Kerry Condemns Heckler Arrest
ABC News’ Rick Klein Reports: Sen. John Kerry on Tuesday comdemned the arrest of a University of Florida student at one of his speeches, saying that he was engaged in a "good healthy discussion" with 21-year-old Andrew Meyer when he was Tasered and taken into custody.
"In 37 years of public appearances, through wars, protests and highly emotional events, I have never had a dialogue end this way," Kerry said in a statement. "I believe I could have handled the situation without interruption, but I do not know what warnings or other exchanges transpired between the young man and the police prior to his barging to the front of the line and their intervention. I asked the police to allow me to answer the question and was in the process of responding when he was taken into custody."
"I was not aware that a taser was used until after I left the building," he continued. "I hope that neither the student nor any of the police were injured. I regret enormously that a good healthy discussion was interrupted."
For politicians, hecklers come with the territory. But the arrest and detention of Meyer at Kerry speech on Monday stood out in at least two respects: Police acted aggressively in trying to silence Meyer, and the entire incident was captures on video — making it an immediate Internet and TV sensation.
Videos show Meyer being pulled away from the microphone after as he sought to ask Kerry, D-Mass., a rambling series of questions that touch on allegations of voting improprieties in the 2004 election, possible impeachment of President Bush, Iran, and Kerry’s membership in Yale’s secret Skull and Bones society.
Kerry sought to answer at least some of Meyer’s questions even as Meyer was dragged off by campus police — and after police used a Taser to try to subdue him as he was being arrested.
"Help me! Help!" Meyer says. "What are you doing! Get off of me! Don’t Taser me, bro! Oh my God! Oh my God!"
Watch a clip from ABC’s "Good Morning America" here.
Meyer was jailed overnight on charges of disturbing the peace and resisting an officer. As word spread of his arrest, his friends used his Website as a clearinghouse for supporters to learn about the incident, and to organize a rally on his behalf on the University of Florida campus at noon ET today.
The University of Florida has scheduled a news conference to discuss the incident at 3 pm ET today.
University spokesman Steve Orlando defended the officers’ actions in an interview with the Associated Press, but said an internal investigation would be conducted to make sure they acted appropriately.
"He apparently asked several questions — he went on for quite awhile — then he was asked to stop," Orlando said of Meyer. "He had used his allotted time. His microphone was cut off, then he became upset."
Typically, hecklers and aggressive questioners are handled informally at political events. Shouts of "boo" or political chants drown out someone who dominates a forum, and peer pressure normally is enough to regain order.
But sometimes, law-enforcement officials take a more aggressive tack.
During the 2004 campaign, protesters were occasionally ushered off of the premises by Secret Service officers assigned to protect President Bush. In one incident, in West Virginia in July 2004, two protesters at a Bush event say they were arrested for refusing to cover up their anti-Bush T-shirts.
In another, post-campaign incident that drew wide publicity, two people were ejected from a presidential event in March 2005 in Denver. In a lawsuit, they claim they were kicked out even before the president arrived because they drove up in a car with a bumper sticker that said, "No more blood for oil."
In this year’s presidential race, security has been a major concern early on. One candidate, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., gets Secret Service protection because of her status as a former first lady, while another, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has been assigned protection because of concerns over his safety.
Kerry, who was the Democrats’ nominee in 2004, is no longer assigned Secret Service protection, and does not bring his own security to events. That left University of Florida police in charge of security — to notable results on Monday.

Email
GOP Rap: 'Take America Back'
Afghanistan Timeline Realistic?
This would never, ever, ever happen at a Dennis Kucinich Q & A. Why? Because Dennis would have answered the student’s question; Why didn’t Kerry answer the question? Why didn’t Kerry show any leadership? Kerry knew full well that the police were about to throw this guy out – Kerry preferred to know the student would be thrown out instead of personally befriending and speaking with the guy – as Dennis Kucinch would have. Kerry is an ex-Vietnam war veteran; Kerry is physically a big guy. Kerry could have stopped this if he wanted to, simply by befriending the student and answering his question.
Kerry should have explained to the students that his sorry attorney, Donald McTigue, told Kerry the election was over and wasn’t worth fighting for.
Posted by: Ron Corvus | September 18, 2007, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
This is becoming more and more of a problem. Police have “Policies” and their policies seem to hold precedence over the Constitutional rights of anybody that crosses their path. Courts don’t even look at those policies. Internal reviews do.
Posted by: Sam | September 18, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
I love getting tasered. It’s not as bad as people think and it gives me a nice lift to start the day. Kearndog rocks –YEAH!
Posted by: Jason Kearney | September 18, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
It was appalling to see that individual treated that way. I did not see him do anything that warranted him being man handled let alone tasered.
I’m disgusted.
Posted by: Bret | September 18, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Hahaha
You couldn’t write comedy this good.
The little punk had what was coming to him.
Posted by: Adam Cohen | September 18, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
“Police Brutality–Rodney King!” someone screams. You’ve gotta love the liberals, defend Islamic Jihad terrorists for having reason for their violence but be the first to jump on the Police at any given chance. Sick! Come on now guys, the man was obviously overstepping his time, was belligerent “before” and after the arrest, whining the whole time. The guy was still deluded to even think Kerry won the election, quoting some ridiculous book. (Fact is, GW won, and he even won Florida the election before, even when counting the ballots and hanging chads the way the Gore camp wanted to do it! Funny how the liberals think this defunct voting system with thousands of apparently disenfranchised voters having their votes stolen, somehow miraculously works pretty squeaky clean in the last election with the Democrats sweeping into victory! How convenient! Cry babies all. It would have been a different story is The GOP held better.) And BTW, Clinton was impeached not for a “bl-w job” as this guy dumbly suggests but for perjury. You know, that thing all the liberals got so upset about with Gonzales and even trying to blame Scooter when nothing was even proved. So, add, “hypocrites all” too…oh, and “whiners.”
Posted by: Dzigner | September 18, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Mary,
I’ll bet that kid disobeyed his parnets growing up too. You and I must be looking at different videos. If this man would have acted up at one of my rallies, I would have had him taken to a field and shot like a rabid dog he is! Besides, it’s 2007, THE 2004 ELECTIONS ARE OVER!!!
Your truly,
Posted by: Ron | September 18, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
I’d like to thank all the politicians who voted for the Patriot Act TWICE for throwing the constitution down the toilet – and the majority of the American People for standing silently by watching reality TV unconcerned about its reprecussions.
Posted by: Jeffrey | September 18, 2007, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Just disgusting. This is supposed to be the USA. The officer who used the taser should be fired and brought up on criminal brutality charges.
Posted by: James | September 18, 2007, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
The previous user’s assertion that “courts don’t even look at [policies set by police]” and that only “internal reviews” assess these policies is simply and utterly wrong. In §1983 civil rights cases, courts very thoroughly examine the “policies, practices, and customs” of law enforcement offices. While it might make for a nice provocative soundbite to claim that police department policies aren’t reviewable by courts, it’s simply FALSE: courts examine these policies every day across America.
Posted by: Joseph | September 18, 2007, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
The kid should have just shut up and left. What good did resisting do him??
Posted by: PJ | September 18, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Two seconds of video. He tried to break out of the grasp of the officers. He resisted their mild approach, swinging his arms upward and trying to break away. Serves him right. Good job police!
Posted by: Jon | September 18, 2007, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Go over your “alloted time” you get tasered. What a country! The police are out of control.
Posted by: Bill Deegan | September 18, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Way to go Kearndog! WHOOO
Posted by: Kearndogfan1 | September 18, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Time and time again, police overreact to situations that are easily solved with common sense and non-violence. This is not an isolated occurrence either.
Being a police officer used to entail being honorable and virtuous, now it merely exemplifies the cowardice and thuggery of the disturbed individual wearing the badge.
Posted by: Darren Dupre | September 18, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
It was so nice of the report to include the fact that Republicans are hostile towards hecklers . I wish they would apply the same standards in defending Republicans as they do Democrats. The news wonders why nobody trusts them. The comparison wasn’t necessary and demonstrates bias. Almost like children in an argument, “they did it too!”
Posted by: Mike in Sierra Vista, AZ | September 18, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
So, what’s new? I was in an airport yesterday where I was not permitted to use the word “bomb.” I was not permitted to carry a weapon to protect myself or others. My personal effects were searched and a partially filled tube of toothpaste was confiscated.
That’s four of the top 5 ammendments that are gone. Lost. You’ll never get them back.
This country’s screwed – we just don’t know it yet.
Posted by: Jack | September 18, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Also, I enjoy reading these fantastic ad hominem attacks on the police, suggesting that somehow the PATRIOT Act governs the powers of police officers to promulgate crowd control policies. Then again, my experience is that almost no critics of the PATRIOT Act have actually read its provisions.
People need to stop making delusional, baseless accusations and parading them about as if they are well-reasoned political arguments. When you rabidly fulminate about everything and blame the woes of the world on George W. Bush, you’ve lost all touch with reality and have made your fantasy ideology of group hatred into a moral philosophy. Absolutely disgusting.
Posted by: Joseph | September 18, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Kerry should have done something right then and there. Period end of story. All these long winded comments are bunk. This should destroy Kerry’s chances of election and future office. He should lose his senate post for this absolute atrocity. He is a political leader who allow this fascist event to occur right in front of his face and all America.
Wake up people.
If America was not outraged about this- Kerry would have said nothing nor disagreed with the arrest.
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Get used to it. This has not been a truly free country for a long time. Its sad that it has taken people this long to notice. Our freedoms started to get removed when people used statements like “for the good of the community”.
At least for now we still have freedom of thought.
Posted by: Dave | September 18, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
This isn’t a matter of free speech, you morons. This is a matter of the student disobeying direct orders of police officers. In an attempt for EVERYBODY to have a fair chance to speak, EVERYBODY was held to time limits. What about the rights of the other people who wanted to speak? He should not, and did not, have free reign at the microphone. He had every chance to leave after he disrupted the event by causing problems before and while speaking. You do NOT start resisting a police officer and jump around when you are being ushered out CALMLY. You can tell how crazy this guy is when he starts saying that the police are going to kill him and just make him disappear. He is clearly partially insane, as he tells people to go to the police station to ask where he is. He also tells the police that people have seen him there, and they can’t just make him disappear and die without people knowing. If he had for one second shut up and stopped jumping around and fighting the police, they could’ve heard Kerry’s voice saying he would answer the question and to let him go. It is completely his fault, and I do not feel bad for him. Maybe he will get the help that he needs. A normal person does not start saying that he is being turned over to the government to be disposed of simply for asking slightly critical questions of John Kerry. That’s absurd.
Posted by: Mike | September 18, 2007, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
The founding fathers stand solemnly, heads lowered, looking into the freshly dug grave in which rests the tattered remains of the constitution.
It is amazing that there is condemnation for the one who spoke, and praise for the ones who so forcefully stopped him.
The Republic is dead when we are violently attacked for excercising our first ammendment rights. I weep for the future…
“Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither” – Ben Franklin
Posted by: John Adams | September 18, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Uh, what most seem to be missing, and was something that I picked up from another blog (not that they are the wherewithall of total accuracy) but the video wasn’t turned on until sometime _after_ the officers were up by the microphone. Seems that it might have been going on for some time. The officers were not up there just to protect the equipment.
Just because your seeing the video, it sometimes does not show the whole event in it’s entirety.
Posted by: Fred | September 18, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Geez. This is scary stuff. Sure the kid is rude and loud, but he is asking topical questions.
This is police state stuff, send in the goons to shut someone up. And to think it happened on a college campus, supposedly a bastion of free speech where people are supposed to ask questions and make mistakes without fear of brutality.
The university should be ashamed of itself. That boy should sue the s— out of school and the cops.
Posted by: Scott | September 18, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Kerry has the money to pay this peasant’s legal expenses, but he shouldn’t and here’s why:
When peasants get out of line, it’s necessary for the tattooed pack of police to take action. There needs to be about six unscrupulous police for every peasant, this ratio held true in relation to this incident. Uppity peasants are increasingly starting to behave as if they have rights, and this must end. I think the Orwellian O’Brien Shock Treatment should be mandatory for anyone who gets out of line–tazer voltage needs to be doubled or tripled to really send a message to the intransigent peons’ central nervous systems. STOP ASKING QUESTIONS AND GROVEL BEFORE YOUR MASTERS!
Posted by: Sauros | September 18, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Mike, you’re missing the larger point: leftists are so ardently obsessed with the theory of free speech that they have utterly no idea how to make free speech practicable. What you end up having, then, is a million people screaming at each other without inhibitions (and without even getting their message across). Remember, for the left, speech is not about reason or argumentation, it’s merely an avenue for human beings, as highly advanced apes or whatnot, to collectively blow off some steam.
Posted by: Joseph | September 18, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Um…did the police answer his question of, “Why are youd doing this to me?”
Habeus Corpus, anyone?
Posted by: the anon guy | September 18, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Kerry condemnation is too little too late. He should have intervene right away. The abuse of power was OBVIOUS. I am glad Kerry didn’t get elected. This show how arrogant he really is. period.
Posted by: etienne | September 18, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
The guy kept flailing around and shouting. He acted like a sissy, a narcissist and a jerk, shrieking BEFORE he was tasered as if he were being stabbed to death! He was RESISTING even tho’ he was in the grips of several officers. Do NOT feel sorry for him!
Posted by: Laura | September 18, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
He deserved the tazing he was way out of line he already had his chance on the open mike why did he make a mockery of the police by not doing as he was told in the first place
Posted by: jim | September 18, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Kerry lied about his scratches and conned the military into giving him 3 purple hearts. Lowest of low, john Kerry
Posted by: martin | September 18, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Kerry is simply defending one of his loony cult followers.
Posted by: rplat | September 18, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
This was grand stand for this wannabe politico’s website.
Posted by: Harry | September 18, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
“I was not aware that a taser was used until after I left the building,” said Senator Kerry.
Give me a break. Does the man ever tell the truth? Watching the video it is impossible to not know about the taser. Kerry went on the Meet the Press on Sunday and continued to lie about the actions of his party. Thank God Senator McCain was there to squash his lies and propaganda.
Posted by: Mark | September 18, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Kerry did NOTHING to intervene. What an asset he’d be as president in fighting terror. Limp and arrogant, phlegmatic weakling loser.
Posted by: kalubajdembaru | September 18, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Some these comments are really out there…
The point here is that the kid was forcibly removed by police for asking questions and being disruptive.
The police became physical for no noticeable reason. The student panicked, reacting with force and is ultimately tazed and dragged away.
Who among you thinks it’s OK to forcibly remove non-violent people?
Who among you believe that this kid didn’t need to be told why he was being arrested?
Now that you’ve answered “me” to the previous questions, let me ask: who among you are in the Kremlin?
Posted by: Adam | September 18, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Here is proof that the police have become the bad-guys.
Neither I, nor anyone I know, have ever been helped by a police officer… only harrassed, accosted, and/or assaulted… especially in jurisdictions that place quotas on their police officers. Law enforcement has become a source of revenue generation, rather than the defenders of the populace.
Further, it is beginning to look like the vast majority of people going into law enforcement do so not out of duty, but to acquire power over their fellow citizens.
There are weekly reports, around the country, of crimes committed by police officers, including drug abuse, theft, racketeering, falsifying evidence, entrapment, and assault. Investigations invariably find the officer(s) innocent, because the city/county/state government does not want to waste their precious tax dollar on compensating the victims of the officer(s) crime.
If a citizen criticizes a police officer (or his/her actions), they are invariably labeled as bad people, or unpatriotic, and everyone who is afraid of those labels ceases to publicly question the matter… its like a bunch of third graders’ name calling.
The courts and the government stonewall these cases because they do not want to have to admit any form of liability.
Whatever happened to “defending the Constitution of the United States of America?” What ever happened to “Serve and Protect?”
Posted by: Darren | September 18, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
The cops overeacted.
This was just some college kid. Who cares, let him finish his question.
The reaction of the police looks like something out of the Prague Spring.
Was the end result worth it? You taser someone who is beating the crap out of someone, or a robbery suspect. But a college kid asking a politcal question.
Maybe they just didn’t like his question.
Posted by: Tim N | September 18, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Yeah… Kerry really did something about it while it happened. That kid got Swift-boated. This goes to show what kind of integrity Kerry has. Like liberals, they are all talk and no action. Way to go John..Way to stand right there and let it happen. Why do you guys keep putting these weak-kneed people into office?
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 18, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I guess we should just let anyone take over a political discussion if he/she wants. His ramblings and going over the allotted time violated the free speech rights of everyone else in the room that wanted to make orderly comments. Should the loudest and most obnoxious among us be the only ones that have rights?
Posted by: NB | September 18, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
“Um…did the police answer his question of, “Why are youd doing this to me?”
Habeus Corpus, anyone?”
Clearly you don’t even know when the doctrine of habeas corpus applies. When you interrupt a PRIVATE discussion forum by REFUSING to follow the PRIVATELY set rules, police who are present to provide security to the event are authorized to stop people from INTERRUPTING the forum. They are not, and never have been, required to immediately give the detained individual a dissertation–or even a single word–of explanation as to why they are stopping him from speaking. That, in essence, speaks for itself. Before you start accusing President Bush of making this the rule, the ignorant among you might be surprised to know that this policy has never received any substantial criticism from any members of the Democratic Party, and it’s been practiced since the 1830s.
Posted by: Joseph | September 18, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
While I’m no fan of Kerry; this is not his fault but the fault of some overzealous wannabe campus cops! While this guy was being a jackass; he didnt deserve being tasered! Are we now a police state???
Posted by: Mr. Drysdale | September 18, 2007, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
As someone who has challenged Senator Kerry to answer questions he does not want to answer….I was the guy who asked him about meeting with Foreign Leaders….Kerry has been a protestor and traitor all his life. Certainly he should be able to relate.
Posted by: Cedric | September 18, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Let’s try some logic: the guy didn’t get tasered because of his question; he got tasered because he was resisting arrest. The taser is the ONLY thing that brought this embarassing (not heroic) incident to a halt.
Good job officers.
Posted by: Patrick | September 18, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Mike, well said. The guy was obviously delusional in his conspiracy laced mind. He was belligerent and made the matter far worse, resisting the police for overstepping the allotted time. funny how the police had no right to do what they did but these same liberals who love to shout “police brutality,” end of our freedoms, etc, are the same folks to defend the terrorists for having reason for their violence . Sick! Delusional!
Posted by: Dzigner | September 18, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
This looks totally a setup. First there’s evidently a couple of camera waiting to record this kid. According to the article the kid jump to the front of the line. Then kid had a motive for a confrontation. He initiated it (pretty sure the Blow Job comment was out of line), was asked to leave(or shown the door), didn’t leave, started fighting with the security, and got owned. Simple as that. Now he’ll sue, a liberal judge will side with him, and he’ll get paid. It’s a shame that parents don’t teach their kids to respect their elders anymore. This looks so like a setup to get this kid into the spotlight. I read an article that he’s in journalism. This was a great audition for CNN.
Posted by: Great One | September 18, 2007, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Kerry let it happen. You give Kerry a pass? Kerry is the smartest man in the world. He is right about almost everything. He could have stopped it! Like puny, the big man keeps me down liberals, he just stood there.
Posted by: SoonerJJ | September 18, 2007, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I’m not a fan of Kerry but this student got what he deserved for disrupting a conference by trying to take it over. He is a big guy and a mush smaller female officer and a much smaller male officer was trying to civily usher him out when he resisted and started flailing his arms around while holding a book. I would take that as assault on a police officer. He deserved it and too bad they didn’t whack him on the head with a baton to knock some sense into the idiot.
Posted by: jimbo | September 18, 2007, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
“Who among you thinks it’s OK to forcibly remove non-violent people?
Who among you believe that this kid didn’t need to be told why he was being arrested?”
I think it’s okay to forcibly remove non-violent people who are demonstrating complete refusal to cooperate with police. Evidence from the video: this guy constantly was running away from the law enforcement officers, threatening them, and demanding that they not touch him. If he’s reacting this insanely to a group of police officers whose initial action was simply to try and escort him away from the microphone, then what reason do the police have for assuming that he poses absolutely no potential threat whatsoever?
Also, I think this kid didn’t need to be told why he was being REMOVED FROM THE MICROPHONE. If you’ll go back and look at the video, the police *did* in fact tell him why he was being ARRESTED. He was not being ARRESTED when he was taken away from the microphone. NO ONE has claimed, or COULD claim, that he was being arrested at the time that he was removed from the microphone. The arrest came later, as everyone can plainly see from the video.
Posted by: Joseph | September 18, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
This was a real authentic case of police over reacting there was no need for the use of a Taser.
Posted by: R. Fortin | September 18, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Strangely, I find my self sidding with many of the Libs on this one. The question should have been answered.
All to often Bush, Clinton, and others dodge tough questions … this is yet another example of a dog and pony show.
I would add this limit to speech has NOTHING to do with the Patriot Act.
That said, two wrongs do not make a right ….. he was not following the (poor) rules of the event … he was evading being escorted … and it is not clear what else he had in mind …
Finally, he was ONLY Tasered (not shot), and was capable of walking down stairs less than a minute later. This level of force allowed the police to get the situation under control.
Those who think this force is at the level of Rodney King are way off base.
Posted by: Steve | September 18, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
THIS WAS SET-UP FOR THIS JERK’S WEBSITE. NOT A STORY ANYMORE.
Posted by: Harry | September 18, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
if you condem it mr kerry why did wait till today to say something . glad i didnt vote for you !!!
Posted by: scott | September 18, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
While the kid was having his face pushed into the floor, Kerry was cracking jokes about how the kid wasn’t going to swear him in.
Unbelievable… Thanks goodness that idiot was never our President. I hope that kid sues. Outrageous.
Posted by: darrin | September 18, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
The guy was asked to leave a public place by lawful authorities. He was disturbing a public event. He refused.
When officers tried to remove him, he resisted removal.
They then placed him under arrest, which he also resisted.
He resisted being hand-cuffed, and was warned he would be Tasered if he did not comply.
He did not comply. He was Tasered.
You nuts out there have got to realize that there are rules to society. And when you break one after another, you are going to suffer the consequences.
Don’t turn him into a martyr.
He’s a rude, obnxoious, self-righteous disturber of the peace.
Posted by: publius | September 18, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Refuse to comply with the rules of the forum, you’re going to get asked to leave.
Refuse to comply with the people in charge of security (in this case, police officers) at the forum, you’re going to get physically removed.
Fight back when the police try to physically remove you, you’re going to lose.
Contrary to what many whiney liberals are claiming, this moron DID fight back. In case you weren’t watching, the officers were standing behind him for a bit and let him ramble on for a while before stepping in. They asked him to leave. He refused and PUSHED several officers away several times. In the course of his drama queen flailing around, it’s hard to believe that he didn’t strike an officer, too.
He got what he deserved.
Bigger question, though…
After all the delusional liberal ranting and raving about Bush taking away their rights and freedoms (which, by the way, no liberal has yet to show an example of!), what do you have to say now? One of your “legendary” protesters (Kerry) stood by doing NOTHING while a person who had come to hear him speak got physically removed from his audience for (allegedly) attempting to exercise his freedom of speech.
Kinda sucks when one of your own does exactly the same thing you accuse your opponents of doing, doesn’t it? LOL
Posted by: timr1271 | September 18, 2007, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Don’t you just love the way the liberals at ABC had to mention Republican events to example silly enforcement of security issues?
Posted by: Die Hard | September 18, 2007, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
This was a real authentic case of police over reacting there was no need for the use of a Taser.
Posted by: R. Fortin | September 18, 2007, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Unless the gentleman was posing a threat to someone there was no reason to act this way. If he was going over his alotted time, then Mr. Kerry could should have been the one to have cut him off. Lets here it for the free speech an a unilversity campus. OOOPPS don’t the liberals believe in free speech anymore? Was this censorship? Yes, we should start at least 18 investigations of why this happend. Maybe this there should be at least one investgation to determine if this was a racist act by the black cop beating up on a white guy. (Which I don’t believe.)It is getting more ridiculous as each day passes.
Posted by: The Founding Fathers | September 18, 2007, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
We now live in a police state.
What happened to free speech?
Kerry…they’re your goons, your condemnation is hollow.
Posted by: Rand | September 18, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
john kerry is a coward….that is obvious as he had no clue what to do or how to handle this situation. he will probably ask for another purple heart for this incident.
Posted by: joel | September 18, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
It would have been a violation of Andrew Meyers’ 1st amendment right if they pulled the microphone away from him because he asked a question they didn’t want him to. This is not a violation of rights issue. The issue is the security of John Kerry and clearly the campus police felt Mr. Meyer was a threat. When someone acts in an unusual or aggressive way (much like what you see on the clip) they deserve to be dealt with appropriately. What would everyone be saying if the UPD didn’t do what they did and Mr. Meyers attacked Mr Kerry? They probably could have subdued him eventually, but all it takes is one good hit with to do irreversible damage. I think the UPD acted in good judgement and Mr. Meyers should have complied with the officers when they first tried to escort him off the podium.
Posted by: Ethan Jennings | September 18, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Don’t worry too much about it, our civil liberties will improve when the mexicans take over.
Posted by: HunterRose | September 18, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
that kid actually got off easy- if this were Duke U, he would have been arrested on RAPE charges, had his reputation and future destroyed so that a liberal DA could get re-elected, he would have been denounced by the university that his parents spent ungodly anounts of money on, and would owe millions in lawyer fees to fight all this. Personally, I would much rather be tasered!
ew
Posted by: eddie willers | September 18, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
The guy had lost his marbles. That was obvious. Maybe he just got flustered because he was in the same room as his hero. He brought everything on himself. He created a scene. He needed to be dealth with.
Posted by: Scott | September 18, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
It’s always surprising to me how quickly people jump up against police and those that put themselves at risk to protect society according to the tenets of law and order. Go about the blogosphere and you will see individuals like Ms. MacElveen opine and espouse their views on free speech and excessive force.
I was not at the event, but from the other videos and testaments from the event, it would seem this individual was bent on hijacking more than his allotted share of time and forum. Regardless of free speech, common sense and good form would dictate that he wait patiently for his turn (he did not), ask a few questions (he asked far more, at the expense of those that may have also had questions), and relinquish his position at the microphone when a “comfortable” amount of time had passed (he did not).
I agree that perhaps a moderator or some other usher should have used some polite prodding or a giant novelty hook to remove Mr. Meyer before the police got involved, but you can immediately tell from Mr. Meyer of his belligerence the moment he was “gently escorted” from the microphone. His cries for “help” and “assistance” were unanswered, even by his peers (who normally would at the very least raise their voice in support). Bottom line, they knew and felt he was an annoyance.
Granted, it may have been harsh to taser him – but considering his physical resistance, the officers on scene may have felt there was no other choice to quickly gain Mr. Meyer’s cooperation.
Without continuing on a rant, I guess the question I pose to individuals like Ms. MacElveen is: When is it okay for one person’s free speech to come at the expense of someone else’s? And why are you so quick to point the finger at the authorities that felt they needed to escort this usurper from the premises? Because of Mr. Meyer’s poor decision and selfishness, someone may missed their opportunity to exercise their free speech. And worse, because of this incident, those in attendance won’t be talking about Mr. Kerry’s appearance, but instead of this hijacker and his website ( dot com).
Posted by: George K | September 18, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
I just finished watching the video and, I must say, I am shocked at people’s reactions. Most people seem to be taking this incident as some sort of repression of the Freedom of Speech. Also, people seem to think that using the taser was extreme in this situation.
Well, as per the above article, the student barged to the front of the line and proceeded to fire off information that he acquired from a book. Whenever someone tried to get him to ask his questions, he became beligerant. When the police tried to escort him out of the building, he resisted every attempt at the officers made to remove him peacefully. The student then started to shout, at the top of his lungs, things like, “Help! Help!” and “I’m being repressed!” (Note: I don’t know if he was trying to be funny by quoting Monty Python)
So, with that chain of events, who can blame the officers for using the taser before things could turn more violent and dangerous?
Posted by: Dan | September 18, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
As a teacher and a parent I am appalled by the actions used by the University police yesterday. How ironic, we were teaching our students about the Constitution yesterday.(Constitution Day September 17) Heaven forbid another student would have spoken up in the young mans behalf. We may have had another Kent State atrocity…
Posted by: Diana Walker | September 18, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
I thought Liberals were opposed to the police state. Good thing Kerry lost the last election. Hopefully Hillary doesn’t win the next one.
Posted by: Paul A. | September 18, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
I love reading these chowderheads who claim this agitated moron should not have been tasered. They fail to understand that the cops have a OBLIGATION of the SAFETY of the OTHER PEOPLE in that room! If this moron DID get violent and hurt someone then the cops would be liable and SUED by the slip and fall “loiyas”. Put yourself in their boots for a change, you have the responsibility to protect the public, you arms have been tied back because of bleeding heart Liberals who always berate cops for stronghanding suspects using other means; so they have to resort to the Taser® which infact is the least lethal of any current means of restraint. Something law enforcement – HAS A LEGAL OBLIGATION TO DO.
Posted by: Mauricio | September 18, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
The cops did exactly what they were trained to do. There was no excessive use of force, and in fact, they looked rather restrained to me. That little punk got what was coming to him. He was nothing more than a disorderly, rambling little immature worm.
Posted by: Dave Cowen | September 18, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
The man should have 1_ obeyed the rules, and b) obeyed the police when they confronted him. If you resist the police, you’ll get tazered. Plain and simple.
Now about Kerry, this episode shows just how colossal underqualified Kerry is about anything. This is just another example how Kerry managed to make colossal elementry mistakes in the public eye. Recall how Kerry insulted the troops suggesting they had literacy problems.
Posted by: Darryl | September 18, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
This is more evidence, that we see every day, that we need to discipline our kids and teach them RESPECT. Meyer had no respect for the officers in the room. Had he showed even a small amount of respect to the officers, he would not have been tasered, or arrested. They would have escorted him from the stage. After all, his time was up. Come on, give someone else the time of day. Meyer wasn’t the only one who wanted to ask Kerry questions.
I saw the video that showed the officers calmly ask him to step down. What are they supposed to do if he doesn’t? Walk away? That would send a message to the world saying: “You don’t need to do what the police say”.
Just because he was begging not to be tased, and screaming help, doesn’t mean he was right. The boy needs to learn some manners. Maybe jail time will help.
GO GATORS!!!
Posted by: Jonathan | September 18, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I saw that clip and as usual kerry is a liar. For him to claim he wasn’t aware of the arrest when the boys screams are clearly herd over Kerrys answer to his question, is beyond bizzare but nothing new for a liberal.
He made the statement that he condemns the arrest because he is taking a hit. This is no different then Clinton returning $850,000 because SHE GOT CAUGHT and not because she realized SUDDENLY the donar was a fugitive.
Posted by: Joseph J Vialonga | September 18, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
John Kerry is so insignificant in the contemporary debate he’s interceded in this doltish, self-aggrandizing student’s behalf to make some headlines. The tazing was definitely warranted. If just to counter his inane ranting, I would have tazed him just for the heck of it. Every police officer has been on the receiving end of the device so it’s not like it will leaving a mark. Perhaps a lasting impression, but when a doopa-head like this attention-seeking continues acting like a looney, the police were well within their prerogative to administer some juice.
But, as noted before, Kerry condemning the attack is just a vane effort to capture some media attention when he’s otherwise been pushed way, way off the media radar screen.
Posted by: Schratboy | September 18, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
I wonder how long the would have been able to yell if Ann Coulter was speaking?? Only John gets that kind of protection.
Posted by: richard larsen | September 18, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
As usual, we get a distorted synopsis from the distorted, liberal media.
This kid deserved what he got, and MORE!
There is a line between dissent and ‘healthy discussion’ as Kerry misspoke, and breaking the law. This kid, obviously a spoiled brat, learned a good lesson: Obey a lawful police order.
John Kerry also has a great deal to learn, because when a U.S. senator cannot distinguish between inciting a riot and a ‘healthy discussion,’ we’re all in trouble.
Reminds me of the melee at Columbia University — another bastion of liberal assininity.
Posted by: Ed | September 18, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Very entertaining, especially since it happened at a Kerry speech. What a whiny little punk. Oh, and the hysterical college student was too.
Posted by: LA Doc | September 18, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
John Kerry was quietly in his glory watching this kid get his comeuppance for having the gall to not stop talking when he suggested that he do so. All he had to do was to tell the police to stop and they would have. If you live in MA like I do you’ve already heard too many stories about John “Do you know who I am Kerry” to believe anything but that he looks at the rest of the world as his slaves! He’s just another elitist who needs to be put out to pasture! THIRD PARTY NOW!
Posted by: geddesman | September 18, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
what is a taser
Posted by: huff | September 18, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Just looks like an extension of “zero telerance” policies that liberals love to put into place (unless it is something they want to hear or agree with).
Posted by: Rich | September 18, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
If you look at several different clips from different vantage points you can see Kerry’s handlers standing behind the student. They give hand signs including a finger across the throat (i.e. cut this) across the room and then stand back just before the police move in. The police who eventually take the student down are looking across the room as well so someone in charge of the police (the decision maker) was across the room and decided it was time for the police to move in. Was it Kerry’s handler? Was it the head of security? Can’t tell but it wasn’t the police standing behind the student who made the call.
Posted by: K | September 18, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Interesting how Kerry did absolutely nothing while this was going on. Only a day after all of this hits the press, then he comes out and makes all of these heroic statements. Makes him come across as the weasel he is. If he is such a “he man” as he wants us to think, his time to make his statement was to do make it at the time of the outburst. Additionally, how can Kerry say he didn’t know the guy was being tased? The student is yelling about it. It’s always so convenient for Kerry. What a wuss.
The student, the police and Kerry are all so pathetic. Just another loving glimpse of the reasonable side of the Democratic Party.
Posted by: JR | September 18, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
For all the whining peasants that are against electroschock therapy pain compliance via tazers, you’re really going to be in a world of hurt once crowds have their insides cooked with microwave guns. You’re really going to have a bummer when the sound canons blow out your worthless eardrums! BWAHAHAHA! RESISTANCE WILL BE FUTILE! YOU WON’T BE ABLE TO RESIST THE MICROWAVE GUNS!
Posted by: Sauros | September 18, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
The student had to be stopped before he asked why the FCC fined Clear Channel nearly $750,000 because of Bubba the Love Sponge in an election year (2004) for complaints made from programs in 2001.
Posted by: Ned Schnittt | September 18, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Isn’t it obvious this is just and attempt to “TaserBoat” Kerry?
It is the vast right wing at work, no doubt we now know what Karl Rove has been working on.
Posted by: Jerry | September 18, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Make that tolerance. Where’s my spell checker when I need it?
Posted by: Rich | September 18, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Kerry needs Help, cops over there need allot of help, this is outrageous, Kerry needs mental help
Posted by: Paul | September 18, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Across the web, the responses to this event from readers and viewers is beyond absurd. From trying to capitalize on it, as a chance to promote one’s own preferred candidate, to taking shots at liberals, republicans, or [insert group here], to decrying the police actions as the end of free speech everywhere, the stupidity is appalling. Kept in context, the short version is that the man resisted when asked to leave. He was both uncooperative and combative with the police. He probably got exactly what he wanted, which is his 15 minutes of fame, for being an idiot. His behavior was unacceptable and the outcome was totally justifiable.
Posted by: TMac | September 18, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
I don’t think police should have laid hands on the man in the first place. However, once they did, he resisted violently, as the video clearly shows. There’s no future in that. Once police have decided to put a person under arrest, physically resisting them never, ever comes to a good end. Your recourse against a bad arrest is in a court of law, not a contest of physical strength with armed law enforcement officials.
Posted by: Doug Barber | September 18, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Police in this country are completly out of control. This was a shameful display and the only reason it happened is because he didn’t bow and kiss the police’s collective asses! Read your history folks! At the risk of sounding like a nut myself, does this remind you of another time in the forties in Europe?
Posted by: Don | September 18, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
the guy’s an attention-obsessed %&$*%^. he was detracting from the civility of the entire event, turning the focus of the event from Kerry to himself.
doesn’t he know everyone was there to here Kerry, not him?
i would have tasered him, then maced him, as a future deterrent to other loudmouth idiots.
Posted by: jimmy smits | September 18, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
The reason people are so wound up and screaming is because everything is out of control. People have a right to be angry. VERY ANGRY.
If our supposed leaders (no an enlightened one in the bunch I might add) were being a voice of the people and for the people- this crap WOULD NOT BE HAPPENING IN THE FIRST PLACE.
You are a moron- and when you are sitting in a concentration camp trying figure out how to escape- a kid like Meyer will be the one with a plan or the first to charge the gate to help free his fellows. One thing is for certain- it wouldn’t be you- you would be the one stealing a potato off the dead guys tray next to you!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
the police action was no different than the actions used by hitler to silence pople who ask questions he objected to .
cosmo
Posted by: lawrence siegel | September 18, 2007, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
The kid should’ve listened to the police who told him to stand down. He didn’t and that’s what happens when you resist the cops.
They didn’t do anything wrong. The only person in the wrong here was this nutty kid.
Posted by: Contrarian_Libertarian | September 18, 2007, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Two things:
Why didn’t Kerry demand that the police let this young man with a question ask it?…
and
Why didn’t anyone else in the audience stand up with this man and help protect him against the police?
Complacency has no place in this society now.
Posted by: Coco | September 18, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
This is a dark day in our country,and it has been for a very long time.we lost our right to protest.but the real shame is that most americans will not stand up and demand that we get not just our rights back, but our country.but who would blame us, after the 60′s and 70′s. the very thought of protest will make most stop in there tracks and think twice,because all of our great leaders and speakers students and suppoters.where either shot down by the bullet of assassins. or had dogs turned on them and lets not forget the tear gas and bullets and billy clubs turned on us.by the people paid to protect us. GOD BLESS THE USA
Posted by: sidney o. | September 18, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
I love how being Electrocuted is now called Tazered. tazered sounds like a game like tazer tag or something.
Isn’t Electrocution torture? Abu Garab? Capital punishment?
What is wrong in the country
Posted by: William St John | September 18, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
The guy barged to the front of the line and started a tirade. He obviously wasn’t going to let Kerry answer his questions, he just intended to keep going with his tirade — any objective person watching the video could see that. The most ridiculous thing was his trumped-up indignation — and those of his friends. And the biggest shame is he’s actually getting recognition for this mockery in the name of “free speech” and “debate” — two concepts which I truly doubt he understands.
Posted by: Ted | September 18, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
The cops asked him to leave, all he had to do was leave but he didn’t. You don’t start swinging your arms when dealing with the police. The idiot got what he deserved. Rather to be tassered than shot or beat-up.
Posted by: frank | September 18, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Oh that was great – “Oh God! Oh God!” I could not stop laughing so I forwarded it to everyone else at my job; NONE of us could stop laughing. Again, GREAT video. ALmost as good as the video of the woman who gets tasered and her shoes fly off.
Posted by: BoBB | September 18, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
The whole thing boils down to this: kid was obnoxious, was making an nuisance of himself, and campus police responded poorly. I say poorly because a taser is intended to subdue a person who is a threat to the officer. That man was held down and tasered, effectively using the device as a punishment and not as a defensive tool, as it was intended. I don’t think anyone can be a threat when they’re being held down that way. The cops should have handcuffed him, and physically hauled him out of there, like they’re supposed to be trained to do.
Posted by: -David | September 18, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Police carry weapons to protect themselves and the public from dangerous criminals. This guy was on the floor with six officers on top of him. He wasn’t going anywhere, he was unarmed, and the only thing he was doing at that point was yelling. What you have to ask yourself is why those officers felt they had to use a weapon on a civilian that posed no threat. Why is it ok for public servants to use weapons on non-violent citizens? The guy was out of line (literally) but that does NOT give the police the authority to use a weapon on him. These gestapo tactics are only necessary when the government wants to subdue dissent. Call me a kook, but that doesn’t sound like the America that grew up in.
Posted by: JPublic | September 18, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I guess if you mention Skull and Cross ‘BUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ” !
Posted by: rex | September 18, 2007, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
When a person’s time is up, and he won’t shut up and leave the microphone, what is a person supposed to do? Maybe they just should have waited and waited until he fell asleep? Please. This jerk was like a 2 year old having a tantrum in the middle of the department store. They reasoned with him but he was having nothing of it. It was a matter of forcefully removing him or losing all control. How much force was up to him until he started whining like a hyena.
Posted by: Drommm | September 18, 2007, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
The tape only shows the police and the young man wrestling around. I would like to say video of how this kid was acting when asking his question. I can visualize that it was some smart*** kid who thought he was all cool standing up there asking the ‘tough’ questions to the spineless senator. There were, and still are, tons of those types of guys on college campuses all around the country. The wannabe anarchist types who are anti-establishment because it is cool and makes the girls swoon in those poli-sci and sociology classes. You know the type, the radical leftest on campus who doesn’t shower or bathe and goes out of their way in every single lecture to ask questions that are anti-corporation and pro feminism. It’s like a comedian with their act. It makes them look like the rebel and it turns on the girls who don’t shave their armpits and hate men in general.
This guy deserved everything that he got with that voltage and an evening in jail. Go to any campus and you will se a bunch of guys who are just like this clown.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
How many volts is it gonna take until whinny anti-authoritarian liberals (I claim that this ’student’ is liberal) realize that the voting box is how you win…not discourse and disrespect?
Posted by: OMSmedia | September 18, 2007, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
I think the questioner is a delusional idiot (politically), but I do NOT think his behavior in ANY WAY warranted removal. I don’t think people should have force used on them when all they are doing is asking a long question; I mean I don’t think he was even at the microphone for more than about a minute. Don’t we all deserve two minutes of microphone time?
Posted by: Hans Conser | September 18, 2007, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
This is the main reason why we can not let Democrats win in 2008. We must elect Rudy Giuliani who will uphold fredom and liberty in America. No to Kerry and No to Clinton. Rudy Giuliani for President !
Posted by: Michael | September 18, 2007, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Did anyone see the video on liveleak? The kid is a nut-job, he clearly states that he thinks the goverment is going to kill him for this. I think he needs to be committed.
Posted by: Dan | September 18, 2007, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
As a teacher and a parent I am appalled by the actions used by the University police yesterday. How ironic, we were teaching our students about the Constitution yesterday.(Constitution Day September 17) Heaven forbid another student would have spoken up in the young mans behalf. We may have had another Kent State atrocity…
Posted by: Diana Walker | September 18, 2007, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Has Kerry claimed yet that he was “wounded” in the scuffle?
Any medals requested?
Posted by: appmann | September 18, 2007, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
HAIL MUSSOLINI
OOPS AM I IN THE WRONG COUNTRY?
Posted by: howard kaplan | September 18, 2007, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Well, leave it to the network that brought us the “Path to 9/11″ to call this kid’s questions “rambling.
This kid presented NO THREAT WHATSOEVER.
If people don’t realize what an important story this is they are asleep.
There was NO disruption, just a kid passionate about stating the facts and asking Kerry a question about election fraud and impeachment. The only “threat” the kid presented was ASKING AN UNCOMFORTABLE QUESTION that our EVASIVE, IMPOTENT ELECTED OFFICIALS aren’t DOING ANYTHING ABOUT.
Don’t ever ask a question of an elected representative in America that people don’t want to hear or acknowledge or this will happen to you. Especially not if you are a student at a CAMPUS TOWN HALL FORUM asking about IMPEACHMENT.
And Johnny “Come Lately” Kerry is an embarrassment as a leader as well for not answering the question and stopping the violation of this kid’s free speech rights while it was happening but “condemning” it now. No wonder he lost the last election. I’m embarrassed I ever believed in him.
I’ve read some of Palast’s book, and he’s done the research to back what the student was asking.
How nice that facts are expressed about election fraud and this is how the kid is treated. This kid was completely within his rights as well as his anger regarding the continued lies and his questions. It’s appalling.
Isn’t it especially chilling to hear people CLAPPING as this is happening? I imagine it’s the same kind of clapping and approval Germans gave when Jews were hauled off in Nazi Germany.
Posted by: Jerry Vasilatos | September 18, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
if this paranoid drug user had behaved as a normal “reasonable person” he would not been interrupted. But I guess he felt he was more important than the other students at the meeting. Police are trained to match the behavior of the person there are dealing with. If he had responded normally he never would of been arrested. This never would have been acceptable at any town meeting in NH. The moderator would have taken control of the floor and shut him down. The only rights violated here were the rights of the other students to a reasonable discussion of the issue.
Posted by: NHred | September 18, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Everyone here that thinks this student got what he deserves, ought to put themselves in his shoes. He was speaking at a microphone, not waving a weapon. The police tasered him as if he posed a threat to the personal safety of others. I thought that in this country we were protected from cruel and unusual punishment. The student offered to leave if they’d take their hands off him. They did not comply, and instead subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment. It’s total trash. This countries constitution is continually flushed down the toilet to suit the opinions of those who want to think they’re right.
Posted by: Dan Galasso | September 18, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
After watching both videos posted on Drudge I’d have to say the guy was a punk and an idiot. He didn’t do anything (that I saw) that justified them grabbing him and trying to haul him out of there. But once the police grabbed him and tried to cuff him he should have shut up and obeyed the officers. Personally, I think the kid just needs a good smack upside the head. It’s almost like he wanted there to be a scene (future lawsuit perhaps?). It is curious that the police acted so swiftly and aggressively. You wouldn’t have expected that if it had been a republican speaking. Usually bad behavior is tolerated and even encouraged at a republican/conservative speaking engagement.
Posted by: Bill | September 18, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
I love how being Electrocuted is now called Tazered. tazered sounds like a game like tazer tag or something.
Isn’t Electrocution torture? Abu Garab? Capital punishment?
What is wrong in the country
Posted by: William St John | September 18, 2007, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
William St John:
See America….William St John is exactly the type of man on campus that I was talking about.
William St John states:
I love how being Electrocuted is now called Tazered. tazered sounds like a game like tazer tag or something.
Isn’t Electrocution torture? Abu Garab? Capital punishment?
What is wrong in the country
William…..you are what is wrong with this country. Comparing Abu Garab to this clown’s little act….are you serious ?
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
it’s called resisting arrest.
of course the cops were right.
liberals are unbelievably stupid.
Posted by: matt | September 18, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
I agree, they should not have tazered the student. There were, at least, 5 cops trying to subdue the student and a police squad should be trained enough to handcuff an out-of-control person without tazering him.
However, the student was no saint. Consider what he did:
1. he butted to the front of the line without asking. This was not an open forum for questions. People had to wait in line. (the police didn’t stop him – though they probably should have)
2. he was aggressive and highly charged – immaturely stating that Clinton was impeached for a “blowjob”, rather than perjury which was Clinton’s real charge.
3. He rambled and rambled…never getting to the end of his “questions”.
4. When the female cop gently tried to physically get him away from the microphone, he resisted. Then he resisted the male cop. Then he resisted the 3rd cop. Then, a cop had to physically carry him out of the room and the student continued to resist – throwing his arms around and resisting arrest.
5. The cops got him on the ground and told him to lay down on the floor face first or he will be tazed. The student tried to break away and he was tazed.
The cops did what they were trained to do. If someone is disturbing the peace, they need to subdue that person. They tried to be polite and they tried to walk him out but he resisted. They told him to calm down, they gave him a warning and he still resisted.
This was not police “brutality”. This was procedure. No cops or the school should be punished for anything.
Posted by: Kelly O | September 18, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Every defender of this outrage is probably in a church pew every Sunday getting programmed. The numb of mind shouldn’t be allowed to vote. FREEDOM OF SPEECH is what our entire Country’s fredoms are based on. The guy was NOT disturbing the peace, only the status-quo. They can spy on everything private that you read or send WITHOUT a warrant. Our current situation scares and saddens me. And again, if you’re religous, shut the hell up. By definition you are irrational.
Posted by: singram | September 18, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Don’t you love this. It’s a librals event through and through, a librals’ dog fight in fact. One is an old school liberal elite who never stands up for anything. The another is ‘moveon’ type lunatic college kid who thinks he cares and is intelligent. He didn’t keep cool and got taser, what does this has anything to do with free speech and ‘police state’? and by the way, for an ordinary productive memeber of society, who the hack cares about 2004 election? Don’t you think you really have a free speech in ‘liberals’ world? This freak deserved it! Move on ‘moveon’.
Posted by: libslover | September 18, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
That’s o.k. what they did to this kid? Respect? Discipline? Who the hell gives the officers the right to tell the kid to step away from the mike when he had broke no laws! I guess we do live in the old Soviet Union now and some of you good old boy’s like living in a police state!
Posted by: Joe | September 18, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
The comment most worthy of notice here is posted by Dave | Sep 18, 2007 1:30:28 PM
He was not quite right that this wasn´t a matter of free speech – It was just a matter of free speech for the others in the auditorium.
Clearly, Kerry isn´t to blame for this event any more than Bush as people assume. The police were doing their job – Securing the free speech of others in the hall – You get a time on the mic to ask a question and you need to stick to it.
Kerry was calmly answering and pleading the police to go easy on him, the guy was yelling and being generally unpleasant. His yelling drowned out others in the auditorium and limited their chance to excercise Free Speech.
If anything is weird about this is the Police feeling compelled to shoot electricity through the guy for this small a crime and handcuff him. I am actually fairly certan Mr. Meyer planned to get arrested there on camera to show how police brutality is used in the US to quench what can so easily be dealt with otherwise – His acting isn´t that good :) – And in THAT he succeeded. How 6 officers can´t see themselves escort the man out for disturbing public order or something that minor is beyond me.
Overreaction upon overreaction.
Posted by: Runar | September 18, 2007, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Since when is resisting a police officer okay? Maybe they should of split his head open with their night sticks instead…no permanent damage done. wah wah wah
Posted by: Ed Norton | September 18, 2007, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Diana Walker:
Which part of the Constitution were you teaching yesterday? The part that states that it is a right to kill an unborn baby, or the part that excuses the behavior of wannabe anarchists? Just curious with you being a teacher and all? To think that this guys Constitutional rights were violated is the same as still believing that the earth is flat.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
He was looking to make a scene when he showed up that day. His tone, demeanor, aggressiveness – he wasn’t there as a student sincerely interested in simply furthering his knowledge and understanding of the political process. He wanted to make a scene. And when the officers first approached him, they were not aggressive. He however, started making the scene. I’m not a fan of Kerry, but I’m less a fan of yahoos who make noise just to get noticed.
Posted by: Jeremy | September 18, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
You guys are all taking this too far. It was an obnoxious person trying to test the limits, who got what he was asking for. All in the middle of the speech of a 3rd rate has-been politician. Its not shocking that the camera quality was basically just one step up from the Zapruder film. The cops were just doing their jobs and that’s that. Let’s all take a deep breath and move on.
Posted by: DW | September 18, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I must be Rip Van Winkle, I thought this was America. Reading these jerks who advocate stifling freedom of speech by use of the police is what the Soviet Union did. Try this is N. Korea!. What part about this video do you all not understand. Next it is you. This is very embarrassing to all democrats and Americans in general now that this display is being viewed all around the world. “Land of The Free” between the Patriot Act and This Kid getting Zapped for making a good point Kerry would of engaged him on, -that phrase is laughable.
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
While he probably didn’t deserve to be tasered, he was resisting arrest. He did have a chance to leave and the police probably would have uncuffed him once he got outside. But he chose to go wild instead. Again, tasering is probably a bit unnecessary here, but I don’t feel too sorry for him. Idiot.
Posted by: Zach | September 18, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
It amazes me that no one is talking about the rules of these organized town halls. If any of you first amendment defenders have ever been to one then you know that there are rules set forth in the beginning. The rules are for everyone and no one is above the rules. This guy obviously broke the rules and was resisting arrest.He needed to shut up and sit down or be escorted out of the building. Did he need to be tasered? NO! He should have been escorted and if need be dragged outside and not let back in. He did not need to be arrested and did not need to be tasered. I can understand why the Police did use NON-LETHAL force but he from what I saw in the video did not pose a threat to anyone.
I am just very concerned that you all elect some of these politician that are drunk drives, check bouncers, and have FELONIES…. They are Democrats and Republicans. We need less Liberals and Conservatives, and need more Americans. You all spend more time pushing your agendas and not looking what is best for Americans.
Stop blaming everyone and get into politics and change things…
Posted by: Brad | September 18, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
The right to free speech is not unlimited and never has been. The comparison to Nazi Germany is ludicrous. Meyer will be released and that will be it. He will not be gassed.
Posted by: RODOM | September 18, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
The Police are always right ! This is the begining of the
Kaos. Most police are not qualified to work in the general public. Police show signs of imatient judgement. Police are violent and will respond this way to any situation they deem. JURY, JUDGE and EXECUTIONER. Thank God John Kerry spoke out against this. It is outrages, a college student getting violently shocked by the police for fredom of speech. Give me Liberty or Give me Death.
Posted by: christopher | September 18, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
What bothered me most is the reaction of the crowd. They were like sheep. If this had happened back in the mid 70′s, those cops would of had their %$%$&% kicked. John Kerry is a wimp for not stepping in and stopping this serious violation of this young mans rights.
Posted by: knot jamminn2 | September 18, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
A typical shameless self-promoter. This was nothing more than a stunt. This egomaniac is trying to get as much publicity from this as he can. Another totem in American jackass culture.
Posted by: David Hamsa | September 18, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
My God… I’m a huge supporter of the police. But watching that video (especially when I THOUGHT I saw one of the police officers smirk, and listening to the kid scream) almost made me vomit.
The kid asked a RELEVENT question. There was nothing inapproprate about it. It’s not like he was asking Kerry what his favorite Ben & Jerry’s flavor is over and over.
And to the idiot who says the Taser is the “least lethal of any current means of restraint,” are you kidding? There have been any number of deaths in the past year from over use of Tasers. I kind of think five officers holding the kid down is a bit less risky.
And speaking as a Republican to everyone here who thinks this kid “had it coming”: How would you react if your kid got Tasered while asking Hillary about her “missing” senior thesis. Would you think your kid “had it coming?” I kinda doubt it…
Posted by: Greg8898 | September 18, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Lawd some of you people are ridiculous. Since when is it okay to resist arrest and run around while law enforcement is giving you orders to the contrary? Can you imagine if the police was required to allow people to act like that? How many incidents would you have get out of control if the police can’t reasonably expect people to follow their commands in an orderly fashion?
There are means by which this student could have challenged his removal/arrest…flailing around and screaming at officers is not the proper way to accomplish the goal. How can you people be apologizing for this kids stupidity?
Posted by: reisonable | September 18, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Mr. Jimmy Smits- I hope you are the famous actor because it would prove just because a person is famous doesn’t necessarily mean they have anything relevant to say.
It isn’t difficult to diffuse a situation like that. The kid said let me go I will walk out. They could have surrounded him and escorted him to the curb without the danger of anyone getting hurt.
Was he paranoid, delusional and/or a mental defective? So what if he is- there is a way to handle it- and it wasn’t handled this way. Period.
A crazy disruptive conspiracy nut? Fine- but what if the conspiracy is true? What if the conspiracy has elements of truth?
One thing is for absolute certain. Both Bush and Kerry admit to belonging to a secret society known as Skull and Bones.
Fact is- if someone is going to speak for me as a leader of my nation- I want to know everything that is effecting my leaders decision making- INCLUDING THINGS HE HAS LEARNED FROM HIS SECRET SOCIETY.
LETS NOT FORGET THAT JOHN F, KENNEDY SPOKE OF THE DANGERS OF SECRET SOCIETIES DICTATING THE ACTIONS AND VOICES CITIZENS- THEN HE WAS ASSASSINATED SHORTLY AFTER
Mr. Meyer is influenced by the ramifications of these secret societies. Alarmist or paranoid his question was more than relevant.
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
The entire state of Florida gets in a nervous twitch about the 2000 SELECTION and any reference to the 2004 OHIO squat buckets crimes makes Florida squimish. Nobody wants the truth of the failed state of Florida and its crime of 2000 to hit the papers and the Miami Herald will certainly herald that sentiment. Fortunately, the young and many others are going to punish the republicans in a major way in 2008 and I think they will have trouble coping. Get out the Tasers baby and practice your goosesteps, Florida.
Posted by: daddy | September 18, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
I will pray for you…how is that for religion? You are just another anarchist, anti-social pervert who is so filled with hate that you would even attack religion on a forum that has nothing to do with religion.
Just keep killing babies and leave the country’s salvation to us real American’s.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Land of the free.
Home of the brave.
This student showed the qualities that once made America great: he showed courage, independent thinking, intellectual curiosity, asking hard questions to our leadership.
Regardless of what you think of him, his message, or his behavior, we all should be very concerned that a college student asking questions – in a question-answer forum might I add – was hauled away and given electrical shock.
Posted by: Pat | September 18, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Student protest planned for Dont taser me, bro! Kerrys Statement
I decided that the other thread was just getting too long, so Ill try to put most of the new information on this story here.
(Slight reposting) Here is a link from Political Radar (An ABC News blog) that discusses more of the reaction, particula…
Posted by: Neocon News | September 18, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Zach,
What would he have been handcuffed for? Asking questions in a Q&A? Dude check yourself. This is suppose to be free speech. All politicians should expect to be hit with hard questions regardless of political affiliation. If this were W. this student of be heralded as some hero today. This is not the Chris Mathews show where softballs are tossed to dems and the “Hardballs” are tossed to conservatives.
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Why the police went after the guy:
S 240.20 Disorderly conduct. (NYS PENAL LAW)
A person is guilty of disorderly conduct when,
with intent to cause
public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or
recklessly creating a risk
thereof:
1. He engages in fighting or in violent,
tumultuous or threatening
behavior; or
2. He makes unreasonable noise; or
3. In a public place, he uses abusive or obscene
language, or makes an
obscene gesture; or
4. Without lawful authority, he disturbs any
lawful assembly or
meeting of persons; or
5. He obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic;
or
6. He congregates with other persons in a public
place and refuses to
comply with a lawful order of the police to
disperse; or
7. He creates a hazardous or physically
offensive condition by any act
which serves no legitimate purpose.
Disorderly conduct is a violation.
Posted by: Emily | September 18, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Does he honestly think that we are so stupid as to not believe what we just saw? He asked the police to let him answer the question eh? I listened hard over and again, and didnt hear anything of that nature. He didnt know he was tazed? Didnt hear the blood curdling screams? I suppose he thinks that the American people can be led like the blind sheep that were attending this speech. Not one was concerned with this guys freedom of speech – not one stood up to defend him. Mr Kerry – we are not all as dumb as you presume. You aren’t talking to a bunch of college kids now!
Posted by: Chelsea | September 18, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
The cops did their job, all Meyer had to do was walk away, but he decided to have a tantrum instead. Go a few years back and he is the kid you remember kicking and screaming as Mom & Dad negotiate with him as they leave Disney World…..pathetic. If he wanted to ask a good question from the past, he should have asked about Kerry’s failure to sign his form 180 releasing his military record. We’re still waiting Jacques……….cue the crickets.
Posted by: Zeke | September 18, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
So it was freedom of speech when he jumped the line in front of the other students? What about them??? Where’s their freedom of speech? Or how about when he ignored Kerry and kept “ranting” and saying he “deserved” two minutes? Please.
Posted by: Emily | September 18, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
I bet the kids parents are whiners, too.
Posted by: Divine_Moments | September 18, 2007, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
This needs to be said again.
1. he butted to the front of the line without asking. This was not an open forum for questions. People had to wait in line. (the police didn’t stop him – though they probably should have)
2. he was aggressive and highly charged – immaturely stating that Clinton was impeached for a “blowjob”, rather than perjury which was Clinton’s real charge.
3. He rambled and rambled…never getting to the end of his “questions”.
4. When the female cop gently tried to physically get him away from the microphone, he resisted. Then he resisted the male cop. Then he resisted the 3rd cop. Then, a cop had to physically carry him out of the room and the student continued to resist – throwing his arms around and resisting arrest.
5. The cops got him on the ground and told him to lay down on the floor face first or he will be tazed. The student tried to break away and he was tazed.
Posted by: Ken | September 18, 2007, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Almost everday, the Left-wing or the Right-wing claim victory or foul of a hot newsmedia event. Be it an tvAd or a speech or a rebuttal or news coverage or lack of news coverage…
So another day goes by.
and the rhetoric gets worse.
IF you can’t get along we may have to separate you.
Posted by: kruiz | September 18, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Emily,
Is this any different from any other liberal behavior. Like pies in the faces of conservatives when they speak on college campuses?
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Kerry DID release all of his military records and the navy approved of it during 2004. I guess that part is missed eh? The guy was totally being violent and the officers had no idea what was going to happen next and Kerry didn’t have his own security they were it.
Posted by: Emily | September 18, 2007, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
In fairness to the University, both Kerry and the student will be receiving Purple Hearts.
Posted by: Wildbill | September 18, 2007, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Student Finds Out What Happens When You Ask The Tough Questions Of Your Government Officials The HARD Way (Video)
Senator Kerry was speaking at the University of Florida when an extremely motivated student asked him if he was President Bushs fellow member of the Skull and Bones Society at Yale
This is what happened next (H/T for the YouTube video g…
Posted by: The Gun Toting Liberal™ | September 18, 2007, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
This forum is a classic example of how we are so divided right now. One side of the argument is that the kid was out of control, and that can be seen on the video. The other side states that this was a violation of his right to free speech, and that can also be seen on the video.
The problem with the second view is that this was not about free speech. He was allowed to ask multiple questions even though he knowingly broke the forum rules by skipping in the line, asking multiple questions and not ending his tirade when asked to. A previous poster stated it perfectly by pointing out that this was old school liberal vs. moveon.org. But to claim that this young man’s right to free speech was violated is absent of any logic. He acted up, thought that he was a member of the Weathermen, and he got tazed as a result. He brought it on himself and now he will have to deal with it. This was not like the Student Non-Violent Committee or SDS, it was some anarchist who did this all on his own.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
To compare this to anything else is ridiculous. You can’t compare one event with another at all. Each event you have to look at. If the people who got a pie in their face or whatever it was want something done than so be it. They have the right to see about legal charges as well. I’m not their lawyer.
Posted by: Emily | September 18, 2007, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
“Unt- Fräulein Emily”,
He was real violent with his book and hands in the air. Unt-We hav vays of making you quiet- No”
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I lived through Communism and I can see the familiar signs of a totalitarian rule in the USA in the making. Here, the officers selfcensored the student – made a personal decision what is allowed what not and used phisical force – like KGB henchmen then. These security guards, high-school dropououts with guns and tasers – the stupid people hired – typical commie and totalitarian idiots. USA is a young country and has to go through a totalitarian phase, the beginnings of which we see now. Please, my ignorant c-citizens, doi not try to ridicule me on this, because 75% of american public are ignorant brainwashed sheeple who think thet they rule the world and I can prove that.
Posted by: Naturalized US Citizen | September 18, 2007, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I can’t believe the number of people who now think we live in some sort of “police state” like China, the Old Soviet Union or Nazi Germany. Could you people be any more over reactionary? Since I doubt that anyone one posting their opinions here (something you would not be allowed to do at ALL in any of the above mentioned gov’t controlled states) has any real idea what they are talking about when they make such foolish comparisons. It’s always the same reactionary rhetoric with the left. Every single little event they love to exploit and blow out of proportion as “another” example of how the neocons are stealing our liberties. They cried when the Patriot Act was made law and warned us about how it was invading the rights and liberties of private citizens. The ACLU has been looking for a test case since and so far…nothing.
And speaking as a republican and a father, my kid has respect for the law and law enforcement. He wouldn’t have been tasered because he wouldn’t have disobeyed their commands or resisted.
Posted by: Bill | September 18, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Never mind the fact that he disobeyed the assembly rules and jumped in line and was aggressive and kept running away etc. and screaming about how the police are going to kill him. Riiight.
Posted by: Emily | September 18, 2007, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Wow, who would have ever guessed, an obviously left aligned person lost their **** and couldn’t control himself.
Posted by: WhoseFault? | September 18, 2007, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Self censored? He kept ranting on and on and on and on! They gave him plenty of time and he showed disrespect towards them. What about the other people in line? What about their freedom of speech? Funny how nobody cares about that.
Posted by: Emily | September 18, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Rex: Yes America is becoming more and more like Nazi Germany or USSR. Churches are being closed all over the country. Corporations are being looted and burned by Brownshirts and death squads. Books are burned in ritualistic heights of rage. Yes Rex, you are correct, we really are a totalitarian country now. Why, we can’t even vote anymore or buy things unless they are approved by the mothership.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
It took Hillary’s village to make this fine specimen of BDS/Truther. Eventually watching Olberman, Maher, Chris Matthews, taking clues from Dean and Rosie, inhaling Kos, and indulging the ‘Politics of Personal Destruction’ has some blow back. It’s fitting it should happen to the Hero of the Army of Genghis Khan. Looking ahead the Dem’s are in for a ’68 Convention redux.
Too bad Ann Coulter or Dave Horowitz can’t get security like that. Maybe this will break the ice for the Capitol Police. It’s about time Sheehan and the Code Pinkos got a dose of civics.
Posted by: i b squidly | September 18, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
PLEASE pray for me. Maybe jesus and buddha and allah and elvis will fly down here to save me. You believe what you believe because you were TOLD what to belive. Just like a terrorist, you’re blinded by ideology. See ya in church Sunday! And yes, JFK DID warn us of secret societies. Anyone think it’s odd that he had his HEAD blown off not too long after?? Jesus or any other super hero won’t save us, only WE can do it for ourselves by asking questions and demanding answers…Remember, OF the people, BY the people and most importantly, FOR the fn people! No one in here can dispute that bush and kerry WERE in the same secret frat at yale and that they are NOT allowed to speak about it…Why??
Posted by: singram | September 18, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Yes, that is cause to kick his butt. Your right Emily- this is public enemy number one. Funny how liberals eat their own.
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
lammyleap,
That was my point exactly! But I think we both used too many big words for people like Rex to understand or get the point.
Posted by: Bill | September 18, 2007, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
The facist propaganda blog police are out in droves today on this article!!
Spin, spin, spin- spin, spin a rooney. Spin, spin, spin- spin, spin a rooney.
Somebody who only reads newspapers and at best books of contemporary authors looks to me like an extremely near-sighted person who scorns eyeglasses. He is completely dependent on the prejudices and fashions of his times, since he never gets to see or hear anything else. And what a person thinks on his own without being stimulated by the thoughts and experiences of other people is even in the best case rather paltry and monotonous. There are only a few enlightened people with a lucid mind and style and with good taste within a century. What has been preserved of their work belongs among the most precious possessions of mankind. We owe it to a few writers of antiquity (Plato, Aristotle, etc.) that the people in the Middle Ages could slowly extricate themselves from the superstitions and ignorance that had darkened life for more than half a millennium. Nothing is more needed to overcome the modernist’s snobbishness. (Albert Einstein, 1954)
Aristotle response:
However, there is a science higher than natural science. For in truth nature is but one genus of that which is.
It is the principles and causes of the things that are that we are seeking, and clearly it is their principles and causes just as things that are …. It is, however, vital not to overlook the question of what it is to be a thing and the definitional account of how it is what it is. If we leave these out, scientific inquiry is mere shadow boxing … the science of it is First Philosophy – and such a science is universal just because it is first. Metaphysics involves intuitive knowledge of unprovable starting-points (concepts and truth) and demonstrative knowledge of what follows from them…. Aristotle
Now Plato:
Plato appreciated that all Truth comes from Reality and this Truth was profoundly important to the future of Humanity. ‘Till Philosophers are Kings, or Kings are Philosophers there is no Hope for Humanity’…Plato
Mr. Meyer was questioning what none of us knows about SKULL AND BONES in an effort to understand the relevances of the association and how he (we) would or could be affected by this.
Unfortunately his passion for this information shall has his undoing- and the neocon spinners will make sure that America believes he is a lunatic and they will do this by pretending to be American bloggers supporting the arrest and discrediting Meyer because he was reactionary or passionate.
And Ron Paul- your perception about public electrocution being minimized as a taser event is dead-on-balls accurate!
I might actually vote for you!
Goodnight Mr. Smits!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
The whining about the knucklehead’s rights are almost comical–yes the police probably could have handled it better–but it doesn’t change the fact that he ignored nonviolent measures ( requests to follow the time limit rules, turning the microphone off, requests to calm down and leave)and then he violently resisted the police officers. Don’t any responsibilities come with his rights?? What about the rights of those around him? I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to turn over my rights to the loudest, or rudest, or most willing to take risks. I’d rather that we all be able to ask our questions-not just the loudest nutjob. The Constitution is a document about freedom, not bedlam.
Posted by: Sean | September 18, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Lammyleap,
Between the Patriot Act, eminent domain (for the use to expand the tax base), and public displays of a police state it is looking real grim for those of us who once considered this a free country. Not sure why immigrants are trying to cross the boarder, I guess over hear you only get Zapped where as over there you might get shot in the head for your beliefs.
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
I think JFK had cornflakes for breakfast the morning he was shot in Dallas and said he didn’t really care for them. Are we sure that the General Mills company didn’t kill him?
His brother Bobby, the AG was going after organized crime in this country. Is it possible that THAT had something to do with it? Or maybe it was payback from Castro and Cuba. Either of those two possiblities are more likely and certainly more believable than the paranoid rantings posted here.
Posted by: Bill | September 18, 2007, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
The officers involved in the incident should get fired, and the student should file a lawsuit against the police department. The use of a taser was unnecessary.
Posted by: Emanuela | September 18, 2007, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Don’t fool yourself about Kerry. He couldn’t have cared less about this when he walked out of the place. Then he got home, saw every blog and email going off on it, so suddenly he pretended that he was offended. Its nothing but manufactured outrage.
Posted by: DW | September 18, 2007, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
“This is the USA” does NOT mean that this freakshow had the right to impose his screaming idiocy on the rest of us.
He did NOT have the right to barge to the front of the line.
He did NOT have the right to exceed his alotted time, dominate the floor, and keep others from saying their piece.
He did NOT have the right to disrupt the event.
He did NOT have the right to resist the police when they asked him to leave.
He had the right to his bizarre thoughts, amateurish opinions and illiterate ramblings, but he doesn’t have the right to waste everyone else’s time with them.
(No, his questions were NOT “topical”).
The police had NO reason to taser him once he was in cuffs. This nutjob will probably bring a lawsuit and win.
Posted by: sue | September 18, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Wow Emanuela you’re a psychic? I’m impressed! I’m so impressed you can read other peoples feelings. So amazing.
Posted by: Emily | September 18, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Don’t fool yourself about Kerry. He couldn’t have cared less about this when he walked out of the place. Then he got home, saw every blog and email going off on it, so suddenly he pretended that he was offended. Its nothing but manufactured outrage.
Posted by: DW | Sep 18, 2007 2:47:05 PM
to his credit, Kerry asked that the guy be allowed to speak… had a Republicant been speaking up there, he certainly would’ve made a joke to the audience at the “troublemaker’s” expense: “I guess I lost HIS vote, ha ha ha!”
Posted by: Pete Bogs | September 18, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Emily, you were responding to DW’s post, not Emily’s. The author’s name appears BELOW the message.
Posted by: sue | September 18, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Again, BOTH kerry and bush were and are in a secret society. Skull and bones. You cool with the people that dictate our foreign and domestic policy in its entirity not answering for ALL of their private connections and affiliations? We aren;t talking about lindsey lohan here, . These are the people that send our boys into the meat grinder known as Iraq. People’s lives and families are affected, to put it mildly, by what these men do and say.
Posted by: singram | September 18, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
It wasn’t up to the police to decide if this young man’s time was up. When somebody’s time is up it’s up the crowd. There was no majority call for young man to step aside. Therefore he should have been allowed to continue until which time the audience desired him to quit or the speaker had demanded him to allow him to answer. Then and only then are the police allowed to move in. But only in cautionary stance.
Senator Kerry was not phsyically threatened. None of the audience members was physically threatened. And none of the officers were physically threatened. There was no call to physically remove the young man who was noticably excited about being able to ask Kerry these questions. You cannot choose your audience. I know some people try. But in the real world not everyone can wrap up a question or questions gracefully. This was a college campus full of young people. Most of which have not yet learned to submit unquestioningly to authority, but rather have been rightly taught to ask questions. And question. All public servents have a duty to answer the questions asked of them. Everyone else has a duty to hold them accountable, especially if they have not answered or try to avoid answering. It is not arrogance or narcissism on our part to question. It is duty. This young man was merely fulfilling his duty as an American citizen. The police had no right to assault him. It is up to the crowd to discipline. The police are merely there to enforce the wishes of the audience. Not to dictate who can ask what of whom. And how.
Posted by: Tom | September 18, 2007, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Interesting how people rally around Rodney King everytime they a video comes out where the police have to subdue someone. Also, many of you seem to believe that this kid was being silenced because of the questions he was asking. Tell me, how is it that his questions were “highly sensitive” when he was just regurgitating the retoric used in a book that Kerry himself had read?
The kid was not detained for the questions he asked. He was being removed from the room for violating the rules of the public discussion.
First, he barged to the front of the line.
Second, he did not keep his words civil.
Third, he ignored the time limit set for each question (It costs alot of money to get someone like Kerry there).
Finally, the kid was being insulting and rude to those around him.
The kid continued to resist arrest after many clear warnings from the arresting officers, so he was subdued in the proper manner. End of story. This is not another Tianaman Square or Martin Luther King. This was just some kid who wanted a little glory, but did the wrong things to get it.
Posted by: Dan | September 18, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Look, I can fault Kerry as much on this as I can Bush not jumping up an running out of the school in mid story on 9/11. First Kerry is not in a position to fight the police. Sure, he could have been possibly more vocal, but he shouldn’t have done anything more. Probably was in shock at what was going on. Kerry did Ok on this. I don’t like Kerry’s politics at all, but this wasn’t his fault.
Posted by: TexBork | September 18, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
No Tom, you’re wrong. It’s up to the MODERATOR to decide when the time is up.
He had NO right to any time. He lost that right when he barged to the front of the line.
Posted by: sue | September 18, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Naturalized US Citizen- I am hereby revoking your status as a citizen. I was born here and retain this right.
“They cried when the Patriot Act was made law and warned us about how it was invading the rights and liberties of private citizens. The ACLU has been looking for a test case since and so far…nothing”.
The cries came because the Patriot Act was not only illegally passed- but was replaced at the last minute with NEW CHANGES that congress believed was not new and/or edited and required a re-read- THIS IS A HUGE DECEPTION.
The Patriot Act was created out of a situation that did not exist!
There were no weapons of mass destruction and no proof that Al Quaeda, Osama Bin Laden, Hussein or anyone else had a hand in 9/11. The big point is the Patriot Act was created and implemented illegally because of 9/11 whish is why 9/11 keeps coming up.
And the government and administration does not and has not answered the questions (other than their official story which has too many holes and still under investigation, I might add).
The Patriot Act is illegal, unconstitutional and is not nor has it ever been based on anything other than a perceived threat that has been sold to all of us as real.
Real Americans think for ourselves- you poster person for the “sheeple”.
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
You are what you state. Sin speaks about what sin is. Like I said, stick to the baby killing and the ‘do whatever feels good’ attitude of yours. I choose going to church on Sunday because that is what I WANT TO DO. You choose not to because that is what YOU WANT TO DO!! I suggest that you take a comparative religion course on day….it will open your eyes to the lies that you continue to tell yourself about religion and God. All that creepy stuff that you hate so much yet know so little about.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Republicans who think the Patriot Act is so harmless would do well to remember that, although she truly frightens some of us (myself included), there’s a good possibility Hillary will get elected next fall. And there’s no telling who she’ll call a “terror suspect.”
See the problem?
Posted by: Greg8898 | September 18, 2007, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
I don’t care that BOTH Kerry and Bush are in a secret society. It is not the issue or the point here. But since you (and so many others brought it up) I guess we can assume that the last 3 years would not have been any different if Kerry had been elected in 2004? He wasn’t you know, for all those out who think he was and just can’t “move on”. I guess we should assume that Kerry would have made all the same decisions that Bush has made concerning our foreign and domestic policy since they BOTH belonged to this evil, all powerful secret society.
Posted by: Bill | September 18, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
I too am disgusted..!! disgusted at the whole of you who believe that this sweet innocent little punk deserved any less than he received…it wasn’t his “tough questions” that warranted a Police response…it was his lack of proper behavior…he was asked to leave the podium, he refused, Police responded and again asked him to leave, he refused, they began to escort him from the area, he resisted, they restrained him and again escorted him from the area, he began fighting with the Officers, he was taken to the ground where he again refused to cooperate by resisting and fighting, he was warned, refused again, was tased ONCE, and then handcuffed..!! what part of that don’t you understand…it has absolutely NOTHING to do with First Amendment rights, and absolutely EVERYTHING to do with his total disregard for authority, decency, respect and law..!! Wake up from your hazy slumber and get with the program…the youth of today are what’s wrong with this country…maybe if any of you had the balls enough to put down your cameras and laptops, move out of your parents house, join the military, and quit your whining about what you feel you don’t have in your life, this country could again be the strong force it was just 20 years ago..
Posted by: JJ | September 18, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Oh, and Tom…
The police were there to enforce the LAW, not “enforce the wishes of the audience”.
Good grief!
Posted by: Bill | September 18, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
The perpetrator in this situation was trying to cause an incident. Those of you who come to his defense know this as well as everyone else. He is attempted to become a martyr for “Free Speech.” What he doesn’t realize is that lies are not covered under Free Speech.
The real point is that Democrats are under attack from the hard-line socialists. You will see more of this as the campaign season heats up. The Democrats are going to have to make a decision – do they fall in-line with the hard-core socialists or not. The hard-core socialists will not take a maybe in this situation.
It’s not out of the question to see a split in the Democrat party in 2008. All Democrats know that and that’s why they’re scared.
Posted by: Jack | September 18, 2007, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
If you liberals really believed we are living in a police Sate, then you wouldn’t so naively foolishly rant against the police in your posts! Don’t you know they’re tracking you?! Oh please! It is such an insult to those who have truly lived under totalitarian regimes. The fact is you are free to say what you want here, just as that guy was, but you have to follow the rules on assembly and can’t resist the police when they politely ask you to give up you over extended allotted time. If you kick back, you are going to get hurt!
The police would be pretty ineffective if they just sat their and never did anything. If the guy was allowed to keep up his ongoing delusional rant, at the expense of everyone else, that only leads to a bully pulpit where only the loudest, most obnoxious can say anything! There is such a thing as law and following the rules as laid out. You liberals are really something else. Delusional.
Police State, yeah right! You guys better go lock up your doors–the police are going to chase you down for what you just wrote! If you really think that, then shy do you keep writing your moronic anti-police rants?!! Isn’t that then stupidly self defeating! No, you will write back. You just want to make a scene and make it worse like the guy you are defending. You might as well blame GW too–I mean why not have the men in black track you down too?! It’s so laughable!
And Nancy, you call yourself a teacher? Typical!
Posted by: Dzigner | September 18, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
C’mon now people, use your brains intead of your heart to think for a change.
This kid obviously is a pathologic attention-seeker, quite shameless in what lengths he will go to to make people have to deal with him.
He was way out of line, shifting the focus of the event from Kerry to himself, all for what? petty personal gains.
the sad state of the wannabe celebri-nots…
Posted by: cfx | September 18, 2007, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Dan- You bring up a valid point- Rodney King. Let’s see, first he took police on a 120mhp car chase, he resisted arrest, he tried to assault the police, but the last part was all people remembered to justify a riot. This is classic liberalism- if this kid jumped line to interrupt a conservative speaker or shove a pie in the face of the conservative speaker and was beat down and arrested- today he would be heralded as a hero. Actually I don’t think this is liberalism at work here, the lights went out on this kid as soon as he mentioned “Skull and Bones”- that was the que for the brownshirts to go into action. Funny how they really are wearing “BrownShirts”.
Late !
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Kerry failed to uphold the rights of a US citizen. Good thing he was not elected president. He just stood there. Shame on him. But he ought to be just as scared as the rest of us–one day the police will drag him off the stage, taser him and lock him up. We are all slaves to Bush now.
Posted by: Dusa | September 18, 2007, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
The enlighten me Lammyleap?
Do you think it is better here because we only electrocute rather than shoot in the head an irascible voice at a Q&A?
So its either electrocution or bullet in the head?
Again, please enlighten me on these levels I am so wrong on. I am listening.
If we let this police state continue soon the choices will be more drastic than electrocution…err, taser!
I am now seeing you as a very clever spinner. But I will listen with an open mind as to these levels you speak….
Lets see what you got. I have read every comment…Have you?
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Meyers should have been corrected by Kerry or someone for jumping to the head of the line- and or civililly esorted out for jumping line.
Even at Disneyland- line jumping is cause for removal from the park- and rightfully so.
But not electrocution.
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
None of this is surprising. A tough question to a liberal politican is like pushing a cross into the face of a vampire.
Posted by: Chas | September 18, 2007, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
I live in Gainesville FL. Everybody knows it’s illegal to criticize an anti-war Democrat in this town. If it had been Bob Dole speaking, the UPD would have let a critic rant until he passed out, then given him CPR.
Posted by: Sam I Am | September 18, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
A police state. That’s too funny. We are not a police state. Now, that said, Hillary wants the Federal Government to punish every American that doesn’t purchase health insurance.
Posted by: TexBork | September 18, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Dusa: Even after he leaves office after the 08 election we will be “Bush’s Slaves” Where do treehuggers come up with this garbage! Liberals are always ready to throw out terms like “Brownshirts”, “Nazi’s” etc. But do they even know what that means? Brownshirts were the violent arm of the National Socialist Party of Germany in the 1930′s. Once Hitler gained power he actually disbanned that organization with many of them being murdered on Hitler’s order. Brownshirts were used to bully other political parties and Jews during the haze of the Weimer Republic and that crazy parlimentary system that came out of WWI.
Nazi’s were member of the National Socialist Party and were for the most part normal German citizens except for those members that were in the military or the government. The only common thread shared among Nazi’s was the feeling that Germany got sold out by the leaders of the country at the end of WWI, i.e. “the stabbed in the back” belief. Nazi’s also were strongly nationalistic and did not want other countries dictating their policies. Another thing that Nazi’s shared was a great need to rebuild their military and to get back land that was taken away from them due to the Treaty of Versailles that was signed in 1919 and was created by every single nation in Europe except for Germany, thus the stabbing in the back theory. Modern day Germany is bigger in area than the area that was left to them after that farse of treaty. Add to that the debt that they were forced to pay, a debt that they would still be paying off, and Germany was ripe to be taken over by a nationalistic party that looked to correct the crimes that Europe committed against them in that treaty. Like it or not, that is the origin of Nazism and Brownshirts. Read your history folks before throw titles out there that have no meaning in today’s world.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Vomeggido- I made that point. Neither electrocution nor being shot in the head is acceptable. Sometimes people do not get the sarcasm in which I make points. My mother was raised in Nazi Germany and later the family was put behind the Iron Curtin. She was one of the few who escaped before the real wall went up. I am apposed to any police state. What they did to this kid was appalling and un-American unless you’re a liberal in denial. Again if this were a conservative speaker and the kid did this and was beat down and arrested he would of be heralded as some hero today.
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
If you look at several different clips from different vantage points you can see Kerry’s handlers standing behind the student. They give hand signs including a finger across the throat (i.e. cut this) across the room and then stand back just before the police move in. The police who eventually take the student down are looking across the room as well so someone in charge of the police (the decision maker) was across the room and decided it was time for the police to move in. Was it Kerry’s handler? Was it the head of security? Can’t tell but it wasn’t the police standing behind the student who made the call.
Posted by: K | Sep 18, 2007 1:53:43 PM
K- you are very correct. I noticed that as well- however- the final judgement is supposed to come from the police.
They are responsible in the end- otherwise Adolph Eichmann is truly innocent!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Clinton was not impeached the charges did not follow through in the Senate. He should have never been asked abotu this situation in the first place. Meanwhile this kid is asking why Bush isn’t being impeached for this war and he is tasered after being floored by 6 cops. Shame on everyone defending the cops and calling this liberals vs conservatives. This kids freedom of speech was violated and he was assaulted by a police force.
Posted by: Brad Allen | September 18, 2007, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Some of you just sound nuts. Regardless of whether this guy had valid political ideas, there is simply no reason for the brutality he experienced. This is America. We are supposed to be free to express our views. This means people can even stand up in a public forum and ask moronic questions. The police in this video should be fired for their trigger-happy reactions. It’s politics, you’re bound to get some passionate hecklers. I’m totally disgusting.
Posted by: Alice | September 18, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
I ecal when Bush announace the invasion on Iraq. We attempted to speak-out on the issue but were meet by threatening police on horses-bashing us to stay clear. Our then Mayor Lastmann (Toronto)ordered these police.Some good folks wee clubed. After then–no-one protested. For those posting creeps that disagree with this mans actions–shame on all you .Wait when the draft calls on you and no-one is there to speak for you. This man put his hands up–to show he had no weapon or intent to fight
Posted by: JoJO | September 18, 2007, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
This is further evidence that the USA is not a democracy, contrary to the myth taught to its citizens. It is clearly an oligarchy contolled by a wealthy “aristocracy” and maintained in place by a population which is unable or unwilling to ask the tough questions which democratic citizens need to ask to acquire accountability from their elected representatives. The fact that this incident happened at a university is in itself eveidence of how the myth of democratic rights that is taught at American schools is not only not applicable in the country, but is not respected in the schools themselves. Whether one agrees with the views of the individual or not, whether one finds his behaviour acceptable or not, is completely immaterial. What is important is that in a democracy one tolerates views and behaviours that differ from one’s own. That is the only guarantee that one’s own views and behaviours will be tolerated by other citizens. The only acceptable excuse for police intervention is if the speaker showed some threat to the safety of someone else. He clearly did not. The police should not have been in the room any where near where he was standing. They were there before he could be described as “worked up” and in the process demostrated clear evidence of the lack of democracy in the United States of America. Florida has done it again.
Posted by: G. Currie | September 18, 2007, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
vomeggido:
Yes, I have read all of the comments. One thing is for sure, one can easily see who is rational and who believes that anarchy is a Constitutional right.
Please give me an example of a police state. I can:
Nazi Germany was a police state. The USSR under Stalin was a police state. Even during WWII, Russian troops that failed to fight in the manner that Stalin wanted them to were killed on the frontlines. Not by German troops, no, no, by Stalins own death squads that were stationed behind regular troops to murder those who failed in their orders. That, my friend, is a police state.
In this country people are given carte blanche to do whtever they want to do for the most part. Would the level of porn that is viewed and collected by many, many people in this country exist in a police state?
You imply by your use of the phrase police state that people are powerless to do things such as speak out against the government, question policy, or anything that the leaders would deem threatening to them. That, simply put, is not even close to the state of things in this country, regardless of what moveon.org may have you believing. Take all of the daily trash that is thrown out there by the MSM regarding our current president as a classic example of a free society, not a police state. In a police state moveon.org or DailyKos would not exist. George Soros would already be hanging in the village square as a reminder of wht can happen if you stand against the current administration. Likening a taser episode to the proven polices states that have existed and still exist is proof of how crazy you and your ideas are. Of course, you have that right in this country, for if we were really in a police state you already would have been hauled away from your computer for speaking out so strongly against the establishment. Yeah, this is a real police state, and meanwhile, in a real police state such as North Korea, you would not even have access to yuor computer. Now do you understand the difference, or are you waiting for more talking points from moveon.org?
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Brad Allen: Clinton was impeached–that’s the name of the process. He simply wasn’t convicted. He lied under oath–an impeachable offense. That’s why he was impeached.
And like I said earlier, if the kid were asking Hillary about her senior thesis and got tasered, most of the people on here would suddenly flip sides. Pretty shameful.
Whatever happened to “right and wrong,” regardless of political affiliation?
Posted by: Greg8898 | September 18, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Hard to believe that there are so many people so incredibly stupid as to think that: Barging unto a stage with a US. Senator doesn’t subject someone under the immediate scrutiny of law enforcement (to spell it out to you bleedin’ heart clowns: “what if he had a weapon?” They have to, by law, remove them.
Freedom of speech means you are free to say/write what you want, but not at the expense of someone elses rights; like Kerry’s right to protection as a US Senator, but if the cops have to remove
Posted by: Mauricio | September 18, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I love how some of these posts embellish the facts. “He tried to run away from the police”….no he did not understand why they were arresting him and he tried to walk away. “he was tasered because it was a woman cop and a smaller male cop”…what about the huge 200+ African American officer that was kneeling on him?
I could go on…
Since when do police enforce time limit rules? Kerry was listening to him speak when the cops went up to him, if Kerry wanted to hear him out, then it should have been allowed. I think a Kerry staff person and a school administrator probably panicked…after all they sent 6 cops to remove him from the microphone? Come on. The NBC6 station in Florida’s video follows into the hall where he keeps asking why he is being arrested where finally the lady cop tells him its for “inciting a riot”. How can there be a riot when only 1 person is doing anything?
As for those who say he deserved to be tasered, what happened if he had a heart condition? It reminded me of the incident in Boston in ’04 when the Sox won the AL East and kids were celebrating and a cop shot a beanbag gun into the crowd even though there was no violent conduct happening and a girl got killed be it.
Posted by: Joe D | September 18, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
It was the fact that he lied multiple times under a federal oath!!! Liberals are so blind to truth that it is no wonder that no one takes them seriously. If you or I lied under oath we would face criminal charges….not billy bob though. There is a reason he is forever banned to practice in front of the Supreme Court and why the Justice’s did not appear at his last State of the Union. They wer just as disgusted by him as most of AMerica was, and still is. There are other sources for history besides moveon.org people!!!
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Lunatic deserved the taser!
Posted by: Jasonr | September 18, 2007, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
kerry should have jumped in and helped this kid. doesn’t he have like 10 purple harts?
Posted by: Ron_Mexico | September 18, 2007, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Lammyleap, I do understand, but other bloggers might not be as witty and bright as you and may see this a different way unless you put (Sarcasm) in parenthesis-Sadly people do need it spelled out.
I am so sorry your mother had to endure such a hell and now we all are beginning to experience it- which is the fact which supports our “leaders” have learned nothing from past mistakes and are attempting (quite successfully) to lead us right back into the same scenario sold as something new and better. A new and improved Tide Detergent if you will!
I would like to read your mother’s comment on this- and if she has passed away or is too sick to participate- please accept my humblest apologies.
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
LampyLeap,
I never have been on Moveon.org (for they are the Useful Idiots- if you know your history), but your right this is not a police state in terms of a totalitarian govt. but your wrong in terms of having your civil liberties eroded away. It may not be at the point you have made LL, but we are headed down a slippery slope. Just look at the eminent domain laws which now state one can have their private property taken away justified by an expanded tax base for a govt entity- no this is nothing like they do around the world is it? (again sarcasm) Look at the bottom line of the patriot act and go figure we are the ones proposing to build a wall on our boarders. Your right LL, we are not there, YET! Go figure, I am no Liberal, Just a disenfranchised conservative.
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
How can anyone defend this moron? Idiots want to hold this up as “what’s wrong with America”. What’s wrong with America, is that this narcissistic 18-30 year old generation has no respect at all for anything. This is the liberal, feel-good, do-no-wrong and do-not-dare-upset-anyone type of thinking that can only come from not yet experiencing the realities and the responsibilities of the real world. Whether driving down the road, buying groceries, or asking questions in a public forum – you must follow rules. If you don’t, there are consequences. The fact that his questions were idiotic at best makes no difference, he had a right to ask them. But when he didn’t follow the rules, he paid the price. He was being escorted out for not following the rules. He was supposed to ask a question – he didn’t need, nor did he have the right, to spend five minutes prefacing the question. So he lost the right to attend the assembly and was being escorted out. He became beligerent, once again not following the rules (when you’re being escorted by the police, you walk in an appropriate manner and do as your told) and was tasered.
Welcome to the real world. I’m sure it’s a bit more harsh than anything you’ve seen thus far in your vast 20-23 years of living…….but that’s how it is sometimes. The world owes you nothing, and the sooner you figure that out the better off you’ll be. The better off the rest of us will be, too!
Posted by: Dave | September 18, 2007, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Alice writes, “I’m totally disgusting.”
His freedom of speech was not the issue. Get out of your box.
Posted by: Dzigner | September 18, 2007, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
G. Currie, yeah, you’re right, what he said is immaterial. You are using a straw man argument though. He deserved to be taken away by the police and deserved the increase use of force when he refused to follow the rules. Without rules or any force the police can serve no function.
Posted by: Dzigner | September 18, 2007, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
vomeggido Thanks but you have me confused with LampyLeap. Yes my mother is still alive and yes she has strong feelings on this. We were raised every day to kiss the ground we walk on. I have had real relatives who were behind the wall until 89. They too remind us who were lucky and by the Grace of God born in the USA too kiss the ground we walk on for our freedom here is something that is rare around the world. This is why I get passionate about examples like this. I kid about Skull and Bones but it is funny that is when the kid lights got put out. Coincidence? Watch the tape and you decide. Today I am not sure if I am living in the America my parents raised us in. My dad was in the Army for 20 years and my mother grew up under real oppression the type of oppression Lampyleap speaks of, the type if you did speak out you were hung from street lamps (no pun intended) because that is what the Nazi’s did to their fellow countrymen who did speak out. They did not hide their executions, no they wanted their neighbors to see what happens when you did speak out. I know the US is no where near that point but we are on a slippery slope with examples such as this kid at the Kerry Q&A.
Posted by: Rex | September 18, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
these officers need to be fired and tried. they abuse their power. this is disgusting and shows what a police state America has become. and kerry just sat back and did nothing
Posted by: american | September 18, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Lammy-
This is a “slow indoctrination” process. Hitler made the mistake as did most fascist leaders of the past by implementing brute force too soon.
They have learned since then. MUCH!
As for porn- its getting nailed all the time. They are even talking about rebuilding the internet for PROTECTION of course.
You are the one who is wrong on so many levels because you don’t see the big picture – what I am saying it what will be in the very near future if something is not done.
If the powers that be could use brute force without opposition or controllable opposition they WOULD. Count on it.
Its a little difficult to contain 302,907,069 people many of them with guns- Many of them VERY ANGRY. Many of them willing to die for our beliefs from which this country was founded upon. LIKE FREEDOM of speech!
Wanna change the rules and prove to the people that a dictatorship is the better way for societal evolution? Fine- tells us whats better about it so we can FREELY choose.
.
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Lammyleap, you ‘say’ it so well. This is indeed not a Police Sate. When the looney left uses such terminology and yet continue to feel they are safe enough to voice their opinion online so freely they only udermine their very arguement!
Posted by: Dzigner | September 18, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
If we all scream Police State or NO POLICE STATE..there is less of a chance of actually becoming a total police state in the future.
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
It is disappointing, but not surprising, that so many people are ready to condemn the victim of police action at the Kerry speech. They are the ones who threaten the existence of a democratic government in the USA. Arab terrorists will never conquer an American people who are proud of their country and happy to live there. It is impossible. However, honest, but blind citizens who consistently support “law and order” issues at the expense of listening to alternate view points will cause the structure of a democratic nation to rot from within. Please open your eyes. This young man was not a physical threat to anyone. If his questions were really rants, he would not have been a political threat to anyone. One has only to wonder why the police really reacted as they did. Is it only a coincidence that this occured in Florida?
Posted by: G. Currie | September 18, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Americans do not deserve the freedom they so happily rant about in their daily lives. When they finally wake up and realize they live in a fascist society, maybee, just maybee they will standup and fight for real freedom. 2 thumbs up for Andrew Meyer, he is concerned about his future and the future of his children.
Andrew, despite all that is published in the private news sector. You are a hero. Those officers deserve jail time for not allowing you your right to speak freely on whatever subject you choose.
You are a HERO!!!!!!!!
Posted by: outrageous | September 18, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Alice writes, “I’m totally disgusting.”
I’m sorry Alice, but you sound nuts! His freedom of speech was not the issue. Get out of your box.”
You’re half right, his freedom of speech is only part of the issue. The biggest issue is the overkill the police used. I saw the video, there was absolutely no reason to tase him. It’s an incredibly painful ordeal, and to say “Oh he was talking too long…” or “Man that guy was crazy…” is completely forgetting the fact that using a taser is supposed to be a last resort. His microphone was off, Kerry said he would answer his question, why in the world would they arrest him anyway?? It was overkill. Plain and simple.
Posted by: Alice | September 18, 2007, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Bill and Lammyleap-
Almost without fail, every bush and cheney apologist find themselves in a pew every sunday. The opiate flows easily through your veins. Thomas Jefferson would’ve wanted it that way. He hated religion and was all too aware of the dangers it posed…a few of which are manifested today all throughout this posting. Bush should be locked up. I spoke up agasinst the establishment-get the taser out!! I hope that all of you that defend this trash that runs our Country encourages every family member you have to sign up and go to Iraq. We are absolutely getting raped as a people. This time though, the ‘roofie’ so to speak, is mind-numbing fear.
Posted by: singram | September 18, 2007, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Alice, I’m sorry but again you use straw man arguments. No one is saying, “Oh he was talking too long…” or “Man that guy was crazy…” as you suggest for reasons why he got tasered. Rather, it was becasue he repeatedly, consistently, was belligerant to the police and focibly preventing them from removing him peacefully. If you push a police officer and resist to the point he did, you may very well get tasered!It is completely appropriate. I commend the police on a job well done.
Posted by: Dzigner | September 18, 2007, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
singram: Please show me where I voiced my support for Bush…..PLEASE!!! No, I just voiced my support for God, Jesus and country. You are the one who melts when you read the bible or think positively of this country. But your hatred is exact proof of how free we are in this country…thank God for that. Even a dillusional extremist like you can be heard, which is why I love this country. My question to you would be, “Do you love this country, and if so what are you prepared to do for this country?” Loving this country means that you except all that makes this country great, even the fact that a majority of Americans each and every Sunday will be in a church somewhere. That must really make your skin crawl. Even your socialist, icon Jimmy Carter is a born again. I am sure you don’t hate him now….do you???
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Doesn’t look like pushed ahead to the front of the line. Nor does it appear he was disrespectful in asking a question when he was acknowledged by Kerry to do so.
After all this is a University and Meyer was on his turf. Kerry was a visitor.
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Rex: I too am a very angry conservative that feels betrayed from the current administration. But I look at the differences between the two camps in this country and the fact remains that in a worst case scenario I would take even Bob Dole over a liberal nutjob who hates this country and looks to instill multiculturalism and remove nationalism. As angry as I am at Republicans abandoning conservative principals, the real threat to this coutry continues to be the liberal left of the Democratic Party that has a louder voice and looks to chink away at important freedoms such as religion, education and speech under the disguise of what they percieve to be freedom. The fact thatt an anarchist such as the one at UofF is viewed as some sort of hero of free speech just proves to me how desperate the left is to establish an if it feels good do it mentality.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
The same people applauding the police tazering a guy already in cuffs, would’ve been cheering when police turned water hoses and dogs on civil right protesters in the 50′s and 60′s. Disruptive behavior isn’t a reason to resort to violence by police.
Posted by: JMC | September 18, 2007, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Statement From Kerry and Staff on Tasering Incident
…
Posted by: Liberal Values | September 18, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Ripper-
Those guys were angry social rejects that needed medication. And those leaders you mentioned that hated religion, they hated it because they wanted total control. And as you’ve evidenced, religion controls and manipulates.
Posted by: singram | September 18, 2007, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Sorry Pat, I hate to see people getting disillusioned with that “land of the free and home of the brave” thing. It’s too bad the believers in that stuff never took a proper look at the role of slavery and native American genocide in our history. Not to mention Lincoln’s denial of habeus corpus, and America’s very violent war against organized labor from, oh, 1870 to 1932.
And by the way, didn’t Woodrow Wilson have socialist presidential candidate Eugene V. Debs (look him up on wiki!) imprisoned for the duration of WWI due to Debs’ opposition to our role in that conflict? Didn’t FDR send Asian-Americans to concentration camps during WWII?
There’s nothing new to the American experience in what this delusional student (“They’re going to kill me!”) underwent.
Posted by: Sorry Pat | September 18, 2007, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Vomeggido, actaully that is the very video I watched. I didn’t say he pushed in front of the line, don’t know, but it is obvious he got belligerant before the police did anything and when he started throwing in the looney conspiracy minded Skull and Bones stuff, it was that much more reason to remove him peacefuly. The guy had gone way over his time limit, was telling others they had to continue listening to him , regardless, and clearly showed a total disregard for any proper protcol. After the police intervened peacefully, he became that much more belligerant, resisted being led away and looked like he was going to get that much more out of hand if not more forcibly apprehended. (Who knows what he might of done then? Maybe something to Kerry who he was so dissapointed in for “ceeding” the election and so on?!) Again, I applaud the police on a job well done.
I love how you liberals throw around “Police State” and then when it is clearly shown we are not in a “Police State;” you can freely speak here, use computers etc, as even many in China can’t, you then go to say, “we are not there YET…” but getting there! OK, then, say what you mean! Don’t throw around such fiery rhetoric unless that is exactly what you mean.
Posted by: Dzigner | September 18, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Meyer is a true patriot and a hero to the American people. Without people standing up for what they believe in this country would be hell. I hope all of those cops get what is coming to them and are stripped of their rights some day. I also hope that the students of UF will not stand for this and roit like there’s no tomorrow. I know none of this would fly on my central Florida campus. FREE MEYER!!!
Posted by: Ryan Lesko | September 18, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
First this “guy” was a little loony.
Regarding him taking too much time… the whole video is only 3mins so I do not feel he took to much time. Why at 20 seconds into his diatribe are the police already surrounding him and grabbing at him.(was he on a watch list?) When did they first tell him he was under arrest? Were they just trying to escort him out before Kerry answered his questions? WHY? He seemed to want to hear Kerry’s answer.
USING TASERS to subdue him after he is already on the ground with 5 cops on top of him, is COMPLETELY UNCALLED FOR. This has become standard operating procedure for cops to “show you who is in CHARGE.” I am at a point where I feel that Cops on Campuses should not be allowed to carry tasers… they have shown they clearly cant tell when it is appropriate to use them. At least with a Gun they will be more responsible.
Kerry is a fool if he thinks I will believe that He was unaware of the use of the TASER. I could hear Kerry Speaking Just Prior to the use of the TASER… and everyone there could hear the screams. WHAT DID HE THINK HAPPENED? 18 hrs passes and now Kerry cares about this kid. Pure BS. Kerry should have stood up there before leaving for washington. Maybe he could helped defuse the situation early, BUT THAT WOULD OF TAKEN LEADERSHIP.
Posted by: Doug | September 18, 2007, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
“Alice, I’m sorry but again you use straw man arguments. No one is saying, “Oh he was talking too long…” or “Man that guy was crazy…” as you suggest for reasons why he got tasered. Rather, it was becasue he repeatedly, consistently, was belligerant to the police and focibly preventing them from removing him peacefully. If you push a police officer and resist to the point he did, you may very well get tasered!It is completely appropriate. I commend the police on a job well done.”
I wasn’t listing those as reasons he was tasered, I was listing them as subjects people are focusing on instead of seeing that he was wrongfully removed, and wrongfully tasered. Admittedly, if it were me, I would have let the police lead me out since I know good and well the consequences of standing up for my rights against a cop who would rather I just do as s/he says. Unfortunately, this guy knew their reason for removing him was crap, and chose to try and make a stand. Plus, you can hear him saying “I’ll leave!” amidst the calamity. Aside from that, cops know how to restrain people and they should have just cuffed him. The taser is for situations where individuals are either out of reach and are posing a threat to police officers or are overpowering a police officer. Again, this is utterly overkill.
Posted by: Alice | September 18, 2007, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Hate is not inherently negative. I hate cancer and aids. And I hate stupid people.
Posted by: singram | September 18, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Actually, Alice, in my course on Comparative Religion at my university we spend a little over a week discussing the varying definitions of Paganism and what a Pagan stands for. There is not one overall accepted definition of the word, but since you seem to know so much about it I will offer my definition, the one I teach my students, while I wait for your definition.
I teach paganism to mean, “Belief in religions other than Christianity Judaism or Islamism, especially ancient Greek polytheism, which was a non-revealed religion.” thus, a Pagan could be an individual who see nature over God, or a person that practices vodoo. Thus, most people who rally against religion are exhibitng paganism in their behaviors. Is that clear enough for you? I await your definition, since their are many that are recognized.
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
“Actually, Alice, in my course on Comparative Religion at my university we spend a little over a week discussing the varying definitions of Paganism and what a Pagan stands for. There is not one overall accepted definition of the word, but since you seem to know so much about it I will offer my definition, the one I teach my students, while I wait for your definition.
I teach paganism to mean, “Belief in religions other than Christianity Judaism or Islamism, especially ancient Greek polytheism, which was a non-revealed religion.” thus, a Pagan could be an individual who see nature over God, or a person that practices vodoo. Thus, most people who rally against religion are exhibitng paganism in their behaviors. Is that clear enough for you? I await your definition, since their are many that are recognized.”
Paganism is an umbrella term for polytheistic nature-centered religions. You’re right that there are many definitions, but to use it as a description of someone who speaks out against religion is a little offensive to someone who defines it as an actual religion.
Posted by: Alice | September 18, 2007, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
There is a reason I went to college for ten years to get my Ph.D. in history and religion. In a Christian perspective, which most of this coutry is, propping nature up before God is paganism in its purest sense, which is why I introduced in my post. I am sure you will not deny that. It was in no ways a slam, and I am sure that you can see that. If anything I stated that it was protected by our Constitution!!
Posted by: lammyleap | September 18, 2007, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Josh more or less spelled out why, as another fed-up conservative, I’m supporting Ron Paul.
Republicans, read super-conservative Bob Barr’s reasons for fearing neo-conservatism
Then ask yourselves if you’d go along with everything Bush has done if it were Hillary in charge. Don’t be blinded by partisanship, people.
Posted by: Greg8898 | September 18, 2007, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I have to disagree. When a person doesn’t even believe in God you can’t state that they’re Pagan in any sense. I can understand that you were trying to insinuate that he’s religious for placing nature before God, but it still doesn’t make sense since you’re taking his motives out of context. Besides, you gave a more offensive definition in your previous post. It’s even more offensive now that I know you’re educated.
Posted by: Alice | September 18, 2007, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
This discussion of paganism has brought up another problem I have with Mr. Bush: his not supporting the rights of fallen soldier Sgt. Patrick D. Stewart to have a pentacle (the five-pointed star) on his memorial marker. I simply cannot fathom such a display of ingratitude, especially since the Pentagon says that more than 1,800 Wiccans are on active duty in the armed forces.
Such closed-mindedness is what has driven me from supporting the mainstream Republican candidates.
Posted by: Greg8898 | September 18, 2007, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
And I never called myself liberal either, only sensible. Both scare them. It’s prolly gonna get worse before it gets better, sad to say.
Posted by: singram | September 18, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Free Speech should be averted with MORE free speech. Physical intimidation only made this worse.
Kerry didn’t answer the questions in this article. I hope he gets asked the same questions again next time he has a public appearance
Maybe we’ll get a repeat.
Posted by: Scott | September 18, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
I am a 22 year US Army combat veteran, a veteran of four major US conflicts(Grenada, Panama, Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom), two peace keeping missions, and seven covert operations. I am completely and utterly disgusted with these police officers their actions and anyone who defends them and there actions. I thought when I retired that my days of defending freedom were over, but I found out that I had to come home to defend freedom still, here at home, not from sunnis or insurgents or al qaeda, but from “American” law enforcement and “American” politicians, whom are all acting like these are the early days of Nazi Germany. I have come home to find local, state and federal law enforcement acting like the gestopo of 1936, and a Home land Security acting like the SS movement of 1936 Nazi Germany.
Those police officers, such as they are, are sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and its freedoms. Title 7 section 1983 of the civil rights code makes it a felony punishable by 10 years and or a 50 thousand dollar fine for using thier authority to deny and interfere with an individuals rights or freedoms. By violating thier oath to the Constitution that also border lines an act of TREASON against the Constitution and the people of the United States, if you violate your oath to defend it, you become an enemy to it and that makes them Treasonous, or traitors to this country, which by the way is a capital offence. Furthermore, thier actions are a direct dishonoring slap in the face of every verteran who has ever fought for this country, and especially the true heros of this country, those who have died to give and protect freedom for all.
It is time that individuals who hold ANY kind of office in our governmental system are held to the strictest terms of the laws, because their bad actions always walk on the edge of Treason when they treaten freedom.
The only answer to Orson Wells’, “1984″, is 1776. “Give me Liberty or give me death” on the battlefield, which ever way anyone who threatens freedom wants to go with it.
Posted by: Ron | September 18, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Singran- you are a riot! Love the swim therapy!
So true- but lets not blast those who swim in the shallows For every ocean has a shore.
Its never a waste of time to have a stimulating conversation and healthy argument with a fellow American.
We are all in this together.
Love your posts!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
I’ve written over 5,000 letters and mailed them to Congress by way of the US postal service and everynow and then somebody gets annoyed with my continuous redress of grievances…..I gotta wonder if I would get tasered also if I showed my face up on Capitol Hill…..
Posted by: Sharon Mounier | September 18, 2007, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Now Ron knows what he is talking about. I sure wish I had said it without so much emotion!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
vomeggido-
Thanks! We definitely are in this together. Folks need to understand that ‘us’ is ALL of us. Texan, Arab, Jew, even NASCAR fans. They try so hard to divide and to foster the ‘us vs. them’ mentality…
Posted by: singram | September 18, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
It hurts to change, grow and learn- but it hurts less when one’s mind is open. This is the most painful lesson I have learned to date.
Hopefully getting this info out will wake people up an shake them into reality.
I know all to well that the view of the world with rose colored glasses is not real and as ugly as the view is right now- I would rather see the truth than a rose colored shaded version of it.
Thankfully I passed up mass a while ago! That’s where the problem is!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
vomeggido – i have been shot four times (clinically dead for 22 senconds on one of those occasions) stabbed twice, two helicoter crashes, and the victim of 3 terrorist bombings what can they do to me that has already been done or tried……??????
Posted by: Ron | September 18, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Please go to this guy’s website (gracelessly plugged by ABC in this story) and check out some of the stupid stuff he’s done in the past, all in the name of attracting attention to himself (usually in the most ass way possible).
This is not about freedom of speech, this is not about the abuses of Big Brother; this is about a rude, loud-mouthed kid thrusting his histrionism into the 15-minute spotlight.
There are better ways to go about promoting your cause, unless the cause is ultimately “you”, and then its not really a “cause” at all but a self-obsession.
Posted by: self thinker | September 18, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
I hear you Ron!
I survived a childhood that reads like a serial killer or worse- and yet I have survived as well. There really is nothing worse they can do except blow it all up rather than be exposed or change.
Sounds like we could both use the rest (peace)!
You are one of my heroes.
If I may- how do you get past past the sadness of humanity not rising to what we are truly capable of in being our best?
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Ron Corvus, stop using this incident to promote Dennis Kucinich. It’s disgusting and shameful. The room was large enough that Kerry had no idea that the tasering was going on; he thought it was just a scuffle. I don’t think Kucinich could have handled the situation any better.
Posted by: Brett | September 18, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Hey Self thinker- I went to his website. So what. The contents on his site have nothing to do with what happened at that particular Q&A.
He is a college kid.
btw, he can play the piano and his girl can sing.
He is only 21 years old!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Also, Kerry did attempt to answer the question. Kerry was many meters away from the incident and couldn’t have taken action had he known that the tasering was going on.
Posted by: Brett | September 18, 2007, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Kerry was in charge and directing the entire situation- only delegating the repulsive to the keystone cops who hung back waiting for hand signals.
Kerry could have easily said, ” leave him alone and let him continue- he has a right to speak up.
But Kerry did nothing. Like all of them in that room. That kid was on his own.
And no matter how much propaganda you spin- the country has seen it and weighed in on it.
YOU LOSE!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
If being a loudmouth, disrespectful idiot is a taserable and incarceration able offense- then why aren’t Bush, Kerry, Gonzales, Rumsfeld, Rice, Rove and YOU in jail?
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
I didn’t see anything about a preordained time limit for questions. Kerry couldn’t even pack the room half of it was empty.
Posted by: omfg | September 18, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
I think this just incident continues to open the door for police to taser anyone they consider a dissident.
Posted by: Brian | September 18, 2007, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Josh, my man, you are funny! First off, let me tell you, I am not some shallow archetype as you might imagine. I am not even from America! I’m actually from across the pond but have lived here for a lot of my adult life by now but believe me, I get out and about–not stuck in some backwoods as you might think. Try again.
No I have not seen the “rev” video you are referring to so won’t comment on that. I can’t speak to the Chicuita banana story either. However, yes, I’m not saying there aren’t times when there is real police brutality but this isn’t one of them. Let’s not use straw man arguments. (You people love to do that.) The guy deserved what he got, I’m afraid. As for corporate pillaging, that’s another story. I’m going to stick to this story here, OK?
Have you ever considered what might have happened if ththis guy hadn’t been further subdued after resisting the police? One never knows for sure. I doubt anything would have happend and he probably would have left but the police are reacting to an situation very quickly, doing the best they can. As far as they know this guy might have lunged at Kerry after getting all worked up, or someone else. Really, you’ve got to admit, if he had gone peacefully the first time, none of this would have escalated.
His shouting “Ow, Ow” seemed terribly put on and staged. He seemed like a big cry baby wanting attention. Hey, he even has his own website, no wonder. His other rants indicated he was certainly not in a right mind, thereby more liekly to do something completely unpredicatable and possibly dangerous. One never knows. The police did the best they could.
And yes, I saw the video. It’s like we are are watching two entirely different clips. I don’t get how you think he didn’t deserve what he got. Silly man. This was hardly a Rodney King type beating as some professed.
Posted by: dzigner | September 18, 2007, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
dzigner is absolutely right.
watch the full, unedited video on LiveLeak. the kid is acting like a donkey’s butt, and has a well-established history of propensity for doing just that.
this is not about freedoms, inaleable rights, habeas corpus, etc. its just about an obnoxious kid attracting attention to himself. sorry but its that simple.
Posted by: cfx | September 18, 2007, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
You call us raving liberals but yet you aren’t even from this country…What the man should have done was what I do and I GET RESULTS!!!! I flood Congress with letters sending them home made videos, home made post cards, Louisiana Hot sauce, Louisiana post cards and even Mardi Gras beads…..The last Congressman who told me that I didn’t have right to do what I did saw me push over 550 letters to every single member of Congress through the U.S. postal service in just two days….Yes I know that there are only 535 members of Congress but I wrote some of them twice….Cost me over 500 bucks but it was worth it and it definitely got their attention!!!!
Next time he should just flood Congress with mail….it has definitely worked for me all though the technique proves to be very expensive……I’ve written over pushed over 5,000 letters to Congress so far and it has costed me over 5 GRAND to do so but I get the results that I want…..Talking to Congress on the phone just doesn’t get it….I like him only get into screaming matches with them and their staff on the phone…..Next time “Flood ‘em!!!”
Posted by: Sharon Mounier | September 18, 2007, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Headline: “Cops put on leave after Tasering student”
Posted by: Bob | September 18, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Kerry Condemns Heckler Arrest might make a nice headline, but it would be better if somewhere in the article you show were Kerry actually condemns the arrest.
He does not.
He says he believes he could have handled the situation, hopes no one was hurt yadda yadda.
“Condemn” is too strong a qualifier just to invent out of whole cloth.
Posted by: Nigel P | September 18, 2007, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
how can anyone still support the kid after reading this arrest report?
click link
|
|
v
Posted by: cfx | September 18, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Sharon, kudos to your involvement in the political process!
BTW, believe me, we have “raving” liberals in the UK too–more of them actually than here, or the “looney left” as Thatcher loved to call Foote, Scargill and the like. They were pretty much Trotskyites and Marxists working within the Labour Party as you have socialists here working within the Democratic party, but even worse than that! (Blair at least had some common sense to ‘fess up to the fact some of Thatcher’s reforms actually worked! But again, another story.) These far left liberals won’t be happy until government, their form of government, runs everything. If they need to shout slogans like “Police State” or “Police Brutality” or anything else that undermines our very structures of democrcy they will do just that.
Posted by: dzigner | September 18, 2007, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
George Bush Jr. and Richard Cheney lie the U.S. into a war in Iraq and that war along w/the subsequent occupation has killed over one million according to objective tallies. Those actions do not bother many, but a 21 year old exercising his free speech rights does.
This 21 year old has the guts to question a Senator and because he is ‘loud’ about George Bush Jr. stealing elections he gets manhandled and shot w/a taser.
The Americans of today who approve of such actions by police have thrown away not just their own decency, but the ideals for which previous generations have fought and died. I, like Kerry served during Vietnam, but unlike Kerry I publicly recognize what traitors George Bush Jr., Richard Cheney and those who support them are to American ideals.
Listening to today’s [re]publicans debate about ‘how much’ to torture and whom to torture makes me ashamed to be an American at this time.
Posted by: maxx | September 18, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
I couldn’t believe it when I heard Meyer was tasered. It is really a shame that the UF police department found it necessary to tase coach Meyer. After all Meyer has done for the football team, is this any way to treat the man who brought the National championship to Gainesville? From what I’ve heard, Kerry was the one who should have been tasered for rambling on and not answering any of the questions.
Posted by: Al E. Gator | September 18, 2007, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Researched Response, kudos here. you’ve ceratinly shown some good input and reserch s your name suggests. I cn se your point.Maybe it was “excessive” s you indicate but “police brutality”? Hardly. Now, if they beat him a few times with a truncheon too then and broke some arms, maybe. The guy deserved what he got. You try to be the police and react perfect adn calmly in that situation with a Senator also in the room. It’s easy to throw stones and label the police here as cruel but I really see that they were doing a good job, reacting as best they could, given the man’s unruly behaviour after they had already tried to politely have him move on!
Posted by: dzigner | September 18, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Since when do you have to act perfectly calm with a Senator in the room?!!! I have been around many Senators in a room and even well known Generals and wine and beer was being served…..
If Congress is that so darn afraid of folks acting up then why the three kinds of different wines and the four different types of beers??? After one glass of wine I loosened up and shook more hands than the law will allow!!!! I talked so much to the politicians that they ran out of catfish before I had a chance to get any!!!
Posted by: Sharon Mounier | September 18, 2007, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Conspiracies kill and not conspiracy theorists…..Remember Kent State and Senator Paul Wellstone…..
Posted by: Sharon Mounier | September 18, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Sharon & Vomeggido,
the main problem with your heartfelt point is that this guy was violently resisting arrest. out on the street this might not have been a big problem, but acting foaming-at-the-mouth-crazy while a feet away from a senator it becomes a problem.
i don’t like cops & brute force either but I know better than to continue struggling after I’m told that I am being arrested.
plus, this guy does this kind of stuff all the time (and is proud of it), its obvious his main motivation is to create a scene.
Posted by: cfx | September 18, 2007, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Reading this post, one thing is evident: people begin to fear authority and the police. That’s not good.
I grew up under a communist regime. I used to be afraid just seing the police walk on the other side of the street.
America used to condemn the very practices she now embraces. How ironic.
A police state is ushered in with the agreement of a large part of the population. Nazis and communists would not exist if people would not get sucked in. The subsurviant police will turn agressive as each member attempts to protect self.
This country is doomed to social turbulance and economic pain. As we, immigrants from the Eastern Europe, keep saying: America had it too good for too long. It begets ignorant and self-occupied people with distorted reasoning. Fat cats.
No matter how you put it, no matter how you explain it, in a healthy society you do not police speech giving or abuse of time given to speak. Don’t blame the abusive student – find a way to manage the situation. Police should not even be present at such event.
Posted by: florin | September 18, 2007, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
I bet he was faking the whole taser thing. He was ACTING the entire time. The news article said that once he was in the hallway, his entire demeanor changed. He was joking and laughing with the cops.
Posted by: faking it | September 18, 2007, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
“Police should not be present…”
Ahh, let anarchy reign. Yes, the single individual should be allowed to completely disrupt/ruin/destroy anything they wish. Do not stop people from doing whatever they wish. We should not stop speeders, we should not stop people from bringing guns into courtrooms, we should not stop bank robbers… Our entire society is based on limiting what people are allowed to do FOR THE COMMON GOOD. It would not have helped the common good of the people in that room to let the jerk keep talking until time ran out, now, would it.
Posted by: police should be present | September 18, 2007, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
You don’t get “electrocuted for being an idiot.” You only get punished for illegal actions. There are plenty of idiots alive and well today, as is evident in all these postings.
Posted by: electrocuted | September 18, 2007, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Florin says “find a way to manage the situation.” They DID find a way, it’s just that you don’t like their way. So, what is YOUR way? What if YOU held a meeting, and had stuff you wanted to talk about, and someone interrupted it and wouldn’t let anyone else talk. No matter WHAT you say, they won’t give up the mike. You paid thousands of dollars for this event and you want to be heard, what will you do about it? Don’t give rhetoric, be specific. Exactly what will you do?
Posted by: florin rebut | September 18, 2007, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
My guess is that the police state is being helped by people such as you: rather than find a way to manage people like this student, you prefer to call upon the police to administer authority and force. What’s next? Have the police distribute food as people jump the line? Perhaps the army?
You have not read the post: “in a healthy society” you should not have the police manage such events. Is that your conclusion: anarchy? There goes the skewed reasoning.
Posted by: florin | September 18, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Give me a P>>>P Give me an I>>>I Give me a G>>>G. WHATS THAT SPELL>>PIG! WHATS THAT SPELL>>>PIG! WHATS THAT SPELL>>>PIG!
Posted by: Steve | September 18, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Here is what I would do.
I would step down from the podium, walk to the student and face him calmly. When he was done speaking, as he would, I would reason with him calmly, even attempting to answer every question with honesty and directness while engaging him in the answer. It would not be possible that he would be so beligerant that he would yell in my face.
Possibly, possibly, at the very end, I would ask for the security (not police) to help after fair warnings.
It is because the student felt he was not listened to that he insisted over his alloted time.
Posted by: florin | September 18, 2007, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Florin for President!!!!!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 18, 2007, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Florin, thank you for attempting to answer the question. However, you assumed he would be done speaking. This guy will NEVER be done speaking. Now what do you do? You are very naieve. “It would not be possible” are the words of a very naieve person who has had the luxury of growing up in an extremely sheltered world. You are lucky to have been so protected. But, you need to learn that it IS very possible, and that is exactly what this fellow was doing. So re-answer the question, and this time the guy NEVER STOPS TALKING AND YELLING. Now exactly what do you do???
Posted by: Florin doesn't get it | September 18, 2007, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
You speak of a “healthy society”, but what you really mean is “fantasy dreamland”. We ALREADY have a very healthy society, and part of a HEALTHY society is finding a way to keep the BAD people from messing with the GOOD people. So we cannot EVER create your version of a healthy society because we will always have BAD people. Get it?
Posted by: healthy | September 18, 2007, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Vomeggido, keep going, you’re doing great. You are a good advocate for the your liberal leanings.
Yes, I definitely got to you, didn’t I? I’m signing off now. Feel free to swear as much as you like–it really helps clarify things perfectly.
Oh, btw, as we do live in some awful Police State, why do you anit police liberals continue to write your diatribe? I’ll be calling the in the FBI now. Maybe “they’ve” wiretapped your line and will be picking you up in the morning? Keep your eyes out on all those thug police out there. Just when you think you’re getting a speeding ticket, watch out! You might be dragged away and never seen again as this sad young man tried to suggest.
You’re too funny. Good night.
Posted by: dzigner | September 18, 2007, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
“Florin says “find a way to manage the situation.” They DID find a way, it’s just that you don’t like their way. So, what is YOUR way? What if YOU held a meeting, and had stuff you wanted to talk about, and someone interrupted it and wouldn’t let anyone else talk. No matter WHAT you say, they won’t give up the mike. You paid thousands of dollars for this event and you want to be heard, what will you do about it? Don’t give rhetoric, be specific. Exactly what will you do?”
This was a lot like using a gun to kill a fly. Besides, he didn’t go on THAT long. I watch CSPAN, and people will go on for a totally mind-numbing amount of time there. He might have had said some questionable things, but it honestly wasn’t as bad as you’ll commonly find in public forums (which this was, and it wasn’t a “meeting”). Kerry stated what he wanted to do, he wanted to answer the question.
Posted by: Alice | September 18, 2007, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
FLORIN – answer the question. What will YOU DO when the bad people never shutup. WHAT?
Posted by: answer the question | September 18, 2007, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Coco says “Why didn’t anyone else in the audience stand up with this man and help protect him against the police?”
Answer = Because they were so happy the cops were taking him away. Did you hear the applause?
Posted by: cuckoo | September 18, 2007, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
This student was intent on making a scene. I don’t believe I am naieve. I watched the clip carefully and went to his website. He’s a mouthful and a jerk.
However, that does not excuse or encourage the presence of the police. The message I am trying to bring across is that we should not increase the use of governmental force to regulate aspects of life that we should be able to handle ourselves.
A person who wants to be president should be able to manage a miscreant. A leader, a person of character and with people abilities, should handle such a nut.
Please read my post again as to *my* reaction as it would probably satisfay even you: by turning the focus on him, asking him to voice his concern, he would eventualy difuse. He wanted noise and disturbance and he got kindness and respect.
If however, after repeated attempts to calm the situation and after fair warnings, I *would* call upon security but not the police.
Don’t tell me I lived a protected life – I lived an oppressed life that ended in a bloody revolution with me in the streets to witness it.
I lived under a regime that was embraced by people believing that they would be helped by the government against the rich. And the governemnt did exactly what EVERY government with too much power does: turns against its people.
So keep giving up your liberties. Keep trusting the government and the police. Keep demanding that they handle your life’s little problems and they will do just that.
Posted by: florin | September 18, 2007, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
The more that people bash the police, the less likely that folks will pursue that profession. The only time we hear about police is when they are being bashed. How about SUPPORTING the people who are doing their best to protect us. Why are the police ALWAYS to blame in the eyes of the media and Florin? What about the kid? He could have backed down. What about Kerry? He could have spoke up, but I bet he was happy the cops were getting him out of there, he didn’t want to answer those questions.
While I support the questions the kid was asking, I also support the cops who were just trying to do their job. Please don’t bash the cops, they really are trying to help.
Posted by: self fulfilling | September 18, 2007, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Damn . . . sure are a lot of ignorant comments in here. Both left AND right. Does anybody out there understand that these knee-jerk reactions keep us mired in the problem and miles away from the solution? Just listen to yourselves rant!
I think I’ll wait to read the WHOLE story, if one is ever told.
Posted by: Musk | September 18, 2007, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
I really have to agree with Musk.
Posted by: Alice | September 18, 2007, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
OK, that is a pretty good response. It is NOT what I was understanding from your earlier posts.
I actually like your line of thinking, that a presidential candidate ought to be able to handle this. In fact, we should put candidates through a stress test before elections, not through sham “debates”…
Thanks for clarifying your opinion, well stated.
I still say the police were just doing their job, if the campus or the city or the Speaker wanted anything different, then tell the cops about it beforehand. Its pretty certain they were following pre-approved protocol.
Posted by: Florin pretty good answer | September 18, 2007, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
self fulfilling says: “The more that people bash the police, the less likely that folks will pursue that profession.”
This is true and we must acknoledge the vast benefits of government and authority. We must reward them with good pay and public display of respect.
I do not bash the police. However I still harbor fear in my heart 20 years later. I suspect your children will get used to it too.
We are talking about *excessive* police powers and presence. While appreciating their authority we should guard against too much power as they *WILL* abuse it. It is just human nature to do so.
Tazing this idiot was not necessary. It was abuse. Ten years earlier they would’ve handled this situation with no qualms. But now they are quick to draw the gun as it’s so close and so easy to solve the problem. One day technology will read your mind and they will use it to shut you up before you open your mouth. In the name of order and thousands of dollars spent for speech.
Posted by: florin | September 18, 2007, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
I’m really disappointed with all the people who think that what the police did was right and the guy got what he deserved. No he did not follow “proper etiquette” and quickly ask his question then turn and sit down quietly. but John Kerry is not the “soup nazi” from Seinfeld.
Go to most question and answer sessions all over the country and your bound to have at least one person act like he did. Should they all get tasered? Our country was founded on the idea that everyone has the right to speak their mind, especially to the powerul elites. Not only did the police overreact, they should have been stopped. Were all the people in the audience cowards? Are we to lower our gaze when innocent people are hauled off by the police? How is that any different than when the Nazis or the communists arrested people?
Mostly I’m ashamed that there so many people who claim to be pro-America patriots but are really fascists.
Posted by: Mike | September 18, 2007, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
OK, now you have turned the tables, and talking from experience. No I have not lived in a true police state, therefore i am not nearly as concerned about it as you. I liked your last response, too. THanks for continuing to post even after you said you were done. Now I am done, i see your opinion and agree with it. Interesting how i started this thinking you were too extreme and unreasonable, and now I see your point and agree with you. Thanks and good night.
Posted by: now i'm naieve | September 18, 2007, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
I didn’t see anything about a preordained time limit for questions. Kerry couldn’t even pack the room half of it was empty.
Posted by: omfg | September 19, 2007, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Is there anyone who believes that if this were video of a prisoner of war that John Kerry would be stumping about how cruel we are as a country, but it is done right before his very eyes on a college campus and he remains silent when all he had to do was say stop. This is what is coming people when you have the nerve to interrupt and elite. Stand up and fight or get used to it. Third Party now!
Posted by: geddesman | September 19, 2007, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Obviously this kid was a serious threat to our civilized, conservative society otherwise the thought police would have never intervened.
Kids like this, with their critical thinking and unscripted questioning of authority are the greatest threat we face today. We have to rise up and Taser them back into submission before it’s too late.
Besides, everyone knows, sometimes you have to crucify a few radicals to keep the Empire stable.
Posted by: Guy | September 19, 2007, 1:46 am 1:46 am
Yeah, we want the likes of you to be embarrassed by us ‘fascists.’ If you didn’t think we were nuts, then we’d really worry. And yeah, crucify all these whiners. I love to go back and listen to that college kid scream. It’s real fun. Mn, I just wish they had zpped the littel whiner a couple of more times, one for each of his dumb web postings. First naive college boys, next the world, ha, ha, ha…
Posted by: come-by-me-again | September 19, 2007, 2:20 am 2:20 am
Since when is freedom of speech countered with a TASER?!
Oh, I remember now, DUBYA removed that right regarding negative protesters whenever he was talking “about important stuff,” if you can call it talking.
We see now how Kerry would uphold the Constitution if he were president. Not at all.
Posted by: Lynn Harris | September 19, 2007, 3:37 am 3:37 am
VIDEOS: Dont tase me bro! – Andrew Meyer
(TIP: For those who just want to watch the videos, Ive embedded 3, and linked to another. So scroll down and skip my pontificating if youre simply here for the vids)
By now it would be shocking if you hadnt heard about the antics …
Posted by: Public Speecher | September 19, 2007, 5:12 am 5:12 am
That university spokesman wasn’t even there. …”His microphone was cut off, then he became upset.” Yeah, Orlando. YOU’D be upset too, if police grabbed you for no crime. He wasn’t doing anything worth being arrested for. That’s the standard, should be the standard. Just being a little obnoxious shouldn’t end in your getting tasered by university cops. Dam Nazis think they can taser anybody that verbally disses them a little. Yeah, I saw that in the videos, I admit he was being an aggressive questioner. But he was being polite about it. Dam Nazi police.
Posted by: kat | September 19, 2007, 5:58 am 5:58 am
Adam Cohen…then I’m sure that you’re very happy with the current tate of this country….. !!!
Posted by: Me | September 19, 2007, 7:17 am 7:17 am
Why do you the Liberal Press ask did the police go to far? Why was your question not was the student out of line?
Posted by: joe | September 19, 2007, 7:52 am 7:52 am
How come all those police officers could not handcuff one kid? There was no need to hurt him. Gives the cops a bad reputation. We are becoming more like China. Next we will be shooting anyone who we disagree with. We are already oppressed with taxes. This Country needs change.
Posted by: Ruth Cunningham | September 19, 2007, 7:52 am 7:52 am
Of course the police went too far…as they most always do! An article should be done on their constant abuse of power!
Posted by: Heather | September 19, 2007, 7:55 am 7:55 am
You can’t have it both ways folks.
You complain about the police at VTech, but then defend an obviously disorderly student???? Lets say the police let him go and he pulls out a weapon. Taser him then? Or do you come on here and complain like VTech? All the student had to do was obey the police. Students do have to obey campus police right? Students are not above the law on their campus. As for the comments on Kerry. Kerry tried to answer the question. READ THE FULL STORY AND STOP ASSUMING. Instead why don’t you ask this question to your President. Why have 2000+ people death and destroyed families of 9/11 still have no resolve and will get NO resolve because we QUIT/GAVEUP/DEFEATED in the capture of Bin Laden? Why didn’t we invade Pakistan? Because they really have WMD!!! People talk about the ignorance of OJ. How did you believe and continue to support such an obvious lie of Iraq having WMD and we do tell all story of how and when we will invade. Oh… and then you knock Obama for him letting you know where he stands. Democracy? Yeah right!
The student got what he asked for.
You need to stop thinking your lil honor roll, college kids are so innocent.
Posted by: Greg | September 19, 2007, 7:55 am 7:55 am
The heckler was causing a disturbance. He did not co-operate with security after they asked him nicely to leave.
The heckler paid the consequences.
They did the right thing in order to protect themselves, Sen. Kerry and the other students.
Posted by: R Taylor | September 19, 2007, 7:56 am 7:56 am
I am a student at the University of Florida, though I did not attend Kerry’s speech on Monday. I am appalled at the way police officers apprehended Andrew Meyer. I agree Meyer was out of hand but it seemed to me as if the police officers were embarrassed that they couldn’t silence him, leading to excessive force to protect their egos. Tasering should a last resort as should pointing a gun. If Meyer had been on a prescription drug or had a heart condition the Gainesville Police could have a dead student on their hands. I have seen police act inappropriately towards students in other situations, not to this extreme but enough to make me feel insecure about the law enforcement officers in this town. Two weeks ago at a home football game a Gainesville police officer harassed students throughout the game, targeting a group with comments such as “shouldn’t you wear underwear to a football game”. The police/student relationship is in dire need of help in Gainesville. If they [law enforcement] can’t respect us [UF’s student body] how can we possibly respect them? They choose this line of work in this town, knowingly taking on the responsibility of dealing with college’s kids antics – one being political activism, so at what point are they allowed to interfere with our freedom of speech ESPECIALLY when the target [John Kerry] was willing to respond?! Meyer was out of line but did not deserve to be tased and I am glad that this is gaining national recognition; forcing Gainesville and the university to step up their student relations.
Posted by: Caley | September 19, 2007, 8:02 am 8:02 am
The police are given way too much power over the public!!!! I have to live in this area, they are never around when we need them but they are sure available to use this brutality on a college student trying to make a statement, which is are right! Granted he should have stopped but that does not give the COPS the right to taser him. FREDOM of speach.
And as for the person who said they would take him to field and have him shot, you need to re-think what kind of world you seem to be living in. You must have real issues with yourself, maybe you should get some help with that anger and maybe get re-educated! (its people like you that ruin it for all the decent people trying to live a good life!!).
Posted by: Barbara | September 19, 2007, 8:03 am 8:03 am
John Kerry did not answer the questions because the guy was out of line. When you start throwing out profanity and talking about “oral sex” in public, you have gone to far! Security was asked to remove him, not arrest him. It is when he started fighting them, that he broke the law. If he had acted like a civilized human being. He would have been escorted out and none of this would have happened. I’m tired of our law enforcement getting so much grief for doing their jobs! This is rediculous! He broke the law by resisting and after many attempt to calm him down, they tasered him… not only for their safty which is number one, but for his saftey as well. Did anyone hear him call out to the croud to help him?! In my book, it sounded like he was trying to cause a riot by getting everyone involved. What about the saftey of the people around him. They did the right thing for everyone by removing him at any means!
If you break the law, you go to jail! PERIOD!
Crystal, 24 , from Virginia
Posted by: Crystal | September 19, 2007, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Two words “KENT STATE”
Posted by: Tom Graye | September 19, 2007, 8:07 am 8:07 am
I don’t like the use of tasers on college students. This is a country with the freedom of speech. What did he do wrong?
Posted by: LaCahnya | September 19, 2007, 8:09 am 8:09 am
So, in the end, did he answer the 3 questions?
- The elections were rigged.
- Iraq.
- Skull and Bones Society
I would love to hear them…
Posted by: JD | September 19, 2007, 8:23 am 8:23 am
I retired from the Police Dept 7 years ago, after serving more than 27 years. Tasers were not around when I was an Officer. I wish they were. They save injuries to both suspects and even more important, to officers doing their job.THe student who was tased could have simply went with the the arresting officers, but instead chjose to resist and his comment “Don’t Tsae me Bro” seemed to be for the sake of the cameras and microphones. THe Officers acted approaitly
Posted by: Sgt Ed Lackey (Ret) | September 19, 2007, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Americans get what we paid for. We gave up our right to free speech and gave the Republicans the right to control our freedoms for their right to gain government control, called ” National Security”. Stop complaining and shut-up and do as your non-counted voted leaders tell you. America isn’t a leader in Democracy, it’s a third rate contry living in it’s past.
JUST SHUT-UP and Stay Home Dogs!
Posted by: Louisrz | September 19, 2007, 8:29 am 8:29 am
The audience should have come to his assistance, taken the Tasers from the bad cops, given them a dose of their own medicine and then run them out of town into the swamps. The People should never become complacent or accomplices to Police and Government torture.
Posted by: Zap Not | September 19, 2007, 8:30 am 8:30 am
It makes me physicaly ill to think that our country has come to this! Did anyone else watch the video?! The guy started hitting and pulling away from the officers FIRST! They were calmly trying to escort him out!!! He acted like an idiot when the situation wasent a threat to his physical saftey.
Does anyone know what happened before the police were ASKED to remove him?! What did he do or what did he say while he was on the microphone. Some words and language are not to be used in public. You can get your point accross in an adult way, and not use this language. The video did not show what he did. O’ NO! It only showed this guys struggle with the police. Its always this way!!! Im am sick that good manors and morals are now thrown out the window because the majority of the population thinks that the constitution protects our right to act anyway we want. Use common sence and stop blaming other people for your stupidity!
Posted by: Crystal Taylor | September 19, 2007, 8:33 am 8:33 am
People are blind to the reality that exotic “crowd control devices” (weapons)have made it too easy to use and very little oversight. The Taser needs to be banned not only for use by the US but also commercial export. Contrary to company propaganda, the Taser is lethal in some circumstances and not one Taser lobbyist or company spokesperson can tell you when it will be lethal. That’s not good. The Taser is increasingly being used to stifle dissent in this country and abroad. America was founded on dissent! In the video that was played earlier at John Kerry’s event, I did not see why the “police” needed to Taser that young heckler. There were at least four of the “police” there with there armored vests on. Folks, that is overkill ! That was done out of convenience and not necessity. Wake up America! That could have been your child! It reminded me of Kent State, when our National Guard directed live ammunition fire at unarmed US citzens of dissent! Start lobbying Congress to ban the Taser before the company has a chance to have more paid lobbyist and politicians in its pocket. The Constitution is the principal of our country. Heckling is okay! Stiffling dissent isn’t.
Posted by: liberty-matters | September 19, 2007, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Political stumping. If Kerry had really thought this he’d have spoken up then. Seems to me he’s waiting to see where the wind blows and then jumping on. I land somewhere on “they should have given it a couple of more minutes.”
Posted by: Sandra | September 19, 2007, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Should this episode surprise anyone? Students cannot protest the war or the President without being expelled from schools! The general public cannot protest war or the president. Goodness, sounds a lot like Germany under Hitler, Russia, and other dictatorships! Sorry, but this is not the America I thought it was, but something far less!
Posted by: Tom | September 19, 2007, 8:53 am 8:53 am
The “kids” who think the police were wrong, are part of the new generation who have grown up with no discipline. They have no respect for authority, and think they can act however they choose.
Kerry adressed it because he needs every vote he can get. Very few born before the 60′s would have thought the police were brutal. What were their choices? He refused to cooperate.
Posted by: Tina | September 19, 2007, 8:53 am 8:53 am
In watching the video I believe the university police used appropriate force with the tazer in taking a non-compliant resistive individual who had already committed a criminal offense (disorderly conduct) into custody.
When an individual does not comply with officers request or commands and actively resists arrest, as is clearly shown in the video, police are left with no other choice than to use some type of force to effect the arrest. It is clearly visible just before the individual is tazed, that he is refusing to allow police to restrain or handcuff him as the suspects hand is clearly visible on a seat or bench next to him.
I question exactly what people and the media would have police do in these types of situations. Simply let the suspect go? Use fists or other strong arm techniques? How about night sticks? Then they would have been accused of using excessive force. The tazer has been proven to be an effective tool in taking aggressive, non-compliant individuals into custody with little or no injury to either the suspect or police.
Police are sworn to do a job many others would not do. People do not understand that it often takes more than two or three officers to take someone into custody who does not want to be arrested. Often times, some type of force is required to effect a lawful arrest. In this situation, I strongly believe the officers used the appropriate force.
Posted by: Jeff | September 19, 2007, 9:04 am 9:04 am
I work in our prison system and deal with inmates that argue and at times fight. I believe he had the opertunity to walk away and chose to be confrontational, it escolated to being escorted and he pulled away so to protect the officers I believe they did what they needed to, for the officers to be safe and unhurt. He chose this course of action for them, next time he will think twice before running his mouth.
Posted by: Al, Prison Worker | September 19, 2007, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Give me a break. Free speech seems to be dead. This guy did nothing illegal or criminal. Why should he go with the officers? It was his turn to ask a question. The police acted like bullies.
Posted by: Trish Speiser | September 19, 2007, 9:15 am 9:15 am
AGAIN! Another case where we only see the resolution, in this case the struggle with police, and not the cause. The guy was out of line in how he asked his question, not because he asked them! WAKE UP! It’s not all a conspiracy! The government it not out to get you. He could have asked his questions as a responsible and respectful adult, but he choose not to.
This person was prbably never held resonsible for his actions as a child and now as an adult he thinks he can do as he pleases with no consiquences. Way to go Mom and Dad!!!!
24 year old college grad form Virginia
Posted by: crystal | September 19, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Rudi Guilliani??? It shocks me to hear southern/midwesterners conservatives speak of the man so highly when they have no clue whatsoever what a TERRIBLE leader he was for New York. People, this dude is responsible for many firefigther and police deaths, both during and after September 11 2001. Had the attacks never happened he would have gone down as a tyrant..
Posted by: Michael | September 19, 2007, 9:25 am 9:25 am
The taser was designed to be used in place of a gun.
There was no justifiable reason to pull a real gun and thus no reason to electrocute or torture an unarmed kid.
This is the kind of political suppression I would expect to see in China or Cuba or other third world country. So much for the seat of freedom and democracy!
Time to bring the troops home to fight the war on terrorism at home, the cops and government are the one we need protected from!!!
Posted by: Freedom? | September 19, 2007, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Only Patriots are agitated that the bushbaby cheeny cabal conducted a coup d’etat involving 2 elections, and the enablers in the USA who can’t stomach the truth are showing their esteemed brilliance here in these posts. His only problem was shoving the truth in the face of americans far too close to the Miami Herald and their doting readers.
Posted by: daddy | September 19, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am
“This is a matter of the student disobeying direct orders of police officers.”
By what authority can a police officer give civilians direct orders? Sorry, their position does not include the right to boss people around.
Posted by: Me | September 19, 2007, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Plain and simple violation of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
The cop that ordered the taser and the cop that actually applied the taser need to go to jail for brutality and violating this young man’s constitutional rights.
This is the new America, change it back!
Posted by: David | September 19, 2007, 10:07 am 10:07 am
That’s the spirit everyone! He should have just COMPLIED!
That’s what everyone in America should do. Just Comply. How do you say that in Latin? It may be time to change our motto to something other than E. Pluribus Unum.
Kerry was speaking at a college campus, allowing college kids to ask questions. Fortunately, at that point in there lives, some of them still have a spark in them that allows them to think they can change the world.
At least this kids spark was doused yesterday, eh?
Now move along. Nothing more to see here.
Posted by: Chris | September 19, 2007, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Chris, if you’ve read Meyer’s website and see how much he tried to call attention to himself before and still think he truly has a spark, then I don’t know what to say man. You’re deluded dude, like this kid. The sooner he wakes up and acts like a decent productive citizen the better it will be for him, his family and the rest of us. Sure, protest if you want, but do it smarter next time, ok Meyer?
Posted by: fprk | September 19, 2007, 10:45 am 10:45 am
He made a decision to act like a 5 year old, made a decision to (blatantly) resist arrest, and it was either use taser or beat him with the their billy club, because he was not going to listen and just continue doing whatever he wanted. Like I bet he did his entire life,
I am glad they have this on video, to show he got what he deserved.
Well done police!
Posted by: Murphy | September 19, 2007, 10:54 am 10:54 am
It’s amazing how many people misunderstand the First Amendment.
***Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.***
The kid was free to speak and say whatever he wanted in the street, but NOT IN THAT VENUE. That was a structured event with specific rules that he flagrantly violated, and that’s what caused the trouble. He wasn’t told to leave to shut him up, he was told to leave because he was deliberately being obscene, disruptive, and belligerent!
By some people’s reckoning, I could go start screaming and yelling in the middle of a movie theater and my “right” would be protected.
———————————
Does anyone else think Kerry’s statement are not the “Condemnation” the incredibly misleading headline of this article says they are?
Go go inaccurate press!
Posted by: Retro | September 19, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am
THIS IS THE SAME GUY THAT IS SHOWN ON GMA PLAYING PRANKS ON THE WEB. THIS LOOKS LIKE ANOTHER STAGED EVENT TO ME. SHOULD THE OFFICERS HAVE PEPPERED SPRAYED HIM? AND CONTAMINATE THE WHOLE AUDITORIUM? MAYBE THEY SHOULD HAVE USED BATONS AND SAPS ON HIM? NOOOO, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN TO SHOCKING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. DON’T EVER PULL AWAY FROM THE POLICE STUPID!! THAT’S CALLED RESISTING.
Posted by: cookiemonster | September 19, 2007, 10:59 am 10:59 am
If we don’t stop the police from doing what they want we will be so very sorry someday. This is beginning to look like Gestapo Germany. They must be disarmed before it is too late. After all we do pay them to protect us. We citizens should start carrying our own tazers and return the favor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Frank Gomez | September 19, 2007, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Tell me group of several police could not take down a single student without using a taser. This was a total misuse of force and the officers involved should themselves be tasered. :p
Posted by: none | September 19, 2007, 11:05 am 11:05 am
None and Frank, OK you loathe the police. It’s distorted your minds. I bet you were licking your chops when you thought to could pin something on those big bad guys. “Like Nazi Germany”–Yeah right!
Posted by: fprk | September 19, 2007, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Talk about a day late and a dollar short… Kerry just needs to take a personal note on this issue, and start acting on what happens around him. And personally if a guy wants to lead a nation, he shouldn’t have to be reminded of that.
We’ve gone from the great JFKs and Martin Luther Kings, to people nick named after beach apparel… (flip flops)
Posted by: Byers | September 19, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am
“The kid should have just shut up and left. What good did resisting do him??
Posted by: PJ | Sep 18, 2007 1:26:33 PM”
This kid had every right to ask Kerry whatever he wanted (Kerry willingly partook in an open forum at a college campus. Did anyone think this was just going to be a spoon-fed Q&A? And if so, what’s the point in that?) Regardless of the question, the student exerted zero physical threat up to the moment the police unlawfully became the aggressors by laying their hands on him. He was being attacked and he resisted and I applaud him for it. Let me ask you PJ, what good did it do to resist King George?
Posted by: Mike Goyanes | September 19, 2007, 11:24 am 11:24 am
This happened in America, the land of the free and home of the brave.
I find this very disturbing that a young man was asking John Kerry a few tough questions and the police hauled him away, threw him to the ground and tasered him in front of an audience of people who showed no collective outrage for what was happening right in front of their eyes, AND as John Kerry answers the young man’s question (why didn’t he also ask the police to backoff a bit while he answered is beyond me).
This young man threatened no one, he struck no one, this young man didn’t hit police…this young man asked questions of a high-ranking government employee and was treated in a brutal manner, all while his fellow citizens watched (and some others actually applauded and smiled).
I long for the government we had that was for and by the people, not against the people.
Thomas Jefferson stated…
“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
Be active, ask questions of your elected representatives, and if you don’t like what you see and hear, elect them out of office and out of power, for we the people should have the power, not them.
Posted by: Mark Hendricks | September 19, 2007, 11:38 am 11:38 am
It is disturbing to see comments that say the guy had it coming to him, and he deserved it. While this may be the case in some peoples eyes, because of his behavior, what this boils down to is the law enforcement arm enforcing the 1st Amendment as they see fit.
Posted by: newspoo | September 19, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am
*sigh* It’s such a shame that there are so many of you who don’t understand why it’s important to not be assaulted by the police. Most likely it hasn’t happened to you, yet. But for the rest of us this is commonplace. The truth is that most regular cops are cro-mags, the same people with “Horn broken, watch for finger” bumperstickers on their trucks. The police had no right to lay a hand on him in the first place, and raising your hands in the air is typically a sign of the intention to be non-combative. Someday you, or your lovedones WILL be abused or ignored in one way or another by the police, and you’ll understand. Until then, at least appreciate that you can post comments like “He got what he deserved” without being pushed away and tazed.
Posted by: Joe | September 19, 2007, 11:44 am 11:44 am
This is not isolated to the US. A freelance BBC journalist got poor treatment from the UK police for simply wanting to ask Gordon Brown a simple question. They abused the terrorist then searched him whilst they promptly drove Brown away. Any the wrong question, that might reveal any truth is treated as a crime these days and the treatment that follows is somehow always justified, even by an ignorant public.
Posted by: Verity | September 19, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Police Brutality
Posted by: anon | September 19, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am
There really is no larger point. Kerry (who got my vote) did not take the lead and that is why he is now condemning the action against the student. Kerry should have stopped the officers and offered to listen to the student (Andrew). Kerry could also have warned Andrew that if he didn’t cut his theatrics, he would leave.
Now, I would like to know the answer to Andrew’s question: Were Bush and Kerry really on the same side? Once a Bonesman… Even though Kerry would never admit to that, his answer would have enlightened us all.
Posted by: Herbert | September 19, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Mark Hendricks-
Thank you for posting this well thought out comment. Sadly, many on here will not actually read your comment
The most awesome result of this horrible incident is that Americans are responding and seeing it for what it is and the reaction is shaking the very core of our dictators rule.
I had a deep and very real fear that Bush would declare war on Iran and thereby lock our country into a state of Marshall law thus ending the possibility of a 2008 election. This was not an unfounded paranoid fear- it had a chance of happening and was well on its way- but this fly in the ointment put the kibbash on that scenario!
With the current batch of presidential contenders- there is not one in the bunch that will not do the same thing as Bush disguised as something else! It will be dressed up.
A brief period of time has been bought for the people to get organized and informed before its too late.
We can stop this, reverse it and do what our founding fathers intended.
First order of business- force the closure of the Federal Reserve Bank. Then disband and dissolve the CIA.
If those two goals can be achieved- then our children will have a future.
If not- we will fail and repeat history.
Thank s again for your wonderful comment- if you scroll up and read all of them you will find that many of us argued those same points and people still logged on and posted the police acted accordingly!!!!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 19, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
IT BECOMES EASIER TO VILIFY THE POLICE EVERY DAY. THIS STUDENT WAS OUT OF ORDER, AND OUT OF CONTROL.ONCE HE STARTED RESISTING THE POLICE HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO END THE SITUATION. THANK GOD WE HAVE THEM. CAN YOU IMAGINE THAT NUT CASE BEING IN CHARGE. HE SHOULD BE CHARGED AND CONVICTED FOR DISTURBING THE PEACE, AND RESISTING ARREST.WHEN YOU RAISE YOUR HAND AGAINST A POLICE OFFICER YOU SHOULD PAY THE CONSEQUENCES. POLICE ARE TERRIBLE PEOPLE UNTIL ( YOU ) WANT ONE, AND THEN WHERE THE HELL ARE THEY.”THE KID WAS IN THR WRONG GET OVER IT”
Posted by: tim whitaker nv. | September 19, 2007, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
There were several officers holding this man on the ground. There was definitely no need to taser him. Sure he was being loud and quite annoying, but the taser isn’t supposed to be used for that purpose. The police used excessive force in subduing this individual, in fact, they had him subdued. People yell and scream all the time at police, it’s supposed to come with their territory.
Posted by: whomever | September 19, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
I’ve included an earlier post to help illustrate the idiocracy in this country
“This is the USA” does NOT mean that this freakshow had the right to impose his screaming idiocy on the rest of us.
:me:
He asked the girl that was soppose to speak in the time slot, to record a video. this was her time to say no. she did not. nor did the many others before him assigned their PRE SCREENED questions
:end:
He did NOT have the right to barge to the front of the line.
:me:
he did not he would have had to ask atleast, the person who was given that time, the girl he asked to record one of the videos
:end:
He did NOT have the right to exceed his alotted time, dominate the floor, and keep others from saying their piece.
:me:
He did and still does have the right to speak freely, dispite given or taken a mic. When the speaker and others said it was ok to continue. The !speaker! not the sponsers or officers, is the person who moderates the disscusion.
:end:
He did NOT have the right to disrupt the event.
:me:
He did not disrupt the event, he added very crucial and factual information to the forum
:end:
He did NOT have the right to resist the police when they asked him to leave.
:me:
He had every right to resist arrest because he commited no crime. He was not asked to step down by the speaker. therefore he had the right to continue and hear his answer when finished his complete question, that includes educating the audience.
Therefore he had the right to resist and defend himself from unjust brutality forced on him. the public had the right to intervene in this instiance because what was happening was not right. And the officers did not do their job professionally as they should have. All officers involved should lose their jobs and their pay and pentions. SEN. john kerry had the right and SHOULD have stepped in on this on the spot. I’m glad he is not our president after seeing him just stand there as the rest of you did. and watch a fellow american censored an unlawfully detained. The officers could have started a riot by their un-professional actions. By acting on their own or listening to the men in suits ( the sponsers )
:end:
He had the right to his bizarre thoughts, amateurish opinions and illiterate ramblings, but he doesn’t have the right to waste everyone else’s time with them.
:me:
His opinions were based on fact, if you had listened to his clearly anunciated questions and staements and we well informed you would realize this. And that he was not wasting anyones time. you are just a waste of space for not even tring to pay attention.
:end:
(No, his questions were NOT “topical”).
The police had NO reason to taser him once he was in cuffs. This nutjob will probably bring a lawsuit and win.
:me:
He was already in cuffs and restrained thouroughly. tazeing him was extreamly brutal and considered tourture. if these officers are going to act like this NONE of them should have weapons at all. they were acting like children who thought it was thier responsiblity to diffuse a situation that was already controlled untill they acted.
Sen john kerry had a responsibility and duty as an american, and jesus a senator! To defend this persons right to speak. So is it the right of the public to do the same. The officers should never of had the chance to take him from the room. The only way to properly diffuse this situation was for kerry to step in physically and take this man from them and ask him to contiue. It saddens me and very disheartening to see how this played out in the land of the free. It’s no wonder the patriot act was passed without even a breath from the public congress or the senate if we all act like lemmings when our rights are in jepordy.
:end:
Posted by: Paul Hibbison | September 19, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
People,
Watch the FULL video… Many versions of it can be found on YouTube. He didn’t go beyond his alloted time, and he didn’t push his way to the front of the line. His questions were rambling, but still more based in reality and intelligence than most of us moronic Americans are capable.
He ignored and subsequently resisted the police because they had absolutely no right to do what they did, but at no time did he strike, push, or even verbally direct his tirade AT the police officers. Beyond that, the fact that they stun gunned him while they had him fully detained on the ground, and simply because he was still yelling, is absolutely no reason to use that kind of force.
John Kerry was more than willing to answer his questions, and if you listen to the video, Kerry was practically begging the police to stop their assault on the student. They ignored both reason and the target of the student’s questions. For what? To flex their ‘badass’ campus security muscles. Their behavior was deplorable.
Non-lethal weapons (stun guns, tasers, bean bag rifles) have not decreased the number of police shootings, it has simply increased likelihood that a police officer will overstep their bounds.
The fact is that this isn’t a liberal or conservative issue. This is an issue of the freedoms afforded by the constitution and procured, via blood and toil, by our founding fathers. In order for a sensible person to be free to do as they please, rambling morons must also be afforded such luxuries, no matter how much it offends your pseudo-intellectual sensibilities.
Read the Declaration of Independence, our reasons for fighting to break free from Britain, and then read the Bill of Rights, the amendments to the Constitution that secure our freedoms. Alexander Hamilton was against a Bill of Rights, arguing that such rights should be inherent in the system, but even with that Bill, we still struggle for them. Why? Because mob rule is apparently too powerful an instinct to fight.
Posted by: Tom | September 19, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Does it take 6 cops to restrain a skinny college with a book in one hand and the other up in the air? These cops are idiots. High-school losers that got NO PLAY. Being a cop is inherently a power-wielding position…anyone find it amusing that so many cops are 5-foot nothing? And usually bitter? We need better qualified cops and teachers for THEY are truly the bedrock of our Country’s future and security. We should expect FAR more and their pay should be adjusted accordingly. We need the angry social rejects out of those positions and the only way to do this is to PAY for it. Talent follows the cash.
Posted by: singram | September 19, 2007, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Basically, Kerry could have stopped that if he really wanted to.
Posted by: Erik | September 19, 2007, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Erik, bravo. He IS afterall a Senator. He absolutely allowed the BS to transpire. He doesn’t want it broadcast that he and tweedle-dee are frat bros.
Posted by: singram | September 19, 2007, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I watched the unexpurgated footage of Meyer’s questions and arrest. Sorry, those cops were thugs, plain and simple. One of them, a male cop, even looks happy and amused as Meyer is zapped. The cop is grinning . This country is slipping further and further away from its ideals and the rest of the world is right to be leery of us at best, and contemptuous at worst. If this is American democracy, we really have no right to be trying to export it. Currently it’s as toxic as Chinese dog food.
Posted by: Bob | September 19, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Tasered for asking a simple political question during an actual open mike political question & answer forum?…..Easy answer….In the wannabe kingdom of modern day BUSHMERICA (please do not pay attention to the old fool behind the curtain…it isn’t Dick, it isn’t Dick…..Dick/Bush is really an old college joke on American campuses nationwide), it is quite known that 2 phrases “shalt never be allowed” to even be uttered or thought.
#1 phrase…Anything concerning the “I” word. (What “they did” to his predecessor…though much to “their dismay”, it didn’t end in a Senate Conviction).
#2 phrase….”Testify on the record subject to penalty of law concerning perjury.” (What lead to, What “they did” to his predecessor, that they “failed in convicting him for” in the Senate.
Yes, I am being very careful w/ my words…I personally have an aversion to tasering myself.
Our US Constitution (“or as the wannabe lil’ king of BUSHMERICA says, “that gd pc. of paper”), has finally been fully shredded…Thank You Republican Right WingNutz…Grandpa Prescott Bush would be very proud.
It lasted for more than 200 years (Our Democratic Republic and its Constitution)….It would have been nice if we had left the legacy to our children…But it wasn’t to be said the Ultra Right WingNutz.
Now I simply see a theocracy in our future (no wonder it doesn’t bother the 16%’ers that the fairly new Iraqi Constitution actually creates a Theocracy instead of a Democracy in Iraq)…I’m just wondering which sect will be chosen for us…..The American X-tian Taliban or the American Muslim Taliban? .
Posted by: You Were Warned | September 19, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Check Kerry’s various websites for comments on his statement. # of Comments? Zero. Or at least, zero allowed by Kerry’s handlers, including mine. Sure, you don’t have to get dissed on your own website, but it’s pretty idiotic to censor all comments when the issue is your willingness to defend dissent. PS: I’m a Dem… or used to be. Third party, here I come!
Posted by: Joe | September 19, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Andrew Meyer is the new Mr. Magoo!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 19, 2007, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
This is surreal.
What kind of a world do we live in that the police are justified in using potentially lethal force on an unarmed citizen for exercising their rights?
First, think about the time line. He doesn’t imagine that he has to fear being tasered for asking a question. He doesn’t realize it as even a remote threat. He can behave as he would like, what’s the worst that can happen?
A man during an open forum attempts to ask questions, which is what is encouraged with the mics being placed in the audience.
He is last, he is allowed to ask the question, and his mic gets cut off. What are the police officers doing there at that point? There is no justification for arrest.
The media wants to paint this person as an outsider, attention seeking extremist. It is their “angle”. But it is the angle they have always had against young millenials and people perceived as being techy, knowledgeable, or liberal. They think everyone operates on celebrity status, idolizing the media as themselves.
What type of man is this?
A man, who has previously been involved in anti war protests, who is also creative and has video taped himself online, which is not unusual for adults attending a college age.
What he has videotaped previously has little bearing on this incident, as he was an impassioned constituent who wanted to have his opinion heard and get a dialogue going.
The fact is that there was no need for the taser, he was under control, pinned to the ground for 4-6 officers. It was his mind and words that was threatening the the police, and he was attracting attention, making the police feel less empowered/in control of the situation.
The police were actually looking for a reason to taser this person. That’s right, at some point, the police officer actually decided or realized that he wanted to taser/injure/torture this individual, because he was not following his will/command/authority. Maybe it was because he wasn’t listening to him, maybe he felt disrespected, maybe he had a fight with his wife. Like Bush entering into the Iraq conflict, he was looking for a convenient excuse to do so.
They were coming up with an excuse, any excuse, such as resisting arrest or disturbing the peace. But I consider it entrapment, when they egg on this type of behavior instead of attempting to reasonably handle the situation. There are many ways to control behavior, and elicit certain responses and the police are well aware of it.
The officer didn’t want to take the time to calm down, follow procedures, be physically forceful if necessary, or seek another method of enforcement, even withdraw and allow someone else to take over the situation.
They were not patient in enforcing the law. Of course, they have no tolerance and no allowance for expression/humanity.
Look at the intentions of the law, to protect the safety of the public. There was no threat here, except to the egos of the authorities entrusted with keeping the peace.
The police here need to get beyond the follow your orders mentality, and apply a little humanity and understanding to their training.
Posted by: jh | September 19, 2007, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
What struck me the most was how everyone around the incident just sat there and let it happen. It looked like the news files in Germany when the Nazis were doing their thing. I know we’re not supposed to compare today with that era…… I’m just sayin’
Posted by: pollyanna | September 19, 2007, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
“(and some others actually applauded and smiled).”
Oh yeah, Mark, i was one of them. Matter of a fact, I’m still smiling…especially when I tink of his patheitic little “ow” “ow”s! I love it! Normally you wouldn’t say “not the taser bro” but he wanted it caught on camera. If only he had pee’d in his pants. This kid was an attention seeker. This isn’t his first stupid prank. Next time he wants to run the bully pulpit I hope the cops are even bigger bullies and teach him a better lesson. At least give him a continued zap.
All you guys who hate the police can enjoy my piece of meat i throw to you dogs. Gnaw away..I’m going to give another hand clap to the campus police. I’m so glad they have tasers for bullies like him.
Posted by: fprk | September 19, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
To the fools that feel the treatment of this kid was justified – this could easily happen to you, too, I wouldn’t be too eager to justify the acts of the police in this matter.
Posted by: Willie | September 19, 2007, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
“but at no time did he strike, push, or even verbally direct his tirade AT the police officers. Beyond that, the fact that they stun gunned him while they had him fully detained on the ground, and simply because he was still yelling, is absolutely no reason to use that kind of force.”
Are you kidding me? I guess we all watched different videos. He totally pushed and resisted being led off. He was verbally demanding with the audience members saying he would say all his points before asking his question. He didn’t go quietly. You need glasses. The poilce only acted stronger when he resisted them. Get real.
Posted by: fprk | September 19, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
No Willie, this wouldn’t happen to me. I wouldn’t get myself so worked up in the first place to give the police caution, and then to have them need to carry me away. I love that he is now facing a felony apparently. God. Maybe one of you beeding hearts can pay for his bond. I look forward to seeing the moron do something else equally dumb in a couple of years. Spoilt rich kid.
Posted by: fprk | September 19, 2007, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“Police and Government torture.”
What a joke. Seriously, you need help.
Posted by: fprk | September 19, 2007, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
The YouTube videos didn’t start until AFTER Meyer — who has a history doing stunts and pranks (on his website he boasts of heckling people like Ken Griffey) — stormed up and took the microphone from a person who was trying to ask Kerry a question. Kerry then made Meyer wait until after he’d answered the person who Meyer was trying to stifle, then let Meyer ask his questions:
Posted by: Phoenix Woman | September 19, 2007, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Pheonix- are you serious with your comment?
the police have been caught on tape even the one I posted previously which occurred months before Meyer/Kerry.
You are scary with your disinfo!
Posted by: vomeggido | September 19, 2007, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
What I find interesting is that people seem to think they actually have an obligation to follow the orders of a police officer. HE is there to up hold the LAW not to “give me orders” if I determine his order is unlawful or unreasonable you can bet I will ignore it AS I SHOULD. Resisting an officer is ALSO not illegal. If the arrest is not lawful reasonable resistance IS lawful and proper.
Posted by: Chris Taylor | September 19, 2007, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
It is amazing how few of the people commenting here have actually ever attended a political event. They are unaware of how emotional people can get at a microphone when discussing something that is important to them. Thus they justify police action by saying the kid was “crazy” or “acting obnoxious”. If that is true the police should be attending every political event in the country and Tasering someone at each event. Also, writers on this site seem to be unaware that when people at a political meeting overstate their case or hog the microphone, the situation gets handled without police action. Usually the candidate or speaker is able to handle a heckler. Often the crowd does so. Never have I ever seen a situation where the police were required to make a person leave a microphone.
Posted by: a democrat | September 19, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Glad to know law enforcement did NOT allow this behavior to continue and protected the others who were there.
Not only do campus police in our Midwest state carry tazers but also guns.
Better safe than sorry.
Posted by: Dale & Patricia | September 19, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
This kid is lucky to have only been tasered…he should have gotten a lot more, especially being around a senator and being so rediculous…It’s obvious the guy’s just trying to be cool and get people to think he’s a funny guy…Well i bet he’s not laughing anymore…
Posted by: Jason | September 19, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
I THINK IT IS TERRIBLE, BUT IMAGINE THIS . I HAVE A MENTALLY RETARDED COUSIN
THAT WAS WITH A GROUP CALLED PACESETTERS. HE LIVED IN AN APT WITH 1 PERON AND CARE TAKER. HE BECMAE AGITATED AND THE POLICE TAZERED HIM TWICE…… HE HAS THE MENTALITY OF A 10 YR OLD OR YOUNGER…TELL THIS STORY
Posted by: cherrie thompson | September 19, 2007, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
The police tried to get him to leave peacefully, but he refused to go. When you start resisting, then force is necessary. How much force depends. Would I have tased him? No, but he would have been subdued. I don’t know why twelve cops couldn’t get a 21 year old under control and why they felt tasing was neccesary, but I wasn’t there and we don’t know what happened before the video started. I’m not necessarily defending the cops, but the kid isn’t innocent either.
Posted by: Matt | September 20, 2007, 12:30 am 12:30 am
The many people expressing joy over the fact that this kid was attacked by several police officers and nearly seriously injured should take a good look in the mirror. What is it in your personality, your mind, your soul that relishes seeing someone suffer at the hands of authorities? The police in this country need therapy. They are over reacting to the slightest thing. The last few years of the Bush have seen a rise in police brutality to the point of almost legitimizing the silencing of dissent. We saw it on the campaign when no protestors could get near Bush. Nancy Pelosi referring to Code Pink protestors as “a bunch of nuts”. There is something seriously wrong. We need to take this country back before it is totally gone. Raise taxes on the giant corporations and tax imports to bring back union jobs and manufacturing. Very simple really. And it is all connected.
Posted by: 123wudrwe | September 20, 2007, 1:20 am 1:20 am
When politicians address college students, they constantly return to the same theme: “Be an active member of your community, be politically engaged and speak up for what you believe.” John Kerry’s lecture at the University of Florida predictably delivered this message. What a shocking disgrace that when Andrew Meyers took Kerry’s advice, he ended up getting electrocuted.
Posted by: Zach | September 20, 2007, 2:48 am 2:48 am
American is a free country, but not as free as the way like this. I think the policemen should not treat a student like a criminal. In other word, the student should be peacefully in discussing problems with the teacher. I don’t agree the behavior of both. Both should control themselves in respective manner.
Posted by: Henry Hu | September 20, 2007, 9:55 am 9:55 am
WHERE IS OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THIS COUNTRY!and police should not be able to taser people.This is an outrage.
Posted by: Jess | September 20, 2007, 11:02 am 11:02 am
After first reading about the event and the actions at the event, I thought the police were in the wrong, and the kid should have been treated better. Once I saw the video and the way the kid kept ranting on without really asking any questions, I did not take the side of the police, but I was more apt to understand why they did what they did. As a college student I would love to side with the kid, claim the police were out of line, but at the same time I know that is not the case. While the police may have overstepped their boundaries some, they did not step completely out of line. They did what they had to do in order to restore the event to order.
As far as those individuals calling the kid insane, crazy, or sick, perhaps you should really look into his motives instead of just analyzing his words. By making those statements, was he not getting his point across and making people aware that he felt he was being treated unfairly?
And to those of you who try to turn this around on Kerry, don’t you think he has seen police escort people out of control before? Is this kid really the only person in the entire nation capable of screaming to falsely make it seem as though he was being treated very poorly?
In my opinion, the kid should not have overstepped his time. He should not have pushed the police officers, and he should not have resisted the police’s orders to leave the microphone. At the same time, the police should not have used a taser. It would have been more logical for them to bring more officers over to escort the kid out instead of using force. While I think they used too much force, I also think that the kid was deserving of it, seeing as he was clearly taking over the event and trying to derail the Q&A section. Neither party acted accordingly, but two wrongs NEVER makes a right either.
Posted by: John | September 20, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am
first and foremost i am disgusted by kerry’s reaction. i think he should either have said “let him ask his question” or he could have said something dismissive such as “young man, i would like to answer your question but your time is up. everyone was alloted 60 seconds and unfortunately you didn’t use your time wisely.” the latter would be an avoidance of the question tactic, but at least he’d be acknowledging that a situation was unfolding before his eyes.
second, the student was a bit moronic. he wanted to cause a stir, and that’s fine. but by the time he was actually being handcuffed and hustled off, i think it was clear that the intensity of the “security action,” if you want to call it that, was only going to intensify. and since nobody was rushing to his defense, he might have been wiser to go with the flow. however, that is arguable.
third, the security or cops or whatever the hell they are used excessive force and poor judgement as far as i’m concerned.
fourth, the proclaim the rest of the audience and spectators to be nothing more than i’ve always said (and unfortunately sometimes been): BOVINE.
Posted by: lolo341 | September 20, 2007, 11:36 am 11:36 am
John, well said.
ABCwudrwe: “Nancy Pelosi referring to Code Pink protestors as “a bunch of nuts”. There is something seriously wrong.”
Actaully, more like there is something seriously wrong in defending the legitimacy of the code pink protesters. Sure they can protest i fnot a threat but disrupting congessional sessions and everything else they do serves no purpose but further alienate the plight of the liberal anit-war left. I commend Nancy Peolosi.
And to the guy who said there were “12″ police officers, I suggest you go back and count! Geez.
Tasers, by the way, are a legitimate form of subduing an unruly protester resisting police orders. It is completely OK. What would you have preferred: half Nesloned him, thereby possibly breaking his arm? Rough house him and leave lots of bruises? Club him? A taser shot is not that bad apparently. The student over exaggerated its affect to get the desired result he so wanted as evidenced by posters here. Police Brutality? Hardly! Prudent Police Measures? Exactly.
Posted by: fprk | September 20, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
It is shocking that so many believe this kid was out of line.
1. He never barged to the front of a line (where did people get this idea?)
2. He did not resist arrest.
3. What does this have to do with his website!!!!)
According to the rules of conduct for the forum the kid did nothing wrong until the police moved in and provoked an arrest- now it was not until near the end that any kind of resistance took place and if I were Meyer I would have resisted as well.
It is not a crime to resist arrest.
Mr. Meyer waited until the end of the Q&A to pose his questions. The session had ended and he was acknowledged by the speaker- which gave him (as everyone participant) an allotted maximum of three questions and/or three minutes.
Mr. Meyer even stated he had been waiting for over two hours before asking his questions, using his valuable time he was gracious for his visitor’s time and patience.
As verbose as this kid was in forming and/or prefacing his questions his time had not expired!
The crud or unacceptable language as cited was not out of context or inappropriate because Mr. Clinton was impeached for allowing an intern to provide the President a bj, then lied about it. It was not Meyer fault for pointing this out- it was after all true!
All anyone has to do is stick to the facts here- simple true facts- then it is easy to see the shocking and horrible reality unfolding in front of our eyes!
Sure people on here and everywhere will resort to accepting the kid deserved it. There is always ample denial when something so monstrous like this happens.
Who wants to believe the truth when it unfolds like this. The smaller majority isn’t ready to acknowledge we are on our way to a full on police state. They want to keep the fascism disguised and continue to view our country with rose-colored glasses. They just cannot handle it. They are slaves to the remaining “Flat-Earthers”.
Thankfully the majority of Americans are not so closed and/or narrow minded.
Posted by: Darrell | September 20, 2007, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
ANDREW MEYER’S “HECKLING” Definitely is a REPEAT of the VIOLATION OF FREE SPEECH; as PRACTICED BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT BACK IN 1988: WHEN DR. IAN R.K. PAISLEY “HECKLED” THE “POPE” OF ROME IN AUSTRIA !
Posted by: ConstitutionalConservative | September 20, 2007, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
“2. He did not resist arrest.”
–Darrell, I suggest you go back and watch the videos. He did NOT go peacefully. He was wailing his arms around, shouting, resisting, etc. Anything beyond walking out peacefully and quietly IS resisting arrest! You need to get your facts straight. And yet, strangely and admittedly, you also write, “..kid did nothing wrong until the police moved in and provoked an arrest- ”
–Yes, indeed. He provoked! That, again, IS resisting arrest. You are contradicting yourself.
“3. What does this have to do with his website!!!!)”
–It says a lot. It shows he is an attention self-aggrandizer seeker who has done this sort of thing before. It highly suggests that he knew what was coming, had provoked the officers “maybe” before and exaggerated the screams of “ow!” I’m goign to give the police more credit that you could ever bare.
“his time had not expired!”
–We don’t know that! We do know that he was belligerant with the other audience members and verbally demanded that he get to say all his stuff BEFORE he actaully asked his question. That is, in effect, going over your time slot. He was given time to go up and ask a question but chose not to. That was his choice. Should we give the floor to a bully pulpit?!
As for Clinton, you’re right. Clinton shouldn’t have got away with his perjury either. His wrong doesn’t somehow justify Meyer’s. What kind of twisted logic is that?
“All anyone has to do is stick to the facts here- simple true facts-”
–Refer to first point above. Now, if only you would stick to the facts!
“There is always ample denial when something so monstrous like this happens.”
–Nothing “monstrous” happend! You are in denial. You, like the guy you are protecting are both making a bigger deal about this and simply trying to stir up the pot with the police. I wonder if your prejudice is blinding you?
“The smaller majority isn’t ready to acknowledge we are on our way to a full on police state. They want to keep the fascism disguised and continue to view our country with rose-colored glasses.”
–This, and the “flat Earthers” comment is so laughable. So the larger majority think we are rapidly running to a Police State? We already have “facism” here?! Amazing anyone dare leaves their house! If you really think that then, why, as I’ve asked before but no one can really answer or justify, why do you even dare take risks condeming the police here?! Don’t you think down the road they could track you dowm and have you disappear as this guy was suggesting?! Come on, be real. You know you are free to write what you want here and have no real fear of existing facism! You are merely writing this to stir up the pot and live in your wanna be delusion to justify your angst at the police. Maybe you watch far too much TV? Very gullible indeed. Maybe you, yourelf, have a narrow spoon fed TV dictated world view?
Posted by: dzigner | September 20, 2007, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Darrel, no doubt many of these students also hate the police like you do. You use each other’s entries for your liberal ‘question authority’ rally cry.your prejudice shines through. I’ve watched many of the videos taken from differn angles, btw.
Again, as you won’t address the other issues I replied to your post piece by piece, maybe instead you would care to enlighten us all why you (and others like you) are so short sighted as to keep writing your banter here against the police when/if you really think we have “fascism” here and are running “full on” towards a “Police State?” That seems pretty marvellously self defeating! (Keep calling attention to yourself with every post!) Obviously, you don’t really believe any of this police state nonsense or that facism is already here! Instead, you are jut trying to make your bully stand, intimidate others who dare question you, and stir the pot. Thank Goodness we have police to keep things in order for the most part, by and large, just as they did here. You try walking in their shoes. Try and get out some more. You might be surprised just how civil the authorities are!
Posted by: dzigner | September 20, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Good article.
Only the title, “Kerry Condemns Heckler Arrest”, I think mischaracterizes Kerry’s position on the incident.
New title suggestion: “Kerry regrets Police intervention and detention of Heckler”.
Posted by: Joe | September 20, 2007, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
It is interesting how many people on this site are expressing their opinions in a heated manner. Could they be “ranting”? If they were at a microphone giving voice to those opinions would they be subject to closure by taser?
Posted by: a democrat | September 20, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
DEmocrat, normally one would follow the appropriate protocol. Places like this are more appropriate for this sort of banter. Now, if the guy had wanted to ramble on here that wouldn’t have been a problem. He decided not to ask a question right up front but bullingly demand to make all his points first when others wer still wating. He foolishly used up his time on hot air. Poor choice…just like his resiting being led away by the police
Yes, it is all intersting. All the expressions here clearly whow the value divide our country is in. Most of the time we just live/work civily next to eachother but these are safe palces to vent..and apparently safe places to be outraged that we are in a “police State” too. Ha! I guess we should all be very afraid then? No, rather, we actually know it’s safe to write what we want here. No cops are waiting to wipe us out…though I’m sure there are many of the anti police protesters who would love to to my posts just what they apparently abhor the police for! Quite ironic really.
Posted by: dzigner | September 20, 2007, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
dzigner,
or could this be the beginning of a realization that he wasn’t really doing anything to justify police action. Even if his behaviour was rude or boorish or unacceptatble for the venue, it was not threatening to anyone. The police should not have been used. It was a case of a consequence that was out of proportion for the “crime”. Surely the speaker, moderator or audience could have handled the situation as they do at every political event that I have ever attended. This is the issue. That is why people are concerned about the consequences to freedom of speech.
Posted by: a democrat | September 20, 2007, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
“Surely the speaker, moderator or audience could have handled the situation as they do at every political event that I have ever attended. This is the issue”
YTes, I see your point, but in answer to it: if only they had! As it was, no one did so the police were asked to quietly remove the man. There didn’t have to be a scene if the guy had been polite and gone quietly. I still seriosuly suspect this guy wanted the attention, especially when considerin his other rants on his website It seems so staged. And yes, I attend my local city meetings on contentious issues, like Walmart trying to move in, but we all know when enough is enough.
Posted by: dzigner | September 20, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Are you people for real?
Constitutional Rights violated?
Give me a break. The guy started throwing his arms around the moment officers began to escort him out. He resisted. End of story! In my opinion, the officers gave him TOO MANY chances to cooperate. He should have been tazed the moment he became belligerent.
Police have a job to do. Protect the public and protect public officials. When an officer asks you to do something, you do it because it’s in the best interest of the surrounding people and yourself.
The moment you act like this tool did, the moment officers go into protect everyone mode. The guy is a tool and deserved the tazing and the prison sentence he should get for resisting arrest.
Who doesn’t cooperate when he or she has police surrounding him/her, especially with a tazer pointed at um?
Posted by: Support Police | September 20, 2007, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
A democrat-
Of course we are all ranting on our computers and we are smart for doing it this way.
Electrocution hurts!
I am thinking about buying a taser myself and zapping “dzigner” and people like him/her a few times!
What’s really funny is the powers that be are coming out against this reprehensible atrocity- mainly because they have been caught.
Then what will the ranters like “dzigner” have to say!
And what’s off the charts hilarious is Mr. Meyer will probably get his own TV show and be laughing all the way to the bank while “dzigner” changes his handle and tries to find another job so he/she can save up his/her money to get out of his parents converted garage!
LMAO!
Posted by: Darrell | September 20, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Speaking of tasers:
My solution to this situation:
Sedative dart.
While she sleeps build a fence around her!
I apologize- I couldn’t resist!
Posted by: Darrell | September 20, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Darrel, I see you still keep giving yourself away. Better watch out. LOL. Your avoidance of the issues but continued input here says volumes.
Posted by: dzigner | September 20, 2007, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
And so are some POWERFUL people who run them and are protecting me.
I am here for a reason.
You are not.
PS- I would hardly say my appearance here could be considered an avoidance in any stretch.
My disappearance over this (or anything) would create far more headlines and reaction than this ill-fated event!
If they could have done away with me- they would have- long ago.
The paranoia/conspiracy button is fun to push- idn’t it?
Posted by: Darrell | September 20, 2007, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Darrell, I refer to your avoidance of why you say we are “full on” to a “Police State”, refer to the situation as being fascist and yet continue to post here? If you really believed that you wouldn’t be so foolish, surely. You don’t address this nor can address my piece by piece response to you (1:47pm +). Actually, I am not some kid as you assume and no doubt you too can surmise from my posts, but prefer to keep it that way, if you prefer. I know you like to make outrageous comments to stir the pot. It seems to be your M.O. (Besides which, even if I happened to really be a kid, which I am not, being one would not detract from my position. You are showing another prejudice here apparently–ageism to the young then!)
“And yes- the police are well aware of who I am. VERY AWARE!”
–Well, no wonder. That doesn’t surprise me.
The real fact is this guy did indeed resist arrest and “provoked” the actions of the officers as you yourself wrote. He did not leave peacefully. That and your continued entries here when you ‘apparently’ think we are in such totalitarian peril show just how much you contradict yourself. You wouldn’t have such freedoms or dare write if it was as bad as you initially tried to exasperated.
Yes, continue the “lunacy” and other childish comments; it’s the best you can do when questioned to defend your position. Typical, again.
Posted by: dzigner | September 20, 2007, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
set tasers for stun, captain!
Posted by: roach | September 20, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
I am very amused that many people actually thought Mr Meyer’s objective is to stand up for rights for free speech.
His intention is simple, grab attention. Imagine he can wait 2 hours till the end of the session to ask question, he even made sure that his action is video and he purposely resisted with the security, it really show how much he is willing to go to execute his plan.
Obviously his plan worked and he got what he wanted, he is now 1st on Youtube and known all round the world. So Americans only idolize pranksters?
Posted by: Denzuko1 | September 20, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
freedom of speech is given in the bill of rights. The kid had evey right to stand up and ask a question and speak his mind. However if the person is being belligerent, not being cooperative and using force agianst the police, then I believe that the police acted correctly. But what do I know I’m just a soldier and to Kerry I’m an idiot.
Posted by: Moake | September 20, 2007, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
I agree with vomeggido’s comments dated 9/18/07. John Kerry should have taken a lead role and prevented this incident from escalating. Kerry is supposed to be a leader but he isn’t! If Kerry can’t protect the First Amendment of one person in a school setting, he can’t do it for a nation. He was a poor candidate for President and he is a poor Senator.
I certainly want to acknowledge the young man appeared overly agressive, the cops tried their best to remove a possible threat to the event, but Kerry, again, should have taken a lead role and should have prevented this situation from escalating.
Posted by: CJH | September 21, 2007, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Mr. Corvus,
Read the news articles carefully, and watch the clips carefully. You will find that Kerry does try to answer questions. This debate is not about Kerry’s response, it is about the police response.
The student should have waited his turn to speak and did not have the right to rush to the front of the line and thereby block other students from exercising their own freedom to speak. That said, there appears to be no reasonable justification for the use of the taser on the part of officers or even for the arrest.
Since Kerry did attempt to answer the questions and did ask police to allow the student to speak, I cannot see how the Senator can reasonably be blamed for the actions of power-hungry and overreaching officers. Your suggestions that Senator Kerry is to blame in any way are frankly ridiculous.
Posted by: christi | September 21, 2007, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Oh to live in Florida! The police have nothing better to do than moderate political speeches. There are no grow ups to bust, no crack heads to arrest, no prostitutes to hassle, no Mafia, no Hells Angels either. I can’t wait to retire and join the white heads in a state that obviously has no real need for police.
Posted by: a democrat | September 21, 2007, 11:30 am 11:30 am
sorry I misspelled my name…
If they just let him ask his questions he would have asked listened and left.
This shouldn’t have happened to the guy, he was in the right, his right were violated.
IT’S NOT THE ONES WHO WIN, IT’S THE ONES WHO FIGHT AND THE FIGHT THAT MATTER.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 21, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am
What people do not realize is this: while tasering may be uncomfortable, it WILL NOT cause permanent damage and therefore DOES NOT infringe on the “rights” of someone who is resisting arrest (note that Meyer’s rights to a peaceful arrest were nullified when he resisted because he was infringing upon the rights of the officers by becoming violent).
Posted by: Salena | September 21, 2007, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Salena-
People die from taser’s all the time. Please be informed before making such a comment.
Posted by: Darrell | September 21, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
I completely believe Meyer planned this to get attention, and perhaps expose UF police. I believe he anticipated this response. HOWEVER, that doesn’t excuse the police behavior, or Kerry’s unwillingness to take charge. Kerry should have been able to handle it. He can be heard mumbling “I will answer the question”, but I never heard him ask the police to stop. He should have took charge. Kerry reports that he was unaware that the student was tasered, but I can’t imagine that he wasn’t aware of what was going on. A leader would have stepped up. I completely agree that Meyer isn’t a ‘victim’, but I don’t believe the police were justified in the excessive force used. Meyer’s only crime was being obnoxious, hardly a taserable offense. He wasn’t violent or a dangerous, simply a pain in the butt.
Posted by: Fee | September 21, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
any idiot can become a cop. thats the problem.
Posted by: satterfield. | September 21, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I come late to this story – but then, in my mind, the real story is the reaction to the story. I think the young man probably did try to “provoke an incident” in order to illustrate and provoke this very discussion.
And THIS is what it’s about. Yes, the young man was provoking a response. But the specific response – that was under the control of “handlers” and the police themselves. And the response he provoked was ineffectual butt-coverage on Kerry’s part and a violent police assault on the provocateur.
It does not matter that he was “disrespectful.” There is no citizenship duty to respect ANYONE – unless that disrespect rises to actual violence.
And to me “resisting arrest” is not the same thing as “quietly taking your lumps.” I saw resisting assault, and quite frankly, given the level of threat presented, I do not think the young man would have been unjustified in resorting to deadly force.
It would have been the wrong call, but police have been given passes for equivalent mistakes – that’s why you can’t find a black water-pistol on the shelves any more.
Indeed, even the manner of the arrest itself – a “shock and awe” swarming of supposed “perp” – is a tactic developed in prisons (to the best of my understanding) to safely restrain a very violent, hardened offender. It’s also designed to strip the dignity from the target, to force submission and to extract a price in pain and humiliation – a lesson to inspire future compliance.
From the reactions here, the lesson has not been lost so much as taken for granted. And yet nobody on either side has asked what “rules” were in existance that would trump Andrew’s constitutional right to free speech, and consultation with someone who wants to be his elected representative?
It was a not very metaphorical rape, a public punishment for a trivial “offense” of “disrespect for authority.”
That itself should make you not just question, but assume that such authority is not worthy of such respect – and more tellingly, knows what a hollow shell it is, and how tenuous their grasp on society’s willing compliance has become that their first resort is overwhelming force.
I find calls to treat anyone who does not immediately submit to any police command this way to be appalling. This was not so much an arrest as it was a summary judgment and execution of sentence.
It was a very effective demonstration of the respect ordinary citizens are given by the police in the United States.
I should add that, while this might well be the result of training and police doctrine, there are quite different training and doctrine sets that result in VERY respectable and appropriate security without offending anyone’s dignity, that in fact rely strongly on our social conditioning to avoid making a scene as a primary tool.
I’m pretty sure I know how the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) would have handled this, ideally. They probably would have stepped up, right at the edge of his comfort zone, and loomed at him until he ran down, simply making him aware of their presence, and their expectation that he would govern his own actions.
Then, if that were insufficient, with appropriate Sirs and polite deferences, they would have respectfully led him away – in a manner designed to be polite but inarguable – and without making an embarrassing scene for everyone.
Canadian police are not feared, nor do canadians expect them to act with predictable violence to any challenge.
Their job is to maintain the peace, not to breach it.
They ARE widely respected and trusted. Even though Canadian cops are in enough violent confrontations that get in the news for the average Canadian to be aware that there is but one predictable outcome for the drunk, the stupid and the violent.
(One great advantage of the RCMP way is that if a confrontation does escalate, it’s in such a way that there is no serious doubt as to who’s being the ass in the equation.)
But their attitude towards the public is quite different from police here – as is the willingness to accept a degree of risk in order to resolve a situation peacefully. And yet,generally they do.
There is another fact illustrated here that has gone largely unaddressed.
The initiator of violence is the one who has lost control of the situation, and it’s that sheer funk that I smell here – the idea that one weedy college student is somehow threatening our society by asking awkward, pointed questions. He was “being disrespectful” for asking rude questions and “deserves” to be beat down for “running his mouth.”
As it happens, there is no Constitutional exception to the First Amendment for speech that is rude, embarrassing, disrespectful or awkward.
Even the ranting of the clearly mad is protected speech – and their is no “right to not have to put up with it.” The only constitutional remedy to offensive speech is more speech, or of course, to walk away.
Kerry – both for failing to realize that he was both in charge at the time and responsible for this outcome and for failing to acknowledge a publicly embarrassing failure of leadership – has lost any remaining benefit of my doubt.
He’s triangulated himself into impotence, lost any sense of command authority he may have one time had, and as such, has demonstrated his lack of qualification to be a leader, for his failure to restrain this clear abuse of authority.
And for this service, you should be thanking Andrew Meyer. He may be an idiot – but yes, he has been a very useful one.
Posted by: Graphictruth | September 21, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Graphictruth-
I wish had not waited so long to weigh in this. I certainly understand your avoidance of American headlines!
In a non-related headline The leader if Iran is coming to New York and is among many things going to speak to students at Columbia University. I thinks its interesting that he is even being allowed into this country being that our current administration has labeled him and his country as the leading supporter of terrorism in the world today.
I mention this because of the galactic hypocrisies within Society- namely America by way of the Meyer/Kerry incident and now this.
The rampant emotionally charged rants regarding this many coming issues shows the obvious voice of the American people and our Canadian neighbors that the majority of the masses are indeed waking up.
Why is it always a foolish idiot who proves incompetence is not necessarily a bad thing!
Thanks for sharing your opinion- I wish there were more like you blogging on here.
This incident though proves there is light at the end of tunnel.
Posted by: Darrell | September 21, 2007, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Ooops, I wish you had NOT waited so long to weigh in on this!
Sorry.
Posted by: Darrell | September 21, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I’m sure everyone has attended a rally or even a public forum of some kind. And I am also sure that at most, if not all, of those forums have had some person who held an opinion that didn’t “jive” with the rest of the forum. In UF, that person was this guy Meyer. Sure he was being somewhat belligerant, but crazy talk and a poor, sarcastic attitude are no reason for police intervention.
It seems to me that we have this right called the right to speech without fear or intimidation. What the cops did was not just use “excessive force”, they violated the supreme law of the land, and for what? the prevention of some jerk to spew his unconforable question?
I sometimes wonder if police officers take a course on the constitution. I also wonder how some people could defend the actions of those police officers. They violated the constitution. They should be fired.
The issue goes further than police brutality. There is nothing wrong with using a Taser on a criminal to subdue him/her, but to punish a person who was exercising (albeit in a poor, rude fashion) his right to free speech is reprehensible and indicative of the lack of respect for the constitution.
Posted by: James bonney | September 21, 2007, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
This kid was obviously a punk looking to make a name for himself. Too bad they didn’t shoot some pepper spray up his snotty little nose. Another poster child for the left wing extremists in this country.
Posted by: Pat Droney | September 22, 2007, 9:44 am 9:44 am
No wonder Kerry didn’t win the 2004 election, he has no leadership skills! I agree with the fact that Kerry could have stopped all of this “b-s” by simply befriending and answering Andrew’s question. It’s almost like the convoy that came with Kerry told the campus police to silence anyone who asked questions about certain allegations that made Kerry and the U.S. government look bad.
I also agree with the fact that police officers have “policies” that conduct everyone, even if those “policies” aren’t according to amendments.
Our government is so screwed up.
Posted by: Karissa | September 22, 2007, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
I thought the whole point of politicians going out to the public, was to engage in discourse with said public. After viewing the video, I have observed no threatening gestures or language displayed by this young man!
What has happened to freedom of speech? And why are these officers behaving like the SS? Then turning to the camera and grinning.
Since when do we arrest and taser people for asking questions in this country?!?!?!??
These so called officers are guilty of false arrest, and assault and battery at the very least!
What is going on here? This is America! this is supposed to be the greatest country in the world with, “freedom and justice for all.” Where is the freedom? Where is the justice?
Posted by: Kathy | September 22, 2007, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
The “bro” was irrational.
He is still entitled to free speach in this country (USA – not communist China). As Kerry pointed out at the time – everone just needed to calm down. I am glad those officers are now on leave and I hope this sets an example of what is not appropriate for other officers. I was victim to a campus cop violation of constitutional rights when I was in college. A gun and a badge do not overide our God given rights. The officers’ actions were clearly a violation of free speach. Back the ___ off.
Posted by: Gavin | September 23, 2007, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Ok so I see the grounds on where they arrested the kid. He was obviously being a little out of control. -BUT-…
They had him in cuffs, he was begging not to be tasered. If he was in restraints and wasn’t putting the police officers in harm I find the need for the taser ridiculous at best. This was a public event and an alotted time is necessary, but to taser a kid while he was in handcuffs is a little ridiculous. The police should be on some probation for awhile and have their jobs looked at.
Posted by: Jayce | September 23, 2007, 10:22 am 10:22 am
thank god i am leaving this country soon for a job in Europe and i am quite sure i will never come back. This is just another example why America has become a horrible place to live today, not to mention raise your children. Adios
Posted by: mike | September 23, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
I think the constitutional approach is as follows:
1. Did the student have the right to speak?
Yes, it appears to be a public forum.
2. Did the restraint by the police officers constitute state action?
Yes, they were state civil servants.
3. If state action was involved, was a constitutional right violated?
Yes, the student has the right to free speech under the first amendment.
4. If this was free speech, what was the nature of the right?
It was pure political speech.
5. If the rights have been violated, who bears the burden?
The government bears the burden under strict scrutiny to prove:
1. The restraint was necessary and compelling.
2. The restraint used the least force possible.
From what I can see, the person acted loud and waived a book for about 1 minute, and the police surrounded him, brought him to the ground, and tasered him.
They could have walked out him of the auditorium and locked the door. That would have been the least force necessary. They do this all the time when liberals act out of control.
Posted by: garygech | September 23, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Last night at dinner, the waitress dropped her tray and our dinners on it, many people in the restaurant applauded. Should I take it to mean that they were HAPPY that the waitress dropped our dinners? That they disliked me and were glad my dinner was on the floor? That they believed that the waitress should throw EVERYONES dinners on the floor? Could it just be that people never lose that childish stupidity to applaud when someone screws up or gets in trouble, or laugh when someone is injured? That some in the audience applauded doesn’t mean they approve of violence as much as they are childish and think it was humorous that Andrew was getting into trouble.
Posted by: Daiseyland | September 23, 2007, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Andrew Meyer should have the badge(at the very least) of every officer at the Kerry event. He simply ask his question, and spoke loudly to speak over the others around him. He did ask his question aggressively but not angrily. What happen to our American right to freedom of speech. I even just read an article of people wearing Anti-Bush t-shirts being kicked out of Bush events. I want our freedom of speech protected better. First off don’t try to peg me as some anti-bush liberal, because I am not. I AM PRO AMERICA. I have served in Iraq twice for a total of 22 months, and don’t believe we are there for the people of Iraq, and still feel that Bush is not that bad of a president, he just plays the “dumb” card much more often than most politicians. I just feel that our country can get a lot out of having more control and influence in the middle east.
Posted by: Chad | September 24, 2007, 12:34 am 12:34 am
everybody is trying to be an activist…it looks to me that this little weirdo is just another twisted attention getting politician in the making…do something to draw attention to yourself and then deny you did it! haha
Posted by: erin | September 25, 2007, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Bottom line is this is supposed to be a free country and one where we the people vote in these jerks that run are country. Now if we are not free then they should just declare that in the books for the record and then there would be no expectation of anything else. You would know you were going to get tased or killed and you would stay in you place. But this is america and as long as the law allows him freedom of speech and the right to hold those we elect accountable for their actions he had a right to ask his questions no matter how dumb he was. The senator should have told the officers to stand down. The remarks made by so many people are the exact reason why we have a unnecessary war and all kinds of worldly rifts going on because you talk but you know not and they (the people we elect)just laugh at you and keep it moving. Think about it, in my lifetime if ever a president deserved to be impeeched it’s bush jr. But no, as the young man pointed out we will impeech clinton for something that happens daily and is not against the law. Sure he was married and it was not moral, but his wife is still with him so she did’nt care. Bottom line is we have our priorities messed up and becasue jerks miss the point we lose more freedoms everyday without even knowing it. Now!
Posted by: pat | September 29, 2007, 5:27 am 5:27 am
The people defending the police here make no sense. A person should be tasered because he asks a lot of questions?
Are these the same people who decry “political correctness” that they claim stifles debate?
The police on the scene may not be fascists, but they are bullies. All the guy did is continue to ask why he was being arrested, and react angrily to the fact that he was being taken to jail for asking questions in a public forum. Almost anyone would have done the same – people tend to get ticked off when their rights are trampled. The police reaction was “we’re in charge, you shut up.” God forbid anyone question them.
Come to think of it, maybe they are fascists.
Posted by: Brickbat | October 7, 2007, 12:08 am 12:08 am
C’mon guys. If I were at that event, even if I agreed with that guy, I would not felt safe. What if everyone did what he did. What happened to courtesy for others? His right to swing his fist ends where my nose begins.
Even if he had a valid point, there’s no need to get all crazy about it! SHEESH!
If several police officers want me to leave, I’m going to leave; nice and quietly, I’d let them arrest me and later on, I’d respond.
This guy just wanted national attention. What a jerk.
Posted by: Sheri Mallon | October 8, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
What a crock!!! “(Update at bottom: Kerry condemns student’s arrest)” No where in this article does Kerry condemn the arrest. It’s funny how people read but do not comprehend. Not one of the quotes from Kerry that are listed in this propaganda article backs the condemnation claim of the headline. This kid was clearly being and idiot, but the cops should have been more professional in how they handled this situation.
Posted by: Geezer | October 18, 2007, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Have you all seen the video? Things in videos are cut out, you don’t know what he did before. If he had done anything that warranted an arrest, or he was being arrested for the safety of John Kerry, alright, then he is being arrested. He was not following police orders which is an offense. Had the police officers not used the taser to subdue him, it would’ve been a lot messier, and he would’ve gone away bruised up. They don’t use the taser to hurt someone, they use to the taser so they don’t have to hurt someone. If he was being wrongfully arrested, that would be decided in court, the guy was an idiot. His anger and emotions took away his judgement.
Posted by: Sarkis | April 11, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
If Kerry does not have a problem with Meyer asking him questions, then why did the police interrupt? That too without Kerry instructions? The police are misusing their power.
Posted by: Florida Universities | December 10, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Great article on freedom of expression. Police should have good understanding with the public and they should not follow violent methods.
Posted by: Florida Universities | December 12, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm