By Jennifer Parker

Dec 13, 2007 3:06pm

Pelosi: Republicans ‘Like’ the War in Iraq

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is drawing heat for suggesting her political opponents are fond of the war in Iraq.

"The grassroots are justifiably disappointed and I am too that we could not do something to end this war," Pelosi said at a press conference today. "The assumption that I made that the Republicans would soon see the light and listen to their constituents was not an accurate one."

She continued:  "They like this war.  They want this war to continue.  We thought that they shared the view of so many people in our country that we need a new direction in Iraq.  To affect that we need redeployment of our troops with a goal of a year to do that. But the Republicans have made it very clear that this is just not George Bush’s war, this is the war of the Republicans in Congress."

Asked to clarify her use of the word "like," Pelosi backed off her statement of moments before.

"When I say ‘like,’  I shouldn’t say they ‘like’ the war.   They support the war, the course of action that  the president is on and they are not questioning in terms of his implementation of the war, the execution of the war."

In a statement, House Minority Leader, R-Ohio, refrained from attacking Pelosi personally (as the National Republican Congressional Committee is doing) and said, "Republicans and a few brave Democrats have stood on principle to protect current and future generations of Americans, whether it polled well or not.  The success our troops are having in Iraq today is proof positive that our stance was the right one."

- jpt

User Comments

Whatever happened to representatives being actual representatives of the people that elected them? It seems now that they just do whatever they feel like doing w/o considering their constituents at all. It’s time to clean house PEOPLE!! The PEOPLE decide what the US does, NOT those elected to office! Send them a message LOUD AND CLEAR….you’re FIRED! Anyone w/ me?

Posted by: VeteranD | December 13, 2007, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

democrats are traitors

Posted by: joe kovacavich | December 13, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

so… truth hurts does it?

Posted by: RW | December 13, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

the GOP will continue to promote this was because there are MOUNTAINS of dirt on most of them held by the corporations backing this war (for profit) who backed them into the powerful positions they now have. You cross the corporations, and they will unload on you… the GOP are hostage to the very greed that put them in power.

Posted by: RW | December 13, 2007, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

The rubber-stamp Republicans don’t just like the war, they love it. Year after year they vote for anything Bush wants and they don’t let anyone get in their way, certainly not the people who elected them.
They are just like the Germans were under Hitler.

Posted by: Crusher | December 13, 2007, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Repulicans are evil… Most of them sold their souls to religous zealots and/or corporation.
tax breaks for the wealthy, and a few pennies for those who really needed it.
Republicans are more concerned with billion dollar oil companies profits then they are about the world our children will inherit.
Republicans disgust me, and I will never vote for one again. I will spend the rest of my days making sure people know how incredibly evil republicans are.

Posted by: Americans against this dumb war | December 13, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Other than a few people like General George Patton, no one likes war. If everyone in the world was rational and reasonable, there would be no reason for war. Unfortunately, there are always people in control of countries who do not respond to reason, such as Hitler, making war necessary and unavoidable. Also, there are those who still think that Hitler could be reasoned with. Naivety doesn’t avoid war, it just postpones it and makes it worse.

Posted by: Ricky Sims | December 13, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Republicans don’t like the war, but they would like to win the war. The democrats would not like to win the war. It is however being won inspite of their efforts to defeat the US in Iraq though. The democrats promised our defeat in ’06 and they have failed to defeat the US in Iraq and time is running out on making good on that promise. That’s the real bee in her bonnet.

Posted by: TexBork | December 13, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Well…who owns stock in Halliburton and Blackwater…who is making billions off of taxpayers, to pay for this, who is borrowing money from China against FUTURE taxes to pay for this war, so companies like Halliburton and Blackwater reap tons of cash?
Whom?

Posted by: Josh | December 13, 2007, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

People of America unite. If your representative is voting on the war and they are not representing your views, do not vote them in again. These representatives are there for us, not for themselves, and surely not for the minority. WE THE PEOPLE put them there and we can take them out if they are not going to listen to us period.
Pelosi please do not give these warmongering fools one more penny for this war, make them bring the troops home now. The other funding that congress needs can wait for another day, that is what the American people want, and that is what you were voted in to do, so get it done, or you will not see yourselve on the government payroll next time around. Ron Paul can give you some much needed advice Pelosi and the rest of the Congress and he is a Republican.

Posted by: Terry | December 13, 2007, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

MONEY. That’s why the Republicans like the war. Now, I don’t mean most of the saps that VOTE Republican. Naww, those are just the rubes that fall for the GOP’s “moral” line. I mean the real Republicans: War is big money: In Their Pockets.

Posted by: 4cryingoutloug | December 13, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

too bad that’s the worst thing pelosi has said… the democrats should get their spine and stand up and say the damn truth more… the republicans (well, at least the born again’s like Bush who think this war is God’s will),yes… they DO like this war, because it is prophesized in the bible… bunch of nutjobs!

Posted by: earthisnotflat | December 13, 2007, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

texbork, follow.the.money.
How about Cookie Krongard and his brother…God, the bushites are so bold they don’t care anymore about hiding the crony relationships.
And the R-Ohio guy…One LAST TIME HOW IS INVADING A COUNTRY SAVING AMERICAN LIVES?! THEY had NOTHING to do with 9/11!!!

Posted by: Josh | December 13, 2007, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Clinton let the enemy kick him 7 times and did nothing. Bush swings like a blind man at any thing close. Can we please have someone in the middle?

Posted by: Phillip T Rightley | December 13, 2007, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

What Else is New… Start to draft all those nice kids who worship the Republican party, love war, but wont sign up for military service. Then we’ll see how much the Gung-Ho Republicans will stand up and be Gung-Ho for War…

Posted by: BronxBoy7117 | December 13, 2007, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Since contractors and large corporations are making billions of dollars,and the majority of stockholders are wealthy Republicans,war is good! Neocons want wars forever to stroke their big cowardly egos,and benefit their millionare/billionare friends. Neocons are the most evil people this country has ever had. Down with all Neocons! Pure evil!

Posted by: AJ | December 13, 2007, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

So what you’re saying is Pelosi speaks the truth?

Posted by: Sandra | December 13, 2007, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

AJ…all the rich are republicans, huh? Shall I start the litany of well known liberal billionaires for you?

Posted by: cbeargal | December 13, 2007, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Shut up Pelosi, just do your job and impeach Bush..

Posted by: Arthur Somers | December 13, 2007, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Not all Republicans are warmongers. Ron Paul is a Christian who does not support illegal pre-emptive wars, torture, and the killing of hundrends of thousand of innocent humans.
There is no such thing as a “War or terror, no more than “War on Thugs”. Terror is not a country, it is a tactic that can never be stopped, thus, this allows for this warmongers to continue forever. It’s time to support a real conservative who support Freedom and liberty.

Posted by: Greg | December 13, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Yet again, nothing but hatred and name calling coming from the “peaceful” crowd. All of you are trying to be so SMRT and you sound like misguided idiots who have nothing contructive or factual to post, just pure hatred.

Posted by: informed | December 13, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

if you idiots really think that mannequin pelosi and her over the hill bunch is doing anything in your best interest you need help ! and if you don’t watch yourself you will get another brain dead mannequin in our Whitehouse. Lord help us all. Poloticians haven’t cared for American citzens in years. We better get our heads out the the pile we have it in and pay attention to what is going on the DC. Ask the hard questions,demand answers, straight answers from our elected officials.

Posted by: del | December 13, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Polosi cant even get the DEM congress to do anything. But she can sure come out and mouth off at the Republicans.
Thats easy to mouth off when she can’t do her job. Mouthing off is a good rear cover up on yourself Polosi.

Posted by: Jim Rod | December 13, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

The leader has every right to her opinion but;
The Congress is not Alice’s Restaurant where fictional characters rhyme and sing funny stuff about going to war. Or at least I think it should not be that place.
This war is about a wish that every despot be gone from the face of the earth. It is about a wish that every child has the opportunity we have had to grow and learn without mass graves and disappearing relatives. It is a continuation of a policy approved by our elected officials as part of our National interest. It is about our security. It is about failed intelligence, sanctions, negotiation and international bribes.
It is where we are at this point in time. Right or wrong
If the good leader wishes to hurl crass, hurtful, wrongheaded insults (and I am sure all Republicans feel this insult, as a veteran and Republican I certainly do) at the Republicans then she should resign her seat and take her schoolyard bickering somewhere else.
If she wishes to participate as a cooperative member of government, to solve problems, a different tack is suggested.

Posted by: flyover | December 13, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

—Clinton let the enemy kick him 7 times and did nothing. Bush swings like a blind man at any thing close. Can we please have someone in the middle?—
How I wish, Mr. Rightley, how I wish.

Posted by: Febber | December 13, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

So, Madame Speaker has finally figured it out ! It’s all about money and it always has been. And this one is no different than the others of recent vintage.
My question is – if one side of the aisle is so bent on criticizing the White House and the war and how it is totally draining our domestic resources, why have they not taken a real stand, cut off the funds and started to live up to their boasts of ’06.
In the mid 60′s, then retiring senior Senator from Pennsylvania Joseph Clark wrote of Congress and called it the “Sapless Branch”. True then, true now and regrettably, probably true tomorrow

Posted by: MPS | December 13, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

This ‘war’ isn’t saving American lives. More American lives (and money) have been lost in the war than were lost on 9/11.

Posted by: BigT | December 13, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Out of all this vitriol comes great satire. Thanks AJ

Posted by: flyover | December 13, 2007, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Republicans LOVE war. Almost all wars are about resources, just as this one is about war. This war is also about a endemic Republican issue of giving to the rich. Tax-breaks and corporate welfare. We have made close to 100 new Millionaires off of the spoils of Iraq, and God only knows how much corruption there is. People should not be becoming rich at the expenses of those who are fighting, those who are injured and those who came home in body bags!
Meanwhile Bush denies children health care!
Do Republicans like war? No, they love it!! They don’t fight in it and they become rich. I ask you, why wouldn’t they?

Posted by: concordcan | December 13, 2007, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Oh, so now republicans are evil and democrats are immoral. what kind of country is this? for morons? YUP!!! Go beat each other up instead of doing actual thinking.

Posted by: chris | December 13, 2007, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

“VeteranD” – I am TOTALLY with you, even write/email congressmembers all the time asking them to represent me for god’s sake, not make decision for me. Everyone needs to keep putting pressure on their representatives and NOT let them get away with it.

Posted by: SickOf | December 13, 2007, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Concordcan I think you need to check your history a little better. Saying the Reps love war. I think you need to google war and see who was president during the wars.
These guys have stock in major corporations that supply the war and yes even oil. The Dems do as well as the Reps. They are not too worried about who is hurt in the war because if they were it would have been over when they took office (DEMs)You guys are suckered thinking the DEMs care for you. Wait till you see your pay check if Hillary gets in. Dust in the wind

Posted by: Jim Rod | December 13, 2007, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

How is it that they could impeach Clinton and they can’t impeach Bush? Isn’t that a wonder? Ok only you nit wits should wonder-everyone else knows that if those devisive losers on the hill could impeach Bush they would have done it already. Ok, ok, don’t rack what passes for thought in a liberal mind any longer- the answer is: They can’t impeach Bush because he’s done nothing impeachable. Get it? Nothing impeachable. On the other hand, little Bill got big Bill into enough trouble to BE impreached.

Posted by: Chas | December 13, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Ron Paul is a REPUBLICAN totally against the war. So, please don’t say all Republicans are for the war, there is 1 person who isn’t.
Thank You

Posted by: Arlen | December 13, 2007, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Since the Democrats don’t care about the oil, if they were in charge they’d pull out so they can attack another one of Israel’s enemies. They may be controlled by different lobbies, but it’s the same pile o’ crap with a different party name.
Ron Paul is the only major candidate, Republican or Democrat, who is really against more wars.

Posted by: Edward Mann | December 13, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

American english was always plainly spoken with an ear for the potent turn of phrase. Pelosi’s comment was on target. I think her mistake was backing off. The larger question of why we invaded Iraq has been hashed by the administration and the media. If we are going to wield power in the world we had best learn to cope with reality and more important, civility at home and abroad.

Posted by: Charles J. Budde | December 13, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Give it a rest! All this chaos from both sides of the aisle isn’t helping change a thing. What good is the bashing? Is it fun, or can’t you control your tempers? Maybe if everyone would fall back and quit making noise, answers to many of this country’s problems would present themselves. As long as their are political parties there will be dissagreements and fighting across the aisle. The system is flawed, not the opinions of our nation’s people. We all want the best for ourselves. We just believe going about it in different ways makes the most sense. What doesn’t make sense is not getting anything accomplished because of petty rivalry. I just hope Americans will grow up some day soon.

Posted by: caughtinline | December 13, 2007, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Fastest way to make a Republican into a Democrat????
Draft him and send him to fight a Republican President’s war.

Posted by: Roy | December 13, 2007, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Pelosi is an idiot, and so is every other Democrat who supports her warped view of reality.

Posted by: ko6728 | December 13, 2007, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

“This ‘war’ isn’t saving American lives. More American lives (and money) have been lost in the war than were lost on 9/11.”
IF President Bush HAD NOT invaded Iraq; YET IF Saddam Hussein had the WMDs that in 1998 Bill Clinton and many Democrats said he had; and had Saddam Hussein given these weapons to terrorists; and 100,000 Americans been killed in attacks occurring between March 2003 and today; ALL OF YOU WOULD HAVE BLAMED BUSH FOR NOT DOING SOMETHING TO HAVE PREVENTED THE ATTACKS.
Now it is absolutely ridiculous to equate the 2,974 deaths (and 24 missing) that occurred on 9/11 to the 3,888 American soldiers (and hundreds of American civilians) who have died in Iraq the last FOUR YEARS AND NINE MONTHS.
While still tenuous, the surge IS WORKING. The surge was the turning point in this battle. We now can see the light at the end of the tunnel. The Iraqi warlords are finally cooperating with our efforts to rid Iraq of the foreign terrorists. Al Qaeda in Iraq IS ON THE RUN. We are defeating al Qaeda in Iraq. The Iraqi military is taking a larger roll in their own security. Iraqis are beginning to return home. Iraqi children are once again playing soccer in the fields. Iraqi nightlife is returning. There is still a long way to go. So instead of the Democrats “staying the course” in their efforts to inflict an American defeat in Iraq, they should join President Bush and we can end this battle — with victory.
A victory in Iraq will go a long way towards winning the War on Terror!

Posted by: James Danley | December 13, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I am in the same corner as VeteranD. GET THESE FRUITCAKES O-U-T of OFFICE. Start OVER with a new CROP of I-D-I-O-T-S.

Posted by: Iam Avoter | December 13, 2007, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Sorry, but Pelosi is right, Republicans do want this war, from the start, its good for their friends. As far as the Surge is Working, well when you have all those groups that hate each other, and you and the Great American money machine giving away money and arms to the tribes, why wouldn’t you load up and wait. Iraq will have no Light At The End Of The Tunnel, no matter what you want to believe, Iraq has nothing, only oil wealth, and oil wealth, rich and poor, and religion and power don’t mix. The LULL is a good time to get out, only Republicans don’t want that, too much money to be made.

Posted by: True American | December 13, 2007, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I just gotta ask, is there anyone posting on this that is older than 13 or with an IQ above 80? Seriously – we got conspiracy theorists and cry babies posting. I’ll state up-front, I’m republican. I don’t care to much for Bush, but my beef with him has nothing to do with the war in Iraq or the overall war on Terror. Don’t forget that the majority of THE ENTIRE WORLD thought Saddam had WMD’s – including Bill AND Hillary Clinton. For better or worse we’re in this war, and we better win it without question – because if we don’t, Iran will take notice! If you don’t believe that, vote someone in office that WILL pull us out before victory – and wait a few years to see what happens.

Posted by: Chris | December 13, 2007, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Pelosi,Reid,Murtha,Sean Penn,Dick Durbin,Tim Robbins and his live-in girlfriend,Jane Fonda,Keith Oberman,Chris Mathews,the whole staff of radio America,Mark Cuban, the editorial staff and owners of The New York times,the news division of NBC,MSNBC,CNN<CBC,ABC,and PBS, amoung many others…should be arrested for treason for aiding and abetting the enemy during a time of War.then we could get on with the business of winning the war without these Liberal rich treaders.

Posted by: peter cardarelli | December 13, 2007, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Pelosi is an idiot, and so is every other Democrat who supports her warped view of reality.

Posted by: Jay | December 13, 2007, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

SHE’S 100% RIGHT. ChickenHawks LOVE this war. Just read their posts here.

Posted by: wilder5121 | December 13, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

I hope the surge will work,but it’s not for anything Bush and the incompetent Rumsfeld had done during the first several years we have almost 4,000 dead and thousands injured,because of arrogance and swaggering bravado. The Pentagon is sending the wounded soldier’s notices to repay the bonus money they got for enlisting or to re-up.What despicable behavior from this mindless & cruel regime ! This appalling incompetence allowed “Osama Bin Forgotten” to escape Tora Bora,when they had him pinned down. I believe with my whole heart,that it was deliberate.There are so many lies and cover-up we will never know the truth.The Republicans have nothing to offer to anyone,not in the rank’s of the elite & wealthy.This war and the administration has all but ruined our country. It will take decades to recover financially.

Posted by: Sharon White | December 13, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

• Old Granny Pelosi Sucks Yes, in the San FranWay.

House Speaker (D) San Fran Gran Nancy Pelosi disgraced herself, the Democratic Party which she represents and the job she was elected to do. In a statement made to the press today she said
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is drawing heat fo…

Posted by: Ed Gruberman كاف | December 13, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

• Old Granny Pelosi Sucks Yes, in the San FranWay.

House Speaker (D) San Fran Gran Nancy Pelosi disgraced herself, the Democratic Party which she represents and the job she was elected to do. In a statement made to the press today she said
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is drawing heat fo…

Posted by: Ed Gruberman كاف | December 13, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

It’s not so much about “liking” the war, but “profiting” from it.
This includes more than 8 million households in the U.S. who derive all of their income directly from military, defense, and “security” expenditures.

Posted by: Truthout | December 13, 2007, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

As is evidenced by some of these comments, many Americans have a severe case of tunnel vision. They can’t see beyond their hatred for President Bush. Here are a couple of facts: (1) Immediately following the invasion of Iraq, Libya disbanded its WMD programs; (2) According to the recently released NIE report, Iran stopped its nuclear weapons program right after the invasion of Iraq (if you believe the report).
Now then, President Bush has made it quite clear that Iraq is just one battle in the War on Terror. His long term vision is for Iraq and Afghanistan to become thriving democracies and role models for their neighbors. That in time the citizenry of Iraq’s neighbors will demand that their countries follow suit. Then at the same time, Israel and the Palestinians will finally create a sovereign state of Palestine; and that diplomatic efforts succeed in ending the teaching of hatred towards Western Civilization in Muslim schools. If there is EVER going to be peace in the Middle East, that is the ONLY way it can come to fruition. And THAT is the ONLY WAY to win the War on Terror.

Posted by: James Danley | December 13, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

4,000+ of America’s finest killed in combat; 50,000+ injured and/or maimed; 200,000+ Iraqi civilians (men, women, and children) killed; and all to the tune of 1 TRILLION dollars. Oh yeah, that’s what I call “working”. GOP morons.

Posted by: Citizen1960 | December 13, 2007, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Pelosi is an intolerant bigot when it comes to people she doesn’t like or wants to embarrass, which is where asinine comments about all Republicans “liking the war” come from.
The woman is out of her depth as Speaker and should have been canned some time ago.
when she ascended to her throne, you may recall she crowed that “the gavel of the House has passed from the hands of corporate interests into the hands of America’s children”.
How right she was.
And how representative she is of many of her constituents…

Posted by: Harry Schell | December 13, 2007, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Halliburton and Blackwater are run by GOP Bush/Cheney supporters. Cheney was part of Halliburton at one time and made millions. Cheney still is making money off the war. Americans who are living in a world of reality,and aren’t brainwashed by the Rightwing BS,know the truth. The Iraq war was for profit,and big egos. Cowardly Chickenhawk Neocons planned this war before Bush took office in 2001.

Posted by: AJ | December 13, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

60′s throwbacks you got to love em!
Victory is within site and the dem/lib/hate America group cant stand it, because they are invested in defeat.
If so many Americans wanted us out in defeat, why are we still there? Because the libs are lying, True Americans want Victory. No War has ever gone as originally planned.
Also keep in mind we lost less soldiers in this war then during Clintons supposed peacetime.
We need Victory so the soldiers injured or killed were not in vein.
Pelosi and the rest of the libs are traitors to this country of ours.
RW – little info the libs are making more money off the war then any GOP, look at Feinstein, Reid, Kerry and so forth.
Americans against this dumb war – I dont know what war your talking about because the war on terror is far from dumb on our side at least.
If you do not like this country MOVE out no one is stopping you!
GOD Bless our Troops and Thank you for keeping us free! E ven thou we have traitors that can speak too but freedom of Speech, something the Dems do not believe in.
Support our Troops!!
Note on the Wealth, The Dems are personally more wealthy then the GOP politicians!!
Hey Pelosi if it is so important you do what the American people want why are you pushing for Amesty for Illegals when 85% of Americans are Against it.
But you lie and state Americans want defeat in Iraq when they obliviously do not. Oh thats right the group that bought and owns you dems owned by Soros wants us to lose!
Pelosi and Reid MUST RESIGN NOW!!!! From the Democrat Party that started in defense of Slavery

Posted by: spock | December 13, 2007, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Pelosi is “drawing heat” for saying the Republican Administration “likes the war”. Sure she is drawing heat. The truth HURTS.

Posted by: therockofages | December 13, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Citizen: In your post nearly 4000 servicemen and women killed, 50,000 maimed, 250,000 Iraqi citizens killed is just part of it. Did you know there are over 6000 returning vets committing suicide every year. In the last 5 years nearly 30,000 have died on top of the 4000 war deaths. In 2005 over 6000 committed suicide! I know the Republicans really love that information. The worst thing is that Bush has not yet attended one funeral for any fallen soldier!

Posted by: kenny | December 13, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

The military industrialized complex gone horribly awry. A former republican President alerted us to the dangers of this “no-name” military monster back in the early 1960′s. His name was Dwight D. Eisenhower. Defend that neocons. Desiring and working for world peace is painted as some kind of weakness by these warring zealots. Now that is scary.

Posted by: therockofages | December 13, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

And I quote; Dwight D. Eisenhower:
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether
sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will persist”.

Posted by: therockofages | December 13, 2007, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

People like Pelosi, (who by the way has done absolutely nothing to help the US in any? area) as the unfortunate majority “leader”, loves the war and relishes ANY negative reflection on the United States with a Republican at the helm. Kerry, another one. Gore, another one. Chap. Kennedy, another. Can we go on? How much Chinese seed money would buy the Lincoln bedroom, or how about a few sleep overs in NY?

Posted by: sumterala | December 13, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Kenny, you wrote: “The worst thing is that Bush has not yet attended one funeral for any fallen soldier!” Do you know why that is? It’s because the funeral services are private and solemn occasions. Wherever the president goes a throng of the press corps will follow and that would turn the funerals into chaotic nightmares. And then President Bush would become the centerpiece instead of the fallen soldier or Marine. And that doesn’t even take into account any protestors that might show up. So out of respect for the families, President Bush does not attend the funerals.

Posted by: James Danley | December 13, 2007, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

The vast majority of our brave troops would like the Iraq mess to come to a conclusion soon. They know the Neocons were wrong about Iraq. Some day after Bush and Cheney are gone,more facts will come out to prove this war was wrong. It’s unbelievable that there are some braindead Bush supporters who believe iraq attacked us! True patriots are not warmongering neocons. The Neocons are traitors to the true American way. Funny how so many supporters of Neocons are cowards,afraid of their own shadow. They think the boggeyman is around every corner. So pathetic! Our forefathers would have expelled the Neocon type from early America.

Posted by: AJ | December 13, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

After Bush dies there will be people lining up to spit on his grave! Cheneys too! Many will be ex-vets!

Posted by: AJ | December 13, 2007, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

AJ, deny it all you want! But the terrorists do want to destroy Western Civilization. Now as for Iraq not attacking us, it is true that they did not attack us here at home. BUT they did fire missiles at several of our planes. And at least one of the planes was in Kuwaiti airspace at the time. THAT IS an act of war!

Posted by: James Danley | December 13, 2007, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Any one who thinks REPUBLICANS don’t love war just fell off the turnip truck on the way in..This is how their corporate enterprises make billions of dollars..And in turn “BushandDick” get their kickbacks into secret Swiss bank accounts. Of course Republicans love war..

Posted by: Joe MUrphy | December 13, 2007, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

AJ..In response to your comment about spit??? I can think of a couple other substances’s..That would be better..

Posted by: Joe MUrphy | December 13, 2007, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Talk about grasping at straws! Pelosi and her ilk are have a lower rating than President Bush – thats gotta hurt. Oneday she will come to the realization that our troops will be coming home soon, and she will be forced to actually execute the duties of her position – best of luck on that, she is in way over her head.

Posted by: Muleskinner | December 13, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

And Nancy’s plan is what ? She needs the war too. All these politicians need war.
they have to keep people from realizing our country is de facto bankrupt. Both parties a ethicaly bankrupt already.

Posted by: cl1107jrf | December 13, 2007, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

How exactly do you win a war in a country who can’t even create a working govt? Do we stay forever? Simply killing “the enemy” does not stabilize the country. If these warring factions can’t cooperate and form a legitimate govt then the war is already lost. It’s become more than apparent that a working govt in Iraq is going to be hard pressed to see come to reality. Why waste our kids lives for nothing………..

Posted by: dk | December 14, 2007, 12:52 am 12:52 am

DK, I thank God that our founding fathers weren’t as impatient as you. If they had quit 4 years and 9 months into our Revolutionary War, we would still be under the British Monarchy. Our Revolutionary War took EIGHT YEARS and SEVEN MONTHS. It took almost FOUR MORE YEARS before the U. S. Constitution was adopted; another 9 months for it to be ratified; and 8 more months before the 1st Congress convened. That’s just shy of FOURTEEN years from the first shot of our Revolutionary War on April 19, 1775 to Congress convening on March 4, 1879. YET, Iraq’s National Assembly met just 2 years after the beginning of the War, and they adopted their constitution 7 months later.

Posted by: James Danley | December 14, 2007, 2:13 am 2:13 am

“Ron Paul is the only major candidate, Republican or Democrat, who is really against more wars.”
EXCEPT Dennis Kucinich!! The difference is, Kucinich actually believes that the US Government has a purpose and realizes how to make it work for the people. Ron Paul is a well intentioned Libertarian who has much less appreciation for how the US government can function if it was actually put in to the right person’s hands.

Posted by: Allen1120 | December 14, 2007, 3:32 am 3:32 am

Well Mr. Danley, then put your money where your mouth is and put your life on the line for these people. Pick up a gun, hit the streets in Iraq, and send someone home who doesn’t want to be there fighting. That goes for all of you supporters. Step up or shut up!!!

Posted by: dk | December 14, 2007, 5:37 am 5:37 am

Sharon White – “This appalling incompetence allowed “Osama Bin Forgotten” to escape Tora Bora,when they had him pinned down. I believe with my whole heart,that it was deliberate.” — Let me assert something here – I was serving in the persian gulf when “Tora Bora” happened.. It is a LIE. He was not there, we did not “have him”. that statement was made not once, but twice by John Kerry. Here is the interesting thing.. Kerry waas head of the Intelligence counsel. Which means that he had access to the intel surrounding Tora Bora and knew that what he was saying was a LIE … but he said it anyway to score political points in an election… He captured multiple insurgents at TORA BORA with the help of the Afgan rebels who actually first pinned down the enemy then called for our help. Bin Laden was first thought to be there, but it turned out that he was not. Sorry to rain on your parade… but speaking as someone who was there at the time… you are just regurgitating another liberal LIE about this conflict…

Posted by: givemeabreak | December 14, 2007, 8:45 am 8:45 am

To Chris and James Danley – finally, someone on this board who seems to understand… Keep making the point, even though I believe that most will never get it…

Posted by: givemeabreak | December 14, 2007, 8:50 am 8:50 am

This is a STUPID ARGUEMENT, if they didn’t like it….We wouldn’t be there.

Posted by: able | December 14, 2007, 10:36 am 10:36 am

DK, you wrote: “Pick up a gun, hit the streets in Iraq, and send someone home who doesn’t want to be there fighting.” EVERYONE of our men and women fighting in Iraq VOLUNTEERED their service. NOT ONE of them was drafted. Unlike during WWII and most other wars, where our men (women weren’t on the frontlines then) spent years in battle without having a furlough, today our men and women do rotations. War is ugly, war is sacrificial. Unfortunately there are times that evil must be thwarted. Suddam Hussein WAS SUPPORTING terrorism. He failed to comply with the conditions that precipated the cease fire in 1991. He failed to show proof that he no longer had WMDs. He failed to respond to the United Nation’s final ultimatum. When the United Nations made it abundantly clear that their ultimatum was an empty threat, President Bush gave his own ultimatum to Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein still refused to comply. President Bush, unlike the United Nations, meant what he said and followed through on his threat.
Now as for me, I am 58 years old. If I had been in my 20s on 9/11, I would have immediately volunteered my service. When my niece and her husband were both deployed to Iraq, I relocated and cared for their 4 children. I pray for all of our men and women in uniform. I pray for their families and loved ones. Every life lost, every individual maimed, every individual wounded, is profoundly sad. I mourn each loss. But I also honor their courage and sacrifice!
Scoff all you want. Deny all you want. BUT the threat is REAL. Fighting terrorist groups like al Qaeda abroad will not guarantee that the battle won’t return to the Homeland. In fact, the War on Terror cannot be won solely on the battlefield. The Israeli-Palestinian conflicted is the root of the problem. It has been allowed to fester for decades. The previous superficial peace accords that maintained the status quo have failed. So dealing with the Middle East crisis head on by spreading democracy in the region, creating an independent state of Palestine to co-exist with Israel, and ending the teaching of hatred towards Western Civilization, IS THE ONLY ROAD to peace in the Middle East. And establishing peace in the Middle East is the only way to win the War on Terror.

Posted by: James Danley | December 14, 2007, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Cheney told our distinguished Judiciary CAPTAIN Leahy to go F>>> himself. Apparently, Cheney made it stick. Pelosi must have heard about this because she took IMPEACHMENT off the table and has failed to explain why on a radio attempt I heard her try. So Pelosi trumped our Constitution but perhaps we should be asking STENY HOYER why IMPEACHMENT was grounded…

Posted by: daddy | December 14, 2007, 11:02 am 11:02 am

givemeabreak, from the bottom of my heart: THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR YOUR SERVICE AND COURAGE. AND A SPECIAL THANKS TO YOUR FAMILY FOR WHAT THEY HAD TO ENDURE DURING YOUR ABSENCE. GOD BLESS YOU and GOD BLESS YOUR FAMILY!
GOD BLESS ALL OF OUR ARMED FORCES AND THEIR FAMILIES AND LOVED ONES. GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Posted by: James Danley | December 14, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am

If bush and the Republicans did not like war it wopuld not have taken over 4 years to show minimal military progress when we started an invasion of a backward country of a meer 25 million people, a vast majority of whom are not acrtively fighting our troops,with the mightiest military in recorded history. Bush`s progress, BTW, rests on the current alliance with the Sunni`s that a year ago were killing our troopers! Anyone supporting Bush`s tragic war policy should put their life on the line in Iraq and let those that wish, return home!

Posted by: Luke | December 14, 2007, 11:07 am 11:07 am

“Like” “support”, don’t play on words, what’s the difference? With the repubs siding with GWB, we are still in Iraq in a useless, costly, and humanly devasting war because the repubs refuse to side with the dems against their almighty GWB. So don’t mince words – if one supports something, i.e., baseball, they need to like it correct? Or they woould not support it. So why the big hallabula? Call ‘em like you see ‘em – the repubs must like what’s going on in Iraq or they would stop the madman GWB and get us out of there. If you neocons didn’t have the dems to blame now, what in the world would you do – go sit in a corner and cry?

Posted by: Ron | December 14, 2007, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Luke, mistakes were made. President Bush’s biggest mistake was simultaneously fighting the war, building a nation and dealing with reconstruction. Most wars are fought to their conclusion before nation building and certainly before reconstruction begins. BUT I certainly understand President Bush’s decision. He was trying to limit the criticism from Iraq’s neighbors. THAT along with the meddling by Syria (allowing the free flow or foreign fighters) and Iran (supplying arms) have made a difficult war even more difficult. But there is also one important fact that receives little or no attention. When Turkey denied our use of their airspace just prior to the beginning of the invasion of Iraq, THAT took away the northern flank. Without this northern flank, Saddam Hussein and his army were able to escape. So instead of having the forecast bloody hand-to-hand street fight confined to Baghdad, the fight was scattered throughout.
You are correct that the current successes are due to the Sunni warlords cooperating with our military. Had we had that northern flank, and confined the battle to Baghdad, and eliminated Saddam Husseins army, the Sunni warlords would have cooperated much sooner. AND we might have actually had our troops home a couple of years ago. BUT wars are rarely fought as they are drawn out. You don’t pullout just because things don’t go the way you planned. You deal with what you encounter on the battlefield and make adjustments.

Posted by: James Danley | December 14, 2007, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Ron, excellent point! For years we who support our troops have been saying you can’t “say” you support the troops without supporting the mission. YES I support the mission. I don’t like war! But I support the long term vision that President Bush has of democracy spreading throughout the Middle East. Peace in the Middle East will ultimately make us safer here at home.

Posted by: James Danley | December 14, 2007, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Nancy is reaping what has been sown. The San Francisco left is ready to throw Nancy out on her duff and elect Cindy Sheehan to replace her. Nancy is stuck. She has to fight the Republicans in a way that Cindy Sheehan can’t. Otherwise, Nancy is completely expendable. This time Nancy mis-spoke. Now she has to explain herself without alienating her left-leaning base. Nancy is in her own private hell. Congressional approval ratings don’t help. That is Nancy’s legacy right now.

Posted by: Sean O'Brien | December 14, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

There are a lot of reasons to get into a war, and financial profit is one of them. The Republicans may not have started the war for profit, but the net result is that a lot of them are making a ton of money (through investments in reconstruction contract companies, etc.) from this war. Maybe that’s one reason they want to keep it going, and for everything to remain status quo. This is an opportunity for them to make some money on the side, even if peace and democracy fail in this region. And all of this is coming at the expense of our soldiers’ lives. If money and profit are their motives, then shame on them.

Posted by: tom | December 14, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

The point is this, and this only, nothing more needs to be said. Ending the war would mean admitting that we should have never gone there. The one thing I do agree with regrettably is that now that we are there we have to see it through. I couldn’t stand to see what would happen if we ended it before it is done. You think it’s tough to be an American now, think about how much MORE repect we’d lose as a nation if we pull out.

Posted by: Jason | December 14, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Republicans don’t like it when someone tells them the truth … especially, a woman.

Posted by: Jackson | December 14, 2007, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Well, She’s basically right! With the exception of Ron Pual.

Posted by: Tony H | December 14, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

What the House Minority Leader failed to note is the the war on Iraq has been unjustified and unnecessary from the first second the Idiot in Chief ordered it. Any prinicples this country had evaporated in our war of naked aggression, the destruction of human rights, and the economic assault on its citizens. It will take decades to recover from this epic disaster. Of course, the blatant war profiteering goes on. God deliver us from evil

Posted by: DaveM | December 14, 2007, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

And the House Speaker is correct. Republicans must like seeing the death toll go up in Iraq. They must like knowing that thousands of families of our brave men and women struggle while their loved ones are illegally held beyond limits. And they must enjoy seeing the horribly disfigured and maimed soldiers returning from this pointless war, only to find medically aid declined or insufficient.

Posted by: DaveM | December 14, 2007, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Pelosi has gone off the deep end, and you bunch are leaping right after her.
First fact: The Repubs have paid a big price politically for this war; to claim they ‘like’ it is just bizarre.
Second fact: The whole war-for-oil thing is old; if we wanted Iraq’s oil, we would have just bought it from Saddam for less than the trillions the war has cost. Just try to THINK instead of spouting the MoveOn diatribe, willya?
Third fact: “Republicans are evil” – yeah, right. Satan incarnate. It’s just not possible that anyone could possibly look at a set of facts and come to a different conclusion than Saint Nancy, is it? You’re either with us, or you’re “evil!”
Grow up, kiddies; the world is a dangerous place.
Last inconvenient fact: most Americans do not want us to abandon Iraq. How’s that for listening to the people?

Posted by: Paul in NJ | December 14, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

What she fails to mention is that the democrats love the war too hence why they continue to fund it, plain and simple. I will be glad when Cindy Sheehan takes this lady’s spot in office.

Posted by: Charles | December 14, 2007, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

She’s right. It’s the right war.

Posted by: M | December 14, 2007, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Im sure Pelosi is right, that Republicans must like the War in Iraq.If they didnt they would be getting us out of there and not watching the death tolls rise of our Soldiers.I think the house shouldnt give into the demands of handing over more money unless there a time table to start a withdrawl, attached to it!

Posted by: Listen Up | December 14, 2007, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

I guess I don’t understand, I just watched a documentary showing all the reasons we are losing in Iraq, and I don’t see where leaving will do one thing to de-stabilize America. Conservative Republicans that blindly follow without thinking, are traitors to the rest of us.

Posted by: zuzu | December 14, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Nanci Pelosi is a liar. She voted yes to every single war appropriations bill to the tune of 2.4 trillion. She’s worse than bush. I’m with you Joe. RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT!

Posted by: xdream | December 14, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

If you support this murderous regime and their war, then enlist, or have your kids enlist. I don’t see anyone named Bush or Cheney enlisted to fight this rich mens’ folly. Put up or shut up. And give the troops that are out there a break and bring them home. How many rotations to war zones does the voluntary military have to go through to appease your blood lust?
Pelosi, in my opinion is derelict in her duty to uphold the Constitution and impeach the war criminals in the executive branch.

Posted by: NJ Dan | December 14, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I see a lot of name-calling, but spittle-laden epithets aren’t an argument – they’re an admission that you can’t dispute the facts. Here’s another: Abandoning Iraq would be, long-term, a disaster for the West.
I always love the ‘chickenhawk’ bleat; it betrays how little you know about American history. The Founding Fathers insisted on civilian control of the military for a good reason. But if you Bush haters think you would prefer living in a military-controlled government, try Cuba. Let us know how that works, comrade.

Posted by: Paul in NJ | December 14, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

There are no huge profits to be made.
That is what is wrong with peace.
There is no money in it.

Posted by: Doug | December 14, 2007, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

So Paul, exactly what set of facts is it people look at an conclude the Iraq war is good for America? Would it be the WMD that Saddam had? It’s already been widely reported that Bush/Cheney cherry picked the intelligence but that’s a fact most righties seem to ignore. Or would it be the fact that Iraq had something to do with 9/11? Another fact proven wrong by the 9/11 commission. Would it be the fact that Al Qaeda was in Iraq? Another fact that wasn’t true until we decided we wanted to use it for our own private little stomping ground.
I really wish someone would enlighten me to these so-called facts because I don’t think I’m alone when I say most of us who try to stay informed have somehow missed them.

Posted by: dk | December 15, 2007, 1:36 am 1:36 am

DK, here are the facts!
(1) President Bush and Vice President Cheney DID NOT cherry pick the intelligence. The proof is the fact that President Clinton, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, to name a few, ALL SAID SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS A THREAT DUE TO HIS WMDS — BACK IN 1998 — based on the intelligence reports. Congress even gave President Clinton the authorization for regime change in Iraq BASED on his having WMDs. And just in case you don’t remember, President Bush did not take office until Jan 20, 2001.
(2) Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. HOWEVER, he was supporting terrorism — specifically giving up to $25,000 to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers who killed innocent Israelis. The UN gave Saddam Hussein 12 years of chances to prove that he no longer had WMDs. He failed to do so. In 2003 the UN gave him a final ultimatum. BUT the UN made it clear that their ultimatum was an empty threat. SO based on the intelligence reports from the Clinton Administration, and Congress already acknowledging Saddam Hussein’s threat to our national security from 1998-2000, following 9/11 we could not take the chance that Saddam Hussein would pass some of his WMDs to terrorists. So President Bush gave Saddam Hussein a final ultimatum. Saddam Hussein refused to comply. So President Bush followed through on his threat.
(3) Al Qaeda WAS in Iraq BEFORE the invasion. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was running a training camp for al Qaeda in northern Iraq. One clause in Congress’ Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq of October 2002 states: “Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;” The House voted 296-133 and the Senate 77-23 in favor of the resolution. The AYE votes included 81 Democrats in the House; and 29 Democrats in the Senate — all agreeing that al Qaeda was in Iraq. The resolution passed FIVE MONTHS BEFORE WE INVADED IRAQ!

Posted by: James Danley | December 15, 2007, 3:05 am 3:05 am

Repubs DO like the Iraq war. They have OBSTRUCTED EVERY ATTEMPT to stop it or not fund it. They have lock-stepped with the “president” on every vote in Congress…Yes, they DO love the war. They hate the American people but they do love this war. Like Patton they sway ‘God help me, I love it so.”
Trillions for windfall-greedhead oil, trillions for the war in Iraq, trillions for windfall tax-cuts to the trickle-less super-rich, but not ONE RED CEMT for our childrens’ health, not one cent of tax fairness on price-gouger oil companies, not one cent to repair the infrastructure of our country.
Yes, even though Pelosi has betrayed the country time and again and knuckled under to Bush, she has spoken the truth this once…Repubs DO love this war. Rally they do (a la Katherine Hepburn).

Posted by: JL | December 15, 2007, 6:20 am 6:20 am

Saddam refused to comply, last I knew there were inspectors in that country that Bush removed before they could finish their jobs. Many of them came out saying there was no sign of WMD. Who cares what Clinton said in 1990 whatever. The bodies were on the ground and they were searching. What did they find? NOTHING!!!!! Bush didn’t let them finish their job.
As far as the evidence shown to Congress and the world regarding WMD, they did cherry pick it and they weren’t honest. It’s been proven time and again. If I would have looked at what they released I would have voted for the war too. Just because they voted for it after being misled doesn’t give you a legit argument.
AL Zarqawi wasn’t a member of Al Queda until he stepped up and started killing Americans. That was well after the war had begun. Then he released tapes swearing his allegiance etc etc etc etc.

Posted by: dk | December 15, 2007, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Saddam was giving money to Palestinians? So what!!! Isreal can’t do their own bidding? I think they are more than capable of taking care of themselves so don’t use Israel as your excuse.

Posted by: dk | December 15, 2007, 7:51 am 7:51 am

To all of you who think world peace can be achieved by bringing our troops home. Remember Pearl Harbor! The death toll is always higher when you fight the enemy in your own back yard. Let’s keep the filthy swine Al Qaeda busy over there.

Posted by: GODfearingman | December 15, 2007, 9:53 am 9:53 am

JL, you wrote: “…but not ONE RED CENT for our childrens’ health.” The reason President Bush vetoed the S-CHIP bill, again, is that this bill shifts children AND ADULTS who are ALREADY COVERED under private insurance onto the government rolls, it raises the eligibility to above the $62,000 level and it raises taxes.” It is NOT okay to tax the poor in order to subsidize middle class families. The tax on cigarettes IS a tax that the poor pay. This bill would increased the tax on cigarettes to pay for the expansion of the program.
Of course the Republicans have thwarted every attempt by the Democrats to secure DEFEAT in Iraq.
DK, you wrote: “Just because they voted for it after being misled doesn’t give you a legit argument.” Saddam Hussein used WMDs during the Iran-Iraq War and later on his own people. THAT IS A FACT. So Saddam Hussein DID HAVE WMDs at one time. Saddam Hussein was NEVER going to allow the weapons inspectors to prove that there were no WMDs. That’s because he wanted the whole world — but especially his neighbors — to believe that he still had WMDs.
Now then, Congress gave President Clinton the authorization for regime change in Iraq in 1998 — based on the 1998 intelligence that Saddam Hussein had WMDs. THAT IS THREE YEARS BEFORE BUSH TOOK OFFICE. So these Democrats had ALREADY determined that Saddam Hussein had WMDs years before any intelligence that the Bush Administration may have produced for them in 2002. If you want to now admit that President Clinton, his administration and the Democrats ALL LIED back in 1998 FINE! But don’t dismiss what they all said for years before Bush took office.
DK, you also wrote: “Saddam was giving money to Palestinians? So what!!!” Following 9/11 President Bush warned, “any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.” We already knew that Saddam Hussein was supporting terrorists. President Bush did not want to take any chances that Saddam Hussein would intentionally or inadvertently allow WMDs to fall into the hands of terrorists.

Posted by: James Danley | December 15, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Was GWB right or wrong? Either way what is the responsible thing to do? Pulling out would be irresponsible. Damage to the country was done and needs to be fixed. Liberal attitude seems to be “So I ran into your car, tough, I’m moving on.” I don’t know how much simpler this could be related, but I know even this comment will be attacked by the left. “We should not have gone in there, etc.” Fact is that we are, fact is that if you were driving with more care you would not have hit the other car. Unfortunately we are not able to look into the future to see what could happen and make adjustments, so good and bad decisions are made. Many trusted Hitler, we know what happen there. Throughout history lessons have been learned, trusting individuals in positions of absolute power has not been positive. America needs to finish this in Iraq and leave with a positive result, no matter how long it takes. Political actions against finishing only promotes a longer time and encourages the opposition. This is all very simple logic that seems to not be grasped by the left.

Posted by: Brian | December 15, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Nancy Pelosi “likes” defeat. The basis and function of war is to win. It is not a political “pariah” as Senator Kerry would put it. War is not for political gain and it is not to patronize the sensitive social errors of society. War is hellish and brutal. Ms. Pelosi has made it her crusade to diminish morale in our country and shirk her responsibilities as a “non-partisan” Speaker. Let us not forget the pain of defeat in Vietnam when our country was fooled into surrendering when in several instances we were within days of victory. (Just ask the North Vietnam General that published his memoirs). The Democrats that wanted left wing ideology (communism)to flourish in South Vietnam and at home got their victory with the help of the media when the public let politicians defund the war and rendering the lives of 58,000 U.S. troops useless. Ms. Pelosi and the media have invested so much time trying to do the same thing in Iraq. But this time, their plan did not work. We are winning this war, and Ms. Pelosi and her fringe “grass-roots” anti-American supporters can’t stand it. Why isn’t the war in Iraq covered in the papers or on the news? Because we are winning.

Posted by: Zachary Fun | December 15, 2007, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

GWB is not “Their President” he is OUR President. Just because someone doesn’t vote for someone, if they win they ar President. It stuck in my craw when some GOP’ers said that about Clinton and it does now with the anti Bush whiners. Democracy means sometimes the other candidate wins. Just because Al Gore had advantages going in and still couldn’t win, don’t hate on GBW and say he isn’t President or something.

Posted by: David Powell | December 16, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Greatings,
Amazing! Not clear for me, how offen you updating your blogs.abcnews.com.
Thanks
Tania

Posted by: Tania | April 12, 2009, 4:42 am 4:42 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.