Rice: Huckabee Foreign Policy Criticism ‘Ludicrous’
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl Reports: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Friday said criticism of Bush administration foreign policy by Republican presidential candidate former Gov. Mike Huckabee was "simply ludicrous."
Last week, Huckabee said the Bush administration’s "arrogant bunker mentality has been counterproductive at home and abroad" and argued it has had an "go-it-alone foreign policy".
After first saying "I don’t have time to comment on other people’s comments", Rice took on Huckabee, head-on during an end-of-year State Department press briefing.
"The idea that this is a go-it-alone policy is just simply ludicrous. And one would only have to be not observing the facts, let me say that, to say that this is now a go-it-alone foreign policy," Rice said.
"We’re working with allies in Asia on North Korea. We’re working with allies in Europe, Russia and China on Iran … the alliance is mobilized together in Afghanistan," she said. "We had 50-plus countries at Annapolis to launch the peace process between Israelis and Palestinians … I can go on and on and on and on. And so, I would just say to people, look at the facts."
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Sure, Rice, all those countries have troops in IRAQ and they are paying for this so-called war on terror in Iraq. How come terrorist don’t attack Canada or hundreds of other countries? Simple answer, then don’t initiate pre-emptive war and keep troops in their holy lands. Ron Paul is right, they attack us because we are over there, just as we would attack any foreign country who placed their troops on our soil.
Posted by: Greg | December 21, 2007, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Now I know why Foxnews is dissing Huckabee…he isn’t marching in lockstep with the Washington Republican Elites. Maybe it’s Bush’s foreign policy that’s ludicrous? How refreshing to have a republican who thinks for himself. I like Mike!
Posted by: Mark R, Sioux City, Iowa | December 21, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Greg, get a reality check.
“Ron Paul is right, they attack us because we are over there, just as we would attack any foreign country who placed their troops on our soil.”
In one of the last Bin Laden videos, he gave us two options: A)Keep dying, B) give up our democracy.
Bin Laden hates us. Period. His philosophy relies heavily on the works of Sayyid Qutb. Qutb traveled to the U.S. in the 40s. He came back with an enormous hatred for all things Western, saying all it cares about are material things. His writings argued that people can only choose between Islam and jahiliyya. He argued that all Muslims must take up arms and fight, and those who didn’t were just as worthy as everyone else for destruction.
Bin Laden views mass destruction of innocent people acceptable, just as Qutb did, because he sees it as a fight for his faith.
Posted by: Benson | December 21, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Rice and the other Bush warmongers are the biggest threat to the U.S. and our liberty. They are bankrupting our country, both financially and morally with there torture and anti-christian pre-emptive war.
On June 5 at the CNN GOP debate in New Hampshire, Huckabee and the other candidates were asked if they would support a pre-emptive strike against Iran using tactical nuclear weapons.
Each of the candidates responded that they would not rule out the use of nuclear weapons, except Congressman Ron Paul who said: “I do not believe that [pre-emptive war] is part of the American tradition. We, in the past have always declared war in the defense of our liberties or to go to aid somebody. But now we have accepted the principle of preemptive war. We have rejected the just-war theory of Christianity. And now tonight, we hear that we’re not even willing to remove from the table a pre-emptive nuclear strike, against a country that has done no harm to us directly and is no threat to our national security!
We have to come to our senses about this issue of war and pre-emption. We have to go back to traditions and our Constitution, and defend our liberties and defend our rights, but not to think that we can change the world by force of arms and to start wars.”
Dr. Paul, who served in the air force Air Force for five years and is a veteran member of the House Foreign Relations Committee, has dealt with important global issues for decades.
When it comes to Iraq and Iran, Ron Paul was right and the other candidates have it wrong! Paul has the understanding and experience to protect America’s national security through peace and diplomacy. His served in the military and beleives in the oath of office, to defend the constitution.
Posted by: Greg | December 21, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Huckabee and the Republican party are a lose lose situation.
Either Huckabee loses or the Republican party loses.
If Huckabee wins, the Republicans lose because they will forever be branded a party
of fanatical Christian zelots. With no consideration for anything like a “Broad coalition”.
