Clinton Skirts Health Cap Details
ABC News’ Teddy Davis, Eloise Harper, and Jacqueline Klingebiel Report: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., is facing new scrutiny for skirting details on her proposal to cap personal health-care costs.
The former first lady has sought to assuage concern about her proposal that all Americans carry health insurance by telling voters that she, unlike her top Democratic rivals, would cap an individual’s health-care costs at a certain percentage of income.
But when challenged Friday on a conference call with reporters to specify what share of income is reasonable for Americans to have to devote to health care to satisfy the individual mandate, Clinton’s policy director avoided directly answering the question.
Neera Tanden, Clinton’s policy director, said the premium cap separates Clinton from Democratic rivals Barack Obama and John Edwards.
"We are different from every other person in this race by specifying that we would ensure that health care is never more than a certain percentage of income," said Tanden. "We do that because we are precisely concerned about the problem of affordability. We have an individual mandate; we understand that can create a burden on certain families. So that is why we specify that we will not provide, that no one would ever have to do more than a certain percentage of income."
She would not, however, say what share of income is reasonable for Americans to pay.
Ron Brownstein, the political director of Atlantic Media, called Clinton out on her evasiveness, saying, "How can people possibly judge whether an individual mandate is a good deal for them if they don’t know whether you are going to be asking them whether to spend 5, 10, or 20 percent of their income on premiums?"
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Once again, Obama is ahead of the curve by avoiding the mandate because it becoomes a mindfield of missteps. The real job with healthcare is to make it affordable enough that people are willing to pay in without force.
Posted by: RealB.G. | December 1, 2007, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Senator Clinton has a good healthcare plan but her evasiveness will make americans lose faith in her completely.
Why all these hide and seek with voters. I can judge mr Obama well bc he has said everything one needs to know about his plan. A bird in hand is worth ten in sky.
Senator Clinton pls tell us what u will do if someone does succumb to your plan? Fine him or fight him or what?
Posted by: EE | December 1, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Hillary has stated, (according to news reports) that she would garnish the wages of American citizens who do not join her health care plan!!! Does this include the illegal immigrants she wants to become citizens before they are accepted to ciitsenship? Do you need to know anything more about this arrogant Marxist than that? The more she tries to hide her intentions and the weakness of her plan, the more revealed they are.
Posted by: Virginia | December 1, 2007, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
What? Hillary Clinton not being Honest and Forthcoming about her healthcare plan! I am Shocked! LOL!
Posted by: reaganfan | December 2, 2007, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Massaging a health care plan into existence. No wonder how COngress can’t get anything done!!! She’s politicking the issue instead of making constructive decisions and judgments. Uh what I meant was…BOOOO!!!
Posted by: AuggieRocker | December 2, 2007, 1:33 am 1:33 am
What details?? Lots of rhetoric from Hillary, little substance. How will she pay for the chronically ill or termanally ill-those who drive the costs up? And how does she plan to contain these costs? Yes insurance will be mandatory-that is the only way she will be able to float this plan-everyone pays. What if one cannot afford both insurance and the mortgage, and still put food on the table? My employer “offers” insurance- at a rate that insures that very few will take advantage of it-thereby saving him money. He also offers a very limited plan that he calls health insurance, but in reality, will not even cover most minor claims.
To be sure, employers will find ways to avoid this mandate and shift costs.
Posted by: mark | December 17, 2007, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm