pretty weak logic, but a good link.
First you posted her commenting on what she had said, not what she had actually said. And you wan to play some sort of semantics by saying that Coulter saying “I cant talk about John Edwards because I’d have to check into rehab for using the word faggot” isn’t calling his a faggot?
Your logic sucks, but as I said, that link is good, it calls Coulter dishonest 2 or 3 times and gives example.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Coulter is a great writer and thinker. Edwards is an ambulance chasing loser. No question who the better person is.

Posted by: JD | August 18, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Our servicemen aren’t resposible for where, or what situation, the cowards commanding them have placed them. I have complete respect for the members of our armed forces. It’s just unfortunate GW sent so many to die in a voluntary and enormously costly lose-lose conflict.
Yeah, there are always a few bad apples, but that is the case in any field/profession.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Paul, I introduced the link in response to some posts I saw and the rest is, note the quotation marks, is a direct paragraph long quote from the source, ABC news.
What is the point you are trying to make?
Grammie

Posted by: Grammie | August 18, 2007, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Uh oh, must be getting close to 2008 if this loser is being so noisy all of a sudden.

Posted by: Larry | August 18, 2007, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Coulter for President

Posted by: bill | August 18, 2007, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

The right has reached its peak and is now waning. People like Coulter only add to the rididcule of the United States in the eyes of our foreign neighbors. Be prepared the right will be getting more desparate and will be using a lot of fear, religious and extremist tactics to revitalize their base as the count down to the 2008 presidency comes closer. I wonder what statistics are out there regarding just how many criminals were born out of this last presidency. You can count on double or triple were not caught. How quickly they forget Rush is a drug addict.

Posted by: jimmyjak | August 18, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Grammie -
Am pretty sure I made my point…
You posted a link to Coulter paraphrasing her own original comments. She attempted to make it sound much less vitriolic than it did if you had watched the actual video of the original comments. Her original comments can hardly be characterized as other than her calling him a faggot.
You also cherry-picked the one paragraph out of the article that could be construed as pro-Coulter, I was bringing attention to the vast majority of the article that was hardly complimentary to her.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

You’re out of your league, Jill.
(they’re about 3 levels below you)

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

CHRIS MATTHEWS ASKED ANN COULTER TO REFRAIN FROM COMMENTING UNTIL MRS. EDWARDS WAS FINISHED WITH HER PHONE IN COMMENTS–
SHE CONVENIENTLY FINISHED WITH NO TIME LEFT FOR MS COULTER TO RESPOND

Posted by: CRAIG | August 18, 2007, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Jill, it’s the liberals leading the retreat, calling this a lost cause, and eager to give up. Even while the positive reports are flowing in from Iraq.
You can’t win a war if you run away.
That’s how you lose, remember?

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 18, 2007, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

This is funny when somebody says this about Ann Coulter:
“Remember, she is laughing all the way to the bank when you read her hate filled books. By the way, what are her qualifications on anything except language and hate?”
1) They don’t read of her books, it makes them sick to know just how much they have been lied too.
2) They are ‘reality deniers’ when it comes to accepting Ann Coulter is well researched as qualified or more qualified than any of her detractor could ever be.
3) They are ‘truth deniers’ when it comes to realizing how bankrupt their own side is.
If it wasn’t for Ann Coulter fighting for the conservative history, these people would re-write everything we have ever stood for.
Do these ABC guys even read or comment on their stories? I wonder if they realize that Conservatives see thier point and raise them one?

Posted by: Fred | August 18, 2007, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

MikeP, with the way you talk, people might confuse you with another Democrat running for president.
Careful, there.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 18, 2007, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Scott K -
Well, some posts have expired, but in those remaining you’ve defended COulter, Rush, invoked God and trashed the Edwards and the Clintons. Along with a lot of good catch-phrases about scary liberals mixed in. Do I stand corrected that you do not support this administration?

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

None of this matters, Bush has all but destroyed his party. The Dems walk in next year

Posted by: Pete | August 18, 2007, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Pete, I sincerely hope the Dems do walk in ’08…. and don’t ever stop.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 18, 2007, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Some people are obviously upset the Dems will soon have the white house and congress.

Posted by: Pete | August 18, 2007, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Kerchner -
You link some clinton-haters article as proof of what?

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

John Edwards says “We know these people” and we, the people, know that he is one of the biggest phonies ever to seek the Presidency. Living in his America ( the 20,000 square foot mansion,the 400 dollar haircuts, working for a hedge fund that forecloses on the poor while raging against predatory lending practices, charging 50,000 to give a speech on poverty, accepting money from Rupert Murdoch subsidiaries while challenging others to refuse donations , hiding behind his wife when criticised by others, speaking out against Walmart while asking aides to buy his children toys from the same store) while asking his supporters in the poor America to finance his vanity-ridden campaign.

Posted by: Sean | August 18, 2007, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Ann flustered? HA!

Posted by: Bob | August 18, 2007, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I can see it now… another GOP bashing in ’08… and they’ll still want to talk about Clinton.

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

I do recall that Ann was quick to answer back to the comment made by Edward’s wife. And the only reason that she was on attacking Ann for husband was because he was to busy foreclosing on the homes of hurricane victums and making sure his hair looked good.
p.s. i have completely lost all trust in abc news, why do they always have to take things out of context and make the right look bad. i think it is cause they want to see hate in this country, not try to get rid of it.

Posted by: bradley jay | August 18, 2007, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

How bout we talk about something important, a current issue!
One of you wackjobs tell me all the good we’ve gotten out of GW’s adventure into Iraq, then I’ll go over all the costs? Sound fun?

Posted by: Paul | August 18, 2007, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

OK, so if any non-Democrat/Lib said anyone else was a She(or He)-Devil, what would be the consequences?
Let’s find out:
Hilary Clinton is a She-Devil!

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 18, 2007, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

LOVE ANN COULTER—-A GREAT AMERICAN

Posted by: fred | August 19, 2007, 12:06 am 12:06 am

This is hilarious, I especially love the statement “the right-wing media — including Fox News”. So I am looking forward to all other stories referring to the other news networks as the left-wing mainstream media.

Posted by: Grayson | August 19, 2007, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Ann Coulter should pay John Edwards for all the free publicity he is giving her just ahead of her new book release. She should, but I hope she does not. That phoney already has too much money thanks to his “Ambulance Chasing” days and now he wants to become respectible in the eyes of society by calling a tax paying American citizen “She-Devil”? NEWS FOR YOU JOHN: IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN!

Posted by: James A. Webster | August 19, 2007, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Ah, GMN has no faith in our justice system, hence no faith in our Constitution. Tear it up when needed huh? But only when GW says it’s a bad guy… he’s the decider after all.
Yes, my fourth grade teacher, Sister Mary Xavier taught us a lot about the Constitution, but your little snippets form it are a nice refresher, so feel free to quote more if you like. None of it is pertinent to GW having trashed it. I guess I wish GW knew it as well as we do.

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Who is this loser?

Posted by: John | August 19, 2007, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Oh, and Paul, as for this…
“Your #1 is Sandy Berger taking a COPY of a document out of the National Archives?”
First of all, he has admitted that he stole AND DESTROYED — cut them into little pieces–MULTIPLE COPIES of classified national security documents regarding after-action reports related to terrorism. That act ALONE is far more criminal and sinister than anything the Bush administration has ever done. And you try to dismiss it as a “mere copy” of a little old document. Funny thing, you lefties never bother to ask what Burglar was trying to cover up.
But if Condi Rice had done anything remotely similar to that, you’d be making yet another call for impeachment. But let’s be real — can anybody really imagine Condi Rice stuffing classified national security documents down her skirt, sneaking them away and destroying them?
Of course not. But when Burglar does it, it’s no big deal. HALLIBURTON! Yeah, that’s the real crime!
Goodnite, Paul — you lefties are giving me a headache with your wackiness.

Posted by: GMN | August 19, 2007, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Worse thing to happen to the Republican party since, well, GWB…

Posted by: TD | August 19, 2007, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Anyone hear about proposal in the House to radically change our tax system?
It’s called FairTax.
It looks like a win-win-win for everyone.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 12:56 am 12:56 am

FairTax? Is….. that another name for consumption tax?
Is this another Orwell naming thing like “Patriot Act” or “Clear Skies Initiative”?
Do tell…

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 1:02 am 1:02 am

ABC, NBC, CBS, the major newspapers, ad nauseum. They are all in the tank for the libs/dems. Why would anybody with an awareness factor slightly higher than a lady bug think that a conservative would get a fair shake from those liberal groupies?
Liberals CANNOT and WILL NOT discuss an issue on its merits because they do not have rational beliefs grounded in truth. They say what they FEEL, not what is real.
Ann Coulter’s grasp of life’s realities is greater than the Edwards, Maher, Mathews, Rather, Olbermann, the Clintons, Rosie O., etc. combined.
May she rattle their cages and those of all liberals for many years to come!!

Posted by: Don | August 19, 2007, 1:05 am 1:05 am

There appears to be a pattern working in D.C….
Patreaus is calling for troop withdrawl next year. Not in agreement with any Dem/Lib yelling that we’ve lost the war anyway. He says we won’t need them, because the efforts there are succeeding.
And Rove is leaving, not because Congress could find any fault in his work, but because he now wants to spend more time with his family.
The pattern seems to be, that what the Dems want is coming to fruition, but not because of them. It’s happening in spite of them.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Yeah Scott… old tactic that… declare victory and leave. You dont think GW is gonna admit is was a mistake?

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Twinkie, you are you own worst enemy.
You sound like you haven’t read any of Ann’s books, while discounting her altogether and calling her names.
If you read her books, you’d see she’s very smart, articulate, and she backs up nearly everything she states.
Maybe you should have grabbed he Cliff’s notes before posting.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Let’s jus see what Patraeus’ report says next month.
The only mistake that I can see was underestimating how quickly they could overthrow Hussein.
Our troops were caught off guard, with not enough time to prepare the people to form a new governement. I can’t imagine the logistics involved, just considering our huge lanuage disparity in an arabic-speaking region.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:14 am 1:14 am

I’m always surprised by those defending her as I think Coulter has hurt the Republican party immeasurable with her hate-mongering. Seriously, if the elephants are indeed trying to put on a better, more compassionite face perhaps having a classic movie villaness (Cruella DeVille anyone?) as a spokesperson is not the best idea. She promotes nothing but hate…

Posted by: TD | August 19, 2007, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Well, considering that Coulter appeals to an uneducated, prejudiced and generally stupid group of Americans, I guess using the word “faggot” is about what her audience wants. I was never liberal before, but after looking at the hateful bullies that conservatives and Republicans have become, I say the more liberal the media the better.

Posted by: Leticia | August 19, 2007, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Give me one solid case of Ann Coulter’s hate-mongering, and a definition of hate-mongering please.
You sound more like a Lib in elephant clothing to me.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:18 am 1:18 am

So we pull out a year from now amidst fanfare, GW the great victor and we’ll have achieved what?
Whatever the gain may be, we’ll have lost 4000-5000 lives by then, we’ll be out a trillion dollars much needed elsewhere, have ruined our reputation in the world, weakened our alliances, worn out our military, and doubled the number of muslims that want to kill us.
I rather that pipsqueak Saddam were back on his sandhill with UN inspectors and 24-hour overflights keeping him out of trouble, and a somewhat coherent Iraq holding the Iranians at bay.
I don’t understand how anyone could have thought invading and occupying Arab land was a good idea. I don’t understand how after rightfully taking down the Taliban, they thought removing Iran’s other sworn enemy was a good idea.
We’ve shed far too much treasure for little in return.

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 1:19 am 1:19 am

To Buckeye,
Less complicated,…MORE EFFICIENT!!!!
You mean perhaps like the medicare program,the POST OFFICE, public school system, the social sec. system,WELFARE,food stamp program???
You mean efficient,and less complicated like those?
Come on now ,you are tantalized by the illusion of getting your health care free. That’s why it sounds so appealing to you…let the folks who are out-earning you pay YOUR share.
Ah,yes, with a consumption tax Spielberg will no longer spend..even on food..that would mean I would be required to pay for the ditch-digger’s vacation perhaps his medical care,andhs wife’s and the kids. Sounds like a pretty good system..for the ditch-digger…perhaps we should all be ditch-diggers…By the way, do you perhaps have a job, you know,you perform a real service or sell a real item for which you get paid..or perhaps some government job, maybe??
You mentioned a
Ann C. using ‘unfounded and vitriolic statements’ you know like name-calling etc? you mean like’wing-nuts and lunies and ‘profit hungry insurance co, right it’s only name calling when used by the “vast right wing movement, sorry I almost forgot about the standard..I think you mentioned that GW will always, always be remerbered by being the worst..la,la this or thatI was wondering if perhap thelast Pres. might be remembered for one tg.IMPEACHMENT./?? I know, I know that damned conspiracy…they made him lie under oath,suborn perjury,obstruct justice etc..or perhaps simply THE CIGAR. Maybe the blue dress, refusing to take Osama into custody..”because we didn’t have anything on him…spoken like a real lawyer eh pink er Hawkeye.
Oh maybe after 4 short years..20% interest rates, 18% inflation, 10% misery index, 10% unemployment, gas lines etc.fabulous rounds of failed diplomacy while Americans rotted in Iranian jails, yes sir GW will certainly remembered as the worst..in your mind sir, only in your mind.
You mentioned that the real disgrace is that the topic are not worthy of debste,,well, well, Hillary would be proud..she can’t debate the issues either. What a slimy way to dodge the issues eh Pin..er Hawkey. The truth is you don’t know the issues. You don’t know the state or fate of this country either. Why, becsuse you haven’t taken the time to learn.
Yes, America is 42 on longevity. Infant mortality is 10 or 11.Why?
Because the folks living with those wonderful systems that you love come here for their medical care…the sickest ones. next who did the counting? Exactely the same countries that sponser those programs…they don’t have the freedom of infromation act to collect…get the picture yet? Yeah, you get the picture but you single minded collective mentality will not allow you to absorb it OR admit it.
OH,one more thing. Why do you suppose that ol’ corpulant Sandy Berger,doll that he is, was stuffing papers into his jock and sock?? Something to do with or similar to those countries that have one set or figures for their “healthcare system. I will bet and give odds that people on this blog would pay for your trip to Cuba the very nex time you need surgery.
No sir….I certainly not honor you with any inquries..not because of the biggest disgrace you alluded to before,
but because you simpy do not have the facts sir.
Sam
Before you obfiscate over the spelling the keyboard is old and dysfunctional he,he no pun intended HONESTT

Posted by: Sam Russo | August 19, 2007, 1:25 am 1:25 am

What have we gained??? Are you kidding?
If W pulls this one off, he will have outdone several Prezes before.
We will have a demcraitic Iraq (unthinkable in the Arab states), an politically powerful ally in the region, a buffer against Iran, a strong opponent to Al Qaida.
We’ve already seen the new Iraqi government convict and dispense sentence to Hussein and his accomplices.
Best of all, 9/11 hasn’t been repeated, because we’re investing our energies at the source.
For all the talk, and all the summit meetings at Camp David, we finally have real tangible results in the middle east.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Read everyone of Ann’s books in addition to all her columns. Then if you tell me she is very dumb, very viscious and fails to do her homework, I will say congratulations, you are indeed a full fledged liberal and deserve to have John Edwards, or Hillary or Obama as your next president. I think America deserves better.

Posted by: James A. Webster | August 19, 2007, 1:27 am 1:27 am

You’re pumped up Sam!
You gonna go down with the ship like a good zealot?

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Conservativs who criticize Bill Maher don’t know a thing about a joke.. It is not what you say. It is how you say it. Bill Maher is a comedian and Ann Coulter is not. When Bill Maher says something it is funny. When Ann Coulter says she means it in the worst possible way. She is an evil and religious fanatic person. If she has any guts, she should sign up and go to Iraq.

Posted by: kanan | August 19, 2007, 1:34 am 1:34 am

>>You sound more like a Lib in elephant clothing to me<>Give me one solid case of Ann Coulter’s hate-mongering, and a definition of hate-mongering please.<<
Here's five:
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."—New York Observer interview, 8/20/2002
"I think we ought to nuke North Korea right now just to give the rest of the world a warning. … They’re a major threat. I just think it would be fun to nuke them and have it be a warning to the rest of the world."
"[Canadians] better hope the United States doesn't roll over one night and crush them. They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent."
"God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, 'Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours.'"—Hannity & Colmes, 6/20/01
and… to a disabled Vietnam vet: "People like you caused us to lose that war."—MSNBC

Posted by: TD | August 19, 2007, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Scott -
If thats what you want, then expect us to shell out 10 billion a month for the next decade.
And Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, and the invasion has only increased the chance of a repeat.

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 1:35 am 1:35 am

P.S. Im an indie
and “hate mongering” in this case means promoting hateful ideals. did you really not understand that?

Posted by: TD | August 19, 2007, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Omitting the context of Coulter’s comments is egregiously irresponsible journalism. I’m sorry I even read this article.

Posted by: Brendan | August 19, 2007, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Hey Kanan, maybe you don’t appreciate Ann’s humor. I belly-laughed when I saw the event on YouTube. And so did the audience. Ann’s a riot.
You know the basis of good humor is that it’s at least partally true.
Her context was right on, referring to Edwards as a faggot. Again, she didn’t call him homosexual, she used it like you’d respond to a schoolyard wimp.
In Bill Mahr’s case, his jokes are based on very little truth, prior deception, and a punch line. He’s not funny if you already know there’s no truth in it.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:40 am 1:40 am

When I watch Ann Coulter crack jokes about Democrats and their hypocrisy, pandering, etc. — I can’t help but laugh. And I laugh when Bill Maher cracks jokes about Republicans, except that he plays way too much to his audience even when his jokes bomb. But if you say she’s not funny, you’re so in the tank for the Democrats that you can’t even appreciate a good jokes. Yeah, Ann’s ascerbic (look it up, since I know you have no idea what that means) wit sometimes cuts a little too close to the bone, but sometimes Maher does too (anybody heard a good Catholic priest joke lately?). So Maher’s funny but Coulter’s not — and I bet you think Franken’s frickin’ hilarious, right?

Posted by: Comedy-Lover | August 19, 2007, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Isn’t Edwards the guy who’s wife is sick, but SHE’s still running for president? Yeah, that’s them. I think… She, John edwards or whatever his name is wife called into the Chris Matthews show, & sandbagged Ann Coulter. Mathews set the whole thing up, but didn’t bother to tell his guest, Ann Coulter. Such a class act that Mathews. Anyway. Mathews arranged for what’s his name’s wife call into the show to ambush Ann Coulter. Matthews. Yeah that guy, you know. He’s that obscure pudgy moon faced fully Leftist guy, with some show on cable “News”. He pretends to be a “Journalist”. You know, the guy that wrote all Jimmy Carter’s speeches. Including that toe tapping inspirational zinger, the “Great malaise” speech. Yeah, Mathews, he worked four years for Jimmy Carter, & for some other Lefty politicians before that. Yeah, before Mathews helped to ruin Carter’s political career, he helped ruin all his other Lefty bosses careers as well. Mathews, he has that show… “Hard-pan” or whatever… He’s a peachy guy, if ya like snakes, rodents and other vermin… Now, can anyone tell me more about this “Edwards” fella? Wasn’t he the one term Mayor of Podunk, North Carolina a few years ago?

Posted by: Just-Tex | August 19, 2007, 1:44 am 1:44 am

ROFLMAO – I just read her comments on Al Gore. Much funnier than the Sharpton comments, because you fear she’s right about Sharpton.
The Al Gore comments are less painfull if totally true.
Thanks for the link,

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:46 am 1:46 am

I’d leave a comment about my disgust, but after reading these blog comments, I don’t guess there’s any need for me to say anything more about your bias other than “DITTO!!”

Posted by: Shannon | August 19, 2007, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Ah! Shannon’s a Ditto-head.
Nice to see someone here likes Rush!

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:50 am 1:50 am

AC the comedian… yeah, right, there’s a spin. So as we go up in degrees of meanness and outrageousness say from Hannity, to Bill-O, to Rush, to Coulter… at what point does it become comedy?
AC on 9/11 widows: “I’ve never seen people enjoying their husbands’ deaths so much.” Bust a gut on that one C-L?

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Ah, Rush… the Republican Party’s Courtney Love! Only I think the insane Ms. Love may actually be sober now…

Posted by: TD | August 19, 2007, 1:53 am 1:53 am

TD, there seems to be some information missing there.
Can you post your sources for the Ann Coulter quotes for all of us to read in context?

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Paul — ready for a surprise? I agree with you. That one was totally out of bounds. And guess what? O’Reilly called her out on that and said it was wrong of her to say. So was the Edwards trying to be funny when he called Coulter a she-devil? Or was he trying to be hateful? I’m assuming that because in the very next sentence he deplores hateful speech, he was trying to be funny. Did you laugh? If so, you can’t say Coulter’s not funny. You just can’t see it from the other side. Because I laughed when he called Coulter a she-devil — partly at the joke itself, and then partly at her because of the massive hypocrisy in name-calling and then deploring name-calling in the very next sentence.

Posted by: Comedy-Lover | August 19, 2007, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Scottster… you little scamp!
Of course I’m not going to post the context of every quote BUT you can do it! Just Google the quote and several copies of the source show up. I’ve tried it… it works! This Google is pretty cool.
Peace out buddy boy

Posted by: TD | August 19, 2007, 1:59 am 1:59 am

P.S. You should probably avoid ever reading anything by Jonathon Swift. I fear his satire will be lost on you entirely, since you don’t seem to appreciate any unless it comes from your side of the aisle.

Posted by: Comedy-Lover | August 19, 2007, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Ann Coulter was right about the 9/11 widows.. they were paraded by the media and enjoyed a sort of media stardom because they lost their husbands in the attack.
What ever happened to grieveing for your loss? Instead they pressured the state of NY and the Fed for more money.
I saw her say that. And she repeated it to clarify her point afterwards. It wasn’t a joke. She was completely serious. And she’s got a good point.
Again, take it in the context. Read what she says before and after the excerpted quote, and you’ll understand.
Whether you agree with her or not is your choice.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Mr. and Mrs. Edwards are so caught up in this left/right war of words with the very sharp (and quite funny) Coulter. If I were as smart (sarcasm here, you leftist dummies) as the Edwards’s, I’d let her say whatever she will and let it roll off without a fight. They cannot win. Ann’s IQ is more than both of theirs put together. God help Mrs. Edwards with her health. She is not as bad as Teresa H. Kerry, but nonetheless, I’m not too worried about her becoming the next first lady.

Posted by: gzeena | August 19, 2007, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Yes TD.. I read “Gulliver’s Travels” when I was like … um… 12. Maybe you’re there now.
Or maybe you’re referring to his less-famous work: “Arguments Against Abolishing Christianity”. I’m sure he gained lot of notoriety for that in the 1700s.
Sounds like another Bill Mahr fan.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Well TD, you can’t say I (or Ann) can’t, because I just did, and did a pretty good job of it..
That’s what it’s all about, buddy.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 2:13 am 2:13 am

Wow. Scottster, relax.
I’m going to bed. And I’m glad to hear about what you’ve been reading… I was getting worried it might be “Mein Kampf”…
Goodnight and have a pleasant tomorrow…

Posted by: TD | August 19, 2007, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Oops – my apologies TD.
“Comedy-Lover” has corrected me.

Posted by: Scott Kerchner | August 19, 2007, 2:19 am 2:19 am

I don’t think Edwards was attempting humor, he said what he felt, then probably realized even a low-level insult like that would stir the wingnuts, or the overly-politically-correct, so he rephrased after a “I shouldn’t be name-calling”. I don’t think his statement crossed the line. The mythical she-devil… whoa! Is that something you can’t say on TV? Hell, I think I’ve heard that said in cartoons. So, is it nice? No. Is it accurate? Matter of opinion. Now the word ‘Faggot’, I haven’t seen any shows where someone is called a faggot. “Oh, faggot doesn’t mean gay, it just means like a wimpy guy” lol, Did some wanna-be Rove cook that one up? Very weak.
Hell, I agree with him, she’s lower than pondscum. A reprobate that leeches her income off of pitting one-half of America against the other using the most caustic statements she can get away with. She’s a detriment to our democracy, to be tolerated, but not respected. To spin her as a “comedian”, now THAT is truly funny. She spews insults continually and consistantly at the “other half”, all mixed with political opinion, praise of Republicans, etc etc, She’s presented as a wise political pundit and author. So 90% of her insults are to be political commentary, but when she goes over the line it’s “ha ha, she was joking”? That doesn’t hold water with me. More Rovian spin, more fog.
Now Bill Maher, athiest whom I’m not too fond of, when on his show does present himself as a comedian. Anything he starts to say can be expected to end with a punchline, and he trashes EVERYONE. He’s used the Clintons as the butt of his jokes many times. So I do credit him with looking for humor where ever he can find it, even when it isn’t funny, I know his intent. That’s opposed to AC looking for ways to dig her Dem/Lib targets in the worst ways. It’s apples and oranges.
Their packaging, presentation and deliveries, and intent are not at all the same.
(Am sure you’ll pick up on attacking Maher, implying I’m some sort of ally of his, instead of trying to refute my statements about AC)

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Hey Greg and abc,
You asked why all the right-wing wackos have taken over this site……..well….we are EVERYWHERE! We read, listen and watch EVERYTHING that the left has to say. And what’s this comment from you asking the Republicans to stop calling you names………sniff sniff……right-wing wackos….them’s fightin words………so watch out, WE ARE WATCHING AND LISTENING TO YOU!!! Just so you know, we(Republicans) love to compare the news, ABC, NBC and CBS and then we do our homework and find out all how MOST of what really happened wasn’t reported because we ALL know that the dems own “those” stations that try to hide the truth. BTW just like you and me, Anne Coulter can say whatever she wants. Edwards is running for office, Anne Coulter isn’t. So get over it Democrats.
Can’t wait til December ’08 so we can get all this sniffling over with! Republicans Rule!!!!! And we don’t even have to call you names to WIN.

Posted by: Carm | August 19, 2007, 2:31 am 2:31 am

>>so watch out, WE ARE WATCHING AND LISTENING TO YOU!!!<<
Constitution be damned. "Carm" – you may not have wanted that to sound quite so Orwellian.
Just a thought…
Okay, goodnight. Really.

Posted by: TD | August 19, 2007, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Pretty Boy Johnny doesn’t even have enough respect for his supporters to show up on time for campaign rallies. And I thought Dan Quayle was a shallow, vapid suit.

Posted by: Dave | August 19, 2007, 2:44 am 2:44 am

yeah, she was so flustered she was the ONLY person in recent memory to call out Edwards’ ambulance chasing days. Elizabeth’s flustered response to that was to just keep asking Ann to stop name calling. flustered indeed….
Posted by: Matt | Aug 17, 2007 8:19:08 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ann is a pig. And as for Edward’s ambulance chasing days, you only show your ingnorance by making such a stupid comment. You can thank plaintiff’s attorneys every time your air bag goes off in your car, or every time your precious infant stays in a car seat instead of flying through the windshield, or when your doctor takes that extra test that saves your life.
If you don’t see that, you’re an insufferable idiot.

Posted by: Dave | August 19, 2007, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Just embrace it. Embrace the horror, future conservatives.

Posted by: Anonymous | August 19, 2007, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Just embrace it. Embrace the horror, future conservatives.

Posted by: ABC LOSERS | August 19, 2007, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Boy, shut all you up din’t I?
1 post in 10 minutes…
Sorry, always happens.
Bring up Iraq, and you’re speechless.
Talk about what’s left of the Constitution… goes right by you.
Sorry, didn;’ realize the Coulter post would leave ya stumped. Who am I gonna debate with now?

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 2:49 am 2:49 am

NOT true, Truth. There are Republicans and there are Democrats, both badly flawed. Then there are neocons who are more akin to fringe extremist zealots.
But they’ve built their own coffin and put a chink the the armor of the real Republican while at it.

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 3:04 am 3:04 am

I do agree the level of discourse has become shameful, And yes, we’re far more divided than united, which is sad.

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 3:06 am 3:06 am

Liberals…
You people are just pure evil. Quit distorting facts and report the truth!
How anyone can be fooled by your hate is simply amazing.
If you care for the future of the United States you should vote Republican!

Posted by: Robert P. | August 19, 2007, 3:44 am 3:44 am

We don’t hate Roberto… we’re just practicin’ our luuuuv.. we call it “Lovin’ Liberalism”. It’s the next big thing!

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 3:46 am 3:46 am

I see this as a last ditch effort to keep his losing butt in the media. He lost once before and will again, just pathetic!

Posted by: TED | August 19, 2007, 4:18 am 4:18 am

The author of this ABC news article obvoiusly intends to deceive the public by not mentioning the facts. Asside from all the evidence mentioned in previous reader-comments, the author also outright lied by saying “Mrs. Edwards” called in by chance. Actually, she had planned the call well in advance, and Ann Coulter was not informed of the planned event until just moments before she was placed in conversation with her on live TV. Fair? This author and ABC news prefer to have things unfair. I’m voting for the opposite of whomever ABC news decides to support: EDWARDS.

Posted by: G | August 19, 2007, 4:25 am 4:25 am

John “Who” ?

Posted by: Tony | August 19, 2007, 5:24 am 5:24 am

Did Edwards actually say “she-devil?”
If so, he sounds like a girly-man who reads cheesy Anne Rice girly-books.

Posted by: Marlon | August 19, 2007, 6:10 am 6:10 am

Jake…watch John Edwards on Youtube primping and examining his hair…then tell us about his masculinity. He is a fop and a charlatan and any support he enjoys is from dupes.

Posted by: bob | August 19, 2007, 6:39 am 6:39 am

People who support Ann Coulter or sick, rednecks or plain stupid…
This woman make money by ridiculing and offending people …what a lowlife indeed and lowlife scums supporting her ..

Posted by: George | August 19, 2007, 6:51 am 6:51 am

More Machiavellian propaganda of lies, hypocrisy, and deceit from the repressive intolerance of liberals (progressive socialists). They usually don’t understand humor being the butt of jokes that are over their heads — which is most of the time considering their heads are buried deep in the sand where the light of day eludes them.
Liberals MUST lie or else resort to relativistic thinking since the test of truth exposes them…

Posted by: SovereignCitizen | August 19, 2007, 6:55 am 6:55 am

The distorted thinking of those who still believe in “conservative” values has allowed non-political issues and values to become the only topics the far right wants to discuss. Yes people such as Coulter, Limbaugh, etc have found a way of becoming very rich playing to the frustrations of preople with empty lives, who need someome or something to blame for the hollow lives they lead. But in the end that part of American society, who no longer find any sort of contentment in being part of the American consumer-pig society, is going to have to one day realize thay they have been played for suckers by the corporations and the politiceans. The horrible result of the neo-con uprising is Bush and Chaney and Iraq and the inability or conservatives to see just how far off base they really are.
In America we sell injustice to the rich and force it to the poor.

Posted by: geneonlbk | August 19, 2007, 8:35 am 8:35 am

I a pathetic person wanting to “blog” to a 1000-long list of people saying “YAY!” or “NAY!” to a second tier Presendial Candidate’s attempts to fire up support in a rally of people that hate Ann Coulter and the Republicans.
I wonder if anyone will read it, or if my obscurity will be made more profound by its meaningless weight.
Cowards hiding behind a computer screen…but I’ll bet as liberals grow up, they will understand something other than anti-establishment and anarchy.
What is more silly: Conservatives voting for establishment people or Anti-establishment people (Liberals) voting for establishment people?
Come by for dinner to discuss..

Posted by: Scott | August 19, 2007, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Perhaps the biggest phony in American Politics. He invested 16 Million Dollars into a company that has foreclosed on Katrina Victims homes. He has bought no Katrina Victim a home. Typical Democrat.

Posted by: Dennis D | August 19, 2007, 8:46 am 8:46 am

I love Ann Coulter. She is honest and brave and says whats on her mind. God Bless Ann.
And I am a Manhattan Native born in Lenox Hill Hospital. No Redneck.

Posted by: Dennis | August 19, 2007, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Quite the hissy catfight. They should go on Celebrity Boxing and get it over with.
My money’s on Coulter!

Posted by: JohnnyT | August 19, 2007, 9:00 am 9:00 am

I love how Klein doesn’t use quotes when describing Edwards’ position that Fox News is included in the category of “right-wing media.” I guess we are to assume that Klein agrees with Edwards, otherwise he would have qualified it.
ABC, I read this story hoping for some objective journalism out of you, but it’s these kinds of word games that keep reminding most of America how left-leaning you really are.
Fox News is not right-wing media. They are simply to the right of YOU, which in my book puts them just a little left of center.

Posted by: JR | August 19, 2007, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Nice try Klein as you once again misquoted Ann Coulter. Btw, Ann Coulter was never “flustered” during her ambushed appearance with Chris Matthews when the He-Witch’s wife supposively called-in. In fact, she asked what all of us wondered during Elizabeth Edward’s telephone rant to raise the morale of the hundreds of current Edward’s supporters…why isn’t John there?

Posted by: Zac Baker | August 19, 2007, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Let’s see:
1. Ann Coulter’s comments were taken out of context. (Somehow they’re OK since Bill Maher said something similarly stupid)
2. Jon Edwards was an ambulance chaser.
Yep, this article must have ben linked from Free Republic or Drudge.

Posted by: Dingbat | August 19, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am

I would not call the conservatives posting on this forum a “sizeable segment of society”, rather they are about 10% of the population. The only problem with “MSM” is that people like Ann Coulter get air time when they obviously have no substance to add to the political discourse. And by the way, viewership is not down because 10% of the population (i.e. self-proclaimed right-wing conservatives) are not watching the news. It would take a lot more than that. No, it is because people are switching to YouTube and the internet for their news because it is more convenient. There is too much polarization in this country these days which is why we can not achieve any solutions to our real problems. While oil companies and others draw in billions of dollars worth of profit, while at the same time are getting tax cuts by Pres. Bush, the American public suffers. Our healthcare and life expectancy are lower than almost every other modern society. Why? Research funding has been cut extensively, which means patients are going to suffer. Lets worry about those issues instead of worrying about calling each other left-wing or right-wing. Let’s quit worrying about issues which no longer make sense to quabble over. The constitution calls for separation of church and state, so our laws should reflect that. And BTW, we can all agree Edwards is a hypocrit, which is why he will not win the Democratic nomination and definitely not my vote.

Posted by: MDPhD | August 19, 2007, 9:24 am 9:24 am

It continues to amaze me how liberals sound so much the the terrorists. There was Edwards comments about Ann Coulter last week, and now Ahmadinejad’s comments about Israel:
Edwards: “They attacked Elizabeth personally, because she stood up to that she-devil Ann Coulter.”
Ahmadinejad: “The Zionist regime is the standard bearer of invasion, occupation and Satan,”
See the similarity?

Posted by: righty | August 19, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Edwards is pitiful. He’s has so few ideas to bring to the table that he has to let his wife, stricken with cancer, carry his water and do his dirty work. Typical for a trial lawyer who builds his wealth from hedge funds who foreclose on people’s who can’t pay their mortgages due to Katrina.

Posted by: todd | August 19, 2007, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Our country is deadlocked in unbelievable evil from both parties. The Republicans want to spy on you and undermine you covertly if you get in their way and the Democrats want to muzzle free speech and then pronounce their lies as truth… as public policy…, they want to stereotype Republicans… with both parties, it is second rate evil, highly compromised people wanting to pretend to authority over Americans who for the most part are morally superior and often intellectually superior.
Lying, killers like the Clintons should have no place in public life and people should realize that modern Republicans are now so corrupt and blind… such prostitutes to various forms of evil and power that they can no longer be trusted with anything… not even a BB gun. It is a sad, sad day for America.

Posted by: rsw | August 19, 2007, 9:54 am 9:54 am

John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Dodd, Binden and the rest of the people running for the Presidency are such light weights that i find it very depressing this is the best our country has to offer. And dont get me started on the Republicans. What the hell happened to us, i cant just blame Bush on this one, i have to blame the people we have become a society of sleep walkers,who care more about Paris Hilotn, Hollywwod and any thing celebrity, I digress though. Back to this phoney feud does it really matter, Coulter is an attack dog who just wants her name out there to sell books, the Edwards are the lowest common denomantor when it comes to politics. He could be the worse of the worst, with his house the size of Rhode Island his eletist views, his wife the consumet victim. Well i know come Nov 08 its non of the above for me. God help us if we cant unite as one.

Posted by: Ken NJ | August 19, 2007, 9:58 am 9:58 am

MDPhd: Maybe one contributing factor to our life span being lower than other developed countries is due to the fact that a large percentage of us are obese tubs of lard. You don’t see many supersized folks walking around Europe. Maybe a few less Big Mac, Whoppers and supersized french fries will do the trick?

Posted by: Dave Collins | August 19, 2007, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Edwards is going at it again. Emotional nonsensical hysteria he throws at anyone, not unlike his court-days,.
This is the lowest of the lowest as far as life is concerned, just parasiting upon society, driving prices up, breaking down society and having no visions in his mind.
If anyone is “she-devil”, it looks more like people like Edwards himself. What a pathetic fraud.

Posted by: Contributingtosociety | August 19, 2007, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Any time a democrat accuses anyone of of doing anything wrong, you can bet the ranch that they’re engaged in that bad conduct. In 2000, it was their strategy to steal the election in Florida, with their army of lawyerss and challenges to military votes. They were the ones that instructed Governor “Blank Brain” Blanco and Mayor “No Noggin” Nagin to not to act to magnify the negative consequences of Katrina and then blame Bush. This is a party of evil doers. John Edwards is so slimy that even his former running mate John Kerry was grossed out by his discussion of his dead son (G-d rest his soul).

Posted by: Che Chihuahua | August 19, 2007, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Edwards is such a cry-baby that he has to have his sick wife to go out and be an attack dog for him. I think he is the most feminist candidate in the Demo-Commie Party!

Posted by: Anti Demo-Commie | August 19, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am

I conclude that “reporters” like Rick Klein and “politician’s wives” like Elizabeth Edwards do not understand the underlying themes and reasons why Coulter uses hot topic words and phrases like “faggot” and “killed in a terrorist assassination plot” in her commentary. (Hint: the next time you feel outraged or dumbfounded by Coulter’s choice of words, try Googling them to learn about the Liberals who used them first.)
Either that, or Klein and Edwards are deliberate in misrepresenting Coulter’s comments.
Either way, the result is not an intellectually honest critique of Ann Coulter’s comments, but rather, a blemish on the character and integrity of anyone who uses such misrepresentative tactics.

Posted by: BrianNYC | August 19, 2007, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Dear John, Perhaps you should listen to your own words. Hateful? Oh yes. You will say hateful words and more but with a pitiful example of an apology you think it makes it alright? pitiful little man.

Posted by: jim | August 19, 2007, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Poor little Jommy Edwards…the man in the Pink Flannel Suit in the last hours of his little ‘campaign’.
The ‘man of the poor’, ‘defender of the downtrodden’, ‘mr. $400 haircut’……go home and pout in your Spa.

Posted by: Achafalaya Tim | August 19, 2007, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Coulter is a horrible excuse for a human being. Those of you that support the hateful language used by Coulter and her right-wing zombies are what is fundamentally wrong with this country.
P.S. Only 520 more days of Bush!

Posted by: LogicalThought | August 19, 2007, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Edwards….. He and his wife are a joke! Nuff said

Posted by: Bob | August 19, 2007, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Ann Coulter is a big idiot.

Posted by: Bo Waltman | August 19, 2007, 11:04 am 11:04 am

What a class act! The only way he and his wife can get any attention is to attack Ann Coulter. Not exactly taking the high road!

Posted by: Marc | August 19, 2007, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Hang tight everyone… GWB”s reign of terror is almost up!
519 days left!

Posted by: Bo Waltman | August 19, 2007, 11:07 am 11:07 am

use your brain marc… mrs. edwards politely asked coulter to stop saying ridiculous, hateful things about her husband. that doesn’t exactly qualify as an attack.

Posted by: LogicalThought | August 19, 2007, 11:08 am 11:08 am

All you liberals that state Ann is a horrible person need to clean out your own closet. I’ll denounce some things Ann says as soon as I see liberals bash the likes of Michael Moore, Bill Maher, and pretty much half the Hollywood crowd who feel the need to use their status to spread hate. If it’s hate you want to spread, don’t be so dumbfounded when it gets thrown back in your face. You hate Bush so your answer is to try and elect such a polarizing figure as Hillary? Yeh, there’s really no concern for bringing the country together there, is there?

Posted by: Bob | August 19, 2007, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Re DKM claim: “she was mocking Bill Maher who said he wished VP Cheney had died in a terrorist assassination plot.”
Speaking of context: Bill Maher never said anything of the sort! He opined that fewer people would be dead now if Cheney had been assassinated. That is not wishing he had been, and even Bill would admit that no one really knows whether fewer people or more people would be dead: different people, in any event.

Posted by: tomsailor | August 19, 2007, 11:14 am 11:14 am

i think you are exactly right bob… i do denounce the hateful language coming from all sides. shock value and humor is sophomoric and a waste of energy. i’m just commenting on how ludicrous it is that people will post that edwards and his wife have been attacking ann coulter.
and what makes you think i am voting for hilary?

Posted by: LogicalThought | August 19, 2007, 11:15 am 11:15 am

let’s raise the tax rate back up to 94%.
that’s what is was when that repubican like john f. kennedy lowered it to 70%.
i think at 94% we can pay for all the social programs everybody seems to want.

Posted by: bigdawg169 | August 19, 2007, 11:16 am 11:16 am

The fact that mainstream media gives Coulter a venue to spew her right wing propaganda is proof that the notion of a “liberal bias” in the U.S. media is pure fiction.

Posted by: Glenn | August 19, 2007, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Just finished watching the Democratic debate on ABC and it strikes me with every question that’s asked: they don’t answer the question! And Hillary is the worst. They ask her how you protect American interests in trade agreements without causing our trading partners to retaliate against us, and she says “We need to find ways…” Every answer she has is “We need to find ways to do that.” She has no solutions whatsoever. I don’t always agree with Obama, but at least you know what he plans to do.

Posted by: Confused | August 19, 2007, 11:29 am 11:29 am

At the end of the day Anne Coulter is a vile human being. I read her book, and this woman is an angry bitter writer. Unfortunately Americans keep buying her books and so she will keep appearing on talk shows and she will continue to get ratings because people want to see what venom she is going to spit out next and at who. For goodness sake she called Bill Clinton a homo! I mean surely this is one guy that everyone is in agreement loves da ladies!!!

Posted by: Baron | August 19, 2007, 11:32 am 11:32 am

A poster noted of Coulter: “Ann is brilliant, ascerbic and sarcastic. She is so clever that most who hear her sound bites really have no idea what she is talking about.”
And this is supposed to be a good thing? Endorsing someone whom you consider too hip for the room?

Posted by: bill | August 19, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

It’s worked wonders for Dennis Miller’s career.

Posted by: Comedy-Lover | August 19, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

ABC has the nerve to declare that Fox news is conservative news outlet without declaring itself as a liberal news outlet. That’s fair and balanced, ABC.

Posted by: FlDoctor | August 19, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Would the 70% misinformed lefties be trying to differentiate fact from narrative if Coulter had opined that “fewer people would be dead now if something had “happened” to Hillary in Afghanistan” … Hillary voted/votes for the war, nes pas? Cheney didn’t…

Posted by: media libs: 70% | August 19, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

What are the REAL issues facing America?
Whay are we spending so much time on non-issues like this?
Is this really the bet way to choose a President?

Posted by: Will S. | August 19, 2007, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

The first thing I thought of when I read the article was what just about everyone else has commented upon:
The convenient omission of the fact that Coulter was merely referring to(in her usual sarcastic way), Bill Maher’s reference to Cheney being a hopeful (to him)assassination victim is very telling.
Of course,this is exactly what we can expect from the rest of the liberal media too. You won’t hear a peep about what is obvious for us conservatives to point out.
Pure liberal leadership: leave their constituents ignorant and in darkness, so they can appear superior and superhuman.

Posted by: Peter Cephas | August 19, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

You’re a poster child for Liberal.

Posted by: Kelja | August 19, 2007, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Yeah Baby! We’re the New World Order Son… here’s comes “Lovin’ Liberalism” kiddies.

Posted by: Paul | August 19, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I AM SO SICK OF THE EDWARDS BLAMING EVERYTHING ON THE RIGHT WINGERS!!! EDWARDS CAMP ONLY CAN USE SELF PITY AND SYMPATHY TO TRY TO GET VOTES…PLEASE ALREADY, WOULD HE JUMP OF THE TRAIN AND GO BACK TO WHAT HE DOES BEST, SUING PEOPLE!!!!

Posted by: Branda | August 19, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I love Ann

Posted by: upnorth | August 19, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Edwards would be done.
Much like the other socialist presidential yip yappers.
Time to put this non-story in the grave of useless discussion.
BTW, too bad if Ann tells it the way it really is.

Posted by: WWJBD | August 19, 2007, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Poor little Johnny Edwards sends his wife out to fight his battles because he can’t do it himself.
Johhny boy, just go home to your 28,000 square foot mansion and get a $400 haircut and tell yourself all about the two Americas.
Once a ambulance chaser always a ambulance chaser.

Posted by: Darrel | August 19, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

I can’t believe how many people actually defend Ann Coulter. Are you kidding me?? And stop with the Bill Maher comparisons, don’t forget that she also said that Edwards is a faggot. She is nothing more than a piece of trash. And for all the idiots that are saying newspaper readership is decling because of a liberal media, I’ve got news for you, it’s something called the internet.
GOD, THIS COUNTRY IS A BUNCH OF MORONS!

Posted by: JR | August 19, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I’m not going to divulge my true political stance because I think it would make me appear slanted to the other side. So, in order to preserve the purity of my words, I will keep that my little secret.
Frankly, I am extremely disturbed by the childishness and ignorance displayed on this message board. I am absolutely horrified. I stopped at whoever was calling the other side “neandrethals.”
This partisan hate HAS the stop! On BOTH sides! It’s no longer intelligent debate, but has become reminiscent of racism, sexism, etc. People have started hating one another and acting like school yard bullies because of someone’s political view?!
What does slinging mud really accomplish? Does it help our troops? Does it help the needy? Does it help ANYONE! NO! All it does is waste time that could be better spent actually ACCOMPLISHING something worth while. Instead, people choose to simply sit back and defame the other side.
I’m all for political satire. So long as its witty and intelligent. Not just simply slinging mud. For anyone who enjoys the same I suggest you check out a group called Capitol Steps. They are awesome. No matter what side of the fence you lie on, they will have you laughing.
However, the behavior exhibited on this board is absolutely appalling. This is the very reason I decided that I couldn’t handle being a politician. I don’t think my health could handle dealing with this childishness each and every day. So, I’m now choosing to stay in the background as a grassroots politician. I find that things actually get DONE on that level without the unnecessary, ignorant hate talk.
My advice to people on here – GROW UP! You are acting like children! To hate someone you don’t know simply on their politics is ridiculous. If this is the behavior you are teaching your children, I pity the world.
Stop spreading hate. Try debating intelligently and putting yourself in your opponents shoes.

Posted by: Amanda | August 19, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Edwards is a she Devil, he lets his wife do all the talking and fighting, he is an abulance chasing cross gender wimp with 1200 dollar hair! Ann Coulter in a debate would mop the floor with this light weight wimp non contender, it would be like Forman against Gary Coelman, hell his wife wears the pants in that Family! That shows he is the biggest wimp of the demoncrat candidates!
Personaly I would vote for Ann Coulter, she is 1000% a better fighter than any of these whimpy whinny sleasey light weight non leader Demoncrat candidates, and she never backs down on what she thinks! NO focus groups no polls on the audiences that she speaks to! A good debate would be Coulter against Hillary, what ratings, there would be Hillary’s blood he on the floor it would be so embarrasing to Hillary, another weak lame candidate!!
John and the wimpy demoncrat tour of 07, lame lame!!!

Posted by: James | August 19, 2007, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Ann Coulter is not a NUT !!! She is making Millions off of you right wing nuts. If I were her I would keep it up also..

Posted by: kenorb | August 19, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Yo JR. Ya just gotta get a life.
Bill Maher is a card carrying moron.
The longer his hair gets, the more stupid he becomes.
And just to fill you in, newspaper readership is declining. After all, look at all the jobs lost at your favorite “Liberal” run papers, not to mention the decline of viewership of your favorite “liberal” television news.
But, that’s another story at another time.
Next time, try getting the real facts before you post.

Posted by: WWJBD | August 19, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

some one needs to stop these ant – american,white flag waving,terorist loving,surrender to our enemies democrats. god help this country if he have a democrat in the white house in 08, its bad enough we have pelosi running the house and promising to help the terrorists and sen.reid call this war ” lost”. when are people that truly love this country gonna stand up to these democrats and say is enough including john edwards. mr edwards news flash ther is not 2 america`s as you pathetically claim. why is it everytime you democrats love to pit people against each other, such as white vs black , rich vs poor, young vs old.

Posted by: ROB | August 19, 2007, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Brown Shirt Annie is a great recruitment tool for progressives as she accurately exposes the dark heart of present day conservativism. We need to see more and more of sociopaths like Annie and Michael Savage all over the media in the next year to help remind the people why we need a strongly democratic congress and president to help repair the damage done to this nation in the past 8 years. If I were a candidate for office running as a Dem, I’d feature these vile hate-mongers on every single ad I put out

Posted by: El Perro | August 19, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Ann Coulter is nasty , she doesn’t need to be so nasty in order to air her opinions,but she chooses to – for attention probably. Let’s not pay her that attention she so craves.

Posted by: Kelli | August 19, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

After reading all these comments, I have come to one conclusion…there are an awfully large amount of moronic, stupid, lamebrain idiots in society and they should all be dimissed off hand…and they are all left leaning democrat supporters.
Please stop calling us non-democrats names because we call you names.

Posted by: vince | August 19, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Saw Edwards on ABC this AM – Dem debate. He said, in the span of less than 5 minutes (check the tape);
1. RE Iran, the US needs to take military action off the table. Diplomacy is the way to deal with this threat. Talk should be the path forward.
2. RE Lobbyists, the gov’t needs to take action against the lobbyist establishment – talk won’t work, since the lobbyists don’t want to give up their power in Washington.
So, as far as Edwards is concerned, diplomacy will work with an Islamic-extremist led foreign terrorist country, bent on our destruction, but concrete actions must be be taken to end the “terror” perpetrated by Washington lobbyists?!?!?!?
This just shows how the left – EVERY ONE OF THEM – just doesn’t get it!

Posted by: denmac | August 19, 2007, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Ann Coulter is nasty , she doesn’t need to be so nasty in order to air her opinions,but she chooses to – for attention probably. Let’s not pay her that attention she so craves.
Posted by: Kelli | Aug 19, 2007 2:21:12 PM
Yes her poll numbers were lagging so much she had to call John Edwards a He devil…to get them back up…

Posted by: ronnielong | August 19, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

STOP MOCKING EDWARDS!!!!!!
He’s so……DREAMY!!!!

Posted by: Anon | August 19, 2007, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

thank god for rush limbaugh, sean hannity,mark levine,laura ingraham,monica crowley. for exposing these pathetic liberals for who they really are.

Posted by: proud soldier in iraq | August 19, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Coulter’s best shot at Edwards was giving him the nickname, “The Fetus Whisperer”. Hilarious

Posted by: George | August 19, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Denmac
You can’t get through to these people…Bush Derangement Syndrome. They will never get over Bush and Karl Rove kicking their a$$ in 2000 and 2004. So any democrat is better than any republican.
And now it looks like Karl resigned to Kick their a$$ again in 2008

Posted by: ronnielong | August 19, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

ABC is part of the imaginary “Liberal Media” now? Hilarious. Is this the same ABC, owned by Disney, who released a 911 movie making BushCo look like heroes while pinning it all on Clinton? and the same Disney Co. that tried to keep Farhenheit 911 from being released? The same multinational corporation that benefits greatly from rightwing tax cuts aimed at the wealthy and huge companies only? Those guys are radical left-wingers? LOL!!

Posted by: El Perro | August 19, 2007, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

The most telling thing about Edwards?
His wife is dying of cancer, and all he is concerned with is…
1.) A presidential power-grab.
2.) Using his ailing wife as a weapon in said grab. Because god help someone who counter attackes his ‘poor sick wife’.
3.) Making sure we know that he is doing all this “for the poor”.
He reminds me of Russ Cargill in the Simpsons movie…
“I want to give something back….NOT THE MONEY…but something!”
If this man had any soul or compassion he would just take care of his wife and wait for the next election cycle to run. He could throw his support behind another candidate and set himself up as a party statesman. Would let him take care of his family AND stay viable for the next election….
But he won’t. Because power NOW means more to him than anything. And he is willing so sell out everything, including the life of his wife, to get it. (Hey…if Bill Clinton taught him ANYTHING it’s that chicks dig the President!)

Posted by: RWH | August 19, 2007, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

ABC is part of the imaginary “Liberal Media” now? Hilarious. Is this the same ABC, owned by Disney, who released a 911 movie making BushCo look like heroes while pinning it all on Clinton? and the same Disney Co. that tried to keep Farhenheit 911 from being released? The same multinational corporation that benefits greatly from rightwing tax cuts aimed at the wealthy and huge companies only? Those guys are radical left-wingers? LOL!!
Posted by: El Perro | Aug 19, 2007 3:01:03 PM
Yes after they let Bill Clinton do his own editing…..

Posted by: ronnielong | August 19, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

John Edwards actually does talk and act like a young girl. And I mean literally. His wife acts like his misguided mommy.

Posted by: Liz | August 19, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Yeah Amanda kinda like what they want to do with Rush Huh……..cant compete as a matter afact a complete failure so let’s pass the hush Rush law..

Posted by: ronnielong | August 19, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

For the Righties, PLEASE answer me this. How do you condone and enjoy Coulter (with her hateful harangues) and still call yourself compassionate,tolerant and even believers in the teachings of CHRIST.GEEZE SO MUCH HATE Don;t you see yourselves?

Posted by: nick | August 19, 2007, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Hah!! Typical brain-dead, liberal reporting… the idea that Ann Coulter was “flustered”… every idiot liberal involved and watching that “set-up” call from Liz Edwards was “eagerly hoping” Ann would be flustered…when she didn’t cooperate, they just decided to do what they always do…. LIE!!! YEA, ANN!! way to make them look like the fools they are!!

Posted by: marilyn | August 19, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Nick,
I don’t condone all of what she says. However, I do approve when she is only being satrical.
Also, who says all “righties” are followers of Christ? I’m a conservative atheist!

Posted by: Amanda | August 19, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

“She-devil” is too kind a description for that psycho.

Posted by: Hank | August 19, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Amanda
Excuse me for lumping u in as a follower of Christ but how in the world did the Religious Right allow u in.

Posted by: nick | August 19, 2007, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Nick,
It’s understandable why you did and I take no offense to it. I’m definitely not what most people think of when they think “conservative,” but that’s mostly due to overly advertised stereotypes. However, no one has to allow me to have a certain philosophy.
Also, don’t confuse the words Republican and conservative. They are not the same thing despite popular opinion. Conservative is a philosophy, while Republican is a political platform that changes with the times.
I tend to call myself a conservative with a libertarian streak because I don’t agree with how modern conservatives are trying to legislate religious law – no gay marriage for example.
I had planned on running as a politician one day because I felt my ideas filled the void between “Republican” and “Democrat.” Unfortunately, my health probably could stand the hate mongers that have taken place of the intelligent debaters of yesteryear…

Posted by: Amanda | August 19, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Many physicians practicing in the US would consider Edwards and his cronies as the He Devils!

Posted by: Dennis L. | August 19, 2007, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Is Rich Klein a reporter? He wrote that Fox News was right-wing as a fact. Fox actually has too many left wingers, but it is less biased than CNN, BBC, PBS, ABC, CBS, and NBC. That’s why it is popular. Sounds like Klein has some kind of agenda.

Posted by: AmericanMark | August 19, 2007, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

John and Elizabeth Edwards cannot get along with their neighbors.
Wonder what names he calls them?

Posted by: ccd | August 19, 2007, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

The facts of the matter is that the liberals and conservatives are so biased the the truth will hardly ever out! As for Ms. Coulter: She has perfected vicious to a high lucrative art. Doncha just love a screachy attack cat?

Posted by: Louis | August 19, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Problem with Ann, she’s always right.

Posted by: sidney | August 19, 2007, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Perhaps he can go back to chasing ambulances and leave the stupid liberal brainwashed democratic zombies alone!!!
Hilary is a much better choice for the liberals because she will let you kill your own children and cheat on your spouses with no repercussions whatsoever. Look at the benefits. You can cheat on your spouse – get your mistress knocked up and she can have an abortion and kill the child – all with no adverse consequences to your happy marriage.
A true liberal heaven on earth. Or is it a progressive heaven?

Posted by: justbuildthefence | August 19, 2007, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Libs like to attack conservatives on a personal level because they don’t have any truth to support their statements. It is called relativism. Their truth may be different from your truth. You know, some things are driven on truth alone. If you don’t believe this try driving your car on water instead of gas.

Posted by: John | August 19, 2007, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I became a registered democrat while I was in a coma, turns out I voted also. Sure didnt remember it since I woke up 17 days after the election.
I would like for once, tell me the plan, not I have a plan. What is the plan, how will you pay for it and will you get it approved?

Posted by: brandy | August 19, 2007, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Maher’s comments about cheney were about guy responsible for thousands of people dead in Iraq. so there is a little difference here between mahers comments about cheney and coulter’s comments about edwards.

Posted by: calvin | August 19, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Will all of you leftists who keep referring to Ann’s “vile comments” please provide links or quotes (in context) to these supposed comments?
I’m willing to bet most of you have never even read a word she’s written.

Posted by: Dan | August 19, 2007, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

calvin, was he refering to “before or after”
Just a simple question

Posted by: brandy | August 19, 2007, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Brandy, I have a plan. A “Fairness Doctrine” for broadcast television news. ABC News would fold in 3 days.

Posted by: Joseph | August 19, 2007, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

It doesn’t matter whether his comments were referring before or after. the comments were regarding cheney after the invasion and subsequent debacle.

Posted by: calvin | August 19, 2007, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

So the many “thousands” who died before dont matter, expendable, non people. thanks for the clarification.

Posted by: brandy | August 19, 2007, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

the before is another debate. here is what maher said which I don’t see here:
Maher said, “I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power, people wouldn’t be dying needlessly tomorrow.”
Asked by Frank if Maher believed that sentiment, the host replied, “I’m just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That’s a fact.”
I think what he said is crude but true. but I think the context is whether you think the iraq war is justified.

Posted by: calvin | August 19, 2007, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

It’s so freaking hot out today that I only have enough energy to say that I enjoy Paul’s comments and would like to add my own: Please God let it be November 2008 so we can elect a new president (Go Hilary), and please make Ann Coulter go away.

Posted by: Like Living on the Sun | August 19, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Well, well, im really glad he’s not representing me in congress, or in the senate, or even as a city commissioner. What I dont understand is “what gives him the right” to express such an oppinion? Looks like he called for the death of a sitting vice president, shouldn’t that be called a threat under liberal rules?

Posted by: brandy | August 19, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

hey fred. they deleted one of mine from about an hour ago. I was referring to you funky dang conservatives but in fun way. go figure. How about it ABC? Are you censoring? what up dogs?

Posted by: calvin | August 19, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

re: brandy: Looks like he called for the death of a sitting vice president, shouldn’t that be called a threat under liberal rules?
he didn’t call for the death. he said “if he (cheney) did die, thousands would live”. there is a difference. If I say, politely, “our iraq policy sucks. they lied to us and started a war that did….” that I guess is more civil.

Posted by: calvin | August 19, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

To RWH,
Some would call you cynical. I don’t believe you are. Instead you have developed an insight into these folks behavior patterns which seems to be repetious with very similar motivations eg. a senator died and within a week his wife decides to run for his seat
shortly after.A senator dies in a tragic plane crash and his funeral
turns into as political rally..with his sons leading the cheering. Another senator succumbs in a plane crash and a senatorial collegue consoles her by marrying her she is said to very wealthy. Another senator running for president (maybe this one was a VP too, it’s hard to remember because his boss was always doing somethibg sensational,like staying out of jail and having intern pj parties)anyway he spent 30 min. eulogizing his departed sister..at the national convention. Perhaps you see where I may be going.
I have often pondered about the fortuitous timing of elizabeth’s metastasis,even more if she develops a timed remission. Yes, Yes, I know, how cynical can you become..perhaps not cynical enough with this group. But as you suggest we certainly would’nt dare speak of such things….no matter how strong the hunger for power appears..Can we?? SAM

Posted by: Sam Russo | August 19, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

regadless calvin, he’s on “national tv” i admit he sucks, but admit it, you loved his pandering to your cause. thousands died before, whats the difference?

Posted by: brandy | August 19, 2007, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

I work in a large warehouse shopping club. Everytime Ann Coultier’s books come in, they are sent back due to non sales. We may sell 5 or 10 at the most. And I live in a “blue state”. She is down to few programs actually wanting her on tv. I think its funny that she can run her mouth as much as she wants but hwen she is on tv and others start coming down on her, she runs to Hannity to “make them stop Sean”. She cant take what she dishes out.

Posted by: Linda | August 19, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

I would like to make it clear that GWB has created a new definition of “Republican”. Many of us conservatives cannot be defined as republicans anymore because of the last 7 years of this administration. We conservatives do not buy much of what is coming from the White House. On the other hand, the liberal extreme “progressive” Democrats are even scarier in some ways. I mean it’s like do I want to die by drinking hemlock or oding on arsenic. Both official parties suck out the wazoo. And the candidates know it that’s why they run to the “center”. These candidates are the most dishonest of the whole rotten lot.

Posted by: Nicholas | August 19, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

God bless you Ann Coulter. If Edwards want so believe you are a devil, funny that he is the one spewing hate speech. How presidential of him?! If he was actually elected all any two-bit dictator would have to do would be to call him names and watch for his reaction. What a wuss.

Posted by: cash N carey | August 19, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Ann Coulter is a brillant, humerous conseverative WHO IS LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK. SHE KNOWS HOW TO USE THE WORDS TO FIRE YOU FOOLS UP TO KEEP HER NAME UP FRONT SO SHE CAN MAKE MONEY, AND YOU FOOLS DO IT. DON’T TAKE MUCH TO FIRE YOU UP AS YOU ARE ALREADY ANGRY, JUST TRY TO DEBATE HER ON ANYTHING……….YOU WILL LOSE BECAUSE YOU AIN’T GOT A CLUE, YOU JUST WANT TO RUN YOUR MOUTH. You are not willing to do anything except to run that mouth, fun ain’t it.
Dwain

Posted by: Dwain | August 19, 2007, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Many of you have it correct, we have no choice among the Demos or Repubs. We are only seeing a wrestling script. We all know Hillary has already been selected by both parties and the in between is a way to entertain, make us think we are involved, and a source of CASH for both parties.
We also already know that 95% of the running incumbents will be reelected to continue the same old stuff.
It is time to push for adding “none of the above” to all ballots and vote 3rd party in between.
Don’t buy into the script.

Posted by: Keith | August 19, 2007, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

“We know these people. We know their game plan. They’re going to attack us personally,” Edwards said.
I’m sorry, did he just say “these people”
If a white guy said to some black guy, “You people” They would be offended and there would be new hate crimes legislation in the works.
How come he gets to say “these people” and nobody cares?
???

Posted by: Jedi | August 19, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Bush was elected president, he was not ANNOINTED, to take it upon himself to invade and impose ANY form of government.We would all be out in the streets fighting ANYONE who came over here and tried that on us.Rationalize all u want, but that;s the bottom line.
DO UNTO OTHERS.

Posted by: nick | August 19, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

John Edward’s campaign is dead in the water so he says to his wife, “Hey Elizabeth, how can I get my name and face on Drudge and draw in some much needed publicity and money?” Liz says, “Easy sweet lips, just pretend you’re Hugo Chavez and call Ann Coulter a she-devil. If that doesn’t work, offer yourself up on E-Bay.”

Posted by: James A. Webster | August 19, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Nicholas
you got that right. This administration is not CONSERVATIVE or have Republican values.I wish all conservative republican would just STOP and look at what they are doing and not just criticize everything as liberal bias.

Posted by: nick | August 19, 2007, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Sidney
I fought in the Korean War. Which one did you serve in.If you’re young enough how come you;re not in Iraq. Last I heard they people or are you another Chicken Hawk

Posted by: nick | August 19, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

nick, you fought in the korean war, wow, im impressed, i was in vietnam, and the first gulf war, should give you an indication of my age, yours is around 75 right now. yes, im retired. you can come out of the basement now.

Posted by: sidney | August 19, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Serious issues like Darfur need to be addressed, and instead we have candidates forced to defend themselves against personal attacks. It is a shame.

Posted by: Andrew Chulock | August 19, 2007, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Sidney
Ok YOU’re not a chicken hawk, and I respect you for your service, but you have to admit, that a great many pro war advocates (who are able),don;t want to enlist.So they talk the talk and thats it. Hey, I;ve been a conservative all my life, but George is making me see things another way.Can I come out now?

Posted by: nick | August 19, 2007, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Its not George, nick, its the reporting, i talk to people in iraq on a weekly if not daily basis, my son-in-law is there. The people on the ground see it different.
If not for the press it would have been finished during the first war.

Posted by: sidney | August 19, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Will, These are just a few of Ann’s credentials (thanks for asking)…
As an undergraduate at Cornell, Coulter helped found The Cornell Review,and was a member of the Delta Gamma national women’s fraternity.She graduated cum laude from Cornell in 1984, and received her law degree from the University of Michigan Law School, where she achieved membership in the Order of the Coif and was an editor of the Michigan Law Review. At Michigan, Coulter founded a local chapter of the Federalist Society and was trained at the National Journalism Center.
After law school, Coulter served as a law clerk for Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Kansas City. After a short time working in New York City in private practice, where she specialized in corporate law, Coulter left to work for the United States Senate Judiciary Committee after the Republican Party took control of Congress in 1994. She handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan, and helped craft legislation aimed to make it easier to deport aliens convicted of felonies. She later became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights.

Posted by: jahoby | August 19, 2007, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

“She Devil”, boy there’s an epithet that is sure to make Ann six inches taller and walk six inches above the pavement. As member of an organization with a somewhat similar title, “Devil Dogs”, the USMC has never shied away from the name given to my father and his commrades in June 1918 at Belleau Woods in France by the “Huns”, those friendly German tourists of the day. Indeed we proudly use the title in our recruiting posters. So I doubt that Ann will take great umbrage to the title, though I believe that it will give her the ammunition that she will deal back in spades. I hold my breath in anticipation for her response. It’ll be a beaut.

Posted by: Jack "the Ripper" | August 19, 2007, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Jack, that was well done, a little item that escaped an old army persons immagination. thank you for reminding us.
semper fi

Posted by: sidney | August 19, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

To Buckeye,
We have, for a short time, heard from John Edwards but you have been uncharacteristically mute this day. You were called upon at 1:21A.M. Cat got your tongue???

Posted by: Sam Russo | August 19, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

all will be ok. Mrs. Edwards is going to give up “Tangerines” Oh, but she will keep her 25,000 Sq Foot house paid for during John’s Ambulance Chasing days ! Now he is legit !
Don’t fall for it folks

Posted by: Ruckus | August 19, 2007, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Coulter is a vile human being and the lousiest representation of Christianity on this planet.
Anyone who listens to her needs some time on the couch to get a grip on their hate.
There will be a special room in Hell for her kind of Christianity.

Posted by: Michele | August 19, 2007, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Hey nick,
They congress authorized the pres to go to war, and if they wanted to, the democratic led congress could stop the war by voting to stop the funding of the war. So stop whining about how the pres was not annointed..he was elected, confirmed and with the backing of Congress has done what is necessary to protect the US from future 9/11′s.

Posted by: No Rino's | August 19, 2007, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Michele,
Comment’s like “Ann Coulter is a she devil” I am sure will get JE into heaven by your logic.

Posted by: No Rino's | August 19, 2007, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Hmmmmmmm, first one hundred hours, then first one hundred days, how long the dems been in ‘power’.
Nancy said the game was over, have loved the bills they have passed. oh wait, what bills?
lovely time in liberville isnt it

Posted by: umbra | August 19, 2007, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Come on, let’s take off the gloves… “THOMPSON – COULTER 2008″

Posted by: Abbott | August 19, 2007, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Brandy, your shopping club may not buy Ann Coulter’s books but the rest of America does. They don’t keep printing them for nothing. Some are in the second and third printing. And I doubt that what you say is true. Your shopping club would not keep ordering “non Sellers”
Your words “Everytime Ann Coulters books come in” We are not stupid Brandy. If it is truly a ” Large ” Shopping club, they did not become large from being idiots ! We sent back the last order of those Ann Coulter books, what do you say we order some more ! Yeah-Right !!!! If that was the case, you won’t have a job for long.

Posted by: Bernie | August 19, 2007, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

john, he wouldnt have even won his senate bid again. worthless individual johnnny boy is

Posted by: umbra | August 19, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

John Edwards has managed to get into a feud with a commentator and author? How presidential is that?
LOL!!!!!!

Posted by: dcunning30 | August 19, 2007, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

You guys are all conservative nutjobs. Maybe if you weren’t all lying and saying demeaning and hurtful things about everyone but yourselves, you wouldn’t be getting any backlash. Such a wonderful job your idiot has done since taking office, can’t wait for a Dem to take over in 2009.

Posted by: richard from d.c. | August 19, 2007, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

“Lying”??
Really Richard? How so?
Did Edwards not call Coulter a “she-devil”?
His own words are printed in the original blog entry at the top of this page. Do you deny he said what he said?

Posted by: john | August 19, 2007, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

By the way, I love how you do exactly what Edwards condemns. Nice going. What more name calling antics will you engage in? Are you on the Edwards 08 campaign staff?
You’re as bad as “Rick” here.

Posted by: john | August 19, 2007, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Memo To Johnny,
Send E-mails to everyone! Fast!
Another fundraising opportunity for you.
Highlight the fact that you are equally good at shouting match with Coulter.

Posted by: vatodio | August 19, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

unfair, unfair, dont bring facts into this!
john will unite the 2 or 3 or 4 americas
john will get us health care just like cuba
john will get us all paid millions a year
john said so

Posted by: sidney | August 19, 2007, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

How crushed will the dems be when the cons win the presidency again? They will absolutely lose it and go off the cliff…the new media is changing opinions by the hundreds a day with the truth.

Posted by: No Rino's | August 19, 2007, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Hey Yankees, I am up here in Canada enjoying your two year campaign to see who will run the planet next. My money is Rudy G. He is the right man for the job as I sees it from here.
Coulter is in the political entertainment business and is doing well. We love her. She turns the Lefties into a bunch of forehead veins.

Posted by: John | August 19, 2007, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Ok, enough.
Doesnt matter who becomes president in 08 does it. they cant do anthing to change anyting.
we are at an impass.
check to see how many judges are held up?
check to see where the road

Posted by: sidney | August 19, 2007, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Ann Coulter is too gutsy for me. Edwards is too much of a whining crybaby. This is USA and they both have their rights to be so.. period.

Posted by: Liz | August 19, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Yes, Virginia, there really is a Santa Claus and John Edwards is his name-o.

Posted by: Liz | August 19, 2007, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Well, he likes to pretend he is that generous, loving olde saint and that “terrible” Ann stole Christmas and the Baby Jesus right out of his manger.

Posted by: Liz | August 19, 2007, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

See, it’s just that many, many Republicans are lame
…and in denial
…and stubborn to a point where it gets american soldiers killed
…and gullible enough to believe what they are fed
they actually believe Jesus is on their team (this ain’t schoolyard basketball)
…they use fear more than any other group to try to drive their point home
…they don’t know what WMDs are
…yes, most Republicans are lame.
Some are not… but most are.
how many more must die in the name of the fake war (that cheney knew was a problem – we all saw the video)? Seriously… you’re lame. And if you belive Bush you’re stupid too.

Posted by: Tracy | August 19, 2007, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Anyone that liberals hate so much can’t be all that bad, can she?

Posted by: Peter | August 20, 2007, 12:23 am 12:23 am

I think the fact that so many people would even waste a single breath on defending Coulter says a lot about the sad mindset of the past six years. Takes a real sheep to defend Coulter.

Posted by: JD | August 20, 2007, 12:50 am 12:50 am

John Edwards,
your objection has been duly noted AND saved for posterity
Sincerely?

Posted by: Sam Russo | August 20, 2007, 12:58 am 12:58 am

No Rino
You did’nt answer the question. “how would you like it if some foreign nation decided to invade us and instill their form of governmnet on us”/ Also if you turn off Fox news, you would learn that IRAQ had NOTHING NOTHING to do with 911. These neo cons wanted us to destroy Iraq since Gulf 1 and now they are itching for Iran. Did you ever stop to think why. Who benefits from another Crusade. Think it thru

Posted by: nick | August 20, 2007, 1:23 am 1:23 am

For all you who vote Republican,unless you;re rich, you are voting against your own interest. Neither party has been doing a great job, but at least the Dems are for the working middle class and not rich CEO’S.I ask you ” are
you better off now than 7 years ago”Hmm

Posted by: nick | August 20, 2007, 1:46 am 1:46 am

JD, Ann doesn’t need anyone to defend her. That’s precisely what I like about her. As I said before, her IQ is more than the combined total IQ of Mr. and Mrs. Edwards!

Posted by: gzeena | August 20, 2007, 2:01 am 2:01 am

I am surprised there are any pro Ann Coulter posts left on this board. It seems they are getting deleted almost as fast as they are being put up. Rush calls these people the “Drive by” media. I think I will call them the “Drive by and delete” media. We regular Americans who make this country strong love Ann Coulter for telling it like it is and we detest whiney people like John Edwards who constantly run down, for political purposes, anybody who disagrees with them. Aren’t liberals supposed to say, “Can’t we all just get along?”

Posted by: James A. Webster | August 20, 2007, 2:09 am 2:09 am

I am suprised that John didn’t have Elizabeth post a comment here. It might have generated some more cash for him. What else can they whine about? What a freaking joke they both are!

Posted by: Dakota | August 20, 2007, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Speaking for myself, I am better off today than I was seven years ago, however, I was better off seven days ago, thanks to the stock market, than I am today. My answer: Don’t sell. Buy more and seven years from now you’re going to be even better off than you are today especially if a Republican get gets elected President in ’08. Edwards stock has also plunged, but I see no recovery for him and as for Ann, I see high and robust sales for her new book entitled: “If Democrats had any brains, they’d be Republicans!”

Posted by: James A. Webster | August 20, 2007, 2:39 am 2:39 am

If there was ever a more disgusting and self-indulgent person in the world, I would be shocked.
Get it? She’s in it for the attention. Not for her viewpoint. It’s called narcissism. She loves to think she’s a sex symbol or something and she really is not. I remember that… it’s called high school.

Posted by: JB | August 20, 2007, 4:27 am 4:27 am

John Edwards was a do-nothing one term Senator who served 3 years before running for President. Sound familiar? Obama? At least Edwards has given up on his “Two Americas” crusade. There are Two Americas. He lives in one and the rest of us live in the REAL one.

Posted by: Scott | August 20, 2007, 4:29 am 4:29 am

For those of you who can only look at picture and not read, you are missing a great columnist. Read Ann’s article from last week, she makes a great case for calling the left liars. And the only narcissism I have seen is Edwards primping his hair for almost a solid minute (looking at himself in a mirror)

Posted by: Tim | August 20, 2007, 5:59 am 5:59 am

many thanks to Ann Coulter. We need more people like her because without her, Rush Limbaugh and some others we would never hear the truth.
Thanks again Ann!

Posted by: Leo Toby | August 20, 2007, 6:45 am 6:45 am

Poor George, you sound so bitter and envious of Ms. Coulter. Are you jealous that she has a NY Times best seller and that she is an effective communicator of the liberal hypocrisy and double-talk? Ah the green-eyed monster hath bitten George on the tuckus.
It’s ok George… don’t fret, I hear Al Franken is going to make a run for public office. I think an Edwards/Franken ticket could be just what your liberal brain can encompass, more vacuous and inane dribble from the self-aggrandizing and self-concerned party elite. I think they will serve as great city commissioners for LA or San Fran.

Posted by: Dean | August 20, 2007, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Edwards’ populist message sure seems to be getting under alot of people’s skin. Even attempting to defend Coulter is just pathetic. Keep attacking him and see him get stronger.

Posted by: moonsha | August 20, 2007, 8:30 am 8:30 am

moonsha, Ann doesn’t need anyone to defend her. As I said before, her IQ is more than the combined total IQ of Mr. and Mrs. Edwards !

Posted by: gzeena | August 20, 2007, 8:53 am 8:53 am

“The call left Coulter uncharacteristically flustered”
Oh? I saw the exchange. Mrs Edwards spoke like a mindless broken record and Ann mocked her quite well. Chris Matthews did his best to muzzle Ann and give Edwards every advantage. Ann’s only failing was to forget to point out Eliz Edwards hypocracy in saying the Cheney’s were ashamed of their lesbian daughter. Biased and crappy reporting…. We know the author is a democrat. Come out of the closet and be an editorial writer but pretending to be an unbiased journalist is dishonest… Typical…it is no wonder that others seek out Limbaugh and others to get their news with “unbiased” reporting like this…

Posted by: John | August 20, 2007, 10:31 am 10:31 am

John,
You nailed it!!! and because the truth is like Krytonite to liberals they must get rid of it via the fairness doctrine….
Rush and Drudge do nothing but shine a light on liberal idiocy and their point of view. They can’t do what they usually do try to make what they say seem “mainstream” enough that some sheeple will buy it. Instead of just coming out and saying what they are for.
Because they know LIBERALISM DON’T SELL!!
Hillary is already saying that it will be 2 years into her presidency before we even think about leaving. So is Hillary going to pull us out like she said a month ago or start 2 years into her presidency…which is it!!??
Libs are Stallinist in disguise. Just like this comment from this thread”
“It’s so freaking hot out today that I only have enough energy to say that I enjoy Paul’s comments and would like to add my own: Please God let it be November 2008 so we can elect a new president (Go Hilary), and please make Ann Coulter go away.
Posted by: Like Living on the Sun | Aug 19, 2007 6:12:24 PM
How will Hillary make Ann go away…..since the stallinist can’t compete, what are they going to do, drag Ann and any other conservative they don’t agree with to public hearings and try to get jail time on them (hello…. China) You on the left hate Bush so much you have you eyes closed to the facts and your party is now communist. Wait til you say somthing Hillary doesn’t like. You will be in jail.

Posted by: ronnielong | August 20, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Hey libs,
If you can keep it civil come on in here and debate. If not we kick you out:-)Conservatives more of what you think…..so come on

Posted by: ronnielong | August 20, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Hey libs,
If you can keep it civil come on in here and debate. If not we kick you out:-)Conservatives more of what you think…..so come on
Posted by: ronnielong | Aug 20, 2007 1:37:28 PM

Posted by: ronnielong | August 20, 2007, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Now, now PHDMD, tell all the nice people why you want us to all get along AND to keep the research money coming…always an angle with you folks eh ?????
Sam

Posted by: Sam Russo | August 21, 2007, 1:33 am 1:33 am

I’m not quite sure what I find most disturbing: John Edwards’ dishonest rhetoric; Rick Klein’s flagrantly biased reporting through omission; or the misguided angry words of posters such as “VeganMilitia” and “nick.”
Regarding VeganMilitia, apparently some Americans on the Left find it convenient to shout in slogans and scatter-about glittering generalities (some of which contain falsities).
“All we listen to is Rush?”
Even if that were remotely true, why are you afraid of Rush? Are you afraid that the weakness of your position, convictions and beliefs will be shaken? I can’t speak for others but as for myself, as a former Leftist, I try to maintain balance in my reading, listening and viewing content.
“Faux News?”
For years, when conservatives complained about the well-documented liberal biased of the major US networks, they were told: start your own network! Well, an alternative network was created – one in which that liberal bias is no longer in evidence, And now, the Left is hysterical. Hysterical! The funny thing is that Fox News isn’t that conservative; and Fox News invites far more liberals to offer commentary compared to conservative guests/commentators on the Big Three.
Several Democratic Party presidential candidates have been attacking Fox News, That’s not very mature and it smacks of hypocrisy.
“Still think Saddam was behind 9-11?”
This is an apocryphal connection which is often repeated by the left, but never mentioned by anyone in the current administration. Never. Also, Fox News never made that connection. Never. Americans on the Left continue to repeat that assertion in the hopes that it will be accepted as fact. Good thing some of us have been paying attention since 1990 and before.
However, as early as October 2001, I read about Ansar al-Islam and its suspected connections to Saddam Hussein. As Ansar al-Islam, an al Qaeda-affiliated militia that was fighting against the secular Kurds, was an enemy of his enemy, Saddam’s support (direct or indirect) seemed like a natural fit.
“Knuckle-scraping Neanderthals?
I suppose that one when is on thin ice in terms of one’s views it’s only natural that they resort to ad hominem attacks. If that makes The Left, especially VeganMilitia, feel better, then, please, by all means, think of us as Neanderthals. I am a Cave Man.
And not all of us are Christians.

Posted by: CH Lee | August 21, 2007, 9:04 am 9:04 am

btw, Ann Coulter apologized for using the “f word” in attacking Mr. Edwards. She said that she did want any Gay Americans besmirched by comparisons to the candidate.

Posted by: CH Lee | August 21, 2007, 9:09 am 9:09 am

As a Republican, Ann Coulters mouth makes us all look bad. Thats another reason why we’re going to lose in November. Suggesting that politicians “be killed” might work well in Iraq but we are Americans and it’s time we respect each other.
God save the Repuiblic.

Posted by: Bob | August 22, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Just keep lapping this dreck up, you Left and Right wing sheep.
Pathetic.

Posted by: D. | August 25, 2007, 5:01 am 5:01 am

hunting supply

The most efficient way to stumble on this information is to use all means at your disposal.

Posted by: hunting supply | September 8, 2007, 12:00 am 12:00 am

This story doesn’t speak very highly of ABC’s “Good Morning America,” for airing such garbage, right wtrong or whatever. The only name calling that should be considered allowable, in my opinion, are those names that are truely reflective of the person(s) being called. You know what I mean, like, “President Bush is a lier.”

Posted by: Karl Bratcher | October 28, 2007, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.