Aug 28, 2007 7:36pm

Elizabeth Edwards Responds to Attack Over Parenting Skills

ABC News Sunlen Miller Reports: Elizabeth Edwards is taking some heat about her parenting skills from the mom-friendly website "Silicon Valley Moms Blog."

Blogger "Rebecca" wrote a fiery tirade on the site Monday morning attacking Mrs. Edwards choice to bring her two small children, Jack and Emma Claire, on the campaign trail with her while her husband, John Edwards runs for president.

"…. you are being a terrible mother, forcing your young children, who should be in SCHOOL, to ride in buses and talk to the press when they obviously don’t want to. This election is NOT ABOUT THEM, " blogger Rebecca writes.

Responding to the New York Times article over the weekend about the Edwards decision to include their children in campaigning the blog writes, as if speaking directly to Mrs. Edwards, that her kids, "…deserve some peace, not time with nannies and campaign-trail daycare providers, since, as the Times article describes, you don’t have time to see them when you are busy campaigning too."

Mrs. Edwards comments about Hillary Clinton in a recent Salon.com interview were also criticized on the blog, "What resonated in my mind was the way that she (Elizabeth Edwards) dissed Hillary Clinton, decrying the "choices" that Hillary has made. The implication, of course, was that Hillary chose to work rather than spend time with her child. But it took all of my self control not to ask her, ‘Was it Hillary’s work for the Children’s Defense Fund, where she saved millions of lives of poor children, that you thought was a poor choice? Or was it when she went to China and announced, possibly for the first time ever, that women’s rights are human rights? Or perhaps was it the way that insisted on being taken seriously, since she too was an accomplished attorney like her husband?’"

The blogger lashed out and concluded, " Elizabeth, I DON’T LIKE the choices you have made! TAKE YOUR KIDS HOME."

The blog-savvy Elizabeth Edwards took only eight hours to respond to this online attack.

Posting in the comments section of the website, Elizabeth Edwards responded with an equally fiery post, "…what I said about Hillary’s choices is that I had made the same choices she had made as a parent, and when I changed my choices I was happier. Just like you don’t get to decide what makes me happier, I don’t get to decide what makes Hillary happier."

And the mother-of-three wrote at length about her choices as a mother, electing to bring along her children on the campaign trail, "….you have no idea what the quality or amount of the time I spend with my children is….You don’t get to say I am a terrible mother because you think you wouldn’t make my choices in my situation…You don’t get to judge me because you think you know exactly what you would do if you had my disease. I want to be really clear: you don’t know. And if the sun always shines on you — and I pray it does — you will never know."

User Comments

Well-stated, Elizabeth. People who have not had cancer do NOT understand. Until they have walked in your shoes, they need to stop judging you. I have had cancer and I pray each night for you.

Posted by: savethemiddleclass | August 28, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

It’s quantity time, not quality time that kids need.

Posted by: mjb | August 28, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Dear Elizebeth,
i admire you as a person. but, please do not attack Hillary. find another way to help your husband. Hillary Clinton has done many things this country and women all over the world.
Elizebeth, stop giving Hillary a direction. last time you said ” Hillary needs to bring better health coverage for all”. Hillary does not need your lession.
Elizebeth, no mather what i said. i will pray for you

Posted by: Abdirazak Ali | August 28, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

At least she isn’t hiding, and making John go out to defend her . . . unlike him hiding behind her skirt.
And “savethemiddleclass,” where in the story is there an attack on people with cancer???? Wake the heck up, and read it again, and rethink your idiotic comments next time!

Posted by: ToddonCapeCod | August 28, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

“Blog savvy”? Please.
Campaigning IS the Edwards’ job at the moment and the children are innocent victims of their so very tired attempts at another 15 seconds of fame.
I’m just hoping the kids aren’t run over by the next ambulance John decides to chase.

Posted by: Pilgrim | August 28, 2007, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

… getting so tired of big-mouth Elizabeth Edwards and her kind of in your face, narcissistic politics. Yes, we’re sorry you have a terminal disease. We hope you don’t turn into one of those walking cadavers. In fact, we don’t want to see you do that. Go away. Take your children home. Give them some of yourself so that when you are dead, their only memory isn’t how their childhood was usurped by their parent’s overweening ambitions – all spun out on their psychotherapist’s couch.

Posted by: Los Angeles Democrat | August 29, 2007, 12:42 am 12:42 am

All of your comments are… “weird”. Politics are important, but when we lose our humanness we’ve got nothing.

Posted by: Alan | August 29, 2007, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Where do these people get off “judging” this remarkable woman whose life is an example of courage and loyalty and love? Their attacks say more about their limitations than they do about Elizabeth Edwards. She is using all the strength she has to help her husband because she believes he will make the best President, and she is teaching her children what it means to fight for what you believe in. It would be interesting indeed to see the differences in the adults Elizabeth Edwards’ children become as compared to those being raised by such critical, judgemental, narrow minds.
Such negativity against Mrs. Edwards sounds suspiciously like politically motivated campaign attacks to me. What a low tactic to attack the wife and not the candidate. Tacky, tacky, foul.

Posted by: Johanna Dordick | August 29, 2007, 1:33 am 1:33 am

This cat-fighting seems to be typical of leftist women in politics. The lack of personal dignity is appalling. Miz Edwards cowardly grandstanding ambushing attack against Anne Coulter is a case in point. Hillary has not done anything but ignore her husbands’ horrific abuse of women in order to advance her own political agenda. Neither of them have earned a place in the history books of great American women.

Posted by: John D. Patriot | August 29, 2007, 5:23 am 5:23 am

ToddonCapeCod: Maybe “YOU” better wake the heck up and read the entire article again. Elizabeth’s response was, “You don’t get to judge me because you think you know exactly what you would do if you had my disease.” I did not state that the article was an attack on people with cancer. I stated that people who had not had cancer did not understand Elizabeth’s decision. There is a big difference in those two statements; therefore, your comment is the one that is idiotic. What do you feel a need to attack anyone whose opinion does not agree with your own??

Posted by: savethemiddleclass | August 29, 2007, 7:45 am 7:45 am

In my view there seems to be a trend for women to dog each other lately. There are entirely too many sanctimonious women in general out there and they all need to back it up. A whole bunch of these mommy blogs will prove what I speak of. I really do giggle at all of the heat all the men seem to have towards this woman. Accusing John of hiding behind her. What’s really bugging them is that Elizabeth got Coulter at her own game more than anything. I guess all you boys would prefer Mrs. Bush – the woman that doesn’t put herself out there for anything other than decoration at all times. It’s 2007. Sorry if the gals bug you.

Posted by: Sandra | August 29, 2007, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Dear Ms. Elizabeth Edwards:
Obviously, it appears as if the writer prefers to be you – have your political lifestyle. People who generally judge others are lacking within themselves. There is no one qualified to judge your family. You are one of the nations most role model for women. If anyone who says anything less – then that is what they are less.
God Bless you & your husband during this political mess!

Posted by: Sue Austin Texas | August 29, 2007, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Although I don’t care to make a judgment about Elizabeth Edwards’ parenting style, it’s silly to say that others must also refrain. Her husband is running for president and she’s been very vocally touting herself and her “choices” as a reason why he should be elected. Furthermore, she has not stinted in her judgments of others. The fact that she tried to pretend that she hadn’t been slamming Sen. Clinton when she got called on it, only makes her deceitful as well as sanctimonious. (Like her husband, she seems to want to score political points just for living.) Finally, the fact that she lashes out against others for evaluating her life in the same way as she evaluates others shows that she can dish it out but not take it. A gracious response would have been smarter, not to mention more, well, gracious. The more I hear, the more I do not like.

Posted by: dawn | August 29, 2007, 9:49 am 9:49 am

As a male, I admire Mrs.Edwards courage and her dedication to making our country a better place. I think that it is very easy for those who are not in the arena to judge the core beleifs of others when they themselves have nothing at risk. I say to Mrs. Edwards keep speaking out and continue to demonstrate to your children and the world,the need for those of us who have so much to help those who do not. I encourage her to continue display her wisdom as it relates to our country and those who criticize her word will benefit from her deeds. I for one am sorry she is not the woman canidate for president. Her honesty and forth-rightness is indeed refreshing. I also appreciate that she refuses to play the victim card like Mrs. Clinton attempts to do.

Posted by: murl41 | August 29, 2007, 10:35 am 10:35 am

I admire Elizabeth Edwards.. What I don’t admire are people that think they can live your life better than you are. Some of these comments only show why the country is in the shape it is in now.. No one needs to hear Elizabeth Edwards is not a good Mother. I believe her children would tell you they love her.. I think Elizabeth Edwards is a women that deserves respect for Loving this Country and the less fortunate of this country and being evolved in things that Help others.. Supporting her husband believing he loves this Country and would be able to bring change in the direction the Country is going in. Maybe some of you have not noticed were the Country is headed we need change.. Go get them Elisabeth we still have free speech in the Country.. John Edwards has my vote..

Posted by: cyncindy | August 29, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am

For John D. Patriot
How can you put Anne Coulter and Elizabeth Edwards in the same sentence???? Anne Coulter’s mouth is like a sewer with nothing but vile ugly words come out of it. There is nothing to compare…. NJ

Posted by: NJ | August 29, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am

How about some real news about John Edwards instead of all this gossip all the time.

Posted by: chicagopoetry | August 29, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Oh please – Hillary didn’t do SQUAT to save the lives of millions of children, or help women’s right. UGH. If anything was improved in these areas, it had nothing, absolutely NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. She may have been in the same country where such things occurred, but it galls me that she is credited for having done SO much for humanity, when in fact, she has NO record of doing ANYTHING useful at all.

Posted by: HoosierMom | August 29, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

It is very telling to see the detractors in the Liz & Hillary Show go after each other like Vick’s Pit Bulls over their feminism, masculinity or lack of it. As painful as it was to watch Bill Clinton’s bizarre,awkward attempt to defend Hillary’s feminism, it is even harder to watch Mother Liz constantly rescue her girlyman husband from his emasculated campaign. Liberal feminist ‘family values’ being what they are require this type of theater so as to not ‘offend’ anyone. Say what you will about Republican perversions, ‘perversity is still diversity’ in the family of the Liberal Democrat.

Posted by: John D. Patriot | August 29, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

It is very telling to see the detractors in the Liz & Hillary Show go after each other like Vick’s Pit Bulls over their feminism, masculinity or lack of it. As painful as it was to watch Bill Clinton’s bizarre,awkward attempt to defend Hillary’s femininity, it is even harder to watch Mother Liz constantly rescue her girlyman husband from his emasculated campaign. Liberal feminist ‘family values’ being what they are require this type of theater so as to not ‘offend’ anyone. So say what you will about Republican perversions, ‘perversity is still diversity’ in the mind of the Liberal Democrat.

Posted by: John D. Patriot | August 29, 2007, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

To Dawn – Wake up and smell the coffee!
Although you don’t care to make a judgment call – that is what you did. You made a judgment call on a remarkable woman. I would like you to count the many ways that you have made a contribution to make this country a better place. Deceitful – is not a word I would use to describe Elizabeth careful of your choice for words especially if you would like to address current problems our nation is experiencing as a result of a DECEITFUL ADMINISTRATION –deceitful. There are many, many Republicans that are sanctimonious, deceitful, and hypocrites like your Senator from Idaho, Larry Craig – what a joke he is, not to mention Tom Delay’s deceitful act of redistricting Texas, I know there are some democrats that cheat however before you choose to be a critic of a remarkable woman I ask you what have you done to contribute to make this country, county, state, your neighborhood to be a better place? Most individuals cannot walk the talk and I suspect that is what you are….a lot of talk.

Posted by: sue from texas | August 29, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Would that all parents have the skills
and judgement of the Edwards’.
Who wouldn’t look back on their own childhood
and be grateful to have had role models
like Elizabeth and John Edwards?
If you can’t see this, then perhaps your own
judgement as a parent is suspect.

Posted by: Vicki | August 29, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

What does cancer have to do with your children on the campaign trail? No disrespect but maybe she should be home taking care of herself. If her children can not go to school because of her sickness, why should she be out on the trail? And again no disrespect, I do not have cancer and can not begin to imagine what she is going through, and if she has the strength to be on the trail with her husband I admire her even more, but that has nothing to do with “parenting skills.” If she needs to have her children with her to help her through this difficult time, as a mom I completely understand, but then do not judge the decisions of others if you too have made selfish ones.

Posted by: tomuchdrama | August 29, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

As a cancer survivor, I think I am qualified to speak to what cancer has to do with her children being on the campaign trail with her (not totally qualified because I was more fortunate than Elizabeth; my cancer was not stage 4). When you receive that diagnosis, your own mortality is staring you in the face like it never has before. There is no more time to waste; you want to take advantage of each moment. I heard her state in an interview that she wanted John to continue his campaign. He would go on only if she were with him. Her treatment plan enabled her to continue on the trail. She decided to take the children with her and home school them. My feelings on that were that she made a good decision. If I were told that there was a good possibility that I might not see my children graduate from high school, I would want to spend as much time with them as possible. And–I would want to spend the remainder of my time doing what I cared about the most. That is what she is doing. I agree with you, tomuchdrama, her decision has nothing to do with parenting skills; however, the blogger who attacked her believed that it did. I disagree, because I believe the children will learn more from this experience than any school can ever teach them (plus they are being home schooled). I will, however, give the blogger the benefit of the doubt by saying that “until you have cancer, you may not understand the decision of this wife and mother.” If she ever does get cancer, which I pray she doesn’t, I would bet a pretty penny that her judgments will not be near as harsh on Mrs. Edwards.

Posted by: savethemiddleclass | August 29, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Sue:
You seem to assume that I’m a Republican. Not so: I’d cut off my working arm before voting Republican. I’ve actually identified as a Democrat since I turned on the 1979 Democratic National Convention and felt right at home. (I checked to make sure by watching the Republican National Convention a little while later. Yup! I’m a Democrat.) I do find Elizabeth Edwards deceitful. Apparently even Democrats can. Any comments about Hillary Clinton’s “choices” comes on the heels of remarks she made about how her own choices made her more “joyful” than Hillary’s made her. She got called on them and had to apologize. Now, she’s referring to Hillary’s “choices” more obliquely, inviting us (I believe) to condemn the woman as a selfish careerist because she chose to keep working. This is deceitful and sly and underhanded. Not to mention backward and Neanderthal. And just a small point: I believe I wrote right in the beginning of my comment that what I wouldn’t be judging was Elizabeth Edwards’ parenting style.

Posted by: dawn | August 29, 2007, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Sorry but Elizabeth Edwards doesn’t get to play victim now that she is coming under withering criticism when she has been attacking both Hillary and Obama. She opened herself up to attack with her own comments. It’s one thing to comment on a candidate’s wife who is not involved in the campaign but when you launch attacks on others, don’t be surprised to get incoming fire. And frankly, I really do wish that she would take her children and go home. I am one of those parents who thinks that young children who’s mothers have a terminal illness deserve some time at home alone with them.

Posted by: Disappointed | August 29, 2007, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

BOTH, JOHN AND ELIZABETH are to blame for putting his VANITY-induced ambitions AHEAD of his kids!!! HOW THE HECK WOULD EITHER OF THEM BE ABLE TO GIVE THEM ANY “QUALITY” TIME, BETWEEN CAMPAIGNING AND MEDICAL VISTIS (AND DEALING W/THE PAIN & OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO THE TREATMENTS OF THE CANCER, NOT TO MENTION, THE CANCER ITSELF)!!! I MEAN, IT’S NOT ONLY ABOUT NEGLECTING THE CHILDREN PHYSICALLY, BUT ALSO, MENTALLY!!!

Posted by: pleaseDONTdeletethis | August 30, 2007, 12:53 am 12:53 am

BTW, WHY DOES Elizabeth go by her MIDDLE name, when she used her FIRST name, MARY, for most of her life…is it because her middle name sounds more REGAL?! [That's TYPICAL of the Edwards, just look into their lifestyle, & the home(s) they live in...making speeches about helping the poor & middle-class...they're SUCH HYPOCRITES!!]

Posted by: pleaseDONTdeletethis | August 30, 2007, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Did you ever stop to think that Elizabeth Edwards wants to spend what time she has left to live with her WHOLE family? Is it better for their kids to be away from their dad all the time and be home with an ailing mom without his support, or to go along with them both on the campaign trail and spend what time is left for their family as a unified force? They will not be harmed by homeschooling. If you have never researched homeschooled kids, you may not know that there are many high-achieving homeschooled kids in this country. Unlike the “old days”, homeschooled families have lots more support these days and their kids are given greater opportunities to learn in many cases than kids in traditional schools. Bravo to the Edwards for doing what’s best for THEIR family despite what others may say. To me, their decision came from the heart and was not politically motivated.

