By Ed O'Keefe

Sep 14, 2007 2:58pm

Gingrich Fears Romney’s Money

ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports: For the first time, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich identified Mitt Romney’s multi-million dollar fortune as psoing a significant hurdle to his ability to get into the 2008 presidential race.

"If he can drown you, what’s the point of going and trying," said Gingrich. "I mean, if the net result is he’ll drown you, then it’s pretty silly to go out and compete with him."

The former House Speaker predicted Romney is prepared to write a $50 – $60 million check to his campaign.

"Gov. Romney will set the tone for the scale of resources you need in the Republican primary," said Gingrich during a breakfast with reporters in Washington, D.C.

Before making a final decision on whether he will get into the 2008 presidential race, Gingrich plans to spend the month of October seeing if he can line up $30 million in financial commitments.

This will tell him whether it is "realistic to be on the same playing field with Gov. Romney."

On his financial disclosure report, Romney estimates his assets as being worth somewhere between $190 – $250 million.

As of the June 30 end of the second quarter, Romney had loaned his campaign $8 million while raising approximately $35 million from 80,000 individual donors.

Asked if Gingrich was correct in thinking that Romney was prepared to inject $50 – $60 million into his campaign, Romney spokesman Kevin Madden would not directly answer.

"Our campaign is focused on building a grassroots network of volunteers and contributors across the country," said Madden.  "These folks are joining our campaign and investing both their time and their efforts growing our donor base because they know that a national campaign is about teamwork and building a national movement of supporters.  That’s where our focus remains."

Gingrich said "the odds are very high" that he will not run for president.

He did not, however, completely rule it out and he urged those currently in the race to make a "clean break" from President Bush and the "current structure of government."

"If you don’t represent real change," said Gingrich, "you just gave away the 2008 election."

User Comments

Gingrich is right, but my bet is that Romney is too thick to understand it. Romney very well may spend over $100M attempting to convince people that he is:
1) Honest
2) Genuine
3) Intelligent
No amount of money can prove the world is flat.

Posted by: PJ | September 14, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

The big problem the GOP has besides Bush is that they will not forcibly come out and say what Americans want to hear, like-”slam the border shut” or tell Islam to never attack the US again or does the name Harry Truman mean anything to you thugs” We want a tough guy not a corporate suit mealy mouthing and the GOP will not give it to us.

Posted by: rockychance | September 14, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I simply don’t believe Romney is genuine in his beliefs and he comes off like a used car salesman. I want Newt to lead my Republican party to a real future! Romney at best would be status-quo.
Newt is the most intelligent, well spoken Republican out there. PLEASE RUN NEWT, WE NEED YOU!

Posted by: Mike | September 14, 2007, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

he urged those currently in the race to make a “clean break” from President Bush and the “current structure of government.”
“If you don’t represent real change,” said Gingrich, “you just gave away the 2008 election.”
++++++++++++++++++++++
No more true words ever spoken. But don’t just say it to get elected; change!

Posted by: JLW | September 14, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

I’m disappointed. I’m a social conservative and I’m desperately looking for a candidate.
I thought it would be Thompson, but it turns out he’s even less of a social conservative than McCain (which means he’s not a social conservative afterall).
I think I’m typical of social conservatives. We want a candidate who will push our views on key issues. Thompson will not. Thompson is against a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Thompson is a big disappointment.
Newt, it seems like it’s up to you. If you get in the race in October, you’ll sweep the South and do well with other social conservatives in the Midwest. You’ll have more delegates than any of the other four or five top vote getters. You can then make a deal with Huckabee where he is your VP.
You’ll win the nomination.
So, you might as well get in the race.

Posted by: Disappointed | September 14, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Disappointed,
Here is a news flash for you, the social issues on your agenda are not important to ANY of the republican candidates, except maybe Sam Brownback and perhaps Mike Huckabee. The republican party only uses those things to get people like yourself to vote for them, then they get in office and ignore them for their entire term. Cite Bush if you need Proof. It’s funny that someone who identifies themselves as “socially conservative” would relate to Newt. Knowing his checkered marital past. LOL. You republicans and your morals!

Posted by: Amazed | September 14, 2007, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Newt is the smartest man in America but the libs hate him almost as much as they hate Bush. That’s too bad because he has wonderful ideas. Mitt Romney is a great candidate and a proven leader that will get things done. I hope the Republicans like Romney and Thompson split from Bush very far on illegal immigration, the North American Union, and fighting politically correct wars. Also, since the corporations are royally screwing retirees that have spend 30+ years with them by taking away their health care benefits and stealing the pension funds, the Republicans should propose a plan to reduce Medicare to age 50 and that would be a great shot in the arm for them and wipe out Hillary’s massive Health Care Plan. It would just take 3 years – age 60 next year, age 55 the next and age 50 the third year. And the system is Already In Place.

Posted by: Bill | September 14, 2007, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

The only “real change” you can expect from a GOPER is what he carries in his pocket.

Posted by: doug | September 14, 2007, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

As long as you oppose illegal aliens to me. You’re ok. The Iraq war is over. People don’t want us there. So the next administration might be easier to say we’ll get out of there.

Posted by: marc | September 14, 2007, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

What Gingrinch doesn’t realize is that the GOP has failed on every level – including that of ideology. The fundamental “small government” ideology of the conservatives is a canard and a failure. It simply won’t work in a civilization as complex as ours. The GOP has failed utterly and completely under Bush and now it’s time for them to step aside for good.

Posted by: Patrick Fleiss | September 14, 2007, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

The founding father’s never thought the Presidency would be up for sale. They expected honor, integrity, and the upholding of the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. “Social Conservatives,” pushing a religious agenda violates the seperation of church and state period.

Posted by: Sandra Lea | September 14, 2007, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

If Newt is the “smartest man in America” then we’re all in much bigger trouble that I suspected. But then again, it doesn’t take much in the way of smarts to impress Republicans – most of them wouldn’t recognize genuine intelligence if walked up to them and handed them a New Yorker subsrciption LOL

Posted by: Jane Says | September 14, 2007, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

The candidate that finally says you have a one year federal tax break should get the vote,

Posted by: TS | September 14, 2007, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Good Lord – what rock did this crudpie crawl out from under? I though we were finally rid of Newt when his own party kicked him out of Congress. This hypocritical clown would be an even worse President than Bush. I would rather vote for a pile of dung than ever vote for another Republcian loudmouth for as long as I live. These fools are dragging the country down.

Posted by: Bill Zietz | September 14, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Dear Conservative GOPERS,
Why not try and join us in the democratic party, in vote, if not registration. We cover the farm from right to left to gay to corporate executive to families and parents and love to talk and argue all over the block. They call me a radical liberal and hey, I am for the death penalty. You might like our BLUE DOG democrats as an opening stepping stone to coming on in and get in out of the rain your peeps trickled down on you. And when you argue the abortion question, go right to GENESIS 2:7 and look at the “breath of life” clause and get off your fetus hugging so we can attend to our kids and their future…OK????? I like Ron Paul like my libertarian friend does but he is a TEXAS republican, kinda makes you nervous going there again, EH????? The ones among you not shy or quiet that want to talk turkey and save this country…COME ON DOWN…the price is right…we care about the poor as well, I am one of them too! And oh yea, don’t forget, the military rank and file is moving left to the Dems in droves and one of my best friends is a Vietnam marine democrat. Our party is better and our parties are better, try us out this time!!!!

Posted by: daddy | September 14, 2007, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Nobody cares what you psychotic Dem-hating cons have to say anymore. All you ever do is rant and rave about liberals and dems and moveon.org, but never say one damn thing about your own party’s excesses. Tell me, did you stand up and denounce the SwiftVets or the attacks on Max Cleland? Nobody cares what your kind thinks about anything anymore.

Posted by: Jane Says | September 14, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Patrick Fleiss – well spoken. The Republicans indeed had their shot to govern the nation according to their ideology and they blew it completely. They should not get a second chance until they can take some responsiblity for their failures. They have nobody to blame for their mistakes except themselves.

Posted by: Holly J | September 14, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Newt would make an outstanding VP to Rudy. I think that is the dream ticket.

Posted by: Scott | September 14, 2007, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

The biggest threat facing America today is illegal immigration. We need to send them back to Tiajuna. The problem is the leftists in the ACLU and so-called “human rights” who are afraid to defend our civilization from the Mexican invasion. We need to forget civil rights and declare Marshall Law – and send them all packing!

Posted by: Bill | September 14, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Illuminator – nope. I’m a proud mother of two wonderful kids.

Posted by: Jane Says | September 14, 2007, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Comments are oll over the lot – a few “Bush haters” who are also Clinton fans and never propose anything concrete as they have nothing to offer. The most realistic view is that there is a lot to balance, but the thinking person will put defense of the Nation above all. Too bad if some minor moral issue gets in the way, we are in the gunsights of all too many crazies, and if don’t survive, the social issues will be irelevant. Secure the Nation first and then there is time to settle the moral issues (which I believe are State issues anyway, except for the full faith and credit problem, which must be solved by a Constitutionl Amendment).

Posted by: TheOldTrooper | September 14, 2007, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

I’m a Republican and I don’t trust Gingrich as far as I can throw him (which isn’t very far, on account of his being fat)! Gingrich is a loose cannon and an egomaniac.

Posted by: David Riles | September 14, 2007, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Comments are all over the lot – a few “Dem Haters” who are also Bush fans and never propose anything concrete as they have nothing to offer.

Posted by: Jane Says | September 14, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Who is Gingrich kidding? He’s one of the least popular politicians alive today. His BEST numbers barely scratch Bush’s WORST numbers. But I think alot of the other posters are right – the GOP just doesn’t deserve another shot in ’08 after Bush. They need to be taught a lesson in humility and to sit this one out.

Posted by: Al Angelo | September 14, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Noot Gingrich is not electable as President. His common image is too extreme, radical, and boastful. The Doonesbury “bomb” image has stuck well.

Posted by: Kah Boom | September 14, 2007, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

hey Bill…I’m against illegal immigration with the best of them, want English as a standard language in the US…all that stuff, hard core. Primarily, the violent crime the commit is against one another. The non-violent crime against us all is the draining of our social services.

Posted by: ARSailorMom | September 14, 2007, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

I just wish there was somebody out there that was running for president that isn’t all about “money”, who can raise the most…in other words, how many favors do they owe and will run the country in a manner to repay those favors. I don’t give a rat’s putuee about Dems or Repubs…I used to say I am a Repub, but I’m not any more because I really don’t like being associated with the crooks in office that are members of that party. On the other hand, I don’t want to be affiliated with the crooks in office that call themselves Dem’s either! Where is a good, honest, American citizen to go to look for true leadership and someone that will at least TRY to keep campaign promises? Anybody? (And please don’t say Ron Paul…I’m sick up to here about him as well.)

Posted by: ARSailorMom | September 14, 2007, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Al Angelo: What does learning a little humility have to do with whether or not someone in the Democratic party can do any better? None of those people have any humility regardless of what party they belong to. We’ve only had one democratic president in the past many years, and he didn’t prove that the dem’s were just and honest! Reagan was the last true leader this country has had. Where’s the cloth he was cut from?

Posted by: ARSailorMom | September 14, 2007, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

There was a time when the republicans were FISCALLY conservative and not so worried about the social aspect. We need to return to that, though I am not sure Newt is the answer. Come on America… the billions of dollars we are spending in Iraq was a BAD business decision, NOT to mention the human toll on which no price tag can be attached. Newt wants change.. but does he want it because it’s the only way the republicans will survive… or because he ACTUALLY believes it?

Posted by: Troy Street | September 14, 2007, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

This is a country that needs to take a good look at what we are trying to accomplish. We have the resources and ability to make a better life for all. The structure of the government is fighting for position to make the wealthy more so and keep the poor down. There is no reason why everyone cannot have a good life with a roof over their head, food on the table, and proper health care. Who is going to supply this? Stop politics and start curing this nation.

Posted by: BIGBARRYW | September 14, 2007, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

I agree with some of the critical comments above, but still I want Newt to run. And I think he will run.
I agree Newt has some terrible character issues in his past, but as bad as they are, they aren’t as bad as Giuliani’s. Giuliani is the current frontrunner and his socially liberal policies would be a disaster for social conservatives. So, character problems included, Newt is the better choice between those two.
I also agree the Republican party often takes social conservatives along for the ride to get their votes and then forgets about them until the next election. That certainly would happen with some of the candidates this time (like the social liberal Giuliani and the libertarian Thompson), but Newt would push social conservative policies.
I disagree that the Republican party should get back to being fiscally conservative and forget about the social stuff. Without the social stuff, the Republican party would once again be a minority party. It’s good to remember that Goldwater (who hated the Christian right and often said so in the media) lost in a land slide. Then Nixon courted the social conservatives and the Repubilcans won.
Without the social conservatives, the Republicans will lose this time too.
It’s about policy choices. Hot air talk doesn’t count. Thompson keeps saying he’s against gay marriage but his policy choice does nothing effectual to stop it. Typical, all talk and no action.
Newt will be good on policy choices and he has the National presence to win the election.
Newt knows this and will run.

Posted by: Disappointed | September 14, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

We absolutely CANNOT have a president like Newt Gingrich. The guy is a confessed adulterer, don’t you know! If he can’t be faithful to his wife, there’s no WAY he can be trusted to be faithful to the American public! I don’t know how ANYONE can still vote Republican anyomre; I mean, just look at Gingrich, Mark Foley, Larry Craig, David Vitter, etc. — it’s a party of moral deviants! Sound familiar?! Moral of the story: These arguments work BOTH ways, conservative folk — not just against “libs” when it’s convenient for your political ends!

Posted by: TheDreaming1 | September 14, 2007, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Too late Newt, the GOP brand is forever tainted with scandal, corruption, waste, fraud, failure, lies, deception and BUSH!

Posted by: bob | September 14, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Anyone with sense would !

Posted by: drwfll | September 14, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Agree with Bob. Too late.

Posted by: marc | September 14, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Well folks, I was going to add a little wisdom, but as I read thru the comments, it looks like all you’ve got room for are haters, and I’m not it – so bye!

Posted by: Missouramule | September 14, 2007, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

When was the last time that anyone with any brains at all cared what Newt thought. This guy was run out of Congress by his own people. This guy should be in jail, not the White House. That any TV Network or any news publication would even give him a second on TV or a line on the net blogs or in the newspapers tells a lot about how corrupt the news industry has become. It’s all about the headlines! Absolutely nothing about integrity.
Perhaps October would be a good time for this guy to announce, it is after all the month of Halloween. Boooooo.

Posted by: Jo T | September 14, 2007, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Our political system is becoming more and more dysfuntional and corrupt. The crooks and liars make the biggest headlines… from both sides of the aisle. Very disturbing.

Posted by: bob | September 14, 2007, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

I am about the biggest relativist around, open to varying opinions and values, but I have to say, as far as I’m concerned, social conservatism and its attendant activism is one of the biggest blights on the this great country. It is amazing how these people preach limited government then turn around support the most intrusive policies (look no farther than the Shaivo case). As long as these nuts constitute the core of conservative values and the base of the Republican party, you can count me out.

Posted by: Jay | September 14, 2007, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Any Republican that plans to carry Bush’s water into the 08 elections is going to drown in it. Conservatives need to WAKE UP and realize that Bush is as close to a conservative as George Soros is to Ronald Reagan. Idiot Republicans keep on sucking down the poison kool-aid but don’t realize that they are going to get pounded next year.

Posted by: Brent | September 14, 2007, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

How forgetful are the Republicans. The
first time the former Mayor from New York got his chance against Hillary he
dropped out claiming prostrate cancer.
What a coward. Hillary won in a landslide. When Hillary sought re-election he never re-enterd the race to
prove that he could beat her. If he cant
beat her in his own backyard how is he
going to beat her in a national race?

Posted by: fitzroy | September 14, 2007, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

ArSailorMom – any Democrat in America can “do better” than any Republican simply because Republicans do NOT believe in the power of government to do good or make a positive difference. Today’s Republicans think that government is the enemy, which is why everything they do is doomed to failure. Democrats, on the other hand still believe in the power of government and in good governanace, therefore they at least have a shot a success. Republicans don’t – their cyncism only breeds corruption and dysfunction. The whole GOP ideology is a fraud and a disaster and Bush proved it conclusively. No More Republicans!

Posted by: Jane Says | September 14, 2007, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Newt needs to run for the southern border. Perhaps there hecan spew his hatefulness for all things Democratic and Repbulican, He can also whale away at Joe Libberman, the man of many faces
Newt and Joe make quite a pair. They are both turn-coats and thief’s
Ladies & Gentleman: What this country needs are two, perhaps three more political parties, with representative we could vote for. We need to split up the red states, blue states, the Republican vs Democrats and work for the American Legal Citizens of America
I feel the biggest terrior group is the Congress of the United States of America. Going not following on Constituation and are going to get us killed by the thousands. Those that are left will be put out by the illegals and their companys will have given their jobs to illegal aliens. Vote out any incumbant at the election. Vote Rudi out, I don’t like him for his scoop and dump policies at the World Trade Center. He just wanted to get to the gold that was in the basement. God Bless those poor souls who lost their lives in the trade center, the pentagon and on the fields of Penneyselvania.
No Yes vote for Newt in this house.
Anyone have a bumper sticker that
Nope to Newt! I sure would like to buy one.

Posted by: Jo T | September 15, 2007, 12:13 am 12:13 am

How come these Republicans are so ugly?
Look closely at all of them. They are
all ugly men with lean face and big
head. Look closely at Mccain, Thompson,
Guilliani, just to mention a few, and
now comes Gingrich. What a waste of time. No wonder their party keep searching for someone to run. Maybe
someone should recruit Rove to run and
label them all the ugliest men in the USA. Now we see why the Dems get all the
female votes. These people are real scary.

Posted by: fitzroy | September 15, 2007, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I can’t believe some of these people. So desperate for a morally decent candidate that you’ll try to latch onto another snake. What are you thinking. Gingrich is running a close second behind Guiliani for the first prize for corrupt morals. I’m from Georgia, 35 miles from his hometown of Carrollton. You speak his name around there and it’s like you uttered a cuss word. The guy had an affair while married in 1977, divorced, remarried his mistress, then has another affair with one of his own staff, divorces and remarries. His first wife was in the hospital with cancer when he served divorce papers to her. I mean come on guys, just because you’re drowning don’t pull the plug just yet.
The guy writes historical FICTION novels, or is that “political fiction”, he was the principle author of the now infamous “Contract on America” that eventually ended up getting him tossed out of the senate along with his buddy Tom Delay, besides that Jack Abramhoff is in jail and still singing. Who’s he going to get to raise funds for him?

Posted by: GC | September 15, 2007, 12:53 am 12:53 am

How ironic. One of the principal architects warning that the building isn’t safe.

Posted by: ommish | September 15, 2007, 6:18 am 6:18 am

I am a liberal/moderate Dem who thinks that Gingrich — while he was a partisan idiot while in Congress — starts to look a whole lot better in comparison to the Shrub and his supporters. This is true of all prior Republicans (including Nixon and Reagan). At least Gingrich can speak his mind without consulting the Rove talking points, something few Republicans in Congress have been willing to do until recently (when the Shrub’s veil was removed for most Americans). Now part of his candor might be because he is now an outsider who wants to return, and not subject to the same pressures as a member of Congress. However, this cannot be a complete explanation since Romney, McCain and Guiliani have yet to remove the gloves on Bush, though they do make ambiguous criticisms of the Shrub. Overall they sound like supporters of hte Shrub.

Posted by: Patrick Henry | September 15, 2007, 7:11 am 7:11 am

You know what I always found hillarious about Gingrinch? When he was Speaker of the House and busy trying to dismantle welfare and other social programs, his home district of Cobb County Georgia was the single biggest recipient of Federal monies – all spent on luxury “pork barrel” projects. Basically the guy is a big, fat, lying hypocrite thief who wanted to steal from the poor and give to the rich. He’s no better than any of the other Republican thieves and failures!

Posted by: Elvis Nutsack | September 15, 2007, 10:14 am 10:14 am

…clean break from current structure of government…representing real change…sounds like he’s talking about Ron Paul…think about it….

Posted by: Hmmmm | September 15, 2007, 11:18 am 11:18 am

It’s not so much about Dems or Republicans as it is about protecting our country,,,,,,,,,,wake up americans!!!!!!!!
By the way, Newt is my choice!

Posted by: Will | September 15, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Most all of us are blinded by our secondary labels we put on ourselves such as Dems or Reps ……….lets not forget or primary and most important label…we are AMERICANS first! A house divided cannot stand!!

Posted by: Will | September 15, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Fortunately, even Romney doesn`t have enough money to buy himself this election.

Posted by: A Viet Nam Vet | September 15, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Newt is no better than the rest of them!
He lies from both sides of his mouth to!
We need to revert back to the ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES!

Posted by: Adams684 | September 15, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

We do need to revert back to original Constitution of the United States, and the only way to do that is by electing Ron Paul.

Posted by: Greg8898 | September 15, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

How refreshing to see several posts that get “it.” More middle of the road. Understands they’re all snarky. I was beginning to think anybody moderate had left the country.

Posted by: Sandra | September 15, 2007, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

If the GOP does not break from Bush, they will lose more seats in Congress. When I say break from Bush I mean they need to vote to end funding Bush’s war. If they don’t they will lose big!

Posted by: Jimbo | September 15, 2007, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Newt will at least bring some conservative issues to the forefront, regardless of his chances. I welcome his entry into the race.

Posted by: b | September 15, 2007, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Note to Newt-you’d have the same odds at the presidency if you became a Libertarian.You’d split the party, just like you split the country.
As for double-speak Romney-who needs a another Republican spin-cycle?

Posted by: shortnativetexan | September 16, 2007, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Why now, it’s too late. They should have split with Bush long time ago. You were used by Bush for his personal gain. Now it’s too late, even Greenspan should have split long before instead of just talking now.

Posted by: marc | September 16, 2007, 12:58 am 12:58 am

I don’t think that Gringrich is telling some of the Republicans anything that they don’t already know. Sentiment is strong to get this conflict in Iraq over and he has been definitely dragging his feet.

Posted by: btl musings | September 16, 2007, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Newt, thou speaks with a forked tongue, we know too much! The GOP will have a hard time convincing anybody of change!
The borders are open, the immigrants are here because of laws not enforced! Any attempt congress has made to rectify these problems goes unfunded. The war in Iraq is a big issue and the Senate while voting to send more troops cannot take credit for those comming home – we can add! Oil prices are going higher – Iran and Venezuela want to wreck the dollar, China will play a big factor in that, they are carring the note for billions! The American people have been crying for change for years and you are just now getting the message? What part of NO translates into business as usual for politicians?
The presidential election of 2008 will be the hardest campaign any candidate will ever have to run for! We mistrust ALL of you – democrat and republican alike!

Posted by: White Mountain | September 16, 2007, 11:04 am 11:04 am

What I don’t get is why the Republican party can’t come up with a viable candidate. Of all those currently running or still hinting they may run, such as Gingrich, there’s not a single candidate who either doesn’t come with dirty laundry, some lack national or international experience, or offers viable plans to address the concerns of the majority of issues presently facing the American public. On the one hand, we have Guiliani who is morally corrupt and an empire builder as well as lack of experience; Gingrich, if he were to throw his hat in the ring would be riding in the same boat as Guiliani morally, has the experience but used it the wrong way, (for himself); Romney, who lacks experience and is a known flip flopper as well as Thompson who also comes with some ethics issues; Huckabee and Brownback who don’t seem to realize the reasons our ancestors invaded America in the first place was to separate the involvement of the church from government; Paul, who can’t realize the fact that America and the world is a much more complicated place than it was during the Jeffersonian era that he wishes to return us to; Tancredo who is an off the wall paleoconservative; and then McCain who has endured some controversies, not only with his constituents from his within his own party, not to mention his age, but still may be the best one of the bunch. There are plenty of folks in the wings, such as senators Jon Kyle, Wayne Allard, Kit Bond, Jim Demint, just to mention a few. Personally I think Jim Demint would be an exceptional candidate. Too bad some of these folks don’t step up to the plate.

Posted by: GC | September 16, 2007, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Sorry, speaking of McCain, I meant to type that he has endured some controversies, not only with his constituents, but also from within his own party.

Posted by: GC | September 16, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Flip-Flopin republicans, 2008 worry.

Posted by: drwfll | September 16, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

OK, lets vote for an adulterer and show just how two-faced a conservative can me. Not a chance.

Posted by: Jim J. Donaldson | September 25, 2007, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.