Huckabee Fights Back on Multiple Fronts
ABC News’ Kevin Chupka reports: It was a busy news day for the Huckabee campaign. From criticism out of camp Romney on his foreign policy and labeling him a Democrat, to Iowa mailers from Fred Thompson picking apart his tax and immigration plans, to the McCain campaign accusing Huckabee supporters of push polling in New Hampshire, Huckabee had many questions to answer at a media availability this evening in Littleton, New Hampshire.
Huckabee referred to a campaign release as his comment about Mitt Romney’s accusations. In the release from campaign director of research Joe Carter, Huckabee is quoted as saying "I am disappointed by Governor Romney’s attempt to label me as a "Democrat" because of my tough approach to foreign policy…Perhaps he should read the article in its entirety before making such ill-informed comments."
As for Sen. Thompson’s mailers, Huckabee referred to the Christmas season saying, "At the time of year when people typically go to the mailbox to get really nice greetings of Christmas cheer from their friends, it’s really pathetic that some campaigns have nothing else to do with their campaign money than to fill mailboxes with poison and really with anything but good cheer."
Huckabee continued to take a very strong stand against push polling, assuring reporters that he has asked for an investigation by the New Hampshire state attorney general into the negative calls. "Anybody who is doing this is probably must be doing it for another campaign, not mine, maybe trying to blame me for it" Huckabee said, "I have nothing but the utmost respect for Senator McCain. He’s a true American hero, he’s an outstanding individual and I can assure you I would never be party to any kind of attack upon him. "
Huckabee vehemently denied any connection to the group purportedly behind the calls, "Common Sense Issues."
Also of note from Huckabee, ever the storyteller, was a new element in his stump speech. He told the story of learning to steer an Olympic-style bobsled several years ago. During his tutorial, the 16-year-old instructor told Huckabee to "steer for the curve ahead." "The ice behind me can’t hurt me anymore…steer for the curve ahead," Huckabee recalled. Perhaps we witnessed a new campaign theme, but the context is just as interesting. With allegations of being soft on crime, suggesting AIDS patients be quarantined, and an oft questioned tax record from his tenure as Arkansas governor, Huckabee seems to be wanting to move forward, to "steer for the curve ahead" rather than worrying about his record.
Unfortunately for him, voters and rivals may not see things the same way as his record continues to be the focus of more than one opposition research team.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
I’ve been around a long time and can’t believe the political perfection of this guy Huckabee… I remember Jimmy Carter’s grassroots movement and his ability to bring over us Christian Conservatives to his camp… Huckabee’s movement is much more impressive… much more strong… and he’s defiantly going to bring the “Independent’s” over to his side.
I remember Ronald Reagan’s assent to the top… very impressive… But he “hemmed and hawed” a lot in interviews and debates… Huckabee NEVER flinches! I’m overwhelmed and extremely thankful to God Almighty for such a MIRICAL in modern politics… Thank you Lord for this wonderful politician… could not have come at better time… GO MIKE HUCKABEE GO!
Posted by: Randy | December 15, 2007, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
I like Huckabee. He needs to be careful not to alienate folks like me who do like him, but like Bush very much as well. I wish he would not have made the “arrogant” comment about Bush.
Posted by: Dana | December 15, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Huckabee is a fresh and clean face in the midst of the constant scandals and rot of DC politics.
Go Mike!!
Posted by: Moe | December 16, 2007, 12:20 am 12:20 am
The media’s trying to create some “holy war” between the “R” candidates and Huckabee should keep emphasizing the traits which make him attractive to independents including the fact that he will not let religion interfere with governing. Jimmy Carter (media darling) was never condemned or grilled to the ends of the earth for being a Southern Baptist- it’s only when it’s a Republican they acuse them of being a “theocrat”.
Posted by: Sandra Riley | December 16, 2007, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Huck is a winner and will continue supporting the “War on Thugs”, those 19 non-Iraq, 15 Saudia Arabia thugs who attack us on 9/11 by continuing the WAR FOREVER. Best of all, Huck will not reverse the Bush Presidential Executive Order 13438 which states,
“Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq, issued. The order asserts the government’s power to confiscate the property “of persons determined to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq or undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people.”
This is great News. Huck will be able to take the property (homes, cars, money) of any American who “pose a significant risk of committing” violence, or, if the goverment determines that an American is protesting “efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq”.
The very idea that the 1st Admendment rights of free speech and assembly would apply to war protestors is absurd. We must start taking there property now, that will shut them up. Yes, we must elect a pro-war Republican Christian, like, Huck to protect us from these anti-American war protestors. Jesus would agree, right?
Posted by: Greg | December 16, 2007, 1:09 am 1:09 am
For a Republican, Huckabee’s comments about President Bush were crap. You can criticize the management of the war, and I wish we’d never gone into Iraq, but a fellow Republican shouldn’t make such demeaning, personal statements about the President. All I saw in the article above is someone who wants to blame someone else for everything that happens to him. In other words, he’s the consumate whiner, plus he’s expert at deflecting questions about his history. Face it Huckabee supporters, he pressured the Arkansas parole board to parole a rapist because his friends convinced him the man had repented. Obviously, they were wrong. In case you didn’t hear it, the parole board thought he was lacking in knowledge of the case. A leader cannot always depend on his friends opinions, no matter how sincere they are. In this case had tragic consequences. I think he made a mistake in judgement, that’s all. I’m sure he is very sorry. I would have liked to see him admit he made a mistake instead of trying to make everyone else (the parole board) the fall guy. They’d already denied parole for the guy. Then after Huckabee met privately with them, they decided to grant a parole. I don’t think Huckabee will ever admit he made a mistake on anything. He’s slick in picking his words, but they ring shallow when you hear enough of them.
Posted by: Keno | December 16, 2007, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Can you believe this would be in a serious essay on foreign policy?
“we played Brer Fox to his Brer Rabbit. We threw him into the perfect briar patch”
What type of intelligent discussion is thisis this? Do we have to go back and read racist storybooks to know what it is he is talking about?
Besides that… Since when was Osama Bin Laden the “good guy”? Nice way to mock pour military and others who have gone out of their way to keep the Huckster free and safe. What do they get? Someone who compares them to a fox that got outsmarted by a rabbit… Nice.
Mine More thing… Why did he user Michael D. Huckabee when he wrote the essay instad of plain old Mike Huckabee. Is he trying to impress someone?
Posted by: Richard | December 16, 2007, 1:56 am 1:56 am
Huckabee’s an average talent with a spotty record and a Nixonian mean streak that doesn’t always make for actual results (versus Rudy, or McCain — both of whom have the Anger Thing, but tend to put it to positive use).
His call for a flatter tax system flies in the face of his Arkysaw years (he actually supports a national internet sales tax system, the so-called Streamlined Sales Tax, that would massively burden most web retailers, while creating huge new state bureaucracies), and his Bush bashing is just plain surreal, given Huckabee’s total lack of federal experience and military service (and sending the Hot Springs state Guard to Fort Polk ain’t being CIC, sorry Mike).
On the plus side, he does trust the Lord and not the unions, he does recognize AIDS as a largely containable if politically correct malady not at the top of the social needs list, and he does respond to self-anointed jerks in the press in the required 24 hours news spin cycle.
Posted by: QUESTION HILLARY tm | December 16, 2007, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Go Mike! Thank God you have brought this great man to the forefront
That our once great Nation may be saved yet again, thank you God,
Mark
Posted by: Mark | December 16, 2007, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Huckabee has every right to defend himself and it will be quite convenient knowing that he will have to confront the likes of Romney. Especially because of his ties to the Mormon church. They are a secretive and exclusionary organization that many people simply are ignorant or made to not know about. I have Mormons for neighbors and despite the alleged “diversity” that the church upholds, they seem to operate under their original doctrine of treating minorities with inferior and condemning status. That explicitly racist doctrine was in effect in their church constitution up until the late 1970s, where only political pressures made them change it. Their so-called prophet and leaders today of the church have been explicitly asked if the revoking of that doctrine was a mistake, and they have explicitly answered that it WAS a mistake to revoke the racist doctrine. People say how we should not condemn Romney’s religious background or give him unfair treatment. I’ll leave the Mormon church alone only if they somehow explain their seemingly institutionalized bigotry. I know protestant churches have members who are bigoted, no doubt, but there is a difference between individuals and institutions practicing and condoning this kind of blatant bigotry. If I vote republican, I don’t want all this baggage that Romney contains. The clear and straightforward Huckabee will be my clear choice.
Posted by: Andrew | December 16, 2007, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I’m not Mormon, but I’ve lived around them & studied the religion. Tell us where to see this Church Constitution is? You’re despicable to spread such outright lies about a church of very decent people. I hope you don’t claim to be a Christian, because I think judgement is best left to God. There’ve been black Mormons since the founding of Mormonism. The problem arose when someone erroneously identified black folks as decendents of Ham and decided they needed some message from God in order to be ordained to the priesthood. It wasn’t about racism, no matter what you think, and no matter how you think it sounds. Your statements above are total nonsense. If anyone’s carrying baggage, it’s you. Get a clue.
Posted by: Keno | December 16, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
What I wanted to make clear above is that Mormons are caring people who don’t see race when they look at people. I attended some of their services in Georgia back in the 1980′s, and that was the first place I saw an interracial marriage in a church setting. I also saw a family who had adopted a black child, and remember, this is Georgia. No matter what erroneous doctrine, the Mormons had been saddled with since around 1840, blacks were always welcome in the church. Also, when Joseph Smith, the founder of the Mormon Church, thought about running for president of the U.S. in the 1850′s he wanted to eliminate slavery by used Government money to buy their freedom. You’ll also notice the Utah was not a slave state. Granted, there are doctrines in Mormonism that many would find strange or different, that doesn’t mean the people aren’t decent children of God. Ask a Penecostal is Catholics are going to hell if you want to hear something that a lot of people would disagree with. However, I’ve met many nice Penecostals & Catholics & Jews. We should not be knocking religions when we’re getting second hand, bigoted information about what they stand for. Incidentally, Mormons believe everyone will inherit the Kingdom of God, not just Mormons. Leave them alone. There’s enough hatred in the world without bringing it into your home.
Posted by: Keno | December 16, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
I meant to address my comments above to Andrew, not Mark as I wrote.
Posted by: Keno | December 16, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm