Bidding Over $2M for Dems Anti-Rush Letter
ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf Reports: Who says the political fingerpointing in Washington is all for naught?
Back in September, when Democrats and Republicans were sniping at each other over the Iraq war, Republicans passed a nonbinding resolution in the Senate condemning Moveon.org for calling David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, "General Betrayus" in a newspaper ad.
For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war "phony soldiers."
The furor seemed to have died down as the Senate moved away from voting on a string of Iraq resolutions to voting on domestic spending bills.
But today comes word that a Wasghinton, D.C. area philanthropist, Betty Casey (or bettyc588, as she is known on Ebay) is going to pay over $2 million for a letter Senate Democrats wrote to Mark Mays, President of Clear Channel, asking him to condemn Rush Limbaugh for the "phony soldiers" comment.
All proceeds from the auction of the letter will go to the Marine Corps – Law Enforcement Foundation, which distributes aid to the families to the children of fallen Marines on behalf of law enforcement officers.
Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY. Limbaugh sits on the board of the foundation and he has reportedly said on his show that he will match the winning bid — a total of $4.2 million for the foundation.
Rush identified Casey on his show today as a listener since the show’s inception. Casey is listed as trustee of the foundation named for her late husband, the real estate developer Eugene B. Casey, who died in 1986 and had worked as director of the Farm Credit Agency under President Franklin Roosevelt.
Betty Casey seems to have disparate political interests. According to campaign finance reports, In past years she has given money mostly to Republican Senate candidates, from Mel Martinez, who succeeded in Florida, to Pete Coors, who was unsuccessful in Colorado.
She gave money to Rudy Giuliani’s exploratory committee in 1999 and then Rick Lazio, the Republican who ultimately challenged Senator Hillary Clinton in that the 2000 race for senate in New York.
But this year, Casey gave the maximum individual contribution to Clinton’s chief opponent for the Democratic Presidential nomination, Illinois Senator Barack Obama. Both Clinton and Obama signed the letter Casey spent $2.1 million on. In fact, their signatures are right next to each other and the "n" at the end of Clinton runs into the "B" at the beginning of Barack.]
Casey was described in 2004 by the Washington Post as eccentric and press-shy. She had at one point tried to create a lavish $50 million mayoral residence for the mayor of Washington, D.C., but those plans fell through amid squabbling with city officials. Casey donated the land for the mansion to the Salvation Army, stunning city leaders.
Back on October 1st, Harry Reid brought the letter to the Senate floor and asked Republicans to join him condemning Limbaugh for saying that soldiers who oppose the Iraq war are "phony soldiers."
No Republicans signed the letter and Limbaugh has made light of it. Also on Ebay, you can buy a t-shirt that reads "Phony 41" on the back. 41 Democratic Senators signed the letter to Limbaugh.
This was a line of political rhetoric that fed off Republicans and their condemnation of Moveon.org for the "General Betrayus" ad. There were nonbinding resolutions and letters written and that was supposed to be it.
At the time, Reid called on Republicans — who had condemned Moveon.org for the General Betrayus ad — to sign the letter condemning Limbaugh. But only 41 Democrats, including Reid, signed the letter.
Today, Reid was more conciliatory to Limbaugh and whoever is paying for the letter. Though he said on the Senate floor that as he had watched the bidding throughout the week, he never thought it would get to $2 million.
"Now, everyone knows that Rush Limbaugh and I don’t agree on everything in life and maybe that is kind of an understatement," Reid said.
"But without qualification Mark May, the owner of the network that has Rush Limbaugh, and Rush Limbaugh should know that this letter that they’re auctioning is going to be something that raises money for a worthwhile cause. I don’t know what we could do more important than helping to ensure that children of our fallen soldiers and police officers who have fallen in the line of duty have the opportunity for their children to have a good education," he said.
Email
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
Romney on a Roll
This is flat out wrong. Limbaugh put the letter up for auction, not the Dems.
Posted by: Jesse | October 19, 2007, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
According to Rush’s own website, he’s matching the bid to go to charity. Anyone out there with an extra 10-20 million out there that can bust the bank of this big mouth?
Posted by: Rick_VT | October 19, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
This is why journalism is in free fall! Whether this article was meant to mislead or just ignorance, author got it totally wrong. The Democrats had nothing to do with putting this letter on Ebay. Senator Reid was on the floor this morning trying to get credit for something that he bashed Mr Limbaugh on. This is so spineless of him. Media, please get your act together.
Posted by: William | October 19, 2007, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
ABC does it again, it’s not the Democrats who put the letter up for auction, it was Limbaugh himself. He got the original letter from Mark Mays, the CEO of Clear Channel. Limbaugh has also pledged to match the amount raised by the letter and donate his own funds to the same charity. I just don’t understand why an average citizen with Internet access can get the facts right and ABC can’t.
Posted by: Well Informed | October 19, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
As William said, this is why your business is tanking. You can’t even bother to get the story right when the facts are widely and publicly available. You fail to mention that Limbaugh did NOT, in fact, call all soldiers who disagree with the war “phony”. You fail to mention that Limbaugh is matching the donation. And you fail to get Limbaugh’s quote in reaction to Harry Reid’s attempt to salvage his reputation. This is disgraceful. More to the point, *YOU* are disgraceful.
Posted by: Justin | October 19, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Hmmmm…no mention of the fact that Rush is matching the winning bid. ABC, part of the “Drive By” Media, clearly wants ignorant readers to think that Reid and the Dems actually had something to do with this. Typical. Liberals and the henchmen in the left wing media are all liars.
Posted by: Rick | October 19, 2007, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Way to go Dems!!!
Posted by: Happy Dem | October 19, 2007, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Wow. Way to go, Dingy Harry. Who would have thought you’d lower yourself to the point of taking credit for the brilliant PR – not to mention charitable – move Rush and the EIB Network made by putting your ridiculous and illegal letter up for bid on Ebay?
Well, I didn’t see it coming, but I’m definitely not surprised. However, you may surprise me even further by offering to match the winning bid yourself; that might give you an ounce of authenticity as far as your sentiments regarding this letter. The only thing you’ve had to do with it is drafting and signing; money to the military didn’t occur until RUSH decided to auction it off.
Remember – the DEMOCRATS did NOT intend for this letter to ever raise money for any charitable purpose. And y**t is going to be in possession of a hard copy of evidence that proves why Congress has an historically low approval rating, if this is how they choose to spend their time. Bravo, Mr. Limbaugh. Harry Reid, on the other hand, can kma
Posted by: DisdainLady | October 19, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Harry Reid and the other 40 oh-so-patriotic senators are absolutely disgraceful. I hope their constituents remember their attempt to break the constitution when election time comes around.
Posted by: Dusty | October 19, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Let’s see if I have this right. Rush refers to an imposter that ABC first brings to light as a “phony soldier”, Harry Reid gets all haughty and condems Rush for his perceived “unpatriotic” speech and gets 40 of his (Harry’s) cronies to send this letter to Mr. Mays of Clear channel.
Rush put the letter on ebay and pledges to match what ever it brings. Now that the bid is over $2,000,000 “Old Dingy Harry” decides to take credit for the letter being on e-bay to begin with!!! Absolutely amazing!!This is so typical of ABC’s trying their best to put spinless people like Harry Reid in the best possible light. They and He should be ashamed!!
Posted by: J. Pritchard | October 19, 2007, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Rush called civilians who PRETENDED to be soldiers the “phoney soldiers”. You know this. Why must you continue to lie?
And the Democrats did NOT put this up for auction, it was 100% Rush’s idea.
STOP YOUR LIES!!!!!
Posted by: Emma Morrow | October 19, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
The EBay page was LITTERED with the TRUTH that this letter was a SMEAR LETTER from Harry Reid who attacked a private citizen from the floor of Congress! Harry Reid is DESPICABLE!!! The people of Nevada must wake up and demand a RECALL election! Who in their right mind would want someone like him to represent them now he has sunk THIS low?
Posted by: Mike M. | October 19, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
“I don’t know what we could do …”
WHO IS “WE” Senator Reid? Or do you have a mouse in your pocket?
Posted by: Mike M. | October 19, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Would this charity be recieving four million dollars if Harry hadn’t written the letter? NO
Posted by: Alan Coulter | October 19, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
You got the article wrong. Reid had nothing to do with the auction and the fact that it brought 2million is because it demonstrates that dems will try to stop free speech when it hurts them. ABC stinks it up again.
Posted by: JIM | October 19, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Hary Reid needs to resign, he’s a disgrace to the Senate. Heck, evry senator who signed it should resign. That means you Mrs. Clinton.
Posted by: BHMason | October 19, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
I couldn’t agree more with the responses sent in but I’m impressed that ABC News actually had the backbone to list all these letter.
Maybe ABC News should rewrite the article and make it accurate.
Posted by: Lou G. | October 19, 2007, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Harry Reid should get ZERO credit for this. It’s terrible enough that members of the US Senate attempted to silence an American citizen’s right to free speech, but to now try and take credit for the charity auction is staggering.
Posted by: Rob Abysmul | October 19, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Sen. Reid has a lot of nerve. Along w/the MSM they smear Rush over the phony soldier comment, now they want to take credit for raising funds. Sen. Harkin,D-IA take the cake though. Harkin, speaking on the floor of the Senate no less, accuses Rush of being high on drugs. The same Sen. Harkin who FALSELY claimed to be a combat pilot in Vietnam. Talk about a phony soldier, phony Senator and phony American!
Posted by: dewey58 | October 19, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Credibility in news reporting has to be at an all time low! This is the reason you run into people making erroneous comments on stories; limited media outlets restrict individuals from getting the truth! In a perfect world, differing views about a particular story helps in having an informed dialogue. After it is all said and done, people are manipulated into believing a lie. Had I not follow the whole story and actually listen to Mr. Limbaugh; I too would have been grossly misinformed. Though this kind of reporting has been going on for years, lately it has been even more out of control. We live in such a media bias era that authentic news reporting is becoming a thing of the past. There should be a law against this kind of practice…shouldn’t it?
Posted by: William | October 19, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
The letter shows Senator Reid and the other signers as the demagogues they are. Now that he is trying to claim credit for the amount raised for a worthwhile charity, I will be waiting to hear how much of his money (not my tax money that I already know he likes to ‘invest’) he has donated. In other words, will he put his money where his mouth is?
Also waiting for ABC to get the story straight. Please hurry, I’m not young!
Posted by: Mary Ellen | October 19, 2007, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
ABC needs to rewrite this article. It is all wrong. Whether intentional or not it is misleading at best.
Posted by: jim | October 19, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Well I guess after reading all the comments enough said ABC SCREWS UP AGAIN!!!! I guess at least ABC covered it kinda. NBC and CBS still don’t have even the wrong news on their website. When will these 3 companies start actually reporting the news.
Posted by: Brent Wilson | October 19, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
As William and Well Informed stated. THIS IS NOT ANYTHING THAT THE DEMS DID. Rush Limbaugh is the one that deserves the credit to break the news of how pathetic the Dems are. Rush asked Harry Reid if he would match the bid, Reid was silent. He said nothing and will do NOTHING. The reporter needs to pull his head out of whereever it is and get the story staight. The charity will be getting an amazing 4.2 million for an amaging and wonderful cause. And the credit does NOT go to the Democrats, it goes to Rush Limbaugh, Clear Channel, Ebay, and Betty Casey. They are the ones you should pay tribute to. If the dems try to capitolize on this it will be one more straw to the camels back that will eventually come back to destroy them. That is what they do best…destroy. Get the facts straight ABC!!!
Posted by: Todd | October 19, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Sen. Reid’s letter, signed by 40 other Democrat Senators, is valuable because it is a historic document; clear and unequivocal evidence of the worst ABUSE OF POWER by the Senate we have seen in this decade, possibly ever.
Posted by: TheOldTrooper | October 19, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
If the bid is actually legitimate, I would suspect that someone figures on a hellatious deduction for charitable contributions. Imagine their surprise when the IRS takes the position that they didn’t make a contribution… they bought a historical document at fair market value.
Posted by: Dutch | October 19, 2007, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
How can everyone in the world get this story correct and not ABC. God, I miss Peter Jennings, he would have never let a story get out without the facts as this one has.
Posted by: Jason | October 19, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
These idiots think they are above reproach….they will not match the bid…at least not unless they pass themselves a big raise…mmm..maybe teddy will say he left his in his wet pants?
Posted by: James Boles | October 19, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
I’m really disappointed by the reading comprehension skills of all the people condemning this article for not specifying that Rush Limbaugh put the letter up for auction. What does this line mean to you, “Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY.”?
Although the proceeds are going to a good cause, who really cares what Rush does or says? He became irrelevant years ago. Still, the fact that the letter was written in the first place indicates the signers’ inappropriate priorities as members of Congress. Rush is free to criticize as he wants (but not free to illegally acquire prescription drugs).
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
This is classic liberal democrats. When in doubt, take someone else’s credit for their work. Harry Reid is a disgrace to this country. He’s nothing but a partisan who thinks nothing about the people of this country. He needs to resign. The bid about the “phony soldier” had to do with a literal phony soldier – he claimed credit for the sacrifice that others made for him. I cannot stand people like him. ABC news needs to rewrite this story to set the record straight, that is if you care to be anything beyond “phony journalism.” It’s up to you. This is a free country and Rush is taking advantage of the freedom to take something aimed at him to turn it into a blessing. God bless this nation.
Posted by: Getalife | October 19, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
I would like to apologize for dick durbin’s existence. History will long remember the democrat leaders for thier lies and distortions, and the mainstream media for keeping the hate alive and making a dirty buck off it.
Posted by: Mitch | October 19, 2007, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Wow. I don’t hear you whiny conservatives boo-hoo when your propaganda channel Fox “news” distorts information. I also don’t hear any Repubes running home crying to mommy when your President Dubya lies on a daily basis.
Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Mr. Wolf you are a liar. A flat out liar. If there is anyone that is “phony” it is you sir. I understand that the news weatherman can be wrong most of the time but you take the cake. I hope your editor reviews the comments on this story and reconsiders your ability to provide objective news reporting. In two words I can sum up your story “PHONY REPORTER”
Posted by: chad | October 19, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
At least ABC mentioned it, the Others do not even have it at all.
Reid, ABC both are wrong, ClearChannel’s Head is MR MAYS not May, so I guess Harry ‘s close “friend”…ooops nope, he even got his name wrong in his speech…say Harry, Match the offer, like Mr. Limbaugh
Posted by: spearstx | October 19, 2007, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
why is anyone here saying that abc is claiming or insinuating that rush didnt put the letter on ebay himself? wheres your reading skills? the article clearly states that rush himself put the letter on ebay . i quote… ” Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY. Limbaugh sits on the board of the foundation.” i personally dont see any need for further clarification or explanation of the previous sentence whatsoever.
clearly, this is one of the reasons the republican party keeps getting in/staying in power , they have a large group of semi intelligent voters/zombies that cant understand a simple sentence. easy to confuse the dense and thats what the republicans count on.
i know public school education did you wrong but jeez.
please try to read and comprehend the written english language correctly before you trumpet out your unbridled ignorance (en masse) for all to see.
Posted by: bah | October 19, 2007, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Harry Reid is a complete Jackass. He is now trying to take credit for Rush Limbaugh’s smart action to turn Harry Reid’s abuse of government letter into a charity for our troops. Harry Reid who tried to get a “private citizen” fired for something he didn’t say is now trying to take credit for Rush Limbaugh turning it around on him. Harry Reid is dispictable and you people in Nevada must be the dumbest people on Earth to send this guy to Congress. Please take him back, he is a total creep.
Posted by: Ray | October 19, 2007, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
conservatives already know all the tricks of the IRS, and just let the IRS make it official that the Reid, et al., letter is indeed an HISTORICAL DOCUMENT, and its value will triple!
Cris: Rush Limbaughr irrelevant? Why then a letter from Dingy Harry and the 40 thieves about what Limbaugh might have said? It was heard by millions of his loyal followers. I heard the whole program, and anyone who says that Limbaugh impuned the troops – including troops who express disagreement with the war, is an unmitigated liar.
Posted by: TheOldTrooper | October 19, 2007, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I can’t believe people actually take what Rush Limbaugh says seriously. You people know he’s a drug addict right?
Posted by: Jon C. | October 19, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
And Mrs. Clinton wants to be commander in chief? Buuwwaahahahahaha! NOT!
Posted by: BHMason | October 19, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Harry Reid is an out and out liar. He had nothing to do with the letter going on eBay. NOTHING! The lib media is running with the Reid version knowing the letter has been on eBay for SEVEN FULL DAYS yet have been ignoring it. This is about an abuse of power by Senate Democrats and ALL Who Signed (yes, Hillary Rodham Clinton signed it too) should be fined the bid amount or forced to leave office. The Senators are dispicable and Harry Reid just raised “dispicable” to a new level. And the lib media (ABC included) just joined them.
Posted by: Bill | October 19, 2007, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
ABC continues to mischaracterize,twice in this article alone, Rush’s use of the term “phony soldiers.”
I regularly write Republican Senators and Congressmen urging them to challenge the media openly, to question the premise of their questions and not allow mischaracterizations such as what happened to Rush to happen to them. I urge anyone reading this,to do the same.
Until they turn the tables on the media, the media will continue to selectively spoon feed us only what they want us to hear. Thank God for conservative talk radio and the internet.
Posted by: Todd Wulf | October 19, 2007, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
LOL LOL
Rush and Clear Channel’s show of mockery & disrespect sure did backfire.
Posted by: MiloMarzel | October 19, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Once again, the democrat’s media lapdogs, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN refuse to report the whole truth and parrot whatever the democrat leadership tells them to say.
Rush called the people who claimed to be Vietnam/Iraq/World II verterans and never served, ‘phony soldiers’. Like the guys that were supposedly throwing their medals over the whitehouse fence with John Kerry but never served in the military. Oh yeah, and Kerry never threw his own medals over the fence either.
There are other names for the soldiers that oppose the war, but not phony soldiers.
Posted by: dennis | October 19, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
So John – what’s your point? Sen. Byrd was a grand dragon of the KKK, Al Gore lied about inventing the internet, Harkin lied about serving in Vietnam. Because he was an addict, does not discredit him from responding to attacks and turning it into a benefit? The fact is that liberals cannot have compete in the arena of new ideas. Because everytime they do, they lose because no one wants a Stalinist socialist state.
Posted by: Getalife | October 19, 2007, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Not very good reporting here. You left out several facts, like that Rush challenged the sens to match his donation. They’ve been silent about this, but now Reid is making out like he’s somehow involved in raising the money.
The “phony soldiers” comment was purposefully misconstrued by these dishonest politicians to mean anyone in uniform who disagrees with the war. Anyone who keeps track of the news and blogosphere knew to whom Rush was referring; the few fruadulent soldiers who’ve popped up and been praised by the left. Most notably that Macbeth character and the Scott Thomas guy who wrote a highly questionable ‘diary’ from Iraq for a lefty rag.
Reid was knowingly being dishonest then, and he’s being dishonest now. It’s nothing but pure, shameless spin for politics’ sake. Just more proof that partisan dem politicians are willing to throw truth and ethics overboard in favor of lies and phoniness, for the sake of their agenda.
And to the chap ‘bah’ who posted above me – who do you think teaches public school? All partisan dems!
Posted by: squeenter squillo | October 19, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Huh? ‘Democrats’ are going to make? Let’s be honest here shall we? Democrats didn’t make A THIN DIME! Rush Limbaugh is the SINGLE PERSON who saw the opportunity to throw in the FACE of these losers and he ALONE made and he ALONE is also giving the ‘ton of money’. Saying democrats had anything to do with it is like giving Hitler credit for the heroism of our troops when they landed at Normandy!
…..
Kerry signed the letter. He’s worth over 800 million; did he match the fund? A lot of the signers have money – NOTHING from them but silence.
Posted by: Mike M. | October 19, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Chris, that’s right; Rush is no longer relevant. That’s why 20 million people listen to him and he’s yet to be discredited. That’s why the stations capture record advertising revenues. Keep it coming.
Posted by: Getalife | October 19, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
How does ABC come to the following conclusion “Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol” when it was Rush who put up the letter for auction and made the matching funds commitment. Maybe they know that the 41 senators, who signed the letter, are going to do the right thing and match the bid price like Rush! Next we will probably see ABC claim to be fair and honest in it’s reporting.
Posted by: Tony | October 19, 2007, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
hey jon c.
they do find their “heros” in the strangest places dont they? evidently rehab centers are a pretty good place to start the hunt for a “good” republican candidate,(what an oxymoron that is!) and then again i hear some of them prefer public toilets for anonymous homosexual encounters too…they are indeed a rather diverse (and perverse) lot .
yup ,i really want those kinds of people to be the moral compass of this nation
those honest, respectable republicans and their loyal intellectual constituents with their upright american values and ethics… …snicker snicker…
;]
Posted by: bah | October 19, 2007, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
ABC please have the integrity to note that you have changed the post. The original post was incorrect giving the democrats credit for putting the letter on ebay. It is now correct. This has caused some confusion in the posts. I agree that there are still significant facts omitted. Without such notification, it is not much wonder that the media is not trusted.
Posted by: Lew | October 19, 2007, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
The Reason all these libs are angry about this is they hate that she had more than 2 million to spend on charity. What needs to happen is, 90% of her assets needs to be taxed (tax being a word meaning theft by a government) and have it put into “free” healthcare. Or perhaps they should demand a “fairness” doctrine for charitable giving and have half of the 2.1 mill put into another equally deserving non-profit like… oooh, just pick one at random… how about moveon.org? They need money too, especially after having to pay full price for their piece of trash, childish, attack add. Moveon spends untold amounts attacking the military and Rush Spends untold amounts (his own 2.1 Million contribution just being a small part of what he does) to help them. Democrats see Moveon as equivalent to Rush? Nope, they probably feel Moveon helps the troops more.
Posted by: Ukomba | October 19, 2007, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
OldTrooper,
Rush became irrelevant when he was busted for illegally acquiring prescription drugs. When he takes a moral hard line and then is busted for immoral activity, he becomes a hypocrite, he is no longer relevant, his moral/ethical authority is completely gone. Only fools believe the words of hypocrites?
Because of Rush’s irrelevancy, Reid and the other signers embarrassed themselves by even bothering to address the situation. Rush is free to say what he wants, and people who favor hypocrites are free to listen to him.
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Senator Reid:
Rush Limbaugh pledged to “put his money where his mouth is” and match the winning bid of over $2 million. He also challenged you and the other 40 signatories to do the same.
Having spoken so eloquently this morning about the positive benefits of this auction and the worthiness of the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, do you and your colleagues have plans to “put YOUR money where YOUR mouth is?” I’m sure this charity could make good use of the extra $82 million!
Posted by: Guy | October 19, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Getalife,
I guess you’re one of those people who believes the words of hypocrites. You can see my previous post about people who favor hypocrites. The fact that there are 20 million listeners proves nothing about their intelligence. Far more than that believed the lie about WMD in Iraq. That certainly didn’t make it right. I saw right through the administration’s smoke screen, just like I see through Rush’s rhetoric. How about you?
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
The “phony soldiers” comment maliciously misconstrued by shamefully dishonest politicians. Thank God every soldier, sailor and airman knows to whom Rush was referring; the few fruadulent soldiers who’ve popped up and been praised by the left. Most notably that Macbeth character and the Scott Thomas guy who wrote a highly questionable ‘diary’ from Iraq for a lefty rag.
We live in dangerous times when crooked Democrat lawmakers (that’s a joke) can be so frivolous with the contitution.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Z. Byron Wolf…….YOU should check the facts and leave your liberal bias out of work you represent to be accurate! This piece is disgustingly and most likely purposely “flat out wrong!” ABC should be ashamed!
Posted by: JLM | October 19, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
It is amazing how you media people cover for the Democrats’ lack of patriotism.
This whole issue proves that Rush is right about you.
Posted by: Dan | October 19, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
OK, whoever wrote this is a moron… My fellow democrats didn’t “make a ton of money for a charity.”
What a idiotic statement. The bidder and Rush made the money for the chairty. All my representatives did was make fools of themselves and play right into Rush’s hands.
Posted by: Smarter than Your Avg ABC reporter | October 19, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
I’m glad this is finally over. Now Rush can focus on keeping Hillary from representing the middle class.
Posted by: Exxon | October 19, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Did anyone notice that after Harry Reid offered his support, the bidding died? His support did nothing to help raise money and might have actually served to kill it, hurting a charity. Just goes to show, even when the Dems loose on an issue they always find a way to piss on your shoes on the way out. Kind of like how Clinton pillaged the White house in 2000, Classy
Posted by: Ukomba | October 19, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Glad to see the “24percenters” are frothing at the mouth!
Ahhhh, the memories of the 90′s…reminds me of all the Republican’s constant and rabid comments about anything Democratic (which meant Clinton during those years…)
Being out of power sucks, doesn’t it? But remaining out of power will suck even worse!
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Posted by: Ryan | October 19, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Hillary could never represent the middle class. She’s to busy trying to win a power struggle and keep the lower class beholden to the socialist state.
Posted by: Exxon? | October 19, 2007, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Great quote from Dan, “It is amazing how you media people cover for the Democrats’ lack of patriotism.” This is one of the fundamental differences between the modern Republican and Democratic mindsets, the Republicans no longer believe that difference of opinion is acceptable. Either you believe what they believe, or you’re unpatriotic. This poisonous idea is truly anti-American.
Thanks to Jon C. for reminding us of other anti-American events that have taken place under the current administration.
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
When it’s time for the American Citizen to reclaim our government the names and signatures on this list will be the ideal place to start! Term Limits Now!
Posted by: S. Braden | October 19, 2007, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
I’m glad this is finally over. Now Rush can focus on keeping Hillary from stopping no bid contracts.
Posted by: Halliburton | October 19, 2007, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
At least we do police our own side. Yes Sen. Larry Craig is a disgrace, but all republicans are calling for his resignation. We do try to hold ourselves to a standard. We don’t live up to it all the time, but at least we have one. How about William Jefferson Democrat who hid thousands in his freezer? How many democrats came out against him? He isn’t the only one either.
Posted by: Ukomba | October 19, 2007, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Stupid, stupid democrats. Did you lower the bar just to keep it a fair fight? Are you just a bunch of clowns on a policical bus running on hot air without a map? After the mess Mr. Bush has made to his party, you had to flush your brains to compete? Geeez !
Posted by: Rick_VT | October 19, 2007, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
ABC shows how liberal they really are!!
Way to go Rush and keep up the good work!
Posted by: abbie | October 19, 2007, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
ABC is making it worse for themselves. The more I listen to Rush the more truth I get. Fox is the most accurate thorough and unbias. They actually have reporters that don’t ask Hillary what to write next!
Posted by: JIM | October 19, 2007, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Does anyone have a copy of the original text of this embarrassing piece of work? They changed it faster than John Kerry’s voting record when it started getting slammed for its string of inaccuracies, distortions, and outright lies. It was the Dems idea to auction the letter? They selected the charity the money would go to? That the Dems would make money for a charity…? Wow.
Does anyone really wonder why the credibility of ABC, CBS, CNN, et al is in the toilet? (Swirling right next to the moral fiber rich intellect of all the libs who commented above)
Posted by: Gunner | October 19, 2007, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
No Chris. I take the word of someone who is willing to be checked for accuracy each and every day. I take the word of someone who is willing to admit he did something wrong and that he sought forgiveness. I can hardly say that about your band of fugatives. Gee, then I would have to tell the advertisers that they are wasting their money on idiots huh? I think those who are willing to spend the money advertising on a show are the ones who recognize that the listeners have a fair degree of intelligence, don’t you think? Besides, I’m glad to hear that Air America has done a booming business. Oh no? Really, they’re bankrupted? Why? No one is listening? The listeners won’t buy their load of crap? Keep talking… someone might hear you.
Posted by: Getalife | October 19, 2007, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
I’m not sure I understand why everyone is so upset. Harry raising over 4 million for a charity is a good thing, right?
Posted by: Confused | October 19, 2007, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Very disappointing story,
I was just getting back to checking ABCNews regularly as they are the better choice over CNN and MSNBC, but now I see now that their ratings are on the rise, they are back to their old tricks: Lies and “info left-outs” for their stories again.
I guess it’s back to Foxnews again.
Posted by: Shane | October 19, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Dingy Harry should be “drubbed” out of office. He used the power and prestige of the U.S. Senate, and taxpayer money, to attack, and to silence, a private citizen.
This is exactly the kind of event that our forefathers were trying to protect us from. A government that has morphed itself into a tyrranical body. Not, a government of, for and by the people.
Posted by: Eric | October 19, 2007, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
ABC News Journalism at it’s finest! Rush Limbaugh took a letter that was completely founded on fabrications and turned it into something really good for the children of fallen soldiers and police officers of our country. What did Harry Reid do to deserve the dubious honor that ABC bestowed upon him?
Posted by: Mike D. | October 19, 2007, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Mike D — Excellently put, my man…excellently put.
Posted by: Eric | October 19, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Mr Limbaugh asked all 41 of the democrats to match his charitable contribution. So far NONE seems to be the number that feel charitable. Figures, can’t put their money where their considerable mouths are.
Posted by: Stephen | October 19, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Hey abc democrat “news”, your reporter forgot to mention what is happening to the millions of dollars? What is the total amount raised and where is it going? Maybe get a real reporter to “dig into this story” and do some actual work for a change. I’m sure you didn’t leave out 90% of the facts because you’re democrats promoting other democrats and unable to writing anything that is unflattering to the democrat party. ….and where are the quotes from the call? If you “insist” that he said what you’re claiming – lets see it? ….oh, that’s because you’d have to alter his words and then you’d be the one in front of a judge paying the millions of dollars to Rush? Good work – free interns are fine as writers for most stories but you may consider employing adults eventually.
Posted by: cheesetoppings69 | October 19, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
OK, Getalife, I get it. You believe Rush’s words, just like you believed the lie about WMD in Iraq. That was so accurate! And by “band of fugtives” I guess you mean my political party. I am a registered Republican. So I guess were you referring to the Republicans? I can see from my criticism of this situation why you might think otherwise, but it is with pain that I write, “the Republicans no longer believe that difference of opinion is acceptable.” What you don’t realize is that above all, I am an American. I am free to agree with whomever I want, just as I am free to criticize whomever I want. That is why my comments criticize Reid and the hopelessly pathetic Rush Limbaugh. I believe in what is just and true, not what representatives from my registered party tell me I should believe. I feel embarrassed that my party has sunk so low by committing so many unethical acts. In other words, I think for myself. Try it sometime, you might like it. If that’s too taxing on you, you can keep listening to that pathetic pill popper.
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
To Jesse:
You wrote: “this is flat out wrong. Limbaugh put the letter up for auction, not the Dems.”
What are you smoking?
The article even quotes Reid acknowledging Limbaugh putting the letter up for auction (on Ebay): “But without qualification Mark May, the owner of the network that has Rush Limbaugh, and Rush Limbaugh should know that this letter that they’re auctioning is going to be something that raises money for a worthwhile cause.
Jesse: please read or read carefully before posting.
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2007, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
This article is more democrat propaganda. It does state in the 5th or 6th paragraph that Limbaugh did put the letter on e-bay but it also makes Harry Reid look like the good guy here when he’s the buffoon that started this whole thing. The article also clearly states that the letter was written to condemn Linbaugh for calling the troops who oppose the war “phoney soldiers”. This is an outright lie and ABC knows it. The troops he called phoney are the ones who lie about their service and try to claim benefits they are not entitled to. Another case of slander by ABC…but what should we expect…
Posted by: Brenda | October 19, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
once again, you, the left media, get it wrong..the dems did not earn this money for charity..it was rush, and it’s because the us gov’t was going after a private citizen..it has nothing to do with the dems and their political clout..is it any wonder we, the american people, don’t trust you..for god’s sake (hope that didn’t offend) get it correct..god bless rush and betty..for you, it is shameful you can’t report the actual facts..
Posted by: tj169 | October 19, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
typical…
just because rush isnt an elected rep doesnt mean he isnt 110% involved in american politics. and if he gets on the playing field with the big boys then he is fair game like everyone else . what are politicians who want to respond to his drug induced diatribes (why they would is beyond me really) supposed to do ,resign office so they can address his blatantly partisan ,mindless drug addicted ramblings ?
i guess ,if rush doesnt want trouble maybe he should just sit on his porch and talk to his cat/rat or whatever and not spend millions of dollars trying to sway the opinion of the gullible largely ignorant american public using his own personal (albeit paid for by insanely wealthy republicans and their partners in legalized crime,big business ) private ” bully pulpit”.
and additionally, IF the aforementioned letter wouldve TOLD or ORDERED the radio network owner to reprimand him, and/or subsequently face gov. sanction of some sort then THAT wouldve been abuse of government power.
eric, in this particular instance reid and the other signers merely ASKED the owner to reprimand him ,which is only a request and so…. shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh eric you are making yourself look dumb .
Posted by: bah | October 19, 2007, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
This Reagan Republican couldn’t care less about that drug addicted blowhard.
Posted by: Jamie | October 19, 2007, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Drive by media at its finest… Anyone who listens to Rush KNOWS that regular media outlets (especially ABC News) are uncapable of providing accurate and unbiased news. What else can you expect from liberals?
Posted by: Carl | October 19, 2007, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Harry Reid got smacked down really good, and he should stay down, as down as his approval rating in Nevada.
Posted by: perimogi | October 19, 2007, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
I think it was brilliant for Rush to do this. Now the band wagon is growing and Reid wants on. Reid needs to resign and say the words of an adult man that he is sorry.
By the way, Can you imagine Bill Clinton as first man. Wow what a desk he will need!!
Posted by: Jim Rod | October 19, 2007, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
ABC is one of the few networks to cover the Harry Reid letter purchase, but only to infect the story with a liberal spin. ABC sank so low, it criticized the previous donations by the buyer, a patriotic American citizen whose money will go to the families of servicemen who gave their lives for our country.
And Reid has the gall to try to take credit for the donation, when his only contribution was an attempt to silence a private citizen’s free speech.
Media left-wing hate has reached a new level of malignancy.
Posted by: H.T. Schmerdtz | October 19, 2007, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
What counts is that money was raised for children of fallen soldiers who sacrificed their lives, no matter whether those soldiers were democrats, republicans or independents.
Hats off to Mrs. Casey for her generosity, for Mr. Limbaugh and Mays for making this possible.
This was absolutely incredible.
Posted by: Stellar Schwartz | October 19, 2007, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
The details were reported accurately.
You’ve been so blinded by Faux news & the conservative biased media, that when something doesn’t go your way, the tantrums begin.
Rush is a disgrace.
When the repub party insists on using the likes of Rush and Coulter to speak for them, then you can expect to be judged harshly.
Posted by: Former Repub | October 19, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol. ”
THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE BY ABC NEWS!!!!!
HARRY REID SENDS A LETTER TO CAUSE TROUBLE FOR LIMBAUGH – A LETTER THAT WAS A LIE!! THE LETTER IS WORTH MONEY BECAUSE IT IS HISTORIC ABUSE OF POWER BY REID, AND THE 40 OTHER DEMOCRATS!!!!!
THE LIB MEDIA IS LYING BIG TIME! WHO CAN HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE???
Posted by: Bill | October 19, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
I believe this letter is worth the millions of dollars it’s going to fetch. Just as the Articles of the Confederation is an early historical piece of US government legislation, predating our Constitution. The Harry Reid letter that Rush is auctioning could possibly be an historical pre- document as well, being the earliest document on record of the United States Democratic Party transitioning into (pre)United States Communist Party, symbolizing it’s earliest efforts to silence free speech.
Posted by: eric | October 19, 2007, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I believe this letter is worth the millions of dollars it’s going to fetch. Just as the Articles of the Confederation is an early historical piece of US government legislation, predating our Constitution. The Harry Reid letter that Rush is auctioning could possibly be an historical pre- document as well, being the earliest document on record of the United States Democratic Party transitioning into (pre)United States Communist Party, symbolizing it’s earliest efforts to silence free speech.
Posted by: eric | October 19, 2007, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Chris,
You state: “Far more than that believed the lie about WMD in Iraq” …
Chris, please review Iraq’s own admissions to the UN regarding WMD (weapons of mass destruction: chemical, biological, nuclear).
Here’s one of many excerpts from the UN on Iraq and WMD:
13. In February 2003, Iraq invited UNMOVIC to witness the excavation of the
remains of R-400 series bombs that had been unilaterally destroyed. Eight intact R-400 bombs were recovered, together with components from 96 additional bombs of the same type. As noted in earlier reports to the Security Council, subsequent laboratory analysis of liquid samples collected by UNMOVIC from two of the intact bombs revealed evidence of fragments of the DNA of Bacillus anthracis and of the chemical compounds Iraq used to neutralize the biological agent.
Chris: facts, details may be disturbing but once you accept them into your life you will find them refreshing.
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2007, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Thank you Sen. Reid for addressing the shameful comments of Rush.
Good things have resulted because of it.
Posted by: Ann of the Mdwest | October 19, 2007, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Get the facts straight!
“For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.”"
THIS IS NOT WHAT HAPPENED! Rush was referring to actual phony soldiers. Look it up!
The second time -
Back on October 1st, Harry Reid brought the letter to the Senate floor and asked Republicans to join him condemning Limbaugh for saying that soldiers who oppose the Iraq war are “phony soldiers.”
THIS IS NOT WHAT HAPPENED! Rush was referring to actual phony soldiers. Look it up!
GAG what a bunch of CRAP -
The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.
THE DEMOCRATS DIDN’T DO THIS. RUSH DID.
Start using and writing facts!
Posted by: Jerry | October 19, 2007, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Dear Joe:
You state: “As the political power of conservatism declines, the symbolic authority of figures such as Limbaugh is likewise shrinking.”
Nice, Joe. I will sleep well tonight having heard it from on high.
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2007, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Here’s the original text from ABC’s story. Judge for yourself what changes were made by ABC.
Bidding Over $2M for Dems Anti-Rush Letter
Email
Share
October 19, 2007 12:34 PM
ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf Reports: Who says the political fingerpointing in Washington is all for naught?
Back in September, when Democrats and Republicans were sniping at each other over the Iraq war, Republicans passed a nonbinding resolution in the Senate condemning Moveon.org for calling David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, “General Betrayus” in a newspaper ad.
For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.”
The furor seemed to have died down as the Senate moved away from voting on a string of Iraq resolutions to voting on domestic spending bills.
But today comes word that someone on Ebay is going to pay over $2 million for a letter Senate Democrats wrote to Mark Mays, President of Clear Channel, asking him to condemn Rush Limbaugh for the “phony soldiers” comment.
All proceeds from the auction of the letter will go to the Marine Corps – Law Enforcement Foundation, which distributes aid to the families to the children of fallen Marines on behalf of law enforcement officers.
It is unclear at this point who the high bidder is, though they go by the Ebay username y***t. Its unclear if anyone will go beyond the $2,100,100.00 bid (the 211th bid on the letter). But time is ticking down.
Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY. Limbaugh sits on the board of the foundation.
Back on October 1st, Harry Reid brought the letter condemning Limbaugh for saying that soldiers who oppose the Iraq war are “phony soldiers.”
This was a line of political rhetoric that fed off Republicans and their condemnation of Moveon.org for the “General Betrayus” ad. There were nonbinding resolutions and letters written and that was supposed to be it.
At the time, Reid called on Republicans — who had condemned Moveon.org for the General Betrayus ad — to sign the letter condemning Limbaugh. But only 41 Democrats, including Reid, signed the letter.
Today, Reid was more conciliatory to Limbaugh and whoever is paying for the letter. Though he said on the Senate floor that as he had watched the bidding throughout the week, he never thought it would get to $2 million.
“Now, everyone knows that Rush Limbaugh and I don’t agree on everything in life and maybe that is kind of an understatement,” Reid said.
“But without qualification Mark May, the owner of the network that has Rush Limbaugh, and Rush Limbaugh should know that this letter that they’re auctioning is going to be something that raises money for a worthwhile cause. I don’t know what we could do more important than helping to ensure that children of our fallen soldiers and police officers who have fallen in the line of duty have the opportunity for their children to have a good education,” he said.
The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.
Posted by: TIM | October 19, 2007, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I believe this letter is worth the millions of dollars it’s going to fetch. Just as the Articles of the Confederation is an early historical piece of US government legislation, predating our Constitution. The Harry Reid letter that Rush is auctioning could possibly be an historical pre- document as well, being the earliest document on record of the United States Democratic Party transitioning into (pre)United States Communist Party, symbolizing it’s earliest efforts to silence free speech.
Posted by: eric | October 19, 2007, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
THIS is the example that republicans are using as “HISTORIC ABUSE OF POWER”
Oh, that’s classic. Such victims…ha..
LOLLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Posted by: Hugo | October 19, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Harry is just not a very bright person. Like the poor souls on American Idol who think they have a great voice because everyone tells them they do, Harry lives in self delusion. His whole mentality is atonal and he doesn’t know it. He really, really believes he did something really, really clever. That is somewhere between funny and silly and I don’t know whether to laugh at or cry for him. Something akin to someone who frames their thoughts with “pathetic pill popper”. High intellect there.
Posted by: Dan Smith | October 19, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
So is it officially impossible to verify the facts before putting an article in print? I, as millions of others were, was listening to the show in question, and now hold this media outlet to the journalistic integrity of a cheap tabloid.
Posted by: Ben | October 19, 2007, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
I just hope Rush does match Mrs. Casey’s bid. It’s getting harder and harder to trust the right wing these days.
Posted by: Lance Coulter | October 19, 2007, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
NO WAY! ABC NEWS JUST CAN’T GET IT RIGHT !!!!
The “Phony Soldiers” comment referred to specific “soldiers” who falsely claimed to have seen atrocities in Iraq.
In fact, one of these liars spent 5 months in the pokey for his lies.
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
As the letter auction proceeded throughout the past week, I have watched in amazement as nearly all mainstream media, including ABC news, participated in a virtual coverage blackout. Fox at least had the journalistic sensibility to not pretend the story didn’t exist. Your belated coverage is written in a manner surely to be welcomed and approved by the mediamatters style book of journalism.
Thanks to Rush Limbaugh standing up to the Reid smear team of 41, a wonderful charity is about to get a $4.2 million windfall. Rush may be THE definition of bombastic entertainment, but he is totally loyal to this country and our military. Everyone really does know that, including ABC.
I’ve been around many decades and am simply perplexed with what is becoming of this great country of ours. For anyone to compare the traitorous treatment of General Petraeus with an ad in the NY Times that even they admitted after publication should never have been accepted as submitted to something Rush Limbaugh was accused of and never said, is sad indeed.
Media has a responsibility to tell the complete story. Now would be a good time for you to start.
Posted by: skb | October 19, 2007, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Congratulations to ABC News. Try to find any mention of this story on the websites for NBC News or CNN.
Posted by: seigfred | October 19, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Bob,
So you believe there were WMD in Iraq? Why did the US and Britain officially announce that there were no such stockpiles? Maybe you should convince our government that WMD were really there before you worry about convincing me.
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
sez right there in the original version what so many ,evidently cant read themselves ,and i quote yet again…
“Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY. Limbaugh sits on the board of the foundation.”
i really cant believe how stupid people are,not to mention how happy and quick they are to show/prove it. i guess its like my buddy george used to say, ” no sense being stupid if you cant show it…”
actually there should probably be a minimum iq requirement of about 100 or so to vote, only problem with that is it would disqualify about 95% of the american people.
all abcnews really did was edit the original piece so light bulb iq readers could comprehend it easier. run spot run,see spot run…you know,get that difficult to process quantum physics level information down to the avg joes’ intellectual level.lol! no wonder people vote for republicans! so easy to fool…abc news did and they werent even trying!!
thanks abc,and although your editing was dearly needed by some/most of the rather dense readers here , i got jist of the original story just fine, i personally dont need the “short bus rider” version.
Posted by: bah | October 19, 2007, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
While no fan of Rush Limbaugh, I hold in distain the likes of H. Reid more.
The man is a blight on the Legislative Branch of gov. and along with Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Shumer are strong contributing factors to the disfavor the U.S. citizens have for Congress.
Democrat and Republican Congress Persons should be ashamed of their (lack of)performance since the last election. Not one piece of meaningful legislation has been sent to the President.
As a long term voter I find it harder and harder to find an honest and sincere person to vote for.
I do wish The People could clean the entire slate of Representatives and Senators and start over.
Posted by: w rhodes dowdy | October 19, 2007, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
ABC got the story wrong. Why am I not surprised! “Senator” Reid (aka backstabbing idiot) had nothing to do with putting the slanderous letter on ebay to raise money. RUSH LIMBAUGH DID IT HIMSELF. Nor did “Senator” Reid tell others that Rush was also donating $2.1 Million. ABC–you’ve done as I expected–kissed the left wing’s butt.
Posted by: g | October 19, 2007, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
The media no longer gives us the news… it only gives us their VIEWS. There’s no such thing as truth in reporting anymore.
Posted by: Terry | October 19, 2007, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
If this little stunt of Reid’s doesn’t clearly show the American people just how stupid these Democrats are, I don’t know what will. It’s a shame that the American people were fooled into electing these do-nothings anyway.
Posted by: Terry | October 19, 2007, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
I’m not surprised. You, the MSM, will use any spin possible to take the truth and turn it to your own advantage. That simply shows how worthless you are; along with Dingy Harry Reid.
The purpose of the letter was to use the weight of the U. S. Senate to pressure an individual citizen. That’s despicable.
It was Rush Limbaugh himself who turned the tables on the Senate. Dingy Harry, et. al had nothing to do with it. Yet Dingy Harry flagrantly tries to take some credit. And you go along with his lunacy.
Well, you’re all of a kind: Despicable, disgraceful and low-life neo-Stalinists who will do anything to frame a story to suit your warped needs.
Like I stated to begin with; I expected nothing less.
Posted by: Jimbo | October 19, 2007, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Want to have this kind of fun every day?
Watch news conferences on C-Span then change to CNN real quick to see then distort the story.
It’s a riot.
Posted by: Roger | October 19, 2007, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Same as the majority here, the liberals have everything wrong and absolutely nothing right. No credibility whatsoever. Lets see just what 2008 produces. I really don’t think Americans are stupid enough to elect these braindead jerks.
Posted by: Tom | October 19, 2007, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Thank goodness that within a few years network news will be irrelevant. America will be better for it.
Posted by: David E | October 19, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
We? Senator Reid, who the hell is “We”?
Posted by: DV | October 19, 2007, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Discrace. I thought ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN were places to go to get the NEWS. Ok maybe they are but they are NOT accurate. No wonder people don’t watch them anymore.
Thank God for FOX. Get your facts right BEFORE you put a story to bed.
Posted by: Amy | October 19, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
The funniest thing about this whole incident is the fact that democrats pretended to be offended by someone insulting the troops (of course Rush didn’t) but the idea that dems would be offended if someone did is funny as hell.
Posted by: Scott | October 19, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
ABC’s report seems accurate. I don’t see where this is bias in this.
Posted by: Republican Proud | October 19, 2007, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
For years the media kept denying a bias. We knew they were lying then and it is apparent they are lying now. The shameful liberals you expect to be biased but the media has an obligation to tell the whole truth. Now they wonder why so many Americans listen to alternative sources of information like Rush. Americans are just do what good consumers do. When a business quits taking care of it’s customers, to the customer’s satisfaction, the customer goes elsewhere. And they wonder why they (the liberal media) are losing millions of viewers.
Posted by: d wood | October 19, 2007, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
This is Rush and Clear Channel going after free publicity.
Wake up and see it for what it is.
They are the phonies.
Posted by: Keefe | October 19, 2007, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
ABC once again shows its complete biased reporting. The democrats had nothing to do with the EBAY event, and the reporter totally ignored why the letter was of such value….because it was predicated on known lies by Harry Reid, Clinton, and the fab 41 that signed it. Report the lies, that is is the story.
Posted by: BW | October 19, 2007, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
“Phony Reporting at Its Best!” Democrats would sooner spit on our military than give them any support.
Posted by: JMC | October 19, 2007, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Great thinking Keefe – “free publicity” at a matching 2 Million dollars. That kind of “free” I don’t need.
Posted by: Chas | October 19, 2007, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
May I also ask that you inquire as to when all of the Senators who signed the letter will contribute, or is Senator Reid’s letter a real “Declaration of Incompetence”? Oh, and by the way, contribute their OWN funds, not the Taxpayers. They already steal enough from us!
Posted by: PhilM | October 19, 2007, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Although I don’t recall hearing about the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation until the Senate controversy came to light, I checked it out and it seems like a very worthwhile organization. I was thinking that it might be nice for all of us commenting here to make a donation. I just made a small donation of my own (the site seems easy enough to navigate through). Regardless of our political beliefs, making a donation to a worthy cause sounds like a nice way to end a long week!! Just a thought from someone in the Missouri Bootheel. :-)
Posted by: mjm | October 19, 2007, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
ABC is ridiculous. Please don’t tell me you actually think America is stupid enough to read this and think the Dems are the ones who are charitable.
Posted by: sweetONE | October 19, 2007, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Reid is too stupid to realize when he and his fellow Senators are getting ‘in your face’ ridicule.
Posted by: IOpian | October 19, 2007, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
I apologize to abc for my negative postings. I finally read the article and it is totally correct. It does say that Rush listed the item on Ebay.
Posted by: Rush Listener | October 19, 2007, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Harry Reid is a disgrace to his position. “I don’t know what WE” could do……He is probable the number one reason behind Congress’ near single digit approval rate.
Posted by: Larry | October 19, 2007, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
The reason the letter sold for two million dollars is NOT because Harry reid wrote it and 40 senators signed it. The real reason is because this letter represents the bigest abuse of power ever taken by the United States Senate(Government). That is why is a historic document.
Posted by: Gustavo | October 19, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Rush Limbaugh, not the hapless Democrats, deserves all the credit for the Ebay proceeds and matching donation.
Posted by: Tim | October 19, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
I figured the democrat’s were the one’s who bought the letter.. Since they were stupid enough to send it in the first place… (purchase it to burn the damned thing) Their kids and grandkids are going to get beat up at school in the future for something these 41 senators did.
smearjay
Posted by: Mike Jones | October 19, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Is it any wonder that the credibility of the drive-by media is even lower than the all time low rating for Congress of 11%. Just look at this report as a perfect illustration of why the drive-bys have lost the ability to claim even the appearance of objectivity.
MikeP
Posted by: MileP | October 19, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
ABC, you should be ashamed of yourselves. This is a VERY misleading account of what really transpired. If it were up to Harry Reid not a penny would have been raised. What a bunch of FOOLS!! Rush totally embarrassed the do-nothing dems.
Posted by: Love America | October 19, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Loook, this is simple…
Rush donates the letter plus 2 million bucks, the high bidder donates 2 million bucks & the Democrats…well, they donate the vitriol.
It makes perfect sense.
Posted by: katiewithroses | October 19, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Pretty funny. Blantant example of the media showing their bias and getting the facts wrong at the same time.
Rush put the letter up, not the Democrats.
Congrats to Betty Casey. The money will be going to a good cause.
Posted by: Kyle | October 19, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Rush challenged the 41 signers to also match the bid. As usual for Dems, no takers. Nothing out of their pockets, but they still try to take credit for it even when they are outsmarted and outmanuevered.
Posted by: RamsandGolf | October 19, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Hey ABC…you are a willing LIAR here. Reid LIED about Rush Limbaughs comments. Reid and company signed this fraudulant document in total knowledge of the truth. Rush was CLEARLY speaking about soldiers who LIED about their status as soldiers, what they had done and what they had been involved in as well as medals they received. And now, ABC WILLINGLY comes along and does its part to falsly make it appear as if the Rush LIE was equal to what Move On dot Org did to Petraes.
SHAME ON YOU ABC! The country will hold you accountable for perpetuating the lie and showing the true colors of always being the liberal bias organization you really are.
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
This shows how liberalism is a mental disorder. There is no point to have conversation with them, they’ll just say something crazy, stupid, or wrong and since they said it and they are the news it will be the truth. Harry Reid=shame.
Posted by: Nic Belcher | October 19, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
News we cannot trust!
Posted by: Diesel | October 19, 2007, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Open note to Harry Reid and Hillary Clinton. When are you going to send your matching check for the kid’s of dead marines…. Or don’t you like children… I am sure Rush Limbaugh will be getting your check any day now…
smearjay
Posted by: Mike Jones | October 19, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
I love how the Dems are trying to spin this to be THEIR idea. Rush challenged them to match the donation out of their own pockets. I wonder how much they parted with? I’m guessing ZERO.
Posted by: Eric | October 19, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
AMERICA KNOWS THE TRUTH!!!
Posted by: Dee | October 19, 2007, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Please, ABC – you can do better than this. The Democrats never intended for the letter to be auctioned, they were trying to get Limbaugh canned. No matter what you think of Limbaugh’s views, this is over 4 million dollars going to charity because Limbaugh is matching the winning bid. The Democrats are the “phony fundraisers”!!
Posted by: AustinTexas | October 19, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
THIS IS SO MISLEADING!!! First, Rush’s comments about ‘phony soldiers’ was never towards soldiers who opposed the war, but real ‘phony soldiers’, people who lie about their army record in order to gain credibiliy for their anti-war views. Second, this letter was auctioned by Limbaugh, not the Dems, and for the purpose of not only raising money for the children of fallen soldiers and police officers, but also to condemn the democrats who signed the letter which was full of spin and blatant lies. The mainstream media is not to be trusted, and anyone who isn’t blind or ignorant can see where their loyalties lie, not with providing unbiased journalism, but with promoting the democratic party.
Posted by: markD | October 19, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
OUTSTANDING! The Democrats eat crow and the US Marines benefit from it.
Posted by: Henry | October 19, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Wow, giving credit to the Democrats for what? They lied and then abused the power of the Senate. How many Democrats stood up and matched Limbaugh’s match? NONE. The fact that the author gives any credit to the Democrats is totally Freudian.
Posted by: Mike Yakus | October 19, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Typo: Wasghinton, D.C.
Posted by: Stuart Crane | October 19, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
thank you mainstream media for carrying stories like this, whatever would we do without you?
/sarcasm off
Posted by: Ralph Tedesco | October 19, 2007, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
I really, really love it when a plan comes together like this.
Thank you, thank you, thank you Senator Harry Reid — and the 40 other Democrat patriots who came up with this brilliant idea to earn money for a worthwhile charity.
And shame shame on you Republicans for not joining in. Certain proof that Republicans don’t give a hoot what happens to our military and their families.
Posted by: Vince | October 19, 2007, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Harry Reid is a weasle and ABC the drive by media continue to carry his water. Truth no longer maters to the Democrats and as for shame, forget about it!
Posted by: Another Outraged American | October 19, 2007, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
The letter is put up to make a mockery of the Dems, (along with raise money for a good cause), and Reid gets up and takes credit. Classic.
Posted by: Carl | October 19, 2007, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
As Tammy Bruce always says” They are ALL Malignant Narcissicts”. ABC, Harry reid, Nancy Pelosi and all the rest of the 11% approval Congress are a waste of of taxpayer money and a disgrace…..
Posted by: Jose Fernandez | October 19, 2007, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
This headline is ridiculous and misleading, as usual. The democrats did nothing for the troops. Rush Limbaugh raised 4 million bucks and made fools of the democrats to boot! LOVE IT!!!
Posted by: Bob - Madison | October 19, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Did the guy edit his article?
Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Anyone notice that no Dem Senator offered to match Limbaughs donation. Limbaugh is matching the 2.1 Million. Where are the VERY WEALTHY DEMS? Kerry, Kennedy, Lautenberg,Hillary, Rockefeller and others. Harry Reid loses again.
Posted by: Dennis D | October 19, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Please stop lying to the American public. What EXACTLY did the democrats have to do with this except for writing the untruthful letter in the first place? RUSH is the one who pulled this together AND THEN matched it with his own money. What a travesty you are doing here.
Posted by: Jason | October 19, 2007, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
the idiots that vote these Hypocrats into office will continue to blindly follow them because they have no capacity for individual thought. It is blatant across the country.
Rush is a freaking genius and outsmarted the Hypocrats again and not one of them “put their money where their mouth is”!
Hey Hillery where are the cancelled checks for the $800,000 you were supposed to give back to Hsu? Did you forget where those files were as well or are they in the same place the Rose law firm records were!
Shameless! But what is even more scary is the 50% of this country that puts them in power!
GOD HELP US!
Posted by: MLight | October 19, 2007, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
I am shocked, SHOCKED, that a rich guy like Rush Limbaugh thinks he can buy his way out of a jam.
BTW, real manly of Limbaugh to hide behind a charity.
The only people fooled are the ones that are already fooled by right wing propaganda. The fanatical minority of America, thank goodness.
Posted by: Reality | October 19, 2007, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
And Liberals are worried that the goverment will not get the taxes from a 4.2 million dollar tax deductible contibution that will actually help someone.
Posted by: jeb | October 19, 2007, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
10-20 million is peanuts to rush. Once again showing the stupidity of some people. You will never be able to shut down the truth especially rush who is the pillar of truth
Posted by: peter | October 19, 2007, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Silly Statements by Left Wing Wackos
RUSH is a Drug Addict for ex.. \
RUSH doesn’t vote in congress. But Dem Patrick Kennedy does. A Drug Addict Congressman should be your concern.
Posted by: Buzz | October 19, 2007, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Hey, ABC why don’t you send Dan Rather (Biased) out to investigate the truth about this letter….and the charitable funds that the Dem’s and Dingy Reid are donating…
smearjay
Posted by: Mike Jones | October 19, 2007, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
ABC, how in the world van you turn it around and credit the Dems for raising all that money for charity????? The articles ok until you read the last paragraph and wonder if Harry Reid is on your payroll. Who posted the letter? Who matched the bid? Who’s donating the money? I’ll talk real slow so even ABC can understand. It was a republican. You big dummy!
Posted by: Rico | October 19, 2007, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Are you high?
The Democrats didn’t raise one red cent. Mr. Limbaugh took a personal attack on a private citizen delivered from the floor the the Senate (!!!) by that pathetic wastrel of a slime ball, Harry “Useless” Reid. To credit him or any of the other harpies who jumped at the chance to smear is a disgrace.
Of course, Reid trying to spin this total backfire as his plan all along (hey, Harry, it’s MayS) is almost as sad as it is infuriating. Shame on him and the other 40 fools.
Posted by: Dingleberry Reid | October 19, 2007, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
ABC’s spin is laughable. As is Harry Reid’s
insistance on inserting himself into the story.
Posted by: BlueStater | October 19, 2007, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
What a utterly phony, utterly corrupt article. The dems did NOT raise a SINGLE DIME.
It was Betty Casey and Rush Limbaugh who donated the money.
The author of this articles is a demonstrable, proven, liar through and through.
Shame on Harry Reid
Shame on ABC for acting as a shill for the democrats.
Posted by: john | October 19, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
This report is just as discusting as Harry Reid’s letter and his comments today on the Senate Floor.
Lastly, WHY DON’T YOU READ THESE COMMENTS AND GET OFF YOUR AGENDA.
IT STINKS
Posted by: 3kushn | October 19, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
My, oh my. I have researched both sides of this story and can only hope that you all will have done the same.
Rush took something that was intended to destroy him, the future of free speech and talk radio and turned it into a positive. To hear Mister Reid spin the story and have the nerve to say “we” is just plain appalling!
Mrs Bridget
88 with the spunk of a 47 year old
Posted by: Mrs Bridget Stanko | October 19, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
As a former marine it sickens me that punks like Reid are in the position they are in!You should be ashamed to be a lib today! The arrogance of Reid to try and take credit for Rushes good works is totally sickening! So keep spouting your crap, it only helps with our cause so thanks! loser.
Posted by: james d hatheway | October 19, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Did ya notice that Limbaugh thinks he can fix this situation where he insulted soldiers, by throwing a bunch of money at it?
Gee, Rush. I though only ‘libs’ threw a bunch of money at something hoping to fix it.
Posted by: Reality | October 19, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Tell me again how FOX news is biased?
Posted by: Franklancer | October 19, 2007, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Your spin on this only validates everything that the right says about the main-stream media. I cannot believe you have tried to give the Democrats credit for this.
Your spin reminds me a lot of the old “but-for” test in negligence cases…”But for the guy driving drunk the accident wouldn’t have happened”.
Same thing here. The only way to say the Dems get some credit is that “But for the Dems lying, abusing their power to attack a private citizen in violation of their constitutional duty, and otherwise completely abasing their public office, Mr. Limbaugh would not have been able to auction off this letter”.
Posted by: Blaise MacLean | October 19, 2007, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
I’m not even a conservative Republican, yet I agree with the majority here (who appear to be). By any standard, this is a stupid use of wit.
Posted by: Jonathan | October 19, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
As a former Democrat, I can only shake my head at the utter abuse of power Sen. Reid and others have shown since taking back the Senate. It is an embarrassment to themselves and the party and it will be used to bury us in ’08.
IF Reid were serious about wanting to be a part of this charitable miracle, he would be putting up his own money to match as Rush did. Reid’s pettyness is making all Democrats look bad.
Put up or shut up Harry!! We don’t need your kind of “help”.
The more you struggle, the deeper you pull us all into your quagmire of what even a liberal like myself can see is pure libel and slander. And to have it blow up in our faces like this… come on DEMS!
Posted by: Dredd | October 19, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Ordinarily, there are more liberal posters on this website.. Moveon.org must have given all it’s staffers the day off to celebrate Chairman Ho Chi Minh’s Birthday…. Or maybe they are all working the phones raising money for Hillary….
smearjay
Posted by: Mike Jones | October 19, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Hey Reality,
Do you really want the brainpower in this chat to bring up all the crooked Hypocrats in Congress!?
Be careful with the $$$ comments Hillery supporter!
Posted by: Mlight | October 19, 2007, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
The letter will stand in history as the first open (in writing) attempt by the democrats to destroy the 1st amendment and install a communist syle government. Take on a democrat and the party will destroy you, is that Communism or Nazism? It sure isn’t a constitutional government that guarntee’s every citize the right to speak. Dems have now proven to the world that they are nothing more than the slime of the world. They back this up with a ‘Stark’ raving lunitic from Ca. Aren’t you dem’s ashamed to be called a dem?
Posted by: Scrapiron | October 19, 2007, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
How did the Democrats raise any money. That wasn’t their purpose in writing the letter. Rush is the one who got the idea of auctioning it off, and he’s the one who agreed to match the winning bid. The Democrats haven’t responded to Rush’s challenge to match the donation, either individually or collectively. Reid’s conciliatory speech urging those with the financial resources to bid on the letter wasn’t made until an hour before the bidding closed and after the winning bid had been submitted. So how did the Democrats raise the money?
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
I am confused, the article states that Rush was responsible for the EBay auction AND that he is matching the donation. Why are all the comments saying that the article does not have this info? Did these folks read a different article as me?
Posted by: Dennis the menace | October 19, 2007, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
phony soldiers? how about phony libs, how about phony news casts. thank god for rush
Posted by: peter | October 19, 2007, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
So how much money did Dingy Harry put up? Millionaire (by way of Theresa) John Kerry? Hillary? What exactly is Reid taking credit for? The lies and fraud that went into the letter and is the sole reason for the 2 Mil bid at auction? Do you think any antiwar nut put up any money to preserve this great act of courage by Reid and the Democrats?
Posted by: john burhans | October 19, 2007, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Of course this was the Democrats doing. It was their idea, their letter and their signature on the letter. Rush was the broker. Now if you believe this, the Democrats’ next trick is Hillary Care for all Americans and Rush will once again be their broker to make sure that we all have socialized national healthcare.
Posted by: Mario | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
SENATOR REID SHOULD CONDEMN EBAY FOR ITS BIAS AUCTION. NO ONE IN AMERICA SHOULD HAVE TO PAY THAT MUCH FOR THESE SIGNATURES
Posted by: john | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
this story was edited after it hit drudge. the first draft did not include the line about rush putting it on ebay himself. drudge should have the old cached page up on his site soon.
Posted by: dcringo | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Would they have received 4Million if the Dems had not written this letter? Yes. The charity that Rush is on the board of has already raised 29 Million and much of that is money Rush has donated.
Posted by: Mike T | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Pathetic reporting and skewing of the facts. Reid and his band of intellectual cowards bare no credit for what was wholey the idea of Rush Limbaugh. It’s very convenient that ABC ignores the fact that not only is Rush matching the amount but he challenged every one who signed this infamous letter to do the same, MATCH THE FUNDS you hypocritical Democrats! Put your money where your mouth is and prove you support the troops!
COWARDS! and SHAME ON ABC
Posted by: AMD | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Reid is a shameless, lying, pitiful man. He is an embarrassment to this country. A weak , weak desperate man.
Posted by: Mary | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
The facts are simple…
1. Rush made the “phony soldiers” combat about actual phony soldiers, in one case he mentioned on air minutes before the comment that drew the senators’ excoriation, he referenced one basic-training washout, now in trouble for fraudulently claiming military benefits who lied by saying he was in Iraq and committed atrocities. Unfortunately Jesse MacBeth is one of many people who have told this sort of lie, many of whom have ended up as tools used by the socialists to smear this country and its heroic soldiers.
2. Harry and the Democrat socialists knew the exact truth when they produced this letter, in an attempt to use it to generate money for the Democrat party for 2008. Nonetheless, they persisted in a lie in order to do so.
3. Clear Channel did nothing because Rush’s show is a matter of record (you can get it on Podcast, for goodness sake), and its executives were able to verify the truth of the matter.
4. Rush cleverly drew this issue out for over a week, and raised over $4 MILLION to help the kids of fallen heroes in both the Marines and Federal law enforcement. Now, Rush will sell some number of “certified copies” with his signature for $1000 each. The suggestion on-air today was to sell 1,000 more to raise another MILLION!
For those who think that Rush could not afford to match the donation if it were $20 million, it is my understanding that he is worth several hundred million dollars and could easily do so. Even still, Rush donates mind-numbing amounts of money to worthy causes everywhere. Another one that comes to mind is the Leukemia and Lymphoma Foundation.
As to Rush being a hypocrite because he had horrible back pain and became addicted to OxyContin, that does not make the man a hypocrite for criticizing immoral conduct. The notion that one must be perfect in order to criticize anything would mean that only Jesus Christ, of all the people who ever lived, could ever correct anyone for anything.
If Rush cannot criticize Harry Reid because Rush once was hooked on OxyContin, then Harry Reid has no right to criticize Rush because he was involved in shady land deals; Hillary has no right to criticize anyone because she stood by as her husband cuckolded her with numerous women, Ted Kennedy had better shut up because he drowned a pregnant woman in his car, and so forth.
This entire argument is a canard from those who cannot form a cogent response to criticism.
Thanks
John
Posted by: Conservativity | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Rush Limbaugh raised the money, the Democrats didn’t.
Posted by: Average Joe | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
If the truth be told, Reid tried to keep the letter from BEING auctioned, then when he failed in that attempt (as he often fails) decided to take credit for raising the money on the basis of having written it. This is tantamount to the Menendez brothers asking for leinency from their jury and court based on the fact that they were orphans! To take any credit for Rush Lmbaugh’s brilliance in this matter, Harry needs to pony up his matching funds as well as every senator who so dispicably signed this piece of idiocy. Where is THAT money? Until we see it…well, you know what you can do–but keep it behind closed doors so I can’t see you do it.
Posted by: jkl | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Come on Harry Reid, pony up some charity money to match Rush Limbaugh’s donation. I know you just made some money on that “crooked land deal” you just did… Do it for the Children…Do it for the children… (classic libera line…)
smearjay
Posted by: Mike Jones | October 19, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
This is why I have stopped watching or reading any news except from FOX, NewsMax, and Drudgereport.
The bloggers, and reporters that work for these outlets, ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN are totally biased, and the liberals know it. Now they want to take over talk radio to completely shout out conservitive views. If you elect a liberal to office, you are damning this country to socialism!
Posted by: Damn Mad | October 19, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
How can you possibly write that the “Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol”??
This had nothing to do with the Democrats–it was Rush and his staff turning an outrageous and slanderou attack on him by the Dems into something positive and beneficial for the children of our military.
And by the way, you need a new proofreader–you misspelled “matters” in the last line.
Posted by: Marie | October 19, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
I feel the same way about the letter as the vote regarding moveon.org’s Patreus ad. Stupid waste of time. I’m glad a charity is getting something out of it.
Although I think Rush is a jerk, it seemed quite clever of Rush to put the letter up on e-bay to make a statement, and I am also so very pleased that he will be making a hefty contribution to such a fine charity.
Posted by: Marilyn | October 19, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Let’s USE this to get out the vote and defeat HC or BO. Hey, BO…get it? More political speak makes me sick.
Posted by: Cash | October 19, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Media bias? What media bias? What did the dimocrats have to do with this? Other than writing and signing the letter to try and get Limbaugh off the air; something they and the media fervently hope for, this was about doing good for the Marine and kaw enforcement orphans and poking fun at Harry “Land Deal” Reid and the other dhimis in the eye. I almost lost my cooke listen Dingy Harry today. Where’s his contribution??
Posted by: Mack the Knife | October 19, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
This story ends all wrong. Democrats raised nothing for Charity, Republicans and in particular Mr. Limbaugh raised over 4 million. Democrats are challenged to match Rush and his generosity toward these children. The author of this story may wish to ask the 41 Senators as to which are going to take the challenge and actually help children. I suspect not a single Democrat. So for helping children, it is millions from Republicans and nothing from Democrats. How typical.
Posted by: David Tennant | October 19, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Good example of partisan bias. The article says three times that Rush was referring to soldiers who were against the war. What is funny is that ABC coined the term Rush used, and like ABC news, Rush was talking about people who pretended to be soldiers.
Posted by: Joe | October 19, 2007, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
To quote Rush:
“Senator Reid, let me be clear about this one more time: it wasn’t your letter that raised this money — it was your abuse of power.”
Giving Democrats credit for this is a pathetic attempt to deceive uninformed readers. Also unlike the letter to moveon.org the letter about Rush was based on a lie, Rush never said that anti-war soldiers were unpatriotic.
Posted by: David | October 19, 2007, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Is anyone who’s posting here actually reading the article? It says clearly:
“Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY.”
Drudge links this page with a headline that ABC credits the Democrats for raising money and everyone jumps to comment without bothering to read. All the article said is that it was the letter written by Democrats that helped Rush raise this money. No one is crediting the Democrats for listing the letter on Ebay.
I hope a Democrat wins the White House so that more funding will go to schools and education and Republicans will get the chance to learn to read.
Posted by: Jason | October 19, 2007, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Reid is a piece of crap along with the rest of the Democrats. Those of us in the military know who supports us. The news wonders why we in the military do not like them. This is a perfect example. The truth right in front of them and they still can not get it right.
Rush is our biggest supporter and always has been.
Posted by: Captain in Iraq | October 19, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
I am Increculous!! And the MSM wonder why they are not trusted? Let this stand front and center as a twisting and malevolent spinning of the facts to make this event the exact opposite of what it was…a condemnation of the Smear Letter as it is widely known.
Posted by: SJ Mart | October 19, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
If you dittoheads want to do something for Marines, you can always go ENLIST.
No, no, let me guess. You were in Vietnam. You were in Beirut. You have 17 Purple Hearts….
Any vet that supports a draft dodger like Limbaugh or Cheney, or an AWOL like Bush, is a disgrace to their uniform anyway. Even a pretend one like most of you have.
Posted by: Reality | October 19, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
We all know how corrupt Big Media has become… So who is REALLY surprised by this EDITORIAL?
Where are Al Gore, John Edwards, Bill Clinton, Dan Rather, Alec Baldwin, Babs Streisand, Robert Redford, Hanoi Jane and all of the other WEALTHY hos, fakes and liars, with their $ 2,000,000?
Posted by: Howard Ino | October 19, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
To Dennis the Menace and Reality and others who think this letter is being misinterpreted you need to get past his attempt to whitewash the smear and join the cause. Now I did delete a sentence so those of you who need help reading between the lines can get it:
“Now, everyone knows that Rush Limbaugh and I don’t agree on everything in life and maybe that is kind of an understatement,” Reid said.
“I don’t know what we could do more important than helping to ensure that children of our fallen soldiers and police officers who have fallen in the line of duty have the opportunity for their children to have a good education,” he said.
Mrs Bridget
88 with the spunk of a 47 year old
Posted by: Mrs Bridget Stanko | October 19, 2007, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Not surprising that the ABC BLOG reporter wouldn’t even take its time to check the facts of a story. No matter how much the mainstream media wants to stay relevent, they never let the facts get in the way of the story they want to tell. Not only is this reporter simply an a partisan hack, but a lousy one at that. A skillful hack would have taken Harry’s comments and made it look like Limbaugh and Reid came together (Reid of course showing the olive branch to that brute Limbaugh). Instead we have a cheap attempt to cover up the real facts with some sort of political rantings from a reporter who clearly couldn’t find a story even if it was handed to him. What’s wrong with reporting the news the way it happeaned and not the way you want it to happean?
Posted by: Steven Pietrykowski | October 19, 2007, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
ABC has been modifying the article. Its different now then when it was released earlier.
Posted by: Jeb | October 19, 2007, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I don’t know why all you people are in such a tuff about Reid. He is basically “out there”, along with the majority of other senators. Anyone following what the Senate has been doing for the past 4 years can see this.
BUSINESS AS USUAL.
Scary. Line up all those 41 Senators and take a picture of them. Title it: “A Halloween Scene”.
Posted by: Marty Minor | October 19, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
This is totally ridiculous, the Democrats were trying to cause an Imus style firing of Rush not raise money, this article is not only completely biased, but total fiction. How could any news organization expect to be take seriously when they print total fabrications because of their political beliefs.
Posted by: Brett | October 19, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Your articale states Rush “reportedly said on his show that he will match the winning bid — a total of $4.2 million for the foundation.”
Why can’t you preface the dems ‘phony soldiers’ allegations against Rush in the same way?????????
Oh yes, “reportedly” can only be used for documentable POSITIVE info. What a joke is the manner in which you do your “job”.
Posted by: Swamp | October 19, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
WWWWHHHHHAAATTTTT????????
That sound you here is the thin veiled curtain that denies liberal bias falling to the ground.
What an out right bold face lie. Maybe this is just a mistake.
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Mr. Wolf,
The democrats have made zero for charity, that is $0.00.
Posted by: Jim Tom | October 19, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Nevadians! Please recall Reid!
Posted by: SEC | October 19, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
You’ve got to be kidding!! Democrats (vs. Rush) did something charitable. ABC, figure it out before you report it.
Posted by: Dennis | October 19, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
I’ve been following this story from the beginning. From the day that Rush used the word “phony” until today. The inability of the “mainstream” media to accurately report on a story that takes no more than an hour to do background on, is shameful at best. There are two obvious conclusions: spin or incompetence.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
NO, Democrats just look like what they really are , a group of leaders all combined who only enjoy having a 11 percent approval rating of the American people. We the people are not privy to who the letter belonged to nor whom it was meant to belittle. Any professional organisation stating differently can expect to enjoy a equally equivalent approval ratings from us.
Posted by: Brian | October 19, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
The letter was full of lies. The forty-one nitwits who signed it used their positions to try to intimidate freedom of speech, clearly a violation of their oaths. ABC never reports the truth about sleazy democraats. These arrogant liberal creeps don’t deserve to be serving as animal control officials, much less making laws tht we have to obey. Pathetic himan debris is what they are.
Posted by: Larry G | October 19, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
This is the most egregious twisting of the truth I have seen in many a year, both by Harry Reid and now by ABC. this will be the first year since 1984 that I will vote Republican, BECAUSE OF THIS!
Posted by: Pog Mahone | October 19, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Last line in this article:
” No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol”
This reporting is nuts !! This auction was in essence a statement AGAINST the Democratic Senate leadership and their interpretation of “free” speech -
Posted by: dlz | October 19, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Talk about getting a story wrong ABC. Rush called people who protested the war AND who lied about their military service to boost their credibility “phony soldiers.”
Rush’s whole statement was about the anti-war movement using fakes who strut about in un-earned unforms and tell tales of valor that never happened.
For shame, ABC. You know this.
Posted by: David Smith | October 19, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Too bad, you were the only one of the big three (four if you count CBS) that I still watched. Now you go down the toilet with the rest. Not as bad as exploding gas tanks, but still a pretty good stink. See ya later, kids! Say bye to Charlie for me!!!
Posted by: jarhed | October 19, 2007, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
To Mary who complains that everyone else is reading the article wrong and needs Democratic money to promote reading lessons, note the last sentence of the article:
“Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Posted by: Susan J | October 19, 2007, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
dear ABC
Your statement “No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol” is completely and totally wrong. the democrats had NOTHING to do with the letter making a ton of money. rush limbaugh was the driving force behind this donation and deserves all the credit for it, not to mention his matching the sale with his own money. i don’t see any of your precious democrats opening their wallets, and they won’t.
Posted by: John P. Thomas | October 19, 2007, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Harry Reid is just such a twit. Trying to take credit for this charitable idea and contribution. Just a twit.
Posted by: Mac | October 19, 2007, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
So let me get this right. Murtha wrongly convicts troops of war crimes. All of Hollywood – while saying they “just want to bring the troops home” continue to talk about them killing mothers and sisters. DePalma makes a movie about a few bad soldiers and portrays it to be what all soldiers do. The group dictating policy for congress (moveon) calls our general in iraq a liar. Where the hell is the letter signed by reid and clinton, et al condemning these people? This is why it’s wrong.
And to the dolt who says Rush is no longer relevant – 20 million listeners makes him relevant. if you knew how to use the english language you would be questioning his credibility – not his relevance.
Posted by: kballintx | October 19, 2007, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Get it right already…..Dems 0, Rush 1, our great military men/women/& families 100!! It is so sad that the people of this great nation, no matter what your beliefs are towards the war/president/military, cannot pull together to support what needs to be completed in order to protect us all and our country. After the war is won there is plenty of time to point fingers and figure out where we went wrong so never to repeat it; but until then we need to unite and finish this as quickly as we can. This lie filled article and actions of the liberal Democratic party is one more example of why there is such mistrust and animosity towards each other.
Posted by: Wisconsin-Richey | October 19, 2007, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
There is nothing more ridiculous then when people who never served in the military, Harry Reid and his friend “Reality” on here, run around accusing others of having never served in the military. It is so retarded and laughable. They are just too stupid to be embarrassed by themselves.
Posted by: Mary | October 19, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
I stopped being a Democrat the minute Bill Clinton shook his finger at the camera stating that he did not have sex with “that” woman. The main reason was that the media was obviously not reporting, what so many people, including myself now know, the real truth. In this case, it is so brazenly obvious that the Senate Democrats are not only lying to the public on the senate floor on national TV… but, they are making &$^*# out of themselves expecting that smart people will believe it. Does Harry Reid actually believe that anyone believes his dribble? His sole purpose was to garner support to remove Rush from the airwaves, much like what was done to Imus, period. To believe that Harry Reid, et al care about the troops is to believe in the tooth fairy.
Ask yourself, if the Senate Majority Leader is so willing to lie with a bold face on national TV about a private citizen…that doesn’t scare you as to what they might do with the Presidency? One of their own major camgaign donors, if you remember, stated that Hillary lies with such ease that it is down right scary. Anyone remember who was recently praising Hugo Chavez…and how easily he came to power?…and what he has done the civil liberties of private Venezuelans? I am just amazed that anyone with half a brain can take Senator Reid seriously…much less report it as such.
Posted by: Dakota | October 19, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
You really believe that the democrats are the ones responsible for making the money here?
There’s a reason that you and the other networks are losing viewership and this is a fine example of it!
Posted by: Wm. L. Townsend | October 19, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
ABC goes another notch down. No real journalism here. Infotainment junk is all that’s left of TV news.
Posted by: John Wark | October 19, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Look, whther you agree with his politics or not, Rush has done a great thing here, depite the Senate Dems. trying to take some credit for it just because they signed it.
Senator Reid, man up and admit that what you said was a boldface lie, taken out of context, and grossly misrepresented or get out of the Senate. Plain and simple. That goes for ANY public official, regardless of party affiliation.
As for the news agency’s, this goes for all of them including Fox to some extent, stop playing politics with us all and just REPORT the news, not distort the news.
When did American politics stray from what is best for AMERICA and move to what is best for me and mine. As Americans, we all hold a portion of the blame for allowing things like this to continue and not stop it by using the ballot box. If you don’t like them, vote them out or shut the hell up.
Posted by: scott | October 19, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Unreal – people bid on this not because it had these idiot democrat’s signatures on it, but because it’s an historical document. The United States congress wishing to punish the SPEECH of an individual private citizen…and the single least effective person in congress (Reid) taking credit for the resultant charity. Where’s your matching funds, Mr. Reid??
Posted by: Brad | October 19, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
THE PERSON WHO WAS TALKING ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS MORAL COMPASS, SEEMS TO HAVE A VERY SHORT MEMORY. AT LEAST NONE OF THE REPULBICANS THAT HE LISTED HAVE NOT DISRESPECTED THEIR OFFICES LIKE PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON DID WITH THE INTERN MISS MONICA. WHICH WAS IT, (ABOUT SEX OR LYING TO THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY) WHICH IS A FELONY. SO WHY DON’T ALL OF YOU GREAT DEMOCRATS, INCLUDING THE OLD TROOPER SEND OVER YOUR 22 YEAR OLD DAUGHTERS TO VISIT WITH FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON. SINCE IT WAS ONLY ABOUT SEX IT SHOULD NOT BOTHER ANY OF YOU.
Posted by: granddaddy | October 19, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Can’t the mainstream media getn anything right? What else is ABC reporting incorrectly, that we DON’T know about?
Posted by: Karl Kategianes | October 19, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
The letter was auctioned as an anti- Rush SMEAR. The MSM and Drive By Media know it. And the public knew they were ignoring the story and would twist it today. They play dumb when they want to, make up the news, twist facts, pretend they are god when they want. Oh yes ~ and they are phony reporters when they want. They cry first ammendment rights when they want and ignore them when it suits their agenda. Proof is in this article. Rush, thank you for your stellar patriotism. America needs you now more than ever!
Posted by: Julie Anne | October 19, 2007, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
It all depends of what the meaning of the word is is.
Posted by: Beau Philips | October 19, 2007, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
What sleezy biased BS!
Posted by: Clint | October 19, 2007, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
First, Dingy Harry doesn’t even know who the head of Clear Channel Communication is — it is Mark Mays not May. Second, ABC News doesn’t bother to fact check and flag the error in Dingy Harry’s stupid speech. Third, Dingy Harry was given the opportunity to come on Rush’s show and say the lies to Rush directly, but since he is a weasel he doesn’t have the class to confront Rush directly.
Posted by: davoh | October 19, 2007, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
What A disgrace!! Harry Reid Should be ashamed of himself! He Had Nothing to do with the money raised By Mr Limbaugh and now he and other democrats are trying to take credit….SHAME on them! Why not do what Rush did, MATCH THE FUNDS!!!!!! Put their money where their mouth is. ABC, shame on You too for making it sound like the Dems helped out, They did NOT and You know it….Get it right so the country can maybe start to trust the network news again or are You just too tied up in the partison politics. No network political bias, give me a break!!!
Posted by: Ken Fontenot | October 19, 2007, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I never liked Rush ever before now. I don’t like his style, never did. But this is amazing and heroic on his part. Good going, Mr. Limbaugh! Even if I don’t like listening to your show and disagree with you a lot of the time, I will NOT vote for any the people who signed that letter! The Democrats in Congress are shameful and deceitful to a level I have never seen before. And the media is proving an AMAZING liberal bias in committing ongoing errors of omission in their selective reporting. The lot of them are bought and paid for by MoveOn, MediaMatters and the Daily Kos. America needs saving from this incredible turn of events. I too wil vote Republican to try to help my country wash its hands of these increasingly Communist criminals. For shame!
Posted by: Einstein | October 19, 2007, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
To all of you liberals, just read the last line. Where are your reading skills? It is an outright lie and yet you seem ok with that. It is really telling about you and the media that is on your side in everything.
Posted by: dana | October 19, 2007, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I served in the ARMY during the Viet Nam War Era, and remember the TET offensive when the Viet Cong finally came out of the woodwork and the US military kicked their butts. I also re-member the media turing “TET” into a humiliating loss for the military -tactics which still exist for ABC, Reid
LIED, Rush “didn’t take it lightly”, another lie, and ABC got it wrong-again!
Posted by: mrpaulusa | October 19, 2007, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I dont understand this story I thought Rush was th one who put the letter up for auction. Well just gives me another reason not to trust ABC.
Posted by: Ken | October 19, 2007, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
More spin-o-rama from the DNC wing of ABC news. Give me a break! The sad thing is that many feeble minded morons will read this story and really think that the democrats had something to do with raising money for the families of our troops/police officers.
Remember, traitors like Harry Reid, B. Hussein Obama, and the former first lady (I can’t even say her name without feeling sick), have repeatedly voted to cut funding for our troops and leave them hanging in a war zone.
It does not surprise me that now the poltical wind is a changin’ and so is the democratic position on the war. IT IS HARD FOR ME TO IMAGINE WHY ANY PERSON WITH AN IQ ABOVE 2 WOULD CONSIDER CASTING A VOTE IN SUPPORT OF THESE DEMOCRATIC IDIOTS.
WAKE UP AMERICA, B4 IT IS TOO LATE!
P.S. GO RUDY GO.
Posted by: Robert Marley | October 19, 2007, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
How did the Democrats raise any money here? They were invited by Mr. Limbaugh to match the winning bid, thereby increasing the amount given to charity. None of the 41 Senators elected to match the bid. Give credit to Mr. Limbaugh for the smarts to use a political hack-job’s ill planned personal attack to benefit the families of true heros.
Posted by: Tim Wolff | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
The Dems had NOTHING to do with the fundraising! They misquoted Rush and mislead the public in the first place.
It is Mark Mays Senator Reid and their was no “we” in the fundraising.
Posted by: A. Lendel | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Wow, I am amazed by the number of people who cannot comprehend this article/blog. Many of you just saw the link from Drudge and assumed the headline from Drudge was accurate. Learn to read!
Wolf credits the political vitriol of Democrats. Much like it was said money was made for the Humane Society off Mike Vick, money was given to charity off the Democrats.
Read and then decide, people. Don’t wait for Drudge to tell you what to think.
Go on and support the man calling any soldier who disagrees this war a “phony soldier,” though. That’s a great way to treat the men and women who have sacrificed so much for us.
Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
What horsecrockery. The actions of Rush Limbaugh are what made money for charity, not Dingy Harry and his co-conspirators. MSM “journalists” are no more than shills for the democrat party. No ethics, no morals, no brains, no originality, but they are the best dang parrots around. BTW, where is the democratic senators contribution to this charity? Supercilious, sanctimonious, slimeballs the lot of them.
Posted by: frippin | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
ABC = Democrat mouthpiece. At least try to be objective and accurate.
Posted by: Joseph | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
What else would one expect from both ABC news and our AMAZING leftist senate? It was a given that Reid and the forty others would take credit for something they had absolutely nothing to do with. After all, that’s the leftist philosophy. Take credit where it isn’t due and lie about your own achievements. It’s all about power, my friends. That’s all they ever have or will care about. Our Democrat politicians will just keep getting more and more twisted the longer they have the government within their iron grips.
Posted by: Grey | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
The democrats contributed nothing to the marine law enforcement fund. Harry Reid crossed perilously close to the line in slandering and lying about a private citizen then trying to get him censored by writing that letter to his boss, Clear channel. Harry Reid is digging his own grave with his mouth everytime he opens it. Veterans of Nevada don’t feel that he represents them anymore. It’s time for HIM to go – vote him out.
Posted by: rose haft | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
The Democrats support the troops, well I mean, besides suppressing their right to vote but that’s a minor thing. I’LL NEVER EVER FORGET THAT THESE PIGS WENT TO COURT TO KEEP THE MILITARY VOTES FROM COUNTING!! That’s ALL you need to know, the Democrats only support the troops if they are sitting around or are posing for photo ops with them, then they’re great and really cute in their uniforms. The Democrats only use the troops for politcal agendas. They couldn’t care less about them b/c they are mainly white, conservative, christian males so not exactly their voting base.
Posted by: Mary | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
What can I say that hasn’t already been said? Not much. Way to go dittoheads, and way to go Rush! In your eye, Dingy Harry. In your eye, you dolt.
Posted by: Deanna | October 19, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
You said in your first post on here:
“clearly, this is one of the reasons the republican party keeps getting in/staying in power , they have a large group of semi intelligent voters/zombies that cant understand a simple sentence. easy to confuse the dense and thats what the republicans count on.
i know public school education did you wrong but jeez.
please try to read and comprehend the written english language correctly before you trumpet out your unbridled ignorance (en masse) for all to see.”
You should be careful when you try to insult people’s intelligence, especially when you’re not exactly “well endowed” in that arena. Let me quote for you the last sentence of the article:
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
I think this sentence is why everyone is upset. The Democrats did absolutely nothing to make money for charity. Rush even challenged them to help out, but they were silent. ABC is trying to give credit to the Dems rather than Rush. That is a grotesque 180 degree twisting of the facts.
I don’t know what would be worse. Either you didn’t finish reading the article and berated people for not reading it, or you simply did not comprehend what you were reading. Either way, you are a credit to you party.
Posted by: ArcherB | October 19, 2007, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Once again, the drive-by media lies for the stupid Democrats – what else is new. Notice how the story mentions that Rush matched the $2.1 million, but leaves out the part that Limbaugh challenged these gutless worms of Senators to also match the winning bid and none of them will.
Posted by: Scott | October 19, 2007, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
this is unbelievable!
Posted by: gary | October 19, 2007, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
As usual the drive-by media are wrong – they did not even report on the auction of the leter – and it was for a charity – and now they give the credit to dingy harry reid. That is why I am glad there is somewhere else to get my news other than the 3 networks – they have only one agenda… we all know what that is…………………..
Posted by: Manuel | October 19, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Since according to ABC this is the Dems raising money, we can except that ALL of the senators that singed the letter will match the donations right?
Posted by: SPRADA | October 19, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Okay Morons listen up. I was listening to Rush when he made the non-comment about soldiers against the war. He never said what he is being accused of by the dems. Gees, where do you start. For those of you too young to know any better, during the Vietnam war a number of people represented themselves as soldiers and talked about how they commited attrocities. The thing was none of them were ever in Vietnam. Lately, another bozzo representing himself as a soldier talked about attrocities being committed in Iraq. Like his predecessors he was never there. This was the phony soldier Rush was discussing.
Posted by: A Real Soldier | October 19, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Reid and the rest of the Democrats and the drive by media don’t give a damn about the truth, nor constitutional protections. Wake up people. Our Republic is beyond what the elctorial box can do. What really boggles my mind are the folks giving the Marxist/socialist Democrats money to run for office and screw them over with a smile.
Even though Rush nails Reid, and the repulsive Democrats, freedom loving Americans sit on their butts while the left is taking over our country. If people don’t get out to the streets, and denounce the crazy left, President GWB needs to be impeached not because of the war, but signing and bringing G-d aweful, and illegal bills. The ability of our country being held together by the rule of law is over.
Posted by: Donald Segal | October 19, 2007, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
I’ve read many of the comments here. People on the right, this is what Rush has been saying about the MSM and Drive By Media for many moons now. This is an object lesson for us all to observe and take to heart. They are INTENTIONALLY twisting the story. They intentionally ignored it and now they are twisting it. They took their cue from Harry Reid on the Senate floor today. Any of this ringing true to you?? ABC loves all these negative comments. They rally the base for the left ~ and in doing so, they hope to glean a few more votes from the right. Don’t be so shocked. Truth no longer has value in the media.
Posted by: tulipred | October 19, 2007, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
I wonder if Rush would take a lie detector test about whether he thnks only one guy and not all the military who oppose the war are “phoney soldiers”.
He’s a phoney and a creep, everything that is wrong about what’s going on in this country with the “phoney patriots”.
Some of these Rushies hate their fellow Americans if they are Democrats as much as they hate the terrorists. Boy when Bush had his chance to heal and bring this country together, he totally did the opposite.
People like Rush, Ann Coulter and Bill O’Reilly have created a verbal civil war in this wonderful country…Lincoln must be crying in his grave.
Posted by: Pam | October 19, 2007, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
There is so much said already on this blog regarding this disgraceful piece of journalistic distortion, I can’t possibly add anything really new, other than to add that although I do not always ‘buy-in” to everything Rush pontificates, THIS article clearly attempts to deflect the central point of WHY this was a successful eBay auction – that the Senate of the US has essentially sanctioned a private citizen for his speech. And to make it even worse, they didn’t even get it right, having totally distorted his “phony soldier” comment. This is really disgusting Senatorial leadership AND journalism.
Posted by: Bob N | October 19, 2007, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Man, all of you right wing nuts are sooo insensitive! I have a friend who knows someone in Code Pink that has a neighbor who reads DailyKos sometimes, and my friend says that it was in FACT Harry Reid who put this up for auction. It was in FACT Harry Reid who masterminded this brilliant way to get more than $4 million to the children.
Why does it always have to be the women and minorities who get hurt by these things? Not only this, but I heard that Ellen isn’t taping shows because she is distraught over her dog.
Whay am I going to do? I need a government program to turn to.
Posted by: Timeline Guy™ | October 19, 2007, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Did Dirty Harry Reid offer to match the auction price as a donation ?
Nope it was Rush who is matching the auction bid, not Dingy Harry.
Posted by: Dick Sicario | October 19, 2007, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Honestly, the only reason I read this article was because Drudge pointed to it.
Posted by: RB | October 19, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Democrats didn’t make a ton of money for charity, what a pathetic thing to say…
Rush Limbaugh is the one that raised the money. The reason it fetched so much was because he put on there an example of the government and democrats trying to silence a private citizen.
Rush Limbaugh deserves credit for this, not the idiot Democrats.
Posted by: Josh | October 19, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money”
Are you for real?
Posted by: JWF | October 19, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
The problem with the article is simple. It gives credit to Sen. Reid for raising funds. The reason why the letter attracted the attention and bids it did was because of how outrageous it was… it attracted attention because of its felicity with the facts of Mr. Limbaughs statement. To say the Democrats raised this money is a little bit gauling.
Posted by: Jason | October 19, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
This is completely misleading. Limbaugh did not call “soldiers who opposed the war” phony. He referred to non-soldiers who claim to be soldiers for political or VA benefits “phony.”
This is yet another example of leftist media attempting to smear someone, in this case, someone who turned the smear of a private citizen by some in Congress into an incredible gift to charity. I would love to see some of Limbaugh’s critics in Congress pool to donate even 10% of this gift to such a worthwhile cause.
Posted by: Bill | October 19, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Byron Wolf, you should be ashamed of yourself for perpetrating these lies. No Republicans signed the letter because they knew the truth: Reid’s allegations were based on a lie ginned up by a liberal attack group.
ABC News, you have a choice: you can continue to spread lies, or you can act like a real news organization and tell the truth: this whole thing was an attempt by Media Matters and Senate Democrats to censor Rush Limbaugh, and he threw it back in their faces.
Posted by: Robert | October 19, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Way to go, ABC. Limbaugh covered the facts on this for 3 hours today and you STILL missed the story.
Just for the record, Limbaugh was calling non-soldiers phonies, not serving soldiers opposed to the war.
ABC-If you tried to get your facts straight and present the news in an objective fashion, you have viewers!
Enjoy-Paul
Posted by: Paul R. Bear | October 19, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Harry Ried had NOTHING to do with the charity aspects of Rush’s brilliant ebay event. You people in the “newsroom” live in an alternate universe.
Posted by: Mark Lloyd | October 19, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
PATHETIC. Absolutely pathetic. What a outrageous joke ABC news is, let alone that lame doddering fool Reid.
Posted by: LA Doc | October 19, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Dingy Harry Smear Letter Now Worth $2.1 Million (UPDATE): Cheesiest Stunt Ever From Dingy Harry
Unbelievable.
The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.
Posted by: JammieWearingFool | October 19, 2007, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
What is all of your problems, do you have that much hatred that you can’t read an article. It states in the 7th paragraph down that Rush Put it up for bid on ebay, and that he planned on matching the funds. Take your foggy glasses of and read the article. then clean your own house before you criticise someone elses. All is see on here is hate, no rationality, but what should I expect from lemmings. We have to do better people
Posted by: Mr Cee | October 19, 2007, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
It’s really mature to accuse people who disagree with you of being incapable of reading.
Posted by: Mary | October 19, 2007, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
This is a prime portrait of how the 110th Congress lied to get elected, and has lied in perpetuity ever since.
Disgusting.
Posted by: Enlightened | October 19, 2007, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
THIS REPORT IS DISHONEST!!!
The Democrat Senators specifically sent this letter to DESTROY RUSH LIMBAUGH. (a la Don Imus)
Posted by: Tony V | October 19, 2007, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
A Real Soldier, the text of Limbaugh’s shows are available online. Nowhere in the few minutes preceding or following his comment on “phony soldiers” does he mention the issue you mention. The only clear connection to his “phony soldiers” comment were those who disagree with the war. He can claim to me misquoted on his own show, but the text doesn’t lie.
Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2007, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Amazing the amount of comments that have already been made.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
You should get Michael Moore to write your next article…
Posted by: Mike Jones | October 19, 2007, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Hey, don’t call this guy a “phoney journalist”, that’s unpatriotic! How many of you have ever served as a journalist? yeah, I thought so!
Posted by: d00d | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
How unfortunate that ABC gets the facts wrong again. I fail to see how the Democrats raised money for charity, when it was Mr. Limbaugh who put the letter up for auction AND will provide 50% of the charitable dollars raised. ABC must get away from the liberal bias, or it will continue to lose viewers. Mr. Wolf and other ABC reporters, please report the facts not your biased, left-wing opinions.
Posted by: Suzanne | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Thank God for the Democrats raising this kind of money–it’s going for a great cause!
Posted by: Dale | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Per: Mary | Oct 19, 2007 6:24:14 PM:
“Is anyone who’s posting here actually reading the article? It says clearly: “Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY.”
Mary… DID YOU READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE???
Big Media understands the analytical skills of typical Democrats! (It is a PROVABLE FACT that the average level of education of Liberals is BELOW that of Conservatives.)
The articles final statement: “The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
The reader is left with a final impression that this charitable bonanza was because of the Democrats!
Posted by: Howard Ino | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Fake story. There are no writers at ABC
Posted by: Scott Von Blog | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
I am stunned by this whole ordeal!! These Democrats are in positions of power in our Federal Government!! I wouldn’t trust any of them with a wooden nickel! Not only are they not honorable, but they think the American public is really stupid! It is really scarey to think they make decisions in our government that affect our lives. Their actions are embarrassing, what does the rest of the world think of all of this?? How can our allies trust the US when they see this behavior by our Senators?
Posted by: Judi | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Yo Mr Cee read this:
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
That makes it sound like Dems raised the $ which they did not. ABC has it wrong.
Posted by: A Lendel | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
I never watch ABC News and the attitude in which this article was written is why.
Obviously, promoting a socialist agenda is more important than money or truth to the creatures at ABC.
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Rush was the one who put the letter up for auction and then matched the 2 million dollar donation! None of the democrats are matching it.
Posted by: Brennon Hartshorn | October 19, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Does everyone realize writing on this site and complaining about ABC is only making them more money from Chevron and whoever else advertises here?
Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2007, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
The Democrats had nothing to do with this auction except that they attacked a privite citizen by lying about him before Congress and before the people of the United States. The Democrats should be ashamed first for allowing the MoveOn ad, then attacking citizen Limbaugh, and then trying to use the letter to make themselves look good.
Posted by: Roy | October 19, 2007, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Will The 41 Democrats each sacrafice a pittance, just over 102K to the same charity? If they won’t then they all ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Posted by: Tom | October 19, 2007, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
You all know the real story. ABC News or Ministry of Truth? You tell me.
Posted by: TheMadKing | October 19, 2007, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Debating about WMD is a change of subject. But since you brought it up… The first time I heard of the Iraq WMD threat was from Clinton. We also heard from the UN, France, Russia, Kerry, etc. So who lied.
Sadaam used chemical WMDs against the Kurds and Iran. So he had them. The US and Britain didn’t say Iraq had no WMDs they declared that none were found.
…and why is that? Unknown at this point however, Iraqi border patrol troops have testified that Sadaam sent his guard to the Syrian border several times prior to the war to relieve them. So crossings might have been made in secret. Also a former Iraqi Air Force officer has testified that several flights of weapons were conducted in hollowed out passenger planes. To Syria.
What this shows is that you are the mind numb robot who feeds off of the talking points.
Back to the point. Even though this letter suggests a repremand for Rush it comes from 41 politically powerful Senators and that makes it an abuse of power.
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
POSITIVE PROOF OF THE EXTREME LIBERAL BIAS OF THE MEDIA…… Democrats had no involvement in putting this letter on Ebay nor in matching the funds that occurred because of Rush Limbaugh. How any so called journalist could write this article and GIVE DEMOCRATS CREDIT FOR THIS IS OVER THE TOP. Let’s see…GWB caused the hurricanes that ravaged New Orleans but Democrats are saving the world thanks to Al Gore and now Democrats get credit for Rush Limbaugh’s putting this on Ebay for charity???? The bias just keeps getting worse.
Posted by: chbeyer | October 19, 2007, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I’ve never been prouder of Sen. Harry Reid–his letter has now earned more than $4.2 million for our Marines–God Bless Sen. Reid (and Hillary too!!)
Posted by: Richard | October 19, 2007, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I guess we will be seeing Harry Reid and Hillary on “The View” monday morning discussing how much money “they” raised for the marines familes….. Liar’s at ABC..
smearjay
Posted by: Mike Jones | October 19, 2007, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Y’know, it really would not be that hard to change the second sentence in the last paragraph to the following:
“No matter what, a deserving charity is going to make a ton of money off of the Democrats’ political vitriol.”
‘Course, I fixed the “mater” vs. “matter” spelling error for him as well.
ABC, I will only accept an editorial position if you promise to put your reporters through an “Accuracy In Media” course. Thank you.
Posted by: TucsonJames | October 19, 2007, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
ABC is making CBS look good.
Rewrite the story and this time, get it right. This is why most Americans no longer pay attention to network news.
Posted by: Seatlle | October 19, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Sen Reid has stooped to a new low….attempting to silence a private citizen….this letter will be used by historians to illustrate the abuse of government.
Posted by: Mark | October 19, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
ABC, this is sleezy, lying reporting…,kind of like Harry Reid. Now you see why you have the reputation for being in bed with the Dems. Now, not only Harry, but you too, need to apologize to Rush. I wonder if that will ever happen. Hmmmmm.
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
An abolutely ignorant article.
Posted by: Interested Litigant | October 19, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
No surprise here. ABC took Reid’s bait from earlier today and put it out as news. This article is no more than a recitation of Harry Reid’s talking points from his speech on the Senate floor. There is now no doubt that the leftist media does not research their stories. Rush predicted this on his show and, amazingly, a few hours later it comes to pass.
You should be ashamed of yourselves, ABC. Try doing a little research next time so you don’t embarrass yourself again. Reid turned this whole thing around to make himself look better. He’s trying to diffuse the situation by making it look like he somehow deserves credit for these funds being raised. How foolish and cowardly. And this guy thinks he’s qualified to help run our country? Shameless!
Posted by: David Crocker | October 19, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
You’re so ridiculous, Z-Byron.
Posted by: Kralizec | October 19, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Last time I ever tune-in to anything related to you. I praise Rush Limbaugh for being what you or any Democrat can claim to be- honest.
Posted by: bobf | October 19, 2007, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
ABC why must you lie and decieve! Do you want to be hated! The truth is so in your face! Sock it to them Mr. Limbaugh!!!!
Posted by: Ron Ahlers, Jr. | October 19, 2007, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rebuked a fellow San Francisco Bay-area liberal Friday for what she said were “inappropriate” comments about Iraq during a congressional debate.
Your turn Reid!!!
Posted by: patriot | October 19, 2007, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Harry and his sons have skimmed enough in Nevada (see LA Times) to match the bid as well. Come on Harry, be a man!
Posted by: Fred | October 19, 2007, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Nice job totally mixing up the issues and turning your story into something so complicated so as to confuse the useful idiots you write for.
Posted by: JACK_USA | October 19, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Give me a break. Reporter Wolf’s news item is one of the reasons why there is so much distrust of the news media and its biases. He perpetuates the lie twice when he states “Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.” Rush NEVER said that!! He was referring to individuals who claimed they had served, when in fact, they had not. That is the truth and by not pointing that out in the article minimizes its credibility.
All you have to do is define the phrase “phony soldiers” and you know what Rush was describing. This whole debacle is a disgrace to Limbaugh, a disgrace to Congress as an institution and a disgrace to our soldiers overseas and their families back home.
Posted by: Chris M | October 19, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Finally my Democratic Party has stepped forward to put our money where our hearts are! This is just fantastic for Hillary and the whole party! God Bless the USA!!
Posted by: Raymond | October 19, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
this has to be a story in itself of how bad and Biased ABC is at reporting. Shame on you for not calling harry Reid out on his comment.
Posted by: Roger | October 19, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Dan Rather got hired on at ABC, eh?
Posted by: REC | October 19, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Give me a break ABC…..my 4th grader could do a better job getting the facts for this story right. Retract it, or fix it or something.
Posted by: Jennifer | October 19, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Why doesn’t ABC take the time to find out the facts before the publish the story. ABC should be embarrassed by such shoddy workmanship.
Posted by: Rod | October 19, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
ABC is corrupt. They are a wing of the dem party. They fabricate the news. This is nothing more than a Rather Gate type slime technique to further a dem agenda.
Posted by: Gloria | October 19, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
AMAZING. Maybe when reporters start reporting on stories by actually researching the facts rather than projecting your view, you might, and I say you MIGHT get some viewers back. I haven’t watched ABC, NBC or CBS nightly news for over 5 years just for this type of unreporting.
Posted by: Brad D | October 19, 2007, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
What do you want to bet that ABC will take out all the good posts about them and print them and forget about the 99% of the posts that vilify them.
Posted by: Sky21dancer | October 19, 2007, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
It’s a shame all this partisanship is obscuring the fact that ABC has done a god-awful job of reporting this story. Honestly, politics is politics and there is slime on both sides. But the truly disgusting aspect of this story is the utter incompetence of ABC and their inability to get even the simplest story correct.
Posted by: Beside the parisanship | October 19, 2007, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
O.K Rush is going to match the 2.1million…so Harry show us how much you care and match Rush’s with some of the proceeds from your crooked Real Estate deals
Posted by: Ron Crimins | October 19, 2007, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol”
Whoa, whoa, whoa…Mr. ABC reporter, are you high? The dems had NOTHING do with this. They never intended for this to happen. This was all Rush Limbaugh. And no mention that he is matching $2.1 million for the cause. You are disgrace to your profession.
Posted by: Gabe | October 19, 2007, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Unreal, leave it to ABC to spin this in the Democrats favor through incomplete and distorted reporting. Jesse MacBeth was a phony soldier and was the focus of Limbaugh’s comments and never mentioned in the articles. This was the Democrat’s attempt to abuse their power and the constitution by curtailing free speech. Thank God for talk radio to get news that either isn’t reported or distorted.
Posted by: Amazed | October 19, 2007, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
As an independent voter, I was horrified that Congress attempted to censor a private citizen. Sounds pretty threatening to me.
Posted by: Maya | October 19, 2007, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
This is exactly why your industry is tanking.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
ABC news. What a joke. They don’t even mention what the democrats said was a pure lie. Rush NEVER said phony soldiers about real soldiers, only ones who lied about actually serving in the military.
Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
When are you idiots in the media going to get it right. The report should say. “When Rush was falsely accused of calling soldiers that oppose the war phoney soldiers.” I am now officially convinced that the main stream press are liars.
Posted by: Ken | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Limbaugh, who then coins the term ‘phony soldiers’, agrees with him. Thus insulting every soldier that disagrees with this position by referring to them as being a phony soldier.
It’s RIGHT THERE, and throwing a bunch of money at a charity won’t make it disappear.
Posted by: Reality | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
ABC: Do you have a fact-checker or a research editor, or just one little person who could have read the letter to a private U.S. citizen from Senator Reid and signed by another 41 spineless senators? Like most of these posts, I’m appalled at your lack of journalistic know-how. How pathetic.
Posted by: Susan | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
What??
Where is the part about the “signing senators” matching the bid to show their support for the troops as they were challenged to???
Oh… that’s right.
They didn’t donate a single PENNY! (and yet ABC has the gall to claim democrats were the reason for this act of charity-I suppose so, from a self-absorbed and perverse perspective, after all… it was they who signed it).
Posted by: rktkr | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
What??
Where is the part about the “signing senators” matching the bid to show their support for the troops as they were challenged to???
Oh… that’s right.
They didn’t donate a single PENNY! (and yet ABC has the gall to claim democrats were the reason for this act of charity-I suppose so, from a self-absorbed and perverse perspective, after all… it was they who signed it).
What a bunch of spineless liars.
I’ve never seen a bigger collection of hypocrites. If you who defend them cannot see through that, you are every bit as depraved.
Sickening.
Posted by: rktkr | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
And to the un-educated few, reading AND comprehension is a must for intelligence to thrive.
If you can’t listen to a transcript, nor read it, nor understand the context, nor read 2 minutes prior to, or after a specific statement – go back to your public grammar school and demand a recount.
Perhaps you can explain (I know, it takes longer than 30 seconds to hold a coherent thought, stinging more than one together could get tough) how it is a man calling soldiers “phony” has donated more money, time and honor to our soldiers than ALL leftwing Democrats combined? You can’t explain it because it’s not real. You can fantasize about it all you want – the left has a chokehold on fantasy.
Posted by: Enlightened | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Reid is a snake. He will try to take advantage of everything and everyone. Obviously anyone who knows about his crooked land deals knows that.
Posted by: Joyce | October 19, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
It brought me to tears when I read what Harry Reid has done for our country–$4.2 million! And now I know why old Rush won’t invite him on the program–Harry was an amateur boxer before he joined the Capitol Police Force!
Posted by: Slim | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
It is so utterly sad when a paid ‘news’ organization who is supposed to be an honest broker in reporting the truth, can’t get even the obvious facts of a simple story correct. I’d recommend changing the first name of your organization to anthing else but American.
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
This poor excuse for a human being deserves to be kicked out of the senate, and furthermore, kicked out of this country. He is a disgusting, dispicable, crooked creep.
Posted by: poysunivy | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Yeah, Clinton only won his elections because of Ross Perot. Clinton never ever got close to 50% of the vote. I always laugh when you Dems bring up Clinton.
Posted by: Perot '92 | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
guys, the quality reporting on this page is the product of the layers of fact checking that goes into a mainstream report. How dare you independent bloggers in your PJs criticize this report. It is 100% accurate and the truth. Do you really think the layers of editors and fact checkers could get wrong who sold the letter or why it was written? those are basic facts. Of course this the correct version of the truth. Ah, who’s John Galt? there’s no way of explaining this to you.
Posted by: minus_273 | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
If I can’t trust ABC with this, then I can’t trust them with anything. Anyone with a hint of an IQ knows what really happened here!
I’ll never watch or listen to ABC news again.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
How can he end the article with saying that the democrats raised all this money for charity? ABC has just lost another viewer.
Posted by: Jeeman | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
How do you fools sleep at night???
Posted by: Steven Rago | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
ABC is part of the new-McCarthyism.
“Sir, have you no shame!”
Posted by: Greg Witham | October 19, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Did Harry Reid write this article?
Posted by: Ani | October 19, 2007, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
All this talk and little mention of the fact that what we have here is the government, or at least 41 Senators, attempting to silence a private citizen by pressuring a radio network that is licensed by the government. Can you imagine the outcry about the attack on the first amendment if 41 republicans wrote a similar letter to say, CNN, trying to silence one of its talking heads? It is truly frightening that the media is willing to ignore this aspect of the story. The latent fascism on the left is enormous.
Posted by: L Brant | October 19, 2007, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Your news report is a bald faced lie. Rush Limbaugh did not call soldiers who oppose the military intervention in Iraq phony soldiers. Harry Ried did not put the letter up for sale on Ebay. How can you possibly hold yourself up as a journalist. You have no respect for the truth.
Posted by: John Mayer | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Since when is a request for Clear Channel to repudiate Limbaugh’s comments censorship? I cannot believe so many people are supporting Limbaugh for calling any soldier who disagrees with this was a “phony soldier.”
Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
This is a typical crock of misinformation from an organization whose integrity, long ago, went the way of the Dodo. If you ever got a story right, it would probably not be believed because of your total lack of credibility, fostered over many long and arduous years of blatant stupidity of your “news” department. This time even a blind man can see through your bias!
Posted by: richard Jones | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
JJ,
Bill Clinton is not respected around the world – he’s liked. There’s a big difference. Travel the world, experience different cultures and you’ll see how real world leaders act.
Posted by: austintx | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
….and yet not a dime contributed to military causes by mr. gReid. He’s a complete failure in the Senate, an non-patriot and a waste of good air.
Posted by: Rachel Carney | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
This story is a joke.
Posted by: Trip | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
They delibrately ignore the truth and choose to spread lies that support their agenda instead.
Posted by: Mike Mahoney | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Man you people at ABC are complete morons, can’t you get anything right? We the people out here know whats what. It won’t be long and the alphabet networks will nothing but a bad memory.
Posted by: John Hassler | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Well, well well…. Another shining example of the Liberal Media trying to change the facts o a story to help the Democratic Party.
Executive at ABC, you should start cleaning house and hire people who can get the fact right!
Posted by: Peter L | October 19, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
HAS ANYONE BEEN WATCHING THIS FOR A WHILE??
I’m not sure, but I think ABC has just added the “off their political vitriol” to the article.
I’m pretty sure that 15 minutes ago it read, “No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for charity.”
Anyone else see this change??
Posted by: jason | October 19, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Limbaugh called a guy who washed out of bootcamp and went on tv to tell his horror tales while serving in Iraq a “phoney soldier”. The guy was NEVER in Iraq and washed out of the military bootcamp. He was indeed a phoney soldier.
Posted by: Shanoe | October 19, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
This article is just sad.
Posted by: Voidseeker | October 19, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
The spin continues with ABC and The democratic senators. Why don’t they match Rush Limbaugh matching donation. Did the senate of the US have nothing better to do than right letters to Clear Channel, based on bad information from ABC.
Posted by: Donald Spinner | October 19, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Hey Slim,
Rush has invited him on the program
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
And, furthermore, I can’t see any reason why we taxpayers should be forced to pay his salary, for his health care, and for his retirement fund. We should be able to fire a disgusting and disloyal employee.
Posted by: poysunivy | October 19, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Your comedy shot is just hanging at the end of the article. (What else could you expect from the alphabet channels.) An other example of the slanted position that has driven viewers away from the nightly news.
The only reason that I picked this up was a link from Drudge – otherwise it just be part of the background “noise” from the left.
Posted by: Howard S San Diego | October 19, 2007, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Harry Reid and his “40 Thieves” trying to steal the credit from Rush. You people at ABC are nothing but fellow travelers willing accomplises. I don’t expect more and you don’t deliver.
Posted by: kalueke | October 19, 2007, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Haha Great job Rush!! You are the best!!
Posted by: Deb | October 19, 2007, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
TYPICAL MSM MISLEADING REPORTING!!!!
Good news: your bias is being revealed to more and more people!
You are DINOSAURS!
Posted by: sunshine484848 | October 19, 2007, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
This article is another example of the mainstream liberal bias. These 41 Democrats were abusing their power to attach Rush Limbaugh, a private citizen, because they don’t like his conservative philosophy. They lie about Rush’s comments in the letter and you repeat their lie in this article. Rush never called REAL soldiers “phony soldiers.” If you did any research at ABC, you would learn that he was referring to someone who was thrown out of boot camp and has since been critical of the war. Harry Reid did not write this letter with the intention of raising money for the Marines’ families. This was Rush’s idea. Harry Reid is disingenuously trying to take credit for the way Rush turned their hate into good.
Posted by: Mark Ahrens | October 19, 2007, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Of course the Dems made lots of money for this cause, they screwed up!!
Posted by: DaveE | October 19, 2007, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Shanoe, maybe you are talking about a different Limbaugh show, but the one in question was regarding anyone who disagreed with the Iraq war. Look up the transcript.
Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2007, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
How totally typical!
Not only does the left try to deflect the fact that they’re looking really bad over this, but they try to take credit for the positive outcome of donating $4.2 million to a great charity!
First off, it was Rush who put the despicable letter on Ebay, it was Rush who offered to match the winning bid and it was Rush who openly invited Harry Reid to also match the amount!
Did Harry Reid offer to throw in one red cent? The answer is NO!
Posted by: Mark | October 19, 2007, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
The ones who did not sign wanted no part of such an idiotic letter and Reid knows this.
Posted by: KG | October 19, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
I can’t believe they haven’t updated this with the correct information. The democrats and liberals are bigots with few exceptions. Trying to take credit for supporting our troops like this is terrible. ABC’s liberal waste repeat the damn lies! Rush Limbaugh is a great American, Reid is a pathetic loser.
Posted by: Jake | October 19, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
This article is a disgrace and a deliberate attempt to mislead the America public. If there was such a thing as journalistic ethics this “reporter” would be a proud recipient of an unemployment check.
Posted by: Aaron | October 19, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
ABC: Tell a lie and change the world. Not anymore!!!!
Posted by: DEAIII | October 19, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Reid and the democrats who signed this letter blundered badly. They now desperately try to spin the story to suggest that they were somehow involved in a worthwhile charitable cause. In fact, it is the historic attack of the majority leader of the senate on a private citizen’s free speech rights that made this letter sell for so much. The whole story will continue to come out and those who signed the letter will be haunted by it. It seems like everytime the democrats try to pull another one of their dirty attack tricks, they just step in it all over again.
Posted by: David Jenner | October 19, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
The end is near… have a nice trip!!!
Posted by: c & S | October 19, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Honestly! Traditional media are the Pavlovian dogs of the current Democrat congress. Don’t worry – the vast majority of existing media is on life support and once they realize their monopoly on information and spin is over they’ll just fade away.
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Who cares what ABC is reporting, Only losers watch the channel. We get our info from Fox and the internet!
Posted by: Robert Ecstein | October 19, 2007, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
TYPICAL DEM PHILANTHROPY…, ALWAYS WITH SOMEBODY ELSE’S MONEY!!!
Posted by: Carlos | October 19, 2007, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Voidseeker, review the transcript. Limbaugh aimed his “phony soldier” comment at those who oppose the war. The transcript is on his own website.
Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2007, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Yeah, um, so if the Wolf or some other highly educated editor of ABC News can come on this thread and explain that last sentence and tell us how, exactly, the Democrats are going to make “a ton of money” for the Marine Law charity, that would be grrreat. mmm-k? yeah.
Posted by: mike d | October 19, 2007, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
This is the worst do-nothing Congress ever. The Dems have the majority and STILL can’t get anything passed. And all their smear jobs are backfiring. They can’t get ONE thing over on Bush. In fact Congress’ poll numbers are much lower than Bush’s!
Posted by: Flint | October 19, 2007, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
ABC stands for “all biased coverage”. Sadly their news programs have become part of the liberal smear macine. Media bias is disgusting.
Posted by: McShan | October 19, 2007, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
“…Democrats are going to make a ton of money for charity…”
ABC does it again; creating news, but never reports news correctly.. Name one Democrat supporting this effort.. You people are really pathetic..!!
Posted by: Gale D | October 19, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
The real news here is that ABC and the other major news networks did not call Sen. Reid on his initial lie, point out Sen Reid’s attempt at intimidating Rush, report about the brillant auction while is was occuring, or honestly report Sen Reid’s pathetic attempt to take credit for Rush’s work.
Posted by: DAN | October 19, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Chris;
Since you and the other liberal deniers of Saddma’s WMD’s have such a short memory about those programs, let me refresh your idiocy. Saddam’s number 2 air force general wrote a book stating that he had flown Saddam’s WMD’s (including Nuke materials) to Syria)
Three weeks ago, Israel took out a Nuclear weapons plant in Syria. So where did Syria’s sudden nuke program come from???
Duh!!!!!!
Hank
Posted by: hank reardon | October 19, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
vitriol – abusive or venomous language used to express blame or censure or bitter deep-seated ill will
….while I am no writer, and wouldn’t pretend to know the “ins and outs” of writing….I don’t think the writer was giving dems a compliment w/ the last comment. …I would read it more as a “regardless of what the dems do their venomous language (..ie..intentions) makes money for charities” ….I do believe I’ve heard Rush himself say “lemons into lemonaide” …granted I’m assuming those in an uproar over the article are focusing heavily on the last comment…maybe not. …and I am a conservative by the way, and found his lies and comments regarding Rush and his “involvement” in the raising of the money appauling.
Posted by: Tim | October 19, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
as usual the party-of-the-devil(democrats) try to take credit on a screw-up they do 24/7/365. this party is total filth and bilge and are a threat to this countries survival.
Posted by: mr. chubbs | October 19, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
It is clear that trying to silence ONE conservative is worth $2.1M, I propose that Sen. Harry Reid send letters threatening the 1st amendment rights of conservatives (its a living, breathing constitution anyway) to each and every conservative in the country. Imagine the windfall charities could then receive.
Posted by: Lennin | October 19, 2007, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
ABC News, you guys twist even this simple story as does Reid.
Reid should resign and do America a favor!
Posted by: Mark G. | October 19, 2007, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Reggie,
ABC has changed the article from how it first appeared here. Also the reason it took so much in at the auction is because Reid was trying to smear and silence Rush by repeating a lie about what was said on his show. If you want to say that Rush was calling all troops that don’t agree with the war “Phoney” then you don’t know Rush. maybe you should listen to him for a couple of weeks.?
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Reid and his co-conspiritors should be known by who they are. The 41 Phony Americans.
Commie scum the lot.
Posted by: Peter Courtenay Stephens | October 19, 2007, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Folks, when truth is no longer of value, the core of our civilization will crumble. For on what basis can the rule of law have value if truth is not at the core? We have “truth” laws. Truth in lending, for instance. Where is truth in reporting? Getting this story factually straight had to be one of the easiest assignments a reporter could report. But, this was not meant to be a truthful story. It is a story w/an arrogant agenda. Hear that crumbling sound? It is our country crumbling from the center.
Posted by: Julie Anne | October 19, 2007, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Of course this report upsets me but remember……we have had the satisfaction of seeing Rush Limbaugh make a complete and absolute fool out of Dingy Harry. This kind of biased reporting may fool a lot of people but it also exposes who they really are and how they are manipulating the information they want America to hear. It’s becoming obvious to more and more people all the time. Even the ones who don’t listen to conservative radio or tv. Do you think Harry Reid expected his phony letter to be sold on e-bay. I am sure this had a profound affect on the idiot.
Posted by: Fred | October 19, 2007, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
This is incredibly misleading, and the reason that I no longer watch or read ABC news (for for that matter, NBC or CBS.) This is why most THINKING Americans look for facts and form our own conclusions instead of having some incompetent news commentator tell us what to think.
Harry Reid is an incompetetent leader, and Rush Limbaugh has every right to crow about his coup against the U.S. House Democrats. And Kudos to Rush for his dedication to a worthy charity.
Posted by: Roger M | October 19, 2007, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
The media was late in reporting what is a great American Story. About a man who turned a bad story into a good one. The bad story. Mr. Limbugh being wrongfully attacked and villified by Congress for something he didn’t do. The Good story. Despite being wrongly attacted, Mr. Limbaugh raised a lot of money for an good cause. He should ABC’s person of the week. But this will never happen. Right. Charles Gibson.
Posted by: Harvey Mcgee | October 19, 2007, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
giving Democrats credit for the money raised. Rush put the letter up for auction!! Another drive by media hatchet job.
Posted by: Rob | October 19, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
If ABC News had any spine at all they’d ask the 41 original signing members why they haven’t also matched the winning bid. Then they really could take credit for finally doing something right.
Posted by: Marty | October 19, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
I can’t stand listening to Rush. His arrogance – whether merely a schtick or not – is so far over the top I can’t tolerate more than maybe 5 minutes of the man.
On this issue, though, Rush is in the right. There is a rash of wannabes who are claiming to have served in the military and, like in the case of that pathetic Jesse MacBeth, doing extraordinary things. Rush called these clowns out. In the process, he also called out the liberals who have so whole-heartedly latched on to these phony soldiers. That didn’t sit too well with Harry Reid and cohorts, so they tried to go on the offensive and tried to spin Rush’s comments into something anti-military. Instead of addressing the issue of these wannabes, Senators such as Iowa’s own Tom Harkin went public with attacks on Rush. Anyone with half a brain and who is willing to learn the truth about what Rush said should be disgusted!
The liberals are so desperate to prove they aren’t anti-America and anti-military, yet they stand idly by while a bunch of pathetic excuses for humans try to take credit for being something they could never measure up to being…an American soldier, sailor, airmen, or marine. These phony soldiers are a disgrace and a danger to those who have served, yet the liberals, the BIG supporters of the military, stand by and do nothing to bring this issue to public attention. Instead, they’d rather create lies about something someone said that they don’t agree with. Pathetic!
And then on top of all of it, morons like Reid try to take credit for an action that is almost completely opposite of what they tried to accomplish. The really sad thing is the sheep who blindly follow what media outlets like ABC tell them to believe. Wake up people! Use your brains…learn the FACTS!
At the same time, I find it absolutely hysterical that Rush took an attack launched on him by liberals and spun it around to something so positive that the liberals who launched the attack are now trying to take credit for the positive results! LOL
Sorry liberals…if that’s the mindset and capabilities of your “leaders”, you’re not only NOT going to win the White House, you’re going to lose Congress and the lofty 11% approval rating you’ve led it to, too!
Posted by: Tim | October 19, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Leave it to liberals to bring up something completely irrelevant to the situation at hand by bringing up Rush Oxy addiction. Allow me to enlighten you…
Rush’s addiction to oxys stemmed from a back injury probably 15 years ago. The painkiller OxyContin was prescribed to Rush by a doctor. This was done prior to the knowledge that the drug was highly addictive.
Rush’s addiction to OxyContin cannot be looked at in the same context as addiction to cocaine or other illegal narcotics.
In terms of how this affects his crediblity..it does not. Whether or not he was an addict and the fact that he speaks out against it does not make the behavior any less wrong. Since his addiction, I have heard him speak with sympathy, even about people on the other side of the aisle, that may be experiencing the samething. For those of you that commented on his addiction, allow me to present a scenario.
If you had a drug problem or a problem with alcohol, would it make you a hypocrit to tell your children or your loved ones that may also be in a similar situtation, that they are wrong? Would that make you irrelevant?
Ofcourse not because your addiction does not make the behavior any less wrong or unacceptable.
Rush’s audience, in general understands this….which is why he STILL has 20million plus listeners everyday and probably just as many his to his website.
Speaking of irrelevant…
Can anyone tell me anything the Democrat run House and Senate have accomplished in the past 10 months besides one bill raising the minimum wage?
Posted by: Brian | October 19, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
It is spelled MATTER, not MATER!!!!
Posted by: Teacher | October 19, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
If at first you dont succeed, jump on the ship that has
~J~ wrote:
Take a look at the sidebar and you will see the winning bid for Rush Limbaughs EBay auction of the letter of condemnation by Harry Reid and some of his cohorts.
The winning bid was $2,100,100, and Rush will match that amount to go to …
Posted by: J's Cafe Nette | October 19, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Actually ABC News coined the phrase “phony soldiers” and “phony heroes” 3 days before Rush ever uttered it.
Saying that the Democrats are going to “make a ton of money for charity” is crediting them, not Limbaugh. Maybe you should learn to read, did you miss that last horribly spelled sentence or what??
Posted by: Christine | October 19, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
You know that the MSM has no credibility when they have to lie to make a story fit their world view.
And they wonder why they’re losing viewers (And ad dollars).
Posted by: Tristan | October 19, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.”
Good lord. It’s been WEEKS and you appropriately named DRIVE-BYs still don’t have it right! You never point out how the charge in the letter was a complete falsehood as Rush was never talking about soldiers who opposed the war. But then you go on to say:
“For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.”"
Oh is that right? Which Democrats are donating to MCLEF? Where’s that in your report. How much is Harry Reid donating in this ‘join venture’ he’s imagining between him and Mark “May”? He’s not donating a thing. And he’s not because he’s a Senator. It’s not his responsibility because he has the authority to tell other people what to do with their own money.
Fortunately this media is becoming more and more obsolete since probably 90% of the people here came from Drudge.
Posted by: Josh | October 19, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
This article is a prime example why the MSM has no credibility. Let’s look at the facts. First, Byron Wolf tries to draw a moral equivalency between the Moveon.garbage ad and Rush’s comments. The truth is that Moveon.garbage intentionally engaged in character assasination of General Petreus. Rush, made a comment about “phony soldiers”; those who claim to have served in Iraq and then write about it. How are the two similar? They simply aren’t.
Posted by: Mike Jefferson | October 19, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
There are those still trying to claim that Rush was directing the phony soldier phrase toward real soldiers who happen to oppose the war. This is patently false which the record shows. But nevermind that. let’s say for a moment he did say that. When will the US senate write letters to my employer suggesting he punish me for saying things they don’t like? Chilling. Pretty soon people will get the real point of this story and then the 41 signers will really squirm.
Posted by: Rob Gentry | October 19, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
this is why the “mainstream media” is slowly dying. All the info above and you’d think they’d clarify Reids lies?
Posted by: Tim | October 19, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Hey- Harry and your “wanna be’s”… a word to the wise. “It is a fearful thing to be in the hands of the living God”. Hebrews 10:31. The end is near… have a nice trip!!!
Posted by: c & S | October 19, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Rush Limbaugh merely agreed with a caller that “real soldiers” are not “phony soldiers”.
How that parses to “Rush said Soldiers Against The War are Phony Soldiers” is not clear, and will never be clear except to those of you still sucking on the bong and/or munching shrooms.
Posted by: Enlightened | October 19, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Our Democrat friends in government and media are incapable of dealing with life as it is. They really do live in an alternative reality comprised of wishful longings, hyper egoism and bile for those that differ.
Posted by: Jack Frost | October 19, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Lying LIbErals LIE.
Completely wrong. Completely. The filth and stench of the left and LIbErals is overwhelming.
Rush’s brilliance puts the power-abusing Lying 41 in its place.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 19, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Lennin, Who do you think makes 90% of the contributions to charity in this country? It is certainly not the liberals.
Posted by: Peter Courtenay Stephens | October 19, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
I’ve never been prouder to watch ABC–Thank You ABC for reminding me why I’m proud to be an AMERICAN and a DEMOCRAT!!
$42 million from Harry REid–have some of that rushmo!!!
Posted by: Billy | October 19, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Is it true Harry Reid is going to match the donation?
Posted by: Not a Dem! | October 19, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Gun control, politics, history, reality…. Is there anything you people tell the truth about?
Posted by: Barb | October 19, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
One question, Z. Byron: If Dingy Harry hadn’t tried to grab credit today, would you have even bothered to report on the outcome of the auction?
Posted by: El Don | October 19, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Rush = Big heart conservative
Reid = Pin head liberal
Posted by: Jeb | October 19, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
If James Watson would just take a look at the media he would realize the least intelligent people are reporters. It has nothing to do with DNA, just bias.
Posted by: Bill | October 19, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Shame on ABC.
Posted by: Ken T. | October 19, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
You should put Rush’s quote for what he said up here before you decide to just reinforce what Reid and his buddies accused him of. He directed the comment at those who falsified their war records, not every soldier who opposes the war. Some of you reporters are such pinheads. Try objective reporting some time. You might have to do some research to figure out what objective reporting is. Reid is just trying to salvage a situation that has made him and his buddies look really petty and stupid and that will be preserved for posterity.
Posted by: Bill | October 19, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
ABC… will you ever get anything right? Oh yes, I know you see it as just plain “balanced journalism” to compare an advertisment clearly and purposly chastizing a great American military hero, to Rush Limbaugh’s use of verbage taken PURELY out of context. Incidentally, Rush didn’t coin the term “phoney soldier”… Rush put this thing up on E-Bay to raise money for military personell and their families because the document is uniques; it’s likely the only time US Senators have attacked a private citizens and suggested his removal from the airways! Why don’t you guys spend a little time on Rep. Pete “Stark Mad” Stark? I’m sure his comments are Republicans fault… just as the creidit for the money Rush raised should go to the Democrats!
Posted by: Michael V. Pearce | October 19, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Typical of the Democrats and MSM, especially ABC News, to get wrong again!
Please do your own research next time.
Posted by: Kevin Schulke | October 19, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
At least the greazy, hypocritical drug addict has finally accomplished something good in his pathetic, far-right, propaganda-pumping, wonderbread-insulated life.
Posted by: hahaha | October 19, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
More evidence that Journalist need to be Licensed, they went to J School at best because they would fail at anything else they did. These are the same people that fail the Rorschach test
Posted by: Cliff | October 19, 2007, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
It’d take more than $10-20m to break Rush’s bank.
Posted by: Ben | October 19, 2007, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Posted by: Reggie | Oct 19, 2007 7:01:06 PM
Rush Limbaugh’s comments were neither “TREASONOUS” or “UNAMERICAN”. And for someone that claims people here are not paying enough attention to details you are being hypocritical.
Get your own facts straight before trying to call out others on theirs.
Posted by: Voidseeker | October 19, 2007, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Harry Reid is marked for banishment from the U.S. Senate.
Can Harry say Tom Daschle? I have my checks ready! It’s just a matter time…
Posted by: NY Jim | October 19, 2007, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
HE NEVER SAID SOLDIERS WHO OPPOSE THE WAR. You are a News agencies aren’t you? Why can’t you tell the truth? HACKS!
For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.”
HE NEVER EVER SAID SOLDIERS WHO OPPOSE THE WAR. EVER! GOT IT!
Posted by: Tatum | October 19, 2007, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
What’s sick is that if this letter was signed by BRITTANY SPEARS, ABC and the MSM would give it MORE and CORRECT coverage!
Posted by: sunshine484848 | October 19, 2007, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Yes, the article mentioned Rush is matching the winning bid. Yes, it did mention Rush was the one who put the letter on Ebay. However…the overall tone of the article is “Oh lookie what the Dems did for the good of the charity!” which is a load of crap. AND it never mentions the fact that Rush’s original comments were made about idiots lying about their service record. Btw, liberals continue to hollar about Rush and his prescription drug problem. Like they know anything about what actually happened. Geezus. Get a life.
Posted by: Suze | October 19, 2007, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Limbaugh did not call soldiers who
oppose our Iraq involvement “phony
soldiers”. You can’t even get that
right. How do sleep at night?
Posted by: Gary | October 19, 2007, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Harry Reid is an idiot. All he did was raise the influence of Rush Limbaugh all over the world. He even helped eBay with their presence, like they needed it. I think he is personally giving the 2008 election to the Republicans because he is just the most incompetent person ever to run the D senate. Every democratic senator who signed the letter has just fallen in line and that will be and always has been their demise. I wish there was something else to believe in but I think the Republicans just received a real shot in the arm which will bring them to power again.
Posted by: chuck klauber | October 19, 2007, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
That is FALSE.
People bid on the letter because it represents the legislature condemning a private individual and the bids represent solidarity from general public for Rush. If Rush put the letter on eBay, money donated supports Rush’s message and helps a charity. It’s a self-less snub to the Democrats.
Harry Reid needs to get a spine. He should apologize and match the $2.1 million. All he has to do is ask his family members on payroll.
Posted by: Harry Reid is a Tool | October 19, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
The slant and bias of this story is just another reason that the media is our enemy within.
Posted by: marilyn | October 19, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Like noy eveb mentioning the “phony soldiers comment was about a liar whop the media love as he stated war crimes, but in turn nerever had been to IRAQ and that Senator Reid tried to raise the stink to ignoire their failed policies.
Posted by: Sonny Ketcham | October 19, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
These weasel senators put their lies about Rush on paper and accused him of things he never did. And it is easy to proove that David Brock is a serial liar. So the dims all fell for the carefully edited tape and tried to use the power of the senate to punish a private citizen. When called on it they refuse to apologise and try to pretend they were raising money all along. although it is so obvious to anyone.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Any Democrat that can pump $2.1 million out of Rush Limbaugh gets my vote!
God Bless ABC News and Harry Reid!!!
Posted by: Linda | October 19, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
This is a quote from the story. “Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY. Limbaugh sits on the board of the foundation and he has reportedly said on his show that he will match the winning bid — a total of $4.2 million for the foundation.” So ABC did mention this fact, however, I watched to see how MSNBC would handle this, an it seemed to get the same coverage, but leaving off the part where Rush matched the funds, also, no reference to the content of the letter, which as Rush has stated today, will be worth much more as years go by. It was so sad to see Mr Reid on the Senate floor trying to take credit for this. Shame on him. It would be nice to get the full story from the MSM, just once.
Posted by: Homjett | October 19, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Dear Democratic party writers at ABC … “phony soldiers”, stands for those who claimed to have fought in Iraq, but did not … those who claimed to have served, but did not.
Posted by: Tgibson | October 19, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Reid is a slimy little twerp and network news is irrelevant
Posted by: mike | October 19, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
To add to Rob Gentry’s posting above, INRE no correlation between Congress condeming MoveOn.org and condeming Rush….
Miles of difference. MoveOn is a non-profit political and *very* partisan (despite disingenuous denials) bundling PAC.
Rush is a private citizen.
The Senate extended their power of intimidation attempts to a new level, and to the wrong person.
They lost the battle of government vs the individual. Simple and clear. And no amount of spin will change the distinct dichotomy of intent and morality between both parties involved.
Posted by: MataHarley | October 19, 2007, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
just when it appears the message is so clear, and laughable that the Dem’s might catch on, their spokespersons and leaders show a scary strange, narcissistic bending of reality. We may need to Move On to a third party. My Dems are leaving me.
Posted by: b | October 19, 2007, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
The only thing the Democrats did involving this letter was to make themselves look like fools. The Republicans had enough sense to not attack a private citizen over something that was made up, that is why not one single republican signed it. It’s to bad for Hillary and Obama that they signed their names to this. They can’t change history as now everyone can see how they really feel about private citizens rights. They feel we have none. Thanks ABC for your fair and truthful reporting. ha ha
Posted by: Debbie | October 19, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Reedo or any other Dem would never know how to contribute their own $dollars. They spend our $$$ that they steal with tax hikes.
Yea, Betty for giving money to stop Hillary on one side ( to Barrack) while boosting support for our fallen solders and law enforcement families.
Harry ain’t going to contribute any more than penniless words.
Posted by: DEAIII | October 19, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Once again, ABC, you are clearly showing your left-leaning bias by not explaining the truth about the “phony soldier” and then saying the DEMS are raising money? All they did was smear a private citizen. It was Rush that put the letter on eBay and pledged his own money. Geez. Come on, ABC, enough is enough!!! And you wonder WHY mainstream media is losing (or has LOST) all credibility???
Posted by: Bob Johnson | October 19, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
I have a correction for this article and the reporting for the past weeks.
The news in one sentence:
A literal reading of the Sept. 26 show in question shows that the controversial host did not say that soldiers opposing the war are “phony.”
Posted by: Zee | October 19, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Rush made a bad move on this. It will just encourage these senators to write more smear letters so they can raise money for charity.
It’s interesting they’ve been watching it all week, but only today did they mention that you should bid on it. Apparently, that’s how long it took to come up with a counter strategy.
Posted by: Zac | October 19, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
How can this article be published with a straight face?
Posted by: jHanson | October 19, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Great! ABC failed to get the name of the Clear Channel CEO right. It’s Mark MAYS, not Mark May. Oh well, all you did was directly quote Harry Reid — and goodness knows HE couldn’t be inaccurate, could he?
Posted by: jill monterey | October 19, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Democrats had nothing to do with this. Shame on ABC news. Good for Rush and Mrs. Casey.
Posted by: Michael | October 19, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I reread the transcript and I was right. Limbaugh was talking about the phoney soldiers who are interviewed ( like MacBeth). Read where the caller says “they never talk to real soldiers” and Limbaugh adds “the phoney soldiers”. After Vietnam this was a real problem “phoney vets who never served in Nam talking about it”. The transcript shows Limbaugh was talking about the phoney soldiers not the real ones. Murtha called our troops killers and Kerry said that our troops were terrorizing Iraqi citizens in the middle of the night. Glad I checked out the transcipt as it shows I was right.
Posted by: shanoe | October 19, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Reid (and 41 co conspirators) smeared a private citizen. RUSH LIMBAUGH turned a government smear into a blessing for the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Charity.
REID is a bumbling fool. RUSH is a Valiant Generous Citizen. GET IT Right.
Posted by: Col RJ Ingold | October 19, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Don’t you government media folks realize that as soon as the socialist obtain full control of the populace (national health care will do it), that you will all be replaced with “their people”? You have a chance to save this country, but continue reporting like this.
Posted by: Dave Abercrombie | October 19, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
As for the wmds, it seems to me there were satellite photos of large trucks leaving Iraq en masse for Syrian soil while the DEMs stalled any military action by demanding another vote to approve the war. But of course that was only on fox, and not for long- so any “well informed” lib couldn’t believe that.
Posted by: Larry | October 19, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
HARRY REID, YOU SNIVELING EXCUSE FOR A MAN- How in blazes do you dare like you are so special as to take credit for this event.
You will probably nor have you ever given to this charity. You spend most of your time trying to derail the victories from the military and NOW you want to act as if it was your idea? You shamesless coward. Go back to that ground hog hole in Nevada from whence you came. Your presence and the name Marine should never be in the same place or century.
They are brave. You are a coward. They have integrity. You do not.
Posted by: dano | October 19, 2007, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
What is amazing is that ABC is generally the least lib-biased news org.! Thats how bad the public is being lied to. Maybe the lies arent working. Hows that 11% approval rating, Harry?
Posted by: Rob | October 19, 2007, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.” What in the world are you talking about. Any penny that came of this for soldiers and Marines is because of the actions of kind-hearted Republicans…as usual. Democrats have nothing to do with raising money for servicemembers!
Posted by: Cory Davenport | October 19, 2007, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
So who is worse? Reid or ABC? Tough call for sure.
Posted by: gary | October 19, 2007, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
1. Harry Reid had nothing to do with this charity – he is only taking credit for something he didn’t do.
2. Limbaugh is matching the donation, a little detail that ABC failed to mention.
3. Besides the money raised, a little extra benefit of auctioning the idiotic letter is the fact that it will forever serve as a reminder of Harry Reid’s government abuse of power. But he is too stupid to realise that.
Posted by: George | October 19, 2007, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
ABC “News” LOL…stick with sports.
Posted by: Badger | October 19, 2007, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
By the way to those few of you that just keep insisting that Rush Limbaugh did insult anti-war troops, it’s really lame to point to a 2-minute snippet of a conversation and act as if that tells you something. Rush discussed “phony soldiers” the day before this conversation with a caller took place so you have to be a regular listener to know what you are talking about so please just go away and stop embarrassing yourselves. You don’t know anything and your hate and jealousy is repulsive. Rush is the most popular person on military radio so clearly the troops don’t agree with you and that’s all that matters. Your opinions are completely meaningless to anyone else.
Posted by: Christine | October 19, 2007, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Rush predicted this on his show today: Reid’s comments were only made to give liberal reporters a chance to spin the story.
I am only here because Drudge linked to this page.
Posted by: Charles | October 19, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
There is nothing stronger that I could add other than to say that I printed out the first five pages of this story (in case ABC changes, alters or removes it) & the comments to keep with my copy of the Reid letter: it will be something that will always remind me what a travesty both the “Mainstream Media” and their accomplices, the Democrat party & its elected officials.
Jefferson’s call for a revolution still applies today: do it!
Posted by: Nick Thimmesch | October 19, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
And to the idiot from Media Matters that keeps posting the Rush transcript that precisely and without a shadow of a doubt proves Rush NEVER, NOT ONCE said “Soldiers that oppose the war are Phony Soldiers”.
Thanks! We have been saying that from day one! Rush merely commented on the callers remark that there are Real Soldiers, and Rush confirmed there are Phony Soldiers. How freakin hard is that to grasp?
Go back to Media Matters and find some new talking point non-scandal to drool over.
Posted by: Enlightened | October 19, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
THE SPIN IS ALL THAT MATTERES. Don’t let the truth and the whole truth get in the way of your agenda. THIS REPORT COULD HOT BE MORE WRONG!!!
Posted by: Skee_Bo | October 19, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, PMSNBC…..you’re all so predictable.
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Dear Chris,
When someone has a debilitating pain they use painkillers. Sometimes, it just so happens, that if they use them enough to get the pain to go away, SURPRISE, they are addicted. Rush is no longer using them at all. If he was, his probation officer surely would have known. Let’s hope you never have to go through the type of pain Rush had.
Signed,
HighIQ
Posted by: HighIQ | October 19, 2007, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Scott Thomas Beauchamp is a phony solder.
He wrote first person accounts that never happened while serving in Germany and Kuwait. Before he even saw Irag!
Report that ABC
Posted by: DEAIII | October 19, 2007, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
ABC is going to publish a correction for this article, yes?
Posted by: Pablo | October 19, 2007, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
the article is correct when it states: “Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.” Those are (factually) the words in the letter, but ABC conveniently leaves the impression that it is a fact that Rush did so; rather than clarify that Rush was referring to those who conjure up military service credentials without ever serving.
Further, Dems not only can’t admit they were outwitted by Rush, they want in on the auction’s success. Harry Reid must believe that all of America is as ‘dim-witted’ as those who elected him. I have notified him that after he ‘retires’ from the Senate, if he visits any town that needs a ‘Village Idiot’..he’s got the job!
Posted by: Retired_Colonel | October 19, 2007, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Angry Non-Partisan:
The original post did not contain that information. It was updated.
As to what Rush said about phony soldiers, why would you assume he was talking about anything other than phony soldiers? There are actual phony soldiers. The video shows Rush putting down his cigar immediately after saying “phony soldiers” and attempting to find the story about MacBeth. That fact proves he was referring to people like MacBeth.
Posted by: Ryan | October 19, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
This is the worst written article that I have read in a long time. It is all over the map, and then give credit to the disgusting folks that signed that letter, rather than to Limbaugh. What a pathetic joke!
Posted by: Joe | October 19, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Absolutely ridiculous you people are attempting to steal credit from Rush and give it to Harry and the other Dems. I honestly cannot believe it.
Posted by: Grant | October 19, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Lets face the facts .. Good News for the USA = Bad news for Liberals/Progressives/DEMOCRATS/SOCIALIST……But bad news for the USA = GOOD NEWS
Posted by: REX HANDSOM | October 19, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
It is time harry matches what Rush did. harry made lots of money on questionable land deals that I know about. What about it harry? Time to pony up!
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Nice Job Senator Reid, you finally joined a good cause, backing Rush Limbaugh’s efforts.
Posted by: Nick S | October 19, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
USMC Veteran. Again, Democratic leaning media at its best. Why not tell the truth and the whole story. You seem to be giving credit to the Dems. I understand ABC is liberal Anti-American media but this goes too far. This idea came from the Rush Limbaugh show. Not the DEMS. Harry lied and tried to give himself credit to provide for charity when he had nothing to do with it. Actually, Rush asked all of the Dems who signed this Anti-Free speech letter to match the funds also…they have yet to give anything. Don’t make any mistake, this is a letter from our Senate trying to inimidate a private citizen. Trying to stop free speech…disgusting..talk about that ABC.
Posted by: Angelo | October 19, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Rush made the democrats look SOOOOOOOOO SILLLLLLLLLY!
Senate Majority vs. Rush Limbaugh
Democrats-0 Rush-1
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
What a bunch of BS!! Harry Reid trys to take credit. Harry Reid is in another universe..Rush gets ALL of the credit for this. If Harry ” Oh So Righteous” Reid is now so happy with this donation oportunity THEN MATCH IT !!!
Posted by: BS2007 | October 19, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Rush merely commented on the callers remark that there are Real Soldiers, and Rush confirmed there are Phony Soldiers.
————-
Limbaugh said what he said. It’s right there on the tape. He had plenty of time left on the show that day to say he didn’t mean soldiers that disagreed with him.
Limbaugh didn’t say anything until after people started complaining. Then, he tried to change everything around and even posted an EDITED version on his website which Fox News (of course) broadcast.
Posted by: Reality | October 19, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
I want to thank Senator Reid for his letter censuring Rush Limbaugh. That letter provides the perfect object lesson, illustrating clearly the character difference between those who espouse liberalism and those who espouse conservatism. Reid took a comment by Rush out of context, made up a set of lies and used those lies to generate fund raising letters for his own benefit. Reid then put those lies in a letter to Rush’s partner, Clear Channel and somehow convinced 40 fellow Senators to sign it! The good news is that Rush turned a liberal mistake into a 4.2+ million dollar contribution to the families of Marines lost in combat. The pathetic Senator belatedly tried to take credit for raising the funds that Rush raised & matched. Reid was aided and abeted by a dying dinosaur, ABC News who tried to spin the loser Reid into a winner! What a perfect display of character differences! The only reason Democrats win any elections is because of the baseline 30% morons who believe the President was involved in 9/11! We can certainly understand why the approval ratings of Congress are around 11%!
Posted by: Curt Greer | October 19, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Let’s face it, Harry Reid and his ilk were pulling their hair out while this smear letter against Rush was climbing up the high money mountain!
Another stupid failure from the democratic hacks who signed onto it.
The reporter is clueless as well since this article is biased!LOL!!!
Way to go Rush!
Posted by: pointyguitarz | October 19, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Why aren’t the other millionaires (Kerry, Kennedy, Biden et al) matching the bid? How about all 41 combined matching the bid!!! Typical – Dems are all talk and NO ACTION!
Posted by: Manny being Manny | October 19, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
ABC = HUGE Liars
All week Rush Limbaugh lampooned Harry Reid’s letter. He enclosed the letter in a Haliburtin titanium briefcase to add emphasis to his lampooning. And Harry Reid tried to take false credit and ABC supports his huge lie….. Pathetic journalism… Absolutely pathetic journalism. Rush claims the ‘drive by’ media is an extension of the Dem party and this article proves him right..
Posted by: Felix | October 19, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
ABC “news” is nothing but a mouthpiece for the Democrat party.
Posted by: Jane | October 19, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
The story is an example of the press knowing it’s wrong and trying to make itself right by lying. Rush did not call the soldiers opposed to the War or the sodiers anywhere Phoney soldiers.
The Press knows this and ABC lies about it. Someone wrote that rush is irrelevant. You wish. 2 million plus is very relevant
Posted by: Leatherneck | October 19, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
ABCs distortion of this story is why the network is tanking in the ratings.
This is why we have banned ABC Network in our home. Once i caught my cat watching ABC, so I shaved his head as punishment.
The whole neighborhood now knows he was caught watching ABC Network and he has to walk around in SHAME until his hair grows back…..yuh!
Posted by: Brent Amundson | October 19, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
The really, really sad part is that the voters that put the dems in office don’t pay any attention to any of this. They just fall in line.
How do you make a free thinker out of someone to lazy to think?
Posted by: Roger | October 19, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Typical of the mainstream media. They got it wrong again. The Democrats had nothing to do with the actual Ebay auction or Rush’s matching funds. The media praised the Democrats. And they wonder why people think that they’re biased!
Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
ABC – Seriously – you must fix your incorrect story – you look like a fool.
You reap what you sow. Good luck with this.
God Bless You.
Please fix it to the report the truth.
Posted by: fools | October 19, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Harry Reid trying to take credit, what a joke! He can’t even get Mike Mays name right.
It’s MAYS, Senator Reid, MAYS, with an ‘S’.
You people still can’t get it right. . .
Posted by: RSS | October 19, 2007, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
BIG DIFFERENCE: MoveOn actually DID make the dispicable comment about the General….but Rush DID NOT make the comment that the Democrats are lying about!!! (And if you don’t believe me…go back and listen to his whole show from that day, the democrats are caught RED HANDED trying to lie and slander him!!!)
Posted by: JoePublic | October 19, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
I hear that both Reid and Max Baucus will be matching the donation to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation. Way to step up gentlemen!
Posted by: Rich | October 19, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
And ABC wonders why no one trusts what is reported??? ABC news you can’t depend on…. Even when it’s spelled out for them!!!
Show me ONE write up ABC did before the closing bell!!!
Totally biased reporting only terroists and democrates can depend on…..
Posted by: mda | October 19, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
America is still waiting for all of you gung-ho dittohead keyboard commandos to enlist.
No, you didn’t already serve.
Posted by: Reality | October 19, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
You guys (abcnews) are a pack of liars.
Posted by: joe | October 19, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
This story and the story the Dems in the Senate are trying to pass is totally wrong.
Rush Limbaugh was commenting on people who claim to be soldiers but are not soldiers and are out there condemning the war as “phony”.
The Dems in the Senate are trying to pass the incident off as Rush Limbaugh saying all soldiers who condemn the war are phony, which is totally false. Rush Limbaugh did not say that.
Furthermore, Rush Limbaugh put this rediculous lettr up for auction to showcase the political folley the Democrats are for trying to denounce a private citizen for words he did not say.
This is more PROOF the Democrats in the U.S. are not capable or trustworthy enough to run this country.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
The author of this story should be fired. The story is wrong. To suggest the democrats had anything to do with the money raised, aside from being made to look like fools for giving Rush the amunition to do what he did, is a complete and utter lie.
Harry Reid knows that he has egg all over his face because of his stupid letter. He is such a clown and again looks idiotic. So now he is trying to save face by suggesting that he was in on it or that this is what he expected or that he and Rush were in cahoots.
Make no mistake, neither Harry Reid nor the democrats had anything to do with raising the money except being made to look foolish.
Posted by: Socrates | October 19, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Once again the media (ABC) has reported incorrect information….proving why the Rush’s of the world are needed!
Come on ABC give us some credit. We are not all stupid and can actually process correct information. Even Drudge is reporting your “oops we did it again”. You folks are as bad as Brittany. A train wreck after train wreck!
I was wondering if anyone has call any of the 41 senators asking if they are going to match the 2.1 million. Rush would love that as would I…That would shut them up quick if they had to dig into their pockets!
Posted by: Gina | October 19, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
It is also interesting that the article doesn’t specify that Rush challenged each of the 41 senators (who financially could) to match the bid. He has been doing this since he revealed the auction last week.
Posted by: Jeffrey Colburn | October 19, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
The clowns that singed this letter are either extraordinarily lacking in reading skills, are ignorant, or sign anything they’re told to, just like most of the legislation coming from the aisle on the left. Shows you how serious they take their responsibilities in Washington all the while on the taxpayer diem!
Posted by: Jeff Wahlen | October 19, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
EVERYBODY CONTACT HARRY REID AND ASK HIM TO MATCH THE FUNDS!!
Posted by: Mo | October 19, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
ABC is totally wrong and a 5 minute read of the Ebay listing would clarify it. I guess that was too much to ask of ABC.
Posted by: Goper | October 19, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
ABC gets it wrong again. What ever happened to journalistic accuracy? What ever happened to objective journalism. This an example of why I no longer tune into ABC news programs.
Posted by: Sterling Cruger | October 19, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
ABC is so DECIEPTFUL!
This writer wrote at several deliberate lies in this article; Like: Rush called a phony soldier a “phony soldier”, NOT soldiers who disagree. Rush put the letter on ebay and matched the bid, NOT Democrats. I no longer can sit through any more of this Useless Socialist Propaganda under the guise of a Major News Outlet.
Posted by: Gerard Bonnette | October 19, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I do not know where to start – I guess the first thing is – Where was ABC when it came to taking credit for the phrase “Phony Soldiers” in the first place? ABC didn’t want in, when the spine-numb Liberals first hammered away at Rush for his secondary usage of YOUR phrase. Why is that? Couldn’t stand the heat? Thought it would be more fun to utter and run – Hey, ABC isn’t a Liberal Bastian is it? Hmmm I wonder. Never mind I see that the hundred or so responders before me already painted that portrait of ABC in bed next to the entire Democratic Party. How much money, implied or expressed has ABC placed in the Liberal coffers? Does anyone at ABC care to hazard a guess? Oh ya, by the way … IF or since there will be no response forth coming from ABC, the public is safe to answer that question absentia and say that millions and millions of dollars from ABC have or will find their way to subservient members of the Liberal Democrat Party. BUT, on the other hand IF ABC would care to attempt to deny the contributions, please feel free to comment.
Quoting ABC as of October 19, 2007, “Back on October 1st, Harry Reid brought the letter to the Senate floor and asked Republicans to join him condemning Limbaugh for saying that soldiers who oppose the Iraq war are “phony soldiers.”
No Republicans signed the letter and Limbaugh has made light of it. Also on Ebay, you can buy a t-shirt that reads “Phony 41″ on the back. 41 Democratic Senators signed the letter to Limbaugh.”
Is it just me or does anyone else find it the least bit odd of ABC, the above direct quoted comments are devoid of truth and factual information? ‘Condemning Limbaugh for saying that soldiers who oppose the Iraq war are Phony Soldiers’ You (ABC just like the Liberals took these words out of context and added in a place where you (ABC) wanted it to be for the Affect of it all, but not the facts. Why, after all, should facts get in the way of a good story? And you people in the thing formerly thing known as ‘the media’ know perfectly well that there is a huge difference between FICTION and FACT – In case you have forgotten, FACT indicates TRUTH, Fiction on the other hand indicates 99/5% of the rest of the ‘stuff’ that you print and say on the air.
Oh ya, I almost forgot to comment on the other part of your quote “No Republicans signed the letter and Limbaugh has made light of it.” Why should or would they? After all – It was a sham and a ruse not to mention … “A Story”
IF I watch another ABC program event it will be a cold day in Hell – I believe that the populous of this Great Nation should take a page from the Al Sharpton’s and Jesse Jackson’s of the world and completely refrain from supporting any of the advertisers on ABC…. Think people, we may have too.
Posted by: Voice of Reason | October 19, 2007, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
This article not only gives Harry Reid and the other Dems credit for the charitable donation that was unquestionably a genius move by Rush and his people, but it also misstates what the controversy arose over. The author here characterizes Rush as calling soldiers who oppose the war as “phony soldiers.” This is a complete mis-characterization, let alone a blatant lie. The transcript of the show clearly and unmistakably shows that Rush was talking about Jesse Macbeth and others like him. Let us not forget that Macbeth is a “phony soldier.”
Posted by: Patrick | October 19, 2007, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
ABC news is disgraceful for crediting Dems. No wonder you continue to lose marketshare.
Posted by: R Hughes | October 19, 2007, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
It seems the same person who does spell check, checked the facts in this story.
Posted by: Martha A Ware | October 19, 2007, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Are you really that miss informed? No wonder everyone is watching FOX NEWS!
Posted by: Nathan | October 19, 2007, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Most politicians are so full of themselves that they think we’re stupid. The left wing TV news networks like ABC, CBS, NBC…have helped people like Harry Reid, Pelosi, Clinton, Kennedy…tear this country apart. We’ll become be a communist country if Hilary is elected and the these left wing wacko’s are not stopped.
Posted by: Jay | October 19, 2007, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
For those who think Conservatives can not read:
“Today, Reid was more conciliatory to Limbaugh and whoever is paying for the letter. Though he said on the Senate floor that as he had watched the bidding throughout the week, he never thought it would get to $2 million.
“Now, everyone knows that Rush Limbaugh and I don’t agree on everything in life and maybe that is kind of an understatement,” Reid said.
“But without qualification Mark May(s), the owner of the network that has Rush Limbaugh, and Rush Limbaugh should know that this letter that they’re auctioning is going to be something that raises money for a worthwhile cause. I don’t know what we could do more important than helping to ensure that children of our fallen soldiers and police officers who have fallen in the line of duty have the opportunity for their children to have a good education,” he said.”
He being Sleazy Harry Reid, from the Great Sleazy State of Nevada! He is attempting to assert himself into the CREDIT of this Auction, and Fundraiser.
Facts are facts. I know the Dems have been twisting them for so long, they no longer understand them… I have seen them over and over LIE, and if the do it enough, it somehow becomes fact… Sad, but true…
Independent!
Posted by: Joe Hagler | October 19, 2007, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
I had a good talk witha phoney soldier two years ago at The Wall in Washington DC. The guy is wearing camies with all kinds of anti war patches on them. I asked if he served in Nam “oh yeah” was the answer. Problem was he was only about 32-35 years old. I told him I was the vet and not him unless he served there at the age of 3. He changed it to his uncle served in Nam not him. The guy was a phoney soldier.
Posted by: shanoe | October 19, 2007, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
I would say that there is no one alive that isn’t somewhat of a Hypocrite! That is such a widley used term. I would say he who is without sin cast the first stone and if you say you don’t sin you are a fool and the truth is not in you. The man was smeared from one of the highest bodies of government and a referance was made that he was still a drug user from the Senate floor even though he is tested by the state of Florida as part of his trial results. Unlike God who forgets sin, humanity can’t especially if they have a preconcieved attitude (prejudice).
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Good job Democrats !!!! You win again…………
Posted by: joe | October 19, 2007, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Very interesting. Is seems the facts are now out.
First, I’ll agree the credit for posting the letter on eBay goes to RUSH.
Second, the reporter got that right.
PHONEY SOLDIERS has nothing to do with soldiers serving anywhere, anytime, anyplace. It is simply a reference to some people providing FALSE documents or impressions they are or were in the military when in FACT, they were not. Those are the PHONEY SOLDIERS and the only ones ever referenced by RUSH.
Finally, the complete factual story was readily available to anyone, including this reporter. Sorry you didn’t check your FACTS.
I am just another voice making the point that the MAJOR media outlets like to CREATE the news, fact or fiction, not REPORT the real news.
Best to all for the holidays.
Posted by: B Griffin | October 19, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
I used to believe that ABC was a little better than the other networks when it came to reporting the news. But now I see that I was all wrong. For a network to go out and provide such a BS (Barbara Streisand as Rush would put it) story only goes to show that there is no true media now. To see Senator Reid on the floor trying to take credit for the auction is absurd and should not even been shown. But for ABC to completely ignore the true facts of the whole affair and to tell only part of the story is beyond me. I will continue to watch the only true balanced news, FOX!!!
Posted by: Goody2317 | October 19, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Surely this writter is not as ignorant as his statements in this column suggest.
Posted by: Rich | October 19, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
to conservatives i say this – you need to take to the streets and start airing your displeasure. the lib dems are kicking your butt because they are going out in force and making noise. forget about truth and honesty – they have proven that it’s the consistent message that wins – not the truth. if you don’t start fighting fire with fire, you are going to see hillary in 08 along with reid, pelosi and the gang in power. and all of those values you hold near and dear are going to be flushed away – along with the influence of talk radio (e.g. rush). it’s time for a social revolution..
Posted by: austintx | October 19, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
It is easy to see why there is little respect for Harry Reid or ABC news for trying to once again mislead the public. Only the dim bulbs will not see the dishonesty of the Democrat leadership.
Posted by: bob | October 19, 2007, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
What the hell do they teach you in journalism school? It is disgraceful that the people at ABC News can get the facts so wrong after this much time.
You really are the drive-by media.
Posted by: Matt | October 19, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
What the hell do they teach you in journalism school? It is disgraceful that the people at ABC News can get the facts so wrong after this much time.
You really are the drive-by media.
Posted by: Matt | October 19, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Keep it up drivebys, you get smaller & Rush Limbaugh & Fox News audience just keeps growing. John
Posted by: John Johnson | October 19, 2007, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
“Senator Reid, let me be clear about this one more time: it wasn’t your letter that raised this money — it was your abuse of power.”
Posted by: Angie | October 19, 2007, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
ABC watches it’s credibility slide even further, then asks, why?
You people at ABC Disney are just as corrupt as the toadies at NBC CNN and CBS.
And of course more people know the real truth. Because they have quit watching, reading, or listening to you.
Posted by: CT | October 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Reid, ABCNews, and Democrats are harmful to the Americans.
Posted by: Michael Choi | October 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
When I was little, my Grandfather told me about how he and his family would gather around the radio and listen to programs when my dad was small. I suspect I will tell my grandson about how we used to gather around the TV in the evenings and watch the news when his dad was small.
Poor journalism and outright propagandizing is killing network news.
ABC, we know you are lying and we will hold it against you.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
I guess you dittoheads missed the results of the last election, and are ignoring how the Repubs are running FAR BEHIND in the polls for ’08.
Hell, even HILLARY CLINTON might win. That’s how far behind Repubs are. The best you can do is dopey Guliani and Flip Flop Romney? LOL
I look forward to voting for Hillary Clinton in Nov ’08 just to make you dittoheads cry.
Posted by: Reality | October 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
It’s the Democrats who raised the money? I bookmarked the page and it was pretty clear that Limbaugh is the one who put it up for auction. I’d say that the Democrats contribution to this was lighting up the exploding cigar in their face. Apparently you lit one too.
Posted by: Richard | October 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
This is just one more example that you “news” organiztions are Democrat lapdogs willing to distort the facts for them. Hopefully, someday, even the simple minded will realize it.
Posted by: Larry | October 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
You guttless News people. The only contribution from the DEMS was the abuse of power. You guttless, incompetent news people. Even I, just a consumer, could do a better job than you on researching the facts.
Posted by: Naomi | October 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Notice how the article left out that Rush challenged all the Senatorial signers to match the winning bid? How many did? Zero.. That’s why it was not mentioned…
Posted by: Dabieb | October 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
the article clearly states in paragraph 6: “Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY.”
so what are you people crying about? the article said rush put it up. learn how to read
Posted by: ricky | October 19, 2007, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
This is one of the worse spins I have ever seen on a story! ABC should be ashamed. Here is what the “philanthropist” who bought the letter said “The Eugene B. Casey Foundation believes freedom of speech is a basic right of every citizen of this country. Their purchase of the smear letter was to demonstrate their belief in this right and to support Rush Limbaugh, his views and his continued education of us.” So she bought the letter to protest stupid Harry’s stupid letter. Why wasn’t that in the story? Don’t you fakers at ABC have web access yet? This is going to be bad for you ABC. Remember what happened to Dan? Keep spinning the news like this and you’ll you’ll realize that you will pay in the ratings.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
“No matter what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity.” The action taken by the Democrats was to write a letter condemning the free speech of a private citizen. The action taken by Rush Limbaugh was to auction off the evidence that free speech is under assault by Democrats. The context of Rush’s original quote about the phony soldier was in reference to an actual imposter. You fail to mention that. If you were investigative reporters, you would look into whether or not the actual phony soldier was paid by a democratic operative. That’s probably the real story! Why was someone impersonating a soldier and criticizing the war? What would be the point of that? You could look deeper, ABC, but you won’t. Your brains are lazy and partisan. The internet has arrived, and your credibility is dead. You think we’re all amused by your droll superiority, and we’re not.
Posted by: joyce | October 19, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
History will remember the fraudulent attempt of Reid to take credit and ABC’s unwitting ? effort to support it.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Ah, the children are in a race to the bottom. Well, stay strong ABC – I think CBS may be tiring.
Posted by: Beej | October 19, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
The article sounds accurate to me. Thank you Dems.
Why should Rush slime his way in ad get the credit.
Posted by: WWJD | October 19, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Hey, Rushbo fans, if you think this is bad, wait ’til the Sunday morning talk shows. I hear that Russert has something special up his sleeve. If you want to get close to the truth, keep it tuned to Fox News.
Posted by: Johnny | October 19, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
You know that your a quality news organization when you get the vast majority of your internet traffic via the Drudge Report on an article that you botched.
Well done ABC, you must be so proud.
I’m sure that once this story fades over the weekend your traffic & ad revenues will rebound back to nil.
Posted by: yjr | October 19, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
How about all those dishwashers and store clerks giving $2300 to Hillary for PRESIDENT.
I need to get a job working with them so I can learn how to have an extra few thousand.
But, I think I’d buy a car.
Posted by: B Griffin | October 19, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
I’ve been listening to Rush for about a year and had previously always taken what he has said about the “drive by media” with a grain of salt. I honestly felt that the media liked to pick on whichever party controlled the White House, just like the comedians do. I was listening to Rush’s show the day he made the “phony soldiers” comment, and I was genuinely surprised to see his words so obviously misrepresented. When this story first broke about Reid’s letter, it should have been reported by all news agencies that Reid’s accusations of Rush’s patriotism were not true. Now, here it is weeks later and this story, which apparently has already been edited for inaccuracies, still fails to mention this fact. Why is that? If the writer, Mr. Wolf and ABC are trying to continue to discredit Rush then I’m afraid they are failing to reach me. Every story I read about this confirms what Rush has been saying about the “drive by media” for years. Inaccurate reporting is doing nothing for your cause, ABC, and I sincerely hope you realize that that you are pushing more people to listen to him, more people to quit listening to your point of view and more people away from your news broadcasts and this will ultimately result in fewer viewers. I could say that your organization should be ashamed, but I doubt very seriously if you have any shame. You should rethink your strategy.
Posted by: William | October 19, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Right. “Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.” It’s not like you need a super-secret password or an eBay charity auction to contribute to MCLEF. Are you people honestly so stupid to think that the reason the Democrats sent the letter was to raise money for charity? I doubt the thought ever came into their minds.
Posted by: Joe | October 19, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
What do you expect? This is the “DRIVE BY MEDIA” This kind of reporting is what makes talk radio so successful and the “Old Media” more and more distrusted.
KUDOS to EL-RUSHBO
Posted by: Don | October 19, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
ABC = All But Closed
mainstream media is near dead, and the spin on this article is just a death throe
I don’t think ABC could be more pathetic
Posted by: kirk | October 19, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
I’m sorry, what? Democrats are going to make a ton of money for charity off of their vitriol?
How much did any of those Democratic Senators contribute? None?
Well, I guess that’s par for the course – Democrats always take credit for spending other people’s money.
Posted by: Warden | October 19, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
What the heck is this nonsense???? “The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”"”
This article needs to be retracted and rewritten. DEMOCRATS did not make any money for a charity here…Rush Limbaugh did. You want to know why your network (and CBS, NBC, CNN) are the laughing stocks of America? THIS is another precise example of why.
Posted by: George | October 19, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Once again ABC lies. Truth is a foreign language to LIBERALS.
Posted by: Doug | October 19, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
No, Mr. Wolf, Democrats didn’t make a ton of money for a charity.
Quit calling us “stupid”.
Posted by: Capitalist Tool | October 19, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Dingy Harry Reid just today PROVED … HE DOESN”T GET IT! Go ahead and take credit for your letter.. a letter which makes McCarthy look like a LIBERTARIAN.
Reid is a moron AND a Disgrace. Reid did EXACTLY the same thing McCarthy DID … he should be taken away in a straitjacket!
Posted by: GW56 | October 19, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
I hope this reminds and wakes up the American people to what the Democrats have become. They are no longer the party of the other side of the argument. They are Socialists, that are willing to LIE and do WHATEVER they can with the Medias help to get Hillary elected. Shame on Reid. Shame on ABC!
Posted by: Erna | October 19, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
I love you, Rush!
Nancy
Texas
Posted by: Nancy | October 19, 2007, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
ABC News is suffering from liberal dilusion syndrome. What next, the WTC was a maintenance issue?
Posted by: Ccoz57 | October 19, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Limbaugh insulted soldiers that know what a disaster Iraq is, and then tried to change everything around after some of those soldiers complained.
Let’s see Rush meet those soldiers face to face. He was invited to, and he declined.
All he had to do was apologize, thank them for their service, and then it would have went away. Now, it never will.
The only people fooled are the same ones fooled by all of the right wing scams. Hell, they even believe Bush really won elections. Pretty far gone group of people.
Posted by: Reality | October 19, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
My wife watches Good Morning America every morning, but starting Monday morning, she will not be watching any show affiliated with the ABC News organization. I will tell her about the backwards reporting ABC News reported on this story and she will not watch anymore. I don’t care if you despise Rush, just get the story straight. This is despicable!
Posted by: Hawaiian Style | October 19, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Rush exposed Reid and his gang of misfits for who they really are. Why didn’t Ried and the 40 Democratic Senators of the smear letter, match the amount that Rush raised to support our troups. Their phoney supporter of our solders, that’s why. Are they only generous with taxpayers money?
Posted by: Jo Steno | October 19, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
The fact that Rush calls the network new the “drive by media” is an understatement. NO mention in this article that Rush NEVER called anybody in uniform “phony soldiers”. It’s appalling that the person writing this article obviously and purposly fails to include this fact.
Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
First, I had to listen to Harry Reid spread lies about Rush Limbaugh and attempt to malign him. Then today I had to listen to Reid stand on the Senate floor and attempt to take credit for Rush Limbaugh’s brilliant idea. Now this support by ABC News of Reid’s distortion of reality. Outrageous, no wonder the mainstream media is in such a decline. You do not report the truth. Lie down with democrats, come up with distortions. You are pathetic!!!!
Posted by: Linda Alpern | October 19, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
ABC misses the facts. Are Dan Rather and Mary Mapes working for ABC now?
Posted by: Axeman | October 19, 2007, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
You control what your wife watches on TV, Hawaiian Style? What a control freak.
Posted by: Ernest | October 19, 2007, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
ABC News makes me feel like I’m living in a communist country, where the “news” is nothing but twisted, agenda-driven propaganda. This is why nobody gives a flying about the so-called (former) “big 3″ of news.
Posted by: SJL | October 19, 2007, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Hey, Pablo…if you ‘secular humanists’ are going to quote one of your non-sensical gurus, you should at least spell his name correctly..it is Dr. Laurence Britt, not Lawrence. That is what you get for doing a ‘cut & paste’ from elsewhere on the net. I get a real kick out of your ilk: “hey, look everybody..see what a deep thinker I am?” No original thought or ability to think for themselves..only a ‘cut & paste’ skillset. Please, log out of your Starbucks ‘hot spot’ and get another overpriced latte.
Posted by: Retired_Colonel | October 19, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
ABC—-This story is full of lies. How can we believe anything that you report in the future?????????
Posted by: David | October 19, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Its important to note that this piece has been edited since it was originally posted @12:34pm. The original credited democrats with the fund raising as per the last paragraph. It was edited after the bidding was over and the winner announced @1:00pm. Does anyone have the original piece cached somewhere so that we can determine if ABC added a mention to Limbaugh having been the one organizing the charity auction after the fact?
This question would not be necessary if ABC had some better practices, including keeping edits separate from original pieces and time stamped.
Posted by: Curtis | October 19, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Wow, hard to believe intelligent people can so misunderstand this article. What is it that you right-wingers don’t get. Read the last sentence of the article AGAIN. Hello??? The story isn’t “wrong.”
I’ve got to think that some of you are paid to post drivel like this. Stop trying to lead people by their noses. The article was informative and interesting, nothing more than that.
er….maybe you just don’t know what the word “vitriol” means???….
Posted by: You folks are NUTS | October 19, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Someday I hope those who report the news will find a way to keep their personal views separate from the truth and report what actually transpires -vs- what is perceived. Granted Reed and company wrote the letter. But it took someone who cares about getting real results to put another person’s arrogance towards a good cause. Bravo Zulu Rush
Posted by: Jay Seaess | October 19, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Once again ABC continues to LIE. It was Rush that raised the money not the lying dems.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
this is absurd!!!! rush is responsible for putting the letter on eBay, not dingy harry. You guys at ABC need to stop letting the facts get in the way of your reporting…
Posted by: will | October 19, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
The Democrats deserve a standing ovation for what they’ve done. Maybe the money can be used to give our troops proper armor that Bush refuses to do.
Posted by: WWJD | October 19, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
ABCF(raudulent) News
ABC Newsshould now be required to add an F for fraudulent to their logo:
But without qualification Mark May, the owner of the network that has Rush Limbaugh, and Rush Limbaugh should know that this letter that theyr…
Posted by: Blue Crab Boulevard | October 19, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Liberal Bias at its best. It was bad enough listening to Reid attempt to take credit for Rush’s auction. Now ABC.com puts their own spin on the story, too. Why is the news media increasingly irrelevant? Answer: stories like this.
Posted by: T J | October 19, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Go Rush. Boo Reid
Posted by: Delano | October 19, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I lost all respect for ABC after Peter Jennings pathetic sermonizing the night of the 1994 Republican congressional election coup. Comrade Jennings likened Newt and the gang’s victory to America throwing temper tantrum. Now this disgrace of a “news” report. ABC has hit an all-time low. No have no credibility and ethics. This story so full of lies its beyond humor. ABC is the new Dan Rather and CBS. I know longer watch such lies. I’m not a bit surprised at Dingy Harry and his stooges. What do you expect from a bunch of socialists.
Posted by: Mark | October 19, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
What is wrong with you people at ABC? Are you stupid or just so far to the left you can’t find the truth if it bites you in the rear? I’ll make it simple for you: Reid made an ass out of himself on the house floor condemning Rush for something he didn’t do. Reid wrote an equally asinine letter of condemnation. 41 Senate morons signed it. Mays and Rush laughed at it. Rush put it up for auction. It pulled in $2,100,100 dollars for the Marine Corp Law Enforcement Foundation. Rush is matching it out of his own pocket. Now Reid wants to be included. GOT IT?
Posted by: Steve Hollar | October 19, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Harry couldn’t get it right, trying to take credit for this. He said he “talked” to Mark May, couldn’t get that right either, it’s Mark Mays. Anyone who thinks Harry was being genuine in his comments today, lives in a dream world and to print the story as you have, is just a lie.
Posted by: Lynn | October 19, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.” The first time you report this story and this is the coverage you give?? At least make an attempt to not look biased!!
Posted by: Brian | October 19, 2007, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
ABC news is the Hope Diamond of misinformation. It’s axiomatic that the money raised was caused by Limbaugh and his audience. The only thing dems had to do with anything was the fact that they were typically mendacious. If the person who wrote this article witnessed a hydrogen bomb going off, the news reported would be “today was unusually warm”.
Posted by: Ray McDaniel | October 19, 2007, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
LIES!
HOW CAN ABC GET AWAY WITH THIS!?!
Rush should sue! Dems had nothing to do with putting this letter up on Ebay.
And people say there is no left wing bias in the media.
Posted by: Aaron R | October 19, 2007, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Hey Harry and the gang. Ok partners, it’s time for you and ABC to put your money where your mouth is. Take your feet out of you mouths (again) and let’s see if you fine, decent, upstanding men and women signatories of the letter will match Rush’s contribution DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR. I bet no a ones got the guts to do it. Not a one. Com’on Jay and John and Hillary and Barack, so us what you got. If you want to be a great leader, then lead with a great example. Same goes for you, too ABC. America dares you. After all, it is for charity, is it not? And remember, you’re not supposed to give until it hurts, but to give until it feels good.
Posted by: I Dare You | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Ho funny is this?
Liberals just can’t help but lie can they?
What else would you expect from the All Bs Channel.
Posted by: Brad | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Napolean Dynamite?? That is not a tired old reference. Wow, way to stay up to date with that one. Dork.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
How funny is this?
Liberals just can’t help but lie can they?
What else would you expect from the All Bs Channel.
Posted by: Brad | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
How funny is this?
Liberals just can’t help but lie can they?
What else would you expect from the All Bs Channel.
Posted by: Brad | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Posted by: Mike M. | Oct 19, 2007 1:33:15 PM
Would this charity be recieving four million dollars if Harry hadn’t written the letter? NO
SO… following your logic if I donate money to a charity then the government should get credit because they printed the money. My company should get credit because they payed me the money.
If I choke and die on a cookie then the cookie manufacturer is responsible because they made the cookie.
Please show us some more moronic logic of the left it makes me laugh and I feel all warm inside.
Posted by: McSorley | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
The Drive-By Media does it again. Democrats had nothing to do with this auction, other than to unwittingly try to silence a private citizen with a listenership of 22,000,000. Now Harry Reid is trying to take credit for what RUSH did, and the Drive-By Media are, as usual, willing accomplices. These people can’t be trusted.
Posted by: Brenda Tighe | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
The Dems? What the hell are you guys smoking???
Posted by: STEVE | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Get the facts right!
Isn’t that the first thing they teach you in journalism school?
The Dems had nothing to do with this except for the fact they signed and sent the stupid letter to begin with.
I can see the Democrats are big supporters of the First Ammendment and Free speech. 41 Democrat Senators want to shut down free speech on the US airwaves.
Good job Rush Limbaugh for pointing out the Democrats hypocrisy!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Thanks, Democratic Party, for setting this up to create such a great donation for a deserving group of people.
It’s too bad Mr. Limbaugh had to be so reactive rather than proactive on this issue. It reaks of him covering his backside. Are his matching funds hush money?
Posted by: Republicat | October 19, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
This is just plain sloppiness and/or outright bias.
As of now for the media the truth is optional if it gets in the way of a politcal agenda. That’s expected of the politions but not of the people whose job it is to ferret out the truth.
Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
So, the same Senator who does not support the troops attempts to cancel funds for their equipment while they are fighting on the field of battle, tries to take credit for the good works of a Radio personality that is beloved and listened to daily by those very same troops!!!
He can only be a Democrat.
Posted by: ET | October 19, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Um, excuse me, what is this, a politburo communique’? It is pure mendacity and demagoguery for ABC not to clarify that when Rush rightfully called out and condemned “phony soldiers” he wasn’t talking about soldiers in general: he was talking about sinister individuals who lie and pretend to have served when they never did. Shame on you, ABC. Shame.
Posted by: Rob S. | October 19, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
EVERYONE CALL ALL 41 SENATORS ASK THEM TO MATCH THE 2.1 Million!!!
Posted by: Grady | October 19, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
I cannot believe how badly ABC screwed this up. No wonder your ratings are in the toilet. Do you realize how many people know you totally misrepresented the story! Dingy Harry had nothing to do with the auction.
Twenty-five years ago the Big Three networks had 57 million nightly viewers. Now you are down to 25 million. At this rate you will be down to 20 by next year. Do you want to keep your job? Get the story right. Jeeze.
Posted by: Richard | October 19, 2007, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
I am guessing that this is the statement that you nutjobs are reacting to. Anyone without a political agenda who reads this sentence understands exactly what it means. But for some reason, most of the folks here don’t. Now, I know you are all intelligent enough to understand it, so why is it that you trying to claim that it means something different than it does? Do you not “get it”??
Posted by: You folks are NUTS | October 19, 2007, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
This ABC News report is straight out of ‘Alice in Wonderland’. Everything is upside down and backwards. The final paragraph is exactly the OPPOSITE of what really happened. If Hairy Reid had his way, Limbaugh would be off the air and not a penny of the $4.2M would have been raised.
Sen. Reid reminds me of a person who is being run out of town on a rail, but waves at the crowd, believing or prtetending that he’s at the head of a parade and that he is the Grand Marshall.
How can a major news organization, with the resources of ABC News, report something so 100% incorrectly? Can they be that idiotic, or was it just intentionally misleading?
Surely the don’t beleive that we are just that stupid and will beleive their report.
Posted by: Pedro | October 19, 2007, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
The last thing the Dems need is for George Soros and their masters at MOveON see them supporting military families. Rush has backed them into a corner
Posted by: Ryan OKeefe | October 19, 2007, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Call the Senators who signed to match the funds.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA
Posted by: Lisa | October 19, 2007, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
well i always wondered about abc.. now i know. they are only in it for the democrats. how dare u take a story as what rush did for our marines and turn it completely around to make it sound like democrats are the reason for the money raised. everyone one of you at abc should be ashamed at yourselves.i guess they only thing abc stands for is tryin to make the democrats look good. which i guess from what the democrats have done here lately, they need all the help they can get.. abc makes me sick to my stomach.
Posted by: Dennis | October 19, 2007, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Basic question to all you Dido heads.
If the letter didn’t exist could have Rush sold it?
I am saying that if the democrats didn’t give Rush and his friends the letter, would Rush have anything to sell. So the product that got the cash was from Senator Reid right?
As to rush’s comments. Yesterday on Hannity and Comes (off the FOX NEWS WEBSITE) Rush linked the guy that said he served and said that his service was like John Kerry in Vietnam.
Question – Did John Kerry serve in Vietnam?
If so then he is a solder that disagrees with Rush that Rush said was not a real solder.
Posted by: jim | October 19, 2007, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Yep you are right they are as left wing as you can get. The last time I watched ABC news was the night they opened with twelve minutes of Bush getting arrested 25 years before for DUI. They totally ignored the fact that Ross Perot
Had just endorsed Bush untill the
very last where it got a token
mention. Haven’t seen another ABC
news program since and don’t
intend to.
Posted by: Bob Hill | October 19, 2007, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Thanks Rush for doing what you did.
Dumb liberals. Don’t you realize that this story was edited by ABC after the backlash.
Once again you prove that liberalism is the philosphy of the stuid.
Gosh…
Posted by: frank | October 19, 2007, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
As a lifelong Democrat I am ashamed of my party today that someone such as Harry Reid is allowed to be its spokesman.
While I cannot stand Limbaugh, clearly he did something magnanimous for a good cause. And for Harry Reid to try to claim credit and then ABC to parrot that is a disgrace and makes ma ashamed to be a Democrat.
Posted by: Democrat | October 19, 2007, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
QUOTE FROM THE WINNER OF THE LETTER:
“The Eugene B. Casey Foundation believes freedom of speech is a basic right of every citizen of this country. Their purchase of the smear letter was to demonstrate their belief in this right and to support Rush Limbaugh, his views and his continued education of us.”
There you go, ABC. Hopefully THIS will motivate you to write a TRUTHFUL article!
Posted by: tulipred | October 19, 2007, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Harry Reid is a disgrace, he got skunked on his anti-free speech letter. Then, at the last minute tries to, in some way, take credit for the generosity of Rush’s listeners. This is disgusting.(By the was I listening to his comments on CPSAN2 at noon.) I pains me to see a grown man attempt to take credit for another mans work. As far as ABC “news” is concerned, I am not shocked at all. The Drive-by media is in the business of giving liberal, antiwar, kook, democrat elected officials cover. That’s how they roll.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
This is outrageous. Either ABC is lazy, incompetent, or so joined at the hip with the liberal left they are essentially an organ of the democratic party. In any regard, how do these so called “journalists” sleep at night knowing the liberal lies they propogate.
The answer is .. they don’t care about truth. They are the new PRAVDA, not state sponsered but their neo-socialist attitudes dictate what they report, what they don’t report and how they spin it.
Posted by: Scott | October 19, 2007, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
$2,100,100 FOR DEM LETTER BASHING LIMBAUGHREID TRIES TO TAKE CREDIT FOR AUCTIONABC NEWS CREDITS DEMOCRATS FOR RAISING MONEY
So the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation, its now official, is going to get in excess of $4.2 million. This quote from Harry comes as a surprise to Rush:
Never did we think that this letter would bring money of this nature. And, fo…
Posted by: Right Voices | October 19, 2007, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
If there wasn’t already enough proof that ABC News is in bed with the Democrats, this article seals the deal.
Posted by: Vince | October 19, 2007, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
ABC news has become a joke. This letter was Harry Ried trying to get Rush off the air or at least discredited. The “Phony Soldier” comment Rush was talking about was one of ABC NEWS story’s!!! by Brian Ross did Harry Reid sent him a letter!!! Maybe you should ask him.
Posted by: jeff | October 19, 2007, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
one more time:
there were weapons of mass distruction.
rush is right 95% of the time..case closed
Posted by: john | October 19, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Mr. Wolf knows no truth! Thanks for helping the Republican Party gain in the race for the White House in “08″. The country can only get better when we remove the 40 Senators from office that sign this letter on taxpayers’ time. What about the troops and the mission? Who really supports them?
Posted by: jmoore | October 19, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Shame on you ABC and Reid.
Can’t even tell the truth. Do you really think Americans are so stupid? Spin, Spin, Lie, Lie, dig your hole deeper and deeper.
This is despicable!
No more ABC news in this house. I have had it with you guys.
Posted by: David | October 19, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
That sentence is a LIE.
It is a pathetic attempt to give credit where ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIT is due. Harry Reid and the other 40 senators had absolutely nothing to do with raising money for the charity. NOTHING. Their intent was to have Limbaugh’s employer censure him and elicit an apology. Limbaugh alone turned it into an opportunity to raise money for charity. The reporter is either stupid, or a partisan hack.
This type of agenda-driven “reporting” is why “journalists” are held in such contempt by most of the American people. The mainstream media is headed for the ash-heap of history. The sooner, the better.
Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Rush matched the funds! Now let’s see how many Dems step uo to the plate!
Posted by: stuart | October 19, 2007, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Dave wrote “If you want to say that Rush was calling all troops that don’t agree with the war “Phoney” then you don’t know Rush. maybe you should listen to him for a couple of weeks.”
Actually I have listened before and I listened to this particular broadcast. It was very clear what he was saying, and now he is trying to backpedal, and you Limbaugh-lovers here are trying to distract with the same old tired “liberal media” crap that just doesn’t hold water. I have heard Rush call out soldiers before who have come home and spoken out against the war. And this from a man who never served his country no less. How do you know the article was changed? Did you get an official word from ABC, or just make it up? The real story here is why it is big news when conservatives like Limbaugh give to charity yet no publications bat an eye when someone like George Soros or Michael Moore give to charity.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Im a 40 yr old conservative from NY. These Dems are such a joke. My 8 yr old laughs at these people. Go getem Rush. I think these Dems are in for a rude awakining com next November. People are not as stupid as the Dems think they are.
Posted by: mike g | October 19, 2007, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
My Third grade teacher warned me that the world would not be a better place when baby boomers (exception for Rush) finally got to run things. I would forget about this hack reporter not writing the truth of the matter and would just like to see them grow up.
A truely dispicable generation, most of them.
Posted by: Henry Patton | October 19, 2007, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Rush Rules…..ABC sucks
Posted by: Rushing | October 19, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
I gotta quit reading this. Deal or No Deal is on.
Plus, the USA is fairly well split between US and THEM.
So it doesn’t matter which side you’re on.
The truth is irrelvant to THEM.
So, DEAL OR NO DEAL,,,
Howie would be proud.
BG OKLA EARTH UNIVERSE
Not Smokin’ Nothin’
Posted by: B Griffin | October 19, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
To ABC News – just so you won’t forget:
“Senator Reid, let me be clear about this one more time: It wasn’t your letter that raised this money — it was your abuse of power.” Rush Limbaugh, 19Oct’07
Thanks D.
Posted by: Thomas D. | October 19, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Fols. It is important to learn to read. It’s a good place to start.
and listening to Rush likely isn’t helping (apparently LOL)
Posted by: You folks are NUTS | October 19, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Sorry Reggie, you got it wrong.
Posted by: DEAIII | October 19, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Baghdad Bob!
You said you would write if you found work.
Posted by: BJ | October 19, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
It’s not news.
It’s ABC.
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
You need to RELAX
LOL
Posted by: You folks are NUTS | October 19, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Dem’s didn’t do anything to raise this money. Do they honestly think that we are all this stupid?! I hope the people that vote for these idiots start seeing them for what they really are or we are in a heap of trouble.
Posted by: adam | October 19, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
ABC News has once again shown that, in journalism, there are no minimum standards!
Regarding Harry Reid, he is Nevada’s embarrassment!
Posted by: robw | October 19, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Rush meets with the troops often.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Thank God for this means of communication to expose stupid Senators, ABC, and the rest of the Left Wing Liberals.
Mega Ditto’s Rush.
Texas No. 1 Tax Watchdog
Posted by: C. A. Stubbs | October 19, 2007, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
ABC— HELLOOOOOOOO! HEY ABC! Is anybody home??
Mrs. Bill Clinton’s Media Matters made a false statement about Rush Limbaugh. HARRY the undertaker reid tried to use the bogus info to smear Rush with a letter from the Senate Floor. Dingy HARRY refused to make statements from outside the Senate because he knew Rush would sue him and win. Rush turned the tables on the Dems and used their poison to do good. Rush challenged the Dems to match the charity contribution but the Dems refused. Even though he wouldn’t give a dime of his own money, HARRY reid took credit and ABC made a fool of itself AGAIN by saying the Dems contributed to the charity. Now you know “The Rest of the Story”. PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND THE NEXT TIME YOU HEAR ANYTHING FROM ABC>>>> THEY NORMALLY GET IT WRONG!
Posted by: kbetts | October 19, 2007, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
March on the media! You don’t have to go to New York, LA or DC as there are ABC, NBC and CBS television stations in every city in the US. Let your local station managers know how you feel about the lies and liberal dis-information that they are helping to spread and ask them to stop. By snailmail, email, website or IN PERSON. Have a pro American values rally in the parking lot of your local ABC affiliate station and tell them RUSH IS RIGHT at the top of your lungs. These ’60s hippie program directors really only understand protesters with picket signs so let em have it! And say DITTOs for me!
Posted by: Don DeVan | October 19, 2007, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Not once is the false ‘phony soldiers’ claim against Rush addressed in this joke of an article. Don’t you nimwits at ABC realize that fewer and fewer take ANYTHING you report as honest?
Posted by: asdfjl | October 19, 2007, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Did not read all the pro-Limbaugh commnents but I’m sure it’s 99%. Did not your own Charlie Gibson do a report on the “phoney soldiers” only a few days before the whole episode? Are you people brain dead?
Congrats to Rushbo for bringing this to the attention of the Lame Stream Media (that’s you ABC) and the country. this is your reward to the libs who hate America and the military.
Posted by: Pat Walter, | October 19, 2007, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Hey ABC News:
I would never read anything you write, but DrudgeReport had a link to the outright LIE you jerks put on the end of your report. You should issue a retraction, and then all resign in disgrace for being PHONY REPORTERS.
Posted by: Ed Holdgate | October 19, 2007, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Drudge has it wrong. This article does not try to credit Dems for raising the money. I think the money quote was supposed to be the last sentence of the article, but I read it as implying the Dems indirectly are causing money to be raised for a charity. So us Repubs can stop bitching now please.
Posted by: Keith | October 19, 2007, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
I Ditto! Stick with the left idiolog and they can contiue watching their ratings fall.
This is great management! Dum Dum Dum
Posted by: rumm1 | October 19, 2007, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
This is crazy. This author is just as bad as Reid. It is clear that the author of this article does not even have the name of the Clear Channel executive right. This is why the Old Media is terrible and is loosing to talk radio, Foxnews and bloggers. It is sad that a journalist cannot get the facts right.
Posted by: wcAg04 | October 19, 2007, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
@ Ed Holdgate
Now that was funny!
Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2007, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Rush “reportedly said he was going to match the money?” What a prime example of LAZY journalism!It is either that or the author is as dishonest as they come. Anybody wanting to find the truth can go on Rush’s website and find out whether he said it or not. Forget that assinine “reportedly. You are a disagrace.
Posted by: mad as hell | October 19, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Rush made the money, doofus. It could only be credited to the democrats if they owned the letter and they’d done the auction.
Posted by: Mark | October 19, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Reid is Pathetic
Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Others have already expressed the truth very well on this blog; something that ABC is incapable of doing. Your phony journalism is completely transparent.
Mr. Reid still owes Rush Limbaugh and our troops an apology for knowingly lying about Mr. Limbaugh’s comments, and trying to rile our troops over nothing. Mr. Reid failed miserably, as did ABC in reporting this story, as usual.
Congratulations Rush and thanks for matching the $2,100,000 bid, for a total donation of $4.200,000!
Posted by: ABCURwrong | October 19, 2007, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Why is it that most who are coming to Rush’s defense cannot seem to spell?
Are they dense or just so grumpy that they can’t relax enough to slow down and proof what they’ve written?
It’s not the first time the conservatives have adopted the ready-fire-aim method.
Funny stuff…
Posted by: spelling lord | October 19, 2007, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
I’d say Rush for President, but he can’t afford the drastic paycut.
Viva Limbaugh! Viva Reagan!
Posted by: Me | October 19, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
check mate big fat Rush Limbaugh ha ha ha ha ha!!! great move Harry!!
Posted by: thomas Martin | October 19, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
The democrats obviously saw their own condemnation coming, and tried to say that they are very glad the money was raised, to hold back their condemnation.
Posted by: Firefly | October 19, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
I can’t beleive the lieing Democrats are now trying to take credit for their “Smear letter” on ebay. These people know no shame. Words can’t discribe how sick I feel for these pathetic sick people (the Democrats). The fellings I have now are beyond words to express it!
Posted by: S. cobb | October 19, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
It seems this article was edited in response to user comments citing inaccuracies – with the publisher pretending this is the original content rather than an edited fix so as to avoid losing face by issuing a retraction.
Posted by: Marty Lund | October 19, 2007, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Democrats trying to take credit for this is as bogus as can be. Their effort was to silence Rush Limbaugh, an obvious and blatant violation of Limbaugh’s First Amendment Rights.
Where was ABC coverage of this last week when it was announced? Where has ABC been as the bidding crept upward? Where has ABC encouraged Democrats, who at the last minute try to take credit for the auction, to match the winning bid to be donated to the Marine and Law Enforcement Foundation?
In fact, which signer of the smear letter will accept the challenge and match the winning bid? Limbaugh did.
Posted by: Lew Waters | October 19, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
I honestly thought Mr. Wolf’s article was satire, my first time through it — an utter twisting and reversal of the facts for the purpose of humor. When it finally dawned on me that the article was being presented as actual reporting I nearly fell off my chair. There are many biases in the media, but I cannot recall any as blatant as this one. Shame on you, ABC. Doesn’t anyone in the front office look at this stuff? Good Lord!
Posted by: Barbara | October 19, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
This is nothing!
Wait till Reid and the Dems take credit for winning the war in Iraq.
tThis is just a warm up.
Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
I find it kind of funny this story has been taken off the hot topics list. I’m sure more people are talking about the first female commander of the Space Station or the sentencing for the guy who killed the author of “Curious George”
Posted by: William | October 19, 2007, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Reid was hilarious on the floor today. Damage control was never in such high gear. Kudos to ABC for reporting something newsworthy (and kudos for that is testament to the credibility they’ve squandered over the years). Unfortunately, seems this reporter was one of the few who swallowed Reid’s damage control mode.
Posted by: Jerry | October 19, 2007, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
ABC= all bogus communication!
Posted by: Denise | October 19, 2007, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
How about a dose of reality here! Did any of these sheep who are defending Rush’s comments actually listen to his broadcast? He said phony soldiers PLURAL. It was almost 3 minutes later before he mentioned the one soldier he is now using as an excuse. The article never says any Democrat put the letter on eBay. “Rush Limbaugh himself put the letter up for auction on EBAY,” that’s what the article says yet folks here are attacking ABC for giving the credit to the Democrats. At what point do the facts begin to affect your arguments? It was President Bush that made General Petraeus part of the political process by using him as a policy spokesman. The fine people that make up our military are drawn from the ranks of ordinary lower and middle class Americans. More than 70% of the country is against this war and my many friends and family who are currently serving assure me that similar numbers are found in the military ranks. These are not phony soldiers! Not a one of them choice to forgo military service like a certain hawkish talk show host!
Posted by: AnAmericanDad | October 19, 2007, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
You are silly idiots who should run for office and push your agenda rather than pushing it from behind your shell of a profession called “journalism.” How can it be that you always get it wrong? You should be ashamed of yourself and your phony self-righteousness.
Posted by: Joel | October 19, 2007, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
HA HA HA HA…
So Rush said he would match the bid?
OOPSI
so if the winner doesn’t pay, that would mean that RUSHIE has to pay the 2 million… ouchi
That must suck
Posted by: jim | October 19, 2007, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
ABC-
Your article was pretty good, and mostly correct, but you just couldn’t help yourselves and blew it with that last sentence.
You would have more credibility if you had covered this auction phenomenon during the week, rather than making a lame statement after the fact.
You can say that Mr. Wolf was only trying to be funny, but you are over the line once too often with this one…
We see through you people. Get a clue.
Posted by: Capitalist Tool | October 19, 2007, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
THANKS DRUDGE!!
WOULD NOT HAVE KNOW ABOUT THIS CRAP OTHERWISE!
Posted by: Tiffany | October 19, 2007, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Why I am not surprised that ABC has intentionally lied to the American public regarding this Harry Reid letter. There is NO WAY, the so called journalist (Z. Byron Wolf) happened to leave out key points. The take away point of this story should be screamed from every “news” organization. A powerful Government official tried to silence and take away the livelihood of a private citizen who is a critic. How can any American, especially a journalist, not be furious over this abuse of power? Then, the smear snake oil politician tries to get in on the action and take credit for the charity. I am sorry, Z Wolff purposefully mislead in his article. ABC, you should be ashamed of yourself for allowing this “phony” report to be written and for not shouting across the airways and print media about this abuse of power by a powerful congressman. “The Eugene B. Casey Foundation believes freedom of speech is a basic right of every citizen of this country. Their purchase of the smear letter was to demonstrate their belief in this right….”said a foundation spokesperson.
Posted by: Babs | October 19, 2007, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Another perfect example of the collusion between the not so main stream media and the clueless democrat “leadership”. My God, you people make one want to puke!
Posted by: daryl | October 19, 2007, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
The “non-biased” media gets it wrong again. Your last line is a sham and a travesty of reporting. The Democrats had nothing to do with raising the money. And last I checked, no Democrats have been offering matching funds like Rush. Way to go even further into irrelevancy ABC.
Posted by: Greg | October 19, 2007, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Thank you ABC News for letting everyone know who REALLY raised the cash. Are you hiring in the News dept? I’m a good speller……………
Posted by: Jayson Blair | October 19, 2007, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Reggie ~ I know your mind is already made up and you won’t believe me. But you’re wrong about Rush. You have to know him. Know his love of the troops. He is so consistent, that he’s hard to misunderstand. You should have heard the entire program ~ and known about the ABC News Program on Phony Soldiers just a day or two earlier. It would have helped you to understand. Surely you know the danger in taking things out of context. I heard the program. To me there was absolutely no misunderstanding of what he said and meant. As to his not serving in the military, he was medically excused. At least he didn’t “dodge.” And what about you? Have you served in the military? If so, I thank you for your service to our country ~ and the millions of others that have and are serving! We must always support our troops! From the Congress throughout all our citizenry.
Posted by: Julie Anne | October 19, 2007, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
“Democrats are going to make a ton of money…” ??? Nice spin. Get your story straight. I recommend a retraction.
Posted by: getthefactsright | October 19, 2007, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
this is simply sad…ABC News has hit a new low…
Posted by: Jason | October 19, 2007, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
I seem to remember when the Dems put this letter out to get rid of Limbaugh that they were sending out copies to raise money for the Dem Senators… These guys were doing their fund raising business on the Floor of the Senate….isn’t that a no no. But of course ABC couldn’t be expected to check anything out. Everyone of these Dems should have a picture of Soros in all their campaign ads because he is that bought and paid for them.
Posted by: SR Williams | October 19, 2007, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
..I am through watching ABC NEWS…the sham that they are attempted to shove down the throats of American viewers is disgraceful…and shame on Pelosi for allowing this deciet to carry the name of the once honorable Democratic party.
Posted by: Jim A. | October 19, 2007, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Here we go again…The liberal media distorting what Limbaugh said. He did not refer to people who opposed the war as “phony soldiers” but to the patsies who never fought in the war and made up lies that the “drive by media” bought without confirming the information. I wish that the media could be held liable for the garbage that they publish as fact. I don’t think that the dems would want credit for helping families who have lost loved ones in the war since they oppose it anyways. I hope that the people in media matters report the fiction that ABC and these other outlets report, but we know they exist to help Mrs. Clinton…
Posted by: Gary | October 19, 2007, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Does anyone doubt that if the Dems had the power they would silence all concervative talk radio and even revoke Murdocchs citizenship?
Funny to watch how Rush brings out the worst bias in the MSM as if thier regular dose of bias isnt enough.
Before talk Rush and FOX the Dems had the media all to themselves and they didnt have to work so hard or be so obvious (except durring elections).
Journalist are a disgrace to their profession!
Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2007, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
ABC is a perfect example of the “Drive-By Media” that can never get it right. The only thing the Democrats can take credit for is the biggest failed attempt at a slam against a private citizen. Unbelievable. What ever happened to the truth?
Posted by: Fla_tom | October 19, 2007, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
This has to be dumbest thing ever written………..
Posted by: Keith Patrick | October 19, 2007, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Rush Limbaugh, like or dislike him… I like him, deserves credit for the auction and his kindness. ABC needs to correct this story to be considered a serious non-partisan news company.
Posted by: Joseph DeLeo | October 19, 2007, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
DEMOCRATS are going to make a ton for charities?!
Now THAT’S warped thinking.
Posted by: David Tanton | October 19, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
ABC News?
Is that still on the air???
Posted by: Bill | October 19, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Today Rush Limbaugh stated on his show that the press would turn this story into a “look what the democrats did for charity” story. And lo and behold, you’re the first so far! You say at the end of this story, that “the democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity..” How sickening! Rush Limbaugh made a ton of money for a charity. I love how you report that Rush “reportedly said on his show that he would match the bid…”
for the record, he said he WILL match the bid and he has already given millions and millions to this group. but, of course, that’s not news.
Harry Reid had no right to stand up in the senate and use the word “we” regarding this wonderful thing that Rush did. Harry and the 41 should be ashamed of trying to trample the rights of an American citizen in the name of politics. I am so sick of them!
Posted by: Teresa | October 19, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Scott,
I’m with you politically but Limbaugh really did not bash any REAL soldiers. The comment was obviously and clearly about those who criticize the war and claim to be soldiers and then it is discovered that they never even served.
Please don’t just hear what our leaders want you to hear. We are not sheep. If you look at it objectively, you will see that Reid and the other Democrat Senators tried to pull the wool over your eyes. I think they succeeded to some degree to the embarassment of Democrats everywhere.
Posted by: Kirk | October 19, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Rush Limbaugh, like or dislike him… I like him, deserves credit for the auction and his kindness. ABC needs to correct this story to be considered a serious non-partisan news company.
Posted by: Joseph DeLeo | October 19, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Hey ABC, don’t get too excited and think your audience share just went up, the only reason you’re getting all this activity is because we’re all coming over from a Drudge link!
Remember the old line that was drilled into us by the the old Valvoline ads,
“those who know”…….
go to Drudge (and Fox News) for the real story….!
Regarding this ABC story, hey folks, don’t get too worked up. I mean ya gotta laugh and enjoy it, it’s gonna be a great week next week! Talk about them so obviously and openly showing their true colors! I mean we have to be positive here and enjoy this. Remember folks, in the end, truth and optimism always win! That’s why we listen to Rush!
It is hard to believe the higher ups at ABC could be ignorant enough to actually let this story be reported with this much bias though. My gosh, go look at Fox News and their ability to be able to correctly report on this story. Talk about a complete scam on ABCs part! Guess we’ll be looking for a flip-flop CYA story next week on this story?? And they wonder why Fox News is kicking their butt in market share!
And as for Dingy Harry, coming in at literally the last hour like he did, look at what an idiot he looks like!
I sure hope ABC was able to firm up the ratings with all that’s left of their viewers (ie the whacked out liberal left) with this story, because if ever there was a clear case of media bias, this has to be it!
And we thought Rush made Harry look like a moron last week? Boy is Rush gonna eat ABC alive next week with this!
Smile and enjoy life!
Posted by: Kevin Steward | October 19, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Try telling the truth for a change – the last sentence is another lie
Posted by: Ron | October 19, 2007, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
THANKS DRUDGE!!
WOULD NOT HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THIS CRAP OTHERWISE.
Posted by: TIFFANY | October 19, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
The DEMS are going to make a ton of money for a charity??? OMG!!!!
ABC, all these commenters are right. I hope you READ these comments. This is why nobody cares about the big 3 network news any longer. At least you could get the story right!
Posted by: Josie | October 19, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
You have got to be kidding. I mean really though. Seriously? This is how you report on this event? Geez. Morons.
Posted by: AreYouKidding? | October 19, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
This story needs to be corrected – the Democrats had nothing to do with auctioning this letter. The reason it fetched millions of dollars is that it is an example of abuse of power. The US Senate has no rights or responsibilities under the consitution to admonish private citizens or abridge their rights to Free Speech.
ABC – I have some advice for you. First, get yourself a copy of the Constitution and have a look at it. Then get your facts straight. You are giving credit to Democrats in this story. I EXPECT A CORRECTION OR A RETRACTION. Calling yourselves journalists is embarrasssing when the facts of this story are in the damn eBay auction.
This “news story” is misinformation. Nice try, but the people are much more informed than you think.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
I have to say that as a disgrunteled Republican who has been tcked off on the way the Repubs have handled these last few months, Dirty Harry and his lap dogs at ABC have definatley gotten me off the fence.
Its crap like this that reminds me of why I voted Republican and always will.
Posted by: Tim Johns | October 19, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
At least the very least ABC dosent block the add comment feature if a story has been linked by the Drudge report..
Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Harry Reid, in his latest comments before the Senate, sought to confuse the public regarding his role in the letter sent to Clear Channel Radio.
When he used the term “we” in describing what happened and the money that went to charity, he has probably offended 100% of those who serve in the military and their families and most of mainstream America. If voices could be given to those who served and are no longer with us, I’m thinking Senator Reid would hear what he needs to hear.
The letter was based on inaccurate information provided by Media Matters. If any of the Senators had actually listened to Rush Limbaugh’s comments or read the actual transcript, there would be no room to come to the conclusion that Rush was criticizing soliders for speaking their minds. We all know that was not the case. Reid counted on the major media outlets to roll out the highlights of his comments and knew that there was a good chance his comments would overshadow the reality of what was actually said.
What is true is that Media Matters and these Senators perpetuated a lie in an attempt to destroy the credibility of a U.S. Citizen; someone they don’t agree with. Morever, they have sought to bring back the Fairness Doctrine, and have been engaged in rhetoric that seems to have the aim of silencing talk radio. What is more important is that these Senators engaged in an abuse of power – an abuse of their office. This should be viewed with great concern for it portends an errosion of our liberties and the right to free speech.
No matter which side of the isle one supports, our citizenry and our country deserve better from our elected officials.
I hope that everyone, regardless of political affiliation, will take the time to voice their concerns about the ongoing erosion of the right to free speech, and the attempts to silence people who voice a contrary opinion.
Last week Rush Limbaugh was the target. In the not so distant future, it could be John Q. Public who can no longer voice an opinion.
Reid and his minions sought to perpetuate a bold, bald-face lie. I don’t agree with Rush Limbaugh on everything, but in this case I’m glad he met the challenge and did so with style.
Given what transpired with this attempted smear, I’m very thankful for talk radio, and alternative news sources on the net and elsewhere.
Most Americans see this for what it was; a shameless lie perpetuated by the Majority Leader of the Senate – a smear that failed. If it weren’t for people like Rush Limbaugh who stand up for what is right and not for what’s politically expedient, I would be afraid for the future of the country.
God Bless Rush Limbaugh.
Posted by: Don | October 19, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
What a CROCK! ABC loses all credibility when it continues to accuse Limbaugh of calling all soldiers who served in Iraq and oppose the war as “phoney” soldiers..The transcripts speak to one particular liar who claimed to have served in Iraq and did not. He did refer to the one and those “like” him who fake thier service..a wannbee Kerry.
It was the genius of Limbaugh who come up with idea to raise money with the dumb … letter the /dems wrote and it backfired on them…they must feel pretty stupidn right about now.
Sorry American Dad..your wrong. Polls show that soldiers still support the war. they get you don’t.
Posted by: sam g | October 19, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
People cannot be this stupid before they
enter journalism school. They must be taught to be this idiotic.
Posted by: Gary | October 19, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
ABC NEWS LIES AGAIN. But no one is surprised.
Maybe this is why your ratings are so poor.
It’s just a joke that you pretend to be a news organization. You are just a shrill whiny voice for the democratic party.
Posted by: Jon M. | October 19, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
QUOTE FROM THE WINNER OF THE LETTER:
“The Eugene B. Casey Foundation believes freedom of speech is a basic right of every citizen of this country. Their purchase of the smear letter was to demonstrate their belief in this right and to support Rush Limbaugh, his views and his continued education of us.”
ABC ~ get your news right!
Posted by: Julie Anne | October 19, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
What a lieing political hack!!! But then again, this IS ABC News sanctioned….
Posted by: G Blanks | October 19, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
No offense, BAH, but I got like halfway through your rant before I fell asleep. YOU ARE BORING AND REDUNDANT!! No one cares.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Sad, disgusting and intellectually dishonest!
Posted by: Thomas | October 19, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
ABC, this kind of mendacious lying by omission is why so many people believe the sooner the Main Stream Media dies, the better.
It’s taken decades of systematic half-truths, liberal spin, and outright dishonesty to destroy the near-reverence your audience once had for you.
This latest piece crosses the line into the shock-jock territory of Howard Stern.
I urge everyone as disgusted as I am to let this be the first and last time they comment on, or reference to, a Main Stream Media web site, much less link to it.
Please do not reward them for their ill repute.
Posted by: Looking Glass | October 19, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
This article is complete b.s. These 41 Democratic senators signed a smear letter against a private citizen. I am stunned that ABC would lie so blatantly. Don’t you have any pride???
Posted by: susan | October 19, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
A liberal hack and snow job.
Posted by: Ed | October 19, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
I really am stunned. I am going to try to write this without calling people names and such but I really don’t know if it is possible. At some point you have to call a spade a spade as they say. I know I should know better by now but for Reid to use the word “we” in his diatribe on the senate floor today was beyond the pale. There really are only two ways to look at this. By the time he wrote that letter the facts were clearly known to everyone that wanted to be informed. So either he is just completly ignorant of the world around him or he was intentionaly trying to smear a private citizen. No matter which one it is , it scares the hell out of me that our country is being run by the likes of people like Reid. If that wasn’t bad enough for him to then get on the floor and take credit for raising funds for this charity is just assinine. I listened to his speach , in the first case he got the name of man he sent the lettern to wrong over and over agin. He made it out that he and Mark Mays (by the way as I said he kept calling him May) talked this over several times . Do you understand what this means. here is a U.S. Senator activly trying to get a private citizen fired and did so several times not just by letter but by phone. I have heard all about the dirty tricks that the bad ‘ol republicans have done in the past. This little deal goes right to the top of the list. This is a disgrace and although it probably isn’t illegal he should be brought home and made to wear a dunce cap in the public square. Aparently he still has not bothered to check the facts and see that ABC ran a story the day before using the word phoney talking about the exact same issue that Rush did. This man is running the country for pete’s sake. This scares the hell out of me. I hope the Democratic leadership can reach down and try to find someone that at least has the ability to keep up with the world around him. Now onto ABC. If this reporter or whatever he/she is, is this ignorant of the facts then for ABC to keep this person in a position where they are reporting they are just putting more nails in their coffin. Notice I am not calling for this person to be fired , just that they are reassigned and to get training in how to research the facts and then present them. So trash me if you want but no matter what party you belong to you should be as concerned as I am that a Senator would go after a private citizen like this either in ignorance or in an attemptto squash free speach.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
It’s articles like these that make the mainstream media (like the NY Times, *cough* *cough*) loose credibility.
Everybody knows Rush didn’t call troops who oppose the war “phony soldiers”.
Everybody knows he was calling persons who lied about seeing combat “phony soldiers” (an accurate moniker).
And everybody knows that it was Rush who raised the money and that the dems have egg on their face.
Once the mainstream media stops running as lackeys for the dems they can begin to regain credibility.
Ugh!
Posted by: Mike Sirilla | October 19, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Um, ABC, there’s this wacky thing called the “Internet.” Maybe you’ve heard of it? All the kids today go on about. Anyway, it allows us to actually check the source documents you are obliquely referring to. And surprise, surprise! The Democrats did not, in fact, use their magical, wonderful vitriol to give anything to charity.
Good heavens, do you think we can’t read? This is why I don’t watch your stupid TV news reports anymore. “Phony soldiers,” indeed. What about phony reporters?
Posted by: sk | October 19, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
HEADLINE WRITERS LIE!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Mark Vahradian | October 19, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Great reporting. No wonder so many people turn to ABC for news… NOT
Posted by: Roger | October 19, 2007, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
The last sentence of your article says this:
“No mater (sic) what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Which is inaccurate. Can you please correct it to this:
“No matter what, Rush Limbaugh is going to make a ton of money for a charity off of the Democrats’ political vitriol.”
The Democrats didn’t want to raise money for charity, indeed on several web sites they started a campaign to bet the auction taken down as “hate speech” and accused the charity of sending the money to the RNC. They deserve not one ounce of credit at all for this.
Posted by: Gaiou Obvious | October 19, 2007, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Soldiers who come back after serving and join anti war causes while the war is still beibg fought are PHONY SOLDIERS!
Please, Harry Reid send a letter to my Mom and ask her to confer with me…
I will auction the letter and keep the money!
Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2007, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Lies Lies Lies.
Shame Shame Shame.
You should be ashamed of yourselves for giving the Democrats credit for this. Why don’t you read the actual text of what Rush said and report the truth. Just more evidence of your bias.
Posted by: Paul DF | October 19, 2007, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
This is why you are losing ratings. Reporting swing info, instead of facts. Even mentioning Harry Reid was a dis-service to the fact that Rush put up 2.1 million of his own money. The challenge to Harry was made, and where is he to be found, how come no DEMS PUT UP MONEY. We the American people know where they are, and we definately know where and what Rush believes in.
Posted by: Joe Stellato | October 19, 2007, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
All the mainstream media outlets with the exception of Fox News have conveniently ignored this because they know it makes their friends the Democrats look like bad (I’m being nice).
Rush challenged the Senators who signed this letter to put their money where their mouth is and contribute to this very worthy cause. As per usual when it comes down to actually doing something Constructive and meaningful the Democrats are missing in action.
Posted by: Roy T | October 19, 2007, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
are you guys in the MSM really that stupid??
Posted by: intrepid | October 19, 2007, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Typical liberal mindset, cause the problem, take credit for it when a Conservative fixes the problem.
Posted by: Gary Boettner | October 19, 2007, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Rush said it best, addressing Harry Reid: “It wasn’t your letter that raised this money. It was your abuse of power that is responsible for raising this money.”
Posted by: David F | October 19, 2007, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
This article is unconscionable. Lies, Lies, Lies. When ABC and Liberal Democrats stop lying, I might start listening to you.
Posted by: Christine Peer | October 19, 2007, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
What do you expect? The people that write this stuff are Liberals.
Posted by: Al | October 19, 2007, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
“If the bid is actually legitimate, I would suspect that someone figures on a deduction for charitable contributions. Imagine their surprise when the IRS takes the position that they didn’t make a contribution… they bought a historical document at fair market value.”
Posted by: Brian O | October 19, 2007, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Go after Rush by purposely taking what he says out of context (there is a transcript of what was said on his show but your too lazy to read it.) then you try to take credit for the letter without covering the auction?
Posted by: PAUL | October 19, 2007, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Why are we surprised at the slant of the coverage on ABC? To do anything that would make Rush Limbaugh look good would go against their good conscience. Regardless of that, to actually CREDIT the Democrats for raising this money is utterly ludicris, regardless of whether you are on the left or the right. Too bad, ABC and media outlets as such as them continue to fulfill their own legacy of total bias to the left.
Posted by: Lisa Adkins | October 19, 2007, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Rush mentioned the phony soldiers the previous day and during that mornings monologue.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
The Democrats had no interest in raising money for the military. In fact, all they wanted to do was to use this “scandal” they created to raise money for their campaigns. Now that is sick.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
And ABC reports that the Democrats’ letter raised money. No, the Democrats’ letter employed the intimidating power of government against a private citizen’s free speech.
Rush Limbaugh raised money for charity. ABC News carried water for the Democrats and continued their smear. ABC News stinks to high heaven. Journalists who do this sort of thing are worse than despicable.
Posted by: Dennis | October 19, 2007, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
The last paragraph of the article is the most “PHONY JOURNALISM” reporting I have ever read. Wonder why the average person doesn’t trust the media for unbiased stories. Totally pathetic!!!!!
Posted by: Ian | October 19, 2007, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
that last line in the article is the LAST STRAW for me.
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Correct the story, you are a liar. I will hold the rest of my comments until Rush tells me what to say, do and think. ;-)
Posted by: K Hall | October 19, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
The 41 senators do not have the guts to match any charity that Rush supports. They are all talk about how they support it, but you will NOT see them prove it with money out of their pocket.
Rush DID.
The 41 should be run out of Washington. They no longer deserve ANY respect.
Posted by: Don M | October 19, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
For the last time go to Rush’s web page. It all started out when Rush commented on a Phony soldiers segment that was on ABS News. For those of us who listen to the show this was a topic all week.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Why was dingy harry the ONLY ONE quoted in this article and not Rush?
…bias…shame on you abc.
Posted by: james | October 19, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I will give Dingy Harry credit if he gets his 40 cronies to match the high bid like Rush Limbaugh did. That would bring the total to well over 6 mill. Then he and his cronies can take all the credit that they want for contributing.
Phony Patriot
Posted by: Kelly Conaty | October 19, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Is it really necessary for ABC to lie to it’s readers by suggesting that Democrats had something to do with raising money for charity? You, I and everyone else in the world knows that they has nothing to do with it/ Rush has just raised close to 4 million dollars for charity and your network refuses to accept the fact that it was a Republican that raised it. Now, I’m not a Republican but as the Democrats become the party of liars and classless politicians that obviously pull your networks strings I must reconsider my party affiliation now. Being a Democrat is starting to make me feel dirty and unintelligent.
Posted by: Dwighjt | October 19, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
If ABC is going to let Columbia Scool Of Jounalism graduates write for this blog they should have a DISCLAIMER!
LOL!
This one reaaly takes the cake!
Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Did Michael Moore write this article? ABC News is a joke.
I will never watch ABC again.
Posted by: Neil | October 19, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Zero’s true political bias is showing. What a Zero he is.
Posted by: J. B. | October 19, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
ABC and the rest of the liberal media are such liars they don’t even know when they can’t hide it anymore. That’s the true meaning of a pathological liar.
Posted by: Alan Waters | October 19, 2007, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
ABC news, as lopsided and deceptive as ever.
If the Democrats are to thank for this charitable giving, do I get back the tax dollars that were spent for our US Senators to try to censure a public citizen?
ABC if you had any shame, this would be the time to use it.
Posted by: Rob | October 19, 2007, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Funny how all you libs mention his drug use. You will excuse any form of behaviour no matter how sick of depraved and yet you pull this out every time showing you have nothing more to offer. Face it, your idiots in the Senate got trumped.
You wanna talk corrupt, look closer to home. YOur party is so corrupt it is sad. Reid himself is a total crook, and shall we mention Feinstein? Hoe about Jefferson, LA.
Rush takes a drug test every month. Do you?
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Unbelievable! Harry Reid is the most despicable Democrat seen is Washington for decades; and that is saying something!
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2007, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
If the democrats raised this money; then hurricane Rita raised money for New Orleans.
Seems both are about as good for this country. . . . . not!
Posted by: farwalker | October 19, 2007, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
ABC slants it in favor of the democrats again. No wonder this news organization is dying.
Posted by: Martin | October 19, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
You Democrats are really getting creative with your name calling. You sure are making all that intellectual superiority pay off.
Good Show!
Keep up the good work.
Posted by: Susan | October 19, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Democrats raise a ton of money for charity? Great illustration of your bias. Do wonder your ratings are sinking. You are as out of touch as Harry Reid.
Posted by: Glenn | October 19, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
duh?
Posted by: Greg Barton | October 19, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
I think I just threw up in my throat a little. ABC news you are blatent liars.
Rush is right. Anybody who gets their news from the major broadcast news channels these days are completely decieved. Liars,Liars, Shameless, Spineless, Spin Doctors.
Posted by: Darryl | October 19, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
ABC news is despicable. Stop lying to the American people and report the truth rather than protecting democrats for a change
Posted by: DJ | October 19, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Can we ever trust ABC reporting again. After this, I am not so sure. Unless they do some immediate mending of their story, I foretell some free falling in the ratings!!!!!
Posted by: Ian | October 19, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
I was listening to the original broadcast that started all of this. It is amazing to me that Reid and the driveby media intentionally miss-quoted Rush or outright lied about what really was said. The Democrats have on a number of occasions presented persons who were supposed to be in or have been in the military, and who were against the war. A large number of these persons turned out to be either not ever in the military, lied about having been to Iraq, lied about being wounded, lied about awards and decorations, etc. These were the people that Rush called “phony soldiers”, the those who really are in the military and serving in Iraq or anywhere else.
Posted by: Theo | October 19, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
This is astonishing! ABC reminds me of Pravda during the days of the Soviet Union. So weak because so easily debunked. One can only hope that your ratings continue to tank.
Posted by: Ardmoor Oakes | October 19, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
How much did Harry Reid contribute? How much did the other 40 Democrat buffoons contribute? Nothing. Zip. Nada. Leave it to the Democrats to take credit for someone else’s good works and blame others for their own stupid mistakes. Morons!
Posted by: Ron | October 19, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Does anyone at ABC fact check –much less spell check — this blog? No wonder the Democratic party and its willing accomplices at ABC, NBC, and CBS have all become the laughingstock of news journalism.
Posted by: Tim W | October 19, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
We all know the libs were trying to get the last bid!
They would have paid 10 million to prevent anyone but a Rush ally get this letter!
Soros himself probably tried to get into the bidding process.
But Rush wasnt going to have any of that.
Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Reid has no class. He takes to the Senate floor to attack the patriotism of a private citizen (Rush). Then he tries to take credit for the generous contribution and auction that Rush initiated and matched with his own money.
Posted by: Former Democrat | October 19, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Way to go ABC. You now made a story that would have gone away over the weekend, into a story that will last another week. This time you are Harry Reid. Enjoy your public relations nightmare.
Posted by: Martha A Ware | October 19, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Reggie-
I am really becoming embarrassed by your lack of coherent thought. You are the one all over this site accusing others of not having served. I call you on it and you, not unlike Harry Reid, try to turn it around as though Republicans are the ones doing that.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Fact Check, Spell check Please!!!!
Posted by: Ian | October 19, 2007, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Well there goes journalistic integrity…
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Are you kidding me? You people are an embarrassment to this country. Please for the love of all that is sacred. Shut up!
Posted by: Tom | October 19, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Looks like ABC is staffed by a bunch of phony journalists!
Posted by: Ron | October 19, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
This is disgusting!
ABC you cannot report a news story accurately that EVERYONE else knows. It was Limbaugh who put this up on Ebay, not Reid.
Reid could not even say the name of the President of Clear Channel correctly but he pretended that he had talked to him about this auction.
Please… all you are doing is proving Limbaugh correct when he says you guys are biased. Ugh… I give up on you guys.
Posted by: Denbo | October 19, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
This story is exactly why many people don’t rely on ABC News as a valid and credible source of information.
Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
What are those snails without shells called, you know – the Democrats in Congress?
Posted by: RealityCheck | October 19, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Julie Anne, this goes beyond just the context of what he said on the show, which by the way I saw in full context. There is no mistaking what Rush meant. Since then he and his supporters have tried to spin it- they did not expect to be called out publicly by Democrats. I am glad Democrats called it to light though, Limbaugh has gone under the radar far too long- many of the things he has said are more unamerican that Ann Coulter!
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
This story is only too typical of ABC “News” and much of the rest of the media — unfettered spin unrelated to the actual facts of the situation, misleading, ideologically-motivated drivel without utility or worth of any kind.
Posted by: Lance Reed | October 19, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
If Rush is so irrelevant then just why is that the very same tired statement I have heard from the left side for so many years, and why did you waste pixles to provide your insight on the issue. Then you have to deal with the drug situation Rush had freely admitted and dealt with in the correct manner.
Care to supply a list of all the left is a similar situation or should I point out all the much more prevalent such activity on the left. At least Rush got involved by an addiction following prescribed medication for a back injury.
Unlike the left where no such case usually exists and the addictions in many cases result from pure recreational usage.
Posted by: CommentGuy | October 19, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Can ABC be a little more blatant in its Leftist-leaning bias?
Posted by: RoboSlater | October 19, 2007, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
I have always held true to original mores of the democratic party and have always voted that way. However, after the dismal performance of this congress, a “mainstream press” that can no longer even pretend to hide any kind of bias, and to top it off just lie after obvious lie. At least Bill Clinton knew how to do it, I, even though my late father must be furious, have hereby cast my last democratic party vote on ANY level, even dog catcher. I am truly ashamed of what the modern democrats have turned into.
Posted by: DemNoMore | October 19, 2007, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
The abuse of power of these 41 Senators is breath taking. To attack a private citizen and try to do him harm is below the dignity of the U.S. Senate. Shame on each and every one of them. Go Rush.
Posted by: Tom Mac | October 19, 2007, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
The last paragraph looks like it was hung on there by some disgruntled Lib passing by Byron Wolf’s cubicle – complete with a misspelled word and a clunky sentence.
It’s not about who’s allowed to have an opinion about the war, it’s about the liberal penchant for lying to cover up mistakes of their own – like undermining a sitting general during war time. The only people who applauded that move are the kooks on the left here and the terrorists abroad sitting in their little hideouts making bombs to kill our soldiers
Posted by: Evrviglnt | October 19, 2007, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
THANKS DRUDGE!
Posted by: TIM | October 19, 2007, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
WRONG!!! The democrats did NOTHING to raise the money you twits. It’s not their sigs that raised the money it’s the historic abuse of power. ABC rewrite this _totally wrong_ and off the mark blog. It’s not even CLOSE to the truth. This was 100% Limbaugh’s doing.
Posted by: Stephen | October 19, 2007, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
The “revolution” is on it’s way. ABC et. al. are just priming the pump. See you all at the next swearing in ceremony….
Posted by: Magna Carta | October 19, 2007, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Challenge the phony US Senators to match Rush Limbaugh’s contribution to show their sincerity,honesty and integrity, starting with Harry Reid, quickly followed by Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama.
Posted by: Derek Hanley | October 19, 2007, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Harry Media Matters Reid had about as much to do with auctioning this embarrassing letter as I had to do with discovering Penicillin. This kind of Soviet style news distortion is why so many people are going to other outlets to find out what is really going on. I said bye-bye to CBSNBCABCPBSCNNMSNBC and most of the major newspaper rags for the facts long ago.
Posted by: Brad | October 19, 2007, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Who in the world listens to ABC/CBS/NBC anyway. Those idiots sold out years ago and long ago lost any credibility.
Posted by: ron | October 19, 2007, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Harry Reid is caught cold stealing the credit for a good deed by Rush Limbaugh, and ABC wants to pat him on the back. Harry Reid wrote his infamous letter with one sole objective, to attack and destroy a man who’s views he does not agree with that. Did Harry write the note on personal stationary, NO? He wrote it as the majority leader of the U.S. Senate and then to make sure that the attack was clearly understood by Rush’s media partner, he got 40 of his fellow Democrats to sign it. To think that Harry now wants credit for Rush’s good deed, is like saying that you can’t have a hero without a villain, so thank God for the villain. Heh Harry, I gave a hundred bucks to the Marine charity – how much did you give?
Posted by: Robert L. Barney | October 19, 2007, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
It’s totallly amazing to me that the party putatively concerned about civil liberties would try to restrict the free speech of a private citizen because it hits too close to home. Let there be no mistake about it, the “Thanks Rush,” response is a 180-degree flip flop from the McCarthyism the Senate Majority Party of Intimidation planned. Rush aced them! Big time! What iota of credibility does a letter imputing his opposition to soldiers exists now? More importantly, why does ABC spin it so heinously erroneously. Ooops, I happened to have missed the first episode of Grey’s Anatomy, flame out and burn, abc baby, a la Rather, Couric, etc. The alternative is to tell the truth, a rarity, before we look at the big three networks as they once were — in a museum.
Posted by: Nick | October 19, 2007, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
ABC’s report is precisely reason I don’t watch the network news anymore…or for that matter CNN, MSNBC, et al…and precisely the reason their ratings are tanking.
ABC conveniently neglects to mention the Senate Democrats’ abuse of power in this matter, abuses that will be far worse if Obama, Clinton or Edwards takes (note the term is not “wins”) the White House next year. Just remember Hillary and her illegal use of private citizens’ FBI files in the 1990′s.
And when ABC, et al are no longer useful to the Democrats, then they will be silenced as well.
Posted by: Tim | October 19, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Reggie-
You clearly do not listen to Rush and do nothing but parrot Media Matters and MoveOn. If you think that the media in America is conservative, you really should be institutionalized as you are a danger to yourself and others. Man, I cannot believe that someone can be as extreme and blind as you are. It’s really sad but shouldn’t be surprising considering you were educated by a government indoctrination school. Stop pretending to know Rush Limbaugh or anyone else. You know absolutely NOTHING expect your own lame, childish opinions.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
My apologizes James Boles.
Posted by: SQUADRON79 | October 19, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
I’m not easily surprised, but I must admit I’m shocked at the spin perpetrated by ABC and their comrade Harry Reid.
You people aren’t even TRYING to even APPEAR to be objective. ABC and its media allies have clearly chosen sides.
What a shame.
Posted by: Mac The Blogger | October 19, 2007, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
ABC and the4 Dems DISGUST me.
The Dems, used the US Senate to attempt to censore and silence a private citizen, in direct violation of the constitution.
Posted by: Doug | October 19, 2007, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Lincoln said, “You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.”
Libs bank on this….it’s the only way
they stay in power. Fools vote liberal.
Posted by: Tom | October 19, 2007, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
The only thing the Democrats did was create an opportunity for a better man to do some good. Not only did make lemonade out of those lemons, he’s contributing immensely himself. I’d like to see Harry Reid and collectively be just a good a man as Rush is, and match the money Rush is contributing.
Posted by: bill | October 19, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
I suppose this type of outrageous behavior by our congress has always been with us, but I can tell you that I am embarrassed that we have to VOTE to be so humiliated by them.
The shenanigans that are going on now are so childish and repulsive that I have a hard time believing Americans can put up with this when we have so many truly awful scenarios to deal with as a country and as a culture.
Posted by: depressed | October 19, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
A Bunch of Crap. ABC news, are you for real????
Posted by: Brad | October 19, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
It’s like this: Harry throws a hatchet at Rush, hoping to injure him. Rush catches it, and then turns around to hunt for game. He suceeds and feeds a family that lost one of their parents, adding in some of his own food.
Just then, Harry jumps up and faces the family: I’m so glad that we were able to provide you some food! See what happens when people work with me in a positive way?
This event has really pulled back the curtain on the Liberal politicians, and the MSN that protects them.
Snort!
Posted by: Imrighter | October 19, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
CRAP journalism at its text-book best! This article is a PERFECT representation of skewered journalism.
ABC has long been taken off of my TV, and this is precisely why.
Posted by: Kevin Coombs | October 19, 2007, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Let’s get off the subject of whether someone never served in the US military. US Navy myself. If that were the case neither Woodrow Wilson or FDR would have been allowed in the Oval Office. By the way FDR did not contract Polio until he was in his mid-thirties. ABC should be ashamed. But this is supposed to be a free country where anyone is protected by the US Constitution on free political speech. That is what this is about.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Where is David Brinkley when you need him?
Posted by: chuck | October 19, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Are you news guys crazy? The democrats are raising money for charity in this story? Talk about a bunch of bankrupt liars. You folks were on the bandwagon of those who tried to smear Limbaugh. Now you’re lying about it. Liberals cant even tell what truth is anymore. Wow
Posted by: Andraes | October 19, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
This is great! ABC News and Harry Reid taking credit for Rush’s fund raising. Both ABC and Reid can’t help lying and misleading the public on this – the Democrats and Reid did nothing to raise these funds – it was ALL Rush! No wonder ABC News (and all networks for that matter) are losing viewers at an alarming rate. Reid has no morals and ABC is too biased to have any integrity or credibility. Both are beyond (below?) pathetic. RIP ABC News and Reid’s career. Most alarming is that the Senate Majority Leader would call for the silencing of a radio show host – Reid, you fool, ever hear of the First Amendment? ABC News – your very existence is dependent on a free press – do your job! (time to leave the comfort of your air conditioned offices and become a real news organization).
Posted by: TP | October 19, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
It has been a while since I tuned in to the ABC News. Judging from the way you report the news, it will be a long time before I ever tune in again. Are you people capable of reporting the truth?
Posted by: Kenny | October 19, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
I remember when the democrats actually stood for something, such as strong unions to build a solid middle class, strong and PRINCIPLED public schools that actually taught our children to a level not seen in the rest of the world, a caring shown on all levels, from the public to officials we could trust in.
Posted by: DemNoMore | October 19, 2007, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Harry Reid, the dems and ABC need to find a surgeon to put windows in their stomachs so they can see the truth. Liberals have no way of defending their beliefs so all they can do is lie and call people names. If you don’t agree with them they will “boo” you off of the stage and not allow you your right to free speech. As Mrs Clinton said during Billys’ re-election, talk radio and the internet allows the “unwashed” axcess to too much of the truth. God help us if she ends up in the White House.
Posted by: bearcdx | October 19, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
All I can say is this: if you really believe the Democratic line, at this point you then must consider yourself a foolish American. We deserve honest people in government, and these folks show themselves over and over they are not. What kind of example does that teach our kids? What kind of country does that make us? Stronger? Or weaker? Their games are wasting our money, hurting our country, and we need them OUT!
Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Drugs might actually improve Harry Reid’s personality and mental capability.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
yup ,i really want those kinds of people to be the moral compass of this nation
those honest, respectable republicans and their loyal intellectual constituents with their upright american values and ethics… …snicker snicker…
Posted by: SQUADRON79 | October 19, 2007, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
ABC’s reporting is outrageous!!! The Democrats censor a private citizen, making this letter historic and they give credit to the Dems for raising money for the Marines. Obviously, the “best and the brightest” are not analysts at ABC! And to think, the Constitution gives the Press a very special place in our system — and they abuse it!! They need oversight, big time.
Posted by: Alex | October 19, 2007, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
That’s it……that’s all you got to say
I won’t be able to sleep a wink from the verbal lashing I just got.
Dominant
Posted by: dominant | October 19, 2007, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Wow, All I can say is wow… Since the Dems were so nice to arrange this, why didn’t they match the funds….. Oh wait, they will claim they made Rush match the funds, and take credit for that as well. As for ABC, since they are so hellbent as being a mouthpiece for the DNC, will try to lend credence to the story. I will give ABC credit. At least you got Clear Channel’s CEO Mark Mays’ name right, which is better than Sen. Reid .
Posted by: Mark | October 19, 2007, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
The anti-military liberal Democrats were made a fool of by Rush Limbaugh.
No matter how the mainstream liberal media tries to spin it, Democratic lawmakers wasted taxpayer time and money attempting to smear a popular and very influential personality…….but it backfired big time.
Posted by: marcus aurelius | October 19, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
That blabber-mouthed, right-wing talk show nut isn’t the story here. Neither is that phony, sorry excuse for a senator. The writer of this article should be checked into the nearest mental facility for such imcompotence.
Posted by: Dan | October 19, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Democrats and their MSM pimps no longer have any redeeming value to our nation whatsoever. They have voluntarily established themselves as the enemy within.
Posted by: joyce | October 19, 2007, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Its not a matter of ABC reporters “being ignorant” or “not getting it right”. They are LIARS, pure and simple. When thousands of internet users can get the facts on this, and ABC can’t, its not because of “ignorance”. Pure Willful Spite And Hatred By Left Wing Ideologues.
Posted by: James | October 19, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Rush beat the democrats at their own game, again. Auctioning “the letter” was a truly brilliant idea.
Posted by: Lisa | October 19, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Is there any qualifications at all to being a so-called journalist anymore? I’d like to get in on this racket….
Posted by: airbrush | October 19, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
I am in total disbelief. I live in Nevada and have never been so ashamed of a public servant from this state. Harry Reed never served in the military and should not have any opinion on military matters according to his own criteria. Rush bills himself as a commentator. He makes no bones about his bias. He is conservative and proudly proclaims it. ABC “news” claims to be an organ of journalism is beyond reprehensible. You report lies knowingly in order to further your unstated agenda.
Posted by: Dave Fulkerson | October 19, 2007, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
DNC = Did Not Contribute!
Posted by: dsb | October 19, 2007, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Interesting comparison of articles, one from CNN, no less. They actually got it more or less right.
Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2007, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Give. Me. A. Break. As a member of the U.S. military, I can tell you that Mr. Limbaugh was calling a man who spent 44 days in the service a phony solider. Additionally, he was talking about Jesse MacBeth, a man who claimed to have been in combat, but has never been in uniform. Listen, ABC News, we all know that you’re liberals, and that’s fine. Just admit it. If you’re going to carry the water of the Democratic Party, that’s fine, too. It is your right. However, please advise the folks that you’re doing this so we can make sound judgments
Posted by: Michael Allan Leach | October 19, 2007, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Of course Rush and an his Boss Mark Mays “know” that this letter will benefit a worthwile cause! It was their idea an their doing! You, Dingy, are the one who doesn’t “know” what what patriotism and charity mean! You and ABC News ovbviously misssed getting on this bandwagon!
p.s. Do you see an ogoing theme of all these readers’commemnets? God Bless The Unites States of America!
Posted by: Bucketheade | October 19, 2007, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
God created our world in 7 days, Rush took down a US Senate leader, 40 Democratic Senators, Network news ABC , NBC, CBS, PBS, MSNNBC, CNN in 5 days….. time will tell how many more Democrat/Liberals will fall.
Posted by: Tony | October 19, 2007, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
ABC,
YOU FAIL!
Posted by: Jay | October 19, 2007, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
“…and Limbaugh has made light of it.”
Certainly if that is this guy’s only reference to how deliberately orchestrated and distorted this latest Democrat smear was, then he has no business calling himself a reporter. Talk about ignoring the 500 lb. gorilla standing on your toe. The most obvious news in this story is how Limbaugh’s comments were completely distorted and misrepresented by the Democrats and their lapdog media sycophants. Does anyone with at least one synapse in his brain still believe anything these mongrels regurgitate?
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2007, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
What a Joke, ABC is on the way out. Was not even on the evening news. Then to put the story here, grossly wrong, full of liberal lies and deciet, bad, bac, bad. And you know there are millions of us who will not watch you anymore. No wonder you are going down in the ratings. You cannot report the truth because it proves you are morons. I surfed abc cbs and nbc tonite during the news and no mention. Morons Idiots Imbeciles. HA HA any business who sponsers you are in the same boat. Fools all of you.
Posted by: John | October 19, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
EBAY auctioned this letter for a week as a “Smear Letter”. It is defintely a “Smear Letter” and has nothing at all to do with political vitriol. The letter was a smear against a private citizen with all the facts wrong about who Rush claimed was a phony soldier. This was a historical letter signed by 41 senators of one party attacking a radio host. Keep in mind not one senator from the other political party joined in this smear attack letter.
B Wolf must be joking. He could not really seriously have said “Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Posted by: bl | October 19, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
The great irony is that ABC blue coats will be pleased to see all of these posts, and conclude that this story must have been thought provoking or insightful. They will pat each other on the backs and say, “job well done.”
A more accurate conclusion: Readers see dishonest reporting for what it is…an insult that demands a response.
Posted by: Katie | October 19, 2007, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
I should watch ABC news why????
Posted by: Tim | October 19, 2007, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
It must make life so easy when you can fling out accusations of ‘hypocrisy.’ Conservatives hold themselves to a standard, and therefore they can be publically flogged for failing to meet it. Whereas Democrats have no morals whatsoever, so at least they’re never hypocrites. Adulterers, thieves, liars, traitors, and profligates, but by God they’re not hypocrites.
Hope that works out for you.
Posted by: Zoomie | October 19, 2007, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Soldiers would have nothing to do with you.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Just a publicity stunt by comedian Rush Limbaugh. Some fringe lunatic, probably Rush, just paid 2M + for the signature of the next president of the united state, Hillary Clinton! The jokes on Rush. HA HA HA HA HEEEE HHHEEE!
Posted by: Bert | October 19, 2007, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Amazing! They are finally addressing the smear letter against Limbaugh and get none of the FACTS, just Harry Reid talking points. ABC is no better than old Pravda. This is chilling.
No wonder they want to silence Rush and others on talk radio. The propaganda is being exposed.
Posted by: EM | October 19, 2007, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Hey, blah….I do like FOX news and I really don’t care for Rush, however, I’m in this conversation for the mere fact that he is right on this one. (Right is right and wrong is wrong) Rush is a blow hard like you…I do hope us Republicans take a beating ….maybe the Republicans will go back to their roots. This is the statement of a real Republican: we eat our own young, unlike Dems who make excuses for their parties’ leaders.Dominant
Posted by: Dominant | October 19, 2007, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Wow… Dem and media, they never cease to go lower and lower! If this party does not speak up against Reid, this tells us that this Dem is nothing but just deserved to be spit on.
Posted by: LisaM | October 19, 2007, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
I love these Democrats that go on and on about Rush Limbaugh and OxyContin while they’re out screaming for Obama and his love of cocaine.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Wolf reports “Betty Casey seems to have disparate political interest” I disagree! It looks like she is a strong republican who does not like Hillary. Go Betty!!
Posted by: anti-clinton | October 19, 2007, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Actually Reid had everything to do with it. Had him and other Democrats let Rush of the hook once again there would have been no letter to auction. The Democrats deserve thanks for calling out the foolish Limbaugh. Limbaugh only auctioned the letter to create a smokescreen to get his unamerican comments off the front pages. It worked as far as our moronic left-wing media is concerned, a shrewd political move it was, but any citizen with an ounce of brain matter can see through it.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
You are correct EM; ABC didn’t even cover this story until Harry Reid spoke on the Senate Floor today; just more proof that abc are nothing but poodles for the DNC. They have no journalistic investigative ability or journalistic integrity. I guess Harry’s staffer wrote this, sent it in, and it got published under the propagandist’s name on the article.
Posted by: tina | October 19, 2007, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
‘m sure since the Dems love the soldiers suddenly then they will all whole-heartedly support this lawsuit.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
You can get the basic idea of what the general feeling of those “in the know” enough to have an opinion on this matter appears to be. You would think that, being simply pounded ON THEIR OWN WEBSITE that these people would get the message and change their tune, realizing that they are doing something that just isn’t working.
You’re all wasting your breath. Or finger muscles, whatever.
Posted by: James | October 19, 2007, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
The “journalist” who wrote this story and the editor(s) that passed it are either inexcuseably ignorant of the topic or inexcuseably partisan and shilling for the Democrats. There is no middle ground. Both possibilities are justifications for holding ABC news in contempt.
Posted by: Sam39 | October 19, 2007, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Um yeah, GeLdOnThebig, great point. Because Limbaugh has never donated to any right wing groups I’m sure.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
God, I’m so sick of people being called unamerican and unpatriotic. Lord, that is childish and annoying. I love how if Rush Limbaugh said something you don’t like it’s suddenly unamerican, who gets to decide these things? I guess that would be the monitoring police at Media Matters.
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Amen…..austintx
Said well!!!!!
Dominant
Posted by: Dominant | October 19, 2007, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
UPDATE: Matt Drudge has removed the false link from his web site that claimed this article “credited Dems” for the auction. As anyone who can read knows, the article clearly credits Limbaugh. To all the right wingnuts on here- please retract your false and libelous statements claiming ABC News wrote something they did not!
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
I see the brain-washed, brain-dead ditto heads are defending their DRUG MAN TONIGHT! Anyone who could listed to this arrogant ego maniac more than 5 seconds would have to be brain-dead!
Posted by: Jack | October 19, 2007, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Lol Tina, that’s hilarious considering how many times Limbaugh and other wingnuts in the news have called anyone who disagrees with the war traitors or unamerican. But when the accusation is reversed you wingnuts all of the sudden get tired of the words. Hilarious.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
ABC News is just doing what the Democrats tell them to, don’t be so hard on them.
Posted by: James | October 19, 2007, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Saying “No matter{mater in the article}what,Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.” is like saying “No matter what, the 911 hijackers made a ton of money for charity {victims families}.The democrats only intended to inflict political damage not do charity work.
Posted by: Nick | October 19, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
While I am disgusted with Harry Reid and his ilk I think a lot of people misunderstand this article. Yes there is a definate liberal spin but the last comment is basically saying that the democrats ignorance is making money for the cause. In a way they are correct. Look up the word vitriol
Posted by: Greg | October 19, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
hey reggie – difference is – repubs are unamerican because we disagree with libs. libs are unamerican because they call our troops killers and rapists; they “protest” by burning effigies of soldiers and burn the flag; and those they elect into office do much of the same right from the floor of the house and senate. so – small difference, but means the world.
Posted by: clooneyg | October 19, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Actually James, the ex-political director at ABC is on record in his book explaining how ABC gets their news from conservative Matt Drudge. His exact words were “Matt Drudge rules our world.”
This probably explains why ABC news decided to do this fluff piece praising Limbaugh while they often ignore some of the sick and hateful things he says on his show.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Slow down Cowboy. You need an editor. You lost me.
Posted by: Dominant | October 19, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Actually clooneyg, I called Limbaugh’s comments unamerican because he had the gall to call out American troops who disagreed with him. I called some posters unamerican in their views because they don’t want Democrats to share their views, they would prefer the first amendment only apply to the right wing.
You folks call people unamerican if they don’t vote a straight party Republican ticket or if they dare criticize any Republican (in the media or in office) for anything at all.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
ABC News. What a bunch of lies.
Posted by: Michael | October 19, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Three things:
1. Matt Drudge has not removed the link. I used it to get here.
2. The “phony senators” hit squad lied and the drive-by media has perpetuated the lie. Rush never said ANYTHING disparaging about our military and, in fact, has never said one demeaning word against our GIs. The gaggle of “phoney senators” should pull their heads from where the sun don’t shine and listen to the audio of what Rush while reading along with the transcript. If they can read, that is.
3. ABC is nothing but a stooge. ABC ought to hang it’s head in shame for the damage it does regularly to this country through lies, distortions and illegal leaks. SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME!!!!!
Posted by: Jerome | October 19, 2007, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
ok reggie – let’s put this to the litmus test. is murtha unamerican? reid? is edwards unamerican? we can go on and on – because all of these have spoken to the horrible acts of the troops in iraq.
is hillary unamerican? barack? they both signed a letter that attempted to take away the 1st amendment rights of limbaugh (by the way – i’m not a fan of the guy). but let’s hear your views on these folks.
Posted by: clooneyg | October 19, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
When this happened, Rush said you tools would figure out some way to give the credit for this to the Dems. Guess Wolf here wanted to be the first.
Pathetic.
Posted by: Joe Lewelling | October 19, 2007, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Don’t I hear the FOX mother ship calling?
Posted by: Ralph | October 19, 2007, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Rush Limbaugh is one of the most military-friendly people there is. It doesn’t surprise me that the fool known as Harry Reid tries to take credit for this, afterall, idiotic liberals will buy it, and it sure doesn’t surprise me that ABC would credit him for it.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Au contraire. That’s misleading Mr/Ms ABC Writer. Although indirectly the Dems’ whining to Mays (and it’s MAYS, Reid, not MAY) about Rush has brought in money for this charity, they had nothing to do with it directly. They have made no money for this charity; Rush did by making it public and putting it up for auction. Reid and his posse tread dangerously close to abusing and misusing their power not to mention doing all their bullying on taxpayer time simply because they can’t stand the heat in the kitchen.
Posted by: kris | October 19, 2007, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
“Bah” is telling everyone what he wants to do, install Communism and destroy the economy. Take heed people, this is the mind of a Socialist…..like most Democrats.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Alright, well I’ve hit my limit of arguing with people that have/make no sense
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2007, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Tom is right.
Let’s use Time Magazine as an example. We all know what happened to their sunk subscription. People should stop watching ABC if they want to speak out against the blatent bias.
Posted by: LisaM | October 19, 2007, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Wow, you are almost as funny as Tina. Republicans, both in office and out, have tried to silence media organizations and personalities for many years if they do not parrot rightwing talking points. What Limbaugh said was disgusting and these Senators have every right to say (it’s that first amendment thing, it covers democrats too) they don’t feel such spew belongs on the airwaves. The difference between the right and left is the left will write a letter about their views on someone like Limbaugh and stop there- the right would prefer there be laws that allow them to forcably remove people from the media they don’t like.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Good Lord, this article is a disgrace beyond words, the Better Business Bureau should be notified for the lies presented as truths. For example,the claim that the democrats raised this money are beyond any ethical boundries of journalistic integrity, especially for a national news organization. I shall never watch ABC again, the Pravda of the Liberal Socialist party.
Posted by: Aaron, Dee | October 19, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
The issues here.
Media Matters started the smear against Rush Limbaugh with a false assertion that he was denigrating troops based on opposition to the war.
Media Matters is at this very moment posting new items standing behind their flawed premise.
Media Matters is also still posting flawed premise items that Rush Limbaugh smeared the Frost family and in particular one of the children.
Harry Reid drafted a letter based on the false premise that was being put forward by Media Matters.
Posted by: CommentGuy | October 19, 2007, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
clooneyg “bill’s act wore thin by the time he left office. people were tired of him”
Um yeah, that’s why his approval rating was something like over 60% when he left office. As for Gore never making it, don’t forget out of all candidates running that year more people voted for him than any other. Now it looks as if Bush will be leaving office with an approval rating half that of Clinton’s. I almost feel sorry for the guy.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Unbelievable . . . . I just remembered why I stopped watching abc so many years ago. Talk about your democratic propaganda WOW!
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Oh my God REGGIE-
Have you never heard of the Fairness Doctrine, you are sooo uninformed.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
And who got Imus kicked off the air? Wake up.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Um who got Rather kicked off the air? As well as a documentary about Reagan they did not like? You wake up.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
I had a friend that is now a “dead soldier” and he, and most soldiers, would never agree with the liberal BS you’re spewing. You have nothing in common with American soldiers so stop using them for your agenda.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
reggie my son,
go check your numbers. his ratings weren’t in the 60′s. and i will go back to my original stance of if he was so popular, why couldn’t his right hand man get about 50%?
remember what reagan’s popularity was when he left office? how much did the first bush beat dukakis by? that’s what a popular president sets up his successor.
and your point about more people voting for him? more people from ever also voted against him.
again – hill will win in 08. buyers remorse by 09. house, senate and white house repub in 12. tell your buddy bah i’d like him to place a wager on that.
Posted by: clooneyg | October 19, 2007, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
There was an attack by a U.S. Senator against a private citizen. Democrats have talk radio in their cross-hairs. The issue is the right to free speech.
Posted by: Don | October 19, 2007, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Excuse me that Reagan documentary aired and Rather LIED and used fake documents on CBS’s air! Hello?
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
The notion that Harry Ried should share some glory for the money Rush raised for this charity simply because he wrote the letter is stupid Get it straight ABC!
Posted by: Mike M. | October 19, 2007, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Congratulations Rush! A great man gives to a worthy cause.
Posted by: Dennis H | October 19, 2007, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
To Bah….your stinging comments about the possessions of the rich, taxing the working man, and getting your health care paid for, reveals your true colors!……..
Posted by: Dominant | October 19, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
I can’t believe that there are actual Americans that support someone like George Soros.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
reggie – i don’t mean this to sound mean or to start making fun. but really, stop posting. you have no idea what you are talking about – it’s like you are just parroting what you’ve heard from somebody else. go get educated on this stuff before you look any worse. please.
Posted by: clooneyg | October 19, 2007, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Kevin, thank you for your service. I think the topic has mostly been addressed though. Things have a way of digressing. Also, can you really assume to know what everyones political views are based on a few posts (regarding your comment on gun control)? For example, I am a democrat who supports the fair tax and the 2nd amendment. I believe in universal health care though and am against the death penalty so I guess that makes me a terrorist-loving liberal in the eyes of many on the right. I voted for Howard Dean because he was a fiscal conservative and endorsed by the NRA.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
clooneyg, rather than insult me, why not respond to the points I made? For example, I directly refuted your claim that people were growing tired of Clinton when he left office and that’s why Gore lost by showing you what Clinton’s approval rating was at the time. I guess I’ll just take your insults as a lack of anything with which to counter?
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Wow, ABC
Was this an exact reproduction of a DNC press release? You can’t honestly believe this drivel you posted.
You guys need to go back to Journalism 101 and start over.
Posted by: Elroy | October 19, 2007, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
ABC gets it wrong AGAIN. This is just another example of one of the outlets in the MSM completely misrepresenting a story. Is it any wonder why no one listens to ABC, NBC, CBS or CNN any longer. The reporting is laughable.
The story is about the leader of the Senate slandering an American citizen, lying about what he said and then attempting to get his employer to “talk to him”.
Posted by: JohnG | October 19, 2007, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Good night reggie, good night bah…………….good night john boy.
Posted by: Dominant | October 19, 2007, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Dear Mr. Wolf:
If the torrent of letters has not clued you in yet, you screwed up one of the biggest stories ever to come your way. The leader of the Senate Democrats joined by 40 other democrats, slandered Rush Limbaugh and attempted to improperly use their influence to force the CEO of Mr. Limbaugh’s syndication partner,to silence Mr. Limbaugh. Only the tables were turned when Limbaugh put the letter up for public sale on E-Bay, listing it as an historic “Smear Letter” demonstrating the worst abuse of Congressional power in our lifetime – not their everyday corruption, but an attempt to use the power of the Senate to silence freedom of speech. The letter sold for more than $2 million dollars which Mr. Limbaugh donated along with another $2 million of his own to a charity for our military and police families. Today Senator Reid added to his disgrace by rising to the floor of the Senate and insinuating that he and his colleagues participated in raising the $2 million dollars from the sale of this dastardly letter and promoted the donation to military charity. Now that is news ABC.
Posted by: PM | October 19, 2007, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
yes reggie – i will say it one more time and bid adieu (that means farewell). the dems blew the dust of the fairness doctrine because of the overwhelming popularity of folks like rush limbaugh. it’s not the right that’s silencing people – it’s the left.
Posted by: clooneyg | October 19, 2007, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Harry really outdid himself in representation of how phony and shallow he and his party really are. Unbelievable was all I thought when I heard his remarks. The socialists are truly a very sad group of individuals who hold the power in the democrat party and are shallow beyond my expectations.
Posted by: TexBork | October 19, 2007, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Wow, you are almost as funny as Tina. Republicans, both in office and out, have tried to silence media organizations and personalities for many years if they do not parrot rightwing talking points. What Limbaugh said was disgusting and these Senators have every right to say (it’s that first amendment thing, it covers democrats too) they don’t feel such spew belongs on the airwaves. The difference between the right and left is the left will write a letter about their views on someone like Limbaugh and stop there- the right would prefer there be laws that allow them to forcably remove people from the media they don’t like.
Posted by: Pink Pig | October 19, 2007, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
I grew up in an age where reporting was actually factual and news anchors didn’t “analyze” the news. I think that we as a nation need to insist that our news is simply and fairly reported and let us draw our own conclusions. Frankly, I gave up watching the “news” many years ago and also gave up taking a newspaper at the same time. Now I look for my news on the internet, read both, or all sides and draw my own conclusions. I absolutely refuse to let anybody else do my thinking for me. How about it America? Let’s tell these “reporters” to either do it right, or don’t do it at all.
Posted by: Denise | October 19, 2007, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Gore lost because he had fewer votes.
But, that didn’t matter, Dems couldn not accept it and have spent 7 years(?) demonizing George Bush.
Rather than debate issues, it’s all personal attacks all the time. That’s because libs can not compete in the realm of ideas. Gotta have a bad guy.
Posted by: Don | October 19, 2007, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Pink Pig, a great example is the right wing-invented “no protest zones” that are established when right wing leaders go to a town.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
You got the story all twisted. All the credit goes to Rush and we know it even if you are to dishonnest to admit it.
Posted by: Suzanne | October 19, 2007, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Pink Pig-
Don’t forget the way conservatives are treated when they go to speak on our wonderful campuses. They’re either shouted down or have pies thrown in their faces, etc. I don’t recall Republicans behaving in such ways.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
you ignored my post reg – just got caught up on being called out. look up what the fairness doctrine is – who reintroduced it and we’ll call it a night.
adios (also means farewell)
Posted by: clooneyg | October 19, 2007, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Actually Don, you need to go back and have another look. More people voted for Gore than Bush in 2000, not fewer. Its an official fact, check the official vote tally. Because more votes came from particular states, as per our electoral college system Bush won the election. That’s our system and I have no problem with this system, but you cannot use the 2000 election to argue that American citizens themselves wanted a change. Had Bush received more votes than Gore, that argument may have merit, but that’s not what happened.
In 2004, Bush received more votes than Kerry, primarily because Kerry was an idiot. Not as big an idiot as Bush in my eyes, but I don’t blame swing voters for going with the devil they knew.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Of course John Kerry will just have you tasered if you annoy him.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Rush 4.2 Million, Dems 0 – They (the dems) think they know what they are doing, but does the american public? Seems not to be the case. Wake Up America – The dems are taking us down to be slaughtered and they think we are going to be better for it. Go RUSH!!! Would ask u to run for president but we need u 3 hours a day, right where you are!
Posted by: FrankRuth | October 19, 2007, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Reggie-
You’re joking right? You don’t think that the Democrat candidates suppress opposition as much as Republicans? Hillary Clinton has had many people forcibly removed from her events. During the Clinton administration they kept protestors far away from the G8 (maybe G7 at the time) and the IMF and any other big events. What world are you living in?
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Hillary won’t get elected so I don’t need to worry about her Kelly. I’m worried about the people that have power in this country.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Libs are pathetic. Circling around
the drain pathetic.
Posted by: sue | October 19, 2007, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Whoa Reggie, loud on blogs? Republicans haven’t tried to silence anyone. As for liberals only being loud on blogs, are you serious? TELL me you’re not serious. You guys OWN the media. The ONLY media you DON’T hold a pseudo-monopoly to is talk radio……and you’re trying your damnedest to rectify that issue. Sorry, Republicans aren’t trying to silence anyone.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
One great example are the no protest zones at Republican events. Another good example is when you have the Secretary of Defense publicly warning people to watch what they say.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
And this is called objective journalism? What a crock of dissembled steaming manure. Good Lord! You can’t go out of business quick enough.
Posted by: RLythgoe | October 19, 2007, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Everyone but the braindead knows that ABC News is one of the DNC lapdogs, as are most mainstream media. So what else is new? This is just one more outrage in a long line of outrages. I am so worn out from being outraged by these duplicitous creeps, that I need to mainline Geritol.
Posted by: Flint | October 19, 2007, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Who wrote this? “What Limbaugh said was disgusting and these Senators have every right to say (it’s that first amendment thing, it covers democrats too) they don’t feel such spew belongs on the airwaves.”
This is a perfect example of someone who has not done his or her homework.
Do us all a favor and listen to the show and read the transcript.
I did and Rush said nothing that was offensive. He was speaking of a phoney soldier who is now serving time because he claimed benefits he wasn’t entitled to and did NOT serve as he said he did.
Did you know that? Evidently not.
Did you listen to the show? Evidently not.
Did Harry Reid listen to the show or read a transcript? Evidently not.
Posted by: Don | October 19, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Reggie-
Hillary Clinton can easily be elected so that was a poor response.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
The French doing so well???? Their socialist idea of a utopian society has failed so miserably in the view of world economics that they have had to rescind their 35 work week as totally unproductive. Regrow their society and economy???? Ever heard of the Marshall Plan funded with U.S tax dollars. If the French were so happy with their socialistic, utopian society why did they REJECT the socialist candidate and elect the CONSERVATIVE candidate, Get real.
Posted by: Slewi | October 19, 2007, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
I have to disagree with you there Kevin- the most popular cable news outlet is owned and operated by conservatives. It’s hosts are mostly conservative.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
What, Fox News? What do you think made them so popular? It’s a FREE MARKET. People WANTED to watch it and apparently you have a problem with it. How freedom-loving.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
yeah well i guess there arent any “no protest”zones at the democrat conventions,because most repubs/conservatives have jobs,own businessess and take care of their families.we dont have time to put on tu-tu’s and dance around playing bongos with giant puppets.plus its really not that effective,and looks ridiculous to boot.i dont blame the repubs at all for a no protest zone.have you seen what makes up the majority of these so-called”anti-war” protests?
Posted by: GeLdOnThebig | October 19, 2007, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Did you read about the woman that impregnated herself with her dead soldiers sperm?
The baby was born 2 years after they shipped his dead carcass back from Iraq.
Kathleen Smith is doing what ever republican wants. To breed new soldier to replace the dead soldiers.
We should freeze the sperm of every soldier serving under George Bush so that their genetic code won’t be lost.
It is becoming more and more difficult to find people gullible enough or with the appropriate level of intelligence to sign up for these pirate missions. Oil will become even more profitable in the future and the need for this special class of people will become even more pronounced. Preserving their seed and securing a proper incubation womb will go along way in re-growing suitable soldiers for our future oil wars.
Posted by: Soldier | October 19, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Reggie-
According to studies, done by liberal college professors, the Drudge Report slants far to the left as far the postings it links to. Drudge is conservative but not his site…so sorry. I don’t recall the name of the report but I’m sure a brilliant liberal like yourself can go google it. He links mostly to the NY Times, the Washington Post, and one of the British papers (don’t recall which) which are all liberal.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Um, there weren’t any no-protest zones at the RNC. They occurred at the DNC.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Kelly, you are going by links, not content. For example, he linked to this article which is an attempt to paint Democrats in a bad light. This would be counted as a link to a left wing site I suppose, since rightwingers consider anything non-Fox to be left wing, but it hardly means that the content linked to from Drudge’s site is not pro-conservative, anti-liberal. I know liberal blogs that often post links to transcripts on Rush Limbaugh’s web site? Does that mean they are really conservative sites since they link to Rush more often than they link to Media Matters?
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
No, Reggie, you didn’t say they originated from the right, YOU said they were at the Republican Convention. This is patently false as I have shown. As for Bush using them, when? Democrats are the ones that want to squelch free speech, not Republicans, and for damn sure not conservatives. Liberals think they’re about freedom, but they are only supportive of freedom when they get to DEFINE freedom. Nope, not for me. My grandfather is a Purple-Heart recipient, my father a Marine, and me an Army Veteran. I didn’t serve so I could be controlled by liberals.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
How are the Dems raising money for charity as the last paragraph implies?
Posted by: Trumpy | October 19, 2007, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Oh yeah Reggie, there were no protests at the RNC! Are you kidding? ARE YOU KIDDING?? They were EVERYWHERE. The DNC then kept their protestors away after seeing the mess in NYC. LORD.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Strike that. The DNC occurred before the RNC, I believe, but the protestors were setting up well in advance and, from what I recall, the DNC was much more strict than the RNC.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
It’s refreshing to see so very, very many people who realize what journalistic malpractice ABC is engaging in here.
They’re as clueless as they think we are.
Posted by: Steve | October 19, 2007, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Blatant lies.
A fifth grader could have fact-checked this with little to no effort. I must believe the lying willful.
Why do people still support the “Main Stream” media?
Posted by: Jim Wood | October 19, 2007, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Now you KNOW that the Left doesn’t believe in the free market! They are socialists. They want a nanny state so that our whole lives depend on the government. Very “progressive”, isn’t it? I guess they didn’t get the memo when the Soviet Union fell and China was forced to enter the Free Market too. Communism is anti-freedom, anti-productive, anti-innovation, and the most depressing system in the world. And a FAILURE everywhere it’s been tried. It cannot survive for the long term. I have been to many Communist nations in my line of work. Always made me kiss the ground when I got back to America.
Posted by: joyce | October 19, 2007, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Sorry Reggie, but Bush didn’t set anything up in ’00 as a candidate as he didn’t have the power to do so. The Nation is not, nor has it ever been, a “credible” news source. Might as well get your news from The Onion.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
I can’t believe people are actually referring to The Nation, that self-proclaimed socialist rag. That’s just sad. And the ACLU? Yeah, they’re not liberal extremists that represent every anti-American, anti-traditonal cause they can 99% of the time.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
ABC “news”
Accuracy not needed for your reporters.
Bias is an understatement!!!
Posted by: Chris Illinois | October 19, 2007, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Wolf reports, “Limbaugh sits on the board of the foundation and he has REPORTEDLY said on his show that he will match the winning bid.” [Caps added]
Reportedly?? REPORTEDLY?? Isn’t Wolf a reporter? Why didn’t he check Rush’s website to confirm the fact?
The answer is obvious: Wolf wanted to put a question in the reader’s mind about Rush’s intention although Wolf knew the facts himself.
Stingy Harry got whupped 4,200,200 to -0-. He didn’t volunteer a penny in his ‘attempt’ to get others to donate.
Stingy Harry has gone from being a penny stock to a laughing stock.
Posted by: Brightwinger | October 19, 2007, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Unbelievable. The Democrats did’nt raise a cent. They try and use their power in an outrageous attempt to silence a public citizen — and to take the heat off the “General Betray Us” Ad. And Rush turns it back on them and raises $2M. He is a Hero. These 41 Dems are garbage. And this story shows why the MSM is considered a joke now.
Posted by: Jim | October 19, 2007, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
By the way Reggie, I CLEARLY recall anti-war protestors complaining that the DNC was more restrictive with them than the RNC and they were whining about it incessantly. To be honest, I DON’T EVEN CARE about this so I don’t know why I’m arguing about it. If that’s your best example, it’s weak.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Hi Kevin:
Just wanted to say I have the utmost respect for you, for serving in the military, and for your service to our country.
God Bless you Sir!
Don
Posted by: Challenger | October 19, 2007, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Rush mentioned Jesse MacBeth both before and after the “phony soldier” remark. That was in reference to an ABC report about phony soldiers.
Meanwhile, Jesse MacBeth is in jail for…being a phony soldier, having been convicted of such under laws passed by the Congress of the USA.
How can Congress condemn Rush Limbaugh for calling Jesse MacBeth a phony soldier when Congress itself has put him in jail?
Posted by: Looking Glass | October 19, 2007, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Here is another one he got wrong:
The Marine Corps – Law Enforcement Foundation does not distribute aid “to the families to the children of fallen Marines on behalf of law enforcement officers.”
Is it too much to ask to have Wolf read even the first two paragraphs of the MC-LEF web site?
“Through the continuous support of our donors, we have distributed aid with a value of more than $29,000,000.00 to eligible children. This assistance was primarily rendered to children of Marines or Federal law enforcement personnel who were killed on duty or died under extraordinary circumstances while serving our country at home or abroad.”
It isn’t to Marine families from federal law enforcement, but to Marine AND federal law enforcement families.
Those are only the sixth and seventh sentences on the page. It would take maybe 10-15 seconds to read that far.
Obviously, that was 10-15 seconds more fact-checking than ABC News was willing to spend on a story already horrible botched.
Posted by: Bob Owens | October 19, 2007, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
ABC News, supposedly is in the “News” business. That is bringing “new” information to your customers. You should be concerned, because you customers know more about the “News” than you do and they’re not getting paid for it. You are. Why should your customers continue to pay you for “Olds” and olds that they know is wrong, a lie or flat out disinformation.
Posted by: Jabba | October 19, 2007, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Actually Kelly, the ACLU has represented many conservatives, including one Sean Hannity of Fox News. Not surprised that you would bash any source I site though, this has happened in pretty much every blog or site I have ever posted, no matter what the source. In fact once I cited Charles Krauthamer, a FNC contributor as was told he was a liberal schmuck. A good strategy- can’t refute the point, bash the source.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Reggie-
Saying the ACLU has represented MANY conservatives is just laughable. Again, the DNC and Democrats in general keep protestors away as much as Republicans so really just get off the damn soapbox. You’re only deluding yourself.
Posted by: Kelly | October 19, 2007, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Add me to the list of the disgusted.
Celebrity bra raises $50,000 -> headline news.
$4 million -> Hey, let’s ignore the personal donation of $2 million, then mis-attribute the rest!
Excellent reporting.
Posted by: Al | October 19, 2007, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
My first posts weren’t controversial, Reggie.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Word, Reggie. Word.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 19, 2007, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
This is why independent blog and forum sites are better. Problem with them is while you can disagree some, you can’t disagree too much with the site owners or you get banned for something.
Posted by: Reggie | October 19, 2007, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
I guess tell them at another site looking glass. I hardly visit any of them anymore- from Kos to Redstate, they’re mostly a bunch of partisan hacks on there, if you don’t agree with most party-line talking points you’re quickly flamed and ultimately banned. Try arguing against gun control on a left wing site or being a proponent of universal health care on a right wing site. I only posted here because I came in from drudge and found a virtual pro-Limbaugh consensus among posters- I thought I’d be the one who spoke out against Limbaugh. Now at least I know how ABC operates its comments sections.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 12:05 am 12:05 am
I think its a great thing that the Democrats and Rush could come together for a good cause and give millions to a worthy charity. I dont see what the big deal is.
I think Democrats should stop bashing Limbaugh then, but also that Limbaugh should stop calling soldiers that oppose the war “phony”. Both sides need to give a little.
Posted by: Jonesy | October 20, 2007, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Reggie-
I will lose my thimble-sized amount of respect for you if you, after bashing Limbaugh for his boring comments, defend Dead Soldier who has been thoroughly and disgustingly insulting soldiers tonight. You cannot be that much of a hypocrite. (I have to go look up a synonym for hypocrite, I’m so sick of the abuse of that word.) They probably erased his postings but he said that they are too stupid to do anything else and that they are murderers and other various insults about them and their families. Please..don’t do it.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Jonesy, Rush never said: soldiers that oppose the war are “phony”. The dems and liberal press said that!
Dominant
Posted by: Dominant | October 20, 2007, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Dems and Rush could come together to make money Jonesy? Apparently ABC did exactly what they set out to do, deceive the ignorant among us.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 12:19 am 12:19 am
If a major news organization can’t even get a story like this accurate, how can one view stories on the war objectively? This is such a major story and I have seen media outlets not cover it at all or get the story absolutely wrong. As a Canadian, I find that if I want to know what is really going on in America or the world, I have to read conservative American websites. And I’m a liberal! ABC, and the rest of the media, is it impossible for you to write a story objectively?
Posted by: Michael S. | October 20, 2007, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Kelly, I mostly only read posts attributed to me, sorry. I can’t comment for or against what Dead Soldier wrote for the most part, but gathered from the harsh rhetoric used against him from you guys that he was not a conservative. I did read a post of Dead Soldiers very early in the evening that I commended and thought should be read by all who visited this page, it does not seem to be online anymore so I can’t quote from it. It most certainly did not insult any soldiers, that is unless the mere act of not being a member of the right wing is considered insulting to soldiers. In regards to the person’s username, I don’t know what it means or is supposed to symbolize so really can’t say if it is offensive or not.
I won’t lose sleep should your “thimble-sized amount of respect” for me dissapate.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Rush Limbaugh is a great American. And 4 plus Million dollars to the charity he chose is a wonderful thing.
Harry Reid is now a lame duck Senator.
Posted by: Bruce | October 20, 2007, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Reggie, we disagree immensely, but I respect you for keeping it civil.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Interesting that the republicans passed the bill about Gen Betray-us. Since they had fewer than 50% of the senators, just how did they do that? It had to have the support of at least a couple of democrats or it would not have passed. The republicans might have proposed the non-binding resolution but they did not pass it; the Senate passed it.
This is such a small-minded and dishonest story as written that ABC should be ashamed to put it out on the web.
Posted by: dick | October 20, 2007, 12:30 am 12:30 am
ABC’s reporting is outrageous!!! The Democrats censor a private citizen, making this letter historic and they give credit to the Dems for raising money for the Marines. Obviously, the “best and the brightest” are not analysts at ABC! And to think, the Constitution gives the Press a very special place in our system — and they abuse it!! They need oversight, big time.
Posted by: Missy Coupe | October 20, 2007, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Harry Reid should be censured for using my TAX DOLLARS to reprimand a private citizen for exercising his free speech. Mr. Reid clearly took words out of context in order to create drama where there was no drama. He over-reacted and should apologize for his error in judgment to the American people and to Limbaugh.
Posted by: CHAD | October 20, 2007, 12:33 am 12:33 am
My God… Pravda.
Posted by: Gary | October 20, 2007, 12:34 am 12:34 am
I don’t think WABC would censor your comments.
They hired IMUS didn’t they with just a 40 second delay. Not bad for another of the Democratic targets.
Don’t miss his first Radio program on December 3, 2007 on WABC 770AM at 6AM
The ABC radio line up is dynamite. You have to listen.
Posted by: Bruce | October 20, 2007, 12:34 am 12:34 am
“Reggie, we disagree immensely, but I respect you for keeping it civil. Kevin”
Thank you. You as well, save the few insults you leveled at me. Outside of the couple of issues we talked about tonight, I don’t know much about your views and assume you probably don’t know much about mine, but saw when checking your background online (sorry, too many people falsely claim to be military members on both sides of the partisan line that I never take it at its face value anymore) that I believe you are in favor of the fair tax and are anti-gun control like me. My biggest complaint about politics in general is that we allow a few issues to divide us so much when in fact we do have common ground. That said I am sure there is probably much we disagree on. But we all get a little carried away, especially over hot topics like Rush Limbaugh and media bias. I cannot imagine how political discussions did not break out into fistfights all the time in the days of public political gatherings long before there was the Internet.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 12:37 am 12:37 am
This breaking news just in: ABC sucks.
Really you should be embarrassed. Agenda journalism at its finest. Rush is the hero. Democrats the goat.
Posted by: Ghost of Benjamin Franklin | October 20, 2007, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Dominant, you said “hell” in the sentence removed. Don’t you know hell is a bad word? Say “heck”. :)
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 12:39 am 12:39 am
I usually don’t come to this ABC website, I just wanted to see how ABC would report it…and sure enough true to their depraved souls, they could not
tell or report the truth that Harry Reid and the democrates got their own egg blown back in their faces.
Posted by: Ed Vega | October 20, 2007, 12:42 am 12:42 am
The few insults I leveled were probably carried over from reading DS’s posts, Reggie. Many times people ASSume too much, myself included. Yes, I’m a Fair Tax Proponent and I’m anti-gun control. There are some issues I’m liberal on and some I’m conservative on. I am NOT, however, a “moderate”. I hate that term. My convictions are my convictions. I’m independent because there’s no party that I agree with on everything. Started as a Reform’er, then a Republican, then a Libertarian, then said to hell with parties.
Kevin Burns
Veteran, US Army
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Interesting how Rush’s critics site his addiction to pain meds and label him a drug addict and resort to name calling in order to minimize his impact. Rush did admit to it on the air and took a sabbatical to go into rehab. Why is it everytime a liberal type goes to rehab for alcohol or some drug addiction the whole world goes ga-ga? They’re praised and held to high esteem for it. Yet Rush isn’t. Yes conservatives do have standards and sometimes we fail. But we pick ourselves back up and try again. This doesn’t make for a hypocrite, rather it just shows our human frailty and condition. Very selective these liberals when it comes to acknowledging a person’s misfortune.
Posted by: bluesky | October 20, 2007, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Darn, I had been hoping to salvage what was in that thimble Kelly. Would it help if I said Rush Limbaugh is my hero?
I am not going to bash someone when I haven’t read most of what they have written. You say you can’t stand people who have no desire to be fair, how would it be fair of me to bash Dead Soldier when I don’t know what they said? I said I recalled commending one of their posts from earlier, but it did not bash soldiers. You probably would not have liked the post though since I did. I don’t remember most of what you said earlier tonight to be honest. There are other posters on this board, I do better when I can go back and review what people have said, which, thanks to ABC, I currently cannot.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Reggie, I see………I don’t cuss…yet my intent was not to use a bad word such as He##
Only a proper word such as he##.
Thanks for the info.
Dominant
Posted by: Dominant | October 20, 2007, 12:45 am 12:45 am
I realize that Limbaugh put the letter on eBay on his own.
However, one must give Reid et al acknowledgement for thier contributions in this. If not for the hatefulness, intolerance, and superficiality of Democrats, a worthwhile charity would be millions of dollars poorer.
Posted by: malclave | October 20, 2007, 12:46 am 12:46 am
No liberals support the fair tax. They only support taxing the successful while exalting the poor. No wonder so many are atheists, when you’re so busy worshipping and enabling and excusing the poor and their ridiculous choices and litters of children they can’t afford, there’s not much time for anything else.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Your spin on this issue is almost as laughable as Reid’s statement trying to horn in the credit. The fact is that Limbaugh made a laughing stock out of reid, and his statement of today made him look twice as ridiculous.
Reid and the Dems had nothing to do with putting this letter on ebay.
gary fouse
Posted by: gary fouse | October 20, 2007, 12:46 am 12:46 am
I can’t wait until we have a shrew for a President. That will be fantastic! At least most wives will have someone to compare themselves to when their husbands complain.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 12:50 am 12:50 am
Say there ABC News, can I have a job with you guys?
I have the internet, which, apparently, the journalism skool major you hired to write this jacked up artykewl doesn’t.
Posted by: Swede | October 20, 2007, 12:51 am 12:51 am
malclave, the Democrats did nothing but waste taxpayer’s money and time by chastising a private citizen. I mean, damn, spending time on Rush, on criticizing the Ottoman Empire, hell, what next? Don’t they have something better to do? Hell, the fools actually waste time on BASEBALL investigations for Pete sakes. If they don’t have anything better to do, why in the hell do we need’em?
Kevin Burns
Veteran, US Army
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Why the hell is Keith Urban wearing a hammer and a siskel on his shirt on Jimmy Kimmel? Uhhh…well that’s the end of that for me. Great.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Yes, Kevin I don’t like the terms moderate or centrist either. I am a libertarian in terms of issues, but a registered Democrat for the purposes of primary voting as I tend to agree more often than not with Democrats over Repubicans, at least Republicans like Bush who have no fiscal discipline. I have yet to find a politician that agrees with everything I do. I liked this Huckabee fellow from Arkansas, and would have considered crossing the “party line” there because of his fair tax support, but from what I read he has no chance to get the nominee. It will be a long time before any democrat supports the fair tax and that is unfortunate. No way would I vote for someone like Romney, Giuliani, Clinton, or Edwards. It looks like four more years of BS.
All disagreements aside, I do appreciate your service. While I have great respect for those (including myself) who disagree with the administration and question the deployment and use of the military in various circumstances, the military is utilized for foreign policy purposes under both Democrat and Republican administrations and soldiers should be commended for doing their jobs no matter how one feels about their deployment.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Omission of the facts, distortions, typical ABC. Thats the reason none of the networks are allowed in my home. I’ve been following this episode from the beginning and Rush was right. ABCNBCCBS cant fool me any more and I’m enjoying watching them sliding into obscurity along withe the NY Times.
Posted by: Steve A. | October 20, 2007, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Wow, what an embarrassing article. You journalists really believe this pile of dung?
Posted by: Jason | October 20, 2007, 12:59 am 12:59 am
That would be sickle, I can no longer spell apparently.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Yeah, that Lieberman thing was nuts. There is a similar attitude on the right toward Chuck Hagel, though the feelings are not as deep. I never liked Lieberman to begin with though, thought he was an awful VP choice for Gore. You are right about parties, they’re not good for much. You’ve got some politicians who choose their party based on the likelihood they can run for election or win on that ticket.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 1:23 am 1:23 am
If a major news organization can’t even get a story like this accurate, how can one view stories on the war objectively? This is such a major story and I have seen media outlets not cover it at all or get the story absolutely wrong. As a Canadian, I find that if I want to know what is really going on in America or the world, I have to read conservative American websites. And I’m a liberal! ABC, and the rest of the media, is it impossible for you to write a story objectively?
Posted by: Missy Coupe | October 20, 2007, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Have you ever been to a college campus when a group of college Repubicans meets? They behave exactly like that. They go a step too far in my opinion by trying to get every single professor they don’t like blacklisted as a liberal professor. Maybe democrat college kids have a similar list, I don’t know. We had some conservative professors when I was in school. I was more Democratic back then, and did not love their ideology, but appreciated learning the views of other people. College republicans these days, at least their spokespeople, expect that all professors must share their same views.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Is there a recall petition on the horizon for Harry Reid? If so, please tell me where to sign it!
Posted by: Dvid | October 20, 2007, 1:38 am 1:38 am
What? Uh..no I have never hung out at college Republican meetings. I’m talking about when speakers come to give a speech and are verbally and physically attacked by the liberal lunatics that are manufactured by universities today. I’m sorry but I wouldn’t compare that to organizing against someone whose salary is paid by their tuition that says that 9/11 victims deserved to be killed.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 1:41 am 1:41 am
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol”
This quote is just amazing to me! Democrats trying to get credit for something they didn’t do! Well Now that I think about it this is normal for Dems and Libs!
Posted by: Alfonso | October 20, 2007, 1:44 am 1:44 am
Well you said you knew all about college Democrats and what they do, a little surprising then you have never seen how college Republicans behave. The heckling of liberal speakers, its just as bad if not worse than Democrats. Our group sure never behaved like that when I was in college. I am not talking about churchill or whatever his name was- nearly every college republican campus has blacklists- they can’t stand professors that don’t pledge allegiance to the right. Check out local papers in university towns, you can find a lot of them in google news. The main goal of college republicans is to make sure school professors are conservatives so they can indoctrinate their beliefs into young students. They do not want a culture of open beliefs.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 1:49 am 1:49 am
Lol, I’ve linked one time save for a post maybe three hours ago in which I linked to a couple of sources in a post to Kevin. This is “constant links”? Um okay. Yeah.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 1:51 am 1:51 am
Reggie-
Apparently you are the only person left in this country that doesn’t know how liberal college campuses are with all of the baby boomers warping kids’ minds. And liberal speakers are RARELY heckled. Republicans tend not to heckle or protest in the streets, it’s not our style.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 1:55 am 1:55 am
I don’t see it, Reggie, and I’m in a conservative hotbed, Augusta, Ga. I have, however, seen liberal protests on the campus of Augusta State. As for professors, well, I’ve been to 4 universities and liberal professors have outnumbered conservatives by about 10-1. Just from my observation.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 2:04 am 2:04 am
What is is with this argument that the whole world is liberal Kelly? College campuses, all the tv networks, nearly every musician and actor, all journalists, every media owner, most business owners, oh and now the Clintons are murderers too? Okay, I think this is where I get off the train. Your posts have lost any semblance of reasonable discussion in my eyes and are now pure comedy. I’m going to call it a night.
Posted by: Reggie | October 20, 2007, 2:10 am 2:10 am
I live near a university where John Kerry had an annoying liberal student tasered. That was fun.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 2:10 am 2:10 am
…now, if you wanna ask me what’s wrong with that profile, I’ll be happy to oblige.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Yes, actually, that is the first post you’ve done which is actually honest. Everything you said is absolutely true. Although I wouldn’t say most business owners are liberal so much as big corporations like Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, MSN, Apple, etc. And yes the Clintons murdered many American civilians. Perhaps you’ve heard of Waco and Ruby Ridge? It would be impossible not to unless you’re a kid. Can’t wait for all that again.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Jesse Metcalf is from Desperate Housewives.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 2:17 am 2:17 am
DON’T TASE ME BRO! ROFLMAO! I was all for the kid until I found out his motive. They should have upped the voltage.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 2:17 am 2:17 am
No wonder ABC hates the free market. It can do to ABC what they had hoped would happen to Rush
Posted by: Ted Southgate | October 20, 2007, 2:22 am 2:22 am
Is Jesse MacBeth his real birthname? I thought his real name was foreign, like middle-Eastern or something. I might have heard Rush discussing this, that Jesse Macbeth was his name after it was changed. Okay, I can’t remember, and this is starting to sound like a conspiracy theory now.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 2:27 am 2:27 am
His birth name is Jesse Adam Al-Zaid.
Kevin Burns
Veteran, US Army
“Rebel”
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 2:31 am 2:31 am
Mr. Z. Byron Wolf,
I am not sure if I should be disgusted or amused at you. You have the unmitigated gall to say that a smear job done by Sen. Reid and others on Mr. Limbaugh was actually planned as a method of generating charitable funds. What spin, what audacity. The article read like something written by a flack for the Democrat Party than a Mainstream Media (but I repeat myself). It ranks right up there with the Yahoo News article that said in effect, “Iraqi Deaths Down, Grave Diggers and Funeral Parlor Operators Suffer Most”.
Posted by: David in San Diego | October 20, 2007, 2:37 am 2:37 am
The Democrats learned a wonderful lesson here. Smear a prominent conservative, if that person manages to turn it all around on you, the media will give you credit for it all anyway. Fantastic.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 2:54 am 2:54 am
What do you expect from ABC? First they kowtow to Democrat pressure and unfairly edit and censor the movie The Path to 9/11. Then they allow one of their television personalities, Rosie O’Donnell, to make sacrilegious, racist, intolerant, and fanatical statements on a daily basis. Then they are one of the many outlets to report false information for the sole intent to defame Bill O’Reilly and insinuate he is a racist. And now they intentionally mislead the public in believing that the Democrats were the party responsible for raising over $4 Million in charity funds, while not once reporting on the incredibly horrific abusive of power seen by Senator Harry Reid and his fellow Democrat senators. Truly disgraceful, ABC News. You should know that your incredible liberal bias will come back to hurt you in the end. The American public wants REAL news, not “news” spewed from the minds of a fringe outlet.
Posted by: Chris G. | October 20, 2007, 2:56 am 2:56 am
I was just on Drudge and I don’t see the link to here that everyone is talking about but maybe I’m blind at this hour. I heard about this “article” on the radio and came here to check it out.
Posted by: Kelly | October 20, 2007, 3:02 am 3:02 am
1. ABC News runs a story on phony soldiers on Monday or Tuesday.
2. Rush does a morning update on the ABC Phony soldiers story.
3. Wed. caller on Rush’s show complains about Jesse Metcalf, a true convicted phony soldier.
4. Rush says “yeah the phony soldiers”.
5. Media Matters take two words out of context in an attempt to paint Rush as unpatriotic and unsupportive of anti war troops. All not true.
6. Media Matters (A Hillary Clinton 501c3)flashes CBS, NBS, ABS, CNNBS, PMSNBS, and the democratic leadership in congress. No one contacts Rush to ask him what he said.
7. The drive by media run with the Media Matters smear.
8. Dingy harry, in order to deflect some of the bad press from the Move-on Betray us ad in the New York Times, (That really backfired on the democrats by the way) decides to right a letter urging a private citizens’ business partner spank Rush for his outrageous words that he never said. 40 other democrat senators also sign. (See the usual suspects)
9. Mark Mays get the letter from Dingy Harry and offers it to his friend Rush. It was Mays letter and he can do that.
10. Rush announces that he will put the smear letter on ebay for Charity.
11. Letter to go to the highest bidder in a Zero Haliburton brief case. (thats to tick off the libs and energize rush listeners and supporters)
12. Bids go higher and higher for the smear letter.
13. Rush vows to match high bid. Challenges Dingy Harry to do the same.
14. at twelve o’clock on the final day of the auction, one hour before it is scheduled to end, Dingy harry takes to the Senate floor to make himself look like he was apart of the whole process. he, of course was not. the outrage of the abuse of power is what drove the auction, not to mention republican disgust with Dingy Harry over the issue.
15. Dingy Harry uses the pronoun we in his remarks and constantly mispronounces the name of Mark Mays, not may Dingy Harry, on the Senate floor. (watch the video on cspan2)
16. Media Matters flashes the reporter on this left wing democrat mouthpiece “news” outfit.
17. An article gets posted on the blog that has specks of truth, but kinda make Dingy harry look like a good guy. Instead of the impotent hack that he in fact is.
Posted by: steve | October 20, 2007, 3:19 am 3:19 am
I usually like Charles Gibson but the the weekend version of World News Tonight is just awful. The liberal bias on the weekend version is out of control.
Posted by: Ella | October 20, 2007, 3:44 am 3:44 am
Easy St.,
We must fight these democrat/journalist hacks. They fear the truth. The truth makes them out to be the shills that they are. If too many people figure out that the drive-bys get their cues from hillary/media matters then, well, the jig may be up. The are really in CYA mode now. Maybe this is why the think that the good news in Iraq is no news. If they were to report the good news, then the Reid comment about the surge failing would really make Dingy out to be a cheerleader for defeat. What happens to all these democrats if the surge continues to work. What will they say. Dingy Harry could not dare take credit for success. In July he said that the mission had failed. You gotta love this stuff.
Posted by: steve | October 20, 2007, 4:00 am 4:00 am
Maybe ABC News should rewrite the article and make it accurate.
Posted by: brettCoupe | October 20, 2007, 4:02 am 4:02 am
Chris:
You believe …the lie about WMD in Iraq… as you stated: “Far more than that believed the lie about WMD in Iraq” …
Iraq and the UN documented Iraqi use of chemical weapons (at least against the Kurds) and documented traces of chemical and biological agents present with their weapon systems.
Seems reasonable to conclude that there were WMD in Iraq. My beliefs are based on historical facts and expert research vice the bumper sticker education campaign some politicos are pushing on people such as “Bush lied” – “Bush lied about WMD in Iraq” etc.
Posted by: Bob | October 20, 2007, 4:07 am 4:07 am
Let’s cool it, folks. There’s much drift from the main issue and, on both sides, far too much of our un-esteemed author’s “vitriol”.
Let’s review: During a phone conversation, Rush dropped a phrase (phony soldiers) drawn from his previous day’s “Daily Update” (and the previous Monday’s ABC Nightly News!), then clarified it about 2 minutes later by discussing the lying imposters who claimed to have committed or witnessed U.S. atrocities in Iraq. Senator Reid chose to misinterpret this as impugning the honor of any soldier who spoke out against his (or our) involvement in the war against Islamo-fascism. This shows either the ignorance and/or incompetence of the senator’s staff, or deliberate lying by the senator on the floor of the Senate. (The choice is his.) The time elapsed until the infamous letter’s signing and delivery absolutely assures that he and his forty Senatorial friends knew they were signing on to a lie, compromising their integrity for reasons only they can, but assuredly won’t, explain.
Senator Reid’s Friday theatrics on the senate floor were a loser’s assertion of self-importance. Limbaugh turns Reid’s lies into financial support of warriors’ survivors. Reid stretches to take credit for the raised cash.
Ain’t the first amendment great? It encourages the ignorant to stand up and identify themselves. It also allows the intelligent and informed to illuminate the illogical and incompetent
Posted by: Jimmy Joe | October 20, 2007, 4:09 am 4:09 am
Easy,
I meant that it is fun to watch the dems implode. They have had a couple of bad weeks. The Betray-us letter, not getting us out of Iraq. That stupid Turkey resolution failed. The Schip expansion failed. thank god. They say Bush is just a hayseed but he smokes them every time. I love it. All the while the lib base gets madder and madder at Pelosi and Dingy Harry. I love it. Take heart, we are winning. We are preventing a lot of bad legislation from becoming law. We are winning!!!!!!
Posted by: steve | October 20, 2007, 4:27 am 4:27 am
I’m not so sure we’re doing that well, Steve. The Democrat Party has fallen prey to the moonbat fringe. Enough reasoning former Democrats have switched to the Republican party, to drag us well to the left. By trying to slip us Rudy for ’08, the GOP has become what the Democrat party used to be. Who’s winning? Did we win when we got Ahnold in CA? I’m happy about all of the wins you cite, but the trend overall looks like we’re fighting a slow slide into socialism, big government, gun control, shamnesty and consequent depression, while ultimately making conservatism and Christianity into “thought crimes”, all with the aid of a complicit media.
Posted by: EasySt | October 20, 2007, 5:24 am 5:24 am
Well, this is my first time in over a year that I’ve bothered with ABC Views…ah…News. Probably be another year before I check on how biased they are . . . And now, back to Fox…
Posted by: Martin | October 20, 2007, 5:59 am 5:59 am
The conservatives are in an uproar because the voters are jumping of their ship of fools by the millions! Even the average voter is realizing republicans are nothing but NUTS and WAR MONGERS!
Posted by: Bert | October 20, 2007, 6:12 am 6:12 am
Half a hand-clap for even noticing the auction.
You lose credit for giving Senate Democrats any credit for the money raised.
This was an attempt at “Fairness Doctrine by Intimidation” – Mays & Limbaugh weren’t supposed to fight back.
Reid’s really a pathetic leader; but he’s just what that caucus deserves.
Posted by: BD | October 20, 2007, 6:57 am 6:57 am
ABC is trying to turn a triumph for Rush Limbaugh over cowardly Democrats trying to curb free speech with a lying threat letter into some sort of Democratic plan. The Dem Senators are liars in their own published letter, as Limbaugh was referring to impostors PRETENDING to be soldiers, not ones protesting the war. Too subtle for lying trash like Reid?
Posted by: daveinboca | October 20, 2007, 7:20 am 7:20 am
And to this comment:
Voidseeker, review the transcript. Limbaugh aimed his “phony soldier” comment at those who oppose the war. The transcript is on his own website.
Posted by: Paul | Oct 19, 2007 7:05:20 PM
I have done more than review, I was actually listening to the show when the comment was made. I have also reviewed the transcript.
Anyone that actually has a brain, and more than a 20 second attention span is able to see that Rush Limbaugh was not talking about real active members of the armed forces.
The only people that think he was are obviously unable to follow intelligent conversations. The caller addressed the topic, Rush made his comment, they moved on to other items, and right after the call Rush returned to his comment to expand on the point. This is NORMAL for his show and requires just a tad higher IQ to follow than most liberals / MSM people have – or so it would seem by their inability to get this story right.
Posted by: Voidseeker | October 20, 2007, 7:58 am 7:58 am
The New York Times just tanked, largely for being grossly unfair. The LA Times and San Francisco Chronicle are in a free fall. All the network news are crumbling.
Can someone in American media get a story right any more?
I am no spokesperson for the right, but if the media cannot begin to be fair, it cannot expect anything more that collapse.
I’m pleading, for the sake of journalism in America, somebody step up to the plate and stop this crap.
Posted by: Mike Mennard | October 20, 2007, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Call out to the politicans standing for the good old Dem party… You need to do something serious to take back your party. The Dem party has been filled with ridiculous, childish, but dangerous people like Reid. He along with other bully politicans consistently put black eyes on your party. Making slander statements and distorted stories have become a typical Dem Party style nowadays. Disagreeing with Bush is fine, but any descent adult would not openly say the president taking “soldiers’ head got blown off” as his own amusement. They do not present themselves as leaders, but bullies.
The good old Dem Party is gone.
I never trust 100% of what presented by the media, but at least 80%. Media has blatently become the Dem propaganda forums.
Posted by: LisaM | October 20, 2007, 8:21 am 8:21 am
If you correct nothing else about the article, correct the final paragraph. Democrats had nothing to do with raising money for charity, and it’s “matter” not “mater.”
Posted by: JMC | October 20, 2007, 8:24 am 8:24 am
continued from last posting…
Now, I find media has become a self-serving political playground. They have redefined “journalism”.
Posted by: LisaM | October 20, 2007, 8:28 am 8:28 am
“…Today, Reid was more conciliatory to Limbaugh and whoever is paying for the letter….”
O, man! What a twist! This makes Reid look like he is the kind one.
Reid said he has watched the bid the whole week!? Did he do it at his work hours too? So, tax payers not only have to pay for the time for them to type up that letter and signed, but also have to pay for him (or his staff)to surf ebay!!!!
Posted by: LisaM | October 20, 2007, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Dear Z. Byron Wolf
You got the basic facts in this story all wrong.
You need to go back to journalism school for a refresher course on getting the facts right.
Posted by: slp | October 20, 2007, 8:50 am 8:50 am
41 dishonest senators wrote a letter regarding something which demonstrably did not happen. They did not smear a private citizen in order to raise money for charity. A dishonest reporter seems to want people to believe they did.
Posted by: andy | October 20, 2007, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Limbaugh Gets $2.1 Million for Phony Soldiers Letter
Rush Limbaugh auctioned off a letter signed by Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, and 39 other Senate Democrats condemning his phony soldiers comments for $2.1 million on eBay. Hes matching that total and donating $4.2 million to a cha…
Posted by: Outside The Beltway | OTB | October 20, 2007, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Once again, ABC shows itself to be in the DEMS hip pocket and an unworthy source of accurate news. The DEMS had NOTHING to do with this VICTORY. Wolf should quit trying to be a journalist, and retire on his DEM pension. What a joke!
Posted by: Michael - PA | October 20, 2007, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Limbaugh was not referring to soldiers who oppose the war when he uttered the phrase “phony soldiers.” He was referring to phony soldiers. Go listen to the segment. It’s on line.
Not that you care about the truth.
Posted by: Jim O'Sullivan | October 20, 2007, 9:01 am 9:01 am
There is something that has bothered me for quite some time. I’m sure most of you know what I mean. Those nagging little questions that hover at the edge of reason on those rare occasions when you watch the old media or try to read any of the twaddle they try to pass off as “news”. “Why,” I always wonder, “has the media gone obtusely insane?” “Do these people live in the same nation I do? Or even on the same planet?” “How can these hacks get so much of what they’re trying to shove down our throats so obviousy, factually wrong and still proclaim themselves as the watchdogs of democracy?” “Hasn’t anyone told them we live in a new world where the information dynamic has shifted dramatically and anyone who cares to take the slightest effort can go straight to the source and verify for themselves if what was just presented to them as fact and truth was, in reality, just a load of bullsh*t crafted to reinforce the presenters’ biases and political agendae?” It really is astounding in its hubris.
So, we’re left with the quest of finding the answers to these questions on our own. We look back in our history in the hope that perhaps some of the answers may lie there. And what do we find? Well, take the media coverage of the war on terror as an example. You have “journalists”, many who have never set foot in the theater of operations, much less left their desks in Manhattan for the duration, expounding on what a disaster it is. You have “jounalists” who have never served a single nano-second in the armed forces second-guessing military professionals who have devoted their entire adult lives to the defense of this nation and her freedoms. On the flip side, their are a handful of real “journalists”, such as Michael Totten and Michael Yon, who have actually placed themselves in harms way to find the “truth” whom the old media have resolutely ignored because the reports they file from the front lines don’t echo the old media’s predujices against the men and women who fight for something larger than themselves.
I have just read a letter from an NCO to his father about his perceptions of the world the rest of us live in and the world the old media wishes we lived in. The young man was disheartened, to say the least, that when he returns to civilian life, the country he thought he grew up in will no longer exist because the media has created two nations: A nation of people who are at war against Islamic Fascism intent on world domination, and a nation of people who are at war with the nation of people who are at war against Islamic Fascism intent on world domination. Well, that young NCO doesn’t have that worry anymore. He was killed this past June doing what he knew to be right and the “truth”. He died a hero to us all by placing his body in between an ideology more insipid and dangerous than Nazism and and the rest of us.
Then it struck me like a lightning bolt. That’s the answer. Well, maybe one of the answers, but a big one, nonetheless. The old media doesn’t have any skin in this game. Unlike previous wars, the media has insulated itself from the daily grind and dangers of serving this nation to the fullest measure. And why is that? (I know. Another nagging question.) I’ll tell you why. They don’t “have to”. There is no military draft anymore that would force them to face the reality of this brave new world. Just think a second about this. If the people of the media were forced to pick up a weapon and stand a post or hump a patrol, would their perceptions and knowledge of what we are up against alter? And would this change in perceptions and knowledge change the words and images they choose to document this conflict? There can be only one answer to this question. Damn right it would. Once it was their backsides on the line, those who denigrate their betters and deliberately mislead and lie to this nation as a daily routine in their columns, in on-air reports, and in op-eds, would be whistling a different tune. They would know how that young NCO felt before he gave his full measure to ensure our freedom. They would be the first to scream “Foul!” whenever some agenda driven hack tried to pass off fantasies as facts in the press or knowingly propped up some fraudulent, malcontent losers as dissident soldiers.
So, I propose we reinstate the draft. But not the same old draft we used to have. No. But a targeted draft. Only old media and their enablers in government and the blogosphere go first. And they don’t get to pick what branch of service they go to either. And they don’t get to pick their posts. No Stars and Stripes assignments like Al Gore’s daddy finagled for him during Viet Nam. They all go in as grunts and stay grunts for the duration. And they all go immediately to the front lines.
Who knows, maybe an Ernie Pyle is waiting to emerge from amongst them. The only question left then, is do they have the stones to do it?
Posted by: The Last Patriot | October 20, 2007, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Lets see if I got this right. Reid hatches a plot to write a letter signed by 40 bozos in congress claiming Rush is a bozo because he knows the letter will be sold on ebay and benefit kids. He also has planned to have the winner be a sorta dem supporter, who in reality claims she always listens to Rush when he is on the radio. Or is that just the ABC spin machine?
Posted by: ragebot | October 20, 2007, 9:23 am 9:23 am
I hope I never need Z. Byron Wolf as an eye witness. He couldn’t even accurately report this story that had unfolded over a week’s time. ABC must have very low standards for employment not to mention a complete lack of integrity.
Posted by: Steve Grande | October 20, 2007, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Harry Reid is an opportunistic prune.
Posted by: Udder Madness | October 20, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am
The only ones that are actually benefiting are the kids of fallen Marines and law enforcement.
Those Senators misled the people. ABC News misled the people. Z. Byron Wolf misled the people. Those mentioned are pitiful and dangerous.
Posted by: Marie | October 20, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am
ABC is a shill organization for the liberal democrat party. They should lose any protections afforded to true members of the press and just be categorized for what they are, a political party’s advertising wing.
Posted by: Shawn | October 20, 2007, 9:42 am 9:42 am
How many posts have you altered, ABC?
How many posts have you deleted?
Why do you never mention that ABC news itself ran a story abou “Phony Soldiers” two days prior to Rush’s statement?
Posted by: drjohn | October 20, 2007, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Good grief! Is this what ABC tries to pass off as journalism? No wonder the media is dying a slow death.
Posted by: CT | October 20, 2007, 9:46 am 9:46 am
You want to know why only 14% percent of Americans think journalism is respectable profession? Look no further than the gall of ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf. That’s right, 86% of Americans think Mr. Wolf’s profession isn’t worthy of their respect. I agree with them. He’s either an uneducated buffoon or a dishonest reporter. Either one explains and justifies Americans contempt for the media.
Posted by: Andy B | October 20, 2007, 9:52 am 9:52 am
San Francisco Chronicle
Z. Byron Wolf says a prof at UC Berkeley’s journalism school rattled off the barrage of frustrated e-mails she got from Berkeley “intelligentsia” when the Berkeley Daily Planet closed last month. “But how many of these folks trundled down to the corner to pick up a copy of the Daily Planet five days a week?” asks Wolf, an ex-Daily Planet staffer. “You’d think it would be a travesty that a city that is home to one of the most educated populations on the planet, a major research university, the Free Speech Movement, and a functioning graduate school of journalism would not have its own paper. And it is.”
Obviously, they also closed down the J School before Wolf was able to matriculate.
Posted by: CT | October 20, 2007, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Ironic how ABC News, touting themselves as a Champion of the First Amendment, would conduct such insidious and brutal attacks on the First Amendment by tainting and despoiling protected speech.
Posted by: Johnny | October 20, 2007, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Harry and the forty other signers are fools and Democrats. But I repeat myself.
Posted by: hawkeye | October 20, 2007, 10:20 am 10:20 am
When I read this story, I feel like I am in some sort of bizarro world.
It is a shame that journalism has reached such a low. ABC forgets that the monopoly is over for good.
There is a reason that Fox and AM radio command such a huge audience. It is because the drive-by media is actually driving the audience to them with stories like this.
Posted by: NV | October 20, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am
“[Rush] has reportedly said on his show that he will match the winning bid…”
Reportedly?
You mean you didn’t even have the fact-checking capability to verify THIS? Unbelievable.
Hey, take a wild guess which “professional” community has even lower ‘approval’ ratings than the President *and* congress?
Journalists. Because they are MORONS.
Posted by: TMM | October 20, 2007, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Look, I know it’s important for ABC to believe that the Democrats are the white hats. But speaking truth to power is what journalism always claims to do and crediting Reid and his colleagues for the happy results here is absurd.
Posted by: Mark H | October 20, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am
This report is blatantly off-base. As best I can tell, Democrats did nothing to raise a dime for this charity, other than sign onto a letter attempting to suppress a citizen’s First Amendment rights by twisting Limbaugh’s words into something he didn’t say.
If ABC is sincere about how wonderful these contributions are, they should be pushing the 41 Senators who signed the abominable letter to meet the match challenge. Thus far, they have not contributed a dime toward the $4.2M collected for the charity.
Now, if the Democrats want to show their sincerity, each one who signed that letter should match the $2.1M for the Marines. Just imagine what good would come of over $84 Million, for the children. ABC should be putting every one of these charlatans on record as to how much they are contributing.
Posted by: Deputy Dawg | October 20, 2007, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Maybe this report can point out which Democrats donated the $4.2 million to the charity.
Anytime now.
Posted by: Good Lt | October 20, 2007, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Another good thing is coming out of this:
Dingy Harry and 40 Democrats Senators wil not be able to bash soldiers any longer. They just lost that right by 4.2Million to Zero… but then i won’t be surprised at all if they resume their hypocracies as early as MOnday morning..RUSH ROCKS !
Posted by: Tony | October 20, 2007, 11:22 am 11:22 am
No ifs ands or buts. The statement that Democrats are making money for the charity is factually incorrect, and ABC owes its web readers a retraction and correction.
Congratulations, Rush, on your charitable works. Pity we all had to pay the price of Democrat demagoguery.
Posted by: apetra | October 20, 2007, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Here we have a group of 41 Senators, 4 of which hope to become our next President, send a letter to the CEO of Clear Channel Communications demanding him to publicly repudiate Rush Limbaugh. This Letter was not sent to Rush as a lot of the press seem to imply in their articles, it was given to him by his Friend, Mark May(s).
Harry Reid is a little weasel for even trying to take credit for this auction. The only thing that Harry did was abuse his power as a Senator by trying to silence free speech and violating the principles of our First Amendment.
The 4 Senators that also signed this letter running for President is where the press should be reporting to the public. This blatant abuse of power should shake the souls of every American, including those working for the MSM. If any of these four happens to make it to the Oval Office, beware of powers beholden to them to silence any media that speaks or writes in a negative light of their position.
It is neither the Letter nor the Auction that is the news here, but rather the Orwellian approach to strike the first Amendment from our Constitution.
Posted by: Stuck in Michigan | October 20, 2007, 11:28 am 11:28 am
This was an absolute and complete slam-dunk for Limbaugh over the Demosocialists. Love Limbaugh or hate him, be glad of the fact that when 41 powerful politicians tried to interfere with a private citizen’s rights to speech and gainful employment, they got their heads handed to them.
Posted by: Mike | October 20, 2007, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Once again you guys GET THE STORY WRONG!
ON PURPOSE!
Why do you think Rush’s letter brought in 4Million dollars total? Because it’s a message to all of you at ABC..CBS..NBC..MSNBC and CNN…. YOU DON’T REPORT THE FACTS CORRECTLY OR FAIR… and your attacks to bring down those who disagree with you is NOT working!!!
Posted by: Karen | October 20, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am
I’m a moderate, and not a Limbaugh fan, and I can clearly see what happened here.
Limbaugh won this round, hands down. Reid comes off as spinning desperately after losing badly and ABC doesn’t look too good at this point, either.
The old ways of politics and the media are dead. They’re not coming back.
Posted by: JR | October 20, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am
This seems to prove that Rush Limbaugh is correct about ABC News and the other media (that he calls “Drive-by media”). Rush is correct about the fact we should be very careful when reading news from the “drive-by media”(This includes ABC News).
Posted by: Rodney | October 20, 2007, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Unbelievable.
I don’t think Harry Reid could write a more misleading, inaccurate recap of the events.
Posted by: BP | October 20, 2007, 11:40 am 11:40 am
The ABC piece must have been a parody? Right? It couldn’t have been real.
Posted by: jim | October 20, 2007, 11:54 am 11:54 am
It doesn’t take a genius to see that ABC is trying to slant this in the Democrats favor. And this continual drumming of “Rush is a drug addict so he’s no longer credible” is sad. It certainly dismisses anyone who has ever recovered (and still recovering)from the disease of addiction. Guess I’ll have to throw out all my Beatle and Eric Clapton CDs because they were all once “addicted.” Have Democrats ever really considered the possibility of revovery and redemption? Too bad Bill Clinton never addressed his addiction (sexual, remember?) maybe the Dems could’ve learned something from their so called mentor…
Posted by: Ron J | October 20, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol”
More than anything else, this statement summarizes the difference between conservatives and liberals. Conservatives help people by giving their own hard earned money. Liberals help people by taking from conservatives and then taking credit.
Not mentioned in this story was that Rush will MATCH the 2.1M donation by Betty Casey. The offer to match was also extended to Harry Reid. He declined. Yet he takes credit for “helping”.
I have come to believe that no amount of shame or ridicule will EVER change the democrats. To know right from wrong, or good from evil, requres a soul. These people have none.
Un-freakin-believable.
Posted by: Swibbie | October 20, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
The real story has now switched from Rush and Reid to ABC. This is utterly unbelieveble!!!
Posted by: ted | October 20, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Having voted for Bill Clinton twice, I never thought back then I would think this, but, Senator Reid and the 41 Democrats and Z Byron Wolf of ABC have so grossly distorted what Rush Limbaugh actually said, and then so falsely implied that the Reid 41 are partly responsible for the good that has come from this, I will never trust any of them again. I doubt they have the integrity to undo this, so the only thing they have thus far accomplished is to make the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Anne Coulter appear like height of integrity by comparison. May they and all those who falsely exploit our soldiers live to feel the profound sting of shame that they deserve.
Posted by: Casey in Chicago | October 20, 2007, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Limbaugh insulted soldiers and believes that he can buy his way out of it.
Posted by: Reality | October 20, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
It was NOT the “Dem’s letter” – it was a letter from them to Ruch Limbaugh. Why do you bury that fact in one paragraph at the bottom of the story? You should fix your headline too!
Posted by: Catttt | October 20, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Harry Reid is a pathetic little worm. And this article is a pathetic little lie.
Posted by: kevin | October 20, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
“No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
Who is the author of this article? I would have thought they could have gotten the simple fact that Limbaugh put that letter up for auction and not the Democrats. This is why I haven’t watched ABC News in 15 years.
Posted by: Larry in New Hampshire | October 20, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Some of the comments from liberals on this thread are absolutely incredible. Liberals will never be called hypocrites on moral issues because they don’t have any moral standards in the first place. But Republicans do have moral standards…therefore, any time a Republican makes a mistake, he or she is automatically a hypocrite. See how that works? It’s much easier to stand for nothing so you don’t have that problem.
Also, I find it interesting that libs made snide remarks about Sen. Craig’s allegedly homosexual encounters or Rush’s substance abuse problems, when these are the very types of issues liberals purport to empathize with. There have been at least two Democrats accused of pedophilia in the last ten years or so, and I seem to remember something about a young Kennedy and some pill popping a while back. So, what’s your point? Oh, I get it…you have to resort to insults in order to change the subject when you don’t have a legitimate argument on the issues.
The comments on this thread have been a mind-boggling display of the tolerance and open-mindedness about which liberals are so self-congratulatory.
Posted by: nolagirl05 | October 20, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Journalistic standards. ABC News. Jumbo shrimp.
Posted by: John E. Brown | October 20, 2007, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Hairy needs to be Daschle’d.
Posted by: Ken | October 20, 2007, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
This story highlights the difference between liberals and conservatives.
The Conservative finds a way to use the free market to raise money for a good cause and matches it with his own money.
The Liberal asks other people to donate without shelling out a penny of their own money, all the while taking credit for it themselves.
Posted by: Steve | October 20, 2007, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
This is Journalism? This is selective reporting of the facks to try to persuade the reader. What is going on here? Not one mention why the “phoney Soldiar” remark was in despute. Not one mention that Rush matched the money out of his pocket and the grand total was $4mil+. This story is huge and it is not getting covered. The story behind this also is that Rush is loved by the military and has for years donated and work to help them any time he could. Now we have ABC trying to report on this and piling more lies on top of lies. Try reporting the news rather than shaping the news to push an agenda!
Posted by: Davd D. | October 20, 2007, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Wow, So ABC is the Mouthpiece for the demagogues of the Democratic Senate. Wow. Bias this apparent is truly enlightening.
Posted by: G.M | October 20, 2007, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Harry got EXACTLY what he wanted from Mr. Wolf, after he went on the floor of the Senate and ATTEMPTED to take credit for raising money for a military charity.
Harry kept using the word “We”, as if he was in on the “PLAN”. Haaa-ha-ha. You know, as well as I do, he had to have been “furious”.
HARRY’S LIKE A REPORTER WHO LOOKS OVER YOUR SHOULDER AND STEALS YOUR NOTES FOR A STORY AND THEN PUTS HIS NAME ON IT.
“UNETHICAL AND SLIMY” ARE TWO WORDS THAT FIRST CAME TO MIND TO DESCRIBE HARRY’S ACTIONS.
Posted by: c.blake | October 20, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Sound like Dems have a winning plan here. Why dont the Dems keep constructing more inaccurate threat letters targeting a private citizens in the attempt in managing free speech and place it on EBay for charity? I heard Media Matters is tax exempt just like MC-LEF.
Posted by: ScottK | October 20, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
I’m with Ted Koppel on this one. With everything that is happening in the world right now, when the Majority Leader has nothing better to do than take to the floor of the Senate to smear a private citizen, we’re in trouble! This is blatant abuse of power, and at taxpayer expense to boot! But that is precisely the reason that the letter brought such a high bid at auction.
Posted by: Ruth | October 20, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
ABC news had access to the transcript of Limbaugh’s comments and to the audio. They had access via there own video of Harry Reid’s remarks and they come up with this article that has only a nodding acquaintance with the truth.
If they can’t get a simple story correct which took place in the continental United States, how can we trust them to report accurately on what takes place in Iraq?
Posted by: Kaymad | October 20, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Wow! Limbaugh made complete national fools out of Reid and the other 40 Senators. The weasel Reid tried to spin it. Z. Byron Wolf and ABC in true liberal fashion missed the true bullet points of the story entirely. Liberals abuse their power in the senate and they abuse their power in the media. Fortunately, millions of people across the land know the true story.
Posted by: Ron Hunnicutt | October 20, 2007, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
ABC and Z. Byron Wolf had no intention of getting the facts of the story. But the great thing is that now they get called on their spin. They are arrogant and stupid to think they can re-write the story when the number’s in Rush’s audience (who know the truth about the issue) dwarfs ABC’s.
Posted by: Ruth | October 20, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
I can’t believe how wrong this story is and that you have the gall to leave it up as is.
“Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
How do Democrats have anything to do with this? Rush initiated the auction, and Betty C, who contributed $55K to the RNC won.
Priceless bias.
Posted by: Dan Jones | October 20, 2007, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
It is amazing to me how libs defend the actions of Harry Reid, his 40 co-perps, and a bias media. You people talk about freedom, but do not see the danger this blatant distortion of the facts represents…or, you do and are ok with it.
Getting the facts was as simple as listening to the show. Think what you want about Limbaugh, “pill-popper” bla bla bla…a major political party and a large majority of the media working hand-in-hand to spew lies and propaganda seems to be a much larger problem to me.
You libs are so out of touch. You come here repeating years old lies about Bush lying about WMDs, when all you have to do is read, listen, and watch multiple sources of information that indicate otherwise…to include video and audio of your own politicians telling the same (ahem) “lies”. As a matter of fact, material to prove this is so abundant, that I can’t help but come to the conclusion that many of you are either straight brainwashed, on the take, or just plain idiots.
Posted by: James W | October 20, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
If you’re ever wondering how sleazy the left is, just take a look at “Dead Soldier’s” posts. If I had the money I’d put his posts on billboards nationwide with the title, “The Face of the Democrat Party”. THAT is why conservatives don’t want you idiots silenced. We WANT you to get your word out. It only helps conservatives.
Kevin Burns,
United States Army Veteran,
Augusta, Georgia (Ft. Gordon)
Administrator of USMILNET
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
What is sad is that the author of this posting thinks the people that would read it are ignorant of the facts. – Listen up MSM – You don’t have a monopoly on the news anymore.
What was left out of this article is so telling. What happened to the 5 w’s? You missed a bit.
WHO were the ‘phony Soldiers’ Rush was talking about. – They were not the people your organization portrayed them to be.
WHAT was in the letter the democrats signed about? What did it say? – A simple link to the auction would allow people to read it for themselves.
WHY did Reid send the letter? Was it just tit-for-tat as this article leads one to believe?
WHERE is the ridicule for Harry Reid in this article? His statement, “But without qualification Mark May, the owner of the network that has Rush Limbaugh, and Rush Limbaugh should know that this letter that they’re auctioning is going to be something that raises money for a worthwhile cause.” is ridiculous!
They didn’t know this? Does Harry Reid actually think that when they set up the auction they didn’t know where the funds were going? It took his statement to inform them? – Or perhaps you believe they didn’t know it until Harry Reid told them…
And what is this nonsense of trying to belittle the high bidder? How the Washington Post views her has as much a hold on reality as does this article.
Sad, sad, sad!
Posted by: prying1 | October 20, 2007, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
This is who the Iraqi Veterans Against War (IVAW) pimped last year
Jesse Macbeth. Now, what’s wrong with that military.com profile? He has 3 “Mustard Stains”, better known as combat jumps, on his jump wings. This is impossible given the fact that there haven’t BEEN 3 combat jumps since WWII within the duration he’s said to have served. Next is his Combat Action Badge, second award (Meaning 2). Sorry, this award isn’t given to combat infantry or Ranger qualified personnel. Then he has a Combat Infantry Badge, second award. Wrong again. Next is his Special Forces tab. Sorry again, he states he’s a corporal and a requirement Special Forces, upon selection from SFAS at Camp Mackall, is WLC, the predecessor to PLDC, the first NCO leadership course. I.e., you aren’t going to find a tabbed SF Corporal. Next you have his “hobbies” listed as “Killing Haajis”. Excuse me? Isn’t he a peace freak? Next you have an overseas ribbon. This isn’t given for deployments, it’s given for a PCS.
Wrong flash, wrong way to fold a beret, and NOT an authorized roll for his sleeves per AR-670-1, the Army’s regulation governing the wear of the uniform. He also has his arms crossed. LOL. Rrriiigghhhhhhh….t.
The “real” issue here is if IVAW is some high-speed organization stock-full of supertroopers, how in the HELL was is so easy for this idiot to fool them? What were their backgrounds? You telling me out of all those supertroops, NONE had a little lightbulb going off above their head? I picked up on is just as SOON as I saw the first picture. My guess? They’re a political organization with an agenda. They didn’t CARE about the truth. The first time they heard about this guy they jumped on him like stink on you know what thinking he could help their cause.
I challenge YOU, IVAW, to provide a reason for NOT verifying claims by people you pimp for your cause. Until then, if you are against the war, there’s a simple solution, don’t enlist.
Kevin
United States Army Veteran,
Augusta, Georgia
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Let’s recap:
1. Uncritical reprint of Media Matters falsehoods – check
2. Enthusiastic pumping of synthetic Democratic outrage – check
3. Complete indifferance to thuggish push by Senate Majority Leader to get Limbaugh suspended or fired – check
4. Non-coverage of letter auction – check
5. Avid spin-meiste4ring of Harry Reid as participant in this act of charity – check
6. Failure to mention $2.1 million matching donation by hated radio host – check
Could it be that there is a single MSM member that still puzzles as to why his or her profession is held in such low regard and as a mindless mouthpiece for the Democratic Party?
Posted by: Jeffersonian | October 20, 2007, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Could this article be any more factually incorrect? It’s amazing how you guys can screw up something so royally when the facts were easily attainable to anybody with half a brain.
Posted by: Brent | October 20, 2007, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I wish that some one at ABC would ask Reid why he is trying to take credit for the auction and the money that has been raised. I also wish that some one would ask him why he isn’t matching Casey’s bid.
Posted by: Kevin in Dallas | October 20, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
does anyone know how much”media mutters”celebrated phony soldiers like jesse macbeth and scott beachump?im sure they did..all the lefties did..until they were discovered to be..well..phony…then they just acted like nothing happened,never heard of the guy,etc,etc.id dirty myself by checking out their site,but i know,beyond a doubt,they deleted that kinda stuff immediately.perhaps a blog has screencaps saved or something?????????????
Posted by: GeLdOnTheBIG | October 20, 2007, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.”
A BLATANT LIE. abc, the kiddies block network KNEW from the outset that RUSH NEVER called real soldiers phony, to have used the above line was without a doubt, pure BIASED, twisted, distorted and an outright LIE by abc.
WHERE were the demagogues when the Republicans called for a resolution condemning the nytimes ad calling Gen. Petraeus a liar? In fact many demagogues actually insinuated that Gen. Petraeus WAS lying, with NOTHING to base their statements upon. To fail to mention this was yet another example of pure BIASED reporting.
The REFUSAL of abc, the kiddie blocks network, to acknowledge that not one single demagogue has offered one single penny to the charity is yet one more PROOF that abc is totally biased,
Posted by: TheEnigm47 | October 20, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
to: TheOldTrooper
Sorry, typo there.
JKD should have been JFK (John F. Kennedy) – the well known Democratic druggie that was President during the 60s. This is a most appropriate comparison because Rush and JFK were both hooked on pain killers.
Posted by: Mind The Gap | October 20, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Posted by: Jeffersonian | Oct 20, 2007 2:27:41 PM
Brilliant post. You encapsulated the entire story in a few short, snappy sentences. That means you can NOT be a journalist.
Posted by: Jabba the Tutt | October 20, 2007, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
As a regular listener of EIB I heard and understood every word that was spoken by Rush regarding the phony soldier. Dingy Harry and his
cohorts trying to take credit for the $2
million is so outragous that had this happened back in my younger days These
would have been tarred & teathered and road out of town on a rail.
Posted by: Ewen Garner | October 20, 2007, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
When Harry Reid and his cohort sent their letter to Clear Channel, charity was the last thing on their mind. It was the political equivalent of a pitcher throwing a beanball at a batter’s head for the purpose of intimidating him and making him back away from the plate. The fact that Rush took that dirty pitch and belted it out the park — scoring $4.2M for the MCLF — is to Rush’s credit, not Harry Reid. In baseball, the value of the home run ball isn’t attibuted to the guy who tossed it, it goes to the man who hit it out of the park. You’d think even ABC could have figured that one out. Kudo’s to RUSH. Semper Fi.
Posted by: Pat P | October 20, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Some of those “Senators” that signed the letter were some of the very ones that REFUSED to denounce Moveon.org for their trashing of an active duty General. ..if that tells you anything. Congress has more important things to do than trashing and denouncing private citizens. They want to do it “as” citizens, fine, on the floor of Congress, in the building that WE pay for? Hell no.
Kevin
United States Army Veteran,
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Qwacker, they’re not beholden to the 1st Amendment as they are a private business. However, if they want to be taken seriously by anyone OTHER than left-wing loons, it would do them well to be a little less biased. Afterall, isn’t a news organization supposed to be interested in the facts? Well, guess that’s a rhetorical question these days.
Kevin
United States Army Veteran,
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Bidder pays over 2 million for Rush letter. Harry Reid takes credit.
This is why the main stream media can not be trusted. ABC News pretty much gives all the credit for the money raised for the Rush letter to Reid. First of all none of the MSM covered the story when it first came out except for Fox News. They only begin…
Posted by: Quiglag.com | October 20, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Stories like these and the blatant disregard for the truth should prove to all Americans that liberalism really is a mental disease. The stubborn refusal by left wingers to acknowledge the truth even when beaten over the head with it is not rational. For them, there is a conspiracy behind every tree. I guess it’s easier to believe that then expend the intellectual energy required to understand the real complexities of the issues confronting the world. The MSM is shameless and they will pay the ultimate price as their dishonesty is increasingly exposed.
Posted by: Chris Schumacher | October 20, 2007, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Congrats Harry Reid, Comrade Stalin would be proud, Stalin always said his goal was to control the truth as good as the the American MEDIA,CBS (Clinton
Broadcasting Service, NBC (Nothing But Clinton, and ABC (Always Bout Clinton, are able to take an absolute lie about Rush Limbugh and turn it into a Democatic PR plus. Good work Comrades!
Posted by: mrpaulusa | October 20, 2007, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Rush HAS contributed to veteran’s causes. He’s done it for years. The Marine Corp-Law Enforcement organization isn’t something he just pulled out of a hat.
Kevin
Veteran, US Army
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
O, man! What a twist! This makes Reid look like he is the kind one.
Right on LisaM:
Reid said he has watched the bid the whole week!? Did he do it at his work hours too? So, tax payers not only have to pay for the time for them to type up that letter and signed, but also have to pay for him (or his staff)to surf ebay!!!!
I say let’s impeach 41 Senators for bashing our troops, harrasing a private citizen, taking credit for work they didn’t perform, and surfing Ebay on tax payers money time.
the tower of of Democratic party and main stream media is crubbling down.Quick, Someone please make a Halloween movie “fall of Main stream media and Democrats”
ABC is out FOX ‘ed again
Posted by: Tony | October 20, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Wow. This is stunning. Reid lies about what Limbaugh said (check the transcripts, ABC), then has the chutzpah to try to take credit for 4.2million in donations (1/2 of which came from Limbaugh’s own pockets), and ABC says, “yeah, okay, we’ll go along with whatever story you want, Senator Reid!” I guess because (am I wrong?) Reid has a D after his name? Unreal.
Posted by: Lizzie | October 20, 2007, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Rush did his part by matching the winning bid. He called on the Democrats, or any of the senators that signed the smear letter to also match the winning bid. None of them did. It would have been great to see Harry Reid do something positive and give money to this charity, but I guess he is just going to have to be happy knowing that his unintended actions raised money in spite of him.
Posted by: Jim | October 20, 2007, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Reid and dems pretend Reid letter on ebay is their idea
Picked this up from the brilliant writing at Sweetness and Light, but Warner Todd Houston at Stop the ACLU also noticed
Reid, Media Pretend eBay Letter Dems’ Idea.
Watch the video.
There seems to be no end to their lies.
What Rush said is tr…
Posted by: Cao's Blog | October 20, 2007, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
One day some adult at ABC/Disney is going to wake up and realize that it’s ‘news’ department is doing major damage to the rest of the franchise. I read baloney like this Wolf wrote, and tell the kids: sorry, no Disneyland this year. And the oldest one now gets why.
Posted by: CT | October 20, 2007, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
So, ABC and the Washington Post are taking their orders from MediaMatters and Harry Reid and his shameless cohorts. Willful lies, omissions and distortions are all we can expect from these violators of their sacred public trusts.
Well, since ABC and the Post are knowingly and willfully carrying water for these 41 shameless senators and dutifully regurgitating the mandated spin and lies as directed, then it’s only fair that they should step up to their long abandoned responsibilities and apologize to the American Public by matching the $4.2 million dollar charitable contribution for each and every one of the 41 shameless senators they are covering for.
Let’s see… That comes to
$172,208,200.00
Now, Pay Up ABC and the Washington Post, and Fix Your Lies and distortions!!! (Yes, we all knew that you knew what you did, when you did it. Some of us knew you were going to do it BEFORE you did it. May you and the senators you obfuscate for all soon be unemployed…)
Posted by: EasySt | October 20, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol. ”
WHAT?!?!?!?!
Do you at ABC get all your “news” from the DNC, or what? No wonder no one believes a word you people say, !!!
Tell the truth, dammit!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: jdawg | October 20, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
LOL, I think the lib drive by media needs alittle more polishing up before hillary gets dem nomination that way they can help Democrats better cause stories like these just gives them away.
Posted by: Tyrone | October 20, 2007, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
As a Cold War-era veteran, I remember hearing PRAVDA and Radio Moscow on HF radio overseas. Run no doubt by seasoned kommissars, the outright lies and blatant omissions of truth were horrific. It was all about the party line and demonizing political enemies.
Im glad we don’t have news organizations like that in America.
Posted by: JohnnyT | October 20, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Ever the optimist, I’m going to assume Reid is using the “we” pronoun because he’s going to accept Rush’s challenge to match the contribution. That’s the ONLY way he can legitimately use “we” in this situation.
Senator Reid, your name will forever be linked to this incident, but not in the way you might have hoped. As Rush said, this letter will forever memorialize you as a demagogue.
It’s sickening what you and the other Democrat leaders have done to the once-great Democrat Party. My parents are surely rolling over in their graves because of the incivility from your side of the aisle. Shameful.
Posted by: Donna | October 20, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
ABC should be embarrassed by this article. Even when the facts are widely known they try and mislead the readers just like Reid. I wonder if ABC will attempt to set the facts right since so many people called them on this propaganda article.
Posted by: Jim C | October 20, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Z Byron Wolf and ABC are an embarrassment to journalism.
Posted by: Roy Mustang | October 20, 2007, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Wow. ABC takes a DRUBBING in the reader comments!! Scan of the postings looks like about 98%-2% that they totally blew the story. Main Stream Media has to HATE the internret tand the fact that their version can be fact checked by readers in nano-seconds. Yet they don’t seem to catch on that they come off as buffoons?
Maybe they don’t have internet access for the lackey reporters in the ABC newsroom?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Posted by: R Larson | October 20, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
I have watched Harry Reid for over six years, and I can say truthfully that he shows all signs of being a psychopath. Has no conscience, so he can stand there and tell a lie, and not even know it is a lie. Although I no longer live in Nevada, I am determined to get him canned somehow. Nevadans, you have to do your part.
Posted by: William Goodman | October 20, 2007, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
This paragraph in the article is nothing but misinformation:
For their part, Democrats sent a letter calling for Rush Limbaugh to be reprimanded for calling soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers.”
Rush called phony soldiers “phony soldiers.” That’s right, people who claimed to be something they were not.
It is reporting like this that stops me from watching ABC newscasts.
Posted by: Mark | October 20, 2007, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
…not to mention some of the SAME Democrats REFUSED to denounce Moveon.org for their attack on a 4-Star General. Hypocrisy….when your best just isn’t good enough.
Kevin
Veteran, US Army
“Rebel”
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Thank heavens for the internet!! This should be considered journalistic malpractice–The reporter should be fired–Rush Limbaugh DID NOT call the soldiers who opposed the war “phony soldiers”–read the transcript–it’s on the internet on Rush’s site!!!! There is no wonder the public has little faith in what you report!!! You see, the media elite think we are dumb as stumps!!!
Posted by: Sherri | October 20, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Rush predicted articles like this would finally surface. Their snips and slants, of the truth were so predictable, not to mention detestable!
Posted by: Beth Straley | October 20, 2007, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Just rechecked, he retired as a Staff Sergeant.
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 20, 2007, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
1)ABC news has adopted the Baghdad Bob standard of journalism.
2)The first amendment, in fact the entire constitution, is designed to protect the rights of individual citizens, such as Rush Limbaugh and you from abuses of government officials, such as the 41 Senators or an IRS auditor for example. Some seem to misunderstand this fundamental.
3) God bless America.
Posted by: Chuck | October 21, 2007, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Censorship is, by definition, an action of government. Individuals and private entities have the right to pick and choose which information, if any, they disseminate.
For government to silence(censor) an individual is a violation of that individual’s first amendment right to free expression.
Posted by: Chuck | October 21, 2007, 12:38 am 12:38 am
I thought the article was mostly accurate- except for the repetition of the Media Matters/Harry Reid slander that Rush was referring to soldiers who don’t support the war instead of the many “phony soldiers” who have been reported in the media.
Posted by: bruce | October 21, 2007, 1:12 am 1:12 am
You guys at ABC must think that we are all idiots-ever hear of the internet?
I never read(or watch) ABC and I guess this is one of many reasons. I was directed here from Confederate Yankee blog.
Posted by: dianainsa | October 21, 2007, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Does ABC write it’s own stories or just copy DNC press releases?
Posted by: Ken Hahn | October 21, 2007, 3:29 am 3:29 am
“…All proceeds from the auction of the letter will go to the Marine Corps – Law Enforcement Foundation, which distributes aid to the families to the children of fallen Marines on behalf of law enforcement officers. …”
At least you could have gotten the mission of the Marine Corps – Law Enforcement Foundation correct. A simple internet search and 5 seconds of reading would have thickened the superficial factual veneer slapped on this pig.
“…This assistance was primarily rendered to children of Marines or Federal law enforcement personnel who were killed on duty or died under extraordinary circumstances while serving our country at home or abroad. …”
AND THIS..
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
HAS GOT TO BE THE MOST HEINOUSLY ARROGANT DISTORTION I HAVE EVER READ!
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, [ RUSH LIMBAUGH IS ] going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
That would be a factual statement. I suggest you save it as an example for future reference.
Posted by: onetimegeek | October 21, 2007, 3:34 am 3:34 am
I just discovered that a couple points I made in my previous comment (see prying1 comment above) were factually wrong. I stated, “WHAT was in the letter the democrats signed about? What did it say? – A simple link to the auction would allow people to read it for themselves.”
I have since found that you did indeed link to the auction (Paragraph 5) and the letter (Paragraph 10).
I apologize for making my statement prior to clicking the links which led to the auction and letter . I should have checked my facts before rushing to judgment. – Sorry again.
~~~~~
See how easy that was?
Your turn.
Posted by: prying1 | October 21, 2007, 4:47 am 4:47 am
He should email, make t-shirts, print fliers and bumper stickers quoting his comment. Americans need to witness this soul-destroying hatred that has infected the liberal psyche. And he is a perfect example of this diabolical malevolence that replaces reason and kindness. The problem is-he thinks he has no problem.
——————————————————————————–
Who wants to wager some money that ABC pulls this post? I bet they will soon pull this utterly embarrassing blog post?
Any takers?
Pretty soon somebody in upper management will get wind of this post and demand it come down.
Don’t get me wrong. I hope it stays up forever.
This truly will go down as a “milestone!” a “turning point!” or the “death knell” of the mainstream media’s slow slide into irrelevancy and onto the ash heap of history.
I can hear the screaming and gnashing of teeth as I’m typing this comment.
But seriously, this post is a perfect illustration of the conscienceless, intentional abandonment of the truth and somebody will demand it come down.
Any bets?
——————————————————————————–
Here’s my favorite:[And it's good]
“ABC, this kind of mendacious lying by omission is why so many people believe the sooner the Main Stream Media dies, the better.”
“It’s taken decades of systematic half-truths, liberal spin, and outright dishonesty to destroy the near-reverence your audience once had for you.”
“This latest piece crosses the line into the shock-jock territory of Howard Stern.”
Timewaster is currently calling them on it.
Posted by: Andy B | October 21, 2007, 7:56 am 7:56 am
Here’s a comment from Steve that was an accurate account of what has happened, but for some (ahem) “unknown” reason keeps getting deleted. Several of my comments and probably dozens, if not hundreds, of others have also been censored.
This is what Steve wrote:
“OK. Since my comments keep getting edited by faceless liberal hacks I will continue to post this:
How it all started:
1. ABC News runs a story on phony soldiers on Monday or Tuesday.
2. Rush does a morning update on the ABC Phony soldiers story.
3. Wed. caller on Rush’s show complains about Jesse Metcalf, a true convicted phony soldier.
4. Rush says “yeah the phony soldiers”.
5. Media Matters take two words out of context in an attempt to paint Rush as unpatriotic and unsupportive of anti war troops. All not true.
6. Media Matters (A Hillary Clinton 501c3)flashes CBS, NBS, ABS, CNNBS, PMSNBS, and the democratic leadership in congress. No one contacts Rush to ask him what he said.
7. The drive by media run with the Media Matters smear.
8. Dingy harry, in order to deflect some of the bad press from the Move-on Betray us ad in the New York Times, (That really backfired on the democrats by the way) decides to right a letter urging a private citizens’ business partner spank Rush for his outrageous words that he never said. 40 other democrat senators also sign. (See the usual suspects)
9. Mark Mays get the letter from Dingy Harry and offers it to his friend Rush. It was Mays letter and he can do that.
10. Rush announces that he will put the smear letter on ebay for Charity.
11. Letter to go to the highest bidder in a Zero Haliburton brief case. (thats to tick off the libs and energize rush listeners and supporters)
12. Bids go higher and higher for the smear letter.
13. Rush vows to match high bid. Challenges Dingy Harry to do the same.
14. at twelve o’clock on the final day of the auction, one hour before it is scheduled to end, Dingy harry takes to the Senate floor to make himself look like he was apart of the whole process. he, of course was not. the outrage of the abuse of power is what drove the auction, not to mention republican disgust with Dingy Harry over the issue.
15. Dingy Harry uses the pronoun we in his remarks and constantly mispronounces the name of Mark Mays, not may Dingy Harry, on the Senate floor. (watch the video on cspan2)
16. Media Matters flashes the reporter on this left wing democrat mouthpiece “news” outfit.
17. An article gets posted on the blog that has specks of truth, but kinda make Dingy harry look like a good guy. Instead of the impotent hack that he in fact is.
18. Many posters try to correct the information in said article and some of their posts are edited and deleted. Especially the ones that mention the Media Matter- ABC connection. You see, these reports have their leg work done for them by Media Matters. It is easier that way, and you don’t have to deal with the fact that Dingy Harry is a complete tool.
Posted by: James W | October 21, 2007, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Get the facts straight please, “phony soldiers” referred to are just that. Not what you refer to as those who don’t believe in the war!
Posted by: Robert | October 21, 2007, 9:37 am 9:37 am
More censorship. Kills you that you’ve been caught, hasn’t it? What’s the matter ABC? Afraid of a website that caters to the military? It’s the soldier that protects free speech, not some moonbatic journalist. Oh, and I see you removed my last name. I’m not afraid to state my convictions and put my name on them. Why are you? You don’t HAVE a monopoly anymore.
http://usmilnet.com/smf/index.php
Open to all who support the military
Kevin Burns
Veteran, US Army
Administrator, USMILNET.COM
“Rebel”
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 21, 2007, 11:12 am 11:12 am
I’ve started saving this webpage and will continue to do so as soon as I see a post I’ve made deleted. I advise you guys to do the same. These idiots are deleting our comments to protect their own agenda.
http://usmilnet.com/smf/index.php?topic=10926.0
Open to All
Kevin Burns
Veteran, US Army
Administrator, USMILNET.COM
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 21, 2007, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Man, if the government shut these fools up like they’re doing us, they’d bitch to high Heaven.
I’ve started saving this webpage and will continue to do so as soon as I see a post I’ve made deleted. I advise you guys to do the same. These idiots are deleting our comments to protect their own agenda.
http://usmilnet.com/smf/index.php?topic=10926.0
Open to All
Kevin Burns
Veteran, US Army
Administrator, USMILNET.COM
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 21, 2007, 11:13 am 11:13 am
thanks James. I knew they would delete it again. check out how times I have had to post this deal (at bottom)
OK. Since my comments keep getting edited by faceless liberal hacks I will continue to post this:
How it all started:
1. ABC News runs a story on phony soldiers on Monday or Tuesday.
2. Rush does a morning update on the ABC Phony soldiers story.
3. Wed. caller on Rush’s show complains about Jesse Metcalf, a true convicted phony soldier.
4. Rush says “yeah the phony soldiers”.
5. Media Matters take two words out of context in an attempt to paint Rush as unpatriotic and unsupportive of anti war troops. All not true.
6. Media Matters (A Hillary Clinton 501c3)flashes CBS, NBS, ABS, CNNBS, PMSNBS, and the democratic leadership in congress. No one contacts Rush to ask him what he said.
7. The drive by media run with the Media Matters smear.
8. Dingy harry, in order to deflect some of the bad press from the Move-on Betray us ad in the New York Times, (That really backfired on the democrats by the way) decides to write a letter urging a private citizens’ business partner spank Rush for his outrageous words that he never said. 40 other democrat senators also sign. (See the usual suspects)
9. Mark Mays gets the letter from Dingy Harry and offers it to his friend Rush. It was Mays letter and he can do that.
10. Rush announces that he will put the smear letter on ebay for Charity.
11. Letter to go to the highest bidder in a Zero Haliburton brief case. (thats to tick off the libs and energize rush listeners and supporters)
12. Bids go higher and higher for the smear letter.
13. Rush vows to match high bid. Challenges Dingy Harry to do the same.
14. at twelve o’clock on the final day of the auction, one hour before it is scheduled to end, Dingy harry takes to the Senate floor to make himself look like he was apart of the whole process. he, of course was not. the outrage of the abuse of power is what drove the auction, not to mention republican disgust with Dingy Harry over the issue.
15. Dingy Harry uses the pronoun we in his remarks and constantly mispronounces the name of Mark Mays, not may Dingy Harry, on the Senate floor. (watch the video on cspan2)
16. Media Matters flashes the reporter on this left wing democrat mouthpiece “news” outfit.
17. An article gets posted on the blog that has specks of truth, but kinda make Dingy harry look like a good guy. Instead of the impotent, power a busing hack that he in fact is.
18. Many posters try to correct the information in said article and some of their posts are edited and deleted. Especially the ones that mention the Media Matter- ABC connection. You see, these reporters have their leg work done for them by Media Matters. It is easier that way, and you don’t have to deal with the fact that Dingy Harry is a complete tool.
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am
ABC are you scared of the truth? It will set you free. Free like the exchange of ideas that libs everywhere go on and on about. Free like healthcare and government cheese.
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2007, 11:54 am 11:54 am
“Would this charity be recieving four million dollars if Harry hadn’t written the letter? NO”
Would this charity be getting this money if we hadn’t invaded Iraq? No. What’s your point?
Posted by: Pablo | October 21, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
DS is the “wicked,” “fiendish” face of the Democrat party. He should email, make t-shirts, print fliers and bumper stickers quoting his comment. Americans need to witness this soul-destroying hatred that has infected the liberal psyche. And he is a perfect example of this diabolical malevolence that replaces reason and kindness. The problem is-he thinks he has no problem.
Posted by: Andy B | October 21, 2007, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Churchill,
“What kind of example is Dingy Harry setting for his grandchildren, and this man is the leader of the democrat party in the senate. Disgraceful. Shame on you dingy Harry. I predict a Daschelesque future for the esteemed gentleman from Nevada.”
I’m from Nevada and this statement is EXACTLY what is going to happen in 2010. Only in SPADES!!!!!
K/H D
Posted by: SQUADRON79 | October 21, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
As opposed to remarking on Betty Casey’s apparent “disparate political interests” has it occurred to the ABC braintrust that Casey donates to people who run against Hillary?
Obama seems to be the only Democrat she’s ever donated to, but he has that one thing in common with Guiliani and Rick Lazio, both of whom she donated the max to. He’s also the only person that has a prayer of knocking her out in the primary.
The obvious conclusion is that it isn’t donating to Obama as much as it is donating against Hillary. Or it would be obvious if you were objective.
Posted by: Pablo | October 21, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
ABC The MC-LEF is also for the benefit of law-enforcement officer’s children, for those killed in the line of duty. A little fact checking would be nice.
Posted by: Bill | October 21, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
While Z. Byron Wolf’s well-crafted press release for the DNC can be simply framed as part of a larger controversy, there is a severe and longstanding consequence to his political allegiance: A democracy will perish without a free press. Wolf’s coverage of this event serves only a political ideology, with no value at all given to the facts or original actions of the principals. The new media of Internet et al. may be untamed and tangential, but it is our current best chance for a free press, and a free press would destroy organizations like ABC News.
Posted by: Elkerton | October 21, 2007, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
How in the hell is this:
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
accurate?
Open to All who support the military
Kevin
Veteran, US Army
“Rebel”
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 21, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
I believe the only explaination for this Z. Byron Wolf abomination, is that ABC News have decided to compete with MSNBC for the “nutroots” crowd. And this Z. Byron fellow is their version of Keith Olbermann.
If that’s the case, (and I believe it is) I don’t fault them for doing what they have to, to survive. Because, after all, if like ABC you are (1) wedded to the socialist doctrine (2) believe that America is always wrong and it’s up to you to make it right ; and (3) realize that the numbers of people who believe in (1)and( 2) are rapidly dwindling. You have no other choice but to do what they are doing. Get in on the ground floor before it’s to late.
Good luck with your new show, “COUNTDOWN WITH Z. BYRON WOLF”.
Posted by: Mike | October 21, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
How in the hell is this:
“The bidding ends at 1:00p.m. No mater what, Democrats are going to make a ton of money for a charity off their political vitriol.”
accurate?
Open to All who support the military
Kevin
Veteran, US Army
“Rebel”
Posted by: Kevin Burns | October 21, 2007, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
ABC just CANNOT get it straight – Rush did not refer to any and all soldiers opposed to the war as “phoney soldiers”
He was specifically referring to a few soldiers who are actual frauds and liars. They wrote lies about their “experiences” (that never happened) in Iraq and were later exposed. Kind of like the Bush national guard memo – REMEMBER THAT?
Posted by: Steve the Signpainter | October 21, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
ABC is not interested in the truth of this story. The point was and is to smear Rush. If a democrat senator shows his arse while driving the story line (Rush hates the troops) then, they (CBS, NBS, ABS, CNNBS, PMSNBS,) will cover for him. That is what ole Z Byron was doing. I know that it is difficult to believe, but I have seen it over and over. I bet Z Byron never even called Rush.
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Absolutely amazing editorial. Oh this was a news report you say. Tsk Tsk. Someone needs to take a refresher on the difference.
Try reporting the facts, then giving your editorial opinion.
The efforts of Democrat Senators has been limited in this matter to an illegal attempt to silence a private citizen’s free speach.
Be careful ABC, you may be next.
Posted by: Gus Bailey | October 22, 2007, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Kudos to Rush for raising money for such a worthwhile cause. It’s unfortunate that so many in the media misrepresent the facts and mislead people into believing that Harry Reid or any of the Democrats had anything to do with this auction. If Harry Reid wants any credit at all, he would agree to also match the winning bid as Rush is doing.
Posted by: ProudConservative.com | October 22, 2007, 10:22 am 10:22 am
ABC “News” has no credibility anymore, you lose.
Posted by: DirtCrashr | October 22, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
When are the 41 idiots that signed the letter going pony up thier 2.1 million to match Rush’s ????
Never, because the truth is it is THEY who don’t support our troops, or thier families.
Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2007, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
OK, now that I’ve got your attention, Mr. Wolf… you’ve suffered enough …but do yourself a favor… start listening to Rush every day for a while… and have a nice day. Seriously.
Posted by: Michael G. | October 23, 2007, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Re: Brian | Oct 19, 2007 7:09:53 PM
Give credit where credit is due. The Democrat-controlled Congress has passed several bills to give names to federal courthouses and post offices.
Among the bills signed into law by President Bush is “H.R.342: To designate the United States courthouse located at 555 Independence Street in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ‘Rush Hudson Limbaugh, Sr. United States Courthouse.’” Named after the first Rush Hudson Limbaugh, Rush Hudson Limbaugh III’s grandfather.
Posted by: Vince | October 23, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Yeah, but Bush misled them into naming those buildings.
Posted by: Steve | October 23, 2007, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm