You Get a Car! You Get a Car! You Get a Car!
The email from the Obama campaign arrived in my inbox at the crack of dawn.
"OPRAH WINFREY TO TOUR EARLY STATES WITH BARACK OBAMA," screamed the headline.
And yes, goddess Oprah Winfrey will try to do for Barack Obama what she did for Wally Lamb.
I know this much is true: on December 8th and 9th, O will join Obama at events in Iowa, South Carolina, and New Hampshire. All events will be free and open to the public, the campaign says.
While in general I remain skeptical of the power of endorsements (Gore, Bradley and Harkin for Howard Dean, anyone?), especially regarding celebs (Robert Duval for Rudy? Chuck Norris for Huckabee?), O is to millions of American women more akin to the leader of a movement than "just" a talk show host a la Ellen, Rosie, Jay and Dave.
Why is that?
Will O make a difference for Obama?
- jt
UPDATE: My brilliant wife — who also happens to be a junior clergywoman at the Church of Oprah — says that if the Obama campaign was really wise, they might have Oprah also come to Iowa the day after the Iowa Caucus — for an event only Caucus-goers would be able to get into. That would increase turnout at the Caucuses for Obama, she suggests. How would you best use the star-power of O?
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
I think she will make a difference for Obama. I think Winfrey has earned the trust of her devoted fan base and for some in that number that trust will carry over into the selection of a presidential candidate. I do not think Obama will be the Democratic nominee, however.
Posted by: DKNY | November 26, 2007, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Dear DKNY, Oprah will have a profound effect and Obama will be the democratic nominee — for sure! Don’t let our country’s historical narrative fool you. People’s intellect and heart have evolved toward an inclusive America.
This said, there are still some residues of racism, chauvinism. classism and xenophobia, but these retrograde ways of looking at a political candidate are nearly marginal.
Voters who are denuded from these cancerous and anti-evolutionary concepts will see in Obama, no only an affirmed intellectual but a truly wise candidate whose judgement (as evidence in his well founded opposition to the Iraq war) is undeniably important in leading this country to the right path.
Posted by: Kunzi E. West | November 26, 2007, 11:22 am 11:22 am
sHE IS NOT A POLITICIAN AND SHE WILL HAVE NO EFFECT.
HOW DOES SHE THINK SHE WILL MAKE PEOPLE VOTE FOR OBAMA.SHE IS RICH AND CAN NOT REALLY CONNECT WITH RURAL PEOPLE WHO ARE THINKING OF THIER OWN PROBLEM. IF IT WERE IN SANTA MONICA,I WILL THINK OTHERWISE.
Posted by: CHARLIE | November 26, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Isn’t what your wife suggests coming awfully close to buying votes? Too close for my comfort… if not technically, then ethically.
Posted by: cms | November 26, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Oprah can do, of course, entertainment very well. But she has earned her credentials as a thoughtful person, too, because she has taken her talk show to a more cerebral level than some others. So, even though, say, the liberal Alec Baldwin, or the conservative Chuck Norris may be intelligent, their value as endorsers is mostly ceremonial. I think Oprah will take some women away from Hillary, and some rural folk away from Edwards, and she might make a difference. How would I use her if I were Obama? I would appear with her in public alot, of course, but I would also ask her to do what she does best—I would buy a block of a half hour or so, close to the caucuses, to be run in Iowa only, and have her talk to people about Iowa issues and Obama’s advantages.
Posted by: SteveW | November 26, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Does anyone want a Person who can not win the Presidency on their own merits anymore? This only shows if it works that people are brainwashed. Obama as clever as he is with his speeches written by someone else, now will have someone else running in his name. As seen in the debate he is has no experience and is very naive.
I think and hope the American people will look at the individual running not what celebrity is endorsing them.
Posted by: spock | November 26, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I think Jake’s brilliant (and creative) wife, would rather, the higher goal of citizens, exercising their franchise, by attending a caucus. Nowhere do I see any visit with the O tied to a vote for a particular candidate in her suggestion.
Posted by: flyover | November 26, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Oprah supports Obama because he is black. If anyone were to vote for someone merely because a hollywood superstar said “vote for him” then that would be akin to the religious right voting for Bush because the church people said “vote for him” and look where that has gotten us. Just look at all the facts and make an INTELLIGENT decision on your own. Too many people can NOT do that and need to be TOLD who to vote for. Are you one of them?
Posted by: TooMuchSilliness | November 26, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
TooMuchSilliness – yes if you use President Bush as an example, then we should listen to the so called Religous Right, we got a Great President out of it. It is only the libs that gives us lousey Presidents.
Posted by: spock | November 26, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
I hope we will listen and vote for who we want not who O wants. She’s great for TV and remember she has a staff who does most if not all her back ground check’s.It’s not like she went out and did the foot work.
Posted by: Rose | November 26, 2007, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
A celebrity has the same right as anyone else to try and convince us to support a given candidate/issue/cause…no more, no less…they just have a bigger megaphone to do it with
Posted by: phillygirl64 | November 26, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Oprah has legions of fans…but when a candidate depends on a star’s power to create a big turn out one must remember it is the star power that causes the draw, not the candidate.
Posted by: troy masters | November 26, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Oprah is a great TV icon, but should stay out of politics, especially when it is race-based.
Posted by: Jim B. | November 26, 2007, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
The lady with more money than sense is over-estimating her influence.Obama however would make a great talk show host.Like Oprah he got a ready solution for every problem in the world.
Posted by: pickleramoji | November 26, 2007, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Miss Opraah needs to stay out of this. In many ways it will hinder and work against Obama. Oprah turns everything she supports into a religion with her at the alter. And her opinions fortunately are growing stale and cliched. If Oprah’s name is on any thing, I am not interested.
Posted by: Jan McNutt | November 26, 2007, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Its about time that Obama got a true celebrity to run around backing him…Hillary has been using Bill the whole time and there is not a bigger draw in the Democratic Party than him
Posted by: jackandjackie | November 26, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Ms.Winfrey will not change one vote. She can turn out the crowds but so what. President Clinton did not help Kerry in Ohio at that massive rally. Ms. Winfrey supports Obama because of the color of his skin and that is what makes him unelectable. And his astounding lack of experience. His debating skills are sophmoric. His message has no substance. Can Ms. Winfrey help in those areas. No. She will polarize the race issue. Mistake. Big mistake.
Posted by: Judith | November 26, 2007, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
The Big O won’t be able to help BO win the nomination, but she would be huge for him if he were going to win the nomination, but democrats, I believe are going to nominate another Clinton. I think most of the delegates may really like BO, but when it comes right down to it, the Clinton name still trumps everything. I think all this drama about her trailing him now is really good for her in the long run. She can now be the comeback kid, just like Billy. If her last name wasn’t Clinton, she would never have even been a senator. That’s the rock-star draw that brings democrats to support Hillary. Oh, and has she mentioned that she deserves to be president because she’s a woman? That’s going to count for quite a bit too. Southern hardcore democrats won’t support a black man any more than they would have voted for a Jew for president.
Posted by: TexBork | November 26, 2007, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Oprah campaigning with Obama is a joke.
I hope the voters in Iowa, NH and SC will not be swayed by this obvious showbusiness manoeuver because that is exactly what it is.
God help us all if we let Oprah pick our next President, especially one who is inexperienced.
Posted by: Jane Green | November 26, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Exhibit O for campaign reform – Neither their dollars or prowess should outweigh the volume of an individual’s voice – It goes for Oprah as well as OPEC.
Posted by: auggierocker | November 26, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Oprah can and will make a difference. If you don’t see this you are clueless to how the American mentality works. Oprah has enormouos credibility. Her endorsement sells books like no one else on this planet. Selling Obama will be even easier. Many like Obama better than Hillary but are reluctant to support such a young and apparently inexperiened candidate. An Oprah enorsement will give these people the courage to follow their instincts and go for Obama. She will have a significant impact.
Posted by: bob | November 26, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Does anyone want a Person who can not win the Presidency on their own merits anymore? This only shows if it works that people are brainwashed. Obama as clever as he is with his speeches written by someone else, now will have someone else running in his name. As seen in the debate he is has no experience and is very naive.
I think and hope the American people will look at the individual running not what celebrity is endorsing them.
Posted by: spock | Nov 26, 2007 1:33:14 PM
I just have one word if you’re a Hillary Supporter, no make that a few words, BILL, and CNN!
Posted by: Ayyub | November 26, 2007, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Ms O perhaps feels politically incline and willing to support an Amercian attitude and that is ” anything is possible if u work had to achieve it and u want it real bad!! Mr O feels he can be president and wants it real bad!
Common y’all she has the right!
Posted by: ThisisAmerica! | November 26, 2007, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Jane Green……I am shocked and awed by your comment it makes no sense. Celebirties have been supporting canidates for years and in some cases it made a difference. Why should any of us be surprised that a very successful woman who happens to be black endorse a very qualified man to be president who happens to be black. Get real we have live with the Bush and Clinton families for the past 20 years and look at the mess we are in. Oh yeah however the only difference is they are white I supposed and celebs certainly did endorse them. One thing is clear from several of the comments “Racism” remains alive and well with a lot’s of us “White” folks.
Posted by: murl41 | November 26, 2007, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Guess What!
Oprah has a over exaggerated sense of her own importance. Now I know who “NOT” to vote for. Thanks oprah
Posted by: fred | November 27, 2007, 6:49 am 6:49 am
it will do no good,,,,he will still lose
Posted by: rick | November 27, 2007, 8:13 am 8:13 am
How does Oprah campaigning for Barrack any different then Bill doing the same for Hillary, they are both celebrities. Is getting an endorsment froma a labor party any different than from a celebrity? I have seen many other people from the American Legion to AFLAC reps endorsing candidates and speaking at functions. Actually, it’s really part of the campaign process.
Posted by: vnvet68 | November 27, 2007, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Oprah will have to learn the lesson herself: anyone who plays in the political arena gets dirt on them. Look at all the religious leaders who suck up to politicians. I hope she has no skeletons in her closet. Regardless, after this, her reputation will be tainted.
Posted by: DaveM | November 27, 2007, 9:47 am 9:47 am
This rubs me the wrong way. Flashback to the 80s. Daytime TV was a cesspool, consisting primarily of game shows, soap operas and Proctor and Gamble ads. But there was one shining exception: Phil Donahue. Donahue paid respect to mothers by challenging them. He discussed the social issues that Oprah features, but he also covered politics. Hardcore. Donahue was a regular stop for campaigning politicians.
Then Oprah came along, and it’s all lets get our hug on and lets get our cry on. And politics? Too boring for O, I guess. I happened to see Oprah on Ellen (a couple of months ago), and she prefaced the Obama endorsement with “I don’t follow politics.”
Oprah has a captive audience of millions every day. Rather than engage her audience in politics, she chooses this new age-y caca and GET A CAR!!! Yes, she’s several notches above the bottom dwellers who do daytime talk. But you’ll have to forgive me if I don’t respect her newfound interest in politics. And wonder if it has more to do with charisma and star power than actual issues.
Posted by: cordelia525 | November 27, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Whether or not people like Oprah or Obama, the fact is she will influence a small percentage of Hillary’s base supporters- WOMEN.
If I were in Clinton’s camp I would continue my efforts to get women’s support, but I would look to my old friends and allies for their relationships.
Regardless of what happens in Iowa, it still appears that Hillary has a good lead in the other early states. The O’s have a lot of ground to cover. I don’t know if staying in Iowa the day after the caucus would be the best use of Oprah’s time. Perhaps a post caucus event that evening would be a better idea.
Posted by: CD | November 27, 2007, 11:00 am 11:00 am
clinton just put some make up on and you would first pick.
Posted by: mark | November 27, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Oprah Winfrey is certainly a wonderful person who does wonderful things around the country and the world. However, picking a president is a tad more serious than following a lead on an interesting book or today’s latest fahion for women. I think her endorsement will feed Obama’s ego a bit and get him some free publicity, but I think mature people have learned a hard lesson this past 7+ years and will think long and hard about their vote on the next person to lead our country (at least I pray so). Obama needs some more growing up, more maturity, more experience and certainly more finesse before I would ever trust him with the United States of America. We need a person of experience, knowledge of foreign policy, diplomacy, and last but not least, love for America and Americans. Obama is a fine gentleman who needs to stay a Senator for a while longer. Knowledge-wise and experience- wise, It would be like hiring a high school senior over a college grad to do an important job.
Posted by: Ron | November 27, 2007, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
This has to be the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard — relying on a TV personality to help win a political race. Oprah she remain in her “space” — which aint politics.
And what could be more ridiculous than arguing that Oprah’s support of Obama is ok because of Bill’s support of Hillary; they’re married for Christ’s sake. If Obama’s Wife wants to hit the campaign trail (which she has done), good. But Oprah is not Obama’s Wife — so they are comparing apples to oranges.
This is a potentially dangerous thing for Obama, and I hope he realizes it.
Posted by: JCT | November 27, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
STOP OPRAH!!!
She just got to get over her Color!!! why endorse now? why never before?
Right, no one was good enough for her endorsement before. Except this one BLACK candidate. What about women? what about latinos? what about whites? Asians?
Oh yeah, she just found all the right reason to endorse OBAMA?
It’s obvious people!! WAKE UP.
Posted by: blacknwse | November 27, 2007, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
I myself do not run out and buy something just because Ophra recommends it but their are so many people that are like a cult and can’t think for themselves.I have not made up my mind on who to vote for yet but think they are all full of it and say just what you want to hear in order to be elected.I don’t think they really listen to American citizens who want them to uphold the laws this Country was founded on.
Posted by: Lupe Phillips | November 27, 2007, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Have the people that write dissenting comments here watched Oprahs program over the years, seen what she has done in her community and in the world?
Why should a celebrity have a voice? Because this celebrity has done 1 million times more good in this world than anyone you know! ANYONE!
I don’t value her opinion because she is on tv, famous, or rich. I value it because she is an extremly knowledgeable and caring person who has found a voice in her belief in this man.
Let’s look deep in ourselves and determine how much of being president is knowledge and experience and how much is character. We havea 2 term limit. There is only so much experience you can get in 8 years, but people who have 50 years behind them in questionable character are not acceptable alternatives.
She CAN cost Democrats the Presidency. Barrack cannot lose if he is the candidate. Ask a republican who they want to win the primary. They all want Hillary to win, because they know she is beatable.
Posted by: Scott Schindler | November 28, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am
“what she has done in her community and in the world?” $25,000 for childhood cancer and $40 million for her private jet….um lets c..NOW that’s doing alot of good…for herself
Posted by: john | November 28, 2007, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Lets see Celebrities are dimwits, yes Oprah has done charity, just not for our country! that is besdies the point it is her money to do with as she wishes, that is the freedom here. but what does she know about the presidencey absolutly zilch, Obama has NO expierence whatsoever, he would be trampled on the world stage. The Presidency is not a On the Job Training position.
But then none of the Libs have experience, if Hilary does then Monica must have more since it seems she was in the oval office more times.
Edwards would not even of won in his home state.
On the other side of the aisle the top 3 Rudy, Fred, and Mitt all have the experience needed.
Posted by: spock | November 28, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Jake – By the way when I first read the headlins for this Blog, I though It was about Hilary offering a Car if you vote for her, since she is offering everything else these days.
Posted by: spock | November 28, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
I always liked how Oprah was unbiased when it came to politics in the past-that was part of her appeal as an “every woman”. I don’t think this is good for her image in the long-term. Oprah is great at choosing books and favorite items. However, what makes her qualified to choose a presidential candidate? I think she should stick to what she’s good at-entertainment. And Obama should stick to getting his message out instead of having a celebrity do it for him.
Posted by: Jeanne | November 29, 2007, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Her support can’t hurt!
Posted by: AuggieRocker | December 5, 2007, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Oprah gives advice on relationships, but has a boy friend who is a door mat … gives advice on marriage, but has never been married … gives advice on child rearing, but has no children … gives advice on Obama, but was a member of Jeremiah Wright’s anti-American racist church for several years. Now, her white women’s audience, which made Oprah rich, wants to know more about Sarah Palin, but Oprah says NO !!!
Posted by: Gina | September 5, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
OPRAH … from spending several years in Jeremiah Wright’s anti-American racist church, listening to sermons like “God Damn America”, and giving life time achievement awards to the likes of Louis Farrakhan … to her newest opportunistic religious beliefs … who could possibly take Oprah seriously? This woman’s ego is soooo big, being a billionaire celebrity isn’t enough, she has to start her own religion … not to mention all the additional money she is going to make selling all those book, tapes, CD’s, etc. to her poor followers. Oprah’s new power hungry ambitions include efforts to replace traditional America with Obama … and access to a President she puts into office … to her efforts at replacing Christianity with a new religion she controls. I think it’s time for America to deny Oprah access to our television sets.
Posted by: Howard | September 6, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm