Senators Grill General Petraeus
ABC News’ Jennifer Parker reports: On his second day of testimony to Congress about the future of the Iraq war, Army Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, faced criticism from senators in two, almost back-to-back hearings of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee.
One Republican senator, who announced this week he would not be running for president or any other elected office in 2008, had one of the angriest exchanges of the day.
"Are we going to continue to invest American blood and treasure at the same rate we’re doing now? For what," demanded Republican Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska. "The President said, ‘let’s buy time.’ Buy time for what?" Hagel asked, arguing Iraq’s national leaders have not made progress on quelling sectarian violence.
"We have got too many disconnects here, General — way too many disconnects," Hagel said. "This is the administration’s fault, we have never ever looked at Iraq in the larger strategic context."
Hagel also launched into an attack of Ambassador Crocker’s assertion that if U.S. forces pull out of Iraq, Iraq could degenerate into a civil war.
"We going to see Iraq devolving into a civil war? Come on. Our National Intelligence Estimate says we’re already in a civil war," Hagel charged.
Five senators running for president also had the opportunity to grill Petraeus — who said the troop surge should continue until summer of 2008, upon when U.S. troop levels in Iraq would go down to the pre-surge level of 130,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.
Among them was Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a Democratic presidential candidate, who implored the general to end the President’s military surge strategy.
"The American people will not support an infinite war whose sole remaining purpose is to prevent the situation in Iraq from becoming worse than it is today," Biden said.
Biden argued the point of the surge was to give Iraqi national leaders breathing room to stem ethic and sectarian violence and tensions, and that hasn’t happened.
"It’s time to turn the corner," Biden said. "We should stop the surge and start bringing our troops home."
Senator Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., told the general " you have been made the defacto spokesman for what many of us believe to be a failed policy."
Clinton accused the general of dodging a question first posed by Biden earlier in the day about how long U.S. troops will remain in Iraq.
"If in fact the circumstances on the ground are exactly what they are today in March of next year, will you recommend the continuation of somewhere between 130 to 160- thousand troops being shot at
killed and maimed everyday?" Clinton pressed Petraeus.
"I would be very hard pressed at that time to recommend a continuation," Petraeus responded. But he said, "it is an awfully big hypothetical and it is not something that would want to try to determine right here right now about a point a year from now."
Another Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., also disagreed with Petraeus’ assessment that the surge had worked to quel violence in Iraq.
"We’re seeing nothing getting better here at all," Dodd said. "How do we justify this continuation?"
Outside the hearing room, Dodd said Petraeus and Crocker were delivering "happy-talk" about the progress made in Iraq. "Happy talk doesn’t get the job done," he told reporters.
As he was leaving the committee hearing, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., told reporters that he was not persuaded by the officials’ assessment of progress on Iraq.
"Petraeus and Crocker are capable men … they have been given an extraordinarily messy task," Obama said. "But they have not swayed me. Staying on the same path in the next four or five years will not yeild a different result."
Petraeus received a much warmer welcome from Republican presidential candidate Senator John McCain.
"I, too, have been made sick at heart by the terrible price we’ve paid for nearly four years of mismanaged war," said the Arizona Senator. However McCain argued leaving Iraq would create a "terrorism sanctuary in the heart of the middle east."
"I believe we cannot choose to lose in Iraq. And I will do everything in my power to see that our commanders in Iraq have the time and support they request to win this war," he said.
When Democratic Senator Robert Menendez asked Petraeus how much longer U.S. troops would be in Iraq, the general refused to answer, saying it would be a "disservice" to the troops.
"I’m as frustrated in the situation as anybody else. It’s going on three years living in the situation after a year in Bosnia," Petraeus said, referring to his own deployment.
ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf and Matt Jaffe contributed to this report.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
After they grill a sycophantic general who gets his talking points from the whitewash house, they can go grill a steak and pat each other on the backs at the infinite war they created. Ask him about a mission and see if he coughs before answering.
Posted by: daddy | September 11, 2007, 11:45 am 11:45 am
These politicians are clueless and Petraeus just amplifies how uninformed they really are. I would advise Biden to shut up and listen.
Posted by: Ryan | September 11, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am
What a Joke of a report by ABC: Fair and balenced as a sea saw with a sumo on one end. What are we talking about? A bunch of stuffed suits comitting treason in the face of a lethal enemy. Drudge shouldn’t have bothered.
Posted by: Andrew | September 11, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am
with the Dems attitude, Asia would be controlled by the Japanese…
Posted by: Daveyboy | September 11, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Biden is and has always been a bozo.
Posted by: John Shackelford | September 11, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Petraeus was also blasted by Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a Democratic presidential candidate, who implored the general to end the President’s military surge strategy.
Senator, you are not fit to carry the general’s bags. What is it about the Roman Senate that makes these fools think they are so high and mighty? I am talking both sides of the aisle. We should make you people wear robes and wigs, maybe then your image will match your attitudes.
Posted by: Drommm | September 11, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Likely Senator Question: “Umm, do you actually expect us to believe any of this?”
Posted by: Mark Johnson | September 11, 2007, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Strange. I watched the hearings. I actually heard positive comments about the reports. Are you sure your reporters were there??? Because they obviously missed some key testimony.
Posted by: Marine | September 11, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
The reporting criteria was modified so things wouldn’t sound as bad . . .
Posted by: osipov | September 11, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Come on folks, check out Biden’s Bio,he had WAR101 during his stay at Syracuse. What does a graduate from West Point with thirty years in the field know!!!
All those years Joe put in serving his country in the MILITARY should count for something!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: wildbill | September 11, 2007, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
I really wish that we could pull all of our troops out immediately, just to show the left how wrong they really are with there policy decisions. How would they ever explain themselves out of that tragedy?
Posted by: Lee | September 11, 2007, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
The general is a soldier doing his job and doing it well. Senator Biden is an embarrasment. Only people who hate the military could enjoy this.
Posted by: Elery | September 11, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
The Senator’s are right. What are we fighting for? What is our strategic plan? Is 5 more years, 600 billion, 4000+dead, 20,000+ wounded worth…..what exactly? Cheap gas for your suv? stop AQ? Their in Afganistan, Pakistan and Saudia Arabia. Where the real war is…
Posted by: futureshock | September 11, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
The posts here show basically why the military uses poor folks with the dream of education after they serve, to prop them up and make them look good. No use getting an educated person in the military frontline, that is held for the leaders only, like BETRAYUS…
Posted by: daddy | September 11, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
So how did the General respond? Or is the only point of this article to advance the blowhard talking points of grandstanding senators?
Posted by: Jimmy | September 11, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Hey Brian,
When are you going to do your “investigation” on Hillary’s bribs.. I mean donations?? I’m still waiting on that one??? HMMMMM mmmmmm when I wonder.
Gutless wonder! Democratic Liberal Hack. Treasonist Loser!
Posted by: r | September 11, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Forget the Iraqi government…When are we going to withdraw support to the dysfunctional US Congress?!
They are failing to meet any of their benchmarks. The Senate has passed 0 of 12 appropriations bills necessary to keep USG doors open come Oct. 1.
We must deliver a clear message that “The Free Ride is Over!”
Posted by: carl | September 11, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Leave it to the brilliance of MYSTICDON to conjure up the SPECTER of FASCISM these republicans thrive under. The neo-con swindlers know the chapter from MEIN Kampf about how you forget the intelligent people and go for the easily misled among them…Vini Vidi Vici…
Posted by: daddy | September 11, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I too would like to see a real investigation of the Clintons, especially the activities at Mena Airport where Poppy Bush was landing the dope. No, not his son. The drugs.
Posted by: tim osman | September 11, 2007, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
All politics, Biden could care less what the general has to say. He has already made up his mind and he knows best. This is a great example of what is wrong in DC. All talk, All show, no listen and thinking allowed.
Posted by: dilbert | September 11, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
General Patraeous did a good job! I would ask our politicians if they want us to WIN in Iraq! It was obvious that the real issue sums up to politics as usual! Most Dem’s want this war to end in Bush’s watch, so that the next president which we can assume will be a DEM will not have the responsibilty. On the other hand the Rep’s don’t want to pull out, realizing also this can come back and bite the Dems if not hanlded properly.
Dem’s should not feel victimized either since 90% voted for the war. It’s defenitely a dificult task for any party. The question…remains, do we want to WIN!
Gary
Posted by: Gary Oura | September 11, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
low life democrats grilling a decorated 4 star general. A man who lives his life for honor and integrity. Shame on you democrats. You are the reason why I will never vote for a democrat again in my life.
Posted by: Harry | September 11, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Only those that have actually been on the front lines have any business questioning this General. Biden, that doesn’t include you! You have now or ever known what you’re talking about!
Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
ABC- what a lousy half written crappy story. you do not include our great generals responses to these lame attacks buy (pun intended) democrats. YOu are so obviously pro obl and terrorist its ridicilous. Get a grip. You are losing audience online and on tv. Support your country. Stand with us, not against us.
Posted by: Harry | September 11, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Senator Biden and others;
Please stop referencing voters, which includes me, in your questions to the General and tell us what you believe. From what I hear you are notspeaking form. I ,Senator Biden, believe !!!
Dick Weiss
Posted by: Dick Weiss | September 11, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Joe biden for sale to the highest bidder. Say no to joe. loser.
Posted by: Harry | September 11, 2007, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
It’s a shame that these senators can’t be drafted, given a rifle and made to defend this country. Politics take men and women and turn them into cowards. Then they become traitors. Biden is so consumed with his hatred of Bush he will destroy this country. Shame on the voters that elected this clown.
Posted by: L. Liesner | September 11, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Political horse and pony show by Biden.
Bidens verbal attack on Petraeus was disgraceful, cowardly and was one of the
lowest acts of political jocking for the day..
Posted by: Adams | September 11, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Another phony Bin Laden tape. Be very afraid. In fact, I think he’s been stealing socks out of my drier. And,and he hates kittens and panda bears.
Posted by: tim osman | September 11, 2007, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
and GWB hated Hussein so much he was willing to start this mess of a war and kill innocent folks on both sides! that’s right – Iraqis love their children too!!
Posted by: osipov | September 11, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
What a bunch of nonsense most of you are writing. What are we doing in Iraq in the first place? Bin Laden is a devout Muslim, and despised Saddam’s sectarian despotism in Iraq – these guys had nothing to do with each other. Saddam had no Weapons of Mass Destruction, and nothing to do with 9/11. Those are the facts. We went to war, spilling our blood, and our treasure, because that arrogant fool in the White House was upset that Saddam tried to kill his Daddy! History will so record. We gave up the chance to strike a killing blow against As Queda by doing that!
Posted by: Al Feldzamen | September 11, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
I wonder how many of the writers here were actually in the military. Go enlist if you are so concerned. Don’t let age be a factor. Or is your hero 5 deferment Chaney?
Posted by: chopper | September 11, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Gary, Do we want to win the war?
WHO THE HELL CARES?
What the hell is wrong with you people? What can possibly call a victory at this point? WE WILL NEVER CATCH ANYONE INVOLVED WITH 9-11. Pulling our troops out wouldn’t be a tragedy, it would be a step toward ENDING a tragedy. Democrats and Republicans alike, ALONG WITH THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE THEY REPRESENT, want this war to end. “Winning” hasn’t been relevant since “Mission Accomplished” day. Because there is no way to win. This is a no-win situation. Understand? If you can define what you think is a “win”, then we can debate whether we can or not. Until then, as long as we’re needlessly fighting somewhere we shouldn’t be, there is no win.
Our enemy is not Usama bin Laden. It is ourselves. General Petraeus is indeed doing his job, and that is lying to keep the war going. That’s why he’s general.
How do you not see that? I mean, not as a republican or a democrat, but just as a human being? Are you people that dense?
Posted by: Seth | September 11, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
All you whiners on this post have obviously never worn a uniform or stood a real post. My fellow military borthers/sisters are dying because W’s and DIck’s lies and you support that? I should come to your neighborhood and enlist you, your wives and your sons and daughters. Then your pespectives will changes when you die and yours die for lies and oil.
Pathetic you are!
Posted by: Tony | September 11, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
What a contrast.These two bit fat politicians that sit in air conditioned offices that could not find the dipstick on their car is telling a four star General how to conduct a war?
What a joke.
Posted by: Jack Weaver | September 11, 2007, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Does anyone else notice how this report was strategically timed to the anniversary of 9-11? There are no parallels between the attacks and the was in Iraq so the Bush Crime Family will do anything, no matter how despicable, to draw connections.
Posted by: Liz | September 11, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Comments like Daddy makes show the basics civics lessons that the military used to understand before they were fed ‘dumbledorf patties” by halliburton money swindlers. And in the midst of the killing fields no less…swift boat people R US…your left…your left…your left…right-NO!!!!!
Posted by: daddy | September 11, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Bush Crime Family is right.
Let’s talk about how W’s gran dad did business with the Nazi’s and the recent reports on YOUTUBE that his daddy was in Dallas in proximity to the depository the day JFK was assissinated.
Posted by: Tony | September 11, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Osama is a mercenary marketing director for various government owned weapons manufacturers parading as a religious person…that flies planes into buildings; and Americans accept that he is a religious person; which explains why Americans accept this war; which in fact should only be portrayed as a weapons deal; whether or not it is a weapons deal is of no relevance. A law making the minimum price of Gasoline at the pump $1.70 means “war ends we win“; otherwise we lose…Signed: top Intel analyst in the world.
Posted by: Getzel | September 11, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
John Arquilla, an intelligence and counterinsurgency expert at the Naval Postgraduate School, is even harsher in his assessment of Petraeus. “I think Colin Powell used dodgy information to get us into the war, and Petraeus is using dodgy information to keep us there,” he said.
Posted by: tim osman | September 11, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
I really have a problem with People who voted for this General to access the situation, and then play politics with his accessment. Also ABC’s reporting on this and anything other than their obvious adgenda is very offensive…they sure like to preach to the choir, they just don’t realize everyone doesn’t belong to thier choir.
Posted by: Barbara | September 11, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Seth, good post.
Posted by: tim osman | September 11, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
This is one of the most educated (PHD) and experienced (Haiti, Bosnisa, Kuwait, Iraq, Etc.) Generals we have had on the frontline. Each tribe in Iraq has its own challenges and the General was right on the money when in his manner of depicting the situation on the ground. We will never win this fight if the politicians don’t stop getting in the way with their “I’m protecting the voter” and “looking out for myself” attitudes. These politicians should be ashamed.
Posted by: Major Seabass | September 11, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Tony, first I doubt you’re military. Second, winning this war will prevent future generations from paying an even higher price. Third, the aid and comfort the dems are giving the enemy is directly responsible for the deaths of many, it’s time to stop. Fourth, our soldiers aren’t kids that their parents send off to fight. They’re grown men and women who know the risk and join because they believe in the cause.
God bless our brave troops and shame on the treason of so many unpatriotic fools we have to suffer.
Posted by: Kirk | September 11, 2007, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Calling our military uneducated is so out of line with reality! Today’s military personnel have higher levels of education than the general population. Petraeus himself has a PhD. in foreign relations!
Democrats, especially are playing politics with war and have so heavly invested in the concept of defeat, they can’t accept good news without losing face!
Posted by: Mike Sarkisian | September 11, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Are we to believe that MOP Biden who visited Iraq for a few hours knows more than a 4 star, unanimously confirmed General who is leading our troops in the War on Terror on a day-to-day basis? This is pure, shameless politics by the MoveOn.org Puppets in the Senate (MOPS).
Posted by: Don | September 11, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
The ethanol investors do not build because monopoly OPEC would lower the price to rust out their billion dollar million barrel a day still. Brazil is energy independent: ethanol; All their cars come built running on ethanol; Archer Daniel Midland made millions on $1.00 gallon ethanol in the 1990s; that trumps any canard/invalid objection to ethanol. Since 1973 it has been oil for dollars for weapons; Americans financed 9/11/01 at the gas pump…and continue to finance the war against themselves. President Bush got precisely the outcome he desired in Iraq: “A nice long lasting war and sell lots of weapons“. signed: the top Intel analyst in the world
Posted by: Getzel | September 11, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Mr Biden receives my endorsement as the the Democrat nominee for President…of the Hair Club for Men.
Posted by: s. sperling | September 11, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
What is so sad about the majority of these posts is it just how disillusioned you people (republicans) are. How sick, I mean even if you have fellow Republicans calling out this President and his ‘surge’ strategy, you fools stand by him (GW). And you are the reason why this country in in turmoil, fools! Even after spending 500 billion dollars, I raq is still in turmoil and the current ‘flunky’ running the country can’t even take care of his own people and is not willing to share the oil amongst the other tribes. But you fools say lets keep sending more troops and money. Great strategy, now tell me this, do you think we can keep it up? Who’s gonna pay for the war, exactly you’re children. And to hear Republicans say, Democrats are going to raise taxes, HOW IN THE HELL DO YOU EXPECT THIS COUNTRY TO PAY FOR THE WAR that this idiot Republican President is responsible for?! You know what, educate yourself, don’t get all your talking points from FOX NEWS!
Posted by: veteran | September 11, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Who left the door open at the psychiatric ward? There are more conspiracy theories here than there are congressmen. Seriously though, is MoveOn on lunch break?
Posted by: Drommm | September 11, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
When is everybody going to understand that the US did not go into Iraq to win. If we did, we would have seen shock and awe and had plenty of troops to prevent the chaos that ensued shortly after the fall of Baghdad. The Bush administration went in with just enough troops not to lose and to maintain a perpetual war that is quickly draining our treasury and making many cronies very rich. I only wish more senators had the nads to ask the tough questions during the lead up to war. We disparately need a third party that is about the people. I for one am sick of the corporatist mentality of both the Dems and Reps.
Posted by: Scott | September 11, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
“Only those that have actually been on the front lines have any business questioning this General. Biden, that doesn’t include you! You have now or ever known what you’re talking about!”
-sigh- Gimme a break…
Do you have to be dead to talk about death?
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
I say we leave and build a fence and a moat around the US. hahaha
Libs have no concept of history and refuse to accept what made us the only superpower in less than 250 years. No other country in the world has accomplished this. We feed, clothe, cure, and even send taxpayer aid to sworn enemies, among other things, name another country who has contributed so much in less than 250 years.
I take refuge in the fact that throughout history, going back 200 years, there has always been opposition to any war.
God Bless America.
Posted by: AJ | September 11, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Kirk — it not patriotic to die in a mis-guided, mis-led war that had nothing to do with 9-11 or WMDs or anything to secure our defense in the first place.
Posted by: Bob Brown | September 11, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Why do we only get told what will happen in the next year or so? After 4 years of this war do we still not have a plan? Why are we so nearsighted? I don’t care whether it’s now or 3 years from now but we need to have a PLAN to get out of Iraq and stick to it. The idea of insurgents just waiting out should not be a problem if Iraqi government beefs up security forces to deal with that.
Posted by: Dmitri | September 11, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Al Qaeda has indicated many times that Iraq is their Central Front in the war. Wake up!
Posted by: Had it in Ohio | September 11, 2007, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I think it’s just Senator Biden plagiarizing Osama Bin Laden’s talking points. Isn’t that what Biden does best
Posted by: Sam | September 11, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
While we’re busy slamming Biden, let’s not forget: Chuck Hagel, a dutiful Republican, blasted the general, too. I suppose he’s also a traitor. Maybe that’s why he’s quitting the Senate…or maybe now that he doesn’t have to worry about getting reelected, he’s finally able to say his piece.
We have GOT to keep our eye on the ball here, people. It’s been YEARS since we were first told, “be patient.” Let’s ask ourselves: At what point are we allowed to throw up our hands and say, “that’s enough patience” without having our patriotism or intelligence called into question? Or are we EVER?
Posted by: John the Man | September 11, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Hey Daddy,
You said, “No use getting an educated person in the military frontline…” I served for 6 years in the Army in a frontline unit. I have a masters degree in Civil Engineering … and I’m not poor … and there were plenty others just like me. Why do people like you make up false facts when you know absolutely nothing?
Posted by: J-Man | September 11, 2007, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that as long as our president and his general are willing to keep our troops in Iraq, the Iraqi goverment will not do what it will takes politically to unify their country. How many more American lives is it going to take before they admit they are wrong? The majority of the people in the U.S., the majority of the people in Iraq, and the majority of the people of the world think this war is wrong and want it to end. Only 3 men are keeping this war going, GWB, Patreaus, and Malaki. Unbelievable!
Posted by: Ron | September 11, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Conspiracy idiots are all over the place.
Any of you ever looked into Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, Kim Jong-il, Syrian prez, Saddam Hussein…..
Its fun to hate Bush, but why do these foreign presidents have more credibility than our own.
What happened to you Americans, if we cant count on you guys, who can we count on?
Posted by: AJ | September 11, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
People of Delaware…please wise up and stop sending Joe Biden to D.C. He is, and has been for years, an idiot looking for the camera…
Posted by: TommyJack | September 11, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
The miracle is that a lot of you folks still have the right to vote…no wonder we’re in this mess.
Posted by: TBM | September 11, 2007, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Interesting,
Biden is the same guy who gave a plagiarized speech when he last ran for president. The fact the speech was originally given by a socialist leader give us an indication of his ideology,
The most frightening thing about his and other defeatists is their reasoning. They want to the military to lose so the democrats can continue to lead congress. Never mind puttting our country in danger.
Putting politics ahead of security is not the answer but it is consistent. These are the same folks who want amnesty for illegal aliens so we can lure them into entitlement programs.
Posted by: roger | September 11, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
To all the conspiracy theorists here the plane to LA LA Land is now boarding at gate zero
Posted by: Sam | September 11, 2007, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
John the Man: Calling the anti Iraq war people traitors and terroist sympathizers is all the neocons have going for them now. They have no legitimate argument in favor of the war so they stoop to attack measures. The neocons are done and they know it so they are cursing everyone else. As one of theirs said they are in their “last throes” so they are babbling and bad mouthing as they go DOWN.
Posted by: Ron | September 11, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
4 years ago another respected ex General and Secretary of state sat at the UN and told us about all of the terrible things that would happen if we didn’t immediately go to war with Iraq. It was all lies, the President, Vice President,Rumsfeld,Rice and all of the rest all lied to us. Why in the world would anyone think that another General
would not lie to us? With this track record, any time that they open their mouths, you can be pretty much sure that they are lying!
Posted by: Donna | September 11, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
I’ve noticed for a long time, that the Bush opposition can do nothing but try and insult and quote one liners. If I didn’t have some very dear friends and relatives that are stron Democrats I would think the entire Party is a party of nuts….however, I know better, true Americans regardless of party don’t stoop to insults born out of ignorance and emotion.
Posted by: Barbara | September 11, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Hey Lee,
Treason is treason, whether you speak it, write it or act on it. There is no “freedom” laid out in the Constitution to commit treason.
Posted by: dlbizzz | September 11, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
I love that ABC is able to print the diatibes of our representitives but not a word of response from Gen. Petraeus……fair and balanced?
Posted by: DaveBlat | September 11, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Lee
The operative word is temporary! The first Amendment does not give license to make things up, cry fire in a crowded theater and to libel.
On the other hand, while criticism has been a part of every war, the fact is that we would have mass censorship, the kind of political hyperbole exhibeted here and in Congress would be soundly rejected and folks like Kuinich, who openly goes to a terrorist country to call the president names, would be jailed!
Posted by: Mike Sarkisian | September 11, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
“daddy”
you obviously have done your research, however, you forgot to mention that the J Edgar Hoover meeting was called by the pope and it included Wernher von Braun, Comissioner Gordon, the Yetti, Colonel Tom Parker and Ruppert Murdoch…keep up the informative posts. By the way, how’s life in your moms basement?
Posted by: N. Chomsky | September 11, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
“I don’t want a small group a scared people to hamper my freedoms that so many people (True Americans) died for. But I guess thats treason to talk like that????”
The War in which the freedom those true Americans you speak of died for, Im sure was protested, and Im sure no matter what war it was that you classify as a “real war” there were people like you who said we were dying for no reason, treason, etc, etc, etc…
Its easy to say the war is wrong, but its been said before….
Posted by: Bobby | September 11, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Hey J-Man,
Usually you military types are good with figures and cite the years you served and the name of the operation. So for now, I am guessing your civil engineering degree came after your service. Army Corps of Civil Engineers perhaps????
Posted by: daddy | September 11, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Can anyone tell me what 9/11 has to do with Iraq, or are you one of those people who think they all look alike so….??
Posted by: Lee | September 11, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Mike Sarkisian, WOW……I love how this nation labels everyone, and I bet you have a perfect picture in your mind of me and what I stand for? Guess what, it’s your right and your freedom to feel in this manor, no matter how idiotic it may sound to others. Truly amusing to me.
Posted by: Lee | September 11, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
So, ok, Biden is certainly a Bozo, and it is definately unsightly that these suits are questioning a uniform. But this is what we asked them to do when we elected them. Though the democrats aren’t the most savy as a party, Bush’s policies and motives should be under attack
Posted by: wes | September 11, 2007, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
ABC shoyuld be ashamed as should those that can not even bring themsleves to utter the worgs…USA and Victory in the same sentence. You say Petraus is lying but bin Laden is telling the truth. What is ABC thinking?
Posted by: Damian | September 11, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Mike Sarkisian…you seem to have a problem with the media reporting anything other than the Bush Jr. administration version of events. Maybe that’s because they’ve gotten tired of being endlessly lied to for five years. Maybe your anger would be better directed at the pack of LIARS that make up the Bush Jr. administration.
Posted by: wilder5121 | September 11, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Biden is a misplacement. He sit’s in the Senate like a toga’d Roman only because he was prematurely plucked from a Petri dish in a lab doing stool specimens.
Posted by: Stev | September 11, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Damian..I want you to explain EXACTLY what “victory” is. Come on, General Damian…lecture us all on EXACTLY what “victory” in Iraq is. We’re waiting…
Posted by: wilder5121 | September 11, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
This is great farce if it weren’t so deadly serious. The dems really know how to make America laugh.
Posted by: Jacque Bauer | September 11, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Stev…your nanny is calling…time for your nap.
Posted by: wilder5121 | September 11, 2007, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
“daddy”
now you have crossed the line, please don’t bring cats into this.
Posted by: your mom goes to college | September 11, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Jacque Bauer…very funny. Almost as funny as a moron incompetent president who gets us stuck in endless quagmire and gets thousands of US troops killed for NOTHING while spending over a TRILLION taxpayer dollars doing it! HAHAHAHAHA!
Posted by: wilder5121 | September 11, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
When do Sean Penn and Tim Robbins and other America haters get to question the general? It amazes me how many people here blame the administration for this war. It’s especially ironic today.
Posted by: Chas | September 11, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Well the General sure has allot more patience than i would have had. Can you picture Patton up there in front of this clueless group. These Sen. approved of Gen Petreous in confirmation hearings, now that the good Gen doesnt tell them what they want, he is suddenly incompetent. Biden is showing what a true hack he is.
Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
AJ, ummmm we are in Afghanistan, and I highly doubt the dems would authorize an attack on pakistan seeing as they don’t have the balls to support the current mission that THEY VOTED FOR. Also, my fellow soldiers and I die for our country and YOUR freedom of which you apparently don’t appreciate. Mis-led, mis-guided, whatever, although I disagree it doesn’t matter. We are all serving our nation and thats what we die for. We die for you and your freedom to hate us, your freedom to spit on us and devalue our mission. It is a sacrifice that you cannot and will not ever understand. At least not until you are willing to make it yourself.
Posted by: Jason | September 11, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Liberals just suck! Facts & results mean nothing.
Posted by: Thomas Pain | September 11, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
We went into Iraq for no good reason, other then that a bunch of idiot neo-cons thought that a was a good idea.. Our kids are dying for no good reason, IRAQ WAS NEVER A THREAT TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY!! When they say that are kids are dying to protect our freedoms they are lying, Iraq never was a threat to our freedoms. Our kids are being sent into this hell by Bush to extend this war until he leaves office and can push it off to the next guy and to try to save his legacy.This is an immoral use of our troops. Some day the parents and families of these troops will realize this and Bush will be remembered as the President who misused our troops for personal reasons and history will judge him harshly.
Posted by: Donna | September 11, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
All the Republican ARMCHAIR GENERALS posting here are laughable. Been wrong every step of the way about EVERYTHING…and STILL think they’re geniuses….lecturing us all. These clowns sound just like Bush Jr. and his pack of incompetent liars. Totally oblivious of the fact that nobody believes them anymore…
Posted by: wilder5121 | September 11, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Treason comes to mind for the politicians.
Posted by: Tony | September 11, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Seth,
Yes…we want to win the war and here’s the reason why. Who do you think were fighting in Iraq? Iraqi-citizens? They are being blown-up but not by us.
I’m Japanese 4th generation and beleive in this country. I’m proud of what it has done in the past in liberating other countries.
Seth…you need a wake up call, unless you find yourself one day being blown up by someone who you thought was no threat!
To WIN the war means we don’t give Iraq to the enemy at any cost!
Posted by: Gary Oura | September 11, 2007, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Sorry AJ that last post was aimed at Bob Brown not you.
Posted by: Jason | September 11, 2007, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
The more I watch Patraeus, the more I like him. He’s very confident and answers all questions perfectly. What I can’t stand is the show the dems are putting on. They show him no respect.
I was leaning to the dems but once again they show their true colors. Can’t they ask intelligent questions and show the man the respect he deserves. They always have to yell and act like they are at a barbecque.
Posted by: Kathy | September 11, 2007, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
I’m sure of this whether General Petreaus is right or wrong on his assessment, we need to get out of Iraq. We don’t want to invest American blood on something that will not go our way.
Posted by: marc | September 11, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
No more blame game. Let’s get out. That’s what the people want. Not oil. Find alternative source for oil. Oil is Bush business. War is Cheney’s business, do you know Haliburton?
Posted by: marc | September 11, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Anybody posting here willing to DIE for the primitive bloodthirsty pack of tribes that make up Iraq…while they fight over the money and oil? That’s what our troops are doing. Nothing’s going to change a thousand years of blood hatred in Iraq…even if the US stays for 100 years. All you “gung-ho” warriors posting here…SIGN UP TODAY…get over there and sacrifice yourself for the tribes of Iraq!!! GO NOW!!! QUIT STALLING!!!
Posted by: wilder5121 | September 11, 2007, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Most of the people in this blog are brainless.. Question: What the heck is the only military sperpower in the 21st century of Civilization, pounding and bombing and killing everybody in a 3rd worl country like Iraq? Iraq is a country of tribes and they are very poor and have no resources other than the oil, which is why they are being killed in the first place. And the BRIGHT AND ILLUSTRIOUS 4 STAR GENERAL can not stop the carnage. Or maybe he doesn’t want to. Maybe he is lying to us like our also ILLUSTRIOUS president
has been doing for years. Lets get out of there while we can, there is no WIN
Posted by: Angry | September 11, 2007, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
This questioning reminds me of a bunch of kids with sharp sticks standing around a dog in a kennel. Put the kids in the kennel one by one, without the sticks.
Posted by: greatamerican | September 11, 2007, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Comrade wilder5121, Don’t hate on me, I’m like you, you and me, we’re the same, We shouldn’t be involved in arab vs arab conflicts, why should we care. After all, retreating has never hurt our standing in the world.
Posted by: Chuck Guevara | September 11, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Why so quiet warmongers?
Posted by: jack | September 11, 2007, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
KATHY.. it makes me wonder where your admiration for this SUPERGENERAL commes from, All military people are the same and think the same way whether they are recruits or generals. Take it from me, I’ve been there. The only think they learn is how to better kill the ENEMY. NO MATTER WHO THE ENNEMY IS.
And do not tell me that your darling general is not following strict direct orders from HIS COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
Posted by: Angry | September 11, 2007, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Jack, Unlike you, we have to get back to work.
Posted by: wardC | September 11, 2007, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
What you can’t walk and chew gum at the same time too?
Posted by: Lee | September 11, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
So whoo hoo for the ‘educated’ torch bearers of liberalism.
Posted by: Andrew | September 11, 2007, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
When I was in college I took advanced corps ROTC for the specific purpose of avoiding the draft.
So I served as an infantry officer in the Korean War.
I found that I had a home in the army so I applied for a regular army commission. As a result I was relieved of my duties on the front line because I couldn’t pass the army physical to the point that I could not be drafted.
Posted by: tiny | September 11, 2007, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
The anti-war liberals frequently use the talking point-”American is shedding its blood for OIL”.Awaken liberals, walk toward the light. Oil is the blood of the American dream. Without oil America cannot provide security for its citizens, nor could we live the American dream or maintain our wonderful lifestyles. Without Oil America and every other developing nation in the world will cease to exist. Therefore, until we find a cheaper and better energy alternative, we must secure our oil interests which includes Iraq. Liberals take off your blinders and see the reality of the situation, every area in the world that produces oil is America’s national interest. Since the industrial revolution, OIL has been the source of world war…the devils blood heats our houses, fuels our automobiles, feeds our crops, cures our illnesses (pharmaceuticals), keeps our economy thriving, and gives our mighty military the means of operation, so yes we fight for oil or die.
Posted by: awaken | September 11, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
If I was the General, I would flip off the Senators and tell them to kiss off. They are stumping for presidential election and once you get past all the hyperbole, you see them as they really are–pork barreling, posturing, foot tapping, money wasting, over taxing, candy ass, non serving, Monday morning quarterbacking, sunshine patriot, quit when it gets hard, photo op taking, punks who don’t have the credentials to shine the General’s shoes.
Posted by: rangerdahl | September 11, 2007, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
this war is lost. not one added american life should be spent. get our brave soldiers out of there
Posted by: rb | September 11, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
WHOA!!!! Timeout!!! We need to forget politics in order to resolve all of this nightmare that politics created. We have wonderful men and women in uniform in another country trying to help people out. God bless our troops. Believe it or not there are good Iraqi people who need help. God bless all good people worldwide that need help. We cannot keep our troops in harms way in foreign countries indefinitely. We need to quickly form police state governments within Iraq and Afghanistan that can quickly restore order, lawfulness, and civiliation to their own respective countries with a guarantee that they will gradually become democracies after civility is restored by their own people/temporary police state governments. We would then start a plan immediately to remove our troops as their troops are ready to replace ours. We and the UN would oversee the temporary governments to ensure they installed civility then transitioned to democracy. This is the only plan that would work to give us the fastest withdrawl and timelines that we and the World need to see.
Posted by: VoiceOfReason | September 11, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
It’s sad that we, the people of the USA, can’t be united to see this through. The hate doesn’t help, the repeat dredging up the past doesn’t help. Uniting will help. Whether you believe in the war or not, we have to unite and go forward. All the negativity is not helping us, it’s helping the enemy. Good God, can’t you people see that? This is playing into their plan. Dividing America is what they want. When a country is divided, they are easily attached or taken over. The hatred in America is scaring me. I feel we will soon have our own Civil War again in this country. I’ve never seen so much hate, and disrepect to our leaders and to each other. Stop and think what you are saying. I just read an article about an anti-war american killing someone, a stranger, jsut because he couldn’t find a soldier to kill. He doesn’t like the war. This is crazy. Stop the hate please! It’s not too late.
Posted by: Susan | September 11, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
“….We went to war, spilling our blood, and our treasure, because that arrogant fool in the White House was upset that Saddam tried to kill his Daddy! History will so record. We gave up the chance to strike a killing blow against As Queda by doing that!”
Posted by: Al Feldzamen
Al, you started out by claiming everyone was spouting nonsense and then you trumped them with your own lies. Where is the evidence that Bush went to war to satisfy a personal feud? Are you a mind reader, or simply a charlatan? Saddam had WMD, what better proof than the fact that he used them against the Iranians and the Kurds. You should be worried about what became of them, but you are too preoccupied with Bush hatred.
And for those of you (this would include Al) with a memory shorter than that of a fish: Bush declared war on terrorism – not exclusively upon Al-Queda. Aside from the fact that Saddam had reneged on his agreements to the UN cease fire agreement that put the Gulf War on hold, Iraq was financing terrorists, including rewarding suicide bombers. There is an aphorism: The enemy of your enemy is my friend. Bin Laden is not a Muslim, he is an Islamofascist. If he would have nothing to do with Saddam, how is it that his surrogates were in Iraq?
Posted by: malarky1 | September 11, 2007, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
“1. War is never just. It is hell on earth. Unless you have been in combat, you cannot know how terrible war is.”
No, I think I can imagine how bad it is without having been through it. I’ve never had my testicles eaten off by a Pit Bull, but I can imagine that it wouldn’t be a picnic.
“7. If it is determined that going to war wa a mistake – that does not mean you can pull out. The ones who caused a freeze on ammunition to the Vietnamese Army are responsible to God and man for the immense slauters which occurred in Vietman after we pulled out and we pulled out even though we were beating the crap out of the Cong.”
What about those that started American involvment in Vietnam in the first place? What American freedoms were at stake such that we had to invade? Now that they’ve been Communist for 30+ years, have we lost more freedoms because of Vietnam or because of the PATRIOT act?
“8. The threat of Muslim extremists is greater than any threat laid in Vietnam. If we pull out of Iraq and environs, all hell will break out including the possibility of bombings in the major cities of the United States.”
Too bad the U.S. never stopped subsidizing oil consumption to reflect the true cost of oil. Too bad the money being used to invade a country that we were only too happy to arm in the 80s wasn’t used to develop alternative fuels that derive from inputs in the U.S. such that we don’t have to keep funding our enemy. Too bad the U.S. help whip that extremism up to mire the Soviets in Afghanistan and now it is biting us.
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
“Saddam had WMD, what better proof than the fact that he used them against the Iranians and the Kurds. You should be worried about what became of them, but you are too preoccupied with Bush hatred.”
And the U.S. was so outraged, we decided to immediately invade them and depose Saddam and help save the Kurds….oh wait….we didn’t….
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Hey, like they say the truth hurts.The general tells the truth and they can’t handle it.
Posted by: CINDY | September 11, 2007, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
tim, thanks.
gary,
RE: They murder and kill anybody at any cost! including their own people to advance their belief.
They are responsible for 911! They hate democracy and especially America. (stop)
Are you talking about the Bush family?
And I guess it doesnt matter that you misspelled a made-up phrase, but who are these “Islamo-Fashiost’s” ? just a muddled group of people who “hate our democracy?” first of all, America is a republic, not a democracy. Secondly, They HATE that we are meddling in their affairs. They HATE that we will forever side with Israel no matter what. They HATE that our government does nothing to tamp the blind hatred of foreigners in this country, but in fact feeds it with fear-mongering (example: the last few things you typed in your last post).
and everyone,
LET’S KEEP THIS DISCUSSION RELEVANT.
i really don’t care how book smart Petraeus is. Throughout history, most of major blunders have come from highly educated people (Oliver North, Richard Nixon, FDR). Hell, W went to Yale, and He doesn’t even know where he is half the time. Petraeus could have graduated top of his class, and I still wouldn’t put it past him to tow the never-ending war cry, just like john bolton, just like alberto gonzales, just like…well, pretty much everyone.
Fighting this war is not making us safer. Just ask Baker, or Gates, or Hagel, or any bright American not hypnotized by the War crowd.
Call is surrender, call it unpatriotic, call it whatever gets your right-wing rocks off, but those words mean nothing to me. We are not kicking ass in Iraq, and we should leave. We aren’t winning or losing anything. All this war is is political and military masturbation.
It honestly feels like our government is doing nothing but playing a sloppy game of Risk, using real people as pieces. And all you care about is winning. Perfect.
Posted by: Seth | September 11, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Meet the village idiots, Biden, Hagel and Dodd.
Posted by: DAN | September 11, 2007, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Some seem to think I have a problem with journalists reporting les than what the administration says is true. No so! I have a problem with journalists who only report in the negative and demonstrate a lack of balance.
I guess it is perfectly within balanced journalism to print a daily tally of American losses as somehow showing any level of progress or lack thereof.
I seek only some balance and point out that journalism is quite different today than in WWII.
I guess it perfectly OK for journalists to make up stuff such as the LATimes unsourced article claiming that the White House was going to write General Petraeus’ report?
I am in daily contact with several military personnel from various units, some enlisted as well as officers. Every one of them complainabout press coverage as being imbalanced and skewed.
This has been a continuing complaint since the start of the war.
Do you remember the idiot reporter asking soldiers engaged in combat what they were doing during Desert Storm?
Do you think journalists in general have a clue as to what war is about?
I guess you approve of the L.A. and N.Y. Times blowing the cover off legal programs that were uncovering terrorist activites?
Posted by: Mike Sarkisian | September 11, 2007, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
rangerdahl, VoiceOfReason & tiny -
Great posts. I hope that ABC News realizes not all Americans are drinking the Kool-Aid and eating the cornbread. Not all of us rely on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MoveOn.org and the Daily Kos for our education. There is a new revolution and it is against the traditional media and academia – we are onto your lies and distortions. Watch ABC News. Watch This Week; where their idea of fair and balanced is two liberals against one conservative, hosted by a former Clinton advisor. Of course, that would be a fair fight were the conservative alotted equal time.
Posted by: malarky1 | September 11, 2007, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Love all the commentary from warmongers here regarding “winning”, when not a one of you could actually accurately depict what a “win” would be anymore. And regarding brilliant comments like “I simply hope that WHEN (not if) America is hit again by terrorists, that the ones that are hit the hardest are the same lily livered, stick your head in the sand liberals” – hey – this war has made America LESS safe, according to every independent study —- so when you’re looking for reasons why terrorists hate us enough to come here again to attack us, all you’ll have to do is look in the mirror to figure out who’s setting the stage for them to do that….
Posted by: Chris | September 11, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Evidently, many of the people writing today who are upset that General Petraeus got a few tough (yes, FEW) questions from the Senate never served in the military. If they did, they would know that General Petraeus reports to his Commander In Chief. If he were to make George unhappy, he would suffer the same consequences that General Eric Shinseki did in 2003 at the hands of Rumsfeld. Of course, the general is going to report George’s line. It’s appalling that the House gave an even weaker performance yesterday. At least, Senator Chuck Hagel(R)took his job seriously and attempted to provide the people with some oversight of this administration. Too bad that he has chosen to retire from the Senate, most of the Democrats and Republicans are too afraid to ask hard questions. Oh yeah, I know what it’s like to be in the military even though it was forty years ago. If you’re in the service you have a mission. If you’re in the Congress, it’s your duty to provide oversight. Sadly, no one knows what the mission is.
Posted by: Bingo | September 11, 2007, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Actually, Daveyboy, it was a liberal Dem President who DEFEATED the Japanese in WWII. We Dems win our wars – why can’t you Republican loudmouths win yours? You’re all big talk and no action. ROFL
Posted by: Ray Ray | September 11, 2007, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
It’s all Bill Clinton fault. He had several chances to prevent this but he was too busy wasting fine cigars. Those of you who want to pull out think it will end there, your wrong they have said over and over again they want all of us dead. So if we don’t fight them there then where?
Posted by: russ | September 11, 2007, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Larry Williams – it’s true. Bush’s disinformation and propaganda campaigns have derranged Republicans for years now.
Posted by: El Angelino | September 11, 2007, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I find it interesting how everyone can assess, if we pull out all hell will break loose. In fact we have not done it so how would you know, and if you can indeed predict the future please help me out with the lotto? The only thing we have done is increased our troops there and it does not seem to be working. So what do you do when something is not working, Stay the course, how dumb of me? How could I disagree?
Posted by: Lee | September 11, 2007, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Iraq is Bill Clinton’s fault? That’s the single stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. When will you Republicans stop blaming Clinton for all your messes and start taking some responsibility for your own failures. Un-freakin-believable! This is why the GOP is doomed in ’08 – the rest of us are sick and tired of your pathetic excuses.
Posted by: Jeanie R. | September 11, 2007, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“We Dems win our wars – why can’t you Republican loudmouths win yours?”
You mean like Johnson did in Vietnam and Truman did in Korea?
The Dems do at least have a lock on starting wars….WW I, WWII, Korea, Vietnam…something to be proud of…sure enough….
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Bill Clinton, hmmmm I guess he did leave the Afghans after the Russian left? Get your history correct if you’re going to go to the past.
Posted by: Lee | September 11, 2007, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Gary Oura My Dad was FDNY for 40 years, so don’t tell me what sacrifice is all about. I’ve seen it up close and personal. And he would never advocate that only a soldier having civil rights because he and his brother fought in WW II to prevent fascists from detemining the new world order. I
Posted by: Bob Brown | September 11, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
“Iraq is Bill Clinton’s fault? That’s the single stupidest thing I’ve ever heard.”
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 – Declares that it should be the policy of the United States to seek to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government.
Signed by Bill Clinton on October 31, 1998.
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
The best shots of the day came from Chuck Hagel (fellow Husker) and John Warner, both Republican. Combine their Q&A sessions and it is easy to see that the general and the envoy really do not know why we are in Iraq sacrificing young American souls. And neither have they a clue as to the time line extent of their undefined mission.
Posted by: Butch Dillon | September 11, 2007, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
I have no issue with the general getting tough questions. He has gone through worse, including getting wounded and nearly while he was training with his Soldiers at fort Campbell–we use live ammo to train with you know. I do have an issue with the way the questions are framed with a bombastic diatribe and tirade by the balding, aging, sackless senators as they posture for the camera. If you have a question, ask it,,,but please spare me the whole 10 minute speech prior. I’ll answer the question, but I don’t need all the sanctimomious BS. I have Soldiers to lead and a war to fight and no time for your stumping.
Posted by: rangerdahle | September 11, 2007, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
should have read “…nearly killed…”
Posted by: rangerdahl | September 11, 2007, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Poor old TINY must be the nickname for his brain…he thinks a group of saudis with boxcutters who forced a nation to blink and attack a country they had planned to attack before 911 and spend how many billions and kill how many citizens and our soldiers, is really a massive world wide army of billions of islamo fascists ready to take over america. He needs to ask the MAINSCREAM media to pull their heads out of that EMBEDDED place they now reside in where the sun don’t shine and ask some questions again so ole TINY can get up to snuff on the current news. Tiny you got one thing right…the number of terrorists is growing by leaps and bounds under the bushbaby and cheeny packer brigade and will actually end up proving your point. You really are quite smart…sorry to bother you here today.
Posted by: daddy | September 11, 2007, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Nice try, Frank Linton, but Clinton didn’t invade Iraq or fail to plan for the occupation. Bush did and the success or failure of the operation rests with him. It’s not about “policy” it’s about performance – and Bush and Rumsfeld botched their war beyond belief. So stop blaming Clinton and take some responsibility for your party’s MASSIVE failure for once.
Posted by: Jeanie R. | September 11, 2007, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Vietnam was a bi-partisan disaster, with the first troops sent by Ike and the final collapse presided over by Nixon. Try again. As for WWI and WWII – we Dems are happy to take credit for winning those massively important struggles. You’re welcome. As for Korea – if you don’t think that freeing the people of South Korea from the Communist yoke was an important undertaking at the time, well good luck with that Comrade. Once again, Dems win wars. Republicans lose them. LOL
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Malarky1 – what a load of, well, malarkey. Your insane partisanship is duly noted. If you Cons would spend as much time and energy on winning your war as you do on attacking and maligning your countrymen then maybe you wouldn’t have lost it. Stop blaming everyone else for your failures – sack up and take some responsibility for your mistakes.
Posted by: Jeanie R. | September 11, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Knowledge is power, don’t believe the media, check your facts.
Posted by: Someguys | September 11, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Biden Grills? He interrupted the general more than a complaining housewife. These poli-chickens are rude! Mr Biden, you are rude and you don’t know how to listen.
Poli-chickens can not make it in the real world. Politics is the only place they can have a career.
Be honest. Would anyone hire these yahoos? Well, maybe Hillary. She did well for the Rose Law firm.
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 11, 2007, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
This war is already over anyway – we simply have no more troops left in the pipeline and a drawdown is just a matter of months. This is all face-saving political theater aimed at giving the Republicans a shot to pin their failure on the Democrats. Too bad nobody is buying it but the 21%-er morons who still believe Fox News.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
So you hate all our elected officials, eh SoonerJJ? Maybe representative democracy isn’t for you. You might be happier in a place where the military rules directly. Have you considered Pakistan or Algeria?
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Linda Dee-those six hash marks on the general’s right sleeve mean six months each in combat. He has been there off and on for three years. In addition, he has a combat action badge–awarded only for close combat. Moreover, he was shot during training and nearly died becasue he beloievd in training hard and realitically. He has seen action and been in the fight. So your argument is not valid about him not being alongside his Soldiers. In addition, the rules of engagment (ROE) are not restricting–they are necessary. I lived under them for two tours in Iraq. I fired back and was never hampered by them. They allow us to fight back whenever we want to and anyone who says we should be allowed to loosen them to fight the way the enemy does is an idiot–lowering our standards is not an option, you saw what happened with Abu Gharab when we took it upon ourselves to emit justice. It made more enemies than friends. Your friends (National Guard?…reserves?)are numbskulls if they believe indiscriminate killing is the way to fight. Please tell them to get out of the military now before they get someone killed with their bravodo, leave the fighting to the professionals. The genmeral is legitimate and he’s doing a crappy job other generals ran from.
Posted by: rangerdahl | September 11, 2007, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
“Nice try, Frank Linton, but Clinton didn’t invade Iraq or fail to plan for the occupation. Bush did and the success or failure of the operation rests with him. It’s not about “policy” it’s about performance – and Bush and Rumsfeld botched their war beyond belief. So stop blaming Clinton and take some responsibility for your party’s MASSIVE failure for once.”
The point of such a post is to note that Clinton and other top dems (such as John Kerry) supported the removal of Saddam. The groundwork for the current mess was laid by Congress drafting and endorsing that act, and by Clinton signing it. Both Congress and the Bush administration sited that act for justification of the invasion.
It is 100% about the policy. That is why there was any real difference between Bush and Kerry on Iraq in 2004 (Kerry said he’d do things differently….good grief, what a fool…so would Bush with the benefit of hindsight) and there won’t be any difference if a Dem gets elected president in 2008. Notice how both Obama and Clinton have been beating the war drum and trying to sound very tough recently.
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Dems are trying to recreate their “glory days” where, after Nixon had won Viet Nam, they managed to steal defeat from the jaws of victory. Nixon negotiates peace treaty, then Dems refuse to fund, leading to the Killing Fields and Reeducation Camps. Now the Dems really, REALLY want to lose another winnable war, but thing is, they want for a different Republican to take the fall. Problem for the Dems, it ain’t gonna happen!
Posted by: Doug L | September 11, 2007, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
My grandmother who was alive during WW2 was really disappointed in America now.
She said “that in the America of the 40s and 50s if someone killed American soldiers we wanted THEIR heads.”
“Now we want each President’s and each others.”
Posted by: Eddie Estes | September 11, 2007, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Your right Jane Says. We need our govt to start protecting us from big profits and our own health and to stop protecting us from criminals and terrorists. We need to get back to work for the American people by getting rid of the job providers. We need to slash profiteers cushy lives. We need to implement free health care.
We need free lawyers too. Anyone think John Edwards would go for that?
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 11, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Just curious rangerdahl – are all Petraeus’ hashmarks and combat experience from THIS war? There’s an old adage about Generals always being prepared to fight the last war…
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
The Dems have had their minds made up for them as evidenced by Chris Dodd statements and well as others like Nancy Pelosi. So what that the Dems hate our troops.. they don’t have any nerve to pull the funding in Iraq because they know they are acting like traitorous morons.
Posted by: Bill | September 11, 2007, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
“Just curious rangerdahl – are all Petraeus’ hashmarks and combat experience from THIS war? There’s an old adage about Generals always being prepared to fight the last war…”
Have you been in ANY war?
On the internet doesn’t count!!!!!
Posted by: Eddie Estes | September 11, 2007, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
yes Jane says, this war. He was the commander of the 101st Airborne Division at the beginning of the war.
Posted by: rangerdahl | September 11, 2007, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Last Post: Did I use the word Hate? I think they are incompetent. Very rarely do they succeed in any govt program. They would rather have ribbon cutting ceromonies for their little pet projects than fix bridges. They fail every time they try to deliver aid (16 cents out of every dollar given to Katrina victims was wasted through fraud). They believe raising tax rates is the only way to fix the deficit when we know they spend too darn much. The only thing that is working is we are kicking butt in Iraq. We’ve lost fewer people in this war than ever.
I stand by my comment about politicians. They are not very competent. These addressing the General are disrespectful, rude, grandstanding, and quite frankly would be asked to leave my house.
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 11, 2007, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Frank Linton – so what if others supported the removal of Saddam? That’s not the issue. The issues are 1.) the timing – why invade Iraq before the job was done in Afghanistan if Saddam was no immedieate threat? Opening a second front may cost us success in BOTH theatres. 2.) the execution – neither Clinton nor anybody else can be held responsible for Bush, Rumsfeld and Bremmer’s DISASTEROUS execution of the early occupation. It was their bad judgement alone that resulted in the mess we’re in now and you need to stop whining about Clinton and FACE FACTS!
Take responsibility for the failures of YOUR party and stop blaming everybody else!!!
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
How much longer should we stay in Iraq? I don’t recall the democrats complaining about our troops being in Bosnia for 9 years. Yeah, they weren’t at anywhere near the same risk being there but then again the Bosnians were never our enemy whereas al Qaida IS and they are in Iraq desperately trying to stop bin Laden’s biggest nightmare – a FREE DEMOCRACY right on Islam’s 2nd most holy place. God Bless a FREE Iraq!
Posted by: Mike M. | September 11, 2007, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
I agree. Bush is a politician and very incompetent. And judging by the failure of the surge, Petreaus is equally incompetent.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Thanks for that off-topic nonsensical, rant SoonerJJ – glad to see that you can’t seperate your partisanship or your ideological rigidity from a discussion of the facts. Good luck with that, hon! LOL
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Let’s see:
Al Queada is in the Phillipines
They were in Afghanistan
They are in Pakistan
They were even in Florida,
but there is no way they were in Iraq.
What a joke!!!
They were in Iraq and they are there now!!!!
Posted by: Eddie Estes | September 11, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Nice try, Mike M. but the difference between our mission in Bosnia and Iraq is that in Bosnia, our peacekeeping forces were actually capable of keeping the peace. Iraq is a failure on every level.
Posted by: Jeanie R. | September 11, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Carl,
Vini Vidi Vici….. wrong…its Veni, Vidi, Vici…..
Posted by: Kevin | September 11, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Yes, that is true. Ike started, Kennedy (a Dem) wanted to end it, but Johnson, so he could make a little money for his boys at Brown and Root, ramped it up bigtime. A whole bunch of people were killed in that ditty. Of course, he didn’t run for re-election in ’68, which more than makes up for the mess… -cough-
It is also true that our Congress is still comprised of two parties and plenty of Dems gave the green light to Bush to do whatever he wanted.
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Tom. Your fundamental argument is flawed because you assume, incorrectly, that ALL Islamic terrorists are working in some kind of united front against the U.S. – which is about as far from the case as you can get. Conflating Iraq with Al Queda might play well for domestic politics at home, but it has NOTHING to do with the reality on the ground. Wise up.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Hagel (combat vet) and Biden are charged with the job of challenging a policy that is sucking treasure at the rate of $3B weekly, and our young soldiers UTTERLY without a coherent plan that does not need “upgrading” and amending about every eight months. Let’s see, what Does Iraq have to do with 9/11 again?
Posted by: tonio | September 11, 2007, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
History always repeats itself…
Anyone remember which president got elected last time the Democrats pulled this gameplan of tear down and destroy the repub party?
Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: Remember | September 11, 2007, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Tom,
By far the best post of the day.
Posted by: JC | September 11, 2007, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Why are liberals so miserable? Did any of you ever consider that if a democrat gets elect president, we will not get the heck out of Iraq? These senators know, but they are simply playing to liberal constituents. They know they will not repeat what happened when funding and support was pulled from Vietnam. Believe me, they know.
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 11, 2007, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Tom, by far the dumbest post of the day.
Posted by: RonJon | September 11, 2007, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Someone actually used: Al Queda in Mesopotamia,…. Guess what? That’s Iraq. Are you a politician too?
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 11, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
SoonerJJ – what a load of nonsense. You have got the situation 100% backwards. As Jane Says pointed out earlier, there are no more troops in the pipeline and the money is running out to fight this war. A drawdown within the next six months is an inevitibility.
Posted by: RonJon | September 11, 2007, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
SoonerJJ – you do realize that Al Queda in Mesopotamia never actually existed under Saddam and only came into being after our invasion created a power vaccum, right? Also, you’re aware that, relatively speaking, AQ is a very minor player in Iraq compared to the various factional militias. Duh.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
LindaDEE – the differnce between Pearl Harbor, Japan and Iraq is that, after Pearl Harbor we actually attacked the people who attacked us. 9/11 had NOTHING to do with Iraq under Saddam. NOTHING!
Posted by: RonJon | September 11, 2007, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
How sad a reminder that on this day six years ago so many lost their lives and instead of getting Bin Laden, Bush opted for this war…I felt the same anger today and yet was ashamed of the actions of our country, we should be slow to act, unlike the minority of so-called conservative christians that were quick to call reasonable and rational debate and decent unpatriotic and treasonous back then, I caution you all to tread litely in this matter, lives have been lost and blood shed over such talk then and if the will of the people are not heavily voiced like then, even more will be shed.
Posted by: E$ | September 11, 2007, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
It is part of the issue. The groundwork was laid during the Clinton administration.
(Then there’s his less-than-stellar response to the first WTC bombing, but I digress…) Key Dems supported his removal and supported Bush’s push to invade. The support existed before he was president (by both Republicans and Democrats).
1) I don’t know. I suppose because the American public is easily duped. The events of 9/11, probably the most covered event in history, and yet most Americans believe Iraq was involved somehow. They struck while the “iron was hot” so to speak…same with the ironically named PATRIOT Act, which again had many Dems in support.
2) Agreed.
Bush…Clinton…Bush…who in 2008?
Doesn’t matter which party is in charge anymore, they are both comprised of a lot of fools.
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Id love to see where you got the information that we are bogged down, have no troops in the pipeline, and are out of money?
If that were true would you really be posting it on some forum?
This forum is no different than the stock forums…there is always an argument on both sides. COmmon denominator over here is the obvious dislike for Bush…
Is Bush running again in 2008?
Posted by: Mad Max | September 11, 2007, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Your Mom Goes to College…I saw your post way up above before all this republican apologist spew hit the decks…and I apologize to you for bring the cats into the fray…but like the ending of the Tolkein trilogy everything and everybody from the cats to the trees will be brought into the war to end all wars as we have to extract the infinite war gamers from their position and watch them scurry into the dark ends of the earth…FRODO
Posted by: daddy | September 11, 2007, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Bill – don’t worry. You won’t live to see any of that nonsense because it only exists in the most fevered partisan nightmares of wackjob Republicans. Maybe if you stopped drinking the GOP kool aid and joined the real world you would get so hysterical over complete nonsense?
Posted by: RonJon | September 11, 2007, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
EVERYONE knows Iraq did not plan 9-11. Bush even said so. Enough of the Iraq/9-11 association. But AQ is there. RIGHT NOW! Let’s get them. Hey peace activists. They want to come after you too. They hate our culture. They hate our R-Rated movies. They hate we do not pray to the moon god, allah five times a day. They hate we build cool things. They hate we can use a PC and type stuff on this site. We are not creating more terrorists. They are. They are making their stand there. We should be there too. Pray our troops take them out before they come after you.
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 11, 2007, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Mad Max – um, have you actually read Petreaus’ report? All the info is in there. Sorry, but the fact that we have no more troops to commit is a matter of public record and not in dispute. Do your homework.
Posted by: RonJon | September 11, 2007, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
And Jane, we can throw more troops at them. We can keep them coming. We have plenty. Don’t worry though, there won’t be a draft.
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 11, 2007, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Jane -
Thank you for your input. Have you considered as to WHY the enemy is factionalized? The reason is because we have driven wedges between them, disrupted their networks, and kept them from organizing en masse. In other words – we are winning. It is much easier for one to fight ten men, one at a time, than it is for one to fight ten men at once. And this is precisely how badly we are out-numbered, and yet – we are still winning.
You recognize the elements who have declared war on us. How can we possibly fight them on the ground if we have no established ground positions from which to engage?
The President chose the fronts of Afganastan and Iraq from which to establish these ground positions. From there, we can root out and defeat all the factions you speak of, one at a time.
Posted by: Tom | September 11, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
To everyone in support of the surge. A surge would have been most effective after the conclusion of the war and forced surrender of the enemy. Thats when more troops are brought in to securely occupy the enemy’s territory and to bring its people under subjection of the victors. Point is they waited to long to employ the surge for it to be effective. It should have been done after an end to major fighting was declared by bush. Then they could have got a jump on any attemps by insurgents.
Posted by: Dennis Allen | September 11, 2007, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Conclusion to earlier comment I made. Had the surge been done sooner it would have allowed for the stability needed to get Iraq’s new government started.
Posted by: Dennis Allen | September 11, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Wrong again, Tom. Your fundamental assumptions are simply incorrect. Our enemies (plural, not singular) are factionalized for a variety of reasons, and were factionalized long before we ever got ourselves into the so-called “War on Terror.”
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Sorry, Frank Liton, but I don’t deal with revisionist historians. Good luck peddling your nonsense elsewhere.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
It is good to see you still support the right to vote. Once you support open debate, you’ll be on the right track.
Posted by: Frank Linton | September 11, 2007, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Jane -
Thank you for acknowledging that we have enemies. I assume you are willing to fight them.
Exactly how do you propose to do that?
Tom
Posted by: Tom | September 11, 2007, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
SoonerJJ – wrong. Our military is simply stretched too thin right now, and having incredible difficulties meeting its recruiting goals. Moreover it takes months to train up and equipped new divisions – and there ARE no new divisions being trained or equipped. We’re simply training replacements for old divisions. Do you seriously not comprehend this? Whatever. You may not understand this, but Petraeus does.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
The pre-emptive invasion and occupation of Iraq will undoubtedly go down in history as the greatest foreign policy blunder in the history of the USA.
Despite this poor decision (and all the strategic blunders that followed), the harsh reality is that the USA has a moral obligation to stay in Iraq until they have a functioning government and an adequately trained military and police force.
To leave prematurely would only lead to civil war on a massive scale with the Sunnis being slaughtered, and Iran becoming the superpower of the Middle East. And I don’t think anybody wants that…Certainly not Israel.
Posted by: mark | September 11, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
It appears we have appointed our worst generals to command forces, and our most gifted and brilliant to edit newspapers. In fact, I discovered by reading newspapers that these editor/geniuses plainly saw all my strategic defects from the start, yet failed to inform me until it was too late. Accordingly, I am readily willing to yield my command to these obviously superior intellects, and I will, in turn, do my best for the Cause by writing editorials – after the fact.
Posted by: Dan Geer | September 11, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
I don’t care if you want to support Bush Jr’s endless incompetence and failure. That’s your right. But what REALLY ticks me off is that you ask the VAST majority of Americans that disagree with you to FOOT THE BILL in blood and money for your mistakes.
Posted by: wilder5121 | September 11, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Tom -By invading the right countries, for a start. And acknowledging that police and intel work is possibly even more important that military action in the fight against our enemies. And by fighting a smarter propaganda war for hearts and minds. And by picking our spots and recognizing that it’s more productive to fight our enemies one by one than to take them all on at once. And by realizing that we may be able to play our enemies off against one another instead of perceiving them as a united front.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Mark -
As far as the greatest foreign policy blunder in history – the press already gave that award to Truman with regard to Korea. The only problem is – they (the press) were wrong. The N.Y. Times crucified Truman daily. He was called a traitor on the senate floor. He left Washington in disgrace and did NOT EVEN SEEK RE-ELECTION.
The only problem is – Truman was right. Historians on both sides of the aisle agree that the Korean war not only saved South Korea – but saved Japan as well – and the consequences of cut and run at the time would have been catastrophic. Let the historians write history. God bless Harry Truman
Posted by: Tom | September 11, 2007, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Yes, Frank – the CIA-sponsored overthrow of the Mossedegh govt. of Iran in 1953 and our support of Saddam in Iraq are both matters of public record. The crackpot assertion that FDR provoked Pearl Harbor is not.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Jane -
O.K.
Exactly which countries do we invade?
Posted by: Tom | September 11, 2007, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Tom -
Afghanistan. That’s where the guys who attacked us on 9/11 were all along. And I give Bush full marks for his invasion of Afghanistan right up until he inexplicably dropped the ball and focused all his attention on Iraq. There was no reason to open up a second front while we still had OBL and Al Queda on the run and in our sights in Afghanistan. Saddam was simply NOT a credible threat at that time. He was contained and could have been dealt with at a later date. Now our forces are stretched to thin in both fronts and we’re in danger of losing BOTH wars. Seriously, this stuff isn’t rocket science.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Gotta run and make some dinner for a hungry family. I’ll be back to school you Republicans later
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Tom,
Forget Korea: Viet Nam would be a more apt comparison to Iraq. A disastrous, unpopular war that cost the USA tens of thousands of lives, billions of dollars, and loss of face internationally. Yeah, that about sums up Iraq. At least we could pull out of Viet Nam… We are stuck in Iraq. There are no good solutions. What do you envision as the likely outcome in Iraq, and how do you think history will judge the decision to go in?
Posted by: mark | September 11, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
In Geography 101 you may note that Iran is bordered on one side by Iraq, and on the other by Afganastan. And that Syria is also bordered by Iraq.
I realize that you deem yourself to be a military genius – after all – “it’s not rocket science”.
However, I believe that you are more interested in destroying a Republican President than you are in prosecuting a war.
Posted by: Tom | September 11, 2007, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
I just read an article about turning salt water into energy. I wonder if we would care about the sectarian violence if this pans out. Come on, do we really need to be picking sides in a civil war. What side would you pick? Sunni, Shia, Kurd , we have been on all sides at sometime or another. What is our mission? If Bin Laden was tried in a court, all the Muslims of the world would see him for what he is. A fanatic, hateful man without a plan to even save his own people.
Posted by: Greg | September 11, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Look, every war has its protesters. But Iraq is the first time in history that a superpower invaded/overthrew a sovergn nation preemptively. Furthermore, the administration waged it incompetently based on faulty intelligence, and blatently deceived its own populace to garner support for the invasion.
Posted by: mark | September 11, 2007, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Are there still people so stupid that they don’t realize that Bush invaded Iraq so that he and his oil billionaire buddies could seize control of its oil? And that he is looking for an excuse to do the same thing in Iran? And all the while planning to make fools of patriotic boobs as he waves the flag in front of their faces to hypnotize them into letting him send their sons and daughters to be slaughtered to enable US oil companies to charge more money at the pump because they will control more of the world’s oil?
Have a good time when you drive your gas guzzler over a bridge that has not been repaired in thirty or forty years.
Posted by: Bill | September 11, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Just keep pointing fingers to whom ever you want to trump so you can have the feeling that YOU KNOW [YOU KNOW YOU KNOW] why this invasion was instigated. Or possibly you have read and listened but never understood WHY AND SO YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU THOUGHT YOU KNEW AND now you wish you did know what you do not know –THE WHOLE REASON FOR YOUR ASSUMPTIONS AS TO THE end is coming – better ask for another Bush direction.
Posted by: WILLIAM J CLEMONS | September 11, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
This whole article and hearings… exactly why I dislike politicians and Washington D.C. This amounts to grandstanding by some presidential hopefulls. I can’t help but laugh about all the names that Conservatives and Liberals create for each other, as if they are clever and witty. In reality they are childish and well… not funny. The fact of the matter is this; we are there, might as well let the General do his job so we can get the heck out and bring our guys back home. I had family who served over there who believed in the mission, I can’t say I have any right to discount their feelings and opinions seeing as they are the ones in harms way. These congressional “leaders” should do the same.
Posted by: Jack | September 11, 2007, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Just a sidenote; I do find the “we invaded Iraq solely for cheap oil” argument to be fascinating. Primarily because I live in a part of the country where gas is actually cheap in comparison to the rest of the nation, yet I’m still paying significantly more than I was prior to the war, during the war, and up to this point of the war. So much for cheap gas.
Posted by: Jack | September 11, 2007, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Thats a big surprise coming from Biden!
Posted by: Bill | September 11, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Was the Vietnam war a success or failure? A FAILURE! We lost! Yet every General who testified befor Congress 40 years ago said: “We’re making progress.” “The bodycounts of Vietcong are up” “Villages are being secured” etc, etc. etc. ad naseum. But they were all wrong – we lost. Petraeus gives us the same nonsense today. Is anyone surprised??
Posted by: Al | September 11, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Where’s the United Nations? We the United States of America are enforcing the 14 or 15 resolutions the United Nations passed against Iraq but didn’t have the balls to enforce
Posted by: Rep | September 11, 2007, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Can you please back up your absurd slanders against Democrats with some actual proof or evidence? How do you know what Democrats “want” – are you a mind reader?
Posted by: Mary Ann | September 11, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Tom – in reality 101 you may note that Iran has nothing to do with our war against Al Queda.
I realize that you deem yourself to be a military genius – after all, “It’s not rocket science.”
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Jane, Now thats an intelligent comment. See that’s why people say what they do about Democrats.
Posted by: Rep | September 11, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Rep – thanks, but it was an even less intelligent comment when a previous poster said the exact same thing about Democrats (looks like BOTH posts have been scrubbed now, btw). I was simply turning it on it’s head to reveal how ridiculous it sounded from either side.
Posted by: Jane Says | September 11, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
POOR JOB REPORTING. The report just repeats what an ill informed senator states, where is the independent verification of the actual facts. And ABC and the other networks wonder why viewership is down.
Posted by: simon | September 11, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Just thought I’d add my two bits for what they’re worth. The Iraq war is in part, about oil. I don’t believe that we are there to harvest or “steal” their oil, but it is in our best interest to see Iraq’s vast reserves in friendly hands. We saw the corruption of the UN’s “Oil-for-Food” program, and we saw the power oil revenues sway over greedy and needy minds. I truly believe that the Iraqi government and its people would benefit greatly from properly managed oil production, even if some Americans profited greatly as well. I truly believe that the Bush administration’s stated intent was, and is, to put Iraqi oil into Iraqi control.
General Patreaus was UNANIMOUSLY approved for his current appointment as commander of US forces in Iraq. It troubles me to hear some, such as J. Biden, to question the General’s reputation now instead of at his appointment hearings. At the General’s words, not all is well in Iraq, but he has demonstrated that there is military and security progress.
We all are at war with Al-Qaeda, they have declared war on us, they have declared that Iraq is their present primary battle ground. Some may say that we would gain popularity and respect if we left. We would truly gain nothing. Al-Qaeda, and the rest of the Islamic Extremist (Iran et al.) would gain their exaltation, the veneration of their stated prediction that we could not stomach war, the enslavement of countless women and children, the encouragement to extend their fanaticism closer to us, vast uncontrolled training grounds, and enormous oil reserves. They have more to gain by us leaving Iraq then we do for staying. The war will be won when, in hindsight, the brave and free Iraqi people form a government that can provide for their common defense, and ensure their domestic tranquility. We owe support to that cause of any nation we invade, rightly or wrongly.
Our enemy, Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Ahmadinejad, and others, know full well that old adage “A house divided cannot stand.” We are experiencing the onslaught of propaganda and doubt casting that is disheartening our resolve. Often, I have found, that the propaganda and doubt casting works best on those who for some reason or another, consider themselves intellectuals. I am inclined to believe that a graduate student is more likely to be mired in philosophical indecision than a high school graduate. Sometimes, the simple and generalized truths better suit the motivation of individuals. There is a place and time for deep and philosophical questioning, but there is a place also for mediation on the simple and straight forward. Self preservation, rapid response, team-work, and battle-field situations are usually the time and place for faith in the necessity of the straight forward. When we discredit so readily those who are trusted with the execution of battle, we risk becoming “aiders” and abettors of the enemy. There is no room in my imagination to compare any misstep of our President, our legislators, our military, with the true Evil that is in our present adversaries.
United we stand, but divided we fall. And our fall would be to the great liking of Usama Bin Laden and his ilk (to include Sadam).
I, for one American, detest the idea of being dishonored by defeat to such an evil. I will never bow to the Allah of extremist, I will never forgive them, I will never forget.
Timothy
Posted by: Timothy J. Peterson | September 11, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
What’s that Rep, that they’re informed? Fyi, Al Qaeda is a Sunni Muslim movement, and actually more like Wahhabist Sunni Muslim movement. Iranians, mmm…, not so much (see for example when the Taliban saw fit to execute a delegations of diplomats from Tehran- that’s an Iranian city fyi). But you guys will believe anything they tell you won’t you. Drudgebot keyboard warriors marching around dutifully following orders calling for blood. God help us all.
Posted by: Majorajam | September 11, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
when i was president we won the war. don’t forget that
Posted by: dick nixon | September 11, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
don’t forget too that The Great Henry Kissinger was the best, HE delivered peace!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: dick nixon | September 11, 2007, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Amazing! We have a congress that unanimously approved that General as being qualified to make an informed assessment, and as soon as the libs hear an answer they don’t like, the General becomes a liar, of course those Senators are the last people qualified to make an assessment and they have absolutely no proof that the data is not true. So the people need to demand proof when the Senate make wild unproven accusations.
Posted by: Patriot 2007 | September 11, 2007, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Timothy,
You should know that fascism is also incompatible with intellectualism, as long as we’re critiquing intellectuals and their divisive traitorous tactics. And as long as I’m pointing out facts, you might find it interesting that far more Iraqi oil production money has disappeared unaccounted for in the four years of occupation then during the years of sanctions. You were saying? Ah yes, one of those tid bits they neglect to tell you over at the, “don’t lose your nerve, God Bless America” sites. Other candidates include but are not limited to the fact that the CIA had a source within Saddam’s government prior to the war contemporaneously indicating that the regime had no WMD nor links to any terrorist network anywhere. Every check they did on this individual checked out. Bush was briefed- didn’t wish to hear it. Now there are a veritable cornucopias of terrorist networks in Iraq. Cha Ching!
One last thing before I go: I want you to prepare yourself so as to not be overly upset upon fruition. Whether Petraeus’s pageant and the rest of the administration propaganda machine is successful, we are going to lose in Iraq, and we are going to lose badly. Leave tomorrow or ten years from now, we will leave behind a failed state in the throws of a civil war deeply hostile to the United States, unless we are able to install a strongman, i.e. another Saddam (on the plus side, another man to sell the precursors for WMD, a la Donny Rumsfeld). All of which ignores the high probability of regional conflagration fyi.
This is a preordained outcome because we are resented there, (see for example recent poll indicating majority of country wanting us out pronto), we have zero credibility there having been no WMDs nor iota of threat to these United States prior to invasion, we thus have zero cooperation from anyone that can positively affect the situation in the spirit we would want it, and it is clear to those who don’t think we’re there to make war on Islam that we want they’re oil (not that we don’t want other things like edifying our military industrial complex, etc.). Sure, we have tribal Sheiks allying with us for the purposes of short term interests, just as the Soviets did in Afghanistan periodically. It will evaporate as soon as our interests and theirs diverge, which includes anything like a unified government not hostile to our interests.
So, believe as you may, but when the helicopters come to take the harried diplomats off the roof, don’t say you weren’t warned.
Posted by: Majorajam | September 11, 2007, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Warner: “Does continuing the Iraq war make American safe?” Patreus: “I don’t know. I haven’t thought about it.” —– that says it all. He’s basically saying I’m just doing my job. I don’t know why the %$^# we’re doing here.
Posted by: JT | September 11, 2007, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
GET OFF PETRAEUS- HE IS JUST TRYING TO DO HIS JOB – YOU KNOW WHO HIS BOSS IS GWB! WE HAVE ALL HAD TO SUCK-IT-UP AND DO WHAT WE ARE TOLD! HOWEVER……
THE US SENATE REPRESENTS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE – NOT THE PRESIDENT! TAKE THEM TO TASK – THEY SUPPORT THIS PRESIDENT… NOT MAKING A DECISION – IS STILL MAKEING ONE! THEY ARE INEFFECTIVE BECAUSE OF THEIR WAIT AND SEE ATTITIUDES! THIS WAR IS THE RESULT OF AN INEPT ADMINISTRAION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE AND DON’T FORGET IT!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: White Mountain | September 11, 2007, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Will the Democrats and their leftist friends EVER discuss their plans for how to protect us? Be responsible, folks! The Islamists want to destroy us and all of our freedoms. Sure our efforts and those of President Bush aren’t perfect. What’s your proposal? Please tell me about your flawless strategy, that won’t cost lots of money and too much American blood. O.K., you don’t agree with the war in Iraq. Do you have to smear our Commander in Chief? Couldn’t you at least recognize that the barbarians we fight are not going to roll over and play dead? We will have to fight them someplace. How and where do you propose that we fight them? Denying that we have enemies that hate us for who we are will not make them disappear. I would like to just fight with words, but that is clearly not their preference. Your constant character assasination and lack of constructive ideas puts all of us in danger. They will hate us whether Carter, or Clinton or Bush is President. This loud mouthed slandering of the U.S. is a great recruiting tool for our enemies. No offense, but it’s is hard to tell who is more fanactical–Al Queda and or the American left.
Posted by: Tom | September 11, 2007, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
What an anti-american loser.
Posted by: No Rino's | September 11, 2007, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Majorajam,
Thank you for your cohesive, and mostly respectful response.
Certainly, the image of a helicopter exodus of the remnant “faithful” would be greatly discouraging to me. I would have to, as I am now, trust in something greater than myself or my own understanding. I am fully aware that the possibility of that scenario exists. My faith in the principles of human freedom, and the Creator who endows them, leads me to believe that those principles are ubiquitous, despite cultural differences. The voices of those Iraqis who hold dear these ideals are rarely heard in the “mainstream” media, but most certainly exist. The perpetuation of only bad news in baffling to me, I have yet to see any constructive story on the success of the Kurdish area.
One could argue that the timing of such a revolution has to come from within, that such a hunger for freedom has develop before the populous has the fortitude to pay the price necessary for its achievement. I sense that you would make such an argument, I could be wrong. There are the examples of Japan as well as South Korea to detract from that argument, but one could easily point to Vietnam. The failure in Vietnam is multi-fold, but I do not believe that the situation in Iraq and the history of Vietnam are so easily and justifiably compared.
I do, however, question your unstated but implied conclusion that the missing oil revenues are in the hands of US sanctioned persons, and with knowledge of the administration. Sure corruption exists, sure there are individuals who fall to greed and stress. This is true in war and business. To apply that kind of guilt to the administration and military wholesale without proof seems to me presumptive.
Please point me to the poll that states that the Iraqi’s want us out “pronto.” I heard a congressman yesterday cite a poll with the same outcome. There is a danger, however, in leaning too much on polls. In truth, our own revolution would have not happened when it did if such dependence on popular opinion were heeded. Nor would the war with Mexico had been fought, and the entire Korean peninsula would now be in oppressive darkness.
Remember, that we live in a republic, and not a straight democracy. As Benjamin Franklin once wrote – “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.” I warn you not to be so committed to a perfect and critiquing idealism that ignores the pragmatic. So if in the unfortunate event we continue to rationalize away the true threat, when the American version of the Taliban forces your wife to wear a burkah, or your children are forced to pray in school, don’t say you weren’t warned.
Regards, Timothy
Posted by: Timothy J. Peterson | September 11, 2007, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
All the angst and partisan food fighting is for naught. Iraq will divide into 4 or 5 sectors based on tribal and religious lines. The Kurds will thrive unless Turkey invades, Al Anbar will remain in turmoil till the tribal leaders get it under control. The US is building a base in the south along the Iraq/Iran border where they will redeploy at some point in time – that is where most of the oil is. In the North the Kurds will throw out Arabs and other Saddam imposed “cultural diversity” by moving Sunni and Baathist ethnic and religious groups into the Kurdish area in Kirkuk – the other important oil region. In a couple of years – if Turkey doesn’t invade or Iran doesn’t throw snot into the Kurdish national dish – the area will be even more stablized than it is now. In the South — America will be the watcher on the Gulf and do fly overs when the Sunnis and Shia get through bashing each other’s brains out and eventually go back to totally hating America. There is not going to be a unified Iraq — not even if we stayed for the next 100 years.
Posted by: Sam Packard | September 11, 2007, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
The attack by these brave Senators is to be commended, next they need to attack a 9/11 responding fireman, that way they can humiliate another person who risked his life for the bigger good. They are attacking a person of honor and integrity, who is fighting a war and protecting our freedom. Petraeus should ask them to go to his office next time for the hearings, or better yet ask them to walk down his streets. I don’t know if the surge is working or not but you either have to believe what Petraeus tells them or replace them.
If the democrats want us out of Iraq get the votes, if they can’t get the votes to over ride a Bush veto then suck it up and support the troops. They are whining about their own failure to get the votes to do what they want. With Nancy and Harry incharge of both houses they still can not get the votes to do a simple override.
Posted by: Jeff In Miami | September 11, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
60 years later..troops still in Germany and no oil nor bush there.
50 years later.. troops still in Korea.. no oil nor bush there.
Even after Iraq becomes stable we will still have large amount of troops in Iraq. Its part of being a super power and maintaining peace. I dont think in recorded history any country or presence won a war and just got up and left. Anyone who thinks thats the way it should be, needs to not have a voter registration card.
Posted by: Tim | September 11, 2007, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
It is simple, a group of extremist decided we are their enemy, we can either fight them or we can die. TAKE the cuffs off our troops and let them win!!!
Posted by: Richard Thomas | September 11, 2007, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
This is exactly why we have the right to bear arms.. Don’t like it? Over throw the Govt. or, Ask yourself how many people did YOU try to recruit to vote, when BUSH was elected.. 2 times I might add..
Quit you sniveling and do something about it..
Posted by: Wade | September 11, 2007, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
The vast majority of people either are ok with the war or ill informed by the left wing media/news. If more people paid attention to how congress treated a 4 star general & what he had to say instead of britney spear’s performance on mtv, then maybe the polls would be more accurate.
Posted by: Tim | September 11, 2007, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
I really think it was very unprofessional of some of the members of the Senate in the way they questioned the General. Here is a man who has served his country for well over 20 years, through numerous operations. He has followed the command of his superiors, regardless of his own personal feelings. I’m sure he doesn’t like the idea of his own son going to war, but he understands the commitment. He has done more for this country then many of the members of Congress. I think despite their personal feelings, they should have given the General a little more respect than what they showed on national television.
Congress is also disputing a war thousands of miles away. They are disputing this from the comfort of their own desks, and the security provided by those fighting in the war. No one can spectulate whether things have gotten better because we don’t know what it would be like if we weren’t at war.
Posted by: Duvall | September 12, 2007, 12:34 am 12:34 am
A lot of complaining and name calling. ‘Idiot’, ‘fool’, ‘spokesperson for Bush Jr’. But typical of the american way today which is sad. Respect for your neighbor or countrymen? Willing to make an extra effort to do something right? Of course not, it has to be easy and it has to benefit ME. People in England felt the same way about Hitler before WWII. Saddam wasn’t going to bother us, so what if he wanted to kill 500K of his own people, it’s none of our business. Like women being assualted in Central Park, it’s not my fight. God put us on this earth to make things better for our fellow man be they brown, black, white, red or other. We take up for the underdog, defend the weak and help the poor and infirm. Morally, WMD or not, we are on the right side of this and have a responsibility to win! Win is simple, help these people along to a free, democratic state where prople can treat each other like the americans treated each other here. For the complainers, stop name calling and give your answer. For people that insult our military, leave. Daddy and his powerful intellect has no idea what it means to take an oath to follow an order. I doubt that there is anything there, in his heart or puny soul, that would put fourth that kind of conviction. Note: I called no one a fool, an idiot, a lib or a neocon. I respect your right to disagree and promise as an american I will respect that right even if I have to bear arms (again) to protect it.
“I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.’” – MLK
You can turn and run and leave this country to death and genocide or we can fight on and make it the first middle eastern country capable of the GREATNESS of these United States we live in.
God bless you and GOD BLESS AMERICA!
John in Texas
Posted by: John in Texas | September 12, 2007, 2:17 am 2:17 am
As incredible as it seems to those who have a D after their name, if I as an American believe anyone, I would believe the General Petraus assessment long before I would believe anyone who majors in politics and minors(actually gets an “F”) in military history. It’s a credit to our free society that idiotic, outrageous comments are allowed by Congresspersons Wexler and Sanchez towards a 4 Star General, and also a credit that ordinary Americans can hear that, be embarrassed that they elected them and mark them for defeat in ’08.
Barbara Boxer even embarrassed Joe Biden, usually an embarrassment in his own right.
Now those who count, the ones who take the fight to the terrorists, vote with their feet to the tune of 130%, that is, re-enlistments. If anything would indicate defeat on the horizon, it would be a lack of re-enlistments. That 130% number says it all.
Keep mouthing off Senators and Congressmen. It will make it very easy to remember who to mark “No” on the next ballot in ’08.
By the way, the mantra for ’08 will be “vote D for defeat”.
Posted by: Harry Sonke | September 12, 2007, 2:30 am 2:30 am
General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker served the Commander in Chief well by delivering precisely their scripted upbeat appraisal of Mr. Bush’s otherwise disastrous misadventure into Iraq. One can not only assume but know for a fact that anyone, Petreaus and Crocker included, associated with or under the command of Mr. Bush will not even remotely be objective but mouth the implanted words of their master. Fortunately, Senators such as Warner, Hagel, Lugar, etc., all from Mr. Bush’s party pinned the General down and exposed him for what he is, a mere stooge of the President for whom voicing mistruths apparently brings no shame.
Posted by: mongo100 | September 12, 2007, 4:39 am 4:39 am
In order to agree with the democrats you have to be a conspiracy believer and believe tens of thousands of people will keep their mouth shut regardless of the truth. Which seems more plausible– the truth or 8 years of lying be tens of thousands in the administration with no valid proof?
Posted by: Tim | September 12, 2007, 7:01 am 7:01 am
Hah Daddy, I haven’t heard an intelligent thing in any of your quotes yet. It’s a good thing they get the low lifes to serve in the military, promise of education or not. It appears the super intelligent among us, like yourself are big on pontification and little in the results department. Maybe we really do want a house senate and president of panty-waist democrats?
Posted by: John | September 12, 2007, 8:16 am 8:16 am
The democrats have once again shown this country that they are generals in regard to the war on terrorism, general foul-ups.
Posted by: Ex-military | September 12, 2007, 9:14 am 9:14 am
To bring to light a few things and dispel some bs.
1: THIS WAR IS NOT ABOUT OIL. We as the US do not get our oil,gasoline, or other petro products from Iraq. THIS HAS BEEN a fact for the past decade. So, those of you blinded by this, STOP playing the oil card. Talk about being lied to
2: IRAQ DID HAVE WMD. But why couldn’t we find it? Several reasons. A: Over 1/2 of the UN are Muslim and/or Muslim sympathizers. B: Several other countries came in with undercover and removed these weapons (Don’t believe me, do the search/research OUTSIDE of Democratic/Muslim control…preferably Dutch or Eastern European sites) C: Here is the tiers of control-Democrats are owned by Major Media, Major Media is owned by Muslim factions, Muslim factions are dictated by Iran, Iran is dictated by Howdy Doody Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Think this is a lie or an outrageous claim? Track some monies being handled back and forth. With a bit of luck, you will see a connection as large as the Golden Gate Bridge.
3: What do we hope to gain from Iraq? What did we hope for and got from Japan? Imagine if we pulled out of Japan and not helped them rebuild. They would of likely been part of China. Or, they would of gone back to an extreme dictatorship/shogun type style. In either case, Japan would not be as it is today and one of the US’ staunch allies.
4: Have I been in the military? No, however I have 6 family members and 9 friends in the military-many of them mid level and front line officers. And each night I pray for every one of them. Each morning my face and pillow is wet as my tears fall for their well being. Would I love to hear they would be home tomorrow? Of course I would, anyone would. But their actions as well as the actions of brothers and sisters in arms are preventative, then of course anyone would say “Do it!”. For those that lost friends and family of the 3700 heroes so far, my heart bleeds for you. There is a silver lining-its only been 3700. The Bosnia fiasco-which to this day IS FUBARRED BECAUSE WE PULLED OUT, we lost 4700+ heroes. How many tens or even hundreds of thousands of innocents have been killed? And why did we go over to Bosnia? FOR THE SAME DAMN BOTTOM LINE REASON AS IRAQ..to try to institute a peaceful government, a stable government, a productive economy where its citizens benefit. BUT LO AND BEHOLD..what occurred? WE, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…PULLED OUT. That’s right. Pulled out. The Bubba and Bubbaette showed to the world a pure form of hypocrisy. Can you spell that with me? H Y P O C R I S Y. And yet, Bubbaette and her cronies want to ‘restore our world image’. Restore what..we are hypocritical wimps? Is that why our previous deceased citizens fought so hard from the times of the Revolutionary War til Vietnam and to the present? To have a country full of hypocritical, limp wristed, brain damaged lunatics running around WILLING to let our safety, our pride, our freedoms go asunder. So, in closing reason 4 why we are in IRAQ..TO PROVE AND VALIDATE THAT THE SYSTEM RUNNING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CAN WORK IF FILLED WITH PEOPLE WITH THE GOOD HONEST INTENT RATHER THAN HATE FILLED, GREED INFESTED, BRAIN DAMAGED, HYPOCRISY MINDED IDIOTS!
Well, I hope this has been elightening. Please feel free to respond back..that is, if you have the nerve.
SALUTE!
Posted by: Erik M | September 12, 2007, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Here is how this plays out. Dems pull out of Iraq. Keep spending at it’s current clip though transfering it to social programs, to make people reliant on government and vote for them. Mind you it is really NOT about the troops, it is where money is spent. Iraq goes into chaos spills over into that neighboring place called Afghanistan. Oh and then there is Pakistan with a nuclear weapon. Finally, we come to Iran, who as we all know will do what ever Jimmy Carter begs them to do. Great Plan Dems! Great Plan!
Posted by: Kevin | September 12, 2007, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Someone actually said: The pre-emptive invasion and occupation of Iraq will undoubtedly go down in history as the greatest foreign policy blunder in the history of the USA.
Noooooooo! Jimmay Carter going to Korea in the 90s and coming back with a peace treaty and a promise they would not develop nukes was one of the biggest. Teaching China how to orbit rockets in the 90s was almost as bad. Actually, I like what Bush said in one of the State of the Union speeches: We cannot wait for threats to be emminent. We need to go in before the threat is emminent.
I only wish we prevent Iran from developing nukes. Would anyone volunteer Jimmay Carter? Yeah right!
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 13, 2007, 12:12 am 12:12 am
John, I’m not critizing your arguments. I actually agree. But you are talking to libs and you have to keep your message short and simple. If its oil we want, we can seize any oil field we want and why would Bush sacrifice any military votes? I mean, don’t they vote Republican? Their slogans alone are enough to show how baseless their arguments are. I mean come on, “No blood for oil?” Sounds like, “If the glove don’t fit, you must acquit.”
Remember, when talking to libs, you must be short and simple. Making it sound complex only makes them leery thinking they are getting a snow job.
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 13, 2007, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Hillary Clinton knows absolutely nothing about the reality of war. Men die. I knew men that died. And they die for freedom. I don’t think she can face that fact.
Posted by: WWII Vet | September 13, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm