By MichaelJames

Sep 23, 2007 12:19pm

Verdict: New York Times Gave MoveOn a Discount

We’ve covered this for a couple weeks here on the blog (LINK)… And it turns out we were right to.

Clark Hoyt, the New York Times public editor, today confirmed the suspicions of conservative critics of the newspaper, writing in his column that the newspaper gave MoveOn.org a discounted rate on its "General Betray Us" ad that the antiwar group was not entitled to under Times pricing guidelines.

In his column (LINK) Hoyt writes that the Sept. 10, 2007, MoveOn.org ad "violated The Times’s own written standards, and the paper now says that the advertiser got a price break it was not entitled to."

Hoyt notes that "MoveOn.org paid what is known in the newspaper industry as a standby rate of $64,575 that it should not have received under Times policies." But, Hoyt says, the group "should have paid $142,083. The Times had maintained for a week that the standby rate was appropriate, but a company spokeswoman told me late Thursday afternoon that an advertising sales representative made a mistake."

Moreover, Hoyt says that the "ad appears to fly in the face of an internal advertising acceptability manual that says, ‘We do not accept opinion advertisements that are attacks of a personal nature.’"

Wow.

– jpt

User Comments

what is wrong in giving discount? It is not they have been bribed, or cheated or robbed anybody. Ofcourse MoveOn doesn’t get big money like Republicans get from Enron, Halliburton and other big oil companies. Oil companies can afford to give money because they enjoy profits at the cost of the lives of US Military men and women.

Posted by: Sam | September 23, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Amen, Sam. They don’t have much in the way of “polical capital” to spend now, so they’re grasping at straws in order to insite…..their usual way of gaining support!

Posted by: Kathleen | September 23, 2007, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

NY Times make their own rules so they can make exceptions. Why should we care? Conservatives need to flush their own toilets before they criticize other peoples’ housekeeping.

Posted by: jmcalli | September 23, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

I was in the newspaper business at executive levels for 15 years. It is an absolute lie to claim tha an advertsing sales representative made a ‘mistake.’
An ad sales rep could and would never make a ‘mistake’ such as that. This was a decision that was made at the Publisher level.
You are lying scum, NYT.

Posted by: Dan Green | September 23, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

For the dumb Leftists saying ‘nuttin’ wrong with a discount!”, Moveon.org is a PAC and contributions to them are governed by law.
$5000 is the limit of contribution for individuals and corporations are prohibited completely, I think.
NYT broke the law while pimping their biased leftist agenda.

Posted by: Dan Green | September 23, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

the New York Times should have given MoveOn.org the ad for free. Bush and his piety party can resign if they don’t like it. The General should resign too. The soldiers in Iraq should resign and let Blackwater take over, Let our guys come home to their families and to a country that loves them. Iraq is about oil, Haliburton and a corrupt George Bush and Dick Cheney who got us into this mess. Let them put on uniforms and go over to Iraq and fight. We are in a war in Iraq and now we are in a war here in the United States. The rich against the poor and middle class. We need more organizatins like MoveOn.org to surface and bring America back to the once proud nation we were. God Bless America but not the Congress and the Bush/Cheney & company.

Posted by: Jo T | September 23, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

I’m surprised that the NYT even charged MoveDemOn.org at all. Still, the NYT has no crediility anyway. Dan Rather claims that the government runs the media, but it’s not. It the progressives that run the media. With almost every reporter actually being a progressive democrat, they don’t have to actually plan to promote their agenda, they are just naturally inclined to apply their bias intentional or otherwise. Sammy Donaldson, disgraced reporter who used to make up the news is again proven to be wrong again a news media colludes with progressives to spread their propaganda. It’s typical.

Posted by: TexBork | September 23, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

is this news? is like big brother telling on little brother to mommy. get over it. lame.

Posted by: Tom | September 23, 2007, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Bye the way, here in the MidWest, almost every newspaper had the ad about General Petraius from MoveOn.org
Will the Republicans now take on most of the newspapers in the country besides the New York Times. Surely there are more important things to worry about, LIKE THE BODY COUNT FOR TODAY IN IRAQ!
Republicans and Democrats alike are to blame for the loss of hundreds/thousands of lives in this Bush/Cheney war. Consider for today, Ladies and Gentlemen, that Bush fought the good fight to help his fathers friend get elected in Alabama and Dick has 5 defferments because it wasn’t in his game plan to be drafted during Korea nor Vietnam. Do you have a friend or family member who has been drafted or lost their life in service for our country? Think about these two rich guys who were able to NOT SERVE. Is it any wonder that Bush/Cheney team have hired terriort”s like the Blackwater Inc. How many of these Blackwater Inc. “contractors” have caused the death of our regular soldiers? If there are suppose to be 180 Contractors in Iraq..who are they and what are they doing? Again, the ad about the General was in 100′s of newspapers across the country and good for them it they allowed the ad to run….we need more like them.

Posted by: Jo T | September 23, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Did the “Swift boat veterans for truth”
get a discount to smear the integrity of John Kerry? Did the Republicans get a discount for questioning the honor of Max Cleland? This outrage is so fake!
Let’s just all agree to NOT make the honor and integrity of our military a political playing card.

Posted by: uuforyou | September 23, 2007, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Does anyone know why the General didn’t inform the Congress and America on how many of the Blackwater Inc “Contractors” were also fighting in Iraq and elsewhere. When he was giving numbers, was he including these “contractors”? Why no mention of Blackwater Inc. by the General. Perhaps he forgot to mention the “contractors” sorta like Alberto forgot, I don’t recall, etc. etc. etc.

Posted by: Jo T | September 23, 2007, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

That’s their right. If I owned the paper I’d give it to them free. And I wouldn’t insult the intelligence of my readers by putting so much as a “thought” (and I use the word loosely) that “President” bush might think he has. The man has an exceptional day when he is able to actually tie both shoes. Put him in a mental home and let’s get on with being real Americans.

Posted by: eric donovan | September 23, 2007, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Hilarious how many of you Leftists find no problem is this blantant abuse of campaign finance law yetyou like to whine about our government’s corruption.
As long as you get yours, eh? LOL.

Posted by: Dan Green | September 23, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Gee, things must not be going their way, do I hear the distinct sound of a baby rattle?

Posted by: Sandra Lea | September 23, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

And now the Republicans are demanding the same discount routed through Tom Delay, back through his cronies, and into Newt Gingrich’s pocket so he can buy drugs to keep Rush Limbaugh on the radio. You know it’s OK, Pat Robertson gave it his blessing, as long as we kill Hugo Chavez before next Christmas.

Posted by: heilbush | September 23, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Every single Republican presidential candidate believes in creationism – that the world began just as the bible says it did – with Adam and Eve. Interesting. If Adam and Eve didn’t know right from wrong until AFTER they ate the “apple” how could they have known it was wrong to eat it BEFORE they ate it? The story belies itself just like Bush everytime he opens his mouth. Wonder what meds he’s on? Wonder what meds Cheney is on? Probably stuff Rush got for them. Gotta have a drug test to work at Walmart but…to be president? Not a problem. Take what you wanna take until you are numb to killing. These mindless morons all belong in the 11th century.

Posted by: Dana | September 23, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“General betray-us”? Whatever moveon minion came up with that little gem is no doubt now soaking it up in the caribbean somewhere.. I knew the minute I heard of him that some brilliant nut on the left would capitalize off his name. Now we have proof positive of how deeply entrenched their hooks are in the gray lady herself, and all the papers across the fruited plain that march lockstep with her.. as for those of you who cry and wail about halliburton, blackwater et al. welcome to the real world! All the conflicts present and past have had some strategic motivation involved to protect our interests, from the Spainish American war to WWI & II, Vietnam etc. The Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor over oil.. this is nothing new.. it’s just our nintendo generation doesn’t have the stomach for anything that requires a grasp of history and our role as the worlds only democratic superpower and how radical Bush’s vision of a democratic outpost in the Arab world really is!!

Posted by: Kelly | September 23, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

The NYT is a business. They had the opportunity to print an article that would call the attention of many. (lets not draw lines between parties) If you had a product that would sell, but the only way to print it is to charge less, wouldn’t you charge less? It is rather convenient and petty to focus on how much the NYT charged for an add. Why not focus on, lets say….how to best get out of the damn mess were in!!!

Posted by: Natalia | September 23, 2007, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

The troops were calling him General Betray U, WAAAAY before this little kerfluffle. The dude’s a well known Kiss-As$

Posted by: cat | September 23, 2007, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

The NY Times and moveon.org should be charged with campaign violations. The Dems and their chicanery/conspiracy with the lib media must not be tolerated. Is moveon.org and the NY Times above the law? I hope not!!! This story is not over until moveon.org pays a price for their Treasonous assault. BTW – how about the rumor that a Democrat Senator set the whole thing up? I think it is time to raid the moveon.org offices, seize their computers, and get to the bottom of this.

Posted by: Bill | September 23, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

And the lies keep coming.

Posted by: HAHA! | September 23, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Now you know the far-right is getting desperate when they blame the future on the past. “Well, duh….that’s the way wars are fought.” LOL!

Posted by: Ron | September 23, 2007, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Ever heard of “the past is prologue”? How do you think our nation sprung into existence, a UN mandate? And if Petraeus was known as such a big brass kiss a** then why did he have the wholehearted approval of Biden, Kennedy et al to head the commission?? huh?

Posted by: Kelly | September 23, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

And this is surprising because????????????????

Posted by: tixMoff | September 23, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Last time I looked, the US military is not sponsored by, paid for by, or in any manner the representatives of the Republican Party itself. Nor do I recall that the US military is contracting the Republican Party to represent them as spokes-people either. — It’s inappropriate and unethetical for the Republican Party to use our military to polarize this country and to advertise oneself as being in a special alliance that the “other” side doesn’t have for your own benefit. Our solders do not deserve exploitation by the Republicans any more than insults by Democratic fringe groups.

Posted by: Rick_VT | September 23, 2007, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

cat
I guess you’re of the opinion that two wrongs make a right? Gen. Petreaus is serving his country and your disagreement with his strategy or perspective does not make him a “Kiss-As$” or deserving of derogatory or demeaning titles. Meow!
uuforyou
You’re comparing apples to oranges. John Kerry and Max Cleland were running for political office, Gen. Petreaus is currently serving in the military and is not a candidate for political office. The career and actions of anyone running for office, wanting the votes of their constituents, is open for public scrutiny. To call a decorated General a liar (Sen. Clinton) just because he has a different perspective (an educated and experienced one) is despicable and beneath the dignity of the institution of the Senate. I can agree with you we should keep the military out of the political positioning and attacks that unfortunately go on inside the nation’s capital.
The NYT got caught in what amounts to a political donation and in order to make a level playing field, they should offer the same ad rate to any other candidate that wishes to place an ad with them.

Posted by: BradS | September 23, 2007, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

What bothers me is that ABCnews would rather focus on the NYTimes gaving a discount to Moveon.org rather than investigating if the General actually did lie. The media has gotten so lazy. If they had done their job in the beginning there would have been no war and, therefore, no moveon.org ad needed.

Posted by: James martin | September 23, 2007, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

James,
This report doesn’t mean ABCNews ISN’T looking in into Gen. Patreus. I imagine a report like the one you want would take much longer to compile.
That said, I agree the media is a pack of pansies looking to file their quota and go home for home with the wife and kids (husband and kids).
It kills me to hear about a libreal bias in the media. The media did nothing but support Bush in waging this ridiculous war. Is that what people are liberal these days? :-)

Posted by: RIck | September 23, 2007, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

A few typos in my last. I meant “Home for dinner.”

Posted by: Rick | September 23, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Dan Green,
Leftist? Rightist? You know me well to know my politics?
It’s black-and-white, simplistic comparisons that reveal a person’s shallow depth. So beware what you show us here!

Posted by: Rick | September 23, 2007, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

jeez, more typpos…I meant “You know me well ENOUGH to know my politics?”

Posted by: Rick | September 23, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

More skillful backpedaling by the Libs. “Billing mistake?” Sure, just like Kerry’s “botched joke.”

Posted by: dks0442 | September 23, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

If the media would actually examine the General’s contentions and report to the American people their truth or falsity, they would be doing their job to give unbiased opinions. The General’s picture of Iraq was awfully rosy and it certainly does not seem to be backed up with all the violence and chaos currently happening in Iraq.
I, for one, do not believe the American people bought his story and, in a sense, he was not truthful. MoveOn has a right to call him on the fraud!

Posted by: two-cats | September 23, 2007, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

No group should receive a discount over the other. And I loathe Bush. Mistake my hooey.

Posted by: Sandra | September 23, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

“And it turns out we were right to”
Shouldn’t it be “too” at the end, genius Tapper boy?

Posted by: Tapper Boy | September 23, 2007, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

What is wrong with a discount? The “extreme” right gives out “FREE” coverage across all of their newsfeeds and talk shows. This could not be a more hypocritical comment. Practice what you preach. I am getting so very tired of hearing about wrongs that are not wrongs from those who do wrong every day and every time they open their mouths. The extreme right needs to get back what they have been pushing for so many years. Don’t preach to others what you don’t practice your selves.

Posted by: dlboggan | September 23, 2007, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Actually, “to” is correct.

Posted by: Amber | September 23, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Why delete my post, ABC? Should you have not covered this story of an illegal PAC contribution to this hate group weeks ago?

Posted by: Dan Green | September 23, 2007, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

MoveOn, a hate group. I beg to differ. I suppose it was fine for the Swiftboaters to malign Kerry and for Republicans at their convention to pass out bandaids for his war wounds, but it is not okay for MoveOn to call Gen. Petraeus for an outright fraud. The hypocrisy is blatant!

Posted by: sesanders | September 23, 2007, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Hey dlboggan, you either believe in campaign finance laws or you don’t.
It’s not OK to just break the law simply because you agree with the message.

Posted by: Dan Green | September 23, 2007, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

The only problem with your quaint argument, sesanders, is the the Swiftboat facts were true. Look ‘em up.
The good news is, this ad exposed moveon.org for the hate group that they are, and it has exposed many of those supporting them. People are watching.

Posted by: Dan Green | September 23, 2007, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

The Republican party has been getting free advertising for years from Fox News and tax exempt churches all over the country. Why doesn’t Tapper do something really useful with his time and find out why people like Rev James Dobson are out there actively choosing Presidential candidates but still enjoying tax exempt status? Give it a try Jake! I triple dog dare ya!

Posted by: Sandra | September 23, 2007, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

“The good news is, this ad exposed moveon.org for the hate group that they are, and it has exposed many of those supporting them. People are watching, blah, blah, blah!”
Well thank you, Big Brother! The Swift Boat Vets were absolute liars–and common trait among conservatives who have made hypocrisy and dishonesty an art form recently! I’m a proud contributor to MoveOn and the day after the Senate passed their stupid condemnation of it, myself and other contributed nearly $500,000.00 dollars to it! So take your Bill O’Reilly talking points and get lost!

Posted by: George | September 23, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

The Swift-boat facts were totally untrue. Even the press finally came around to debunking this outrage. Black is not white and white is not black.
No matter how much one argues, the facts can’t be erased. Kerry served in Viet Nam and none in the Bush Administration had done anything but take deferments in the Viet Nam conflict. That is the truth.

Posted by: sesanders | September 23, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Sorry if truth and facts bother you, George. People are watching hateful scum like moveon.org. The ad was a terrific backfire that exposes them for the seditious worms that they are.
America sees the Liberal Lie.
Me, I’m luvin’ it!

Posted by: Dan Green | September 23, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Wow! The right-wingers are frothing at the mouth over the MoveOn ad. The truth must really hurt!!!

Posted by: sesanders | September 23, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

See, Annie, that’s one of the problems. You read some completely unattributed story on some Leftist rag blog citing unnamed ‘sources.’ To you that means it is true. Just because moveon.org, or Think Progressive says it does not make it true.
You probably think Bush was behind 9/11 as I think that is a regular topic of discussion on those boards. LOL.

Posted by: Dan Green | September 23, 2007, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

It isn’t being mentioned as much that Clark Hoyt said the paper similarly mistakenly undercharged Giuliani for his ad responding to the MoveOn ad. http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/23/nyt.moveon/index.html : “Hoyt noted, however, that the executive who approved the ad did not view it as a personal attack. Rudy Giuliani, a leading GOP presidential candidate and former New York mayor, received the same rate for a response ad he placed days later, Hoyt wrote.”
As for whether the MoveOn ad WAS a “personal attack”: “The executive who approved the ad, Hoyt wrote, said the ad was ‘rough’ but that ‘he regarded it as a comment on a public official’s management of his office and therefore acceptable speech for The Times to print.’
“The full-page ad, which ran the same day as Gen. David Petraeus’ testimony to Congress about the state of affairs in Iraq, did not address Petraeus’ personal life. The ad — titled ‘General Petraeus or General Betray Us?’ — called the general ‘a military man constantly at war with the facts’ and cited quotes of Petraeus that differed from independent reports and news stories.”
In other words, they called him dishonest — or, at a minimum, consistently seriously mistaken. Is this a “personal attack”? If it is, God help the future of the political part of the First Amendment. The only thing that can be said against that ad was its overwrought title (and maybe not all that much overwrought, depending on whether his misstatements have been deliberate).
Also note: “In a 72-25 vote, the Senate approved a resolution last week condemning the ad… Republicans filibustered a Democratic proposal that condemned past GOP attacks on former Sen. Max Cleland of Georgia and on Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, said Sen. Hillary Clinton, a front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination.”
Gosh, what would we do without that ol’ filibuster? It does so much for small-”d” democratic governance, and I have no doubt it will do a lot more. (Particularly since the Congressional Democrats still seem to be afraid of their own shadows, possibly because most elected officials really don’t have all that strong a belief in much of anything except for their own income.)

Posted by: Bruce Moomaw | September 23, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

One thing this proves though is that the media is biased to the progressives. That’s why MoveDemOn.org received a 50% discount. The media being politically biased is nothing new, this was just one of many pieces of evidence that proves it to be true.

Posted by: TexBork | September 23, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

The hysteria of NO-SURRENDER McCAIN, NO-FAMILY-VALUES Giuliani, and the Idiot-in-Chief over MoveON is GREAT!!!!!!! Proof that this organization is one of the best political groups ever. I’ve doubled my contributions to MoveON so they can continue their outstanding patriotic efforts to restore the will of the people. Those opposed to freedom of speech will, of course, continue to try to stifle MoveON and any other group that doesn’t agree with them.

Posted by: ALEX H. | September 23, 2007, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

This story only shows what we on the right have known for a long time. The NYT is nothing but a shill for the democrats.

Posted by: Scott | September 23, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

LIARS…………MOVEON.ORG…….LIARS AT THE NYTIMES. Both of these corrupt liberal and far-left news organinzations represent poison in the bloodstream of this great nation. They should both be SUED………..Americans no longer trust our corrupt liberal MSM wolfpack press…………and that’s really sad.

Posted by: perception5 | September 23, 2007, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

I don’t have any problem with the ad. We don’t even have a military solution to the war in Iraq. Betray-Us does not know the outcome himself other than he got his Fourth Star & is due to retire soon. He will leave with 130,000 troops in Iraq and his job is accomplished. Leave the problem with the next General who wants to pin his Fourth Star by Bush. Now, he needs to invest in the oil business with Bush and do some commentaries with Fox News or as military consultant.

Posted by: marc | September 23, 2007, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

The New York Times is a liberal News paper,so what do you expect?

Posted by: BTL musings | September 23, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Good. MoveOn has a right to express the opinion that anyone who was in the whitehouse preparing for their appearance before Congress was told exactly what to say. Petreaus is a man who has his career and good standing on the line for Bush. Bush fires generals who oppose him and rewards generals that dance to his tune. So no surprise here. We don’t believe anything Bush or someone speaking for him says.

Posted by: Vicki | September 23, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

A mixed blessing for MoveOn.org. The resulting brouhaha probably hurt their credibility. However, they claim a million new members since the ad (3.3+1 mill), putting them even steven with the NRA in paid memberships. Wonder if Giuliani will kiss any rings at their annual meeting?

Posted by: ommish | September 23, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

It is a much bigger story that the press has favored the conservatives, fearing criticizing them, and feeling over-obligated to criticize the intellectually honest (liberals). When will the press stop perpetuating the right wing propaganda machine?????

Posted by: Bruce | September 23, 2007, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

So her’s the best question that I can ask Moveon.org: If you disagree with Gen. Patreaus, present your argument against his claims. If you don’t have proof then you really should just be quiet. I understand your frustration. But just because it is going to be awhile before you mandate taxes by getting your candidate in the White House, doesn’t mean you have to act like toddlers without a sippy. Get your facts from one relible source and we’ll listen.
Good luck.
Sincerely,America.

Posted by: tider1701 | September 23, 2007, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Dear MOVEON, you’ve expressed the feelings of many Americans accurately, when it was an unpopular time to do it. The people you represent appreciate using your “Freedom of Speech” to detail their frustrations. EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN has a right to “free speech”. Please don’t listen to the “rantings” of a those that don’t agree, I saw nothing saying they were REQUIRED to agree. Thanks You So Much, AMERICA.

Posted by: heil-bush | September 23, 2007, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Hey, this General couldn’t answer the Virgina Senator Warner’s basic question “is this war in Iraq really good for America”? If a General cannot give a straight answer for such a simple question, then is he a General or a Right wing politician?

Posted by: Patriot | September 23, 2007, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

It is the prerogative of New York Times to give a discount to any person or organization. Bravo Moveon.org and New York Times. The heart and minds of America is being properly represented with this act of speaking out. We want our soldiers home. We respect and honor their sacrifice and service. The war is a lie and has been from the start everyone with half a brain knows that. We also know the only reason we are still there is our government has not raped us enough they are greedy, lying, pilfering mongers with out conscience. This presidency or mockery is sucking our nation dry and murdering our good and faithful soldiers.
BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME! BRING THEM HOME!

Posted by: Brenda | September 23, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Sorry for the double post, but as I was leaving, I caught your comment, Brenda, and I couldn’t resist. Of course the NYT can sell ads for whatever they want. All they had to do was spew out a little of what you just said. But, no—THEY LIED ABOUT IT–for more than a week. Thank you, Brenda for your graphic illustration of what Liberals really think. Hence my point—-no matter how they lie or spin, or tap-dance, the Lib candidates are just like you and Bowel-Move-on. Americans, thankfully, are not. Brenda–please, please–send your comments verbatim all over the net, and to as many publications as you can, so more Americans will see you all for who you are, how you think, and what you ‘stand’ for.

Posted by: SteveW | September 23, 2007, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Brenda, obviously there is nothing I can say that you will believe. But for others who read these comments, the truth IS the truth. The Left wants to portray the war in Iraq as just an oil grab by President Bush. That “he lied” about WMDs, therefore the war is unjustified and even “illegal.” But, first of all, the Left conveniently forgets that Congress actually gave President Clinton — back in 1998 — authorization to overthrow Saddam Hussein because, as the Democrats so eloquently stated, he was an imminent threat due to his WMDs.
The Gulf War in 1991 NEVER ENDED. The UN finally convinced Saddam Hussein to agree to a truce with conditions; and the fighting stopped. BUT after 10 years of failing to adhere to the conditions, the Bush Administration got the UN Security Council to pass UN Resolution 1441, which gave Saddam Hussein one final opportunity to abide by the conditions. He failed to do so. BUT when it became painfully clear that the UN would not follow through on its ultimatum, President Bush decided to act (Congress had already given him the authorization in 2002), and gave Saddam Hussein 24 hours to leave Iraq. He failed to do so. Unlike the UN, President Bush meant what he said and said what he meant.
Now as for bringing our troops home, you can deny it all you want, BUT we are fighting al Qaeda in Iraq. Leaving Iraq without defeating al Qaeda, gives al Qaeda a military victory. You may not care about the consequences of that, but it WILL be the death mill of the civilized world if we hand a military victory to al Qaeda. They will FOREVER use this victory as a recruitment tool to enlist millions to join their jihad against the civilized world. Again, deny this all you want, but you cannot appease or negotiate with these terrorists. They want us dead. And they are willing to not only die for their cause, but to commit suicide in car and truck bombs all around the world. Staying in Iraq will NOT guarantee that the United States will be free from these attacks. BUT leaving Iraq before al Qaeda is defeated, WILL guarantee that we will one day see IEDs and car and truck bombs throughout the United States. And once they start, no school, no mall, no restaurant, no stadium, no church, no hotel or motel, NO PLACE will ever be safe again.

Posted by: James Danley | September 23, 2007, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

So James Danley… If the Gulf War never ended, why did Cheney, between the wars when he was CEO of Halliburton, open up a subsidiary in the British Cayman Islands to do business with Saddam? The US had a trade embargo with Saddam and so the subsidary was opened so Halliburton could get around US law and make a few bucks. So you like it when your Republican buddies talk out of both sides of their mouth?? That sounds like Treason to me? Don’t you think?

Posted by: roy | September 24, 2007, 1:23 am 1:23 am

US law does prohibit American companies from doing business with countries designated as “terror-sponsoring states.” However, a loophole in the law does allow foreign subsidaries of American companies to conduct business with these “terror-sponsoring states,” provided they are completely independent. There are many American companies who take advantage of the loophole and have foreign subsidaries that legally conduct business with these countries. It’s just too bad that Congress never closed this loophole. But until they do, as long as these foreign subsidaries remain independent, they are legally allowed to conduct business with these countries.
Now then, it is true that as CEO of Halliburton, Cheney, set up a number of foreign subsidaries of Halliburton in several Caribbean islands, including the British Cayman Islands. Halliburton and Cheney acknowledged that foreign subsidaries did conduct business with Libya and Iran, but long denied doing any business in Iraq. However, I believe it was in 2001, it came to light that two foreign subsidaries of Halliburton, Dresser-Rand and Ingersoll Dresser Pump Co. had, in fact, sold material to Baghdad through French affiliates in 1997 through the summer of 2000. However, this was not in violation of US law because it fell within the UN’s oil-for-food program. The fact that Cheney was not aware of these sales is evidence to the independence that these foreign subsidaries had.

Posted by: James Danley | September 24, 2007, 3:02 am 3:02 am

I just sent MoveOn.org ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS. Any organization that enrages the fanatical right-wing and makes them want to shut it down is definitely patriotic and worth supporting. MoveOn has every right to express their opinion without fear of the Thought Police and GOP Book-Burning Squads, since this is still America…in spite of Bush Jr’s endless attempts to undermine and destroy it.

Posted by: wilder5121 | September 24, 2007, 4:34 am 4:34 am

Either way the Times is a privately held Company and they can write and publish whatever “news” or “editorials” or “infomercials” or “commercials” they see fit to print. They set their fees, can adjust or waive them, and charge what they want. If someone feels slandered or libeled they can try and sue but that is no guarantee they will win anything. If you don’t like the paper, don’t buy it, don’t pay attention to it, or buy it and use it to line bird cages with if that is what its utility is to you. People need to wake up and realize that papers like this can be as biased and off the wall as they want. The media in America is big business, controlled by editors and owners and advertisers and you are just a consumer of this product. It can affect your beliefs, your information base, your politics, your expectations, and your freedom. And its your dime. All the free news sites on the net exist to sell advertising and get you to buy things or believe things as certain people profit or gain power from this. The general can take care of himself and now more people are aware of Move on.org’s bias and willingness to use it in the public arena. There is no such thing as “unbiased” reporting today anymore than there is unbiased advertising. This has been true for a long long time. Wake up!

Posted by: Brian Stewart | September 24, 2007, 5:22 am 5:22 am

If Mr. Hoyt’s explanation of the appearance of the ad is correct, then he should ensure that the NYT’s ad department knows those policies so such a mess as this doesn’t happen again. Until then, the NYT can hardly be considered a reliable reporter of facts concerning Iraq, can it?

Posted by: chuck | September 24, 2007, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Has no bearing on the fact that Admiral Fallon called the bush weasel a sycophant, so BETRAYUS fits. Perhaps the TIMES is just making up for lost time as Maureen Dowd sat the bench while the access connected reporter missy miller(forgot her name) ran the show.

Posted by: daddy | September 24, 2007, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I think every left wing nut ought to give all their money away to some far left group. That way they can sponge off the government when they retire and really show their “I hate the US Government for what it stands for” mantra.

Posted by: Johnny Quest & Bandit | September 24, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am

The collapse of the republicans would be so very fulfilling except for the fact that they only have one last gasp left…misery loves company .anybody buying their failed spiel now???? The networks have…

Posted by: daddy | September 24, 2007, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Keep up the good work MoveOn. If nothing else, you have the Bush in an uproar. I can’t believe that anyone with the cerebral tissue of cockroach would still defend this administration!

Posted by: Becky | September 24, 2007, 10:11 am 10:11 am

wilder5121, daddy, and Becky – Interesting Posts! You support a Hate America Organization like Move on which is Funded by George Soros who funds the Clintons Media Matters group, you hate our military, so why do you live here? Why not move to Cuba, Venezuala or similar Country? Since Soros and the Dem/libs want to bring socialism here, but they all should move to Venezuala. Oh thats right you would not have the freedom that you enjoy here because of our Great Men and women of the Arm Services.
Also in your opinion anyone who loves our country and Military is a Far Right wing Nut? People who speak the truth are Right Wing nuts? Hey then I guess that makes me and the majority of True Americans Right Wing nuts.
Libs are so arrogant and gullible it is sad!!

Posted by: spock | September 24, 2007, 11:18 am 11:18 am

This is really embarassing for the New York Times. Politics in reporting is nothing new, but big time newspapers pride themselves in maintaining their professionalism in the middle of political dogfights. A large number of NYT sponsors would drop their advertisements if the NYT became known as a left-wing prop. This is not a goof just because the NYT representative cut MoveOn.org a break on the ad price, but because the NYT representative did not maintain the confidentiality of the agreement. It is a cardinal rule of professionalism. If you are going to play favorites (and everyone does, folks, sometimes for good reasons), do not get caught doing so. Someone will get fired for this, no doubt. It won’t make General Petraeus’ job any easier.

Posted by: Sean O'Brien | September 24, 2007, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Dear Spock,
We are only saving the country from lemmings who know very little besides what HUSH BIMBO, BILE OHREALLY, SHUN HANNITY, and the nervous little twitch…mikey the savage weiner, feed you.

Posted by: daddy | September 24, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

I can’t believe you spent “a couple” of weeks on this — how about some real news — gee did ya spend two week covering Coulter — there is real news out there maybe we need real journalists for a change.
By the way, I do have a question, do pundits get paid for appearing on TV News shows and is that a negotiated figure or a set figure like appearing on Letterman or Leno??

Posted by: Paulet | September 24, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

daddy – ummmm! What do they do that is so wrong? Speak the Truth! Did you know by a poll from your own Liberal papers that the most informed group of people are those that listen to Rush L.
Sean O’Brien – They are losing sponsors and money! The are very Left leaning there is no question about it.
Again all libs know how to do is attack people, they never give facts!

Posted by: spock | September 24, 2007, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

I find it very interesting that the same politicians and bloggers who blast the Republicans for cowtowing to special interests and lobbyists are themselves cowtowing to groups like MoveOn.org. Don’t get me wrong. I am all for free speech. If an organization is fortunate enough to have a billion dollar war chest and can not only express its view point throughout the different media outlets but also have a leash on those running for office, the more power to them. However, they must abide by all campaign and lobbying laws; and any contributions to the organization must be within the campaign finance laws.
At the same time it is fair game for individuals and other organizations who disagree with another organization’s viewpoint to express their own viewpoint and attempt to make as much political hay as possible. THAT IS WHAT FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ALL ABOUT.

Posted by: James Danley | September 24, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Why is it that the only people crying about saving the troops are people that have nothing to do with the troops. 99.9% of the troops agree with the mission and the president. But the left with only listen to that .1% of the military that agree with them. I like how they find one soldier out of a thousand to disagree with the president and make it seem like all soldiers feel the same way. These are all big boys that volunteered and are happy to do it for their country. They only ones whining are the cowards that joined for college money and had to actually fight for their country. As far as oil for Bush and Cheney, what a joke. How many Democrats voted for this war with the same intelligence that was given to the president? But now it’s not convienent anymore and won’t get them elected. Or as Hillary says “If I knew then what I know now”. What a great line. If I knew that a car was going to run me over, I wouldn’t have walked out in front of it. What a complete moron she is. She
supported this war based on the info she had at the time it was given. I’m sure we all wish we had info 6 months before it was actually available. Stop defending these idiots and their left wing propaganda tools.

Posted by: Doug | September 24, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Applause to Doug and James – Only if the Republicans could speak like you guys!
Doug – they also put up people as if they served and then it is found out they did not serve or were not in Iraq.
Also if they did not pass the Feingold/McCain campaign bill Moveon and others would not have as mush money.

Posted by: spock | September 24, 2007, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

If the right wing is so sensitive, Bush should have picked a general with a different last name to hide behind. 99% of the american public would not have known about this ad, had the Bushies not raised such a stink. Good work MoveOn, just sent a check.

Posted by: Becky | September 24, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Ironic how “Swiftboat Veterans” saved the election for GWB, now, because of one minor advertisement, the same party flatulates a cow. Kerry was way ahead in all the polls until the ads for “Swiftboat Vets” started to appear. I guess it’s OK to “fix” an election, if it’s the “right people” doing it.

Posted by: igor | September 25, 2007, 3:30 am 3:30 am

It turns out that Rush Limbaugh was the first to introduce “Betray Us” and Petraeus in the same sentence….. What hypocrites!….. MoveOn has sent in the rest of the money for the ad. Get over it!

Posted by: Becky | September 25, 2007, 5:48 am 5:48 am

Becky – Get Real ok, also Petreaus I do not think even said anything, why dont you just admit you libs crossed the line. I know especially after seeing the libs on TV last night you guys dont even think there are terrorists out there, that America is bad, I just don’t get it, if America is so bad why Live here! oh thats right Libs never put there money where their mouth is.
igor – Please Bush was going to win that election no matter what even if the swiftboats did not bring out the truth about Kerry.

Posted by: spock | September 25, 2007, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Becky – It was not Bush, but the American People that brought the complaint.
Sam / Kathleen – interesting, moveon gets millions from Soros, they control the Lib party. The Libs actually own more stock in those companies then the Republicans.
And when was the last time you heard an Oil company insult our military?
Also you see nothing wrong with Edwards earning money from people who are foreclosing on their homes?
What other American company can do what Haliburton does?? Huh ? I’ll answer for you NONE! oh thats right you want jobs to goto France!

Posted by: spock | September 25, 2007, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.