By Jennifer Parker

Sep 21, 2007 4:27pm

Magazine Cover Likens Bush to Saddam

ABC News’ Jennifer Parker Reports: Canada’s top news magazine has caused a stir with a provocative cover depicting an image of President George W. Bush dressed as Saddam Hussein  — complete with the former Iraqi dictator’s mustache and beret.

The controversial headline to the September 20th Maclean’s cover reads "How George Bush Became The New Saddam Hussein," and accompanies a story by freelance writer Patrick Graham about how the Bush administration has decided to embrace former members of Hussein’s Baathist regime  — once considered insurgents by the administration — in an attempt to ward off Iran and al-Qaeda.

"It’s certainly a provocative cover and it’s meant to draw attention to the story itself," said Suneel Khanna, Maclean’s magazine’s director of communications.

Khanna said "there’s definitely been a lot of noise in the public space about the cover," with liberal blogs championing the story and conservative blogs arguing the story has a liberal bias.

"Graham’s one-sided portrayal of Iraq made the New York Times’ coverage look Fair and Balanced," charged Newsbusters, a U.S.-based conservative blog.

"I think it’s distasteful, inappropriate, border line outrageous, and it’s obviously not serious journalism," said Scotty Greenwood, executive director of the Canadian-American Business Council, a U.S.-based lobby group that promotes trade between Canada and the U.S. "This makes the MoveOn.org ad attacking General Petraeus look like kindergarten," she said. 

Greenwood said the cover may perpetuate stereotypes of Canadians as left-leaning anti-Americans. "It certainly doesn’t help Canada-U.S. relations when a leading news magazine chooses to do something like this," Greenwood said. 

The magazine disputed claims it has a left-leaning bias, but acknowledged the piece has a "point-of-view."

"It definitely has a point of view, as much of Maclean’s reporting does," Khanna said, "but balance and point of view journalism are not mutually exclusive."

Khanna said the magazine hasn’t heard any complaints from it’s 10,000 subscribers in the U.S., who get their copies mailed to them by Maclean’s parent company Rogers Media Inc.  Maclean’s is the most popular news magazine north of the border, with 2.9 million Canadian readers.

With reporting by ABC News’ Lindsey Ellerson.

User Comments

It is a sad thing to compare President Bush to a mass murderer. I am sorry to see our friends from the north stoop to to this level of hatefulness.

Posted by: RDA | September 21, 2007, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

RDA… truth hurts doesn’t it? Take off your rose colored glasses, and you might just see what the rest of us see. Then again, maybe not. You Bushies are set in your ways. His own party is distancing themselves from him, but you sheeple still follow blindly.

Posted by: newzjunky | September 21, 2007, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

I just hope the Senate doesn’t waste time to take an idiotic vote condemning the magazine like they did with the moveon ad. There’s too much real work to do!!

Posted by: Marilyn | September 21, 2007, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

its about time a magazine stood up to the dictator, who is responsible for the HUNDRED THOUSAND deaths in Irak.

Posted by: joey | September 21, 2007, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

LOL! How true! I just hope that having the world laugh at us is a step up from hating us.

Posted by: Rick | September 21, 2007, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

For the american readers , they can take some Comfort that Macleans is certainly strongly left leaning and secondly by knowing that Macleans has long since gone beyond its best before date.
comparing George bush to Saddam Hussein is only a step away from the old cliche of comparing whatever political leader we dont like these days to Hitler.
Macleans clearly has nothing better to do

Posted by: A Canuck | September 21, 2007, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

GO Canada!!!!

Posted by: Eric | September 21, 2007, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Bushbaby should feel lucky they did not go with the hitler makeover, which is far more suited to this clown. I just read 3 glaring failures by Gen.Betrayus in Iraq so he and bushbaby should become fast friends. Did Admiral Fallon call Gen.Betrayus a sycophant? What dear republicans would he call your bushbaby moron??????

Posted by: daddy | September 21, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

So is Bill Clinton a murderer too in view of the military deaths that occurred during his Presidency? Give me a break!
The anti-american left that frequent and post on this site need to take a deep breath and get a life (and a job)…
Just remember that the pendulum in politics is a funny thing. All the hate and vitriole being slung towards our President is going to boom-a-rang back on the next Democrat president (if one is ever elected again).
BTW, I note that ABC does not bother to inform the American public about the state of Macleans. I think more people still read MAD magazine as compared to Macleans.

Posted by: Robert Marley | September 21, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

While I am by nature a little put off by stuff like this I do have to say it got my attention and to be frank I learned soemthing. I sort of turn off anymore when the war comes up. I don’t see where my point of view is really covered and I do see us in this mess forever!
So it did give me a smile and I did get a laugh out of it, so I guess they can say “Mission accomplished” huh?

Posted by: Bonnie J Kimberly | September 21, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

That cover picture and article must have OLD MAN Bush cryin’ buckets. Never mind Barbara. Hell, nothing bothers her; even if her son is compared to Saddam. And Laura must really be ticked. George W is such a loser. And he doesn’t even realize it. How in the hell does that man sleep at night?

Posted by: CHUCK PARTON | September 21, 2007, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I really think it is sad to have a so-called ally(when it lines your pockets up north) from our work and do absolutely nothing about it except print a picture of our leader in a pathetic attempt to sway opinion. Now don’t get me wrong, I am NOT a Bush supporter or of the IRAQ war. But when you are dealt with the cards you are given and he isn’t going anywhere. You just have to lay the groundwork for change, positive change. In no way shape or form will this one: change our attitude about the war but resent the Canadians for trying to make us change our opinion. Would you appreciate it if we were standing at the border yelling “Liberate Quebec!” What is your internal business is yours and ours is ours….

Posted by: Shawn | September 21, 2007, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

This story is a bit ridiculous. Bush is no Saddam, the two aren’t even in the same category. Saddam tyrannized his own people through ignorance and fear. The only person Bush tyrannizes is himself with his funny Bushisms. I sure will miss Bush when he leaves office, as I so enjoy the Bushisms, its what makes this presidency unique.

Posted by: RobertJB | September 21, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Its what the US Press should have done if they had the “guts!!! Good Show Canada at least you still have freedom of the Press!!!!!!

Posted by: Camille Pagnotta | September 21, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

everyone can talk all the smack they want about Bush and the US. But I find it funny that no country can survive on it’s own without any kind of assistance from the US. When Canada gets attacked by Al Qaeda, they will come crying to Bush to bomb the horrible countries responsible. Get over it idiots the US is the best, and everyone comes to us for help only when it’s convenient for them!

Posted by: Jesse | September 21, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

I’m glad to see the press from other countries criticize the American government in this way. The USA government has perpetrated an unforgivable slaughter of the Iraqi population for oil. (Bush didn’t do this on his own) If our government had used the funds spent on this war to finance fuel replacements, we would be less than 5 years from the freedom of the shackles of crude oil

Posted by: NANCY SAIN | September 21, 2007, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Canada wishes it had the significance of the United States. Sorry, Canada, maybe when you grow up you can play with the big boys.

Posted by: Lola | September 21, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Personally, I see two sides to this.
On one hand, Bush and his party have triggered a war where 3,000 people or more have died thus far, and the fighting will not stop. I don’t think even Hussain killed as much people as have been lost to this useless war.
In contrast, don’t any of you think it’s a bit extreme? Yes, this war is a mistake. Yes, people are dead because of a stubborn president who’s more like a dictator. But it is neither our duty to criticize nor judge, but to bring healing and hope to others. Especially in this time of need for both Americans who have family out there fighting for this country…and the innocent Iraqis who have died by our gunfire. – patronofhealin07

Posted by: PatronofHealin07 | September 21, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

It’s great how our ABC degrades our President by giving free press to this foreign c-r-a-p magazine…….You can disagree with the President without this type of extreme insult………. There is no-comparison…. this is just raw left-wing extremist HATE .. Based on this… I guess that would make Billary… who voted to go take action… and still thinks it was the right thing to… Ms. Suddam….

Posted by: FidoNY | September 21, 2007, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

So – I’ll bet the majority of you are moveon supporters, right? Yeah, that’s a bunch of respectable characters. Nonstop character assassinations and slander.
You’re all just po’d that a republican is in office so you make up lies and slander non-stop. I used to be a registered dem – but after seeing the nonstop extreme hatred from the left, never again. IF a liberal becomes president in 08 — just wait for the crap to hit the fan. AND there will be lots of it.

Posted by: Jeff | September 21, 2007, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

No matter what country you live in, the press has learned that such things sell. It is why the American press does it’s very best to keep the American people divided. Hate sells. The Natl’ inquirer and the WWF learned it first. The “good guys” vs the “bad guys”. All the press need to do is tell you which is which, and why. If certain info or facts are left out along the way, what the heck. Kind of like a half finished paint by numbers painting. Money and ratings are very good for business.

Posted by: Mitch | September 21, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Wow, so we have to go abroad to see the truth of our nation? My, how the might have fallen. If our own media wasn’t such a craven mass of conspirators with the inhumane, fascist doctrines of the Bush administration, I might try to listen to them once in a while.
By the way, I think Maclean’s cover is grossly UNFAIR. Saddam killed 300,000 Iraqis over three decades; the Bush doctrine has produced at least 750,000 dead Iraqis in just four years, with the final tally sadly headed past 1 million. So, no, Bush is not the new Saddam; he’s much WORSE.

Posted by: Tarik | September 21, 2007, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Robert Marley: You can call the left “anti American” all you want.. but just remember one thing: ALL the powers the governement have aquired since 9-11 will eventually be bestowed upon a democratic President and Congress. Will you be sooooo apt to stick up for all the “anti-terror” legislation then? I’ll await your posts of protest.

Posted by: Troy Street | September 21, 2007, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

This article sounds like the Christocrats are about to take office. Oh; its an election year for the demoCRATS????
Christocrats – Democracts that are for the poor people Haha

Posted by: Fred | September 21, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

As an old song by Badfinger once said, “There’s no good revolution; it’s just power changin’ hands.” To the Iraqi people (the few remaining non-violent ones), their lives are worse under Bush’s occupation than they were under Saddam. At least, under Saddam, they could go about their business with litle fear of being blown to pieces or shot, as long as they didn’t bad-mouth Saddam in public. That was a small price to pay for stability which may never again exost in Iraq.

Posted by: rmberryman | September 21, 2007, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

All these international “comediennes” are funny until we cut off their foreign aid and commerce.

Posted by: Doug | September 21, 2007, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Well in all fairness they were probably debating and thinking of using devil to symbolize shrub but that would have offended satanists.

Posted by: Hegel321 | September 21, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Fortunately for us Americans, we will not have to wait for an invasion to remove Bush from office! Inauguration Day baby! ROCK THE VOTE!

Posted by: Citizen1960 | September 21, 2007, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

It is ridiculous to compare President Bush to Saddam. Even if you pin the 4,000 troops to President Bush, it does not compare the Saddam. He was a tyrant. He viciously had thousands of innocent people sent to their death. I am sure that those troops are proud to give their lives to bring freedom to people around the world.

Posted by: Brielle | September 21, 2007, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Well, if the shoe fits he certainly acts like a dictator. What is this deal with Iraq and U.S. about this 30 year oil and dealing in U.S. Dollars??? Is this why US soldiers have been dying???????? The arrogance of power without intelligence or wisdom on how to use it.
When I think of how he could have united this country after 9/11 is truly saddens me.

Posted by: Paulet | September 21, 2007, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

To die in the battle field is a soldier’s honor. You left-wing morons are denouncing and condemning our troops!!! Why don’t you worms and creeps crawl back to where you belong and indulge yourselves with $$$$$ and shut up!!!

Posted by: shannangreen | September 21, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

If you really loved America, you don’t care who is in power as long as they are keeping you safe. You can’t enjoy your “rights” if you are dead.

Posted by: Robert Marley | September 21, 2007, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I do not think the comparison of bush to hussein is at all fair. Bush is responsible for the deaths of far more people, is probably as or more stupid than any other public official in the history of this country, and certainly far more stupid than hussein, has no accomplishments in life other than receiving handouts from his daddy, daddy’s wealthy friends, and 5 political hacks on the supreme court, is gutless, and has done more damage to this country than all of the other enemies of America combined. Hussein at least rose to power by his own efforts. But – in one respect – they’re quite similar, both being shameless puppets of the republican party, both psycopaths, and both entirely lacking any morals or conscience.

Posted by: Bob Bergstrom | September 21, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

He was on vacation for a month before 911, did nothing. Did nothing for New Orleans for three days. Invaded a sovereign country killing hundreds of thousands!

Posted by: j | September 21, 2007, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

This just goes too far over the top. President Bush is NOTHING like Saddam. He doesn’t order the killing of his own people. He’s not a dictator, because he will be leaving office after the 2008 election. And if he were a dictator, all of you lefties wouldn’t be able to spout your hate filled rhetoric day in and day out.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | September 21, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

First Amendment!!!he seems to me that he is more like that crazy president of Iran instead. The rest of you hide behind religion as an excuses that oh Bush is a Christian so you shouldn’t portray him that way-instead of using or having and common sense. That is like saying Hitler was a Jew but look what he did to them??? Can’t make sense out of a madman.

Posted by: lalonartist | September 21, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

No, president Bush is the new ‘madass’ close to saddam spelled backwards. his administration has barely attached themselves to the truth with regards to their hegemonic agenda and could care less who loses their lives. Bush, taken in the context of reality, is ever so much more the mass murderer and tyrant than Saddam. He makes Saddam look like a school kid. Plus, Saddam was much more intelligent and well-spoken that Georgie Boy sadly enough!

Posted by: Bill Hicks | September 21, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

George W. Bush is an excellent President who is maintaining the election day agenda that we, the AMERICAN VOTERS elected him in HUGE NUMBERS to carry out! Many of those posting here are the same old bitter democrat losers who lose over and over and never learn. Excellent work President Bush, we hope you continue to ignore those who have forgotten 9/11 and the threats we face every day. We are very grateful that your policies have kept our nation safe after repairing the wall between FBI and CIA that clinton and his flunky attorney cemented (due to her moronic leftist misunderstanding of US law). We are also grateful that you have returned dignity and respect to the Whitehouse. We, THE PEOPLE know that poisoned yellow reporting like this piece remains part of the democrat party and their media stooge’s lame attempts to bring down the party of the PEOPLE while trying to generate interest in their hatful little rags. Still, readership continues to tumble and they see their CORPORATE PROFITS dwindle away as we all laugh! USA! USA! USA!

Posted by: cheesetoppings69 | September 21, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Gee Jeff: I thought we already saw the extreme hatred stuff from the republicans against Clinton.

Posted by: ted | September 21, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Well well, let’s bail on Iraq and let Al Qaida take over its resources, and Iran too, there will only be a few million casualties and refugees in the ensuing halocaust and imposition of a Talibanesque hardcore regime, then the terrorists can build a couple hundred brick and mortar terror universities. Next we can watch Canada enjoy the aftermath along with the USA, because last I checked, Canadians were a bunch of heathen non-believers fraught with corruptions of western living and were due for a good terror hit themselves according to the jihadists–there’s some really juicy targets in Vancouver and Toronto… Maybe Dudlee Dooright will come to the rescue!!

Posted by: matilda | September 21, 2007, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Hey I have’nt seen this magazine near the checkout stands in a long time,… but maybe now since the Weekly World News is gone kaput it just might show up again! Somethings got to replace the worlds most reliable newspaper.

Posted by: doug | September 21, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

few people hate clinton. How could you hate Buba? He’s a laughable fool in a dead marriage who rips the presidential seal out of Air Force One and chases chubby girls! LOL We are amused and pity clinton…. We do, however, hate what the fool and his wife did to our country.

Posted by: cheesetoppings69 | September 21, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Gee, let’s play the violin for all those Bush apologists who are screaming that this comparison is unfair. This from the same who used lies in the swift boat attacks on John Kerry and connecting Bin Laden to decorated Viet vet Max Cleland. Actually, I think comparing Bush to Saddem is an insult….to Hussein.

Posted by: Duane Rogers | September 21, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Wow! That article is even harder on Bush than I am, and that’s saying a lot as I truly dislike the man, and the harm he has caused.

Posted by: Sasi1 | September 21, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

As a dusgusted american, I can think of no better comparison! I for one am glad to see our illustrious “Emperor” has new clothes.

Posted by: Vulpecula | September 21, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

cheese topping: Amazing how Bush lovers have an entirely different version of history and reality. The election (popular) was rigged and the electoral is unconstitutional and eventually decided by the chief justices not the general election majority.

Posted by: lalonartist | September 21, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

It would appear that Maclean’s now hopes to replace ‘Frank’… not that this is a bad thing, rather, I hope that when the ‘pulp paper version’ arrives on the newstands it will consistently reflect the editorial prowess and the reasoned journalism so ably demonstated by ‘Frank’.

Posted by: Jim Fera | September 21, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Great cover, I’ve read 500,000 Iraqi’s dead almost 4,000 Troops Dead. Several thousand more wounded. The Govt. is borrowing from China and other countries to pay for it and we the tax payers are paying it all back for oil, and control of the region.. It costs 3 BILLION A DAY. How much did the Oil companies profit this past year? Those who finance the war make a profit.Defense contractors are literally making HUGE profits. Its the New World Order. They (The Central Banks) want total control of all regions to form a One World Monetary System and Govt.

Posted by: John Wiese | September 21, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

With close to 6 MILLLION Iraqis dead and the war costing 4.5 BILLION dollars a day, its no wonder the economy is failing.

Posted by: Eric Weis | September 21, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

As we have learned since childhood from our history books, the greedy and tyranical rulers and ruling classes have almost always employed deception and misinformation in order to mask their true reasons for going to war and inflicting the atrocities of war and economic oppression on their own peoples as well as on those who stood in the way of fulfilling whatever was on their agendas. The Bush gang have been a blatent reminder of this timeworn reality. Intelligent people of integrity of all political stripes are capable of seeing through the charade. The Iraqi people suffer needlessly in a destabilized and dangerous environment surrounded by violence, death and sorrow which will require incredilble healing to ever bring about positive change. The American people are being strangled by an economy which is being bled in order to support a a war which is filling the coffers of the extremely wealthy and is making them into the moral pariahs of the planet because of their complicity in supporting such a government. The American military has been sent on a fool’s mission, and the majority of the military personel know this and feel as frustrated and hog-tied as the rest of the world, while the machinery of war and destruction driven by greed and facilitated by the modern day tools of domination, marches on. Misinformation, disinformation, economic stress, the distractions of mass media entertainment and governing structures have coralled us all and have pushed aside or put to sleep all of the many who would oppose the tyrany and the war and those who personify these evils, such as the current American administration. Time to wake up!

Posted by: Erich Zeichner | September 21, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Why do our representatives stop short of holding the current administration accountable for their actions? We need to stop complaining about Bush and Cheney and keep the focus on the action that we can take, such as impeachment proceedings. Don’t forget that Bill Clinton was impeached. Many of us believe that Cheney and Bush deserve to be, and that it would be good for America.

Posted by: martha.s | September 21, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

His is a war family. He went to prove an elephant and found nothing but an ant. He share the same or similar characteristics of Saddem Hussian. Now when his tenure is close he want to make things look clean in the eyes of global leaders.

Posted by: Peter, E | September 21, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Because they know the “actions” you refer to are nothing but a media sham. It’s fine for the little people to run around clucking ‘Bush lied, Bush lied’ like fools but in the real world it’s nonsense. Hillary’s husband called for the liberation of Iraq every year of his silly administration but did not have the ability or fortitude to make it happen.

Posted by: cheesetoppings69 | September 21, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

I think the picture was taken when he was AWOL from his National Guard unit.

Posted by: marc | September 21, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Shawn… P.S. Born, bred, raised, and still currently living in Philadelphia, so put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Posted by: newzjunky | September 21, 2007, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

I just wanted to post a comment…he he

Posted by: jay | September 21, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

what an incredibly horrible comparison, this is truely below decent journalism. I must point out that I believe Saddam actually fought for his country before he lead it astray, it is truely rude to defile a dead mans name in this way.

Posted by: jeff | September 21, 2007, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Because they know the “actions” you refer to are nothing but a media sham. It’s fine for the little people to run around clucking ‘Bush lied, Bush lied’ like fools but in the real world it’s nonsense. Hillary’s husband called for the liberation of Iraq every year of his silly administration but did not have the ability or fortitude to make it happen. She knew how danger Iraq was, yet she has sold her sole (assuming she ever had one) and is now eating from the left hand of ridiculous web sites

Posted by: cheesetoppings69 | September 21, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

I wonder if Sadaam would be the one offended?

Posted by: art | September 21, 2007, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

bingo art

Posted by: jeff | September 21, 2007, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

What is scary is that the government is doing all but taking police action against the media that criticizes what they do rather than play along with the propaganda game. What is said is true; don’t forget the US put Saddam into power in the first place. We decided to get rid of him, thinking we could install a nice, cooperative puppet-government that will do as we say, but it backfired because we didn’t take into account that Saddam and the Baathists were enemies with terrorist groups like al Quaeda and without him they would come rushing in.

Posted by: Edward Mann | September 21, 2007, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Only if we work hard Edward and Chris. I thought 2004 was in the bag, but I still worked harder in any campaign than ever before, but lies are strong, greed is powerful, and hate, when cultivated by professionals can turn even an honest man astray. WORK HARD NOW.

Posted by: jeff | September 21, 2007, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

funny bag, because most of Americans have no representation right now. The majority of Americans want us out of Iraq, but a minority in the Senate block any action in that course. Repubs tell their constits that they want change, but then vote party line to block it. How are we any different from Canada.

Posted by: jeff | September 21, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

I have to go to Canada now to get a chuckle? Good thing Saddam is dead…can you imagine the humiliation he would suffer if he learned Dubya was compared to him?

Posted by: Looken | September 21, 2007, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

and my response again, lol, l8tr
funny bag, because most of Americans have no representation right now. The majority of Americans want us out of Iraq, but a minority in the Senate block any action in that course. Repubs tell their constits that they want change, but then vote party line to block it. How are we any different from Canada.

Posted by: jeff | September 21, 2007, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Thanks to the courageous magazine for the excellent work.

Posted by: ronnierayjenkins | September 21, 2007, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

spread the word J.
we need to tell the truth, again and again, until people hear it.

Posted by: jeff | September 21, 2007, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

jeff, americans have a choice to vote people out in the next election canadians don’t…

Posted by: abcnewsbag | September 21, 2007, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

The question should be: Is Bush as dangerous as Saddam? My Answer: Yes. Even more dangerous.

Posted by: avatar | September 21, 2007, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Paulet: “…To die in the battle field is a soldier’s honor. You left-wing morons are denouncing and condemning our troops!!!” I’m a flight medic in the Air Force; so I guess I only have one question for you Paulet: When do you enlist?

Posted by: J | September 21, 2007, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Bush is not chubby enough to be depicted as Saddam. Bush lacks the harems, or the lips to be seductive (poor Laura, no wonder the marriage is not well). Bush has made mistakes, but not as brutal as Saddam, not smart like a U.S. President should be, but not as brutal as Saddam. Bush has done better than Al Gore would have done. Global Warming is not the cause of terrorism. I notice how the liberals to comment, do not even have the vocabulary to spell Iraq (spelled as Irak). Bush was the lesser to two inadequates (Bush v. Gore).

Posted by: jupiterviews | September 21, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

For all Saddam lovers … What do you think the new world order would be like if Saddam had Bush firepower at his command?

Posted by: abcnewsbag | September 21, 2007, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Paulet: My humblest apologies! I misread the way ABC attributes postings and mistakenly attributed the quote above to you. I am very sorry. It should have been attributed to shannangreen

Posted by: J | September 21, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

I am a former US Marine and a history majore at UNLV. George Bush is not a good president. I am not a democrat in fact I am a Republican. I think this country is wonderful and I believe that George Bush is not to blame for all of the problems but, he is part of it. The real blame should fall on us, the average citizen! We elected a man who is a liar and has led us into a war based on false pretenses. WMD’s OBAMA and withholding health care from first responders at ground zero, withholding video footage that would prove once and for all that a plane indeed struck the pentagon. I can keep going and going but, I figure that is enough to make my point! RON PAUL FOR PRES!! SEMPER FI!!!

Posted by: Ezra | September 21, 2007, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Better yet, what would this world be like if GWB hadn’t spent every penny in our economy on this War? What if we could AFFORD to shop somewhere besides Walmart (Chinamart)? My liberties were lost here, in America (Patriot Act). Sadaam had no control of ANY of my rights, GWB did.My problem isn’t really with the War so much as the spending going on over there, they kill our soldiers, so, in return we rebuild their infrastructure.

Posted by: art | September 21, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Saddam’s government killed hundreds of thousands of its own people. Radical Muslims have killed many thousands more. The U.S. isn’t killing innocent people in Iraq. The people of Iraq are killing themselves (with the help of Iran and Syria).
We liberated millions in Iraq from a dictator. The French, Belgians, Germans, Poles (the entire European Continent, really) owes a debt it can never repay to the U.S., the U.K., and those countries who liberated them.
Get over yourselves. Your hate towards our president is not appealing. Your mothers and fathers would be ashamed of you.

Posted by: Jack | September 21, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Yeah but Bush is not nearly as successful at keeping the peace as Saddam. Who’d of thunk it? I mean what is the death count under Bush compared with Saddam. Honestly. I’ll tell you what the American death count is surely much higher!

Posted by: geddesman | September 21, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

PS – And our gas prices are much higher! And were hundreds of billions in the hole!
But hey there are a lot of new billionaires! Sickening! Had enough? Third Party Now!!!

Posted by: geddesman | September 21, 2007, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Bush attacked without provocation from Saddam Hussein. Now we’re stuck with the pottery barn principle: We broke it, we buy it. Saddam allowed and trusted Christians allowing them to worship freely. When Saddam was diagnosed with prostate cancer, he feared the thought of a Muslim surgeon with a knife in hand and he under sedation that he assigned a female, Christian surgeon to perform the surgery. Today Christian Iraqis are fleeing Iraq.

Posted by: Norman Matsumura | September 21, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

If the shoes fits…

Posted by: JT | September 21, 2007, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

This cover is completely ridiculous. It’s offensive and it’s outrageous. Frankly, I don’t care if you hate President Bush and I don’t care if you hate the war. The fact is that George W. Bush currently has the title of The President of the United States of America, and that title should be respected, along with the person who holds it. There’s a fine line between disagreement and disrespect. This is about thirty feet over that line.

Posted by: Brady | September 21, 2007, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

So as long as a dictator kills only his enemies, but “keeps the peace,” you’re all right with that? I thank God you were not making the decisions when the colonies of the new world fought for freedom against a tyrannical king.

Posted by: Jack | September 21, 2007, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

The cover is on the wrong issue; it was meant for end-October, for the Halloween edition!

Posted by: Bruce | September 21, 2007, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Wow! I didn’t see that one coming, but I must say, I share the same sentiments, but my question is Who then is “DICK” Chaney?
You Go Maclaine! You now have a new subscriber.

Posted by: 10 Mega pixel | September 21, 2007, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

The president said, “This is not a time free from peril – especially as a result of reckless acts of outlaw nations and an unholy axis of terrorists, drug traffickers and organized international criminals. We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st century…[T]hey will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, and the missals to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this than Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.” President Bill Clinton, February 17, 1998.
In December of 1998, the Clinton administration, rightly I believe, changed its Iraq policy from containment to regime change. President Clinton said Saddam needed to be ousted. He just didn’t do it. He did a lot of things he shouldn’t have, and didn’t do a lot of things he should have. This was one of them.

Posted by: Jack | September 21, 2007, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

I don’t think we should condem a whole country(Canada) based on an article in a magazine. They have as free a press as we do here.They certainly don’t need any “aid” from the US as they seem as well of as we are in USA.They are also as critical of their leaders as we are of ours. But,I think the magazine acted in poor taste.

Posted by: Brian | September 21, 2007, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Hmmm. I was thinking more along the lines of Hitler…

Posted by: Thadeus | September 21, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

It’s astounding to read what these liberal freaks are saying. Besides this is the kind of crap I expect from the freaksin the left wing fanatic media.

Posted by: kalamere | September 21, 2007, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

It was actually a pretty good article to read. My first reaction upon seeing the cover, was this is a bunch of crap. After second person sent me the url I read the article, and was rewarded with clear non-condesending writing about the way a significant part of Iraq sees things. This is necessary, if not necessarily uplifting information for Americans to know.
The editors did a disservice to the author by putting up such a guaranteed to be controversial image, which has little to do with the article.

Posted by: EOS | September 21, 2007, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Food for thought:
In a time of social fragmentation, vulgarity becomes a way of life. To be shocking becomes more important — and often more profitable — than to be civil or creative or truly original.’’
— Al Gore
Although you disagree with Bush, is it necessary to demonize?

Posted by: Jeff | September 21, 2007, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

I dis-agree with George Bush on almost everything. However, he is not a Saddam Hussein. I would take the idea behind the picture to be one of George Bush’s gunboat democracy taking the place of Saddam’s directorship. Any other literal way of looking at it would dis-credit all the American people. I am not going to go along with that.

Posted by: cliff jones | September 21, 2007, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

While its intent may not be lost on those who take a moment to read the article, the bigger question is what is the purpose of the image.
“It’s certainly a provocative cover and it’s meant to draw attention to the story itself,” said Suneel Khanna, Maclean’s magazine’s director of communications.
While the article may inform, it appears to me the image is meant to provoke a reaction. While it is certainly within the law to publish this image, should they? Do we really believe that their intent was only to provoke interest, or is this a manifestation of an underlying political point-of-view? I’m a cynic and doubt that this is merely clever marketing.

Posted by: Jeff | September 22, 2007, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Hey Bob Marley, can it with the hate slinging BS. All the hate slinging was started in the 90′s and it sure wasn’t the left-leaning american haters that started it. Pubs are suffering the just desserts from the vitrole they started nearly 2 decades ago……… and why? Simply because of sour grapes from losing an election. Unfortunately it looks like dems love the atmosphere because they are actually supporting Hillary Clinton which will do nothing more than perpetuate the politics of hate we have suffered through for nearly 16 years. Aren’t we as American citizens sick of the air yet?

Posted by: DK | September 22, 2007, 12:27 am 12:27 am

As far as the ad goes? I react to it the same way I would if it was the cover of Mad Magazine, I chuckle and go on about my life. The only thing more ridiculous than the picture iself is people making a big deal about it. Freedom of speech right? Or does that only mean something if you approve of the language?

Posted by: DK | September 22, 2007, 12:30 am 12:30 am

True – There is freedom of speech. That is not the issue. The magazine is completely within its right to run the image. The question is: Should we expect a level of civility in our political discussions? I agree, if this image was in MAD mag, no big deal, but it is in a mainstream mag. Is this image meant to portray Bush in the same category as Hussein? Is that a really fair portrait to reasonable people, no matter if you agree or disagree with his policies? Or does this serve an underlying goal of demonizing Bush?

Posted by: Jeff | September 22, 2007, 12:41 am 12:41 am

DK makes a good point. We need to change our course, forge a new path. Only Obama offers that at this point, the rest are noise.

Posted by: jeff | September 22, 2007, 1:30 am 1:30 am

which is worse: that Dubya knows exactly what he is doing, or that he doesn’t? ……..the former would make him somewhat like Saddam in his disregard for life and freedom (opening iraq to terrorism, thereby supporting terrorists, while straining the physical and mental well-being of our military; the attack on Constitutional freedoms “its just a g*dd*mn piece of paper!”); the latter would make him just as dangerous for the well-being of our soldiers and our nation. Justice would be impeachment and imprisonment. this article and cover are just truthful pieces of evidence, though inadmissable.

Posted by: mitch | September 22, 2007, 1:40 am 1:40 am

It is worse if Bush knows exactly what he is doing – that he willed all of the consequences of his decision. I find that highly unlikely. Given the track record of his administration, episodes of incompetence, insufficient planning, etc. are much more likely explanations. This is my point, that there is plenty to legitimately criticize Bush for, without resorting to comparisons with a dictator who directly willed the death of many of his countrymen. For all of his deficiencies, Bush still is an American, and likely believes in many of the same ideals expressed by you. Here’s a question, if Bush were truly all powerful and able to exactly exert his will, would he want Iraq in its current state, and thousands of US soldiers dead?

Posted by: Jeff | September 22, 2007, 1:59 am 1:59 am

If the shoe fits…

Posted by: JT | September 22, 2007, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Comparing Bush Jr. to Saddam? That’s not fair. Saddam had a brain.

Posted by: wilder5121 | September 22, 2007, 2:22 am 2:22 am

MacLean’s has alot of panache for a small Canadian magazine. Perhaps this controversial magazine cover mirror’s ABC’s wish that they had done it first.

Posted by: morley | September 22, 2007, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Quote>If the shoe fits…
Oh yes, I forgot again, Bush is the all-powerful, witless, malevolent, no-brain, murderer, bumbler, who controls everything and has implemented his evil master plan to perfection resulting in more power for him and his buddies(approval 30%, rove gone, rumsfeld gone, democrats in congress, and term over in ’08), more oil from Iraq (below pre-war levels), and a platform from which to launch his next war (with ALL of the extra troops we have available now).
The truth is that none of the consequences of the invasion are going according to Bush’s “plan”.
Comparisons like this distract from the real issues we face.

Posted by: Jeff | September 22, 2007, 2:51 am 2:51 am

“It is a sad thing to compare President Bush to a mass murderer” was the comment, and I found it very interesting.
Bush HAS killed more than Saddam Hussein! Add up the numbers, of course you can’t have them all as Gen. Franks refused to release civilians deaths.
If we had not attacked Iraq for oil in the first place, no one would be dead, we would not have over 4,000 dead, and the Iraqi’s have lost a lot of people for one man, somewhere between 100,000 and 600,000!
Actually the cover does Bush an injustice as we are the ones who put Saddam in power.
I see now, Bush’s privately funded army, Blackwater, is coming under attack for murder and selling US weapons to the enemy, whoever that is today! Isn’t that an impeachable offence to start your own army as president?
By the way, where is Osama bin Laden? Is Bush concerned about him yet?

Posted by: Dan Wayment | September 22, 2007, 3:00 am 3:00 am

Those comparing the Bush presidency to a dictatorship, or our political system to fascism, are ignoring history and discounting reality. Read. Research. Try to learn what life under a dictator is really like, before making ridiculous comments online.

Posted by: dks0442 | September 22, 2007, 3:16 am 3:16 am

Do you think all of you could do a better job????? Probably not, so get over it and SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!!!!!!!

Posted by: T | September 22, 2007, 3:48 am 3:48 am

George W. Bush is an idiot. He should have at least faked some sort of Al Qaeda connection or even made up some WMDs. Its stupid to say that the country is stabalizing when his own researchers are finding the facts to dire to spin. Just walk away now and serve out your term in a better light. Make friends with Iran, show Palestinians that you’re their friend and make America a better place.

Posted by: webterractive | September 22, 2007, 4:21 am 4:21 am

Bush IS a dictator!!!! If he is going against the will of the people, he is a dictator. Period.

Posted by: moderateistheway | September 22, 2007, 7:12 am 7:12 am

Bush fired people that rejected the faulty intelligence data prior to him selling the war to Congress.

Posted by: moderateistheway | September 22, 2007, 7:13 am 7:13 am

Bush moved resources from Afganistan into Iraq. Why do you repubs think that he has done a good job???

Posted by: moderateistheway | September 22, 2007, 7:15 am 7:15 am

Too funny

Posted by: TamSam | September 22, 2007, 7:18 am 7:18 am

I thought Canada was better, then this
But maybe not.

Posted by: Allen | September 22, 2007, 7:27 am 7:27 am

Maclean’s is irrelevant. Go and find another country to blame for America’s problems. Canada haters. Why do you hate everyone but yourselves so much? Let me guess, you need doctor Phil to explain this one.

Posted by: Tez | September 22, 2007, 7:37 am 7:37 am

Who needs enemies if we have so many Americans hating their hpresident?

Posted by: Gregory Markzon | September 22, 2007, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Who needs enemies if we have so many Americans hating their hpresident?

Posted by: Gregory Markzon | September 22, 2007, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Gregory:
1.Bush fired people that rejected the faulty intelligence data prior to him selling the war to Congress.
2.Bush moved resources from Afganistan into Iraq-Dropped the ball
3. Religious extremist
4. Won’t change strategy despite actual evidence.

Posted by: moderateistheway | September 22, 2007, 8:06 am 8:06 am

If almost 90% of the people disagree with the President and he continues to ignore them, he is a dictator.

Posted by: moderateistheway | September 22, 2007, 8:07 am 8:07 am

The President has his eyes open. He did not use the words Right wing conspiracy left wing comspiracy, he just trying to fight people who hate us and do whatever is possible to hit us. They alrady did. Why do you think they stopped. To read silly Canadian magazine?

Posted by: Gregory Markzon | September 22, 2007, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Bush certainly has all the right traits to be Saddam. Arrogant, prideful, unwilling to admit mistakes. The one thing he lacks is Saddam’s intelligence.

Posted by: TomBob | September 22, 2007, 8:17 am 8:17 am

With or without intelligence he outplays our smart congresspersons any time he wants. He does it in style too.

Posted by: Gregory Markzon | September 22, 2007, 8:21 am 8:21 am

You Americans,don’t let binladen and his terorists rule this world. Don’t be short-sighted. Don’t be weaklings. The war is really ugly. But good life will never come to you when your America is under the ashes. You are the only nation on earth capable of stopping bin laden and his demonic cohorts from dominating this earth. Make sacrifice now or else we all will perish with you. It’s just too late to realize by then that “survival of the fittest” is still the rule of life. Good bye good life by then!

Posted by: ben pinlac | September 22, 2007, 8:25 am 8:25 am

Marzon, I’ll respond with an equally effect retort, “Nuh Uh!”…..there. You’re effectively neutralized.

Posted by: TomBob | September 22, 2007, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Finally we see a real enemy coming aboard. Are the rest of you who are enjoying Canadian shtick understand now what is in stake.

Posted by: Gregory Markzon | September 22, 2007, 8:36 am 8:36 am

If Canada has “Freedom of the Press”, what’s your problem, don’t buy a copy, it’s your right. George has run this country like a dictatorship, and a few noisy “fanatics” have been pushing to make us happy with his schemes. Someone wrote about Hillary not long ago,”IF IT WALKS LIKE A DUCK, QUACKS LIKE A DUCK, AND LOOKS LIKE A DUCK…..IT’S A DUCK!”

Posted by: art | September 22, 2007, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Having lived in Canada for a couple of years, I am not surprised by this nor the frequent comments by Canadians on this type of thing. Land of the smug. They like to think everything they do is perfect and they’re more important then they really are. While I loathe all things Bush and hate this war myself? I must view this as though they’re knocking my relative. I can knock him, buy you guys can’t. Not in this public fashion as I think it’s over the top. Sorry. As far as I’m concerned you do nothing to put yourselves out there, and are living like you are because we have done so much for you. Easy to judge when you can’t take any risk yourselves?

Posted by: Sandra | September 22, 2007, 9:03 am 9:03 am

newsjunkoff- pipe and smoke it??? Oh I get it you are a Clinton Fan!!!!!
ps. good luck with the eagles as well this year…

Posted by: Shawn | September 22, 2007, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Terribly disturbing! Canada should be ashamed of themselves! As the mother of a United States Marine I find this to be quite offensive… Ungrateful Northerners! Before you jump all over this, lets remember, it’s not about being a Bush supporter or basher, he is the Commander in Chief and my sons boss! I hope Canada never needs a helping hand as I’d be the first to cut it off! Shame shame shame!

Posted by: Kim | September 22, 2007, 9:10 am 9:10 am

At least Saddam had a brain!

Posted by: Becky | September 22, 2007, 9:31 am 9:31 am

To the person who said people outside of th US should show respect to Bush because he’s the US president, regardless of how we feel about him: Does that mean you’d respect and honour Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Iran, simply due to his presidential garb? I suspect you don’t, given how his request to lay a wreath at Ground Zero was received
I come from a military family, and feel for the soldiers and their families – o all stripes. But I also feel that Bush and his cadre are dangerous rogues on the world stage. It doesn’t hurt to argue and debate – it hurts far more to blindly defer to a man with that much firepower, be it Bush or those of Saddam’s ilk. Long live debate!

Posted by: Valarie | September 22, 2007, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Why is it other countries can see what’s happening in our country when the people of the US can’t? Military families and those military hurt in Bush’s war seem to be trying the make sense of why they were sent into a no win situation. Why were their bodies mutilated, why were sons and daughters killed needlessly? War is a no win for anyone – except Bush. He got the man “who almost killed my daddy.” GW Bush will go down in history as a divider, a dictator, and a war monger

Posted by: Diane | September 22, 2007, 9:58 am 9:58 am

This is dispicable! Bush is an excellent president and stands by his convictions better than the last president we had. He is concerned for America and I, personally, trust him completely!!!

Posted by: marsum42 | September 22, 2007, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Kim, as a ‘mother of a marine’ who thinks it proper to tell the truth, you ought to be ashamed to be a mother who has no more respect for her son than to support a president who is sending him into harm’s way for absolutely NO good reason. What kind of a mother prefers a warmongering president over the senseless endangering of her own son?

Posted by: JL | September 22, 2007, 10:05 am 10:05 am

i am going to buy this issue. it is a great job. it tells the truth.

Posted by: greatjob | September 22, 2007, 10:13 am 10:13 am

To whoever posted about the media being left-wing:
Well, actually, from what I can observe, the media is more right-wing than left, and only goes left when it’ll make their ratings go back up.

Posted by: PatronofHealin07 | September 22, 2007, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Hypothetically if a cover of say Time or Newsweek Magazine depicted some Canadian leader in a derogatory manner such as this one has of Bush, we Americans would probably being writing here telling the Canadians to just “deal with it.” It falls back to the old adage of, “I disagree entirely with your position, but will defend to the death your right to express it.”
Freedom of the Press works both ways.

Posted by: Big Blue | September 22, 2007, 10:35 am 10:35 am

marsum42: “.. and I, personally, trust him completely!!!”
It is exactly THAT which is eroding the democracy in this country. Question nothing, trust big brother. Perhaps YOU are not man enough to take care of your own family without GWB tapping your phone… but I AM.
And as for my fellow Americans dissing Canada because they have an opinion: Do you really expect other nations to just shut up while the big bully does whatever he wants? Respect is earned… not forced, and we have no one other then George Bush to blame for our world image.

Posted by: Troy Street | September 22, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Woody, if you studied your history you would know that Canadians both French and English speaking were fighting and dying for two years before we in the U.S. even got into World War II. They flew fighters during the Battle of Britain. They fought and died in North Africa and on D-Day and right up until the war ended. And there were the three years of trench warfare during World War I before we came in to fight. Did the U.S. turn the tide in these wars? Yes, we did. Did we do it or even could have done it alone? No, we didn’t and no we couldn’t. And there are Canadian forces fighting in Afghanistan today.

Posted by: Big Blue | September 22, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am

This is not even news. Major news magazines in countries across the world have compared Bush most often with Saddam, Stalin, or Hitler. Most of it just doesn’t reach our shores. “Liberal news media”? You’ve got to be kidding me. The news agencies in this country are by far the most conservative in any free country. Many world news items deemed inappropriate for the ears of Americans are never broadcast or distributed here. Major world news organizations have also reported on the fixing of the 2004 elections (before it happened), and the death of Osama bin Laden in late 2001, but again most in America never heard a peep.

Posted by: BU36 | September 22, 2007, 11:09 am 11:09 am

It is a sad thing to compare President Bush to a mass murderer. I am sorry to see our friends from the north stoop to to this level of hatefulness.
Posted by: RDA | Sep 21, 2007 5:00:09 PM
Really? Last I checked Bush IS a mass murderer.

Posted by: TamSam | September 22, 2007, 11:15 am 11:15 am

I think this Canadian article insults Sadam unfairly. What an awful comparison.

Posted by: Patrick Henry | September 22, 2007, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Everyone seems to have a good opinion and a bad one on this small issue. Of course people want to take pot shots at others because they feel insecure on there point of view they need to defend it. If anything we should take this artical for as it stands and look at it as it is, it’s the only way we will grow as people.
However I would like to point out to “Shawn” on his final comment on internal buissnes, to which I suport but wish to make clear that that there is just a small diference. Any matters in Canada about Quebec are internal because Quebec is in Canada, however Iraq is not in the US there for not an internal matter as the case may be so everyone is practicaly open to opinion on it. As for “liberation” of our wonderful provence and shouting it at the boarder I don’t think would be nessasary. During the clinton administration a small onvoy talked with quebec sepratists about there options, the US state department seems to have it covered.

Posted by: STIX | September 22, 2007, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Bush has not ordered the killing of innocent civilians – so he isn’t a mass murderer.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | September 22, 2007, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Lets see… Private Army [check], Civilian deaths [check], Pollution of the land to fit own purposes [check], Weapons of Mass Distruction [nope - Sadam didn't have'em], Brains [nope - Bush doesn't have'em] — no, I can’t say this is a really good match here – interesting though.

Posted by: Rick_VT | September 22, 2007, 11:24 am 11:24 am

During the onset which led us to this “war” (I personally call it and attack and an occupation) had a US based magazine posted some sort of nasty picture of the leader of France or Russia you’d have been gleeful to say the least. Funny how the right can’t eat out of the same dish they feed to others.

Posted by: DK | September 22, 2007, 11:28 am 11:28 am

The war in Iraq is so very tragic on so many levels. My nephew is on his way back there for a second(and longer) tour next month. My sister told me that he still isn’t over the deaths by an I.E.D of two of his friends with whom he ate breakfast with four hours before they were killed. My nephew called the war in Iraq a “total waste. They[Iraqis] hate us or are scared to have anything to really do with us. You can see it in their eyes except for the little kids.”
His is a voice that Bush will never hear because his “visits” to the troops are photo ops, and every soldier or Marine knows what they are to say even if it is not what they really think or feel. Whereas Bush looks at maps and believes only his own spin, my nephew and so many others there look at real blood and death. You can’t put spin on a flag-draped casket.

Posted by: Big blue | September 22, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am

ellsbells – wrong. Bush’s order to invade Iraq resulted in the deaths of THOUSANDS of innocent civilians.

Posted by: May Ann | September 22, 2007, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Flag draped caskets? that’s funny I don’t remember ever seeing any of those……….

Posted by: DK | September 22, 2007, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Some people are not members of the “right” and still think this type of name calling and comparisons by both extremes are infantile expressions. It likely stems from a need to demonize the other because they are deeply insecure in their own position and ability to make coherent, legitimate arguments of the issues at hand. It is easier for one to cast Bush on the same level as Saddam, Hitler, whatever, and dismiss him.

Posted by: Jeff | September 22, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I just feel like people do not understand just how EVIL Saddam was. We are fighting a war – people are going to die. Our soldiers are not slaying innocent civilians.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | September 22, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Bush has been responsibly for more dead Iraqis than Saddam ever was…..

Posted by: TomBob | September 22, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

ellsbells, tell that the the remaining relatives of the 14-year-old Iraqi girl raped, shot and burned by US soldiers….sheesh.

Posted by: TomBob | September 22, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Under Saddam there wasn’t 100+ Iraqis being killed every single day. Now, we get to pay to rebuild Iraq while our country falls apart.

Posted by: Becky | September 22, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Nobody needs to apologize for your President because he is doing what we, AMERICAN PEOPLE, voted him into office to do. You moveduh org clones (who took your money then helped elected your President) are on the OUTSIDE looking in, smudging up your computers screens with spittle are you frantically type your hatred. The comparison is not ‘unfair’ it’s stupid….and so ridiculous it’s amusing. The democrat reporters who write this nonsense are not even smart enough to be embarrassed, which I guess is how they keep from going back to their jobs at the fast food drive-thru. As an apologist for John Kerry, you must be equally outraged by the fraud surrounding your President’s service to his country as a fighter pilot that Dan Rather is now suing over? …and speaking of frauds, he is just another democrat loser opportunist who had his little party backfire! LOL This election was no different then any other except that cry baby democrats sent lawyers to every close race and filed lawsuits…..and when their little tantrum was thrown out of court, they were exposed for the losers they are. If a lawsuit is filed, the ruling takes place in a court room…yes.. uh, so what has you so confused?

Posted by: cheesetoppings69 | September 22, 2007, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

I am sick of so many people poking fun at Bush and saying how dumb he is. If he is so dumb how come 300,000,000 people in this country can’t get rid of him? Why do we continue to tolerate what he has done to our country, are we just that complacent or are we that dumb, apparently the latter! I am beginning to wonder where Bush has done the most harm,Iraq or America, but I guess that is a loaded question and some general will have to clear that up. In order to prove how smart we all are in 2008 we will most likely trade this bumb for another and we can all live happily ever after, YEAH!!

Posted by: Harry Edwards | September 22, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

dks0442 …yeah, so when are you going to start???

Posted by: "We the people" want America back !!! | September 22, 2007, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

As usual, you hippies miss the point. Your President, George W. Bush, was elected in HUGE NUMBER by us, the AMERICAN VOTERS. He is doing an excellent job fulfilling the commitments he made to the AMERICAN VOTERS. You are the losers known as ‘democrats’. You are on the OUTSIDE looking in with your 3% approval ratings – the lowest in the history of United State polling data. It never seems to occur that the freak show on the hill has FAR LOWER approval ratings then the President you keep crying about? Shouldn’t you be hysterical about dumping them and returning the Republicans who belong in power and know what to do with it? Either way, we, the AMERICAN VOTERS, will fix that in 2008.

Posted by: cheesetoppings69 | September 22, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

It’s no wonder our young people are becoming more and more rude and disrespectful to their parents, to the elderly and to people who have been elected into public office. Such disrespect and hatefulness breads more disrespect and hate and the story goes on and on. Good luck America.

Posted by: Samantha | September 22, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

You remaining Bush supporters don’t seem to realize the level of horror, disgust and rage so many of us feel. Try and remember your feelings about the Clinton and Monica escapade. Bush is the most dangerous man in the world right now, tilting our nation dangerously towards being run by the military-industrial complex Eisenhower warned us about. The Iraq war is generating billions in profits for a multitude of war businesses – and providing us no benefits at all, just a massive tax bill that our children will be paying for a long time.

Posted by: McGreen | September 22, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

this is horrible! there is no reason to do that to some one, whether you like them or not! Bush is our president; we need to show respect.
you know he (Bush) is doing the right thing when everyone hates him.

Posted by: ShowSomeRespect | September 22, 2007, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

It’s sad how the folks on the right forget that a portion of the military are democrats…Especially when they try do demonize the left as unpatriotic…The next time you wish to badmouth your fellow Americans, remember there are liberal service men and women fighting and dying in Iraq for your “freedom” to do so!

Posted by: Fedup | September 22, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

How long is ABC going to keep the left wing extremist HATE article posted on their main page…….? They’re doing a good job helping the Democratic National Committee .. with this free negative ad campaign donation

Posted by: FidoNY | September 22, 2007, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Look W Bush is a total mess. Jimmy Carter’s days of ineptness are way more appealing than this current presidents bungling. Bush W has no grip on the reality of international politik. He’s blown all the coffers and turned the conservative base into big government denialists. The neo cons are busy attaching freedom and liberty slogans while ironically denying those same things in practice to all. Hell W doesn’t even want to take care of sick children but has plenty of cash for Blackwater. So much for the compassionate conservative. He’s handled the war very badly and shouldn’t have started it to begin with. Yeah he’s the worst president since Hoover and maybe since Andrew Johnson.
Nevertheless as bad and inept a leader as W is I don’t think it’s quite fair to portray the man as Sadaam Hussein. Look- Hussein did try to kill W’s dad #41. How would you feel if someone caricatured you as the very guy who tried to kill your dad? Of course how stupid was Sadaam for trying to put a hit out on the patriarch of one of the most powerful families of our time.
Anyways I’m hardly a supporter of #43 I did like and still do like #41. Another irony is that #41 was probably one of the most ingenious and talented globe trotters out there.
The cover is in bad taste. Pick a different villain or bumbler.
Tom Vaitys

Posted by: Tom Vaitys | September 22, 2007, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

BUSH IS A GREAT MAN! DEAL WITH IT, PLUS 2 FOR 2 POOR KERRY! LOL!

Posted by: BUSH IS GREAT! | September 22, 2007, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

ShowSomeRespect – he’s not our President. He’s an illegal, unelected occupant of the White House. Al Gore won the 2000 election and everyone knows it. So if you angry cons want us to respect Bush, you need to start showing respect for the REAL President: Al Gore.

Posted by: May Ann | September 22, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Kim – I’m the wife of a US Marine and I think Bush is an utter disgrace and should be impeached. Also, I think Canada is a great nation and we could learn alot from them. Keep your hate to yourself.

Posted by: Bethany R. | September 22, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Saddam… yes.. God rest his soul… since he was able to keep this volatile region peaceful, and GWB has not…. you tell me where the evil lies.
Meanwhile, of course, Osama is obviously enjoying the lifestyle of the rich and famous.

Posted by: Troy Street | September 22, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

I just feel people do not understand just how EVIL Bush is. We are fighting a war – people are going to die.

Posted by: Father Ted Crilly | September 22, 2007, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

To JL: PLEASE DON’T EVER tell me the kind of mother I am because I Support my son and those like him who’ve chosen the road less traveled! He could have done anything with his life but chose to serve his country! You are an idiot and and a spineless keyboard warrior! You think bashing the president and spewing stupidities does anything positive for the situation? Who in the hell do you think you are? It’s people like you that make the rest of us look like morons!

Posted by: Kim | September 22, 2007, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

The fact remains that Bush unleashed a catastropic war that has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people – way more than Saddam ever killed. And the chaos is Iraq is DIRECTLY his fault since he signed off on Rumsfeld’s completely inadeqaute plan for the occupation. These civilian deaths are on Bush’s head as much as they are on Al Queda in Iraq’s, the Sadr Militias, The Sunni insugents, etc. – since NONE of these organizations would exist without Bush’s bungling.

Posted by: Jane Says | September 22, 2007, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Tom Vaitys – How about Mussolini? He was more of a comic blowhard and a massive military incompetent like Bush. Nevertheless his incompetent bumbling still killed thousands.

Posted by: Jeremy | September 22, 2007, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

IF you are the wife of a Marine you should be ashamed of yourself! You should know better than to spew nonsence about our president as YOU HUSBAND’S learned during his Recruit training to keep his mouth shout and carry out the mission! It is not about whether you like Bush or not or whether you support the war or not, HE IS OUR COMMANDER IN CHIEF and to compare him to a murderer is ridiculous! Deranged? Young Grasshopper, that is why you are only the wife of one and not the MOTHER of one! You are an embarrassment to the rest of us that stand firmly behind our Marine’s! P.S. I could care less what you think of Canada!

Posted by: Kim | September 22, 2007, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Bush is not Saddam, but it is easy to see the parallels: acting ‘unilaterally’, responsible for thousands of deaths, ruling with fear (terrorism card is played every election cycle), ruling with ignorance (bad intelligence, suppression and manipulation of information).

Posted by: Eric | September 22, 2007, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

I love republicans! Vote republican! We are willing to help all the poor misguided home owners when they are in trouble, heck I am thinking about buying me one of those mansions with a cement pond and let all you democrats pay for it. Boy, a Hummer would look nice in my driveway, I’ll be able to afford it considering you will be paying for my mansion. Also, the heck with the kids health care, we need the money for the war for oil, my Hummer would be worthless without a lot of gas. Don’t forget we are the prolife party, so what if a few thousand Americans and a few hundred thousands Iraqies were accidentally killed during our war for oil they were probably worthless democrats anyway. Stem Cell research, forget it, let Michael J Fox shake a little bit, it is good exercise for him. If it weren’t for you democrats screwing up our reform on SS we wouldn’t have to borrow money from China to support this honerable war, we could have just used the money we cheated the old worthless people out of, heck they are about to meet their maker anyway. Vote Republican, remember “We are the prolife party, no cronyism, no nepotism” just good honest government!!

Posted by: Harry Edwards | September 22, 2007, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

On a lighter note: Looks like Sen. Ted Stevens (R) of Alaska was recorded taking bribes on tape in an FBI sting. You Republicans should be proud. That’s a whole week that went by without ONE Republican scandal (unless you include that Republican US attorney from Florida (appointed by Alberto Gonzales) who was busted trying to have sex with that five-year old girl). CONGRATULATIONS on a GOOD WEEK for the GOP!!!

Posted by: wilder5121 | September 22, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

its not because the army is doing service to the commander in chief, that it is a service for humanity or other americans, we HAVEN`T BEEN ATTACKED BY IRAQ ON OUR SOIL

Posted by: joey | September 22, 2007, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Geez, wonder how long it will take for the whiney R-pubs in the Senate to take a vote on this form of free speech and denounce it because they’re sooooo offended insulting their fearless leader? But getting Swift-Boated was perfectly acceptable. Anyway, I don’t know about Bush being compared to Hussein, but another Fascist comes to mind!

Posted by: TDef | September 22, 2007, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Look at the lot of you, all buzzed up in a mess over a stupid picture of a stupid man. You’re all fightin with each other and such that you aren’t able to unite. So, stop calling it the United States and call it what it is, “The House Divided Upon Itself”.
From the great nation of Texas.

Posted by: chris | September 22, 2007, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

The book says there is not anything new under the sun and the old tired left is again pulling out their emaciated puke bag , the hate America first last and always barf.
I wish for the condition that would locate these America haters in the midst of much of the rest of the world and determine how many wish to stay in their new environment and how many would return to this nation.
Considering how many differences exist between the political left and right, perhaps Chris from the nation of Texas is right, maybe we’re too divided to reunite.

Posted by: Brennus | September 22, 2007, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

TomBob – they weren’t ordered to do that.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | September 22, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Wow Brennus – maybe if you dumb cons spent as much time fighting your war as you do hating liberals, you wouldn’t have lost it. LOL

Posted by: Mary Ann | September 22, 2007, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Why compare Bush to Saddam? Why not!

Posted by: eric | September 22, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

The first comment reads, “Sad to compare Bush to a mass murderer…” Bush IS a mass murderer! How many innocent civilians have been killed because of his illegal war? Hundreds of thousands — AT LEAST. How many more American soldiers will die because of his lies? And when are the right-wing nut cases going to realize that to oppose Bush is not equal to “hating America.” To love America is to oppose W (worst ever) and his war for oil. But OK, lets not compare him to Saddam.

Posted by: tom w. | September 22, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Canada is known as a peace keeping country, granted Prime Minister Harper is a conservative and quite ridiculous.

Posted by: Ash | September 22, 2007, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

one more comment, if bush can send his own people (troops) get killed in irak in a no win situation, he could attack us, he`s that crazy.

Posted by: joey | September 22, 2007, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

I can’t believe that there are spineless antiAmerican libs that somehow think that this President is worse or the same as Saddam. Absolutely pathetic. This President hasn’t ordered the slaughtering of liberals here in the USA. Violently and repeatedly raping of the women and slowly killing the husbands and sons.

Posted by: Sig_P226 | September 22, 2007, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

No he hasn’t but he has offered up a Constitution amendment to say 10 percent of the the country should never been equal. Yes he is a great guy!

Posted by: j | September 22, 2007, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Remember Alfred E Newman? Striking resemblance here as well – however quite humorous.

Posted by: dig4truth | September 22, 2007, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Wake -up people and see bush for what he really is!!!…and ABC your a disgrace to this country for not going after bush for the crimes this dictator has done!! It takes a Canadian news magazine to do your job!!! but the again you get your orders from the white house!!!

Posted by: JP | September 23, 2007, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Now, der Fuhrer Bush looks like a Christian Soldier.

Posted by: JohnShaft4 | September 23, 2007, 12:23 am 12:23 am

GW’s first ‘notable’ or possibly ‘warning’ comment on his first trip to Washington as President-Elect, Dec., 2000…
“If this were a dictatorship, it’d be a heck of a lot easier… just as long as I’m the dictator.”
I remembered this (though have just located the actual quote above) and remember being stunned he could actually say something like this publicly.
Who knows (well some of us do I suppose) what he says and thinks ‘privately’… ‘Scary’ doesn’t express it.

Posted by: dig4truth | September 23, 2007, 12:48 am 12:48 am

After getting rid of those dolts Martin and Cretien we had two less reasons to be embarrassed to be Canadian. Now we have Taliban Jack (NDP), the Puffin Party (Liberal) and this cover from the twits at Maclean’s.

Posted by: javahead | September 23, 2007, 1:41 am 1:41 am

We the people… your point?

Posted by: dks0442 | September 23, 2007, 2:24 am 2:24 am

c’mon people, it’s freakin canada. a tree felled in canada, it doesn’t make a noise unless the american says it does.

Posted by: jenesus | September 23, 2007, 6:18 am 6:18 am

Since he was nominated, these last 8 yrs are filled with horror, blood and sadism. Right Saddam, for sadism!!! Somebody nailed it!!

Posted by: WOWNEWS | September 23, 2007, 6:47 am 6:47 am

What is sad is not that canadians can see the truth that the kneejerkers here with blinders on refuse to see with respect to Kommisar Bush. He and the people who support him are plain and simple authoritarians (aka fascists).
Given the level of sheer destructiveness for everyone concerned with this war, I think the comparison is valid, with the exception that Bush has killed even more than Saddam and has left Iraq and the USA both in much worse shape. In that way, he is worse than Saddam.
I get sick of all these ‘my president right or wrong’ apologists for what is inexcusable to be just as repugnant as Bush himself. I’m sick of the American blindered authoritarians. They’ve made a huge mess of everything and don’t deserve any attention be paid to their blind allegiance to a wannabe dictator.

Posted by: JL | September 23, 2007, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Ever notice how the really controversial stories, the ones which are sure to generate plenty of comments, are almost always relegated to this goofy “blogger” format so as to make the comments harder to read? Comparing Bush to Saddam is unfair to Saddam. Saddam didn’t level an entire country in order to ‘root out’ evil doers. He also never attacked the US to rid the world of our very real WMD’s, which number in the tens of thousands. Read the Lancet report of the actual number of Iraqi deaths since the war began– it’s not 30,000 (the official DoD number). It’s anywhere from 450,000 to 800,000. The Lancet is a medical journal– and unlike the corporate lackeys of the American media, they have no political agenda to push other than accurate reporting. No amount of spin will turn an illegal invasion of a sovereign nation (anti-US or not) into anything other than what it is– wrong. We have decimated their population, destroyed their nation, and have ransacked our own economy to do so.

Posted by: h5mind | September 23, 2007, 7:59 am 7:59 am

If we had kept up in Afganistan, the terrorists would have been wiped out, instead they have used the opportunity to spread everywhere in the middle east, while our troops are thinly spread across Iraq. Even though OBL was behind 911, Bush says that he doesn’t care much either way about getting him. That is so rediculous. Iraqis didn’t cause 911, OBL did with othe terrorists. WE INVADED THE WRONG COUNTRY. And, do you really think Congress would have voted for the war, if the mission was to just liberate the Iraqi people? I don’t think so, not when the real enemy was somewhere else. Bush fired all the people that objected to the WMD intelligence prior to selling it to congress. Just ask Clark or any of the other people Bush tried to sweep under the carpet. THe fact that you support him still is pathetic.

Posted by: moderateistheway | September 23, 2007, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Bush is the next Hitler…its the “STATES” That Have to prevail…its the “STATES” That Have to be #1…Anybody smell Sepremicy? Good God where would the world be if the precious STATES Weren’t The FIRST there? Probobly a better state of affairs then what its in now!! In My Opinion…Anyone that goes to war for their “Country” is Suicidle…Hey Bush…USE YOUR BRAIN!!Use SENSE…and deal wirh matters PEACIBLY…Who are you trying to impress by flexing your millitary muscles?

Posted by: Sum Guy... | September 23, 2007, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Why can’t you repubs get it in your head that BUSH DROPPED THE BALL IN AFGANISTAN.

Posted by: m | September 23, 2007, 9:02 am 9:02 am

BUSH FIRED ANYONE THAT DISAGREED WITH THE WMD INTELLIGENCE

Posted by: m | September 23, 2007, 9:05 am 9:05 am

I Really don’t think Bush knows how to run a country…hes only there cause his Ol’ Dad was into politics…so hes just the next in line…

Posted by: WHO | September 23, 2007, 11:00 am 11:00 am

prime minister maliki wants to kick out remove blackwater visas for the unprovoked killings and dictator bush wants him to change his mind and persuade him that blackwater stays in irak, who does he think he is……. a dictator

Posted by: joey | September 23, 2007, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Why do some names show up over and over. Cheesetoppings says the same stuff repeatedly, arguing with those who don’t agree with his OPINION. Kim calls names, tells people they are stupid, and asserts we don’t care about American Soldiers if we don’t see things HER way. There are so many more, if you want to push your opinions, either run for office, join the military, or start a Sunday morning talk show. My OPINION is, if you don’t like it, don’t buy the magazine, cancel your subscription, whatever….but, freedom of speech guarantees they are allowed to voice their opinion.

Posted by: heilbush | September 23, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Next month, same hat/moustache, the picture will be Dick Cheney’s.

Posted by: able | September 23, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Once a upon a time in a middle eastern country far away an imperialistic, colonialistic, neo con, born again messiah complex white male American President granson of a Nazi thought he could “fix” things. Manufacturing “evidence” appeared to be no problem because he answered to a higher authority. Never accustom to doing his homework, after all he partied through school and had daddy “fix” any and all arising problem, he neglected to read middle eastern history. Listening to swaggering toadies who had never served in the military themselves he became the “War President.” Ta Da! Onward Christian soldiers marching off to war made the blood rush through his veins. But somehow something became amiss. His ungrateful feudal peasents resented their children being slaughterd in his war, he broke his kingdoms budget, and lost the support of his feudal knights.
To make matters worse he now appears as the foe he attacked, and published as such. Woe unto him, a self fulfilling prophecy indeed.

Posted by: Sandra Lea | September 23, 2007, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Good for them. The man is no better than the rest of the world’s tyrants, he lies to america, causes terror in order to further his agenda! People dont realize just how evil the man really is!

Posted by: no one | September 23, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

One of Petraeus`s main proofs of the success of Bush`s surge, repeatedly endorsed by the President, is the partnership with the Sunni Tribesmen who had been killing our troops last year. Saddam`s power base were these same tribesmen. Figure it out.

Posted by: A Viet Nam Vet | September 23, 2007, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

This is from a right wing magazine.

Posted by: Paul Belair | September 23, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

I think the main reason the article compared Bush to Saddam was from the viewpoint of the Iraqis themselves. It was pointed out by an Iraqi that ‘Bush is the new Saddam’. I has nothing to do with MacLean’s being a so-called ‘leftist’ rag; actually in my view, MacLean’s is a bit on the right side. I guess it’s all perspective. And more perspective is better than more right-wing rhetoric.

Posted by: Sean | September 23, 2007, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Quite sad that many of you people missed the point of the magazine. Hmmm maybe 40% plus Americans are unable to read the contents. It means that Bush is using the same tribes and tactics that Saddam used. In other words things in Iraq are back to normal

Posted by: Backcut | September 23, 2007, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Macleans Magazine is actually fairly conservative. I’m willing to bet none of you here have read it before. This story and its cover, clearly a surprise to Americans based on the majority of views above, does largely represent what most non-Americans feel about the US actions in Iraq. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 and everyone outside of the US knows it. The problem is that most Americans don’t know the truth and are clearly misinformed by the intentional and constant US government and media collusion to keep you thinking that the US attack on Iraq was anything other than what it was. You and I may not live in Iraq, but just think how bad things are there that most Iraqis were actually better off before the US invaded. Now think what you’d think of the US if you were them. Bush >= Saddam

Posted by: Kevin Bruce | September 23, 2007, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Typical…For all of you spouting all the “right-wing vs. left-wing” and “Oh how anti-American” silliness: Try actually reading the article, and exposing yourself to information that goes beyond nationalist spin you’re constantly bombarded with. You might actually start to get a handle on some genuine truths, gain a broader world view, and maybe finally find the political will to actually start DOING something about what this administration has been doing.
This is not even remotely about anti-Americanism. This IS indicative of a general understanding that this President is out of control, and has done massive damage to America’s reputation on the world stage, to the economy, and to the Republican party. Not to mention just how much he has managed to divide the nation.
Following a bad leader blindly is disrespectful of the freedoms we enjoy in a democracy

Posted by: Dan Tallion | September 24, 2007, 8:34 am 8:34 am

It is sad the fascists have gained so much traction under the bushbaby and their republican sycophants, but when the newsie outlets and networks conduct a thorough vetting of the bushbaby “UNDIES” and test the brown streak thereunto, well then the comedy is delivered with each newsie cycle and the depths are explored daily…

Posted by: daddy | September 24, 2007, 10:18 am 10:18 am

How about you start by looking up the word ‘fascist’ in the dictionary. …if you can figure out how to do that, then write back with your apology. Your President is doing what he promised to do during the last election when we, the AMERICAN VOTERS, swept him into office. Excellent work George W. Bush, carry on!! These silly democrats are all talk until another terrorist attack does get through and they’re in their basements curled up in the fetal position blubbering in their cell phones for someone will come save them. LOL

Posted by: cheesetoppings69 | September 24, 2007, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Whats the difference between G.W.Bush and Saddam Hussein?
al-qaeda didn’t want Saddam to be re-elected.

Posted by: waleeg | September 24, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

GWB is the first president to actually attempt to alter and permanently change the Constitution’s Bill of Rights. As, we speak, he is attempting again to deny citizens the freedom to privacy in every aspect of daily life. A satellite is positioned to spy on any citizen without their knowledge. Private conversations are already a thing of the past. When you call your loved-one… the “I love you..” will be heard and recorded for hundreds of other ears to hear. Hell, picking your nose will no longer be a private matter! Saddam NEVER had it as good as Bush!

Posted by: Shamrock | September 24, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I think the cover photo is actually reflecting the views of the MAJORITY of Iraqi citizens who now think their life was BETTER under a satanic Saddam rather than a bumbling Bush…

Posted by: BooRadley | September 24, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

mmmh….post irag…..who would ever believe they were a threat….it’s just oil….and revenge….for his daddy….what I worry about….he’s already refuted our constitution…..what if he refuses to leave office?….are you gonna fight him and his troops?…..something to think about……

Posted by: DONNA | September 24, 2007, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

one more thing….he was never voted into office …..the american public voted otherwise…the election was stolen….amazing what money can do…..

Posted by: donna | September 24, 2007, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

The last time I knew, this country was run by the majority. To say that GWB is doing what he wants, is the definition of a DICTATORSHIP. When the leader does his own will, without explanation, it’s a dictatorship. Don’t oppose the government, don’t keep secrets from your government, don’t try to change the government, follow mindlessly, is the rallying cry of Dictators.

Posted by: bush | September 24, 2007, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Here,s to george. he,s got style, taking the U.S. down the drain but with a smile.

Posted by: gk stuart | September 25, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

To the person who said “if canada were attacked they would run to the u.s. for help”. remember the war of 1812? the only country to attack canada was the u.s.a.Jefferson said; “it,s only a matter of marching”. hull, invaded canada july 12 1812, ran back to detroit,chased by maj. gen. brock and surrendered without a fight. attack across niagra river oct. 13 .. crushed, 1812 dearborn tried to advance north from lake champlain…crushed.now your looking at our freshwater to supply the u.s.a.? now your disputing our northwest passage (artic)? most americans do not realise that we (canada) are you best friends, biggest trading partner, and supply you with more energy. oil ,gas, electric power than anyone else.so, if like jefferson, someday you feel like taking a walk north to get some remember 1812

Posted by: gk stuart | September 25, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

George Bush has disgraced the office of president, and inflicted pain, suffering and needless death on hundreds of thousands of innocent people. He intentionally misled our country into an unnecessary war, costing billions of our dollars and the lives of thousands of of honorable soldiers – for nothing. He ignored the economy and global warming, pardoned a convicted perjurer, presided over the politicization of government and justice, ignored the geneva convention and the kyoto agreement, condoned torture, and abuses civil rights as stated in the constitution. He has not treated the office of president with dignity or respect, and as such he deserves no respect. He is a liar, a coward, and incapable of admitting a mistake. He fully deserves to be compared to Saddam, and fully deserves to be brought to justice.

Posted by: Tom | September 26, 2007, 12:29 am 12:29 am

One undeniable thing: in Canada we have freedom of press. Whether true or not, appropriate or immature, does the U.S. major media have the freedom of expression that this cover flaunts?

Posted by: Adam | September 27, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

At times I wonder what it would take to have Bush formally removed from office .. War crime charges?
Evidence of the countless covert rendition operations?
Conspiracy charged for stealing the election in the first place?
And yet, all three of the above took place years ago while Bill Clinton was nearly impeached for Lewinsky …
I can understand why Americans are upset regarding the Maclean’s cover, perhaps because it shows Bush to be a lesser evil, being portrayed as Hussein.

Posted by: M Madsynn | October 19, 2007, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.