By Nitya

Sep 4, 2007 11:32am

High School Student to McCain: You’re No Leader

ABC News’ Bret Hovell and Matt Stuart Report: Senator John McCain had a testy exchange with a high school student in Concord, NH, Tuesday, but one that McCain himself characterized as “what America is supposed to be about.”

William Sleaster, a student at Concord High School rose to ask McCain a question about gay rights and, ultimately dissatisfied by the answer he received from McCain, told the Republican presidential contender that he’d come looking to see a leader and didn’t.

McCain first answered the high school student by talking about his support for Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, the military’s policy regarding gays, and about his belief in the sanctity of marriage.

“Discrimination in any form is unacceptable in America today,” McCain said.

“I understand the controversy that continues to swirl around this issue,” McCain said. “That debate needs to be continued.”

Sleaster pressed on. “Do you support civil unions or gay marriage?”

“I do not,” McCain answered. “I think that they impinge on the status and the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman.”

“So you believe in taking away someone’s rights because you believe it’s wrong?”

“I wouldn’t put that interpretation on my position, but I understand yours,” McCain said diplomatically.

Sleaster went on to ask another question about how to help the working class in America, which McCain fielded by talking about the country’s need to figure out education and health care, and to secure the environment.

Sleaster indicated that he wanted to follow up again.

“You have one more? Go ahead you’re doing good,” McCain encouraged.

“I came here looking to see a leader,” Sleaster said. “I don’t.”

The assembled students murmured, and a teacher started to step in.

“I understand,” McCain said. “I thank you. That’s what America is all about.”

User Comments

Ironic the kid’s name is Sleaster… McCain seems to have handled the situation in a very diplomatic way to a student who was quite disrespectful.

Posted by: Aaron | September 4, 2007, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

McCain’s nuts! What’s he doing addressing kids in a HS. The only ones in HS who will be old enought vote in the next election are also the one’s old enough to drink!

Posted by: Bill | September 4, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Wow! That was disrespectful of the teenager. McCain has served our country for many years and I don’t think he deserved that.

Posted by: Terry Ann | September 4, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

How can you claim that it is “disrespectful” to question the beliefs and discuss the issues of a man who wants to be the President of an entire, diverse nation? To say the Senator did not “deserve” that kind of aggressive questioning is complacent. We ALL, no matter our beliefs or political leanings, should question our want-to-be leaders and ask them the tough questions and not allow them to sidestep around real issues affecting millions of Americans. I say good for you Mr. Sleaster for being an intelligent young man and not accepting simplified political speech.

Posted by: Matt | September 4, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Mr. Sleaster gives me faith in the youth of today the way that Miss South Carolina did not.
Way to go!

Posted by: John | September 4, 2007, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Kudos to the kid for speaking the truth! McCain is no leader and never will be.
Its too often we coddle senators, congress men and women that we are in the sad situation we are in today. Time we call all these fools for who they are “Cowards”
Defend the damn constitution and Impeach this administration.

Posted by: Mike | September 4, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Disrespectful?!! It is our duty to ask hard questions of anyone who wants to be the president. If ANY of the media had done this in 2000 we wouldn’t be stuck with the monkey in the white house we have now!

Posted by: James Martin | September 4, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Disrespectful are you kidding me? The HS student was dead on with his concerns, he asked profound questions and received a typical answer from a politician. What else would expect from someone who is so hypocritical as to demand resignation from one senator and not the other when the only differences in the choice of the illegal service provider was the gender of the person. Are they not the same offense, and in fact one is clearly the adulterer and one is an attempted adulterer…so much for the so called moral superior party.

Posted by: Dave | September 4, 2007, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

“So you believe in taking away someone’s rights becuase you believe it’s wrong?” The idiocy of this statement shows just how much this Sleaster kid has been spoon fed the pro homosexual agenda via mass media. Homosexuals have no right to marry so there’s no right to deny. No one has the right to do drugs though many do and many more think that there’s nothing wrong with it. Just becuase someone wants to do something they don’t automatically have a “right” to do it. I thought my generation was pretty pathetic but this shows that the next one is even worse.

Posted by: Pete | September 4, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

McCain is a relic. Wake up, candidates! Whether these kids are old enough to vote in the next election isn’t the point. This is the next generation of voters and I think this young man did an excellent job of voicing their dissatisfaction with the status-quo.

Posted by: Christopher | September 4, 2007, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Typical reaction from a snot-nosed punk who doesn’t want to hear another opinion other than the one already formed in his indoctrinated left-wing so-called mind.

Posted by: Andrew | September 4, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

No one running for office deserves respect. That’s a guise they hide behind in an attempt to have people NOT question them.

Posted by: Foster | September 4, 2007, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Gay marriage threatens hetero marriage HOW??? I’m STILL waiting for an answer!

Posted by: rocknation | September 4, 2007, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

The child who spoke of taking away someone’s rights fails to understand the difference between privileges and rights. It is illegal to marry your sibling in all 50 states regardless of how much you care for each other. Does that mean your right to marriage has been taken away? No, it means your right to think like an idiot has been upheld and your friendly federal government has protected you from your stupidity. Likewise, those with other immoral leanings are also protected from themselves for their own good as well as the nation’s. If they should decide to behave as God and nature have designed them, they are free to marry any non relative of the opposite gender that they choose. As long as they are not illegal aliens :-)

Posted by: D | September 4, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

“Discrimination in any form is unacceptable in America today?” Well, what the heck does McCain think “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” and being anti-gay marriage all about???

Posted by: yoadrie | September 4, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

The kid was disrespectful, but he was right. This is why I don’t do sitting Senators for president. They’re not leaders, they’re a bunch of deliberators who think they should be president. If he was a leader, he would have said just what Pete said. You can’t deny someone a right that they don’t have. I’m sure most pedophiles would like to have conjugal visits in prison from minors. Is this their right? Are we denying them? We give conjugal visits to other prisoners. Hence the slippery slope. Fortunately, most pedophiles have the good sense not to ask.

Posted by: Kafir | September 4, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Pete brings up a good point. Gay people can’t get married now, so the wording of Sleaster’s comment may not quite apply. But he also shows the desperation that homophobic bigots are experiencing across the country, as more and more Americans are becoming supportive of gay and lesbian people and their struggle to enjoy the same rights as their straight counterparts.
His comment:
“I thought my generation was pretty pathetic but this shows that the next one is even worse.”
I’ll agree on one point… his generation was indeed pretty pathetic when it came to expanding the American civil rights struggle to include everyone. The next generation, if the last 10 years of polls are accurate, will do a much better job.

Posted by: Brian | September 4, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I love it when youth show up the adults.

Posted by: Marco E. Garcia | September 4, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I am so tired of hearing the lame argument comparing loving, adult, consensual same-sex relationships with pedophilia. Are you people for real? You really think that the abuse of a child, who lacks any power or ability to provide informed consent for an adult relationship, is the same as a committed relationship between two adult same-sex partners? It’s so easy to show how this argument is invalid that it amazes me that people continue to use it to justify their own bigotry.
This is exactly the reason why we’re in the mess we’re in today. People don’t think. They don’t want to think. They want their pastors or their priests or their parents or their president to tell them what to think. I always thought that being an adult was all about being able to think critically about things like this.

Posted by: Brian | September 4, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

John McCain divorced his first wife for a younger, richer wife before carpet-bagging himself to Arizona to get a Senatorial seat by playing up his POW-ness. Why the views on marriage by a confessed cheater should be respected is something I don’t understand.

Posted by: Carl | September 4, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

I congratulate Mr. Sleaster for being bold enough to question a presidential candidate. As others have stated, it is our duty to question candidates with fervor. Those persons who step into the public arena, whether it be for public service or fame or future riches, they do so knowing that they will be questioned and scrutinized exhaustively. It may be wrong in some instances but they do so knowingly.
And, finally, if McCain believes in the sanctity of marriage, why is he divorced? And, why does he and every other divorced Republican candidate (but for Romney) not advocate a bill to truly protect the sanctity of marriage by outlawing divorce but for cases of physical abuse????

Posted by: Scott | September 4, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

At least someone had the guts to say it. Too bad it’s a high school student and not a regular-Joe voter. And why shouldn’t gay marriage be legal? Just because someone’s outdated and skewed interpretation of the Bible says it shouldn’t? Equal rights for all, period.

Posted by: Josh | September 4, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Whatever happened to Renegade Mccain..
Oh wait…he pandered to George Bush and the Bob Jones University types.
That high school kid had every right to question the validity of Mccain’s campaign.

Posted by: Brian | September 4, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Ahh, the “desperation that homophobic bigots are experiencing”. That’s the typical smear tactic used by those who so boldly believe in their own enlightened position that they don’t deign to actually engage in debate. Mr. Sleaster is someone who came to this meeting with an agenda and managed to highlight the blissful ignorance of a generation enamored with it’s own psuedo intelligence. More and more Americans are not becoming supportive of the gay and lesbian “plight” but the media and academia are getting more and more up front and vocal about their support of the issue. There are few voices in the “mainstream” media that oppose “gay marriage”. But outside of those concentrated blue zones on the opposite coasts most Americans are pretty disgusted by the idea. But then again, the rest of America is not nearly as enlightened as those inhabiting those cities. Homosexuality, like prostitution, drug abuse, murder, rape and various other social cancers has and always will be with us. We accept it as part of life. Just don’t try and force feed us the politically correct, moral equivalency garbage that makes up your socialistic, nihilistic philosophy. FYI, I’m no supporter of McCain.

Posted by: Pete | September 4, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“There are few voices in the “mainstream” media that oppose “gay marriage”. But outside of those concentrated blue zones on the opposite coasts most Americans are pretty disgusted by the idea.”
how do you know that? who are you to speak for most americans? why does your opinion matter more than anyone else’s?
i think what that kid did to mccain was awesome. and who cares that he’s only in high school, and that he probably isn’t able to vote in the next election anyway? the point is, this kid had the courage to stand up to a potential american president and didn’t back down for one second.
what were mccain’s intentions in speaking to a high school crowd anyway, but to gauge how his talking points go over with the younger generation? was he hoping to get canned applause from students he thought didn’t know any better? well, there’s your answer mccain, even though you knew it all along.
so get over it, move on and be a part of the country’s forward momentum — or peacefully step back and make room for somebody who really does get it.

Posted by: blake | September 4, 2007, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

“Homosexuality, like prostitution, drug abuse, murder, rape and various other social cancers has and always will be with us.”
I can’t believe you just grouped homosexuality with rape and prostitution. People like you are the reason our country is bass-ackwards as far as civil rights go. Who cares if you think it’s disgusting? You don’t have to get married to a same-sex partner. Let ALL of our citizens have equal rights, it doesn’t have to be about the Bible, it should be about equality and what our country used (and should still) to stand for.

Posted by: nk | September 4, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

I agree with poster Rocknation. Opposing discrimination while supporting Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and being anti-gay marriage contradict each other and put McCain’s credibility–and by extension, his leadership skills–into question.

Posted by: rocknation | September 4, 2007, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

congrtats to this High Schooler. it’s a shame when a person in High School is the only one to know the difference between double-speak rhetoric and BS. Too bad more adults aren’t up to speed with what credentials a real leader needs.
btw: he was no way disrespectful, in fact McCain was, for not answering the question.

Posted by: tellitlikeitis | September 4, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

“how do you know that? who are you to speak for most americans? why does your opinion matter more than anyone else’s?”
“somebody who really does get it.”
See above mention of enlightened psuedo intellectuals who truly believe they have acheived some sort of special insight into what society is supposed to be.
I have as much right to speak for most Americans as any one else. I never said my opinion mattered more than any one else’s. But that is the usual liberal retort. The fact is, that some opinions do matter more than others. Usually those opinions based on a review of facts. But then again, facts have never been one of the liberals (read utopian socialists) big concerns. It’s all about feeling and “moving forward”. Moving forward to what exactly? An amoral, godless commune like existence? Go and practice your utopian fantasies with the trees. The incovenient truth of the matter is that there are far too many of us “right wing, religious conspirators” to allow a couple of joint smoking, non bathing hippies to coopt this country and conform it to their image of one big do what you want woodstock. There are not equal rights for everyone nor should there ever be. That is called anarchy. Of course, I forget that that’s exactly what a growing percentage of left wingers would like to achieve. So, for your edification here’s just one recent poll.
CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Aug. 6-8, 2007. N=1,029 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.
“Do you think marriages between homosexuals should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages?”
8/6-8/07 .
Should Should Not Unsure
% % %
40 57 3

Posted by: Pete | September 4, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

I support Barack Obama 100%. But I totally disagree with that student’s behaviour.
Yes, he was very disrespectful and Yes, McCain was very diplomatic.
Shame to you, Sleaster or hwetevr your name is.

Posted by: Michael, Des Moines, Iowa | September 4, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

This young man is the nose under the tent: the old, hateful, bigoted and fearful geezers will soon die, and thoughtful, caring, loving and democratic people like our young high school student will be the majority. For anyone looking at the demographics: it’s about 8 years now, and the Old Haters will be dead, and the Young Americans will be in charge. Bye-bye, haters, hello, young Americans!

Posted by: SanDiegoan | September 4, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

What we’ll find out soon, is that republicanism is a disease, likely viral, possibly inherited, and we’ll know which direction to turn for a cure.
Meanwhile, the only response that makes sense: quarantine. If you find yourself in the same location as a republican, quickly get a surgical mask on, and leave the premises. Do not, do NOT attempt to engage the patient, this should only be undertaken by professionals. If you can, call former Senator Larry Craig for advice and logic.

Posted by: SanDiegoan | September 4, 2007, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

The Senator was talking about “sanctity”? What the heck does THAT have to do with the question? He dodges a question about civil unions or gay marriages by babbling about “sanctity”? This guy is either nuts or stupid. The US government has no power to rule on the sanctity of anything.

Posted by: JS | September 4, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

“But then again, facts have never been one of the liberals (read utopian socialists) big concerns.”
Wow, some jokes really do write themselves! It would take a joke like that to believe in this superstition about gays.

Posted by: JS | September 4, 2007, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

“Ironic the kid’s name is Sleaster… McCain seems to have handled the situation in a very diplomatic way to a student who was quite disrespectful.”
nope, that ain’t irony, and mcvain already used up his lil jerk comeback. so solly please try again

Posted by: iRony | September 4, 2007, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

I am a Gay American and I would not die for my country.
It has done nothing to provide me with equal rights. With foriegn countries recongnizing their gay citizens with the right to marry, they are surpassing the world’s most powerful nation in humanity and respect.
I was born a second class citizen and hopefully, with the help of our next generation, I won’t have to die one.
Bravo for questioning authority.

Posted by: RJ | September 4, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

The student was correct. Sen. John McCain is not a leader. He is a follower. Following whatever the Right Wing Religious Organizations tell him to do. He is doing the work for Pat Robertson, James Dobson, and Gary Bauer.

Posted by: kerplunk | September 4, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Utopian Socialists? You mean, Communists? Wow, tellitlikeitis, you can use Wikipedia to string together words that you believe make you sound intelligent. We’re all very impressed. But save the pseudo-intellectualism, and just call us Commies like you want to.
And precisely which “facts” are YOU so concerned with, tellitlikeitis? The “fact” that the universe is 5000 years old? The “fact” that dinosaurs and humans lived happily together as portrayed on The Flintstones? The “fact” that every animal on the planet today had an ancestor on a big wooden ark a few thousand years ago? Or is it the “fact” that God hates homosexuals and wants you to hate them too?
As for your poll, I’m sure you can find a poll from the 1950′s that supported segregation. Do you support that, too? What’s the difference? It’s our responsibility as a society to protect and equate the rights of minorities among us. Especially when it’s not the popular thing to do.
Have fun on your trip to the creationism museum, tellitlikeitis. Do lots of research.

Posted by: Matt K | September 4, 2007, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Sorry, TILII, my comments were actually meant for Pete.

Posted by: Matt K | September 4, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Bravo!!! Mr. Sleaster – my hat is off to you. Way to call it as you see it.
Regardless of whether other’s agree with your or disagree with you – it is YOU who acted like a leader, by doing what your heart told you to do.
Those people on this board who are insulting you for speaking your mind — THEY are the followers. I’d venture that those who have a problem with what you said are simply ‘Right-Wing-Authoritarin-Followers.’ They believe that it’s your DUTY – as an American citizen – to shut up and keep from doing anything that undermines the authority of our glorious “leaders.” Don’t believe them.
Again, bravo for showing what TRUE leadership is all about.

Posted by: David | September 4, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

I don’t believe the questions were out of place for a Presidential candidate. What was out of place was a lack of manners and the common courtesy one should use, along with a degree of respect that one should show when addressing a war hero and a Senator of the United States.
Does anyone wonder why we have a vengeful and partisan political class running the country??? Its because idiots encourage spoiled kids to continue embarrassing behavior like this.
If this were my son and he had addressed John McCain or Hillary Clinton in this manner, he would have been disciplined not encouraged and praised. Kids need to be taught respect for those with different ideas and that a reasonable discussion using manners and reason, not attacks is proper.
If we are going to encourage attacks based on ideas just go ahead and fit the kid for a suicide belt and let him really make his point.

Posted by: Ron W | September 4, 2007, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Sleaster pressed on. “Do you support civil unions or gay marriage?”
“I do not,” McCain answered. “I think that they impinge on the STATUS and the SANCTITY of marriage between a man and a woman.”
The kid is right. Straight people fight to preserve a higher STATUS than gay couples is disgusting.
No CIVIL MARRIAGE has any SANCTITY they are a government civil – not religious – union. It is misleading to fall onto the sanctity BS when talking about a secular marriage – which most religions do not recognize as valid.
So this kid was right…. just a rich white straight military guy … working to CONSERVE (that is why they are called conservatives folks) THE STATUS QUO that gives him more STATUS than others in our society.
GO KID!!! GO !

Posted by: rjp3 | September 4, 2007, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Let’s point out the fact that RED states have WORSE divorce statistics than BLUE states.
And the only state with gay marriage, Massachusetts, has had, and continues to have, one of the lowest divorce rates in the country.
Let’s also point out that when you look at polls taken over time, there is definite increasing national support for gay marriage and/or civil unions.
In fact, when the question is asked about gay marriage OR civil unions, you now have a solid MAJORITY in FAVOR. In poll after poll. This isn’t spin, this isn’t “liberal propaganda”, it’s just the reality of everyday Americans realizing that their gay friends and neighbors are just regular people who happen to fall in love with the same gender, and otherwise aren’t very different from anyone else. And, when they realize this truth, most Americans also tend to choose respect and equality over discrimination and hate.
The next President needs to be able to represent ALL American citizens, not just the straight ones, if he or she is to truly fulfill their vow to uphold the Constitution. Unlike the current President, who has no respect for the foundation of our great nation, we need someone who will fight for the rights and dignity of all Americans.
Kudos for this brave high school student for speaking truth to power when so many adults have been too craven or too selfish or too blinded by ideology to do the same.

Posted by: MIke H. | September 4, 2007, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

I’m so exhausted with the Moral Superiority Right Wing clique. Gay/Lesbian/Transgendered individuals are people too.
When did Christianity become a religion of hate and exclusion? I know that there must be loving, caring Christians out there, but it seems like the only ones we see any more are the ones spouting bigotry and regressive social policies.

Posted by: matt | September 4, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Pathetic that Americans have allowed themselves to be used to the point that they turn against other AMERICANS for the defense of the Dear Leader.
How was this American out of line for asking a question? Just because it made McCain look foolish? Does that mean we should only be allowed to ask questions that start with….”I love you, I pray for you, I follow you blindly. How can I do more?”
These were the questions that Bush followers asked during his 2 presidential campaigns.

Posted by: Shawn Fassett | September 4, 2007, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

How considerate – and pseudo-intellectual of you to so rabidly attack a high school student who had the courage of his conviction to face a presidential candidate and, in the process, give many of us faith in the younger generation. I don’t live on either “left” coast, nor do I believe you begin to have the right to speak for me and hundreds of thousands of other enlightened, tolerant, American citizens who feel that EVERYONE deserves a voice under the Constitution (as it was written).
I don’t care what CNN poll you wish to quote, and none of my gay friends know what this alleged “homosexual agenda” stands for – perhaps you could tell them.
McCain is running to be president of the United States. As citizens, we don’t have a right or privilege to confront candidates – even U.S. Senators – on their positions. Every American citizen has a duty to learn everything they can about the candidates, and that means asking tough, thoughtful questions – not listening to sound bites, or accepting only what a high school student’s parents want him/her to hear or believe.
Accepting complacency or mediocrity is akin to a willingness to live under fascism. And when did “Christianity become defined by hate and intolerance?
With any luck, Mr. Sleaster will run for public office once he graduates from college.

Posted by: Steve in Middle America | September 4, 2007, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

“Just because someone’s outdated and skewed interpretation of the Bible says it shouldn’t? Equal rights for all, period.”
I think it’s funny how you think you can date the words of God, whether you believe in him or not. His words don’t expire like milk, it doesn’t work that way.

Posted by: Tidal9 | September 4, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

A 16 year old? This Slickster, or whatever his name was, can’t hold McCain’s soiled underwear. Calling McCain too old and too conservative was merely the liberal brainwashing he’s been subjected to by his dullard parents living under Bernie Saunders.

Posted by: schratboy | September 4, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

As always, let the right wing whack-jobs talk long enough, and they give themselves away.
“there are far too many of us “right wing, religious conspirators” to allow a couple of joint smoking, non bathing hippies to coopt this country and conform it to their image of one big do what you want woodstock. There are not equal rights for everyone nor should there ever be.”
This is the truth of it. Some still hates the hippies and anything he associates with them, a hatred he has probably nourished since the 60′s. That’s his whole motivation.
If you agree that “There are not equal rights for everyone nor should there ever be,” then you will love the the hate-motivated, irrational, delusion-loving ‘philosophy’”. But the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence say otherwise. Equal rights for everyone is in fact the motivation of liberalism. The right of the rich to do anything they want is the philosophy of the “conservatives”. What is it they want to “conserve”? Why, their own privilege.

Posted by: mguyot | September 4, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

I salute the young man who sunmmoned the courage to offer the questions. I am proud to consider he and I as fellow Americans. I also salute Senator McCain for his encouragement of this type of discourse, no matter that it put him on the spot. Altogether, a refreshing diversion from some of the vituperative and mean-spirited text included in the responses. You don’t have to agree with either of them to see that they both deserve respect and gratitude for keeping the level of discussion at a relatively high level. Thanks to both of the gentlemen.

Posted by: Nick | September 4, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Hey Pete,
Here’s another fact for your stack: The number one state in divorces is Texas, in last place is Massachusetts. If gay marriage is going to destroy traditional heterosexual marriage. Why does this statistic prove the exact opposite.
And you may want to lay off the ‘intellectual elite” crap. By that measure we should be letting 2 year olds run the country, since they’re untainted by “intellectualism”.
And how exactly did having more education than you’d get from watching Hogan’s Heroes reruns become a negative in this country? No wonder we’re in such a stupid mess, we’ve demonized anyone smart enough to think us out of it.
Kudos to that young man for being willing to speak truth to power.

Posted by: McE | September 4, 2007, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

McCain is a moron — and a hypocritical moron, at that. I agree with Mr. Sleaster 100%.

Posted by: Chris | September 4, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

This shows how cowardly and anti-democratic the republican politics of division are. When challenged in a way that the media and democrats refuse to do, their scapegoating is exposed for the demagoguery it is.

Posted by: professor smartass | September 4, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

“Ironic the kid’s name is Sleaster…” by Aaron….
I find it ironic that just because someone questions and stated his feeling in looking for a leader that Aaron needs to imply that the student is a Sleaze. Hmmm… Sounds to me that he (Aaron) has learned some basic propaganda tools by those who don’t know that the process is about questioning. Sleaster in my book is much more intelligent. Go Sleaster!

Posted by: Sabrina | September 4, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Wow, in every post I’ve read the fact that left wingers actually do think that they have a more enlightened grasp on what society really should be keeps coming to the surface. It’s really heartwarming to see how courageous this kid is for asking “hard questions” but ask a liberal candidate a hard question and you’re a racist, narrow minded zealot attempting to impose a theocracy on the country. But he’s open minded, caring and a leader for making a snarky comment to someone who’s done more for this country than he ever will.
As far as the Constitution and Declaration of Independance, I think it’s very safe to say that none of the authors of these documents had no intention of ensuring the rights of homosexuals to marry and flagrantly flaunt their depraved lifestyle. I assume that it also guaranteed the rights of transsexuals to undergo sex change operations using taxpayer money. I love it when leftists so liberally extrapolate the “All men are created equal” phrase to whatever cause is currently in vogue. So, the Constitution and Declaration of Independence can be used to justify accepting any degree of perversion because they’re just “people” as well. If they want to mutilate themselves and change their sex we should support them as it’s obviously their constitutional right. If they want to travel to foreign countries and have sex with boys well hey, that’s their constitutional right. The framers of these documents were obviously much more open minded than we ever thought. That’s good to know.

Posted by: Pete | September 4, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

aw, poor McCain…..some kid had the guts to tell it like it is and you all fawn around McCain like adoring dolts.
DAMN RIGHT that kid had nerve. Will ny of you NOT be allowed into your partner of 25 years hospital room because a parent he has not spoken to in years won’t allow it, AND……..because of no gay unions the partner has no recourse?
hypocrites. Good for this kid for having the nerve to stand up to this moron

Posted by: Fred | September 4, 2007, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

To those in this comment stream who continue to push their “theology” on the rest of us. I would like to point out a couple of things.
First, I am so tired of hearing the argument against gay marriage by rationalizing that siblings will be able to marry. I don’t know of too many families with multiple gay siblings so the probability of this occurrence is vanishingly small and I doubt it would happen any way. Besides if they do, they are not going to have children and the genetics are the reason relatives need to be distant.
Second, the Constitution strictly prohibits the government from promoting religion. The only arguments against gay marriage are religious. The government needs to live up to the obligations give it by the Founders. Stay out of my religious and personal affairs.
As far as this young man. He did exactly what I would have done: challenged McCain to go beyond the rehashed platitudes that these politicians dole out to as if they actually have addressed the issue.
Sleaster asked an either/or question and McCain did not address either option directly.
Please tell me how gay marriage is any more threatening to the institution than a 50% failure rate in straight marriages.

Posted by: Gordon | September 4, 2007, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

“I understand,” McCain said. “I thank you. That’s what America is all about.”
Good, then recognize your finished..and drop out of the race

Posted by: Larry | September 4, 2007, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

I think all of the homophobes spitting out their hate-filled AGENDA have lost site that there is no homosexual AGENDA… except you want to count the desire to be treated as an American without being judged by something as personal as one’s own intimate relationships.
Dave said.. “Homosexuals have no right to marry so there’s no right to deny.”
Brilliant!… well not really. Judging someones qualifications to marry or not by who they sleep with is DISCRIMINATION…that’s all. Americans have the right to marry whomever they fall in love with. Hmmm.. funny how my description doesn’t mention any sexual orientation at all.
Right now I’m glad I live outside the country. I know now, how much of the rest of the world laughs at the U.S. for being so petty and narrow minded.

Posted by: Outside Looking In | September 4, 2007, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Outside Looking In hit the nail right on the head. This high schooler we’re all talking about did the right thing. He stood up for himself and that which he believed in. That is, believe it or not, part of what this country stands for.
This whole argument really is quite frustrating. America falesly prides itself as being the so-called “Land Of The Free,” quite possibly the biggest joke I’ve ever heard in my life! If this really were a “free” nation, I’d be allowed to legally marry the one man I’ve loved with all that I am for the last fifteen years.
It genuinely offends me when bigots automatically equate homosexuals with drug-pushers, sex addicts and child molesters. These are people who, years ago, had the nerve to tell me that my relationship was invalid, that it wouldn’t last, and that I would somehow contract the AIDS virus simply because I was gay. Well, here I am 15 years later, still happy–DISEASE FREE, thank you very much–and still with the same wonderful man my MOTHER, of all people, introduced me to! Ironically, each and every single person who ever doomed my relationship to failure have all seen their own collective marriages wither away and ultimately succumb to the bitterness of divorce. This is why I simply laugh anytime some stranger, who doesn’t affect my life one way or the other, shuns the happiness that I have with somebody I’ve never considered as anything less than a loving husband.
Discrimination is discrimination. Why is that such a difficult concept for certain people to wrap their minds around?
I applaud William Sleaster for what he did. He has a great head on his shoulders and deserves nothing but the utmost praise.

Posted by: Brian Summers | September 4, 2007, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Hey Pete.
Why don’t you just go ahead and come out of the closet. Why do you care what other people do in the privacy of their own bedrooms?
Oh…. I suppose you haven’t really thought about this important point: Homosexuality is not a CHOICE, moron. If it were, do you think MILLIONS of people would actually choose to be gay? Have you thought about how absurd that proposition sounds? Of course not. That’s because you actually did make a choice: you chose to be straight. Right?

Posted by: aBetterNation | September 4, 2007, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

“The idiocy of this statement shows just how much this Sleaster kid has been spoon fed the pro homosexual agenda via mass media.”
Oh yes, I bet the poor kid also believes in equal rights for blacks, including interracial marriage– more evidence of his brainwashing by the pro-black agenda!!!!1
My god. I try to be open-minded to all views, but the utter denial of rational thought among anti-homosexuals is absolutely mindboggling.
…but that’s not what we came to discuss. Unsurprisingly, I’m full of kudos for the kid. Not many teenagers seem to be able to think past “Bush ROOLZ” or “Bush SUCKZ”, politically, but this kid seems like he actually knows what he believes, and knows what he would like to see in a leader. It’s enough for me to not give up all hope in my generation…

Posted by: Paul B. | September 5, 2007, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Manners Matter or Little Liberal Snots Insult a Hero

PRIMARIES 2008<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial,Hel…

Posted by: The Pink Flamingo | September 5, 2007, 12:02 am 12:02 am

“No CIVIL MARRIAGE has any SANCTITY they are a government civil – not religious – union. It is misleading to fall onto the sanctity BS when talking about a secular marriage – which most religions do not recognize as valid.”—–
Oh ho. I had not even considered it from that angle. That’s a very good point… it perfectly augments the “marriage as a social, not just religious, institution” argument.

Posted by: Paul B. | September 5, 2007, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Manners Matter or Little Liberal Snots Insult a Hero

PRIMARIES 2008<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial,Hel…

Posted by: The Pink Flamingo | September 5, 2007, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Sleasters gutsy jabs at Republican/Democrat antigay politician McCain may seem like a minor incident in the campaign, but it represents a sea change going on in American politics. Our fight against the Democrat/Republican Parties DADT and DOMA and for a tough EDNA are integrated into the politics of a new generation unburdened as never before by bigotry.
Sleaster’s linking that to “how to help the working class in America” represents the next big break for our movement – using the connectivity of our issues with those of our natural allies and working with them in independent political actions away from the treachery, corruption and ‘politics as usual’ of the Democrat/Republicans, the political organ of the billionaires.
Sleaster is light years ahead of frauds who masquerade as leaders but hustle and shill for the politics that have kept us in chains for generations. Sleasters generation is ringing the death knell for sellouts like HRC, the Logheads and the Stoneheads.

Posted by: Bill in Sin City | September 5, 2007, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I’m sick of reading responses that perpetuate the belief that asking questions of a Presidential candidate and voicing an opinion about a candidate’s position is somehow *disrespectful*.
It is the duty of every citizen to ask questions of those seeking office (and those who presently hold office) *and* to voice opposition when the answers are *BS*!
Anything less is un-American and downright un-Patriotic!
Kudos! to the young man. Shame on those her that criticize him for voicing his opinion and calling a candidate out on his rhetoric!
We need more like him!

Posted by: Chapeau | September 5, 2007, 2:34 am 2:34 am

The kid is right on the money. By the way, McCain doesn’t even believe what he said. He has said before that he has no problem with same-sex marriage, which is the typical live-and-let-live decency of Arizonans. He only says his right-wing drivel in his quest to get the Republican nomination, also known as Operation Fat Chance.

Posted by: ProfessorVP | September 5, 2007, 4:19 am 4:19 am

Sleaster is MY HERO!

Posted by: JL | September 5, 2007, 7:11 am 7:11 am

I am not a supporter of Sen. McCain’s views on the war, etc., etc. I also support William Sleaster’s right to ask tough questions. Having said that, his comments about McCain not being a leader were out of line, and very disrespectful! Just because William’s views are not those of McCain’s doesn’t give him the right to insult McCain…He WAS disrespectful, plain and simple… he probably hasn’t even started shaving yet, and he’s already shooting off his adolescent mouth to a most distinguished war hero and U.S. Senator… Sleaster should have ended the dialogue with his last question, and kept his opinion about leadership to himself, the disrespectful punk!

Posted by: William L. Marinucci | September 5, 2007, 7:24 am 7:24 am

Sleaster: “Do you support civil unions or gay marriage?”
McCain: “I do not. I think that they IMPINGE on the status and the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman.”
Was Mr. Sleaster disrespectful? No. If Mr. McCain had explained HOW two men, or two women who marry “impinge” – RESTRICTED or INTERFERE with the marriage of a man and a woman then, maybe, the young man’s later comment could be called disrespectful.
Several countries and several states have a history of civil unions and marriage without any evidence of marriage for a man and a woman being “impinged” on.
Since the Senator did not offer any basis for his opinion, the young man was right. McCain is no leader.
McCain said we need to continue the debate about this issue. Well, debate and leadership require reason and fact, not just feelings.
McCain is no leader. Bush is no leader.

Posted by: Leslie in California | September 5, 2007, 10:38 am 10:38 am

The student was not only perfectly correct but perfectly respectful. Being able to tell a public offical that you disagree with his stance is the essence of being an American. The student didn’t interrupt a speech, didn’t use profane language. He made a declarative statement to a campaigning politician.

Posted by: Ken | September 5, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I can’t believe “being gay” is such an issue in this country. Gay people aren’t looking for your approval, they just want a little human compassion. The “religious” folk in this country are a true laugh riot a minute. Anybody remember Ted Haggerty???? I hate to break it to all of you, but NO amount of “dancing with snakes” and “chanting” is going to change who or what a person is – yet there are idiots out there who truly believe Ted was “cured.” LMAO! I have no problem whatsoever with granting civil unions to gay people. Why should I care? They deserve to be loved just like any other man or woman. I can’t think of ONE gay person that threatens my marriage – that includes Ted Haggerty. Don’t you think there are much more important and pressing issues in this country? I can think of a few: illegal immigration, the non-enforcement of Federal laws, the Iraq War, the health care crisis in our country, NAFTA, the NAU, Identity Theft, SS. People, please wake the hell up. If you’re really that intimidated by gay people, you need a head doctor.

Posted by: BlackHeart | September 5, 2007, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

“The kid was disrespectful, but he was right. This is why I don’t do sitting Senators for president.”
Disrespectful HOW? Having the guts to stand up and ask direct questions that should be expected in politics? Aren’t they equally as direct in the Senate at question time? Isn’t that the reason you go into politics, to interact?
No-one would have said Sleaster was “disrespectful” if it were any other question other than a gay one, because no-one would have noticed!
I like this kid and I’m straight and totally support his view. Marriage is not threatened, it’s the state’s idea of “Christian American identity” that feels threatened and it’s time these old warhorses stopped putting heavy expectations on everyone else.

Posted by: Gopher Broke | September 5, 2007, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

I love the hypocrisy of people. they say our young people are not interested in our country and current affair, but why is it that when young person who takes a keen interest and asks questions adult don’t have to nerve to, why is that wrong? i applaude Sleaster for raising up and speaking his mind. this is america and we vote for our leaders, how can you vote for our leaders when you don’t know what they stand for? I think we have a lot to learn from our kids who have not been tainted by the hypocrisy of our society. My 13 year old cousin often makes more sense and asks the real questions when we watch the news. Kids are not dumb people, they are pretty smart and I am proud of Mr. Sleaster.

Posted by: peter chan | September 5, 2007, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

I think if the gays all want equal rights, then break off a chunk of land from Texas and let them all live on it as a Sovereign Nation. They can make up their own laws and rules and not bother us with their “equal right for all b.s.” And since they seem to think being republican is soo bad then they can all become democrats… See how far that gets them.

Posted by: TRW | September 5, 2007, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

actually many HS students will be able to vote in the election..alot of HS seniors are 18 or will be by the time the election comes by..and whether or not they are of age to vote they still have the right to have their voices heard

Posted by: Dusty | September 5, 2007, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Psst. Hey PETE. We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal and endowed with the inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. There’s the right you were lookin for. Happy to help!

Posted by: Nina Nealon | September 5, 2007, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Oh, PETE. Sorry, i missed your mistake here:
“As far as the Constitution and Declaration of Independance, I think it’s very safe to say that none of the authors of these documents had no intention of ensuring the rights of homosexuals to marry and flagrantly flaunt their depraved lifestyle.”
Allow me to be of some assistance. Channeling the dead is not an ability of yours. Neither is interpretting the law. Please “break off a chunk of Texas” and live there with everyone else who thinks rich, white, educated men are the only people George Washington ever intended to ensure rights for.

Posted by: Nina Nealon | September 5, 2007, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Apparently,rightwingers only use the word “disrespectful” when it appears to be directed against a fellow rightwinger. To me this shows they don’t really give a hoot about “respect” since they really have none and actually deserve none.

Posted by: Jon | September 5, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

I’m a sophomore and may be able to clear somethings up for I was on the stage during the assembly. Since New Hampshire is the first in the primary we have the oppertunity to hold assemblies where presidential candidates may come and express there ideas to the students and obviously get free media coverage. I’m part of the committee the invites and plans such advents. Last year we had seven candidates alone come to our school. The students that come to our assemblies have always been known to ask tough questions and we accept them to be answered. Will replied the way he did because he believed that John McCain didn’t truly answer his question on the working class. I don’t believe Will should have voiced his opinion the way he did, however we are in America and have the right to do so. Personally the media blew this totally out of portion. It’s just one kid, if someone can’t handle it then they certainly can’t handle a country.

Posted by: Amilia Theberge | September 5, 2007, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

What a disrespectful little snot! Talk about being raised with no manners. He’s not fit to gather the crumbs under Sen McCain’s feet. McCain is a war hero, who’s service to this country is one of the reasons this jerk gets freedom of speech. Must be awful having to pander to the likes of high school students….Sen McCain has two sons serving in the US Miltiary…wanna bet smart mouth will never serve?

Posted by: kit hogan | September 5, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

I applaud the student for pressing his points! And so WHAT if he can’t vote YET??? Are his issues & views irrelevant for 2 more years until he CAN vote? How ridiculous.
I think McCain handled it just like a typical politician – vaguely. Which, by the way, is infuriating. No wonder the kid got stymied.
If McCain is against civil unions, he needs to just freakin’ SAY it, whatever the consequences. Why can’t these candidates just speak plainly & honestly instead of trying to spin every answer to be as vague and generally unoffensive as possible?

Posted by: Disdain Lady | September 5, 2007, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

What a disrespectful kid?! McCain has served our country in ways more than a book can be written. He served our nation bravely. When he was captured and being tortured in Vietnam, he refused a deal to be let go early before other POW because he believes in first comes first leave and won’t dishonor himself and his fellow soldiers. He stayed in a POW prison for another 5 years without knowing if he will make it out alive. McCain has served honorably as our senator. That little punk all he can do is whine. Frankly, he is the kid of person who will sell out his country in the face of someone will torture him. Frankly, many great Americans are against gay marriage. People somehow thought this is a republican-democrat thing. No, it is not. Colin Powell certainly against gay marriage. Bill Clinton signed the infamous Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). John Kerry and G Bush both ran on “support civil union, but against gay marriage” in 2004. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards and Bill Richardson are all against gay marriage.
You know. I am actually for gay marriage, but it is these disrespect jerks (like this kid) make me wonder what I am standing for sometime.
Some people are confused. They thought the whole “protection of traditional marriage” ideal is pushed by only Christians. Well, what a ignorant idea! China is a atheist country and it does not allow gay marriage. Saudi is a Islamic country, and gays are stoned to death — by being just gay. India is Hindu, and there is no gay marriage. Gays in America have more protection than say in China or North Korea, which are atheist countries, so please do not make it into some “Christian versus gay” things.

Posted by: Richard | September 6, 2007, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Sodomy, bad manners and sloppy thinking are serious social problems. But they pale before the suggestion to “break off a piece of Texas.” Those are fighting words!

Posted by: Texan | September 6, 2007, 6:27 am 6:27 am

The Right Wingers here are simply bitter because they know that kids like Sleaster will change the future and not in the way the right wing wants..
Interracial Marriage was taboo a few decades ago to older generations, but younger generations see nothing wrong with it. The same will soon be said of Gay Marriage and Conservatives know it. Their only defense is to say that “the homosexual agenda” is brainwashing kids. I suppose these people would have said the same things about the “civil rights agenda”.
These politicians are too used to speaking in front of supportive audiences that agree with everything they say. And sadly for the Republican party–kids aren’t on their side. :)

Posted by: derek | September 6, 2007, 11:45 am 11:45 am

To the person who wonders why McCain is talking to high school students – I would like to point out that most Seniors and many Juniors will be 18 years of age when the elections are held. Eighteen just happens to be the legal age to vote in this country. This individual seems to be confused as to what the legal drinking age is – it is 21.
Also, many high schools students do have an influence on adult family members. When I was 14-21 years of age (back then 21 was the voting age) I had a very heavy influence on shaping the political thoughts of my parents and two older siblings. If you got me one your side, you didn’t have my vote because I couldn’t vote, but you probably had secured at least four votes from my family. Today, my influence is even greater, what with kids, in laws and nephews and nieces.

Posted by: grumpy gramps | September 6, 2007, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Posted by: Dave | Sep 4, 2007 1:02:32 PM
“So you believe in taking away someone’s rights becuase you believe it’s wrong?” The idiocy of this statement shows just how much this Sleaster kid has been spoon fed the pro homosexual agenda via mass media. Homosexuals have no right to marry so there’s no right to deny. No one has the right to do drugs though many do and many more think that there’s nothing wrong with it. Just becuase someone wants to do something they don’t automatically have a “right” to do it. I thought my generation was pretty pathetic but this shows that the next one is even worse.
Oh Really Dave? What is the Gay Agenda? Wanting to be treated Equally..you know, like the laws Heteros TAKE FOR GRANTED>? Not being fired from your job because your gay? Being able to adopt/or foster a child? The 1400 Federally backed rights Marriage gives to heteros? Even Hetero murderers on death row can marry,but law abiding,TAX paying Gay citizens can’t? Let’s take away or limit your rights and see how you like it!

Posted by: John | September 6, 2007, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Just because someone was in the military doesn’t mean every word from thier mouth is that of “SKY GOD”….the kid was respectful, and asked thoughtful questions with manners…as a matter of fact, he spoke better then President Nit-Wit.

Posted by: JRC | September 6, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

> “Wow, in every post I’ve read the fact that left wingers actually do think that they have a more enlightened grasp on what society really should be keeps coming to the surface.”
Wow, in every post I’ve read the fact that right wingers actually do think that they have a more enlightened grasp on what society should be keeps coming to the surface.
Grow up.

Posted by: Chris | September 6, 2007, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Wake up people, there is No god, the bible is nothing more than a book. Even your puppet master Karl Rove is an atheist . so what’s left? What do you base your irrational fear and hate of gay people on? You talk about morals? The gay people I know are a more honest and sincere, than the people at church lying, cheating and fooling around on their spouses, or the straight guys trying to fool around with a guy in the mens room

Posted by: PHG | September 7, 2007, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I agree with Sleaster, that it is completely unfair for someone to deny a gay couple the rights to engage in an affair. McCain might as well prohibit two men from being friends. One could say that if two people of the same sex were supposed to be together, the would be able to reproduce together. The point of the human race is to expand, and same sex relationships does not encourage that. Even though both sides can be argued for centuries with even force, I believe that one cannot control who they love. It is fate that puts two people together, and a leader cannot reverse fate.

Posted by: Amanda | September 10, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

What’s up with all this ‘Pseudo-Intellectualism’, ‘left-wing’/'right-wing’ crap?
The kid asked what he believed was a relevant question of a potential President of the United States.
This student asked a question of Mr. McCain and did not receive a straight answer… why is that? Why didn’t Mr. McCain say “Because I believe ‘x’ (fill in the blank)”.
We should be talking about the ‘Main-stream’ Media’s lack of testicular fortitude when it comes to asking a question and demanding an answer. The ‘Main Stream’ media isn’t doing their job. So, I guess this means that the best ‘actor’ who can ‘read lines’ and kiss babies and shake hands will be the leader of all of us without question?
The kid deserves kudos for standing up for what he believes in. The rest of us could learn a lesson from him – especially the ‘Mainstream’ Media!

Posted by: Joe the 'Mo | September 13, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Grumpy Gramps said:
“…Where one is weak the other is strong. Children need to be raised by TWO HEALTHY parents (a man and a woman) to be able to learn how to function effectively and become well rounded, functional, successful adults. Single parents (I was one), self centered parents, same sex parents, work alcoholic, emotionally immature parents…are selfish and thinking NOT of what is best for the child — but their own desires of “having a family” etc. You only need to look at the current generation and the children of the 60′s to see the damage that has been done.”
As a Gay Man who has been happily partnered for 13 years and has raised a ‘genetic’ son I am truly amazed at your ignorance.
Your basic argument is that kids raised by Straight parents are ‘good’ and ‘whole’ (except for those darn ‘hippies/commies/(u fill in the blank)’)? What data are you using to justify this supposition? If I may be so bold, I don’t believe that you have any data to back up your hypothesis – you are using a vague/general concept to justify your beliefs.
Have you met any kids raised by a gay or lesbian couple? Have you spoken with them? Have you sat in their families’ homes and talked about your concerns? Have you talked to their teachers? coaches? parents? Probably not…
Before you go judging people, try walking in their shoes for a day or two…

Posted by: Joe the 'Mo | September 13, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am

SLEASTER FOR PRESIDENT 2008! To those who felt this high school student was being disrespectful by asking direct questions to someone seeking the highest position in the United States: GET A GRIP! Since when are we supposed to handle these candidates with kid gloves? I don’t think you have an issue with his lack of respect. You just don’t like the particular questions he presented. Too bad! A lot of people have suffered for 8 years under Evil Bush’s gay-hating reign. But as long as YOU weren’t affected it must not matter, right? You are the ones lacking in respect. I just hope someday you’ll venture out of your bubble of intolerance and realize there are other people out here who simply want the same rights as everyone else.

Posted by: Mb | January 4, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

I get very, very ticked off when my generation is basically told that we’re hopeless, but when something happens that could potentially prove that we have a collective IQ of more than a box of rocks, the kid gets called disrespectful.
I think it’s awful to use that wonderful thing called a double-edged sword without telling us: we’re “lazy, good-for-nothings” if we don’t say what we think, but we’re “disrespectful” if we do, and it hurts someone’s feelings.
Can someone make up his/her mind?
Personally, I’d like a follow-up on this: did the kid get a detention/suspended?

Posted by: Kari | February 25, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am

I think anyone saying that student was disrespectful, you’re wrong. I think gays should have a right to marry and be happy wether or not others like it. Its their life. why should any other individual control how they live it?
I’m for gay marriage. I have quite a few gay friends and I support them 100%

Posted by: nicole | March 18, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

The student WAS disrespectful. Whether he had good points or not, he went about expressing them in a very disrespectful manner. Every word that came out of his mouth was argumentative and completely unnecessary. McCain showed respect for the kids differing opinion, and the little brat refused to show him the same courtesy.

Posted by: Dan | April 3, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

i think this kid asked a great question. however, i think that mccain answered it well. it is what he believes and he has a right to believe it. also, he delt with the question in a good mannor. he respected the student for asking the question and handled himself well with answering the question. he didn’t blow up or criticise the kid.. idk.. i say kudos to both. remember ppl.. you have to look into someone’s history (as in like adolescent life) to know them. mccain has a history with a temper problem – and he handled himself greatly here!

Posted by: Nikki G | April 21, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

first of all mccain has served this country for many years and does not deserve the disrespect.. in the bible and i will quote leviticus 18:22 you shall not lie wit a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination

Posted by: R.J. | April 23, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

The kid is not disrespectful, he had a valid point, GOOD FOR HIM for standing up and saying it to McCain’s face

Posted by: Joe | August 12, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Whether one agrees with the high schooler’s views, dissent, doubt, and constant vigilance is indispensible to a working democracy. There are countries in which one is not allowed to critcize their leaders. See North Korea, Stalin’s Russia, Hitler’s Germany, amongst others. It is a sad day in America when dissent has been given the label of disrespectful. Let those who deserve respect get it and may those who don’t not get slavish adoration because of popular ideology.

Posted by: Susan | August 13, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I’d also like to point out to those who say that one’s rights cannot be taken away if they don’t already have those rights, that same sex couples (who’s only logical, apples to apples, comparison is opposit sex couples) have the right to marry in California and Massachussettes. McCain fully supports the Proposition 8 amendment in California which, if enacted, would take away the fundamental rights of LGBT Californians to enter into marriage.
McCain also supports restricting the co-equal powers of the judiciary in his own state of Arizona via an already defeated amendment drive, and has stated publicly, his support of a federal marriage amendment, if the DOMA were threatened as it currently is now that California is legally recognizing marriage equality and Massachussettes has repealed it’s 1913 law restricting out of state couples from marrying.
So the kid’s question about taking away rights was right on target. If only more young people were educated and more involved in the political process.

Posted by: Daimeon | September 5, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

And RJ…A president puts his/her hand on the Bible or other holy book of choice if he/she chooses to, and swears to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. He/She doesn’t put his/her hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold The Bible.

Posted by: Daimeon | September 5, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am

Gosh, all the talk about “disrespect” talk seems a bit off base to me.
If John McCain had respected that student, he would given him honest and direct answers. He did not.
So just who was disrespecting who?
I respect the student for not being willing to accept McCain’s attempted smokescreens and having the courage to call him on it.
That’s leadership.

Posted by: mggm | September 5, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am

LOL. McCain dodges but the kid is “disrespectful.” Republicans have become too accustomed to hand-picked crowds and prearragned questions.

Posted by: smartvoter | September 5, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

I wish all these born-again bigots would take the next evolutionary step and GROW UP!

Posted by: Nathanial | September 5, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Wow, so many ignorant comments from “Christians” and republican party wanna-be hacks. I think the kid did great! McCain is a tool, and his defenders (at least here) appear to mostly be small-minded, foolish people that are easily persuaded to follow whoever says the word “jesus,” which has the same observable effect on reality as the word “expelliarmus.”
The stupid runs deep in my country. Bravo to this student for not letting himself get washed away in it.

Posted by: troy | September 5, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Of course he didn’t see a leader. John McCain was a traitor when he was collaborating with Viet Cong propaganda (lying to protect his own skin while his actions put thousands more in harm’s way), and he’s a traitor now in his support for Bush’s illegal war and for the GOP’s anti-American, anti-Constitutional “Rich First” agenda. Like Bush, McCain is an enemy of hte people who deserves impeachment, trial and execution.

Posted by: Copper Stewart | September 5, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Pete, sorry to burst your bubble but the survey data just doesn’t support your conclusions.
For example, Gallup, a respected leader in polling the public has been taking a poll on what Americans think is moral and immoral since 2001. For the first time, it’s even split on homosexuality. (48% to 48%)
A different gallup poll from 2007 shows that 59% of respondents think homosexual relations should be legal, that’s up from 50% in 2003.
Pew Research released a poll in 2007 that showed that people who know gay folks are more likely to support their civil freedoms than those who merely hear about them from preachers and politicians.
The Pew center found in 2006 that 51% of Americans still oppose legalizing gay marriage, but in 2004, there was much more opposition(63%).
So sorry, homosexuality IS becoming more acceptable.

Posted by: Jason | September 5, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

So sorry for all of you opposed to gay marriage. If I have a marriage that you object to, and your party platform and beliefs drive you to take my marriage away from me, I have every right to question your candidacy.
I can even ask the question in a manner that you might find disrespectful. Attempting to codify your beliefs and removing my civil marriage is the height of disrespect.
Go Sleaster.

Posted by: Tenax | September 5, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Respect is earned not given. What has McCain done to earn respect?
Oh yeah, he sat in a ditch for 5 years because he was patriotically fighting an illegal war and was dumb enough to get caught and too dumb to talk his way out.
The kid is right – he’s no leader, just a whiner, whining about how he spent a gazillions years as a grunt. dumbass.

Posted by: Sleaster Rocks | September 6, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am

McCain: “I think that they [civil unions or gay marriage] impinge on the status and the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman.”
And how do they “impinge?”
The kid’s right. McCain’s no leader. Just another professional politician with slogans.

Posted by: Leslie | September 6, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

The kids was brave. Its like asking his own father about sexuality. It sound disrespectful but in deep, the question is sound.

Posted by: Nit Ron | September 29, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

You idiots are crazy, thinking that that stupid kid was right.

Posted by: Knight of Ungays | October 18, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.