Craig Decides to Stay on as GOP Senator
ABC News’ Jake Tapper Reports: Disgraced Republican Senator Larry Craig announced Thursday he will continue to serve as an Idaho senator despite the fact a judge denied his request to withdraw his guilty plea in connection with a bathroom sex sting.
"I am extremely disappointed with the ruling today," read Craig’s statement released Thursday afternoon. "I am innocent of the charges against me."
Craig’s statement went on to read: "I will continue to serve Idaho in the United States Senate, and there are several reasons for that. As I continued to work for Idaho over the past three weeks here in the Senate, I have seen that it is possible for me to work here effectively."
However Craig said he will retire and not seek reelection when his term expires in 2008.
Craig’s decision to stay through 2008 is not going over well among Republicans on Capitol Hill who have made it clear they want Craig to go.
In his statement Craig also cites his committee assignments below as a reason for him to stay.
"I have accumulated seniority and important committee assignments that are valuable to Idaho," he writes. The statement is especially odd since one month ago the Senate Leadership stripped him of his committee assignments while he’s being investigated by the Ethics Committee.
"He’ll have an awful lot of distraction," said a Senior GOP Senate leadership aide, saying he doesn’t think it possible for Craig to serve effectively.
Craig’s senate office released the statement hours after a judge handed down a scathing denial to Craig’s request to have his guilty plea withdrawn in connection with a bathroom sex sting.
In a 27-page order, Judge Charles A Porter, Jr, hammers down every explanation Craig had offered to justify withdrawing his August plea of guilty.
Porter finds Craig’s plea accurate, voluntary, and intelligent. He rules the conviction for disorderly conduct was supported by the evidence and the charge itself is a legitimate one for society to prosecute.
The Judge suggests that Craig’s motion was politically motivated — which is not a valid legal reason.
He notes that Craig "has not expressed dissatisfaction with the actual terms of his sentence, which consists solely of a financial penalty of $575 provided that he does not commit any same or similar violations for one year. Likewise (Craig) does not challenge the actual validity of the conviction of the fairness or appropriateness of the negotiation. The timing of the motion relative to the social and political events that began when the case became publicized … makes the motion untimely as it is politically, rather than legally, motivated."
He also notes "the Defendant’s relative diligence in seeking withdrawal …,The two month lapse in time between the arrest and the plea negates any reasonable conclusion that the questioning by Sgt. Karsnia in June overrode the Defendant’s free will in such a way that he was forced by events in June, to plead guilty in August."
He calls "illogical" Craig’s argument that he was confused and "was not admitting to have engaged in that conduct" for which he was charged.
"This Court believes that the Defendant’s plea had a more than sufficient factual basis on the face of the petition."
Craig’s office did not return requests for comment.
Email
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
LOL Sorry, Larry. You can run, but you can’t hide. Come out, come out, wherever you are!!! You’ll be a happier man when you just come clean to your wife, kids and the world that you’re a middle-aged gay man. It’s not that hard. Just say it. “I’m gay.” See how easy that was? Now find yourself a nice man to settle down with, and stop cruising public men’s rooms, ok?
Posted by: Scott | October 4, 2007, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Just another of those clean-vesseled,up-standing religious republicans…
Posted by: Lowell Browning | October 4, 2007, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
I liked that,lol…thanx for the humor Scott…heehaw
Posted by: Lowell Browning | October 4, 2007, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
You are CAUGHT!! just face it, admit to it and be done with it. No one in their right mind would agree to a charge like that, unless they were actually doing it. That’s like me stealing a car, being cuaght driving the car, admit to it, but then say oh I change my mind because I didn’t know what I was admitting to!!. . I did
Just come clean . .it’s out now!
Posted by: LaToya | October 4, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
whew. glad that’s over.
now we can move on…
NEXT!!!
Posted by: 4EYES | October 4, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Wonder what the next Republican scandal will be? It’s been a whole week since the last one…we’re due again.
Posted by: wilder5121 | October 4, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Nice job of “Photoshopping” him in over the pic of the bathroom stalls, LOL. ABC does it again! Can you say professional?
Posted by: Mitch | October 4, 2007, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Despite what the religious-right has brainwashed you into believing, there is actually nothing wrong with being gay. Be who you are, you’ll be happier that way and maybe you won’t have to resort to cruising public restrooms for sex anymore.
Posted by: TG | October 4, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
What a jerk – Craig, so he wanted some man sex at a stay over, big deal. We all do things we do not get caught for! To deny it is simply stupid, and unfair to everyone involved. You are an elected official for freak sake! The facts are undeniable that he was crusing, so what! Stop giving gay people a bad name!
Posted by: bush | October 4, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Damn activist judges legislating from the bench. Don’t judges know their place. When a good christian politician (is that an oximoron?) says he’s innocent the judge must see it that way. A good christian politician would never lie. (-;
Posted by: BooMan | October 4, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
good … i’m glad he is having to face the consequences of his actions .. but to those of you referring “religious, reblicans that just need to come out”, stop stereotyping & putting everyone into the same category … not all religious republicans are closet gays … Thank God!
Posted by: beheard70 | October 4, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Larry Craig is not gay. He was forced into confessing by the socialist police in Minneapolis. This was a set up by the newspaper who was on a witch hunt. He didn’t do anything wrong. He was in a narrow stall and his feet accidentally collided. And there is no crime in picking toilet paper off the floor.
Larry Craig should continue serving in the Senate and win reelection next year. He should continue with his crusade against homosexuality. He shouldn’t give up just because he’s being pressured to quit.
I would even go so far as to say he should run for president. That would really shake up the race.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 4, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Yeah.. LCING…. great idea! A president who caves to “socialist pressure”! That’ll shake things up alright.
I was waiting to hear your bit about the Easter Bunny but i guess it got cut off by some glitch.
Posted by: Nina Nealon | October 4, 2007, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
He was in a rush to catch his flight. He just wanted to put this all behind him. He thought the police would keep their word and not make this public.
Posted by: LarryCraigIsNotGay | October 4, 2007, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
So what says Senator Craig? Didn’t he have a comment?
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | October 4, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Congress should pass an amendment to condemn the Minneapolis police for playing politics.
Posted by: LarryCraigIsNotGay | October 4, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Well, if his career is over, he can always try out on broadway as a tap dancer! I’m sure he’d be great with that. Larry, Larry, Larry, you may have fooled your family in thinking you’r the victim of a witch hunt, but the we males both gay and straight, know that wide guy or skinny guy, you don’t stick your foot into the other stall and and touch the other guys foot and start tappin’. Just face it, you’re a hypocrit and a queen! Just come out already so we can move on.
Posted by: Andy | October 4, 2007, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
For last time: LARRY CRAIG IS NOT GAY!!! Stop spreading lies about this great man!
Posted by: LarryCraigIsNotGay | October 4, 2007, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Who cares if he’s gay or not? None of the gay people I know cruise airport bathrooms for anonymous sex. If he were looking for a female prostitute it would be just as illegal. The whole “gay” thing is just a red herring.
The real issue is that this man shows no signs of leadership, was caught in an illegal act, knowingly pled guilty to it (two months later, so no “late for my flight” defense is plausible), and lied about it to police, his family, and his constituents.
And for anyone who thinks it’s normal or explainable to peek between the cracks into occupied stalls in a men’s restroom, rub up against your neighbors feet, or lean down underneath the stalls– please don’t sit in the next stall to me.
Posted by: Sam | October 4, 2007, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Gay is gay is gay is gay… once you admit to it, you cannot decide you are not just because it suits you. Sorry Larry-Boy, but everyone has known you were gay for a long time. Now that you’ve been CAUGHT wide-stanced, you’re still gay. Why can’t you just come on out and admit your are gay? Ellen did and look what it did for her! She got a television talk show and everyone (except bible-thumpers) loves her. You’re GAY Larry.
Posted by: Stimpson J. Katt | October 4, 2007, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
my my … and this guy was elected twice by conservative republicans and supported by the religious right … and who are they going to support now?
Posted by: Jackson | October 4, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
The way I look at it is no one pleads guilty in to a lesser charge in a case like this to just “make it go away” unless they are guilty. I heard the tapes, read the transcripts, he’s not angry, he’s scared. A self-proclaimed anti-gay politician is being accused of soliciting sex from other men in a public restroom and he’s not getting fire and brimstone, he’s begging the cops to believe he’s “not like that”. This was a man terrified that his secret is coming out. I mean come on, who the heck picks up toilet paper off the ground of a public bathroom? I’m a tall, “wide” person too and no matter how narrow the stall is my feet have never slid under the stall next to me. he’s guilty. plain and simple.
Posted by: Wendy | October 4, 2007, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
His senate staff missed a golden opportunity for Sen.Craig to go public and say: I was only REACHING out to my gay constituents and trying to understand their POSITIONS. case closed…next
Posted by: daddy | October 4, 2007, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
To LarryCraigIsNotGay – If that hogwash you wrote in this post is what you need to believe in order to sleep at night, then so be it. Larry Craig is a closeted gay man. He got caught trying to solicit sex in a public restroom, and he plead guilty to it. He’s not stupid. He knows the law. And he plead guilty, hoping it would “go away”. He’s a liar and a hypocrite, and deep down he knows it, and we know it. And the sooner you accept it, the sooner you might find some peace for yourself, too.
Posted by: Scott | October 4, 2007, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
The most important lesson this whole affair teaches is how easy it would be under our system to set someone up.
First: Larry Craig went into a men’s room stall and spread his legs a bit too wide and his feet entered another stall. A bit wierd, I’ll admit, but the last time I checked–not a crime.
Second: Larry Craig allegedly picked up a piece of paper from the floor. A bit wierd, I’ll admit, but the last time I checked–not a crime.
Third: Larry Craig allegedly put his hand under the stall. Again, a bit wierd, I’ll admit, but not a crime.
The arresting officer alleges that these moves constitute signals that the person making them is seeking sexual favors. Can you prove that Sen. Craig knew that and it was his intention to send said signals? Or was this a set-up from the word, “Go”?
I do not know if Sen. Craig is homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual or what, or that he knew in advance what these “signals” meant. At this time it is no crime to be either, however, there are those holding religious views who would describe some of these sexual preferences as sinful. The point here is to illustrate how you or I could be set up by a scenario like this and accused of sending signals we may not have known anything about. Though many of us would want a Senator with better judgement, unless the police can prove Sen. Craig knew what those actions meant–they don’t have a case. Period.
One final question: Suppose instead of Larry Craig in that stall making those alleged moves, it was you? What happens when the shoe is on the other foot?
Posted by: dovestar | October 4, 2007, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
The problem is he plead GUILTY. And yes, the case is closed.
If I were in toilet stall and for some odd reason my foot collided with the guy next to mine, I would say I’m sorry and move it. I would not pick toilet paper off the floor but would leave it there. I would take some toilet paper off the role. And I would not touch the stall dividers.
And if some rogue cop flashed me his badge under the stall, I would ask him what the hell is going on. And I certainly wouldn’t plead guilty to “make it go away.” What a joke.
Posted by: forestpath | October 4, 2007, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
How can you say he is not gay? He was playing footsie, waving and giving the cop the thumbs up from underneath the stall.
Posted by: John | October 4, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
John, the point is there are a lot of people in denial. Pretty sad, but true. They go around in life and find their bodies doing things that they don’t quite understand. Then they play mind games to keep it away from their conscious minds. These people who keep denying the obvious have a lot of junk hidden in their trunk, so to speak. And they tend to vote Republican.
Posted by: forestpath | October 4, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
What’s funny is that we’re all so shocked when a Republican does something like this, but we expect it from a Democrat!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Ted Kennedy outright killed a woman and he’s still in Congress!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
We are doomed.
Posted by: havoc | October 4, 2007, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
No, gay democrats have no need to cruise public bathrooms looking for anonymous sex.
Posted by: forestpath | October 4, 2007, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Just resign and do us all a favor.
Posted by: TimTom | October 4, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Larry don’t resign! You did nothing wrong! Everyone knows you are not gay! Everyone knows you were set up! Stay and get reelected in 2008!
Posted by: LarryCraigIsNotGay | October 4, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
The real problem with the Craig issue is that apparently no one has taken 5 minutes to read the [1]transcript [2] the report that the Sgt had a lady prepare [3] the report that the Sgt completed and [4] the exact charges by the State of Minnesota against Craig.
It would appear that someone wanted Craig out of the political arena for over one year in Idaho or perhaps from Washington through the Idaho newspaper. Articles produced by the newspaper never had any conclusive evidence of ANY wrongdoing by Craig – but they went from month to month attempting over and over to present undocumented arguments to that favor. The only REAL PERSON that they mentioned was a Gay Activist that has been trying to pop Craig for years due to legislation that Craig approved that was not in agreeance with the gay community. Even the reporter from the newspaper almost broke up when CNN’s reporter tried to get him to give any of the evidence that he had when he wrote the article that got this whole debacle started in the first place. Really, why do the Republicans want Craig fried.
If you are of an opinion that INNOCENT UNTIL “PROVEN” GUILTY, then the media should refrain from entering the “gotcha” pulpit. This is a weird example of ALL OF THE MEDIA declaring to the PUBLIC that Craig was guilty within just a few minutes of hitting the tube. Every channel had him “guilty as sin” with no exception of “better take even one minute to examine the charges and also investigate the surface of the allegations by the officer”.
That transcript leaves a lot for even the simple “gotcha” reporter to determine that Craig was guilty without trial.
You betcha he erred in his thinking that “he had a problem and wanted it to just go away” – archaic thinking that it would just go away, but indeed he had a problem. Whether his REAL PROBLEM was REAL or not will probably never be known.
Again, I ask any of you to attempt to SIT ON THE STOOL TO THE LEFT OF THE OFFICER – PUT YOUR LEFT HAND UNDER THE RIGHT BOTTOM PANEL – without destroying your integrity. The officer said he SAW HIS HAND – LARRY ASKED HOW BECAUSE WHAT THE OFFICER WAS REFERRING TO [THE RING ON CRAIG'S FINGER] WAS ON LARRY’S LEFT HAND.
Also, be fair minded y’all and stand at the front of the stall – PEEK in through the 3/4″ opening and ask the person 40″ away to tell you what color your eyes are. Of course, the officer said he could see the “blue” in Larry Craig’s eyes. Apparently the officer has greater than 20/20.
Doesn’t it seem a bit irrational that when Craig walked into the room that ALL STALLS WERE OCCUPIED – and within 3 minutes, only ONE stall vacated – NEXT TO THE OFFICER. And THEN almost immediately when Craig sat his body down –ALL STALLS VACATED and then there were no more people in any of the stalls during the fiasco. Must have been a weird restroom.
You may gather from the foregoing that there is some doubt that Craig is guilty. Rather than sling stones, try INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
NO ONE has attempted to let that omen be included in their thinking. For some reason or other – the media has convinced ALL WHO READ-HEAR-SEE “CRAIG IS GUILTY”. There can be no doubt in any mind that Craig [a human also] is guilty and the Officer [a human also] is to be believed over the Craig rebuttal –without any investigation. If you believe that ALL OFFICERS OF THE LAW relate in their claims the truth and nothing but the truth –there is a man at the other end of the block that a left handed monkey wrench that you may decide you need.
Mindsets are easy – lawful- and accommodating to those who choose to shove the stuff past the nose of the person who wants THE FAIRNESS PRINCIPLE to be used in their case – and in the case of any person charged without actual and factual evidence.
There are only two who really know if Craig is guilty – Larry Craig and God. Those who want to play God – go at it. Craig can only play his own part – no one dares contest the other.
Posted by: WILLIAM J CLEMONS | October 4, 2007, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
In this country, you are guilty if you plead guilty. If guilt can only be known by the defendant and God, then really no one can be said to be guilty which is an absolutely ridiculous thing to say. The media have every right to jump in on this as he is a public figure and now has a criminal record. End of story.
Posted by: forestpath | October 4, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
After seeing the police report, there’s no indication that the officer was making anything up. Craig stood outside the stall and peered through the crack a VERY long time. He lifted his foot and placed it on the officer’s foot, not just making side to side contact. He ran his left hand (his no ring finger) under the bottom of the stall wall dividing the toilets. These are all classic cruising behaviors.
Posted by: smisky | October 4, 2007, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Geoman – Sorry – I don’t get it…HE CONFESSED! He IS guilty!!
Posted by: Huh? | October 4, 2007, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Okay, I don’t think the gay community really wants to claim him. So go home have sex with your wife and then everyone can claim you are heterosexual-because you had sex with a women.
Posted by: Bruce | October 4, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
No laws may have been broken. But fines or probation have little to do with this mess.
This is just one more rebublican that has been tripped up.He has been caught living a lifestyle that is directly against everything that he was supposed to have stood for. Churches across America are not blind.The true color and character of the GOP keeps coming into view each week.
Posted by: Lowell Browning | October 4, 2007, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
OUTSTANDING! When conservative Idaho voters go to the polls they will look at their ballot and have to choose between a Democrat they don’t know or a Republican they don’t know…and after Larry Craig…they just may choose to change direction. I love it.
Posted by: Looken | October 4, 2007, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
dovestar – “Third: Larry Craig allegedly put his hand under the stall. Again, a bit wierd, I’ll admit, but not a crime.” Remarkable. Yes it IS. Read the cops report, read the law. This is the WHOLE point.
Posted by: mrdbond | October 4, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Larry Craig is gay. He plead guilty to a crime of attempting to solicit sex from a MAN in a public restroom. You cannot admit to being gay any more than than other than putting on the pink shoes and tap dancing across the television screen with that little furry guy that does the sweating with the oldies crap. I’m not saying that there is anything wrong with being gay, I’m saying that there is something wrong with DENYING you are gay when everyone on the entire planet KNOWS you are gay. Larry, you have been denying you are gay for YEARS. Why is this? Why would you have to deny such a thing for so long if you were not in fact Gay or Bisexual or a pervert of some kind that likes to pick up strange men (and nasty bits of urine soaked paper) in public bathrooms? You plead Guilty to “make it go away”. WHAT? How is that going to make it go away? If you are not trying to finally admit somehow that you are indeed gay by pleading guilty, what were you thinking? Wide stance, yeah right. you knew the game and how it is played and you stepped right in and dealt your hand. JUST ADMIT IT and get over it! Admitting you are gay will be less earth-shattering than all your pandering and whimpering and whining that you are not gay. Get it over with.
Posted by: Dr. Jim DeOwl | October 4, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
LarryCraigIsNotGay
Plese explain how Larry was “setup”…did the police know that Larry Craig was going to go to the restroom and much less know which set of restrooms at any airport he would pick. The police officer was already in the stall working on what has been a problem for that airport in the past. Come on explain “setup”
Posted by: TomV | October 4, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Correcting my horrible typing:
I meant to say “You cannot admit to being gay any more than that, other than putting on the pink shoes and tap dancing across the television screen with that little furry guy that does the sweating with the oldies crap”
Posted by: Dr. Jim DeOwl | October 4, 2007, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Those are MY pink shoes, and he can step right in and tap dance anytime he wants. Lookit those eyes… the man is gay, gay, gay! Nobody that’s NOT gay goes into a restroom and feels up someones leg in the stall next to them unless they are G A Y.
Posted by: Pink Shoes | October 4, 2007, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
GIVE ME A BREAK !
All this talk about a set up because he’s a bigotted anti-gay hating hyprocrite. It’s probably true that the police set him up by sitting in a stall knowing that he would get into a airport, choose a bathroom completely out of the way and know to be “cruisy”, know that he would choose a stall, know that he would choose the “right” stall, know he would peek into the stall, know he would rub his hand under the stall wall, know he would “pick up toilet paper” all at the right time. That is one smart police force to be able to put that together.
Posted by: GiveMeABreak | October 4, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
I’m never going into a public restroom again.
Posted by: Where's Waldo | October 4, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
I agree with GiveMeABreak, except that the main thing here is that the police were in that restroom arresting perverts because of complaints made by other men that had been hit on way before Larry the Gay GOP even arrived at the airport. This had been an ongoing problem, and Larry walked right in and dropped his pants. Seriously, how much more guilty can that be? Larry’s gay. Yep. Gay Gay Gay. That’s what Larry is. Look at the pictures of him and his “wife” while he’s crying to the press that he’s NOT GAY. You can see it in her eyes.
Posted by: Dr. Jim DeOwl | October 4, 2007, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Unbelievable! What gift for the Dems. I guess Craig felt he was going unless David Vitter went,too. Vitter must be worried.
Posted by: April Campbell | October 4, 2007, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Let’s get it ‘straight’ once and for all (pun intended). It matter not on the personally intimate level whether Senator Craig is gay, bisexual, and/or straight for that’s really a very personal matter that he seems unwilling to deal with. However, his self-hatred and extreme psychological pathology manifests itself in such a way as to do damage to other people. That is, it’s the ‘pathology’ that then manifests itself in the way he votes on issues that affect gay etc., people. For that reason and that reason alone this man is a danger to society and, perhaps even more importantly, to his wife and children. They may go blindly along with his espousing that he’s ‘straight’, but, surely they must intuitively know that this man that’s so very close to them is sick. The ‘sickness’ further manifests itself, beyond the self-hatred, in his facility to lie. He says he’ll resign if there is no decision reversal by the Minnesota judge and yet he does not. Further, he’s narcissistic to the point of indifference when it comes to the greater good and the opinion of his peers. Despite all the the pressure for the sick Senator to leave office – he won’t because it’s only his ego he cares about and, other than that, he’s emotionally frigid.
Posted by: DrBehavior | October 4, 2007, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Clarity here — he did not plead guity to solicitation. he plead guilty to a lesser charge. He cannot be “proven guilty” because the people do not get the opportunity to see him in a court of law. He chose to forgo his rights to be considered innocent until proven guilty when he copped his plea. If you were a US senator being accused of something you didn’t do, with as flimsy of stuff as they had, wouldn’t you fight it? I can’t imagine any circumstance where a person of his stature would plea bargain except one of guilt.
Posted by: Wendy | October 4, 2007, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Does anyone really believe he won’t run again when his term is up? He has lied about everything else.
Posted by: Steve R. | October 4, 2007, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
So… first he says he’s not gay when accused of it , but then gets caught in soliciting gay sex in the airport men’s room. Then he says he’s guilty but then says he’s not guilty. Then he says he will resign from the senate but then says he won’t resign. Now he says he’s staying in the sentate but won’t run for re-election.
Given his recent statements its pretty clear that he is going to flip-flop again later and decide to run for re-election.Talk about a man of convictions.
Posted by: Patrick | October 4, 2007, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
The poor Repubs… getting set up by the evil God-hating liberal police and the evil God-hating liberal press. Spending all that money on their ’cause’. Geez you’d think they were Dems with all that whining…
What a joke. There is no conspiracy. He was busted trying to commit a lewd act in a public restroom. He should grow some and own up to it rather than admitting to it, then denying it, then resigning, then unresigning, then making more lame excuses. What a poor excuse for a leader, gay or straight.
Posted by: JHA | October 4, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
If I am using the restroom as intended, and someone flashes a badge under the stall, my response would be ‘What the Heck?’ or something to that degree. If I am doing something illegal, and someone flashes a badge, I would probably also yell “No!” just as Larry did.
If you are not guilty, then you don’t plead guilty. He was fine with being guilty until the story broke. He should have just come out of the closet then and admitted he was gay. It would have been so much easier for him. Now he’s giving he seat away to the Dems on a platter.
Posted by: LarryComeOut | October 4, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
We think he is effectively in love with another senator or three and a couple underage male pages, so leave him alone. Don’t ask don’t tell is the RNC leadership motto, approved by Cheney and Bush.
Posted by: happie guy | October 4, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
It just goes to show republicans are hypocrites and liars….Craig is… as he said he would resign Sept 30th, and then he said he would stay til judge rules…the judge did and now Craig is dragging his party further down and making his party look even worse by staying..what an ass!but the republican arty is full of them
Posted by: Susan | October 4, 2007, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
I love it. Another nail in the GOP coffin in 2008. It just don’t get any better than this.Another REPUBLICAN LIAR like BUSH and CHENEY..The entire Republican Party is ROTTEN to the core. core.We need more Republican scandals.
The more the better.The GOP is going to be out of power for the next 50 years with the likes of the Republican MORONS in Washington today….Thanks.
Posted by: Joe Murphy | October 5, 2007, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Larry Craig is not gay. The Dems are on a witch hunt to try to force Repubs. out of office in order for the Dems to win control of the Senate. It is a well-known fact in national Presidential politics that private investigators are hired to destroy perfectly good politicians to make way for them. This is dirty rotten politics. Both parties engage in this and frankly its getting very tiresome. Our country is suffering from the dirty politics on both sides and our domestic policies are suffering. Our nasty politicians are not doing the peoples business which is what they were elected to do, while these search and destroy missions are taking place. If you have to engage in this kind of behavior to get elected, you do not deserve to be in office either.
Posted by: Sarah Linderman | October 5, 2007, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Surprise, surprise! Why do I want to believe Senator Craig? He doth protest too many times to be believable.
I would not be upset if he were or were not gay. I find this whole episode just one more lie to himself, family and the American people. I am tired of dishonest politicians.
Posted by: Nancy | October 5, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Enough is enough about Craig. He just might be the catalyst for Idaho voters to turn their four electoral votes blue come Nov. 4. Let’s move on to more important scandal’s like the current one brewing in Tulsa regarding traditional Republican supporter Richard Roberts at Oral Roberts University. I’m surprised this AP story airing Oct. 2 hasn’t garnered more attention.
Posted by: GC | October 6, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Larry Craig is a typical, hypocritical, power-hungry, lying Republican. They’ll do anything, legal or illegal, to gain and keep power. If that sleazy, disgraceful bigot doesn’t resign his office, the Senate should throw him out. That phony just voted against extending hate crime protection to homosexuals too. He doesn’t want them to have “special rights.” (even though he himself is one) Meanwhile, religion is already covered by hate crimes laws. So if a Christian is victimized because he or she is a Christian, they are protected by hate crimes laws. I guess it’s OK for them to have “special rights”. What a bunch of scumbags Republicans are.
Posted by: Republicansarescum | October 8, 2007, 8:41 am 8:41 am