Comments on: Clinton and Obama — Drags on the Ticket?

By: spock

spock — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:26:42 +0000

Since all the Deomcrats/Socialists/Libs want Goverment intervention into every aspect of our Life and destruction of the Constitution, they all are competing who can go further Left then the other. It is sad to say at the least. Obama is just Niave, Clinton is a power hungery individual who will say anything to get what she wants but will never follow thru, and Edwards well he is just a airbag.
moving to Canada does nothing if they win because it will be the same socialist country the libs want to bring here.
As far as Ron Paul, well he might be decent but his nutcase supporter ruin that.
Why is it that the Libs want to give more rights to illegals then Citizens?
I would not be surprised if someone not in the race at this time win the Dem primary. Do not forget the other nutcase Hypocrisy Gore.
We need Fred/Rudy or Huckabee!

By: Royce

Royce — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:05:01 +0000

Look at Clinton’s record: She favors only the rich owning guns. Favors illegal aliens over Americans. Favors government intervention into every aspect of our lives. …She’s almost as much of a left wing elitist as Giuliani. …. In a Giuliani vs Clinton election, I favor secession. McCain vs. Obama would be just as bad. Face it, Thompson, Huckabee and Paul are the best choices out of a bad crowd.

By: chuck

chuck — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:27:37 +0000

Intriguing results, but we have more than a year before the national election, and a lot can change in that time. Mayor Giuliani is certainly a strong candidate as a moderate Repub, but he will lose some of that strength if he continues pandering to the more conservative elements of his party to get their votes (cf., his appearance before the NRA last week where he backpedaled about 100 mph to rationalize possession of assault weapons).

By: E

Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:59:22 +0000

want to rattle the mindless dem?
from now on refer to them as “democrat”!
the term “democrat” originated as an epithet and referred to ‘one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses’.
could anything better define today’s democrat party?

By: PetraeusSucks

PetraeusSucks — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:28:34 +0000

Edwards WAS on the Presidential ticket last time around if you happen to recall………and that sure worked out well for Democrats in those swing districts didn’t it?
Edwards is already a two time loser, lost in the 04 primary, lost in the 04 general election. If Dick Cheney is Darth Vadar then Hillary is Jar Jar Binks when it comes to her popularity among independents and republicans.
Hey Democrats how about nominating someone who can actually win for a change like Barack Obama?

By: Socialist

Socialist — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:07:05 +0000

What kind of findings do you expect from a poll run by the Washington Post?
Obama is the most intelligent and actually the most experienced of all the credible candidates. Actually he is the only credible candidate on the Dem side. He is the only one who was against the War from the beginning and that is more than any of the others can say. How can you vote for someone for president who was apart of getting the US into this most horrible mess? Think about who you are voting for before you actually do so.

By: Mary Ann

Mary Ann — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:58:24 +0000

Guiliani is a vain, arrogant authoritarian headcase – there’s no way he can win the general election.

By: BTL musings

BTL musings — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:13:50 +0000

The Democrats will have a hard time winning the presidency if they continue to lean to far to the left, moderation is needed.Contrary to what far left liberals think, they are not the predominant philosophy in this country.

By: Rick_VT

Rick_VT — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:23:50 +0000

Hey Mike Huckabee – The story about your son torturing and killing a defensless dog is gaining momentum on the internet. It’s being associated with similar cruel and revolting animal treatment of dogs by Vick and DMX. This sick behavior is going to haunt you through your campaign when you try to speak of the preciousness of life and family values – the fact that your family apparently never learned from you the values you want us all to believe in you. I’d like to see you address this adequately before you are given further consideration.

By: cordelia525

cordelia525 — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:19:31 +0000

This reflects more on Guiliani’s strength with moderates than it does on Obama and Clinton’s weaknesses. Guiliani is a damn strong moderate candidate – pro-gay, pro-gun control, pro-choice, tolerant towards immigrants, favors lower taxes, perceived as strong on security and…he’s a hero. I mean, on paper he’s got it in the bag. How could any democrat compete with that in moderate districts?