If Huckabee loses, the Republican party wins because it keeps its “Broad coalition” togather.
Any party, Republican or Democrat, needs a broad coalition to win.
Also, I do not think the ” Value voters” are going to rebel against
the Republican party, they are not going to vote Democrat. They can sit out
elections, but with that they give up any piece of the political pie.
Posted by: Ron | December 21, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Mark, we do not have a democracy in this country. We have a Representive Republic. If we had democracy, i.e., majority rules, then Al Gore would the President.
Posted by: Greg | December 21, 2007, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Let’s be clear: we have lost this war. We have lost because the initial, central goals of the invasion have all failed: we have not secured WMDS from terrorists because those WMDs did not exist. We have not stymied Islamist terror – at best we have finally stymied some of the terror we helped create. We have not constructed a democratic model for the Middle East – we have instead destroyed a totalitarian government and a phony country, only to create a permanently unstable, fractious, chaotic failed state, where the mere avoidance of genocide is a cause for celebration.
We have, moreover, helped solder a new truth in the Arab mind: that democracy means chaos, anarchy, mass-murder, national disintegration and sectarian warfare. And we have also empowered the Iranian regime and made a wider Sunni-Shiite regional war more likely than it was in 2003.
Posted by: Greg | December 21, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Mark, if Bin Laden hates us so much, based upon the writings of the 1940′s, then why was he our ally? Why did the CIA train him to fight the Russian invasion of a muslim country? The answer is simple, oil.
After spending billions of dollars, do anyone really believe that we can’t find “Osama bin Laden” after 5 years?
Why do you think Bush help Osama bin Laden’s relatives flying them out of the US when all other airlines were grounded after 9/11? It’s obvious the Bush neo-cons never wanted to find Osama bin Laden. They needed him alive and well, to continue keeping Americans in fear so that neo-cons could proceed with their agenda of taking over IRAQ and the “controling” their oil, not to mentiion mention tramping on the Bill of Rights. Why else would we they be building a dozen bases in Iraq? Like Korea, we will be there for decades unless there is a real change in 2008.
Posted by: Greg | December 21, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
A republican that can think for himself!
Wow, could it be a sign of things to come?
Posted by: TYSPOCK | December 21, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Maybe Slick Huck is a Democrat. Afterall America’s corrupt liberal MSM press “loves him”…………NEXT!
Posted by: Allen Ridge | December 21, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
No, Condi, what is ludicrous is this administration’s policies…both foreign and domestic. Bush and his team of “superstars” has done more to harm this country than “terrorists” could have ever hoped to do.
Posted by: dano | December 21, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Huchabee is playing to the bully crowd. To fit in he kicks people when they have the ire and ridicule of those that seem to be in the majority. We are still waiting to hear his platform and plan for the future of our country. So far all we hear from him is jabs and fault finding of what others don’t understand or appreciate. This country should never be lead in that manner.
Posted by: lorax_mbell | December 21, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Huckabee is for “Open Boarders” and is very weak on Illegal Immigration policies….which is why his campaign is trying to change the message, so he critizes the Bush Administration. The more America finds out more about Huckabee (besides that he is a Christian) they will see that this man is actually an incompetent idiot; he ran Arkansas as a Democratic; he is not a Conservative, don’t know why he is a Republican. But the Media loves him….that should tell you all.
Posted by: No to Democratics in 2008 | December 21, 2007, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Isn`t Rice the genius who couldn`t imagine an enemy usiung an airplane as a weapon? Didn`t 9/11 happen on her and Bush`s watch after clear warning? Isn`t it true that our perseverence after 9/11 and Bush`s tragic war of choice in Iraq is due to the spirit of the American people, in spite of the incompetence of Bush and the neocon Republicans? Only Bush and his Republican allies in Congress would point to any progress in Iraq today as a triumph when in fact any competent leader at the head of the mightiest miloitary in history would have made short work of the Iraq war. Even now, Bush`s military commanders acknowledge that the decrease in violence is a product of a partnership with the Sunni`s who were killing our soldiers last year.
Posted by: Luke | December 21, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
No to Democrats, I think you’re confused. I believe Bush is for open borders as in 8 years and still can’t build a fence. Huckabee has a record of getting things done i.e, education, roads, health care, for the little guy. I think America needs some of that right now, don’t you? Or are you one of greed first, corporate republican types?
Posted by: Mark R, Sioux City, Iowa | December 21, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Mark: It’s highly simplistic to believe the whole “they hate us for our freedom” excuse. If that were the case, Islamists would be taking over Switzerland–an extremely liberal country that is much weaker militarily.
But they’re not, which begs the question: Why is Switzerland left alone? The answer is quite obvious. Switzerland doesn’t meddle in every country on the face of the earth, inciting hatred among the people of one of the least understood regions in the world. That hatred becomes the primary recruiting tool for extremists like Bin Laden.
And before you go saying I’m “blaming America,” consider this. I’m a life-long Republican, but the problem I have with my party today is its inability to view the government as anything less than perfect. Republicans: THE GOVERNMENT MAKES MISTAKES. This used to be one of the core beliefs which shaped our “less government is better government” philosophy. What happened?
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with being a Republican like Ron Paul and pointing out the federal government’s foreign policy blunders. That’s exactly what a Republican should do! In fact, I would say there is something very wrong with someone calling oneself a Republican and NOT acknowledging the federal government’s faults.
Posted by: gb8898 | December 21, 2007, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
“In one of the last Bin Laden videos, he gave us two options: A)Keep dying, B) give up our democracy. ”
YOU check your facts. He never said such a thing. In the speech you speak of, if you read it yourself and not the B.S. summary provided by Faux News, he said that he was attacking us because we wouldn’t get out of muslim lands (which he has been saying for over 10 years). He did argue that Americans were hopeless to stop those in power from continuing what they are doing, because the system here is corrupt, so he told us we need to REFORM our system – and SUGGESTED Islam as one possible solution.
Libertarians, the CIA, and the rest of the world had been warning us of the “blowback” that would result from us bullying the middle east, and everyone here laughed and said “what are those pathetic, third-world ########### going to do to us, the most powerful nation in the world?” Well, they found a way. So did we stop bullying? NO! The neocons used it to push MORE bullying – giving arguments identical to Hitler’s “we need breathing room” speech.
Posted by: Edward Mann | December 21, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Huckabee has a problem with putting is foot in his mouth. He doesn’t any foreign policy experience. He also doesn’t have a clue what’s going on. If for some bizzare reason he becomes president, he’s going to eat those words.
Come to think of it, that job sucks anyway. Anyone who’s dumb enough to want to president obviously deserves to be one. Here’s the reason why being president sucks:
You only make $400k a year.
Everyone critizes every decision you make regardless of how smart or dumb they are.
You’re traveling all the time in an obsolete Boeing 747.
When you’re finally home after a long 23 hour day and you get to spend three minutes with your wife, secret service has to stand outside the door.
Gay protesters in G-strings are always sitting on your front lawn.
You can’t walk around your house in your underwear. There’s interns and gay protesters.
Death threats force you to have to jog on the White House treadmill.
You still have to pay for the snacks in the vending machine.
Oil companies are always calling for money.
You have to tell them you only make 400k a year, and they turn you down for a job.
Personally I would rather be a corporate CEO.
Posted by: michael charlton | December 21, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Wow, even the republicans hate this president.
Posted by: BronxBoy7117 | December 21, 2007, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Benson:
You still just don’t get it, huh? Do you actually think that when Bin Laden and other radicals tell us “to give up our democracy”….do you actually think they expect for us not to practice democracy among our citizens and with other countries who believe the same? That’s like telling them to give up their form of government…..So, it’s not a matter of other nations and people hating us because of our freedom, they attacked us because of our involvements in their affairs—like what Ron Paul said buddy.
Why can’t folks simply understand that….Remember the Cuban Missle Crises? We don’t allow it, so what should we expect other countries to set up camp in their back yards and homeland? Perhaps I’m missing something, huh?
Posted by: tony | December 21, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
This woman is a LOOSE CANNON on the world stage. The country would be much safer and better served if she just SHUTS UP and goes back to teaching her kindergarden classes..393 more days of her mouth I guess we can expect.
Posted by: Joe MUrphy | December 21, 2007, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
If anything is ludicrous it would be everything that comes out of Condosleezy Rice’s mouth.
Posted by: Patriot 2007 | December 21, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Rice’s foreign affair’s record speaks for itself, as do your words. You too are a “uniter, not a divider!”
Posted by: Nelly | December 21, 2007, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
The point here is that Huckabee should not be criticizing anyone on foreign relations after he admitted is lack of experience in foreign relations. Back off Huck your starting to talk about a real issue here. Your a lot safer dodging the issues and promoting yourself as the “Righteous Republican”
Posted by: Will | December 21, 2007, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Condolezza is like an ostrich with her head in the sand. Sure the U.S. has allies.. if you count places like Micronesia and that other island out in the ocean somewhere, population of 3 I believe, forget what its called now. One need only review the makeup of the ‘Coalition of the Willing’ to get the idea.
We should just make our own allies to instead. Just pour some dirt out in the Pacific to reclaim land, hand it over to some foreign nationals and *presto*.. instant ally! Saves time.
Posted by: Robert | December 22, 2007, 2:54 am 2:54 am
If the goal of the neocon Mad Hatters was to create in Iraq… a Greek Republic in the middle of the oil patch… It has been an utter failure.
I watched what passes for news last night on tv. The talking head was chattering as to how the surge was working. The accompanying video was HUMV’s and M1A1 tanks firing into Iraqi residential areas… (bringing Christianity, apple pie and baseball to the neighborhood I suppose).
The number of air strikes is also indicative of our bull-in-a-china-shop approach. Until the end of August, U.S. warplanes were conducting about 25 strikes a month. The number rose to 62 in September, then to 122 in October and 120 in November. 4 air strikes a day… and that’s nearly 5 years after we invaded.
The bottom line is that we’re an occupying army in Iraq… nothing more… nothing less. The Iraqis are doing to us what the American Colonists did to the Kings Men in 1776 and what the American people would do if our nation was invaded and occupied. A third of us would turn Quisling… a third would simply accept it and a third would take up arms. Does anyone remember the 1964 election when Goldwater was blasted as being “too ready” to press the nuclear button? How times have changed. We’re now so terrified of our own shadow that presidential hopefuls can actually thump their chests and state that a nuclear sneak attack on a 5th rate power like Iran is acceptable.
During the last presidential election, I threw away my vote by casting it for the lesser of two evils. Next election, I will make my vote count and my voice heard by voting for the only choice of anyone who still believes in the United States Constitution and our founding principles. That man is Ron Paul.
Posted by: Dutch | December 22, 2007, 7:55 am 7:55 am
Let’s see if I’m right?
Conservatism – means less government. That means no S.S. (did you ever think what that means? I’m retired and my wife and I get $28,000 a year.) No thank you Ron Paul. Means no Socialized Medicine. It cost me $7,680 a year – just in case I get sick. I’m a healthy, active retiree skiing in the winter and golfing in the summer. No thank you Ron Paul. I don’t believe in attacking a country that hasn’t attacked us and spending a half a trillion bucks in doing it. I thank you Ron Paul. I don’t believe in a Secret Presidency, wrapped in cloak and dagger. I thank you Ron Paul.
I like Conservatism – no Bridges to nowhere, no Politicians working 12 months a year (they don’t do it anyway), to big pay checks to Politicians, no big retirement for the Pols, no free Medical benefits (unless we all get them), no Lobbyist lining their pockets (don’t let Lobbyist into the Capital buildings – why should they be there anyway?) Let our Representatives work only somewhere between four and five months a year. That’s all they do work anyway. They did that originally. Most important – write off all the freebies they are now getting, that we don’t know about.
THEN I’LL BE A PROUD CONSERVATIVE AND WE’LL HAVE A GOOD START ON A NEW AMERICA. NOT AN AMERICA THAT TAKES CARE OF CORPORATE INTEREST. AN AMERICA THAT HAS A FAIR TAX SYSTEM FOR THE PEOPLE, NOT THE CORPORATIONS OR THE WEALTHY. FAIR JOBS AND FAIR WAGES, NOT THOSE CORPORATIONS THAT SHIFT THEIR PRODUCTIONS OVERSEAS FOR CHEAP LABOR. AND FOR THOSE CEO’S THAT TAKE THEIR BILLION DOLLAR PAYCHECKS. PASS SOME OF THAT MONEY DOWN TO THE RANK AND FILE OR THERE WILL BE NO ONE LEFT TO BUY YOUR PRODUCTS – WE’LL ALL BE POOR.
THAT’S A STARTER RON PAUL – DO ALL THAT AND I’LL VOTE FOR YOU. THE REST OF THE CANDIDATES DON’T HAVE ANY INTEGRITY, TO BE PRESIDENT,ANYWAY.
Posted by: Terry | December 22, 2007, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Bush is Anti-Christian. No true Christian would ever do the things he has done and say the things he has said. His administration is right there with him.
Posted by: MetaphoricAllegoric | December 22, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am
islam wants to become the world denominate religion. Period. There is no other reason for Islam Extremism except for that.
Posted by: terrie | December 22, 2007, 11:08 am 11:08 am
I love how the media pulls one sentence from someone. LOL Huckabee has praised the current surge in Iraq and overall has praised Bush’s Foreign policy however you have to be crazy to not see that Bush has done some stupid things. I love that Mike doesn’t care what other’s think. Mike is his own man and thinks for himself.
Go Mike !
Posted by: Scott | December 22, 2007, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
“The idea that this is a go-it-alone policy is just simply ludicrous….”
Rice is certifiably insane. This administration has become so used to Americans buying whatever they say, they will say anything. “The facts” indeed point to a go it alone policy, and dissention has been deemed terrorist behavior!
I can’t wait to get these knuckleheads out of office… and then we need to prosecute!!
Posted by: Troy Street | December 22, 2007, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
And Rice is critical of Huckabee, based on her successes? The accolades internationally on U.S foreign policy? The renowned respect this administration has garnered? She is just one of the performers in the biggest circus our country has ever had!
Posted by: Nelly | December 22, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
It is easy to understand Mike Huckabees’ thinking and where he stands on Safety issues.He sided with criminals and Dictators look at his record of pardoning criminals including many murderers while governor of Arkansas very dangerous.
Posted by: kmjjp | December 22, 2007, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
From the inside looking out, you are doing everything possible. From the outside looking in and in hindsight, you might see a few things that were overlooked. My question, from the outside, is, where was Huckabee when all of this was happening?
Posted by: Daleri | December 22, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
I think a lot of people are underestimating Mike Huckabee. Just like they underestimated George Bush.
Posted by: Sally | December 22, 2007, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
OMIGOSH! I LOVE CONDOLEEZZA RICE! <3
Posted by: mm mm good | December 23, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
“BINGO!!! Huckabe is right. Condoleezza Rice is in over her head and doesn’t have a CLUE on foreign policy. This administration has no foreigm policy. Diplomats in the Bush Administration are EXPERTS at creating problems overseas.”
Posted by: Pointman | December 23, 2007, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Hey guys, I think Bush and Huckabee actually have the exact same views, religious ties and Middle East opinions. See, they know that another Bush term (if there were multiple terms allowed again) or another candidate just like Bush would never happen again (people finally woke up about Bush’s B.S. and real agendas). So, the cons are deliberately criticizing Huckabee to make us think he is different. Be Careful!
Posted by: Wait and watch | December 24, 2007, 2:23 am 2:23 am
Does it really matter what Mike Huckabee thinks about U.S. foreign policy? He’ll be owned by the Pro-Israel lobby just like every other politician in America. They’ll write his speeches, his talking points, even do all his research. If he ever goes astray, he’ll get a call from the powers that be, warning him about straying from script. He’ll have to make a pilgrimage to Israel and profess his loyalty to the puppet masters. Otherwise, AIPAC will guarantee that he’s a one term president.
Posted by: MrPeanut | December 24, 2007, 4:15 am 4:15 am