Posted by: cao | August 30, 2007, 7:57 am 7:57 am

GO, Elizabeth!! I admire your courage in your battle with cancer and, especially, your choice to be involved in your husband’s campaign (I hope he wins the nomination, by the way). Your, and your husband’s, choice to include your children is a definite indication that you’ve thought long and hard about it. You SHOULD all be together every possible moment during your illness and the campaign. How better to teach them how to confront the challenges Life throws our way?! People will always criticize but the Edwards FAMILY has shown great courage in making difficult decisions and we all need to take encouragement from your decisions, follow your lead, and attempt to make a difference, in our own lives and, in the lives of others. YOU ARE ALL TO BE ADMIRED!

Posted by: Helen | August 30, 2007, 8:54 am 8:54 am

REBECCA AND THOSE LIKE HER–
WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO SAY THAT ABOUT ANYONE???? DO YOU LIVE THEIR LIVES??? DO YOU KNOW WHAT GOES ON BEHIND CLOSED DOORS?? DO YOU KNOW THE QUALITY OF TIME SHE SPENDS WITH HER KIDS?? THEY ARE HER KIDS!!!! SHE KNOWS BEST!!!! SOUNDS TO ME LIKE YOU NEED TO FIND SOMETHING TO DO WITH YOUR SPARE TIME–LIKE READ TO YOUR KIDS OR SOMETHING!! UNLESS SHE’S LEAVING HER KIDS IN A SWELTERING CAR OR ABUSING THEM
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CRITIZE HER, REGARDLESS OF HER CANCER OR POLITICAL VIEWS!!! IT’S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!!!!

Posted by: ANN-MARIE | August 30, 2007, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Going on the campaign trail with their family is most likely a once in a life time experience for these children. Growth and memories in childhood are not created only from school but also from life experiences. The ability to travel and meet a wide variety of people will only increase the children’s empathy for others and ability to adapt to situations that would otherwise be outside their paradigms. Perhaps they will become non-judgemental adults that won’t feel compelled to tell others how they should and should not live their lives.

Posted by: Sparky | August 30, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am

I am a cancer surviver. I know a number of homeschooled kids. There is no question in my mind that the Edward’s are doing the right thing for so many reasons.

Posted by: Martha | August 30, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Sometimes people need to remember the old saying that you shouldn’t judge a man until you’ve walked a mile in his shoes! Elizabeth Edwards faces more uncertainty with regard to her future than those who do not have a terminal disease. The fact that she wants to spend her time with her husband and her children, even if it’s on the campaign trail — how can anyone criticize that? I agree with the previous comments that she is giving her kids other experiences that are different, but no less valuable than those they might learn in school, as well as proving the point of standing up for what you believe in. Does anyone really think that she loves her children any less than the rest of us love our own?
Whether you like a candidate or not is your choice/your opinion. I’d like to know when people will start judging candidates for their records and the issues they support – rather than nitpicking over all of this stupid stuff. Comments just seem to be “canned” according to which political party you are aligned with. Think for yourself and get informed about the candidates. Whomever wins the presidential election has a lot of work to do — lets make sure they’re up for it!

Posted by: cl-new jersey | August 30, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

I am a member of the sister site where “Rebecca” blogs and I have to say that I completely DISAGREE with Rebecca. Regardless if Elizabeth Edwards has cancer or not it is John and her decision whether to bring the children on the campaign trail. I don’t believe (like other candidates) that they force their children to make statements to the press and as far as education goes, was there any statement made that the children would not be schooled – home schooled?
To pass judgement on someone’s decision based solely on your experience is very narrow minded. It is the same type of judgement call made on people who take sides on the “SAHM vs. Working Mother” debate. You absolutely DO NOT KNOW UNTIL YOU’VE WALKED A MILE IN THE OTHER PERSON’S SHOES.

Posted by: Irene | August 30, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Martha- I have read every one of these comments but as I was reading yours it brought tears to my eyes. I dont think that anyone could have said it better. I think you hit the nail in the head. At what point did we start looking at what we can dig up on a canidate and their famlies rather than the issues that plague our Nation. If our next door neighbor were to pull their child out of school to be home-schooled are they going to be this highly criticised? I think not. Along with the academics that they are learning, the Edwards’ are giving their children an experience that the majority of the population could never give their children. They are learning more than any classroom could teach them and on top of it they are learning it from their parents and you dont think that when these children are all grown up they are not going to cherish this time with every fiber of their being.

Posted by: LeeAnne | August 30, 2007, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

By the way, Although I agree with Martha I was really talking about the post from cl-new jersey

Posted by: LeeAnne | August 30, 2007, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

I sure wish I could take my kids to work with me. I’m a struggling, single-mother that fantasizes about having my children with me more and I can assure you, if I were teetering on the verge of losing that time with them due to a disease that could prematurely take me away from them, then I’d have them at my side as much as possible. If Elizabeth wanted to be a single-mom I’m sure she WOULD take her kids and go home, but clearly that’s not her choice…keeping her family in tact while they continue to “work” because what they’re doing is their JOB then bravo to Elizabeth and John. I know one thing, home is NOT a physical address…it’s being in my mom’s space…wherever that may be. Ask any kid.

Posted by: Staci | August 31, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

To all of you “holyer than thou” Elizabeth supporters: What the H##L do you think the reason for THIS “COMMENT” box is for??? It’s for people to give a “COMMENT” OR an OPINION on what they’ve read (in THIS case, her PARENTING SKILLS)!!! SO STOP COMPLAINING about the posters who give their OPINION ABOUT THAT (her parenting skills) whether or not YOU agree with it!!! GOOD GRIEF!!!

Posted by: Keith | September 1, 2007, 12:37 am 12:37 am

For Keith – don’t know if you’re a parent, but if you are – how would you like to have your parenting skills up for personal comment/bashing by all sorts of people who don’t really know you? I don’t claim to support Edwards or anyone else at this point, so that is irrelevant. Some stuff just doesn’t belong in the political arena. We are all entitled to our opinions — regardless of what “side” we are on. It seems to me that the COMPLAINING started with a women who had a “holier than thou” attitude about her parenting beliefs vs. those of Elizabeth Edwards! Maybe we need to focus on the greater issues here when deciding who the next leader of our country will be. Good Grief yourself!! (and no expletives necessary!)

Posted by: cl | September 1, 2007, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Why is everyone wasting so much time second-guessing the parenting skills of a pair of accomplished parents? Read Elizabeth’s book, “Saving Graces.” Then focus on the issues of the day. ABC News should invest more in investigative reporting to uncover fraud and waste occurring wholesale in Iraq. Are the coastal areas off Louisiana still degrading and making the area susceptible to future hurricane damage, and why isn’t government investing more in fixing essential New Orleans infrastructure?

Posted by: MotherTeresaHadDoubts | September 3, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

I’m not understand why you all are attacking this woman for something her husband did. Now if they stated they wanted it to be private then at least we sure. Just because they are in the public eye doesn’t give you first rights to what goes on in hteir bedroom. Some things sure be left alone, adn also if she decided to stand by her husband thats her right a women doesn’t mean she condomes what he did but she adn this man have history, maybe some of you aren’t in relationships longer then a day so how will you all understand what it means to share your life history with someone. This woman and man decided to do thi, not Elizabeth so back off..Now why aren’t you all jumping on the *girl* who cheated with Edwards, who knew he was marry, but yet didn’t have enough morals to not sleep with him. She wants privacy, well you sure have thought about this before you *open up* now you sure also be in the spot light..not Elizabeth!

Posted by: Felecia | August 26, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

I just want to say I wish you the best. Ambition is one thing but home is where the heart is. I do not know what it is to be you but I do know that God has put you in a situation to send a message. Rather than worrying about Clintons, Obamas and McCains focus on your life and your children. Every day is a blessing. Your husband has to live with what he did and you are right to try and hold your family together. Take your kids to the beach or to the mountains and just be yourself and live your life for them. Your turn is over now it is their turn. Let go and live. Everyday you worry ,stress and struggle is a day you WILL NOT get back. Take care and God Bless frslouie@aol.com

Posted by: Lou | August 26, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

My respects are for you mrs. Edwards. You are a very courages woman that is going through a very difficult time and all you need right now is for others to be on your side instead of against you. Just ignore all the negative and look forward and remember not to ever give up. You deserve the best in life so God bless you and your kids!! Just listen to your hearts desire and may everything turn out for the best. Take care!

Posted by: claudia | May 8, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.